Episode 3

Download Subtitles

Transcript

0:00:06 > 0:00:09Insurance fraud has reached epidemic levels in the UK.

0:00:09 > 0:00:14It's costing us more than £1.3 billion every year.

0:00:14 > 0:00:17That's almost £3.6 million every day.

0:00:19 > 0:00:24Deliberate crashes, bogus personal injuries, even phantom pets.

0:00:25 > 0:00:29The fraudsters are risking more and more to make a quick killing.

0:00:29 > 0:00:34And every year, it's adding around £50 to your insurance bill.

0:00:34 > 0:00:36But insurers are fighting back,

0:00:36 > 0:00:39exposing just under 15 fake claims every hour.

0:00:39 > 0:00:42Armed with covert surveillance systems...

0:00:42 > 0:00:44Subject out the vehicle.

0:00:44 > 0:00:47..sophisticated data analysis techniques...

0:00:47 > 0:00:49SHOUTING

0:00:49 > 0:00:51..and a number of highly skilled police units..

0:00:51 > 0:00:53Police! Don't move! Stay where you are!

0:00:53 > 0:00:55..they're catching the criminals red-handed.

0:00:55 > 0:00:57Just don't lie to us.

0:00:58 > 0:00:59All those conmen,

0:00:59 > 0:01:03scammers and cheats on the fiddle are now caught in the act...

0:01:03 > 0:01:04and claimed and shamed.

0:01:10 > 0:01:16Today, a car-con's dodgy insurance policies are uncovered...

0:01:16 > 0:01:19If you write off your car

0:01:19 > 0:01:21when you have one of these policies,

0:01:21 > 0:01:24the cost of the damage will have to be borne by you.

0:01:24 > 0:01:27And a phoney caller is encouraged to come clean.

0:01:40 > 0:01:43Now matter how experienced you are behind the wheel,

0:01:43 > 0:01:45every time you take to the road, there's a risk.

0:01:45 > 0:01:48Motor insurance offers customers protection

0:01:48 > 0:01:50in the event of an accident.

0:01:50 > 0:01:53Fraudsters have long being targeting the car insurance industry,

0:01:53 > 0:01:58but one particular scam, known as "ghost broking", is a major issue.

0:01:58 > 0:02:01A ghost broker will pretend to be a licensed insurance broker

0:02:01 > 0:02:04and obtain a cheap policy using false information.

0:02:04 > 0:02:06He'll then sell you what appears to be

0:02:06 > 0:02:09a genuine insurance policy at a bargain price.

0:02:09 > 0:02:13But what you actually receive is a completely bogus certificate

0:02:13 > 0:02:18offering zero cover that's not worth the paper it's printed on.

0:02:19 > 0:02:22If you buy one of these fake policies in good faith,

0:02:22 > 0:02:24the law is crystal clear.

0:02:24 > 0:02:29John Beadle knows the consequences of this scam can be severe.

0:02:29 > 0:02:31The bottom line with this is that

0:02:31 > 0:02:34if you write off your car

0:02:34 > 0:02:35when you have one of these policies,

0:02:35 > 0:02:38you will be un-covered,

0:02:38 > 0:02:41and the cost of the damage, or the loss of your car,

0:02:41 > 0:02:45will have to be borne by you, because you will be uninsured.

0:02:45 > 0:02:48Purchasing a spurious policy from a ghost broker

0:02:48 > 0:02:51could be a financially devastating way

0:02:51 > 0:02:54to try and save a few quid on your car insurance.

0:02:54 > 0:02:56Meet Jeffrey Derek King.

0:02:58 > 0:03:01He used to hire cars to people, sell jewellery...

0:03:01 > 0:03:05A wheeler-dealer who could even sell you a cheap car insurance policy.

0:03:05 > 0:03:10But his deals on wheels weren't all they were cracked up to be.

0:03:10 > 0:03:13Mr King came to our attention because we spotted a number

0:03:13 > 0:03:16of unusual patterns in new policies being taken on

0:03:16 > 0:03:19via authorised garage outlets,

0:03:19 > 0:03:23where you purchase a new car, and they will

0:03:23 > 0:03:25issue you with a policy of insurance.

0:03:25 > 0:03:28He would continually contact our company,

0:03:28 > 0:03:31disguising his identity, but obviously he leaves footprints

0:03:31 > 0:03:35and patterns, telephone numbers, and so forth,

0:03:35 > 0:03:38which linked him together.

0:03:38 > 0:03:41With alarm bells ringing, John's team dug deeper.

0:03:41 > 0:03:44And they discovered 50 policies all connected

0:03:44 > 0:03:46by one mobile phone number.

0:03:46 > 0:03:49They all led back to a website operated by King.

0:03:50 > 0:03:52And in the end we put together

0:03:52 > 0:03:55a comprehensive intelligence package on him.

0:03:55 > 0:03:58And then, having identified who he actually was,

0:03:58 > 0:04:00and then referred that to IFED.

0:04:03 > 0:04:06IFED is the City of London Police's

0:04:06 > 0:04:09Insurance Fraud Enforcement Department.

0:04:09 > 0:04:11A dedicated team of detectives dedicated to stopping

0:04:11 > 0:04:14insurance fraud cheats.

0:04:14 > 0:04:17There's ever more sophisticated detection tools being used by

0:04:17 > 0:04:18the industry.

0:04:18 > 0:04:21We're getting more and more cases every day.

0:04:23 > 0:04:26This elite squad has prevented millions of pounds being paid

0:04:26 > 0:04:28out to criminals in fraudulent claims.

0:04:29 > 0:04:34From now on, insurance cheats needs to look over their shoulders.

0:04:34 > 0:04:38It's all fraud, it's all crime, and it can all lead to prison.

0:04:38 > 0:04:40Police! Don't move! Stay where you are!

0:04:42 > 0:04:45Simon Styles is IFED's financial investigator,

0:04:45 > 0:04:48and was part of the team that took on the case.

0:04:49 > 0:04:52RSA's enquiries had already identified that King was behaving

0:04:52 > 0:04:55very suspiciously by making dozens of calls to them

0:04:55 > 0:04:57under various guises.

0:04:59 > 0:05:02So, the first thing that IFED detectives did was to take

0:05:02 > 0:05:04a closer look at his business activities.

0:05:05 > 0:05:09From the outside, Jeffrey King appeared to be

0:05:09 > 0:05:12a hard-working individual, an entrepreneur, if you like.

0:05:12 > 0:05:16IFED quickly established that King had his fingers in lots of pies.

0:05:17 > 0:05:20But it was one of his online enterprises

0:05:20 > 0:05:22that stood out in particular.

0:05:22 > 0:05:25Mr King had advertised for

0:05:25 > 0:05:27the selling of insurance

0:05:27 > 0:05:29on 28 occasions via the internet.

0:05:29 > 0:05:33Those companies were checked and details from that were taken

0:05:33 > 0:05:38which showed that Jeffrey King was behind those advertisements.

0:05:38 > 0:05:41And it was from that that the investigation really took

0:05:41 > 0:05:43a step forward.

0:05:43 > 0:05:45King many have been a man of many trades,

0:05:45 > 0:05:49but licensed insurance broker wasn't one of them.

0:05:49 > 0:05:51He was selling fake insurance policies which

0:05:51 > 0:05:55unlucky recipients believed to be 100% genuine.

0:05:55 > 0:05:58IFED quickly sussed out that King was taking advantage of

0:05:58 > 0:06:02a special offer available at certain car dealerships,

0:06:02 > 0:06:04where customers who'd brought brand-new cars

0:06:04 > 0:06:08could claim a week's free insurance cover.

0:06:08 > 0:06:11He just obtained the dealer code off a flyer

0:06:11 > 0:06:13at any dealership.

0:06:13 > 0:06:15He was then able to ring RSA, purporting to be anybody,

0:06:15 > 0:06:18and having the details of a registration number,

0:06:18 > 0:06:20was able to obtain free seven-day cover.

0:06:20 > 0:06:22And as a result of that,

0:06:22 > 0:06:25received, by e-mail, the cover.

0:06:25 > 0:06:27And it's from that cover he would sell on to

0:06:27 > 0:06:30unsuspecting members of the public.

0:06:30 > 0:06:33So, King had a source of genuine certificates

0:06:33 > 0:06:35he acquired with false information.

0:06:35 > 0:06:38He then doctored the document with the details of the individual

0:06:38 > 0:06:42he intended to pass the worthless policy off to.

0:06:42 > 0:06:45But, little did he know, that IFED were on to him.

0:06:45 > 0:06:46And with his MO revealed,

0:06:46 > 0:06:48it wasn't long before the case against King

0:06:48 > 0:06:51started to accelerate.

0:06:51 > 0:06:53I was able to link

0:06:53 > 0:06:56the certificates that were purchased by

0:06:56 > 0:07:00Mr King to money that was placed in his account.

0:07:00 > 0:07:03That came to just over £65,000.

0:07:04 > 0:07:07As a financial investigator, it's Simon's job to look for

0:07:07 > 0:07:11connections between suspected fraudsters and their income.

0:07:11 > 0:07:15And in the case of King, there was no shortage of evidence.

0:07:15 > 0:07:18By now, we had obtained evidence that Jeffrey king was acting

0:07:18 > 0:07:20as a ghost broker.

0:07:20 > 0:07:22We decided to visit his home address

0:07:22 > 0:07:24and ask him directly what he was up to.

0:07:26 > 0:07:30On the 6th December 2013, officers from IFED carried out

0:07:30 > 0:07:35two early-morning raids on addresses linked to Jeffrey Derek King.

0:07:36 > 0:07:38DS Craig Mullish heads up a team

0:07:38 > 0:07:40that raids his home address.

0:07:40 > 0:07:42The plan of action today is to execute

0:07:42 > 0:07:46a warrant in Chadwell Heath, Essex, and in addition to that,

0:07:46 > 0:07:50simultaneously, there'll be another warrant executed in East London.

0:07:50 > 0:07:53The element of surprise is crucial to a successful raid.

0:07:55 > 0:07:58Targeting multiple addresses at the same time prevents

0:07:58 > 0:08:01communication between any of the suspects, and minimises the

0:08:01 > 0:08:05risk of potentially damning evidence from being destroyed.

0:08:05 > 0:08:08All our enquiries linked Mr King to the family address.

0:08:08 > 0:08:12Just before the raids took place, I identified another address

0:08:12 > 0:08:14that he'd recently moved to.

0:08:14 > 0:08:17And so we decided to knock on two doors

0:08:17 > 0:08:21on the day of Mr King's arrest.

0:08:21 > 0:08:24Over in East London, DC Alex Cooley is leading the raid

0:08:24 > 0:08:27on King's second potential location.

0:08:27 > 0:08:28We have to remain on our guard.

0:08:28 > 0:08:31We have no reason to believe the suspect is aware that we're

0:08:31 > 0:08:33going to be turning up early in the morning,

0:08:33 > 0:08:36so he could react in any one of a whole number of ways.

0:08:38 > 0:08:40Today, the evidence that we'll be looking for would be

0:08:40 > 0:08:45computers and any device capable of storing data.

0:08:45 > 0:08:49Together with documentation relating to insurance policies.

0:08:52 > 0:08:55It's not uncommon for suspects to make a dash for it.

0:08:55 > 0:08:57So, before knocking on the door,

0:08:57 > 0:09:00officers get into position to cover all escape routes.

0:09:01 > 0:09:03- Good morning.- Morning.

0:09:03 > 0:09:05HE KNOCKS

0:09:05 > 0:09:08Oh, hi. Morning to you. City of London Police.

0:09:09 > 0:09:12DS Mullish enters King's home address,

0:09:12 > 0:09:14placing him under arrest on suspicion of fraud.

0:09:16 > 0:09:18The team then search King's home...

0:09:20 > 0:09:24..and after three hours emerge with several bags of key evidence.

0:09:26 > 0:09:27Having swept King's property,

0:09:27 > 0:09:29DS Mullish inspects his car

0:09:29 > 0:09:32for further incriminating documents.

0:09:32 > 0:09:34From what you say...

0:09:34 > 0:09:36- Yeah.- ..we're not going to see anything in this car, right?

0:09:36 > 0:09:38- Yeah, yeah, yeah.- Yeah?- Yeah.

0:09:40 > 0:09:42- You stay there.- OK.

0:09:48 > 0:09:50Despite King's casual attitude,

0:09:50 > 0:09:54it doesn't take long to find even more evidence.

0:09:54 > 0:09:57The document seized from the suspect's vehicle is

0:09:57 > 0:10:01a copy of an insurance document in another person's name,

0:10:01 > 0:10:02other than the suspect,

0:10:02 > 0:10:07which is further evidence of the crime that we're looking into today.

0:10:07 > 0:10:10With a hefty haul of evidence bagged and tagged,

0:10:10 > 0:10:13it's loaded up, along with King.

0:10:13 > 0:10:17The evidence that we've found today relates to various insurance policy

0:10:17 > 0:10:20documentation in other peoples' names apart from the suspect.

0:10:20 > 0:10:24Which is good evidence to suggest they are absolutely linked

0:10:24 > 0:10:27into the investigation that we're currently undertaking,

0:10:27 > 0:10:31and we've also seized mobile phones and electrical devices.

0:10:31 > 0:10:34Motor documentation, MOT certificates.

0:10:34 > 0:10:36All in all, very good evidence.

0:10:37 > 0:10:41Over in east London, DC Cooley and his team have searched King's

0:10:41 > 0:10:44family home, which has been equally successful.

0:10:44 > 0:10:48We found documentation relating to motor insurance policies,

0:10:48 > 0:10:51we found a letter reportedly written by the suspect

0:10:51 > 0:10:56to an insurance company brokering terms and conditions

0:10:56 > 0:10:58on behalf of a reported client.

0:11:00 > 0:11:03The haul of evidence meant the brakes had been well and

0:11:03 > 0:11:06truly applied to King's operation.

0:11:06 > 0:11:09We found a large number of

0:11:09 > 0:11:10bogus certificates.

0:11:10 > 0:11:13We found original certificates that had been scanned and changed,

0:11:13 > 0:11:15and these details had been sent to

0:11:15 > 0:11:17unsuspecting members of the public,

0:11:17 > 0:11:20to drive around without any cover whatsoever.

0:11:21 > 0:11:25This was the evidence IFED needed to take King offline for good.

0:11:26 > 0:11:29When given the opportunity to tell his side of the story,

0:11:29 > 0:11:32King refused to break down.

0:11:32 > 0:11:35He tried to justify the certificates

0:11:35 > 0:11:38in his possession by making no comment.

0:11:38 > 0:11:41He made no comment throughout the investigation.

0:11:41 > 0:11:43He thought it would go away.

0:11:43 > 0:11:45But it wasn't going to.

0:11:45 > 0:11:47The case proceeded to court, at the Old Bailey,

0:11:47 > 0:11:50where King pleaded not guilty to three counts of fraud by

0:11:50 > 0:11:54false representation, and one count of money laundering.

0:11:54 > 0:11:57But the evidence was overwhelming.

0:11:57 > 0:12:01Jeffrey King was found guilty by a unanimous verdict and

0:12:01 > 0:12:03he was sentenced to two years' imprisonment.

0:12:04 > 0:12:08King's illegal sales of fake insurance policies had been

0:12:08 > 0:12:10shut down for good.

0:12:11 > 0:12:15For Simon, it was the end of a long, complex investigation.

0:12:15 > 0:12:17But his work wasn't quite done yet.

0:12:17 > 0:12:20It was my job to follow the money.

0:12:20 > 0:12:23I found that Mr King had made an awful lot of money

0:12:23 > 0:12:25from criminal activity.

0:12:25 > 0:12:28I managed to return £20,000 to victims of crime.

0:12:29 > 0:12:31Job well done.

0:12:31 > 0:12:34Jeffrey King thought no-one would come knocking at his door.

0:12:34 > 0:12:38He was wrong. This is a message to everyone out there who is thinking,

0:12:38 > 0:12:41or is committing, insurance fraud, that we won't stand for it.

0:12:41 > 0:12:44Like Mr King, we'll follow you, we'll track you down,

0:12:44 > 0:12:48we'll knock on your door, and you will be sentenced and convicted,

0:12:48 > 0:12:52and spend time behind bars to think on where you went wrong.

0:12:58 > 0:13:03Later, a man is prepared to reverse into another motorist - twice -

0:13:03 > 0:13:04for a pay-out.

0:13:04 > 0:13:05It makes me angry.

0:13:05 > 0:13:08This fraud is... Well, it's disgraceful, really.

0:13:12 > 0:13:15Often, it's the first thing we reach for when we wake up

0:13:15 > 0:13:18and the last thing we look at before we go to sleep.

0:13:18 > 0:13:21Smartphones are now an integral part of modern life.

0:13:21 > 0:13:25But, with handsets costing around £500,

0:13:25 > 0:13:28they are a high-value commodity which insurance cheats

0:13:28 > 0:13:31have identified as an easy way to make a quick buck.

0:13:32 > 0:13:37Whether you're calling, texting, e-mailing, sharing, surfing,

0:13:37 > 0:13:39or streaming, today's smartphone

0:13:39 > 0:13:42is something many just can't live without.

0:13:42 > 0:13:46So, what happens if your device gets accidentally damaged, or ditched?

0:13:48 > 0:13:52Luckily, there are people like Andy Morris at Assurant Solutions

0:13:52 > 0:13:55who protect our phones against all manner of device disasters.

0:13:56 > 0:14:00Andy's team received one particular call from a customer

0:14:00 > 0:14:03who'd made a few phone faux pas in quick succession.

0:14:05 > 0:14:09The very first claim that this individual submitted to us

0:14:09 > 0:14:16was for a loss of an iPhone which would have a value of over £500.

0:14:16 > 0:14:20That was assessed on its own merits and the claim was accepted.

0:14:20 > 0:14:22Amazingly, within a week,

0:14:22 > 0:14:26the claimant telephoned us back again to process a claim.

0:14:26 > 0:14:30So the claimant had previously said that his first phone

0:14:30 > 0:14:32had been stolen from his workplace.

0:14:32 > 0:14:35He then submitted a second claim, stating he'd left

0:14:35 > 0:14:39the replacement handset on the bus while on the way into work.

0:14:39 > 0:14:41Now, once is unlucky,

0:14:41 > 0:14:44but to lose two phones in as many weeks raised suspicion.

0:14:46 > 0:14:48Our fraud team felt it was worthwhile

0:14:48 > 0:14:51investigating a little further.

0:14:52 > 0:14:54With the claimant's run of bad luck not ringing true,

0:14:54 > 0:14:57a claims investigator gave him a call

0:14:57 > 0:15:00to talk through the details of his most recent claim.

0:15:26 > 0:15:28It seemed like a plausible story,

0:15:28 > 0:15:32but Andy's team had been doing their homework and it appeared

0:15:32 > 0:15:35the handsets have more in common than just their make and model.

0:15:37 > 0:15:40Upon further investigation of the second claim

0:15:40 > 0:15:44and reviewing both the second claim and now the first claim,

0:15:44 > 0:15:47it became very clear that both devices

0:15:47 > 0:15:50had been sold to the same recycling shop.

0:15:51 > 0:15:54This information was put to the claimant.

0:16:39 > 0:16:45Our fraud agents had received the information from the recycling shop.

0:16:45 > 0:16:50Not only the receipts of the transaction but, also, the identity

0:16:50 > 0:16:55and the documentation that the claimant had provided to that shop.

0:16:55 > 0:16:58The claimant hadn't just sold on his phones,

0:16:58 > 0:17:00he'd inadvertently sold himself out

0:17:00 > 0:17:04by providing the recycling shop with his genuine personal details.

0:17:04 > 0:17:08Armed with this knowledge, it was time to take the challenge to him.

0:17:34 > 0:17:40During the call, the claims handler provides lots of opportunity

0:17:40 > 0:17:42for the claimant to be honest.

0:17:43 > 0:17:46He actually declines to take that opportunity.

0:17:48 > 0:17:51While the claimant is given the chance to press cancel on his lie,

0:17:51 > 0:17:53he refuses to tell the truth.

0:17:53 > 0:17:56But it isn't long before he pushes redial,

0:17:56 > 0:17:58managing to get through to a claims handler

0:17:58 > 0:18:01who's unfamiliar with the case.

0:18:02 > 0:18:04The claimant, unprompted,

0:18:04 > 0:18:09then telephones back and asked to speak to our claims handler.

0:18:10 > 0:18:14And it would be a call the claims handler would never forget.

0:18:27 > 0:18:30OK. Let's hear that one more time.

0:18:50 > 0:18:54The claimant had attempted a successful claim, initially,

0:18:54 > 0:18:58and then, effectively, tried it on again.

0:18:59 > 0:19:02As the claimant talks through details of his admission,

0:19:02 > 0:19:04the full extent of the fraud becomes clear.

0:19:24 > 0:19:27After selling his first phone to a recycling shop,

0:19:27 > 0:19:30the claimant has then sold the replacement handset

0:19:30 > 0:19:31to the same store

0:19:31 > 0:19:34and attempted to make separate insurance claims

0:19:34 > 0:19:36for both devices.

0:19:48 > 0:19:52He then has a discussion with our claims handler

0:19:52 > 0:19:57to ask about what would be the consequences of his behaviour.

0:20:13 > 0:20:19This claimant, actually, is noticeably concerned

0:20:19 > 0:20:22about the potential consequence of his fraudulent behaviour.

0:20:35 > 0:20:38Er, maybe not the next best time to be asking for an upgrade.

0:20:47 > 0:20:51Due to the customer's honesty, it resulted in us

0:20:51 > 0:20:55not needing to do any more investigation in this case

0:20:55 > 0:20:58and the claimant withdrew their claim.

0:20:58 > 0:21:01On this occasion, the claimant had a lucky escape.

0:21:01 > 0:21:03It could easily have been a different story,

0:21:03 > 0:21:07as the insurer could have blacklisted, or prosecuted him,

0:21:07 > 0:21:08for attempted fraud.

0:21:13 > 0:21:15Now, how do you do your grocery shopping?

0:21:15 > 0:21:18I know Sunday evenings wouldn't be the same for my wife and I

0:21:18 > 0:21:21without a cup of tea and a bit of an online shop.

0:21:21 > 0:21:23I am a hopeless romantic.

0:21:23 > 0:21:26Well, one in four of us now do our main food shop online.

0:21:26 > 0:21:29And, to meet demand, supermarkets have introduced

0:21:29 > 0:21:33thousands of new commercial delivery vehicles to UK roads.

0:21:33 > 0:21:36While this service has been eaten up by customers,

0:21:36 > 0:21:40it also provided a tasty target for insurance cheats,

0:21:40 > 0:21:42who caused deliberate crashes.

0:21:42 > 0:21:44A practice known as "crash for cash".

0:21:46 > 0:21:47You might be wondering

0:21:47 > 0:21:50why fraudsters would target delivery vehicles

0:21:50 > 0:21:54It's a subject Tom Gardiner is well versed in.

0:21:54 > 0:21:56In the past, commercial vehicles have been deliberately targeted

0:21:56 > 0:21:59by fraudsters because they know that they will be insured

0:21:59 > 0:22:03and that they are likely to get a pay-out.

0:22:03 > 0:22:06With delivery drivers clocking up so many miles every day,

0:22:06 > 0:22:09the risk of incident is high.

0:22:09 > 0:22:13Just like the one involving a car and an Iceland delivery van

0:22:13 > 0:22:15in Luton, in 2014.

0:22:15 > 0:22:18The initial claim that was reported by Mr Hussein

0:22:18 > 0:22:22was for damage to his vehicle and for whiplash injuries,

0:22:22 > 0:22:24following what appeared to be, on the face of it,

0:22:24 > 0:22:27a straightforward rear-end shunt at a junction.

0:22:27 > 0:22:30It looked like an everyday claim.

0:22:30 > 0:22:35A whiplash injury may be worth £1,500-£3,000.

0:22:35 > 0:22:38It may have appeared to have been a run of the mill accident

0:22:38 > 0:22:40but Mr Hussein didn't waste any time

0:22:40 > 0:22:44in getting in touch with Iceland store manager Ian Bisby.

0:22:44 > 0:22:47The driver of the vehicle called me and told me

0:22:47 > 0:22:50that my driver had driven into him.

0:22:50 > 0:22:53He said, my driver hadn't stopped at a T-junction,

0:22:53 > 0:22:55damaged his car and he had a witness.

0:22:55 > 0:23:00And that he wanted our insurance details to take the matter further.

0:23:00 > 0:23:04But it wasn't long before Ian was to hear a different story.

0:23:04 > 0:23:06Within moments, my driver called me

0:23:06 > 0:23:08and said a customer reversed into him.

0:23:08 > 0:23:09On the face of it, I thought,

0:23:09 > 0:23:11the customer's probably more plausible.

0:23:11 > 0:23:14He was stationary at a T-junction. My driver approached him.

0:23:14 > 0:23:17My driver hit him. That's the way I probably would have viewed it.

0:23:18 > 0:23:21The driver in question was Ashley Dissan.

0:23:21 > 0:23:24And he wasn't about to let his side of the story be discounted.

0:23:24 > 0:23:27I saw his reversing lights come on.

0:23:27 > 0:23:29And I thought it was a little bit strange.

0:23:29 > 0:23:31You know, seeing as though we were at a set of lights.

0:23:31 > 0:23:35The only way forward is forwards.

0:23:35 > 0:23:38And then he'd come back so far that the impact had happened,

0:23:38 > 0:23:42he rolled forward, I thought, OK, maybe he just got stuck in gear.

0:23:42 > 0:23:44And then I saw the reversing lights come on again.

0:23:44 > 0:23:47When he started coming back, that's where it, kind of,

0:23:47 > 0:23:50hit me that he's just not stopping.

0:23:50 > 0:23:52I was just lost for words. I got out of the van

0:23:52 > 0:23:55and I, obviously, asked him "What were you doing?"

0:23:56 > 0:23:59He said, "I tried to get it into gear and it got stuck into reverse."

0:23:59 > 0:24:03"I do apologise." I was, like, "OK. That's fair enough."

0:24:03 > 0:24:05He took responsibility.

0:24:05 > 0:24:09After that, we just followed on with exchanging insurance details.

0:24:09 > 0:24:12He may have been apologetic at the scene of the accident,

0:24:12 > 0:24:14but that didn't last long.

0:24:14 > 0:24:17It was Ashley's word against Mr Hussein's.

0:24:17 > 0:24:20However, Ashley did have an all-seeing ally

0:24:20 > 0:24:22who would reveal the truth.

0:24:22 > 0:24:25What was unusual about this particular case was,

0:24:25 > 0:24:28over and above our driver's evidence,

0:24:28 > 0:24:31there was dash-cam evidence from our driver's van.

0:24:31 > 0:24:35What the dash-cam footage revealed was that this wasn't

0:24:35 > 0:24:38a straightforward rear-end shunt, at all.

0:24:38 > 0:24:42Dash-cams have been commonplace in commercial vehicles for years.

0:24:42 > 0:24:45And what this one revealed was that Mr Hussein

0:24:45 > 0:24:49was telling porky pies bigger than any Ashley's van was carrying.

0:24:49 > 0:24:52So, let's see what actually happened.

0:24:52 > 0:24:55It's a row of traffic. Everyone's got their brake lights on.

0:24:55 > 0:24:58Looks like they're waiting to go on to the main road in Luton

0:24:58 > 0:25:02Oh! The car in front of my driver reversed back into him.

0:25:02 > 0:25:04For no particular reason.

0:25:05 > 0:25:08The car hit Ashley's van.

0:25:08 > 0:25:11Mr Hussein may have lied about how the accident happened

0:25:11 > 0:25:15but, maybe, the act itself was genuine driver error.

0:25:15 > 0:25:17He's just put a brake light on

0:25:17 > 0:25:20and he's reversing again. Into my van.

0:25:21 > 0:25:22It's the second time.

0:25:24 > 0:25:28It seems that Mr Hussein was running a buy-one, get-one-free special

0:25:28 > 0:25:30on shunts that day.

0:25:30 > 0:25:31It was conclusive evidence

0:25:31 > 0:25:35that Ashley's version of events checked out.

0:25:35 > 0:25:39Well, it makes me angry because the gentleman told me quite clearly

0:25:39 > 0:25:41my driver drove into him.

0:25:41 > 0:25:43It's fraud. It's disgraceful, really.

0:25:44 > 0:25:46The camera never lies.

0:25:46 > 0:25:49And with Mr Hussein's deception discovered,

0:25:49 > 0:25:52he was in for a nasty shock.

0:25:52 > 0:25:56Mr Hussein was trying to submit a fraudulent claim for damage

0:25:56 > 0:26:00to his vehicle and for a whiplash compensation.

0:26:00 > 0:26:03In this case, the evidence was so overwhelming that,

0:26:03 > 0:26:08not content with just repudiating the claim, we then presented

0:26:08 > 0:26:12the case to the Insurance Fraud Enforcement Department to prosecute.

0:26:12 > 0:26:16The IFED team were successful in bringing the case against

0:26:16 > 0:26:19this fraudster and justice was delivered.

0:26:19 > 0:26:22At court, Mr Hussein pleaded guilty to fraud

0:26:22 > 0:26:25and he received 100 hours community service,

0:26:25 > 0:26:29over and above not receiving a penny pay-out himself.

0:26:29 > 0:26:32Mr Hussein actually had to repay his own insurers for the damage

0:26:32 > 0:26:36that he had caused to his own vehicle, as well.

0:26:36 > 0:26:39Mr Hussein's attempt at fraud could have had severe consequences

0:26:39 > 0:26:42for Ashley and his family.

0:26:42 > 0:26:45We treat safety of our customers very importantly.

0:26:45 > 0:26:48The driver in question could have gone down the disciplinary route

0:26:48 > 0:26:51and, possibly, lost his job, if we felt he was lying to us

0:26:51 > 0:26:54in an investigation or causing an avoidable accident.

0:26:54 > 0:26:58He's a driver by trade and his future employer might say,

0:26:58 > 0:27:01"Why did you leave your last job?" "I was sacked for crashing a van."

0:27:01 > 0:27:04The dash-cam may have saved Ashley's bacon

0:27:04 > 0:27:07but he had already suffered needless stress.

0:27:07 > 0:27:11I was always questioning whether I'm going to get that dreaded line

0:27:11 > 0:27:15of, "I'm sorry, unfortunately, you've lost your job."

0:27:17 > 0:27:21But, luckily for me, with the equipment of the dash-cams,

0:27:21 > 0:27:25I'm here today and, obviously, going to be here tomorrow.

0:27:30 > 0:27:34Nobody likes paying more than we have to for everyday services,

0:27:34 > 0:27:37but this is exactly what's happening with insurance fraud.

0:27:37 > 0:27:40Scammers and conmen are swindling their way to pay-outs

0:27:40 > 0:27:41that they don't deserve.

0:27:41 > 0:27:44The knock-on effect is that the extra costs result in ever

0:27:44 > 0:27:46increasing premiums.

0:27:46 > 0:27:49We're getting hit in the pocket and it's not just organised

0:27:49 > 0:27:50criminal gangs to blame.

0:27:50 > 0:27:54Exaggerated household claims also take their toll.

0:27:54 > 0:27:56But instead of getting away with it,

0:27:56 > 0:28:00more and more of these fraudsters are being Claimed And Shamed.