Browse content similar to 21/05/2013. Check below for episodes and series from the same categories and more!
Line | From | To | |
---|---|---|---|
Politics. David Cameron nurses his wounds after the rebellion last | :00:45. | :00:50. | |
night by over 100 Conservative MPs against gay marriage. The proposals | :00:50. | :00:56. | |
passed with the help of Labour, but many backbenchers are unhappy. Alex | :00:56. | :01:00. | |
Salmond posts a report which he says shows Britain -- Scotland would be | :01:00. | :01:04. | |
better off as an independent nation. | :01:04. | :01:07. | |
Hot sauce entrepreneur Levi Roots joins us to discuss the government | :01:08. | :01:11. | |
scheme to help the unemployed start own businesses. | :01:11. | :01:15. | |
And could the coalition talks of 2010 ever have resulted in a Lib-Lab | :01:15. | :01:19. | |
pact? We will bring together two keep | :01:19. | :01:28. | |
layers from those five days in May. -- two key players. With us for the | :01:28. | :01:32. | |
whole programme is the former Labour Transport Secretary and Education | :01:32. | :01:37. | |
Minister Andrew Adonis. Let's start with a Scottish | :01:37. | :01:39. | |
government report published this morning which makes the economic | :01:39. | :01:45. | |
case for independence. Speaking in the last hour, Scotland's First | :01:45. | :01:50. | |
Minister Alex Salmond said the UK Government had held Scotland back | :01:50. | :01:54. | |
for decades. Economic policy at the present moment is largely determined | :01:54. | :02:03. | |
at Westminster. Westminster refused to invest Scotland's resources for | :02:03. | :02:06. | |
future generations, Westminster has cut capital investment in a | :02:06. | :02:11. | |
recession. The one thing you must not do is cut back on investment in | :02:11. | :02:16. | |
the future in a recession. Westminster has allowed too much of | :02:16. | :02:20. | |
economic activity of the United Kingdom to be concentrated in the of | :02:20. | :02:23. | |
England. We can't afford to make these mistakes in Scotland, nor can | :02:23. | :02:30. | |
we afford to have mismanagement by governments we have never re-elected | :02:31. | :02:36. | |
setting the economic temperature and calls for Scotland. Laura Bicker is | :02:37. | :02:40. | |
at the event in a bus factory in Falkirk. | :02:40. | :02:45. | |
Is there anything new we are hearing from the SNP and Alex Salmond? We | :02:45. | :02:51. | |
have heard those arguments rehearsed many, many times by Alex Salmond. | :02:51. | :02:55. | |
Are there new figures or new analysis? There is no new figures or | :02:55. | :03:02. | |
analysis, but I think he is trying to ram home a message. I think the | :03:02. | :03:07. | |
first thing to note is the venue that he chose to make his speech. | :03:07. | :03:09. | |
This is a bus manufacturing depot right in the heart of Scotland in | :03:09. | :03:16. | |
Falkirk, it employs 900 people and ships buses right across the world, | :03:16. | :03:20. | |
low carbon buses using special technology to Malaysia, Hong Kong, | :03:20. | :03:25. | |
Australia. This is the kind of manufacturing plants that Alex | :03:25. | :03:29. | |
Salmond says would do better if decisions were made in Hollywood | :03:29. | :03:33. | |
rather than Westminster. The key messages he is trying to get across | :03:33. | :03:39. | |
that, first of all, people should not fear independence. We have had | :03:39. | :03:43. | |
successive UK ministers coming to Scotland to put across this message | :03:43. | :03:47. | |
that there is a risk associated with independence, financial risk. Most | :03:47. | :03:52. | |
recently, George Osborne talked about the currency. Scotland would | :03:52. | :03:57. | |
like to keep the pound if they became independent, the Chancellor | :03:57. | :04:00. | |
said it would perhaps not become possible and it might put the rest | :04:00. | :04:05. | |
of the UK at risk. Alex Salmond is saying that the real risk is if | :04:05. | :04:08. | |
Scotland stays with Westminster. You have heard many of the points he | :04:08. | :04:13. | |
made earlier. The second clear point he is trying to get across is that | :04:13. | :04:19. | |
Scotland is a diverse economy with more to it than just oil and gas. We | :04:19. | :04:25. | |
know it generates about �25 billion to the Scotland GDP. But he is | :04:25. | :04:30. | |
trying to say that there is far more than that, there is a �14 billion | :04:30. | :04:35. | |
turnover in the last year in manufacturing, �12 billion for food | :04:35. | :04:38. | |
and drink. He says Scotland could do better in these industries if | :04:38. | :04:43. | |
decisions were made here. There is very little detail in the paper, he | :04:43. | :04:48. | |
cited two things in it, our passenger duty, which he said would | :04:48. | :04:54. | |
be lower in an independent Scotland to allow freedom of movement and | :04:54. | :04:58. | |
businesses to trade. He said it would be good to get a good child | :04:58. | :05:02. | |
care policy in place so that young mums could get back to work. These | :05:02. | :05:07. | |
are the kind of things he said an independent Scotland could do, but | :05:07. | :05:12. | |
there is very little detail so far. He has until September 2014 to put | :05:12. | :05:17. | |
that in place. Thank you, Laura. One of the things that will boost the | :05:17. | :05:23. | |
SNP campaign is discontinuing thread that Scotland is not a priority for | :05:23. | :05:28. | |
Westminster, it never has been, and in an ongoing difficult economic | :05:28. | :05:34. | |
time, we are suffering in Scotland. Scotland has done extremely well out | :05:34. | :05:38. | |
of the union and its per capita public spending is higher than in | :05:38. | :05:42. | |
England. I think this will concentrate the minds of the Scots. | :05:42. | :05:46. | |
To my mind, the defining moment is what Alex Salmond has said about the | :05:46. | :05:51. | |
currency. He is saying that he wants to stay with sterling. The SNP has | :05:51. | :05:54. | |
toyed around with the idea of Scotland in Europe, possibly the | :05:54. | :05:58. | |
euro. If he was saying that Scotland was going to leave Stirling and join | :05:59. | :06:05. | |
the euro... He has dropped that.A large part of his economic policy | :06:05. | :06:09. | |
will continue to be driven by London. The Bank of England will | :06:09. | :06:13. | |
determine his interest rates and his economic policy will be determined | :06:13. | :06:18. | |
by what goes on in London. The Scots need to address that if they are | :06:18. | :06:23. | |
going to stay in a currency union with England, isn't it better to | :06:23. | :06:28. | |
have some real say in how the currency union is run? That is | :06:28. | :06:31. | |
precisely the reason why I think the Scots will follow Alistair Darling | :06:31. | :06:34. | |
and do the sensible thing, not the insane thing of keeping in a | :06:34. | :06:39. | |
currency union with England and having no control. There will be | :06:39. | :06:44. | |
months of debate, exactly on the issue of the currency union. Andrew | :06:44. | :06:47. | |
Adonis is described as a rail enthusiast, but we suspect he might | :06:47. | :06:52. | |
be more than that. As Transport Secretary he personally | :06:53. | :06:56. | |
championed the new High Speed two rail line and inspected the nation's | :06:56. | :07:04. | |
railway. So we wish to see how big a Trainspotting he really is. Here are | :07:04. | :07:08. | |
four famous engines, and at the end of the programme, if you have time, | :07:08. | :07:11. | |
we will see whether you can name them all. | :07:11. | :07:17. | |
Are we a nation of entrepreneurs? This morning, the Department for | :07:17. | :07:19. | |
work and pensions has been promoting plans to help unemployed people | :07:19. | :07:22. | |
start up their own businesses. The new enterprise allowance was | :07:22. | :07:29. | |
launched two years ago to encourage people to consider self-employment. | :07:29. | :07:33. | |
Participants get action is to a volunteer businessmen tour providing | :07:33. | :07:36. | |
guidance and support as they develop their business plan. Once they | :07:36. | :07:42. | |
participant has had their plan approved and start training, they | :07:42. | :07:47. | |
can access financial support consisting of an allowance worth | :07:47. | :07:52. | |
�1274 over 26 weeks, and the facility to access a loan of up to | :07:52. | :07:57. | |
�1000 to help with start-up costs. The scheme aims to create 40,000 new | :07:57. | :08:05. | |
businesses by 2015. By November 20 15,210 loans had been taken out | :08:05. | :08:11. | |
across England. This morning, the government has been promoting its | :08:11. | :08:18. | |
latest recruit, the entrepreneur and hot sauce salesman Levi Roots. He is | :08:18. | :08:22. | |
an ambassador for entrepreneurship, and he has already been put to work. | :08:22. | :08:27. | |
Have you ever thought about being your own boss? Using your skills to | :08:27. | :08:33. | |
do a job your way? You are not alone. The thing that puts most | :08:33. | :08:36. | |
people off becoming self-employed is the thought of doing it by | :08:36. | :08:40. | |
themselves. The job centre plus new enterprise allowance can provide the | :08:40. | :08:45. | |
support you need to get started in business, to do the job you want, | :08:45. | :08:50. | |
your way. You can use your skills and experience to do something you | :08:50. | :08:57. | |
really enjoy. Levi Roots has joined us, as has the Pensions Minister, | :08:57. | :09:00. | |
Mark Hoban. How important our schemes like this? Would it have | :09:00. | :09:10. | |
:09:10. | :09:12. | ||
helped you? Absolutely, I started out like this. I met my first mental | :09:12. | :09:19. | |
in 2006 -- I met my first mentor. I said that I thought I had a source | :09:19. | :09:26. | |
which could outsell Heinz Camacho catsup, and he showed me the door! | :09:26. | :09:33. | |
-- Heinz tomato ketchup. Here is a mental, somebody in June to you I | :09:33. | :09:43. | |
:09:43. | :09:45. | ||
am. That's here is a mentor. have to be able to get off the | :09:45. | :09:52. | |
ground. It is about personality, and you have a big personality, it is a | :09:52. | :09:56. | |
winning formula. What sort of businesses will you be mentoring? | :09:56. | :10:01. | |
am working with the young boy from south London, which resonates with | :10:01. | :10:05. | |
me. He has a great skateboarding business, fantastic passion and a | :10:05. | :10:09. | |
great opportunity, but he lacks the advice from somebody like me, a | :10:09. | :10:14. | |
mentor or a role model he can be in June with. What sort of advice are | :10:14. | :10:20. | |
you giving? Just seeing somebody a bit like himself, perhaps from a | :10:20. | :10:23. | |
similar area with a similar background, or are you giving hard, | :10:23. | :10:31. | |
gritty business advice? Hard-core advice, and making the crucial calls | :10:31. | :10:37. | |
that he perhaps will not make. I would have the experience that was | :10:37. | :10:42. | |
instilled into me, I now want to pass it onto a young entrepreneur. | :10:42. | :10:48. | |
You think he will succeed? I think so, I believe he has the tools the | :10:48. | :10:52. | |
passion. The money helps, but having somebody around who can help showing | :10:52. | :10:57. | |
you how to use the money is the crucial thing. You will get that | :10:57. | :11:02. | |
involved? That will make a big difference? But coming onto the | :11:02. | :11:08. | |
money, you had an investment of �50,000, a sizeable investment from | :11:08. | :11:18. | |
:11:18. | :11:18. | ||
two Dragons. The amounts here, �65 a week, it sounds poultry. That the | :11:18. | :11:22. | |
initial money you need to start the business, because before I got to | :11:22. | :11:29. | |
dragons den, I needed the initial help, I did not go there as a first | :11:29. | :11:39. | |
:11:39. | :11:42. | ||
step, my business was ready for the next step. And this gives you that | :11:42. | :11:47. | |
first step. How do you judge who gets the money? Bee people come into | :11:47. | :11:54. | |
the job centre, they have a new idea from day one. We have a network | :11:55. | :11:58. | |
dividing advice from people like Dean who we saw this morning, or | :11:58. | :12:04. | |
Natasha, who was setting up a counselling business. The mentor's | :12:04. | :12:08. | |
will work with somebody, they will look at their business plan, they | :12:08. | :12:11. | |
will look at whether or not it will be successful, if they give the | :12:11. | :12:15. | |
planned a green light, the people get the money and they will be paid | :12:15. | :12:21. | |
a weekly sum over 26 weeks, six months, to help them get off the | :12:21. | :12:24. | |
ground. There are some really good quality people giving advice, people | :12:24. | :12:29. | |
like Levi and others with experience of business, helping young | :12:29. | :12:32. | |
entrepreneurs setting up a business to look after themselves and their | :12:32. | :12:38. | |
families. You will rely on people like Levi to root out the dead-end | :12:38. | :12:44. | |
ideas which will just not make it to money? The mentors that we have in | :12:44. | :12:51. | |
place are good at defining the opportunities. �65 a week for the | :12:51. | :12:54. | |
first 13 weeks, �33 a week for a further 13 weeks, do you really | :12:54. | :12:58. | |
think that is enough? It helps people when they are starting to | :12:58. | :13:05. | |
earn a living. They are getting their benefits, once they... If they | :13:05. | :13:10. | |
are going to have their business plan approved, the benefit has two | :13:10. | :13:14. | |
stop and they have to start trading. In the absence of the scheme they | :13:14. | :13:19. | |
would get nothing. They would get their benefit. If they are not | :13:19. | :13:24. | |
looking for work, they do not get benefits. We are giving them | :13:24. | :13:26. | |
financial support which they would not otherwise get to tide them over | :13:26. | :13:30. | |
the first period of trading, to give them the confidence of money coming | :13:31. | :13:38. | |
in, so they take that idea, grow it and develop it. It is real support, | :13:38. | :13:42. | |
people want to get off the ground. There are fantastic stories from | :13:42. | :13:46. | |
around the country, people who have taken advantage of this. In Grimsby, | :13:46. | :13:51. | |
a chap recognise that if you go to hospital you might not have pyjamas, | :13:51. | :13:56. | |
so he set up a kiosk selling pyjamas in the hospital. It only has | :13:56. | :14:01. | |
provided a job for him, he has taken an apprentice. Somebody unemployed | :14:01. | :14:09. | |
in Glasgow who had worked in the care sector provided a tucking in | :14:09. | :14:11. | |
service for elderly people, she is now employing nine people who were | :14:11. | :14:15. | |
previously unemployed. We need people like Levi acting as mentors, | :14:15. | :14:20. | |
role models. But we have a problem of exploding and employment, and the | :14:20. | :14:25. | |
idea that this will be a big solution, I don't think is correct. | :14:25. | :14:28. | |
But for those who have set of these companies it will be life changing, | :14:28. | :14:34. | |
and having mentors like Levi is the right way. Is it right way for tax | :14:34. | :14:42. | |
payers money to be spent? Just over 15,000 loans. That is not a bad | :14:42. | :14:52. | |
:14:52. | :14:53. | ||
amount... We rely on people like Levi to show that it will go one | :14:53. | :14:59. | |
good propositions. But we need really good role models. How many | :14:59. | :15:06. | |
mentors have you got? Over 15,000 businesses have started, we have | :15:06. | :15:09. | |
provided advice to 30,000 people interested in getting a business | :15:09. | :15:15. | |
going. The people I have spoken to today are helping to support | :15:15. | :15:19. | |
businesses in South London, and they say 75% of the ones they have worked | :15:19. | :15:24. | |
with have survived a year, a good track record given how precarious | :15:24. | :15:29. | |
small businesses can be. It is one of a range of ways in which we have | :15:29. | :15:32. | |
to help people get back into work and look after themselves and their | :15:32. | :15:38. | |
families. How hard is it for businesses to start about the | :15:38. | :15:42. | |
moment? Very difficult. We look at this thing about self-employment, it | :15:42. | :15:48. | |
is a lonely world out there. Part of the reason and part of the message I | :15:48. | :15:53. | |
am hoping is to tell people that they are not alone. There is | :15:53. | :15:58. | |
fantastic help, people are azure crew willing to stay the course with | :15:58. | :16:03. | |
you. It is not just the money. The money is small, but the advice and | :16:03. | :16:07. | |
the mentorship is perhaps the best thing. How often are you meeting | :16:07. | :16:13. | |
with some of the business people you are mentoring? Once a week, do they | :16:13. | :16:18. | |
phone you and say, Levi, come over? It is going really badly and I need | :16:18. | :16:24. | |
your help? It is an open book. They can have my e-mail address. We will | :16:24. | :16:29. | |
converse. It is about hands-on help. A bit like a Peter Jones made the | :16:29. | :16:34. | |
crucial call for me. I am hoping I will be able to make a call for some | :16:34. | :16:42. | |
of these entrepreneurs. There is an old saying in Parliament that it is | :16:42. | :16:48. | |
the opposition who are in front of you and the enemies behind you. Last | :16:48. | :16:52. | |
night the Government pushed throughs its Same-Sex Marriage Bill with the | :16:52. | :16:56. | |
support of Labour and in the face of opposition from many on its own | :16:56. | :17:02. | |
side. Here a flavour of the debate. -- here is a flavour of the debate. | :17:02. | :17:07. | |
This Bill has a single important and straightforward purpose to extend | :17:07. | :17:11. | |
marriage to same-sex couples. And I'm delighted that the major | :17:11. | :17:15. | |
political parties on the front benches are unanimous in the view | :17:15. | :17:20. | |
that this is ants essential objective and I'm grateful for their | :17:20. | :17:25. | |
unwavering support. It has been reassuring to see the other parties | :17:25. | :17:30. | |
sharing my determination to ensure that nothing derailed or delays this | :17:30. | :17:34. | |
very important piece of legislation. If you are a same-sex couple you | :17:34. | :17:38. | |
have no justice at all. It is not about fairness, there is no justice, | :17:38. | :17:44. | |
you cannot be married. And it seems to me to be grossly unfair to | :17:44. | :17:52. | |
continue to perpetuate an injustice particularly the proposal in this | :17:52. | :17:57. | |
amendment is accepted tonight. a free vote. We are in danger of | :17:57. | :18:03. | |
being party to a stitch-up, a last minute stitch-up between front | :18:03. | :18:12. | |
benches, but this is a free vote, not on a conscience issue, but on | :18:12. | :18:17. | |
equality. Whether they are whipped to support the Bill or will defy the | :18:17. | :18:20. | |
whip to oppose it. There are people in this House who are supporting | :18:20. | :18:24. | |
this amendment for the opposite reason. I do not include my | :18:24. | :18:27. | |
honourable friend in that. There are people who are breathing the word | :18:27. | :18:35. | |
equality for the first time. It sticks frankly in the claw of us to | :18:35. | :18:37. | |
be lectured about equality by a group of people who have been | :18:37. | :18:42. | |
opposing this Bill and opposing equality and opposing every measure | :18:42. | :18:46. | |
that has come forward to promote equality in the first place | :18:46. | :18:49. | |
including civil partnerships. I fear that the playing field is not | :18:49. | :18:54. | |
being levelled. I believe that the pendulum is swinging so far the | :18:54. | :19:02. | |
other way and there are plenty in the aggress aggressive homosexual | :19:02. | :19:07. | |
community who see this as a stepping stone to something even further. | :19:07. | :19:13. | |
Well, that was the debate yesterday. Let's get the latest from Carole | :19:13. | :19:16. | |
Walker. Hugely divisive for the Conservatives, but where are we now | :19:16. | :19:20. | |
with the Bill? Well, the debate will continue in the Commons this | :19:20. | :19:24. | |
afternoon, Jo, and there are more amendments down and there will be a | :19:24. | :19:28. | |
further vote in principle on what is called the third reading, another | :19:29. | :19:32. | |
important milestone in the Bill this evening. The expectation is that it | :19:32. | :19:37. | |
will get through the Commons with a similar figures to the votes that we | :19:37. | :19:41. | |
have seen in the past. More than 100 Conservative MPs perhaps voting | :19:41. | :19:44. | |
against it, but with the support of Labour and the Liberal Democrats, | :19:44. | :19:47. | |
the Government will get through this milestone. It does go on to the | :19:47. | :19:51. | |
House of Lords where it could face quite a difficult ride. But clearly, | :19:51. | :19:55. | |
I think, the Prime Minister thinks that this is an important issue. He | :19:55. | :20:00. | |
will press on with this, but the legacy that it will leave, in terms | :20:00. | :20:05. | |
of the difficulties within its own party, I think, it is something that | :20:05. | :20:08. | |
is going to be difficult for him to overcome. He sent this e-mail out | :20:08. | :20:12. | |
today. It is something when a Prime Minister has to send an e-mail to | :20:12. | :20:17. | |
his party members saying, " I really wasn't sneering at you." Many MPs | :20:17. | :20:22. | |
and activists will be looking him to say, " Well, if you really care | :20:22. | :20:26. | |
about our feelings then you have got to show that in what you do and say | :20:26. | :20:32. | |
in the coming months." highlighted the disconnect between | :20:32. | :20:35. | |
David Cameron and his party and we have yet to see if the relationship | :20:35. | :20:40. | |
can be fixed. How much does David Cameron have to fear from his | :20:40. | :20:46. | |
backbenchers. Some of whom feel he hasn't been leading the party on the | :20:46. | :20:51. | |
key issues of Europe and gay marriage? There is a sense of | :20:51. | :20:54. | |
frustration that every time David Cameron does something which is aP | :20:54. | :21:00. | |
mrauded amongst his own -- applauded amongst his MPs that is not followed | :21:00. | :21:06. | |
up with action. We had as one MP put it, four months of inactivity after | :21:06. | :21:11. | |
that speech during which time UKIP then made great strides and did very | :21:11. | :21:16. | |
well in the local elections. I think David Cameron now does face a series | :21:16. | :21:21. | |
of tests and the first one will be the Government's handling of that | :21:21. | :21:24. | |
Private Members' Bill on a European referendum. I think MPs will be | :21:24. | :21:29. | |
looking to see if the part of the Government does do all it can to | :21:29. | :21:34. | |
make sure that that gets some passage through Parliament. As one | :21:34. | :21:38. | |
senior figure in the party said to me, he has got to start governing as | :21:38. | :21:43. | |
though he is in a coalition with the Conservatives rather thatten thatten | :21:43. | :21:47. | |
than looking at his Lib Dem coalition partners. MPs and | :21:47. | :21:50. | |
activists would like to see him standing up to the Lib Dems more and | :21:50. | :21:52. | |
pushing some core Conservative issues. | :21:52. | :21:57. | |
Carole Walker, thank you very much. Are David Cameron was chosen as | :21:57. | :22:01. | |
Conservative leader because in a way he was different to many grass-roots | :22:01. | :22:06. | |
Tories, young, moderniser, a little bit like Tony Blair. So who is it | :22:06. | :22:10. | |
that's out-of-touch in this argument within the Conservative Party? Is it | :22:10. | :22:14. | |
grass-roots Tories or David Cameron? I think David Cameron is in touch | :22:14. | :22:18. | |
with middle opinion which is in favour of gay marriage and I am glad | :22:18. | :22:23. | |
all three parties united to support it. And Carole mentioned it going to | :22:23. | :22:27. | |
the House of Lords. I suspect it would have a majority in the House | :22:27. | :22:30. | |
of Lords. The thing I find disappointing what is going to | :22:30. | :22:34. | |
happen in the House of Lords is the position of the Church of England. | :22:34. | :22:39. | |
The bishops headed by the Archbishop of Canterbury are opposing gay | :22:39. | :22:43. | |
marriage and opposing the right of vicars who want to conduct gay | :22:43. | :22:48. | |
marriages to allow their churches to be used for that purpose. In two or | :22:48. | :22:51. | |
three years time that will look like a serious mistake and a back ward | :22:51. | :22:55. | |
looking position on the part of the Church of England. | :22:55. | :22:58. | |
But you think it will pass? I think so with a big majority. | :22:58. | :23:06. | |
When you talk about the Church of England. The views chime with many | :23:06. | :23:09. | |
of not just Conservative voters in the country who feel strongly on | :23:09. | :23:14. | |
this issue? Opinion is moving. And the polls I see show a majority in | :23:14. | :23:17. | |
favour of gay marriage and it is a basic issue of equality and with | :23:17. | :23:20. | |
each passing month. Those who are prepared to argue on principle | :23:20. | :23:24. | |
against equality are finding it harder and harder to do so. What was | :23:24. | :23:33. | |
telling about the debate yesterday was Nick Herbert's speech. The | :23:33. | :23:36. | |
argument for equality is to allow gay marriage. | :23:36. | :23:39. | |
Tomorrow hundreds of solicitors and barristers from all over England and | :23:39. | :23:42. | |
Wales are planning to demo in Westminster against the Government's | :23:42. | :23:47. | |
plans to cut criminal Legal Aid. The Ministry of Justice is consulting on | :23:47. | :23:55. | |
plans that will save �220 million. BBC West Midlands reporter, | :23:55. | :24:00. | |
Elizabeth Glinka has been to Birmingham University's law school | :24:00. | :24:04. | |
to cross-examine witnesses. The key point to look at... What | :24:04. | :24:08. | |
price justice? Legal Aid for criminal cases costs the taxpayer | :24:08. | :24:11. | |
over �1 billion a year. The Government wants that to come down | :24:11. | :24:14. | |
and is consulting on plans to restructure the system, cutting the | :24:14. | :24:20. | |
number of firms allowed to defend criminal cases from 13600 to just | :24:20. | :24:25. | |
400. Instead of choosing your lawyer, you will be assigned one | :24:26. | :24:30. | |
from a Government approved list from a firm which has agreed to work for | :24:30. | :24:40. | |
at least 17. 5% less than it charges at the moment. . Client choice goes | :24:40. | :24:44. | |
out of the window. The inhe centretive is there for the | :24:44. | :24:47. | |
solicitor to do a good job. When that solicitor does a good job, it | :24:47. | :24:51. | |
the clients come back and refer other clients to us. | :24:52. | :24:56. | |
So rich lawyers are less rich. Why does that matter? Well, what about | :24:56. | :25:00. | |
if you want your day in court like these Birmingham students? Your | :25:00. | :25:05. | |
lawyer would be paid the same whether they take your case to trial | :25:05. | :25:11. | |
or advice you to plead guilty. obvious fear is they will be putting | :25:11. | :25:15. | |
pressure on the clients to plead guilty so they can get on with their | :25:15. | :25:21. | |
next guilty plea and they don't have to waste the time doing the trial. | :25:21. | :25:24. | |
The consultation on the plans ends on the 4th June and the scheme could | :25:24. | :25:30. | |
be up and running as early as next year. Under the it changes, 36 firms | :25:30. | :25:37. | |
would be awarded contracts across the Midlands. There are 55 operating | :25:37. | :25:42. | |
in Birmingham alone. Which could mean law firms going out of business | :25:43. | :25:46. | |
a worrying trend for the next generation. At the end of the day, | :25:47. | :25:52. | |
we are in this to get a job. There is the whole want to do justice and | :25:52. | :25:55. | |
all the ideals and everything that comes with it, but if you can't put | :25:55. | :26:00. | |
food on the table what's the point? By saying that you should just be | :26:00. | :26:03. | |
allowed to cut people's pay, it means you are going to get less | :26:03. | :26:07. | |
people wanting to do it. And if there is no passion in it, you will | :26:07. | :26:11. | |
not get the results. Access to justice should be paramount over | :26:11. | :26:15. | |
cuts when people really need help. think whilst the Government is | :26:15. | :26:20. | |
sensible to look at cuts, to cut them as excessively as they have in | :26:20. | :26:24. | |
this case is just bizarre. The Government says fewer firms will | :26:24. | :26:29. | |
mean better value for the taxpayer. The lawyers fear the quality of | :26:29. | :26:30. | |
The lawyers fear the quality of The lawyers fear the quality of | :26:30. | :26:32. | |
The lawyers fear the quality of justice will suffer. Elizabeth | :26:32. | :26:36. | |
Glinka reporting and Giles Dilnot is outside Parliament with more on | :26:36. | :26:38. | |
this. Jo, it seems to be a suggestion | :26:38. | :26:41. | |
about the quality of justice and access to justice that is key here. | :26:41. | :26:49. | |
What's going on? Well, Elizabeth Davis is the chair of the Legal | :26:49. | :26:53. | |
Services Consumer Panel. The Government says that within its | :26:53. | :26:57. | |
search for money and this is what it is, it is a search for savings, you | :26:57. | :27:00. | |
will still get access to a descent lawyer and you will still get access | :27:00. | :27:06. | |
when you need it to justice. What's wrong with that? Our main concern is | :27:06. | :27:10. | |
you might get it, but you will have absence of consumer choice. And what | :27:10. | :27:14. | |
that means in reality is, at the moment, if you have Legal Aid, you | :27:14. | :27:19. | |
might use a provider based on how close they are to you. Their | :27:19. | :27:24. | |
sPesism, the ex-- specialism, the expertise your case needs. It might | :27:24. | :27:28. | |
be based on an existing relationship. Under the proposals, | :27:28. | :27:33. | |
you will not have that choice. And under the proposals if you have real | :27:33. | :27:37. | |
concerns about the kwaflt of -- quality of your provider, you will | :27:37. | :27:41. | |
not be able to switch to another provider. | :27:41. | :27:44. | |
If you are paying for it, choose as much as you like? The notion that | :27:44. | :27:48. | |
choice as a consumer should be linked to whether you are paid or | :27:48. | :27:51. | |
not is something I would never support and nor do I think many | :27:51. | :27:56. | |
people would. And let me give you examples of other areas of | :27:56. | :28:00. | |
Government policy, in healthcare, in social care and in education. The | :28:00. | :28:04. | |
idea that choice is important is well rehearsed and well accepted. | :28:04. | :28:09. | |
So why not here? The problem I can see is you don't represent lawyers | :28:09. | :28:12. | |
and you don't represent clients and their customers, but lawyers will | :28:12. | :28:17. | |
say the same sort of things, this is going to provide access to justice, | :28:17. | :28:21. | |
but lots of people say lawyers would say that, wouldn't they because they | :28:21. | :28:27. | |
are the greatest recipient of the pie? There is a public perception of | :28:27. | :28:34. | |
fat cat lawyers. Le, they don't do too badly. When it | :28:34. | :28:37. | |
comes to the pay, the fee structures, I will leave that to the | :28:37. | :28:41. | |
representative bodies to argue that one for you. My big concern around | :28:41. | :28:45. | |
this is access to justice, access to quality, and choice that means you | :28:45. | :28:51. | |
can choose the provider that's best for you. When you have saving money | :28:51. | :28:55. | |
as the key driver to any change, if all of the things that they fear are | :28:55. | :28:58. | |
going to happen, don't happen, do you accept they are at least a risk | :28:58. | :29:03. | |
of what could happen? Well, the reality is that those who are most | :29:03. | :29:08. | |
vulnerable, so people who have been victims of violence, of domestic | :29:08. | :29:14. | |
abuse, will be in receipt of Legal Aid. The big question, I think you | :29:14. | :29:19. | |
touched upon it a minute ago, is in our country, in England and Wales, | :29:19. | :29:26. | |
we spent �39 her head on Legal Aid. In France and other countries, it is | :29:26. | :29:33. | |
5 or �6 per head. We are right to introduce rigour into the system and | :29:33. | :29:37. | |
make sure money is well spent. You heard it is the perception that you | :29:37. | :29:43. | |
have got fat cat lawyers. There are lawyers, a lawyer earned over �1 | :29:43. | :29:49. | |
million in Legal Aid fees. They are exceptions to the rule? But they are | :29:49. | :29:55. | |
spending time on spending Legal Aid money on immigration appeals and | :29:55. | :30:03. | |
plan ning appeals. That can't be right when we are borrow borrowing | :30:03. | :30:09. | |
426 approximately bds a day. -- �426 billion a day. | :30:09. | :30:12. | |
I see you sneering? It is a challenge for all areas of public | :30:12. | :30:17. | |
service. Let's not pre-empt the outcome. Come 4th June, I would be | :30:17. | :30:21. | |
surprised if you have a lot of responses pushing for the status | :30:21. | :30:24. | |
quo, saying that Legal Aid is different to any other public | :30:24. | :30:29. | |
service that they shouldn't face our fair share of economic cuts. | :30:29. | :30:34. | |
That's good news. Never and not at the expense of quality. | :30:34. | :30:38. | |
Absolutely right. The most important thing is better focus. The money | :30:38. | :30:43. | |
going to those in most need. When times are tough, at times of | :30:43. | :30:48. | |
austerity, what you do is you try and focus every taxpayer pound on | :30:48. | :30:53. | |
those most in need. Can we see that greater transparency | :30:53. | :30:58. | |
then? Let's see a competitive tend tendering process that has quality | :30:58. | :31:02. | |
at the heart of it, not price. Let's see the quality monitoring processes | :31:02. | :31:10. | |
you set in choice. How will we judge the performances of these firms? | :31:10. | :31:13. | |
Snool I am all for transparency, the more information that we put out for | :31:13. | :31:18. | |
people to scrutinise, we will introduce more rigour into the | :31:18. | :31:23. | |
system. What I have a problem is very wealthy prisoners using Legal | :31:23. | :31:27. | |
Aid to change what prison they are in. That's wrong. Let's have you | :31:27. | :31:32. | |
back when we have had a look at whether there is transparency in the | :31:32. | :31:35. | |
system. You nearly put me out of the job there and a good thing too. I | :31:36. | :31:38. | |
suspect we will be out here Jo discussing this. | :31:38. | :31:43. | |
STUDIO: You were pushed out of that conversation, weren't you, Giles? | :31:43. | :31:46. | |
The days that followed the 2010 general election saw negotiations | :31:46. | :31:49. | |
between the three main parties as they fought for the right to govern | :31:49. | :31:55. | |
Britain. The talks resulted in the Lib Dem/Tory coalition we have | :31:55. | :32:04. | |
today. Was that a foregone con cushion. -- conclusion, a | :32:04. | :32:09. | |
documentary made by Nick Robinson, David Thompson has been looking at | :32:09. | :32:15. | |
how the drama played out and how it might have turned out differently. | :32:16. | :32:21. | |
Five Days That Changed Britain, we know the ending. A Conservative-Lib | :32:21. | :32:27. | |
Dem coalition. How might it have been and what happens next? | :32:27. | :32:31. | |
It started with one man's refusal to admit defeat. | :32:31. | :32:38. | |
Gordon and the people around Gordon were determined so far as we could | :32:38. | :32:42. | |
to stay in power. We saw this as a straight and important competition | :32:42. | :32:43. | |
for power between us and the Conservatives. | :32:43. | :32:47. | |
That meant being anal to do a deal with the man who came third, not | :32:47. | :32:52. | |
first at the general election. The thing is at times, Labour were so | :32:52. | :32:58. | |
close. It was ex-cruisenating. If the electorate moved 1% differently | :32:58. | :33:02. | |
than it had, almost all of those problems would have been self | :33:02. | :33:07. | |
resolving. After the result then I talked to Gordon Brown on three or | :33:07. | :33:10. | |
perhaps four occasions over the critical weekend. The message I | :33:10. | :33:16. | |
wanted to get to him was for me, and a lot of Liberal Democrats, the more | :33:16. | :33:20. | |
natural position was to see whether or not an arrangement could be made | :33:20. | :33:21. | |
with Labour. The conversation that really | :33:21. | :33:26. | |
mattered for Labour was the one with the current Lib Dem leader and that | :33:26. | :33:32. | |
was the problem. I don't think Nick found him im impossible -- | :33:32. | :33:38. | |
impossible and I think he found him a bit Gordon I shall! | :33:38. | :33:43. | |
Then there was the lack of a plan. No, we didn't have a document of | :33:43. | :33:48. | |
paper, a renegotiating position. I mean, we were sort of flying blind | :33:48. | :33:51. | |
in that sense. Which gave the advantage to David | :33:51. | :33:56. | |
Cameron. But Gordon Brown had one more dramatic shot in his locker. | :33:56. | :34:01. | |
The reason that we have a hung parliament is that no single party | :34:01. | :34:04. | |
and no single leader was able to win the full support of the country. As | :34:04. | :34:09. | |
the leader of my party I must accept that that is a judgement on me. I | :34:09. | :34:13. | |
therefore, intend to ask the Labour Party to set in train the processes | :34:13. | :34:16. | |
needed for its own leadership election. | :34:16. | :34:20. | |
It all changed in the last hour. is a bid by Gordon Brown to keep | :34:20. | :34:24. | |
Labour in power. On the Monday evening, I believed there was all to | :34:24. | :34:30. | |
play for and there was a good prospect of a Labour-Lib Dem | :34:30. | :34:33. | |
coalition being negotiated. But it turned out like this. Is it | :34:33. | :34:38. | |
really the end of the story or the beginning of a saga? I think the | :34:38. | :34:43. | |
possibility exists for coalition politics to be a feature of British | :34:43. | :34:49. | |
democracy for sometime and therefore p we in the Labour Party have got to | :34:49. | :34:52. | |
be thinking alliance, coalition, partnership because that maybe the | :34:52. | :34:58. | |
only way in which we get back into power or it maybe the next way we | :34:58. | :35:08. | |
:35:08. | :35:09. | ||
Peter Mandelson ending that report. David Thompson reporting with a | :35:09. | :35:19. | |
:35:19. | :35:25. | ||
little help from Nick Robinson. Our guest of the day Andrew Adonis has | :35:25. | :35:30. | |
just published a book. You say you felt it was close on | :35:30. | :35:38. | |
that Monday evening. Was it really, realistic a Lib-Lab coalition? | :35:38. | :35:40. | |
will never know. There was a possibility. The key thing, it is | :35:40. | :35:48. | |
clear to me, is that Nick Clegg had decided he wanted to go in with the | :35:48. | :35:53. | |
Conservatives. That was an an honourable position. He thought they | :35:53. | :35:58. | |
won the election and for him to try and swim against the tide was too | :35:58. | :36:01. | |
big a thing to do. He is quite sympathetic to the Conservatives and | :36:01. | :36:11. | |
:36:11. | :36:12. | ||
was prepared to sign up up -- sign up to their economic strategy. | :36:12. | :36:17. | |
My party didn't prepare properly for a hung parliament. You have got to | :36:17. | :36:21. | |
terms in terms of people and ne terms of understanding the | :36:21. | :36:26. | |
manifestoes of the other parties. I hope Labour win the next election | :36:26. | :36:31. | |
outright. There is no excuse for the parties not to be properly prepared. | :36:31. | :36:34. | |
Was Nick Clegg only going to go into coalition with the Conservatives? | :36:34. | :36:40. | |
That's not right. The second half of Andrew's analysis I agree with. | :36:40. | :36:44. | |
Parties should prepare beforehand and that's something the Liberal | :36:44. | :36:49. | |
Democrats had done. Nick appointed the team to do work befores hand. | :36:49. | :36:56. | |
Some of us faced Andrew with ideas of what needed to needed to happen | :36:56. | :37:01. | |
and it was fascinating to discover that a party that been running the | :37:01. | :37:07. | |
country had no plan for the next step forward and that derailed the | :37:07. | :37:11. | |
negotiations that we had with Labour. | :37:11. | :37:15. | |
Nothing to do with the nature of Nick Clegg with David Cameron? There | :37:15. | :37:19. | |
is now a feeling that the two of them were better matched than any | :37:19. | :37:22. | |
match between Nick Clegg and somebody who is going to replace | :37:22. | :37:28. | |
Gordon Brown? Well, a match with anybody with Gordon Brown would have | :37:28. | :37:32. | |
been an interesting challenge, but leaving that particular point aside, | :37:32. | :37:37. | |
as Menzies Campbell said if you looked at our manifesto beforehand | :37:37. | :37:43. | |
and the Conservative manifesto and the Liberal Democrats manifesto. | :37:43. | :37:46. | |
When we met the Labour Party negotiating team, Andrew was there, | :37:46. | :37:50. | |
they could not give a commitment to support their policy on voting | :37:50. | :37:53. | |
reform which by the way was something of a dilution of what we | :37:53. | :37:57. | |
wanted to see. That lack of preparation really undermined any | :37:57. | :38:02. | |
successful discussion with Labour. You brought it on yourselves? You | :38:02. | :38:06. | |
talked yourselves out of a coalition with the Liberal Democrats, not just | :38:06. | :38:10. | |
for the reasons you say, but probably because there was a sense | :38:10. | :38:16. | |
of we can't do business with these people. People like John Reid and | :38:16. | :38:20. | |
Andy Burnham were saying it would be a disaster? I think we could have | :38:20. | :38:25. | |
done a deal. On the issue of voting reform, we were content to hold a | :38:25. | :38:28. | |
referendum which is the position that... But you had nothing to talk | :38:28. | :38:34. | |
to them about? We said that in the discussions. I don't accept it was a | :38:34. | :38:36. | |
negotiating failure. Nick decided he wanted to go in with the | :38:36. | :38:41. | |
Conservatives. Having said which though, it is important you make the | :38:41. | :38:44. | |
strongest possible play that you can in a hung parliament situation. | :38:44. | :38:49. | |
you didn't? He we could have made a stronger play and if we are in the | :38:49. | :38:54. | |
situation again, we should do so. It is interesting. You can argue | :38:54. | :38:57. | |
about whether Nick Clegg decided to go in with the Conservatives. In | :38:57. | :39:01. | |
terms of the negotiating team. It took place over a period of days. | :39:01. | :39:07. | |
Paddy Ashdown and Menzies Campbell had links with Labour? There were | :39:07. | :39:12. | |
strong links. But Gordon and Nick didn't have strong personal | :39:12. | :39:18. | |
relations. It is important the Prince pals they have -- principals, | :39:18. | :39:24. | |
that they have strong relations smtz Gordon Brown said he was going to | :39:24. | :39:30. | |
If Alan Johnson had been there, the promise of him as leader. Would it | :39:30. | :39:33. | |
have been different? Could it have been different for Nick Clegg? | :39:33. | :39:37. | |
don't accept the point that Nick was Tory facing. Nick said beforehand | :39:37. | :39:40. | |
that we would if necessary enter negotiations with the party which | :39:40. | :39:44. | |
had the largest numbering of seats. That was -- number of seats, that | :39:44. | :39:49. | |
was the Conservatives. It could have been the Labour Party as Paddy | :39:49. | :39:53. | |
Ashdown pointed out on that clip. It wasn't a predetermined decision to | :39:53. | :39:56. | |
go with the Conservatives. There was a P plan to say we would discuss | :39:56. | :40:01. | |
with the party which had the largest number of seats and that will be the | :40:01. | :40:05. | |
position that I'm sure we will be adopting if that arises at the next | :40:05. | :40:08. | |
election. Should Nick Clegg have got himself a | :40:08. | :40:13. | |
department? Do you think, having gone into Government and decided | :40:13. | :40:16. | |
that he was Deputy Prime Minister, should he have got a department? | :40:16. | :40:21. | |
Would that have given the Liberal Democrats more influence? The role | :40:21. | :40:27. | |
Nick has is an oversight of a wide range of department departmental | :40:27. | :40:32. | |
initiatives in he every department. -- in every department. I have seen | :40:33. | :40:38. | |
Andrew's comments on this. Maybe if one looks at Continental examples, | :40:38. | :40:41. | |
you find Deputy Prime Ministers occupying major ministerial posts. | :40:41. | :40:46. | |
If you want to have a strategic view of what a Government is achieving, | :40:46. | :40:49. | |
you can't do that from one individual ministerial post and | :40:49. | :40:53. | |
clearly, that was a decision that was taken by Nick. I have to say | :40:53. | :41:00. | |
that the negotiating team at no point was discussing those matters, | :41:00. | :41:03. | |
we were looking at the policies, not the personalities that should be | :41:04. | :41:11. | |
leading P. That was as mistake. Nick marooned himself in the Cabinet | :41:11. | :41:19. | |
Office. It is a clearing house. It is not an office of state. | :41:19. | :41:23. | |
Continental governments, the second party has a significant office. In | :41:23. | :41:26. | |
Germany, the green leader is the Foreign Minister. In Sweden, it has | :41:26. | :41:29. | |
been Finance Minister. Having a significant departmental power base | :41:29. | :41:32. | |
dm a Government is very important to having influence across the | :41:32. | :41:35. | |
Government. Gordon Brown wanted a deal with the | :41:35. | :41:38. | |
Liberal Democrats before the last election or it was talked about. Do | :41:38. | :41:41. | |
you think there should be now proper talks with the Liberal Democrats xw | :41:41. | :41:51. | |
:41:51. | :41:51. | ||
that he deal before 2015? I think it would be premature to talk about | :41:51. | :41:56. | |
that. I thought we were just talking about a lack of preparatory is in | :41:56. | :42:02. | |
the event of hung parliament. don't think we should be in the | :42:02. | :42:07. | |
business of formerly negotiating, I think preparing means developing | :42:07. | :42:09. | |
strong relationships between the parties, and a strong mutual | :42:09. | :42:14. | |
understanding. You have to understand the Lib Dems to | :42:14. | :42:18. | |
understand why people like Andrew are so mad keen on constitutional | :42:18. | :42:23. | |
reform. My lot found it hard to understand. Unless you understand | :42:23. | :42:27. | |
that the first, second, third and fourth concern the Lib Dems always | :42:27. | :42:30. | |
have this House of Lords reform, you can never really get under their | :42:30. | :42:36. | |
skin. Peter Mandelson said he didn't even know who you were before the | :42:36. | :42:45. | |
negotiations were starting. I think I wear that badge with pride! | :42:45. | :42:48. | |
Preparation is about, firstly, knowing what you want. If ever there | :42:48. | :42:52. | |
was a team of people in the room who did not know what they want, it was | :42:52. | :42:56. | |
the Labour team we met, with Ed Balls Parling one-way, Andrew | :42:56. | :43:00. | |
valiantly pulling in another and Peter Mandelson holding the reins | :43:00. | :43:04. | |
with some difficulty. We had in the preparatory work, we knew what the | :43:04. | :43:09. | |
priorities were for Britain, we discuss the pupil premium and issues | :43:09. | :43:12. | |
about budget and finances, we discussed with Labour all of those | :43:12. | :43:16. | |
things, and their answer was nothing. We will cancel runway three | :43:16. | :43:23. | |
at Heathrow. That is not a negotiating position. I said that I | :43:23. | :43:27. | |
think they could have done the deal. The basic dynamics of that was | :43:27. | :43:33. | |
moving in on David Cameron. You said that the Liberal Democrat | :43:33. | :43:37. | |
negotiators only started talks with Labour to get an AV wrap around. As | :43:37. | :43:45. | |
the person mad about constitutional reform, was that the nub of it? | :43:45. | :43:49. | |
discussions with Labour, we were ready to have a full range of policy | :43:49. | :43:53. | |
discussions which we had with the Conservatives. Looking at the | :43:53. | :43:56. | |
coalition agreement, it is very wide-ranging in a whole scope of | :43:56. | :44:01. | |
government departments and policies, many of which are in place now and | :44:01. | :44:04. | |
more of which will follow, things like reform of the state pension | :44:04. | :44:08. | |
system and someone which are fundamentally radical and, I would | :44:08. | :44:14. | |
say, left of centre reforms, which were long overdue. We could not get | :44:15. | :44:19. | |
any engagement with Labour on that. The fundamental decision which Nick | :44:19. | :44:24. | |
Clegg took was to support the Osbourne plan, to go for further and | :44:24. | :44:29. | |
faster cuts than Alistair Darling proposed. I would say to throw over | :44:29. | :44:33. | |
the Lib Dems' own manifesto. Once they had taken up, I think the die | :44:33. | :44:38. | |
was cast. Do you think what has happened in this coalition | :44:38. | :44:44. | |
government will put the public off in the future? I don't think it will | :44:44. | :44:48. | |
be determined in that way. I think the public will be voting for the | :44:48. | :44:52. | |
party on the policies they favour, we will have to deal with the | :44:52. | :44:58. | |
consequences. Has this government and coalition a bad name? Thank you | :44:58. | :45:03. | |
very much. According to our next guest, the | :45:03. | :45:08. | |
American War on drugs has cost $1 trillion, resulted in 45 million | :45:08. | :45:13. | |
arrests yet has achieved nothing. This filmmaker argues that | :45:13. | :45:18. | |
politicians are afraid to do anything but be tough on drug users | :45:18. | :45:26. | |
and drug dealers. His film, The House I Live In, aims to argue for | :45:26. | :45:31. | |
the decriminalisation of drugs. Carpenter's perspective on the | :45:31. | :45:36. | |
severity of drug laws caught me off guard. A long time ago, we may drugs | :45:36. | :45:44. | |
into this huge thing and we have made it so illegal and we made it | :45:44. | :45:50. | |
such a national issue with that tough on crime stance. You can't get | :45:50. | :45:56. | |
elected if you don't profess to be tough on crime. We have to join | :45:56. | :45:59. | |
together to ensure that drug dealers are punished swiftly, Shirley and | :45:59. | :46:05. | |
severely. You can't stay elected if you don't do things to be tough on | :46:05. | :46:13. | |
crime. Build new prisons base for 24,000 inmates. Nobody wants to be | :46:13. | :46:16. | |
the first person to say, we can't afford what we are doing, let's do | :46:16. | :46:20. | |
something different. If you made any noise about being soft on crime in | :46:20. | :46:27. | |
any way, you would be out of a job. Three strikes and you are out. | :46:27. | :46:33. | |
Eugene joins us now. Wide EU say it has not worked, in broad terms, the | :46:33. | :46:39. | |
war on drugs? We have been at this for 40 years, we have spent $1 | :46:39. | :46:42. | |
trillion, we have 2.3 million people in jail and we have an unmitigated | :46:42. | :46:50. | |
rate of addiction. Drugs are cheaper, purer and more in use, more | :46:50. | :46:55. | |
widely available, so I don't see how it is meant to have succeeded. | :46:55. | :47:01. | |
is your benchmark for success? we concerned about the ravaging | :47:01. | :47:04. | |
impact on human life, families and communities of drug addiction? We | :47:05. | :47:09. | |
would like healthier families, individuals and communities, safer | :47:09. | :47:13. | |
neighbourhoods, it has made American communities less safe. When you over | :47:13. | :47:20. | |
apply the police to nonviolent dissent -- offenders, cops are | :47:20. | :47:25. | |
racking up petty drug arrests all night and there is an closer | :47:25. | :47:32. | |
violence in America. Communities are made less safe. We have not made | :47:33. | :47:37. | |
communities safer, nor individual safer, we have just enriched those | :47:37. | :47:43. | |
who profit from incarceration. a very difficult issue for | :47:43. | :47:46. | |
politicians, very few governments have tried it on any big scale | :47:46. | :47:51. | |
because it would not be palatable with the population, despite the | :47:52. | :47:58. | |
litany of woes that have been associated with the war on drugs. | :47:58. | :48:02. | |
You are kind to call it decriminalisation, we commonly here | :48:02. | :48:06. | |
it is legalisation. That scares everyday people, they would think | :48:06. | :48:10. | |
that overnight there would be a drug dealer in every corner and we would | :48:10. | :48:15. | |
declare open season on substances, with devastating impact. I am not an | :48:15. | :48:20. | |
advocate of legalisation, but I'm an advocate of following the example of | :48:20. | :48:25. | |
Portugal, for example. Portugal decriminalised the position of all | :48:25. | :48:28. | |
-- the possession of all drugs across the board, up to a certain | :48:28. | :48:34. | |
point. Beyond that point, somebody is assumed to be a dealer. At every | :48:34. | :48:41. | |
other level, that criminalisation had striking results. Drug use, HIV | :48:41. | :48:47. | |
and violence associated with drugs, these figures all went down. And | :48:47. | :48:53. | |
there was enormous savings in the criminal justice system in Portugal | :48:53. | :48:59. | |
with which they developed a robust treatment centre. You have thought | :48:59. | :49:03. | |
about policies that are difficult to make work, for governments to put in | :49:03. | :49:08. | |
place. Could something like that ever work here? I don't recognise | :49:08. | :49:12. | |
that position. We don't have a problem with exploding crime and | :49:13. | :49:16. | |
violence. Crime rates are coming down, violent crime rates much more | :49:16. | :49:21. | |
rapidly than overall crime rates. Drug-related crime, in terms of the | :49:21. | :49:25. | |
impact on the court, is coming down. There are big negative effects, | :49:25. | :49:30. | |
potentially, whether you quality criminalisation or legalisation, on | :49:30. | :49:34. | |
individual lives and the lives of communities. It can wreck lives. -- | :49:34. | :49:39. | |
whether you call it decriminalisation or legalisation. | :49:39. | :49:45. | |
In 2013, this situation is improving in this country, it is not getting | :49:45. | :49:50. | |
worse. Perhaps that is not the case in some parts of the world. | :49:50. | :49:54. | |
reality is that this was always a public health matter, it was a | :49:54. | :49:57. | |
complete departure from common sense to treat it as a criminal matter. If | :49:58. | :50:01. | |
somebody came to you and told you they were addicted, as so many | :50:01. | :50:05. | |
people in this world are, the first thing you would do was not to call | :50:05. | :50:09. | |
the police, you would say to them, you need counselling, you need to | :50:09. | :50:14. | |
get in a programme, somebody to intervene, many tough love kind of | :50:14. | :50:18. | |
things. In America we just did tough on crime, because it sold tickets | :50:18. | :50:22. | |
and was good for politicians. The failure is so monumental that even | :50:22. | :50:26. | |
people from the far right all the way to the far left are finding a | :50:26. | :50:30. | |
common voice. Washington disagrees about everything except for the drug | :50:30. | :50:36. | |
war. Many people are against the drug war. Leading Republicans don't | :50:36. | :50:40. | |
want to see a bloated federal programme that does no good, there | :50:40. | :50:43. | |
is certainly a common cause with people who think it is inhumane to | :50:43. | :50:50. | |
treat the nonviolent as though they were violent. We need to do more on | :50:50. | :50:52. | |
rehabilitation, and I am always struck by the big problem about drug | :50:52. | :50:58. | |
use in prisons. Of course, when they get out, unless they are on the | :50:58. | :51:01. | |
straight and narrow, you are just recycling them back into prison | :51:01. | :51:07. | |
again, and drugs are a big part of that. The amount -- the more that we | :51:07. | :51:13. | |
can do to help people out of addiction and so on... American | :51:13. | :51:23. | |
:51:23. | :51:49. | ||
politicians will share that view, Isn't it criminal when you have drug | :51:50. | :51:54. | |
cartels? It is a massive business? Isn't the problem the shipping of | :51:54. | :51:58. | |
the stuff in America stickily of the drugs being there in the first | :51:58. | :52:04. | |
place? Naes a consequence of the criminalisation of the drug. When | :52:04. | :52:08. | |
you criminalise a drug, it creates the market. We did prohibition. It | :52:08. | :52:13. | |
was a disaster. So then about five decades later somebody said, " Why | :52:13. | :52:18. | |
don't we try that again?" We have gone into the prohibition of drugs. | :52:18. | :52:23. | |
Alcohol is a far more destructive substance to public safety than any | :52:23. | :52:32. | |
of the drugs. We say some drugs are legal and other drugs are not. | :52:32. | :52:37. | |
social acceptability is quite a big point. When you are dealing with | :52:37. | :52:40. | |
substances which the overwhelming majority were enjoying, you have big | :52:40. | :52:46. | |
problems if you start decriminalising them. In the last | :52:46. | :52:49. | |
few days, there have been plenty of reports of Conservative voters | :52:49. | :52:53. | |
jumping ship to join UKIP. Conservative local councillors have | :52:53. | :52:56. | |
switched parties and there are murmuring is that some Tory MPs | :52:57. | :53:00. | |
might be tempted to change sides. But political defections are | :53:01. | :53:04. | |
certainly not a new thing. Winston Churchill, elected as a Conservative | :53:04. | :53:11. | |
MP in 1900, defected to the Liberal party in 1904. By 1924 and a switch | :53:11. | :53:17. | |
or two later, he was back in the fold as a conservative. 1981 was | :53:17. | :53:21. | |
notable for the biggest UK political defection, Labour lost 28 MPs to a | :53:21. | :53:27. | |
new party when the gang of four founded the SDP. More recent | :53:27. | :53:30. | |
Parliamentary wardrobe swaps include Shaun Woodward, who left the | :53:30. | :53:35. | |
Conservatives to join Labour in 1999, Paul Marsden went from red to | :53:35. | :53:42. | |
yellow in 2001, and Bob Spink went from conservative to UKIP in 2008. | :53:43. | :53:45. | |
We have been joined by the Conservative MP said Judge Karim, | :53:46. | :53:52. | |
who used to be a Liberal Democrat, and by a councillor who has switched | :53:52. | :53:56. | |
to UKIP from the Conservatives. And Lord Adonis was originally a member | :53:57. | :53:59. | |
of the SDP, then the Liberal Democrats, before defecting to | :54:00. | :54:08. | |
Labour. Just the Conservatives to go! Suzanne, you are the most recent | :54:08. | :54:16. | |
defector, how long have you been in UKIP? A couple of days, it is that | :54:16. | :54:22. | |
new. Have you been warmly received? Allah guess, I said, hello, I think | :54:22. | :54:31. | |
I am the new leader of UKIP in Merton. What made you decide to | :54:31. | :54:37. | |
become a cloud or a fruitcake? felt let down by the Conservative | :54:37. | :54:41. | |
Party. There were various issues locally where I felt the party | :54:41. | :54:45. | |
should have intervened. I also felt that my residents were not being | :54:45. | :54:50. | |
represented properly. When you find yourself on the streets delivering | :54:50. | :54:53. | |
literature that you think is wishy-washy, Labour light, not | :54:53. | :54:57. | |
getting the message across, and you stand on the doorstep and somebody | :54:57. | :55:01. | |
says, I've always voted conservative and never will again because of | :55:01. | :55:05. | |
this, this amp is, you have to find yourself buttoning your lip when you | :55:05. | :55:09. | |
are thinking, I kind of agree. Surely it is time to examine your | :55:09. | :55:15. | |
conscience and think where you want to go. How big a threat is UKIP to | :55:15. | :55:25. | |
:55:25. | :55:27. | ||
your old party? 22% in the polls yesterday. In terms of my local area | :55:27. | :55:29. | |
in Merton, I think UKIP has more chance of taking seats than the | :55:29. | :55:37. | |
Labour stronghold. We will keep away from local politics. Sajid, you | :55:37. | :55:42. | |
followed Winston Churchill, are you now in the right party? I started | :55:42. | :55:49. | |
out very early, I was seven years old when I was active in the | :55:49. | :55:54. | |
Conservative Party, I left them at 19 and I came back some years later. | :55:54. | :55:58. | |
When somebody is on a political journey, it is important that our | :55:58. | :56:01. | |
political system is quite accommodating, especially if we want | :56:01. | :56:06. | |
younger people to get involved in politics. We have to allow them to | :56:06. | :56:09. | |
develop their thought processes and move within accordance of that. | :56:09. | :56:15. | |
it difficult psychologically to move between parties? It is a very tough | :56:15. | :56:20. | |
decision. Even at the age of 19 when I decided I was going to leave the | :56:20. | :56:24. | |
Conservative Party at that stage, it was a tremendously difficult | :56:24. | :56:29. | |
decision. Then when I made a decision to rejoin once again, it is | :56:29. | :56:36. | |
a tough call. Most of your political movements over the years, you | :56:36. | :56:40. | |
develop very strong personal links with people within political | :56:40. | :56:44. | |
parties. It is important that as you develop you are able to move in | :56:44. | :56:50. | |
accordance with those developments. Are you hated by the party you left | :56:50. | :56:52. | |
behind and viewed in suspicion by your new home, or those in your new | :56:52. | :56:59. | |
home? I was incredibly lucky because I had many, many friends in the | :56:59. | :57:03. | |
Conservative Party from my younger days who were extremely welcoming of | :57:03. | :57:09. | |
the fact that I was coming back into the fold, so to speak. And I still | :57:09. | :57:12. | |
have friends in the Liberal Democrats and, indeed, in the Labour | :57:12. | :57:16. | |
Party as well. So as a pragmatic politician I think it is important | :57:16. | :57:21. | |
that you have friends in a wide base and call on those when there is | :57:21. | :57:26. | |
political advantage in terms of pushing the agenda you want to push. | :57:26. | :57:29. | |
Andrew Adonis, people are always those bitches when you join a party, | :57:29. | :57:32. | |
you were liked very much by the Blairites and Tony Blair, but there | :57:32. | :57:38. | |
will always those in Labour who viewed you with suspicion? I changed | :57:38. | :57:43. | |
when I was 30, when Tony Blair became the Labour leader. I took the | :57:43. | :57:46. | |
view that if you are modernising social Democrats, a modernising | :57:47. | :57:51. | |
social Democrat had just become the leader of the Labour Party. I did | :57:51. | :57:56. | |
not change a single view I had. Defections are there most potion -- | :57:56. | :58:01. | |
potent when people say that the abuse they hold are better | :58:01. | :58:04. | |
represented by the new party than the last. -- when people say that of | :58:05. | :58:09. | |
the views they hold are better represented by the new party than | :58:09. | :58:13. | |
the last. Many people defecting to UKIP say that their views are at | :58:13. | :58:20. | |
upheld by UKIP. Just time to find out the answer to | :58:20. | :58:24. | |
the quiz. Andrew has forgotten! We wanted to test what a rail | :58:24. | :58:32. | |
enthusiasts years. Can you identify these four famous engines? InterCity | :58:32. | :58:41. | |
125, Thomas the Tank Engine, the Rocket, and is that just a Mullard? | :58:41. | :58:47. | |
You are just too good, it is not from Thomas the Tank Engine, but it | :58:47. | :58:52. |