:00:18. > :00:20.Hello and welcome to The One Show with Matt Baker.
:00:21. > :00:24.It's only February but our guest tonight has already given
:00:25. > :00:31.one of the most talked about performances of the year.
:00:32. > :00:34.She's a home-grown movie star who has appeared in films such
:00:35. > :00:36.as Pirates of the Caribbean, Mandela: The Long Walk
:00:37. > :00:39.to Freedom and now, the eight times Oscar-nominated
:00:40. > :00:44.Not forgetting giving James Bond a run for his Moneypenny
:00:45. > :00:50.But every superstar has got to start somewhere...
:00:51. > :01:01.If I have to eat any more sand wedge is, I will die of boredom. If she
:01:02. > :01:05.had come to school today, she could have magic to a fish and chips
:01:06. > :01:09.again. Fish and chips bring you out in spot. No they don't, they have
:01:10. > :01:21.more vitamins C in them, so there. Naomie Harris!
:01:22. > :01:28.APPLAUSE . You were so funny. I was about
:01:29. > :01:37.nine. It was literally the first thing I did. What was your role in
:01:38. > :01:42.it? I was Joyce, and a witch who came to school. All the kids knew
:01:43. > :01:47.she was a witch, but the teachers didn't. What is your most vivid
:01:48. > :01:54.memory of that time as a nine-year-old? I remember being so
:01:55. > :01:58.excited. I had always wanted to be an actress, so even when I was four
:01:59. > :02:03.years old I would be performing for everybody. I would spend hours in
:02:04. > :02:09.front of the Mirror doing different accents. So finally, this was my big
:02:10. > :02:12.moment. I loved being in front of the camera. You have gone from
:02:13. > :02:17.strength to strength, you were at the BAFTAs, because Moonlight, it is
:02:18. > :02:23.coming out on Friday has been nominated for Oscars and BAFTAs.
:02:24. > :02:27.Crazy, it is a tiny movie, it was made with a small budget so nobody
:02:28. > :02:32.expected it to do well. Barry Jenkins, the director talked about
:02:33. > :02:37.the fact he expected just his friends and family to see it. Now
:02:38. > :02:43.millions of people have seen it. Now hopefully millions more in the UK.
:02:44. > :02:52.You look incredibly well and alive, considering... Did Iupati hard last
:02:53. > :03:02.night? I am normally embed by 9:30 a.m., I am a lightweight. I was out
:03:03. > :03:04.until 2am! We will talk more about Moonlight later.
:03:05. > :03:06.Andy Kershaw's latest film might not win any awards,
:03:07. > :03:09.but it features an intimidating cast of hundreds giving a strong,
:03:10. > :03:10.powerful performance by digging really deep.
:03:11. > :03:12.But it's the digging that's the problem for their next
:03:13. > :03:29.Wild animals in a residential area isn't a good mixture. These are big
:03:30. > :03:35.animals and be very strong. People have written of cars. Huge things,
:03:36. > :03:39.ever so ugly. I have come to Gloucestershire the beautiful Forest
:03:40. > :03:44.of Dean to investigate some very strange comings and goings. And
:03:45. > :03:50.these are the culprits. Wild boars. They were hunted to extinction in
:03:51. > :03:58.the 17th century, but in the 1980s were reintroduced onto farms as a
:03:59. > :04:01.source of meat. In 2004, we thought a few were released, possibly
:04:02. > :04:05.accidentally into the Forest of Dean, where they have been
:04:06. > :04:11.multiplying. The population is estimated to be around 1500 and have
:04:12. > :04:17.recently found a way into the nearby town of Cinderford. This butcher was
:04:18. > :04:21.stunned to spot a one in the high street. He walked down the street,
:04:22. > :04:25.had a nose about the place, crossed over the road, check out the bins.
:04:26. > :04:32.He was just walking around and then just rolled off into the sunset.
:04:33. > :04:36.Evelyn Smith came face with one of the animals in broad daylight. I was
:04:37. > :04:41.walking down the green with my dog and one came behind me. People say
:04:42. > :04:46.they won't hurt people, but I wouldn't like to take the chance.
:04:47. > :04:50.And the vicar says they have even wandered into the local graveyard.
:04:51. > :04:55.It is very distressing for families when they come to visit a grave and
:04:56. > :04:59.they encountered this damage. Wild boar is coming to town looking for
:05:00. > :05:06.food. When foraging, they dig and this is what causes the damage. Di
:05:07. > :05:11.Martin is a local councillor. This is astonishing, and this was a
:05:12. > :05:16.children's play area, when did this happen? Last weekend, but it's not
:05:17. > :05:20.the first time. It has happened several times and the residents have
:05:21. > :05:24.had enough. What is being done to tackle the problem? The Forest of
:05:25. > :05:30.Dean comes under the responsibility of the forestry committee. Kevin is
:05:31. > :05:35.their deputy surveyor. The numbers have grown very rapidly over the
:05:36. > :05:39.last few years. Whilst the Forestry Commission killing of wild boar has
:05:40. > :05:44.got bigger with each passing year, the number still outpaces our
:05:45. > :05:49.ability to reduce them. Our responsibility only goes up to our
:05:50. > :05:54.boundary. Here at this question Centre, Alistair Frazier keeps a
:05:55. > :05:59.number of boars in captivity. He has a suggestion. They have all been
:06:00. > :06:04.given contraception and we have had no young. How could that be extended
:06:05. > :06:10.to the wild population living in the forest? Is it feasible? It is
:06:11. > :06:16.absolutely feasible. When you dart of the animals, they didn't even
:06:17. > :06:18.stop eating. The Department for the environment says the responsibility
:06:19. > :06:24.for control of the wild boar lies with individual land owners and
:06:25. > :06:28.managers. But there is no requirement by law for them to meet
:06:29. > :06:33.that responsibility. The town is divided on what to do about the
:06:34. > :06:38.boars. Wildlife photographer, Robin Jones believes there is a way to
:06:39. > :06:43.live alongside the animals. Wild boar aren't the problem, but people
:06:44. > :06:49.refuse to coexist with them. There is no education in place. Wild boars
:06:50. > :06:54.are largely nocturnal and difficult to spot during the day. But Robin
:06:55. > :07:00.and I give it a go. We soon spotted the tell-tale signs that boars had
:07:01. > :07:04.been here. They are keen on digging? They are, they are turning over the
:07:05. > :07:09.soil which makes the plants grow better. Keep voices down, we don't
:07:10. > :07:15.want to startle them. We searched high and low. Elusive little
:07:16. > :07:20.blighters, aren't they? But that boars were well hidden. Perhaps they
:07:21. > :07:25.have gone to town. Not had much success this morning, trying to find
:07:26. > :07:30.a wild boar in the forest. With decisions about wild animals left to
:07:31. > :07:34.the local community and landowners, some of the town and officials have
:07:35. > :07:39.agreed to get together to try to find a solution. There are places
:07:40. > :07:45.where the public could help by not feeding them. The recommendation is
:07:46. > :07:50.offence that is barbed up the top and bottom and electrified. It
:07:51. > :07:57.doesn't look good round the church. Groups have been formed to deal with
:07:58. > :08:03.the problem. We have got to work together to try to get an answer to
:08:04. > :08:06.it. Whilst it seems there aren't any instant solutions, the fact locals
:08:07. > :08:10.are getting together to discuss a bollard bits of these is progress.
:08:11. > :08:14.It may be the start of a conversation which finally reaches
:08:15. > :08:24.some answers. Andy in Gloucestershire. You have a
:08:25. > :08:31.film coming up about wild animals let loose in the city, so we put
:08:32. > :08:35.that feature on for you. Thank you. Let's talk about Moonlight. We have
:08:36. > :08:43.both seen it, had the privilege of seeing it. The story is based on
:08:44. > :08:48.this young boy. Is it based the director and the writer's combined
:08:49. > :08:52.story? Yes, they grow up close to each other and had a similar
:08:53. > :08:56.upbringing, so they had mothers who were crack addicts and contracted
:08:57. > :08:59.HIV, both of them as a result of their addiction and abuse of drugs.
:09:00. > :09:03.But they didn't know each other, even though they grew up in the same
:09:04. > :09:13.neighbourhood and went to the same school. This is in Miami? Yes,
:09:14. > :09:17.Miami. Set in the 1980s. You play Paula, who is a drug addicted
:09:18. > :09:24.mother, but you are quite hesitant to take on the role? Yes, first of
:09:25. > :09:29.all I had no experience of addiction of any form. And I don't drink
:09:30. > :09:33.alcohol. I have never even been drunk, so how am I going to inhabit
:09:34. > :09:42.and attacked. You have never been drunk? No, because I don't drink! He
:09:43. > :09:46.is finding it hard to believe. I just thought you may have had some
:09:47. > :09:52.drinking experience and then decide to go teetotal. I just don't like
:09:53. > :09:56.the smell of alcohol, it has always put me off. Anyway, partly that and
:09:57. > :10:01.then also I won't be able to inhabit the role of an addict. And I always
:10:02. > :10:06.thought, I want to portray positive images of women and black women in
:10:07. > :10:11.particular. I thought playing an addict didn't fall into that. That
:10:12. > :10:15.is why I was hesitant. I sat down with Barry Jenkins, the director and
:10:16. > :10:20.he persuaded me. He said this is based on my mother's story. I
:10:21. > :10:25.realised he had a vested interest in making sure she wasn't just a
:10:26. > :10:29.one-dimensional character. It was my hesitation, I didn't want her to be
:10:30. > :10:36.portrayed as just her addiction, I wanted her to have her humanity. It
:10:37. > :10:42.does come across in the film, let's have a look. Why didn't you come
:10:43. > :10:57.home like you were supposed to? Who is you? Nobody. I found him
:10:58. > :11:02.yesterday. Found him in a whole. Yes, some boys chased him, wouldn't
:11:03. > :11:06.tell me where he lived this morning. Thanks for saying to him. He can
:11:07. > :11:18.usually take care of himself. He is good that way. Little man.
:11:19. > :11:26.APPLAUSE . The tempo of it draws you in. But
:11:27. > :11:32.you were parachuted in, all in three days? Yes, and that clip shows me at
:11:33. > :11:37.the start of the addiction when she is managing to hold down a job and
:11:38. > :11:41.being a good mother at that stage. She has a handle on her addiction
:11:42. > :11:46.and then it gets dark. She loses herself to the point where she is
:11:47. > :11:53.incredibly abusive to her son. We were chatting and your accent is
:11:54. > :11:58.perfect. You are London born and bred, but doing this American
:11:59. > :12:02.accent. The weird thing is, I am not good at accents, it requires a lot
:12:03. > :12:08.of work. I have to work with an accent coach, do sessions with him
:12:09. > :12:12.over the Internet. And I stay in the accent, I go shopping in it,
:12:13. > :12:17.interact with people pretending I am from Miami. It is the only way to do
:12:18. > :12:24.it, you have to stay in it all the time. Immerse yourself in it. For
:12:25. > :12:27.what it is work, you are so worth all your nominations. It is
:12:28. > :12:36.definitely worth the watch and it is released on Friday nationwide. But
:12:37. > :12:43.Naomi is also familiar with the world of gadgets and gizmos. But
:12:44. > :12:47.what Marty has discovered is something better than what Q could
:12:48. > :12:52.have come up with. Fancy a levitating car. In 2015I was blown
:12:53. > :12:59.away by a new technique that can make objects levitate, using nothing
:13:00. > :13:03.but sound. It was developed by scientists at Bristol University.
:13:04. > :13:07.Since then, they have made huge progress and the technology is even
:13:08. > :13:21.more like science fiction. I cannot wait to see it. It was right, up and
:13:22. > :13:28.then left. Now the scientists have come up with a way to move objects
:13:29. > :13:34.around in midair. Look at that, left and right, up and down, all over the
:13:35. > :13:40.place. That is quite spooky. How are they able to take it onto this new
:13:41. > :13:45.stage, just with the power of sound? The genius of it is they are taking
:13:46. > :13:50.advantage of an intriguing way that sound waves behave. When they
:13:51. > :13:57.collide, they do something very strange. Let me show you. I have got
:13:58. > :14:04.two speakers. If I turn on this speaker over here so it produces a
:14:05. > :14:09.pure, continuous note. Then I turn on this speaker over here, so it
:14:10. > :14:16.produces the same continuous note... You would expect that when I go from
:14:17. > :14:19.one to two speakers, the volume of noise would simply increase
:14:20. > :14:22.everywhere. But watch what happens when I measure the volume in
:14:23. > :14:30.different areas of the room with this microphone. I get to about
:14:31. > :14:38.their, it is actually quite quiet. If I go a little bit this way, it
:14:39. > :14:47.suddenly gets louder. And then... Quieter again. And then... That is
:14:48. > :14:56.really loud, just there is really loud. The loud areas are created
:14:57. > :15:02.when the peak of the sound waves meets another. They combine and the
:15:03. > :15:10.sound gets louder. But when a peak meets a trough, they can sell out
:15:11. > :15:16.and so it gets quieter. This means that with just two speakers, I can
:15:17. > :15:23.create a pattern of noisy areas and quieter spots. But Bruce has 64
:15:24. > :15:28.speakers and so he can make a far more elaborate, 3-D pattern. If we
:15:29. > :15:33.look on the screen, you'll see the simulation of what is going on. So
:15:34. > :15:38.these blue blobs of a loud bits and every thing else is quiet? The sound
:15:39. > :15:42.landscape is a force field so the quiet region is a place where there
:15:43. > :15:46.is no force and the loud is where there is a high force. If the
:15:47. > :15:49.particle tries to get out of the quiet region, it is blasted back
:15:50. > :15:56.into the quiet region by the loud sound. So, Bruce can move the bead
:15:57. > :16:00.around by changing the position of the quiet and loud areas. He does
:16:01. > :16:05.this by controlling the output of individual speakers. This is not
:16:06. > :16:12.just a bit of fun in the lab, it does have the potential to help
:16:13. > :16:17.tackle serious challenges. You can already imagine this, add bigger
:16:18. > :16:21.version as a production line, so imagine if it was dangerous or a
:16:22. > :16:25.dangerous chemical or something that was incredibly sensitive to
:16:26. > :16:30.contamination and you wanted to move it around in a noncontact way. I
:16:31. > :16:35.think this is wonderful technology and the potential applications are
:16:36. > :16:39.really exciting. They go beyond just handling dangerous chemicals. It
:16:40. > :16:41.could one day be used in medicine to move things inside the body without
:16:42. > :16:56.breaking the skin. Did you follow that, Michelle? I
:16:57. > :17:03.might have to watch it again. First, we have to talk about bond. What is
:17:04. > :17:08.happening? What can you tell us? I have an exclusive for you! Know, I
:17:09. > :17:17.don't know anything. Will you be in it? I hope so! It would be awful if
:17:18. > :17:23.I wasn't. Wasn't it Lois Maxwell who played the role for 25 years? That
:17:24. > :17:32.is what I'm hoping for. I want to break that record, in fact. Go,
:17:33. > :17:39.girl! There is something in the production line at the moment. The
:17:40. > :17:42.working title is Bond 25. Did you not know that? Well, we tried, but
:17:43. > :17:47.all we could get from them was that. Confirming the suspicions of older
:17:48. > :17:49.brother and sisters everywhere, research from Edinburgh University
:17:50. > :17:51.has recently shown that first-born children could be more intelligent
:17:52. > :17:57.than their siblings. Sounds great to me! I don't believe
:17:58. > :18:04.a word of it! Apparently it's all to do
:18:05. > :18:06.with them getting more mental stimulation from their parents
:18:07. > :18:08.in their early years. Jean's been in Edinburgh putting
:18:09. > :18:19.the theory to the test. Don't even bother putting it on!
:18:20. > :18:24.It is all about sibling rivalry today on The One Show. If I told you
:18:25. > :18:30.that the older sibling was the smartest, what would you say to
:18:31. > :18:34.that? I think yes. Do you think it is true? So you are admitting that
:18:35. > :18:40.your big sister is a smarter than you. Since you two are quite evenly
:18:41. > :18:44.matched, let's put the theory to the test. Two beautiful sisters here.
:18:45. > :18:46.Have you heard that the elder sister is the smartest. What do you think
:18:47. > :19:02.about that? Not true. We have a game right here to
:19:03. > :19:05.put it to the test. All you have to do is build me a cube, ladies. May
:19:06. > :19:13.the best sibling when. Three, two, one, go! It is hard to judge. They
:19:14. > :19:17.are both as bad as each other, but I am going to be a bit naughty and
:19:18. > :19:22.give this round to the younger sibling. I'm going to have to give
:19:23. > :19:27.it to the younger sibling. I will have to announced Charlie the
:19:28. > :19:34.winner. Not exactly a box, but a really good effort.
:19:35. > :19:38.I will list this cloth to reveal six items. You must memorise them and
:19:39. > :19:55.tell them back to me. You have 20 seconds.
:19:56. > :20:07.Glasses... Candle... I forgot. So Charlie got three, and Emma league
:20:08. > :20:12.at all six. So round to go Hannah. So who ever answers correctly is
:20:13. > :20:18.officially the smartest sibling. It is a riddle, so listen up. If you've
:20:19. > :20:30.got it, you can't share it, and if you've shared it, you haven't got
:20:31. > :20:35.it. What am I? A secret? Well done! Congratulations. That means that,
:20:36. > :20:41.after all, your youngest sibling is smarter than you. What begins with E
:20:42. > :20:53.and ends with letter Echo and contains one letter? Yellow man -- I
:20:54. > :21:00.have to announce that you are the smartest sibling. It is envelope!
:21:01. > :21:06.How far can you run into the woods? I am so impressed you got that.
:21:07. > :21:13.Emily, you have proved the theory that the eldest child is smarter in
:21:14. > :21:20.this case. We kind of guest by your reaction,
:21:21. > :21:24.Naomie, that you are the eldest. Here is a family photo. Your brother
:21:25. > :21:30.is on the left, and then your sister. And my stepdad and my mum.
:21:31. > :21:35.Who is the cleverest out of the three of you? Strangely enough, I
:21:36. > :21:42.was! I think it's more about the pressure that is put on the first
:21:43. > :21:47.child. All that pressure to get a A in the exam. By the youngest sister
:21:48. > :21:53.they were like, do what you want. All actors - even Oscar-nominated
:21:54. > :21:55.ones like Naomie - have one man to thank
:21:56. > :21:56.for revolutionising But you might not hear his name
:21:57. > :22:00.in their acceptance speeches. So we've left it to the shy and
:22:01. > :22:18.retiring Simon Callow to big him up. Picture a night at the theatre. The
:22:19. > :22:22.lights go down, the audience is hushed, and each and every eye is
:22:23. > :22:30.fixed on the world unfolding before them. It's a world I've been part of
:22:31. > :22:35.since I took my first role, working in the box office at the National
:22:36. > :22:39.Theatre. I watched the actors rehearsing, and realised I wanted to
:22:40. > :22:44.dedicate my life to this noble craft. But the theatre hasn't always
:22:45. > :22:49.been the world we recognise today. A great deal of what I love about it
:22:50. > :22:54.was brought into existence by one extraordinary man in the 18th
:22:55. > :23:04.century. Somewhat of a hero in my eyes. In 1741, a young actor from
:23:05. > :23:06.Lichfield stepped into the limelight. His name was David
:23:07. > :23:11.Garrick, and he was about to change the world of theatre forever. When
:23:12. > :23:20.he first stepped onto the stage, he was about to change it. Quinn was
:23:21. > :23:24.the biggest actor at the time, and he was slow and stiff in his
:23:25. > :23:29.delivery. David Garrick was different. He brought his characters
:23:30. > :23:34.to life, transforming before the audience's eyes. No one had seen
:23:35. > :23:41.anything like it before. It was a new kind of acting, that even Quinn
:23:42. > :23:48.had to acknowledge. He said, if this young man is right, we have all been
:23:49. > :23:52.wrong. But Garrick wasn't just a revolutionary act. As the manager of
:23:53. > :23:58.the Drury Lane Theatre, he set out to transform how things will run off
:23:59. > :24:05.the stage as well. This theatre historian is an expert on Garrick's
:24:06. > :24:11.life. We are standing outside where Garrick's theatre would have been.
:24:12. > :24:16.It would have been a different theatre? People would have pushed in
:24:17. > :24:22.closer to each other, sat on the stage and in the auditorium, jostled
:24:23. > :24:27.and argued. What did Garrick do to change all that? He moved the
:24:28. > :24:33.audience off the stage, so this stage becomes a special area that
:24:34. > :24:39.they want to watch. Step-by-step, he moved the theatre towards what we
:24:40. > :24:42.know now. Actors have a lot to thank Garrick fall, and I want the next
:24:43. > :24:51.generation to be as passionate about his legacy as I am. So these
:24:52. > :25:00.students from the National Theatre of performing one of Garrick's
:25:01. > :25:15.greatest hits, Romeo and Juliet. I do bite my son, Sir! Fight if UB
:25:16. > :25:19.men! Absolutely fantastic. Thrilling. In the physical
:25:20. > :25:26.excitement of what you are doing with your bodies, just don't lose
:25:27. > :25:31.what they are thinking. When you say, for example, these heartless
:25:32. > :25:36.Hyden is, that isn't as much of a blow as punching someone in the
:25:37. > :25:40.face. It needs to go right to the destination. David Garrick would be
:25:41. > :25:46.surprised to see Romeo and Juliet be done like that, but I think he would
:25:47. > :25:49.know it was true. I believed all the violence in that, and that's the
:25:50. > :25:56.thing that Garrick would have thought about. But what do these
:25:57. > :26:01.budding young actors know of Garrick? I'm going to think of my
:26:02. > :26:08.performing differently having heard that. I wasn't familiar with his
:26:09. > :26:12.story until today, so it was great to sit down and listen. To see how
:26:13. > :26:23.his story and teachings are living today is great. It was 1779 when the
:26:24. > :26:27.curtain finally fell on Garrick's remarkable life, but his name lives
:26:28. > :26:32.on, not only in the world of theatre, but in the fabric of London
:26:33. > :26:36.itself. A remark of respect for one of the most influential figures the
:26:37. > :26:47.theatre had ever seen, and perhaps ever will.
:26:48. > :26:50.Who knew it was David Garrick? Really interesting!
:26:51. > :26:52.So Simon Callow, world-renowned actor of stage and screen,
:26:53. > :26:54.once worked in a box office selling theatre tickets.
:26:55. > :26:57.That got us thinking about your fellow actors
:26:58. > :27:00.did for a career before they hit the big time.
:27:01. > :27:14.I was acting since the age of nine, so I haven't really done much else.
:27:15. > :27:20.But I did have a little stint working in a call centre. I was the
:27:21. > :27:24.tech support for a mobile phone company. That's very interesting
:27:25. > :27:32.because I am a complete Luddite and don't know how to work phones or
:27:33. > :27:34.anything technological at all! Here we go. We will show you a silhouette
:27:35. > :27:36.of a celebrity. Our first celebrity
:27:37. > :27:38.started out life working in making dog treats such as
:27:39. > :28:06.pup tarts and pup cakes. MS Dhoni? Absolutely right! Well
:28:07. > :28:11.done! -- Emma Stone. This person was a bricklayer before they were famous
:28:12. > :28:12.and said they could build a wall more quickly than anyone on her
:28:13. > :28:14.team. Was it would be Goldberg? It was.
:28:15. > :28:29.How about this one? This celebrity worked
:28:30. > :28:31.in an amusement park in Southend and their job was to try
:28:32. > :28:34.and encourage people to try out I don't know. Judi Dench? No, it was
:28:35. > :28:48.Helen Mirren! Thanks to Naomie -
:28:49. > :28:51.You can see her on the big screen Adam Hills will be here,
:28:52. > :28:57.and we'll have a special Valentine's