0:00:09 > 0:00:12CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:00:12 > 0:00:14Hello and welcome to Debatable,
0:00:14 > 0:00:17where today one player must answer a series of tricky questions
0:00:17 > 0:00:21to try and walk away with a jackpot of over £3,000.
0:00:21 > 0:00:23But they're not on their own.
0:00:23 > 0:00:27They'll have a panel of celebrities debating their way to the answers.
0:00:27 > 0:00:30Will they be able to talk the talk? That's Debatable. Let's meet them.
0:00:30 > 0:00:33Chin-wagging their way to the answers today we have
0:00:33 > 0:00:35actress Sunetra Sarker,
0:00:35 > 0:00:37we have writer Germaine Greer
0:00:37 > 0:00:39and comedian Russell Kane.
0:00:39 > 0:00:41CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:00:45 > 0:00:47Sunetra, you're in the middle seat.
0:00:47 > 0:00:50Does this mean you're taking charge of our panel today?
0:00:50 > 0:00:52Well, I'm honoured with the promotion,
0:00:52 > 0:00:53except I am feeling slightly nervous,
0:00:53 > 0:00:57because that means I have to sort of look after this rowdy bunch.
0:00:57 > 0:01:00- The lovely thing is they're not rowdy yet.- Yes.
0:01:00 > 0:01:02But I'm looking at Germaine,
0:01:02 > 0:01:04and I have seen you on many shows, Germaine.
0:01:04 > 0:01:08I don't think I've ever seen you lose a debate.
0:01:08 > 0:01:10- Really?- You talk sense pretty much every time.
0:01:10 > 0:01:12I wouldn't take that, Germaine.
0:01:12 > 0:01:15Well, if you do talk sense, you're likely to lose the debate.
0:01:15 > 0:01:17You have to talk a certain amount of nonsense.
0:01:17 > 0:01:21- The strategy is, whatever Germaine says, agree with it.- What?!
0:01:21 > 0:01:23It looks like the perfect panel.
0:01:23 > 0:01:26Let's see if you can help out our guest.
0:01:26 > 0:01:28It's time to meet today's contestant!
0:01:28 > 0:01:30APPLAUSE
0:01:31 > 0:01:33- Welcome to the show, Chris. - Nice to see you.- Nice to meet you.
0:01:33 > 0:01:36- Thank you.- Tell us a little bit about yourself.
0:01:36 > 0:01:40I'm a retired - only just recently retired - solicitor, and, erm,
0:01:40 > 0:01:44basically, I do am dram, which is amateur dramatics,
0:01:44 > 0:01:47and that sort of takes up quite a lot of time.
0:01:47 > 0:01:51- And you're married, of course. - Oh, yes. Yes, yes, I'm married.
0:01:51 > 0:01:5440 years now. It seems like yesterday.
0:01:54 > 0:01:56- ALL:- Ahhhh!
0:01:58 > 0:02:00So, tell us a little bit about the family.
0:02:00 > 0:02:04Ah, well, my wife Celia, we've got a son called Tim
0:02:04 > 0:02:08and a daughter called Jo, and she's got two little boys of four and two.
0:02:08 > 0:02:12- And yourself and Celia look after those occasionally?- Well, yes.
0:02:12 > 0:02:17Not too much. They live in Reading, which is just far enough to, erm...
0:02:17 > 0:02:19not have to baby-sit.
0:02:19 > 0:02:21But we do see them quite a lot.
0:02:21 > 0:02:23I've got to shake your hand there for honesty.
0:02:23 > 0:02:26There's lots of grandparents watching. None would admit that.
0:02:26 > 0:02:29And what stuff would you like to see coming up?
0:02:29 > 0:02:32Quite keen on film and theatre and musicals.
0:02:32 > 0:02:36- A little bit about politics.- And what do you make of today's panel?
0:02:36 > 0:02:40Wow! Well, I'm overwhelmed. They're absolutely fabulous.
0:02:40 > 0:02:43As we go on, you're going to have to pay close attention,
0:02:43 > 0:02:45because you will only be choosing one of them to help you
0:02:45 > 0:02:47in today's Final Debate.
0:02:47 > 0:02:50- Right.- Are you ready to play? - Certainly am.- Best of luck, Chris.
0:02:50 > 0:02:52Let's play Round One!
0:02:55 > 0:02:57OK, Chris, in this round, it is multiple choice.
0:02:57 > 0:03:01There will be four possible answers. Only one is correct.
0:03:01 > 0:03:04We have four questions in this round. Each answer's worth £200,
0:03:04 > 0:03:08so a possible £800 to go into your prize pot, which of course
0:03:08 > 0:03:10you'll play for at the end of the show in the Final Debate.
0:03:10 > 0:03:13- Ready to go?- Yep.- Let's get cracking. Question one.
0:03:35 > 0:03:38- I've got an idea, but I think I might need a bit of help.- OK.
0:03:38 > 0:03:40Playing his cards close to his chest.
0:03:40 > 0:03:43No doubt our debaters will be able to sort this out very quickly.
0:03:43 > 0:03:46Panel, your debate starts now.
0:03:46 > 0:03:50- So, bears!- Does anyone have an inkling before we even get going?
0:03:50 > 0:03:54Because I honestly don't. I'm up for reasoning it out. I don't know.
0:03:54 > 0:03:57I'm going to throw moustachioed bear out there, because I think
0:03:57 > 0:03:59that's a joke answer, but it could be the real answer.
0:03:59 > 0:04:03I think for something so... I mean, who would ever dream of
0:04:03 > 0:04:06calling a bear a moustachioed bear?
0:04:06 > 0:04:09You would need to ask, wouldn't you, whether the monocled bear
0:04:09 > 0:04:13- had two eyes? - Yes.
0:04:13 > 0:04:18Because if it did, it's a bit odd that one of them appears
0:04:18 > 0:04:22to be wearing a monocle, which is probably a stripe around the eye.
0:04:22 > 0:04:25So I'm leaning towards spectacled bear,
0:04:25 > 0:04:29because we have other spectacled beasts. We have spectacled bats.
0:04:29 > 0:04:33- Mm-hm.- The only one who's worrying me is bearded bear.
0:04:33 > 0:04:35- You get bearded in other creatures, as well.- Oh, do you?
0:04:35 > 0:04:38- I've heard of spectacled... - There is a lot of bearding going on.
0:04:38 > 0:04:40There's a bearded dragon.
0:04:40 > 0:04:42Most of those bearded dragons live in the East End.
0:04:42 > 0:04:45- You realise that, don't you? - I'm glad YOU said that!
0:04:45 > 0:04:50No, no, I'm talking about the real lizard! It's a very popular pet.
0:04:50 > 0:04:52Russell and I thought that was hipsters you were talking about.
0:04:52 > 0:04:56Yeah. I thought it was something to do with Hackney or soy lattes.
0:04:56 > 0:05:00Did either of you think I had a theory with my moustachioed bear?
0:05:00 > 0:05:04- I think we can discount moustachioed.- OK.
0:05:04 > 0:05:07Well, should we go for spectacled because we believe there is
0:05:07 > 0:05:08a spectacled bat?
0:05:08 > 0:05:13So, we have decided that the only bear native to South America
0:05:13 > 0:05:14is called the spectacled bear.
0:05:16 > 0:05:21So, Chris, any sense talked there, anything to direct you?
0:05:21 > 0:05:26Well, I can't see bears with spectacles, really.
0:05:26 > 0:05:31Obviously, it's not real spectacles, but, erm...
0:05:31 > 0:05:35I'm inclined to go for bearded bear.
0:05:35 > 0:05:38So, based on the panel's debate...
0:05:38 > 0:05:40No, not based on their debate at all.
0:05:40 > 0:05:42LAUGHTER
0:05:42 > 0:05:44- RUSSELL:- Go on, Chris!
0:05:44 > 0:05:48What I'm saying, Chris, is based on the lack of knowledge
0:05:48 > 0:05:52from the panel, you've decided to go your own way.
0:05:52 > 0:05:54- SUNETRA:- Go, Chris. - Well, that's right.
0:05:54 > 0:05:57But not because I think there was anything wrong with what they
0:05:57 > 0:06:01said, but I just have a feeling it's more likely to be bearded
0:06:01 > 0:06:04bear than anything else. I'm probably quite wrong.
0:06:04 > 0:06:06- But that's what I'm going for. - OK, I like it.
0:06:06 > 0:06:08A man who knows his own mind.
0:06:08 > 0:06:11He's going against the panel. Our panel went for spectacled bear.
0:06:11 > 0:06:17You believe it is bearded bear. For £200, the correct answer is...
0:06:23 > 0:06:26- Ahhh!- ..spectacled bear.
0:06:26 > 0:06:30Yes, well, I was wrong. But it was worth a try.
0:06:30 > 0:06:34It was worth a try. Spectacled bears are also called the Andean bears.
0:06:34 > 0:06:37They're among the smallest members of the bear family. There he is.
0:06:37 > 0:06:40- RUSSELL:- He should have gone to Bearsavers, shouldn't he?
0:06:41 > 0:06:43Here comes your next question.
0:07:02 > 0:07:03Right, well, erm...
0:07:05 > 0:07:09..I certainly believe chief superintendent is a rank.
0:07:10 > 0:07:14Erm, I'm not absolutely sure about the others.
0:07:14 > 0:07:15I think I'm going to need some help again.
0:07:15 > 0:07:18Don't worry, that's what they're here for.
0:07:18 > 0:07:20Panel, your debate starts now.
0:07:20 > 0:07:22- Right.- Obviously, you know this. You must do.
0:07:22 > 0:07:26- What do you mean, just because I've played a policewoman on TV?- Yeah!
0:07:26 > 0:07:28How did your research go with that part?
0:07:28 > 0:07:33Well, I've recently been playing a detective chief inspector.
0:07:33 > 0:07:36That's not up there. So I definitely know chief and inspector exist.
0:07:36 > 0:07:41However, I think you can be a sergeant in any of
0:07:41 > 0:07:44those branches, so I believe the sergeant inspector exists,
0:07:44 > 0:07:47even though that stands out to me as being the oddest,
0:07:47 > 0:07:50don't you think, sergeant inspector?
0:07:50 > 0:07:53You don't have to say anything, but anything you do say...
0:07:55 > 0:07:59- Very good! You're good. - Erm, commander seems to ring a bell,
0:07:59 > 0:08:02the one that always comes in with the tassels on his breast pocket,
0:08:02 > 0:08:05the posh one that's only in every five episodes in The Bill?
0:08:05 > 0:08:08- Isn't he normally a commander?- Now, I will stop you there and say, look,
0:08:08 > 0:08:11they've said the Metropolitan Police,
0:08:11 > 0:08:15which makes me think commander is a US version of a police rank.
0:08:15 > 0:08:18Don't you think deputy assistant commissioner...?
0:08:18 > 0:08:20- It's desperate, isn't it? - It sounds a bit ridiculous.
0:08:20 > 0:08:23- I mean, you've got a deputy... - It feels bureaucratic enough
0:08:23 > 0:08:25to be real, if you know what I mean.
0:08:25 > 0:08:27I feel like there would be a deputy assistant commissioner.
0:08:27 > 0:08:32My instinct says I definitely know there's a chief superintendent.
0:08:32 > 0:08:34Sergeant inspector sounds like one of those hybrids that
0:08:34 > 0:08:37I think exist but we don't hear about it often.
0:08:37 > 0:08:40I don't know, but just by reasoning it out we've come to commander.
0:08:40 > 0:08:43- Shall we go for commander? - I feel like we should just...
0:08:43 > 0:08:49Based on our wonderful analysis, the panel have chosen commander.
0:08:51 > 0:08:53So, Chris, the panel have gone for commander.
0:08:53 > 0:08:57Anything in there that's made any sense, fired any memories?
0:08:57 > 0:09:01Hm, yes, I was very interested to hear what they said,
0:09:01 > 0:09:05and I basically am inclined to agree with them.
0:09:05 > 0:09:11So I also think commander is not a rank in the Metropolitan Police.
0:09:12 > 0:09:18OK. You're agreeing with our panel. For £200, is that correct?
0:09:23 > 0:09:25PANEL: Whoa!
0:09:25 > 0:09:29- Wrong one.- Sergeant inspector. - I'm so sorry.
0:09:29 > 0:09:34I felt sergeant was going to pull us down, so I went to commander.
0:09:34 > 0:09:37- What would you know? You only lived as a policewoman!- Sorry!
0:09:37 > 0:09:40- OK, Chris, no money there. - That's all right.
0:09:40 > 0:09:42But we've got two more chances in this round.
0:09:42 > 0:09:44Here we go, here's your third question.
0:10:03 > 0:10:08- Classic films, Chris. - Yes, this is certainly my thing.
0:10:08 > 0:10:12I know all the Hitchcock films practically - not off by heart,
0:10:12 > 0:10:18but I do know which of those is not a work by Daphne du Maurier.
0:10:18 > 0:10:21- Hold that... - I won't say it yet.- Yes.
0:10:21 > 0:10:22I like what you've done there.
0:10:22 > 0:10:26Let's test our panel to see how their Hitchcock knowledge is.
0:10:26 > 0:10:28Panel, your debate starts now.
0:10:28 > 0:10:31- So, really, we're just trying to prove ourselves to Chris now!- Yes.
0:10:31 > 0:10:35- It's like an audition for Chris! - So, what I'll start off with,
0:10:35 > 0:10:37I can start off by saying I do know that Rebecca is...
0:10:37 > 0:10:40- We all know Rebecca's... - So we can write that one out.
0:10:40 > 0:10:42- That's GCSE stuff. - So we'll move on from there.
0:10:42 > 0:10:45- Which is the one you're going to knock out?- No, go on.
0:10:45 > 0:10:48I've just done mine. You told me it was GCSE, so now A-level, Russell.
0:10:48 > 0:10:50Tell us what the next one is.
0:10:50 > 0:10:53I love literature, but, sad to say, I'm not a du Maurier fan.
0:10:53 > 0:10:57If I had to reason it out based on my knowledge of literature, I think
0:10:57 > 0:11:01she's more ghostly, haunting and suggestive rather than
0:11:01 > 0:11:02- birds pecking at the face. - Mm-hm.
0:11:02 > 0:11:05So I'm guessing she wrote Jamaica Inn and Strangers On A Train
0:11:05 > 0:11:07rather than The Birds. But I could be wrong.
0:11:07 > 0:11:10- Erm, hm...- Do you know the answer, Germaine?
0:11:10 > 0:11:14Well, I'm trying to remember Strangers On A Train.
0:11:14 > 0:11:16- I'm not doing terribly well. - Hang on a second,
0:11:16 > 0:11:19Strangers On A Train wasn't Patricia Highsmith, was it?
0:11:19 > 0:11:22- That's just come to me in a flash. - No, I don't think so.- I don't know.
0:11:22 > 0:11:26I'm on the point of agreeing that it's The Birds,
0:11:26 > 0:11:29because I seem to remember a discussion of how that was
0:11:29 > 0:11:32developed as a film, and it's got such
0:11:32 > 0:11:35a linear progress it just doesn't feel very du Maurier.
0:11:35 > 0:11:38I'm happy to go with what you guys are suggesting.
0:11:38 > 0:11:45So, we, the panel, feel that The Birds is the film of Hitchcock's
0:11:45 > 0:11:48that was not based on a work by Daphne du Maurier.
0:11:49 > 0:11:51OK, they're doing for The Birds, but the good news is, Chris,
0:11:51 > 0:11:53- you think you know this. - I do.
0:11:54 > 0:11:58Erm, Strangers On A Train was definitely based on
0:11:58 > 0:12:01- a work by Patricia Highsmith. - RUSSELL:- I knew it!
0:12:01 > 0:12:04At least, I think that's definite, but, er...!
0:12:04 > 0:12:06But I know all the others were Hitchcock films,
0:12:06 > 0:12:08so I'm going for Strangers On A Train.
0:12:08 > 0:12:12OK, you're saying Strangers On A Train. The correct answer...
0:12:12 > 0:12:16If that is Highsmith, I'm going to start listening to my voices.
0:12:20 > 0:12:23- ..Strangers On A Train! - Was it Highsmith?
0:12:25 > 0:12:29Strangers On A Train was based on a Patricia Highsmith novel.
0:12:29 > 0:12:33Chris, can I please have a proxy point for almost being right?
0:12:33 > 0:12:34- You WERE right! - Yes.
0:12:34 > 0:12:37What we're going to do, Chris, we're going to take the next question,
0:12:37 > 0:12:40we're going to get Russell a little bit of therapy and we'll
0:12:40 > 0:12:43crack on from there. The good news is there's £200 in the prize pot.
0:12:43 > 0:12:45We're up and running. Here we go.
0:12:50 > 0:12:51OK, next question.
0:13:10 > 0:13:15- Erm, I'm not absolutely sure, to be honest!- Are you a fan of the selfie?
0:13:15 > 0:13:19Erm, well, I've never taken one,
0:13:19 > 0:13:22because I just don't do that sort of thing.
0:13:22 > 0:13:25But, erm, I do know what it is!
0:13:25 > 0:13:28I'm not sure what glamping is, I'm sorry to say.
0:13:28 > 0:13:31I probably ought to.
0:13:31 > 0:13:34- But, erm, I think I'm going to need some more help.- OK.
0:13:34 > 0:13:37I'm sure one or two members of the panel have been
0:13:37 > 0:13:39glamping in their time. Your debate starts now.
0:13:39 > 0:13:44- Who's glamped? - It's "glamour camping".- Correct.
0:13:44 > 0:13:48Camping with luxury on the side. So it's not really...
0:13:48 > 0:13:52Shall we try and hazard a guess each for when we think each one
0:13:52 > 0:13:55started being used, based on our memories? Emoji.
0:13:55 > 0:13:58- If you had to say the year... - I'm pretty sure emoji was last year,
0:13:58 > 0:14:01because I was reading a ladies' magazine which was talking
0:14:01 > 0:14:04about the entries into the Oxford Dictionary,
0:14:04 > 0:14:06and emoji was one of them in the top ten.
0:14:06 > 0:14:11So I have a huge pulling towards saying emoji is the most recent one,
0:14:11 > 0:14:15although I definitely know selfie's in there and I know glamping.
0:14:15 > 0:14:18Retweet's bound... If tweet's in there, then retweet must be.
0:14:18 > 0:14:20Twitter's been going since 2008,
0:14:20 > 0:14:24and you could retweet when it first came online, so that's nine years.
0:14:24 > 0:14:27- It's highly likely that went in before.- Germaine, do you use emojis?
0:14:27 > 0:14:29No!
0:14:29 > 0:14:32- No, but you know what that means, right?- Well, sort of.
0:14:32 > 0:14:34I mean, I know they're little
0:14:34 > 0:14:37face things and they look happy and they look sad.
0:14:37 > 0:14:41I think, especially for birthdays and stuff like that,
0:14:41 > 0:14:43people use emojis a lot, so I think it's definitely out there,
0:14:43 > 0:14:45it's definitely in the dictionary,
0:14:45 > 0:14:47and I'm feeling it would be the most recent.
0:14:47 > 0:14:51- So if either of you feel any differently, tell me now.- No.- No?
0:14:51 > 0:14:54So, we feel, according to the Oxford English Dictionary Online,
0:14:54 > 0:14:59the word entered in the English language most recently is emoji.
0:15:01 > 0:15:05So, Chris, quite a bit of logic there from the panel.
0:15:05 > 0:15:08- What do you make of that? - Yes, er, very interesting.
0:15:08 > 0:15:12I think they spoke a lot of sense, and I think I agree with them,
0:15:12 > 0:15:14- so I'll say emoji. - OK.
0:15:14 > 0:15:19You're agreeing with the panel, you're going for emoji.
0:15:19 > 0:15:21For £200, the correct answer is...
0:15:28 > 0:15:32- Retweet!- ..retweet!- Goodness! Who would have thought it?
0:15:32 > 0:15:35Retweet entered the English dictionary in 2007.
0:15:35 > 0:15:38And emoji was the oldest.
0:15:38 > 0:15:42It entered the English dictionary in 1997.
0:15:42 > 0:15:46- What?!- That's another £200 down the drain, as they say.
0:15:47 > 0:15:50You didn't manage to bank anything for that question.
0:15:50 > 0:15:53It means at the end of Round One, you're still on £200.
0:15:58 > 0:16:01So, you've gone with our panel on a couple of questions,
0:16:01 > 0:16:03you've gone against them on occasion.
0:16:03 > 0:16:07- How do you think they're doing so far?- Better than me.
0:16:07 > 0:16:09- Awww! - No, you're being very kind.
0:16:09 > 0:16:12Let's see how they cope with pictures. It's time for Round Two!
0:16:15 > 0:16:17OK, Chris, Round Two is our picture round.
0:16:17 > 0:16:20You must place three pictures in the correct order.
0:16:20 > 0:16:24There are three questions in this round. Each question is worth £300.
0:16:24 > 0:16:27Maximum £900 for the prize pot.
0:16:27 > 0:16:30- Ready to play?- Yep.- Here we go. Here's your first question.
0:16:50 > 0:16:52How's your sporting knowledge?
0:16:52 > 0:16:58Er, not too good. Erm, I do remember those events,
0:16:58 > 0:17:03but which order they came in I'm not sure.
0:17:03 > 0:17:07But no doubt our friends may know when the World Cup and
0:17:07 > 0:17:10the Olympics took place, and so perhaps
0:17:10 > 0:17:13they can give me a hint or two.
0:17:13 > 0:17:15Absolutely, Chris, no doubt that
0:17:15 > 0:17:18the panel can sort this out for you(!)
0:17:18 > 0:17:19Your debate starts now.
0:17:19 > 0:17:23Erm, nuclear physics would be preferable to this, to me!
0:17:23 > 0:17:30I'm trying to work out how old my dog was when he died last year,
0:17:30 > 0:17:35because his name was Michael, and he was called after Michael Owen.
0:17:35 > 0:17:37So, how old was Michael when he died?
0:17:37 > 0:17:41Did you get your dog when the World Cup was on? Can you remember that?
0:17:41 > 0:17:46I can't remember what the intervals are between the World Cups.
0:17:46 > 0:17:47It's 1990, '94 and '98.
0:17:47 > 0:17:49They're your three choices.
0:17:49 > 0:17:52I remember because World Cup '90, collecting the stickers at school.
0:17:52 > 0:17:56- How old were you then? - Er, that remains to be discovered.
0:17:56 > 0:18:00My instincts would be to say Linford first,
0:18:00 > 0:18:03Owen second and South Africa third.
0:18:03 > 0:18:04When was Mandela released?
0:18:04 > 0:18:08- I feel that was '95, '96. - But also, we've got...
0:18:08 > 0:18:12Where did Linford Christie win the 100 metres Olympic gold?
0:18:12 > 0:18:15- Let's backtrack from the Olympic years.- Are we talking Atlanta?
0:18:15 > 0:18:17That's got to be '92, right?
0:18:17 > 0:18:22- So are you thinking '94 or '98...? - I'm thinking that.
0:18:22 > 0:18:26I'm thinking '92. Don't know about that, but that's '98.
0:18:26 > 0:18:30- That could be '99, though. - Yeah, this is what I would think,
0:18:30 > 0:18:35personally, because Owen was 16 when he first played for Liverpool. 17?
0:18:35 > 0:18:38He was a young, young player, and he looks super-young there,
0:18:38 > 0:18:44and I think that was before Francois Pienaar...
0:18:44 > 0:18:48South Africa won the Rugby World Cup in South Africa, remember?
0:18:48 > 0:18:52- So I feel that's the most recent. - Yeah, I agree.
0:18:52 > 0:18:54We, the panel, have put these sporting events
0:18:54 > 0:18:56- in chronological order. - We think.
0:18:56 > 0:18:59Linford Christie, Michael Owen
0:18:59 > 0:19:01and South Africa winning the Rugby World Cup.
0:19:01 > 0:19:04- '92, '98...- Well, I think Chris has got the answers, anyway.
0:19:05 > 0:19:07- So, Chris?- Tricky.
0:19:07 > 0:19:08I'm not really sure.
0:19:10 > 0:19:13I'm going to go for Linford Christie
0:19:13 > 0:19:19first, Michael Owen second and, yes,
0:19:19 > 0:19:22South Africa third, which is,
0:19:22 > 0:19:24in fact, what they've said, as a matter of fact.
0:19:24 > 0:19:28But not necessarily because they said it, but I think that is right.
0:19:28 > 0:19:32So you're going to agree with the panel but not necessarily
0:19:32 > 0:19:34because they said it.
0:19:34 > 0:19:36LAUGHTER
0:19:36 > 0:19:39- Well, let's hope you're both right. - Absolutely!- OK.
0:19:39 > 0:19:44Here we go. Is that the correct order, for £300?
0:19:51 > 0:19:54It's the wrong order!
0:19:54 > 0:19:57Let's have a little look, Chris, at the correct order.
0:19:57 > 0:19:59- Mandela in the middle. - There you go!
0:19:59 > 0:20:03Linford Christie won gold at the '92 Olympics in Barcelona,
0:20:03 > 0:20:07then the South Africa World Cup was in 1995,
0:20:07 > 0:20:11Michael Owen scored against Argentina in the 1998 World Cup.
0:20:11 > 0:20:13He was aged 18.
0:20:13 > 0:20:16And two years later, Germaine, you named your dog after Michael Owen.
0:20:16 > 0:20:18He was a standard poodle.
0:20:18 > 0:20:22And if you know standard poodles, you know why he got that name.
0:20:22 > 0:20:25OK, Chris, no money added to your prize pot, but don't worry,
0:20:25 > 0:20:26we still have two questions in this round.
0:20:26 > 0:20:30Let's see if we can get the 600 quid up for grabs.
0:20:30 > 0:20:31Here's your next question.
0:20:48 > 0:20:52I know when Obama and Hollande were elected,
0:20:52 > 0:20:55but I'm not sure about Angela Merkel at the moment.
0:20:55 > 0:20:57That's the one you need a little bit of clarity on.
0:20:57 > 0:20:59I do need a bit of clarity on that.
0:20:59 > 0:21:03OK, panel, can you sort this out for Chris? Your debate starts now.
0:21:04 > 0:21:05I feel the same as Chris.
0:21:05 > 0:21:08I think we probably know about Barack and Francois.
0:21:08 > 0:21:09Maybe it's the Angela question.
0:21:09 > 0:21:13Germaine, can you enlighten us slightly on...
0:21:13 > 0:21:14when she came into power?
0:21:14 > 0:21:16I have the feeling that lots of people have,
0:21:16 > 0:21:19that's she been around for ever...
0:21:19 > 0:21:21erm, which is some doing,
0:21:21 > 0:21:23considering what she's actually lived through.
0:21:23 > 0:21:29And I think it goes Angela, Obama and Hollande.
0:21:29 > 0:21:31So, in your opinion, Germaine, you would say...?
0:21:31 > 0:21:33What year was Angela...?
0:21:33 > 0:21:35That's the one Germaine's trying to help us with,
0:21:35 > 0:21:39- because if we think 2008 for Barack Obama...- It's before 2008, I think.
0:21:39 > 0:21:42So you think she was before him and Francois was after him?
0:21:42 > 0:21:43Definitely.
0:21:43 > 0:21:47So, yeah, I'm just hoping we're getting this the right way round.
0:21:47 > 0:21:50Angela Merkel was actually trained for the job by one of
0:21:50 > 0:21:53the German chancellors. If I could remember which... Is it Helmut Kohl?
0:21:53 > 0:21:57- Yeah.- Oh, that's ages ago, then.- Exactly.
0:21:57 > 0:21:59That's why I said she'd been around for years.
0:21:59 > 0:22:02Well then, if that's the case, then we stick with Angela being
0:22:02 > 0:22:06- there first, Barack in the middle... - I think she's about 2007, maybe.
0:22:06 > 0:22:10OK, so what we shall do is, Chris, we have decided that the
0:22:10 > 0:22:17order will be Angela Merkel, Barack Obama and Francois Hollande.
0:22:17 > 0:22:19Chris, there was two that you were quite confident about,
0:22:19 > 0:22:21one that you weren't sure about.
0:22:21 > 0:22:24Has the panel managed to shed any light for you?
0:22:24 > 0:22:27Yes, it's down to Angela Merkel, and I'm...
0:22:27 > 0:22:29inclined to agree with them that she was...
0:22:30 > 0:22:32..earlier than any of them,
0:22:32 > 0:22:34so I'll go with the order that they have suggested.
0:22:35 > 0:22:38OK, you're going with the panel,
0:22:38 > 0:22:42you're saying Angela Merkel first elected, then Barack Obama,
0:22:42 > 0:22:47then Francois Hollande. Is that the correct order, for £300?
0:22:52 > 0:22:54It is correct! CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:22:56 > 0:22:58Well done, sir!
0:22:58 > 0:23:01Angela Merkel became the German Chancellor in 2005.
0:23:01 > 0:23:03She was the first woman to hold the position.
0:23:03 > 0:23:08Barack Obama was elected in 2008 but not sworn in until 2009.
0:23:08 > 0:23:12Francois Hollande became President of France in 2012.
0:23:12 > 0:23:15Well done, everybody, we've got there in the end.
0:23:15 > 0:23:18That's another £300, Chris, taking your total up to £500.
0:23:23 > 0:23:25OK, Chris, final question in the picture round.
0:23:25 > 0:23:28Let's see if we can throw another £300 into your prize pot.
0:23:28 > 0:23:30Here it comes.
0:23:47 > 0:23:52Right! Well, they're in different parts of the world, are they not?
0:23:52 > 0:23:57Erm, Bali is in Indonesia, I believe.
0:23:57 > 0:24:00Saint Lucia, of course, is in the West Indies.
0:24:00 > 0:24:04The Maldives, I'm not sure how far away that is.
0:24:04 > 0:24:09Oh, dear! Well, once again I'm going to need a bit of help.
0:24:09 > 0:24:12What you need is a well-travelled panel.
0:24:13 > 0:24:16And I believe we are looking at such.
0:24:16 > 0:24:19Guys, let's see if you can sort this out. Your debate starts now.
0:24:19 > 0:24:23Great, well, we've got Indian Ocean, Indonesia and the Caribbean.
0:24:23 > 0:24:25Can we just clarify which species of crow...?
0:24:28 > 0:24:31Which species of crow goes on honeymoon to the Maldives?
0:24:31 > 0:24:33It's quite a distance, you see.
0:24:34 > 0:24:38Erm, well, the flight time to the Maldives is 9.5 hours.
0:24:38 > 0:24:43- To Saint Lucia it's about seven to eight hours.- Yeah.
0:24:43 > 0:24:47The Maldives is just off of the Indian Ocean, to the south-west.
0:24:47 > 0:24:51- You can fly directly there from Kerala. It's about two hours.- Yeah.
0:24:51 > 0:24:55- The Maldives is about ten hours. - Yeah, it's nine to ten hours.- Yeah.
0:24:55 > 0:24:57St Lucia's somewhere between six and eight, I think. About seven.
0:24:57 > 0:25:01And I'm pretty sure the flight time's about 11 hours to Bali.
0:25:01 > 0:25:04So therefore you're in the same ball park as what I think Germaine
0:25:04 > 0:25:05and myself would say -
0:25:05 > 0:25:08Bali is the furthest as the crow flies from London.
0:25:08 > 0:25:09I'm a bit worried about
0:25:09 > 0:25:11the shortness of the flight to Saint Lucia.
0:25:11 > 0:25:15- Yes. Fair comment. - You're crossing the Atlantic.- Yeah.
0:25:15 > 0:25:19- It seems a bit short. - You could be right there.- Well, yes.
0:25:19 > 0:25:22What we can definitely say is this is the furthest. Right?
0:25:22 > 0:25:25- Are we all in agreement about that? - We reckon.- Bali's the furthest.
0:25:25 > 0:25:29We will go with your hunch on this occasion, Russell.
0:25:29 > 0:25:31I'm not saying that you're wrong,
0:25:31 > 0:25:33I just didn't know that it was quite as short as that.
0:25:33 > 0:25:36And we're going to go for the Maldives second.
0:25:36 > 0:25:42So, our chosen order is Saint Lucia, Maldives and Bali.
0:25:42 > 0:25:47OK, Chris, our panel have decided to ignore how that crow flies
0:25:47 > 0:25:50and have gone with flight times.
0:25:50 > 0:25:53Clearly, Russell is a complete expert in this, because...
0:25:53 > 0:25:55- -- Oh, my God! - -- ..he travels everywhere!
0:25:55 > 0:25:57- -- Famous last words! - -- You've given
0:25:57 > 0:25:59the exact times of all your flights.
0:25:59 > 0:26:01I'm going to go with the panel
0:26:01 > 0:26:05and say Saint Lucia, Maldives
0:26:05 > 0:26:07and then Bali.
0:26:08 > 0:26:10OK, you're going with the panel again.
0:26:10 > 0:26:16For £300, is Saint Lucia, the Maldives and Bali the correct order?
0:26:22 > 0:26:25CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:26:28 > 0:26:32Very well done! Very well played, Chris.
0:26:32 > 0:26:36Saint Lucia is 4,230 miles as the crow flies from London,
0:26:36 > 0:26:40the Maldives is 5,419 miles as the crow flies,
0:26:40 > 0:26:46Bali in Indonesia the farthest, 7,761 as the crow flies.
0:26:46 > 0:26:49Very well played, Chris. At the end of Round Two,
0:26:49 > 0:26:51your prize pot is up to £800!
0:26:56 > 0:27:01- So, Chris, end of Round Two. How's the panel faring?- Very well!
0:27:01 > 0:27:05- Whenever they've been wrong, I've been wrong, and vice versa.- Mm.
0:27:05 > 0:27:08Now, if you had to choose one for the Final Debate,
0:27:08 > 0:27:10based on their performance so far...
0:27:10 > 0:27:12We haven't got to that stage, have we?
0:27:12 > 0:27:16- No, we haven't!- Well, I'm not going to choose now.
0:27:16 > 0:27:18- I'm thinking about it. - LAUGHTER
0:27:18 > 0:27:22OK, hold that thought, Chris. Let's play Round Three!
0:27:25 > 0:27:28OK, Chris, in Round Three, you will face questions that contain
0:27:28 > 0:27:31a statement about a person, a place or a thing.
0:27:31 > 0:27:33Only one of those statements is correct.
0:27:33 > 0:27:35We need you to find the correct one.
0:27:35 > 0:27:38There's three questions in this round, each worth £500,
0:27:38 > 0:27:42so lots of money to play for. Let's see if we can get your prize pot up.
0:27:42 > 0:27:43Here comes the first question.
0:28:03 > 0:28:06Right! Well, I think we all know he's the same age
0:28:06 > 0:28:08as Queen Elizabeth II,
0:28:08 > 0:28:11but he's either slightly older or slightly younger,
0:28:11 > 0:28:15so I'll have to think about that.
0:28:15 > 0:28:18I'm not sure about the Baftas or the species.
0:28:18 > 0:28:24I know he's had many species named after him, but over ten seems a lot.
0:28:24 > 0:28:29I'm sure Germaine will know all about this.
0:28:29 > 0:28:33- No!- OK, panel, let's see if you can sort this out for Chris.
0:28:33 > 0:28:34Your debate starts now.
0:28:36 > 0:28:39It might sound like an awful lot to have ten species named after
0:28:39 > 0:28:43you, except that it goes right across the entire spectrum of
0:28:43 > 0:28:47earthlings, and it could include all sorts of things - bacteria,
0:28:47 > 0:28:49crustaceans...!
0:28:49 > 0:28:53I know that I've seen them called attenboroughensis and stuff
0:28:53 > 0:28:55- like that. I can't remember what. - Attenboroughensis?!
0:28:55 > 0:28:57Something like that. It's a mouse or ant named after him,
0:28:57 > 0:29:00something like that. (A very quiet mouse.)
0:29:00 > 0:29:01(You have to approach it softly.)
0:29:01 > 0:29:05It seems highly likely it's the middle one for two reasons.
0:29:05 > 0:29:09Number one, the Attenborough At 90 season is still on iPlayer,
0:29:09 > 0:29:11I think, some of the stuff.
0:29:11 > 0:29:14And he was on Graham Norton, being interviewed. That was very recently,
0:29:14 > 0:29:16And the Queen's 90th feels a bit more distant than that.
0:29:16 > 0:29:18No. No, no, no, the Queen was 90 the same year as him.
0:29:18 > 0:29:21- No, no, but it feels like it was about a year ago.- Oh. Oh.
0:29:21 > 0:29:24She's older by about four or five months than him, maybe six.
0:29:24 > 0:29:28It is inconceivable that he has never won a Bafta.
0:29:28 > 0:29:32I know, and if he hasn't, I'm happy to stand by the fact that
0:29:32 > 0:29:34he should have, and I'm believing that he has had one.
0:29:34 > 0:29:36We should empty-chair the show.
0:29:36 > 0:29:38Yes, and he should get one immediately if he hasn't.
0:29:38 > 0:29:42- It's the middle one. Come on, guys. - Germaine, what are you thinking?
0:29:42 > 0:29:45Er, my instincts are having a dreadful time.
0:29:45 > 0:29:47You were right first time, Germaine - the crustaceans,
0:29:47 > 0:29:51the bacterias, the insects, the arthropoda. Come on!
0:29:51 > 0:29:54OK, I'm going to go with my team-mates on this one,
0:29:54 > 0:29:57and the panel have decided that it is true that David Attenborough
0:29:57 > 0:30:00has over ten different species named after him.
0:30:02 > 0:30:04- OK, Chris, we got an answer in the end.- Mm-hm.
0:30:06 > 0:30:07I have actually met David Attenborough,
0:30:07 > 0:30:10because he lives very near me in Richmond.
0:30:10 > 0:30:12Was he holding a Bafta or any of his species?
0:30:14 > 0:30:17Species... Yes, he's pretty keen on the species.
0:30:18 > 0:30:22The Queen's birthday is the 21st of April.
0:30:22 > 0:30:26Her 90th, of course, was last year. And his 90th was last year,
0:30:26 > 0:30:29but was it before or after April?
0:30:29 > 0:30:33Yeah, I know the panel thinks it was after April, but, erm,
0:30:33 > 0:30:34I'm not so sure.
0:30:34 > 0:30:39I'm going to go against the panel and go for A, he IS older than
0:30:39 > 0:30:41the Queen.
0:30:41 > 0:30:44OK, disagreeing with the panel. The correct statement is...
0:30:44 > 0:30:48- I hope we're wrong now. - I hope we're wrong now.
0:30:48 > 0:30:49Come on, Chris.
0:30:52 > 0:30:54Sorry. I am wrong.
0:30:54 > 0:30:56Germaine, your gut reaction at the beginning -
0:30:56 > 0:30:59the species include wildflower, carnivorous plants, butterflies,
0:30:59 > 0:31:02even a prehistoric creature called an attenborosaurus.
0:31:02 > 0:31:04- Oh, it's probably what I was remembering.- Well done!
0:31:04 > 0:31:06Attenboroughensis.
0:31:06 > 0:31:09David Attenborough and the Queen were both born in 1926.
0:31:09 > 0:31:10Sir David was born on the 8th of May
0:31:10 > 0:31:14so is two-and-a-half weeks younger than the Queen.
0:31:14 > 0:31:17- Really, guys!- I knew it was very close, but there we are.
0:31:17 > 0:31:21- I got the wrong side.- Sadly, Chris, no £500.- Never mind.
0:31:21 > 0:31:24There's still £1,000 up for grabs with our final two questions
0:31:24 > 0:31:26in this round. Here's question two.
0:31:30 > 0:31:31- RUSSELL:- Ugh!
0:31:35 > 0:31:37LAUGHTER
0:31:48 > 0:31:53- Now, you did say musicals was one of your strong points.- I did, yes.
0:31:53 > 0:31:57I do know the musical. I could sing a couple of songs, but I won't.
0:31:57 > 0:32:00- Oh, I think you probably should. - No. No, no, no, no, I don't sing.
0:32:00 > 0:32:03I don't think it won an Academy Award, but again,
0:32:03 > 0:32:05I'm not absolutely sure.
0:32:05 > 0:32:09I think I must rely on my colleagues over there.
0:32:09 > 0:32:13OK, we will defer to the panel. Your debate starts now.
0:32:13 > 0:32:17I love this film, as well. I actually don't know these
0:32:17 > 0:32:23- statements!- Musicals and sport, I have nothing. Really?
0:32:23 > 0:32:27But I bet you've got an opinion on whether or not Henry Winkler
0:32:27 > 0:32:29- can dance. - RUSSELL LAUGHS
0:32:29 > 0:32:34Funnily enough, Henry Winkler is my go-to lookalike fancy-dress Fonz.
0:32:34 > 0:32:36I do my hair up, put the jacket on and do that.
0:32:36 > 0:32:40But whether he was found for Happy Days by virtue of being on
0:32:40 > 0:32:42Broadway, it's a story I want to believe...
0:32:42 > 0:32:44No, he wanted to be the lead...
0:32:44 > 0:32:48He was going to play the role John Travolta played, but he didn't.
0:32:48 > 0:32:51I know there's a Henry Winkler connection to Grease.
0:32:51 > 0:32:52Whether he played Danny...
0:32:52 > 0:32:54I don't think it was an original Broadway production.
0:32:54 > 0:32:57Hang on a second, he was singing and dancing
0:32:57 > 0:32:59in the West End recently, in Les Mis, something like that.
0:32:59 > 0:33:02- Oh, was he?- I've seen him on the posters, giving it all that.
0:33:02 > 0:33:05Does anyone speak Spanish, Italian, Latin? Anyone got anything?
0:33:05 > 0:33:08I've got a little bit of Italian, a little bit of Spanish.
0:33:08 > 0:33:11Vaselina is not grease in any language, I don't think.
0:33:11 > 0:33:14- It's Vaseline! - It's Vaseline.
0:33:14 > 0:33:17You can be sure it doesn't come from a Latin or Italian or Spanish root?
0:33:17 > 0:33:22Oh, no, but then, most of our words do come from somewhere there.
0:33:22 > 0:33:25But, I mean, that could genuinely be the Spanish verb for "grease".
0:33:25 > 0:33:27Yeah, but they won't change the words of the song to
0:33:27 > 0:33:30"Vaselina is the word".
0:33:30 > 0:33:34They've got to stick to the word "grease".
0:33:34 > 0:33:36You'd be surprised, some of the amusing translations.
0:33:36 > 0:33:41"Go, vaselina lightning." It's not going to happen, is it?
0:33:41 > 0:33:45The one that's interesting me now is "The film won an Academy Award."
0:33:45 > 0:33:50- Now, not all Academy Awards are for performance and for acting.- Mm-hm.
0:33:50 > 0:33:52- Music. - Oh, I see what you mean.
0:33:52 > 0:33:57It has to be one of the best scores, soundtracks, of any musical ever.
0:33:57 > 0:34:02It had to be some strange muddle if it didn't win an award at
0:34:02 > 0:34:05- that sort of level.- That's a really good point, Germaine, actually.
0:34:05 > 0:34:07Are we going to go for the Academy Award?
0:34:07 > 0:34:09Are we going to go for the Academy Award?
0:34:09 > 0:34:11- Go on.- Come on, then. - Be a devil.
0:34:11 > 0:34:16We the panel believe that the musical Grease won an Academy Award.
0:34:18 > 0:34:24- OK, Chris.- Oh, dear! Erm, I'm going to discount A, I think.
0:34:24 > 0:34:26It's a question between B and C.
0:34:26 > 0:34:29I can't remember it winning an Academy Award, so, on
0:34:29 > 0:34:35balance, Patrick, I'm going to go for B, Henry Winkler played Danny.
0:34:35 > 0:34:40OK. Sunetra feels that there is a Henry Winkler connection to Grease.
0:34:40 > 0:34:44Our panel went with "The film won an Academy Award".
0:34:44 > 0:34:48For £500, the correct answer is...
0:34:54 > 0:34:56GASPS IN AUDIENCE ..the film was released as Vaselina
0:34:56 > 0:35:00- in countries such as Mexico. - Russell, I take my hat off.
0:35:00 > 0:35:05Henry Winkler turned down the role in the film playing the role
0:35:05 > 0:35:06of Danny because he didn't want
0:35:06 > 0:35:09to be typecast after playing... HE CLICKS HIS TONGUE
0:35:09 > 0:35:10The Fonz! Ohhh!
0:35:10 > 0:35:12The sad news, at the end of that question,
0:35:12 > 0:35:15- I'm afraid we've got money, but it's not multiplying.- No.
0:35:15 > 0:35:18LAUGHTER
0:35:18 > 0:35:21- Very good! - I'm off! I'm off!
0:35:21 > 0:35:23It's electrifying!
0:35:23 > 0:35:26Chris, you've gone against the panel four times so far.
0:35:26 > 0:35:29One more chance to put another £500 into your prize pot.
0:35:29 > 0:35:31We're all going to wish you the best as we have
0:35:31 > 0:35:33a look at the next question.
0:35:52 > 0:35:54Hm! Well!
0:35:54 > 0:36:01- The Great Fire of London, I think we all know, was 1666, wasn't it?- Yes.
0:36:01 > 0:36:05Oliver Cromwell, not as late as that, I think, but I'm not sure.
0:36:05 > 0:36:10Valentine's Day, I've no idea. I don't remember reading about that.
0:36:10 > 0:36:14Samuel Pepys did write about the fire in his diary.
0:36:14 > 0:36:17Whether he mentioned a cheese I've no idea.
0:36:17 > 0:36:21I'm sure that some of you will be able to help me on that, though.
0:36:21 > 0:36:23Oh, I'm sure they will. LAUGHTER
0:36:23 > 0:36:25Panel, your debate starts now.
0:36:27 > 0:36:30Well, it doesn't occur during the protectorate of Oliver Cromwell.
0:36:30 > 0:36:34That we know, because it's during the reign of Charles II.
0:36:34 > 0:36:37Now, if the fire started on St Valentine's Day...
0:36:37 > 0:36:40it's not my feeling that it was particularly cold.
0:36:40 > 0:36:42I feel, for some reason, it was autumn.
0:36:42 > 0:36:44I don't know why I feel it's autumn. Maybe I was...
0:36:44 > 0:36:47It burnt quite fiercely, so that would suggest maybe it's not winter.
0:36:47 > 0:36:52As for burying a cheese, Pepys is quite capable of burying a cheese.
0:36:52 > 0:36:55And it sounds like the kind of entry that you would get in a diary.
0:36:55 > 0:36:58It feels like it's one of those sort of random facts that might
0:36:58 > 0:37:00travel through history and become
0:37:00 > 0:37:04one of those sort of fond anecdotes, I suppose.
0:37:04 > 0:37:06- Or fondue anecdotes. - Oh, you're good.
0:37:06 > 0:37:09Hot cheese! Come on! How many hot cheese jokes are there?
0:37:09 > 0:37:11- You are on fire! - Come on!
0:37:12 > 0:37:15- You can always rely on Russell. - Did you just say I'm on fire?- I did.
0:37:15 > 0:37:19Thank you. Should we go with Samuel Pepys and hope that Chris
0:37:19 > 0:37:22has more of an inkling than we do, or do we feel that we want to go...?
0:37:22 > 0:37:25- We're writing off Oliver Cromwell. - Do you think it's Pepys and cheese?
0:37:25 > 0:37:27It's so preposterous, isn't it,
0:37:27 > 0:37:30that you'd bury a cheese to protect it from the fire?
0:37:30 > 0:37:32- I seem to remember it. - All right, let's go for it.- OK.
0:37:32 > 0:37:37- Let's take a punt.- We the panel believe that Samuel Pepys buried
0:37:37 > 0:37:39a cheese to protect it from the fire.
0:37:40 > 0:37:42They believe it's preposterous,
0:37:42 > 0:37:45but they have gone for the cheese, Chris.
0:37:45 > 0:37:49Well, I think we've all discounted C, and I'm inclined to agree
0:37:49 > 0:37:53with the panel this time and go for Samuel Pepys.
0:37:55 > 0:37:59Final chance in the show to get the prize pot up. For £500, Chris,
0:37:59 > 0:38:01you've gone with the panel.
0:38:01 > 0:38:05Did Samuel Pepys bury a cheese to protect it from the fire?
0:38:05 > 0:38:07The correct statement is...
0:38:08 > 0:38:10Please be a cheese burier!
0:38:14 > 0:38:18It's the correct answer! CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:38:18 > 0:38:20- Well done! Very well done. - Thank you.
0:38:20 > 0:38:24Pepys wrote in his diary that he buried his prize Parmesan
0:38:24 > 0:38:28cheese as well as wine and some other things.
0:38:28 > 0:38:29The fire started - you were right,
0:38:29 > 0:38:33it was the autumn - the 2nd of September in 1666.
0:38:33 > 0:38:38And Cromwell was from 1653 to 1658.
0:38:38 > 0:38:40Chris, well played on that last question.
0:38:40 > 0:38:44It means at the end of Round Three, the prize pot is up to £1,300.
0:38:44 > 0:38:45APPLAUSE
0:38:48 > 0:38:53So, it's a decent amount. Any plans if you win the money?
0:38:53 > 0:38:57I expect I would probably go on a long trip, possibly to Costa Rica.
0:38:57 > 0:39:00- Oh!- Ooh! - See a monocled bear.
0:39:00 > 0:39:05- No, no, no!- OK, Chris, in the Final Debate you'll face one question.
0:39:05 > 0:39:09That question will have six possible answers.
0:39:09 > 0:39:11Only three are correct. In order to win,
0:39:11 > 0:39:14you're going to have to give me all three correct answers.
0:39:14 > 0:39:16As before, though, you're not alone.
0:39:16 > 0:39:19You must choose one of our panel to assist you.
0:39:19 > 0:39:21So, based on their performance today, Chris,
0:39:21 > 0:39:23who would you like to join you in the Final Debate?
0:39:23 > 0:39:26Will it be big cheese Russell Kane,
0:39:26 > 0:39:30will it be Deputy Chief Assistant Commander Sunetra Sarker or
0:39:30 > 0:39:32will it be Germany Greer in the hope that
0:39:32 > 0:39:35The Life And Times Of Michael Owen The Poodle comes up?
0:39:37 > 0:39:39Well, it's difficult, but I'm going
0:39:39 > 0:39:42- to choose Russell. - Oh, my God!
0:39:42 > 0:39:45Russell, would you join us as we play today's Final Debate?
0:39:51 > 0:39:54OK, Russell, Chris has chosen you for the Final Debate.
0:39:54 > 0:39:56I can't bear the thought of Chris trading in Costa Rica.
0:39:56 > 0:39:57"It's Brighton again, dear."
0:39:59 > 0:40:02- Don't worry about it! - Absolutely no pressure, then...!
0:40:02 > 0:40:05You've got two categories, because it is your Final Debate, Chris.
0:40:05 > 0:40:08Have a look and choose one from these two.
0:40:13 > 0:40:15What are you like with mythology? Have you done much...?
0:40:15 > 0:40:18I did Classics, but it's so long ago I've forgotten it.
0:40:18 > 0:40:20Have you done any Aristophanes, any Sophocles at the theatre?
0:40:20 > 0:40:23- I know a bit about it, yeah. - Good!- But not Norse mythology.
0:40:23 > 0:40:26- Not Norse mythology, no. Let's go Mythology.- Mythology.
0:40:26 > 0:40:29- Mythology! - Yeah.
0:40:29 > 0:40:31- OK.- And try not to be a Thor loser if it is Norse.
0:40:33 > 0:40:35OK, Chris, we're going to wish you the best of luck.
0:40:35 > 0:40:38We're going to put 45 seconds on the clock.
0:40:38 > 0:40:40£1,300 up for grabs.
0:40:40 > 0:40:44Here comes today's Final Debate question on Mythology.
0:40:53 > 0:40:56- Yes, winged horse. - Shhh.- Sorry.
0:40:58 > 0:40:59Yep.
0:41:06 > 0:41:10- Your time starts now.- Right, Pegasus is a winged horse.- Cupid is winged.
0:41:10 > 0:41:12Cerberus is a three-headed dog.
0:41:12 > 0:41:15- Minotaur is...- Minotaur is a monster. Wouldn't have wings.
0:41:15 > 0:41:17- It's got the bull's head. - Nike is a shoe.
0:41:17 > 0:41:20It's between Nike and Anansi.
0:41:20 > 0:41:24- Cerberus is a dog.- Cerberus is a dog, minotaur's a bull.
0:41:24 > 0:41:29- Cupid's a little winged love dude. - Pegasus is the horse.- Well, Nike...
0:41:29 > 0:41:32- Who's Anansi? I'm not sure who Anansi is.- Nike is the god of...
0:41:32 > 0:41:35- Was she winged? - 20 seconds.
0:41:35 > 0:41:39- The sports logo would suggest winged.- Mm.- A winged helmet, maybe!
0:41:39 > 0:41:41Yes, that's a good idea.
0:41:41 > 0:41:44- I don't know who that Anansi is, I'm afraid.- Ten seconds.
0:41:44 > 0:41:47Well, you're going to have to guess Nike, Cupid, Pegasus,
0:41:47 > 0:41:49- because we don't know who Anansi is. - That's what I'm going to go for.
0:41:49 > 0:41:51- I'm so sorry if it's not. - No, no, you've done very well.
0:41:51 > 0:41:56- That's what I would have gone for. - Time up. I need three answers.
0:41:56 > 0:41:58Pegasus. Nike. Cupid.
0:41:59 > 0:42:05Pegasus, Nike and Cupid. For £1,300. We're wishing you the best of luck.
0:42:05 > 0:42:10Here we go. First you said Pegasus. Is Pegasus a correct answer?
0:42:14 > 0:42:15It is correct. APPLAUSE
0:42:15 > 0:42:17You were right, it's a winged horse.
0:42:19 > 0:42:21You then said Nike.
0:42:21 > 0:42:25Was Nike correct, to keep us on track for £1,300?
0:42:30 > 0:42:32It is a correct answer! APPLAUSE
0:42:33 > 0:42:37- The Greek winged goddess of victory. - Nike puts us "in the running".
0:42:37 > 0:42:38LAUGHTER
0:42:38 > 0:42:40So, it all boils down to Cupid.
0:42:42 > 0:42:44If Cupid is correct, Chris, you win £1,300.
0:42:44 > 0:42:48If it's wrong, I'm afraid you do leave with nothing. Here we go.
0:42:48 > 0:42:52For £1,300, is Cupid a correct answer?
0:42:59 > 0:43:01CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:43:03 > 0:43:06- Congratulations!- Thank you! - Congratulations,
0:43:06 > 0:43:08Russell, congratulations, Chris.
0:43:08 > 0:43:11£1,300. Give it up for Chris!
0:43:15 > 0:43:17Well, that is it for Debatable.
0:43:17 > 0:43:19There's just time for me to thank our fantastic panel,
0:43:19 > 0:43:22Russell Kane, Sunetra Sarker and Germaine Greer.
0:43:22 > 0:43:25I do hope you've enjoyed watching. We'll see you next time for more
0:43:25 > 0:43:27heated debates. From me, goodbye.
0:43:27 > 0:43:30CHEERING