Browse content similar to 31/10/2012. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Good morning. This is the Daily Politics. "Continuing as we are is | :00:42. | :00:46. | |
not an acceptable option". So says Tarzan, who has emerged from the | :00:46. | :00:49. | |
political jungle to issue a not very pleasant message for the | :00:49. | :00:52. | |
government on its economic strategy. He wants bolder action to be taken | :00:53. | :00:58. | |
on growth, infrastructure, an airport and energy. We'll be | :00:58. | :01:01. | |
finding out exactly what he wants when we talk to Lord Heseltine | :01:01. | :01:04. | |
later in the programme. Talking of energy the Conservative | :01:05. | :01:09. | |
Energy Minister, John Hayes, appears to have had enough of these. | :01:09. | :01:13. | |
But is he blowing just a lot of hot air? | :01:13. | :01:16. | |
We'll be looking at the political shenanigans being played out over | :01:16. | :01:21. | |
Europe ahead of the vote tonight on the EU budget. | :01:21. | :01:24. | |
And forget bob-a-job week, or learning about knots. Politics is | :01:24. | :01:34. | |
:01:34. | :01:48. | ||
I used to do Bob Bird job. A way you in the Scouts? | :01:48. | :01:54. | |
I was a cub. We showed the wrong wind farms. It | :01:54. | :01:59. | |
is the onshore wind farms he has a problem with. | :01:59. | :02:02. | |
Yes all that and more coming up in the next 90 minutes of truly | :02:02. | :02:05. | |
terrifying TV, which frankly this programme is every week, not just | :02:05. | :02:08. | |
on Halloween. And with us for the duration we have Count Dracula and | :02:08. | :02:15. | |
Van Helsing. I leave you to decide which is which. The Business | :02:15. | :02:19. | |
Minister, Michael Fallon, and the Shadow Welsh Secretary, Owen Smith. | :02:19. | :02:24. | |
Welcome to you both. Now first today enough is enough. No we're | :02:24. | :02:29. | |
not coming off air now. We're going to talk about wind farms, because | :02:29. | :02:31. | |
the Conservative Energy Minister, John Hayes, doesn't appear to like | :02:31. | :02:39. | |
them very much. He's apparently ordered a new analysis for the case | :02:39. | :02:42. | |
of onshore wind farms which he says should form the basis of future | :02:42. | :02:44. | |
government policy, rather than, "a bourgeois left article of faith | :02:44. | :02:53. | |
based on some academic perspective". I think you can see where he's | :02:54. | :02:58. | |
coming from. Anyway, does he have a point? And is everyone happy? Well | :02:58. | :03:03. | |
not his boss, we're told, the Energy Secretary, Ed Davey. And not, | :03:03. | :03:11. | |
I suspect the Liberal Democrat MP, Andrew George, who joins us now. | :03:12. | :03:16. | |
What is your reaction? I think John is as entertaining as ever with his | :03:16. | :03:22. | |
usual panache. Your picture, as you were showing of offshore wind is | :03:22. | :03:28. | |
not the issue. We did clarify that. The issue of onshore wind is a bit | :03:28. | :03:33. | |
of a dog whistle issue for some Conservatives. They object to the | :03:33. | :03:38. | |
matter. The Government policy remains as it is, 20% of energy | :03:38. | :03:45. | |
supply from renewable sources by 2020. I thought it was a 30%. | :03:45. | :03:53. | |
you are, 30%, it goes up. Be very significant amount of VAT will come | :03:53. | :04:01. | |
from wind. Most of it will be wind? The most significant and economic | :04:01. | :04:07. | |
the efficient method by which you obtain renewable energy is from the | :04:07. | :04:12. | |
wind and onshore wind is the most economic of all. If it is economic, | :04:12. | :04:22. | |
:04:22. | :04:23. | ||
why does it need a huge subsidy? does not need a huge subsidy. | :04:23. | :04:28. | |
is so economic why does it need a guaranteed twice -- Prize, twice | :04:28. | :04:34. | |
the guaranteed rate? It gets a lower subsidy than any renewable | :04:35. | :04:40. | |
energy. His is hydro electric power. It gets less than any of the other | :04:40. | :04:49. | |
new forms of renewable energy. All I would say is planning matters are | :04:49. | :04:53. | |
matters that need to be determined on their merits. How much energy, | :04:53. | :04:59. | |
as we speak, is being generated by wind power? At the moment, I do not | :04:59. | :05:07. | |
know the actual figure. As we speak at 11:15am this morning is 6%. Your | :05:08. | :05:14. | |
target is to get to 30% in eight years. From all renewables. | :05:14. | :05:20. | |
most of it will come from wins, can you do that? It is a challenge, but | :05:20. | :05:25. | |
it is one the Government wants to take on. Is it a challenge now John | :05:25. | :05:29. | |
Hayes has said it is not in your policy any more? He is talking from | :05:29. | :05:35. | |
a personal perspective. No, he is the Energy Minister. He is not | :05:35. | :05:40. | |
spouting Government policy. What is Government policy on wind farms? | :05:40. | :05:43. | |
is to encourage renewables of all kinds, to meet the target Andrew | :05:43. | :05:50. | |
has described. You said wind is 6%, it has been increasing over the | :05:50. | :05:57. | |
next few years. We do not set a target from each renewable sectors, | :05:57. | :06:03. | |
we want them all. Is it Government policy to build a more onshore wind | :06:03. | :06:08. | |
farms? These things are determined locally. It is not for the | :06:08. | :06:11. | |
Government to determine where a wind farm should be. But whether | :06:11. | :06:17. | |
his consent, we welcome the contribution wind makes onshore and | :06:17. | :06:27. | |
:06:27. | :06:31. | ||
offshore. The Government policy is for 1000 wind farms. If it is down | :06:31. | :06:36. | |
to localism, which is what you seem to be saying, what happened if | :06:36. | :06:40. | |
every locality said we do not want to wind farms? How would you need | :06:40. | :06:45. | |
your target? There would be the contribution from offshore wind and | :06:45. | :06:49. | |
other sources. There are already onshore wind farms, and there will | :06:49. | :06:54. | |
be more of them, but it is for the local community to decide if they | :06:54. | :06:58. | |
want these things. In some areas of the country, it is windier than | :06:58. | :07:04. | |
others. Then there are 3,000 onshore wind turbines at the moment. | :07:05. | :07:10. | |
The Government is planning another 4,000. Of course, locals can be | :07:10. | :07:17. | |
overruled. I ask again, after John Hayes, is it Government policy to | :07:17. | :07:21. | |
build another 4,000 onshore wind farms? It is Government policy to | :07:21. | :07:26. | |
encourage onshore, offshore, all types of renewable. We're not | :07:26. | :07:31. | |
saying we have to have 4,000 onshore wind farms by a certain | :07:31. | :07:36. | |
date, these things have to be determined locally. And locals on | :07:36. | :07:40. | |
never overruled in these matters? They can be overruled, but it | :07:40. | :07:45. | |
depends on each case, on the merits of each application. They are over | :07:45. | :07:51. | |
ruled on they? Of course. So it is not all down to the locals? What | :07:51. | :07:57. | |
the Government are doing is undertaking a review as to how we | :07:57. | :08:00. | |
ensure the communities that are closest to the wind farms gain | :08:00. | :08:07. | |
additional benefit. You have an open goal here. Can you get | :08:07. | :08:12. | |
anywhere near your renewable target if you do not build the 4,000 plant | :08:12. | :08:18. | |
onshore turbines? That is a target and it is very laudable. You have | :08:18. | :08:24. | |
not answered my question. I have wind farms in my constituency... | :08:24. | :08:29. | |
Can you meet the target if you do not build 4,000 more onshore wind | :08:29. | :08:35. | |
turbines? There are many ways that target can be met. A target of | :08:35. | :08:42. | |
4,000 is in the plan, and it is down to the locals to decide. | :08:42. | :08:47. | |
Smith, shoot. I am none Budweiser as to the Government's policy. | :08:47. | :08:55. | |
thought it was just meat. -- none the wiser. We have Ed Davey saying | :08:55. | :08:58. | |
he is in favour of more wind farms and Michael Fallon sitting on the | :08:58. | :09:04. | |
fence and getting splinters in the studio. Painful, he's used to that. | :09:04. | :09:09. | |
Government policy was to try and increase the volume of onshore wind | :09:09. | :09:14. | |
power. We know it is the cheapest and most developed of the renewable | :09:14. | :09:18. | |
facilities we have. We know it makes sense. The Government will be | :09:18. | :09:23. | |
in power -- were we in power, would be sending more signals we need | :09:23. | :09:28. | |
more wind power and need to invest in a renewable sector, apart from | :09:28. | :09:35. | |
the shambles from the Tories and the Lib Dems. | :09:35. | :09:37. | |
Now the Taxpayers' Alliance have published figures today showing | :09:37. | :09:40. | |
that trade unions received �113 million of taxpayer subsidy last | :09:40. | :09:43. | |
year in direct payments and through staff being paid to work on union | :09:43. | :09:49. | |
business. The unions say this is money well spent with union | :09:49. | :09:51. | |
representation helping to reduce absenteeism and increase | :09:51. | :09:57. | |
productivity. We asked the TUC to come on and discuss the issue but | :09:57. | :10:00. | |
no one was available, we also asked for a pre-recorded interview, but | :10:00. | :10:08. | |
no-one was available. No one is at home. But we can now speak to | :10:08. | :10:12. | |
Matthew Sinclair, from the Taxpayers' Alliance. How do you get | :10:12. | :10:19. | |
to the figure of �113 million? built up by going to public sector | :10:20. | :10:23. | |
organisations across the country, NHS trusts, councils, Government | :10:23. | :10:28. | |
departments, and asking how many trade union staff they were | :10:28. | :10:37. | |
allocating, and what payments they were making. It is an underestimate, | :10:37. | :10:40. | |
because a lot of organisations were not recording how much time they | :10:41. | :10:45. | |
were giving to the trade unions. The TUC dispute that figure, but | :10:45. | :10:51. | |
even if you take the figure at face value, it works at a 25p per public | :10:51. | :10:57. | |
sector worker per week. That does not sound like bad value. That is | :10:57. | :11:02. | |
an underestimated figure. Look at the 25p a week. What Francis Maude | :11:02. | :11:10. | |
wants to cut this to his 0.1% of the public bill. We have huge | :11:10. | :11:15. | |
arguments about much smaller sums of money. It is an enormous subsidy. | :11:15. | :11:23. | |
In terms of politics, and frees up their resources to campaign on, | :11:23. | :11:26. | |
that can buy everything in Westminster and twice over. It is | :11:26. | :11:32. | |
an enormous amount of money in a specific interest group. What does | :11:32. | :11:36. | |
that interest group do? Is it a waste of money to look after and | :11:36. | :11:40. | |
represent employees in the public sector, and of course there are a | :11:40. | :11:44. | |
union representatives in the private sector. Is it a waste of | :11:44. | :11:49. | |
money, they shouldn't be represented at save the public | :11:49. | :11:53. | |
purse a lot of money in terms of dispute resolution, training take | :11:53. | :11:58. | |
up and health and safety? I do not think there is anything wrong with | :11:58. | :12:03. | |
people being represented. My organisation is to represent the | :12:03. | :12:06. | |
taxpayer's interest. But if you are representing someone, it shouldn't | :12:06. | :12:11. | |
be paid for by someone else. It Union staff are representing their | :12:11. | :12:16. | |
members, they should pay for it. If you are working for the trade union, | :12:16. | :12:22. | |
you should be paid for by the trade union. Taxpayers shouldn't have to | :12:22. | :12:27. | |
pick up the bill, particularly when unions use resources for strikes, | :12:27. | :12:32. | |
fight necessary reforms to pensions and necessary control in public | :12:32. | :12:37. | |
spending. There is nothing wrong with a lot of what trade unions do, | :12:37. | :12:41. | |
they have a legitimate function, but all those legitimate functions | :12:41. | :12:44. | |
are being paid for by taxpayers, which frees up their own resources | :12:44. | :12:48. | |
which should be used to pay for things like representation and be | :12:48. | :12:51. | |
spent on political campaigns and functions that shouldn't be having | :12:51. | :12:56. | |
the bill picked up by taxpayers. New don't disagree with what they | :12:56. | :13:01. | |
are doing in terms of representation? Do you agree with | :13:01. | :13:05. | |
the research commissioned by the Department for business, that in | :13:05. | :13:15. | |
2007, those union representatives save the public purse between 170 | :13:15. | :13:19. | |
million and 200 million a year. That looks like it is saving money? | :13:19. | :13:24. | |
If you look at the kind of estimates being found on official | :13:24. | :13:28. | |
estimates of the full scale of this, not just the ones we could pin down | :13:28. | :13:31. | |
to specific organisations. And the range is lower than the estimates | :13:31. | :13:36. | |
of the cost of this. In terms of cost benefits, unless you take the | :13:36. | :13:41. | |
high end of the range, it does not justify this as a spending item. | :13:41. | :13:45. | |
Beyond that, a lot of what they are claiming, it will lead to lower | :13:45. | :13:50. | |
sick leave, but there is far more time off in the public sector than | :13:50. | :13:59. | |
in the private sector and there is also more sick leave. Why don't | :13:59. | :14:03. | |
union just pay for this? Public sector and private sector employers | :14:03. | :14:09. | |
think it is good use of public and private sector money to facilitate | :14:09. | :14:15. | |
the employment of Union... Private sector pay for their own? | :14:15. | :14:18. | |
public sector pays for people because they know it saves them | :14:18. | :14:24. | |
money. It is not new, this is the second time the TaxPayers' Alliance | :14:24. | :14:30. | |
have announced this alleged 113 million in November. It is | :14:30. | :14:34. | |
interesting when the governments are in trouble on all sorts of | :14:34. | :14:44. | |
:14:44. | :14:46. | ||
issues. Should they be rolling out this 100 and think -- 113 million | :14:46. | :14:52. | |
as nonsense. In 2007, they are reviewed it and said it saves them | :14:52. | :14:57. | |
money. I don't think the TaxPayers' Alliance are disagreeing the | :14:57. | :15:00. | |
functions are useful and could bring down costs to the public | :15:00. | :15:04. | |
sector, but why don't the unions' pay for it? It is not like they | :15:04. | :15:09. | |
don't have many of their own? theory the unions could pay for it. | :15:09. | :15:14. | |
They should. Public sector and private sector employers who pay | :15:14. | :15:19. | |
for facility down -- time had done so since the early 1990s when this | :15:19. | :15:24. | |
was established in law by the Tory Government in 1992. They have done | :15:24. | :15:28. | |
so because they think it is a good use of public or private money. | :15:28. | :15:32. | |
They've been think it is good because it allows for proper | :15:32. | :15:35. | |
representation of the workforce, a proper channel of engaging with the | :15:35. | :15:40. | |
workforce, it reduces costs a recruitment and lost hours, | :15:40. | :15:44. | |
sickness. It is clear why they do it. If they did nothing it was | :15:44. | :15:49. | |
worthwhile, it would stop. It has got out of hand. What has got out | :15:49. | :15:54. | |
of hand? The mound of union activity on the public sector pay | :15:54. | :15:59. | |
roll. The school's budget is used to finance teachers who are not | :15:59. | :16:03. | |
teaching, but sitting in a union office negotiating on behalf of | :16:03. | :16:05. | |
their members but not doing any teaching. The school's budget | :16:05. | :16:15. | |
:16:15. | :16:23. | ||
You should be paying teachers to teach, not to sit in a union | :16:23. | :16:28. | |
offices. Watch out, animal hunters, Tarzan | :16:28. | :16:32. | |
is back. Yes, Michael government intervention Heseltine has returned | :16:32. | :16:38. | |
to the police could jungle with his new Treasury Commission report | :16:38. | :16:44. | |
which promises to leave no stone unturned. At this moment I shall | :16:44. | :16:48. | |
turn to Jo and she will give you an exposition of what is in the | :16:48. | :16:54. | |
Heseltine report. But I am lost for words. Our computer has got stuck. | :16:54. | :17:00. | |
I have offered to whack it with a spanner but they said no. It is | :17:00. | :17:04. | |
probably being powered by windmills which is why we cannot use it. | :17:04. | :17:10. | |
Onshore ones. So, Mr Heseltine says, your government does not have a | :17:10. | :17:17. | |
strategy for growth. commissioned this report. We asked | :17:17. | :17:21. | |
Michael Heseltine to do this. He has come forward with a whole range | :17:21. | :17:25. | |
of ideas which we are going to follow up. He wants to go further | :17:25. | :17:31. | |
and faster for growth and so do we. You go and have a major | :17:31. | :17:34. | |
restructuring of local government. He has put forward different ideas. | :17:34. | :17:39. | |
You can go to a unitary authority which is what he is suggesting. | :17:39. | :17:43. | |
There is nothing stopping a council orate group of councils coming to | :17:43. | :17:48. | |
us and wanting to take out a layer of bureaucracy. He recognises what | :17:48. | :17:51. | |
we are doing on local enterprise partnerships as the key to growth. | :17:51. | :17:57. | |
We are doing that as well. A un favour of handing 58 billions of | :17:57. | :18:04. | |
pounds of Whitehall cash -- are you win favour? We are already handing | :18:04. | :18:09. | |
money to cities. We have eight core cities and City deals at the moment. | :18:09. | :18:14. | |
We invited 20 to apply in the second wave of this week. He is | :18:14. | :18:19. | |
suggesting we should transfer more of the skills budget down from | :18:19. | :18:27. | |
central by Jim down to the cities and local enterprise partnerships. | :18:27. | :18:31. | |
Are you going to give more power to local enterprise partnerships? | :18:31. | :18:38. | |
have already given their money. much? 24 million over the last two | :18:38. | :18:41. | |
years. They are getting core funding now. They are coming | :18:41. | :18:45. | |
forward with their growth plans. It is for them to tell central | :18:45. | :18:54. | |
government what their priorities are. Michael Heseltine, he wants | :18:54. | :18:58. | |
them to have 58 billion. That is a different scale. I gave them money | :18:58. | :19:01. | |
for their capacities and own resources to finance themselves. He | :19:01. | :19:06. | |
says they should have more control over government spending programmes. | :19:06. | :19:12. | |
That is only a couple of billion. think it is more than that. Do you | :19:12. | :19:15. | |
favour coming out with an aviation policy this side of the election | :19:15. | :19:20. | |
which he has called for? We need to look carefully at the issue of | :19:20. | :19:24. | |
where hub airports should be. We think there should be a hub airport. | :19:24. | :19:31. | |
We think that should not be done by politicians by somebody independent. | :19:31. | :19:34. | |
We have asked Howard Davies. Michael Heseltine is saying it | :19:34. | :19:39. | |
should come out before the election. It is a simple question. Do you | :19:39. | :19:43. | |
think that should happen on not? are not responding to the entire | :19:43. | :19:47. | |
report today. What the Chancellor has said it is he is going to set | :19:47. | :19:52. | |
out his response in the Autumn Statement on 6th December and tell | :19:52. | :19:55. | |
you what we are going to do with each of the recommendations. | :19:55. | :20:00. | |
Michael Heseltine is impatient for growth and so are we. That is | :20:00. | :20:05. | |
because you have not had any. economy is growing now. Where were | :20:05. | :20:11. | |
you last week? How since your government came to power we have | :20:11. | :20:17. | |
had 0.6 % growth. Whereas, in June 2010 you predicted almost 6% growth, | :20:17. | :20:23. | |
or the OBR did, say you are out by a factor of 10. It was an | :20:23. | :20:28. | |
independent forecast. But you depend on it. You drop the cuts on | :20:28. | :20:37. | |
the basis of a projected 6% growth, you have had a 0.6. I don't think | :20:37. | :20:40. | |
anybody knew just how prolonged the problems in the eurozone would be | :20:40. | :20:43. | |
and some of the fall-off in growth we have had in the rest of the | :20:43. | :20:51. | |
world. Nobody predicted that. come on. The recession lasted | :20:51. | :20:54. | |
longer than anybody thought. It turned out that boom-and-bust was | :20:54. | :21:00. | |
far worse than anybody estimated. The big news is we are growing now. | :21:00. | :21:05. | |
All right, are you in favour of an interventionist industrial policy | :21:05. | :21:10. | |
as Michael Heseltine calls? We have an industrial strategy which Vince | :21:10. | :21:15. | |
Cable set out in a speech a month ago. That means more collaboration | :21:15. | :21:19. | |
on research and development in each sector, it means looking at the | :21:19. | :21:25. | |
skills gap in each of the sectors, so yes, we have... Are you in | :21:25. | :21:30. | |
favour of an interventionist policy? I am not sure what the | :21:31. | :21:34. | |
differences. We do not want to pick winners but we want to help each | :21:34. | :21:39. | |
sector pick its own winners and focus on what needs to be done on | :21:39. | :21:43. | |
partnership with government. This is probably your second own goal of | :21:43. | :21:48. | |
the day. I am trying to think of questions to ask you. You must love | :21:48. | :21:53. | |
all this? No, we do not love it. What Heseltine has pointed out is | :21:53. | :22:00. | |
the reality that we do not have a growth strategy in this country. I | :22:00. | :22:05. | |
think it is broadly agree with what we have been saying for the last | :22:05. | :22:08. | |
two years which is a, you do need an active industrial strategy. You | :22:08. | :22:13. | |
do need government to intervene. You do need to have not got rid of | :22:13. | :22:17. | |
the RDAs. The supreme irony of Michael Heseltine saying you have | :22:18. | :22:26. | |
got it wrong, you have to have money is spent in the regions. | :22:26. | :22:33. | |
the contrary... He believes you should have an interventionist | :22:33. | :22:41. | |
government. Can I ask you, is a Labour in favour of passing �58 | :22:41. | :22:44. | |
billion of Whitehall spending through the local enterprise | :22:44. | :22:48. | |
partnerships? We are in favour of much greater emphasis on regional | :22:48. | :22:52. | |
growth. I understand that, that is like saying you are in favour of | :22:52. | :22:58. | |
motherhood and apple pie. Are you in favour of giving �58 billion of | :22:58. | :23:02. | |
Whitehall cash to the local enterprise partnerships? You would | :23:02. | :23:08. | |
not expect me to say now worth around in favour of 58, 57 off �43 | :23:08. | :23:12. | |
billion. What we are in favour of his money being spent at a local | :23:12. | :23:18. | |
level by effective organisations. That is what we had when we had | :23:18. | :23:21. | |
Regional Development agencies right across the country which had real | :23:21. | :23:25. | |
powers and real resources. This is an important point, unfortunately, | :23:25. | :23:30. | |
the government got rid of those things. What Michael Heseltine was | :23:30. | :23:35. | |
saying is they got it wrong. have made a point twice already. | :23:35. | :23:40. | |
I'm sure it is a good point but it is not one I am asking. We will | :23:40. | :23:44. | |
move on. We know when we are beaten. We will be talking to Tarzan | :23:44. | :23:49. | |
himself, Michael Heseltine, live after Prime Minister's Questions. | :23:49. | :23:57. | |
Now, Darth Maul, Greedo and Boba Fett, D you-know-who they are? They | :23:57. | :24:02. | |
are not members of the European Central Bank. Apparently they are | :24:02. | :24:06. | |
something to do with a lucrative movie franchise which started in a | :24:06. | :24:12. | |
galaxy far, far away. Star Wars creator George Lucas has sold his | :24:12. | :24:15. | |
film production company Lookers fell to the Walt Disney Company in | :24:15. | :24:23. | |
a deal worth �2.5 billion -- Lucasfilm. Is nothing sacred? Some | :24:23. | :24:28. | |
things cannot be bought so cheaply. Let me assure you you will never | :24:28. | :24:35. | |
see this. Stormtroopers! I have one thing to say to Mr Disney, they are | :24:35. | :24:40. | |
not the mugs you are looking for because they are not for sale at | :24:40. | :24:46. | |
any price. But if the force is with you, dear viewer, one of these fine | :24:46. | :24:50. | |
interstellar receptacles can be beamed to you at no cost. All you | :24:50. | :24:55. | |
have to do is enter our guest the Year competition. Are we will | :24:55. | :25:01. | |
remind you how to enter in a minute. Let's do a bit of our own time | :25:01. | :25:11. | |
:25:11. | :25:24. | ||
travelling. See if you can remember Respect, tolerance, the family, try | :25:24. | :25:34. | |
:25:34. | :25:52. | ||
If you are handing on the torch, to give somebody us the opportunity, | :25:52. | :26:02. | |
:26:02. | :26:24. | ||
make sure the torches burning To be in with a chance of winning | :26:24. | :26:29. | |
an intergalactic Daily Politics mug, send your answer to our special | :26:29. | :26:34. | |
quiz e-mail address, [email protected] and you can see | :26:34. | :26:36. | |
the full terms and conditions on our website, | :26:36. | :26:42. | |
bbc.co.uk/dailypolitics. Now it is coming up to midday here. Let's | :26:42. | :26:47. | |
take a look at Big Ben. That can only mean one thing, Prime | :26:47. | :26:52. | |
Minister's Questions is on its way. Nick Robinson is already here. | :26:52. | :26:56. | |
Welcome. Tell us about this European vote, there is a big row | :26:56. | :27:00. | |
building up in the Commons today. Those who remember their history | :27:00. | :27:05. | |
will remember in the 1990s, the Tory party pretty much fun apart on | :27:05. | :27:09. | |
the issue of Europe and the Labour Party helped them, even though they | :27:09. | :27:13. | |
were led by an avid pro-European, John Smith. I think the leadership | :27:13. | :27:19. | |
of the Labour Party are inspired by Smith's example, urged by the | :27:19. | :27:23. | |
Guardian editorial today and others, don't fait with the Euro-sceptics | :27:23. | :27:27. | |
and the Tory rebels. The Labour leadership is sane, forget that. | :27:27. | :27:32. | |
Nobody remembered in 1997 that the Labour Party were playing with the | :27:32. | :27:36. | |
Euro-sceptics. They remember the chaos in the Tory ranks. What the | :27:36. | :27:41. | |
Labour Party want today is to try and alive with the Tory rebels and | :27:41. | :27:44. | |
defeat the government on the issue of the EU budget. A what is it they | :27:44. | :27:49. | |
want, freeze on the budget already cut? They want a real-terms cut. | :27:49. | :27:53. | |
The government have talked of the policy of having a real-terms | :27:53. | :27:59. | |
freeze, in other words, goes up with the rate of inflation, but the | :27:59. | :28:03. | |
rebels and Labour Party are saying that is not good enough. It is an | :28:04. | :28:07. | |
argument between you room realism and fundamentalism. The government | :28:07. | :28:11. | |
are saying, of course we would like to cut the budget but we will never | :28:11. | :28:15. | |
get it. We might be able to build an alliance in terms of a real- | :28:15. | :28:21. | |
terms freeze. The rebels are saying, forget that, we want it cut. There | :28:21. | :28:24. | |
are a mix of motives. One is to give the Government a bloody nose | :28:24. | :28:28. | |
and the other is a cost free advertisement that Labour does not | :28:28. | :28:32. | |
want to spend your money. If Labour vote with the rebels, could the | :28:32. | :28:36. | |
government lose? They could if there are enough of them. Into | :28:37. | :28:43. | |
simple terms, government majority of 68, the key is he turns up? Who | :28:43. | :28:47. | |
is in the House of Commons on the relevant day? The second key thing | :28:47. | :28:51. | |
is devoted against the government if you are a Tory or do you | :28:51. | :28:56. | |
abstain? If I was the Tory whips I would say do not put a smile on the | :28:56. | :29:05. | |
face of Mr Bowles and Mr Benn abound tonight. -- Mr balsa and Mr | :29:05. | :29:11. | |
Miliband. Isn't there something you could do like catch-up on eight DVD | :29:11. | :29:16. | |
box set. There are enough rebels on the issue of Europe. All the | :29:16. | :29:21. | |
opposition -- if all the opposition parties were here and if all the | :29:21. | :29:24. | |
rebels vote against the government, the government can be defeated. It | :29:24. | :29:29. | |
does not mean they will be. Labour were responsible for the last time | :29:29. | :29:35. | |
the EU budget was fixed and agreed to a doubling of the contribution, | :29:35. | :29:43. | |
now you are calling for a reduction in the Budget, how does that work? | :29:43. | :29:47. | |
Circumstances have changed. We know that we have got austerity right | :29:47. | :29:51. | |
across Europe. We have governments right across Europe asking people | :29:51. | :29:55. | |
to take tough decisions and tighten their belts and we think it is | :29:55. | :29:59. | |
appropriate that in these changing circumstances, our government | :29:59. | :30:08. | |
should go to Europe. It is smart fiscal policy. If the rest of | :30:08. | :30:13. | |
Europe insists on going ahead with an increase and Mr Cameron wield | :30:13. | :30:18. | |
the veto, will Labour support it? It is a shame we have got to the | :30:18. | :30:22. | |
stage when David Cameron is so isolated in Europe. The Swedes are | :30:22. | :30:28. | |
taking an even tougher line. I have just read what the European | :30:28. | :30:35. | |
Minister has said. They want a bigger cut. So do the Dutch. He is | :30:35. | :30:40. | |
not isolated. That is not the question I asked. If he is forced | :30:40. | :30:45. | |
to stop a real-terms increase going through, we used support him | :30:45. | :30:49. | |
wielding the veto? We will look at that at the time when we see what | :30:49. | :30:54. | |
comes out of the negotiations. you calling for a cut? We are | :30:54. | :31:00. | |
calling for a real-terms cut. there is a real terms increase, | :31:00. | :31:07. | |
which is what the majority want, and Mr Cameron says no, I will veto | :31:07. | :31:13. | |
it, surely biologic if you are calling for a real-terms cut, you | :31:13. | :31:18. | |
should support the veto. Let's see what happens when he comes back to | :31:18. | :31:24. | |
Europe. Can I say, very straight forward. We will be arguing tonight | :31:24. | :31:34. | |
:31:34. | :31:44. | ||
for a real terms... I understand Want to pay tribute to those who | :31:44. | :31:52. | |
have lost their lives a deep debt of gratitude. Their dedication, | :31:52. | :31:56. | |
professionalism one never be forgotten by our nation. And our | :31:56. | :31:59. | |
condolences are with their family, friends and colleagues. | :31:59. | :32:03. | |
Our had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others and in | :32:03. | :32:07. | |
additional duties in this house I will have further meetings later in | :32:07. | :32:12. | |
the day. I am sure the house will want to associate itself with the | :32:12. | :32:17. | |
remarks from the Prime Minister of our brave service personnel. Will | :32:17. | :32:21. | |
the Prime Minister confirm if he cannot get a good deal for Britain | :32:21. | :32:27. | |
in the EU budget negotiations, he will use the veto? And reject any | :32:27. | :32:37. | |
:32:37. | :32:40. | ||
advice on this matter from those who gave our rebate away? I can | :32:40. | :32:44. | |
absolutely give him that assurance. This Government is taking the | :32:44. | :32:48. | |
toughest line in these budget Nick positions of any Government since | :32:48. | :32:54. | |
we joined the European Union. At best we would like it cuts, at | :32:54. | :32:59. | |
worst, frozen. I am prepared to use the veto if the do not get a deal | :32:59. | :33:03. | |
that is good for Britain. It is within our interest to get a deal | :33:03. | :33:07. | |
because a seven-year freeze would keep bills down compared to annual | :33:07. | :33:12. | |
budgets. Labour's position is a one of opportunism. They gave away half | :33:12. | :33:17. | |
the rebate, sent the Budget through the roof, now they want to posture | :33:17. | :33:21. | |
rather than get a good deal for Britain. We can see right through | :33:22. | :33:29. | |
it. Mr Ed Miliband. Can I stop by joining the Prime Minister are | :33:29. | :33:36. | |
paying tribute to corporal David Hope cannot and corporal Channing | :33:36. | :33:41. | |
day of the Royal Medical Corps. It is a reminder of the danger troops | :33:42. | :33:45. | |
based on a daily basis on our behalf. They both showed the utmost | :33:45. | :33:49. | |
courage and bravery and our condolences go to their family and | :33:49. | :33:55. | |
friends. The Prime Minister has an opportunity to get a mandate from | :33:55. | :34:00. | |
this house for a real-terms reduction in the EU budget which he | :34:00. | :34:06. | |
says he wants over the next seven years. He could take to the talks | :34:07. | :34:13. | |
in Europe. Why is he resisting that opportunity? I think the whole | :34:13. | :34:19. | |
country will see through what is right opportunities and. People | :34:19. | :34:23. | |
have not forgot the fact they gave away half our rebate in one ago as | :34:23. | :34:30. | |
the Asian. They agreed a massive increase on the EU budget under | :34:30. | :34:34. | |
their Government. And they have not even put down their own resolution | :34:34. | :34:39. | |
on this issue. The nation will absolutely see straight through it. | :34:39. | :34:45. | |
He is playing politics, he is not serving the country. Ed Miliband. | :34:45. | :34:50. | |
When it comes to consistency, he seems to have forgotten what he | :34:50. | :34:54. | |
said as leader of the opposition just four months before the last | :34:54. | :35:00. | |
General Election. This is what he said. I would have thought they | :35:00. | :35:04. | |
would be interested what the Prime Minister said when he was leader of | :35:04. | :35:11. | |
the opposition. "at a time when budgets are being cut in the UK, | :35:11. | :35:15. | |
does the Prime Minister agree in reviewing the EU budget, the main | :35:15. | :35:23. | |
purpose should be to push for a real-terms cut". That is what he | :35:23. | :35:28. | |
said in opposition. When it comes to opportunism, this Prime Minister | :35:28. | :35:33. | |
is a gold medallist. At a time when he is cutting it the education | :35:33. | :35:40. | |
budget by 11%, the transport budget by 15% and the police budget by 20%, | :35:40. | :35:45. | |
how can he be giving up on a cut in the EU budget before the talks have | :35:45. | :35:50. | |
begun? We have to make cuts in budgets because we are dealing with | :35:50. | :35:57. | |
a record debt and deficit. If he wants to talk about consistency, | :35:57. | :36:01. | |
perhaps he can explain why his own members of the European Parliament | :36:01. | :36:07. | |
voted against a budget freeze we achieved last year? Perhaps he can | :36:07. | :36:10. | |
explain why the Socialist group in the European Parliament he is such | :36:10. | :36:15. | |
a proud member of, are calling, not for an increase in the Budget, not | :36:15. | :36:21. | |
for a freeze in the Budget, but for a 200 billion euros increase in the | :36:21. | :36:26. | |
Budget. And they want to get rid of the rest of the British rebate. Is | :36:26. | :36:36. | |
:36:36. | :36:36. | ||
that his policy? Ed Miliband. good to see the Crimson tide... | :36:36. | :36:41. | |
Order, order. Government backbenchers, including ministers, | :36:41. | :36:47. | |
are preaching majority. They have got to tackle their behavioural | :36:47. | :36:53. | |
problems before it is too late. Ed Miliband. He is getting very angry, | :36:53. | :36:57. | |
maybe that is because he is worried about losing the vote this | :36:57. | :37:03. | |
afternoon. MEPs voted the same as his on the motion before the | :37:03. | :37:07. | |
European Parliament 10 days ago. The reality is commonly cannot | :37:07. | :37:11. | |
convince anyone on Europe. Last year he left the December | :37:11. | :37:16. | |
negotiations with a veto and an agreement a went ahead anyway. He | :37:16. | :37:21. | |
had thrown in the towel before these talks had begun. He cannot | :37:21. | :37:23. | |
convince European leaders comedy cannot convince his own | :37:23. | :37:29. | |
backbenchers. He is weak abroad, he is weak at home, it is John Major | :37:29. | :37:36. | |
all over again. His position is completely incredible. He says he | :37:36. | :37:41. | |
wants a cut in the EU budget, but he does not sanction a veto. We | :37:41. | :37:47. | |
have made it clear we will use the veto, as we have used it before. I | :37:47. | :37:52. | |
will ask him, will you use the veto? Order. I won't be using the | :37:52. | :37:58. | |
veto. I will ask the Prime Minister to respect Parliamentary procedure | :37:58. | :38:08. | |
in these matters. The south-east region is often regarded as the | :38:08. | :38:12. | |
engine driver of the British economy. But the Solent region | :38:12. | :38:16. | |
faces challenges, particularly with the announcement of job losses at | :38:16. | :38:21. | |
Ford last week. Will he agree with me, the case for a city Deal for | :38:21. | :38:26. | |
Southampton and Portsmouth is particularly compelling? I do think | :38:26. | :38:30. | |
it is particularly compelling, we make sure Southampton has a City | :38:30. | :38:35. | |
dealer. I understand they are on the list. The news from Ford was | :38:35. | :38:41. | |
disappointing. It was a blackspot in an otherwise strong performance | :38:41. | :38:45. | |
by the British automotive industry. We will be working with Southampton | :38:45. | :38:52. | |
City Council to help everybody find jobs. May I ask a straightforward | :38:52. | :38:59. | |
question that should command a straightforward answer? In the | :38:59. | :39:01. | |
forthcoming police and crime Commissioner elections, it is | :39:01. | :39:06. | |
predicted the turnout will be as low as 20%. Does the Prime Minister | :39:06. | :39:11. | |
think it gives them Democratic legitimacy? I want the turn out to | :39:11. | :39:15. | |
be as high as possible, but I recognise in new elections for a | :39:15. | :39:20. | |
new post, it is a challenge. It is a challenge when you have dedicated | :39:20. | :39:24. | |
Labour MPs resigning from his house to stand as police and crime | :39:24. | :39:31. | |
commissioners. One thing the commissioner will be able to make | :39:31. | :39:41. | |
:39:41. | :39:44. | ||
is that since crime is down by 20%. Lincolnshire has benefited from | :39:44. | :39:48. | |
announcements that will boost the local economy. A Kimberley Clark | :39:48. | :39:53. | |
announced the closure of their factory in Barton-upon-Humber in my | :39:53. | :39:58. | |
constituency with a loss of up to 500 jobs. Can he assure me | :39:58. | :40:01. | |
everything possible will be done by the Government to attract a new | :40:01. | :40:06. | |
business to the area? I can give him that assurance. It is sad news | :40:06. | :40:11. | |
for the workers at Barton-upon- Humber. The local council is | :40:11. | :40:15. | |
working closely with Jobcentre Plus and the company to establish a | :40:15. | :40:21. | |
local task force and the Government will support employees and try and | :40:21. | :40:25. | |
find alternative employment. Following a report in the | :40:25. | :40:28. | |
Hillsborough disaster and the phone hacking scandal, self regulation of | :40:28. | :40:34. | |
the press, by the press is no longer acceptable to the public. | :40:34. | :40:39. | |
More than three-quarters responding to recent polls back an end to | :40:39. | :40:42. | |
media self-regulation. Prime Minister, your ministers have been | :40:42. | :40:50. | |
briefing against Lord leathers and. Whose side are you on? Members must | :40:51. | :40:57. | |
adhere to the proper procedures of this House. I think we should wait | :40:57. | :41:01. | |
for the report to come out. A lot of work has been done. I want to | :41:01. | :41:07. | |
see a robust regulatory system. What happens most of all, as I said | :41:07. | :41:10. | |
in a house last week, is to make sure it newspapers get things wrong, | :41:10. | :41:15. | |
they can be fined, journalists can be investigated, and there are | :41:15. | :41:22. | |
prominent apologies. We know what a regulatory system should look like, | :41:22. | :41:29. | |
we don't have one now but we need one for the future. I would like to | :41:29. | :41:33. | |
echo the Prime Minister's tribute to our armed forces and fallen | :41:33. | :41:39. | |
comrades. We owe their families and loved ones are a huge debt of | :41:39. | :41:43. | |
gratitude. Last week we saw the sentencing of former staff of | :41:43. | :41:46. | |
Winterbourne View Hospital who were found guilty of ill-treatment and | :41:46. | :41:51. | |
neglect. I had hoped this would bring closure and a sense of | :41:51. | :41:56. | |
justice to the victims and their families. But we have learnt | :41:56. | :42:00. | |
patience from Winterbourne View have been -- may have been subject | :42:00. | :42:04. | |
to neglect and ill-treatment elsewhere. Does the Member for | :42:04. | :42:13. | |
Sutton and Cheam think they should be subject to a corporate | :42:13. | :42:18. | |
prosecution? I pay tribute to what he said it on armed forces. On the | :42:18. | :42:21. | |
issue of Winterbourne View, anyone who saw those pictures about how | :42:21. | :42:25. | |
very vulnerable people were being treated, would be absolutely | :42:25. | :42:31. | |
shocked. And just like me, they would want to make sure the law | :42:31. | :42:35. | |
will go exactly where the evidence leads. But there needs to be | :42:35. | :42:38. | |
further prosecution, then there should be. It was shocking what | :42:38. | :42:43. | |
happened and we should judge for our society on a vulnerable and | :42:43. | :42:48. | |
needy people and what happened was an acceptable. Ed Miliband. It is | :42:49. | :42:53. | |
welcome the British economy is in a long as did Paul -- double dip | :42:53. | :42:59. | |
recession since the war. And nor Heseltine said today "the message | :42:59. | :43:05. | |
idea is the UK does not have a strategy for growth and job | :43:05. | :43:10. | |
creation". Who does the Prime Minister blamed for that? What | :43:10. | :43:13. | |
Michael Heseltine said is the coalition is fundamentally on the | :43:13. | :43:18. | |
right track. He said, I praise its work for the industrial strategy | :43:18. | :43:23. | |
plans, pioneering city devolution and the revelations in education | :43:23. | :43:28. | |
and tackling unemployment. That is what Michael Heseltine said. We can | :43:28. | :43:33. | |
keep trading quotes, but I think he is making a bigger.. It is an | :43:33. | :43:40. | |
excellent report. What he is saying is over decades in our economy, it | :43:40. | :43:45. | |
became too centralised, and regions and nations fell behind, | :43:45. | :43:47. | |
manufacturing half as a share of national income during the last | :43:47. | :43:51. | |
Government. And during the boom years, in the West Midlands there | :43:51. | :43:55. | |
were no net a new private sector jobs. He is dealing with the big | :43:55. | :44:01. | |
issues. What a pity or he can do is stand up and read out a quote. | :44:01. | :44:06. | |
says Lord Heseltine's report says they are on the right track. | :44:06. | :44:10. | |
Goodness knows what it would have said if he thought they were on the | :44:10. | :44:14. | |
wrong track. He's said there is no strategy for jobs and growth, | :44:14. | :44:19. | |
deregulation, his chosen approach is not the answer. Let me turn to a | :44:19. | :44:25. | |
specific area of the report. Recommendations 61. He says, "the | :44:25. | :44:30. | |
Government needs to set out a definitive and unambiguous energy | :44:30. | :44:38. | |
policy." This is an appropriate day to be considering this | :44:38. | :44:42. | |
recommendation on energy. It is good to see the business secretary | :44:42. | :44:46. | |
on the bench. I'm sorry the growth Committee he is on his so one | :44:46. | :44:51. | |
memorable, he cannot remember it. This is an appropriate date to | :44:51. | :45:01. | |
:45:01. | :45:02. | ||
consider these recommendations will I am enjoying this, Mr Speaker. His | :45:02. | :45:07. | |
energy secretary says he is against wind farms and enough is enough. | :45:07. | :45:13. | |
Whilst his... The order. Let me say to the Government backbenches. It | :45:13. | :45:18. | |
is straightforward. They either calm down or the session it will be | :45:19. | :45:24. | |
extended, at whoever inconvenience that involved. It is incredibly | :45:24. | :45:27. | |
straightforward. His energy minister says he is against wind | :45:27. | :45:31. | |
farms and enough is enough while his energy secretary says he wants | :45:31. | :45:37. | |
them. Who speaks for the Government, the Energy Secretary or the energy | :45:37. | :45:43. | |
minister? Today the jokes has been bad and the substance is bad also. | :45:43. | :45:47. | |
I tell you why it is a good day to talk about energy policy, because | :45:47. | :45:53. | |
today Hitachi are investing �20 billion in our nuclear industry. | :45:53. | :45:57. | |
Today is a good day to talk about energy because there is more | :45:57. | :46:00. | |
investment in renewable energy under three years of this | :46:00. | :46:04. | |
Government's ban under 13 years of their Government. It is a good day | :46:04. | :46:10. | |
to talk about energy policy because we have got a Green Investment Bank | :46:10. | :46:14. | |
up and running. There has been no change towards renewable energy. We | :46:14. | :46:18. | |
have a big pipeline of onshore and offshore wind projects coming | :46:18. | :46:23. | |
through. We are committed to those. All parties will have to have a | :46:23. | :46:27. | |
debate in his house and outside this House about what happens once | :46:27. | :46:37. | |
:46:37. | :46:47. | ||
the targets are met. And he ought It is very simple for the Prime | :46:47. | :46:53. | |
Minister will stop you have one minister who says he is totally | :46:53. | :47:02. | |
against wind farms and he has won a minister who is totally gunk hoe | :47:02. | :47:06. | |
for wind farms. He has a wind turbine on his house, I thought he | :47:06. | :47:12. | |
would be in favour. Lord Heseltine says in his report there are people | :47:12. | :47:17. | |
resistant to his ideas. We know who they are, the Chancellor and the | :47:17. | :47:21. | |
Prime Minister. The evidence over the last two years is de Regulation, | :47:21. | :47:26. | |
sink or swim. His answer is not the answer. Lot Heseltine is right and | :47:26. | :47:31. | |
they are wrong. I have got one thing to say, not you, Mr Speaker | :47:31. | :47:41. | |
:47:41. | :47:47. | ||
but he, he is no Michael Heseltine. Order! Order! I want to hear Mr | :47:47. | :47:52. | |
Swales and I feel sure the people of red-carded. Thank you, Mr | :47:52. | :47:59. | |
Speaker. The Russians want to award a prestigious medal to Arctic | :47:59. | :48:05. | |
convoy veterans. The governments of Australia, Canada, the USA and | :48:05. | :48:11. | |
Canada have agreed, the UK government have refused. Will the | :48:11. | :48:17. | |
Prime Minister get this decision reversed so my constituent get the | :48:17. | :48:26. | |
recognition that they reserve -- deserve. I have every understanding | :48:26. | :48:31. | |
which is why we have asked Sir John Holmes to conduct this review into | :48:31. | :48:35. | |
medals and important cases of which the Arctic convoy is probably the | :48:35. | :48:45. | |
:48:45. | :48:50. | ||
most pressing. He is getting on The Foreign Secretary said | :48:50. | :48:54. | |
yesterday that the rules of this House require that ministers answer | :48:55. | :49:03. | |
questions. Sir, There is a stash of embarrassing emails, isn't there? | :49:03. | :49:07. | |
Adam Smith has to publish every single one of his emails and ended | :49:07. | :49:13. | |
up resigning. Why won't the Prime Minister publishes emails? Can he | :49:13. | :49:17. | |
really be a fit and proper person to judge on the future of press | :49:17. | :49:20. | |
regulation if he will not come clean with the British public? | :49:20. | :49:24. | |
There is another rule of this house which is if you insult someone in | :49:24. | :49:29. | |
this house you do an apology. I have to say, I am still waiting. | :49:29. | :49:33. | |
The fact is, it is this government which set up the Leveson Inquiry | :49:33. | :49:41. | |
and I gave all the information that Leveson asked to the inquiry. | :49:41. | :49:47. | |
Owl and the pussycat is a coffee- shop in Larne in my constituency. | :49:47. | :49:52. | |
They have just had their business rates hyped-up by 700 % and the | :49:52. | :49:56. | |
council is coming up with the money -- coming for the money even though | :49:56. | :50:04. | |
they have not yet heard the appeal. This is not unique to Wales, can | :50:04. | :50:06. | |
the Prime Minister come to the rescue? I have every sympathy with | :50:07. | :50:11. | |
the business he mentions. Business rates are a devolved issue. This is | :50:11. | :50:14. | |
something which needs to be taken up with the Welsh Assembly | :50:14. | :50:21. | |
Government. In England we have halved rate relief -- doubled rate | :50:21. | :50:28. | |
relief to help small businesses. We have given councils new powers to | :50:28. | :50:33. | |
levy discounts. I think that is the right approach to England and he | :50:33. | :50:41. | |
will want to take their case to Wales. In 2007, the Prime Minister | :50:41. | :50:45. | |
identified Lewisham Hospital as one of 29 hospitals he would be | :50:45. | :50:51. | |
prepared to get into a bare knuckle fight over. On Monday, it emerged | :50:51. | :50:56. | |
that Lewisham's a Andy and maternity services could end up | :50:56. | :51:01. | |
paying the price for financial failures elsewhere in the NHS -- | :51:02. | :51:06. | |
accident and emergency. Which side of this bare knuckle fight is he | :51:06. | :51:09. | |
on? The fight we are on is increasing the resources going into | :51:09. | :51:15. | |
the NHS. We have extra money is going into Lewisham and she is on | :51:15. | :51:21. | |
this side of cutting money into the NHS. What we have done is set out | :51:21. | :51:24. | |
that there will be no changes to NHS confederation's unless they | :51:24. | :51:29. | |
have the support of local GPs and unless they have strong public and | :51:29. | :51:33. | |
patient engagement, unless they are backed by sound clinical evidence | :51:33. | :51:37. | |
and they are backed by patient choice. Those sort of trustees | :51:37. | :51:42. | |
whenever there under the last government. They are there now. | :51:42. | :51:45. | |
light of last it's positive growth figures, does the Prime Minister | :51:45. | :51:49. | |
agree with me that policies requiring yet more spending, more | :51:49. | :51:53. | |
borrowing and more debt halve the precise opposite of what our | :51:53. | :52:00. | |
country needs. My honourable friend is entirely right. The news last it | :52:00. | :52:03. | |
was welcome that the economy is growing, unemployment is coming | :52:03. | :52:07. | |
down, inflation is coming down, the rate of small business creation is | :52:07. | :52:10. | |
going up, there are a million more people employed in the private | :52:10. | :52:14. | |
sector that there were two years ago and the one absolute certainty | :52:14. | :52:19. | |
is the worst approach and Michael Heseltine confirms this, would be | :52:19. | :52:22. | |
to see more spending, more borrowing and more debt because | :52:22. | :52:26. | |
that is what got us into the mess in the first place. The party | :52:26. | :52:36. | |
opposite have only one growth plan and that is to grow the deficit. | :52:36. | :52:39. | |
condolences -- condolences on the death of my constituent, Corporal | :52:39. | :52:46. | |
Channing day. She always wanted to join the armed services. She wanted | :52:46. | :52:52. | |
to save lives. Imagined how it felt for the injured soldier to see her | :52:52. | :53:02. | |
going to help. She was soon return to the family who love their dearly | :53:02. | :53:07. | |
and the community who are very proud. The community of Northern | :53:07. | :53:11. | |
Ireland salute her courage, bravery and heroism. Would you agree with | :53:11. | :53:16. | |
me that army medics are often the unsung heroes of conflict and will | :53:16. | :53:21. | |
he agree to meet with me and my colleagues to discuss the | :53:21. | :53:23. | |
implementation of the military covenant in Northern Ireland? | :53:23. | :53:29. | |
of all, I would be very happy to meet him and his colleagues to talk | :53:29. | :53:34. | |
about it. I have spoken to the First Minister and deputy First | :53:34. | :53:37. | |
Minister in Northern Ireland. I know there are issues about | :53:37. | :53:43. | |
implementing the covenant but I would be happy to have that meeting. | :53:43. | :53:50. | |
He spoke very movingly about Corporal Channing Day. They do a | :53:50. | :54:00. | |
:54:00. | :54:01. | ||
tremendous job. It has been a huge privilege for me to meet the medics | :54:01. | :54:11. | |
:54:11. | :54:12. | ||
in Afghanistan. British forces are receiving the best care. Question | :54:12. | :54:19. | |
number 8. Kettering hospital will retain its accident and emergency | :54:19. | :54:23. | |
and maternity services. Any suggestion otherwise is | :54:23. | :54:29. | |
scaremongering of the worst kind. Kettering has the 6th highest | :54:29. | :54:33. | |
household growth rate in the whole country and accident and emergency | :54:33. | :54:37. | |
missions are up 10 % year on year. Given that Kettering General | :54:37. | :54:41. | |
Hospital has been at the very heart of the local community for well | :54:41. | :54:45. | |
over 100 years, but local people deserve a clear assurance that our | :54:45. | :54:49. | |
much loved and badly needed local hospital has a bright future ahead | :54:49. | :54:54. | |
of it? I gave my honourable friend the strongest possible assurance | :54:54. | :54:58. | |
and the point I have made, as I have made it to the honourable lady | :54:59. | :55:02. | |
opposite, is there cannot be any changes and as there is full public | :55:03. | :55:06. | |
consultation, and as there is the support of local GPs and strong | :55:06. | :55:11. | |
public and patient engagement. In the case of Kettering, that does | :55:11. | :55:15. | |
not on the agenda. Any suggestion by the opposition is scaremongering | :55:15. | :55:22. | |
of the worst kind and I can see they are at it again. It has been | :55:22. | :55:26. | |
emphasised again and again on all sides of the house, on the | :55:26. | :55:33. | |
importance of skills to promote economic growth. The why did the | :55:33. | :55:37. | |
number of apprenticeships start to fall last year? The number of | :55:37. | :55:42. | |
apprenticeships under this government are about 900,000. It | :55:42. | :55:46. | |
has hugely increased. government recently announced plans | :55:46. | :55:51. | |
to extend the freeze on council tax for a third year. Unfortunately, | :55:51. | :55:56. | |
the Labour-run city of York council increased council tax by 2.9 % at | :55:56. | :56:04. | |
has moved with remarkable speed to confirm a 2% increase next to you. | :56:04. | :56:09. | |
-- next year. Can Mike right honourable friend agree that the | :56:09. | :56:16. | |
city of York council should look again? The government has made | :56:16. | :56:20. | |
money available so councils can freeze their council tax fought the | :56:20. | :56:23. | |
third year in a red. This demonstrates we are wrong side of | :56:23. | :56:27. | |
people who work hard and want to get on and struggle to pay the | :56:27. | :56:30. | |
bills. All councils should look at the money available and recognise | :56:31. | :56:38. | |
that a council tax freeze is in the best interest of all our citizens. | :56:38. | :56:42. | |
When did the Prime Minister become aware of the plans to close fought | :56:42. | :56:45. | |
at Southampton and Dagenham and was the where of those plans went his | :56:46. | :56:49. | |
government awarded a large sum of money from the regional growth fund | :56:49. | :56:54. | |
to that company just a few days earlier? Obviously, these issues | :56:54. | :56:58. | |
were discussed and we work closely with all the automotive companies | :56:58. | :57:02. | |
in the United Kingdom. The news from most of them, from Nissan, | :57:02. | :57:07. | |
Toyota, Jaguar Land Rover has been extremely positive. What happened | :57:07. | :57:11. | |
at Ford in Southampton is very regrettable but we must do | :57:11. | :57:15. | |
everything we can to help those people into work. | :57:15. | :57:18. | |
I am delighted the economy is finally growing and green growth is | :57:18. | :57:23. | |
a key part of this. He is the Prime Minister still committed to this | :57:23. | :57:28. | |
being the greenest government ever, particularly when it comes to his | :57:28. | :57:31. | |
policies on renewable energy? under this government that we have | :57:31. | :57:35. | |
seen more investment on green energy in three years than we had | :57:35. | :57:38. | |
13 from the party opposite. The Green Investment Bank that we | :57:38. | :57:44. | |
promised, that is up and running. The carbon plans we spoke about | :57:44. | :57:47. | |
foreign players. This is a Green government and it is sticking to | :57:47. | :57:55. | |
its promises. -- the plans are in place. The number of people waiting | :57:55. | :58:01. | |
more than four hours in accident and emergency units has doubled. | :58:01. | :58:07. | |
There are plans to close Central Middlesex Hospital, Ealing Hospital, | :58:07. | :58:13. | |
Lewisham and a suspect Kettering hospital as well, if constituents | :58:13. | :58:17. | |
had to end up in casualty they would have to wait longer for | :58:17. | :58:21. | |
accident and emergency services. have to say, I could not be any | :58:21. | :58:25. | |
clearer about the future of Kettering hospital and for him to | :58:25. | :58:29. | |
say that is scaremongering of the worst kind. Let me tally him what | :58:29. | :58:34. | |
is happening at the hospitals which serve his constituents. In May 2010 | :58:34. | :58:39. | |
there were 52 patients waiting longer than 12 months. How many are | :58:39. | :58:42. | |
there now? None under this government will start that is what | :58:42. | :58:46. | |
is actually happening. We are putting the money into the NHS and | :58:46. | :58:56. | |
:58:56. | :58:57. | ||
Further to the result on 18th October, on the contentious | :58:57. | :59:02. | |
decision at the Royal Regiment of the Royal Fusiliers, it would the | :59:02. | :59:05. | |
Prime Minister meet with me and other interested members from | :59:05. | :59:09. | |
across the House to discuss this issue? I am always happy to talk to | :59:09. | :59:14. | |
colleagues about this issue. I know the Ministry of Defence and | :59:14. | :59:18. | |
Secretary of State is. He knows we have to make difficult decisions to | :59:18. | :59:26. | |
be done place about the future structure of the army. Clearly, we | :59:26. | :59:29. | |
have a to make some difficult decisions about regiments and | :59:29. | :59:33. | |
battalions and in that, we were guided by trying to save as many | :59:33. | :59:38. | |
regiments and cap badges as possible. The Defence Secretary | :59:38. | :59:43. | |
will continue going on listening to recommendations. | :59:43. | :59:45. | |
Will the Prime Minister confirm that the changes to child benefit | :59:45. | :59:51. | |
due to be introduced in January this year, next year, but the cost | :59:51. | :00:00. | |
of that, the overall cost is very much over �100 million? The changes | :00:00. | :00:04. | |
that we are making to child benefit, where we are taking child benefit | :00:04. | :00:11. | |
away altogether from people earning over �60,000, that will save around | :00:11. | :00:14. | |
�2 billion. It is necessary to take tough decisions in order to deal | :00:14. | :00:18. | |
with the massive deficit, bigger than Greece, bigger than Spain, | :00:18. | :00:24. | |
that his party left us. I find it completely inexplicable why the | :00:24. | :00:28. | |
party opposite, that say they want those with the broadest backs to | :00:28. | :00:32. | |
share some of the burden, oppose the idea of taking child benefit | :00:32. | :00:39. | |
away from people over 60, 70, 80, 90,000. I do not see why the front | :00:39. | :00:42. | |
bench there should go on collecting their child benefit when we have to | :00:42. | :00:50. | |
make such difficult decisions. Will my right honourable friend | :00:50. | :01:00. | |
:01:00. | :01:01. | ||
joined me in congratulating might - - accompany my constituency for | :01:01. | :01:06. | |
their Queen's Award. Does he agree this is the finest example of | :01:06. | :01:14. | |
business on the up? I think the honourable lady next at -- makes a | :01:14. | :01:24. | |
good point. We need to go further and faster and that is what Michael | :01:24. | :01:34. | |
:01:34. | :01:43. | ||
Heseltine's excellent report is They were saying on wind power, | :01:43. | :01:53. | |
:01:53. | :01:58. | ||
Investment to meet the 22 Beavon -- 2020 target was on target. The main | :01:58. | :02:03. | |
exchange between the two front benchers, it was split into three | :02:04. | :02:12. | |
and three. Normally the leader of position does all six questions. -- | :02:12. | :02:22. | |
:02:22. | :02:23. | ||
leader of the opposition. He was talking about the European budget. | :02:23. | :02:32. | |
Labour wants a real-terms increase in the European budget. Mr Cameron | :02:32. | :02:36. | |
says he will settle for a real term rise. The leader of the opposition | :02:36. | :02:41. | |
moved on to the Michael Heseltine report. We will be speaking to him | :02:41. | :02:46. | |
in a few moments for stomp and then brought in a wind farms, as we know | :02:46. | :02:53. | |
the Government's party is not totally clear on that. We will get | :02:53. | :02:57. | |
a reaction in a minute, but we want to know what you thought. | :02:57. | :03:06. | |
Lots of Commons. Diane from Cornwall said, "pour | :03:06. | :03:10. | |
from David Cameron who lost his temper under pressure from Ed | :03:10. | :03:14. | |
Miliband. He did well by splitting his questions and seems to have | :03:15. | :03:20. | |
continued for where he left off before the recess". | :03:20. | :03:26. | |
Ian Whitely, "Ed Miliband trounced David Cameron and the EU position | :03:26. | :03:29. | |
on the budget will stop Ed Miliband it is showing he is more interested | :03:29. | :03:32. | |
in putting Labour before the country". | :03:32. | :03:39. | |
Robert, "David Cameron has been dealt a blow from the opposition he | :03:39. | :03:43. | |
finds him at odds not only in Parliament but within his own | :03:44. | :03:53. | |
party". "I enjoyed the you are no Michael | :03:53. | :04:03. | |
:04:03. | :04:13. | ||
Heseltine comment from the Prime If you could see his face, he would | :04:13. | :04:18. | |
be smiling. What do we make of this? We are seeing how the leader | :04:18. | :04:22. | |
of the Labour Party has decided to try to repeat what happens to John | :04:22. | :04:32. | |
:04:32. | :04:32. | ||
manger. He brought up John manger - - John Major from the 90s. The | :04:32. | :04:36. | |
truth is, there is no comfortable middle ground between the two. What | :04:36. | :04:42. | |
the Tory backbenchers want, which is a wholesale rejection of what | :04:42. | :04:46. | |
Europe stands for and a cut in their budget, is not what any | :04:46. | :04:56. | |
:04:56. | :05:00. | ||
diplomat or businessman will tell you is possible. What people will | :05:00. | :05:06. | |
remember is it the Tory party is in disarray. He is equal on the issue | :05:06. | :05:11. | |
on wind farms, trying to pull the coalition parties apart. John Smith | :05:11. | :05:17. | |
used this tactics in the 1990s to make life awkward for John Major, | :05:17. | :05:22. | |
in which Tony Blair was the great inheritor of. Why isn't the Prime | :05:22. | :05:26. | |
Minister going to Brussels to talk about a real-terms cut in the EU | :05:26. | :05:32. | |
budget? We have to deal with the budget we have got, and it is | :05:32. | :05:40. | |
expanded. Neighbour just waved through an 8% increase. If it has | :05:40. | :05:45. | |
expanded, cut it. We wouldn't be in this mess it you had exercised some | :05:46. | :05:53. | |
proper control over it. He waved through an 8% increase last time. | :05:53. | :05:58. | |
It has got out of control and we are Di -- trying to cap it. We have | :05:58. | :06:03. | |
to do with the budget we have got. It is not a huge chunk of the | :06:03. | :06:10. | |
overall resources of the European Union? 1%. Because we are having to | :06:10. | :06:14. | |
inflict cuts at home on domestic spending priorities, we are saying | :06:14. | :06:20. | |
to parts of the private sector, you have had a pay freeze. We have to | :06:20. | :06:24. | |
persuade other governments to get the budget under control. That | :06:24. | :06:29. | |
means there will be some cuts in some areas of the Budget. No one | :06:29. | :06:34. | |
really believes, I suggest that if Labour was in power they would be | :06:34. | :06:42. | |
going to Brussels arguing for a real-terms cut in the Budget, not | :06:42. | :06:46. | |
pro-European Ed Miliband? We can only rely on the evidence we have | :06:47. | :06:52. | |
got. Last July the voted for a real-terms cut in the Budget. Our | :06:52. | :06:56. | |
MEPs voted for a cut in the Budget now. The Tories used to believe, | :06:56. | :07:02. | |
when in opposition, they should be a cut in the budget in real terms. | :07:02. | :07:06. | |
Now they are arguing for a 5% increase. You have done the same | :07:06. | :07:09. | |
thing, called for cuts in opposition, but go along with | :07:09. | :07:16. | |
increases in Government. The world has changed. We have austerity, you | :07:16. | :07:23. | |
keep telling us we need to make cuts. We are going round in circles. | :07:23. | :07:26. | |
Back to Nick Robinson for some common sense. Also, we will be | :07:26. | :07:32. | |
going to Michael Heseltine. Europeans read the same opinion | :07:32. | :07:37. | |
polls. Ministers get the same advice from diplomats whether they | :07:37. | :07:40. | |
are Labour or Conservative switchers, the alliance's don't | :07:40. | :07:45. | |
exist to deliver a cut. You don't deliver anything it you don't get | :07:45. | :07:50. | |
people on your side. No matter how many vetoes, you have to reach an | :07:50. | :07:54. | |
agreement or lead. These guys are doing what the Tories did before | :07:54. | :07:57. | |
and the Tories are doing what Labour did before. And that is what | :07:57. | :08:02. | |
happens. It will keep on happening the sometime until there is a way | :08:02. | :08:05. | |
through. The interesting thing on the Michael Heseltine peas, there | :08:05. | :08:11. | |
is a deeper thing I think that is interesting. But there is no doubt | :08:11. | :08:17. | |
Michael Heseltine wrote a script that was helpful in the short term | :08:17. | :08:22. | |
to Ed Miliband. No great strategy, indecision on airports and a mess | :08:22. | :08:26. | |
on energy policy. But his long-term policy is an interesting challenge | :08:26. | :08:32. | |
to all politicians. What he is saying is, Britain should be more | :08:32. | :08:36. | |
like Germany. There should be an industrial strategy driven by the | :08:36. | :08:40. | |
Government. They should be a strong series of business organisations. | :08:40. | :08:46. | |
He talks about the possibility of forcing, by law, business has to | :08:46. | :08:52. | |
join the Chamber of Commerce. And he talks about having the powerful, | :08:52. | :08:56. | |
local organiser it -- Local Enterprise Partnerships, which | :08:56. | :09:01. | |
would spend and allocate the money. It is a reshaping of the British | :09:01. | :09:05. | |
state along dramatic lines. The Lib Dems used to argue to scrap the | :09:05. | :09:10. | |
business department. The Conservatives were always split | :09:10. | :09:14. | |
between people like Michael Heseltine and the free market. The | :09:14. | :09:18. | |
Labour Party have been interesting decision, and there were a lot of | :09:18. | :09:24. | |
speeches that sounded like this, but they did not do it. Now I | :09:24. | :09:29. | |
believe the man of the moment can join us now from Birmingham. Lord | :09:29. | :09:36. | |
Heseltine, welcome to the Daily Politics. I don't know whether you | :09:36. | :09:41. | |
heard that, but do you want Blighty to be more like Germany, as Nick | :09:41. | :09:47. | |
Robinson was saying? No, I want it to be every other capitalist | :09:47. | :09:53. | |
economy. Germany is not special, it is the same. We are the ones out of | :09:53. | :09:58. | |
step. Whether you look at America, the Asian tigers or the European | :09:58. | :10:03. | |
competitors, they all have a system of Government which devolved power, | :10:03. | :10:08. | |
broadly to their local city states. They all have industrial strategies | :10:08. | :10:15. | |
designed to help their industries win. All right, I wondered, why did | :10:15. | :10:20. | |
it take you six months to come up with all of this, since I have | :10:20. | :10:25. | |
listened to you talking about this for the past 25 years? Andrew, you | :10:25. | :10:33. | |
have not seen the report, I suspect which is 220 pages and a 40 page | :10:33. | :10:37. | |
Amex would 89 recommendations, covering a wide range of Government | :10:37. | :10:42. | |
and local authority and private sector activity. It has been quite | :10:42. | :10:47. | |
a task. And if I say so, a privilege. But the Government to | :10:48. | :10:52. | |
have the guts to have the Civil Service report to look at | :10:52. | :10:56. | |
everything they are doing and produce a report without trying to | :10:56. | :11:01. | |
influence it, it is a Government of confidence. Why do you think a | :11:01. | :11:06. | |
free-marketeer like George Osborne asked you to do this report? | :11:06. | :11:11. | |
Perhaps because he does not believe in the simplicity of your | :11:11. | :11:17. | |
definitions. It was the Prime Minister who instigated it. It was | :11:17. | :11:22. | |
George Osborne and Vince Cable to whom I have to report. They know my | :11:22. | :11:28. | |
form, as you know my form, so it is not in the least bit surprising | :11:28. | :11:33. | |
that what I have said is consistent with what I have said over the last | :11:33. | :11:38. | |
30 years. They knew all that. They were interested in my ideas. | :11:38. | :11:43. | |
Whether they carry them out, is for them. Let's look at your ideas. You | :11:43. | :11:51. | |
talk about English local Government. Talking about it being too | :11:51. | :11:54. | |
fragmented and you call for a major restructuring of local Government. | :11:54. | :12:01. | |
Is the Government's up for this? You did it with Peter Walker, do | :12:01. | :12:05. | |
you think this Government is up for another restructuring of local | :12:05. | :12:10. | |
Government? Don't let's get carried away. I'm talking about allowing | :12:10. | :12:16. | |
counties, if they want, to become unitary as opposed to two Tear. A | :12:16. | :12:21. | |
few of them have done it. The legal position entitles them to do it. I | :12:21. | :12:25. | |
am saying under the pressure of public spending constraints, as you | :12:25. | :12:30. | |
can save between 10 and �15 million a year accounted, if they want to | :12:30. | :12:35. | |
do it, they should. But whether conurbations of coming together, | :12:35. | :12:41. | |
they should be encouraged to do it and they should have the choice of | :12:41. | :12:46. | |
having a mayor to figurehead it if they want is. Those are not going | :12:46. | :12:50. | |
to cause, in my view, certainly in the conurbations, it is already | :12:50. | :12:56. | |
happening. On they are moving to a wider authorities in the model of | :12:56. | :13:00. | |
Manchester. On the unit trees, I am saying if they want to do it, let | :13:00. | :13:06. | |
them do it. Do you believe these Local Enterprise Partnerships, of | :13:06. | :13:11. | |
which I would suspect 99% of people have never heard of and have no | :13:11. | :13:17. | |
idea what they do. Are they really ready to take �58 billion of | :13:17. | :13:25. | |
taxpayers' money? That is the arguments, Andrew, which all my | :13:25. | :13:29. | |
life has led central Government to say No They are not. It has two | :13:29. | :13:36. | |
permutations. They are doing it badly, so we will create a quango | :13:36. | :13:41. | |
and take it away from them. Housing went that way. People say, why | :13:41. | :13:46. | |
don't you let the chambers do this. We say they are not up to it, | :13:46. | :13:50. | |
therefore we have another quango. If they are not doing it well | :13:50. | :13:55. | |
enough, if they are not strong enough, help them become strong. | :13:55. | :14:00. | |
What you have got to get hold of is the dynamism of English cities and | :14:00. | :14:05. | |
the states around them. That is how a capitalist a economy works. | :14:06. | :14:10. | |
criticise the Government for putting off the decision on airport | :14:10. | :14:13. | |
expansion or runway expansion, particularly in the South East. | :14:13. | :14:16. | |
They have kicked it into touch by giving it to someone who won't | :14:17. | :14:22. | |
report until after the election. You need to think they should take | :14:22. | :14:26. | |
the decision quickly, if not immediately. What you don't tell us | :14:26. | :14:33. | |
this, where do you think it should go? Should -- where should the | :14:33. | :14:38. | |
extra runway capacity be? I don't criticise the Government. The | :14:38. | :14:42. | |
Government has an honourable commitment not to provide a third | :14:42. | :14:47. | |
runway at Heathrow. They made that in the election campaign. They have | :14:47. | :14:56. | |
said we cannot break R-word. -- R- word. They have said they will | :14:56. | :15:01. | |
delay any further decision until after the next election. I am | :15:01. | :15:05. | |
pointing out that compatible with that, they could speed up the | :15:05. | :15:09. | |
process without taking a decision finally until after the next | :15:09. | :15:14. | |
election. It is not a criticism of the Government. Can I take this | :15:14. | :15:20. | |
whole issue? It is tedious. The moment it you repute -- produce a | :15:20. | :15:24. | |
report like this, if the journalists can find a gap between | :15:24. | :15:28. | |
the word I use and the word the Government used, it becomes a | :15:28. | :15:33. | |
monumental divide and a crisis. I reject that totally. Strike the | :15:33. | :15:43. | |
:15:43. | :15:57. | ||
word criticism and let me ask you, I am not criticising you for not | :15:57. | :16:01. | |
saying in your report where the runway should be, I am asking you | :16:01. | :16:05. | |
as a man of public affairs who follows these things, what is your | :16:05. | :16:09. | |
view about where the extra runway capacity should go in the south- | :16:09. | :16:15. | |
east? Can I be a little humble, without the facts and figures and | :16:15. | :16:20. | |
costs, I would hesitate to answer your question. That is why the | :16:20. | :16:24. | |
government set up the Davies report. Exactly, let's wait to see what it | :16:24. | :16:30. | |
says. The they will not be until 2015 witches I thought the point | :16:30. | :16:38. | |
you're making that they should do it sooner. Even that is not true. | :16:38. | :16:44. | |
They can provide information before 2015. It is the decision that wants | :16:44. | :16:48. | |
to wait until after the election because they look will not break | :16:48. | :16:53. | |
their election promise and you should be praising them for that. | :16:53. | :16:57. | |
am not asking them to break anything, and simply asking if you | :16:57. | :17:02. | |
took the decision and if they were not breaking their promise, what | :17:02. | :17:06. | |
should that decision be? I know when I am beaten on this. We will | :17:06. | :17:16. | |
move on. NEWLINE never beaten, Andrew! I am enjoying it Eva in -- | :17:16. | :17:26. | |
:17:26. | :17:33. | ||
it even so. 89, there we go... is this another failure? | :17:33. | :17:39. | |
actually is a criticism that you could not round it up to 90. Let me | :17:39. | :17:46. | |
plead guilty. It has got to wade through 89 of these to decide, | :17:46. | :17:50. | |
which won? The Prime Minister and Chancellor are watching now, which | :17:50. | :17:58. | |
one, two or 3D say it should give priority now from the 89 to do now? | :17:58. | :18:02. | |
I would say to the Prime Minister, that you have got the loneliest and | :18:02. | :18:07. | |
most difficult job in the country and you are at the mercy of world | :18:07. | :18:12. | |
events which you can only partially influence. The battering of leaders | :18:12. | :18:19. | |
of politics today by the incessant 247 news coverage is frightening. | :18:19. | :18:24. | |
But if it could bring himself to recognise that the growth of the | :18:24. | :18:28. | |
economy is the overarching responsibility and the biggest | :18:28. | :18:31. | |
opportunity and therefore, put himself at the front of the pursuit | :18:31. | :18:37. | |
of growth, with all the type of support systems that I indicate, | :18:37. | :18:41. | |
that would be to me, a transformation of what has happened | :18:41. | :18:44. | |
in this country Thrupp my life. We are not talking that short-term | :18:44. | :18:47. | |
things here. This is something I think Britain should have done | :18:48. | :18:52. | |
historically. Michael Heseltine, we will have to leave it here. It is | :18:52. | :18:58. | |
good to see back in the limelight. It is like the old days again and | :18:58. | :19:04. | |
you are enjoying it. And always with you. It is symbolic that he | :19:05. | :19:08. | |
unveiled the report in Birmingham and not London, I think that was | :19:08. | :19:15. | |
ace and -- a sensible thing to do. When you opened the report with the | :19:15. | :19:20. | |
picture of Jo Chamberlain, the old city creators of wealth, the people | :19:20. | :19:24. | |
who ran cities and did not care what London thought, he wants a | :19:24. | :19:28. | |
return to that. It was interesting. He is basically saying England | :19:28. | :19:32. | |
needs to be more a Wales and Scotland in terms of its | :19:32. | :19:36. | |
organisation also Wales and Scotland have unitary councils and | :19:36. | :19:40. | |
they have governments who tend to go out and back for their economy. | :19:40. | :19:44. | |
England has a mess of councils. Some my unit tree and someone not. | :19:45. | :19:50. | |
I do not think that is right. In Scotland, I do not know about Wales, | :19:50. | :19:55. | |
is all power is centralised in Edinburgh now, not London. Glasgow | :19:55. | :20:00. | |
and Aberdeen, he wants them to have the power. Is that a criticism in | :20:00. | :20:07. | |
Wales as well? There is always a few there is too much | :20:07. | :20:12. | |
centralisation. Michael says there is not a scintilla of a gap between | :20:12. | :20:19. | |
him and George Osborne, there is a gaping chasm on this. He is arguing | :20:19. | :20:24. | |
for devolution, if you like, throughout England. He is arguing | :20:25. | :20:28. | |
for a regional growth strategy and for him to turn round and say the | :20:28. | :20:32. | |
Prime Minister needs to recognise that growth did to be the primary | :20:32. | :20:37. | |
priority for this government, that is a criticism. He did not answer | :20:37. | :20:40. | |
that but he answered my question about the two or three general | :20:40. | :20:45. | |
things with a general statement on growth. Ultimately, he is talking | :20:45. | :20:49. | |
about statelet intervention where this government believes the state | :20:50. | :20:53. | |
crowds out private sector enterprise. The Easter Fallon will | :20:53. | :21:00. | |
have the final word. -- Michael Fallon. We have to look hard at | :21:00. | :21:04. | |
ourselves and we have done that. We will go through these | :21:04. | :21:08. | |
recommendations. He has only just produced it. We will go through | :21:08. | :21:14. | |
these one by one. All that stuff is something we heartily endorse. All | :21:14. | :21:17. | |
ministers are as impatient as Michael is to get this country | :21:17. | :21:22. | |
growing again. You have not worked out how to do it. The have worked | :21:22. | :21:26. | |
it out. We want local growth. He does not recommend going back to | :21:26. | :21:32. | |
the regional bureaucracies that Owen had. He wants city regions, | :21:32. | :21:35. | |
local enterprise partnerships which we are doing. A lot of things we | :21:35. | :21:39. | |
are doing he wants us to accelerate and we will look at the | :21:39. | :21:46. | |
recommendations. Thank you for staying with us. Are a pleasure. A | :21:46. | :21:54. | |
Hezza Andrew contest. Do you get time 1/2 when you stay for extra | :21:54. | :21:59. | |
time? Over to you with your toggles and wobbles. Warbles, actually. | :21:59. | :22:04. | |
Do you get your Waples in a twist when it comes to parliamentary | :22:04. | :22:11. | |
process -- woggles. We have got just the team for the bob-a-job. | :22:11. | :22:16. | |
The Scouts have invaded Westminster. They are taking on MPs in a quiz | :22:16. | :22:23. | |
today. It is to mark the launch of their citizenship project. We can | :22:23. | :22:27. | |
cross to College Green and talk to Scout leader Peter Jeffries, Scout | :22:27. | :22:34. | |
Imogen Woodhall in the middle and MP Graham Evans who is co-chair of | :22:34. | :22:38. | |
the All Party Parliamentary Scout group. Graham, can we tell -- can | :22:38. | :22:44. | |
you tell us more about this? It is an opportunity for scalps to come | :22:44. | :22:51. | |
into Westminster and test their politics with politicians -- for | :22:51. | :23:01. | |
:23:01. | :23:05. | ||
scalps to come in. Will your Scouts Way you're scalps get a badge? | :23:05. | :23:11. | |
will have a good time. They will understand more about the world | :23:11. | :23:17. | |
around them and how to engage in the political process. It does seem | :23:17. | :23:23. | |
to tie in with what they are doing in schools at the moment, young | :23:23. | :23:27. | |
people and citizenship, is that the idea to link it educationally? | :23:27. | :23:32. | |
is absolutely right and it is all credit to the scouting movement. | :23:32. | :23:35. | |
Education, in my view, with politics, has been lacking in | :23:35. | :23:39. | |
recent years, along with the teaching of history. I think | :23:39. | :23:44. | |
politics, history and citizenship go together. You have just had | :23:44. | :23:47. | |
Michael Heseltine and he was a minister in the 1970s, in the Ted | :23:47. | :23:53. | |
Heath government. How many people actually know that? It is about the | :23:53. | :23:55. | |
general public engaging in the vitally important subject of | :23:56. | :24:01. | |
politics. Imogen, do you think it will work, do you think it sounds | :24:01. | :24:04. | |
interesting? I think it sounds interesting and it will work | :24:04. | :24:08. | |
because not many young people know about Parliament, so it is a good | :24:08. | :24:12. | |
opportunity. What are your first impressions of being out | :24:12. | :24:15. | |
Westminster? Maybe you have been here before, looking around | :24:15. | :24:22. | |
Parliament? It is very big! There are a lot of them, they'll go and | :24:22. | :24:28. | |
hide in there, don't they, Graham? Yes, we do. What is the best way, | :24:28. | :24:33. | |
Peter, of trying to make this accessible to young people like | :24:33. | :24:40. | |
Imogen? One of the really important things for Scouts like image and to | :24:40. | :24:43. | |
understand is how this affects their lives. Rather than being a | :24:43. | :24:48. | |
far away context, what is it in their local communities, how can we | :24:48. | :24:53. | |
become more active, with our local authorities and local MPs so | :24:53. | :24:57. | |
everyone can understand more about what people are thinking about the | :24:57. | :25:02. | |
world around them. Taking the whole day into account, we are going to | :25:03. | :25:07. | |
quiz Imogen and Graham. Graham, be very scared. We are going to start | :25:07. | :25:14. | |
with you, Imogen. My first question is Leader of the Opposition? Think | :25:14. | :25:21. | |
Wallace and Gromit. If that is a clear. Is that an unfair clue. | :25:21. | :25:29. | |
we allowed to give hints along the side. Ed Miliband. Ed Miliband. | :25:29. | :25:35. | |
many houses of parliament are there? Imogen, do you know? Two. | :25:35. | :25:41. | |
well done, you can get a bonus point if you name them both. | :25:41. | :25:46. | |
House of Lords and Commons. Well done. You have got a very deep | :25:46. | :25:54. | |
voice, Imogen! How old do you have to be to get the vote? 16? Well, | :25:54. | :26:04. | |
some people think so. 18. Yes! We will give you 2.5. Graham, no help | :26:04. | :26:08. | |
for you. Who was British Prime Minister when Abraham Lincoln was | :26:08. | :26:14. | |
the President of the United States. Pass. Yes, it is quite hard. It was | :26:14. | :26:20. | |
Lord Palmerston. I should have known that. But you did not. What | :26:20. | :26:27. | |
does LIBOR stand for? LIBOR is the interest rate which banks agreed | :26:27. | :26:31. | |
between each other. It is, but do you know what it stands for word | :26:31. | :26:38. | |
for word? No, pass. It is the London Interbank offered Rate. And | :26:38. | :26:42. | |
which British animal linked the founder of the Society of Friends, | :26:42. | :26:48. | |
a 60 No 5 comedy by playwright Ben Jonson and a Whig politician born | :26:48. | :26:55. | |
in 1756. Which animal links those? Blackadder? No! You have not done | :26:55. | :26:59. | |
very well. We did make them quite tricky. Peter, do you have the | :26:59. | :27:04. | |
Daily Politics mug there? I have. Who wins this after those | :27:04. | :27:10. | |
questions? I think we can fairly and squarely say Imogen. You get a | :27:10. | :27:15. | |
Daily Politics mug. Sorry, Graham, there is nothing for you at all. | :27:15. | :27:22. | |
The story of my life! Thank you for joining us. | :27:22. | :27:28. | |
Black had a? When was that an animal. He was never a Prime | :27:28. | :27:35. | |
Minister. Time to guess the year, the answer was Michael. Michael -- | :27:35. | :27:41. | |
the answer was 2000. Michael, press the red button. Who is the lucky | :27:41. | :27:51. | |
:27:51. | :27:54. | ||
winner? I do not know why they have What do you think about this idea | :27:54. | :28:02. | |
of getting Scouts in and doing political engagement? One of my | :28:02. | :28:09. | |
sons is a car and the other is a Brownie. It is a great initiative. | :28:09. | :28:14. | |
Young people have not been voting in great numbers. Do you think they | :28:14. | :28:17. | |
should have the vote at 16? There is an argument that that because | :28:17. | :28:23. | |
they are not paying taxes. You were in favour of anything we are not in | :28:23. | :28:31. | |
favour of. So stop it, you two! are going to stop the petty | :28:31. | :28:35. | |
bickering and bring it all to an end. Thank you to all our guests | :28:35. | :28:40. | |
who appeared today. The One o'clock News is starting over on BBC One. I | :28:41. | :28:43. |