0:00:12 > 0:00:15Hello, and welcome to Debatable, where today one player must answer
0:00:15 > 0:00:18a series of tricky questions to try and walk away with a jackpot
0:00:18 > 0:00:22of over £3,000. But, as always, they are not on their own.
0:00:22 > 0:00:25They will have a panel of well-known faces debating their way
0:00:25 > 0:00:28to the answers. Will they be all talk and no action?
0:00:28 > 0:00:32As always, that's debatable, so let's meet them.
0:00:32 > 0:00:35Chin-wagging their way to the answers today we have retired MP
0:00:35 > 0:00:38and writer Ann Widdecombe, we have broadcaster Rick Edwards,
0:00:38 > 0:00:40and TV presenter Rav Wilding.
0:00:40 > 0:00:42APPLAUSE
0:00:45 > 0:00:48Rick, you're in the centre chair, you are taking hold of this panel.
0:00:48 > 0:00:51- I certainly am. - It's a good panel, I think.
0:00:51 > 0:00:52- It's a great panel. - It is a good panel.
0:00:52 > 0:00:55- I'm thrilled. - So, you've done the show before.
0:00:55 > 0:00:58- I have.- And, I mean, you were the full package.
0:00:58 > 0:01:00You had the brains, you had the looks, you had the charisma,
0:01:00 > 0:01:04I mean, we're not putting any pressure on you here.
0:01:04 > 0:01:06I love the way he said, "You HAD the looks".
0:01:06 > 0:01:08- As if they've now gone. - I know, I know.
0:01:08 > 0:01:09Reminding me of a better time.
0:01:09 > 0:01:13We just want to know, Rick, is it still there?
0:01:13 > 0:01:15I wasn't entirely sure it was the first time.
0:01:15 > 0:01:17- Oh, it was.- I'm thrilled to be asked back, clearly.
0:01:17 > 0:01:19It very much was, and welcome back, Ann.
0:01:19 > 0:01:21Thank you, thank you.
0:01:21 > 0:01:24Now, in a Strictly way, what are you going to be bringing to the dance?
0:01:24 > 0:01:28Well, I shan't be bringing any knowledge of pop or sport.
0:01:28 > 0:01:30If such questions were to come up,
0:01:30 > 0:01:32you go with the answer I do not give.
0:01:32 > 0:01:33- Yes. - Noted.
0:01:33 > 0:01:35Noted. Noted, Rav?
0:01:35 > 0:01:37- So, Rav, of course, a former policeman.- Mm-hm.
0:01:37 > 0:01:40You're going to be here to oversee things, keep things right.
0:01:40 > 0:01:41Well, let's try.
0:01:41 > 0:01:44- Let's try.- I think I'm going to have my work cut out, though.
0:01:44 > 0:01:49But, yeah, law and order is probably going to be one of the strengths,
0:01:49 > 0:01:53- if any. - That is our fully formed panel.
0:01:53 > 0:01:57Let's meet today's contestant - it is Dave from Weston-super-Mare.
0:01:57 > 0:02:00APPLAUSE
0:02:00 > 0:02:01- How you doing? - Very good.
0:02:01 > 0:02:03- Welcome to the show. - Thank you.
0:02:03 > 0:02:06- Tell us a little bit about yourself. - Right, well, my name is Dave,
0:02:06 > 0:02:09I'm a retired bank manager from Weston-super-Mare,
0:02:09 > 0:02:13I've got two grown-up daughters and, having retired,
0:02:13 > 0:02:16I'm now trying to do as much travelling as I can possibly do.
0:02:16 > 0:02:18So what do you do in your spare time?
0:02:18 > 0:02:21Right, I enjoy football.
0:02:21 > 0:02:23I was a football referee.
0:02:24 > 0:02:26Please don't hold that against me, guys!
0:02:26 > 0:02:29And now I'm too old to run around the football field,
0:02:29 > 0:02:33I sit in the stand and assess other referees and coach them so that
0:02:33 > 0:02:35hopefully they can progress their careers through.
0:02:35 > 0:02:39So, our panel here, if any of our panel step out of line,
0:02:39 > 0:02:42what's it going to be? Is it going to just be a straight red?
0:02:42 > 0:02:43Is it going to be a talking to?
0:02:43 > 0:02:46Or are you going to do that thing where they wave them away?
0:02:46 > 0:02:48Wave them away, no, I think it will just be...
0:02:48 > 0:02:50just be a gentle talking to to start with,
0:02:50 > 0:02:54and if they step out of line then we may have to use the stepped approach
0:02:54 > 0:02:56- with the captain. - OK, you are going to have to keep a
0:02:56 > 0:02:59referee's eye on them because you can only choose one of them to play
0:02:59 > 0:03:02- the Final Debate at the end of the show.- Yes, right.
0:03:02 > 0:03:05- Ready to play?- Excellent, yes.- OK, here we go, let's play Round One.
0:03:08 > 0:03:10This round is multiple choice, Dave.
0:03:10 > 0:03:13Each question contains four possible answers,
0:03:13 > 0:03:17four questions in this round, each correct answer is worth £200.
0:03:17 > 0:03:20A possible £800 up for grabs.
0:03:20 > 0:03:22So the best of luck to you, best of luck to the panel,
0:03:22 > 0:03:24here's your first question.
0:03:43 > 0:03:49Right. Well, I don't think that it would be a brown bear
0:03:49 > 0:03:53or a wolf because they are a little bit too vicious to be let out
0:03:53 > 0:03:55into Scotland, so...
0:03:55 > 0:03:58I mean, you've clearly not had a night out in Glasgow.
0:03:58 > 0:04:01No, I haven't actually. Without knowing the answer,
0:04:01 > 0:04:05my leaning would be towards the Irish elk, but...
0:04:05 > 0:04:08OK, you're leaning towards the Irish elk in Scotland.
0:04:08 > 0:04:11Panel, let's see if you can shed some light on this.
0:04:11 > 0:04:12Your debate starts now.
0:04:12 > 0:04:16Well, I rather share the view that it won't be brown bears.
0:04:16 > 0:04:19I mean, would you like to meet a brown bear when you were walking in
0:04:19 > 0:04:21- the Scottish Highlands?- I'd absolutely love to, Ann,
0:04:21 > 0:04:25- but I don't...- From a distance! - Yeah.- That would be incredible.
0:04:25 > 0:04:27I feel like bears is...
0:04:27 > 0:04:31Just feels a bit too much of a push, doesn't it?
0:04:31 > 0:04:34- No, not bears.- Ann's convinced it isn't bears so we're going to
0:04:34 > 0:04:35- leave bears alone. - What about wolves?
0:04:35 > 0:04:39- Wolves.- Same? - The thing about wolves is, there
0:04:39 > 0:04:42have been conversations about the possibility of bringing wolves back
0:04:42 > 0:04:46to the British Isles, I know that, but I don't think it's happened.
0:04:46 > 0:04:49What's the normal habitat for a beaver, does anyone know?
0:04:49 > 0:04:51- River.- River. - Building dams.
0:04:51 > 0:04:53So, Scotland, it would suit all of that?
0:04:53 > 0:04:56- It would. Yeah, yeah, yeah.- Have they ever been extinct in Scotland?
0:04:56 > 0:04:58- Woods, rivers? - I think...
0:04:58 > 0:05:00- Hmm. - This is a reintroduction.
0:05:00 > 0:05:03- That is a pertinent question. - I don't think they've been extinct.
0:05:03 > 0:05:06So you think beavers are there but they've always been there?
0:05:06 > 0:05:08Well, that's my gut instinct. I don't know that.
0:05:08 > 0:05:11I think I might just go with Irish elk.
0:05:11 > 0:05:15Yeah, but I sort of hate to go for Irish elk and it be wrong and then
0:05:15 > 0:05:19Patrick to say, "It is an IRISH elk, we're talking about Scotland".
0:05:19 > 0:05:22- And for us to go... - Which is a very good point.
0:05:22 > 0:05:25- You know what I mean? - I wouldn't possibly say that!
0:05:25 > 0:05:28I think you would be delighted if we said Irish elk and it was wrong.
0:05:28 > 0:05:30And you say Irish elk.
0:05:30 > 0:05:31I would go beavers.
0:05:31 > 0:05:32- Beavers. - Beavers.
0:05:34 > 0:05:35Butthead?
0:05:36 > 0:05:38Beg your pardon? Beavers.
0:05:38 > 0:05:41- Beavers? - Beavers.
0:05:41 > 0:05:45We are going to go with beavers.
0:05:45 > 0:05:49OK, I'm assuming that Butthead was an elk reference?
0:05:49 > 0:05:52It was. It was very clever.
0:05:52 > 0:05:54Didn't like it, didn't like it at all.
0:05:54 > 0:05:58I'm going to stick with my thought and go Irish elk on this one because
0:05:58 > 0:06:02there's a little bit of uncertainty in the panel on it, so...
0:06:02 > 0:06:03OK.
0:06:04 > 0:06:07For £200, the correct answer is...
0:06:13 > 0:06:15..beavers.
0:06:15 > 0:06:16- Sorry, guys! - Oh!
0:06:16 > 0:06:18It's all right, Dave, it's not personal.
0:06:18 > 0:06:20- Sorry, sorry, sorry. - Beavers. Native Scottish beavers
0:06:20 > 0:06:24were hunted to extinction in the 16th century but Eurasian beavers
0:06:24 > 0:06:29from Norway were released in Argyll in 2009, and they will now be given
0:06:29 > 0:06:30protected status.
0:06:30 > 0:06:35The Irish elk, AKA the giant deer, have been extinct since the ice age.
0:06:37 > 0:06:40Dave, nothing for that. Still three questions in this round, though.
0:06:40 > 0:06:42Plenty of chances to get some cash on the board.
0:06:42 > 0:06:44Here's your next question.
0:07:00 > 0:07:05Absolutely no idea whatsoever. I'm very much open to persuasion
0:07:05 > 0:07:08- on this one.- OK. I'm sure our panel will bring their extensive
0:07:08 > 0:07:11food knowledge to this. Panel, your debate starts now.
0:07:11 > 0:07:13- Yeah. - No idea.
0:07:13 > 0:07:16OK, does anyone know what cornichon is?
0:07:16 > 0:07:18Yeah, cornichon is like a little gherkin.
0:07:18 > 0:07:24- OK.- So like a tiny, little pickled cucumber.- OK.
0:07:24 > 0:07:27On that basis, I feel like cornichon has already got another name
0:07:27 > 0:07:29- in gherkin.- In gherkin!- It can't have that many names,
0:07:29 > 0:07:32- it can't be greedy.- Yeah, garbanzo, what are we talking about?
0:07:32 > 0:07:34- Is that Italian, do you think? - It sounds Italian.
0:07:34 > 0:07:39Because the only alternative name on that board I know is cauliflower,
0:07:39 > 0:07:41which I believe is chou-fleur, is that right, in French?
0:07:41 > 0:07:43Ooh! I like it!
0:07:43 > 0:07:46But then, if we're talking Italian, that doesn't really help at all.
0:07:46 > 0:07:48No, it feels like you are just bragging about your French.
0:07:48 > 0:07:51- Yes, yes. - Courgette is zucchini.
0:07:51 > 0:07:53- Oh, very good. - Oh, well done.
0:07:53 > 0:07:56Which leaves us with chickpea but that garbanzo just doesn't sound
0:07:56 > 0:07:59- like...- It doesn't sound right. - It doesn't sound right, does it?
0:07:59 > 0:08:02- My gut instinct is no. - No, I'm with you, I'm with you.
0:08:02 > 0:08:04And it is a gut-based question.
0:08:04 > 0:08:06Ho, ho, ho(!)
0:08:06 > 0:08:08My gut would go chickpea, and I've got no idea why.
0:08:08 > 0:08:11OK. Well, do you know what?
0:08:11 > 0:08:13I can't offer anything else other than that.
0:08:13 > 0:08:18I don't know. I'm happy to go with chickpea but I don't know, Dave,
0:08:18 > 0:08:20and none of us know, actually.
0:08:20 > 0:08:25So we're going to go with my ill-informed gut
0:08:25 > 0:08:28and we're going to go, weirdly, with chickpea.
0:08:28 > 0:08:30So the key phrase in that debate, Dave,
0:08:30 > 0:08:33comes from Ann, when she says, "None of us know".
0:08:33 > 0:08:36"None of us know". Last time I went on my own and got nowhere,
0:08:36 > 0:08:39so let's go chickpea with the panel.
0:08:39 > 0:08:42OK, on the basis that when you went alone it didn't work out,
0:08:42 > 0:08:45you're going for chickpea, you're going with the panel.
0:08:45 > 0:08:48For £200, the correct answer is...
0:08:55 > 0:08:58- It is chickpea! - Oh, thanks, guys!
0:08:59 > 0:09:01Well done. Oh, well done, sir, brilliant.
0:09:01 > 0:09:03- Good knowledge, panel(!) - Never in doubt(!)
0:09:03 > 0:09:04Absolutely. Never in doubt.
0:09:04 > 0:09:07- Never in doubt, never in doubt.- It was a bit of a "gimme", I thought.
0:09:07 > 0:09:10Especially in North America, chickpeas are known as
0:09:10 > 0:09:12garbanzo or the garbanzo bean.
0:09:12 > 0:09:15- The term garbanzo comes from Spanish.- Spanish, yeah.
0:09:15 > 0:09:18Well played, Dave, though, it means you are up and running.
0:09:18 > 0:09:19£200 in the prize pot.
0:09:19 > 0:09:23- APPLAUSE - Thank you.
0:09:23 > 0:09:24Here comes your next one.
0:09:44 > 0:09:47I'm not a great horse racing fan.
0:09:47 > 0:09:51I know Party Politics won the Grand National.
0:09:51 > 0:09:53That's not a lot of help.
0:09:53 > 0:09:55OK, well, hold that thought.
0:09:55 > 0:09:59So, Party Politics, Ann, I'm sure we can get to the bottom of this.
0:09:59 > 0:10:01Your debate starts now.
0:10:01 > 0:10:03No, I do wish I'd known he was running
0:10:03 > 0:10:05because I would have backed him.
0:10:05 > 0:10:10Three of those years are general election years, but 1990 was also
0:10:10 > 0:10:12very famous for the fall of Thatcher.
0:10:12 > 0:10:16So if one's talking about memorably, I'm trying to link it to a
0:10:16 > 0:10:19party but, well, you know, any of them will do.
0:10:19 > 0:10:22- I... I...- '87 seems a long time ago for something...
0:10:22 > 0:10:26I remember hearing Party Politics from the commentator
0:10:26 > 0:10:28- shouting the name. - Do you?- OK.- Right.
0:10:28 > 0:10:30But whether it's a clip I've seen or whatever,
0:10:30 > 0:10:31but '87 does seem a long time ago.
0:10:31 > 0:10:35Yeah, so I think 1997 is too recent.
0:10:35 > 0:10:39I mean, this is so kind of vague but I sort of agree that '87 is a bit
0:10:39 > 0:10:43too early, and I think that '97 is a bit too recent,
0:10:43 > 0:10:46so I'd be going between 1990 and 1992.
0:10:46 > 0:10:48Do we know when, within the year,
0:10:48 > 0:10:50the Grand National is run and when the election would have been?
0:10:50 > 0:10:53- It is always run March, isn't it? - And what about the election?
0:10:53 > 0:10:56- I know the election, I think you will find, was May/June.- Hmm.
0:10:56 > 0:10:59- '90 would be... - '90 was the fall of Thatcher.
0:10:59 > 0:11:01The most memorable sort of political year because of the fall of
0:11:01 > 0:11:04- Thatcher, would you say?- But that didn't happen until November,
0:11:04 > 0:11:07and your interesting question is the Grand National would have been
0:11:07 > 0:11:09in March, and nobody knew it was going to happen in November,
0:11:09 > 0:11:11the fall of Thatcher, nobody knew it.
0:11:11 > 0:11:14Why was it memorable? Did he do something else in the race
0:11:14 > 0:11:16that was memorable?
0:11:16 > 0:11:18Ran faster than the other horses.
0:11:19 > 0:11:20- Thank you(!) - Yeah.
0:11:20 > 0:11:24Is that memorable? For the horse, yeah.
0:11:24 > 0:11:27With absolute confidence and conviction,
0:11:27 > 0:11:30we're going to go with 1990...
0:11:30 > 0:11:31two.
0:11:32 > 0:11:35You little tease there, Rick, I see what you did there!
0:11:36 > 0:11:39So, they've plumped for '92.
0:11:39 > 0:11:42Right, well, I can remember refereeing a football match in the
0:11:42 > 0:11:48pouring rain on Grand National day and I'm pretty sure that that was
0:11:48 > 0:11:51when Party Politics won,
0:11:51 > 0:11:55but when that was, I've no idea, but it would rule out 1987.
0:11:56 > 0:12:00So, on that basis, 1992.
0:12:00 > 0:12:02With the panel.
0:12:03 > 0:12:07Going for 1992 for the year that Party Politics won the National.
0:12:08 > 0:12:10Correct answer is...
0:12:16 > 0:12:18It was! 1992.
0:12:18 > 0:12:20Thank you, Rav. Thank you.
0:12:23 > 0:12:25What are you thanking these people for, Dave?
0:12:25 > 0:12:28Cos we got it right, Patrick!
0:12:28 > 0:12:30They've got three out of three - it's terrific.
0:12:31 > 0:12:35Ridden by Carl Llewellyn, the great Carl Llewellyn,
0:12:35 > 0:12:41Party Politics beat Romany King by 2.5 lengths in April 1992,
0:12:41 > 0:12:45just days before John Major's general election success
0:12:45 > 0:12:47in the 1992 general election.
0:12:47 > 0:12:51- Well played, Dave. It means your prize pot is up to £400.- Lucky...
0:12:51 > 0:12:54Thank you. APPLAUSE
0:12:54 > 0:12:57One more question to go on this round - here it comes.
0:13:15 > 0:13:19I've got a feeling that, because Vasco Da Gama was the first person
0:13:19 > 0:13:23to circumnavigate the world, that he might predate Sir Walter Raleigh.
0:13:25 > 0:13:28My inkling is towards Marco Polo
0:13:28 > 0:13:33but, again, I'm far from 100% certain.
0:13:33 > 0:13:35Don't worry - our panel will talk this through.
0:13:35 > 0:13:37They'll know nothing about this and they'll choose the right answer.
0:13:37 > 0:13:39Panel, your debate starts now.
0:13:40 > 0:13:44What have we got, then? Anyone... Anyone want to start us off?
0:13:44 > 0:13:47So, Christopher Columbus - was he the USA?
0:13:47 > 0:13:49Is that what he discovered?
0:13:49 > 0:13:51- He discovered America.- Yes. Yes.
0:13:51 > 0:13:54So, do we have a rough time when that would have happened?
0:13:54 > 0:13:56- 1492?- What?- As early as that?
0:13:56 > 0:14:00- It wasn't that early, surely? - 1492?- What about Marco Polo?
0:14:00 > 0:14:02He's Venetian.
0:14:02 > 0:14:03OK.
0:14:04 > 0:14:07And I think he's pretty early.
0:14:07 > 0:14:08Do we know what he discovered?
0:14:08 > 0:14:12- I think he's sort of roaming around in the Far East, isn't he?- OK.
0:14:12 > 0:14:17- Definitely before Raleigh's time.- Do we know what he discovered or did?
0:14:17 > 0:14:19- Sir Walter Raleigh?- Was he bringing back potatoes?
0:14:19 > 0:14:21He was bringing back potatoes and tobacco
0:14:21 > 0:14:23and things of that nature, yeah.
0:14:23 > 0:14:24And God bless him for it!
0:14:24 > 0:14:26- Yes, I agree.- Thank you, Walter.
0:14:26 > 0:14:28"Vasso" Da Gama?
0:14:28 > 0:14:30He's the one I'm much less certain about.
0:14:30 > 0:14:32Vasco Da Gama is...
0:14:32 > 0:14:35Well, Dave said that he was the first person
0:14:35 > 0:14:38- to circumnavigate the globe. - I don't think he did.
0:14:38 > 0:14:41- I didn't know that, but it sounds... - I don't think he did.- Sounds good.
0:14:41 > 0:14:45And I think that would have been the same sort of time as Columbus.
0:14:45 > 0:14:48- I'm going to go with Marco Polo, I think.- As the first?
0:14:48 > 0:14:52This is probably the most confident we've been - so beware, Dave.
0:14:52 > 0:14:55We would go for Marco Polo.
0:14:58 > 0:15:00Confidence from the panel.
0:15:00 > 0:15:01Indeed.
0:15:01 > 0:15:05I'm not so sure Vasco Da Gama was the first person to circumnavigate
0:15:05 > 0:15:07- the globe now...- Dave!- It might have been Ferdinand Magellan.
0:15:07 > 0:15:10But Vasco Da Gama was about that sort of time.
0:15:10 > 0:15:13So, yeah, Marco Polo.
0:15:13 > 0:15:14I think we're all agreed.
0:15:14 > 0:15:16- Yeah.- You've gone for Marco Polo.
0:15:17 > 0:15:21For £200, was Marco Polo born first?
0:15:30 > 0:15:32- He was!- Well done.
0:15:34 > 0:15:35Very nice work, Dave.
0:15:35 > 0:15:40Marco Polo was born in Venice around the year 1254.
0:15:40 > 0:15:44Christopher Columbus was born in Genoa in 1451.
0:15:44 > 0:15:47In fourteen hundred and ninety two, Columbus sailed the ocean blue.
0:15:47 > 0:15:50- Oh!- Well done.- Ah! - That's impressive!
0:15:50 > 0:15:52- That's impressive.- Well done.
0:15:52 > 0:15:56Vasco Da Gama was born in 1469 in Portugal
0:15:56 > 0:15:59and played centre of midfield for Benfica.
0:16:00 > 0:16:04Sir Walter Raleigh was born in the 1550s.
0:16:04 > 0:16:07So, er, very well played, panel. Very well done.
0:16:07 > 0:16:08- Well done.- Well worked out, Dave.
0:16:08 > 0:16:12It means at the end of Round One, your prize pot is up to £600.
0:16:12 > 0:16:14- Brilliant.- Thanks very much, guys.
0:16:15 > 0:16:18So, Dave, how do you think the panel's faring so far?
0:16:18 > 0:16:19Yeah, I think they're doing well.
0:16:19 > 0:16:22They've got a good amount of intuition in there as well.
0:16:22 > 0:16:25That's a very, very polite way of saying
0:16:25 > 0:16:29"not much knowledge at all but quite a bit of luck".
0:16:29 > 0:16:30OK, let's play Round Two.
0:16:33 > 0:16:36OK, Dave, Round Two is our picture round.
0:16:36 > 0:16:38We need you to place three pictures in the correct order.
0:16:38 > 0:16:41Three questions in this round, £300 for each correct answer.
0:16:41 > 0:16:44A possible £900 up for grabs.
0:16:44 > 0:16:46Here comes your first picture question.
0:17:02 > 0:17:05I've never, ever seen a Star Wars film.
0:17:05 > 0:17:06I know nothing about it at all
0:17:06 > 0:17:10but I believe Yoda is a character from Star Wars.
0:17:10 > 0:17:12What you need is someone who may have been a teenager
0:17:12 > 0:17:16around this time, in his bedroom, watching these films...
0:17:16 > 0:17:19Not looking at anybody in particular, Rick.
0:17:19 > 0:17:20Do you think I'm 45, Patrick?!
0:17:24 > 0:17:26Let's see if our panel can sort this out for you.
0:17:26 > 0:17:28Panel, your debate starts now.
0:17:28 > 0:17:30Ann, have you any ideas on this one?
0:17:30 > 0:17:32Well, I've seen all three.
0:17:32 > 0:17:34- OK.- Did you see them in chronological order?
0:17:34 > 0:17:37- No, I didn't.- Oh, that would've been really helpful.
0:17:37 > 0:17:42I remember Star Wars being very big at the end of the '70s
0:17:42 > 0:17:46and the reason I remember that was I fought the '79 election and I was
0:17:46 > 0:17:49taken by a friend to see The Empire Strikes Back afterwards.
0:17:49 > 0:17:52ET I remember coming out.
0:17:52 > 0:17:54I was a little kid and that was in 1982.
0:17:54 > 0:17:57- Oh, just bang on?- Well done.- Yeah, definitely.- Well done.- Definitely.
0:17:57 > 0:18:00- OK, so that's interesting. - And Gremlins was...- Gremlins,
0:18:00 > 0:18:03- I watched at the cinema. It was later.- A couple of years later.
0:18:03 > 0:18:06Well, it was also... Stephen Spielberg directed both
0:18:06 > 0:18:09and this was his next big one and that was in '84.
0:18:09 > 0:18:12- No, I think that Robert Zemeckis directed Gremlins.- Oh, did he?- Yeah.
0:18:12 > 0:18:15- Not that that's relevant. - But I do think the date is '84.
0:18:15 > 0:18:18In which case, our real question is,
0:18:18 > 0:18:22did this chap come in any of the prequels to
0:18:22 > 0:18:25Return Of The Jedi? I can't see him in Star Wars at all.
0:18:25 > 0:18:27I don't think he's in Star Wars, and I'm pretty...
0:18:27 > 0:18:29- He's not in Empire Strikes Back, is he?- Empire Strikes Back, no.
0:18:29 > 0:18:32I don't think he is, and if that was in '83,
0:18:32 > 0:18:34which I've got a feeling Return Of The Jedi was,
0:18:34 > 0:18:37- it would go right bang in the middle.- One, two, three.
0:18:37 > 0:18:39So we think that, don't we?
0:18:39 > 0:18:42The only thing is that I don't know when Return Of The Jedi came out.
0:18:42 > 0:18:45Was there a four-year gap between Empire Strikes Back
0:18:45 > 0:18:47- and Return Of The Jedi? - It's pretty long, isn't it?
0:18:47 > 0:18:49It is quite long.
0:18:49 > 0:18:52I was still living at home
0:18:52 > 0:18:56- when the Return Of The Jedi came out...- Oh!
0:18:56 > 0:18:58..because I went to see it '81-ish.
0:18:58 > 0:19:00- Oh!- OK.
0:19:00 > 0:19:02I mean, it would make sense to have...
0:19:02 > 0:19:05- It would be a long gap.- ..two-year, two-year, gaps.- So do you want to
0:19:05 > 0:19:08- swap them round?- So maybe we... Shall we swap?- Yeah, let's swap.- OK.
0:19:08 > 0:19:11That covers us just in case he does pop up in one of the earlier ones.
0:19:11 > 0:19:14- Yeah. Agreed.- Shall we do that?- OK. - Yeah, let's do that.
0:19:14 > 0:19:16- OK.- Now, I've got the earliest, right?
0:19:16 > 0:19:22Yes. So Yoda, ET, Gremlins
0:19:22 > 0:19:24is the order that we'd like to go for.
0:19:26 > 0:19:27So, Dave, this is a first.
0:19:27 > 0:19:30The panel bringing genuine knowledge to this question.
0:19:30 > 0:19:33- Faulty memories, probably. - What do you make of all this?
0:19:33 > 0:19:37Well, first of all, my wife will be shouting at the TV screen,
0:19:37 > 0:19:41saying the answer to this cos she loves all three of those films.
0:19:41 > 0:19:45Let's go with that order of Yoda, ET and Gremlins.
0:19:47 > 0:19:49OK, you're going with the panel.
0:19:49 > 0:19:52You believe Yoda was the one that appeared in a feature film first,
0:19:52 > 0:19:55then ET and then Gremlins.
0:19:55 > 0:19:58For £300, is that the correct order?
0:20:06 > 0:20:09- It is!- Oh!- Yes!
0:20:09 > 0:20:12- Well done, panel.- Excellent.- Yeah, we worked that out -
0:20:12 > 0:20:14- we didn't even guess. - Very pleased with that.
0:20:14 > 0:20:17- Very good last-minute swap.- Yeah. - Very good last-minute swap there.
0:20:17 > 0:20:19- Excellent.- Yoda first appeared
0:20:19 > 0:20:24- in the Star Wars film The Empire Strikes Back...- Ooh!- ..in 1980.
0:20:24 > 0:20:27So you were right to cover your bets by swapping that back.
0:20:27 > 0:20:32ET - 1982, Rav. Very well remembered.
0:20:32 > 0:20:35And then Gremlins from 1984.
0:20:35 > 0:20:37- Good childhood knowledge there. - Spot-on.
0:20:37 > 0:20:41- That's fantastic.- You never thought then...- Crop up all those years later!
0:20:41 > 0:20:43..that it would ever win Dave £300.
0:20:43 > 0:20:45- But it has!- Brilliant.
0:20:45 > 0:20:47Very well done, Dave.
0:20:47 > 0:20:50It means you're up to £900.
0:20:50 > 0:20:51Thank you. Thank you, panel.
0:20:52 > 0:20:54Here comes your next picture question.
0:21:11 > 0:21:17Right, OK. Emeli Sande probably won round about 2012 -
0:21:17 > 0:21:20she did the big Olympics show then.
0:21:20 > 0:21:24Adele - did she win when she had 19 or 21?
0:21:24 > 0:21:28And Ellie Goulding, little bit later, I would think.
0:21:28 > 0:21:31That's my initial thoughts.
0:21:31 > 0:21:35OK, panel, let's see if we can sort this out. Your debate starts now.
0:21:35 > 0:21:36THEY CHUCKLE
0:21:36 > 0:21:39- I've only ever heard of one of them...- Go on.- ..and that's Adele.
0:21:39 > 0:21:43- OK.- I haven't a clue who these people are so, Dave,
0:21:43 > 0:21:45- whatever I say, do the opposite. - Rick, I'm sorry, this is...
0:21:45 > 0:21:48- You're going to have to...- Yeah, it's all down to you.- Come on.
0:21:48 > 0:21:51- I think I've met them all, actually. - Do you know about the Brits?
0:21:51 > 0:21:53Cos we've got here the British female solo artist,
0:21:53 > 0:21:57- as opposed to best album or something like that.- Yeah.
0:21:57 > 0:22:00I suspect that our knowledge of the winners of Brit Awards is not
0:22:00 > 0:22:02- detailed enough.- We're not going to be good.
0:22:02 > 0:22:05We're going to be like, "Oh, was that best album?"
0:22:05 > 0:22:08So, the one thing that I definitely agreed with was...
0:22:08 > 0:22:13Emeli Sande had a huge year in 2012 and she was everywhere...
0:22:13 > 0:22:16- Yeah. OK.- ..to the point of, "Oh, you're here AGAIN, are you?"
0:22:16 > 0:22:1819 had come out before that...
0:22:18 > 0:22:20- Yeah.- ..I think. But did she win?
0:22:20 > 0:22:23- She must have won an award, surely. - I think she will have done.
0:22:23 > 0:22:25- Yeah.- And that would have been about 2-10, 2-11, something like that,
0:22:25 > 0:22:28- I think, for 19.- Yeah, so I would probably put Adele...
0:22:28 > 0:22:31- First.- ..before Emeli Sande.- That's going to be before Ellie Goulding.
0:22:31 > 0:22:33- It's got to be before. - Ellie Goulding.
0:22:33 > 0:22:36Ellie Goulding's been around for a while but it kind of really
0:22:36 > 0:22:38kicked off for her in the last few years, didn't it?
0:22:38 > 0:22:40- Yeah.- Ann's just head in hands here.
0:22:40 > 0:22:42I remember the Beatles, if that's any use.
0:22:42 > 0:22:45Oh, the Beatles were definitely... Have you got a Beatles card?
0:22:45 > 0:22:46They were definitely the earliest.
0:22:46 > 0:22:48So which one's...?
0:22:48 > 0:22:50- So it's...- This is newest.
0:22:50 > 0:22:52Adele. Yeah.
0:22:52 > 0:22:55- This is the first?- This is the order we go for -
0:22:55 > 0:22:58Adele first, Emeli Sande,
0:22:58 > 0:23:01Ellie Goulding. That's our order.
0:23:02 > 0:23:03That be their order, Dave.
0:23:04 > 0:23:07Been listening to what the panel are saying.
0:23:07 > 0:23:11Like the arguments that they've put forward, so I'm going to stick with
0:23:11 > 0:23:13my original thought and what the panel have said, as well,
0:23:13 > 0:23:16of Adele, Emeli Sande and Ellie Goulding.
0:23:17 > 0:23:19Good pop knowledge from yourself, Dave, I have to say.
0:23:19 > 0:23:23For £300, is that the correct order?
0:23:31 > 0:23:32It IS the correct order!
0:23:32 > 0:23:35- Well done. Well done.- So, well done.
0:23:35 > 0:23:41Well played, Dave. Adele first won in 2012 and then again in 2016.
0:23:41 > 0:23:45Emeli Sande first won in 2013 - you were right, guys -
0:23:45 > 0:23:48and Ellie Goulding not till 2014.
0:23:49 > 0:23:51Well played. Well done, Dave.
0:23:51 > 0:23:53It means you're now up to £1,200.
0:23:53 > 0:23:55Wow! Thank you.
0:23:58 > 0:24:00Here comes the final picture question.
0:24:17 > 0:24:19From the heaviest to the lightest.
0:24:19 > 0:24:21No idea again.
0:24:22 > 0:24:25I'll go the way it's up on the screen as an initial thought.
0:24:25 > 0:24:28OK, panel, Dave going for the order
0:24:28 > 0:24:29in which it sits - liver, spleen,
0:24:29 > 0:24:31and then a pair of lungs.
0:24:31 > 0:24:33What do you make of this? Your debate starts now.
0:24:33 > 0:24:35I tend to agree.
0:24:35 > 0:24:37I think the liver is the heaviest.
0:24:37 > 0:24:41Imagining yourself holding liver that you buy at the butcher's -
0:24:41 > 0:24:43it's actually quite heavy.
0:24:43 > 0:24:45I've never bought human liver, is the only thing.
0:24:45 > 0:24:49No, nor have I, but you understand entirely what I'm saying.
0:24:49 > 0:24:51It's lovely with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.
0:24:53 > 0:24:55The liver's solid, but the lungs -
0:24:55 > 0:24:57they are deceptively large
0:24:57 > 0:24:59when they're stretched out, because lungs can
0:24:59 > 0:25:01actually cover a tennis court.
0:25:01 > 0:25:02How do you know that?
0:25:03 > 0:25:05When I was watching ET and Gremlins...
0:25:05 > 0:25:07- Yeah.- ..years ago...
0:25:07 > 0:25:08I dissected some lungs.
0:25:08 > 0:25:10I was reading some fact books at the time.
0:25:12 > 0:25:17I still say lungs are the lightest but I am happy enough to...
0:25:17 > 0:25:18To be overruled.
0:25:18 > 0:25:21- Yeah, I...- Have you ever said that in your life, Ann?
0:25:21 > 0:25:22Very occasionally!
0:25:25 > 0:25:27I think the spleen is...
0:25:27 > 0:25:30small. I mean, it is going to be an issue. We just kind of...
0:25:30 > 0:25:33I guess that's the thing, isn't it? You just close your eyes
0:25:33 > 0:25:34and imagine cradling a spleen.
0:25:35 > 0:25:37It's not that heavy.
0:25:38 > 0:25:40- It's not that heavy. Now do it... - Cradle a pair of lungs.- Lungs.
0:25:43 > 0:25:45Similar weight - that's not helping.
0:25:46 > 0:25:49- Let's do a little swap here.- OK. Are we happy with that?- Yeah, OK,
0:25:49 > 0:25:53so the order we'll go for is liver heaviest, then the lungs,
0:25:53 > 0:25:56then the spleen. That is our order.
0:25:58 > 0:26:02OK, Dave, it looked like there was some science being added to this
0:26:02 > 0:26:05until Rick started to weigh an imaginary spleen.
0:26:07 > 0:26:09These guys have done so well so far.
0:26:09 > 0:26:13By the law of averages, I think we may be due a fall on this one.
0:26:13 > 0:26:15So I'm going to put the spleen back in the middle
0:26:15 > 0:26:16and the lungs at the end.
0:26:16 > 0:26:19- I think you're right.- Oh, OK!
0:26:19 > 0:26:21You're going against the panel.
0:26:21 > 0:26:22I'm going against them.
0:26:22 > 0:26:24OK, your original thought -
0:26:24 > 0:26:26liver, then the spleen, then the pair of lungs,
0:26:26 > 0:26:28from the heaviest to the lightest.
0:26:28 > 0:26:31For £300, is that the correct order?
0:26:41 > 0:26:42Oh!
0:26:42 > 0:26:45It's the wrong order, Dave.
0:26:45 > 0:26:47Let's have a look at the correct order.
0:26:47 > 0:26:49I bet they're right. I bet they're right.
0:26:49 > 0:26:52- Oh!- The panel were right.- Guys!
0:26:52 > 0:26:54Should have gone with the panel there.
0:26:54 > 0:26:57The liver weighs roughly 1,560 grams.
0:26:57 > 0:27:00- The lungs together... - Yeah, that's right.
0:27:00 > 0:27:03..weigh approximately 1,300 grams.
0:27:03 > 0:27:07- Yeah.- The spleen - 175 grams.
0:27:07 > 0:27:09- Tiny. Absolutely tiny. - Much, much lighter.
0:27:09 > 0:27:13- Dave, nothing for that question. - Not that time.- You're still doing well, though.
0:27:13 > 0:27:15At the end of Round Two, you're up to £1,200.
0:27:15 > 0:27:20Lovely. Thank you. Thanks, guys. Sorry about that.
0:27:20 > 0:27:22So, how's the panel faring?
0:27:22 > 0:27:23Still proving useful?
0:27:23 > 0:27:25100% record, still, they've got.
0:27:25 > 0:27:27I need to listen to other people, don't I?
0:27:29 > 0:27:31Well done. You're up to £1,200.
0:27:31 > 0:27:32£1,500 still up for grabs.
0:27:32 > 0:27:34Let's play Round Three.
0:27:36 > 0:27:39Dave, in Round Three you'll face questions that contain
0:27:39 > 0:27:41three statements about a person, a place or a thing.
0:27:41 > 0:27:43Only one of them is true.
0:27:43 > 0:27:45We need you to find that true statement.
0:27:45 > 0:27:48Three questions in this round, £500 for each correct answer.
0:27:48 > 0:27:52A possible 1,500 quid that you can add to the prize pot.
0:27:52 > 0:27:54Here comes your first one.
0:28:15 > 0:28:18I think that I've read somewhere
0:28:18 > 0:28:23that a sumo wrestler making a baby cry is considered lucky.
0:28:23 > 0:28:26OK, panel, Dave thinks he may have read this.
0:28:26 > 0:28:29Let's see if you can keep your lucky run going.
0:28:29 > 0:28:30Your debate starts now.
0:28:30 > 0:28:32Anybody been to Japan?
0:28:32 > 0:28:35I've just got back from Japan on my honeymoon.
0:28:35 > 0:28:37Did you slurp in a restaurant?
0:28:37 > 0:28:39Just a bit, Ann!
0:28:39 > 0:28:43They couldn't stop me! So I actually think that slurping in restaurants
0:28:43 > 0:28:46is, on the contrary, encouraged.
0:28:46 > 0:28:49- I believe so. - And it's not impolite at all.
0:28:49 > 0:28:51And you do it with ramen, cos it's so hot
0:28:51 > 0:28:53- and you need to get some air in... - OK, I'd go with that.
0:28:53 > 0:28:54..to stop you burning your mouth.
0:28:54 > 0:28:57And you noticed people doing it? No-one was arrested?
0:28:57 > 0:28:59Oh, loads of it. No-one got arrested that I saw.
0:28:59 > 0:29:02OK. Did you see any babies crying next to a sumo wrestler?
0:29:02 > 0:29:06- I- made a baby cry and I felt like I had quite a good day afterwards.
0:29:09 > 0:29:13I've not heard that but it's the kind of thing that sounds plausible.
0:29:13 > 0:29:16- Yeah.- In kind of....- Yeah. - In that culture.
0:29:16 > 0:29:18And we've got the karaoke now.
0:29:18 > 0:29:21Where it says "hear me sing", that doesn't jump out.
0:29:21 > 0:29:23I don't think that's quite right.
0:29:23 > 0:29:27- Or is it?- Roots and stems? - I don't speak any Japanese.
0:29:27 > 0:29:30- Anything?- I can't remember what it means but I don't think it's
0:29:30 > 0:29:33"hear me sing" - it's something quite...
0:29:33 > 0:29:34That's what I'm thinking.
0:29:35 > 0:29:38It's sort of quite weirdly poetic.
0:29:38 > 0:29:40I'm assuming you've all sung karaoke?
0:29:40 > 0:29:42- Don't be daft!- Yeah.
0:29:42 > 0:29:43You must've done a little karaoke!
0:29:43 > 0:29:44I'm tone deaf!
0:29:44 > 0:29:46That's not a problem.
0:29:46 > 0:29:49- It would be if you had me trying it. - It's more fun.- Yeah.
0:29:49 > 0:29:52- Oh. Well, we know what we're doing afterwards, Ann!- We are not!
0:29:53 > 0:29:55- I think it's the first.- Yes.
0:29:55 > 0:29:59Our answer would be that a sumo wrestler making a baby cry is lucky.
0:30:01 > 0:30:04So, on the basis that the panel have a 100% record,
0:30:04 > 0:30:08based purely on luck, there must be children all the way from the studio
0:30:08 > 0:30:11to the house in tears today.
0:30:11 > 0:30:16I'm in agreement with the panel. I'm sure it's A, the sumo wrestler.
0:30:16 > 0:30:19OK, it was your first thought - you thought you read that somewhere.
0:30:19 > 0:30:23In Japan, a sumo wrestler making a baby cry is considered lucky.
0:30:23 > 0:30:26For £500, is that true?
0:30:36 > 0:30:38- It is!- Well done, guys.
0:30:39 > 0:30:41It is indeed. It is
0:30:41 > 0:30:45part of an annual festival that has been held for over 400 years.
0:30:45 > 0:30:48Sumo wrestlers make loud noises and faces at babies
0:30:48 > 0:30:50to get those babies to start crying.
0:30:53 > 0:30:55Karaoke is "empty orchestra".
0:30:55 > 0:30:56- Oh!- Ah!
0:30:56 > 0:31:00It is actually polite to slurp noodles in restaurants -
0:31:00 > 0:31:02it shows that you have enjoyed the meal.
0:31:02 > 0:31:05Very well done. It means you're up to £1,700.
0:31:05 > 0:31:06Brilliant. Thank you.
0:31:09 > 0:31:13Another £500 up for grabs for this. Here it comes.
0:31:39 > 0:31:44Walking on the moon was late '60s, early '70s.
0:31:44 > 0:31:46Not sure of the split on that one.
0:31:46 > 0:31:49Can't think why they'd pay thousands of dollars for volunteers
0:31:49 > 0:31:51to lie in bed for weeks, so that's probably a good reason
0:31:51 > 0:31:54for the Americans to decide to do it,
0:31:54 > 0:31:57and I've no idea what NASA'S logo looks like.
0:31:57 > 0:32:00So no help to you guys at all on that one, I'm afraid.
0:32:00 > 0:32:01I mean, don't worry.
0:32:01 > 0:32:04They've all made babies cry on the way to the studio -
0:32:04 > 0:32:06let's see if they can keep their lucky streak going.
0:32:06 > 0:32:07Panel, your debate starts now.
0:32:07 > 0:32:10- Moon landing... - Well, the moon walk was
0:32:10 > 0:32:12- right at the end of the '60s - '69. - The moon landing...?
0:32:12 > 0:32:14- Yes.- ..was '69.
0:32:14 > 0:32:15And that was the first walk.
0:32:15 > 0:32:17- Correct.- That was only two people.
0:32:17 > 0:32:19- At that time.- Yeah.- But you're not going to have another one
0:32:19 > 0:32:21within a year, which would be the end of the '60s?
0:32:21 > 0:32:24You're certainly not going to have lots within a year,
0:32:24 > 0:32:26because this is more than at any other time.
0:32:26 > 0:32:31Yes, any other decade, so the '70s surely would have more than trying
0:32:31 > 0:32:33- to get more people walking in 1969. - I think I read somewhere -
0:32:33 > 0:32:36I can't remember - something like 16 men have actually walked
0:32:36 > 0:32:39- on the moon. Well, that didn't all happen in '69.- The middle one...
0:32:40 > 0:32:42- ..I think is plausible, because... - I do.
0:32:42 > 0:32:45..they'd be looking to study the effects of being...
0:32:45 > 0:32:48- In one position for a long time, yeah.- ..stationary and not moving,
0:32:48 > 0:32:50- what the body does.- That could make sense.- That makes sense.
0:32:50 > 0:32:53- I think that makes a lot of sense. - Which brings us on to
0:32:53 > 0:32:56- what I presume is Latin.- It is Latin.- Anyone going to have a...
0:32:56 > 0:32:58I'm going to have a guess and then Ann's going to tell me whether I'm
0:32:58 > 0:33:00- right.- Go on, go on. - I think that probably means
0:33:00 > 0:33:04- "to infinity and beyond".- Yes. - Which is from Toy Story.
0:33:04 > 0:33:07- Well done.- So I don't think...- If you get that, that'll be amazing.
0:33:07 > 0:33:08I think it's lying in bed.
0:33:08 > 0:33:10OK, that would be brilliant, yeah.
0:33:10 > 0:33:13I really do. I mean, it's the effects of immobility.
0:33:13 > 0:33:16When you go into space, you're immobile for a very long time.
0:33:16 > 0:33:18And they'll obviously want to test on volunteers -
0:33:18 > 0:33:20that'd be perfect. I think the middle one.
0:33:20 > 0:33:22Especially if you're sending people on long journeys,
0:33:22 > 0:33:25they're going to be in stasis. You need to study that stuff.
0:33:25 > 0:33:28This is the most confident I've been.
0:33:28 > 0:33:29I like the sound of that.
0:33:29 > 0:33:31Make of that what you will, Dave.
0:33:31 > 0:33:34I think I've been sufficiently appealed to by the middle one.
0:33:34 > 0:33:36- We will go...- Yeah. - ..with the middle answer.
0:33:36 > 0:33:39We think that NASA pay thousands of dollars
0:33:39 > 0:33:41to people to lie in bed and study them.
0:33:43 > 0:33:46- What do you make of that, Dave? - I'm going to go with the panel
0:33:46 > 0:33:49and they're going to pay volunteers to lie in bed,
0:33:49 > 0:33:53- cos it's a great job.- It would be a great job, I have to say.
0:33:53 > 0:33:55You're going for B, you're agreeing with the panel.
0:33:55 > 0:33:59For £500, the correct statement is...
0:34:11 > 0:34:13- It's B!- Yes. Well done.
0:34:13 > 0:34:16It is B. Very well done.
0:34:18 > 0:34:21They are called bed-rest studies.
0:34:21 > 0:34:24The purpose of the study is exactly what you said,
0:34:24 > 0:34:27to research the microgravity on the human body.
0:34:27 > 0:34:31There were two manned moon landings in the 1960s,
0:34:31 > 0:34:35with four astronauts walking on the moon. But in the 1970s,
0:34:35 > 0:34:39from 1970 to 1972, there were four moon landings,
0:34:39 > 0:34:42with eight people walking on the moon, 12 in total.
0:34:42 > 0:34:47"Ad infinitum et ultra" is "to infinity and beyond",
0:34:47 > 0:34:52and it is the catchphrase of Buzz Lightyear in the Toy Story films.
0:34:52 > 0:34:53Very well done, Rick.
0:34:53 > 0:34:57I believe it is a 100% record from the panel.
0:34:57 > 0:34:58Another £500 for you.
0:34:58 > 0:35:01- Fantastic.- You are up to £2,200.
0:35:01 > 0:35:03Thanks very much, guys.
0:35:03 > 0:35:05Brilliant.
0:35:05 > 0:35:08OK, one more question to go in this round.
0:35:08 > 0:35:10Another £500 up for grabs.
0:35:10 > 0:35:11Here we go.
0:35:31 > 0:35:34A 100% record from our panel so far. They'll sort this out no problems.
0:35:34 > 0:35:35Panel, your debate starts now.
0:35:35 > 0:35:38Well, I think you can rule out publishing more novels
0:35:38 > 0:35:40than Mary Shelley because he was a poet.
0:35:40 > 0:35:43- Yeah.- Now, you know, unless he published, too,
0:35:43 > 0:35:48and I don't think he did - he was a poet. He died very young.
0:35:48 > 0:35:52- Right.- And he was writing at the same time as Wordsworth, Coleridge,
0:35:52 > 0:35:54the Romance Poets, as they were called.
0:35:54 > 0:35:57I've got a feeling he was the youngest of them.
0:35:57 > 0:35:58It's a feeling.
0:35:58 > 0:36:01- OK.- But it's quite a strong one.- OK.
0:36:01 > 0:36:04- And then Napoleon...- What his height was, I've no idea.
0:36:04 > 0:36:06Well, Napoleon, I believe, was 5'4".
0:36:06 > 0:36:09- But was Keats short? - Well, that's very, very short -
0:36:09 > 0:36:12- to be shorter than 5'4". Do you think?- Back in the day, though,
0:36:12 > 0:36:14it was more in vogue to be short.
0:36:14 > 0:36:17Well, not a question of in vogue. It was just the way we were developing!
0:36:17 > 0:36:20I was joking, Ann! It's OK.
0:36:20 > 0:36:22- It's OK.- You would've had a terrible time!
0:36:22 > 0:36:27If I could direct height to vogue, I would be rather more than I am.
0:36:28 > 0:36:33So we're kind of erring towards shorter than Napoleon, aren't we?
0:36:33 > 0:36:36- I think. Just on the basis... - I know nothing to rule it out.
0:36:36 > 0:36:38- Yeah.- I know nothing to rule that out.
0:36:38 > 0:36:41I would go with him being shorter than Napoleon.
0:36:41 > 0:36:44By a process of elimination, I'd arrive at that.
0:36:44 > 0:36:48- Yeah.- OK, so our answer is "shorter than Napoleon Bonaparte".
0:36:48 > 0:36:52What do you make of that, Dave?
0:36:52 > 0:36:56Process of elimination and hoping that the 100% record continues,
0:36:56 > 0:37:00I'll go with the panel and go for C, shorter than Napoleon Bonaparte.
0:37:01 > 0:37:03You're going with the panel.
0:37:03 > 0:37:08Was John Keats shorter than Napoleon Bonaparte, for £500?
0:37:18 > 0:37:20- He was!- Fantastic!
0:37:21 > 0:37:23- What a result!- Well done, Ann.
0:37:23 > 0:37:25- I think that was mainly you. - That was just elimination.
0:37:25 > 0:37:27I mean, well done, panel.
0:37:27 > 0:37:28What can we say?
0:37:28 > 0:37:31- Dream team.- Dream team. You either know it or you don't, really.
0:37:31 > 0:37:34- That's the thing.- I don't think a panel has ever gone through
0:37:34 > 0:37:38one of these shows with a 100% record, so hats off there.
0:37:39 > 0:37:43Keats is reported to have been just over five feet tall.
0:37:43 > 0:37:46Napoleon's height was historically given as 5'2"
0:37:46 > 0:37:50but modern historians estimate that his height may have been
0:37:50 > 0:37:52much greater, possibly 5'6".
0:37:52 > 0:37:54Huge man. Dave, very well played.
0:37:54 > 0:37:58At the end of Round Three, your prize pot is up to £2,700.
0:37:58 > 0:38:01- Brilliant.- Well done.- Thanks so much. Thank you. Thank you.
0:38:03 > 0:38:06So, only one question between you and that money.
0:38:06 > 0:38:09If you manage to answer our Final Debate question correctly,
0:38:09 > 0:38:10any plans for the cash?
0:38:10 > 0:38:12Yeah, I think we'd like to do another trip,
0:38:12 > 0:38:17possibly up to the fjords and see the northern lights, as well, on a cruise.
0:38:17 > 0:38:21Dave, there is only one question between you and that £2,700.
0:38:21 > 0:38:24It is, of course, the Final Debate question
0:38:24 > 0:38:25but you are not on your own.
0:38:25 > 0:38:31You will choose one of the 100% club here to help you in the debate.
0:38:31 > 0:38:36So, based on their magnificent performance today,
0:38:36 > 0:38:38who will be joining you in The Final Debate?
0:38:38 > 0:38:40Will you play party politics with Ann?
0:38:40 > 0:38:42Will you go to infinity and beyond with Rick?
0:38:42 > 0:38:46Or will it be our own petit chou-fleur? Will it be Rav?
0:38:47 > 0:38:49Well, they've all done so tremendously well,
0:38:49 > 0:38:52it's really difficult. But I'm going to go with Rick.
0:38:52 > 0:38:55OK, Rick, please join us as we play The Final Debate.
0:39:01 > 0:39:03OK, Rick, Dave has chosen you.
0:39:03 > 0:39:05I mean, he could have chosen anyone from the 100% club...
0:39:05 > 0:39:08- Uh-huh.- ..but he has put his faith in you.
0:39:08 > 0:39:11Yeah. I mean, I hope your faith hasn't been misplaced, Dave.
0:39:11 > 0:39:14- I'm sure it hasn't.- We just need to ride this lucky wave,
0:39:14 > 0:39:17get you that money, get you to the fjords.
0:39:17 > 0:39:19Dave, it is the Final Debate question so we're going to give you
0:39:19 > 0:39:21two choices. Have a look at this.
0:39:21 > 0:39:23Tell me what you fancy.
0:39:28 > 0:39:30- Hmm.- Depends which sport it is, doesn't it?
0:39:30 > 0:39:32It does. Which sport is it, Patrick?
0:39:32 > 0:39:34Well, funny you should mention...
0:39:34 > 0:39:37- If it's football, hurrah.- If it's football, we're in business.
0:39:39 > 0:39:43I mean, obviously, obviously, up to you but I would probably go sport.
0:39:43 > 0:39:45- What's your TV like?- Yeah.
0:39:45 > 0:39:46Not bad.
0:39:48 > 0:39:51But I don't know. If it's Downton Abbey, then we've had it.
0:39:51 > 0:39:53- Shall we go sport?- Let's go sport.
0:39:53 > 0:39:54We'll go sport, please.
0:39:54 > 0:39:57- You're going for sport.- Yeah.
0:39:57 > 0:40:0245 seconds on the clock, £2,700 up for grabs, six possible answers.
0:40:02 > 0:40:04You know we need three correct answers.
0:40:04 > 0:40:05Yeah.
0:40:05 > 0:40:07Here we go on sport.
0:40:07 > 0:40:08Here's your Final Debate question.
0:40:31 > 0:40:32Your time starts now.
0:40:32 > 0:40:35Bears, Dolphins, Seahawks.
0:40:35 > 0:40:38- Oh, you're straight in with that? - That's my thoughts, yeah.
0:40:38 > 0:40:40- I reckon... I reckon they've done that.- Dave, I love it.
0:40:40 > 0:40:42I was going to say Dolphins,
0:40:42 > 0:40:47pretty sure, because in Ace Ventura there's a guy who's won it and...
0:40:47 > 0:40:50- Bears...- William Perry, the Refrigerator.
0:40:50 > 0:40:52The Re... The Refrigerator.
0:40:52 > 0:40:54Don't know what you're talking about, but fine.
0:40:54 > 0:40:56- Yeah. He was... - He was the massive...
0:40:56 > 0:40:58The massive fella, yeah.
0:40:58 > 0:41:00- 20 seconds.- And you think Seahawks?
0:41:00 > 0:41:02I think the Seahawks, yeah.
0:41:02 > 0:41:05I mean, I've... I'm not an American football fan
0:41:05 > 0:41:10but I'd definitely go with Bears and Dolphins and I think...
0:41:10 > 0:41:12- I think...- If you're...- It's the one that jumps out at me
0:41:12 > 0:41:15- in front of the others. - If the hawk is jumping,
0:41:15 > 0:41:18- pick the hawk - that's my motto. - Panthers are quite new. Right.
0:41:18 > 0:41:19OK, Dave, three answers.
0:41:19 > 0:41:21Chicago Bears.
0:41:21 > 0:41:22Miami Dolphins.
0:41:22 > 0:41:23Seattle Seahawks.
0:41:26 > 0:41:27Here we go.
0:41:27 > 0:41:32For £2,700, the first team you gave me was the Chicago Bears.
0:41:32 > 0:41:35Have the Chicago Bears won the Super Bowl?
0:41:43 > 0:41:45They have.
0:41:45 > 0:41:47CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:41:47 > 0:41:50Well played. Chicago Bears won the Super Bowl in '86
0:41:50 > 0:41:54and William Perry, the Refrigerator, played on that team.
0:41:54 > 0:41:59Next, to keep you in the game, for £2,700,
0:41:59 > 0:42:01have the Miami Dolphins won the Super Bowl?
0:42:14 > 0:42:16They have!
0:42:18 > 0:42:22- Well done.- They won in '72 and '73,
0:42:22 > 0:42:25which brings us to the Seattle Seahawks.
0:42:25 > 0:42:27Now, this was the one you were least sure of.
0:42:27 > 0:42:30- Yeah, that's right.- Any other names up there?
0:42:30 > 0:42:34Er...I would think the other possible one is the Eagles, but...
0:42:34 > 0:42:37You think maybe the Eagles but you've gone for the Seahawks.
0:42:39 > 0:42:41For £2,700...
0:42:42 > 0:42:46..have the Seattle Seahawks won the Super Bowl?
0:43:07 > 0:43:08Yes!
0:43:10 > 0:43:12APPLAUSE DROWNS SPEECH
0:43:12 > 0:43:14Come here, you! Come on!
0:43:14 > 0:43:17- Well done, mate.- Well played. - Thank you.
0:43:17 > 0:43:21The Seahawks first won the Super Bowl in 2014.
0:43:21 > 0:43:24Very well played. Very well played, panel. Well done, Dave.
0:43:24 > 0:43:27- You leave today with £2,700. - Thank you.
0:43:29 > 0:43:31Thank you.
0:43:33 > 0:43:34That is it for Debatable.
0:43:34 > 0:43:37Just enough time for me to thank our fantastic panel -
0:43:37 > 0:43:40to Rick Edwards, to Ann Widdecombe and to Rav Wilding.
0:43:40 > 0:43:42CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:43:42 > 0:43:45I do hope you've enjoyed watching. We will see you next time for more heated debates.
0:43:45 > 0:43:47For now, it's goodbye from me.