0:00:11 > 0:00:14Hello and welcome to Debatable, where today one player
0:00:14 > 0:00:17must answer a series of tricky questions
0:00:17 > 0:00:21to try to walk away with a jackpot of over £3,000.
0:00:21 > 0:00:22But they are not on their own.
0:00:22 > 0:00:24As always, they will have a panel of celebrities
0:00:24 > 0:00:26debating their way to the answers.
0:00:26 > 0:00:28Will they be able to talk the talk?
0:00:28 > 0:00:29That's Debatable. Let's meet them.
0:00:31 > 0:00:33Chatting their way to the answers today,
0:00:33 > 0:00:35we have broadcaster Suzi Perry,
0:00:35 > 0:00:37we've got entrepreneur Peter Jones,
0:00:37 > 0:00:39and we have actor Nitin Ganatra.
0:00:39 > 0:00:41APPLAUSE
0:00:43 > 0:00:46Yes, it is a good panel, it is a solid panel,
0:00:46 > 0:00:50it is an overly educated panel, Peter Jones, I believe.
0:00:50 > 0:00:54- I wouldn't say that!- One of those statements is definitely not true.
0:00:54 > 0:00:56Well, I mean, Nitin, you went to Bristol University.
0:00:56 > 0:00:58- I did indeed.- Yeah.
0:00:58 > 0:01:01- Studying...?- Studied film and television and drama.
0:01:01 > 0:01:04Studying drama, it means that even if you don't know the answer today,
0:01:04 > 0:01:07you will be able to project an authority.
0:01:07 > 0:01:09Exactly. I will bluff my way through it.
0:01:09 > 0:01:12Now, Peter, you recently did an A-level. Is that true?
0:01:12 > 0:01:15Yeah, I was a late starter, educationally.
0:01:15 > 0:01:18I took an A-level at 45.
0:01:18 > 0:01:19It was business studies as well.
0:01:19 > 0:01:22Yeah, but there's a back story to this, isn't there?
0:01:22 > 0:01:23You guys on Dragons' Den
0:01:23 > 0:01:26kept dismissing business studies as a joke.
0:01:26 > 0:01:29I did a business studies degree so I know that it actually is.
0:01:29 > 0:01:31LAUGHTER
0:01:31 > 0:01:33I kept on saying that business studies is quite easy
0:01:33 > 0:01:37and the Sun said, "OK, we will challenge you, then.
0:01:37 > 0:01:41"Can you take an A-level online and we will see what grade you get?"
0:01:41 > 0:01:43I decided to take the challenge up and have a go.
0:01:43 > 0:01:46- And?- I got an A*.
0:01:46 > 0:01:49- A*!- Of course you did! APPLAUSE
0:01:49 > 0:01:51Which brings us to Suzi, then.
0:01:51 > 0:01:53What did you get in your business studies, Suzi?
0:01:53 > 0:01:56I got, you know, not an A*.
0:01:56 > 0:01:58A first, I bet.
0:01:58 > 0:02:00I did OK.
0:02:00 > 0:02:01And you ended up flying around the world
0:02:01 > 0:02:03with one of the most glamorous jobs on the planet?
0:02:03 > 0:02:05Somebody had to do it.
0:02:05 > 0:02:07OK, that is today's panel.
0:02:07 > 0:02:09Let's meet today's contestant.
0:02:09 > 0:02:11It is Jonathan from Milton Keynes.
0:02:14 > 0:02:16- Jonathan.- Hi, Patrick. - How are you doing?
0:02:16 > 0:02:18- I'm good, thank you very much. - Tell us a little bit about yourself.
0:02:18 > 0:02:22Yeah, I'm a doctor's receptionist and if I look a bit tired today,
0:02:22 > 0:02:24it's because our dogs have been keeping us up all night.
0:02:24 > 0:02:27I've got a French bulldog with a snoring problem,
0:02:27 > 0:02:29we have to wear earplugs in bed every night
0:02:29 > 0:02:32because the snoring is so bad.
0:02:32 > 0:02:34Who else lives with you and your dog?
0:02:34 > 0:02:37My partner. We recently just got married in Las Vegas.
0:02:37 > 0:02:40- Come on! There you go! - Thank you very much.- Well done.
0:02:40 > 0:02:43So, was it a traditional church service in Vegas?
0:02:43 > 0:02:46No, we got married by Elvis. It was brilliant!
0:02:46 > 0:02:49It was the best seven minutes of my life.
0:02:49 > 0:02:50LAUGHTER
0:02:50 > 0:02:55It doesn't get any better, you know. It's all downhill from now on!
0:02:55 > 0:02:59You're about to have the best 45 minutes of your life, Jonathan.
0:02:59 > 0:03:01- Yeah.- What do you make of today's panel?
0:03:01 > 0:03:03Yeah, I think there's a bit of everything there today.
0:03:03 > 0:03:06Oh, there is a bit of everything there. There definitely is.
0:03:06 > 0:03:07I'm certainly interested in Peter
0:03:07 > 0:03:10because I think he will be quite strong with his opinions.
0:03:10 > 0:03:13I think he will have good knowledge of business and everything.
0:03:13 > 0:03:14To be honest, Peter is just delighted
0:03:14 > 0:03:16that he's just come on a show
0:03:16 > 0:03:18where somebody else has to give the money away.
0:03:18 > 0:03:21- Absolutely!- You're going to have to pay close attention to our panel
0:03:21 > 0:03:24because you can only choose one of these fine people
0:03:24 > 0:03:26- to help you in the final debate.- OK.
0:03:26 > 0:03:28- Ready to play?- Yeah, ready to play.
0:03:28 > 0:03:29Here we go. Let's play Round One.
0:03:32 > 0:03:34Jonathan, this round is multiple choice,
0:03:34 > 0:03:37you will have four possible answers in each question.
0:03:37 > 0:03:38Only one of them is correct.
0:03:38 > 0:03:40There are four questions in this round,
0:03:40 > 0:03:41£200 for each correct answer.
0:03:41 > 0:03:44- A possible 800 quid for your prize pot.- Cool.
0:03:44 > 0:03:46- Yep.- Ready to go?- Yep, definitely.
0:03:46 > 0:03:48- Best of luck.- Thank you. - Let's get cracking.
0:04:08 > 0:04:10Right, I think there's two things
0:04:10 > 0:04:12that definitely jump out at me straightaway,
0:04:12 > 0:04:15but I'd like to definitely ask the panel and see what they think.
0:04:15 > 0:04:17I think we would all like to do that, Jonathan.
0:04:17 > 0:04:18Let's not give them any help.
0:04:18 > 0:04:20Don't look at me like that!
0:04:21 > 0:04:24Your debate starts now.
0:04:24 > 0:04:25Go on.
0:04:25 > 0:04:28I'm just trying to remember what Wi-Fi stood for
0:04:28 > 0:04:30and it's wireless...something.
0:04:30 > 0:04:32Doesn't Wi-Fi come from hi-fi?
0:04:32 > 0:04:33Yeah, I think so.
0:04:33 > 0:04:34Er...
0:04:34 > 0:04:36Can we dismiss hashtag
0:04:36 > 0:04:38because although it has become a technological term,
0:04:38 > 0:04:39it's not really, is it?
0:04:39 > 0:04:41No. It was a made-up term, wasn't it?
0:04:41 > 0:04:43So it wouldn't relate to any previous king.
0:04:43 > 0:04:46- Perhaps we can remove that.- The one that sings louder to me is Wiki
0:04:46 > 0:04:49because of Wikipedia, WikiLeaks, Wiki...
0:04:49 > 0:04:53I don't know what wiki means, but it's...
0:04:53 > 0:04:56- Wiki the Viking, do you remember that?- Wiki the Viking!
0:04:56 > 0:04:57I know we're laughing,
0:04:57 > 0:05:00but that was the cartoon when we were growing up, wasn't it?
0:05:00 > 0:05:03In Scandinavian mythology, you've got all the Norse gods,
0:05:03 > 0:05:06you've got Thor, Loki, Wiki...
0:05:08 > 0:05:11Jimmy Wales, the guy behind Wikipedia, though, I know him and...
0:05:11 > 0:05:15- Of course you do, Peter!- I remember the story and I'm pretty sure
0:05:15 > 0:05:17that didn't come from a Scandinavian King.
0:05:17 > 0:05:21Bluetooth. I think Bluetooth wasn't a real name, it was a nickname.
0:05:21 > 0:05:25You know how people get given nicknames because of eccentric...
0:05:26 > 0:05:29King of so-and-so, one-eyed King.
0:05:29 > 0:05:31Did the king have a blue tooth?
0:05:31 > 0:05:33I'm just thinking it's a nickname.
0:05:33 > 0:05:35Go with Wiki. Your instinct was Wiki.
0:05:35 > 0:05:38- Well, it is, but... - I feel a bit Wiki about it.
0:05:38 > 0:05:39You liked all the "kis".
0:05:39 > 0:05:41Yeah, I liked the "ki" bit.
0:05:41 > 0:05:45Well, let's go with Wiki, then. So, we think that the answer is Wiki.
0:05:46 > 0:05:50So, Jonathan, the panel have gone with Wiki, but what do you think?
0:05:50 > 0:05:53When you look at them, Wi-Fi, hashtag and Bluetooth
0:05:53 > 0:05:56don't sound like they would be a medieval king.
0:05:56 > 0:05:58I think it is Wiki.
0:05:58 > 0:06:01- You're going with the panel?- Yeah, I'll trust the panel on this one.
0:06:01 > 0:06:04OK, you're trusting the panel.
0:06:04 > 0:06:08You're going with Wiki for £200 to get you off the mark.
0:06:08 > 0:06:10Correct answer is...
0:06:14 > 0:06:16- Bluetooth!- Oh, no!- It is Bluetooth.
0:06:16 > 0:06:18SUZI SIGHS
0:06:18 > 0:06:20Oh!
0:06:20 > 0:06:24It is said to be named after the 10th-century King Harald I
0:06:24 > 0:06:27who was also known as Bluetooth.
0:06:27 > 0:06:29The rumour is he had a bad tooth.
0:06:29 > 0:06:32Having got a dentist in my family,
0:06:32 > 0:06:35when you knock your tooth and it discolours, it can go blue.
0:06:35 > 0:06:39- Why are you saying this now?! - It's too late! Why tell us now?
0:06:39 > 0:06:42Bluetooth was credited with uniting Denmark and Norway,
0:06:42 > 0:06:46just as Bluetooth technology unites people with their devices.
0:06:46 > 0:06:48Jonathan, no money there,
0:06:48 > 0:06:50but there's loads of time to get some cash on the board.
0:06:50 > 0:06:52- Here comes your second question. - Yep.
0:07:14 > 0:07:16I'm feeling confident about this one.
0:07:16 > 0:07:19Not because I know the answer, but just because I think the panel
0:07:19 > 0:07:21probably eat at nice restaurants when they go on holiday,
0:07:21 > 0:07:24so I think one of them will definitely know the answer.
0:07:24 > 0:07:27You have no idea!
0:07:27 > 0:07:29Peter Jones is a fiend for a Nando's!
0:07:31 > 0:07:33Panel, your debate starts now.
0:07:33 > 0:07:35Well, Modena, definitely.
0:07:35 > 0:07:38- Ferrari...- Italy, yeah. And it's obviously an Italian name.
0:07:38 > 0:07:43Francescana, it sounds very Italian, but then you get all these...
0:07:43 > 0:07:47A lot of Italians - universal, international dish.
0:07:47 > 0:07:51Also, Osteria is Italian.
0:07:51 > 0:07:54- It is.- And I think it's Italian for either, like...
0:07:54 > 0:07:57- House or... - ..a place to eat or something.
0:07:57 > 0:07:59- Yeah, an eating house. - So, it's an eating house.
0:07:59 > 0:08:02There's a big giveaway there, linking it to Modena.
0:08:02 > 0:08:06I can't see Francescana in Copenhagen.
0:08:06 > 0:08:07What about Vienna?
0:08:08 > 0:08:09I kind of ruled that out straightaway
0:08:09 > 0:08:11because it's not Italian.
0:08:11 > 0:08:14Do you think that the strange one in there is Bilbao?
0:08:14 > 0:08:16- Yeah.- It's Spain. - It would be weird
0:08:16 > 0:08:19to call the restaurant an Italian name in Spain, wouldn't it?
0:08:19 > 0:08:22Yeah, but because these are Latin-based countries,
0:08:22 > 0:08:24- whether it be...- Italy or Spain.
0:08:24 > 0:08:26..Italy or Brazil or Portugal,
0:08:26 > 0:08:28these have all got their root in Latin.
0:08:28 > 0:08:33So Francescana could be a Spanish name as well.
0:08:33 > 0:08:36My money would be on Modena purely because of the Italian link.
0:08:36 > 0:08:37The Italian link.
0:08:37 > 0:08:39I think that's the logical...
0:08:39 > 0:08:41- It's logical, yeah? - ..answer to go with.
0:08:41 > 0:08:44But I...I really...
0:08:44 > 0:08:45- Shall we go with that? - Yeah, let's go with that.
0:08:45 > 0:08:49We believe that Osteria Francescana is located in Modena.
0:08:51 > 0:08:53So, Jonathan, do you agree?
0:08:53 > 0:08:57As soon as you said the question, my gut instinct was to say Vienna.
0:08:57 > 0:08:59I'm tempted not to give the celebrities the benefit of the doubt
0:08:59 > 0:09:01because of the last question.
0:09:01 > 0:09:04You are harsh, Jonathan! LAUGHTER
0:09:04 > 0:09:07- I don't blame you.- Probably fair. - What are you trying to say?
0:09:07 > 0:09:09I think I will trust them on this one,
0:09:09 > 0:09:11because I think they've got this one in the bag.
0:09:11 > 0:09:13- I'm going to go with Modena. - Oh, no!- Yeah.
0:09:13 > 0:09:16OK, so, you are going for Modena.
0:09:16 > 0:09:20Is Osteria Francescana in Modena?
0:09:26 > 0:09:28- Yes!- It is!
0:09:28 > 0:09:30- Well done!- Well done.
0:09:30 > 0:09:32- The relief from the panel!- Phew!
0:09:32 > 0:09:36- Well done, Jonathan.- Thank you. My faith is restored now.
0:09:36 > 0:09:39An osteria is the Italian equivalent of a bistro.
0:09:39 > 0:09:41All of that means, Jonathan, well played.
0:09:41 > 0:09:44You were right to go with the panel. You are up and running - £200.
0:09:44 > 0:09:45Cool!
0:09:48 > 0:09:50Let's see if we can keep it going.
0:09:50 > 0:09:52Here is question three.
0:10:11 > 0:10:13Can you see what we've done here, Jonathan?
0:10:13 > 0:10:16- I haven't got a clue.- Do you want to see what the panel thinks on this?
0:10:16 > 0:10:18Yes, please. Thank you.
0:10:18 > 0:10:21OK, panel. I'm sure they will sort this out very quickly for us.
0:10:21 > 0:10:22Your debate starts now.
0:10:22 > 0:10:25We're going to look stupid, whatever we say here, aren't we?
0:10:25 > 0:10:27Wow, OK. I'm kicking myself, you know,
0:10:27 > 0:10:32cos my son was really into dinosaurs - flash cards, everything.
0:10:32 > 0:10:34He had names of all sorts of raptors.
0:10:34 > 0:10:36I should have paid more attention.
0:10:36 > 0:10:37Well, Mickeyraptor doesn't sound...
0:10:37 > 0:10:39Mickey sounds odd, because that is a mouse.
0:10:39 > 0:10:41But you know what a raptor is, right?
0:10:41 > 0:10:43- It wouldn't be a mouse raptor, would it?- No.
0:10:43 > 0:10:46Raptors are... Raptors are particular...
0:10:46 > 0:10:48They've got these claws and they're fast sprinters, all raptors.
0:10:48 > 0:10:50They are highly intelligent,
0:10:50 > 0:10:53they have claws and they sprint very fast and hunt in a pack.
0:10:53 > 0:10:57Now, whether Disney knew this when he drew these cartoons...
0:10:57 > 0:10:58Because nobody...
0:10:58 > 0:11:02I still, to this day, don't know what kind of animal Goofy is.
0:11:02 > 0:11:05- Isn't he a dog? - No, I don't think he is.
0:11:05 > 0:11:06He's got these two big teeth.
0:11:06 > 0:11:08That... That's Pluto.
0:11:08 > 0:11:10Yeah, what is Goofy?
0:11:10 > 0:11:13- What is Goofy?- But he is goofy, isn't he?- I thought he was a horse.
0:11:13 > 0:11:15That's why he's call Goofy, because he's a bit of a...
0:11:17 > 0:11:19..type. Obviously, Bambi is a deer,
0:11:19 > 0:11:22has four legs. Let's imagine what these would look like.
0:11:22 > 0:11:25So a Dumboraptor would have large ears...
0:11:25 > 0:11:27Don't know any dinosaurs with large ears.
0:11:27 > 0:11:29There is no elephant raptor, is there?
0:11:29 > 0:11:32- Definitely not.- I don't think so. - And there is no mouse raptor.
0:11:32 > 0:11:34- No.- But I don't know, what is Goofy?
0:11:34 > 0:11:37We don't know what it is, but that leaves us with the Bambiraptor.
0:11:37 > 0:11:38I think we've worked this out.
0:11:38 > 0:11:39OK.
0:11:39 > 0:11:43We think the official name of a species of dinosaur
0:11:43 > 0:11:44is a Bambiraptor.
0:11:46 > 0:11:49So, Jonathan, any of that make any sense?
0:11:50 > 0:11:53No, not really. I think I will definitely trust the panel again.
0:11:53 > 0:11:55I like their way of getting to the answer.
0:11:55 > 0:11:59I think they might have just been so random that it might be right.
0:11:59 > 0:12:02So I think I'm going to go for Bambiraptor.
0:12:02 > 0:12:04Even they don't like the way that they get to the answer,
0:12:04 > 0:12:06- let's be clear.- No!
0:12:06 > 0:12:09- You're going to go with the panel? - Yes, I'm going to go with the panel.
0:12:09 > 0:12:11OK, you're going with the panel.
0:12:11 > 0:12:17Is Bambiraptor an official species of dinosaur?
0:12:17 > 0:12:19£200. The correct answer is...
0:12:23 > 0:12:28- Yes! Brilliant!- That's brilliant.
0:12:29 > 0:12:33The species of dinosaur was named after the Disney movies.
0:12:33 > 0:12:35- Oh!- So, the name was given retrospectively
0:12:35 > 0:12:38- because it was a little tiny dinosaur.- Oh, right.
0:12:38 > 0:12:40Only three feet from its nose to the tip of its tail.
0:12:40 > 0:12:43Goofy is a dog.
0:12:43 > 0:12:44- No!- Thank you!
0:12:44 > 0:12:46- Really?- Goofy is a dog.
0:12:46 > 0:12:48- He doesn't look anything like a dog. - I know!
0:12:48 > 0:12:50I thought he was a horse or a donkey or something.
0:12:50 > 0:12:52Donkey?!
0:12:52 > 0:12:54- He's got a tail!- So has a dog!
0:12:54 > 0:12:58I know, I know. But he just... doesn't look like a dog.
0:12:58 > 0:13:00To be fair, Goofy is a dog
0:13:00 > 0:13:02that walks on his hind legs and drives a car.
0:13:02 > 0:13:06- I rest my case.- You rest your case.
0:13:06 > 0:13:09OK. Well done, Jonathan, though, right to go with the panel,
0:13:09 > 0:13:11- you're up to £400.- Brilliant.
0:13:16 > 0:13:19OK, here comes your next question.
0:13:37 > 0:13:40I think there are a couple possibilities
0:13:40 > 0:13:45- that I think it could be.- Yes? - But as always, I am not 100% sure,
0:13:45 > 0:13:47and I am hoping that the panel are going to enlighten me
0:13:47 > 0:13:49and tell me what the answer is.
0:13:49 > 0:13:51If you are drawn to one of those at the moment,
0:13:51 > 0:13:53- would it be...?- I think something you play with your fingers,
0:13:53 > 0:13:56so possibly the violin.
0:13:56 > 0:13:58OK, panel. Let's see if you can sort this out.
0:13:58 > 0:13:59Your debate starts now.
0:13:59 > 0:14:03I used to play the oboe when I was at school.
0:14:03 > 0:14:05Did you tune?
0:14:05 > 0:14:06No, you don't tune oboe, do you?
0:14:06 > 0:14:09It's ready... Put your reed in and you're ready to go.
0:14:09 > 0:14:12So that's a good point.
0:14:12 > 0:14:14It's an instrument that you don't have to tune.
0:14:14 > 0:14:15Do you tune a violin?
0:14:15 > 0:14:17Yes, you must do, because it's a stringed instrument.
0:14:17 > 0:14:19- Yes, you have to tune a violin. - It's like a guitar.
0:14:19 > 0:14:23- A flute?- A trombone, you slide...
0:14:23 > 0:14:24You find the note.
0:14:24 > 0:14:27- Yes.- So... So that's...
0:14:27 > 0:14:28I would go either oboe or flute.
0:14:28 > 0:14:30But what about the flute, though?
0:14:30 > 0:14:33When you... I've never played the flute, but when you play a flute,
0:14:33 > 0:14:35- when you blow... - Does it make a different sound?
0:14:35 > 0:14:38No, I would have thought that it's a pure...
0:14:38 > 0:14:40That's a pure sound, isn't it?
0:14:40 > 0:14:43Flute feels like a more important instrument than an oboe.
0:14:43 > 0:14:45Oboe just sounds a bit stupid.
0:14:45 > 0:14:48It does. So would you tune to a flute or tune to an oboe, then?
0:14:48 > 0:14:50Let's try flute. I'm just trying to think
0:14:50 > 0:14:53of any orchestra I've been in front of where they're tuning up.
0:14:53 > 0:14:56- It's flute or oboe, isn't it, so let's go flute.- Let's go flute.
0:14:56 > 0:14:59We think that the instrument
0:14:59 > 0:15:03that a symphony orchestra will tune to is a flute.
0:15:03 > 0:15:04OK, Jonathan.
0:15:04 > 0:15:08Suzy used to play the oboe but wasn't quite sure.
0:15:08 > 0:15:09See, I thought it was violin,
0:15:09 > 0:15:13but then I heard the discussion and I don't think it is violin now.
0:15:13 > 0:15:17I kind of liked it when it was between oboe and flute.
0:15:17 > 0:15:18I liked Suzy's argument
0:15:18 > 0:15:20that the flute was a more important instrument
0:15:20 > 0:15:24- so I think I'm going to go for flute. Let's do this.- OK.
0:15:26 > 0:15:29Going with the panel. Saying flute.
0:15:29 > 0:15:32£200, is that the correct answer?
0:15:38 > 0:15:40- Oh, no!- It was the oboe.
0:15:42 > 0:15:44It was oboe!
0:15:46 > 0:15:47Suzi Perry!
0:15:47 > 0:15:48- You had it.- Come on!
0:15:48 > 0:15:51Oh, we went round the houses too much with that one, didn't we?
0:15:51 > 0:15:53You had it and then you went wrong.
0:15:53 > 0:15:55I was hoping you would come back to it.
0:15:55 > 0:15:59The internationally agreed standard for tuning musical instruments
0:15:59 > 0:16:02is to the note A above middle C.
0:16:02 > 0:16:04So, Jonathan, nothing for that.
0:16:04 > 0:16:07It means the total banked at the end of Round One is £400.
0:16:07 > 0:16:08Brilliant. Thank you.
0:16:11 > 0:16:13Keep a close eye on them, because you can, of course,
0:16:13 > 0:16:16- only choose one in the final debate today.- OK.
0:16:16 > 0:16:19Let's see how they cope with pictures, it's time for Round Two.
0:16:22 > 0:16:24OK, Jonathan, Round Two is our picture round.
0:16:24 > 0:16:26You must place three pictures in the correct order.
0:16:26 > 0:16:30Three questions in this round, £300 for a correct answer.
0:16:30 > 0:16:32A possible 900 to go into the prize pot.
0:16:32 > 0:16:33Here comes your first question.
0:16:57 > 0:17:00My best friend is training to be a pilot at the moment in New Zealand.
0:17:00 > 0:17:03- Yes?- So if he was here, this would be a good question for him.
0:17:03 > 0:17:07It would. It's just a shame he's on the other side of the world!
0:17:07 > 0:17:10But I don't know, I'm willing to give this one a go.
0:17:10 > 0:17:13Once again, I'd like the panel to help, give me an idea.
0:17:13 > 0:17:15I'm sure they will have no problem with this one.
0:17:15 > 0:17:17Panel, your debate starts now.
0:17:17 > 0:17:19- OK, we are off. - The bomber has got to be,
0:17:19 > 0:17:21the Lancaster has got to be the heaviest, hasn't it?
0:17:21 > 0:17:23- So it must be the slowest. - It looks slow.
0:17:23 > 0:17:25Even from the picture, it looks slow, doesn't it?
0:17:25 > 0:17:29You've got the four engines. It just looks heavy, doesn't it?
0:17:29 > 0:17:33- So that's the slow...- But it's got four engines, so it has more power.
0:17:33 > 0:17:36- So...- It's also got more weight. It depends on...- Yeah,
0:17:36 > 0:17:38but because it's a bomber, it's travelling longer distances.
0:17:38 > 0:17:43Spitfires, I know were created as being the most agile, speedy planes.
0:17:43 > 0:17:45- Yeah.- I wonder, if we do this,
0:17:45 > 0:17:47- whether we will be on the right track?- You see, I'm...
0:17:47 > 0:17:49You're worried about the heaviest.
0:17:49 > 0:17:51- I'm worried.- You're looking at me, thinking I'm fast.
0:17:51 > 0:17:53- That's what you're thinking, is it? - I think...
0:17:53 > 0:17:55- Well....- "He's big, but I know he's quick."
0:17:55 > 0:17:59"Average maximum speed," so if it's a sprint,
0:17:59 > 0:18:01this one is lighter and more agile.
0:18:01 > 0:18:03But that is what they were designed for.
0:18:03 > 0:18:06They were designed for their versatility.
0:18:06 > 0:18:07Same with the Hurricane.
0:18:07 > 0:18:10But that - four engines...
0:18:11 > 0:18:13Flies much higher than these two...
0:18:15 > 0:18:16You like that one, don't you?
0:18:16 > 0:18:18I'm just kind of...
0:18:18 > 0:18:20"Average maximum speed." You could be onto something.
0:18:20 > 0:18:23I don't know whether we should get too caught up in the word "average".
0:18:23 > 0:18:28- Because...- I have to deal with that every morning.
0:18:28 > 0:18:31Every morning, I look in the mirror, I have to deal with that one.
0:18:31 > 0:18:35But I think that one, the average speed, if it's quick...
0:18:35 > 0:18:38- Yes.- It doesn't matter if it only can fly for five minutes.- 100 feet.
0:18:38 > 0:18:41I wish I had better knowledge of old planes.
0:18:41 > 0:18:43No, I think that the heaviest is going to be the slowest.
0:18:43 > 0:18:46- I think so.- I still think we are right with the Spitfire mid-range,
0:18:46 > 0:18:48- and I think the Hurricane... - Fastest.
0:18:48 > 0:18:51..it's a longer wingspan, it's a slightly newer plane.
0:18:51 > 0:18:53- Yeah, OK.- Shall we go with that?
0:18:53 > 0:18:55Yeah, OK. OK. Let's go with that.
0:18:55 > 0:18:57The panel have decided.
0:18:57 > 0:19:01We are happy that the slowest is the Avro Lancaster,
0:19:01 > 0:19:03next is the Supermarine Spitfire,
0:19:03 > 0:19:07and the fastest is the Hawker Hurricane.
0:19:08 > 0:19:11So, Jonathan, the panel, they say, are happy with this,
0:19:11 > 0:19:13but what do you think?
0:19:13 > 0:19:15Right, gut instinct,
0:19:15 > 0:19:18I think the Hawker Hurricane is going to be the fastest.
0:19:18 > 0:19:22I'm actually going to go against the panel
0:19:22 > 0:19:24and swap the Supermarine Spitfire
0:19:24 > 0:19:26and the Avro Lancaster.
0:19:26 > 0:19:28Going to swap them round.
0:19:28 > 0:19:30So, Jonathan, you're going against the panel.
0:19:30 > 0:19:34You're saying Supermarine Spitfire has the lowest average maximum speed,
0:19:34 > 0:19:37then the Avro Lancaster, then the Hawker Hurricane?
0:19:37 > 0:19:38Yep.
0:19:38 > 0:19:43OK. For £300, is that the correct order?
0:19:49 > 0:19:50It's the wrong order.
0:19:51 > 0:19:53Let's have a look at the correct order.
0:19:55 > 0:19:57Oh! So we were all wrong!
0:19:57 > 0:20:00- We were.- I feel better now.
0:20:00 > 0:20:02I feel better when we are all wrong.
0:20:02 > 0:20:04Because then that's fine.
0:20:04 > 0:20:05Everyone wrong on this one.
0:20:05 > 0:20:09The Avro Lancaster's maximum speed, around 280 mph,
0:20:09 > 0:20:15then the Hawker Hurricane, 330 mph average speed,
0:20:15 > 0:20:21then the Supermarine Spitfire, average maximum speed 360 mph.
0:20:21 > 0:20:24Anyway, no money added there to your prize pot.
0:20:24 > 0:20:25You're still on £400.
0:20:28 > 0:20:30- We were close.- We were so close!
0:20:30 > 0:20:32We still have two more picture questions to go,
0:20:32 > 0:20:33here comes your second.
0:20:52 > 0:20:56Already, loads of songs come into my head. I Will Always Love You.
0:20:56 > 0:20:58Take That, How Deep Is Your Love?
0:20:59 > 0:21:02- That's two.- That's two! - But they are all going round my...
0:21:02 > 0:21:04I can see them, I just can't recite them!
0:21:04 > 0:21:06But I can think of loads of songs, yeah.
0:21:06 > 0:21:09Well, maybe what we should do is take a pause,
0:21:09 > 0:21:10- you think of a few more.- 100%.
0:21:10 > 0:21:13Let's see if our panel can think of a few.
0:21:13 > 0:21:15- Your debate starts now. - There's quite a few.
0:21:15 > 0:21:18- A Million Love Songs. - A Million Love Songs.
0:21:18 > 0:21:19# A million love songs... #
0:21:19 > 0:21:22The cover version of the Bee Gees song, How Deep Is Your Love?
0:21:22 > 0:21:24Jonathan said that. That's two straightaway.
0:21:24 > 0:21:26- I Will Always Love You. - I Will Always Love You.
0:21:26 > 0:21:28See, Whitney has got a lot.
0:21:28 > 0:21:29- Yeah.- What else?
0:21:29 > 0:21:32I think they've both got a lot. I think Bowie tried his best to...
0:21:32 > 0:21:34- Modern Love?- Modern Love.
0:21:34 > 0:21:36- But he did avoid the cliches a bit with his songs.- Massively.
0:21:36 > 0:21:39So I think he's got the least.
0:21:39 > 0:21:42The thing is, Take That appeal to a younger crowd,
0:21:42 > 0:21:44I think, than Whitney Houston.
0:21:44 > 0:21:47- More bubble-gum pop, wasn't it? - It was bubble-gum pop.
0:21:47 > 0:21:51Whereas Whitney Houston had a wider spectrum for an audience.
0:21:51 > 0:21:54But she was always singing about love and things, wasn't she?
0:21:54 > 0:21:56- We are a bit like this, aren't we, at the moment?- Yeah.
0:21:56 > 0:21:58Let's bring David up here.
0:21:58 > 0:22:02- I think this could be right. - OK.- I do.
0:22:02 > 0:22:05OK. We think that the right order is
0:22:05 > 0:22:09David Bowie has the least number of songs with love in it,
0:22:09 > 0:22:10Take That next,
0:22:10 > 0:22:13and then Whitney Houston has the most.
0:22:13 > 0:22:16So, Jonathan, has that fired any more?
0:22:16 > 0:22:19I definitely think David Bowie is where they have put it,
0:22:19 > 0:22:22but I think it could be Take That. Whitney has had a lot of...
0:22:22 > 0:22:23I think she had a love songs album as well,
0:22:23 > 0:22:25I think she has done a lot of love songs
0:22:25 > 0:22:27but I can't think of loads with "love" in the title.
0:22:27 > 0:22:29But when I think of Take That,
0:22:29 > 0:22:32I think of How Deep Is Your Love?, Love Ain't Here Any More...
0:22:32 > 0:22:35And there was another one. I think it's the other way round.
0:22:35 > 0:22:38I think it's David Bowie, then I think it's Whitney,
0:22:38 > 0:22:40then I think it's Take That.
0:22:40 > 0:22:42So I'm going to go against the panel.
0:22:42 > 0:22:44You're going against the panel again?
0:22:44 > 0:22:47Yeah. I don't know if that's the right thing to do.
0:22:47 > 0:22:50- I've just got a feeling. - We're about to find out.
0:22:50 > 0:22:51It didn't work the last time.
0:22:51 > 0:22:54Let's see if it works this time for you.
0:22:55 > 0:22:56Is that the correct order?
0:23:02 > 0:23:04Oh, no!
0:23:04 > 0:23:07Jonathan, it's the wrong order.
0:23:07 > 0:23:09Let's have a look at the correct order.
0:23:11 > 0:23:14Oh, I always do the opposite at the wrong time!
0:23:14 > 0:23:15Oh, sorry.
0:23:15 > 0:23:18You should have gone with the panel, this time round.
0:23:18 > 0:23:21David Bowie just had one hit - Modern Love.
0:23:21 > 0:23:25Take That had four top 40 hits -
0:23:25 > 0:23:27A Million Love Songs, Love Ain't Here Any More,
0:23:27 > 0:23:29How Deep Is Your Love? and Love Love.
0:23:29 > 0:23:32Whitney Houston had five with love in the title -
0:23:32 > 0:23:34Saving All My Love For You,
0:23:34 > 0:23:35The Greatest Love Of All,
0:23:35 > 0:23:36Love Will Save The Day,
0:23:36 > 0:23:38I Will Always Love You,
0:23:38 > 0:23:40My Love Is Your Love.
0:23:40 > 0:23:43She also had one hit with "loves" in the title.
0:23:43 > 0:23:46I Want To Dance With Somebody Who Loves Me.
0:23:46 > 0:23:48- Oh!- Oh, yes.
0:23:48 > 0:23:51Look, Jonathan, wrong to go against the panel that time round.
0:23:51 > 0:23:54No money added to the prize pot.
0:23:54 > 0:23:56Let's see if we can get back on track.
0:23:56 > 0:23:58Here is your final picture question.
0:24:16 > 0:24:21I haven't got a clue about this, but I think the panel might have a clue.
0:24:21 > 0:24:23It doesn't matter, Jonathan.
0:24:23 > 0:24:25- No pressure here, Suzi(!) - None at all. None at all.
0:24:25 > 0:24:27Panel, your debate starts now.
0:24:27 > 0:24:29I might be able to help out a little bit here.
0:24:29 > 0:24:31What a great question!
0:24:31 > 0:24:33Have you got any thoughts, first of all, before I plough in?
0:24:33 > 0:24:36I've got a funny feeling you know all about this,
0:24:36 > 0:24:39but I would say Germany will all be about Schumacher, six or seven wins.
0:24:39 > 0:24:41Seven for Michael Schumacher.
0:24:41 > 0:24:45- Oh!- Seven. - Yeah, the most winning driver.
0:24:45 > 0:24:48- Brazil, the only one I know will be Senna.- Yeah. There's Senna.
0:24:48 > 0:24:52There's also Nelson Piquet and also Fittipaldi.
0:24:52 > 0:24:55- So three.- So three... - Three Brazilians.
0:24:55 > 0:24:57- ..to seven. - Three different winners
0:24:57 > 0:25:00with different amounts of championships,
0:25:00 > 0:25:02so you've got three different there.
0:25:02 > 0:25:04You're right about Michael Schumacher.
0:25:04 > 0:25:07And United Kingdom's got to be up there.
0:25:07 > 0:25:09It's got to be number one, hasn't it?
0:25:09 > 0:25:13- Damon Hill, Nigel Mansell... - Yeah, OK.- Go on. Carry on.
0:25:13 > 0:25:19Damon Hill, Nigel Mansell, Lewis Hamilton, Jenson Button...
0:25:19 > 0:25:21Jim Clark. That's three.
0:25:21 > 0:25:25No, it's ten championships, so we've won ten championships.
0:25:25 > 0:25:30- So we are definitely... We should be up here, then.- This is...
0:25:30 > 0:25:33- This is the least. So it should be like that.- Yeah...
0:25:33 > 0:25:34Hang on, hang on, let me think.
0:25:34 > 0:25:38- You're saying Brazil's three. - No, wait.- Seven, ten.- No.
0:25:38 > 0:25:41UK has won ten championships all in.
0:25:41 > 0:25:44This is not just Michael, it's also Sebastian Vettel.
0:25:46 > 0:25:47Don't forget. He is German, he's won four.
0:25:49 > 0:25:51- Oh!- So that makes 11.
0:25:51 > 0:25:54- Ah.- It would be like that. I hope I've got this right.
0:25:54 > 0:25:56Let me... I'm just trying to think.
0:25:56 > 0:25:58Nico Rosberg, Sebastian Vettel.
0:25:58 > 0:26:00- So 12 there.- There's loads of...
0:26:00 > 0:26:04- Yeah. I think it's ten. I think that's the order.- OK.
0:26:04 > 0:26:07Well, we've put these... Suzi has put these in the order she...
0:26:07 > 0:26:09Hang on. Wait, wait, let me just...
0:26:09 > 0:26:12I'm a bit worried I've got those two the wrong way round.
0:26:12 > 0:26:15- What about James Hunt?- James Hunt. 11.- Get in!
0:26:15 > 0:26:17And... Am I missing somebody out?
0:26:17 > 0:26:20- I'm missing... Did I say Mike Hawthorn?- No.
0:26:20 > 0:26:24That's 12. And then I'm missing another one.
0:26:24 > 0:26:25Suzi has just changed her mind.
0:26:25 > 0:26:28We've put them in the order of which we think is right now.
0:26:28 > 0:26:30Be it on Suzi's head.
0:26:30 > 0:26:33We're going Brazil, Germany and the United Kingdom.
0:26:35 > 0:26:37So, Jonathan, it looked obvious,
0:26:37 > 0:26:40we thought Suzi would sort this out pretty quickly.
0:26:40 > 0:26:42Finally swapped it round after a little bit of deliberation.
0:26:42 > 0:26:45But have they managed to convince you?
0:26:45 > 0:26:48Right, it's time to put some confidence back in the panel.
0:26:48 > 0:26:53- Yes!- I definitely think that they've got the answer,
0:26:53 > 0:26:55so I'm going to go with the panel, definitely.
0:26:55 > 0:26:56You're going with the panel.
0:26:58 > 0:27:01You're saying Brazil, Germany and the UK.
0:27:01 > 0:27:05Is that the correct order of Drivers' Championships,
0:27:05 > 0:27:06starting with the least?
0:27:06 > 0:27:08For £300...
0:27:14 > 0:27:16- Yes!- Yes!
0:27:16 > 0:27:18Well done, well done.
0:27:18 > 0:27:22- The pressure was on! - The relief on that woman's face!
0:27:22 > 0:27:25- Well done.- You know, it's one of those stats
0:27:25 > 0:27:28that you sort of know and when you start to go through it,
0:27:28 > 0:27:29you question yourself.
0:27:29 > 0:27:32That was brilliant, and then the little turnaround...!
0:27:32 > 0:27:35- I did my best to contribute on that one.- You did.
0:27:35 > 0:27:38LAUGHTER
0:27:38 > 0:27:39Brazil have won eight.
0:27:39 > 0:27:42Germany have won 12
0:27:42 > 0:27:45- and the UK have won 16.- 16.
0:27:45 > 0:27:46Jonathan, well done,
0:27:46 > 0:27:49at the end of Round Two your prize pot stands at £700.
0:27:49 > 0:27:52- Well done.- That was a good twist at the end.
0:27:54 > 0:27:57Oh! OK, Jonathan, £1,500 still up there.
0:27:57 > 0:27:59Let's see if you can get hold of it in Round Three.
0:28:02 > 0:28:05In Round Three, Jonathan, you'll face questions that contain
0:28:05 > 0:28:08three statements about a person or place or a thing,
0:28:08 > 0:28:10but only one of those statements is correct.
0:28:10 > 0:28:12We need you to find the correct statement.
0:28:12 > 0:28:13It is the final round.
0:28:13 > 0:28:16The money goes up to £500 for each correct answer.
0:28:16 > 0:28:18Best of luck. Here comes your first question.
0:28:45 > 0:28:49Right. My gut instinct, I don't think it's A.
0:28:49 > 0:28:50I think it's probably more.
0:28:50 > 0:28:52Mine's between B and C.
0:28:52 > 0:28:56But obviously, I'd like to ask the panel for their input.
0:28:56 > 0:28:59Maybe you want someone who possibly danced on Strictly
0:28:59 > 0:29:01to help you out on this.
0:29:01 > 0:29:02Panel, your debate starts now.
0:29:02 > 0:29:04Hang on a second.
0:29:05 > 0:29:08Bit of hairspray continued to be used there, isn't there?
0:29:08 > 0:29:10And do you know what, when I started, it's the first time...
0:29:10 > 0:29:12And I've always used it since.
0:29:12 > 0:29:16- Are you serious?- I'd never used hairspray before Strictly.
0:29:16 > 0:29:19And I did the Sport Relief for Strictly dance-off against Duncan.
0:29:19 > 0:29:21And the fake tan, you've kept that up, I see.
0:29:21 > 0:29:23Yes, it's good, isn't it?
0:29:23 > 0:29:25LAUGHTER
0:29:25 > 0:29:27Hairspray's used continuously.
0:29:27 > 0:29:30It doesn't matter... To even keep hems down, everywhere.
0:29:30 > 0:29:33But Anton du Beke, I don't think he's the only one.
0:29:33 > 0:29:35Who else, then? I can't think of anybody else.
0:29:35 > 0:29:38Who was on your show, then, when you were dancing, professionals?
0:29:38 > 0:29:40Who were you dancing with?
0:29:40 > 0:29:43- No, no. It was two of us. So it was just...- Oh, only two.
0:29:43 > 0:29:45- Who did you dance with? - It's a bit different. Natalie Lowe.
0:29:45 > 0:29:48- Oh, yeah.- And I think Natalie was on there since the start.
0:29:48 > 0:29:51- Is Natalie still on there? - Yeah.- OK, that's interesting.
0:29:51 > 0:29:53- And then the other one. - And more female contestants...
0:29:53 > 0:29:56But a lot of men have won Strictly, though, haven't they?
0:29:56 > 0:29:58- A lot of men, yeah. - There was a period
0:29:58 > 0:30:01where it was constantly men winning, sort of early on.
0:30:01 > 0:30:04- It's been male the last two... - Ramprakash.- Mark Ramprakash won.
0:30:04 > 0:30:06He won.
0:30:07 > 0:30:09Recently there's been some men who have won, as well.
0:30:09 > 0:30:12- Well...- I'm a bit clueless on this one.
0:30:12 > 0:30:14I think it's hairspray.
0:30:14 > 0:30:16Hairspray or male...
0:30:16 > 0:30:19- It's got to be hairspray. - I'd go for hairspray, as well.
0:30:19 > 0:30:21We think the answer is hairspray.
0:30:23 > 0:30:26OK, Jonathan, it's a slightly random answer from our panel,
0:30:26 > 0:30:28but could it be true?
0:30:28 > 0:30:30I'm completely torn.
0:30:30 > 0:30:31See, I think it's B or C.
0:30:31 > 0:30:34I think Anton du Beke's been on a lot of series,
0:30:34 > 0:30:37but I think if he'd done every series, it would be, like,
0:30:37 > 0:30:40all in the magazines and everything and they'd keep harping on about it.
0:30:40 > 0:30:42I know it started in 2004.
0:30:43 > 0:30:45I'm trying to think how many women had won.
0:30:45 > 0:30:48I'm either going to go... I'm going to go against the panel and go C.
0:30:48 > 0:30:50Just going to do it.
0:30:50 > 0:30:53- Yeah.- OK, you're going against the panel.
0:30:53 > 0:30:56The panel believe it's hairspray.
0:30:56 > 0:30:58For £500,
0:30:58 > 0:31:04has there been more female winners of Strictly than men?
0:31:11 > 0:31:12- Oh, no! - It's hairspray.
0:31:12 > 0:31:17During a series, over 500 cans of hairspray are used.
0:31:17 > 0:31:22- He is an expert! He is an expert! He's showed you his hair.- He has.
0:31:22 > 0:31:26An average of 504 cans are used in every series.
0:31:26 > 0:31:30That figure comes from the official Strictly Come Dancing blog.
0:31:30 > 0:31:33Brendan Cole has also appeared in every series.
0:31:33 > 0:31:37- Six women have won to date and eight men have won.- Oh, wow.
0:31:37 > 0:31:40So, Jonathan, no money added to the prize pot,
0:31:40 > 0:31:42but there's still £1,000 up for grabs.
0:31:42 > 0:31:43Here comes your next question.
0:32:04 > 0:32:06How's your poultry knowledge, Jonathan?
0:32:06 > 0:32:10I'm vegetarian, so... Wrong question!
0:32:10 > 0:32:12I haven't got a clue!
0:32:12 > 0:32:16I quite like the black-and-white one, cos it's such a random answer.
0:32:16 > 0:32:18But then, how would they find that out?
0:32:20 > 0:32:22I'm going to just ask the panel.
0:32:22 > 0:32:25OK, let's see if we've any meat eaters on the panel.
0:32:25 > 0:32:27Your debate starts now.
0:32:27 > 0:32:30- I'm a vegetarian, too. - Are you?- Jonathan.
0:32:30 > 0:32:32Pretty sure that they can see in different colours.
0:32:32 > 0:32:34Black and white, I think, is a red herring.
0:32:34 > 0:32:36I think I've heard they see in black and white,
0:32:36 > 0:32:38but I don't know if it's an urban myth.
0:32:38 > 0:32:41And, like Jonathan said, how did they find that out?
0:32:41 > 0:32:43A chicken suddenly started to speak.
0:32:43 > 0:32:45Live chickens - let's take that one first -
0:32:45 > 0:32:47aren't allowed in Antarctica.
0:32:47 > 0:32:50I'm guessing, if that was true, it would be to do with disease.
0:32:50 > 0:32:53- Why wouldn't they be allowed?- Maybe something to do with salmonella?
0:32:53 > 0:32:57- Live chickens spreading...- That was the one to me that kind of said...
0:32:57 > 0:33:00That kind of makes sense. The first one seems ridiculous.
0:33:00 > 0:33:01Yeah, I agree with you.
0:33:01 > 0:33:04- Originated from a species... - An African pheasant.
0:33:04 > 0:33:06- No.- No, I don't think so. - Don't think so.
0:33:06 > 0:33:09I'm happy to go with your opinion on that.
0:33:09 > 0:33:12We're going to go with live chickens are not allowed in Antarctica.
0:33:13 > 0:33:15So, Jonathan, the panel believe
0:33:15 > 0:33:18live chickens are not allowed in Antarctica.
0:33:18 > 0:33:20It seems like...
0:33:20 > 0:33:23It seems like a ridiculous answer, doesn't it, that would be true.
0:33:23 > 0:33:26Like we said, I don't think you can prove black and white
0:33:26 > 0:33:30and I see your argument about not coming from the African pheasant.
0:33:30 > 0:33:34I'm going to trust the panel and go with C.
0:33:34 > 0:33:36You're putting your faith in the panel.
0:33:36 > 0:33:37You're going for
0:33:37 > 0:33:41live chickens aren't allowed in Antarctica for £500.
0:33:41 > 0:33:43Is that the correct statement?
0:33:49 > 0:33:52- Yes!- Well played! Well done!
0:33:52 > 0:33:56- Very well done, panel. Very well played, Jonathan.- Thank you.
0:33:56 > 0:33:59An international treaty prohibits the import
0:33:59 > 0:34:03of live poultry to Antarctica to protect penguins from disease.
0:34:03 > 0:34:06That be the reason. They are thought to originate
0:34:06 > 0:34:08from the red junglefowl in southern Asia,
0:34:08 > 0:34:11not an African pheasant. Studies have shown
0:34:11 > 0:34:15that they can distinguish different colours in different environments.
0:34:15 > 0:34:17Well done, guys, well worked out, Jonathan.
0:34:17 > 0:34:20Another £500 in the prize pot, bringing you up to £1,200.
0:34:20 > 0:34:21Wow, brilliant!
0:34:25 > 0:34:28Let's see if we can get you up to 1,700.
0:34:28 > 0:34:29Here comes your next question.
0:34:48 > 0:34:49God.
0:34:49 > 0:34:50Em...
0:34:50 > 0:34:52I quite like the A answer,
0:34:52 > 0:34:54that her father was a chef at Buckingham Palace.
0:34:54 > 0:34:56- You'd like that to be true?- Yeah.
0:34:56 > 0:34:59I don't know if it's factual, but I'd like it to be the answer.
0:34:59 > 0:35:02But, once again, I need the panel to help me.
0:35:02 > 0:35:05OK, panel, let's see if you can sort this out. Your debate starts now.
0:35:05 > 0:35:08I love Delia Smith, but I've no idea.
0:35:08 > 0:35:14Well, Delia Smith, so big fame, huge in the '80s, all her books.
0:35:14 > 0:35:16Late '70s, through the '80s.
0:35:16 > 0:35:19I'm just wondering, if we take the Rolling Stones album cover,
0:35:19 > 0:35:23which album cover had a cake on it? Was it Sticky Fingers?
0:35:25 > 0:35:28Did that have... Was it like a Union Jack of two fingers?
0:35:28 > 0:35:31- Was that a cake?- I can't remember. - Am I going off into...?
0:35:31 > 0:35:33When did that album come out, though? Was that '80s?
0:35:33 > 0:35:38- That would've been late... - But Delia Smith's got a kind of...
0:35:38 > 0:35:40There is a hipness about Delia.
0:35:40 > 0:35:42She might have been the go-to chef,
0:35:42 > 0:35:44that's what I'm thinking about the Rolling Stones.
0:35:44 > 0:35:46- Maybe.- That sounds more feasible
0:35:46 > 0:35:48than allergic to mustard, doesn't it?
0:35:48 > 0:35:51A chef being allergic to mustard would be pretty tricky, wouldn't it?
0:35:51 > 0:35:53- Was her father a chef? - I don't know.
0:35:53 > 0:35:56If he was a chef at Buckingham Palace, then,
0:35:56 > 0:35:58that would have obviously given her a role model.
0:35:58 > 0:36:00I just... I never thought of Delia...
0:36:00 > 0:36:03I always thought of somebody who is self-taught
0:36:03 > 0:36:06and has just picked up a hobby and has made a living out of it.
0:36:06 > 0:36:09So if you had a father that was cooking at Buckingham Palace...
0:36:09 > 0:36:11- He probably would have been... - She would have grown up...
0:36:11 > 0:36:13I think she would have already had a head start.
0:36:13 > 0:36:18I like... I would go with Suzi's first instinct on the cake.
0:36:18 > 0:36:21If you think the cake was on an album cover, that was made by Delia,
0:36:21 > 0:36:23why would we not go with that?
0:36:23 > 0:36:25It could be any of those, couldn't it?
0:36:25 > 0:36:27- But, I guess, if... - Why don't we go for it,
0:36:27 > 0:36:29because Jonathan's going to make his own decision, anyway.
0:36:29 > 0:36:32Exactly. Exactly. He's got his own mind, that man.
0:36:32 > 0:36:35We believe that Delia Smith made a cake for the Rolling Stones.
0:36:37 > 0:36:39They look convinced by that, Jonathan.
0:36:39 > 0:36:41- Yeah.- Have they managed to convince you?
0:36:41 > 0:36:44Great debate. I think it's quite rock and roll, isn't it?
0:36:44 > 0:36:46I'm going to go for B. Yeah.
0:36:46 > 0:36:49You're going with B, because you believe it's a bit rock and roll.
0:36:49 > 0:36:54Did Delia Smith make a cake for a Rolling Stones album cover?
0:36:54 > 0:36:56For £500, the correct statement is...
0:37:03 > 0:37:10- Yes!- Well done.- Wow!- Well done. - Oh, brilliant.- Very well done.
0:37:10 > 0:37:12Very well played. Well done, panel.
0:37:12 > 0:37:15Her father was an RAF wireless operator.
0:37:15 > 0:37:16She was born in Woking.
0:37:16 > 0:37:20She baked a cake for the Rolling Stones album Let It Bleed.
0:37:20 > 0:37:22She is a director of Norwich FC,
0:37:22 > 0:37:26who used to be sponsored by a famous Norwich mustard manufacturer.
0:37:26 > 0:37:29On her website, Delia gives a mustard recipe and says that
0:37:29 > 0:37:33she likes the ferocious kick that English mustard gives.
0:37:33 > 0:37:35Very well done, Jonathan.
0:37:35 > 0:37:38- At the end of Round Three, your prize pot is £1,700.- Wow!
0:37:42 > 0:37:45So, only one question between you and the money.
0:37:45 > 0:37:47A little bit too early for this, maybe,
0:37:47 > 0:37:49but any plans what you'd do with it?
0:37:49 > 0:37:51Part of me would like to get another dog, a French bulldog.
0:37:51 > 0:37:54But then I think I probably wouldn't sleep ever again.
0:37:54 > 0:37:57So I think a holiday, definitely.
0:37:57 > 0:38:00Jonathan, in the final debate, you will face one question.
0:38:00 > 0:38:02That question will have six possible answers.
0:38:02 > 0:38:04- Right.- Three are correct.
0:38:04 > 0:38:07We need all three correct answers for you to leave with the money,
0:38:07 > 0:38:09but don't worry, you are not alone,
0:38:09 > 0:38:13you will be joined by one of these fine panellists to assist you.
0:38:13 > 0:38:17So, based on their performances today,
0:38:17 > 0:38:20who would you like to join you in the final debate?
0:38:20 > 0:38:23Would you like to tune your oboe to Suzi Perry?
0:38:23 > 0:38:26Would you like to go with Peter Jones, because he's worth it?
0:38:26 > 0:38:29Or will you be flying on all four engines with Nitin Ganatra?
0:38:29 > 0:38:32They've all been fabulous, just to begin with,
0:38:32 > 0:38:35but I think for overall knowledge and just getting really stuck in,
0:38:35 > 0:38:37I'm going to pick Suzi.
0:38:37 > 0:38:40OK. Suzi, join us as we play the final debate.
0:38:46 > 0:38:48OK, Jonathan, as it is our final debate,
0:38:48 > 0:38:50we will give you a choice between these two.
0:38:50 > 0:38:54Have a little look, tell us what you fancy between...
0:38:57 > 0:39:00- What do you think? - Celebrities, straightaway.
0:39:00 > 0:39:02Yeah, you feel like celebrities is your thing?
0:39:02 > 0:39:04- OK.- Yeah, definitely.
0:39:04 > 0:39:06- All right.- Are you happy to do that?
0:39:06 > 0:39:09I'm happy to stand here and support you in this, Jonathan.
0:39:09 > 0:39:12- Yes, celebrities. - And help, Suzi, and help.
0:39:12 > 0:39:14- And help.- OK.- OK.
0:39:14 > 0:39:16So, Jonathan, you're going to go for...?
0:39:16 > 0:39:18Celebrities.
0:39:18 > 0:39:20OK. Best of luck.
0:39:20 > 0:39:22£1,700 up for grabs.
0:39:22 > 0:39:24We're going to put 45 seconds on the clock.
0:39:24 > 0:39:27Here comes your final debate question.
0:39:49 > 0:39:50Your 45 seconds starts now.
0:39:50 > 0:39:53Right, should we take out the ones that we don't think it is?
0:39:53 > 0:39:57- OK.- I think Richard Burton, possibly, was he? I'm not...
0:39:57 > 0:39:58He was married to Elizabeth Taylor.
0:39:58 > 0:40:00I don't know if he was married to Marilyn Monroe.
0:40:00 > 0:40:03Joe DiMaggio was the baseball player.
0:40:03 > 0:40:06He was definitely married to Marilyn Monroe.
0:40:06 > 0:40:08Right, so that's one. Do we know about John Warner?
0:40:08 > 0:40:11Not sure about that. Arthur Miller's the playwright.
0:40:11 > 0:40:14- He was married to Marilyn Monroe. - So, Joe DiMaggio and Arthur Miller.
0:40:14 > 0:40:18- James Dougherty.- 20 seconds.
0:40:18 > 0:40:19I don't know the third one.
0:40:19 > 0:40:23Percy Gibson. I don't even recognise the...names.
0:40:23 > 0:40:26We definitely think Joe DiMaggio and Arthur Miller.
0:40:26 > 0:40:28- Definitely those two. - It's between them two.
0:40:28 > 0:40:30- We need to pick another one. - James Dougherty...
0:40:30 > 0:40:32Who's shouting out you?
0:40:32 > 0:40:34I don't know who John Warner is.
0:40:34 > 0:40:37- Percy Gibson? - Jonathan, I need a name.
0:40:37 > 0:40:40OK. Going to go for Joe DiMaggio...
0:40:40 > 0:40:43Arthur Miller...
0:40:43 > 0:40:44and Percy Gibson.
0:40:47 > 0:40:52OK, Jonathan, you said Joe DiMaggio, Arthur Miller and Percy Gibson.
0:40:52 > 0:40:56If all three of those answers are correct, you leave with the money.
0:40:56 > 0:40:58We need them all to be correct.
0:40:58 > 0:41:00Best of luck. Here we go.
0:41:00 > 0:41:02For £1,700.
0:41:02 > 0:41:05The first name you gave us, you were pretty sure on this one,
0:41:05 > 0:41:07Joe DiMaggio.
0:41:17 > 0:41:18Yes. Well played.
0:41:18 > 0:41:22Joe DiMaggio married Marilyn in 1954.
0:41:22 > 0:41:25The next name you gave me was Arthur Miller.
0:41:25 > 0:41:28To keep us on track for the money,
0:41:28 > 0:41:31was Marilyn married to Arthur Miller?
0:41:41 > 0:41:47She was. She married Arthur Miller the playwright in 1956.
0:41:47 > 0:41:53So, we're looking for Marilyn's third husband for £1,700.
0:41:53 > 0:41:55You ruled out Richard Burton.
0:41:55 > 0:41:58You weren't sure who John Warner, James Dougherty
0:41:58 > 0:42:00or Percy Gibson were.
0:42:00 > 0:42:03You plumped for Percy Gibson.
0:42:03 > 0:42:07If Percy Gibson is the correct answer, it's £1,700.
0:42:08 > 0:42:10We're wishing you all the best here.
0:42:10 > 0:42:12Was Percy Gibson married to Marilyn Monroe?
0:42:24 > 0:42:29- Oh!- He wasn't, Jonathan. I'm so sorry!
0:42:29 > 0:42:32Percy Gibson is still married to Joan Collins.
0:42:32 > 0:42:34The correct answer was...
0:42:34 > 0:42:37- I don't want it to be that... - It was James Dougherty.
0:42:37 > 0:42:40- Oh, I was going to say that, as well!- Yeah, you said him.
0:42:40 > 0:42:43James Doughherty married Marilyn very early on in 1942.
0:42:43 > 0:42:45He was 21 and he married
0:42:45 > 0:42:47his next-door neighbour, Norma Jean Baker.
0:42:47 > 0:42:50She was 16 years old.
0:42:50 > 0:42:54John Warner and Richard Burton were husbands of Elizabeth Taylor,
0:42:54 > 0:42:58Percy Gibson is Joan Collins' fifth husband.
0:42:58 > 0:43:01You played the game so, so well, Jonathan, it was so, so close.
0:43:01 > 0:43:03Give it up one more time for Jonathan.
0:43:03 > 0:43:06CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:43:06 > 0:43:07That is it for Debatable.
0:43:07 > 0:43:10Just enough time for me to thank the fantastic panel again,
0:43:10 > 0:43:13to Suzi Perry, to Peter Jones and to Nitin Ganatra.
0:43:13 > 0:43:14I do hope you have enjoyed watching.
0:43:14 > 0:43:16We will see you next time for more heated debates.
0:43:16 > 0:43:18For now, it's goodbye from me.