05/03/2014 The Papers

impressive target of 304 runs. And we will show with the goals from

England's women's victory in the Cyprus Cup. That is all in Sportsday

in 15 minutes after the papers. Hello there and welcome to our

lookahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. With Wii

broadcaster Daisy McAndrew and Owen Jones, author and columnist. -- with

me are. Starting with the Telegraph, middle-class Britons have reaped the

most benefits from immigration, but working class people have not. The

Financial Times says the Bank of England is embroiled in the

allegations over foreign exchange manipulation. A warning over sugar

is the lead on the front page of the Daily Mail. And the Guardian leads

on the Ukraine, saying Western attempts to force Moscow to back

down are bailing. Finally, the Daily Mirror focuses on bankers' bonuses,

which it says are sparking more fury. We will start with the

Guardian, deadlock as Russia digs in over Crimea, US making unacceptable

ultimatums as talks to resolve the crisis falter. William Hague has

been speaking this evening, he said no-one has budged on their position.

I would imagine deadlock is a word we will be seeing a lot more of in

the next few days over the situation in Crimea. And the reason there is

deadlock is Russia, for example, is denying they have invaded Crimea,

they are claiming these are autonomous self defence squads who

have sprung up and are defending Russian speaking people within

Crimea. I think the problem is, though, is that it is complex.

Russia have clearly invaded Ukraine, despite their claims, and are

exploiting a crisis on the ground. But a democratically elected

government which abused Ian Wright has been overthrown and replaced by

a government which includes far right extremists. -- which abused

human rights. There was an attempt to ban Russian as a official

language, which caused real fear among the Russian minority. There

has to be guarantees in any deal for the Russian minority, the right for

Crimea to determine its own future. It was gifted, if you like, to

Ukraine. That is not to say that most Russian speakers want to join

Russia, that is not the case, but that has to be settled. And there

have to be free elections in Ukraine to actually have a proper

representative government. There were attempts to ban political

parties in Ukraine following the uprising which took place. It is a

very divided country, divided between West and East, and it is

difficult to see not just how we can get peace between Russia and

Ukraine, but peace within Ukraine. I agree that the situation is much

more complex than the headlines would lead us to believe, it is not

as simple as saying Russia is the bogeyman, the baddie, that were

Ukrainians are being bullied by Russia. It is more complex. Although

most of us might not understand that, all the people around those

tables do understand. All the politicians understand that, John

Kerry understands, David Cameron understands, and yet they are not

getting anywhere with these negotiations, which must mean that

somebody is not budging. And it does look like it is President Putin who

is not budging on anything. Today we have just seen a rash of phone calls

and photo opportunities, and you know, we have had Merkel and Putin

and Obama and Cameron, they have all been at it, and we have had the

meeting in Paris, and tonight we still seem to be no further forward.

Yes, talking about the possibility that it is the Russians who are not

budging, clearly the West is digging its heels in as well. There was an

agreement back in February that would have potentially stopped all

this happening, but we're not in a time machine, we cannot go back, but

there was an agreement just before Yanukovych was kicked out of power

or deposed, that would have changed the constitution and would have made

elections happen before the end of May. If the opponents of Yanukovych

had got their way, we may not be in this mess, and yet the West doesn't

want to go back to that agreement - the Russians do. Yes, but we can

understand why they do, but of course everything has changed since

then, and we are all in agreement that the previous Ukrainian

government was no great shakes, it was violating human rights. So

everything has changed, but where we go from here, apart from the sabre

rattling and that their baiting is difficult to see. It is an awkward

situation in the sense that, if you like, Russia have got themselves in

a position where, in terms of their rhetoric, they are saying, we are

trying to defend an elected government that was overthrown by

force, whilst the West are supporting it. An elected government

that seemed to be murdering its own people. Democracy does, you know, if

you are violating your own citizens, that is something

different, it is undemocratic. I agree, there was clearly terrible

repression which took place at attacks on human rights, but police

officers were violently killed as well. This was not a peaceful

uprising, there was violence on both sides, and the West has got itself

in an order situation where it has supported a democratically elected

government, and it did the same in Egypt as well. From the perspective

of Russia, they would argue, you have violated international in

Iraq, Israel violates international law in Palestine, Saudi Arabia

invaded Bahrain. If we are going to talk about international being

consistently upheld, those issues have to be addressed, because at the

moment it seems international law is used to attack your opponent when it

is inconvenient for you. It is the ultimate political cliche, but two

wrongs don't make a right. You cannot start and picking the last

ten years of international relations. We need to address the

issue, because this is symptomatic of the fact that the international

has broken down, international is not consistently upheld, and we will

get more crises unless it is addressed. This is why this is going

to take a long time to sort out, folks! We will sort out the world in

the paper review! Let's go on to the Daily Telegraph, Daisy, middle-class

people are being blamed for migration, apparently. This is a

speech that James Brokenshire, the new Conservative immigration

minister, will be making tomorrow or this week, and clearly he is going

to be coming down, as the Tory party tends to do, had on immigration, but

he is particularly going to side himself with working-class Brits,

working-class voters, you could fill in the dots, and say that one of the

problems with immigration is that the middle classes benefit from

immigration, both by employing cheap labour, either in their house, as we

might remember his predecessor did, and that is the reason why his

predecessor was kicked out of office, for illegally employing an

immigrant who did not have the right to work. But apparently the middle

class are demanding cheaper labour, they are not just... Their action is

setting the market rate, and as a result only some were Romanian or

whatever, that is the contention, who was willing to work for it. As

with so many political stories, this is much more to do with the way

people feel than the reality. I think what the message really is is

that working-class people or people on a lower income feel more

threatened by immigrants than the middle classes, and not only do they

feel more threatened because these people are taking their jobs, but

they look at the middle classes and see they are benefiting, and that is

why they are pro-immigration. Personally, I don't believe a word

of it, and I think it is blatant electioneering. UKIP could have

written that. I do not like the phraseology, blamed for migration,

like blamed for crime. There are concerns about immigration, but most

people would say, actually, it has enriched our society, there have

been many positives that we all take for granted. And count opposing

middle class and working class, a lot of working-class people are

immigrants or former immigrants, those cleaning the toilets of Tory

ministers, in that case illegally so. The fact is, firstly, we never

hear the positives like the fact that our NHS is propped up by

immigrants nurses and doctors, and a lot of social problems in society,

often wind up scapegoating immigrants. So for example, the

failure of successive governments to build another housing to meet

needs, people go, not enough housing, why is it going to

immigrants? It is the same with wages, wages have been falling

because of minimum wage being allowed to fall in real terms, weak

unions, globalisation, and immigrants get scapegoated for it.

It is quite convenient for politicians of all stripes to say,

not us, these problems are not our fault. But peoples concerns are very

real, and they do feel this, and rightly or only in many people's

opinion, there is a sense that there are too many people coming. That is

exactly the point, they do feel it, and although it is an helpful for us

to be agreeing... It is not an helpful! People feel threatened

because politicians and certain sections of the media are constantly

telling them things that neither of us believe are true. Tomorrow he

will be saying that they push house prices up and push wages down -

they, immigrants. It is a load of rubbish! The evidence we have is

that a report that has been concealed and not released. It is

just being fine tuned, Daisy, please! They get more money in taxes

from immigrants than they pay out in benefits. These headlines do not

help, they are relentlessly negative, they only include extreme

examples which are negative to make people's blood boil. The Telegraph

says British women have been crowned the Queens of leisure. 27 minutes a

day spent watching telly. At least! Repaint our nails and read magazines

and do nothing all day. It says so in the Telegraph. How long do those

nails take? If you could see how chips they are, you would realise! I

spend hours on mine. This is funnily enough a good news story. The OECD

is comparing countries. We should be proud of the fact that our women

seem to have so much leisure time. I must say, British women are beaten

by British men, who have even more. Of course. This report also says, in

a possible blow to national pride, that no matter how they might think

of themselves as new men, British men have been overtaken by their

counterparts in France in terms of pulling their weight around the

house. So even Frenchmen are better than us? They do more hoovering.

Then something is clearly going wrong. I am surprised at this,

because we do work some of the longest hours in Europe in this

country. But not as productive as we should be. And we do have longer

holidays. No, we have less bank holidays than a lot of other

countries. But we have longer weeks off work from our jobs. We do more

unpaid overtime than a lot of other countries. That is worth aliens to

employers. Voices are saying yes, we do, in my earpiece. Dickensian ways

at the BBC! Exactly. We will not go into that any further. 106 minutes

watching TV? Who has time for that 's women! Don't you multitask

mother? You watch TV while doing your e-mails. Facebook stalking, is

that work or leisure? Because we multitask, we save up that extra

free time. Let's quickly go to the Daily Mail. Cut your sugar intake by

half. Children should not be having fizzy drinks. My biggest achievement

last year was halving the amount of sugar I have in my tea, so I am

ahead of the curve. This is fascinating. They are arguing that

all this idea that fat is the problem and that you should stick to

a low-fat diet, when actually, obesity has been going up. So they

have gone, maybe that is not why we have this problem. So they are

suggesting that sugar intake is the issue. It is surprising because, I

am quoting statistics from the Daily Mail, wow! Well, that is fair

enough, because it is the paper we are talking about. They say no more

than 60 spoons for a child. We think one banana has seven teaspoons of

sugar in it -- no more than six teaspoons for a child. If you are

child, you have your daily recommended guidelines. This is a

serious issue, because sugars are often completely disguised. Daisy,

are you working on this with your kids? All the time. If you look

further into this report, it is about obesity and health issues, but

they say the number-1 health issue is into care. How long have we been

saying, don't have so many sweets or your teeth will fall out to our

children? Distil the case, do -- dental care is a real problem . But

how exhausted as everybody at the moment? This morning, we were being

told you must not do the high protein diets because of this

Californian report that says you will get cancer. Now we are told

that the low-fat diet is bad for you. Now it is sugar, so it is

exhausting. What are you supposed to actually eat? It is a simple rule,

variety and moderation. And on that Michelle... It is a kind of Jerry

Springer and to the programme. Wise words. You will both be back in an

hour to look at more of the stories behind the headlines. Stay with us

on BBC News, because at 11 o'clock, we will have the latest on the

diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis in Ukraine and get a report

from our world affairs editor John Simpson, who is in Sevastopol in

Crimea. Now, time for Sportsday. Hello and welcome to Sportsday. I'm

Katie Gornall. Coming up: England scrape through their final World Cup

audition, as Daniel Sturridge earns them a narrow win over Denmark.

Bale proves too hot to handle