:00:57. > :01:05.. And where were you when JFK was shot?
:01:06. > :01:11.Paul Giamatti and Zac Efron star in Parkland.
:01:12. > :01:18.Plus, the revenge drama, Vendetta, and The Grand Budapest Hotel. The
:01:19. > :01:24.new film from Wes Anderson. We're happily joined by guess critic Chris
:01:25. > :01:28.Hewitt. First-up, Jennifer Lawrence recreates her role as Katniss
:01:29. > :01:36.Everdeen in The Hunger Games Catching Fire. Having won the Games
:01:37. > :01:44.first up, and Peeta are up against previous victors.
:01:45. > :01:48.Ladies and gentlemen, the victors of the 74th Games, Katniss and Peeta.
:01:49. > :01:51.We pick up when Katniss and Peeta are about to go on the victory tour
:01:52. > :01:57.and everything is just different after the Games and she doesn't feel
:01:58. > :02:01.like she belongs anywhere. She's not who they think she is. She just
:02:02. > :02:04.wants to save her skin - simple as that.
:02:05. > :02:12.She has become a beacon of hope for them. So she has to be eliminated.
:02:13. > :02:17.The way they won The Hunger Games is unlike any other. The first time
:02:18. > :02:21.that there were two victors. Help me get through the trip. This trip
:02:22. > :02:28.doesn't end when you get back home. What do we do? Your job is to be a
:02:29. > :02:32.distraction. It has such an enthusiastic fan base so I was
:02:33. > :02:36.energised. Because the fan base is so big, you have to make sure that
:02:37. > :02:39.you tell the story in the best way possible. You haven't heard people,
:02:40. > :02:42.Katniss. You've given them an opportunity. They have to be brave
:02:43. > :02:47.enough. We have to go before they kill us. They will kill us. What
:02:48. > :02:51.about the other families? The ones who stay? What happens to them?
:02:52. > :02:57.People are looking to you, Katniss. I don't want anyone looking to me. I
:02:58. > :03:01.can't help them. The stakes are incredibly high.
:03:02. > :03:09.Everything in their world has intensified inside and out of the
:03:10. > :03:14.arena. We get to see a broader scope of the world. See more of the
:03:15. > :03:21.capital, more of the districts and then you've got another danger with
:03:22. > :03:26.these guys. We go back in to the games. So, short stick, I would say,
:03:27. > :03:32.is what the characters are drawn to. This is the 75th year of The Hunger
:03:33. > :03:43.Games. The tributes are to be reaped on the existing pool of victors. I
:03:44. > :03:48.have to say goodbye. Katniss. Remember who the real enemy is.
:03:49. > :03:51.Katniss Everdeen in the first film is a young girl who raises her hand
:03:52. > :03:56.for her sister - just a gut reaction. And in this movie, she
:03:57. > :04:02.becomes a warrior. And we do see her start to evolve in to this... In to
:04:03. > :04:10.what we see as a leader of a rebellion. Go ahead. Her entire
:04:11. > :04:13.species must be eradicated. Her species, Sir? The other victors.
:04:14. > :04:19.Because of her, they all pose a threat. Because of her, they all
:04:20. > :04:22.think they're invincible. She looks amazing in the grey there.
:04:23. > :04:30.What do you think? Catching Fire is the second film. Sorry, the second
:04:31. > :04:33.in a quadrilogy. An unglamorous place for a movie to be. And it has
:04:34. > :04:37.a strange job because it has to take the story from over here and put it
:04:38. > :04:42.over there in time for the 2-part grand finale. I think it is better
:04:43. > :04:45.than the first movie. It is lean and slick and relentless and
:04:46. > :04:48.relentlessly cynical for a movie. The message of the movie is that you
:04:49. > :04:53.can't trust the government, you can't trust the media and people in
:04:54. > :04:56.show business. I think that's a healthy message to tell the youth of
:04:57. > :05:03.today. It is healthier than the toxic guf I used to get from
:05:04. > :05:08.Twilight. To be honest, I'm 41. And so, I stand back from this and say -
:05:09. > :05:13.this is a well made peels of Hollywood entertainment. If I was 15
:05:14. > :05:16.and had to go out and bare knuckle fight 200 other kids to work in a
:05:17. > :05:20.call centre, this would be my favourite movie of all time. My son
:05:21. > :05:24.isn't that old. He's almost 11 and he's counting the minutes. He's
:05:25. > :05:28.literally set his timer for when he can go at the weekend. What do you
:05:29. > :05:32.think? I liked it. I went in to this movie as I go in to most movies as a
:05:33. > :05:38.position of ignorance. I didn't know anything about it. I hadn't read the
:05:39. > :05:42.books. I barely remembered the first movie. I remember enjoying it. There
:05:43. > :05:46.was one part where someone was disguised as a tree. Otherwise I was
:05:47. > :05:49.in a position of ignorance. This movie is better than the first, as
:05:50. > :05:52.far as I could tell. It is more gripping and more adult. It is not
:05:53. > :05:56.really aimed at kids. I think that 10-year-olds will love it. Jennifer
:05:57. > :05:58.Lawrence is fantastic. And it is constantly surprising as well.
:05:59. > :06:03.Things happened that I didn't see coming. I loved the first film. I
:06:04. > :06:07.think that it is... If this isn't too mean - all about her. If it was
:06:08. > :06:11.anybody else, it would be fine. But she is - you can't stop staring at
:06:12. > :06:14.her. It is interesting. One of the things about the movie that it does
:06:15. > :06:18.so well is that it is two movies in one. You've got this media satire
:06:19. > :06:22.all about the government and about society and then it turns in to an
:06:23. > :06:26.action movie. And the action movie is impressively weird. It takes
:06:27. > :06:31.place in this artificial jungle set in a dome and it is a neat trick to
:06:32. > :06:35.pull off. Because the thing about this science fiction is often there
:06:36. > :06:38.are barbaric terrible sports which is secretly really fun to watch. If
:06:39. > :06:42.anybody remembers the original roller ball, the sport. Which we
:06:43. > :06:45.were supposed to be appalled by. And I think that Catching Fire does a
:06:46. > :06:49.good job of that. There's a level of excitement, but it is not too
:06:50. > :06:53.exciting. The film belongs to Jennifer Lawrence. She elevates the
:06:54. > :06:57.whole thing. It is difficult for me, having said that I'm 41, a
:06:58. > :07:00.41-year-old man, I can't talk about Jennifer Lawrence without sounding
:07:01. > :07:03.like a desperate old pervert, but actually, the series as a whole is
:07:04. > :07:07.lucky to have her because I think what she does is that the reason
:07:08. > :07:11.that people fall in love with her off camera is because she seems like
:07:12. > :07:15.a movie star who may also be a human being. You said she was your
:07:16. > :07:18.favourite interviewee? She's sparky and not playing a game. She's just
:07:19. > :07:22.herself, essentially, and she's fantastic in the movie. One of the
:07:23. > :07:26.things that doesn't work about it is that there's a love triangle at the
:07:27. > :07:30.core between Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson and Liam Hemsworth.
:07:31. > :07:34.And neither of those two are really good enough for her. There's a big
:07:35. > :07:38.pivotal kiss about halfway through and I watched this with a notable
:07:39. > :07:43.film critic. And when it happened he went - oh! Almost as if I was
:07:44. > :07:47.disapproving in some way. It is great. All of that stuff translates
:07:48. > :07:50.on to screen. Because the thing about Katniss Everdeen shall the
:07:51. > :07:56.character, and it wouldn't work with many other actresses is that she
:07:57. > :07:59.seems like an ordinary girl. A Hollywood actress to appear like
:08:00. > :08:04.she's been made up to not wear make-up. Most other young actresses,
:08:05. > :08:08.that's what you would get. And she's not a Ripley clone. Most action
:08:09. > :08:13.heroes are. She's smart and tough but also vulnerable. There are a lot
:08:14. > :08:16.of scenes where she's put in peril and doesn't know what's happening.
:08:17. > :08:19.You see it all in the face. But another reason that I think that the
:08:20. > :08:22.film as a whole is better than the first film, from what I can remember
:08:23. > :08:32.of the first film s that the cast are better. You still have Stanley
:08:33. > :08:36.Tucci and also Philip Seymour Hoffman who underplays everything.
:08:37. > :08:39.You can tell that he's professional because they introduce him and bring
:08:40. > :08:45.hem on the stage. He doesn't flicker for a second and gets on with it.
:08:46. > :08:50.But the whole supporting cast, there's really... Yes, all of them.
:08:51. > :08:55.The sparky characters. And nobody looks bored or resentful or too good
:08:56. > :08:58.for this. Nobody looks like they're sending an abusive text to their
:08:59. > :09:02.agent the moment they say cut. Which is rare with a movie like this.
:09:03. > :09:06.Good, you love it. I love it. I thought that it was long. And I
:09:07. > :09:10.wanted something to happen at the end rather than her just to open her
:09:11. > :09:15.eyes - excuse me! Rather than an ensemble for Parkland
:09:16. > :09:17.which recreates the chaotic events immediately surrounding the
:09:18. > :09:26.assassination of JFK. Are you going to be OK here? Yeah,
:09:27. > :09:35.it's a good program. I want everybody downstairs to see the
:09:36. > :09:40.President. Parkland is about the assassination
:09:41. > :09:47.of John F Kennedy in a way we've never seen before. It's through the
:09:48. > :09:50.eyes of the people who were so intimately involved. The man who
:09:51. > :09:53.accidentally took the home movie of the evidence of the crime. The
:09:54. > :09:57.brother of the killer. The FBI agent who knew about Oswald the whole
:09:58. > :10:02.time. It's from the point of view of people who were not witnesses,
:10:03. > :10:08.necessarily, but actually participants. We've got something.
:10:09. > :10:13.It's the President, he's coming in. I'm fascinated by stories in the
:10:14. > :10:16.periphery. The stories that we don't think about and which frequently
:10:17. > :10:19.turn out to be more powerful and interesting. And the idea of a
:10:20. > :10:24.rookie doctor who thought that the President was coming in because he
:10:25. > :10:30.had a cold and then to be covered in his blood. You can't make that up.
:10:31. > :10:35.It is the President. I know who it is. I need pressure right now. And
:10:36. > :10:39.when Oswald came in, he was treated by the same team of young doctors.
:10:40. > :10:44.So the murder victim and the murderer, it's shake peerian. We
:10:45. > :10:52.might get to keep this one. Do we want to? -- Shakespearean. What if
:10:53. > :10:56.he dies? We need a confession. The Kennedy assassination and 9/11
:10:57. > :11:00.are the two most sim inial moments in history. It rels owe nats because
:11:01. > :11:04.it is a part of our national mythology. I hope that people will
:11:05. > :11:07.experience the Kennedy assassination as if they were witnessing it unfold
:11:08. > :11:14.in front of them instead of something that they read 50 years
:11:15. > :11:19.ago. We have the assasin of the President in our office, ten days
:11:20. > :11:24.ago. We had him and we couldn't stop him. Jeet us Christ - this was not
:11:25. > :11:29.supposed to -- Jesus Christ, this was not supposed to happen.
:11:30. > :11:36.Chris? Can I say that this may have been rushed out in time for JFK's
:11:37. > :11:41.50th an veraries which is a little bit tawdry. -- anniversary, which is
:11:42. > :11:47.a little bit tawdry. Based on the other people involved in the
:11:48. > :11:50.assassination and Lee Harvey Oswald. Unfortunately, this is a little dull
:11:51. > :11:54.and roped. It is not Parkland. It sits there like a coat on a coat
:11:55. > :11:58.rack. It doesn't work. It's very samy! It is a shame because it is a
:11:59. > :12:02.great idea. I can't get over the idea. Chris is right. Some movies
:12:03. > :12:05.are inspired, most movies are I spired because someone involves
:12:06. > :12:09.feels very passionate and inspired and wants to bring a story to the
:12:10. > :12:14.world. Others are made because someone in a studio was browsing on
:12:15. > :12:19.WikiLeaks and said - it is -- on Wikipedia and said it is the 50th
:12:20. > :12:22.anniversary coming up. It is interesting to take this very over
:12:23. > :12:25.familiar scene and look at the secondary characters and make it new
:12:26. > :12:27.again. But you don't feel, I didn't feel anyway, that you learn
:12:28. > :12:31.anything. You don't really feel anything. And so that impulse to
:12:32. > :12:36.commemorate is fine. But that's what details are for. There's a line
:12:37. > :12:41.where a character says, "Doctor, you have nothing to work with." And that
:12:42. > :12:46.says it all about the fill. It is referential, which it has to be. And
:12:47. > :12:52.grown-up. But at other points, it becomes sort of comedy! Yeah, it is
:12:53. > :12:56.overbearingly sombre throughout. Which you're right, it has to be.
:12:57. > :13:00.But it is so in your face, it ends up tipping to to camp. There's a
:13:01. > :13:04.scene, Chris and I were talking about it earlier where the coffin
:13:05. > :13:10.had to be brought on to the plane so that it could finally escape Dallas
:13:11. > :13:14.ta becomes - if you are charitable, John Waters, and uncharitable, the
:13:15. > :13:18.Chuckle Brothers. And I hope that people over there won't see it as a
:13:19. > :13:21.spoiler but for most, we go in to the film knowing how this is going
:13:22. > :13:28.to go for Kennedy and how it is going to go for Thomas Waldrom. And
:13:29. > :13:35.it leaves a -- Lee Harvey Oswald. And there is an inconsequential
:13:36. > :13:37.moment in there. And the man who filmed the incredibly famous
:13:38. > :13:41.footage. The sequence of whether they can develop the footage or not.
:13:42. > :13:46.And you think - well, it's on YouTube. Without want be to be
:13:47. > :13:49.crass, we do know. I thought that it worked. There were moments and
:13:50. > :13:52.things in the movie that I hadn't seen or heard before about the
:13:53. > :13:56.assassination. But that worked for me. But there are moments when it
:13:57. > :14:02.felt that the movie was slightly cheap. It was a superior fwil am but
:14:03. > :14:06.didn't have the budget to recreate the film. There is a moment where
:14:07. > :14:10.Paul Giamatti is filming the famous film and he's in dal they clearly
:14:11. > :14:31.can't afford the procession to go past so they had the camera on her.
:14:32. > :14:35.We want them. But you know you're in trouble pretty much straight way
:14:36. > :14:39.way. Kennedy is wheeled in to the Parkland Hospital and who turns
:14:40. > :14:43.around only Zac Efron! If that was me, and if I'm ever in a position
:14:44. > :14:47.where my life depends on Zac Efron, you can wheel me straight back out
:14:48. > :14:50.and leave me in the car park. He manages not to burst in to song, but
:14:51. > :14:55.that's about it. I think that the casting with Zac Efron is
:14:56. > :15:01.disastrous. And Jackie Weaver, the great Jacki Weaver who plays Lee
:15:02. > :15:05.Harvey Oswald's mother. They pitches everything at such a level of
:15:06. > :15:09.cartoonishness, it's like she'll leave the funeral in the Mystery
:15:10. > :15:13.Machine. It capsizes the movie. I think it's a shame. There are
:15:14. > :15:19.moments when you get a sense of what the movie could have been. Made by a
:15:20. > :15:23.brilliant journalist. You might be right there, but apparently he was
:15:24. > :15:26.passionate about making the film and the director there and himself. And
:15:27. > :15:33.you can imagine himself just gathering all of the research and
:15:34. > :15:39.all of the information. It's not a bad movie. Just a pointless one. It
:15:40. > :15:45.doesn't have the department of Oliver Stone's JFK. There's an actor
:15:46. > :15:50.that crosses over from both, Gary Grubs. And when he walks in you're
:15:51. > :15:54.thinking - I may as well watch JFK now. And it is so much more detailed
:15:55. > :15:59.and so much more momentum behind it and so much more passion.
:16:00. > :16:02.Next, The Family starring Robert De Niro and Michelle Pfeiffer as Mafia
:16:03. > :16:04.whistleblowers who are relocated to France with their families for
:16:05. > :16:09.safety. Once you turn on the mob, the mob
:16:10. > :16:16.turns on you. Welcome to witness protection. Try to fit in. This is a
:16:17. > :16:29.story about a mob family who have to keep being relocated because they
:16:30. > :16:38.can't quite do that. Peanut butter. After the dog food. Stupid
:16:39. > :16:45.Americans. How was day? Fine. My character is Bell Blake. She's pet u
:16:46. > :16:51.lent one moment and then kicking somebody's... I never know what I
:16:52. > :16:55.can say and not say? Is that swearing if you say that?
:16:56. > :17:00.Hey, boys, if this is your approach to women, you're not going to get
:17:01. > :17:04.very far! It is lawless in a way. They're making up their own rules
:17:05. > :17:08.and I think that that dangerous recklessness is a feeling to people.
:17:09. > :17:12.You're going to take that silverware and put it back where you found it
:17:13. > :17:16.nice and easy or else I'll break both your arms. I like the outlaw
:17:17. > :17:20.thing and going against the establishment. I'm the plumber. You
:17:21. > :17:25.said five minutes. That was 45 minutes ago. The idea of the family
:17:26. > :17:31.sticking together was one of the appeals. I didn't kill him. I took
:17:32. > :17:37.him to the hospital. Why did you beat him to a pulp? He's the only
:17:38. > :17:41.plumber within a radius of 20 minutes. He made you wait. He was
:17:42. > :17:46.trying to rip me off. Put yourself in my shoes. I wouldn't have beat
:17:47. > :17:50.him up. Who is going to fix the pipes? Who's going to rebuild the
:17:51. > :17:56.supermarket that burned down the day we got here. We had a good time and
:17:57. > :18:00.I'm sorry that we hadn't worked together earlier. What do you think
:18:01. > :18:03.you're doing? The idea of working with Robert De
:18:04. > :18:09.Niro as an actor is a little bit daunting. But one of the biggest
:18:10. > :18:15.surprises for me is how accessible he is. I think what's nice about
:18:16. > :18:21.this film is you do see how much they love each other and why they
:18:22. > :18:28.want to stay together. I think ultimately that's what the movie is
:18:29. > :18:32.about. That family bond and the lengths that people will go to to
:18:33. > :18:36.preserve that. Your family is the incarnation of
:18:37. > :18:44.evil. The clean-up operation. Get that family out of there. I've got
:18:45. > :18:48.to find my kids. Alright, before we ask you both your
:18:49. > :18:53.opinions. Let me start with a tweet. The Family is a surprisingly
:18:54. > :18:58.entertaining crime comedy that blurs the lines between bleep violence and
:18:59. > :19:02.cartoon hilarity! Not this family. It's not that movie. I wish we
:19:03. > :19:09.didn't even have to speak about this film. Black comedies are notoriously
:19:10. > :19:14.tricky to pull this off. This is done in clown shoes. There is one
:19:15. > :19:18.joke which is essentially that the French are all rude and
:19:19. > :19:23.condescending and teenage boys are all acne ridden sex pests. And
:19:24. > :19:28.because of that, as a nation, they should be beaten to death and
:19:29. > :19:31.dragged behind cars. Which seems disproportionate and grotesque. If
:19:32. > :19:36.you wanted to save yourself the ?10, draw yourself a cartoon of a little
:19:37. > :19:41.man with a moustache and a beret with a string of onions and Robert
:19:42. > :19:44.De Niro coming in with a chain saw. I've saved you the tenner and you
:19:45. > :19:50.haven't had to see him on the screen further soiling his legacy with the
:19:51. > :19:53.same facial expression since 1989. Michelle Pfeiffer is always
:19:54. > :19:59.unbelievably good. I love everything about her. I do. I know that you're
:20:00. > :20:03.both looking at me with sympathy. I like Michelle Pfeiffer. They do OK.
:20:04. > :20:07.They say their lines. No-one walks at the camera. But for me, this is
:20:08. > :20:13.probably the worst film of the year. I absolutely hated it. This was an
:20:14. > :20:15.ordeal for me watching this. And it is monumentally misjudged from frame
:20:16. > :20:20.one to frame eight million. And one of the reasons is that there's a
:20:21. > :20:25.scene towards the end where Robert De Niro has to watch Goodfellas in
:20:26. > :20:29.the movie and nobody points out that he looks like Jimmy Conway. We're
:20:30. > :20:33.watching a better movie than the one we're in. It is better because the
:20:34. > :20:37.director, who is French. I should point out that it is weird. I'm
:20:38. > :20:41.assuming that he is being chased through the streets of Paris. I
:20:42. > :20:44.assume in the way that he thinks that the film is edgy and dark, that
:20:45. > :20:51.he thinks that that scene in particular is a bit clever and a bit
:20:52. > :20:55.Charlie Kauffman. I don't know how much money Robert De Niro needs or
:20:56. > :21:00.why he's doing this movie. He might just like working? It is not that.
:21:01. > :21:04.South of France? I want it on record that if it is the money, I will
:21:05. > :21:09.donate. I will go on to the telethon and I will give pretty much to stop
:21:10. > :21:14.him doing this. And it is so weird with Robert De Niro because for my
:21:15. > :21:19.entire adult film going life, he's been doing this. He's been parodying
:21:20. > :21:22.the early great roles that he had for longer than he played the early
:21:23. > :21:27.great roles. This has been going on for some time. He owns New York.
:21:28. > :21:31.When does it end? He doesn't officially own New York. He owns
:21:32. > :21:34.areas and a restaurant! Chris is right, the tone deafness about the
:21:35. > :21:38.film. You realise that you're supposed to be laughing because
:21:39. > :21:46.Robert De Niro and people beating people to death. It is incredibly
:21:47. > :21:51.violent. It is partly produced by Martin Scorcese. You only know that
:21:52. > :21:55.you're supposed to laugh because the jaunty accordian music kicks in and
:21:56. > :22:00.there will be a response for me where you cower. That's what you end
:22:01. > :22:06.up doing. OK, he says worst film of this year.
:22:07. > :22:09.Next, Danny Dyer goes on a Death Wish style revenge in the low budget
:22:10. > :22:15.drama, Vendetta. There was a time I would have bled
:22:16. > :22:21.to keep the red in the Union Jack. Them days are long gone.
:22:22. > :22:28.Vendetta is a sort of a remake of Death Wish. A vigilante type of
:22:29. > :22:34.movie. I pla a character called Jimmy Vicars, SAS highly-trained
:22:35. > :22:39.killer. I'm going to annihilate you. His mum and dad are killed in the
:22:40. > :22:44.most horrific way you can possibly think. There's nothing to stop them
:22:45. > :22:50.doing it again. There's me. And I basically go on an urban
:22:51. > :22:57.safari through London torturing and killing people. Let ne go, man,
:22:58. > :22:58.please! One by one in the most creative ways you can possibly
:22:59. > :23:02.imagine. If you want to take a stand. You've
:23:03. > :23:08.got to be tall. Taller than you've ever been. Finish these guys a
:23:09. > :23:11.then... You'll vanish. It's OK to turn awe way from the
:23:12. > :23:15.screen every now and again, I understand. Because it can be quite
:23:16. > :23:22.horrific. They don't deserve to live. They need their hearts torn
:23:23. > :23:27.out. Where is he? We shot this in three weeks. A 6-day week. Shot it
:23:28. > :23:32.for ?100,000 and you would think that that is impossible. That's not
:23:33. > :23:38.even like a catering budget on most films. This script lands on the
:23:39. > :23:45.floor and I pick it up and go... Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
:23:46. > :23:50.This is what I've been waiting for. You see that this is a good piece of
:23:51. > :23:57.entertainment. Please, I'm sorry, I'm sorry.
:23:58. > :24:01.?100,000. Three weeks long. It's impressive? Yeah, and it looks
:24:02. > :24:06.great. Danny Dyer is impressive because he has become a bit of a
:24:07. > :24:10.punching bag. But underneath all of the finger pointing, he's an
:24:11. > :24:13.underrated actor and he can deliver. And he's an effective presence in
:24:14. > :24:18.this movie. Having said that, it's a little bit like it wants to be Death
:24:19. > :24:22.Wish, but it is actually more Death Wish 4 meets a Rambo. It doesn't
:24:23. > :24:26.work as a thriller. But he's effective. I think that there are
:24:27. > :24:36.many worse things going on in cinemas than Kieron Dyer movies and
:24:37. > :24:42.this week, we've seen two of them. -- Danny Dyer. I think that Danny
:24:43. > :24:46.Dyer is underrated and I think that the way that he's treated by members
:24:47. > :24:50.of the critical fraternity is kind of a little bit repellent, actually.
:24:51. > :24:53.Not everybody goes to a nice school and has a certain background. He's
:24:54. > :24:56.trying to pay his mortgage and the work that he does, he brings a lot
:24:57. > :25:01.of commitment to the table. At least sometimes. And he is here what he
:25:02. > :25:06.always is, which is a talented erratic actor with, I think, a lot
:25:07. > :25:11.of presence on the screen. You know, who has made some fairly bad career
:25:12. > :25:18.choices. But you know... Look, the film is incredibly long and
:25:19. > :25:24.incredibly violent. Yes yeah, it is about 105 minutes, it feels about
:25:25. > :25:32.140. It is almost Games 2 territory. He's not helped and the cast is not
:25:33. > :25:36.helped by the fact that it looks there. But I think that it is better
:25:37. > :25:40.directed. And some of the lines here have never been said by anyone who
:25:41. > :25:44.hasn't just got off a space ship. No actor should really be asked to
:25:45. > :25:50.deliver those kinds of lines. There's at least one character whose
:25:51. > :25:56.final word is "bruv". Another character who compares something to
:25:57. > :26:01.piss rain. I don't know what it is. Everybody should try it once in
:26:02. > :26:07.their lives. And Danny Dyer himself. One scene in particular he's with
:26:08. > :26:11.his ex-wife and it is poignant and then he has to stay there and say -
:26:12. > :26:17.can I use your bathroom. Which no actor should have to do. But I think
:26:18. > :26:24.that the film itself is cliched. But no no more so than there. And
:26:25. > :26:30.anything that Liam Neeson has done in recent years. I wish if had more
:26:31. > :26:35.snap. It is a little bit long and pomp us at times. There's nothing
:26:36. > :26:40.wrong with that. There could be a sequel. Vendetta and Vendetta.
:26:41. > :26:45.There's a blitant appeal for a sequel halfway through the credits.
:26:46. > :26:50.Film of the week? The Hunger Games for me. I would say Catching Fire
:26:51. > :26:55.for me. There's another one? There is a film called Computer Chess
:26:56. > :26:58.which has a limited release. It's absolutely charming. It is strange
:26:59. > :27:05.and wonderful. It's the story set back in the early 1980s. A group of
:27:06. > :27:09.rival computer programmers who have rival chess programs. It starts off
:27:10. > :27:14.at '80s nast algia and then becomes weirder and funnier. So if you can
:27:15. > :27:17.see Computer Chess, I would very much recommend that you do. Thank
:27:18. > :27:22.you very much. That is all from us. We'll be back at the same time next
:27:23. > :27:29.week when we review Tom Hanks, Emma Thompson and the remake of Carrie
:27:30. > :27:33.and Jeune Jolie. We'll leave you with a look at The Grand Budapest
:27:34. > :27:35.Hotel. That will be in cinemas from February. Thank you for watching.
:27:36. > :27:41.Goodnight. Why do you want to be a lobby boy?
:27:42. > :27:47.Who wouldn't? At The Grand Budapest Hotel. And so, my life began. Junior
:27:48. > :27:51.lobby boy in training under the strict command. Many of hotel's most
:27:52. > :27:55.valued and distinguished guests came for him. I love you. I love you. She
:27:56. > :28:03.wasle dynamite in the sack, by the way. She was 84. I had older. I
:28:04. > :28:07.became his pupil and he was my guardian and counsellor. The police
:28:08. > :28:14.are here. Tell them I'll be right down. She's been murdered and you
:28:15. > :28:18.think that I did it! You're looking so well, darling. You really are. I
:28:19. > :28:24.don't know what cream they put on you at the morgue, but I want some.
:28:25. > :28:32.This is the last will and test am. A painting known as Boy with Apple.
:28:33. > :28:40.Who is Gustav H? I'm afraid, that's me? This is in code and you might
:28:41. > :28:48.need a magnifying glass. I want road blocks for every train station for
:28:49. > :28:56.100km. Get in. I want 50 men and ten blood hounds ready in five minutes.