:00:31. > :00:40.Welcome to Film 2017. Up late on a school night, what seems. Tonight we
:00:41. > :00:53.will be talking Oscars. Send us your tweets for best picture. Will it be
:00:54. > :01:01.La La Land? Let us know your thoughts. Off we go on tonight's
:01:02. > :01:06.show. Marathon manhunt. Mark Wahlberg stars real-life terrorism
:01:07. > :01:10.thriller Patriots Day. We've got to find these guys before they do this
:01:11. > :01:19.to somebody else. The doctor will see you now. Dane DeHaan is not sure
:01:20. > :01:28.about A Cure For Wellness. Paso doble canapes and prepare the plonk,
:01:29. > :01:34.it's the Oscars. -- pass over the canapes.
:01:35. > :01:38.Talking of beautiful people with great teeth and dripping with
:01:39. > :01:44.diamonds, joining me to chat all things Oscar related our two of the
:01:45. > :01:55.film world's most glamorous critics, Danny Lee and Tim Roby. Let's get
:01:56. > :02:02.things going with tonight's show. Back in 2013 two bombs were
:02:03. > :02:07.detonated at the end of the Boston Marathon. This is the subject of
:02:08. > :02:14.Patriots Day, starring Mark Wahlberg. It is marathon day, be
:02:15. > :02:24.prepared to augment should they require our assistance. Wow. They
:02:25. > :02:29.say half a million people take place in the Boston Marathon here in New
:02:30. > :02:33.England. Children, mothers, fathers, going on route on the Mac and loved
:02:34. > :02:45.ones. It's a joyous occasion. People don't expect something like this to
:02:46. > :02:53.happen. -- root on their loved ones. When it happens people to -- when it
:02:54. > :02:57.happened people didn't run away, they ran towards the victims. They
:02:58. > :03:01.were pulling people to the emergency vehicles. It was an amazing example
:03:02. > :03:16.of human heroism. It's terrorism. Let's get the evidence, it started
:03:17. > :03:21.right over there. What I was interested in doing in this film is
:03:22. > :03:23.showing a positive reaction that the law enforcement had, to show how
:03:24. > :03:29.helpful they were and how tireless these men were and how they were
:03:30. > :03:34.putting themselves on the line of fire to help the Citizens of Boston.
:03:35. > :03:39.Two bombers. We need to find these guys before they do this to somebody
:03:40. > :03:42.else. We cannot have our citizens on the street with all these threats.
:03:43. > :03:49.Every inch of the city is getting searched. They realised there is
:03:50. > :03:57.nobody else but us. We need to stop this, figure this out. Are there
:03:58. > :04:02.more bombs? All units be on alert for a black Mercedes SUV. Are there
:04:03. > :04:12.more bombs? I want a lawyer. I have rights. You ain't got nothing,
:04:13. > :04:21.sweetheart. For me this felt too soon. Really? Bitter taste, really.
:04:22. > :04:25.Interesting because I am a very oversensitive person. I didn't feel
:04:26. > :04:28.that. I thought it handled it gracefully. It almost reminded me
:04:29. > :04:37.that it could be mawkish but it reminded me of the film that came
:04:38. > :04:45.quite soon after 911. It felt necessary. I think it's something
:04:46. > :04:48.quite important about the way a city response. It doesn't feel
:04:49. > :04:55.jingoistic. It is a film about Boston. It reminds me of 77, I am in
:04:56. > :05:01.London, it doesn't become aggressive and exclusive, and I think it
:05:02. > :05:08.captures that nicely so it doesn't feel, if I can be honest Trumpy.
:05:09. > :05:13.What about the characters, the goodies and the baddies? This is the
:05:14. > :05:24.third one this director has done with Mark Wahlberg. They did Lone
:05:25. > :05:28.Survivor. I would be interested to see him do a film about survivors
:05:29. > :05:32.that are not American and without Mark Wahlberg. It isn't quite
:05:33. > :05:41.believable that this guy did all of this stuff in the course of a few
:05:42. > :05:45.days. That is a debit audit. The way the terrorists are bullying each
:05:46. > :05:48.other is really good. And there is a very good Chinese actor who plays
:05:49. > :05:53.the hostage. There is a really good bit of sequence building. He is
:05:54. > :05:57.getting better at doing that. And the manhunt, and the shoot out, the
:05:58. > :06:05.really big shoot out that began. It is fantastic. On a pragmatic level.
:06:06. > :06:09.You know the story. Exactly and when the explosion happened at the
:06:10. > :06:16.marathon. It takes you by surprise. That is why mentioned 1993. The
:06:17. > :06:21.camera goes half a second ahead of you. You have to catch up with it.
:06:22. > :06:26.That is what happens with the explosion. There is not that
:06:27. > :06:29.tick-tock we are not ready for it. When the explosion happens it is
:06:30. > :06:33.chaos and bedlam. You feel connected with the characters because of that.
:06:34. > :06:38.For them everything is scrambled and for you, as well. As the film
:06:39. > :06:42.unfolds, the shoot out, listen, I may write, what do I know about
:06:43. > :06:50.that, I don't know how that works, but it feels real. It feels chaotic.
:06:51. > :06:55.You don't know what's happening. The trilogy, do we want more from them?
:06:56. > :07:06.I prefer Mark Wahlberg when he is being nasty light in The Departed.
:07:07. > :07:10.He is better. -- like in. As well as the shoot outs, there is the
:07:11. > :07:17.interrogation rooms. We saw that in that clip when the woman says are
:07:18. > :07:26.there any more bombs. She has to say that about ten times. She goals from
:07:27. > :07:31.coldly terrified and to maternal. It was a really well-written scene. --
:07:32. > :07:37.she goes. There are not many other male movie stars who can play a
:07:38. > :07:41.working dude without seeming like somebody raiding the dressing up
:07:42. > :07:47.box. I think the director will keep going back to Mark Wahlberg because
:07:48. > :07:53.he has the nature for it. The go to guys. Next up, a thriller, A Cure
:07:54. > :07:58.For Wellness. Dane DeHaan stars as a young executives sent to rescue his
:07:59. > :08:06.boss from a mysterious wellness spa from the Swiss Alps. But he soon
:08:07. > :08:15.figures out that all is not what it seems. I would like you to go to
:08:16. > :08:18.Switzerland and bring him back. What do you offer here? It is a process
:08:19. > :08:29.of purification away from the pressures of modern world. You want
:08:30. > :08:38.to bring him back with you? He is -- is that a problem? He is a patient,
:08:39. > :08:47.not a prisoner. I was just leaving. Nobody ever leaves. Welcome back.
:08:48. > :08:54.Signs of concussion. Deplete the immune system. I would like to
:08:55. > :09:01.recommend a treatment. Think of it as a cleansing of the mind. As much
:09:02. > :09:07.as the body. Some patients experience visions. Rest assured, it
:09:08. > :09:21.is just the toxins leaving the system. There is a terrible darkness
:09:22. > :09:26.here. This is happening now. You said no one ever leaves. What
:09:27. > :09:32.happens to them? I saw the bodies. You are not a well man. You are
:09:33. > :09:40.trying to make me think I'm insane. What is happening to me? It is all
:09:41. > :09:41.part of the cure. There is no cure. Accept the diagnosis and you will
:09:42. > :09:52.see. Any problems with the dentist? Don't
:09:53. > :09:57.go anywhere near this film. Or eels. There were so many in this film. I
:09:58. > :10:01.don't know if any of them were harmed. Some of them definitely fell
:10:02. > :10:09.asleep. It goes on forever, this thing. I think he is an interesting
:10:10. > :10:14.stylist. Here, I think he has just plucked things and put them in any
:10:15. > :10:19.order and it seems to go around in circles. It could be signpost this
:10:20. > :10:29.way too scary Gothic peace number five. It just keeps doing that. --
:10:30. > :10:32.this way to scary Gothic set number five. If you're old enough to
:10:33. > :10:38.remember the 90s first hand you will remember the music videos of Marilyn
:10:39. > :10:44.Manson. When people watch that people think the only bad thing
:10:45. > :10:49.about these videos is it isn't to the half hours long, well, this is
:10:50. > :10:54.the movie for you. He packs every single second with something. Some
:10:55. > :11:01.of those images are chilling, but there is a lot of camp going on. It
:11:02. > :11:12.is like League Of Gentlemen making a trip around advert. How many hosed
:11:13. > :11:19.buttocks to have to see? I'm not getting time back. He says that is
:11:20. > :11:24.his nightmare. And mind. There is no logic to your dreams and your
:11:25. > :11:30.nightmares. -- and mine. It made sense, that he was just throwing
:11:31. > :11:35.that logic as the film. You feel as if you are stuck inside a sleep
:11:36. > :11:39.cycle with him. You feel like asking can we do it in 90 minutes and throw
:11:40. > :11:46.in a bit of the camp which I did enjoy to a point. The actor who
:11:47. > :11:54.played the owner of the spa seemed to be enjoying himself. I think it
:11:55. > :11:59.also becomes Shutter Island on half speed with Dane DeHaan just doing
:12:00. > :12:03.Leonardo DiCaprio light, his younger brother, or something. Lots of great
:12:04. > :12:10.stuff is getting thrown around. There is the old universal horror
:12:11. > :12:12.films coming through. Dracula, mad science, Frankenstein, but the thing
:12:13. > :12:18.about the capital murder universal horror films is that they were 70
:12:19. > :12:21.minutes. This film is not 70 minutes, you cannot kill the slasher
:12:22. > :12:26.in the film, every time you think you have him he gets up again, let's
:12:27. > :12:30.have more eels! It tries to mess with your head. But you are thinking
:12:31. > :12:37.I'm still watching this film, this is a dream, I'm still going to be at
:12:38. > :12:42.A Cure For Wellness, I'm never getting out of this film. Help me.
:12:43. > :12:47.Let's leave eels and fluffy robes to one side, it is time to talk dickie
:12:48. > :12:53.bows, it is time to talk Oscars. Four days until the 89th Academy
:12:54. > :12:56.Awards. The glitzy annual jamboree where the fabulously famous and
:12:57. > :13:02.tremendously talented gather to celebrate the best of last year's
:13:03. > :13:10.films. Top of the pile nominations wise is La La Land. Can anything
:13:11. > :13:24.beat it? Let's take a look. And the BAFTA goes... And the BAFTA goes
:13:25. > :13:30.to... Emma Stone. La La Land. This year La La Land seems unstoppable.
:13:31. > :13:33.It's very, very exciting. With a record 40 nominations it could be
:13:34. > :13:42.the biggest Oscar winner of all time. What? -- 14. Hollywood likes
:13:43. > :13:53.happy endings but Tinseltown also likes a surprise. What? What? What
:13:54. > :14:06.do you mean? This year sees other films threatening to take the glory.
:14:07. > :14:15.Brace for impact. Hidden Figures has beaten La La Land at the box office
:14:16. > :14:23.and picked up three nominations, including Best picture. Pretty heavy
:14:24. > :14:27.stuff. Going in all guns blazing is Hacksaw Ridge with six nominations,
:14:28. > :14:35.including one for director Mel Gibson, his first in over 20 years.
:14:36. > :14:41.Sci-fi epic Arrival has eight nominations. But is it proper
:14:42. > :14:47.introduction. But none for its star, Amy Adams. When it comes to acting,
:14:48. > :14:54.La La Land's chances may not be set in stone. With show stopping
:14:55. > :15:02.performances from Isabelle Huppert in Elle. Natalie Portman in Jackie.
:15:03. > :15:04.And Casey Affleck in Manchester By The Sea threatening to spoil the
:15:05. > :15:14.party. But always invited to the party is
:15:15. > :15:23.Meryl Streep. I am so blessed. She picks up her 20th nomination for
:15:24. > :15:29.Florence Foster Jenkins. After last year's Oscars saw controversy, this
:15:30. > :15:32.year sees seven actors of colour nominated. Including first timers
:15:33. > :15:59.Dev Patel for Lion. The money is on the Viola Davis --
:16:00. > :16:11.is on Viola Davis in Fences. Missing out our Tom Hanks -- are Tom Hanks.
:16:12. > :16:22.And Annette Bening's performance in 21st-century Women. It is radio
:16:23. > :16:23.silence for Martin Scorsese. And, as ever, some of the biggest grossing
:16:24. > :16:40.movies of the year have missed out. Such as Dead pool. And Finding Dori
:16:41. > :16:50.but one film which might give La La Land a run for its money is
:16:51. > :16:54.Moonlight. Having already won big awards ceremonies, it is officially
:16:55. > :17:00.this year's little movie that could. What was you expecting? Will Barry
:17:01. > :17:08.Jenkins become the first ever African-American to win best
:17:09. > :17:14.director? Or will wonder kid Damien Chazelle become the youngest ever
:17:15. > :17:31.winner for La La Land? Either way, on Sunday, all will be revealed.
:17:32. > :17:42.I want to know what are you doing for Oscar night. I don't spend
:17:43. > :17:46.enough of my life in cinemas watching things so I'm watching it
:17:47. > :17:59.on a big screen! Probably drinking coffee all night. I will break into
:18:00. > :18:07.his house! Every year! Weird. With eels! Walk away from the eels! Do
:18:08. > :18:10.you think the nominations are a good representation, is a good year? I
:18:11. > :18:15.think it is a very good year. We talk about it every year but this is
:18:16. > :18:19.the first I can remember when a lot the best films actually stand a good
:18:20. > :18:25.chance of winning something, maybe even best film. I would say it is an
:18:26. > :18:29.uncommonly good year. Is it a good representation of variety? There are
:18:30. > :18:33.some good nominations and some unfortunate missing people, Annette
:18:34. > :18:38.Bening was highlighted and that was a real shame. Some of the other
:18:39. > :18:44.actors in Moonlight as well. La La Land looks set to do well. I feel we
:18:45. > :18:49.are jaded media darlings that we have been hearing so much about it
:18:50. > :18:53.since September, that you reach a point, enough already. Give it some
:18:54. > :18:59.Oscars and move on. The conversation which seems to be happening is this
:19:00. > :19:03.Moonlight against La La Land almost wrestling match which we need to get
:19:04. > :19:08.over. If you talk to Damien Chazelle or Barry Jenkins, they would both
:19:09. > :19:12.love each other's films. I was not a huge fan of La La Land at the time
:19:13. > :19:15.but it is a huge crowd pleaser and audiences here in the state have
:19:16. > :19:21.fallen in love with it. We are a couple of years away from everyone
:19:22. > :19:25.eating each other! If people can find some solace and fun and at the
:19:26. > :19:30.cinema, great. And there are so many crowd pleaser is, different kinds
:19:31. > :19:34.this year. La La Land is the obvious one, Hidden Figures is another one
:19:35. > :19:38.and it has done better at the box office in America. And Moonlight as
:19:39. > :19:42.well, I have been to screenings and the crowd go crazy for it. Hell Or
:19:43. > :19:49.High Water is above nobody is talking about. Fantastic film. And
:19:50. > :19:56.did very well at the box office. It kept being filled, people would go
:19:57. > :20:01.and said they had seen it... It is the sleeper hit of the year and I'm
:20:02. > :20:05.glad it got the attention it's got. Jeff Bridges was nominated, I would
:20:06. > :20:10.have nominated Ben Foster as well. I would have nominated about six from
:20:11. > :20:15.Moonlight. But I think it will win and hopefully screenplay as well is
:20:16. > :20:22.pretty much in the bag so I think it will get two. I'm so much more of a
:20:23. > :20:29.Moonlight fan but La La Land has almost become cast as the bad guy.
:20:30. > :20:32.It is a little film actually. It is not an expensive movie. There is
:20:33. > :20:38.huge ambition behind it and it is straight it has become cast, it is
:20:39. > :20:44.like King Kong. I hope Moonlight wins a lot of Oscars and more people
:20:45. > :20:47.go and see it. But in no way it is bigger than the Oscars and the
:20:48. > :20:51.effect it has already had and will continue to have gone films from
:20:52. > :20:58.2070 onward are going to stop looking like Moonlight. That the
:20:59. > :21:05.-- 2017. The Academy has done a little better this year after last
:21:06. > :21:14.year's all-white acting nominees. Let's have a look at the acting
:21:15. > :21:21.categories. I just settled in. It seems like he's doing pretty good. I
:21:22. > :21:25.think he is. When I first read the script I cried many times, it is a
:21:26. > :21:33.really moving story in a way that you just don't see any more. You
:21:34. > :21:40.think you're better than us? No. Did you like that? There wasn't any
:21:41. > :21:45.hesitation when I read the script, it was a compelling script and a
:21:46. > :21:53.compelling person. I don't know how I'm going to live with myself.
:21:54. > :22:07.You've never seen it. All my other but it's playing... You should go. I
:22:08. > :22:12.can take you. We can't go to the funeral. We had to be what we're
:22:13. > :22:21.told. The powerful control the lives of the powerless. That's the way the
:22:22. > :22:24.world works. He is the father of six children from the live deep in the
:22:25. > :22:29.forest from the youngest ones have hardly been out of the forest at
:22:30. > :22:33.all. Why don't you go ahead and let him play football, he wants to be
:22:34. > :22:37.like you. I don't want him to be like me, I want him to get as far
:22:38. > :22:40.away from my life as he can possibly get, the only decent thing that ever
:22:41. > :22:45.happened to me. We couldn't have done it if we hadn't done the plate.
:22:46. > :22:47.You're trying to find your character and direct and produce and the
:22:48. > :23:03.dialogue! It's a story about a woman to whom
:23:04. > :23:09.something violent and unusual happens. And she react in such a way
:23:10. > :23:15.that it's quite unpredictable. Will you marry me? We both really love
:23:16. > :23:19.these characters and I think we needed one another for these
:23:20. > :23:22.performances. It was strangely non-verbal of agreement that we
:23:23. > :23:30.would treasure these people and honour them by being as truthful and
:23:31. > :23:37.authentic as possible. Can you hear me? One of the most inspiring things
:23:38. > :23:43.for me in playing the role was that she edited all her interviews so she
:23:44. > :23:47.had so much control and wanted to author her story. I'm guessing you
:23:48. > :23:57.won't allow me to write any of that. No. Because I never said that. Two
:23:58. > :24:05.options from you follow my rules or follow my rule. This is my favourite
:24:06. > :24:12.place in the whole world. And I'm going to sing here. It is true that
:24:13. > :24:20.a lot of singers might age are on the decline I seem to just get
:24:21. > :24:24.better and better. Her favourite place, Oscar-nominated! Can we talk
:24:25. > :24:32.about actor first? Is it a close race between Casey and Denzel? It is
:24:33. > :24:37.because Casey has been winning most of the award but there was a bit of
:24:38. > :24:41.controversy around him and Denzel does some of his best work in
:24:42. > :24:50.sensors. It could be down to the wire between them. What about Andrew
:24:51. > :24:53.Garfield? -- in Fences. Andrew Garfield is very good, but also in
:24:54. > :24:59.Silence which has been shut out completely. I would have nominated
:25:00. > :25:02.the Japanese actor who plays the main interrogator and he was
:25:03. > :25:08.brilliant. If that is not a best supporting actor, I don't know what
:25:09. > :25:15.is. By Ola Davies is the interesting one. For a lot of the films it is a
:25:16. > :25:18.double act -- Viola Davis. This is a slightly cowardly thing they've
:25:19. > :25:27.done, she is going to win because she should and overdue as well but
:25:28. > :25:33.she won on Broadway for playing the lead actress. She would have beaten
:25:34. > :25:43.Emma Stone and she would have only been the second black actress to win
:25:44. > :25:48.after 5-3. It feels premeditated, she has always been talked about in
:25:49. > :25:55.terms of best supporting -- after Halle Berry. If you tally it up, she
:25:56. > :25:59.is on screen as least as much as Denzel Washington if not more and in
:26:00. > :26:02.the scenes in that film, the big scenes are hers. She is supporting
:26:03. > :26:06.actress but the supporting categories you will traditionally
:26:07. > :26:13.have someone like Anne Hathaway singing a song. Don't spoil it! I
:26:14. > :26:19.don't know what the category is supposed to be any more. I interpret
:26:20. > :26:29.it as a support to the lead actor. You think about Mascarell yelling in
:26:30. > :26:35.Moonlight -- this Mahershala Ali. It is also about reflecting on the
:26:36. > :26:44.other actors. That is the perfect size for a sporting of Ormesby is up
:26:45. > :26:52.against Dev Patel who might be a spoiler -- but he is up against. We
:26:53. > :26:58.love Dev Patel and Lens is a great movie but he the supporting actor
:26:59. > :27:03.despite having half the film but the actor in the first up is nowhere to
:27:04. > :27:06.be seen. There are lot of double acts this year and Florence Foster
:27:07. > :27:12.Jenkins, and course Meryl Streep rolled up for her nomination but
:27:13. > :27:16.Hugh Grant does not get nominated. He is constantly turning the light
:27:17. > :27:19.on Meryl Streep and he is nowhere. But a look at the elms up for the
:27:20. > :27:30.top prize, best picture. There are days that define your
:27:31. > :27:36.story beyond your life. Some people build Fences to keep people out and
:27:37. > :27:41.that build them to keep people in. You're free to run into the health
:27:42. > :27:48.of our -- going to be hellfire battle without a weapon. Did you
:27:49. > :27:58.hear about these bank robberies? Can you handle it? Absolutely.
:27:59. > :28:06.I have to find my way back home. What if you do find it? I can't be
:28:07. > :28:13.the guardian. I thought we had discussed this. At some point you've
:28:14. > :28:21.got to decide for yourself who you're going to be.
:28:22. > :28:35.I'm here. I want to do the Casey Affleck think I don't know! So many
:28:36. > :28:39.fantastic films. If La La Land wins everything, it could only win 13 and
:28:40. > :28:44.it becomes the most successful film ever. It won't win that many, maybe
:28:45. > :28:48.seven or eight. The big one it might lose its best actor I think Ryan
:28:49. > :28:54.Gosling lose. But it will lose things like costumes, I think Jackie
:28:55. > :28:58.might win, and one of the Sound awards might go to Hacksaw Ridge,
:28:59. > :29:04.they will give that a well done for coming. It might lose original
:29:05. > :29:06.screenplay to Manchester by the Sea which I think would be the correct
:29:07. > :29:12.call, Kenneth Lonergan deserves that. I have certain issues with
:29:13. > :29:20.Manchester by this e-book is a piece of writing it is phenomenal. And the
:29:21. > :29:25.as well. -- Manchester by the Sea but as a piece of writing. Is there
:29:26. > :29:30.a film that could be something that sweeps? We have talked about
:29:31. > :29:34.Moonlight and there is a lot of love for it, is that what you want to
:29:35. > :29:38.see? I would like to happen but I don't think it will. Moonlight will
:29:39. > :29:43.elevate from being the runner up in a sense, the kind of dark horse that
:29:44. > :29:48.people wanted to win. La La Land will be the winner that people
:29:49. > :29:56.forget in five years' time. I think that's right. I'm still going to be
:29:57. > :30:00.doing jazz hands in 20 years! You need to stop that. I don't begrudge
:30:01. > :30:05.people the good time they have had La La Land but thinking about best
:30:06. > :30:08.director, if you get Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling, it is almost like
:30:09. > :30:14.buying them off the shelf, they come and do at what they do. It is a
:30:15. > :30:19.persona. They are basically doing their thing. It is not a film that
:30:20. > :30:23.has been made on the same level as Moonlight and to just get that film
:30:24. > :30:26.made in the way it is, that is kind of astonishing. I don't think
:30:27. > :30:31.Moonlight needs the Oscar, maybe the Oscars need Moonlight. Arrival is up
:30:32. > :30:36.for best picture but nothing for Amy Adams? Which is strained again, we
:30:37. > :30:40.talked about Annette Bening. They would have both have lost and
:30:41. > :30:45.they're both be nominated about five times.
:30:46. > :30:53.I will put you on the spot. Which film do you think will win and which
:30:54. > :31:00.ones you want to win? I think Moonlight should win but I think La
:31:01. > :31:05.La Land will win. Same. If Hidden Figures picks up a couple, or
:31:06. > :31:11.Manchester By The Sea, then great. I only ask you for one. I could give
:31:12. > :31:21.you a very big list. Let's talk about eels. Not again. A Cure For
:31:22. > :31:27.Wellness. Oscar. We know what they think, now what do you think. Jamie
:31:28. > :31:33.says La La Land will win but I once Moonlight to win. It is a master 's
:31:34. > :31:36.piece that space with you. Spencer says let's not overpraised La La
:31:37. > :31:42.Land. Has everybody else forgotten Arrival? Andy says that La La Land
:31:43. > :31:46.is entertaining, wonderful, and just what the world needs will stop an
:31:47. > :31:51.all-time favourite of mine, I have seen it six times, I think it will
:31:52. > :31:56.win. Dora says Lion is a bit of a sleeper, it would not surprise me if
:31:57. > :32:03.it won best picture. It would surprise me half a bit. Brandon says
:32:04. > :32:07.if Moonlight doesn't win anything I will cry. Not long to wait now. All
:32:08. > :32:16.will be revealed early Monday morning. Next week, Charlie Brooker
:32:17. > :32:20.will be back. But for all a few beautiful people jetting off to LA
:32:21. > :32:25.this week and, I am going to leave you with a masterclass in how to
:32:26. > :32:33.make an awards show pop. This is a multi-award-winning, well, I think
:32:34. > :32:36.it won two Razzies. Nominees, presenters, take note, this is how
:32:37. > :32:49.you do it. Thanks for watching. Goodbye. In three, two... Read the
:32:50. > :32:56.card, moron. Well, this certainly is a special evening. I can barely
:32:57. > :33:03.catch my breath. Turn it over the term... What the hell is he doing?
:33:04. > :33:11.It gets me out of breath just watching you. To Raquel... You are
:33:12. > :33:16.not supposed to read that. Let's get to the subject at hand. The nominees
:33:17. > :33:26.are Sir Richard Attenborough for his musical based on the life of Mother
:33:27. > :33:38.Teresa. Mother! # I love food, I love food
:33:39. > :33:42.# Don't get any salsa... #. Spike Lee. But as Frank at the
:33:43. > :33:46.Academy Awards. And his tale of genetics going
:33:47. > :33:58.haywire at a retirement home. A 24-year-old man
:33:59. > :34:06.has been charged with murder. Huntley's definitely
:34:07. > :34:10.hiding something.