:00:15. > :00:18.Hello and welcome to the One Show with Matt Baker. And Alex Jones.
:00:18. > :00:21.Tonight we're joined by a four-time Olympic gold medallist and current
:00:21. > :00:24.world record holder for the 400 metres, Michael Johnson, and he's
:00:24. > :00:31.going to show you how, with a simple online test, you can find
:00:31. > :00:34.out how competitive you are. that's not all, we're also joined
:00:34. > :00:39.by a man who hasn't got Olympic medals and no world records we
:00:39. > :00:49.could find when we googled him, but on the plus side he is quite funny.
:00:49. > :00:53.
:00:53. > :00:58.Good to see you, Ricky! This thing on competitiveness, you are a very
:00:58. > :01:04.successful man, do you have that competitive drive? Over trivial
:01:04. > :01:07.things, yeah. Tiddlywinks. Tiddlywinks, pub quiz, I am
:01:07. > :01:13.heckling the present at the pub quiz. I will be pedantic, I will
:01:13. > :01:18.try to get one extra point, I am a typical bloke, I cannot lose at
:01:18. > :01:25.trivial pursuit, forget it. We will talk to Michael about that later.
:01:25. > :01:29.Running? Carry on! Ricky is here to talk about his brand new series,
:01:29. > :01:35.the third series of The Ricky Gervais Show. He appears as a
:01:35. > :01:39.cartoon, it is not a bad likeness. No, it is not! But watch out,
:01:39. > :01:49.because if the similarity get any closer, you might accidentally
:01:49. > :01:53.It is one of the great puzzles of animation. You can create a big
:01:53. > :01:57.green ochre that audiences love or make a fish talk, and people will
:01:57. > :02:02.flock to see it. But make a realistic human character, and we
:02:02. > :02:07.often do not like it, we find that sort of creepy. Why is it that the
:02:07. > :02:13.more lifelike a human animation becomes, the less we seem to be
:02:13. > :02:17.prepared to accept it? Polar Express, made in 2004, used the
:02:17. > :02:21.then state-of-the-art CD-i to create human characters. But it
:02:21. > :02:25.didn't do as well at the box office as expected. Some film experts
:02:25. > :02:30.believed it was because the characters were too lifelike. Other
:02:30. > :02:36.more recent films seem to show the same kind of effect. What is it
:02:36. > :02:40.about these characters that bothers us? The skin is really smooth, no
:02:40. > :02:46.texture, that gives it away. There is something that does not sit
:02:46. > :02:52.quite right. It should be the real actor or somebody like Woody in Toy
:02:52. > :02:55.Story. Representations are humans that move, like a ventriloquist's
:02:55. > :03:00.dummies, have long been known to unnerve some of us. Sigmund Freud
:03:00. > :03:04.wrote about the reaction and called it the uncanny valley. In the 1970s,
:03:04. > :03:10.a Japanese robotics researcher came up with a way of illustrating this
:03:10. > :03:15.and gave it the name. The uncanny valley. This phenomenon gets its
:03:15. > :03:18.name from a graph that you can draw like this, where you have
:03:18. > :03:24.increasing realism here and increasing empathy or friendly less
:03:24. > :03:29.along there. At this end, you have a stick man, right? Completely
:03:29. > :03:33.unrealistic, completely unfriendly. Up here, you have got me,
:03:33. > :03:38.completely realistic and completely friendly. As you draw a graph, it
:03:38. > :03:44.goes up like this and you hit a point which would represent a Snow
:03:44. > :03:49.White, quite realistic and friendly. When you go a bit further, suddenly
:03:49. > :03:53.you hit this big dip in the graph. Just before you get to 100% realism,
:03:53. > :04:01.that might represent something like this character, Tom Hanks in Polar
:04:01. > :04:06.Express. He is quite realistic, but really rather creaky. He would sit
:04:06. > :04:12.down here in what has become known as the uncanny valley. But why do
:04:12. > :04:16.we react badly to characters who look more like us? This doctor from
:04:16. > :04:18.Bolton University has been carrying out work into the uncanny valley
:04:19. > :04:23.for the games industry. Her research has found that people
:04:23. > :04:28.react particularly badly when the upper facial movements in animated
:04:28. > :04:33.characters are not realistic enough. It may be that one perceives a lack
:04:33. > :04:38.of empathy in a character, due to the lack of upper facial movements,
:04:38. > :04:42.in that the character may not be able to appreciate or share one's
:04:42. > :04:46.feelings, understand how you are feeling, or express or shown the
:04:46. > :04:51.social skills to show compassion towards you. A lot of animated
:04:51. > :04:55.films will avoid the uncanny valley by making the character is
:04:55. > :05:01.deliberately unrealistic. They would give them a big head and
:05:01. > :05:05.exaggerated features. But a team of British animators have another idea.
:05:05. > :05:10.This is image metrics in Manchester. They are at the cutting edge of
:05:10. > :05:15.animation and have worked on video games and major Hollywood films.
:05:15. > :05:21.This is our digital project. This is not real, this is computer-
:05:21. > :05:25.generated. No! That is real, isn't it? Emily is based on a real person,
:05:25. > :05:29.but her face has been replaced with a computer animated version. She is
:05:29. > :05:34.being hailed as a breakthrough in believable computer graphics. What
:05:34. > :05:38.is different here to what has been done before? The main thing was the
:05:39. > :05:42.level of detail to which remodelled the actor. We took scans of their
:05:42. > :05:46.fees in various facial expressions, and we have modelling her down to
:05:46. > :05:50.the skin pores. That is significantly more detail than what
:05:50. > :05:55.people traditionally do, and it enables us to create a result that
:05:55. > :05:59.pulls the eye. I was certainly fooled by Emily, but strangely the
:05:59. > :06:04.moment I was told she was not real, she fell straight back into the
:06:04. > :06:12.uncanny valley for me. So will this level of realism catch on? I don't
:06:12. > :06:17.know, what do you think question? do not know, that is creepy.
:06:17. > :06:21.just cannot relate to that character at all, it is a bit weird.
:06:21. > :06:25.What did you make are Emily? think the technology is amazing,
:06:25. > :06:30.but when it is animation, it defeats the object, really. There
:06:30. > :06:35.is less escapism. I don't know, you might as well get the actor. I
:06:35. > :06:40.would rather have one of them to me so that I don't have to turn up.
:06:40. > :06:44.The style of the characters in The Ricky Gervais Show... Well, I
:06:44. > :06:47.wanted that to be really retro and cuddly, because the things we talk
:06:48. > :06:54.about are quite challenging. I did not wanted to be trendy and spiky
:06:54. > :07:01.and challenging in any way. I sort of designed the original sketches
:07:01. > :07:06.and sent them off to the animators, who are amazing. So you drew them?
:07:06. > :07:11.Obviously, they made them brilliant. They are lovely. They actually said,
:07:11. > :07:15.with mine, between series two and three, they said, you have lost a
:07:15. > :07:20.bit of weight and you have got a beard, to want to change it? I said
:07:20. > :07:26.no, that would be too expensive, leave him fat and shiny. I like it
:07:26. > :07:30.to be a time capsule. Even if Karl got it on their head and became
:07:30. > :07:35.really smart, do you know what I mean, he is there for ever. My note
:07:36. > :07:43.on him was, even rounder! He is rounder than a drawing in with a
:07:43. > :07:47.compass. But the new show is back on Tuesday, and I mean, it looks
:07:47. > :07:53.like you three friends in there having a chat. How much of it is at
:07:53. > :08:00.Live? It is all I live. People say, is a scripted? As if we would
:08:00. > :08:03.bother scripting that rubbish! We just... We went in, I did it as an
:08:03. > :08:08.experiment, I love being in a room with Karl Pilkington, he is my best
:08:08. > :08:13.mate. I call him all the time, I will call him after this show. And
:08:13. > :08:19.I just thought, that is fun, I think that is what normal people do,
:08:19. > :08:23.they chat, and we tried to do that. Then we are loaded it as a podcast,
:08:23. > :08:27.it went crazy, and then this happened. It was just an experiment,
:08:28. > :08:35.it was just fun, a labour of love, really, but it is totally Ablett,
:08:35. > :08:39.yeah. Let's have a look at one of the shows. The tsar things that
:08:39. > :08:44.really annoy you. So low it is, they cause more problems than good.
:08:44. > :08:49.They eat cabbage. When they should not be. They get in boxes and mix
:08:49. > :08:58.stamps. They don't make stamps. They like the blue on it, that is
:08:58. > :09:08.why they are so slow. I think they are sweating blue. -- Blue. What do
:09:08. > :09:09.
:09:09. > :09:14.It is great! He observed the world, but then he makes up his own facts.
:09:14. > :09:18.He has obviously heard that they like the taste, so they are making
:09:18. > :09:23.stamps, that quantum leap, and then they are sweating the gloom. I like
:09:23. > :09:27.that. His knowledge of the animal kingdom is fantastic, I love to get
:09:27. > :09:32.him on the big subjects, he is amazing. This is the third series,
:09:32. > :09:37.and historically you do not do a third series. Yes, at two series,
:09:37. > :09:44.but you have got to realise, with this, someone else is doing all our
:09:44. > :09:50.hard work. I just chatted! I am selling is a third time now. It is
:09:50. > :09:54.the third season, 39 episodes, which I think is more than the
:09:54. > :09:59.Office and Extras put together! We are doing a special of An Idiot
:09:59. > :10:03.Abroad, he is doing his travels now. You put him in extraordinary
:10:03. > :10:07.situations, do you feel bad about that? No, he is my gift to the
:10:07. > :10:11.world. I think he is the funniest guy in the world, he is my best
:10:11. > :10:17.mate, and people who say I am volleying him, right in it he wants
:10:17. > :10:22.to be bullied by me, because you get a series, a new house. Not a
:10:22. > :10:32.bad deal! One of the big parts of the animation is your laugh, it is
:10:32. > :10:42.
:10:42. > :10:49.brilliant. Brilliant for some! That howl at the end! Nothing makes
:10:49. > :10:54.me laugh like him. People say, is the real? If he is not, he keeps
:10:54. > :10:58.the Act Up 24-7. He is funny all the time. We were wondering if you
:10:58. > :11:05.could guess other people's laughs, gets the laugh, this game is. They
:11:05. > :11:14.are famous people. As opposed to the guy who works in the chip shop!
:11:14. > :11:24.We have got three, RK, listen up. Sid James! That was very good,
:11:24. > :11:28.
:11:28. > :11:35.straight away. This is the second I have no idea. Think about it, he
:11:35. > :11:41.is a friend of yours. There he is, it is Jimmy Carr. OK, stop it!
:11:41. > :11:49.is a bit creepy after a while. is like a ghost. This third one is
:11:49. > :11:57.quite hard, isn't it? Good luck with this one. It is a female.
:11:57. > :12:07.Female what?! Human? That is their actual laughter. Douet again! I
:12:07. > :12:11.
:12:11. > :12:17.It is Adele. Really?! That is good. What a game! She has got a lovely
:12:17. > :12:20.voice, but not when she laughs. That is funny. The third series of
:12:20. > :12:24.The Ricky Gervais Show starts next Thursday at 11:30pm. Now, if
:12:24. > :12:31.anybody follows you on Twitter, they will know you are a big cat
:12:31. > :12:36.lover, you posed pictures of your cat quite often. Did you know that
:12:36. > :12:46.as a cat lover in the 1960s, you could walk into Harrods and pick up
:12:46. > :12:46.
:12:46. > :12:50.a Winnie The Pooh? It is ridiculous. Here is Gyles to explain more. The
:12:50. > :12:57.60s were exciting times, the days before tedious stuff like the
:12:57. > :13:03.dangerous Wild animals Act of 1976, and if you fancied by Neil self-pay
:13:03. > :13:07.Klout, there was nothing to stop you. You simply popped out to the
:13:07. > :13:12.shops. In 1969, Harrods was offering a lion cub as the ultimate
:13:12. > :13:16.Christmas present. You could not resist it, you look at it and
:13:16. > :13:22.thought, heavens, we have got to do something about this. Star moving
:13:22. > :13:27.up the equivalent of �4,000, John bought the Harrods line, naming him
:13:27. > :13:33.Christiane, they took him home to a London furniture shop. It is still
:13:33. > :13:38.trading, but in new premises. Seriously, a shop like this amidst
:13:38. > :13:42.all the furniture? New line, the sofa and the wardrobe. Exactly
:13:42. > :13:49.right! This was his jungle, and used to sneak around between all
:13:49. > :13:55.the chairs, stalking people. This is your gallery here. Sitting on
:13:55. > :13:57.the stairs. What did the customers make of him? They loved it! He is
:13:58. > :14:02.about eight months old here. Obviously, he looks like he was
:14:02. > :14:07.happy to be handled. He had complete trust in us. It is
:14:07. > :14:10.impossible to assess what he thought we were. All he knew was
:14:10. > :14:16.that we loved him unconditionally. And here he is up in a flat, you
:14:16. > :14:22.say. A My gosh! Were people write to be a bit wary? They were right
:14:22. > :14:25.to be wary, but he never attacked anybody. This is before the age of
:14:25. > :14:35.health and safety, so nobody was coming along and saying, you cannot
:14:35. > :14:37.
:14:37. > :14:41.Christian became the focus of John's life, but the growing lion
:14:41. > :14:46.needed space, which was in short supply on the King's Road. This is
:14:46. > :14:51.where you would come? It is a graveyard. It is a graveyard and
:14:51. > :14:56.the perfect safe walled garden for him to play football. He persuaded
:14:56. > :15:02.the vicar to lead to bring a lion, in your car? He was a marvellous
:15:02. > :15:09.man, he was animal lover, he said, he of course you can. Did you have
:15:09. > :15:14.a pooper scooper? No, of course not. Standards were different. It was a
:15:14. > :15:21.scooper shovel! It is amazing, a liar and running three in west
:15:21. > :15:25.London. -- a lion running free. Despite their close bond, they knew
:15:25. > :15:30.that Christian could not stay in London much longer. But putting him
:15:30. > :15:34.back into captivity would be betrayal. It was distressing, what
:15:34. > :15:40.was going to happen to him. I was quite pleased when Bill Travers
:15:40. > :15:44.walked into the shop looking for a desk. I thought, I know who you are.
:15:44. > :15:49.I have got something to show you. Bill Travers and Virginia McKenna,
:15:49. > :15:56.stars of the hit film, born Free, instantly joined Christian boss fan
:15:56. > :16:00.club. At that moment, it was absolutely wonderful. And I thought,
:16:00. > :16:06.as I looked at him, he was one of the most beautiful young Lawrence I
:16:06. > :16:13.had ever seen. There was something about him. With Bill's help, the
:16:13. > :16:16.lion was given a chance of freedom. He was flown to Kenya where the
:16:16. > :16:20.conservationists are tempted to integrating into the wild. I felt
:16:20. > :16:24.confident that Christian would have a fulfilled life in the wild, for
:16:24. > :16:32.however long or short that might be. Even if it was a year, it would be
:16:32. > :16:36.better than a lifetime in a zoo. Christian had left a massive gap in
:16:36. > :16:41.John's life. A year later, they flew to Kenya with a cameraman,
:16:41. > :16:46.hoping to film them. But the lion was wild and potentially dangerous.
:16:46. > :16:56.Had he forgotten his human friends? You can see him thinking it through.
:16:56. > :16:56.
:16:56. > :17:05.Is it then? Is it then? That is when he started to run. -- is it
:17:05. > :17:11.When he actually jumped into arms, and was rubbing against us, it was
:17:11. > :17:16.an extraordinary feeling. This huge animal now. It was a unique
:17:16. > :17:23.privilege to be there. The sheer excitement, that he hadn't
:17:23. > :17:29.forgotten us. It is remarkable that a lion from Harrods should manage
:17:29. > :17:32.to adapt to the wilds of Africa. John will never forget the cub he
:17:32. > :17:42.released into freedom. What is more remarkable is that Christian didn't
:17:42. > :17:43.
:17:43. > :17:50.forget them. It has given me goose pimples. Me
:17:50. > :17:56.and Giles have got tears! It is an amazing story and it is not unique.
:17:56. > :18:01.I have another bit of footage to show you about this gorilla. The
:18:01. > :18:04.gorilla was brought up in captivity at the Aspinall family zoo in Kent.
:18:04. > :18:08.Hand-reared for five years and then he became too big, they had to
:18:08. > :18:13.release him into the wild. They went to West Africa, to the Gabon,
:18:13. > :18:19.and they gave the guerrilla back- to-nature, as they rightly should.
:18:19. > :18:24.Five years later, Damian Aspinall thought, I wonder what is happening.
:18:24. > :18:27.The last time the group had been seen, he had twice attacked humans.
:18:27. > :18:32.Damian went in a boat to try to find him. Came to the shore,
:18:32. > :18:42.calling out his name, looking for this wild gorilla. And watch what
:18:42. > :18:42.
:18:42. > :18:50.happened next. I go and see him, and he embraces me and he hugs me.
:18:50. > :18:54.You know, you develop these incredibly strong emotional bonds,
:18:54. > :18:57.because they are so closely related to us. Damia and the gorilla had
:18:57. > :19:03.not met for five years but the guerrilla definitely did remember.
:19:03. > :19:07.This is to do with imprinting. This was discovered about 100 years ago.
:19:07. > :19:12.When baby animals are born, indeed when birds are hatched from eggs,
:19:12. > :19:18.the first thing they see, even if it is an inanimate object, they
:19:18. > :19:22.want to follow it. This has had some wonderful implications in
:19:22. > :19:27.terms of conservation. Condors in California were buying up, there
:19:27. > :19:32.were about nine left in the net -- early 1980s. They're only breed
:19:32. > :19:36.when they are six years of age, they breed quite slowly, one egg
:19:36. > :19:40.every two is. They had the idea of taking the a go away from the live
:19:40. > :19:46.gundog, letting it hatch and showing the Condor a puppet of a
:19:46. > :19:50.Condor. Here is a photograph. It is apparent the rearing a baby Condor.
:19:50. > :19:54.This enabled the adult to give birth to another chicken, lay
:19:54. > :20:03.another egg, and they were able to rear these baby condors with
:20:03. > :20:06.puppets. And now, in California, there are about 178. Yeah, yeah. It
:20:06. > :20:10.is that interesting argument of feed to allow the imprinting to
:20:10. > :20:16.happen with humans. It happened with the lion cub. The problem is,
:20:16. > :20:19.in general, you shouldn't keep wild animals. The fact that they are so
:20:19. > :20:24.intelligent, it proves that they shouldn't be imprisoned for our
:20:24. > :20:29.amusement. It is a privilege and it is a nice ending, but he shouldn't
:20:29. > :20:33.have been in Harrods in the first place. People see things like this
:20:33. > :20:38.and they think, how cute, I could have won, and you shouldn't keep a
:20:38. > :20:45.wild animal. And it can't be done. Legislation followed that made it
:20:45. > :20:52.impossible. It makes a contribution to conservation, so it is difficult.
:20:52. > :20:55.Thank you. The Boeing 787, or Dreamliner, has landed in the UK
:20:55. > :20:59.for the first time, and from next year will be transporting thousands
:20:59. > :21:03.of us on our summer holidays. makers claim it is one of the
:21:03. > :21:08.quietest and greenest airliners ever made. We sent Matt Allwright
:21:08. > :21:13.to ask the question on everybody's lips. Is it just another plane?
:21:13. > :21:18.There was a time when air travel was seen as a gateway to exotic
:21:18. > :21:24.plants. But then again, have you been through passport control --
:21:24. > :21:30.exotic plants. The 1950s are over. Even Concorde has gone. Air travel
:21:30. > :21:34.is a bit every day, a bit humdrum, isn't it? Apparently this is the
:21:34. > :21:41.aeroplane that is going to change all that. But is it just another
:21:41. > :21:46.plane? Boeing certainly haven't been shy in the claims they are
:21:46. > :21:51.making for their new 787 Dreamliner. They say it will make flying but
:21:51. > :21:57.only more comfortable, but more ecologically friendly. Welcome
:21:58. > :22:01.aboard. How are you? I am OK. Excellent, come and enjoy the 787
:22:01. > :22:06.Dreamliner. They are only a few of these flying around the world at
:22:06. > :22:10.the moment and the one show has secured a few places on an
:22:10. > :22:15.exclusive test flight. It is not just the aerodynamics but the level
:22:15. > :22:25.of style and comfort that Boeing are selling. Very high ceilings.
:22:25. > :22:26.
:22:26. > :22:32.Large windows. Dinner at the touch To and cleaner air. Is it just
:22:32. > :22:35.another plane? I don't think it is just another plane. I think it is a
:22:35. > :22:39.step forward, much more fuel efficient, will produce a lot less
:22:39. > :22:44.greenhouse gases, much more comfortable for the customers.
:22:44. > :22:48.this your first time to get your hands on this plane? It is, my
:22:48. > :22:52.first fight. That was my first take-off. The technology is very
:22:52. > :22:57.different to other aeroplanes. It is lighter and more airy and the
:22:57. > :23:02.atmosphere is much more similar to what you would encounter on the
:23:02. > :23:07.ground. Is this just another plane? Absolutely not. This is not another
:23:07. > :23:12.plane. This is going to change the way passenger's seat air travel.
:23:12. > :23:18.Change the way airlines use their planes. It would change the
:23:18. > :23:24.economic occasion -- equation. there a reduction in noise for
:23:24. > :23:30.people in their gardens? Absolutely. This will be a very good neighbour
:23:30. > :23:34.to the community. The advanced technology, plus the chevrons that
:23:34. > :23:39.you see on the fans that on it as a ball from the ground, have created
:23:39. > :23:45.a noise signature for this airplane which is contained within the
:23:45. > :23:48.airport boundary -- that are noticeable from the ground. They
:23:48. > :23:53.claim it is quiet on the inside. But does it make any difference for
:23:53. > :23:56.people living near by? It feels like a movement in the right
:23:56. > :23:59.direction. It would be brilliant if all of the planes are like that
:23:59. > :24:04.tomorrow, but it will probably ensure it never quite a period of
:24:04. > :24:08.time. I will commit, but how quickly you are going to see the
:24:08. > :24:13.benefits, and would wake me up at five in the morning? -- it will
:24:13. > :24:18.probably inch in over a period of time. It must be all your birthday
:24:18. > :24:21.is at once? It depends how much less the noise is, and how much
:24:21. > :24:25.less the emissions are. The emissions per plane are improving
:24:25. > :24:28.by about 1% per year, but the growth is four or 5%, so we are
:24:28. > :24:33.getting more and more emissions, more and more noise and
:24:33. > :24:36.environmental damage as time goes on. Isn't it a bit like those diet
:24:36. > :24:42.biscuits. You know they don't give you as many calories, so you end up
:24:42. > :24:46.eating more. Are we going to have more and more air travel, which is
:24:46. > :24:49.not really beneficial? People will continue to want to travel and we
:24:49. > :24:55.continue to try to make the airplanes better, to make less
:24:55. > :24:59.impact on the environment and cost. Is it just another plane? This more
:24:59. > :25:05.comfortable, smoother, quieter Dreamliner is certainly making a
:25:05. > :25:10.big noise in the aviation industry. But would you notice the difference
:25:10. > :25:14.on a two-hour flight to Alicante? Possibly not.
:25:14. > :25:21.Thank you, Matt. We are joined by Olympian and what record holder
:25:21. > :25:28.-- world record holder Michael Johnson.
:25:28. > :25:32.Launching a brand new BBC online experiment Lon -- looking into
:25:32. > :25:36.sports psychology. Right, and it can help anyone. Anyone who goes
:25:36. > :25:40.online can be helped in terms of the pressure they feel, whether it
:25:40. > :25:45.is a job interview, speaking in front of people, sitting next to
:25:45. > :25:55.Ricky Gervais. It can help you understand how you deal with
:25:55. > :25:55.
:25:55. > :25:58.pressure. You like that? Yeah. will help scientists and
:25:58. > :26:03.psychologists figure out what type of characteristics make people
:26:03. > :26:06.better at handling pressure. The one thing that most people
:26:06. > :26:10.understand is that you can improve, you don't have to stay where you
:26:10. > :26:16.are. We did it this afternoon, to find out what conditions you what
:26:16. > :26:19.Bastin. Yours was happiness, mine was excitement. -- you work best in.
:26:20. > :26:25.Ricky Gervais was saying, pub quizzes and trivial pursuit, what
:26:25. > :26:34.state are you in when you are playing that? I just want to win.
:26:34. > :26:38.Are you angry? No, it is sort of tongue in cheek. Pressure... I go
:26:38. > :26:48.from 0-60. I can be having the best day in the world and something goes
:26:48. > :26:48.
:26:48. > :26:54.wrong and it is like... What?! I tried to rule stress out of my life.
:26:54. > :26:58.I avoid stress by making sure things are OK. That doesn't
:26:58. > :27:03.necessarily mean he is going to perform better when he is angry.
:27:03. > :27:06.You would need to take the test to see. Some people feel more
:27:06. > :27:10.comfortable when they are angry. I felt better and I competed better
:27:10. > :27:15.when I didn't really like one of my competitors. But you can't rely on
:27:15. > :27:18.that. Yours is explosive, it is physical. I don't want to be
:27:18. > :27:23.running around trying to find somebody to be angry about before
:27:23. > :27:31.going to a race. You can't rely on that. You want to make this the
:27:31. > :27:41.biggest experiment of its kind? Competitive! I am doing a very good
:27:41. > :27:45.one, it is on ITV tomorrow! Let me go on! We have just launched it
:27:45. > :27:49.this morning. 18,000 people have signed on. We want to get over 1
:27:49. > :27:54.million people. It helps people understand better how they deal
:27:54. > :27:59.with pressure and how to improve themselves. We can see it here, in
:27:59. > :28:09.outstanding form. This is you, 16 years ago, setting the 400 metres
:28:09. > :28:10.
:28:10. > :28:13.world record. Look at the distance! It is remarkable. You have beaten
:28:13. > :28:19.yourself and set that record more and more, but how secure do you
:28:19. > :28:23.think it is? You never know. Somebody will break it one day. You
:28:23. > :28:26.never know when somebody will come a long, some kid who is
:28:26. > :28:30.tremendously talented, who takes the experiment and finds out he
:28:30. > :28:34.performs really well under pressure and breaks my board record! The
:28:34. > :28:38.special thing is breaking the world record -- and breaks my world
:28:39. > :28:43.record. I am not doing anything out to hold it. When I broke it, it was
:28:43. > :28:48.a great sense of accomplishment. is inspiring to talk to you, thanks
:28:48. > :28:55.ever so much. If you want to get involved, the details are on our