Browse content similar to 11/10/2012. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Afternoon, folks. Welcome to the Daily Politics. The government | :00:38. | :00:41. | |
spends �280 million helping first time buyers on to the housing | :00:41. | :00:46. | |
ladder. But will this really help us out of the housing crisis? | :00:46. | :00:49. | |
Credit rating agencies downgrade spanish bonds to one notch above | :00:49. | :00:54. | |
junk status. But what do the financial markets know? We'll be | :00:54. | :01:03. | |
speaking to polemicist Max Keiser. But say direct result of a bank's | :01:03. | :01:08. | |
confiscating millions from the economy using illegal practices and | :01:08. | :01:13. | |
larceny. Could David Cameron and Alex | :01:13. | :01:18. | |
Salmond open the door to allow 16 and 17-year-old to vote? They will | :01:18. | :01:23. | |
be allowed to in the referendum of Scotland. We are going to debate it. | :01:23. | :01:26. | |
And how would Conservatives here vote in the US presidential | :01:26. | :01:33. | |
election? Not necessarily for the candidate of the right, apparently. | :01:33. | :01:36. | |
All that coming up in the next hour of top-notch public service | :01:36. | :01:39. | |
broadcasting. And with us for the duration editor of City AM Allister | :01:39. | :01:43. | |
Heath. Welcome to the show. Let's start with the fall out from the | :01:43. | :01:46. | |
collapse of the proposed merger between the aerospace and defence | :01:46. | :01:48. | |
equipment manufacturer BAe Systems, the group once know as British | :01:48. | :01:52. | |
Aerospace, and the giant european aerospace manufacturer EADS. The | :01:52. | :01:54. | |
deal would have created a European defence titan with combined sales | :01:54. | :02:01. | |
of �60 billion and a serious rival to American companies like Boeing. | :02:01. | :02:04. | |
But it floundered on the insistence of the French and German | :02:04. | :02:08. | |
governments that they hold on to a sizeable shareholding. BAe employs | :02:08. | :02:12. | |
over 50,000 workers in the UK. Many in this jet-building factory near | :02:12. | :02:19. | |
Preston. The local MP Mark Hendrick joins us now. Were you disappointed | :02:19. | :02:24. | |
it did not go ahead? Very disappointed. Quite exasperated, | :02:24. | :02:28. | |
actually, because potentially it would have created a huge company | :02:28. | :02:32. | |
to compete with the American giants, which is what is needed for the | :02:32. | :02:36. | |
future. The jobs here are fairly safe for the short to medium term | :02:36. | :02:39. | |
but, in the longer term, there needs to be some European | :02:39. | :02:43. | |
consolidation in order to take on the Americans, otherwise Europe | :02:43. | :02:48. | |
will fall behind. Wasn't there a huge risk if it had gone ahead, and | :02:48. | :02:51. | |
clearly many people thought there were flaws in the deal being done, | :02:51. | :02:55. | |
you would have lost their jobs in your constituency anyway, because | :02:55. | :02:59. | |
they could have gone to France and Germany? That's true, because the | :02:59. | :03:02. | |
French and German governments needed to reduce their shareholders | :03:02. | :03:08. | |
down to 90% and then there could have been some balance on the | :03:08. | :03:10. | |
governance of the new company, but what would have happened if the | :03:10. | :03:15. | |
deal had gone ahead in the form presented, the German and French | :03:15. | :03:17. | |
governments would have had the better deal, and decisions would | :03:17. | :03:21. | |
have been made on a political basis rather than on commercial logic. | :03:21. | :03:26. | |
That may have meant jobs in Lancashire are going to Germany. | :03:26. | :03:30. | |
people in your constituency could be puzzled as you're puzzled the | :03:30. | :03:36. | |
merger did not go ahead? It makes commercial logic. In the longer | :03:36. | :03:40. | |
term, what we want to see are the French and German governments | :03:41. | :03:45. | |
reducing their stake and decisions are made on commercial logic and | :03:45. | :03:50. | |
jobs and investment stay in the UK, and not on the basis of expedience | :03:50. | :03:53. | |
for the German and French governments. What will happen now | :03:53. | :03:57. | |
as far as BAe is concerned? Will it survive or will it be vulnerable to | :03:58. | :04:03. | |
a takeover from elsewhere? BAe has exposed itself. The deal has not | :04:03. | :04:06. | |
gone ahead and the fact they did not ask for an extension to | :04:06. | :04:10. | |
continue negotiations mean the likelihood in the short term of a | :04:10. | :04:14. | |
deal with the Europeans is now off the table. The big American | :04:14. | :04:18. | |
companies like Boeing will look at BAe and decide whether they wish to | :04:18. | :04:25. | |
move in because, clearly, BAe, while it has orders, really needs | :04:25. | :04:29. | |
civil work because it's on the increase and military work, due to | :04:29. | :04:33. | |
the huge defence cuts in America and here, is on the down slope. In | :04:33. | :04:38. | |
order to secured its future, BAe needs to diversify and, ideally, we | :04:38. | :04:43. | |
could do that with the Europeans, but if not, obviously there are big | :04:43. | :04:46. | |
American companies which might fancy taking over. OK, thank you | :04:47. | :04:52. | |
very much. The British Government was never quite explicit about how | :04:52. | :04:56. | |
much it wanted his deal to take place. We now know from Jeremy | :04:56. | :05:00. | |
Heywood, the Cabinet Secretary in 10 Downing Street, through a whole | :05:00. | :05:04. | |
host of senior establishment figures, they wanted this to happen, | :05:05. | :05:09. | |
but it could have been a political crisis for a government? Yes, I'm | :05:09. | :05:11. | |
astonished how the Government backed this tour without thinking | :05:11. | :05:15. | |
about it and looking at the detail. It was apparent to me one it was | :05:15. | :05:19. | |
announced it would not work. It's a political deal. The Germans, French | :05:19. | :05:27. | |
and the Americans, because BAe has a preferred status depending on | :05:27. | :05:32. | |
assets to the market. It didn't seem to make sense. Commercially, | :05:32. | :05:36. | |
the deal failed completely. It's quite astonishing to see the | :05:36. | :05:40. | |
biggest shareholder in one of the UK's biggest companies falling out | :05:40. | :05:44. | |
completely with the board of the company, so this was a really | :05:44. | :05:48. | |
disastrous deal, badly managed, and everybody involved has failed. | :05:48. | :05:54. | |
Someone at the top of BAe needs to step down, I think. Yes, your paper | :05:54. | :05:57. | |
said youth or the chairman at the very least, the chief executive, | :05:57. | :06:02. | |
should stay, but the chairman should step down. Yes, some money | :06:02. | :06:06. | |
to pay the price for this disastrous deal. It collapsed so | :06:06. | :06:09. | |
quickly and it was not thought through properly. There was no way | :06:09. | :06:13. | |
the French and Germans were going to give up control over their own | :06:13. | :06:17. | |
domestic defence industries. This is a corporate system where | :06:17. | :06:20. | |
governments call the shot. You can't run them on a commercial | :06:20. | :06:23. | |
basis. The when I interviewed Philip Hammond about this, on | :06:23. | :06:30. | |
Monday, from up in Birmingham, the Defence Secretary, he had to have | :06:30. | :06:34. | |
been a crucial part of this. You think you would have been. He | :06:34. | :06:38. | |
seemed to be prepared to allow a deal to go ahead in which the | :06:38. | :06:43. | |
French and Germans would still have a 9% each and the British | :06:43. | :06:48. | |
Government would have 0%. Don't you think that would have caused the | :06:48. | :06:52. | |
Tories a lot of problems on their own back benches? Yes, there would | :06:52. | :06:56. | |
be a lot of upset about it. Ultimately, I just didn't | :06:56. | :07:00. | |
understand why they backed this deal. It's a very important | :07:00. | :07:05. | |
decision to make. Do we want to have a European defence industry, | :07:05. | :07:08. | |
an integrated European defence force one day? There is a political | :07:08. | :07:12. | |
message underlying this, which has to be decided in the next few years | :07:12. | :07:16. | |
when it comes to our relationship with the EU, and allowing the whole | :07:16. | :07:20. | |
thing to be decided in the way it could have been decided, had the | :07:20. | :07:24. | |
merger, had, strikes me as something very strange and not | :07:24. | :07:33. | |
thought out. It would have been the biggest merger in history. | :07:33. | :07:38. | |
would have been taken over by EADS. I agree. It involves the biggest | :07:38. | :07:41. | |
manufacturing company in Britain and yet, I don't think we've heard | :07:41. | :07:44. | |
a word from the Prime Minister. There was not enough discussion and | :07:44. | :07:49. | |
debate about this. I'm more in favour of free markets than anybody | :07:49. | :07:53. | |
else but this was not that kind of deal. This was a bad governance, | :07:53. | :07:57. | |
governments, politics, the long- term relationship between the UK | :07:57. | :08:00. | |
defence establishment and the European and American defence | :08:00. | :08:05. | |
establishment. There needed to be a proper discussion. On a purely City | :08:05. | :08:09. | |
terms, the deal was a failure. A revolt of shareholders. I don't | :08:09. | :08:15. | |
understand what they were playing at. It's not going ahead. No, I | :08:15. | :08:19. | |
wouldn't be surprised if it came back on the agenda some time. It | :08:19. | :08:23. | |
would be European companies. wouldn't be surprised if somebody | :08:23. | :08:29. | |
tries to bring life to this. Remember where you heard this first. | :08:29. | :08:35. | |
Now time for our daily quiz. A car previously owned by David and | :08:35. | :08:38. | |
Samantha Cameron is being auctioned today. The car was bought by the | :08:38. | :08:41. | |
Prime Minister as a surprise present for is wife way back in | :08:41. | :08:44. | |
1998. And it's expected to fetch up to �12,000 at the auction today. | :08:44. | :08:52. | |
But what kind of car is it? Is it: At the end of the show we'll see if | :08:52. | :09:00. | |
Allister knows the answer. I don't think he does. No, but he has got | :09:00. | :09:04. | |
time to find out. Now, as we read the runes of the conference season, | :09:04. | :09:07. | |
one of the policy problems that all three parties said they knew how to | :09:07. | :09:10. | |
solve was housing. And, as if by magic, today the government is | :09:10. | :09:13. | |
announcing the latest allocations of funds from their First Buy | :09:13. | :09:16. | |
scheme which aims to reduce the amount of deposit first time buyers | :09:16. | :09:23. | |
have to have to save. In a moment I'll be speaking to the Housing | :09:23. | :09:27. | |
Minister Mark Prisk. But first, Jo has put on her hard hat and taken a | :09:27. | :09:30. | |
look at Britain's housing crisis. That's right, Andrew. The Prime | :09:30. | :09:32. | |
Minister said yesterday the Conservatives are the party of home | :09:32. | :09:36. | |
ownership. But are enough new homes being built? There are three | :09:36. | :09:40. | |
million 20 to 34-year-olds still living with their parents. And, | :09:40. | :09:42. | |
according to government figures, the total number of households in | :09:42. | :09:48. | |
the UK is expected to hit 27.5 million by 2033. Up by 5.3 million | :09:48. | :09:55. | |
since 2008. That's an extra 232,000 households every year. So are | :09:55. | :10:00. | |
enough new homes being built to meet this increased need? Well, | :10:00. | :10:03. | |
government figures show only 21,540 were started in the three months | :10:03. | :10:09. | |
from April to June of this year. A drop of 10% on the first three | :10:09. | :10:19. | |
:10:19. | :10:19. | ||
months. That's 54% below the pre- year, only 98,670 homes were | :10:19. | :10:27. | |
started. Also down 10% on the previous year. And way below the | :10:27. | :10:37. | |
:10:37. | :10:38. | ||
232,000 needed to meet the The problem is that there's not | :10:38. | :10:43. | |
enough homes. What is needed? What is the priority, as far as you're | :10:43. | :10:48. | |
concerned? It's great to see housing got a strong profile in the | :10:48. | :10:50. | |
conference programmes across the political parties. It's very clear | :10:50. | :10:54. | |
now that this is going to be significant coming up to the | :10:54. | :10:57. | |
election. There's a number of younger families worried about | :10:57. | :11:03. | |
getting on the ladder, worried that their bank of mum and dad may not | :11:03. | :11:08. | |
help out with a deposit, so the profile is welcome. We now need | :11:08. | :11:12. | |
policy to link up with that rhetoric and at the moment, we're | :11:12. | :11:15. | |
getting from successive governments, a number of small schemes which | :11:15. | :11:19. | |
nibble around the edges but not been changing policies which will | :11:19. | :11:24. | |
deliver 232,000. What is the policy needed? The Government needs to | :11:24. | :11:29. | |
look far more seriously at how we reduce the price of land to make it | :11:29. | :11:32. | |
more affordable. Look at the structure of the development market. | :11:32. | :11:37. | |
A small number of large developers who have never deliver the kinds of | :11:37. | :11:41. | |
numbers of homes we now need. They need to bring in more competition | :11:41. | :11:48. | |
into that sector. They need to bring in bigger, simplified schemes | :11:48. | :11:52. | |
along the lines of First Buy. To help those on the middle and lower | :11:52. | :12:00. | |
incomes. But what's the point of this it does no homes out there for | :12:00. | :12:05. | |
them to buy? The primary focus has to be on supplying. It's | :12:05. | :12:08. | |
interesting home ownership, a staple of political rhetoric for | :12:08. | :12:14. | |
the last 30 years, is now in decline. Since 2003. We have far | :12:14. | :12:22. | |
too many mortgages and home ownership so it clearly not a | :12:22. | :12:27. | |
mortgage problem but a supply problem. Should we encourage people | :12:27. | :12:32. | |
to get onto the housing ladder when it is so expensive? That is | :12:32. | :12:36. | |
arguably what caused the crash in the first place. Certainly we need | :12:36. | :12:39. | |
to make sure mortgage regulation and lending is done very sensibly. | :12:39. | :12:42. | |
We need to look at the private rented sector where people can't | :12:43. | :12:48. | |
get in the social housing, can't to become homeowners, and many more | :12:48. | :12:54. | |
families end up in that sector, over one million. This does not | :12:54. | :12:58. | |
provide the stability the need. They signed contracts for one year | :12:58. | :13:02. | |
but put their children to school for up to five years. The governor | :13:02. | :13:09. | |
needs to reform that sector as well. The thank you very much. And the | :13:09. | :13:13. | |
shiny new Housing Minister Mark Prisk is here. Is this your first | :13:13. | :13:22. | |
appearance? Yes, it is. Less look at the context of this initiative. | :13:22. | :13:31. | |
There were 120,000 houses built in the 2010. 98,000 last year. Down at | :13:31. | :13:35. | |
20,000. How many will be built this year? So far we have seen | :13:35. | :13:41. | |
completions, not starts, which is very important because they | :13:41. | :13:46. | |
sometimes stay as foundations. I don't believe in speculate in a | :13:46. | :13:49. | |
whopper number will be in the next six months but, so far, in the | :13:49. | :13:54. | |
private sector, there is some real progress. Overall, how much will | :13:54. | :14:02. | |
housing be? You build 98 last year, rounded up to 100, so you say | :14:02. | :14:07. | |
110,000 this year? I'm not going to guess. We are in the middle of | :14:07. | :14:10. | |
October, and is only a couple more months to go and not much happens | :14:10. | :14:15. | |
over Christmas. You must know how many completions we will have this | :14:15. | :14:18. | |
year? We are on target for an improvement on that and I'm making | :14:18. | :14:25. | |
sure, not only do we do things about supplying would also demand. | :14:25. | :14:30. | |
That is what the First Buy is about. Even with an 80% increase, you will | :14:30. | :14:34. | |
still build fewer houses this year than were built in 2010 when you | :14:34. | :14:39. | |
came to power, and that was only 120,004 for a pretty bad figure in | :14:39. | :14:44. | |
its own right. There has been a long dysfunctional market, rented | :14:44. | :14:48. | |
and ownership, but what I would say, we are looking to make sure | :14:48. | :14:53. | |
affordable homes are expanded. Making sure private rented sector | :14:53. | :14:59. | |
is expanded. And using things like First Buy so the first buyers can | :14:59. | :15:03. | |
come into the market because if you help them, you unlock the housing | :15:03. | :15:09. | |
chain. It's got to be balanced carefully here. Alastair would | :15:09. | :15:12. | |
think we don't want to create the next boom and bust but we want to | :15:12. | :15:16. | |
make sure we are investing. I can assure you, you are a long way over | :15:17. | :15:20. | |
from a boom of for so I don't see how you can put life into the | :15:20. | :15:23. | |
housing market for affordable housing when you're cutting capital | :15:23. | :15:33. | |
:15:33. | :15:40. | ||
$:/STARTFEED.. You're cutting capital spending on housing by 60%. | :15:40. | :15:45. | |
The public sector side. We are using the public sector money to | :15:45. | :15:51. | |
leave a private money. This scheme, where you get a mortgage, but you | :15:51. | :15:56. | |
get a loan as well to help you with the deposit. You only have to raise | :15:56. | :16:02. | |
5%. How many people will this help? In its first 12 months we have seen | :16:03. | :16:07. | |
3,000 sales and 8,000 reservations. This year we will double that. We | :16:07. | :16:14. | |
are looking at 27,000 first-time buyers. We were told it would help | :16:14. | :16:19. | |
16,500 first-time buyers. That is from this year onwards. Many people | :16:19. | :16:22. | |
are on bleak affordable housing waiting list. A more than that. | :16:22. | :16:29. | |
many? I don't know. 1.8 million on the waiting list. Would you like to | :16:29. | :16:35. | |
give me these figures again of how much your scheme will buy? | :16:35. | :16:39. | |
first time by ink is about helping a third -- particular group. The | :16:39. | :16:43. | |
affordable housing programme is bigger than that, that is 170,000 | :16:43. | :16:50. | |
homes in that market. This scheme will help very few people and on | :16:50. | :16:53. | |
the start to a state where you launched it, you needed a joint | :16:53. | :16:58. | |
income of �60,000 to take part. Is that right? You have to make sure | :16:58. | :17:06. | |
you have an income. Winnie goes there, where I launched it, what | :17:06. | :17:11. | |
you see is the number of affordable homes was nil because the old | :17:11. | :17:18. | |
planning laws prevented it. We will have 114 new homes. It only applies | :17:18. | :17:23. | |
to first-time buyers. It only applies to new-build homes. It | :17:23. | :17:27. | |
can't be used to get a flat somewhere in an existing building, | :17:27. | :17:34. | |
is that right? That is correct. It is designed just for that group. | :17:34. | :17:38. | |
The danger is if we go broader than that, we start reaching beyond its | :17:38. | :17:45. | |
purpose. If we look at new by, that is a broader group. Qui do you | :17:45. | :17:51. | |
think any of these schemes make a blind bit of difference? The real | :17:51. | :17:54. | |
problem is that the price of land has been made artificially very, | :17:54. | :17:59. | |
very expensive bike over restrictive planning rules in this | :17:59. | :18:03. | |
country. We have a distorted construction and housing market. | :18:03. | :18:08. | |
That has been a problem for a long time. We need a massive increase in | :18:08. | :18:13. | |
the building of homes. They need to be the right kind of homes in the | :18:13. | :18:18. | |
right places, not tiny flats in privileged destinations. That is | :18:19. | :18:25. | |
where the change has to come. You need to liberate a lot of land, | :18:25. | :18:30. | |
maybe 1% of the total UK Land Pastor suddenly become developed | :18:30. | :18:35. | |
over the next few years. That is a very big issue that has to be | :18:35. | :18:44. | |
tackled. I see no sign... Tell me otherwise. I see no sign of any | :18:44. | :18:48. | |
housing boom happening in this country for the foreseeable future. | :18:48. | :18:55. | |
We are trying to not have a boom... Even building a lot more. The extra | :18:55. | :19:04. | |
170,000 homes is a good start. 170... 170,000 new houses. The | :19:04. | :19:07. | |
private rented sector which Roger referred to it is an important | :19:07. | :19:12. | |
thing which is often overlooked. It is correct to say that we need more | :19:12. | :19:19. | |
investment and that is what we're looking for. We looked at the run | :19:19. | :19:25. | |
rate for start-ups and so far this year, if you look at the first | :19:25. | :19:30. | |
couple of quarters, start ups of new houses were running at an | :19:30. | :19:37. | |
annual rate of only 80,000. That is below your completion rate. Rather | :19:37. | :19:41. | |
than any danger of a boom, you will probably end up building fewer | :19:41. | :19:46. | |
houses. We are trying to make sure that we don't get ourselves into | :19:46. | :19:52. | |
the danger of creating that potential boom. You're as far from | :19:52. | :19:58. | |
a boom as we are from the Antarctic! Wears the danger of the | :19:58. | :20:02. | |
boom in housing? We have to make a difference. Investing in an | :20:03. | :20:09. | |
affordable homes for makes a difference. You really think | :20:09. | :20:13. | |
there's no cause for concern when start-ups in the first half of this | :20:13. | :20:17. | |
year were running at an annual rate of only 80,000? There's a lot of | :20:17. | :20:21. | |
cause for concern. This is a dysfunctional market that has been | :20:21. | :20:26. | |
like this, whether it is owner- occupied or rented, for 15 to 20 | :20:26. | :20:33. | |
years. You are only tinkering at the edges? I don't buy that. | :20:33. | :20:40. | |
don't? We are not tinkering. We are looking at where the problems are | :20:40. | :20:45. | |
in supply and demand and using this scheme intelligently. The demand | :20:45. | :20:50. | |
side stuff, I worry when you guarantee loans, first time buyers | :20:50. | :20:54. | |
only have to put in 5%. House prices in most of the UK are | :20:54. | :21:00. | |
falling. It is very plausible that a lot of these people will be | :21:00. | :21:04. | |
pushed into negative equity and this will create a situation of | :21:04. | :21:09. | |
sub-prime light where thousands are encouraged to buy... If we helped | :21:09. | :21:13. | |
the supply and demand we can make a difference. It is a tough market | :21:13. | :21:16. | |
and I don't want to over a promise. We can make a difference, but I'm | :21:16. | :21:23. | |
careful about it. Thank you. Don't become a stranger. Don't go hiding | :21:23. | :21:29. | |
when the figures get worse! Life is getting more difficult for | :21:29. | :21:32. | |
Spain and the situation for the eurozone more perilous. Last night, | :21:32. | :21:35. | |
the credit rating agency Standard & Poor's downgraded Spanish bonds - | :21:35. | :21:40. | |
or government IOUs - to BBB minus, or just above junk status. This | :21:40. | :21:42. | |
morning, the markets have reacted and it's got more expensive for | :21:42. | :21:46. | |
Spain to borrow money. But what do these credit ratings agencies know | :21:46. | :21:50. | |
and have we all become slaves to the financial markets? This man | :21:51. | :22:00. | |
thinks so. Bankers? They need to be dredged out on the streets and | :22:01. | :22:06. | |
shafted. The bloody bankers, they are responsible for the food banks, | :22:06. | :22:11. | |
this bloody shower of a government is prostituting itself for the | :22:11. | :22:19. | |
bloody bankers. The omniscient London taxi driver. It is absurd to | :22:19. | :22:23. | |
think that it is a period of Banket bashing that has come to a close | :22:23. | :22:28. | |
because we have not even begun to - the bankers. We will fight them in | :22:28. | :22:34. | |
the trenches. We haven't even started. How dare they say it time | :22:34. | :22:41. | |
to stop? It is absurd. Makes our programme seemed quite quiet! And | :22:41. | :22:48. | |
the star of the Keiser Report - Max Keiser - joins us now. We take our | :22:48. | :22:53. | |
inspiration from you. You are the template we try to follow. There | :22:53. | :23:00. | |
goes my trance -- my chance of contract renewal! Give me a system | :23:00. | :23:04. | |
that works without bankers. We saw some great bridge bank against | :23:04. | :23:11. | |
Bankers in Iceland. -- push back. They got the country into deep | :23:11. | :23:16. | |
trouble and they effectively pushed back begins the bankers. They had | :23:16. | :23:20. | |
been economic downturn and now they are recovering. They still have | :23:20. | :23:26. | |
banks. Sure. The problem is not banking per se, but too big to fail | :23:26. | :23:31. | |
banks. Part of the crisis of 2008 was that the big banks got even | :23:31. | :23:35. | |
bigger. We have fewer of these institutions. Iceland is the best | :23:35. | :23:40. | |
we can do? It is a great example. You ask me for examples. I'm not | :23:40. | :23:47. | |
arguing. It is a global problem. We don't have a lot of great examples. | :23:47. | :23:52. | |
We need banks. The banking institutions are a necessary part | :23:53. | :23:57. | |
of running society, no doubt, but when you have too big to fail banks | :23:57. | :24:02. | |
and bankers engaging in wholesale fraud, manipulation, insider | :24:02. | :24:07. | |
trading, this country... In London you have just come out of the libel | :24:07. | :24:13. | |
scandal and other scandals. The City of London is the most regular | :24:13. | :24:17. | |
to relax environment in the world. AIG come through London, Lehman | :24:17. | :24:21. | |
Brothers come through London. All of these scandals come through | :24:21. | :24:25. | |
London because they have very lax banking standards and that is one | :24:25. | :24:29. | |
thing for prime minister should address. He should address this | :24:29. | :24:33. | |
issue, to get rid of some of these guys who are making it very | :24:33. | :24:38. | |
difficult. Whether or not we need banks, and we probably do, the | :24:38. | :24:42. | |
record of the banks in recent years has been quite appalling. Just when | :24:42. | :24:48. | |
you think it will get better, some other mis-selling or scandal or | :24:48. | :24:53. | |
moving the money of the Mexican drug cartels or helping finance the | :24:53. | :24:57. | |
Iranian government against sanctions. You couldn't make it up. | :24:57. | :25:02. | |
It has been catastrophic. Why were these decisions made? One wire -- | :25:02. | :25:08. | |
why was there a huge bubble? A huge cluster of errors made by bankers | :25:08. | :25:13. | |
and financial services? The first explanation is it is a spontaneous | :25:13. | :25:18. | |
outcome when you have banks and capitalism. That is my view. The | :25:18. | :25:22. | |
markets were horribly distorted by a very lax and ridiculous monetary | :25:23. | :25:25. | |
policy and ridiculous guarantees from governments and intervention | :25:25. | :25:30. | |
at this idea that big banks would be bailed out and the Federal | :25:30. | :25:35. | |
Reserve would always step in if the financial markets went down. Those | :25:35. | :25:41. | |
two factors were the dominant cause of the financial crisis. We have | :25:41. | :25:46. | |
common views in terms of monetary policy. It has been a catastrophe. | :25:46. | :25:51. | |
It is not a spontaneous eruption of fraud. There's more premeditation | :25:52. | :25:55. | |
going on because somehow bankers continued to get enormous bonuses | :25:55. | :26:02. | |
every year. They are not suffering. It is not a spontaneous combustion. | :26:02. | :26:08. | |
The monetary policies are definitely... There it -- there are | :26:08. | :26:13. | |
regulatory loopholes and they must be looked at. The Monetary Policy | :26:14. | :26:18. | |
encourages moral hazard. The Fed and the Bank of England keep giving | :26:18. | :26:24. | |
banks cheap money. That is a massive government failure. Q2 are | :26:24. | :26:28. | |
agreeing! We will have to put an end to this. For when it comes to | :26:28. | :26:33. | |
fraud, there has been a massive error in the UK. Fraud in finance | :26:33. | :26:37. | |
or business in general wasn't prosecuted heavily enough compared | :26:37. | :26:47. | |
:26:47. | :26:47. | ||
to the weight it was in other countries. What we saw a... When | :26:47. | :26:51. | |
there's a bubble, nobody cares, nobody looks for the fraud in the | :26:51. | :26:55. | |
crime, everybody's happy. When there's a recession, everybody | :26:56. | :27:00. | |
starts looking under every stone and finds horrible things. | :27:00. | :27:03. | |
housing market booms and everybody says look the other way because my | :27:03. | :27:08. | |
house is going up. The housing market collapses and they go, wait | :27:08. | :27:12. | |
imminent. -- wait a minute. There was a massive pharmaceutical | :27:12. | :27:17. | |
scandal recently where one company had to pay it -- making huge fine. | :27:17. | :27:22. | |
It didn't make the front pages. Rightly we are exposing scandals | :27:22. | :27:27. | |
and banking. Let's focus on the new regulator, Martin Wheatley. They | :27:27. | :27:32. | |
are bringing in a new regulatory agency. He says we will start | :27:32. | :27:35. | |
prosecuting crimes in the future, they should start to look at the | :27:35. | :27:43. | |
crimes that are still seething in the present. They bring in a new | :27:44. | :27:48. | |
regulator, out with the old, in with the new, deflect attention. | :27:48. | :27:52. | |
Martin Wheatley has an demonstrated... If he wanted to do | :27:52. | :28:02. | |
:28:02. | :28:14. | ||
A way key Iceland is the way ahead? The way ahead is to treat banks | :28:14. | :28:17. | |
much more like other kinds of businesses and make sure that | :28:17. | :28:20. | |
failure in banking is published in the same way it is punished in | :28:20. | :28:24. | |
other industries, with bankruptcy and loss. You can't nationalise | :28:24. | :28:28. | |
losses. You need to find new ways of allowing the biggest banks to go | :28:28. | :28:33. | |
bankrupt. Her what would be the effect on the population at large? | :28:33. | :28:38. | |
Exactly. You have to protect that, but you have to make sure the | :28:38. | :28:42. | |
bondholders that were bailed out pay the price. There's ways of | :28:43. | :28:48. | |
doing this. That is the most important point. You need to have | :28:48. | :28:53. | |
real capitalism in banking, not the rigged markets we've seen. Haven't | :28:53. | :28:57. | |
we become too dependent on the financial markets? We borrow so | :28:57. | :29:02. | |
much as individuals and as governments. We wouldn't have to be | :29:02. | :29:08. | |
in hock to these guys if we lived within our means. That is true. | :29:08. | :29:13. | |
Banks make money by putting money - - people in hock. You see this on | :29:13. | :29:17. | |
an individual level with the pushing of credit cards, but also | :29:17. | :29:22. | |
on a regional level and sovereign level. The problem in the eurozone | :29:22. | :29:25. | |
was these countries were forced into these huge debt positions, | :29:25. | :29:29. | |
particularly Greece, they were encouraged into enormous debt | :29:29. | :29:33. | |
before a jury -- joining the euro by bankers on Wall Street. | :29:33. | :29:40. | |
banks made them do it. You can fudge the rules by not complying to | :29:40. | :29:44. | |
the Maastricht treaty, according to Goldman Sachs. The politicians went | :29:44. | :29:48. | |
along with that. I don't buy this idea that borrowers are powerless | :29:48. | :29:56. | |
people who have to borrow. Tainted meat! They need consumer | :29:56. | :30:00. | |
protections. People are selling bad debts. Politicians borrowed too | :30:00. | :30:07. | |
much because they were stupid. They joined the euro. I knew I could get | :30:07. | :30:14. | |
the two of you to disagree. Who is the biggest contributor to the re- | :30:14. | :30:20. | |
election campaigns in the US? Wall Street. David Cameron is very, very | :30:20. | :30:30. | |
:30:30. | :30:32. | ||
city with the City of London. And, Max, you're staying with us | :30:32. | :30:36. | |
because, did you understand any of what we heard there? Do you know | :30:36. | :30:39. | |
your debt from your deficit? Your RPI from your CPI? Your QE from | :30:39. | :30:41. | |
your government bonds? They're terms we hear on programmes like | :30:41. | :30:45. | |
this one all of the time. But we at the Daily Politics believe that our | :30:45. | :30:48. | |
audience should be well informed. So Susana Mendonca has put together | :30:48. | :30:58. | |
:30:58. | :31:03. | ||
her very own shopping list of terms Goods and services, we all buy them | :31:03. | :31:07. | |
and the price we pay for them changes over time. The inflation is | :31:07. | :31:12. | |
the rate at which that change happens. Say this basket of | :31:12. | :31:17. | |
groceries cost me �10 today. An extra 25p for the same items in one | :31:17. | :31:23. | |
year. That would mean inflation had gone up by 2.5%. But there are | :31:23. | :31:28. | |
different ways to construct a representative basket. There is the | :31:28. | :31:37. | |
RPI, and CPI, I think I might need a copy of this now. The main | :31:37. | :31:44. | |
difference between them is that the RPI includes mortgage interest | :31:44. | :31:50. | |
payments and the CPI does not. Meaning the RPI tends to lead to | :31:50. | :31:55. | |
the entire outcomes for inflation. Debt and deficit. Don't confuse | :31:55. | :32:00. | |
them. Debt is the total amount of UK government owing, whilst the | :32:00. | :32:08. | |
deficit is added to that debt each year. That's what I was looking for, | :32:08. | :32:12. | |
a bit of feta cheese, which brings me to another financial phrase we | :32:12. | :32:17. | |
hear a lot about. The eurozone debt crisis. The eurozone debt crisis is | :32:17. | :32:21. | |
the result of market's thinking that the peripheral countries of | :32:21. | :32:27. | |
Europe, Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Spain and Greece have bad debts, | :32:27. | :32:30. | |
and can only be lent to at very high interest rates. The Bank of | :32:31. | :32:34. | |
England has rolled out a couple of rounds of quantitative easing, | :32:34. | :32:41. | |
printing money to you and die. print anatomically and use it to | :32:41. | :32:45. | |
buy a specific types of assets, long-term debt, held by financial | :32:45. | :32:49. | |
institutions and companies. This makes debt cheaper for those | :32:49. | :32:53. | |
companies and allows them to keep operations ticking over. The | :32:53. | :32:58. | |
problem is, it is very hard to determine what effect it's actually | :32:58. | :33:02. | |
had and if it has had positive effect, it could make the rich | :33:02. | :33:08. | |
richer. Why not throw in a few Bonts? Imagine I want to borrow | :33:08. | :33:13. | |
money from you, I would say, lend me 10 quid until next week. If I am | :33:13. | :33:18. | |
a government, I want to borrow billions of pounds, obviously this | :33:18. | :33:24. | |
not one person to give me a cheque for that much, so I split it into | :33:24. | :33:28. | |
little Bonts and sell them so people can buy the bike to get | :33:28. | :33:36. | |
interest on the debt from me. -- born tos. That's the shopping done. | :33:36. | :33:39. | |
I'm off to find out what the word broke means. | :33:39. | :33:43. | |
I think I can help you with that one, Susanna. | :33:43. | :33:47. | |
Max and Allister are still here. Andrew Hawkins from ComRes joins us. | :33:47. | :33:51. | |
The economy has been the main issue for the last five years. Has | :33:51. | :33:56. | |
economic literacy improved? I don't if it improved in the last five | :33:56. | :34:00. | |
years, but in that context of the present crisis, nine out of 10 of | :34:00. | :34:06. | |
the public, in some recent polling, actually thought at the end of this | :34:06. | :34:12. | |
Parliament, the Government will have paid back �600 billion in debt, | :34:12. | :34:17. | |
rather than increased it, and the political row of the occasions of | :34:17. | :34:21. | |
but obviously are huge. The Government's message on the deficit | :34:21. | :34:27. | |
has been very strong. When you look at who wrongly believes the debt is | :34:27. | :34:31. | |
being repaid, the Government could be in real difficulty because most | :34:31. | :34:35. | |
of those are Conservative voters. So when it comes to saying of the | :34:36. | :34:39. | |
economy is stupid, how are politicians supposed to direct | :34:39. | :34:46. | |
their campaigns if the understanding is pretty mediocre? | :34:46. | :34:51. | |
It can be done. The single message in the last election was a brace | :34:51. | :34:55. | |
yourself, it's going to be bad. The trouble is, the timing of the cuts | :34:55. | :35:02. | |
and the nature of them haven't really affected people. Obviously, | :35:02. | :35:06. | |
you go for the easiest things to cut first and then get into the | :35:06. | :35:10. | |
nitty-gritty. The fact that the economy has not turned around, the | :35:10. | :35:14. | |
time has been delayed when the nasty cuts are going to hit at the | :35:14. | :35:20. | |
next election. If one doesn't really understand enough about | :35:20. | :35:24. | |
fiscal and monetary policy, austerity verses fiscal stimulus, | :35:24. | :35:30. | |
how can you decide who to vote for? The it's a terrible problem. These | :35:30. | :35:33. | |
findings are interesting and show it's a major issue at the heart of | :35:33. | :35:36. | |
British culture and anybody is to blame for this. The education | :35:36. | :35:42. | |
system, media and politicians. Nick Clegg not long ago was confusing | :35:42. | :35:46. | |
deficit and debt for the George Osborne has also confused them | :35:46. | :35:51. | |
saying that we are paying down the debt. Is that accidental? The | :35:51. | :35:54. | |
probably accidental, but it shows is a major problem if the | :35:55. | :36:00. | |
politicians are confused. I think it makes matters worse. It's a | :36:00. | :36:05. | |
really big problem. His economic literacy worse in this country than | :36:05. | :36:10. | |
it was 30 years ago? I don't know if it has become worse but what I | :36:10. | :36:14. | |
do know, it is really, really bad, and the basic concepts need to be | :36:14. | :36:18. | |
taught in schools from a younger age. There needs to be public | :36:18. | :36:22. | |
conversation about this and it's about numbers and innumeracy and | :36:22. | :36:26. | |
percentages, the difference between millions and billions. But people | :36:26. | :36:32. | |
will understand the way you have been bashing the bankers. It's a | :36:32. | :36:37. | |
simple concept but, beyond that, perhaps they don't really know what | :36:37. | :36:41. | |
you're talking about in terms of regulation. Is there any point | :36:41. | :36:46. | |
going on about it? Financial literacy is a problem and clearly, | :36:46. | :36:52. | |
it is, you have to ask yourself whether George Osborne puts forward | :36:52. | :36:55. | |
a scheme to exchange rights for shares to a population and knows | :36:55. | :37:01. | |
nothing about shares. You have to ask yourself, is George Osborne | :37:01. | :37:05. | |
exploiting that knowledge gap? Exploiting the a literacy to get | :37:05. | :37:09. | |
bigger to sign up for something not in their best interests? That is | :37:09. | :37:14. | |
shameless. I was shocked he made that offered to the public. The I | :37:14. | :37:18. | |
also shocked by Ed Miliband and others saying millionaires are | :37:18. | :37:25. | |
going to get a cheque for �40,000. Because of cutting the income tax | :37:25. | :37:31. | |
to a 45p. He said the redistribution, which attacks the | :37:31. | :37:36. | |
problems in the system, before they develop and get out of hands, | :37:36. | :37:41. | |
that's interesting concept, adopted by Margaret Thatcher. It was a | :37:41. | :37:46. | |
justification for selling off the council estates. There were some | :37:46. | :37:51. | |
interesting policies which I think are more market sensitive. This | :37:51. | :37:58. | |
prime minister, this chancellor, shows remarkable market illiteracy. | :37:58. | :38:02. | |
I agree. The Ed Miliband argument about millionaires, every single | :38:02. | :38:07. | |
millionaire in the country being given a cheque was clearly wrong | :38:07. | :38:08. | |
and something Republic could have understood immediately had there | :38:08. | :38:13. | |
been more financial literacy. It's a damn a complicated debate about | :38:13. | :38:17. | |
the cause of the crisis if there's not more financial literacy. I | :38:17. | :38:25. | |
would argue that that is why your ideas are not so successful. Your | :38:25. | :38:33. | |
ottomans are more complicated? easier than saying there's a whole | :38:33. | :38:40. | |
set of issues, cheaper money, imbalances, all that sort of stuff. | :38:40. | :38:44. | |
There is an issue of right and wrong. Listening to the Prime | :38:44. | :38:48. | |
Minister in his speech, he talks about ambition for the country to | :38:48. | :38:53. | |
knuckle down a. That would encourage fair play. When you have | :38:53. | :39:00. | |
a looting at the banks, rigging scandals, laundering drug money, | :39:00. | :39:05. | |
it's tough to put the opposition out there. Aren't all politicians | :39:05. | :39:10. | |
guilty of putting a political gloss on a more complicated economic | :39:10. | :39:16. | |
message? He yes, and people who support different parties will see | :39:16. | :39:19. | |
a political message in what they want to see, but we shouldn't | :39:19. | :39:24. | |
forget an awful lot of people are in business, run businesses, and I | :39:24. | :39:33. | |
seem to recall in the days before I had lots of grey hair, Margaret | :39:33. | :39:36. | |
Thatcher countered this in grocer's shop finances and I think people | :39:36. | :39:42. | |
understood that. The chattering classes may deter for doing that. | :39:42. | :39:48. | |
But today, for example, I wouldn't want to be having debt higher than | :39:48. | :39:54. | |
5% of my turnover. The Government seems to think it's OK to have a | :39:54. | :40:00. | |
debt 15 times the size of that 5%. Yes, people also understand, of | :40:00. | :40:06. | |
course, the analogy of you have your credit-card, and you spend it | :40:06. | :40:11. | |
all, then you have a problem. The Government do not have a credit | :40:11. | :40:14. | |
card but run debt for the it's different when you talk about | :40:14. | :40:19. | |
governments, because they can print money and do all sorts of things. | :40:19. | :40:24. | |
Consumers are not empowered to make the right choices when it comes to | :40:24. | :40:28. | |
financial services. You have had endless scandals. Miss selling and | :40:28. | :40:35. | |
so on. It never ends and the never solve these problems and people are | :40:35. | :40:40. | |
not saving enough and have enough pensions. It's a major problem. | :40:40. | :40:44. | |
going to up to stop you there for that we will have to get you one | :40:44. | :40:48. | |
for an economics lesson in future. Thank you very much. Come back and | :40:48. | :40:54. | |
see us. Now, on Monday, the Prime Minister and First Minister of | :40:54. | :40:57. | |
Scotland will meet to seal the deal on a referendum on independence. | :40:57. | :41:01. | |
Part of that deal is said to be a concession which will allow 16 and | :41:01. | :41:04. | |
17-year-olds to vote in the poll expected to be held in two year's | :41:04. | :41:11. | |
time. It looks like the nationalists will agree there is | :41:11. | :41:14. | |
only one question, are you for against it? Concern about the | :41:14. | :41:22. | |
proposal was raised in the House of I beg leave to ask a question about | :41:22. | :41:27. | |
which I have given private notice. The question is as follows. To ask | :41:28. | :41:31. | |
her Majesty's Government, whether, before the Prime Minister meets the | :41:31. | :41:36. | |
First Minister of Scotland on Monday 15th October, they will | :41:36. | :41:40. | |
clarify whether it is proposed to extend the franchise in any | :41:40. | :41:46. | |
referendum on Scottish independence to 16 and 17-year-old and, if so, | :41:47. | :41:51. | |
by what legislative means? And what of the implications for electoral | :41:51. | :41:59. | |
law in the UK? My Lords, people in Scotland deserve a referendum of | :41:59. | :42:02. | |
the Scottish independence which is legal, and decisive. There has been | :42:03. | :42:06. | |
progress made towards an agreement but details are still under | :42:06. | :42:09. | |
negotiation between the two governments. The Government which | :42:09. | :42:13. | |
will both houses of parliament are fully informed and are required to | :42:13. | :42:18. | |
provide components to the Scottish parliament will require the | :42:18. | :42:23. | |
approval of both Houses and Her Majesty's Council. Could I suggest | :42:23. | :42:30. | |
he's not answered my question? Matters of electoral importance and | :42:30. | :42:36. | |
the extension of the franchise are not matters to be carried out in a | :42:36. | :42:41. | |
corner negotiations, however senior the party. If the franchise is to | :42:41. | :42:44. | |
be extended in Scotland for referendum, is it not inevitable | :42:44. | :42:48. | |
that we will have to extend it to 16 year-olds for all elections | :42:48. | :42:52. | |
throughout the UK? A matter which has huge implications, not least | :42:52. | :42:56. | |
that it will bring politics into schools? If the Government is | :42:56. | :43:01. | |
proposing to do that, would it not be proper for them to issue a paper | :43:01. | :43:05. | |
for consultation and to consult widely and make no commitments | :43:05. | :43:10. | |
what's above until they have done And here to debate the pros and | :43:10. | :43:13. | |
cons of lowering the voting age are the Conservative MP Eleanor Laing. | :43:13. | :43:17. | |
And Rhammel Afflick from the British Youth Council. Welcome to | :43:17. | :43:23. | |
both of you. Do Conservatives oppose votes for 16 and 17 year- | :43:23. | :43:28. | |
olds? No, in principle, not because they will vote one way or another | :43:28. | :43:31. | |
but because I think you have to draw the line somewhere. The | :43:31. | :43:38. | |
obvious place to do it is adulthood, 18. Why is that question you can | :43:38. | :43:45. | |
have a job, pay tax, get married at 16? Isn't that the age? You can | :43:45. | :43:52. | |
legally get matter at 16 but I wouldn't recommend it. Why can't | :43:52. | :43:56. | |
you vote them to? It's not a sudden point when somebody becomes an | :43:56. | :44:03. | |
adult, but a process. For some of us, it's still going on! Do I | :44:03. | :44:07. | |
couldn't agree more. I know lots of 16 year-olds who are far, far | :44:07. | :44:12. | |
better informed about politics than many 60 roles. Of course, they are | :44:12. | :44:15. | |
intellectually Capel, writing essays for A-level politics, for | :44:15. | :44:21. | |
example. -- capable. There's nothing intellectually wrong with | :44:21. | :44:26. | |
people being involved in politics. I want people involved at all ages, | :44:26. | :44:31. | |
but you have to draw the line somewhere. It is silly to draw it | :44:31. | :44:38. | |
at 16 for this, when the age of adulthood is 18. It's not fair to | :44:38. | :44:43. | |
give people a responsibility too early. What do you say to that? | :44:43. | :44:47. | |
completely disagree. It is something I have been passionate | :44:47. | :44:51. | |
about for a long time, that people, young people, should be able to | :44:51. | :44:56. | |
vote, simply because, actually, you're quite an independent person | :44:56. | :45:03. | |
at 16, and they are mature enough and they are affected by the | :45:03. | :45:07. | |
decisions the politicians make. They are not able to hold them to | :45:07. | :45:10. | |
account properly without having a vote, so I believe strongly they | :45:11. | :45:20. | |
:45:21. | :45:23. | ||
$:/STARTFEED. Whatever done so is there that 16-year-old would do it? | :45:23. | :45:28. | |
It is not relevant. The reason I say that is because the issue of | :45:28. | :45:33. | |
getting people to vote is a separate issue. If we were having a | :45:33. | :45:38. | |
problem getting women to vote, we would not take away their vote | :45:38. | :45:41. | |
because they are disengaged from politics so I don't believe that is | :45:41. | :45:46. | |
an argument. If you want young people to get involved in politics, | :45:46. | :45:50. | |
why not get in early? There are other ways in which young people | :45:50. | :45:55. | |
get involved, there's a Youth Parliament, the British Youth | :45:55. | :46:00. | |
Council. I hold an annual debating competition in my constituency | :46:00. | :46:03. | |
where kids take part and they are brilliant and they put forward | :46:03. | :46:06. | |
brilliant arguments. They are practising, developing their | :46:06. | :46:12. | |
political ideas. You need to serve an apprenticeship. You are | :46:12. | :46:16. | |
practising at 16 and 17 and at 18 you can vote. Why is your | :46:16. | :46:20. | |
government allowing them to vote in the Scottish referendum? If that is | :46:20. | :46:26. | |
the case, which it looks like it is, it is part of a deal. It is wrong? | :46:26. | :46:31. | |
I still think it is wrong, but I would question the whole franchise | :46:31. | :46:35. | |
of the Scottish referendum. There are more Scots living outside | :46:36. | :46:40. | |
Scotland than there are living in Scotland. A you do think it was | :46:40. | :46:45. | |
wrong to make that part of the deal? I would rather that hadn't | :46:45. | :46:51. | |
happened, but if the deal is that there will be one distinct question | :46:51. | :46:58. | |
on the ballot paper... That is the deal. I'm OK with that. He can have | :46:58. | :47:04. | |
the vote? If that is the deal, he can have the vote. Just this once? | :47:04. | :47:10. | |
Is that really possible? This is a stepping-stone for all elections. | :47:10. | :47:16. | |
Put it back on the agenda. If it has and rightly so. As a 16-year- | :47:16. | :47:20. | |
old, you can pay taxes. Why shouldn't young people be able to | :47:20. | :47:24. | |
have a say on the taxes they are paying? At 16, you have to pay | :47:24. | :47:30. | |
adult fares on the train. If you have an argument that you are going | :47:30. | :47:34. | |
to use Boris Johnson, you don't like what he is dealing with | :47:34. | :47:38. | |
transport in London, the prices are too high, how do you have a saying | :47:38. | :47:44. | |
that? You say this is a stepping stone, this deal will be a stepping | :47:44. | :47:48. | |
stone to other elections, how will you stop it? You won't be able to | :47:48. | :47:53. | |
say you were doing it on just this referendum. It is not a precedent. | :47:53. | :47:58. | |
It puts the matter on the agenda. We had a debate about four years | :47:58. | :48:04. | |
ago on this. There were about 40 people in the chamber, nobody cared. | :48:04. | :48:09. | |
40 is quite a lot these days! That is overcrowding. Perhaps. There | :48:09. | :48:16. | |
weren't many people taking part. I was. It is essential that the | :48:16. | :48:20. | |
matter should be debated in the Commons properly. If Alex Salmond | :48:20. | :48:23. | |
has managed to get it through this time, that doesn't create a | :48:23. | :48:29. | |
precedent. What is upsetting is that something so important, | :48:29. | :48:33. | |
extending devote to 16 and 17 year- olds, has been part of some grubby | :48:34. | :48:38. | |
little compromise. It is like House of Lords reform. It is the sort of | :48:38. | :48:42. | |
thing the public looks at an things, what are the politicians playing | :48:42. | :48:46. | |
at? How can such important questions be decided in this way? | :48:46. | :48:51. | |
They can make it up as they go along. Can I quickly say to you, we | :48:51. | :48:56. | |
have a short gap between her -- before Parliament returns, are you | :48:56. | :49:01. | |
happy Andrew Mitchell will be come back? He has never called me | :49:01. | :49:09. | |
something he shouldn't have. Give him time. Undoubtedly. He is a good | :49:09. | :49:14. | |
chief whip. He was a whip before when it was difficult and he will | :49:14. | :49:18. | |
get on with it now. I care more about his ability to manage | :49:18. | :49:22. | |
business in the House of Commons. He will be able to now? | :49:22. | :49:28. | |
Do you don't fancy him as High Commissioner in Rwanda? He was a | :49:28. | :49:31. | |
very good International Development Secretary ft up her I'll take that | :49:31. | :49:41. | |
:49:41. | :49:42. | ||
as a yes! Thank you. You'll all have your alarm clocks | :49:42. | :49:45. | |
set for 2am tomorrow morning, won't you? Because that's when the debate | :49:45. | :49:47. | |
between the two vice presidential candidates in the November's US | :49:47. | :49:51. | |
general election. Only US citizens get to vote, of course, but we like | :49:51. | :49:54. | |
to extend the franchise here so Adam took his moodbox out at the | :49:54. | :49:56. | |
Tory Party Conference to find out how British Conservatives might | :49:57. | :50:06. | |
:50:07. | :50:16. | ||
Which one of these two would people at the Tory conference like to see | :50:16. | :50:20. | |
in the White House? Let's find out. In America, the colours are the | :50:20. | :50:30. | |
:50:30. | :50:31. | ||
other way around. Romney is red and Obama is blue. Why Mitt Romney? | :50:31. | :50:36. | |
think Obama is no friend of the UK. Ronnie is a nutcase. He is out of | :50:36. | :50:43. | |
touch. Obama is the sensible candidate. We need the American | :50:43. | :50:48. | |
economy to get moving and I think Bromby could do that. I don't think | :50:48. | :50:54. | |
the founding fathers believed in mixing religion and politics. I | :50:54. | :50:58. | |
think mitt Romney is overly religious. I would hope that David | :50:58. | :51:03. | |
Cameron would vote for Obama because views are nearer his. | :51:03. | :51:07. | |
he is left-handed. Five of the last seven US President's have been left | :51:07. | :51:17. | |
handed. K is his red? A Mitt Romney man. Conservative. I support | :51:17. | :51:20. | |
Conservatives in almost every country so I hope Mitt Romney wins. | :51:20. | :51:25. | |
The even if they are gaffe-prone? The best politicians are gaffe- | :51:25. | :51:30. | |
prone? What has Mitt Romney got so wrong? He has been very gaffe-prone. | :51:30. | :51:35. | |
He hasn't come across as a One nation Conservative. He was very | :51:35. | :51:41. | |
rude about London, frankly. I took that rather badly. We have a real | :51:41. | :51:44. | |
live American. A lot of people think there's an automatic link. | :51:44. | :51:50. | |
doesn't follow the same lines. My mother is a democrat and she was | :51:50. | :51:57. | |
horrified that I was voting Tory. I had to explain the difference to | :51:57. | :52:07. | |
:52:07. | :52:09. | ||
Watched the next debate because it will be interesting. It is not just | :52:09. | :52:14. | |
going to be the two leaders, it will be the two candidates being | :52:14. | :52:19. | |
questioned by a group of voters who have been specially selected by the | :52:19. | :52:23. | |
Gallup Organisation because they are undecided. Who speaks well on | :52:23. | :52:33. | |
:52:33. | :52:37. | ||
Would you like to vote in the American election? That is not | :52:37. | :52:42. | |
diplomatic! Are you worried you might create a diplomatic incident? | :52:42. | :52:48. | |
I'm always worried about that so I always avoid them. I think he is | :52:48. | :52:51. | |
one of the most intelligent leaders the Western world has ever had, | :52:51. | :52:56. | |
Obama. I would like him to be more decisive and cut the deficit faster. | :52:56. | :53:01. | |
Those are words I could use about David Cameron as well. | :53:01. | :53:05. | |
confident are you that will be the result? I think it is too close to | :53:05. | :53:11. | |
call, it will go down to the final debate. We will see which direction | :53:11. | :53:15. | |
America takes. Whoever wins, they have to get to grips with America's | :53:15. | :53:22. | |
budget deficit. It threatens our economy as well as theirs. For ages | :53:22. | :53:26. | |
Obama was ahead and then Ron knee snap up from behind. Look at the | :53:26. | :53:32. | |
final result. Obama has won at the Tory party conference. | :53:32. | :53:34. | |
Congratulations on your re-election, Mr President. | :53:34. | :53:41. | |
If only it was that simple! The MEP Daniel Hannan - a big | :53:41. | :53:44. | |
Romney supporter - is in Brussels, and Kwasi Kwarteng, who has mixed | :53:44. | :53:54. | |
feelings about the two candidates. More Conservatives at your | :53:54. | :53:58. | |
conference saying they would vote for Mr Obama than Mr Romney. What | :53:58. | :54:03. | |
do you make of that? Four years ago I would have been one of them. What | :54:03. | :54:08. | |
has changed since then is the size of the US deficit, which is now not | :54:08. | :54:13. | |
just a domestic problem for them, but it is becoming a global problem. | :54:13. | :54:18. | |
I wish I had a vocabulary to convey what 16 trillion dollars of debt | :54:18. | :54:23. | |
means. There are not the words in the English language to do credit | :54:23. | :54:27. | |
to a numbers at astronomical. don't your fellow Tories recognise | :54:27. | :54:32. | |
that? The reason is we tend to see him doing what he is good at. He is | :54:32. | :54:37. | |
a very good speech maker, he does the ceremonial side of the | :54:37. | :54:41. | |
Presidency beautifully and simply by occupying the office he does, he | :54:41. | :54:45. | |
reminds us that America is a country with a greatness of spirit | :54:45. | :54:49. | |
to have moved in a single generation from the semi- | :54:49. | :54:54. | |
formalised exclusion of black voters to the election of a mixed | :54:54. | :54:57. | |
race President. It was on those grounds that I backed him for years | :54:57. | :55:05. | |
ago. We don't have to live with it. Up isn't the truth of this, why we | :55:05. | :55:10. | |
got the that result, that today's Republican Party, not just Mitt | :55:10. | :55:15. | |
Romney, but those to the right, and today's Conservatives, probably | :55:15. | :55:19. | |
have less in common than the Republicans and Conservatives in | :55:19. | :55:22. | |
any time during the Second World War. I think that is true. You have | :55:23. | :55:27. | |
to look at what has happened to the Republican Party. The Republican | :55:27. | :55:31. | |
Party of Ronald Reagan was not as obsessed with social issues | :55:31. | :55:37. | |
regarding abortion, religion. I've no idea what Ronald Reagan's | :55:37. | :55:40. | |
religious beliefs were, I suspect he was a Christian. There was | :55:40. | :55:45. | |
something he never talked about. The rise of the religious Right in | :55:45. | :55:49. | |
America has alienated a large portion of the Republican Party | :55:49. | :55:54. | |
from Conservatives. As Daniel said, on the fiscal side, we are in | :55:54. | :55:58. | |
agreement with Mitt Romney and I think the debt situation... It is | :55:58. | :56:06. | |
the social issues? We haven't got much time. If you look historically | :56:06. | :56:11. | |
at this, if you take Mr Eisenhower and Mr Macmillan, they had a lot in | :56:11. | :56:16. | |
common, they fought a war together. No argument about Mr Reagan and Mrs | :56:16. | :56:20. | |
Thatcher, they were ideological soulmate. Even John Major and | :56:20. | :56:24. | |
George Bush were similar post ideological friends, they got on | :56:24. | :56:29. | |
well, they began a war together. Mr Romney and Mr Cameron, it doesn't | :56:29. | :56:35. | |
quite work. I hope they will not begin any wars together! Per not | :56:35. | :56:45. | |
ruling it out. Of course. Religious issues have taken more of a centre | :56:45. | :56:48. | |
stage, but it is worth stressing that none of these questions have | :56:48. | :56:51. | |
anything to do with the White House. The issues of gay marriage and | :56:51. | :56:56. | |
abortion and so on, I'm not saying they're not important, but read the | :56:56. | :57:05. | |
constitution. Keith Daniel is technically right. In order to win | :57:05. | :57:08. | |
the Republican nomination, it is absolutely certain that these | :57:08. | :57:12. | |
issues are critical. They are central to how you get to the | :57:12. | :57:16. | |
nomination. That is why this sort of language has put off a lot of | :57:16. | :57:22. | |
people on the centre right. I'm not sure it is fair to include Mitt | :57:22. | :57:26. | |
Romney in that. He has been desperate not to talk about his | :57:26. | :57:31. | |
religion. We know why that is. Most Republicans desert -- regard | :57:31. | :57:38. | |
Mormonism as a cult. I think most Americans have their humanity, the | :57:38. | :57:42. | |
courtesy and the decency, and are taught by their constitution and a | :57:42. | :57:45. | |
Bill of Rights, not to make an issue of people's innermost | :57:45. | :57:49. | |
convictions. They are polite enough to understand they don't do that. | :57:49. | :57:54. | |
Will you watch the debate tonight? I have to be up at an unfeasibly | :57:54. | :58:02. | |
early time tomorrow. Don't go to bed! When you watch it? Who would | :58:02. | :58:06. | |
you vote for in November? I would probably -- probably end up with | :58:06. | :58:11. | |
Mitt Romney. You would not want to see Mr Obama have a second term? | :58:11. | :58:16. | |
The debt, welfare, taxes issue is what the Democrats will lose on. | :58:16. | :58:23. | |
Thank you. There's just time before we go to | :58:23. | :58:29. | |
find out the answer to our quiz. The car previously owned by David | :58:29. | :58:33. | |
and Samantha Cameron is being auctioned at today. What car was | :58:33. | :58:40. | |
it? Have a guess. Is it the Mini Cooper? It is not. It is the Fiat | :58:40. | :58:48. | |
500. Very similar, but very different. And people say he is a | :58:48. | :58:50. | |
posh! That's all for today. Thanks to our | :58:50. | :58:53. | |
guests. The One O'Clock News is starting over on BBC One now. I'm | :58:53. | :58:56. |