:00:21. > :00:24.Hello, welcome to The One Show with Matt Baker... And Alex Jones. After
:00:25. > :00:29.winning Let's Dance in 2009 with his amazing version of Flashdance,
:00:29. > :00:35.our guest tonight said, if I get run over by a bus and get on to the
:00:35. > :00:45.Ten O'Clock News, we know which a video clip they will show off.
:00:45. > :00:53.
:00:53. > :01:03.are not sure, there are plenty to It is the persistently fruity
:01:03. > :01:06.
:01:06. > :01:11.All my finest work! The banana dance was like the prototype of
:01:11. > :01:16.Flashdance. That was getting into gear. When you write a sketch show,
:01:16. > :01:20.how does, I know, let's dress up and dance as a banana,, been
:01:20. > :01:24.conversation? The rest of the sketch is me going up to David and
:01:24. > :01:33.saying, look, can I jump up and down as a banana? He goes, that
:01:33. > :01:38.would be awful. I ran it past the series producer. Then you get to do
:01:38. > :01:43.the sketch. You are encased in this not very ironic ending, that it was
:01:43. > :01:50.a conversation. Good training? that how Flashdance happened as
:01:50. > :01:58.well? It was a little bit easier. I was less encumbered by the banana.
:01:58. > :02:02.A little yellow bottom, sticking out from the back. Coming up we
:02:02. > :02:08.have a world champion, here in the studio, who has a connection to
:02:08. > :02:11.your new project. The stick might be a bit of a clue. We are going to
:02:11. > :02:16.find out what he is the world champion of later when he comes out
:02:16. > :02:20.from behind his mum and dad. Don't worry, Aiden. Screening for breast
:02:20. > :02:23.cancer has been credited with saving countless lives. One of the
:02:23. > :02:26.men behind its introduction now thinks it might be doing more harm
:02:26. > :02:32.than good. Gloria Hannaford has been to see how that can possibly
:02:32. > :02:38.be true. It has been 25 years since the NHS
:02:38. > :02:42.introduced breast screening. Last year, more than 1.8 million women
:02:42. > :02:47.between 50 and 70 were screened. My daughter, Karen, died eight years
:02:47. > :02:51.ago from breast cancer. She was just 41. Technically, at that time,
:02:51. > :02:55.she would have been outside the breast screening age group. Knowing
:02:55. > :02:59.the devastation of losing someone to cancer, I have to admit that I
:02:59. > :03:05.am the biggest advocate of early detection and, hopefully, saving
:03:05. > :03:09.lives. It is a belief I share with many women. Women have been told
:03:09. > :03:14.over and over again that screening is the answer, early detection is
:03:14. > :03:20.the answer. Do you agree with that? Yes, I do. But you can check
:03:20. > :03:24.yourself as well. But going for the mammogram is really helpful.
:03:24. > :03:28.Whether it is a false alarm or not, it is better to have somebody say
:03:28. > :03:32.that it might or might not be. recent studies have questioned
:03:32. > :03:38.whether routine breast screening is as effective as we have long
:03:38. > :03:42.believed. Professor Michael Bourne was one of the Killie founders of
:03:42. > :03:49.the programme. Now he is turning his back on it. One problem is that
:03:49. > :03:52.we are catching it too early. We are catching stuff that looks like
:03:52. > :03:57.cancer under the microscope, but is not programmed to progress to
:03:57. > :04:00.become cancer. The pre-cancerous cells might never become life-
:04:00. > :04:06.threatening. But they are often treated in the same way as more
:04:06. > :04:12.aggressive cancers. You have to screen 2000 women for 10 years to
:04:12. > :04:19.avoid worn breast cancer death. But something like five to 10 women
:04:19. > :04:23.will be diagnosed as having cancer when they are never going to be
:04:23. > :04:27.threatened by cancer. Some of them will be having unnecessary
:04:27. > :04:31.mastectomies. He believes that instead of screening for something
:04:31. > :04:36.that might not be cancer, we should simply treat the things that we
:04:36. > :04:44.know to be cancer. I do not think screening is the answer. Treatment
:04:44. > :04:51.is so good and will continue to improve. Rely on treatment, forget
:04:51. > :04:54.screening. Marion believes a routine screening in 2007 led to
:04:54. > :04:59.her being over diagnosed and treated for a cancer that may never
:04:59. > :05:06.have threatened her life. On what basis did you say they needed to
:05:06. > :05:11.give you treatment? They told me, pre-invasive cancer that may never
:05:11. > :05:14.harm you. Or it may develop into invasive cancer. They wanted to
:05:14. > :05:19.remove a quarter of my breast. I thought that was a very serious
:05:19. > :05:25.matter. Faced with a chance that she might develop invasive cancer,
:05:25. > :05:29.she eventually opted for surgery. Unfortunately, it did not cancer --
:05:29. > :05:33.capture all of the pre-cancerous cells and she then had to undergo a
:05:33. > :05:38.vasectomy. As borers learned about how the cells behave, experts
:05:38. > :05:42.increasingly believe they may never become life-threatening. I went in
:05:42. > :05:48.healthy thinking I was fine. I ended up with a far more radical
:05:48. > :05:52.situation. For something that may, I realised, may not be necessary.
:05:52. > :05:56.Miriam says if she knew about the doubts surrounding over diagnosis
:05:56. > :06:02.she would not have had the surgery, which she still does not know if
:06:02. > :06:06.she needed. I had a right to know about this phenomenon so I could
:06:06. > :06:12.protect myself from something that would be extremely distressing to
:06:12. > :06:16.me. Last autumn, an independent review into the breast screening
:06:16. > :06:20.programme was launched. When it is published, it will bring together
:06:20. > :06:26.evidence about the benefits and down sides of screening and how
:06:26. > :06:30.well they are communicated to women. Marilyn Morris has every reason to
:06:30. > :06:34.be a firm supporter of breast screening. I was called for a
:06:34. > :06:39.routine appointment, something was found. It was confirmed it was
:06:40. > :06:44.cancerous. I would not be here today if it had not been for that
:06:44. > :06:49.screening appointment. I would never have found it, because of
:06:49. > :06:51.where it was, very deep within the chest wall. In terms of this review
:06:52. > :06:56.that is going to be published, it would seem the medical profession
:06:56. > :07:00.are beginning to change their minds in terms of may be over diagnosis,
:07:00. > :07:05.overtreatment. How do you feel about that, being a cancer
:07:05. > :07:09.survivor? I am not a medical expert. But I wholeheartedly believe that
:07:09. > :07:14.breast screening saved my life. If you have got the opportunity to go
:07:14. > :07:18.a long full screening, please go. The Department of Health say that
:07:18. > :07:21.breasts screening saves many lives and the programme is regularly
:07:21. > :07:25.scrutinised. Until the independent review was published, the medical
:07:25. > :07:34.advice is for women to attend their screening appointments and raise
:07:34. > :07:37.any further concerns with their Gloria is here, as is Dr Sarah
:07:37. > :07:43.Rawlings from Breakthrough Breast Cancer. After hearing what
:07:43. > :07:49.Professor Michael Baum had to say, has your faith been shaken? Are you
:07:49. > :07:53.confused? I felt confused at first. Its controversial, when you hear
:07:53. > :07:57.somebody like that saying that screening is not the answer,
:07:57. > :08:00.treatment is so good that it is the way forward, of course it is great
:08:00. > :08:04.that it has become better, but at my stage in life I have been
:08:04. > :08:07.programmed to have my screening. Until this review is published,
:08:07. > :08:11.which I think we'll be in a couple of months' time, I still stand with
:08:11. > :08:14.the fact that I think I would rather have the information, but at
:08:14. > :08:18.the same time those leaflets that you saw on definitely out of date.
:08:18. > :08:22.The best thing will be that the leaflets will be updated, the
:08:22. > :08:26.information will be better. I, like a lot of other women, will be more
:08:26. > :08:31.able to make an informed choice as to whether I have treatment or not.
:08:31. > :08:35.I think that is the good thing to come out of the report. Doctor
:08:35. > :08:38.Rawlings, say somebody has been screened and they are told they
:08:38. > :08:41.have pre-cancerous cells. What questions can they asked to make
:08:41. > :08:45.sure they get the right treatment for them? We know that breast
:08:45. > :08:48.screening is really important because it can pick up some early
:08:48. > :08:52.forms of breast cancer. The earlier it is detected, the better. But for
:08:52. > :08:55.some of these really early forms, we cannot yet tell if they will
:08:55. > :08:59.progress to become harmful or not. Most women will be offered
:08:59. > :09:03.treatment. If you are diagnosed with breast cancer through
:09:03. > :09:05.screening, it is really important that you answer questions -- ask
:09:05. > :09:09.questions about what type of cancer you have been diagnosed with and
:09:09. > :09:13.your treatment options. Your doctor will be more than happy to talk
:09:13. > :09:17.this through with you. If you want more information, charities like
:09:17. > :09:21.Breakthrough Breast Cancer can help you with that. You have invested
:09:21. > :09:25.millions of pounds in treatment, I know that you are also involved in
:09:25. > :09:28.the leaflets. Where is the treatment going? We know that early
:09:28. > :09:32.detection is important. We have made fantastic strides in treatment
:09:32. > :09:35.as well over the last 25 years. UK survival rates are better than I
:09:35. > :09:40.have ever been. That is a combination of better awareness,
:09:40. > :09:43.that a screening and a better awareness. If I had one big hope
:09:44. > :09:47.for breast cancer, it is that we would use all of this information
:09:47. > :09:51.coming through, that breast cancer is a complex disease and we can
:09:51. > :09:53.categorise it into different types. A study last week talked about 10
:09:54. > :09:58.different types. If we know the different types we can tailor
:09:58. > :10:01.treatment. By that I mean you will be confident you will receive a
:10:01. > :10:04.treatment that will be tailored to your particular type of breast
:10:04. > :10:08.cancer. You may have less side- effects and you will be confident
:10:08. > :10:11.it will go away and stay away. bet we men are watching tonight and
:10:11. > :10:17.saying that they are confused. This report and review has not been
:10:17. > :10:20.published. It is a controversial status. In essence, you seem to
:10:20. > :10:24.disagree with the professor. My advice would be to have your
:10:24. > :10:28.screening, have the information and then seek further information from
:10:28. > :10:32.the doctor or cancer specialist if you can.
:10:33. > :10:37.Well, big stars like David Beckham, Katherine Jenkins and Cheryl Cole
:10:37. > :10:41.have all visited our troops in Afghanistan. But they are not the
:10:41. > :10:44.first entertainers to go to the front line. Larry Lamb has been to
:10:44. > :10:48.meet one lady who did her bit to boost morale way before that lot
:10:48. > :10:53.were even born. During the Second World War, some
:10:53. > :10:57.of the biggest names in show business try and be Entertainments
:10:57. > :11:01.National Service Association, or ENSA, to do their bit, home and
:11:01. > :11:06.abroad. I am on my way to Hurst Castle. It is home to one of the
:11:06. > :11:11.few surviving garrison theatres, where performers trod the boards.
:11:11. > :11:15.It might be hard to believe that a group of theatre luvvies had a
:11:15. > :11:22.crucial part to play in wartime. But on stage is like this,
:11:22. > :11:26.performers from ENSA did their bit for the war effort. So, Sean, can
:11:27. > :11:32.you tell me why it is that there is a theatre out here in the middle of
:11:32. > :11:36.the silent? During the Second World War we had a garrison of 160 troops.
:11:36. > :11:40.Being very isolated, they needed to make their own entertainment. From
:11:40. > :11:45.a couple of gun days they made the theatre we can see now. There were
:11:45. > :11:51.singers, acrobats. They used to like the dancers, especially the
:11:51. > :11:54.pretty ones. It must have been a tremendous atmosphere. ENSA was the
:11:54. > :12:01.brainchild of theatre impresario Basil Dean, he wanted to establish
:12:01. > :12:04.a network of entertainers. What was Basil Dean's vision? His vision was
:12:04. > :12:08.based on what had happened at the First World War, where there was a
:12:08. > :12:13.definite need for some sort of morale-boosting entertainment. He
:12:13. > :12:17.kept that belief going for the whole of the Second World War.
:12:17. > :12:24.year-old dancer Audrey Landreth joined ENSA as an entertainer. How
:12:24. > :12:30.can you decided to join? Strangely enough, I got my call-up papers. I
:12:30. > :12:35.appealed against it on the grounds that I had been a dancer. They said,
:12:35. > :12:42.OK, as long as you joined ENSA. travelled to military bases all
:12:42. > :12:47.over Britain with a group of five performers called Magic Moments.
:12:47. > :12:53.Short skirts. That was daring in those days, don't forget. A bit of
:12:53. > :12:58.showing your bust. Blonde, as I was in those days. You brought the
:12:58. > :13:02.house down. I bet you did! didn't have to be a good dancer.
:13:02. > :13:10.The theatre's further afield were much more makeshift. They worked
:13:11. > :13:15.from the back of a lorry, from tents, in Italy they worked in
:13:15. > :13:19.conditions where rats were, running across the stage. Despite the
:13:19. > :13:25.efforts of the performers, some said that it stood for every night,
:13:25. > :13:28.something awful. He had to fulfil the demands on him to produce
:13:28. > :13:35.shores. He couldn't always have George Formby. He had to make do
:13:35. > :13:39.with other people. Some were good and some were not. After D-Day and
:13:39. > :13:43.the Normandy landings, Basil Dean wanted his performers to follow our
:13:43. > :13:49.troops as they pushed through Europe. Which meant real risks to
:13:49. > :13:54.their safety. Audrey's best friend, Vyvyan, had also joined ENSA. She
:13:54. > :14:00.was travelling with a different trip. She was what I would call
:14:00. > :14:05.bubbly, happy-go-lucky. I don't know, she was full of life.
:14:05. > :14:10.January 23rd, 1949, while travelling to a show in Holland,
:14:10. > :14:14.the truck she was in hit a landmine and she died. I was absolutely
:14:14. > :14:19.devastated. It really was a terrible tragedy. I could not
:14:19. > :14:23.believe it. She was the only ENSA performer killed during the war,
:14:23. > :14:32.but the dangers were real. They knew there were dangers, but they
:14:32. > :14:35.felt the troops needed entertaining and they took the risk. So, Audrey,
:14:35. > :14:45.if you do not mind, I would like to take you over there and we are
:14:45. > :14:49.
:14:49. > :14:56.going to recreate a bit of that To get us into the mood, local
:14:56. > :15:00.performers the Windmill swing band. During the war, ENSA staged over
:15:00. > :15:04.2.5 million performances. Talented ladies like Audrey helped raise the
:15:04. > :15:14.spirits of our troops during those troubled times. For that, we should
:15:14. > :15:26.
:15:26. > :15:31.He hears it, isn't it great? would you ever go out and a form on
:15:31. > :15:35.the front line? Absolutely not, no. Physical education was a
:15:35. > :15:39.paramilitary activity. I have to pretend to my daughter that it is
:15:39. > :15:46.fine when a wasp comes near. No serious army would have me anywhere
:15:46. > :15:51.near it, even in PR. Mind you, your new job is quite full-on. This is
:15:51. > :15:57.it, away from the front line, what is going on here? That is how a
:15:57. > :16:01.real man spends his... That is how you earn a living. Here are
:16:01. > :16:06.narrating the new stories of Winnie The Pooh. Yes, there are some new
:16:06. > :16:13.stories based on the original Winnie The Pooh, and Disney have
:16:13. > :16:16.made 18, I think, new ten-minute television stories, and I am the
:16:16. > :16:21.storyteller, wandering around that beautiful green screen set, which
:16:21. > :16:25.is about to get coloured in with magical computer pencils to be made
:16:25. > :16:30.to look like the hundred Acre Wood. So you will actually be in the
:16:30. > :16:36.cartoon. It is weird, really. The lock that I sit on his real, or at
:16:36. > :16:42.least plastic, but the people I am talking to, Christopher Robin here,
:16:42. > :16:49.A good, they are made up. When they answer back, I am doing the voices,
:16:49. > :16:52.so I am telling the story, like when you read to your children, you
:16:52. > :16:57.sort of to the voices a bit, but let's not get carried away. It is
:16:57. > :17:02.not like proper acting. You often hear from actors that it is hard
:17:03. > :17:07.work on green screen, have you done anything like it before?
:17:07. > :17:11.Mitchell and Webb, there were, as the technology got cheaper, we
:17:11. > :17:16.started to do things like that, but nothing so prolonged. This was
:17:16. > :17:19.eight days of green screen, a cast of one, I have got no-one to moan
:17:19. > :17:25.too, to moan about the catering or the weather. So what was pretty
:17:25. > :17:30.lonely, it was all made in Wales, so I say that I made it for my
:17:30. > :17:33.daughter, but I did not see her for a week and a half. Most of us are
:17:33. > :17:39.used to the American Winnie The Pooh, but this is the all new
:17:39. > :17:45.British one. Well, the original books are English... This is the
:17:45. > :17:50.first televised... The inspiration was a wood in Sussex, so the
:17:50. > :17:55.original books were all British, and then the rights went to Disney,
:17:55. > :17:59.and they made the animated films, and very charming they were, to.
:17:59. > :18:05.have, Robert, a world champion in the studio, a very important part
:18:05. > :18:11.of the stories, can you guess what he is a world champion of? Dowsing
:18:11. > :18:17.himself in honey. He is the world Pooh sticks champion! Can you
:18:17. > :18:24.believe it, come On Over! His dad is with us as well. What 18 they
:18:24. > :18:28.are. Come on in, now, we were having a good chat earlier, I am
:18:28. > :18:32.well on the world of Pooh sticks. Can you let everybody else in on
:18:32. > :18:40.the secret? How did you hold the stick when you drop it into the
:18:40. > :18:45.river? Oh, like that? Give us the winning drop. For just like that!
:18:45. > :18:49.It is as simple as that. Textbook. There is no luck involved at all in
:18:49. > :18:54.this, it is pure skill. Will he be going back next year to try to
:18:54. > :19:00.retain his title? No-one has actually retained it before, so
:19:00. > :19:05.fingers crossed. We have got used some tickets for the championships.
:19:05. > :19:12.Well, or round one, anyway. Out of all of those sticks, which one
:19:12. > :19:16.would you choose as a winner? It is that one there! Well, that is going
:19:16. > :19:21.to be up for auction after the programme. You can take that one
:19:21. > :19:26.away with you, good lad. Thank you very much. Well, Tales Of
:19:26. > :19:30.Friendship With Winnie The Pooh is on Disney Junior UK later this year.
:19:30. > :19:33.This is the trophy, it is from the shelf in his bedroom. Now then, the
:19:34. > :19:37.police are always looking for better ways to gather evidence at
:19:37. > :19:41.crime scenes. Scientists in Sheffield think they have found a
:19:41. > :19:50.new way to use one of the oldest tools of the trade. Michael Mosley
:19:50. > :19:55.The fingerprint has been used in crime fighting for of all 100 years,
:19:55. > :20:00.and now scientists are about to give it a high-tech makeover.
:20:00. > :20:03.Fingerprinting may no longer be seen as cutting edge in the
:20:03. > :20:09.glamorous world of crime scene investigations, but there are
:20:10. > :20:14.developments which I think we'll push it back into the limelight. Up
:20:14. > :20:20.classic fingerprinting is tried and tested and has its limitations.
:20:20. > :20:23.John O'Gara runs to a fingerprint laboratory at West Yorkshire Police.
:20:23. > :20:27.At this training facility, he is going to show me how to dust for
:20:28. > :20:33.fingerprints, a technique which has not changed much in a century.
:20:33. > :20:37.is simply a matter of putting dust onto the surface. You can see there.
:20:37. > :20:41.The fingerprint has come out, clear Rage detail. He is using aluminium
:20:41. > :20:47.powder, because it sticks well to the print and can be lifted with
:20:47. > :20:52.take. Everybody's fingerprint has a unique pattern of riches allowing
:20:52. > :20:57.investigators to link a suspect to a crime scene. Even identical twins
:20:57. > :20:59.have different fingerprints. There and there you have the print.
:20:59. > :21:04.Throughout the history of fingerprinting, they are the many
:21:04. > :21:08.exciting developments. A major breakthrough came in 1997 when
:21:09. > :21:14.scientists work out how to extract DNA from them. But investigators
:21:14. > :21:17.are still left with a problem. Crime scenes often contain hundreds
:21:18. > :21:23.of fingerprints. The new technology could provide more information from
:21:23. > :21:28.a print to help eliminate all convict a suspect. Extraordinary
:21:28. > :21:31.though it may sound, from a single fingerprint left at the scene of a
:21:31. > :21:39.crime, it is now possible to tell not just who was there but what
:21:39. > :21:43.they were doing. Dr Simona Francese or at Sheffield Hallam University
:21:43. > :21:48.is developing ways to identify substances someone has come into
:21:48. > :21:53.contact with simply from their fingerprint. What is interesting in
:21:53. > :21:58.analysing these fingerprints is that whatever you have touched can
:21:58. > :22:02.potentially be detected. And not only can she tell what someone has
:22:02. > :22:06.touched, she can even reveal what they have consumed. It sounds
:22:06. > :22:10.incredible, and so I am going to put it to the test. I have
:22:10. > :22:15.deliberately exposed myself to a number of substances that she is
:22:16. > :22:22.able to identify. But she does not know which ones. How much will she
:22:22. > :22:28.be able to tell from my fingerprints? Just like the
:22:28. > :22:33.traditional method, she dusts the can and lift the print with take. -
:22:33. > :22:38.- Take. But what is different is that she is extracting chemicals
:22:38. > :22:44.contained in the print. A mass spectrometer identifies the
:22:44. > :22:49.chemicals. After a couple of hours, the results are ready. It looks
:22:49. > :22:54.like you have been quite generous with some sort of hair wax products.
:22:54. > :22:58.Yes! And I wonder whether or not you have been drinking coffee,
:22:58. > :23:02.because there is evidence that caffeine has been excreted through
:23:02. > :23:05.your fingerprints. It is such a strange thought that you can detect
:23:05. > :23:11.that I have drunk a cup of coffee simply from looking at my
:23:11. > :23:15.fingerprint. Yes. I am very impressed. She did not detect the
:23:15. > :23:20.de-icer I had used, but two out of three is good going for a technique
:23:20. > :23:25.still in its infancy. So how will this help police? If we can
:23:25. > :23:28.restrict the amount of fingerprints that we have to check by finding
:23:28. > :23:31.out what is actually in them and the likelihood of them being the
:23:32. > :23:36.offenders, it will cut down the amount of time we spent working on
:23:36. > :23:40.the case. They hope to use this to detect illegal substances, like
:23:40. > :23:45.drugs and explosives, in fingerprints. This could provide
:23:45. > :23:48.powerful new evidence linking a suspect to a crime. I have been
:23:48. > :23:52.working in the fingerprint bureau for 32 years, and this is one of
:23:52. > :23:56.the most significant breakthroughs that I have known. The work is
:23:56. > :24:01.being funded by the Home Office and should be ready for the police to
:24:01. > :24:07.use in about three years. It may well be the next big thing in
:24:07. > :24:11.forensics. The moral of that story is, if you
:24:11. > :24:15.do not want to know what people are put in your hair, used de-icer.
:24:15. > :24:19.Anyway, it is 30 years since a trim of's diaries were published, and
:24:19. > :24:29.although teenagers are very different today, Alex Riley thinks
:24:29. > :24:29.
:24:29. > :24:34.there are plenty of Adrian Moles in Thursday 24th July 1986, got some
:24:34. > :24:39.spurts. The girl in the grocer's was even nicer looking and served
:24:39. > :24:42.me with a twinkle in her eye. I suddenly desire to buy groceries.
:24:42. > :24:48.Anyone who has kept a teenage diary would probably care to forget the
:24:48. > :24:55.growing pains of puberty with its pent-up frustrations, acne and
:24:55. > :24:59.unrequited love. Or is that just me? What is in yours? Warts-and-all,
:24:59. > :25:09.really, very kind of Adrian Mole. My daughters do. Have you read
:25:09. > :25:13.them? That is a yes, then! How long have you kept it for? Since I was
:25:13. > :25:17.11, and I am now 74. I know I am an intellectual, I saw Malcolm
:25:17. > :25:21.Muggeridge on television last night, and I understood nearly every word.
:25:21. > :25:25.The most famous teenage diary in Britain is probably that written by
:25:25. > :25:29.Adrian Mole, first published 30 years ago, and the creation
:25:29. > :25:34.reflected the inner thoughts and secrets of a generation. Did you
:25:34. > :25:38.ever keep a diary yourself? No, I didn't. I started, like everybody
:25:38. > :25:42.else started. I wish I had kept a diary or my life. Do you think
:25:42. > :25:47.Adrian Mole would be on social networking now, rather than keeping
:25:47. > :25:52.a diary? The important thing about the title of that book is secret
:25:52. > :25:56.diary, and I think he might still prefer, you know, the actual diary
:25:56. > :26:01.form, the tangible, the book, the thing you can open and make marks
:26:01. > :26:06.in. What advice you think he would give to a teenager starting a diary
:26:06. > :26:15.today? A be absolutely honest, as honest as you can be, because there
:26:15. > :26:19.is no point in writing your life if it is not honest. But there are
:26:19. > :26:23.teenage diaries just cringe worthy self-indulgence or genuine
:26:23. > :26:27.historical documents? Dr Finkel is a creator at the British Museum and
:26:27. > :26:31.the founder of a new project created to save the diaries are
:26:31. > :26:35.ordinary people. I think diaries are about the most important of
:26:35. > :26:40.human documents, and the point is that we want to rescue diaries of
:26:40. > :26:44.all kinds, on the assumption that in 150 years' time such documents
:26:44. > :26:50.will be crisis because they talk about daily life in people's own
:26:50. > :26:55.words in a way that nothing else does. So his diary writing in
:26:55. > :27:00.danger of dying out, and to the kids of today appreciate what they
:27:00. > :27:06.have to offer? Hello, everyone! I am Alex. We set to the exercise of
:27:06. > :27:12.keeping a diary over the weekend. How did you find it? It was OK.
:27:12. > :27:16.was boring. I am not trying to be rude or anything, but people who
:27:16. > :27:20.have no friends talk to their Tiree. Were do you mind reading a bit of
:27:20. > :27:25.that? On Saturday, I went to the Royal Infirmary to help out in the
:27:25. > :27:32.children's ward, and they all had a form of cancer, so I felt sorry for
:27:32. > :27:37.them. After that, we went upstairs and played zombies for two hours
:27:37. > :27:43.and 30 minutes. I am going to be on the One Show. I am so excited and
:27:43. > :27:45.nervous. Apart from that, nothing much happened. That is it. All this
:27:45. > :27:50.technology, something new in five years' time, it will be lost
:27:50. > :27:55.forever. Get a diary, write it now, this will last forever, it will
:27:55. > :28:01.always be work, it will always be compatible! Unless it falls in a
:28:02. > :28:07.pond. Unless it falls in a pond... Their is information about Dr
:28:07. > :28:11.Finkel's Great Diary Project on our website, and Sue Townsend's new
:28:11. > :28:15.book, The Woman Who Went To Bed For A Year, is out now. Robert, one
:28:15. > :28:20.date for your diary is you're going to be David Mitchell's best man.
:28:20. > :28:25.is a popular guy, and there are lots of very strong candidates, but
:28:25. > :28:29.I ran a strong campaign, a lot of e-mails, text messages, a mock
:28:30. > :28:34.wedding cake made out of cardboard with, I am warning you, written in
:28:34. > :28:38.lipstick. He got the message. you started the speech was marked
:28:38. > :28:43.that was the beginning, but now I have blown it on TV, so I'll have
:28:43. > :28:47.to think of a new start. Thank-you to Robert, his new series starts
:28:47. > :28:51.this autumn on Disney Junior UK. Tomorrow will we be joined by two