0:00:10 > 0:00:12APPLAUSE
0:00:12 > 0:00:13Hello and welcome to Debatable,
0:00:13 > 0:00:17where today one player must answer a series of tricky questions
0:00:17 > 0:00:20to try and walk away with a jackpot of over £2,000.
0:00:20 > 0:00:22But, as always, they're not on their own -
0:00:22 > 0:00:24they will have a panel of celebrities
0:00:24 > 0:00:27debating their way to the answers. Will they be all talk and no action?
0:00:27 > 0:00:31Well, that's Debatable. So, let's meet them.
0:00:31 > 0:00:34On today's show, we have broadcaster Suzi Perry,
0:00:34 > 0:00:36entrepreneur Peter Jones,
0:00:36 > 0:00:39and we have actor Nitin Ganatra.
0:00:39 > 0:00:41APPLAUSE
0:00:44 > 0:00:47So, that's the panel. Let's meet today's contestant.
0:00:47 > 0:00:49It is Brian from London.
0:00:49 > 0:00:50APPLAUSE
0:00:50 > 0:00:52- Welcome to the show, Brian. - Thank you very much.
0:00:52 > 0:00:54- How are you doing? - I'm very well, thank you.
0:00:54 > 0:00:56Tell us a little bit about yourself.
0:00:56 > 0:00:59I live in North London with my partner of 30 years, Julie.
0:00:59 > 0:01:02By profession, I'm a hypnotherapist.
0:01:02 > 0:01:03Hang on...
0:01:03 > 0:01:05So, what type of hypnotherapy do you do?
0:01:05 > 0:01:09I help people stop smoking, lose weight.
0:01:09 > 0:01:11When did you get into hypnotherapy?
0:01:11 > 0:01:13Well, I used to be a chartered accountant
0:01:13 > 0:01:17and in my mid-40s I actually went to a talk by Paul McKenna
0:01:17 > 0:01:19on a subject called NLP,
0:01:19 > 0:01:21which is neurolinguistic programming,
0:01:21 > 0:01:24and that led me to start thinking about career choices,
0:01:24 > 0:01:26and I then trained to become a hypnotherapist.
0:01:26 > 0:01:28Can you motivate people?
0:01:28 > 0:01:31Can you make them feel like they're more intelligent
0:01:31 > 0:01:33than they actually are?
0:01:33 > 0:01:34We need you, Brian!
0:01:35 > 0:01:38- Is that something that you do? - Motivation, absolutely.
0:01:38 > 0:01:41As long as the person wants to make a positive change and can use
0:01:41 > 0:01:43their imagination, I believe it's possible.
0:01:43 > 0:01:46- Do we want to make a positive change, Nitin?- Absolutely.
0:01:46 > 0:01:48I could do with some hypnotherapy.
0:01:48 > 0:01:51- Can you make me feel like I'm taller?- Well, in your mind.
0:01:51 > 0:01:54You might not actually be physically taller, but...
0:01:54 > 0:01:57I get really uncomfortable when you make direct eye contact with me.
0:01:57 > 0:01:58Keep eye contact.
0:01:58 > 0:02:01You may start feeling a little bit more intelligent.
0:02:01 > 0:02:04- And taller.- And taller!
0:02:04 > 0:02:07Suzi, now, this is what Brian is offering.
0:02:07 > 0:02:08Brian is offering motivation.
0:02:08 > 0:02:10What are you going to offer him in return?
0:02:10 > 0:02:14We're going to offer you loads of really interesting debate...
0:02:14 > 0:02:17- Thank you.- ..that brings you the correct answer,
0:02:17 > 0:02:18is what I'd like to say,
0:02:18 > 0:02:22- but what we're actually going to offer you is a load of chat.- OK.
0:02:22 > 0:02:24You have Peter Jones in the middle.
0:02:24 > 0:02:27Peter will be harnessing the brains on our panel.
0:02:27 > 0:02:29Are you happy with his role?
0:02:29 > 0:02:31He seems like an intelligent guy, I'm sure he knows a lot.
0:02:31 > 0:02:34Oh, he SEEMS like an intelligent guy.
0:02:34 > 0:02:35Look into my eyes, Brian.
0:02:35 > 0:02:38- You're going to win today. - Thank you.
0:02:38 > 0:02:40OK, you're going to need to pay close attention
0:02:40 > 0:02:41to what our panel say.
0:02:41 > 0:02:44You're only going to be able to choose one of them
0:02:44 > 0:02:45to help you in the final debate.
0:02:45 > 0:02:47- Ready to play?- Yes, I am. - Let's play Round One.
0:02:51 > 0:02:52This round is multiple choice.
0:02:52 > 0:02:54Each question contains four possible answers.
0:02:54 > 0:02:56Only one of those is correct.
0:02:56 > 0:02:58There are three questions in this round.
0:02:58 > 0:03:03Each correct answer is worth £200, possible £600 for your prize pot.
0:03:03 > 0:03:05Here's your first question.
0:03:22 > 0:03:24I work with phobias, so I should know what that is.
0:03:24 > 0:03:27I've got an inkling of what it might be.
0:03:27 > 0:03:29I'd like to hear what the panel thinks.
0:03:29 > 0:03:32Panel, your debate starts now.
0:03:32 > 0:03:34I think it would be odd for somebody to have a fear of a pantomime.
0:03:34 > 0:03:38- Have you done pantomime?- No! - I worked on a panto, but not in.
0:03:38 > 0:03:42When I was younger I used to be a stage electrician and the panto
0:03:42 > 0:03:45would go on for two months and we would be really busy.
0:03:45 > 0:03:49- But could anyone have a fear of a panto?- I don't think so.
0:03:49 > 0:03:51And you wouldn't have a fear of kitchenware.
0:03:51 > 0:03:52You wouldn't walk into your kitchen and go,
0:03:52 > 0:03:55"I can't touch that because I've got a fear of that."
0:03:55 > 0:03:57My husband has got a fear of kitchenware!
0:03:57 > 0:04:00So, if we rule out kitchenware and pantomimes
0:04:00 > 0:04:02we've got doctors and everything.
0:04:02 > 0:04:03And if it was doctors,
0:04:03 > 0:04:08wouldn't there be a word in there that related to medical...?
0:04:08 > 0:04:11The only one that really makes sense to me is the fear of everything,
0:04:11 > 0:04:15because pan, it can mean global or universal.
0:04:15 > 0:04:17Like, as in pandemic?
0:04:17 > 0:04:20- Yeah.- Yeah, it is all. It is all, isn't it?
0:04:20 > 0:04:23- I think it's got to be fear of everything.- Yeah, I agree.- Yeah.
0:04:23 > 0:04:25Well, the panel think that the word panophobia
0:04:25 > 0:04:27means a fear of everything.
0:04:29 > 0:04:32- OK, Brian, was that your first thought?- It was indeed.
0:04:32 > 0:04:35I think, as Nitin said, pan means global,
0:04:35 > 0:04:38and I'm therefore going with fear of everything.
0:04:38 > 0:04:40All right, you're going with the panel.
0:04:40 > 0:04:43You think that panophobia is a fear of everything.
0:04:43 > 0:04:46For £200 into the prize pot, the correct answer is...
0:04:53 > 0:04:54CHEERING
0:04:54 > 0:04:57- Well done, Brian.- Well done.
0:04:57 > 0:04:59Very well done. Well done, panel.
0:04:59 > 0:05:03The prefix pan is from the Greek word meaning all.
0:05:03 > 0:05:06Well played, Brian, you're up and running. £200 into your prize pot.
0:05:06 > 0:05:08- Thank you. - APPLAUSE
0:05:10 > 0:05:11Here comes your next question.
0:05:27 > 0:05:29I don't actually know who Elizabeth Gaskell is,
0:05:29 > 0:05:33which doesn't really help. I'm hoping the panel will know.
0:05:33 > 0:05:35I think they look better read than I am.
0:05:35 > 0:05:37- OK, panel, your debate starts now. - Firstly, I've no idea.
0:05:37 > 0:05:41However, Clegg, Gove and Cameron, in the political circles,
0:05:41 > 0:05:44- are clearly named as if we'd recognise them.- And May.- And May.
0:05:44 > 0:05:47- And May.- Yeah.- Oh, no. - So that's what they've done there.
0:05:47 > 0:05:51The first question is, has anybody read Cranford? Does anybody know?
0:05:51 > 0:05:52- No, nor me.- No.
0:05:52 > 0:05:57So, does she use maybe one of the letters?
0:05:57 > 0:05:59Does she go, like, Elizabeth C Gaskell or...?
0:05:59 > 0:06:02Does that ring any bells with anybody?
0:06:02 > 0:06:04Maehorn sounds quite feminine.
0:06:04 > 0:06:06Yeah, unless she's inherited the name
0:06:06 > 0:06:08on her father's side, or something.
0:06:08 > 0:06:11Cleghorn sounds like an inherited name.
0:06:11 > 0:06:14Cleghorn sounds quite Scottish. Was she Scottish?
0:06:14 > 0:06:16I don't know, but she may well have been.
0:06:16 > 0:06:19- Not doing very well here, are we? - It's a bit of a guess, this one.
0:06:19 > 0:06:21- Maehorn...- I know it's not Patel.
0:06:23 > 0:06:26- Thank you.- Well done.- Maehorn, what type of nationality is that?
0:06:26 > 0:06:29- Is that more Irish? Gaskell seems Scottish to me.- Yeah.
0:06:29 > 0:06:34And you said Maehorn sounds a little bit more feminine as a middle name.
0:06:34 > 0:06:36So I'll put it out, I'll go Cleghorn.
0:06:36 > 0:06:39- I'd go Maehorn. - Maehorn.- It's up to you.
0:06:39 > 0:06:43When you said C, when you did the Elizabeth C Gaskell...
0:06:43 > 0:06:46We're going. I think it makes sense. We are...
0:06:46 > 0:06:49The panel have decided it's Cleghorn.
0:06:49 > 0:06:52The panel have decided to go with Cleghorn,
0:06:52 > 0:06:56but no real knowledge injected into that debate, Brian.
0:06:56 > 0:07:00The question is, is it a female name or is it a name
0:07:00 > 0:07:04that's a middle name that she's taken on from somebody else?
0:07:04 > 0:07:06Based on the initial conversation,
0:07:06 > 0:07:09I'll actually not go with the panel, but go with Maehorn.
0:07:09 > 0:07:11- You're going against the panel based on their debate.- Mm.
0:07:11 > 0:07:13You think it's Maehorn.
0:07:13 > 0:07:15For £200, the correct answer is...
0:07:23 > 0:07:27- Oh!- It's Cleghorn.- Well done. - Well done, panel.
0:07:27 > 0:07:30Gaskell was born Elizabeth Cleghorn Stevenson
0:07:30 > 0:07:34the 29 September 1810 in Chelsea.
0:07:34 > 0:07:36Sorry, Brian, no money there,
0:07:36 > 0:07:39but we still have one more question in this round, a possible £200.
0:07:39 > 0:07:40Here it comes.
0:08:00 > 0:08:04It would have to be a pure guess based on what the panel debate.
0:08:04 > 0:08:07I would definitely rule out six hours,
0:08:07 > 0:08:09but I'm not sure about the others.
0:08:09 > 0:08:11OK, you'll rule out six hours.
0:08:11 > 0:08:14Let's see if our panel can bring any knowledge to this.
0:08:14 > 0:08:15Your debate starts now.
0:08:15 > 0:08:19Right, first question, how far is it from the Earth to the Moon, then?
0:08:19 > 0:08:22Well, I was picking up on Branson's Galactica and listening to
0:08:22 > 0:08:24all of that and I think it's around...
0:08:24 > 0:08:26It's under 3,000 miles, I think.
0:08:26 > 0:08:28Right, so it's less than you think, really, isn't it?
0:08:28 > 0:08:29It's not as far as you think.
0:08:29 > 0:08:32When we used to go on holiday, we used to drive from
0:08:32 > 0:08:35Wolverhampton to northern Spain
0:08:35 > 0:08:39and it would take us about 18 hours.
0:08:39 > 0:08:42Just throwing this out there, not scientific!
0:08:42 > 0:08:44What I'm just thinking, based on what we're saying,
0:08:44 > 0:08:49kind of six hours out the way. As Brian says, it's far too short.
0:08:49 > 0:08:52If it's 2,500 to 3,000, you divide that by the speed,
0:08:52 > 0:08:54- average speed of 60.- Yeah.
0:08:54 > 0:08:57Average speed of 60 will get you to about 4,500.
0:08:57 > 0:08:594,500 hours is going to be nearer to six months
0:08:59 > 0:09:01- than it is to any of those. - Yeah, you're right.
0:09:01 > 0:09:04So it can't be six hours, it can't be six days
0:09:04 > 0:09:07and it's definitely not six years. It can only be six months.
0:09:07 > 0:09:09- It depends whether they stop at services.- Is that right?
0:09:09 > 0:09:12Yeah, yeah, that sounds right. At 60mph, yeah.
0:09:12 > 0:09:14You know what I mean? Six months, long time, isn't it, really,
0:09:14 > 0:09:18- to be driving without stopping? - Yeah, I'd say six months sounds...
0:09:18 > 0:09:21- It is six months.- Yeah. - The answer is definitely six months.
0:09:23 > 0:09:25Very, very sure, there, from Peter.
0:09:25 > 0:09:28Peter seems to think it's 3,000 miles.
0:09:28 > 0:09:2960 miles in an hour,
0:09:29 > 0:09:32600 miles in 10 hours.
0:09:32 > 0:09:366,000 miles in 100. 3,000.
0:09:36 > 0:09:38That would be 50 hours.
0:09:38 > 0:09:40This isn't the first time that a chartered accountant
0:09:40 > 0:09:42has actually checked your figures, Peter.
0:09:42 > 0:09:44LAUGHTER
0:09:44 > 0:09:46I'm just going by the 3,000 miles.
0:09:46 > 0:09:49I don't know whether it's 3,000 miles or 30,000 miles.
0:09:49 > 0:09:53So I'm going to go with six days.
0:09:53 > 0:09:55Going to go against the panel.
0:09:55 > 0:09:57- I may well be wrong. - Peter was quite definite on this.
0:09:57 > 0:09:59He thought it was six months.
0:09:59 > 0:10:00It could only be six months, said Peter.
0:10:00 > 0:10:02I may have got my maths wrong.
0:10:02 > 0:10:04It's been a long time since I did accountancy.
0:10:04 > 0:10:08The panel is going for six months, you are saying six days.
0:10:08 > 0:10:12At 60mph, driving to the moon, it would take...
0:10:20 > 0:10:22- Six months. - That's why I gave up accountancy.
0:10:24 > 0:10:27On average, the distance from the Earth to the Moon varies
0:10:27 > 0:10:33between 225,000 and 250,000 miles.
0:10:33 > 0:10:37So it would take around 4,000 hours.
0:10:37 > 0:10:39- You were thinking, Peter, I think, of Galactica...- Yes.
0:10:39 > 0:10:41..which was travelling at 3,000mph,
0:10:41 > 0:10:43and that went to the edge of space,
0:10:43 > 0:10:47which is 62 miles up to where the Earth's atmosphere becomes space.
0:10:47 > 0:10:49- Does that make it any better? - It's quite painful.
0:10:50 > 0:10:51I forgive you.
0:10:51 > 0:10:54- Sorry, I've completely steered you wrong.- It's OK.
0:10:54 > 0:10:56Brian, you didn't manage to bank anything there.
0:10:56 > 0:10:58It means that the total amount
0:10:58 > 0:11:00banked at the end of Round One is £200.
0:11:00 > 0:11:02APPLAUSE
0:11:04 > 0:11:07- Can only get better. - Things can only get better.
0:11:07 > 0:11:10OK, let's see how they cope with pictures. It's time for Round Two.
0:11:13 > 0:11:15OK, Brian, Round Two is our picture round.
0:11:15 > 0:11:18We're going to ask you to place three pictures in the correct order.
0:11:18 > 0:11:22There are two questions in this round, £300 for each correct answer.
0:11:22 > 0:11:24A possible £600. Here comes your first one.
0:11:41 > 0:11:45I used to watch The Inbetweeners and Dad's Army,
0:11:45 > 0:11:47but not Absolutely Fabulous.
0:11:47 > 0:11:49I think The Inbetweeners is the fewest.
0:11:49 > 0:11:52I think they had about five series.
0:11:52 > 0:11:55And Dad's Army seemed to go on for a long, long time,
0:11:55 > 0:11:57Absolutely Fabulous also.
0:11:57 > 0:11:59OK. Panel, can we sort this out?
0:11:59 > 0:12:00Your debate starts now.
0:12:00 > 0:12:04I think, Brian, you're correct with Inbetweeners, because I think
0:12:04 > 0:12:06Inbetweeners did a couple of series
0:12:06 > 0:12:08and then had a huge success with the movie.
0:12:08 > 0:12:10So I think they did the fewest.
0:12:10 > 0:12:12Having said that, you're a big Dad's Army fan.
0:12:12 > 0:12:13I'm a massive Dad's Army fan.
0:12:13 > 0:12:17I remember Dad's Army came out two years after I was born.
0:12:17 > 0:12:20So I was born in '66, Dad's Army came out in '68,
0:12:20 > 0:12:22and I think it went on for a long time.
0:12:22 > 0:12:25- And they were still making them late '70s, weren't they?- Yeah.
0:12:25 > 0:12:27Absolutely Fabulous, again, was really popular,
0:12:27 > 0:12:30but I don't think it could beat or top Dad's Army.
0:12:30 > 0:12:33The number of series broadcast, that's the question.
0:12:33 > 0:12:35The number of series broadcast.
0:12:35 > 0:12:39- How long did that go on for? - It went over five seasons, I think.
0:12:39 > 0:12:41Which would you have liked to have been in,
0:12:41 > 0:12:43Absolutely Fabulous or EastEnders?
0:12:43 > 0:12:47Oh, you can't ask me that! Ab Fab.
0:12:47 > 0:12:50Ab Fab just looked like chaos. It looked like great fun.
0:12:50 > 0:12:53- Right, so we're going Dad's Army longest?- Yes.- Right.
0:12:53 > 0:12:56- I don't know, but, yes. - Is that the order?
0:12:56 > 0:12:58- Well, yeah... - Happy with Inbetweeners.
0:12:58 > 0:13:01- My instinct says Dad's Army as well. - OK, OK.
0:13:01 > 0:13:04OK, the panel have decided this is the order.
0:13:04 > 0:13:10Starting with the least number of shows is The Inbetweeners,
0:13:10 > 0:13:13with Absolutely Fabulous, and the most, Dad's Army.
0:13:15 > 0:13:18OK, Brian, big Dad's Army fan there, Peter in the middle.
0:13:18 > 0:13:21The panel think, like you, The Inbetweeners had the fewest.
0:13:21 > 0:13:24I'm going to go with the panel this time.
0:13:24 > 0:13:27Inbetweeners, Absolutely Fabulous and Dad's Army.
0:13:27 > 0:13:29OK, so you're going to go with the panel this time.
0:13:29 > 0:13:33For £300, is that the correct order?
0:13:39 > 0:13:42APPLAUSE
0:13:42 > 0:13:44- Well done.- Well done.
0:13:44 > 0:13:47Very well worked out, panel, well played.
0:13:47 > 0:13:48The Inbetweeners ran for three series,
0:13:48 > 0:13:50Ab Fab ran for five series,
0:13:50 > 0:13:53Dad's Army ran for nine series - and you were right, Peter,
0:13:53 > 0:13:57between 1968 and 1977.
0:13:57 > 0:13:59Well done, Brian, £300 into the prize pot.
0:13:59 > 0:14:01You're up to £500.
0:14:01 > 0:14:03APPLAUSE
0:14:04 > 0:14:06Here comes your second picture question.
0:14:20 > 0:14:24I'm familiar with Cutty Sark because of Greenwich.
0:14:24 > 0:14:27I'm not so familiar with Santa Maria or HMS Victory.
0:14:27 > 0:14:31So I do hope that the panel will know the answer.
0:14:31 > 0:14:34They look slightly more Tia Maria than Santa Maria,
0:14:34 > 0:14:36but let's see if they can sort this out for you.
0:14:36 > 0:14:38Panel, your debate starts now.
0:14:38 > 0:14:41Cutty Sark, as Brian said, we can still see that today, can't we?
0:14:41 > 0:14:44We can see it when they ran past it on the marathon and go and
0:14:44 > 0:14:47physically touch it, and I wonder whether that's the newest boat.
0:14:47 > 0:14:49The Cutty Sark is definitely the newest. I've been there, seen it.
0:14:49 > 0:14:52Santa Maria was Columbus's first boat,
0:14:52 > 0:14:55so that definitely will be the earliest.
0:14:55 > 0:14:57I don't know anything about Victory but it would only be
0:14:57 > 0:14:59that it's in the middle, anyway.
0:14:59 > 0:15:01Yeah, so that would be the first one.
0:15:01 > 0:15:02- Santa Maria is the first.- Yeah.- OK.
0:15:02 > 0:15:05And that's definite, because that's Columbus. And that's the newest.
0:15:05 > 0:15:08- That's the newest.- You can see just by the look of the pictures.
0:15:08 > 0:15:09Well, I like your logic, Peter.
0:15:09 > 0:15:11And there's Victory, we've missed Victory.
0:15:11 > 0:15:14It just seems logical, if that was Columbus.
0:15:14 > 0:15:16That's definitely Columbus, isn't it?
0:15:16 > 0:15:20So we're pretty confident that the earliest was Santa Maria,
0:15:20 > 0:15:25then came HMS Victory and the latest is Cutty Sark.
0:15:25 > 0:15:28The panel not messing around on this one, they're pretty sure.
0:15:28 > 0:15:32I really can't argue with that as I'm only familiar
0:15:32 > 0:15:35with the Cutty Sark, which seems to be a later boat.
0:15:35 > 0:15:37I'll go with the panel -
0:15:37 > 0:15:40Santa Maria, HMS Victory, Cutty Sark.
0:15:40 > 0:15:42OK, you think the panel are making sense.
0:15:42 > 0:15:45You're going for Santa Maria, the earliest launch,
0:15:45 > 0:15:47then HMS Victory, then the Cutty Sark.
0:15:47 > 0:15:50For £300, is that the correct order?
0:15:57 > 0:16:00It is the correct order! Well done.
0:16:00 > 0:16:03- APPLAUSE - Perfect logic.
0:16:03 > 0:16:05Good Christopher Columbus knowledge there, Peter.
0:16:05 > 0:16:08The Santa Maria was the lead ship of Christopher Columbus
0:16:08 > 0:16:12who set sail on the ocean blue in 1492.
0:16:12 > 0:16:16HMS Victory launched at Chatham in 1765.
0:16:16 > 0:16:21Cutty Sark was launched at Dumbarton in 1869. Well played, Brian.
0:16:21 > 0:16:23At the end of Round Two, you've got £800.
0:16:23 > 0:16:24- APPLAUSE - Thank you.
0:16:26 > 0:16:30- So, Brian, has the panel redeemed themselves?- Yes, they have.
0:16:30 > 0:16:34Apart from the little glitch with the trip to the moon,
0:16:34 > 0:16:36I think they've been right for just about every answer.
0:16:36 > 0:16:39So, Brian is saying that the panel have redeemed themselves
0:16:39 > 0:16:42even though the panel has a 100% record.
0:16:42 > 0:16:45LAUGHTER
0:16:45 > 0:16:48How have you managed to make us all believe that the panel needed
0:16:48 > 0:16:50to redeem themselves, Brian? I can't believe that.
0:16:50 > 0:16:51I can't believe it.
0:16:51 > 0:16:54I can't believe you actually made the panel doubt themselves
0:16:54 > 0:16:56when it's you! It's you, Brian!
0:16:56 > 0:16:58LAUGHTER
0:17:00 > 0:17:03OK, who is standing out for you from our panel?
0:17:03 > 0:17:06Peter I think has some very good reasoning,
0:17:06 > 0:17:10particularly with regard to the author earlier.
0:17:10 > 0:17:12Brian, it is time for Round Three.
0:17:15 > 0:17:18OK, Brian, in Round Three you will face questions that contain
0:17:18 > 0:17:21three statements about a person, a place or a thing.
0:17:21 > 0:17:24Only one of those statements is true.
0:17:24 > 0:17:28Two questions in this round, £500 up for grabs for each correct answer.
0:17:28 > 0:17:30Here we go.
0:17:53 > 0:17:54Easy now!
0:17:55 > 0:17:58Well, I know they're musicians and...
0:17:58 > 0:18:00may I ask the panel, see what they...?
0:18:00 > 0:18:04Oh, absolutely, because they have more rabbit than Sainsbury's.
0:18:04 > 0:18:07Why did you get it off your chest, panel? You debate starts now.
0:18:07 > 0:18:09I think it's called Hooky Street,
0:18:09 > 0:18:12the theme tune to Only Fools And Horses.
0:18:12 > 0:18:15I was just recovering from the fact that they potentially
0:18:15 > 0:18:17shot put in the '98 Olympics.
0:18:17 > 0:18:20Yeah, but that's such a far-out answer that could be true.
0:18:20 > 0:18:22- It can't be true. - It might be true.
0:18:22 > 0:18:24Have you seen Chas and Dave? It can't be true!
0:18:24 > 0:18:27And also, the '80s was when they were going strong and really famous
0:18:27 > 0:18:30and I'm sure we would have known if one of them was a shot-putter.
0:18:30 > 0:18:32Yeah, that one definitely wrong.
0:18:32 > 0:18:36Having said that, Eminem, My Name Is,
0:18:36 > 0:18:39it's a very fast track.
0:18:39 > 0:18:41I think it's perfectly plausible.
0:18:41 > 0:18:45The way these guys are, a lot of the record producers hear
0:18:45 > 0:18:48something from somewhere and go, "I need that."
0:18:48 > 0:18:50It doesn't seem right, but then,
0:18:50 > 0:18:53Only Fools And Horses seems a bit obvious.
0:18:53 > 0:18:56Are we agreed that shot put is completely out of the question,
0:18:56 > 0:18:58- even I would...?- There's no way!
0:18:58 > 0:19:00- I don't know, man. - I'll tell you what,
0:19:00 > 0:19:03I'll give £1,000 to charity if it's the shot put.
0:19:03 > 0:19:06And that charity will be the Patrick Kielty Appreciation...
0:19:06 > 0:19:09LAUGHTER
0:19:09 > 0:19:13My logic is that they were big stars in the '80s,
0:19:13 > 0:19:15they wrote Snooker Loopy,
0:19:15 > 0:19:17so they were in with the BBC.
0:19:18 > 0:19:22It was '80s, late '70s, early '80s, Only Fools And Horses.
0:19:22 > 0:19:25Well, you see, I do like my hip-hop and rap.
0:19:25 > 0:19:27I've grown up with a lot of hip-hop.
0:19:27 > 0:19:30It's perfectly possible that it could have been in an Eminem...
0:19:30 > 0:19:33It would be very cool to have Chas and Dave in an Eminem,
0:19:33 > 0:19:37but given the era of Only Fools And Horses,
0:19:37 > 0:19:40- I'm going to have to go with you guys.- Right, we're going for it.
0:19:40 > 0:19:43Right, the panel have decided that we're going to go with
0:19:43 > 0:19:48the popular vote of, it was the theme tune to Only Fools And Horses.
0:19:49 > 0:19:52It sounds the most obvious answer.
0:19:52 > 0:19:54I don't know whether it's possible they may have competed in
0:19:54 > 0:19:57the shot putt, in which case some charity is going to be better off.
0:19:57 > 0:19:59LAUGHTER
0:20:00 > 0:20:02My just niggling question is,
0:20:02 > 0:20:05why didn't they sing the song for Only Fools And Horses?
0:20:05 > 0:20:07Or maybe they did.
0:20:07 > 0:20:10I'm going to go with the panel and vote the theme tune to
0:20:10 > 0:20:12Only Fools And Horses and...
0:20:12 > 0:20:13hope for the best.
0:20:14 > 0:20:16OK, we're hoping for the best on this one.
0:20:16 > 0:20:20For £500, the correct statement is...
0:20:29 > 0:20:36- Wow.- They did, they played on a song sampled for Eminem's My Name Is.
0:20:36 > 0:20:39When they were session musicians, Chas and Dave played in
0:20:39 > 0:20:42Labi Siffre's I Got The,
0:20:42 > 0:20:45and that song provides the main sample for My Name Is.
0:20:45 > 0:20:48# Just a lonely soul
0:20:50 > 0:20:52# Slowly dying. #
0:20:52 > 0:20:54- # Hi, my name is - What?
0:20:54 > 0:20:56- # My name is - Who?
0:20:56 > 0:20:58- # My name is - Slim Shady
0:20:58 > 0:21:00- # Hi, my name is - Huh?
0:21:00 > 0:21:01- # My name is - What?
0:21:01 > 0:21:04- # My name is - Slim Shady. #
0:21:04 > 0:21:08Neither Chas nor Dave have ever competed, Peter Jones,
0:21:08 > 0:21:11- you'll be thankful to know... - Damn!- Wow.
0:21:11 > 0:21:14..in the 1988 Olympics.
0:21:14 > 0:21:17And the theme tune to Only Fools And Horses was written by
0:21:17 > 0:21:19the show's creator, John Sullivan.
0:21:19 > 0:21:22No money added to the prize pot there but there's still
0:21:22 > 0:21:25£500 up for grabs with your final question.
0:21:25 > 0:21:26Brian, here it comes.
0:21:44 > 0:21:45It's a difficult one.
0:21:45 > 0:21:48- I'm going to have to rely on what the panel say for this one.- OK.
0:21:50 > 0:21:53Panel, can you help us out with this? The debate starts now.
0:21:53 > 0:21:55Any hip-hop involved for Nitin?
0:21:55 > 0:21:58No, no, I can't see any hip-hop in this.
0:21:58 > 0:22:00Don't know much about golf.
0:22:00 > 0:22:02What you need is someone who has played golf
0:22:02 > 0:22:04at St Andrews many times.
0:22:04 > 0:22:07- Exactly.- I have. - And over to you.- Oh!
0:22:07 > 0:22:10It didn't play as the first Ryder Cup, though, did it?
0:22:10 > 0:22:13No. So, I play the Dunhill at St Andrews each year
0:22:13 > 0:22:16and I actually happen to know the Kohler family,
0:22:16 > 0:22:18that own the Hotel, so I do know the answer.
0:22:18 > 0:22:20- Oh, do you?- Yeah.- Oh!- OK.
0:22:20 > 0:22:24- They didn't hold the first Ryder Cup there.- No.
0:22:24 > 0:22:27- St Andrews does have the oldest university in Scotland.- Yeah.
0:22:27 > 0:22:30So, yeah, oldest university in Scotland.
0:22:30 > 0:22:34- So the answer, we're pretty sure, aren't we?- Yeah.- Yeah.
0:22:34 > 0:22:37So, the panel are pretty sure that the answer is that St Andrews
0:22:37 > 0:22:41has the oldest university in Scotland.
0:22:41 > 0:22:42So, Peter Jones is pretty sure
0:22:42 > 0:22:45that it is the oldest university in Scotland.
0:22:45 > 0:22:48I'm more than happy to accept Peter's answer.
0:22:48 > 0:22:52- So you're going with the panel?- I'm going with the panel, absolutely.
0:22:52 > 0:22:55- This can only go one of two ways, Peter.- Yeah.
0:22:55 > 0:22:57- I'm out. - LAUGHTER
0:22:57 > 0:23:01Is St Andrews the oldest university in Scotland? For £500.
0:23:08 > 0:23:09It is!
0:23:09 > 0:23:12APPLAUSE Very well done.
0:23:12 > 0:23:17St Andrews University was founded between 1410 and 1413.
0:23:17 > 0:23:19The first Ryder Cup was held at Worcester Country Club
0:23:19 > 0:23:21in Massachusetts in 1927.
0:23:21 > 0:23:25St Andrews Castle is a ruin and that is why Prince William
0:23:25 > 0:23:27wouldn't have been staying in that.
0:23:27 > 0:23:28Who ruined it?
0:23:28 > 0:23:30LAUGHTER
0:23:30 > 0:23:32Well played, Brian. It means, at the end of Round Three,
0:23:32 > 0:23:34your prize pot is up to £1,300.
0:23:34 > 0:23:36APPLAUSE
0:23:38 > 0:23:42Quite a tidy little sum. Any plans, if you won the money today?
0:23:42 > 0:23:45Well, it's 30 years, me and my partner Julie have been together,
0:23:45 > 0:23:48so it would be nice to treat her to a holiday.
0:23:48 > 0:23:51I was hoping to treat her to go to Australia,
0:23:51 > 0:23:54but maybe this will pay towards it.
0:23:54 > 0:23:56Now, Brian, in the Final Debate you'll face one question.
0:23:56 > 0:23:59This question will have six possible answers.
0:23:59 > 0:24:01Only three of them are correct.
0:24:01 > 0:24:03We need all three correct answers in order for you to leave
0:24:03 > 0:24:06with the cash today. As before, you are not alone.
0:24:06 > 0:24:09You will choose one of these fine, upstanding
0:24:09 > 0:24:11members of the community to assist you.
0:24:11 > 0:24:14You and your panellist will have 45 seconds to debate that question.
0:24:14 > 0:24:17OK, Brian, who would you like to join you in the Final Debate?
0:24:17 > 0:24:20Would you like to ra, ra, ra, rabbit, rabbit, rabbit
0:24:20 > 0:24:21with Suzi Perry?
0:24:21 > 0:24:25Would you like to drive me to the moon with Peter Jones?
0:24:25 > 0:24:27Or, his name is, uh! His name is, uh!
0:24:29 > 0:24:30Nitin Ganatra.
0:24:30 > 0:24:32I'd like to choose Peter, please.
0:24:32 > 0:24:35- Peter, will you join us for the Final Debate?- Yes.
0:24:35 > 0:24:37APPLAUSE
0:24:40 > 0:24:43OK, Peter, Brian has chosen you for the Final Debate.
0:24:43 > 0:24:45You're looking confident. Are you ready to go?
0:24:45 > 0:24:46I'm ready to go, really excited.
0:24:46 > 0:24:49- This is the best bit, isn't it? - Absolutely.- Take some money home.
0:24:49 > 0:24:51- I'm hoping so.- Anything that we want to see up there?
0:24:51 > 0:24:52Anything we want to avoid?
0:24:52 > 0:24:54Hoping for an Entertainment question,
0:24:54 > 0:24:56- want to avoid a Sports question. - Well, it is the Final Debate,
0:24:56 > 0:24:59so you do get two categories to choose from, Brian.
0:24:59 > 0:25:01Have a look at this and see which one you'd prefer.
0:25:07 > 0:25:09- Art, are you good at Art? - No, not at all.
0:25:09 > 0:25:11- Food And Drink.- Food And Drink, should we go for that one?
0:25:11 > 0:25:14I don't mind. You go with what you... This is about you.
0:25:14 > 0:25:18I'm going with Food And Drink, although it is limited
0:25:18 > 0:25:20in my knowledge, but I'll go with Food And Drink.
0:25:20 > 0:25:22- You prefer that over Art.- Yes.- OK.
0:25:22 > 0:25:27£1,300 for grabs, 45 seconds on the clock.
0:25:27 > 0:25:29Best of luck, Brian, here comes your Final Debate question.
0:25:52 > 0:25:5445 seconds starts now.
0:25:54 > 0:25:58- Bearnaise is definitely made with egg.- OK.
0:25:58 > 0:25:59100%.
0:25:59 > 0:26:02Aioli, what's that? I don't even know what that is.
0:26:02 > 0:26:04Aioli, so that is, erm...
0:26:04 > 0:26:08- You know the stuff you can put onto bread?- OK.
0:26:08 > 0:26:10- Aioli, I think that's...- OK.
0:26:10 > 0:26:13So is it bearnaise, bechamel and carbonara?
0:26:13 > 0:26:15Carbonara, carbonara...
0:26:15 > 0:26:19- You've had the Italian pasta with carbonara?- Right.
0:26:19 > 0:26:22- 20 seconds.- I'd say carbonara has got eggs in it.
0:26:23 > 0:26:28- Satay, I wouldn't say that's got any eggs in it at all.- That's peanut.
0:26:28 > 0:26:31- Ten seconds. - Marinara, so I would say...
0:26:31 > 0:26:34- Carbonara, bearnaise...- Bechamel.
0:26:37 > 0:26:38I'd go aioli.
0:26:38 > 0:26:40Brian, I need three answers.
0:26:40 > 0:26:42Oh.
0:26:42 > 0:26:46Erm, bearnaise, bechamel, carbonara.
0:26:46 > 0:26:50Bearnaise, bechamel, carbonara.
0:26:51 > 0:26:53OK, Brian, best of luck.
0:26:53 > 0:26:56We need all three answers correct for you to go home with the money.
0:26:56 > 0:27:01£1,300. The first answer you gave me was bearnaise.
0:27:01 > 0:27:04Is a bearnaise sauce made with eggs?
0:27:11 > 0:27:13Yes, it is.
0:27:13 > 0:27:16Classic French sauce made with eggs and butter.
0:27:17 > 0:27:19You then said bechamel.
0:27:20 > 0:27:23- You weren't sure on that one. - Not sure at all.
0:27:23 > 0:27:25Keep us on track for £1,300.
0:27:27 > 0:27:29Is bechamel sauce made with eggs?
0:27:38 > 0:27:41It isn't, Brian, I am so sorry.
0:27:41 > 0:27:45It is a white sauce normally made with butter and flour.
0:27:45 > 0:27:47- It's aioli, I guess. - Carbonara, you also said.
0:27:47 > 0:27:51Carbonara is made using eggs, cream and cheese.
0:27:51 > 0:27:53Aioli, creamy garlic mayonnaise.
0:27:53 > 0:27:56- Oh, mayonnaise!- It's garlicky.
0:27:56 > 0:28:00I was thinking of olive oil-type dressing. OK.
0:28:00 > 0:28:03Marinara is an Italian tomato-based sauce,
0:28:03 > 0:28:06satay is an Asian peanut sauce.
0:28:06 > 0:28:08Just one out there, Brian, I'm so, so sorry.
0:28:08 > 0:28:10You played the game so well. Thanks for coming to see us.
0:28:10 > 0:28:12Give it up one more time for Brian.
0:28:12 > 0:28:15- APPLAUSE - Thank you for your help.
0:28:15 > 0:28:16- Well done.- Thank you.
0:28:16 > 0:28:18That is it for Debatable.
0:28:18 > 0:28:20There's just enough time for me to thank our fabulous panel.
0:28:20 > 0:28:24To Mr Peter Jones, to Suzi Perry and Nitin Ganatra.
0:28:24 > 0:28:25I do hope you've enjoyed watching.
0:28:25 > 0:28:27We'll see you next time for more heated debates.
0:28:27 > 0:28:29For now, it's goodbye from me.