0:00:11 > 0:00:14Hello and welcome to Debatable, where today,
0:00:14 > 0:00:17one player must answer a series of tricky questions to try to
0:00:17 > 0:00:20walk away with a jackpot of over £3,000.
0:00:20 > 0:00:23But, as always, they're not on their own.
0:00:23 > 0:00:25They will have a panel of well known faces debating their way to
0:00:25 > 0:00:29the answers. Will they be all talk and no action, however?
0:00:29 > 0:00:32As always, that's debatable. So, let's meet them.
0:00:32 > 0:00:34Chin-wagging their way to the answers today,
0:00:34 > 0:00:38we have writer and journalist Grace Dent, we have broadcaster
0:00:38 > 0:00:41Dan Walker, and former royal correspondent Jennie Bond.
0:00:41 > 0:00:44CHEERS AND APPLAUSE
0:00:44 > 0:00:47Hello. Hello. Good afternoon.
0:00:47 > 0:00:50It's a very finely balanced panel, I have to say, Dan.
0:00:50 > 0:00:54- You're taking charge today.- That's a big responsibility, Patrick.
0:00:54 > 0:00:56- I'm slightly concerned about this. - It is!
0:00:56 > 0:00:59- But you've got the knowledge to back it up.- Occasionally.
0:00:59 > 0:01:00Stop building it up.
0:01:00 > 0:01:02Stop it!
0:01:02 > 0:01:06So, what are you hoping for? What's the strengths and weaknesses?
0:01:06 > 0:01:09- Well, obviously, you know, Jennie knows everything.- Oh, gosh!
0:01:09 > 0:01:11Jennie does know a lot. She really does.
0:01:11 > 0:01:14- There's a lot of knowledge in there. Grace...- What am I?
0:01:14 > 0:01:18- I'm just getting to you, Grace. - Come on, get to me.- Hang on. She's started already.
0:01:18 > 0:01:21- "Hey! What am I? Chopped liver?" - No, deep and powerful insight.
0:01:21 > 0:01:25As a columnist, I know a little bit about a lot of things.
0:01:25 > 0:01:29And I shall be sort of threading that knowledge together and
0:01:29 > 0:01:32funnelling it towards money.
0:01:32 > 0:01:36He's diplomatic, Grace, if nothing else. LAUGHTER
0:01:36 > 0:01:39I have to say. That is the panel. Let's meet today's contestant.
0:01:39 > 0:01:41It is Shabs from Chigwell. APPLAUSE
0:01:41 > 0:01:45- Shabs, welcome to the show.- Thank you very much.- Congratulations.
0:01:45 > 0:01:47You are the only contestant we've had on this series that is
0:01:47 > 0:01:50actually dressed smarter than the host.
0:01:50 > 0:01:51I don't know what to say!
0:01:51 > 0:01:54So, tell us a little bit about yourself, Shabs.
0:01:54 > 0:01:57I have two jobs. I work in finance during the week and I'm
0:01:57 > 0:01:59a toastmaster at the weekends.
0:01:59 > 0:02:01So, which one do you enjoy most?
0:02:01 > 0:02:04- Well, if my boss is watching, then I enjoy my finance job.- Yes.
0:02:04 > 0:02:08But I do really, really enjoy being a toastmaster at the weekends, cos you get to meet
0:02:08 > 0:02:13- so many different people, you get to go to so many different events. - And what does a toastmaster do?
0:02:13 > 0:02:15So do you have to wear the full outfit, all that stuff?
0:02:15 > 0:02:17You dress like a tomato from head to toe.
0:02:17 > 0:02:21- Yes.- As you can see, I'm a very tall guy, so it's sweeping the floor.
0:02:21 > 0:02:24You just host events, you introduce acts,
0:02:24 > 0:02:27you host weddings and you just bring everything together, really.
0:02:27 > 0:02:29So, what do you make of today's panel?
0:02:29 > 0:02:32I'm actually quite comforted cos it's quite diverse and I'm
0:02:32 > 0:02:35feeling very confident because of these guys, not because of me.
0:02:35 > 0:02:39- You're a diplomat, aren't you? - I learned from the best, Paddy. - You're a diplomat. Very good.
0:02:39 > 0:02:42OK, well, look, you're going to have to pay close attention to
0:02:42 > 0:02:46them because you can only choose one to play the Final Debate.
0:02:46 > 0:02:49- Let's go.- All set?- All set. - OK, best of luck, Shabs.
0:02:49 > 0:02:51Let's play Round One.
0:02:53 > 0:02:56Round One is multiple choice. Four possible answers.
0:02:56 > 0:03:00Four questions in this round. A possible £800 up for grabs.
0:03:00 > 0:03:02£200 for each correct answer. Let's go.
0:03:20 > 0:03:24Is that a knowing smile or an "I don't know anything" smile?
0:03:24 > 0:03:27That's a wait and see smile, Paddy.
0:03:27 > 0:03:30A wait and see smile, with a little wink.
0:03:30 > 0:03:33Which means - we may know this. Let's see if our panel do.
0:03:33 > 0:03:35Your debate starts now.
0:03:35 > 0:03:39- OK.- I think Mrs Brown's Boys is actually fairly recent.
0:03:39 > 0:03:43Because it's been the one that's cleaned up at Christmas for
0:03:43 > 0:03:45about three years.
0:03:45 > 0:03:48Miranda is also fairly recent because it started as
0:03:48 > 0:03:51a radio show and then went to a TV show. There's only two things...
0:03:51 > 0:03:54It's either Gavin & Stacey or The Inbetweeners.
0:03:54 > 0:03:57- The Inbetweeners has had time to make two Hollywood movies.- Yeah.
0:03:57 > 0:04:00Gavin & Stacey, when you watch the original series now,
0:04:00 > 0:04:03it does feel like it has been around for an awful long time.
0:04:03 > 0:04:05- It feels like it's been around for a long time.- Yeah.
0:04:05 > 0:04:09- How old was I?- Hang on a minute. - I interviewed Ruth.
0:04:09 > 0:04:12That was before my last husband...
0:04:12 > 0:04:14LAUGHTER
0:04:14 > 0:04:19- I remember...- I didn't realise we had Elizabeth Taylor on the panel.
0:04:19 > 0:04:22I remember interviewing James Corden in 2009...
0:04:22 > 0:04:25- And this was when he first made the breakthrough...- ..in 2009.
0:04:25 > 0:04:29- ..from when he was in the Fat Club thingy on ITV with Ruth Jones.- Yeah.
0:04:29 > 0:04:30That's right.
0:04:30 > 0:04:33So I think Gavin & Stacey had been around for a while cos he was
0:04:33 > 0:04:36well known and we did it at Upton Park, where West Ham used to play.
0:04:36 > 0:04:39- OK.- And that was 2009. Cos I'd just started on Football Focus and
0:04:39 > 0:04:42he was one of the first interviews, celebrity football fans, we did.
0:04:42 > 0:04:44- So 2009.- So he'd been around for a few years...
0:04:44 > 0:04:47Gavin & Stacey, I think, had been around for a few years before that.
0:04:47 > 0:04:50- Before 2009?- Yeah.- They all seem... - Those boys in The Inbetweeners,
0:04:50 > 0:04:52they were kids in that and now they're adults.
0:04:52 > 0:04:54From what you're saying, though,
0:04:54 > 0:04:57I would say maybe The Inbetweeners is the earliest.
0:04:57 > 0:04:59Come on, you make the final decision.
0:04:59 > 0:05:01I know I'm sitting in the middle,
0:05:01 > 0:05:04but with your televisual knowledge, which one are we going to go for?
0:05:04 > 0:05:07- Let's go for Gavin & Stacey.- OK. - Gavin & Stacey?
0:05:07 > 0:05:10Jennie Bond is unsure. Grace has got her hands on her head.
0:05:10 > 0:05:13- But we are going to go for Gavin & Stacey.- So invested in this!
0:05:13 > 0:05:16We think.
0:05:16 > 0:05:20- So...- That was terrible!
0:05:20 > 0:05:24From that timeline, they are going for Gavin & Stacey.
0:05:24 > 0:05:26My initial reaction was The Inbetweeners.
0:05:26 > 0:05:28But...
0:05:28 > 0:05:30- DAN:- Oh, no!
0:05:30 > 0:05:35Having heard what Dan said, I think I'm going to go with the panel.
0:05:35 > 0:05:39- OK, you're going with the panel and you're saying...?- Gavin & Stacey.
0:05:39 > 0:05:43Was Gavin & Stacey broadcast first, for £200?
0:05:49 > 0:05:50APPLAUSE
0:05:50 > 0:05:53- Well done!- Yes!
0:05:54 > 0:05:57Shabs, I'm exhausted!
0:05:57 > 0:05:59Can I go home?
0:05:59 > 0:06:02- You're staying, Grace! - That was fantastic.- Well done, guys.
0:06:02 > 0:06:07Very well done. Gavin & Stacey began on BBC Three in 2007.
0:06:07 > 0:06:11The Inbetweeners began on E4 in 2008,
0:06:11 > 0:06:12with the episode First Day.
0:06:12 > 0:06:16Miranda began on BBC Two in 2009.
0:06:16 > 0:06:21And Mrs Brown's Boys began on BBC One in 2011.
0:06:21 > 0:06:23First episode was called The Mammy.
0:06:23 > 0:06:24Well done, panel.
0:06:24 > 0:06:28Well done, Shabs. You're up and running. £200.
0:06:28 > 0:06:30APPLAUSE
0:06:30 > 0:06:32OK, here comes your next question.
0:07:01 > 0:07:03I have no idea at all.
0:07:03 > 0:07:06Don't worry. Don't worry.
0:07:06 > 0:07:09I'm sure our panel can quickly sort this out for you, Shabs.
0:07:09 > 0:07:12Panel, your debate starts now.
0:07:12 > 0:07:15I think we can confidently say, we also have no idea.
0:07:15 > 0:07:17But let's try and work it out.
0:07:17 > 0:07:20Which one of those do you think is the most likely?
0:07:20 > 0:07:22Anything goes in America now, doesn't it?
0:07:22 > 0:07:28- You couldn't make it up.- My gut instinct is that the top two...
0:07:28 > 0:07:32- Yeah.- ..are almost too silly.
0:07:32 > 0:07:37So, there is an attack by a sentient computer - is that not more
0:07:37 > 0:07:39or less the millennium bug?
0:07:39 > 0:07:42Wouldn't they already have something prepared for what was going
0:07:42 > 0:07:43to happen at the millennium,
0:07:43 > 0:07:47when suddenly sentient computers might suddenly take over the Earth?
0:07:47 > 0:07:49So wouldn't they have that in the bag, maybe?
0:07:49 > 0:07:52- There's a difference, isn't there, between...?- Sentient.
0:07:52 > 0:07:55A bug over the millennium and a sentient computer that
0:07:55 > 0:07:58- actually can decide what it's doing. - But maybe that's just terminology.
0:07:58 > 0:08:01- Legal terminology.- What do we understand by sentient computer?
0:08:01 > 0:08:03A computer that is sort of aware of what it's doing and can make
0:08:03 > 0:08:05- conscious decisions, I would imagine.- OK.
0:08:05 > 0:08:08- And they exist already? Do they? - I have...- I don't know.
0:08:08 > 0:08:11I don't know. Probably, somewhere deep underground, in an
0:08:11 > 0:08:14- underground bunker.- I think that's the one they'd go for. Probably.
0:08:14 > 0:08:19My gut would be that they may have an extra-terrestrial invasion
0:08:19 > 0:08:25- one as well because they are very, very into that idea.- Exactly.
0:08:25 > 0:08:27- I agree on that. - They take that a lot more seriously
0:08:27 > 0:08:30in America than, say, we do here.
0:08:30 > 0:08:33And yet, I know you sort of dismissed the zombie pandemic
0:08:33 > 0:08:37- thing, but...- I don't want to think that the US Government have
0:08:37 > 0:08:43a plan if corpses can come back to life and try to feast on brains.
0:08:43 > 0:08:47You make a very strong point. An extra-terrestrial thing,
0:08:47 > 0:08:50you can imagine people sitting round a table and thinking - what are we
0:08:50 > 0:08:54going to do when the guys with green heads come and point guns at us?
0:08:54 > 0:08:57Or whatever happens. How do we deal with that? Where do we go?
0:08:57 > 0:09:00Where do we take the President? Where do we take the First Lady?
0:09:00 > 0:09:03Yeah. I'm going to go with you and I'm
0:09:03 > 0:09:06- completely...- Extra-terrestrials. - I'm with you. I'm with you.- OK.
0:09:06 > 0:09:09We are going to go with the most likely being
0:09:09 > 0:09:12an extra-terrestrial invasion.
0:09:13 > 0:09:17So, Shabs, we now know that our panel don't have
0:09:17 > 0:09:21a clue about this either. LAUGHTER
0:09:21 > 0:09:24Anything in there to fire anything for you?
0:09:24 > 0:09:26You know, what the panel have selected,
0:09:26 > 0:09:30an extra-terrestrial invasion, can, in the US minds, it can happen.
0:09:30 > 0:09:32You know, it's a possibility.
0:09:32 > 0:09:37An attack by a sentient computer is probably more of a realistic answer.
0:09:37 > 0:09:41- So?- So, I've confused myself even more.
0:09:41 > 0:09:43Go for the zombies!
0:09:43 > 0:09:46- SHABS:- OK, let's go for an attack
0:09:46 > 0:09:49- by sentient computers, please.- OK.
0:09:49 > 0:09:51You've gone against the panel,
0:09:51 > 0:09:55who believe that it's an extra-terrestrial invasion.
0:09:55 > 0:09:59For £200, the correct answer is...
0:10:05 > 0:10:07..a zombie pandemic.
0:10:07 > 0:10:08No!
0:10:08 > 0:10:11I said go for the zombies!
0:10:11 > 0:10:13- No!- I'm so sorry!
0:10:13 > 0:10:17- No way!- You could not make it up! - I kid you not!
0:10:17 > 0:10:21- The page is called zombie preparedness.- Wow!
0:10:21 > 0:10:27It appears that it is less than 100% serious. The website states,
0:10:27 > 0:10:30"As it turns out, what first began as a tongue-in-cheek campaign to
0:10:30 > 0:10:33"engage new audiences in preparedness messages,
0:10:33 > 0:10:36"it has proven to be a very effective platform."
0:10:36 > 0:10:39- And so they decided to keep it. - There you go.
0:10:39 > 0:10:41Here comes your next question.
0:10:46 > 0:10:48Jennie...! LAUGHTER
0:11:05 > 0:11:08I think, and Jennie's probably going to tell
0:11:08 > 0:11:11me off about this if I get this wrong,
0:11:11 > 0:11:15- but I think it's Anne, Princess Royal.- OK, you think it's Anne.
0:11:15 > 0:11:16I think.
0:11:16 > 0:11:19Well, look, it doesn't really matter what you think because,
0:11:19 > 0:11:22I mean, the panel will clearly sort this out very, very quickly.
0:11:22 > 0:11:25- Panel, your debate starts now. - I might be in the central area here,
0:11:25 > 0:11:27but I think we should get the Bond involved!
0:11:27 > 0:11:29Completely.
0:11:29 > 0:11:34- Well, um, we all know that Diana married very young.- Was she 20?
0:11:34 > 0:11:36- 19, 20?- She was 19.
0:11:36 > 0:11:40Yeah, 19, just going on 20, is what my memory of it is.
0:11:40 > 0:11:44Birthday's end of July and she married at the beginning of July?
0:11:44 > 0:11:47And I think it was 19, going on 20, or is it 20, going on...?
0:11:47 > 0:11:49I think it was 19, going on 20.
0:11:49 > 0:11:52I think she was 19 because I think that it's an age which feels
0:11:52 > 0:11:54- very young now.- Yeah.
0:11:54 > 0:11:56Yeah, and I do remember at the time when the Duchess...
0:11:56 > 0:11:59You know, we had all that pomp and ceremony when
0:11:59 > 0:12:01the Duchess of Cambridge got married.
0:12:01 > 0:12:04I remember them saying she was quite old for a royal bride.
0:12:04 > 0:12:08- She went through university.- They had lived together for ten years.
0:12:08 > 0:12:10She was, like, 29. 29 or something, was she?
0:12:10 > 0:12:12About 27, 28, something like that.
0:12:12 > 0:12:14- Definitely not the Duchess of Cambridge.- OK.
0:12:14 > 0:12:16So, let's discount that one. We're down to three.
0:12:16 > 0:12:19I have no idea how old the Queen...
0:12:19 > 0:12:22She was married before she was crowned, wasn't she?
0:12:22 > 0:12:26- Yes, she was married in 1947, on November 20th.- OK.
0:12:26 > 0:12:29Shabs, you could not have a better person on the panel here,
0:12:29 > 0:12:32- by the way. - She was born in April 1926,
0:12:32 > 0:12:36so she was 21 and a half when she got married.
0:12:36 > 0:12:38OK, so older than Princess Diana.
0:12:38 > 0:12:41- So it's down to Anne or Diana.- Yeah.
0:12:41 > 0:12:46- Well, Anne, I'm pretty sure she was 22 or 23 when she got married.- OK.
0:12:46 > 0:12:48Anne. Duchess of Cambridge, we know, was older.
0:12:48 > 0:12:53Diana was 19, I think, going on 20, possibly 20, 21. I think 19.
0:12:53 > 0:12:54- I think 19.- Yeah.
0:12:54 > 0:12:5919. So Anne, 22-23, and Elizabeth, 21 and a half.
0:12:59 > 0:13:03- Never doubt the royal correspondent. - And if it's wrong, I'm leaving.
0:13:03 > 0:13:05- You do the rest of the show on your own.- You're retiring.
0:13:05 > 0:13:09Forever. OK, this is big. Shabs, this is big pressure.
0:13:09 > 0:13:12We are fully in Team Bond and we think you can confidently say
0:13:12 > 0:13:14the answer is Princess Diana.
0:13:16 > 0:13:20No pressure on Jennie here(!) They are going for Princess Diana.
0:13:20 > 0:13:23Given the faith I have in my panel,
0:13:23 > 0:13:26and the confidence that I have in Jennie, I'll go with Princess Diana.
0:13:28 > 0:13:33OK, you're going with the panel. For £200, did she marry youngest?
0:13:39 > 0:13:42She did. APPLAUSE
0:13:42 > 0:13:43Very well done.
0:13:43 > 0:13:46- Very well played.- I'm glad I listened.- Very well played.
0:13:46 > 0:13:49Princess Anne was 23 years old whenever she married her
0:13:49 > 0:13:51first husband, Captain Mark Phillips.
0:13:51 > 0:13:56Princess Diana was 20 when she got married. Charles was 32.
0:13:56 > 0:13:59Queen Elizabeth II was 21 when she got married.
0:13:59 > 0:14:02The Duchess of Cambridge was 29 when she got married.
0:14:02 > 0:14:04Very well played, panel.
0:14:04 > 0:14:07Very well done, Shabs. Another £200 into your prize pot.
0:14:07 > 0:14:09You're up to £400.
0:14:09 > 0:14:11APPLAUSE
0:14:11 > 0:14:14OK, here comes the final question in this round.
0:14:33 > 0:14:38- I will probably go for fish scales. - Any particular reason?
0:14:38 > 0:14:41Because I'm hoping I've never tasted carmine that
0:14:41 > 0:14:43- has the other stuff in it.- OK.
0:14:43 > 0:14:46Based on the fact that you're hoping that it doesn't taste of the
0:14:46 > 0:14:49other three, I mean, it's as good a reasoning as any.
0:14:49 > 0:14:51Panel, can you bring anything to this?
0:14:51 > 0:14:53- Your debate starts now. - Food critic...?
0:14:56 > 0:15:01I remember my brother dyeing his hair red in the '70s cos
0:15:01 > 0:15:06he was a punk and he dyed it with red food colouring
0:15:06 > 0:15:10that you would use to put icing on a cake.
0:15:10 > 0:15:12I seem to remember there being
0:15:12 > 0:15:15some huge argument that red food colouring is made
0:15:15 > 0:15:21from crushed ants, or insects. Is it not cochineal?
0:15:21 > 0:15:25- Yes.- Is cochineal... - Beetles, I think, isn't it?
0:15:25 > 0:15:26..not insects?
0:15:26 > 0:15:28And does cochineal... I don't know what
0:15:28 > 0:15:30carmine is, I've never heard that word,
0:15:30 > 0:15:35but I seem to remember red beetles, insects, food colouring.
0:15:35 > 0:15:37My reasoning is very different to food dye.
0:15:37 > 0:15:39- Go on.- On Saturday kitchen,
0:15:39 > 0:15:45- I'm sure I remember James Martin making somebody's food hell.- Yes.
0:15:45 > 0:15:48They made it red and the reason it was their food hell is because they
0:15:48 > 0:15:51hate insects and insects was used in the dye to make the food colouring.
0:15:51 > 0:15:55- Yes.- Right. Insects are quite nice, actually.
0:15:55 > 0:15:57I've eaten quite a few in the jungle, this and that, you know?
0:15:57 > 0:16:00Maggots and stick insects. That was particularly delicious.
0:16:00 > 0:16:02- Any red ones?- No, no.
0:16:02 > 0:16:05All very crunchy, but I certainly, instinctively, went straight
0:16:05 > 0:16:09- for insects because I think it is a kind of beetle.- Yeah.
0:16:09 > 0:16:10It's revolting really, but...
0:16:10 > 0:16:13So for three different reasons, we all think it's insects.
0:16:13 > 0:16:15- It's not going to be animal droppings, is it?- No.
0:16:15 > 0:16:17We've got the triple triangle of power here.
0:16:17 > 0:16:19We have got hair dye,
0:16:19 > 0:16:22we've got beetle knowledge and we've got Saturday Kitchen.
0:16:22 > 0:16:25With those three, Shabs, coming together, you cannot go wrong.
0:16:25 > 0:16:28It is, we can say with some degree of confidence, insects.
0:16:29 > 0:16:32They think it's insects.
0:16:32 > 0:16:35I think it's sufficient to say,
0:16:35 > 0:16:39that based on what the panel have said, I will go with insects.
0:16:40 > 0:16:47You're going with the panel. Is carmine made from insects, for £200?
0:16:53 > 0:16:55- Yes!- It's the correct answer!
0:16:55 > 0:16:58Very well done. Well played.
0:16:58 > 0:17:01Carmine is used in pork sausages, in pies,
0:17:01 > 0:17:05in dried fish and shrimp, sweets, pills, jams,
0:17:05 > 0:17:09lipstick and rouge and, Grace, it is also used in hair dye.
0:17:09 > 0:17:12- Thank your brother. Thank your brother.- Yeah.
0:17:12 > 0:17:14Very good all-round knowledge. Well done, Shabs.
0:17:14 > 0:17:19- It means at the end of Round One, you are up to £600.- Thank you.
0:17:21 > 0:17:23Let's see how they cope with pictures.
0:17:23 > 0:17:26It's time for Round Two. APPLAUSE
0:17:28 > 0:17:30OK, Shabs, Round Two is our picture round.
0:17:30 > 0:17:33We need you to put three pictures in the correct order.
0:17:33 > 0:17:36Three questions in this round, £300 for each correct answer,
0:17:36 > 0:17:41a possible 900 up for grabs. Here comes your first one.
0:18:01 > 0:18:03I'm going to pass this over to the panel, Paddy.
0:18:03 > 0:18:05Is that because you know this, Shabs,
0:18:05 > 0:18:08or is this because you've no tennis knowledge whatsoever?
0:18:08 > 0:18:10I have no tennis knowledge whatsoever!
0:18:10 > 0:18:13OK, panel, let's see if we can sort this out for Shabs.
0:18:13 > 0:18:14Your debate starts now.
0:18:14 > 0:18:16OK. You love your tennis, don't you?
0:18:16 > 0:18:18I absolutely love tennis, addicted to it, listen to it,
0:18:18 > 0:18:20watch it whenever I can.
0:18:20 > 0:18:24And I think this is going to be very close between the three of them.
0:18:24 > 0:18:27- Grace?- Oh, absolutely in doubt.
0:18:27 > 0:18:30I have not as much knowledge as you two on this.
0:18:30 > 0:18:33The only thing I know is that how gorgeous Bjorn Borg was
0:18:33 > 0:18:35during the '70s, to me.
0:18:35 > 0:18:38I mean, if I was to put them in order of attractiveness,
0:18:38 > 0:18:40I would be completely useful to you.
0:18:40 > 0:18:43Well, I tell you what, I think you put them in order of
0:18:43 > 0:18:44attractiveness and I'll tell you whether...
0:18:44 > 0:18:47- I've interviewed all three of these. - All right.- For various reasons.
0:18:47 > 0:18:49I need to think about it. Bjorn, then John, then Jimmy.
0:18:49 > 0:18:51OK, so the most attractive there.
0:18:51 > 0:18:55And that... But I think, bizarrely, that that is actually the right
0:18:55 > 0:18:58order for the answer, because, right,
0:18:58 > 0:19:01I think, I went to the launch of his
0:19:01 > 0:19:05- pant range.- Yeah.- To interview him, not because I liked the pants.
0:19:05 > 0:19:06And there was a big banner
0:19:06 > 0:19:09- that said, "Five-time Wimbledon champion."- OK.
0:19:09 > 0:19:12I distinctly remember it, so I think he's won it five times.
0:19:12 > 0:19:14He should've won it a lot more than he did.
0:19:14 > 0:19:16I think McEnroe, either four or three.
0:19:16 > 0:19:20I think three, but definitely not five, and Connors, I think, won two.
0:19:20 > 0:19:21- OK.- You're so confident.
0:19:21 > 0:19:24I'm quietly confident that we're going to put them in the
0:19:24 > 0:19:28order that Grace finds them the most attractive. There we go.
0:19:28 > 0:19:32Connors, McEnroe, Borg is the answer, we believe.
0:19:33 > 0:19:37OK. So we've basically played Snog, Marry, Avoid.
0:19:37 > 0:19:40They're going for Jimmy Connors with the fewest,
0:19:40 > 0:19:43then John McEnroe, then Bjorn Borg.
0:19:43 > 0:19:44I think I'm going to go with the panel.
0:19:46 > 0:19:50- OK. You've pretty much no tennis knowledge yourself.- Whatsoever.
0:19:50 > 0:19:52- So you're going with the panel. - I'm going with the panel.
0:19:52 > 0:19:56For £300, starting with the fewest titles, going up to the most.
0:19:57 > 0:20:00Is that the correct order?
0:20:04 > 0:20:05Yes!
0:20:08 > 0:20:12High five it. It's that time in the quiz show. There you go.
0:20:12 > 0:20:14Very well played.
0:20:14 > 0:20:17And, I mean, purely based on attractiveness, Grace,
0:20:17 > 0:20:19you managed to sort this out.
0:20:19 > 0:20:24Connors won two in 1974 and 1982, you were right about that.
0:20:24 > 0:20:28- McEnroe has three wins.- OK. - '81, '83, '84.
0:20:28 > 0:20:33And Borg won five in a row from '76 through to 1980 inclusive.
0:20:33 > 0:20:35Very well done, panel.
0:20:35 > 0:20:39£300 into your prize pot, Shabs, you're now up to £900.
0:20:39 > 0:20:41APPLAUSE
0:20:41 > 0:20:44Let's have a look at your second picture question.
0:21:06 > 0:21:09Classic literature, Shabs. Your first thought would be?
0:21:09 > 0:21:10Our Mutual Friend...
0:21:12 > 0:21:16- ..Jane Eyre, and Frankenstein. - OK, hold that thought.
0:21:16 > 0:21:20Panel, can we bring anything to this? Your debate starts now.
0:21:20 > 0:21:25- How embarrassing.- Yes, I feel devoid of...all knowledge.
0:21:25 > 0:21:29- No, I think that Shabs was actually right.- What did Shabs say?
0:21:29 > 0:21:31I think Shabs said... So there was Charles Dickens...
0:21:31 > 0:21:32Would be the earliest.
0:21:32 > 0:21:36- I think that we all have a hunch he's the earliest.- OK.
0:21:36 > 0:21:40Charles Dickens, was that not 18th century?
0:21:40 > 0:21:4319th century?
0:21:43 > 0:21:47- I would say 1800s, maybe.- I've been to his house in Portsmouth.
0:21:47 > 0:21:49Oh, that's a big help. What did you learn?
0:21:49 > 0:21:51- I dressed up like Charles Dickens. - Right.
0:21:51 > 0:21:54I've got a degree in English literature. This is so embarrassing.
0:21:54 > 0:22:00- I wore a hat. I did wear a hat. - To me that's first.- OK.
0:22:00 > 0:22:03And then I'm pretty sure that's kind of turn of the century.
0:22:03 > 0:22:05And what about Jane Eyre?
0:22:05 > 0:22:11Maybe, I've just watched Sally Wainwright's To Walk...
0:22:11 > 0:22:13The whole drama about that
0:22:13 > 0:22:17and now I can't remember when that was published.
0:22:17 > 0:22:19And I'm also thinking about the fact that...
0:22:21 > 0:22:25..Mary Shelley published that under her real name,
0:22:25 > 0:22:28whereas Charlotte Bronte couldn't, because she was a woman,
0:22:28 > 0:22:32so it had to be under the name of Currer Bell, so...
0:22:32 > 0:22:34I think that.
0:22:34 > 0:22:37Does that make... Am I making... Am I sounding logical?
0:22:37 > 0:22:39- Listen, you've clearly got the knowledge there.- Right.
0:22:39 > 0:22:42- We're going in this order. - We're going to go, in order,
0:22:42 > 0:22:46we're going to go with Mr Dickens as the earliest,
0:22:46 > 0:22:49Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte in the middle,
0:22:49 > 0:22:52and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein at the end.
0:22:54 > 0:22:58Any of that convincing? Panel actually agreeing with you on this.
0:22:58 > 0:23:00That's a first.
0:23:00 > 0:23:05Based on what the panel said, very logical and I will stick
0:23:05 > 0:23:08to my original answer and agree with the panel.
0:23:08 > 0:23:10OK. It was your original thought.
0:23:10 > 0:23:13You think the panel has given you enough to back that up.
0:23:13 > 0:23:15For £300, is that the correct order?
0:23:20 > 0:23:24- Oh!- It's the wrong order.
0:23:24 > 0:23:27- Wow.- I'm so sorry.
0:23:27 > 0:23:30- Let's have a look at the right order.- I feel bad.
0:23:32 > 0:23:34Wow.
0:23:34 > 0:23:37- Frankenstein published first. - Oh, really?
0:23:37 > 0:23:41Then Jane Eyre and then Our Mutual Friend.
0:23:41 > 0:23:44- Oh, dear.- Well,
0:23:44 > 0:23:48Frankenstein was written by Mary Shelley and published in 1818.
0:23:48 > 0:23:51- Wow!- The full title,
0:23:51 > 0:23:54Frankenstein - Or The Modern Prometheus. Jane Eyre was written
0:23:54 > 0:23:58under Charlotte Bronte's pseudonym, Currer Bell.
0:23:58 > 0:24:01It was first published in 1847.
0:24:01 > 0:24:04Our Mutual Friend was written by Charles Dickens and first
0:24:04 > 0:24:10published in serial form, 1864-65, and in book form in 1865.
0:24:10 > 0:24:14It was Dickens' last completed novel.
0:24:14 > 0:24:17OK, panel, tough luck on that. Shabs, tough luck.
0:24:17 > 0:24:19I'm afraid no money added to the price pot,
0:24:19 > 0:24:22but still one more picture question to go in this round.
0:24:22 > 0:24:23Here it comes.
0:24:40 > 0:24:45- Let's see what the panel has to say. - And that means?
0:24:45 > 0:24:48And that means I think I know what the answer is.
0:24:48 > 0:24:49Ah! He thinks he does.
0:24:49 > 0:24:52OK, panel, your debate starts now.
0:24:52 > 0:24:55- OK.- I've never seen a Batman film.
0:24:55 > 0:24:59- Excellent.- And neither have I. - Excellent.- Really?- Never seen one.
0:24:59 > 0:25:03- Just not my bag, I'm afraid. - I have seen them all.- Have you?
0:25:03 > 0:25:05Which did you see first?
0:25:05 > 0:25:08- Absolutely no idea. - So they're rom-coms, right?
0:25:08 > 0:25:10LAUGHTER
0:25:10 > 0:25:16I've got vague... Michael Keaton had a ridiculously low voice.
0:25:16 > 0:25:19Again, that's very unhelpful, but I remember he had a low...
0:25:19 > 0:25:21It's a detail.
0:25:21 > 0:25:23I've got memories of Val Kilmer doing Batman years ago.
0:25:23 > 0:25:27My gut instinct from looking at this is it seems like an awfully
0:25:27 > 0:25:32long time since Val Kilmer was... would be the kind of person that
0:25:32 > 0:25:35- got one of these enormous roles. - I'm with you.
0:25:35 > 0:25:38Again, I've seen them all, but I can't remember.
0:25:38 > 0:25:40I think Val Kilmer, probably, I would say, the earliest.
0:25:40 > 0:25:43Again, if Shabs has got a better idea than us, that'd be great.
0:25:43 > 0:25:45Clooney the latest, do you think?
0:25:45 > 0:25:47Well, again, looking at the picture...
0:25:47 > 0:25:52- I don't remember him ever being... - He was quite funny as Batman.
0:25:52 > 0:25:54I think, based on no knowledge, never seen a film,
0:25:54 > 0:25:57I'd put Kilmer, Keaton and then Clooney.
0:25:57 > 0:26:00Well, listen, last time, you put them in order of the most
0:26:00 > 0:26:02attractive. Do you want to give that...?
0:26:02 > 0:26:04It worked with the tennis players.
0:26:04 > 0:26:07So we're going to go there, there and there, do we think? Do we?
0:26:07 > 0:26:11- I don't know.- Kilmer, Keaton, Clooney?- Never seen one.
0:26:11 > 0:26:14- What order would you do?- This. - You're happy with that?- Yeah.
0:26:14 > 0:26:19I think together we've produced an incredible answer for you, Shabs,
0:26:19 > 0:26:23and we're going to go with Val Kilmer first to play Batman,
0:26:23 > 0:26:27Michael Keaton and his deep voice second to play Batman,
0:26:27 > 0:26:30and the last fella we're going to go with is gorgeous George.
0:26:31 > 0:26:33Dan claims they've gone for an incredible answer,
0:26:33 > 0:26:39in the true sense of the word incredible, ie, maybe not credible.
0:26:39 > 0:26:42Prior to the discussion, from the panel, I would've said
0:26:42 > 0:26:47Michael, Val, then George,
0:26:47 > 0:26:49but I am going to go with the panel's decision.
0:26:49 > 0:26:54- You're going to go with the panel? - I'm going to go with the panel.- OK.
0:26:54 > 0:26:57For £300, is that the correct order?
0:26:59 > 0:27:01(I'm holding my breath.)
0:27:02 > 0:27:08It's the wrong order! Shabs, let's have a look.
0:27:08 > 0:27:11- The correct order...- Oh, Shabs.
0:27:11 > 0:27:15Oh! You should've gone with your first thought.
0:27:15 > 0:27:20Michael Keaton, then Val Kilmer, then George Clooney.
0:27:20 > 0:27:23Michael Keaton played Batman in 1989.
0:27:23 > 0:27:27He also played him again in 1992.
0:27:27 > 0:27:31Then Val Kilmer played the Caped Crusader in Batman Forever
0:27:31 > 0:27:35in 1995, and then George Clooney played him in Batman And Robin
0:27:35 > 0:27:40- in 1997 alongside Chris O'Donnell. - A collective apology.
0:27:40 > 0:27:41- Sorry.- There we go.
0:27:41 > 0:27:43Nothing for that one, Shabs.
0:27:43 > 0:27:45It means at the end of Round Two, you're on £900.
0:27:45 > 0:27:48APPLAUSE
0:27:50 > 0:27:54There's still £1,500 up for grabs as we play Round Three.
0:27:57 > 0:28:01OK, Shabs, in this round you will face questions that contain three
0:28:01 > 0:28:03statements, about a person, a place or a thing.
0:28:03 > 0:28:04Only one of them is true.
0:28:04 > 0:28:08We need you to find that true statement. Because it's the final
0:28:08 > 0:28:11round, £500 up for grabs for each correct answer, a possible 1,500,
0:28:11 > 0:28:14so plenty of chances to get your prize pot up.
0:28:14 > 0:28:16Here comes your first question.
0:28:37 > 0:28:39I'm going to go for a wild guess,
0:28:39 > 0:28:41and I'm going to go for...B.
0:28:42 > 0:28:44You think B.
0:28:44 > 0:28:47And by looking at the blank looks on our panel's faces,
0:28:47 > 0:28:49they may also be going for a blind guess.
0:28:49 > 0:28:51Your debate starts now.
0:28:51 > 0:28:53This is the purpose of this programme, isn't it?
0:28:53 > 0:28:55We've got to try and work this one out for Shabs.
0:28:55 > 0:28:57OK, let's go wild stab in the dark.
0:28:57 > 0:28:59Which one would you go for, just off the top of your...noggin?
0:28:59 > 0:29:02- I would go for B as well, 2061. - OK. Me too.
0:29:02 > 0:29:06I would as well and I think that's because the last time
0:29:06 > 0:29:08I heard that mentioned,
0:29:08 > 0:29:09Halley's Comet mentioned,
0:29:09 > 0:29:14I remember thinking I wouldn't be around.
0:29:14 > 0:29:17Unlikely to have appeared twice, perhaps, during anyone's lifetime.
0:29:17 > 0:29:20Yeah, unless you're ludicrously old, but then, I'm thinking about that,
0:29:20 > 0:29:24because maybe that's... And why it's named after him, yeah.
0:29:24 > 0:29:27- That's an awfully good point. - Because he was the first person
0:29:27 > 0:29:29to see it and then the second time, he named it.
0:29:29 > 0:29:32- "I've seen it twice, it's mine." - That's terribly logical.
0:29:32 > 0:29:36Halley's Comet is in the Bayeux Tapestry, isn't it?
0:29:36 > 0:29:40- Oh, hello. Here we go. Where has that come from?- And that's...
0:29:40 > 0:29:43Is that not around 1066?
0:29:43 > 0:29:46- That would mean it's not right, then.- Yeah.
0:29:46 > 0:29:50If it is, then that was before, so that wouldn't be right. Ah-ha!
0:29:50 > 0:29:54So we can discount for actual historical reasons rather than
0:29:54 > 0:29:55just the fact that it's a round year.
0:29:55 > 0:29:58It doesn't say, "It first appeared," it just says, "It appeared."
0:29:58 > 0:30:00Oh, yeah, that's true.
0:30:00 > 0:30:02Often, my issue is reading the question.
0:30:02 > 0:30:03I...
0:30:03 > 0:30:07I think that the first one seems a bit strange to me.
0:30:07 > 0:30:09I still suggest that...
0:30:09 > 0:30:12- I think that our gut instinct was... - Yeah, go with the gut.
0:30:12 > 0:30:15..was B, and we...
0:30:15 > 0:30:18- The triple triangle of power... - Once that comes, you can't...
0:30:18 > 0:30:20And Shabs thought that, too.
0:30:20 > 0:30:22The square of destiny.
0:30:22 > 0:30:23LAUGHTER
0:30:23 > 0:30:25We form... Listen, that... You've convinced me.
0:30:25 > 0:30:29- The square of certainty.- Yes.
0:30:29 > 0:30:32The square of certainty and destiny has spoken, Shabs.
0:30:32 > 0:30:35And we think, along with you, that Halley's Comet
0:30:35 > 0:30:37will appear next in 2061.
0:30:39 > 0:30:41What do you think?
0:30:41 > 0:30:43I'm going to go with my gut feeling.
0:30:43 > 0:30:46And I'm going to stick to B and agree with the... What was it?
0:30:46 > 0:30:47The square...?
0:30:47 > 0:30:50- The square of certainty. - The square of certainty.
0:30:50 > 0:30:52- So you're going with your gut? - Going with my gut.
0:30:52 > 0:30:54You're going with the panel,
0:30:54 > 0:30:57even though the panel have got the last two questions wrong?
0:30:57 > 0:30:59- I'm going to go with B. - OK, you're going with B.
0:31:00 > 0:31:04It is expected to appear again around 2061.
0:31:05 > 0:31:08For £500, is that the true statement?
0:31:11 > 0:31:14CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:31:14 > 0:31:16The square...has spoken!
0:31:16 > 0:31:18We're back!
0:31:20 > 0:31:23- Very well played. Very well played. - We really needed that.
0:31:23 > 0:31:24We needed that so much.
0:31:24 > 0:31:28The comet returns roughly every 75 years.
0:31:28 > 0:31:31It famously appeared in 1066
0:31:31 > 0:31:34and IS depicted in the Bayeux Tapestry.
0:31:34 > 0:31:36Where on earth did that come from?
0:31:36 > 0:31:37Good knowledge.
0:31:37 > 0:31:40But wasn't seen again until 1145.
0:31:40 > 0:31:43We're back on track, £500 into the prize pot, you are up to £1,400.
0:31:43 > 0:31:45APPLAUSE
0:31:49 > 0:31:52OK, here comes your next question, for £500.
0:32:18 > 0:32:20Let's see what the panel have to say.
0:32:20 > 0:32:22Let's see what the panel have to say about this.
0:32:22 > 0:32:24Panel, can you remember the '90s?
0:32:24 > 0:32:26Your debate starts now.
0:32:27 > 0:32:29I loved Oasis.
0:32:29 > 0:32:30I did love Oasis.
0:32:30 > 0:32:32I had a bit of time for Blur as well.
0:32:32 > 0:32:34Remember they had that big chart battle
0:32:34 > 0:32:36and Blur won - Country House was number one?
0:32:36 > 0:32:40Hang on, "Blur had more UK number one singles than them..."
0:32:40 > 0:32:42See, that seems more feasible,
0:32:42 > 0:32:45because Blur, I think, were just more prolific
0:32:45 > 0:32:48and went on for longer,
0:32:48 > 0:32:51and didn't fall out with each other.
0:32:51 > 0:32:53- That's a good point.- Let's see - Country House, Charming Man...
0:32:53 > 0:32:56- You could go through loads of them from Blur.- Girls...- Yeah.- Hang on.
0:32:56 > 0:33:00The third one, unless I am being very silly,
0:33:00 > 0:33:02I can't think of anything that's an anagram.
0:33:02 > 0:33:04I can't.
0:33:04 > 0:33:07I always thought, was it Cigarettes and Alcohol, they had?
0:33:07 > 0:33:10- I don't know. That's definitely not, is it?- No.
0:33:10 > 0:33:11They don't speak at all to each other now.
0:33:11 > 0:33:13I'd have thought that I'd have heard
0:33:13 > 0:33:15something about them having birthdays
0:33:15 > 0:33:17and not speaking to each other on their birthdays.
0:33:17 > 0:33:19- Yeah.- Yeah, that would have come up.
0:33:19 > 0:33:20OK. All right.
0:33:20 > 0:33:24By a method of sort of strange musical deduction,
0:33:24 > 0:33:26I think we are going to go with Blur
0:33:26 > 0:33:28had more UK number one singles
0:33:28 > 0:33:31than Oasis in the 1990s.
0:33:31 > 0:33:32We believe that to be the case.
0:33:35 > 0:33:37OK, the panel going for A.
0:33:37 > 0:33:39- Let's go for A. - You're going to go for A?
0:33:39 > 0:33:41- Let's go for A.- OK.
0:33:42 > 0:33:45Did Blur have more UK number one singles
0:33:45 > 0:33:48than Oasis in the '90s, for £500?
0:33:48 > 0:33:50The correct statement is...
0:33:54 > 0:33:55GROANING
0:33:55 > 0:33:56Oh, we couldn't do the anagram.
0:33:56 > 0:33:59- You couldn't do the anagram. - What was it?
0:33:59 > 0:34:00Supersonic.
0:34:00 > 0:34:02- Supersonic?- Oh, no.- Supersonic!
0:34:02 > 0:34:04PANEL LAUGH
0:34:04 > 0:34:07Noel was born on 29 May, 1967,
0:34:07 > 0:34:11Liam was born on 21 September, 1972.
0:34:11 > 0:34:14Oasis had four UK number ones.
0:34:14 > 0:34:16Blur, despite winning that head-to-head battle
0:34:16 > 0:34:19with Country House, they only had two number ones...
0:34:19 > 0:34:22- They weren't number ones. - ..in the 1990s.
0:34:22 > 0:34:24OK, guys, I'm afraid nothing for that.
0:34:24 > 0:34:28No money there. Still £500 up for grabs.
0:34:28 > 0:34:30Here is your final question of this round.
0:34:51 > 0:34:53- SHABS:- One thing I can say is, I don't think B's right.
0:34:53 > 0:34:55So let's see what these guys have to say.
0:34:55 > 0:34:57OK, you think you can eliminate B.
0:34:57 > 0:34:59Panel, anything on this?
0:34:59 > 0:35:00Your debate starts now.
0:35:02 > 0:35:04My confidence has completely gone.
0:35:04 > 0:35:05Would...?
0:35:05 > 0:35:09They all sound absolutely feasible.
0:35:09 > 0:35:10OK, why would there be no W?
0:35:10 > 0:35:14Imagine if you are... Does it feel too much like an M?
0:35:14 > 0:35:17- But Braille isn't just a representation of...- No.
0:35:17 > 0:35:20Is it completely different symbols?
0:35:20 > 0:35:22I don't really know.
0:35:22 > 0:35:23I've seen it many times.
0:35:24 > 0:35:25- Yeah...- I'm trying to think if
0:35:25 > 0:35:28I've seen a hand going that way or that way.
0:35:28 > 0:35:30- You and I both did that instinctively.- Yeah, right-to-left.
0:35:32 > 0:35:35Was it Louis Braille - was that the name of the...?
0:35:35 > 0:35:37- I think so. - Yes, that sounds right.
0:35:37 > 0:35:39- OK, I've got vague...- Hang on.
0:35:39 > 0:35:42I don't want to throw anything out there that makes me look stupid.
0:35:42 > 0:35:44- Wasn't Louis Braille...? - Was it not?
0:35:44 > 0:35:46Did he not have sight impairment?
0:35:46 > 0:35:48- That's what I'm thinking.- Yes.
0:35:48 > 0:35:53- I'm thinking that Braille himself wasn't 20-20.- Yeah.
0:35:53 > 0:35:57- I'm glad you had that same thought, cos that was in my head.- Yeah.
0:35:57 > 0:35:59- Was he French or was he English? - I think he's French.
0:35:59 > 0:36:00So we think he might be French.
0:36:00 > 0:36:03So why would the French not like Ws?
0:36:03 > 0:36:05Yeah, good point.
0:36:05 > 0:36:08When I've seen people reading Braille, it is kind of like that.
0:36:08 > 0:36:10But then, do they...? Is it like that?
0:36:10 > 0:36:12Is it both ways? What do you think?
0:36:12 > 0:36:14Why would you...? Why would you do it that way?
0:36:14 > 0:36:17Is it because most people are right-handed,
0:36:17 > 0:36:20so they would start there, rather than going there all the time?
0:36:20 > 0:36:23They would start where it was more logical?
0:36:23 > 0:36:27- I think we are less keen on the 20-20 vision, aren't we?- OK.- Yes.
0:36:27 > 0:36:31And I think the one we all went for was right-to-left.
0:36:31 > 0:36:33OK, from the pit of no knowledge,
0:36:33 > 0:36:35we think the middle one -
0:36:35 > 0:36:38Braille in English is read right-to-left
0:36:38 > 0:36:43- is the one that you should, perhaps, go for...- Possibly.- ..or avoid.
0:36:46 > 0:36:49There is a clue in the panel's level of certainty there,
0:36:49 > 0:36:50I think, Shabs.
0:36:50 > 0:36:53Anything in there to fire something for you?
0:36:53 > 0:36:55I'm going to take a risk and agree with the panel,
0:36:55 > 0:36:58because, again, it may sound silly, but it's different.
0:36:58 > 0:37:00So I'm going to go with B.
0:37:00 > 0:37:02OK, you're going with the panel.
0:37:02 > 0:37:06You think that Braille in English is read right-to-left.
0:37:08 > 0:37:09It's the final chance to put some money
0:37:09 > 0:37:11in the prize pot. For £500...
0:37:12 > 0:37:14..the correct statement is...
0:37:19 > 0:37:20AUDIENCE GASPS
0:37:20 > 0:37:23GROANING The correct statement was C.
0:37:23 > 0:37:27There was no W in the original system.
0:37:27 > 0:37:31Louis Braille lost his sight in a childhood accident.
0:37:31 > 0:37:33It was Louis Braille who invented Braille.
0:37:33 > 0:37:36There was no W in the French language
0:37:36 > 0:37:38when Braille came up with the code.
0:37:38 > 0:37:41Sorry, panel. Sorry, Shabs.
0:37:41 > 0:37:43At the end of our final round,
0:37:43 > 0:37:45your prize pot is up to £1,400.
0:37:49 > 0:37:52So it's still a tidy little sum.
0:37:52 > 0:37:54One question between you and that money.
0:37:54 > 0:37:57If you manage to win the Final Debate today, what do you think?
0:37:57 > 0:37:59What you fancy spending that money on?
0:37:59 > 0:38:01See, I have recently moved home.
0:38:01 > 0:38:03And...
0:38:03 > 0:38:04I want a new fish tank.
0:38:04 > 0:38:06LAUGHTER OK.
0:38:06 > 0:38:08How big would you like that fish tank to be?
0:38:08 > 0:38:10PANEL LAUGHS
0:38:10 > 0:38:13Think small, Shabs. Think small.
0:38:13 > 0:38:16- DAN:- It's minimalist. Minimalist fish tank.
0:38:16 > 0:38:18Less is more with these things.
0:38:18 > 0:38:21There is only one question between you and that cash.
0:38:21 > 0:38:23It is, of course, the Final Debate.
0:38:23 > 0:38:25In the Final Debate, there are six possible answers.
0:38:25 > 0:38:26Only three are correct.
0:38:26 > 0:38:29We need you to get all three of those answers.
0:38:29 > 0:38:31However, you won't be on your own,
0:38:31 > 0:38:35because you will have one of these fine intellects
0:38:35 > 0:38:36to help you on your quest.
0:38:36 > 0:38:39Will you be going supersonic with Grace?
0:38:39 > 0:38:41Will you be looking back in anger with Dan?
0:38:41 > 0:38:44Or do you want to roll with it and choose Jennie?
0:38:44 > 0:38:45I've made my decision.
0:38:47 > 0:38:49And the person that I'm going with...
0:38:49 > 0:38:50is...
0:38:50 > 0:38:51Dan.
0:38:51 > 0:38:54- Dan, would you please join us for the Final Debate?- Come on!
0:38:58 > 0:39:00OK, Dan, Shabs has chosen you. He is ready to go.
0:39:00 > 0:39:03- Come on, Shabs, we can do this. - This is the confidence we need.
0:39:03 > 0:39:05We've had a bad sort of 60 minutes,
0:39:05 > 0:39:07- we're going to drive through at the end here.- OK.
0:39:07 > 0:39:09Anything you're hoping to see up there?
0:39:09 > 0:39:10Anything you're hoping to avoid?
0:39:10 > 0:39:13- The subject of Braille, something to do with that.- Yes.
0:39:13 > 0:39:16- Oasis hits. - I'm hoping to see some sport.
0:39:16 > 0:39:18OK. Well, look, it is the Final Debate,
0:39:18 > 0:39:20so you do get two categories to choose from.
0:39:20 > 0:39:22Have a look at this.
0:39:22 > 0:39:24Tell me what you fancy between...
0:39:29 > 0:39:32OK, if I get Footballers wrong, this will be bad.
0:39:32 > 0:39:34I'm assuming you're going for Composers(?)
0:39:34 > 0:39:37- LAUGHTER - His choice. Shabs' choice.
0:39:37 > 0:39:38We're going to go for Footballers.
0:39:40 > 0:39:43Absolutely no pressure, Dan Walker(!)
0:39:43 > 0:39:44- Come on.- OK, here we go.
0:39:44 > 0:39:47- Think about the fish tank. - Think about fish tank.
0:39:47 > 0:39:49Best of luck. £1,400 up for grabs,
0:39:49 > 0:39:5045 seconds on the clock,
0:39:50 > 0:39:54here comes your Final Debate question about Footballers.
0:40:06 > 0:40:07Yep.
0:40:08 > 0:40:10No.
0:40:10 > 0:40:1148.
0:40:12 > 0:40:14Possibly.
0:40:14 > 0:40:17Your Final Debate starts now.
0:40:17 > 0:40:18OK, Gary Lineker, gone, 48.
0:40:18 > 0:40:21Ryan Giggs didn't get 50 for Wales.
0:40:21 > 0:40:22Robbie Keane, definitely.
0:40:26 > 0:40:28- Any thoughts?- None.
0:40:28 > 0:40:30I'm... So we need three?
0:40:30 > 0:40:31We need three answers.
0:40:31 > 0:40:32Robbie Keane is a definite.
0:40:32 > 0:40:34- Gary Lineker?- No, 48.
0:40:34 > 0:40:37Didier Drogba, Ivory Coast,
0:40:37 > 0:40:38- I would imagine, yes.- OK.
0:40:38 > 0:40:39Robbie, Didier...
0:40:39 > 0:40:41Robbie Keane, Didier Drogba...
0:40:41 > 0:40:4220 seconds.
0:40:42 > 0:40:44And then, it's one of Thierry Henry and Diego Maradona.
0:40:44 > 0:40:46I don't think Thierry Henry
0:40:46 > 0:40:48scored 50 for...France...
0:40:50 > 0:40:52..because... No, I don't think.
0:40:52 > 0:40:53I think it's probably Maradona.
0:40:53 > 0:40:54So we've got Maradona,
0:40:54 > 0:40:56- Keane and Drogba.- I think.- OK.
0:40:56 > 0:40:59OK? If I'm wrong, then I'm just going to walk off.
0:41:01 > 0:41:03OK, time is up.
0:41:03 > 0:41:04Three answers.
0:41:04 > 0:41:06Maradona, Keane and Drogba.
0:41:08 > 0:41:09OK, you know how this works, guys.
0:41:09 > 0:41:12We need all three of these to be correct.
0:41:12 > 0:41:15So you were most confident about...?
0:41:15 > 0:41:18- It was Keane.- OK, Robbie Keane.
0:41:18 > 0:41:21Has Robbie Keane scored 50 or more international goals?
0:41:21 > 0:41:22He's got loads.
0:41:23 > 0:41:25Come on, Shabs. Come on. Come on.
0:41:25 > 0:41:26Come on!
0:41:29 > 0:41:31He has! APPLAUSE
0:41:31 > 0:41:32Of course he has.
0:41:32 > 0:41:34- Let's continue the cuddle. - Come on, come on.
0:41:34 > 0:41:37Robbie Keane, Ireland's top scorer, 68 goals.
0:41:37 > 0:41:39Next one you were going for?
0:41:39 > 0:41:42- Let's go Drogba.- Let's go Drogba. - Let's go Drogba.- OK.
0:41:42 > 0:41:45You thought Drogba from the Ivory Coast
0:41:45 > 0:41:49possibly has scored 50 or more international goals.
0:41:49 > 0:41:52- We need this to be correct in order to stay in the game.- Come on, DD!
0:41:52 > 0:41:55Come on. Come on!
0:41:57 > 0:41:59Didier!
0:42:00 > 0:42:02Yes! APPLAUSE
0:42:04 > 0:42:08He has scored 65 goals for the Ivory Coast.
0:42:08 > 0:42:09- OK.- Right.
0:42:09 > 0:42:11So you completely discounted Gary Lineker,
0:42:11 > 0:42:13you completely discounted Ryan Giggs.
0:42:14 > 0:42:16You weren't sure about Thierry Henry,
0:42:16 > 0:42:18and you plumped for Maradona.
0:42:18 > 0:42:20It's all on this one.
0:42:20 > 0:42:22For £1,400...
0:42:24 > 0:42:28..has Diego Maradona scored 50 or more international goals?
0:42:30 > 0:42:31- DAN:- Diego, my friend.
0:42:31 > 0:42:33Come on!
0:42:38 > 0:42:39GROANING
0:42:39 > 0:42:41It's the wrong answer.
0:42:42 > 0:42:43- DAN:- Is it Thierry?
0:42:44 > 0:42:46- Dan, Shabs.- Oh, no.
0:42:46 > 0:42:51Maradona only scored 34 goals for Argentina.
0:42:51 > 0:42:52It was close.
0:42:52 > 0:42:54The correct answer was...
0:42:54 > 0:42:56It was Thierry Henry.
0:42:58 > 0:42:59- DAN:- Dear me!
0:42:59 > 0:43:01Thierry Henry scored 51 goals for France.
0:43:01 > 0:43:03Did he really? Oh, dear.
0:43:03 > 0:43:07One of those goals was after handling a ball against Ireland,
0:43:07 > 0:43:09which kept Ireland from going to the World Cup.
0:43:09 > 0:43:12We'll now have a minute's silence for that.
0:43:12 > 0:43:14LAUGHTER
0:43:14 > 0:43:17- I'm so, so sorry, Shabs. - I'm sorry.- Not at all.
0:43:17 > 0:43:18It was a tricky question.
0:43:18 > 0:43:19Very well played.
0:43:19 > 0:43:22Thanks for coming in, Shabs. Give it up one more time for Shabs.
0:43:22 > 0:43:23- Thank you, guys. - APPLAUSE
0:43:25 > 0:43:27- Thank you.- Thank you very much.
0:43:27 > 0:43:28That is it for Debatable.
0:43:28 > 0:43:31There is just about time for me to thank our fantastic panel today,
0:43:31 > 0:43:34to Dan Walker, to Grace Dent and Jennie Bond.
0:43:34 > 0:43:36APPLAUSE
0:43:36 > 0:43:38I do hope you have enjoyed watching.
0:43:38 > 0:43:40We will see you next time for more heated debates.
0:43:40 > 0:43:41For now, it's goodbye from me.