:00:21. > :00:24.Welcome to The One Show with Alex Jones. And Matt Baker. There is
:00:24. > :00:29.sorcery in the studio at this evening as one of the stars of
:00:29. > :00:35.mileage is here. I have got a brilliant trick. If you said the
:00:35. > :00:45.magic words, the guest will appear. I do not believe Ed. Well done, it
:00:45. > :00:45.
:00:45. > :00:49.is Richard Wilson. Good to see you. Merlin is a massive hit. There are
:00:49. > :00:55.events action figures. Would you have thought in Europe more mature
:00:55. > :01:01.years you would be an action figure? No, I never thought I would
:01:01. > :01:08.be an action figures. Have you got action figures? No, we have not.
:01:08. > :01:15.be fair, it is not a great likeness. Let's have a look at the close-up.
:01:15. > :01:25.Oh, goodness. What do you mean it is not a great lightless, it looks
:01:25. > :01:31.nothing like me. If I looked like that, I would shoot myself. You do
:01:31. > :01:37.not, thank goodness. It is not just Matt and I asking the questions. We
:01:37. > :01:42.have got some big fans of Merlin in the studio. One little fellow at
:01:42. > :01:47.the back is John Sergeant. He will be celebrating a very special 75th
:01:47. > :01:53.birthday. And Christine Walkden takes to the skies to see the most
:01:53. > :01:57.colourful field in Britain. High a pity is that? Do not attempt to
:01:57. > :02:02.resuscitate or a DNAR is the ominous note nobody wants to read
:02:02. > :02:06.above a loved one's hospital bed. It is what doctors used to indicate
:02:06. > :02:11.a patient should not be resuscitated if their heart stops.
:02:11. > :02:16.Simon Boazman explores why doctors come to this decision. A starts by
:02:16. > :02:21.meeting a woman who has taken the power out of the doctor's hands.
:02:21. > :02:27.Few of us are prepared to be so candid about how we would like to
:02:27. > :02:33.meet our mater -- maker. Joy Tomkins has taken the extraordinary
:02:33. > :02:39.step of having these words tattooed across her chest. Some people might
:02:39. > :02:45.think you are a bit crazy having this tattooed. Yes, I agree, I
:02:45. > :02:51.probably am, but I am crazy for a good reason. What is the reason?
:02:51. > :02:55.The reason is I do not want to be half-dead. I am worried about lying
:02:55. > :03:02.down opening my eyes gazing at nothing and my children come and
:03:02. > :03:07.look at me as a vegetable. But the tattoo is extreme step? No, it is
:03:07. > :03:13.immediate. If I am able to speak, I can speak for myself, but this is
:03:13. > :03:18.speaking to meet -- for me when I cannot speak. If you want to refuse
:03:18. > :03:23.medical treatment, you should let relatives know through an advanced
:03:23. > :03:29.decision notice. It is easy enough to make a decision. It does not
:03:29. > :03:34.have to be on a form. It can be on a Post-it note. The doctors have to
:03:34. > :03:38.legally abide by that? A few have the legal right to refuse medical
:03:38. > :03:42.treatment and you can refuse it in advance as long as you have made
:03:42. > :03:46.the advanced decision and you are an adult and are mentally competent.
:03:46. > :03:52.But what about those who want their doctors to try everything they can
:03:52. > :03:58.to resuscitate them? What rights do they have? The family of Janet's
:03:58. > :04:03.Tracey recently began legal action against Cambridge NHS Trust. They
:04:03. > :04:07.led medical staff at Addenbrooke's Hospital enter its a DNAR decision
:04:07. > :04:12.into her medical notes despite a clear wish that they tried to
:04:12. > :04:16.revive her. However, the hospital disputes the family's accounts. It
:04:17. > :04:22.is a fact of life that most of us are going to die in a hospital and
:04:22. > :04:28.of those it is thought around 80% will have a DNAR decision on them.
:04:28. > :04:34.These things are not rare. Making tough calls on the front line is
:04:34. > :04:37.Professor Gavin Perkins. There are three reasons why we would not
:04:37. > :04:42.resuscitate. The first is the person has expressed the wish that
:04:42. > :04:47.they do not wish to receive resuscitation. The second is that
:04:47. > :04:52.where the judgment of the treating is that the act of the
:04:52. > :04:57.resuscitation would be unsuccessful. The third scenario is where one has
:04:57. > :05:00.to balance the potential benefits of the resuscitation attempts
:05:00. > :05:07.against the burdens of somebody going through an attempt and what
:05:07. > :05:12.that might mean in terms of quality of life. Do you think the public
:05:12. > :05:17.have realistic expectations of what can be achieved by resuscitation?
:05:17. > :05:22.If you watch TV programmes, they tend to be relatively short lived.
:05:22. > :05:29.Eight out of 10 times their results in a successful outcome and that is
:05:29. > :05:35.far from reality. It is a traumatic, invasive events that can last 20 or
:05:35. > :05:40.30 minutes on occasion. Only one or two times out of 10 is that
:05:40. > :05:44.successful. You might think a decision as important whether or
:05:44. > :05:52.not to attempt resuscitation would at least be discussed with you.
:05:52. > :05:56.Sadly, it is not always the case. When this 90 year-old man died in
:05:56. > :06:01.hospital in August his daughter was upset. Her grief was compounded
:06:02. > :06:07.when she only learnt afterwards that ADN are decision was place in
:06:07. > :06:13.her dad's medical notes. I asked specific questions like, what
:06:13. > :06:17.happened? I said, did you do CPR? They kept avoiding the question,
:06:17. > :06:25.but eventually adopt a had to admit he had had orders not to
:06:25. > :06:31.resuscitate. How did you feel when you found that out? I was angry, I
:06:31. > :06:36.was upset. I just could not believe it. Letting her dad died without
:06:36. > :06:40.trying to revive him might have been the correct clinical decision,
:06:40. > :06:45.but Maddy is still upset she was not consulted. The hospital have
:06:45. > :06:49.since apologised. But what right do we have its doctors refuse to
:06:49. > :06:53.attempt to resuscitate? You have the legal right to refuse medical
:06:54. > :06:57.treatment, but you do not have the right to request it. If you
:06:57. > :07:01.disagree with the doctor, the doctor should have an open and
:07:01. > :07:05.sensitive discussion with you about why they think treatment is futile.
:07:05. > :07:08.But for the patient it would be best to ask for a second opinion.
:07:09. > :07:13.The medical profession believe doctors cannot be required to give
:07:13. > :07:18.treatment against their judgment. Not that Choi is worried, she has
:07:18. > :07:26.made her own choice. If I changed my mind, I would have a line
:07:26. > :07:32.through it, saying changed my mind. I had to go to the library to find
:07:32. > :07:39.out how to spell resuscitate. Mark Porter is here. In Maddy's
:07:39. > :07:43.situation, what do the Government's say about it and not having their
:07:43. > :07:47.conversation? The Department of Health pointed out that there had
:07:47. > :07:53.been guidelines in place to say most cases discussions take place,
:07:53. > :07:57.you should talk to the person you are considering putting a DNAR
:07:57. > :08:02.order on, and all their family. If you do not, and there are reasons
:08:02. > :08:07.why you might not want to, you should record the reason why you
:08:07. > :08:12.have not done that in the notes. Most of these problems originate
:08:12. > :08:16.from a communication problem. how can the family find out if they
:08:16. > :08:21.do not know if there is a DNAR decision is the patient gets ill?
:08:21. > :08:26.This is about the patient and if they are in a fit mental state, the
:08:26. > :08:29.family do not have the right to know anything. Realistically you
:08:29. > :08:35.can ask the relative themselves or you can approach the sister on the
:08:35. > :08:41.ward or the doctor. But they might need your relative's permission to
:08:41. > :08:46.talk to them. You would think going to hospital is to be resuscitated.
:08:46. > :08:50.The default situation is everybody is resuscitated. There should be an
:08:50. > :08:55.assessment of each individual case to decide whether or not that will
:08:55. > :08:58.apply. If you go into hospital it is the norm, unless someone decides
:08:58. > :09:03.the problems outweighed the benefits. If the family does not
:09:03. > :09:07.agree, is there anything they can do? There is no legal right to
:09:07. > :09:12.force a doctor to do something they do not think is right, but you can
:09:12. > :09:17.lobby them. You can ask for a second opinion poll stop if you are
:09:17. > :09:23.not happy, you must express it. What are your thoughts, Richard?
:09:23. > :09:28.think I have got it in my will. can have an advance notice. I have
:09:28. > :09:33.put an advance notice in my will not to be resuscitated. That is the
:09:33. > :09:39.thing we find, a lot of people do that. There is not like a group of
:09:39. > :09:43.society that is tagged with this? It is not an age thing, as certain
:09:43. > :09:49.illness then, it is all nonsense. It all should be done on a case-by-
:09:49. > :09:53.case basis, that is why you cannot legislate for it. We are always
:09:53. > :09:57.looking for a unique angle on The One Show, which is why it is handy
:09:57. > :10:02.to have our very own hot air balloon. On all week we will be
:10:02. > :10:05.telling stories that are best stored from above and we start by
:10:05. > :10:13.sending Christine Walkden up into the Norfolk sky to look down on a
:10:13. > :10:18.field of rainbows. # Would you like to ride in my beautiful balloon?
:10:18. > :10:23.This line of sheds is hiding the bare bulbs of a great British
:10:23. > :10:29.spectacle. Forget the Notting Hill Carnival, this is the Spalding
:10:29. > :10:35.tulip parade. It takes more than 100 and 1000 petals to decorate
:10:35. > :10:40.each float and it all started back in the 1950s to celebrate the
:10:40. > :10:44.booming, British tulip in the street. But this is a long way away
:10:45. > :10:49.from the natural habitat of wild tulips which are native to cool,
:10:49. > :10:54.mountainous regions, especially from Iran to north-west China.
:10:54. > :10:58.Their name comes from a Persian word meaning turban and they were
:10:58. > :11:03.first cultivated in the Turkish Ottoman Empire. But it was the
:11:03. > :11:08.Dutch who became obsessed with breeding them and in the 16th 30s,
:11:08. > :11:12.they succumbed to tulip mania. The value of bulbs soared and it is
:11:12. > :11:21.believed at one time a single specimen could buy you an entire
:11:21. > :11:26.town house. The British tulip industry only began in 1907 with
:11:26. > :11:34.100 bulbs brought to Spalding from the Netherlands. Since the 1980s,
:11:34. > :11:40.it has been in decline. The Dutch have developed a massive production
:11:41. > :11:44.line to replied --. One nursery grows millions of tulips for
:11:44. > :11:51.British supermarkets every year and they go too surprising lengths to
:11:51. > :11:58.get their blooms right. He none of these will be picked for the flower.
:11:58. > :12:04.We will take their heads off. All of the energy goes back down
:12:04. > :12:10.into the bulb to produce a far better, stronger bulb to use in the
:12:10. > :12:14.glass houses to produce a better flower. By blocking up the bobs out
:12:14. > :12:20.doors, they can guarantee the consistent quality of flowers at
:12:20. > :12:24.the supermarkets demand and his tulips will flower for years on end.
:12:24. > :12:30.The other plus side of removing the flower heads is it is providing the
:12:30. > :12:34.raw materials for the parade. The reason our very last commercial
:12:34. > :12:44.grower is thriving is the scale they can grow on. To see that you
:12:44. > :12:46.
:12:46. > :12:51.really have to be up in the air. You have been growing for 11 years.
:12:51. > :12:55.What does it feel like to be up here seeing it from this angle?
:12:55. > :13:00.is amazing to see the colours and to see them all intermingling
:13:00. > :13:10.together. We get the RAF pilots and they come over and have a good look
:13:10. > :13:10.
:13:10. > :13:16.as well. It looks like a giant deck chair. How do you get the stripes?
:13:16. > :13:21.We use the latest equipment to get as much in the field as we can. We
:13:21. > :13:25.want to utilise the field to its utmost and all the input of
:13:25. > :13:30.fertilisers and everything else. have been to Holland hundreds of
:13:30. > :13:36.times and this is enormous. The Dutch field are tiny. We are lucky
:13:36. > :13:40.we have got lard, arable fields, and we are doing horticulture on
:13:40. > :13:47.and arable scale, trying to do it the most economic way we can.
:13:47. > :13:51.many flowers are down there? Millions. We will probably produce
:13:51. > :13:55.20 million bulbs from these feels. Although Britain is down to his
:13:55. > :14:00.very last commercially viable, outdoor tulip grower, with
:14:00. > :14:05.production on this scale, its future should be secure for a few
:14:05. > :14:10.years more. Incredible. The view from that
:14:10. > :14:15.balloon was incredible. It looked like the studio from above.
:14:15. > :14:25.Christine said whatever you do, do not plant your tulips and on
:14:25. > :14:26.
:14:26. > :14:31.November. After the first frost. Speaking of fire, Merlin is back
:14:31. > :14:34.for a fourth season next month. By the looks of this, things are not
:14:34. > :14:39.well in Camelot. Somewhere in the books there must
:14:39. > :14:44.be something? I'm asking for something to fight them? If I am
:14:44. > :14:51.right, the worlds are torn, there is only one path open to us. To
:14:51. > :15:00.travel to the Isle of the Blest and repair it.
:15:00. > :15:07.How-do I do that? I'm not sure, but it may require a blood sack ifies
:15:07. > :15:13.since it used one to seal it. My word! How long did it take you
:15:13. > :15:17.to grow the hair for that?! I just shaved it off on Saturday!
:15:17. > :15:24.course! What can we expect from the new series? Well, I'm not allowed
:15:25. > :15:29.to tell you, really. The one thing that I can tell you is it is in 35
:15:29. > :15:34.ml now. So it will look even better. But you can't tell us anything
:15:34. > :15:39.about the plot? Just the format? Yes.
:15:39. > :15:46.Is there drama? Romance? Oh, yes, there is lots of romance.
:15:46. > :15:49.You really can't tell us anything?! Well, I could get in trouble. This
:15:49. > :15:53.is going to spoil it for the fans here.
:15:53. > :15:57.We have lovely shots it does look like a Hollywood block buster,
:15:57. > :16:02.comparing it to some of the things you have done in the past. What is
:16:02. > :16:08.it like to work on? It is very different from One Foot In The
:16:08. > :16:13.Grave! It is much longer, the shooting time. We do 13 episodes at
:16:13. > :16:18.a time. That is a long time. Are you aware of how epic it is
:16:18. > :16:23.going to look when you do it? Obviously there are lots of special
:16:23. > :16:27.effects? That is the reason for the success of Merlin. The post
:16:27. > :16:32.production is brilliant. They put in a lot of CGI, the music, all of
:16:32. > :16:36.that is very special. As you say it is incredibly
:16:36. > :16:43.successful, there are big fans of Merlin with us to ask some
:16:43. > :16:48.questions. Here is Kip, aged six. Who do you like to make disappear?
:16:49. > :16:54.Oh, dear! That is difficult. It is difficult! I tell you who I
:16:54. > :17:00.would like to make disappear, the person who is in charge of the
:17:00. > :17:06.railway ticketing system! I thought we had gotten away with One Foot In
:17:06. > :17:10.The Grave! I did a Dispatches about railways. The ticketing system is
:17:10. > :17:16.crazy. You cannot go to the station to buy a ticket. You have to book
:17:16. > :17:22.weeks in advance, unless you want to pay a fortune. It is crazy.
:17:22. > :17:30.Now, moving on to Jamie Allen, aged six.
:17:30. > :17:36.If you wanted to be somebody for a day, who would it be? Somebody who
:17:36. > :17:40.does not work on trains! Oh, dear, gosh. That is difficult. I would
:17:40. > :17:44.like to be somebody who own as beautiful yacht in the
:17:44. > :17:49.Mediterranean. Good answer. All of these people
:17:49. > :17:53.over there are in the audience, they have asked questions. Now we
:17:53. > :18:00.have a different question, have a look at this.
:18:00. > :18:04.Why did Uther destroy all of the dragons and only leave one? Well, I
:18:04. > :18:12.think he was thinking in terms that maybe one day there would abtheme
:18:12. > :18:17.park, so they had to keep one dragon to show what they were like.
:18:17. > :18:22.He has imprisoned this dragon. I can't think of a better answer.
:18:22. > :18:28.Raffie does that answer your question? Yes! I thought they would
:18:28. > :18:32.be easy questions! They were tough! A hard audience. Thankfullys to the
:18:32. > :18:37.children of Stephenson School for all of their questions. You look
:18:37. > :18:41.fantastic! Well done. The new series of Merlin begins on BBC One
:18:42. > :18:48.in October. Now, it is a symbol of victory in the Second World War. It
:18:48. > :18:54.holds a special place in our memory. This year it celebrates its 75th
:18:54. > :19:00.anniversary. A new BBC documentary with John Sergeant plays tribute to
:19:00. > :19:05.the Spitfire and her pilots. I have come -- here to meet a
:19:05. > :19:10.legend, a British dream machine, built by a golden generation. It's
:19:10. > :19:17.the Spitfire. It is 75 years since the first one flew. Surely the most
:19:17. > :19:27.beautiful British plane ever built? First you hear it, then you feel it.
:19:27. > :19:28.
:19:28. > :19:35.It is so exciting! Its top speed was over 400 miles an hour. It's
:19:35. > :19:39.two 20 mill metres canons were fierce enough to bring down the
:19:39. > :19:46.Luftwaffe. The pilots flew several missions a day. During the darkest
:19:46. > :19:55.days in the war one in five of them did not make it back.
:19:55. > :20:03.The most important Spitfire factory in the country was here at
:20:03. > :20:07.CastleBromwich. When ML407 was built in August, 19 543 it was one
:20:07. > :20:11.of three built that month. What was it like when you saw the
:20:11. > :20:17.first one. It went through the hanger doors,
:20:17. > :20:21.we all cheered and patted ourselves on the book -- back, we had gotten
:20:21. > :20:25.one off It was such a delicate thing to put the bits together to
:20:25. > :20:28.see what comes at the end of it. We were very proud.
:20:28. > :20:33.The pilots who fly them say that there is nothing better.
:20:33. > :20:37.You've got to love it. You went into combat daily with it, together.
:20:37. > :20:42.You and that plane. It saved the country in the Battle of Britain. I
:20:42. > :20:52.was allowed to fly it I don't think that I could do anything that would
:20:52. > :20:52.
:20:52. > :20:58.make me prouder than that. It's time for former cadet,
:20:58. > :21:01.sergeant, sergeant, to have a go. We had the best planes in the world.
:21:01. > :21:06.It's time for Cadet Flight Sergeant Sergeant to have a go.
:21:06. > :21:13.We had the best planes in the world. You can't expect a chap to fly a
:21:13. > :21:17.Spitfire rand forget about it, it is imprinted in your mind forever.
:21:17. > :21:19.And Cadet Flight Sergeant Sergeant is in the studio.
:21:20. > :21:29.You don't salute a sergeant, you should know that.
:21:30. > :21:30.
:21:30. > :21:33.I know that. Were you honestly known as Sergeant
:21:34. > :21:39.Sergeant. As a cadet. It was impressive.
:21:39. > :21:43.You did learn to fly as a cadet? did. It was a great moment. I
:21:43. > :21:49.didn't think that I would. The nice pilot who was supervising me said
:21:49. > :21:54.that this was it, to take it over. How did it feel? I thought it was
:21:54. > :22:00.fantastic, but I was nervous, I have known flown a plane for 50
:22:00. > :22:03.years. So to suddenly start flying in a pit fire, you have to be
:22:03. > :22:11.careful one slip and the Spitfire goes down. Tricky.
:22:11. > :22:16.The other Spitfire we saw in the film has had a colourful past?
:22:16. > :22:20.it did. This made the series soing from. We saw it being built. We met
:22:20. > :22:24.one of the people that built it we met a woman who delivered the
:22:24. > :22:30.Spitfire. Then, an extraordinary scene, we
:22:30. > :22:35.met the son of the man who flew it and with him we went through all of
:22:35. > :22:39.his equipment. So we see him sitting there with his father's
:22:39. > :22:43.uniform on. It was so emotional. There was his log book, the whole
:22:43. > :22:48.thing. Is it right that the father did not
:22:48. > :22:54.speak much to his son when he way alive? That's right. They had not
:22:54. > :22:59.had those sort of conversations. He was just 14 when the father died.
:22:59. > :23:03.It is only now that Martin, the son, that in this year that Martin
:23:03. > :23:07.realises what an amazing man his father was. The fact that we tell
:23:07. > :23:11.that story and all of the various people... It is not just about the
:23:11. > :23:17.plane, but about all of the people's lives affected by
:23:17. > :23:23.Spitfires, with the amazingly dramatic stories.
:23:23. > :23:28.How do you deliver a Spitfire? you were a woman, the women did it.
:23:28. > :23:34.They had teams of pilots they would fly it from Castlebomb which, that
:23:34. > :23:44.is where it would be, and that is how they delivered it.
:23:44. > :23:47.
:23:47. > :23:52.You were right to pick up on that. Well, the spit fire -- well, The
:23:52. > :23:57.Spitfire: Britain's Flying Past is on BBC Two.
:23:57. > :24:00.Over the next month Miranda Krestovnikov is looking at why the
:24:00. > :24:04.Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 is needed, starting with a case
:24:04. > :24:09.that led to its creation. Britain's wildlife has been
:24:09. > :24:13.protected by law for more than 50 years. Yet it was only in 2006 that
:24:13. > :24:17.a dedicated national unit was formed to investigate wildlife
:24:17. > :24:21.crime. Before then, many prosecutions came
:24:21. > :24:27.through individual Police Forces, often working with conservation
:24:27. > :24:34.bodies. Especially the RSPB, the threat to British bird life is very
:24:34. > :24:41.real. There are criminals that trade in rare birds, dead or alive.
:24:41. > :24:47.Michael Bartley is the millionaire owner of Hamworth Hall in Norfolk.
:24:47. > :24:53.He was imprisoned for buying eggs and stuffed birds, but he was
:24:53. > :24:59.supplied by John Metcalfe, a taxidermist and a former magistrate.
:24:59. > :25:05.We had had some tip-offs, but in May 2004, the police got a search
:25:06. > :25:12.warrant and we paid a visit to Mr Barclay's impressive country
:25:12. > :25:15.mansion. What did you find there? It was an
:25:15. > :25:21.Aladdin's cave of taxidermy and animals.
:25:21. > :25:25.Most of this collection had been legally akier -- acquired, but not
:25:25. > :25:29.all of it. It was clear that many of the eggs
:25:29. > :25:33.and birds were illegal taken from the wild. He himself had taken
:25:33. > :25:39.6,000 birds out. Did you find the 6,000 in the
:25:39. > :25:46.house? No, just 300 of his own egg, but we went back on a second raid.
:25:46. > :25:49.It was like a scene from Narnia. We went into a secret hidden room,
:25:49. > :25:53.full of egg cabinets. But unfortunately many were not
:25:53. > :25:57.there. What about some of the wildlife
:25:57. > :26:04.caught? There were nesting seabirds that had been collected and removed
:26:04. > :26:12.from their nests that we think were then used for taxidermy.
:26:12. > :26:19.The legality of the tax determiney was key to the case. Specimens
:26:19. > :26:23.dated before 1947, back then, many birds were deliberately killed, but
:26:23. > :26:31.modern taxidermist should deal with birds from lawful sources such as
:26:31. > :26:38.natural or accidental death. Taxidermist Kim McDonald was called
:26:38. > :26:43.in to help to determine if any birds had been sourced illegal.
:26:43. > :26:49.This is a modern mount. We found chipping in the wing feathers and
:26:49. > :26:55.the prime Aries. Something of high velocity has gone through the wing.
:26:55. > :27:01.We found a piece of led shot in the ball of the foot. Obviously it was
:27:01. > :27:08.not trodden on, so it got there somehow. That was taken for X-ray.
:27:08. > :27:11.And even more led shot showed up. Alan Roberts is now an investigator
:27:12. > :27:16.for the National Wildlife Crime Unit. Back in 2004, he was serving
:27:16. > :27:21.with the Norfolk Police when this landmark case turned up on his
:27:21. > :27:27.patch. What can you tell from the X-rays
:27:27. > :27:32.about Metcalfe himself? If the bird has got shot in it, he should be
:27:32. > :27:36.saying he should not taxi determine it as it has been killed illegal.
:27:36. > :27:41.What we found with John Metcalfe, there was shot in the birds and
:27:41. > :27:46.there were broken wings. He should have noticed that.
:27:46. > :27:51.It became clear that this was one of the most serious wildlife crimes
:27:51. > :27:55.in 20 years it was said in sentencing that the legislation was
:27:55. > :27:59.designed to protect endangered species, as these were serious
:27:59. > :28:04.offences that it would worpbt that Barclay and Metcalfe were dealt
:28:04. > :28:11.with. Barclay was sentenced to four
:28:11. > :28:15.months in prison and Metcalfe two months and suspended for a year.
:28:15. > :28:20.October, 2006 was an important landmark in wildlife crime. Not
:28:20. > :28:25.only were the men convicted in one of the most significant cases in
:28:25. > :28:31.trading in endangered species, but also that month, a single national
:28:31. > :28:35.while life crime unit was launched for the whole of the UK. Alan
:28:35. > :28:41.Roberts became one of its first investigators. Extraordinary story.
:28:41. > :28:49.Richard, there is no taxidermy in the new film you are directing?
:28:49. > :28:54.a new play. I am directing a play called Lungs it is about pregnancy.