Browse content similar to 22/10/2012. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Afternoon, folks, welcome to the Daily Politics. | :00:37. | :00:40. | |
In an attempt to seize back the political initiative, the Prime | :00:40. | :00:44. | |
Minister gets tough on crime. After all, what else would you do? In a | :00:44. | :00:47. | |
speech this lunchtime, the PM's expected to call for tougher | :00:47. | :00:49. | |
sentences for the worst criminals and rehabilitation and education | :00:49. | :00:56. | |
for others to cut reoffending. Crisis at the BBC over the Jimmy | :00:56. | :01:00. | |
Savile affair. The BBC's Director General appears before MPs tomorrow. | :01:00. | :01:10. | |
:01:10. | :01:10. | ||
We'll be talking to the man charged with grilling him. | :01:10. | :01:18. | |
Should men and women share parental leave after having a baby? I do not | :01:18. | :01:21. | |
promise... BOOING. | :01:21. | :01:25. | |
And we'll be asking if Ed Milliband was secretly pleased to get this | :01:25. | :01:32. | |
reaction to his speech at this All that in the next hour. And with | :01:32. | :01:35. | |
us for the whole programme today is Justine Roberts from Mumsnet. | :01:35. | :01:39. | |
Welcome. First this morning, let's talk about child benefit because | :01:39. | :01:42. | |
the Government has been warned that it may have left it too late to | :01:43. | :01:45. | |
implement the cut to child benefit. The Institute of Chartered | :01:45. | :01:48. | |
Accountants for England and Wales said yesterday that most middle | :01:48. | :01:50. | |
class families remained unaware of the changes, which will require | :01:50. | :01:53. | |
about half a million people filling out complicated self assessment | :01:53. | :02:03. | |
forms for the first time. Have you found that with your followers? Are | :02:03. | :02:06. | |
they counting down the weeks to the time they will get a reduced child | :02:06. | :02:10. | |
benefit or none at all? I think they are aware because it has been | :02:10. | :02:14. | |
a big issue, but I don't think people know they have tefillin more | :02:14. | :02:19. | |
forms or how to do that. A lot of people have never had to fill in | :02:19. | :02:24. | |
that type of form before. They will be coming on line and asking what's | :02:24. | :02:31. | |
next? I think there are people who might not realise that this is | :02:31. | :02:37. | |
actually going to be done through the tax system by HMRC, it is not | :02:37. | :02:41. | |
that the Inland Revenue as we used to know it is going to cut your | :02:41. | :02:45. | |
child benefit... We each would be the natural assumption. You might | :02:45. | :02:50. | |
still get it and then it will be clawed back. Yes. That sounds very | :02:50. | :02:55. | |
complicated. It does and it is the last thing anyone needs, to have to | :02:55. | :03:00. | |
battle with more forms from the HMRC, which is not the most user- | :03:00. | :03:04. | |
friendly organisation anyway. It sounds like a nightmare for a lot | :03:04. | :03:09. | |
of people. But in no side whether or not a policy is clever or fair, | :03:09. | :03:14. | |
the very fact that you are increasing bureaucracy is the one | :03:14. | :03:22. | |
thing that... Are there people still very upset about the changes | :03:22. | :03:27. | |
themselves? In the end, you could get a couple earning under the | :03:27. | :03:30. | |
threshold who will still get child benefit and one single earner who | :03:31. | :03:36. | |
earns above it he will not. Exactly. I think they are fair -- cross | :03:37. | :03:41. | |
about the unfairness. It is hard to argue that millionaires should get | :03:41. | :03:45. | |
child benefit. A lot of people can understand why the Government would | :03:45. | :03:49. | |
want to reduce it, but they have done it in an unfair way and people | :03:49. | :03:53. | |
are cross about the effect it as one single learning households and | :03:53. | :03:56. | |
lone parents relative to a neighbour where they have more | :03:56. | :04:00. | |
income but they still receive the benefit. For 11 weeks to go until | :04:00. | :04:04. | |
those changes take effect. Tomorrow morning, the BBC Director | :04:04. | :04:07. | |
General, George Entwhistle, will appear in front of the Culture, | :04:07. | :04:10. | |
Media and Sport Select Committee to answer MPs' questions on what the | :04:10. | :04:14. | |
BBC knew about Jimmy Savile. Tonight, a special one-hour | :04:14. | :04:16. | |
Panorama will look at how and why a Newsnight investigation into | :04:16. | :04:21. | |
allegations against Jimmy Savile was dropped before broadcast. The | :04:21. | :04:23. | |
programme includes interviews with the Newsnight journalists who | :04:23. | :04:32. | |
worked on the original Savile investigation. Ever since the | :04:32. | :04:36. | |
decision was taken at Tibshelf Alan Storey, I've not been happy with | :04:36. | :04:41. | |
public statements made by the BBC. I think they are very misleading | :04:41. | :04:45. | |
about the nature of the investigation we were doing. It was | :04:45. | :04:51. | |
an abrupt change of tone from one- day excellent, let's prepare to get | :04:51. | :04:56. | |
this thing on air, to hold on. was sure the story would come out | :04:56. | :05:01. | |
one way or another and if it did, the BBC would be accused of a | :05:01. | :05:06. | |
cover-up. I wrote an e-mail to Peter saying, the story is strong | :05:06. | :05:10. | |
enough and the danger of not running it is substantial damage to | :05:10. | :05:13. | |
BBC reputation. In the last hour, the Newsnight | :05:13. | :05:17. | |
editor Peter Rippon has stood down from his role for the duration of | :05:17. | :05:19. | |
the independent Pollard review into whether there were any failings in | :05:19. | :05:22. | |
the BBC's management of the investigation. Let's get more on | :05:22. | :05:25. | |
this with the media commentator Steve Hewlett, who's at New | :05:25. | :05:31. | |
Broadcasting House. Has Peter Rippon done the right thing? | :05:31. | :05:37. | |
don't think... There was no other option. The blog he wrote a couple | :05:37. | :05:41. | |
of weeks ago outlining the reasons for his decision to stop the | :05:41. | :05:47. | |
Newsnight programme, remember the essential course of events is that | :05:47. | :05:52. | |
Jimmy Savile dies at the end of October, a busy one announces | :05:52. | :05:55. | |
tribute programmes for its Christmas schedule, up pops | :05:55. | :05:59. | |
Newsnight with a suggestion that Savell may have been a paedophile. | :05:59. | :06:06. | |
The Newsnight programme then gets cancelled. People say hang on, is | :06:06. | :06:10. | |
there any danger that one bit of the BBC Cross infect another? If it | :06:10. | :06:16. | |
were true, that the BBC corporate interests overrode its journalism, | :06:16. | :06:21. | |
that would be a disaster. That is the reason there is this concern. | :06:21. | :06:25. | |
Peter Ripon was under pressure to explain why he dropped the | :06:25. | :06:30. | |
programme. His explanation is at best a partial and the BBC have now | :06:30. | :06:33. | |
acknowledged it is incomplete and incorrect in important respects and | :06:33. | :06:39. | |
as a result there is no question he had to stand aside. It now seems | :06:39. | :06:46. | |
that some of the details of the reasons, not all of them, for | :06:46. | :06:51. | |
dropping the investigation are now said to be inaccurate. How does | :06:51. | :06:53. | |
that change things ahead of George Entwhistle's appearance before the | :06:53. | :07:00. | |
committee? It makes the BBC seemed more of a muddle. We have people | :07:00. | :07:04. | |
rich using themselves from these decisions. The Director General is | :07:04. | :07:12. | |
no longer Director General for this, Tim Davey. The whole thing appears | :07:12. | :07:17. | |
Mugly chaotic. Secondly, the Director General, the director of | :07:17. | :07:21. | |
editorial policy and the chairman of the BBC Trust have been on the | :07:21. | :07:26. | |
airwaves and said that this was never any inquiry into Jimmy Savile | :07:26. | :07:29. | |
per se, it was an inquiry into a police investigation and the | :07:29. | :07:33. | |
subsequent decision by the CPS not to proceed. The journalists said | :07:33. | :07:40. | |
that was ridiculous. Our story was, was Jimmy Savile a paedophile? | :07:40. | :07:45. | |
Female trail that Panorama has got demonstrates that in spades. -- the | :07:45. | :07:50. | |
Demel trail. It also demonstrates that Peter Ripon on 25th November | :07:50. | :07:54. | |
said fantastic, full speed ahead, and a few days later says stop, we | :07:54. | :07:58. | |
must concentrate on the CPS decision. It looks like a handbrake | :07:58. | :08:04. | |
turn. What that represents is another question. Is that the | :08:04. | :08:10. | |
problem at the moment? Fears an awful lot of speculation. Peter | :08:10. | :08:14. | |
Ripon has made his dishes and to set aside, but we haven't had any | :08:14. | :08:18. | |
results of the review, we haven't heard from George Entwhistle. | :08:18. | :08:22. | |
Shouldn't we just break and wait until we know for sure what went | :08:22. | :08:28. | |
on? Yes and no. There are two questions. One is what actually | :08:28. | :08:32. | |
happened, and we will have to wait for the review to find that out. | :08:32. | :08:36. | |
The other is what the BBC has said. What is so common, the BBC have | :08:37. | :08:41. | |
made a rod for their own backs by issuing statements which are | :08:41. | :08:45. | |
partial or borderline misleading and they have taken their lead from | :08:45. | :08:51. | |
Peter Ripon's blog. It is important for the BBC to establish | :08:51. | :08:56. | |
credibility. The first thing George Entwistle will have to convince the | :08:56. | :09:01. | |
MPs of is that he has some grip of the situation. At the moment it | :09:01. | :09:09. | |
looks mildly chaotic. If thank you. With us now is the chair of the | :09:09. | :09:11. | |
Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, John Whitingdale, the | :09:11. | :09:14. | |
former Culture Secretary, Ben Bradshaw, who also used to work for | :09:14. | :09:17. | |
the BBC, and the former editor of the Today programme, Kevin Marsh. | :09:17. | :09:20. | |
John Whittingdale, is that what you go to ask him, has he got a grip? | :09:20. | :09:25. | |
That is certainly one of the questions. Steve is right, the | :09:25. | :09:29. | |
handling of this by the BBC has been lamentable. They've made a bad | :09:29. | :09:33. | |
situation even worse and the Director General is responsible. We | :09:33. | :09:39. | |
would want to press him on that. What about his role? What are you | :09:39. | :09:43. | |
going to press him on in terms of what he knew ahead of the tributes | :09:43. | :09:48. | |
being played in his former role at this news that investigation? | :09:48. | :09:51. | |
of the things that Panorama has uncovered is a conversation took | :09:51. | :09:55. | |
place between Helen Boaden and George Entwistle where Helen said | :09:55. | :09:58. | |
hold on a minute with regard to these tributes, you might need to | :09:58. | :10:02. | |
re schedule because Newsnight uttering an investigation. This was | :10:02. | :10:07. | |
a conversation that lasted less than 10 seconds. It seems | :10:07. | :10:09. | |
extraordinary that given George Entwhistle was told that, he didn't | :10:09. | :10:14. | |
want to know more. Do you not think George Entwistle will not be able | :10:14. | :10:17. | |
to be as frank as he might have been because of the review that is | :10:17. | :10:22. | |
now being carried out by Nick Pollard? I don't know that that | :10:22. | :10:25. | |
review is looking into that question. It is looking into why | :10:25. | :10:29. | |
Newsnight was dropped. I'm not aware that it is looking at whether | :10:29. | :10:32. | |
or not George Entwistle knew about it, whether Mark Thompson knew | :10:32. | :10:37. | |
about it, Helen Boaden. Bradshaw, let's pick up on the | :10:37. | :10:41. | |
conversation, do you think there was adequate due diligence, that | :10:41. | :10:45. | |
briefest of conversations between Helen Boaden and George Entwistle? | :10:45. | :10:49. | |
We don't know, but to be fair to George Entwhistle, when he says he | :10:49. | :10:53. | |
wanted to maintain a Berlin Wall between his responsibilities and | :10:53. | :10:58. | |
the news but if the BBC, that is credible. What is incredible is why | :10:58. | :11:02. | |
it has taken three weeks for the BBC to realise that Peter Ripon's | :11:02. | :11:05. | |
account of the dropping of the Newsnight programme was inaccurate | :11:05. | :11:10. | |
and incomplete. That astonishes me. Why was nobody talking to the | :11:10. | :11:16. | |
journalists? Why was nobody asking the reporter and the investigative | :11:16. | :11:22. | |
producer for their side of the story? George Entwhistle and at BBC | :11:22. | :11:26. | |
have repeated his position which we now know to have been wrong. | :11:26. | :11:31. | |
did it take so long? Do you agree that it took too long? I don't know | :11:31. | :11:35. | |
what conversations went on about this investigation. Presumably the | :11:35. | :11:42. | |
Pollard inquiry will find that out. I do believe that Peter Ripon gave | :11:42. | :11:47. | |
an account that he thought was truthful of the reason for him | :11:47. | :11:52. | |
dropping... We now know that some of that data was inaccurate. | :11:52. | :11:56. | |
have to be very careful. E-mails can be taken out of context. Once | :11:57. | :12:01. | |
you take them out of context and apply hindsight, they can mean | :12:01. | :12:05. | |
something different. I don't know how much of this Peter Ripon was | :12:05. | :12:08. | |
aware of at the time. I don't know how much his investigative team | :12:08. | :12:15. | |
were telling him. We have to wait for the inquiry to look at not only | :12:15. | :12:18. | |
the case for the prosecution, which is what we will see on Panorama, | :12:18. | :12:24. | |
but also the case for the defence. With all respect to the BBC | :12:24. | :12:31. | |
management, they've made their position clear. They seem to be | :12:31. | :12:34. | |
either wrong in some cases or misleading because of what we are | :12:34. | :12:37. | |
now hearing from journalists on the programme. I don't think anything | :12:37. | :12:41. | |
was done in bad faith. I think people thought this was the account | :12:41. | :12:47. | |
of the investigation, they believed in it. The Director General turns | :12:47. | :12:52. | |
to the head of news and ask what happened. It is inevitable that the | :12:52. | :12:56. | |
account will be consistent. Now that these details have come out, | :12:56. | :13:00. | |
those details have to change. Peter Ripon right to step aside? | :13:00. | :13:05. | |
the light of this, of course he was. We have to wait for the inquiry, to | :13:05. | :13:10. | |
look at both sides of this question. Did he make the wrong editorial | :13:10. | :13:14. | |
decision in terms of dropping that investigation? I don't know the | :13:14. | :13:18. | |
detail, but no editor of news eyedrops an investigation unless | :13:18. | :13:23. | |
they has -- have severe doubts about the evidence. You shouldn't | :13:23. | :13:29. | |
go ahead with an investigation, particularly one making serious | :13:29. | :13:34. | |
allegations, unless you have a watertight case, would you agree? | :13:34. | :13:39. | |
But if you have an investigation by two very experienced and reputable | :13:39. | :13:43. | |
journalists, who now claim it was almost ready for transmission, | :13:43. | :13:47. | |
about a former BBC personality against whom the most grave | :13:47. | :13:51. | |
accusations are being made, any editor worth his salt goes the | :13:51. | :13:54. | |
extra mile to make sure that programme gets on air and if they | :13:54. | :13:58. | |
can't in the current form, they say get more evidence. You would | :13:58. | :14:03. | |
support that, Kevin Marsh? If you had even has into -- scintilla of | :14:03. | :14:07. | |
an allegation or claim, in this sort of investigation, you don't | :14:07. | :14:12. | |
say you've hit a brick wall, you carry on. A you want your team to | :14:12. | :14:17. | |
go back and look at new evidence. What appears to have happened was | :14:17. | :14:21. | |
that when Peter Ripon said I'm interested in this CPS line that | :14:21. | :14:26. | |
the investigation was dropped, can we stand this up? The team came | :14:26. | :14:33. | |
back and said no. That was when his enthusiasm faded. But the CPS are | :14:33. | :14:36. | |
never going to say publicly that the reason they didn't prosecute is | :14:36. | :14:41. | |
because somebody is too old. That was just an excuse according to the | :14:41. | :14:45. | |
reporter. They felt they were being set a bar that was impossible to | :14:45. | :14:50. | |
jump over. One of the supporting victims, who was very brave to go | :14:50. | :14:54. | |
on air at all, said she had a letter from Surrey police, the team | :14:54. | :14:58. | |
asked her for this letter, the letter wasn't produced. In any | :14:58. | :15:05. | |
editor's mind, that will ring alarm bells. The why was the | :15:05. | :15:09. | |
investigation killed? There was a wealth of evidence and even more is | :15:09. | :15:13. | |
emerging. Because the investigation was dropped without the team being | :15:13. | :15:17. | |
told to dig further and uncover more, that leaves the suspicion | :15:17. | :15:21. | |
that there must have been another reason. I hope that is not the case, | :15:21. | :15:26. | |
I'm prepared to Accept Peter Rippon was not lend on, but because the | :15:26. | :15:31. | |
explanation looks so thin... Panorama can uncover no evidence of | :15:31. | :15:36. | |
that. There's another complication. Newsnight comes off there for | :15:36. | :15:38. | |
Christmas and therefore the investigation would have had to be | :15:38. | :15:42. | |
picked up after Christmas. There's another aspect. I was very often | :15:42. | :15:47. | |
running an investigative team and I would say I don't think this stacks | :15:47. | :15:51. | |
up, and they would offer the material they had to another | :15:51. | :15:55. | |
programme. If this investigative team was so convinced about the | :15:55. | :15:59. | |
material, and Peter was so convinced he could not run it, I am | :15:59. | :16:02. | |
puzzled as to why that material wasn't passed somewhere else. | :16:02. | :16:12. | |
:16:12. | :16:16. | ||
$:STARTFEED. You but the team, the reporter Liz McKean said about what | :16:16. | :16:20. | |
she thought was going on that Peter Rippon said, "If the bosses aren't | :16:20. | :16:24. | |
happy, he can't go to the wall on this one." That's her saying what | :16:24. | :16:30. | |
she she thought. That's not what Peter Rippon said. The allegation | :16:30. | :16:35. | |
is that somehow there might have been pressure put on or it might | :16:35. | :16:37. | |
not have fitted with what the BBC wanted to do. | :16:37. | :16:41. | |
If the allegation is that Peter Rippon was overr over cautious, he | :16:41. | :16:46. | |
would plead guilty. BBC editors are cautious. They demand a high | :16:46. | :16:55. | |
standard of proof. Think we can we can overinterpret this, you take a | :16:55. | :16:59. | |
conversation out of context and you can make it mean something | :16:59. | :17:05. | |
different. Are you can have Are you confident | :17:05. | :17:09. | |
that Peter Rippon wasn't lent on? Every BBC editor I know. If one | :17:09. | :17:17. | |
said, "You can't run this because it would embarrass us it." They | :17:17. | :17:22. | |
would get it on tomorrow. I have worked for some editors who | :17:22. | :17:27. | |
don't need to be lent on because they think they know what the boss | :17:27. | :17:32. | |
class what. It is a plausible explanation and a catastrophic | :17:32. | :17:37. | |
misjudgement. John Simpson, one of the BBC's | :17:37. | :17:44. | |
correspondents says it is the BBC's biggest crisis in 50 years. Is that | :17:44. | :17:54. | |
:17:54. | :17:56. | ||
an exaggeration? There was one crisis that led to the resignation | :17:56. | :18:02. | |
of the Director General and the chairman. | :18:02. | :18:06. | |
This is feeding those people who want to make that claim. That's why | :18:06. | :18:11. | |
it is important that we deal with this quickly and establish that | :18:11. | :18:17. | |
there was no improper interference. There is an issue in terms of trust | :18:17. | :18:21. | |
and integrity. The essence of being an editor and running an | :18:21. | :18:25. | |
organisation like this is we have to have people's trust? As a BBC | :18:25. | :18:30. | |
editor, it is there over your shoulder all the time. You know you | :18:30. | :18:37. | |
are carrying a heavy burden. I agree with John Whittingdale, it is | :18:37. | :18:40. | |
about child abuse and about celebrity and about the BBC and | :18:40. | :18:45. | |
about institutions, this has the potential to be even more damaging | :18:45. | :18:48. | |
certainly than Hutton which was about politics. This touches on | :18:48. | :18:53. | |
what people care about. Justine, do you care about it? | :18:53. | :18:59. | |
and it is good that we are having wit I think deal's inquiry and -- | :18:59. | :19:03. | |
Whittingdale's inquiry. This come as a result of Panorama and | :19:03. | :19:06. | |
Panorama being a BBC organisation and the journalists within it | :19:06. | :19:12. | |
speaking up and speaking out clearly. So, you know, it is not | :19:12. | :19:16. | |
all bad, but we need answers and we need to regain the trust. | :19:16. | :19:22. | |
The handling may not have been up to the mark, but can the BBC regain | :19:22. | :19:26. | |
it's... The fact that they have admitted after three weeks the | :19:26. | :19:29. | |
original statement was wrong and they have suspended Peter Rippon is | :19:29. | :19:33. | |
a start. They need to act quickly and clearly. Get to the facts. Get | :19:33. | :19:38. | |
them out there and apologise for the original decision. This doesn't | :19:38. | :19:42. | |
need to be another Hutton. But they need to act quickly and decisively | :19:42. | :19:46. | |
to make sure it is not. Are you going to get, do you think, | :19:46. | :19:49. | |
clear answers tomorrow that could in a way sort out what has | :19:49. | :19:55. | |
happened? No, we won't because George will say, "Look, I have | :19:55. | :19:58. | |
established an independent inquiry.". You said that you are | :19:58. | :20:03. | |
you are asking about two different things? There are other areas where | :20:03. | :20:06. | |
George does need to provide reassurance. We will be pressing | :20:06. | :20:11. | |
him on those matters and when we see the result of the Pollard | :20:11. | :20:14. | |
Inquiry, if we remain of the view there are questions to answer, we | :20:14. | :20:17. | |
will have back the Director-General and possibly others as well. | :20:17. | :20:21. | |
Ben, do you think George Entwistle should be worried about his | :20:21. | :20:24. | |
position? I don't know because we don't know the facts. What I do | :20:24. | :20:29. | |
know of colleagues and friends at the BBC is that he is a very | :20:29. | :20:34. | |
descent man. He was a brilliant editor at Newsnight in Newsnight's | :20:34. | :20:38. | |
heyday and I thought he was an excellent appointment for Director- | :20:38. | :20:44. | |
General, but he needs to acquickly and -- act quickly and decisively | :20:45. | :20:50. | |
over this. Should 16 and 17-year-olds vote? A | :20:50. | :20:53. | |
cross-bench of peers think that is the Government should be looking at | :20:53. | :20:59. | |
the matter and are introducing a Private Members' Bill today. Lord | :20:59. | :21:04. | |
Adonis joins us now. Why should they be given the vote? As you know, | :21:04. | :21:08. | |
the Scots have decided that 16 and 17-year-olds will have a vote in | :21:08. | :21:13. | |
the referendum that will take place on Scottish independence in two | :21:13. | :21:16. | |
years time. If it is good enough for 16 and 17-year-olds in Scotland | :21:16. | :21:21. | |
to have a vote on the future of their nation, then there is every | :21:21. | :21:24. | |
reason why they should have the vote in local and Parliamentary | :21:24. | :21:29. | |
elections too. This is starting to become internationally normal. | :21:29. | :21:33. | |
Brazil, Austria, within Great Britain, the Isle of Man as well as | :21:33. | :21:36. | |
Scotland give the vote to 16 and 17-year-olds. 16 and 17-year-olds | :21:36. | :21:40. | |
play a a responsible part in our society. It is right they should | :21:40. | :21:43. | |
play a part in determining who governs them. | :21:43. | :21:47. | |
Have you always thought this? I don't know. Is this something you | :21:47. | :21:51. | |
have come to recently or the decision in Scotland made you think | :21:51. | :21:56. | |
this is the way to go or are you a new convert? I supported votes for | :21:56. | :21:59. | |
16 and 17-year-old for a long time. Indeed, the book I published this | :21:59. | :22:02. | |
year, I proposed it. I didn't see that. | :22:02. | :22:06. | |
There is no reason why you should have read T but the fact that the | :22:06. | :22:11. | |
Scots are going to do this in two years time, gives it added urgency | :22:11. | :22:14. | |
and there will be a sense of grievance on the part of 16 and 17- | :22:14. | :22:17. | |
year-olds elsewhere in the country that Scots are allowed to vote and | :22:17. | :22:23. | |
they're not. Can I make porn another important? -- important | :22:23. | :22:27. | |
point? Too few of them vote and take an interest in politics. My | :22:27. | :22:32. | |
view is the way that you get them engaged in politics is to give them | :22:32. | :22:38. | |
real political responsibility while at school and college. We have | :22:38. | :22:42. | |
citizenship education in our schools, but it is not regarded as | :22:42. | :22:48. | |
real. The politicians don't take it seriously and they don't visit the | :22:48. | :22:51. | |
sixth-formers because they don't have votes. If you gave the six | :22:51. | :22:56. | |
formers a vote and had a polling station in every school and every | :22:56. | :22:59. | |
further education college, this would really make politics a | :22:59. | :23:04. | |
serious business. You said engaging... That and that | :23:04. | :23:09. | |
would help engage them more. Don't the polls indicate that 18 to 24- | :23:09. | :23:13. | |
year-olds who have the vote don't exercise it in vast numbers anyway? | :23:13. | :23:18. | |
Well, nearly half of them vote. We have a a problem about people | :23:18. | :23:24. | |
voting at large. The answer is to embed citizenship education at the | :23:24. | :23:29. | |
core of what pupils do so mock elections which have been a | :23:29. | :23:32. | |
practise in our schools lead to real election for the sixth-formers | :23:32. | :23:37. | |
and those at college. If that were the case, citizenship education | :23:37. | :23:40. | |
would be treated with more seriousness than at the moment and | :23:40. | :23:43. | |
the politicians would take it seriously by visiting schools and | :23:43. | :23:48. | |
and engaging with the young people because they would have votes. | :23:48. | :23:54. | |
We will be calling you up to visit schools. I am happy to that. | :23:54. | :23:59. | |
Do you think that 16 is too young? They have made this exception for | :23:59. | :24:03. | |
the Scottish referendum. It maybe difficult to try and withdraw it | :24:03. | :24:07. | |
from other elections, but are 16- year-olds ready to exercise that | :24:07. | :24:11. | |
big responsibility? Well, I think rationally it is hard to argue | :24:11. | :24:15. | |
against 16-year-olds getting the vote. There is a lot of users on | :24:15. | :24:18. | |
our website say they can get married and have children and have | :24:18. | :24:24. | |
a flat. Not letting them vote seems odd. My concern is I can see a | :24:24. | :24:30. | |
stage where there are 16-year-old policy designed to get the 16-year- | :24:30. | :24:35. | |
old vote and we will have easier exams and cheap video games and all | :24:35. | :24:42. | |
the rest of it! That would be awful to have attention focused on things | :24:42. | :24:46. | |
which are narrowly defined for a small group of people, but I can | :24:46. | :24:54. | |
see it coming, but actually my head says and the users on on mumsnet | :24:54. | :24:57. | |
says it is madness because we give them responsibility in other areas | :24:57. | :25:00. | |
and by 16 and 17 you have grown up now. | :25:00. | :25:03. | |
Thank you very much. Should men and women share the | :25:04. | :25:08. | |
leave that they take off work after the birth of their baby? The | :25:08. | :25:11. | |
Government has consulted on the idea of sharing parental leave, but | :25:11. | :25:14. | |
it is yet to outline its plans, but some businesses are concerned that | :25:14. | :25:24. | |
:25:24. | :25:28. | ||
such a move could lead to more red Play time at Mandy's house. She is | :25:28. | :25:35. | |
a mum of four who works part-time for a website that offers women at | :25:35. | :25:41. | |
women advice. She is in favour of more flexible rules that could see | :25:41. | :25:46. | |
dads taking more time off. In my last pregnancy, it would have been | :25:46. | :25:51. | |
brilliant because I didn't get much paternity pay because I was only | :25:51. | :25:56. | |
doing a part-time job and I am the main breadwinner in the family so I | :25:56. | :25:59. | |
had to take that time off and when I could have could have been | :25:59. | :26:04. | |
earning. If my partner had taken the time off, I could have earned, | :26:04. | :26:10. | |
I could have kept my wages coming Women get 39 weeks of paid | :26:10. | :26:16. | |
maternity leave and men get two weeks paid leave. The coalition | :26:16. | :26:21. | |
Government is committed to a form of leave where men and women could | :26:21. | :26:25. | |
share the leave. That was one of the pledges made in the the | :26:25. | :26:28. | |
coalition agreement and the Government carried out a | :26:28. | :26:33. | |
consultation that outlined plans to give women 18 weeks paid leave. It | :26:33. | :26:38. | |
suggested that both parents should share a further 30 weeks of leave, | :26:38. | :26:42. | |
17 of which would be paid. It said that each parent should be entitled | :26:42. | :26:46. | |
to four weeks of parental leave and pay in the first year of their | :26:46. | :26:49. | |
child's life. The Government is expected to set out its plans for | :26:49. | :26:56. | |
parental leave soon and the left leaning think-tank IPRR says they | :26:56. | :27:01. | |
are moving in the right direction. It is the right way to be going. | :27:01. | :27:10. | |
Our Research has shown a parental leave agenda doesn't need to cost | :27:10. | :27:14. | |
more. They could allow better choices for mums and dads in the | :27:14. | :27:16. | |
way they want to bring up their children. | :27:16. | :27:21. | |
What about the impact on small businesses? This accountancy firm | :27:21. | :27:26. | |
employs eight people. One of whom is soon to go on maternity leave. | :27:26. | :27:29. | |
The boss says you can plan for that, but the prospect of parents taking | :27:29. | :27:32. | |
their parental leave in chunks would be a problem. | :27:32. | :27:38. | |
As a services business each person is critical to the business. So we | :27:38. | :27:42. | |
are planning well in advance for the next person about to go for | :27:42. | :27:47. | |
maternity leave and that's fine if we know they are going to be going | :27:47. | :27:50. | |
approximately eight or nine months. If they were going three months off, | :27:50. | :27:58. | |
three months on, it does get more complicated to work out the komp. | :27:58. | :28:01. | |
-- cover. Could the plans be business | :28:01. | :28:06. | |
friendly and family-friendly at the same time? | :28:06. | :28:11. | |
Can we really afford the changes? All the evidence shows actually | :28:12. | :28:15. | |
that offering flexibility to your workforce increases productivity. | :28:15. | :28:20. | |
It increases retention rates. It increases employee well wellbeing. | :28:20. | :28:26. | |
I think certainly you know, we shouldn't just dismiss it as a cost | :28:26. | :28:29. | |
to business. I think flexible working is something that business | :28:29. | :28:35. | |
needs to embrace. I take the point from your film that for a small | :28:35. | :28:37. | |
business there maybe an issue around exceptions because it is | :28:37. | :28:44. | |
hard. Mumsnet is a small business and we employ a lot of women of | :28:44. | :28:48. | |
child bearing age. It is a test for business and I think there is | :28:48. | :28:52. | |
something around you know planning, and small businesses finding that | :28:52. | :28:55. | |
hard, but big business should embrace it. | :28:55. | :29:00. | |
And big business by and large does or certainly has made steps to do | :29:00. | :29:04. | |
so, hasn't it? We have been working closely with a lot of big business. | :29:04. | :29:10. | |
We have a family-friendly programme and they have been doing some | :29:10. | :29:14. | |
innovative things. O2 have a working interest rate which they | :29:14. | :29:17. | |
share between parents that are allowed to share the hours between | :29:17. | :29:22. | |
them. They have one contract. Brilliant idea. But they are doing | :29:22. | :29:26. | |
it for a reason. It works. But if it works in the way that you | :29:26. | :29:29. | |
have said that it increases productivity and helps a business, | :29:29. | :29:32. | |
why has the Institute of Directors called for the reforms to be | :29:32. | :29:35. | |
stopped and the scrapping of flexible working? | :29:35. | :29:39. | |
It is a really good question. I wish they were here to answer it. | :29:39. | :29:44. | |
wish they were too. Look, it suits some industries better than others. | :29:44. | :29:49. | |
But with modern technology and with the fact that our users tell us | :29:49. | :29:53. | |
that three-quarters of them say they are less likely to be employed | :29:53. | :29:57. | |
after they have children, more than that say they won't get promoted, | :29:57. | :30:01. | |
you wonder where there are fewer women in the workforce and there is | :30:02. | :30:07. | |
a glass ceiling. Diversity is not great. Not having diversity in the | :30:07. | :30:11. | |
workplace is a bad thing. I think, you know, people need to get a bit | :30:11. | :30:13. | |
more modern. The Institute of Directors need to look at the | :30:14. | :30:18. | |
bigger picture. Sometimes you just measure the cost of things as | :30:18. | :30:24. | |
opposed to the long-term effect. How much of the statutory pa | :30:24. | :30:25. | |
paternity leave do you think fathers should be permitted to | :30:26. | :30:35. | |
:30:36. | :30:37. | ||
$:/STARTFEED. On the one hand we are telling women they need to | :30:37. | :30:40. | |
breast field for longer and longer, and on the other we are saying go | :30:40. | :30:46. | |
back to work. The truth is, what is good about this policy, it allows | :30:47. | :30:52. | |
each individual some flexibility. It will take a while before women | :30:52. | :30:57. | |
and men of on an equal footing, but at the moment you have total gender | :30:57. | :31:02. | |
discrimination. Employers are reluctant to employ women have a | :31:02. | :31:08. | |
certain age because they think they will go and have babies. We talk a | :31:08. | :31:13. | |
look at about family friendly policies, we need employer friendly | :31:13. | :31:17. | |
policies and flexibility is the key one. The more you open it to all | :31:17. | :31:23. | |
employees, the less discrimination you get. My argument, and the | :31:23. | :31:27. | |
argument of hours, is in the long run it is to is good for business. | :31:27. | :31:31. | |
Thank you. Will this week in politics be as | :31:31. | :31:34. | |
eventful as the last? Let's take a look at the week ahead. Today, MPs | :31:34. | :31:38. | |
debate the Hilsborough disaster. Labour is set to call for powers to | :31:38. | :31:41. | |
force police officers to give evidence to an inquiry into the | :31:41. | :31:43. | |
alleged police cover-up Tuesday promises to be an uncomfortable day | :31:43. | :31:47. | |
for the BBC's Director General, George Entwistle. He's before the | :31:47. | :31:49. | |
Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee over the Jimmy Savile | :31:49. | :31:53. | |
affair. Wednesday promises to be something of a blast from the past, | :31:53. | :31:55. | |
as the granddaughter of famous suffragist Sylvia Pankhurst leads a | :31:55. | :32:01. | |
march on Parliament calling for political action on gender equality. | :32:01. | :32:04. | |
While for Chancellor George Osborne, Thursday can't come soon enough. | :32:04. | :32:07. | |
The latest GDP figures are due to be published, which most economists | :32:07. | :32:10. | |
and commentators expect to reveal that the economy returned to growth | :32:10. | :32:16. | |
in the third quarter. Let's talk now to Rosa Prince, who writes for | :32:16. | :32:24. | |
the Telegraph, and Rafael Behr from the New Statesman. We've had the | :32:24. | :32:28. | |
news for the editor of Newsnight, Peter Rippon, will step aside while | :32:28. | :32:33. | |
the review is carried out. Where do you think this leaves the BBC? | :32:33. | :32:38. | |
all sorts of trouble. It has been a terrible day for the BBC and | :32:38. | :32:42. | |
tomorrow will be worse when George Entwistle comes to Parliament and | :32:42. | :32:46. | |
gets one of those ferocious mornings MPs like to dish out a | :32:46. | :32:51. | |
public figures. A lot of MPs on the conservative side are not keen on | :32:51. | :32:56. | |
the BBC and they will relish this opportunity. It seems strange that | :32:56. | :33:03. | |
tonight we will have Panorama on at the same time as Newsnight itself. | :33:03. | :33:08. | |
It is crisis mode and MPs will enjoy themselves. Do you think it | :33:08. | :33:13. | |
is a crisis, would you agree? crisis for the BBC, a definite | :33:14. | :33:18. | |
crisis for Newsnight. Some hysterical things have been said. | :33:18. | :33:23. | |
If you compare this situation to the situation immediately after the | :33:23. | :33:27. | |
heart an inquiry where senior executives at the BBC were at war | :33:27. | :33:32. | |
with the Government... We need to get to the bottom of precisely why | :33:32. | :33:35. | |
Newsnight pulled this investigation into Jimmy Savile. The charge at | :33:35. | :33:39. | |
the root of this, as I understand it, is that someone somewhere in | :33:39. | :33:43. | |
the BBC decided that the BBC reputation was more important than | :33:43. | :33:49. | |
getting to the bottom of whether a big TV personality abused children | :33:49. | :33:54. | |
over a long period of time. That is a very serious allegation. If you | :33:54. | :33:59. | |
can clear that up, everybody can move on. As long as that is not | :33:59. | :34:04. | |
clear, the crisis will keep going. Her let's talk about GDP. It is | :34:04. | :34:08. | |
being labelled as turn around Thursday and George Osborne needs | :34:08. | :34:12. | |
it to be Thursday -- 10 around Thursday. This was the missing | :34:12. | :34:16. | |
piece of the jigsaw for George Osborne. Ever since the coalition | :34:16. | :34:20. | |
came to power, we've heard ministers putting their trust in | :34:21. | :34:26. | |
the economy. The austerity drive, of the cuts programme, the basis of | :34:26. | :34:30. | |
the plan for winning another term in office is that they are the | :34:30. | :34:34. | |
people that will put Britain back on track by cutting the deficit. | :34:34. | :34:38. | |
You need growth to do that and that has been stubbornly hard to find. | :34:39. | :34:43. | |
If George Osborne gets his Gabby Day on Thursday and the figures are | :34:43. | :34:47. | |
good, fat helps to solve that problem. The trouble vent his you | :34:47. | :34:51. | |
begin to test that premise on whether it is the economy stupid | :34:51. | :34:55. | |
and whether that is the only thing that counts. There's a lot going on | :34:55. | :35:00. | |
for the Government that people are finding uncomfortable. For the on | :35:00. | :35:06. | |
the shambles reputation, and Jim Mitchell resigning, David Cameron's | :35:06. | :35:11. | |
announcement on energy that was quickly denied. Is the public are | :35:11. | :35:14. | |
only interested in the economy and growth? That will be the question | :35:14. | :35:20. | |
going forward. Is it the economy stupid? Will there but all of those | :35:20. | :35:25. | |
other issues outlined by Rosa to one side and they will be able to | :35:25. | :35:29. | |
say, we've got inflation coming down, unemployment is coming down, | :35:29. | :35:33. | |
and we finally got great? economy is the biggest issue and it | :35:33. | :35:38. | |
is the thing that will decide the next election. We can get hung up | :35:38. | :35:43. | |
on the headline GDP figure. On Thursday we will have a number. If | :35:43. | :35:47. | |
it is slightly higher than forecasted, the Conservatives can | :35:47. | :35:54. | |
say behold, it is working. Stick with us, don't go back to Labour. | :35:54. | :35:58. | |
If it is disappointing, Labour can turn around and say we told you so, | :35:58. | :36:07. | |
the economy was growing, the coalition has made it worse. The | :36:07. | :36:11. | |
parties can hang whatever messages they had before on to this figure. | :36:11. | :36:16. | |
Parts of the country have been in recession since before 2008 and | :36:16. | :36:19. | |
parts of the country that never felt the recession that much and | :36:19. | :36:28. | |
are probably growing OK. Fiddling around politically in the margins | :36:28. | :36:31. | |
is great knockabout Westminster politics, it will not tell us that | :36:31. | :36:35. | |
much about the economy. What will it do about allegations and | :36:35. | :36:40. | |
criticisms from within the Tories about incompetence and | :36:40. | :36:44. | |
mismanagement at Number Ten? It is slightly more than fiddling around. | :36:44. | :36:49. | |
I get the message, a percentage point here and there doesn't make | :36:49. | :36:53. | |
much of a difference to people and how they feel about their own | :36:53. | :36:57. | |
circumstances, but if George Osborne can keep saying we have | :36:57. | :37:01. | |
sorted out the economy, there is growth, and David Cameron can say | :37:01. | :37:08. | |
that at PMQ is, that goes a long way. Is it entirely the answer? No. | :37:08. | :37:11. | |
Last week David Cameron tried that during clashes with Ed Miliband | :37:11. | :37:16. | |
about Andrew Mitchell. He kept saying, aren't you going to ask me | :37:16. | :37:19. | |
some serious questions, it didn't really work because Andrew Mitchell | :37:19. | :37:24. | |
still had to resign. It is important, but will it be the | :37:24. | :37:29. | |
panacea for all ills? I'm not sure. What about seizing the initiative | :37:29. | :37:35. | |
with the crime and justice speech today? Will that help regain power | :37:35. | :37:39. | |
for David Cameron? He is sounding tough on crime and that is a | :37:39. | :37:44. | |
popular message. The place for the Tories have gone into now, which is | :37:45. | :37:49. | |
a big problem in the wake of the Mitchell resignation, is whatever | :37:49. | :37:54. | |
they now say, it is seen as an attempt to regain the initiative, | :37:54. | :37:57. | |
to relaunch the Government's programme, and people are less | :37:57. | :38:01. | |
interested in the message than the ralph -- wider brand apparatus over | :38:01. | :38:05. | |
what is going wrong end the Government. People will look at the | :38:05. | :38:11. | |
Prime Minister saying I want to be tough on crime and say, of course | :38:11. | :38:15. | |
politicians would say that, but what is really going on? You get | :38:15. | :38:18. | |
into this position where it becomes difficult for Number Ten to get | :38:18. | :38:22. | |
through with the message they want because everybody else has decided | :38:22. | :38:25. | |
the political narrative is something else. You are very | :38:26. | :38:29. | |
difficult to please! Thank you. And joining us now for the rest of | :38:29. | :38:32. | |
the programme, three MPs. From Labour, Tom Greatrex. From the | :38:32. | :38:34. | |
Conservative Party, Jane Ellison. And from the Liberal Democrats, | :38:34. | :38:42. | |
Simon Wright. Welcome. Let's pick up on growth. Simon, do you agree | :38:42. | :38:46. | |
that the future of the Government hangs on these GDP figures? | :38:46. | :38:51. | |
hoping for a positive story. course! You can take nothing for | :38:51. | :38:55. | |
granted. The last quarter's figures were disappointing, but politically | :38:55. | :39:01. | |
it is important. In his it critical? -- a visit critical? | :39:02. | :39:06. | |
need to show that the plant is going to deliver the growth we all | :39:06. | :39:10. | |
want. We've had some positive figures in the last week's on | :39:10. | :39:14. | |
things like unemployment. Record figures over unemployment. | :39:14. | :39:20. | |
Inflation down. Inflation is now half what it was a year ago. I hope | :39:20. | :39:23. | |
that following falls in unemployment and inflation, we were | :39:23. | :39:27. | |
now see an increase in growth. must be praying for no growth. | :39:27. | :39:33. | |
we want to see the economy growing. It is having a detrimental effect | :39:33. | :39:39. | |
on people. The issue with this quarter, 18 months' worth of TV | :39:39. | :39:42. | |
rights, ticket sales for the Olympics, captured in that one | :39:42. | :39:47. | |
quarter. It is about the sustained picture in terms of growth. Simon | :39:47. | :39:51. | |
is right to talk about further quarters. One quarter of growth is | :39:51. | :39:55. | |
a blip and will not be good for the economy. If the economy starts | :39:55. | :39:59. | |
growing again, what happens to Labour's argument about austerity | :40:00. | :40:03. | |
measures having killed of growth? It will be shot to pieces. Her they | :40:03. | :40:07. | |
have killed off growth. What does Labour say on Thursday if there's | :40:08. | :40:15. | |
growth? Even if it is 1%, we're only going back to where we were a | :40:15. | :40:21. | |
year ago. We've still got, despite the welcome changes, a record high | :40:21. | :40:24. | |
long-term unemployment, a lot of people in my constituency have not | :40:24. | :40:29. | |
been able to get a job. Some deep- seated economic problems. Lots of | :40:29. | :40:33. | |
those are the fault of the Government. Even if you get 1% | :40:33. | :40:37. | |
growth on Thursday, it is worth than the position they inherited. | :40:37. | :40:43. | |
We used will be calling for money to be spent to boost the economy? | :40:43. | :40:48. | |
It is important that we try to build growth, not just relying on | :40:48. | :40:52. | |
one quarter. That means particularly around some of the | :40:52. | :40:55. | |
investment in infrastructure that needs to happen. Not a lot is | :40:55. | :41:00. | |
happening. After the Andrew Mitchell affair, the energy policy, | :41:00. | :41:03. | |
no economic growth would fuel those critics within the Tory party who | :41:03. | :41:07. | |
are questioning whether Cameron and Osborne are up to the job? We've | :41:07. | :41:14. | |
had a difficult few weeks, but the economy is central. More | :41:14. | :41:18. | |
importantly than that, by the time of the next election, we have to | :41:18. | :41:23. | |
show we have taken Ashes -- taken action on some of the big issues. | :41:23. | :41:27. | |
It is not just about one quarter, it is about whether all of the | :41:27. | :41:31. | |
things we are doing on welfare and apprenticeships, all of those | :41:31. | :41:35. | |
things are feeding in to a more robust economy. Do you think for | :41:35. | :41:39. | |
Number Ten operation is competent at the moment? I can't pass comment, | :41:39. | :41:45. | |
I'm not close enough to the seat of power. You're a Tory MP. The prime | :41:45. | :41:51. | |
minister is competent, that is the key thing. The Prime Minister at | :41:51. | :41:55. | |
the party conference know at the big issues. But not Number Ten? | :41:55. | :41:58. | |
Prime Minister laid out very clearly what we need to do as a | :41:58. | :42:05. | |
country. I am 100% behind him. you agree it is mishandling at the | :42:05. | :42:08. | |
Number Ten operation that is stopping the message getting out? | :42:08. | :42:11. | |
think the people of Britain want to see us dealing with the really big | :42:11. | :42:19. | |
issues. All of our constituents at are experiencing difficulty. I'm | :42:19. | :42:22. | |
not going to get drawn into the whole Westminster village | :42:22. | :42:26. | |
discussion about the operation. There are bigger issues for the | :42:26. | :42:32. | |
electorate. It is not the media, it is Tory party members, whether it | :42:32. | :42:36. | |
be senior figures like Norman Tebbit or backbench MPs. One or two | :42:36. | :42:40. | |
figures have been critical but a lot happened. Can you endorse the | :42:40. | :42:44. | |
Number Ten operation for us? It is running the Prime Minister's office. | :42:44. | :42:49. | |
The only thing that matters in Number Ten is the prime minister. | :42:50. | :42:54. | |
David Cameron's deputy chief of staff said on American chat show | :42:54. | :42:58. | |
programme that he spends most of his day doing crisis management, is | :42:58. | :43:02. | |
that what you expect from the senior management team running the | :43:02. | :43:06. | |
Government? To it is not what anyone would expect and not | :43:06. | :43:10. | |
something I've seen happening. Clearly there might have been some | :43:10. | :43:14. | |
problems. Did they handle the Mitchell affect directly? I think | :43:14. | :43:20. | |
Andrew Mitchell was right to resign. It was very clear that after the | :43:20. | :43:22. | |
few weeks that issue had continued to pick up steam that it wasn't | :43:22. | :43:26. | |
going to go away and there was the right decision for him to take. | :43:26. | :43:32. | |
Moving forward, we have to focus on the economy, on improving the | :43:32. | :43:36. | |
outcomes in the education system, bringing down crime. We've had | :43:36. | :43:40. | |
positive crime figures. There's plenty of big issues that we can | :43:40. | :43:44. | |
get stuck into and we are delivering on. | :43:44. | :43:48. | |
To be or not to be tough on crime, that is the question this morning | :43:48. | :43:52. | |
as the Prime Minister lays out his vision on law and order in a speech | :43:52. | :43:55. | |
this morning. Before the election, David Cameron described himself as | :43:55. | :43:57. | |
a liberal Conservative and was derided for wanting to hug hoodies. | :43:57. | :44:00. | |
And two years ago, Ken Clarke described rising prisoner numbers | :44:00. | :44:05. | |
as pointless and very bad value for taxpayers' money. It was a far cry | :44:05. | :44:08. | |
from a previous Conservative position that prison works. But | :44:08. | :44:11. | |
today, tough is the new liberal, as the Prime Minister announces a | :44:11. | :44:15. | |
"tough but intelligent" approach. He says that the debate between | :44:15. | :44:21. | |
being tough or acting soft is a sterile one. In keeping with recent | :44:21. | :44:23. | |
announcements of more freedom for householder to use violence against | :44:23. | :44:26. | |
burglars and longer sentences for handling firearms, Cameron has put | :44:26. | :44:31. | |
a greater emphasis on retribution and punishment. At the same time, | :44:31. | :44:34. | |
he is still pushing Ken Clarke's idea of a rehabilitation revolution, | :44:34. | :44:40. | |
arguing people need opportunities and chances away from crime. So is | :44:40. | :44:43. | |
this a change of direction and can you focus on retribution and | :44:43. | :44:52. | |
rehabilitation at the same time? David Cameron has just been | :44:53. | :44:55. | |
speaking at the Centre for Social Justice. A for many people, when it | :44:55. | :45:00. | |
comes to crime, I'm the person associated with those three words, | :45:00. | :45:04. | |
two of which begin with H and one of them is hoodie, although I never | :45:04. | :45:09. | |
actually said it and I haven't said it again today. For others I'm a | :45:09. | :45:13. | |
politician who has frequently argued for tough punishment. Do why | :45:13. | :45:17. | |
take a tough line on crime or a touchy-feely one? In no other area | :45:17. | :45:22. | |
of public debate to the issues get as polarised as this. On climate | :45:22. | :45:25. | |
change, you don't have to be incomplete denial on the one hand | :45:26. | :45:29. | |
or complaining to get every car off the road on the other. Life isn't | :45:29. | :45:34. | |
that simple. Government policy isn't that simple either. Key with | :45:34. | :45:38. | |
the crime debate, people seem to want it black or white. Lock them | :45:38. | :45:43. | |
up or let them out, blamed the criminal or blame society, be tough | :45:43. | :45:47. | |
or act soft. We are so busy going backwards and forwards that we | :45:47. | :45:51. | |
never move the debate on. What I've been trying to do in opposition and | :45:51. | :45:55. | |
now in government is to break out of the sterile debate and show a | :45:55. | :46:05. | |
new way forward, tough but Jane, is this the end of a hug a | :46:05. | :46:08. | |
hoody phrase? The Prime Minister said he didn't ever say that. It is | :46:08. | :46:11. | |
an evolution of what we have been saying for seven years from | :46:11. | :46:15. | |
opposition through into Government. It is a sterile debate to say it is | :46:15. | :46:18. | |
one thing or the other. There are clearly, people who need to be put | :46:18. | :46:22. | |
away for a long time to protect society and for all the reasons the | :46:22. | :46:29. | |
Prime Minister spelt out, but to imagine there isn't a role for | :46:29. | :46:33. | |
rehabilitation to think we are putting people in prison at great | :46:33. | :46:37. | |
public expense to make sure when they come out they don't slip back | :46:37. | :46:42. | |
into crime. No one would disagree with that. | :46:42. | :46:45. | |
There maybe questions about whether this is a continuation of an | :46:45. | :46:51. | |
existing policy, either prison works and that's your headline or | :46:51. | :46:55. | |
rehabilitation works? The Prime Minister is saying prison should | :46:55. | :47:00. | |
work better. You do get this kind of polarized view and some people | :47:00. | :47:03. | |
have presented the Prime Minister as not being tough enough on | :47:03. | :47:07. | |
serious criminals... You think he gave that impression of not being | :47:07. | :47:13. | |
tough enough? No, I don't. The debate has got bogged down in that | :47:13. | :47:19. | |
territory and parmance have been part -- Parliamentarians have been | :47:19. | :47:24. | |
part of that. The idea that we can't help with drug use and all | :47:24. | :47:27. | |
those things is crazy. You a I gree with Ken Clarke -- | :47:27. | :47:33. | |
agree with Ken Clarke who said, "Too often prison has proved an | :47:33. | :47:40. | |
ineffective approach that failed to turn prisoners into law abiding | :47:40. | :47:43. | |
citizens." Do you think Ken was right? Yes. | :47:43. | :47:49. | |
You don't want to see rising prison numbers? It is what you do with | :47:49. | :47:53. | |
people when they are inside. If David Cameron is saying there | :47:53. | :47:55. | |
have got to be tougher sentences then there are going to be more | :47:55. | :47:59. | |
people going to jail for a longer time. Are you comfortable with | :47:59. | :48:03. | |
rising prison numbers? If prison numbers rise as a result of putting | :48:03. | :48:06. | |
away serious crim criminals, that's fine. | :48:06. | :48:11. | |
How are you going pay for it?. are trying to stop people coming | :48:11. | :48:16. | |
back and that answers your question about payment. It is about stopping | :48:16. | :48:21. | |
the same people coming back and back and back, that's how you get | :48:21. | :48:25. | |
the cost cost down. If you want to send more people to | :48:25. | :48:28. | |
prison, you will need more prisons? Snooze a Liberal Democrat I support | :48:28. | :48:34. | |
the view that we need a revolution in rehabilitation... Do you support | :48:34. | :48:39. | |
the prison works? Prison can can work which is what David Cameron is | :48:39. | :48:43. | |
saying today. We cannot have the resolving door where offenders | :48:43. | :48:47. | |
leave prison and come back in. Our re-offending rates are unacceptably | :48:47. | :48:51. | |
high in this country. We need to focus on the evidence of what works. | :48:51. | :48:57. | |
This means getting away from the the narrow debate about being tough | :48:58. | :49:07. | |
:49:08. | :49:12. | ||
or soft on crime. Initiatives such as the use of restorive jus justice. | :49:12. | :49:16. | |
Julia Lyons warned that tougher sentencing will cost more in the | :49:16. | :49:19. | |
short-term? Well, the only way crime will cost more in the long- | :49:20. | :49:26. | |
term is if we don't... How do we pay for it in the short-term? | :49:26. | :49:31. | |
thing we can do is focus on payment by results so so those providers | :49:31. | :49:34. | |
have a clear idea of what they need to be achieving in order to get | :49:34. | :49:39. | |
paid. That's how we are going to drive down re-offending rates. | :49:39. | :49:42. | |
It puts Labour in a difficult position, painting you soft on | :49:42. | :49:48. | |
crime? No, I don't think so. Today's speech was, there is | :49:48. | :49:52. | |
nothing new in it actually. It is trying to get a third re-launch in | :49:52. | :49:56. | |
the calendar year for David Cameron, but the concern I have with what | :49:56. | :49:59. | |
Chris Grayling was saying this morning about the rolling out the | :49:59. | :50:02. | |
Peterborough pilot, the payment by results is that we haven't got the | :50:02. | :50:07. | |
results from that pilot yet and Chris Grayling has form on this | :50:07. | :50:15. | |
because he rolled out the the scheme for peopling coming off | :50:15. | :50:19. | |
Incapacity Benefit and that caused chaos so we have to make sure we | :50:19. | :50:24. | |
get the details right. It is untested. The Commons justice | :50:24. | :50:28. | |
Select Committee said payment by results were untested in the field | :50:28. | :50:34. | |
of criminal justice. Pinning your hopes on that is premature? It is | :50:34. | :50:38. | |
clearly a learning development. This is an exciting area of | :50:38. | :50:42. | |
development where the Ministry of Justice has been putting in work | :50:42. | :50:45. | |
and effort. We will make it work. We have to make it work because we | :50:45. | :50:50. | |
have to bring down fending. You have to get the results of the | :50:50. | :50:57. | |
pilot. If it is not working, you will create more problems for the | :50:57. | :51:02. | |
few tufr. -- future. | :51:02. | :51:05. | |
We are not without knowledge. One of the things I hope we have got | :51:05. | :51:10. | |
space for in this initiative is to make sure that smaller, voluntary | :51:11. | :51:15. | |
and innovative groups can find space to and not just the big | :51:15. | :51:20. | |
providers. That would be something I'm looking for as we roll this out. | :51:20. | :51:25. | |
Do you accept in the short-term it is going to push up costs and you | :51:25. | :51:31. | |
will need at least some more prison space to hold these prisoners? | :51:31. | :51:34. | |
don't think we know that either of these things are true. | :51:34. | :51:41. | |
You have You have Juliet Lyons saying that and she is an expert? | :51:41. | :51:44. | |
We don't know what is going to happen to prison numbers or the | :51:44. | :51:50. | |
costs. Payment by results has the potential to deliver diminishing | :51:50. | :51:55. | |
costs. It is an area that's evolving. I don't think you can | :51:55. | :51:58. | |
jump from hearing the speech to saying it is the case that numbers | :51:58. | :52:02. | |
are going to go up. Sentencing is down to judges. | :52:02. | :52:05. | |
Why is the re-launch happening? don't think it is a re-launch... | :52:05. | :52:10. | |
What's new? It is a long planned speech. | :52:10. | :52:19. | |
There is nothing new in it? It has become an overly sterile debate and | :52:19. | :52:23. | |
the pragmatic reality is between the two polarizeted pos -- | :52:23. | :52:26. | |
polarized positions. Do you believe that David Cameron | :52:26. | :52:31. | |
is a liberal Conservative? This is one area in which he is | :52:31. | :52:35. | |
demonstrating he can be a liberal Conservative. Supporting | :52:35. | :52:40. | |
Rehabilitation is key to bringing down crime. I am pleased that he | :52:40. | :52:43. | |
has incorporated that into this speech and he is moving beyond what | :52:43. | :52:46. | |
is an old-fashioned rhetoric of the black and the white that he talked | :52:46. | :52:49. | |
about, that you are soft or tough on crime and moving towards a | :52:49. | :52:53. | |
debate on what works. This Bill is very effectively on the work that | :52:53. | :52:57. | |
Ken Clarke was progressing within the Ministry of Justice. | :52:57. | :53:02. | |
Do you agree with the rhetoric surrounding the bash a burglar? | :53:02. | :53:06. | |
think that that policy was very clearly articulated... And you | :53:06. | :53:10. | |
agree with it? It is right that people should not be punished for | :53:10. | :53:16. | |
something that they are caught in the moment in and the heat of the | :53:16. | :53:20. | |
moment and I think making that clear is vital which is what that | :53:20. | :53:23. | |
discussion was about a few weeks ago. | :53:23. | :53:32. | |
And nothing for you to to disagree on, Tom? It is about trying to send | :53:32. | :53:36. | |
a message of being the tough person that will appeal to the base and | :53:36. | :53:40. | |
keep some of Jane's colleagues on board after what was a traumatic | :53:40. | :53:47. | |
for Jane's colleagues last week. Something Labour did successfully, | :53:47. | :53:52. | |
being tough on crime works for the electorate? The issue around this | :53:52. | :53:57. | |
pilot is that payment by results, if you got to get the detail pilot | :53:57. | :54:01. | |
before you, there is a danger in rolling this out and the big | :54:01. | :54:04. | |
companies cherry-picking the easy bits and you leave the real | :54:04. | :54:09. | |
problems behind. If the pilots come back back, they | :54:09. | :54:15. | |
come back and say this works, will Labour back it? Will you say "this | :54:15. | :54:21. | |
is something we will support." That's yu -- that's why you need to | :54:21. | :54:26. | |
get the results. When it comes back, we will evaluate. If it is working, | :54:26. | :54:30. | |
it is something that should be considered. Its danger of -- the | :54:30. | :54:38. | |
danger of rolling this out, Chris Grayling may rush this out, we have | :54:38. | :54:42. | |
got to be careful we don't have unintend consequences and make a | :54:42. | :54:46. | |
situation worse rather than better. Spare a thought for Ed Miliband who | :54:46. | :54:50. | |
turned up a the anti-aurth march on -- anti-austerity march on Saturday | :54:50. | :54:58. | |
and got booed. Take a look at this. Now, of course, now of course, | :54:58. | :55:02. | |
there will still be hard choices and with borrowing rising, nots | :55:02. | :55:10. | |
falling, I do not - I do not promise easy times. You know, you | :55:10. | :55:14. | |
know it is right, it is right that we level with people. That there | :55:14. | :55:19. | |
would still be hard choices. I have said whoever was in Government now, | :55:19. | :55:26. | |
there would be some cuts, but this Government has shown the cutting | :55:26. | :55:31. | |
too far and too fast, self deceiting austerity is not the the | :55:31. | :55:35. | |
answer. It is not the answer to Britain's problems. | :55:35. | :55:41. | |
Ed Miliband, it sounded like everyone was booing him. It might | :55:41. | :55:50. | |
be a small vocal group which is what the SMP are good at. | :55:50. | :55:56. | |
Jane thinks it is Ed Miliband's spindoctors booing for effect! | :55:56. | :56:01. | |
That's taking the events of last week too far. Isn't there an | :56:01. | :56:06. | |
important point that you can make a a controversial, unpopular speech | :56:06. | :56:11. | |
to a friendly audience and get booed and the wider electorate | :56:11. | :56:16. | |
think, "Ed Miliband is saying important. He is prepared to go | :56:16. | :56:20. | |
against his supporters.". The point that Ed Miliband was making was the | :56:20. | :56:24. | |
right one and I know from people who went on the sister march in | :56:25. | :56:28. | |
Glasgow, there are people who aren't the usual suspects in terms | :56:28. | :56:30. | |
of trade union activist who are concerned about issues and joined | :56:30. | :56:33. | |
that march because they are concerned about what is happening. | :56:33. | :56:37. | |
Does it help him being booed? People will see that reactionment | :56:37. | :56:41. | |
people will hear what he says, and what he is saying is right. We have | :56:41. | :56:46. | |
to be clear about what it is - the situation we are likely to inherit | :56:46. | :56:54. | |
if we come into Government gen Government again in 2015. | :56:54. | :57:00. | |
Isn't the real real that Labour would have cut. There would be been | :57:00. | :57:04. | |
serious cuts and slashing of spending? The situation that we are | :57:04. | :57:09. | |
likely to have in 2015 could be worse than the situation in 2010 | :57:09. | :57:19. | |
and we are one of only two G20 economies that that have been in a | :57:19. | :57:24. | |
double dip recession. George Osborne got booed over the | :57:24. | :57:28. | |
summer? Ed Miliband at a time when Britain is trying to attract saying | :57:28. | :57:31. | |
we are open to business and trying to attract jobs and trying to | :57:31. | :57:35. | |
restore confidence, he shared a platform with people calling for a | :57:35. | :57:40. | |
general strike. He would have made cuts? Labour | :57:40. | :57:44. | |
haven't voted for any. We haven't had any support whatsoever from the | :57:44. | :57:48. | |
Opposition in two years of taking hard decisions. | :57:48. | :57:53. | |
That's the receipt riblingt in reality -- rhetoric and they would | :57:53. | :57:58. | |
have made cuts? Well, how can we believe it? His position is not | :57:58. | :58:01. | |
credible sharing a platform with people calling for a general strike | :58:01. | :58:08. | |
that would damage our country. What are the Liberal Democrats | :58:08. | :58:11. | |
going to counter the support? Liberal Democrats are working hard | :58:11. | :58:15. | |
to clear up the mess that Labour left behind. | :58:15. | :58:18. | |
The grass-roots are going over to Labour? No, that's not the case. We | :58:18. | :58:24. | |
are working hard in Government to try and sort out the mess that was | :58:24. | :58:28. | |
inherited. The one thing that Ed Miliband could have said, that | :58:28. | :58:32. | |
might have got got cheers is to apologise for his party's record. A | :58:32. | :58:36. | |
record which he and Ed Balls were very much behind and advising | :58:36. | :58:40. | |
Gordon Brown in the Treasury. So I think that the one thing that Ed | :58:40. | :58:45. | |
Miliband needs to do is reflect on why people are booing him. Why they | :58:45. | :58:49. | |
are disillusioned and it is because he says he wants cuts, but doesn't | :58:49. | :58:53. |