Episode 14

Download Subtitles

Transcript

0:00:02 > 0:00:06Welcome to a world where nothing is quite as it seems.

0:00:06 > 0:00:07Welcome to Fake Britain.

0:00:08 > 0:00:10Police!

0:00:19 > 0:00:21- Get down, get down! - Get on the floor now!

0:00:21 > 0:00:24Put your hands behind your back now!

0:00:24 > 0:00:28Here at the Fake Britain house, things might look familiar, but

0:00:28 > 0:00:33don't be taken in, because this is a house that is filled with fakes.

0:00:33 > 0:00:37In this series, I'll be revealing the counterfeits, copies and cons

0:00:37 > 0:00:40that are flooding the market, fooling the public,

0:00:40 > 0:00:44making money for the criminals and maybe even putting you in danger.

0:00:44 > 0:00:46We'll be investigating those fraudsters

0:00:46 > 0:00:50who are cashing in by selling us something that isn't real,

0:00:50 > 0:00:54and we'll be showing you how to avoid falling for a fake.

0:00:55 > 0:00:57Today on Fake Britain...

0:00:57 > 0:01:00Trading Standards clamping down on the rogue operators using

0:01:00 > 0:01:05fake ATOL memberships to convince travellers to part with thousands.

0:01:05 > 0:01:08I was really disgusted that anybody could do that.

0:01:08 > 0:01:12The fake LED lights that are shockingly bad.

0:01:12 > 0:01:15It's seriously dangerous and potentially life-threatening.

0:01:15 > 0:01:19The huge haul of fake goods flooding the country.

0:01:19 > 0:01:22We reveal what's for sale at just one high street shop.

0:01:22 > 0:01:25He didn't want to actually give me access to the basement,

0:01:25 > 0:01:27and now I can see why.

0:01:27 > 0:01:29And the tragic story of the young boy killed by

0:01:29 > 0:01:32fake almond powder in his curry.

0:01:32 > 0:01:36It's absolutely destroyed that family. It really has.

0:01:42 > 0:01:46When it comes to holidays, we Brits are big spenders.

0:01:46 > 0:01:50We pay an average of around £1,000 per person to get us

0:01:50 > 0:01:53out of the nine-to-five. That's a lot of money.

0:01:53 > 0:01:56And when we sign up to fly away on our package trip,

0:01:56 > 0:02:01it makes to sense to know our money and holiday are protected.

0:02:01 > 0:02:05This sign on your glossy brochure says they are.

0:02:05 > 0:02:08It means the company has an Air Travel Operators' Licence -

0:02:08 > 0:02:12ATOL. So, that's all OK then...except this is a fake.

0:02:12 > 0:02:15This company didn't have a licence.

0:02:15 > 0:02:18And as we are about to find out, you may need to take a closer

0:02:18 > 0:02:22look at your travel operator the next time you book a holiday.

0:02:24 > 0:02:28When David and Marlene Jackson from East Sussex retired, they were

0:02:28 > 0:02:32finally able to look forward to planning their holiday in Russia.

0:02:32 > 0:02:36I came across this company called Russian Gateway.

0:02:36 > 0:02:40Excellent website, very well written, very clear, good photographs,

0:02:40 > 0:02:43good description of the ship that we would be going on,

0:02:43 > 0:02:45a very professional presentation.

0:02:45 > 0:02:49It gave the impression that Russian Gateway was the specialist

0:02:49 > 0:02:53company, and because of that, it generated a feeling of trust.

0:02:53 > 0:02:57So far, so good with the company's website.

0:02:57 > 0:02:59But being seasoned travellers,

0:02:59 > 0:03:02David and Marlene knew to look for a travel company that would

0:03:02 > 0:03:06protect their money should things take a turn for the worse.

0:03:06 > 0:03:10The ATOL logo in particular was something which encouraged us

0:03:10 > 0:03:13as it was a bona fide company, a bona fide claim, and that we

0:03:13 > 0:03:17were covered if there was any cancellation of any kind at all.

0:03:17 > 0:03:21ATOL is a protection scheme for air holidays managed

0:03:21 > 0:03:24by the Civil Aviation Authority.

0:03:24 > 0:03:27And ATOL tour operator protects you from losing money or

0:03:27 > 0:03:31being stranded abroad if the company goes bust.

0:03:31 > 0:03:34Convinced that they had found the right company to

0:03:34 > 0:03:36arrange their holiday, the Jacksons took the plunge

0:03:36 > 0:03:39and booked their Russian adventure.

0:03:40 > 0:03:43But their plans for the trip abroad were about to be sunk...

0:03:43 > 0:03:46by a series of forest fires around Moscow.

0:03:46 > 0:03:49It was about a week before we were due to go that we were advised

0:03:49 > 0:03:53not to go, so we cancelled that trip and we talked about it

0:03:53 > 0:03:55and decided to postpone for a year.

0:03:55 > 0:03:58David and Marlene's holiday would have to wait.

0:03:58 > 0:04:00They had already paid for it and were desperate to go,

0:04:00 > 0:04:03so decided to leave their money with Alan Steel,

0:04:03 > 0:04:08the director of Russia Gateway UK Limited of Leamington Spa,

0:04:08 > 0:04:11not to be confused with any other company of a similar name.

0:04:11 > 0:04:14They looked forward to their holiday.

0:04:14 > 0:04:17We got in touch with them again, we fixed the dates.

0:04:17 > 0:04:20He told us the hotel we'd be staying in.

0:04:20 > 0:04:23He told us the flights we'd be on.

0:04:23 > 0:04:25It seemed that the holiday would be going ahead,

0:04:25 > 0:04:29so they spent £750 on ballet tickets, which they

0:04:29 > 0:04:32arranged to be sent to their hotel in Moscow.

0:04:32 > 0:04:37We then got a message from the ticket agency that we booked through

0:04:37 > 0:04:39to say they had tried to deliver the tickets to the hotel,

0:04:39 > 0:04:41but the hotel didn't know anything about us.

0:04:41 > 0:04:44And that was sort of the first indication that something was

0:04:44 > 0:04:46going wrong with the second trip.

0:04:46 > 0:04:48With their holiday drawing closer

0:04:48 > 0:04:51and their hotel having no record of their booking,

0:04:51 > 0:04:55David got back in touch with Alan Steel at Russian Gateway.

0:04:55 > 0:04:58He was having financial problems with his Russian suppliers

0:04:58 > 0:05:02and he was due to see his bank manager the following day.

0:05:02 > 0:05:05This is a week before we were due to go on holiday.

0:05:05 > 0:05:07The Jacksons didn't know what to think.

0:05:07 > 0:05:11Up till literally two days before we were due to go,

0:05:11 > 0:05:15we were being told there was still a possibility we'd go.

0:05:15 > 0:05:18To be quite honest, I think it was just unbelievable.

0:05:18 > 0:05:22I mean, there are your suitcases that you have started to pack

0:05:22 > 0:05:24and come to a grinding halt.

0:05:26 > 0:05:28I was really upset about it, wasn't I?

0:05:28 > 0:05:31I think, really, you still have sleepless nights.

0:05:31 > 0:05:32It was just awful.

0:05:32 > 0:05:35I mean, we just didn't know what was going to happen.

0:05:37 > 0:05:40Finally, Russian Gateway admitted it to the couple

0:05:40 > 0:05:43that they wouldn't be going on their long-awaited trip.

0:05:43 > 0:05:47David demanded a refund, but company director Alan Steel said

0:05:47 > 0:05:50they could only afford to pay them back in instalments.

0:05:50 > 0:05:54We said, "What we'd like you to do is to pay us so much a month in advance,

0:05:54 > 0:05:57"from September onwards."

0:05:57 > 0:05:59And he agreed to that in principle.

0:05:59 > 0:06:02In reality, they didn't get back one penny,

0:06:02 > 0:06:05despite months of phone calls and e-mails asking for a refund.

0:06:07 > 0:06:10We personally, total, had lost just over £3,000.

0:06:12 > 0:06:14It's a lot of money. It was for us.

0:06:14 > 0:06:17The Jacksons thought their money would be protected.

0:06:17 > 0:06:21Surely the ATOL logos they had seen were proof of that.

0:06:21 > 0:06:24So David contacted the Civil Aviation Authority,

0:06:24 > 0:06:27who manage the ATOL scheme, to see if they could help.

0:06:27 > 0:06:29And it was at that point that we were told that in fact

0:06:29 > 0:06:32he was no longer a member, and he hadn't been a member for six years,

0:06:32 > 0:06:35which means he had been fraudulently displaying the ATOL logo

0:06:35 > 0:06:38throughout that period when he wasn't entitled to do so.

0:06:38 > 0:06:41Marlene was horrified that they had been duped by what

0:06:41 > 0:06:45was in fact a fake ATOL logo.

0:06:45 > 0:06:48When we found out that the ATOL logo

0:06:48 > 0:06:52and the claims to be a member of ATOL were fake...

0:06:54 > 0:06:57..I was really disgusted that anybody could do that.

0:06:57 > 0:06:59You see all these symbols appearing all over the place

0:06:59 > 0:07:02and you take them for granted that, in fact, if they display them,

0:07:02 > 0:07:04then they are entitled to display them.

0:07:04 > 0:07:09We both thought that the ATOL logo was genuine.

0:07:09 > 0:07:12- We had no way... - We had no reason to think otherwise.

0:07:12 > 0:07:16But the fakery didn't just end with the ATOL logos,

0:07:16 > 0:07:18David and Marlene realised that the claim

0:07:18 > 0:07:22made by Allen Steel in the small print of the brochure

0:07:22 > 0:07:25that their money was protected was utterly worthless.

0:07:25 > 0:07:28So, in the terms and conditions, it is quite clear that he says

0:07:28 > 0:07:34he was covered by an insurance bond to comply with European regulations.

0:07:34 > 0:07:39- That was a fake claim. That is total misrepresentation.- That is.

0:07:39 > 0:07:44Russian Gateway's fakery had ruined David and Marlene's holiday plans.

0:07:44 > 0:07:47So was initially extreme disappointment,

0:07:47 > 0:07:52as it was cancelled, followed by hope that we were able to go eventually,

0:07:52 > 0:07:53followed by anger when we couldn't.

0:07:57 > 0:08:00The Jacksons weren't the only ones to be duped by Russian Gateway.

0:08:00 > 0:08:04Eleanor Lake, from Warwickshire Trading Standards,

0:08:04 > 0:08:07had received dozens of phone calls from disgruntled holiday-makers

0:08:07 > 0:08:10who had been misled by the travel company.

0:08:10 > 0:08:12It was large-scale fraud.

0:08:12 > 0:08:16We was aware of around 31 consumers who were affected as a result

0:08:16 > 0:08:21of this, and they had lost in the region of £140,000.

0:08:21 > 0:08:25Many of the people who lost their money were elderly and vulnerable.

0:08:25 > 0:08:30The sort of victims that we had in this case were older pensioners.

0:08:30 > 0:08:34This was the holiday of a lifetime for quite a lot of them,

0:08:34 > 0:08:37and £3,000 to £4,000 wasn't an unusual amount of money

0:08:37 > 0:08:39for people to have lost.

0:08:39 > 0:08:43Many of the holiday-makers thought they'd been doing the right thing

0:08:43 > 0:08:45by specifically looking for assurances that

0:08:45 > 0:08:48their money would be protected should the worst happen.

0:08:48 > 0:08:51Consumers have said that they were particularly looking out for

0:08:51 > 0:08:54an ATOL logo as a form of protection for them.

0:08:54 > 0:08:59All British firms selling flight packages are legally required

0:08:59 > 0:09:02to hold an ATOL licence and show the logo.

0:09:02 > 0:09:04This would be a fake use of their logo.

0:09:04 > 0:09:07He didn't have permission to produce it.

0:09:07 > 0:09:10And consumers would be misled into believing that they were

0:09:10 > 0:09:13getting some sort of protection when they were not.

0:09:13 > 0:09:17It turned out that Russian Gateway wasn't just faking its ATOL logos,

0:09:17 > 0:09:19the company also claimed to be a member of ABTA -

0:09:19 > 0:09:22the Association of British Travel Agents.

0:09:22 > 0:09:25It is a stamp of approval and should mean customers receive high

0:09:25 > 0:09:28standards of service and accurate information.

0:09:28 > 0:09:32One of the consumers was concerned that they didn't know

0:09:32 > 0:09:34Mr Steel's ABTA number.

0:09:34 > 0:09:37Rather than admitting that he didn't have an ABTA number

0:09:37 > 0:09:41because he wasn't an ABTA registered business, he actually

0:09:41 > 0:09:46produced an e-mail to this witness and he created a fake ABTA number.

0:09:46 > 0:09:49The ABTA number did belong to a genuine business,

0:09:49 > 0:09:53and that business had a similar sounding name to Mr Steel's.

0:09:53 > 0:09:57And his hope was that this consumer would be fooled

0:09:57 > 0:10:00by that false number. And that would make them

0:10:00 > 0:10:05feel confident enough to pay the rest of the money for the booking.

0:10:05 > 0:10:08As Eleanor dug deeper, it became clear that Russian Gateway

0:10:08 > 0:10:12offered its customers absolutely no protection.

0:10:12 > 0:10:16What Mr Steel had done was told people that their money would be

0:10:16 > 0:10:20kept secure until they came back from the holiday, but he had lied.

0:10:20 > 0:10:24He had made these false statements that that money was protected.

0:10:24 > 0:10:27And nothing could prepare Eleanor for the reality of what

0:10:27 > 0:10:31Mr Steel was actually doing with his customers' money.

0:10:31 > 0:10:35When we obtained the bank account details for Mr Steel,

0:10:35 > 0:10:38you could actually see that he was using his business

0:10:38 > 0:10:40account for his personal expenses.

0:10:40 > 0:10:43You could see his shopping was coming out of that account,

0:10:43 > 0:10:47so various personal groceries were coming on there.

0:10:47 > 0:10:52So there was no evidence that money had gone in from a consumer and then

0:10:52 > 0:10:55that same amount of money had gone into some sort of trust account.

0:10:55 > 0:10:57The business was spiralling out of control

0:10:57 > 0:11:01and all of Russian Gateway's customers were at risk.

0:11:01 > 0:11:04The very thing that the package travel regulations are there

0:11:04 > 0:11:07to protect against is if a company goes bust,

0:11:07 > 0:11:11and that is the very thing that happened in this case, is that the

0:11:11 > 0:11:13company went into liquidation

0:11:13 > 0:11:18and all of that money that consumers had interested, around £140,000

0:11:18 > 0:11:22worth of consumer money, disappeared overnight.

0:11:23 > 0:11:25Fortunately, the holiday-makers who lost out to

0:11:25 > 0:11:29Russian Gateway's ATOL and ABTA fakery eventually managed

0:11:29 > 0:11:30to get their money back

0:11:30 > 0:11:34as a result of the case brought by Warwickshire Trading Standards.

0:11:36 > 0:11:40Alan Steel had to sell his luxury home to pay his prosecution

0:11:40 > 0:11:44costs - he was ordered to pay over £135,000 in compensation

0:11:44 > 0:11:48to 31 victims, and he was sent to prison.

0:11:48 > 0:11:52Mr Steel was given a 2.5 year custodial sentence,

0:11:52 > 0:11:54which reflects the scale of the fraud.

0:11:54 > 0:11:57The judge said that the actions that Mr Steel had done had

0:11:57 > 0:12:00undermined confidence in the travel industry

0:12:00 > 0:12:04and the judge had taken a lot of regard of the impact

0:12:04 > 0:12:06statements given by the witnesses

0:12:06 > 0:12:10and this holiday of a lifetime was lost to them.

0:12:10 > 0:12:13Eleanor has some advice for anyone out there who might be

0:12:13 > 0:12:14planning a holiday.

0:12:14 > 0:12:18Consumers can go onto the Civil Aviation Authority's website

0:12:18 > 0:12:20and check an ATOL for themselves to find out

0:12:20 > 0:12:22whether a company is ATOL protected.

0:12:24 > 0:12:27Coming up, we're out with Trading Standards as they crack

0:12:27 > 0:12:31down on the tour operators putting holiday-makers at risk.

0:12:31 > 0:12:35They would be handing over £4,000, £5,000 a package.

0:12:35 > 0:12:36They are not protected.

0:12:41 > 0:12:45We are a nation of curry lovers, with over 20 million of us

0:12:45 > 0:12:48tucking into something like this every month.

0:12:48 > 0:12:52And this is almond powder, used in loads of different curries.

0:12:52 > 0:12:56But we have discovered that some almond powder out there is fake.

0:12:56 > 0:12:59So it is not just almonds that will be in your curry.

0:12:59 > 0:13:04It could be something that is proved fatal for some allergy sufferers.

0:13:06 > 0:13:08Previously on Fake Britain,

0:13:08 > 0:13:11we have come across all kinds of food fakery,

0:13:11 > 0:13:14from fake lamb to fake fish.

0:13:14 > 0:13:18But now there is a new and potentially deadly kind of fakery

0:13:18 > 0:13:21out there involving the almond powder used to thicken

0:13:21 > 0:13:24and flavour curries.

0:13:24 > 0:13:29In some cases, almond powder is being adulterated with peanuts.

0:13:29 > 0:13:31Trading Standards are finding fake almond powder

0:13:31 > 0:13:33in restaurants across the country.

0:13:34 > 0:13:38And that could be a problem for the half a million people in the UK

0:13:38 > 0:13:40who have a peanut allergy.

0:13:40 > 0:13:41The problem is getting worse,

0:13:41 > 0:13:45with around 4,000 people being newly diagnosed each year.

0:13:48 > 0:13:53Detective Chief Inspector Michael Fraser knows all too well the very

0:13:53 > 0:13:55real dangers of fake almond powder.

0:13:55 > 0:14:00He investigated the case of 12-year-old Connor Donaldson.

0:14:00 > 0:14:03Connor was a perfectly healthy boy with the exception that he was

0:14:03 > 0:14:05an asthma sufferer.

0:14:05 > 0:14:09He was also diagnosed as having a nut allergy.

0:14:09 > 0:14:11That particular day, the family decided

0:14:11 > 0:14:15they were going to have a takeaway - curry - from the local takeaway.

0:14:15 > 0:14:19Because of Connor's peanut allergy, his mum asked the restaurant

0:14:19 > 0:14:23to confirm that his prawn balti would not contain any peanuts.

0:14:23 > 0:14:26They confirmed there were no peanuts in the dish.

0:14:28 > 0:14:30Just moments after his first few mouthfuls,

0:14:30 > 0:14:32Connor was unable to breathe.

0:14:32 > 0:14:37He had gone into anaphylactic shock, a severe allergic reaction.

0:14:37 > 0:14:39Connor was rushed by ambulance to hospital.

0:14:39 > 0:14:42An emergency staff did all they could to help him,

0:14:42 > 0:14:43but it was too late.

0:14:43 > 0:14:48After arriving at the hospital, it was confirmed that Connor had died.

0:14:49 > 0:14:54It's absolutely devastating for any family to lose a loved one.

0:14:54 > 0:14:57It is particularly devastating when that loved one is a young child

0:14:57 > 0:15:00within your family, within your community.

0:15:02 > 0:15:07It's absolutely destroyed that family. It really has.

0:15:10 > 0:15:14From that moment on, it was DCI Fraser's job to find out why

0:15:14 > 0:15:17and how Connor had died.

0:15:17 > 0:15:20Traces of peanut were actually found within his body.

0:15:22 > 0:15:27Subsequent investigation at the local takeaway found that they

0:15:27 > 0:15:30didn't have peanuts within that takeaway, within

0:15:30 > 0:15:32any of their recipes whatsoever.

0:15:34 > 0:15:38While peanuts weren't used as an ingredient in the recipes,

0:15:38 > 0:15:40the restaurant had used almond paste,

0:15:40 > 0:15:46but shockingly, almonds weren't the only nut present in the paste.

0:15:46 > 0:15:49Subsequent investigation revealed that the actual almond paste

0:15:49 > 0:15:52and the almond powders within the restaurant had actually been

0:15:52 > 0:15:56adulterated by up to 50% peanut content.

0:15:56 > 0:16:01Connor's death has been caused because almonds have been adulterated

0:16:01 > 0:16:05somewhere in the food chain by peanuts.

0:16:05 > 0:16:08But it wasn't going to be easy to find out where or when

0:16:08 > 0:16:10the almond powder had been faked.

0:16:11 > 0:16:15There was absolute no suggestion whatsoever that the adulteration

0:16:15 > 0:16:18of that almond with those peanuts took place

0:16:18 > 0:16:21within that particular takeaway.

0:16:21 > 0:16:25You then have to start looking back in the food supply chain,

0:16:25 > 0:16:29and there were so many different areas of where that

0:16:29 > 0:16:33adulteration could occur that it is almost impossible to identify

0:16:33 > 0:16:36where that adulteration has taken place.

0:16:40 > 0:16:44We wanted to find out why anyone would want to fake almond

0:16:44 > 0:16:46powder by using ground peanuts.

0:16:47 > 0:16:50So we visited award-winning chef Cyrus Todiwala

0:16:50 > 0:16:52at his Indian restaurant.

0:16:52 > 0:16:56I am not surprised that almond powder will get adulterated

0:16:56 > 0:16:57because almond powder is expensive.

0:16:57 > 0:17:01As you know, almonds are expensive compared to other certain

0:17:01 > 0:17:04cheaper nuts, maybe peanuts, for example.

0:17:04 > 0:17:08A very good quality almond powder could be up to £20 a kilo.

0:17:08 > 0:17:10And a cheap almond powder could be between seven, eight,

0:17:10 > 0:17:12nine, ten pounds a kilo.

0:17:12 > 0:17:15If you asked for cheaper quality almond powder

0:17:15 > 0:17:18from a manufacturer, he could put peanuts inside,

0:17:18 > 0:17:20for example, he could put something else inside, for example.

0:17:20 > 0:17:23And you would never know what is inside.

0:17:23 > 0:17:26And that could be hazardous.

0:17:27 > 0:17:30Cyrus thinks the pressure on small businesses to

0:17:30 > 0:17:34maximise their profits has led to some unscrupulous traders

0:17:34 > 0:17:38using cheaper peanuts to bulk up more expensive almond powder.

0:17:38 > 0:17:41If the public keep demanding cheap, cheap,

0:17:41 > 0:17:45cheap all the time, people who open restaurants are there to make

0:17:45 > 0:17:47some money, create a livelihood.

0:17:47 > 0:17:50And if we keep pushing the price down, pushing them

0:17:50 > 0:17:51on pressure to reduce the price,

0:17:51 > 0:17:56they're forced to buy poor quality, cheaper quality raw materials.

0:17:56 > 0:17:59And cheaper quality raw materials are not necessarily

0:17:59 > 0:18:02the best for your health.

0:18:02 > 0:18:05The owner of the restaurant may not necessarily know,

0:18:05 > 0:18:10and they could quite innocently be cooking with that product

0:18:10 > 0:18:14and giving the person who can actually suffer from an anaphylactic

0:18:14 > 0:18:19shock, for instance, a product that he never should have had.

0:18:19 > 0:18:22It is enough to make any restaurateur stop and think.

0:18:22 > 0:18:25Knowing what he does about the dangers faced by diners with

0:18:25 > 0:18:26peanut allergies,

0:18:26 > 0:18:30Cyrus pays forensic attention to what is inside his almond powder.

0:18:33 > 0:18:36It is very, very essential that you buy something that you

0:18:36 > 0:18:40are sure of the history of it, where it originated,

0:18:40 > 0:18:41where it was produced.

0:18:41 > 0:18:46And we always demand that everything is supported by a lab test report

0:18:46 > 0:18:49or a report from the manufacturer on allergens.

0:18:49 > 0:18:52The certificate that comes with Cyrus's almond powder is

0:18:52 > 0:18:55issued by a lab that is used by the wholesaler to test

0:18:55 > 0:18:57the contents of raw ingredients.

0:18:59 > 0:19:03This test is an assurance that customers with peanut allergies

0:19:03 > 0:19:07can eat the almond powder in their meals without ending up in hospital.

0:19:07 > 0:19:09The peanut is there, that it has

0:19:09 > 0:19:11"no peanuts and products thereof".

0:19:11 > 0:19:15So all of these put together give you a completely

0:19:15 > 0:19:20clear message that this product is what you want to use.

0:19:22 > 0:19:25Corinne Lowe from the Trading Standards Institute believes

0:19:25 > 0:19:29that somewhere out there right now, either deliberately or

0:19:29 > 0:19:32otherwise, restaurants could be using ground peanuts

0:19:32 > 0:19:35instead of ground almonds in their meals.

0:19:35 > 0:19:39Trading Standards are testing meals and finding, unfortunately,

0:19:39 > 0:19:43in some cases, up to 40% of those meals can contain peanut

0:19:43 > 0:19:46when they have been described as peanut-free.

0:19:46 > 0:19:50Not only is it a criminal offence to misdescribe food,

0:19:50 > 0:19:54you are also risking people's lives by bulking out

0:19:54 > 0:19:56almond powder with peanut.

0:19:56 > 0:20:00Trading Standards across the country continue to investigate

0:20:00 > 0:20:03cases of suspected fake almond powder.

0:20:11 > 0:20:15Earlier, we saw how David and Marlene Jackson, from East Sussex,

0:20:15 > 0:20:19lost over £3,000 trying to book their dream holiday through

0:20:19 > 0:20:22a company with a fake ATOL membership.

0:20:22 > 0:20:25Up till literally two days before we were due to go,

0:20:25 > 0:20:29we were being told there was still a possibility we'd go.

0:20:29 > 0:20:31But Russian Gateway isn't the only travel company out there

0:20:31 > 0:20:35faking its ATOL logos and putting holiday-makers at risk.

0:20:38 > 0:20:41Today, Mohammed Tariq from Birmingham Trading Standards,

0:20:41 > 0:20:44is travelling down south to join forces with Trading Standards

0:20:44 > 0:20:46from a London borough.

0:20:47 > 0:20:51They received information that suspect travel businesses are using

0:20:51 > 0:20:56fake ATOL logos to dupe British Muslims planning their hajj trips.

0:20:56 > 0:20:59Hajj is a religious pilgrimage to Mecca, in Saudi Arabia.

0:20:59 > 0:21:03As we're coming up to the hajj season in a couple of weeks' time,

0:21:03 > 0:21:06so you're going to get a lot of travel agents just popping up,

0:21:06 > 0:21:08trying to make a quick buck.

0:21:08 > 0:21:12Reputable travel companies pay a large fee, meet financial tests

0:21:12 > 0:21:14and put up a bond to be part of the ATOL scheme

0:21:14 > 0:21:16and have permission to display the logo.

0:21:16 > 0:21:20But some dodgy operators don't want to pay to be a member, meaning they

0:21:20 > 0:21:25are selling unprotected holidays to unsuspecting holiday-makers.

0:21:25 > 0:21:27Trading Standards are duty-bound to stop them.

0:21:27 > 0:21:30They have arrived at the first suspect travel business.

0:21:30 > 0:21:32Is the owner about, please?

0:21:35 > 0:21:36Is anybody else in the premises?

0:21:40 > 0:21:43The man doesn't seem to be involved,

0:21:43 > 0:21:46so the officers head to the back of the shop to find the owner.

0:21:46 > 0:21:48Are you the owner or the manager?

0:21:48 > 0:21:50No, he is.

0:21:50 > 0:21:52- He is, outside?- Yeah, yeah. - He told me you were.

0:21:52 > 0:21:55- No.- What, the gentleman that is sitting there? He is the owner?

0:21:55 > 0:21:56The one that was sitting here?

0:21:56 > 0:21:59Looks like the man they spoke to earlier was involved.

0:21:59 > 0:22:01- He's run off.- Has he run off?

0:22:01 > 0:22:04And he is clearly in the mood for a bit of exercise.

0:22:04 > 0:22:08- He's running, running, running. - Oh, yeah, I can see him, yeah.

0:22:08 > 0:22:12Obviously, he has got something to hide and he has just run off.

0:22:12 > 0:22:15The officers will try to catch up with him on another day.

0:22:15 > 0:22:19But for now, it is time to take a look at why he might have run off.

0:22:19 > 0:22:22Tariq doesn't have to go inside the shop to find some

0:22:22 > 0:22:25potentially incriminating evidence.

0:22:25 > 0:22:27The ATOL logo you can see there is fake, basically,

0:22:27 > 0:22:31because they are not licensed by the Civil Aviation Authority.

0:22:31 > 0:22:34If you haven't got a licence with the Civil Aviation Authority,

0:22:34 > 0:22:37you are not permitted to sell any packages.

0:22:37 > 0:22:41Inside, the officers manage to get one of the owners on the phone.

0:22:41 > 0:22:44Obviously, you've got a fake ATOL logo out there.

0:22:44 > 0:22:46You are giving the indication to members of the public

0:22:46 > 0:22:48that you are ATOL protected.

0:22:48 > 0:22:52You are not ATOL protected, so why have you put the sign up there?

0:22:52 > 0:22:55Tariq knows the fake ATOL logos displayed by this business

0:22:55 > 0:22:58could spell bad news for prospective travellers.

0:22:59 > 0:23:02Rogue traders don't want to pay for that licence and

0:23:02 > 0:23:05they are bypassing that by claiming to be falsely ATOL protected.

0:23:05 > 0:23:07It's not cheap going on hajj or umra,

0:23:07 > 0:23:10we're talking about £4,000, £5,000 a package.

0:23:10 > 0:23:14Now, often pilgrims will save this. This is a life savings.

0:23:14 > 0:23:16And what will happen if the company goes bust

0:23:16 > 0:23:18or the trader goes down,

0:23:18 > 0:23:19the consumer is not protected.

0:23:21 > 0:23:25Tariq will be making further inquiries about this company, but

0:23:25 > 0:23:29there are others out there, duping consumers with fake ATOL logos.

0:23:30 > 0:23:34So the officers head to another suspect business around the corner.

0:23:35 > 0:23:38Tariq explains to the owner why they are there.

0:23:38 > 0:23:41We have carried out some checks in relation to your premises.

0:23:41 > 0:23:44So what we are looking at is traders passing off themselves

0:23:44 > 0:23:46as being ATOL licensed, and they are not.

0:23:46 > 0:23:49As the search gets under way, Tariq immediately finds

0:23:49 > 0:23:54a suspect advertisement that could dupe unsuspecting holiday-makers.

0:23:54 > 0:23:55Look how sophisticated that looks.

0:23:55 > 0:23:58Anyone looking at that will think they are dealing with a proper,

0:23:58 > 0:24:01legitimate company who is ATOL protected.

0:24:01 > 0:24:04But there are other fake ATOL logos at this business -

0:24:04 > 0:24:06dozens in the customer waiting area.

0:24:06 > 0:24:08You got documentation down yet,

0:24:08 > 0:24:12that has got the ATOL logo there as well. That is fake.

0:24:12 > 0:24:14And outside the shop, it is the same story.

0:24:14 > 0:24:17If I can just show you... When a customer is coming in,

0:24:17 > 0:24:19it says it is ATOL protected there.

0:24:19 > 0:24:23That is misleading because you are not associated with ATOL.

0:24:25 > 0:24:28The owner's records leave a lot to be desired and there is real

0:24:28 > 0:24:31concern about what he has been doing with his customers' money.

0:24:31 > 0:24:33Money has been taken off consumers

0:24:33 > 0:24:37and then what this gentleman does is put some money into his account,

0:24:37 > 0:24:40which is totally against the CAA regulations.

0:24:40 > 0:24:44The money should go straight into an ATOL protected account,

0:24:44 > 0:24:47ATOL holder account, so the money is protected then.

0:24:47 > 0:24:51Obviously, he goes into his account, then...

0:24:51 > 0:24:53Where is the money being protected?

0:24:53 > 0:24:56The officers have enough evidence to caution and question the man.

0:24:56 > 0:24:59It is a criminal offence to say ATOL protected

0:24:59 > 0:25:01when you are not ATOL protected.

0:25:01 > 0:25:04You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you

0:25:04 > 0:25:05do not mention in questioning

0:25:05 > 0:25:07something that you later rely on in court.

0:25:07 > 0:25:11What we are going to do is we are going to seize any documentation -

0:25:11 > 0:25:15leaflets, banners - that are displaying this fake logo, yeah?

0:25:16 > 0:25:19This company is about to lose all its glossy advertising.

0:25:19 > 0:25:23It is fake and it is also evidence, so it has got to be seized.

0:25:25 > 0:25:28This is a result for Birmingham Trading Standards with

0:25:28 > 0:25:32companies under investigation for using fake ATOL logos that

0:25:32 > 0:25:35could leave holiday-makers unprotected.

0:25:37 > 0:25:41Remember, if you are about to book a holiday, you can check

0:25:41 > 0:25:44if your travel provider is genuinely ATOL protected

0:25:44 > 0:25:48by logging onto the Civil Aviation Authority's website.

0:25:53 > 0:25:57This is a Light Emitting Diode, or LED bulb.

0:25:57 > 0:26:00It is new lighting technology that gives out more

0:26:00 > 0:26:04light for the amount of power it consumes than conventional bulbs.

0:26:04 > 0:26:07It is also supposed to last longer and be safer

0:26:07 > 0:26:09because it is cool to the touch.

0:26:09 > 0:26:12This LED bulb does all that.

0:26:12 > 0:26:14But this one doesn't.

0:26:14 > 0:26:19It has a fake safety mark on it and it is on sale online now.

0:26:19 > 0:26:20As we're about to find out,

0:26:20 > 0:26:24plug this or any of these fake LED bulbs in

0:26:24 > 0:26:27and you might get more than you bargained for.

0:26:29 > 0:26:33Retired electronics engineer Derek Hawthorne from Hampshire

0:26:33 > 0:26:36wanted to update the lighting in his house.

0:26:36 > 0:26:40In a light-bulb moment, he decided to replace the old light

0:26:40 > 0:26:43bulbs on his cooker with new LED bulbs.

0:26:43 > 0:26:47I thought it was just a matter of picking the right

0:26:47 > 0:26:52size of lamp from an auction website, making sure that the wattage

0:26:52 > 0:26:57was about right and plug it in and forget about it.

0:26:57 > 0:27:01Derek went ahead and ordered his LED bulbs on the internet.

0:27:01 > 0:27:06The package arrived, the lamps looked to be of reasonable quality

0:27:06 > 0:27:10and I thought, "This is plug and play, fit and forget."

0:27:10 > 0:27:16So Derek did fit and forget about his new LED bulb, that is

0:27:16 > 0:27:18until a few days later.

0:27:18 > 0:27:20I moved my hand first of all just underneath,

0:27:20 > 0:27:23and I could feel quite a lot of heat coming out.

0:27:23 > 0:27:26And then I moved my hand up and across the underneath of the cooker

0:27:26 > 0:27:29hood and received an electric shock.

0:27:30 > 0:27:34The jolt left Derek shaken, but luckily, nothing more than that.

0:27:35 > 0:27:39As an electronic engineer, Derek knows a thing or two about wiring.

0:27:39 > 0:27:41As far as he was concerned,

0:27:41 > 0:27:46getting an electric shock from an LED bulb could mean only one thing.

0:27:46 > 0:27:49If I buy a lamp from a certified manufacturer,

0:27:49 > 0:27:53I don't expect to get any kind of an electric shock, because a lamp

0:27:53 > 0:27:55or a bulb should be completely insulated

0:27:55 > 0:27:57from the electricity supply.

0:27:57 > 0:28:03A product purported to have met standards but in fact was

0:28:03 > 0:28:06probably a fake because it didn't meet those standards.

0:28:06 > 0:28:10If an LED bulb but with a CE mark gives you an electric shock,

0:28:10 > 0:28:13then the CE mark itself is probably fake.

0:28:15 > 0:28:19Concerned that they were dangerous, Derek got rid of his fake LED bulbs,

0:28:19 > 0:28:23so we brought him one that was almost identical to those he fitted.

0:28:23 > 0:28:26There are exposed connections

0:28:26 > 0:28:29here, here - and either side of every single LED

0:28:29 > 0:28:31is an exposed connection.

0:28:31 > 0:28:35There is no protection on the front of the lamp to stop

0:28:35 > 0:28:39you from touching any of these parts and receiving an electric shock.

0:28:39 > 0:28:43Derek had brushed against the top of a lamp similar to this one.

0:28:43 > 0:28:45He thinks he had a lucky escape,

0:28:45 > 0:28:49as the electric shock he received wasn't very powerful.

0:28:49 > 0:28:51But not everybody could be as fortunate.

0:28:51 > 0:28:56What would happen if my wife was cleaning underneath the cooker

0:28:56 > 0:28:59hood and she used a damp cloth?

0:28:59 > 0:29:01She would get a much more severe shock.

0:29:01 > 0:29:04If a component in the lamp were to fail,

0:29:04 > 0:29:08then the consequences could have been death.

0:29:08 > 0:29:12Derek also found himself thinking of the consequences of someone

0:29:12 > 0:29:15using a fake LED bulb like this one outdoors.

0:29:15 > 0:29:19That would have been potentially tragic because they would have

0:29:19 > 0:29:23suffered a lethal shock in the event that the lamp had got wet.

0:29:23 > 0:29:27They are potentially hazardous and a risk to life.

0:29:27 > 0:29:30And it is very difficult for people to know

0:29:30 > 0:29:33whether they've got a product that is a fake or not.

0:29:34 > 0:29:37The fake LED bulb that we showed Derek was bought online.

0:29:37 > 0:29:40Disturbingly, it is just one of thousands of fake LED bulbs

0:29:40 > 0:29:41out there.

0:29:41 > 0:29:45Since the European Union ban on older-style filament bulbs

0:29:45 > 0:29:49was phased in, demand for LED lamps has rapidly increased,

0:29:49 > 0:29:52as has the production of the fakes.

0:29:52 > 0:29:55Suffolk Trading Standards sees this pile of fake LED bulbs

0:29:55 > 0:30:00on their way from China into the UK through the port of Felixstowe.

0:30:00 > 0:30:03Many are almost identical to the one that gave

0:30:03 > 0:30:05Derek Hawthorne his nasty shock.

0:30:05 > 0:30:09Over here, we've got nearly 1,000 LED bulbs,

0:30:09 > 0:30:12which are just part of a larger consignment.

0:30:12 > 0:30:15The problem with these is that they've got fake CE marks.

0:30:15 > 0:30:18By that, I mean it is either been misapplied or, in this instance,

0:30:18 > 0:30:22the CE mark itself doesn't actually meet the criteria which it should.

0:30:22 > 0:30:24It's a fake.

0:30:24 > 0:30:28With their fake CE markings, these LED bulbs could be dangerous.

0:30:28 > 0:30:32But we wanted to find out just how dangerous the fakes can be.

0:30:32 > 0:30:37So we went to leading test house Intertek to meet electrical

0:30:37 > 0:30:39safety expert Steve Curtler.

0:30:39 > 0:30:42How can you tell the difference between a genuine

0:30:42 > 0:30:44and a fake LED bulb?

0:30:44 > 0:30:48We can see on the genuine, there is a cover over the LED lamp

0:30:48 > 0:30:51and the LED array itself and any connections, which means

0:30:51 > 0:30:55I can't put my finger on to anything that might have dangerous voltages.

0:30:57 > 0:30:59Steve ordered an LED bulb on the internet,

0:30:59 > 0:31:03identical to the one that shocked Derek Hawthorne.

0:31:03 > 0:31:05At first glance, he is concerned.

0:31:05 > 0:31:09You can actually unscrew the lamp itself

0:31:09 > 0:31:12and get access to live parts, hazardous parts.

0:31:12 > 0:31:16No lamp should be able to be taken apart purely by unscrewing it.

0:31:16 > 0:31:21Easy access to dangerous wiring can mean only one thing for the CE

0:31:21 > 0:31:24and other safety markings on this bulb.

0:31:24 > 0:31:28We've got a problem here at that has the potential to kill somebody.

0:31:28 > 0:31:31And there is no way that genuine manufacturers would produce...

0:31:31 > 0:31:35manufacture anything that could come apart as easy as that.

0:31:35 > 0:31:38There is no doubt that the safety marks that have been applied

0:31:38 > 0:31:42onto this lamp are indeed false, fake.

0:31:42 > 0:31:46With the testing, Steve hopes to put his finger on the problem.

0:31:46 > 0:31:48Well, not his finger exactly.

0:31:48 > 0:31:52We are going to be using a laboratory test finger to simulate

0:31:52 > 0:31:55someone actually touching the outside of the lamp.

0:31:55 > 0:31:58The artificial finger will be connected to a lamp that

0:31:58 > 0:32:00represents the human body.

0:32:00 > 0:32:03If that is to light up, then we know that there is a voltage

0:32:03 > 0:32:04and a current there.

0:32:04 > 0:32:08And then we want to see how dangerous that voltage and current is.

0:32:10 > 0:32:13First, Steve will test a genuine LED lamp.

0:32:13 > 0:32:15OK then, Mike, when you are ready.

0:32:16 > 0:32:21So, we're touching the lamp wherever we can with the test finger.

0:32:21 > 0:32:24The lamp is not coming on. We are not getting any dangerous voltages.

0:32:24 > 0:32:26We get no voltage at all, in fact.

0:32:26 > 0:32:30The genuine LED lamp has passed the test with flying colours.

0:32:31 > 0:32:37Now, what about the LED lamp that Steve bought from an online store?

0:32:37 > 0:32:38To pass the safety test,

0:32:38 > 0:32:41the voltage on the surface of this LED bulb,

0:32:41 > 0:32:45which someone could feasibly touch, must not exceed 60 volts

0:32:45 > 0:32:47and the current - two milliamps.

0:32:49 > 0:32:52It is an immediate result for the fake LED bulb.

0:32:52 > 0:32:57We have got way over the 60 volt limit. 178 volts.

0:32:58 > 0:33:00It has failed spectacularly.

0:33:02 > 0:33:04This isn't just slightly over the voltage limit,

0:33:04 > 0:33:08this is way over, about three times the amount.

0:33:08 > 0:33:11So that is extremely hazardous.

0:33:11 > 0:33:14And the same for the current, 91 milliamps.

0:33:14 > 0:33:17So that is extremely dangerous.

0:33:17 > 0:33:21You could easily get a fatal electric shock from this scenario.

0:33:22 > 0:33:26Steve has all the information he needs to pass final judgment

0:33:26 > 0:33:27on this fake.

0:33:27 > 0:33:29Clearly, the bulb has never been tested before.

0:33:29 > 0:33:33It is marked up with all the safety marks to say that it has been.

0:33:33 > 0:33:38So those marks are fake, the lamp is fake. It is seriously dangerous.

0:33:38 > 0:33:41And potentially life-threatening.

0:33:42 > 0:33:45Anyone fitting a fake LED lamp like this in their house could be

0:33:45 > 0:33:48lucky only to walk away with a minor electric shock.

0:33:51 > 0:33:53But Steve is not finished.

0:33:53 > 0:33:56There is another suspected fake lamp he'd like to test,

0:33:56 > 0:33:58and it is a big one.

0:33:58 > 0:34:02This could be fitted in a shop, school or other public area.

0:34:04 > 0:34:08They run the test, and Steve is astonished by the results.

0:34:08 > 0:34:14We have got voltage of 203 volts, which is ridiculous.

0:34:14 > 0:34:17Extremely hazardous voltage there.

0:34:17 > 0:34:19That is nearly four times the limit.

0:34:19 > 0:34:2397 milliamps - a fatal electric shock waiting to happen

0:34:23 > 0:34:27if you were to touch that when it was in the lamp fitting itself,

0:34:27 > 0:34:29so unfortunately, another fake.

0:34:29 > 0:34:34The fake LED lamps that Steve tested today could kill.

0:34:34 > 0:34:35Some of them, like this one,

0:34:35 > 0:34:39have come from the shipment seized by Suffolk Trading Standards.

0:34:42 > 0:34:45After these and other tests, Suffolk Trading Standards

0:34:45 > 0:34:49are taking drastic action to ensure the fake LED bulbs

0:34:49 > 0:34:51they seized will never be able to harm anyone.

0:34:51 > 0:34:55So these fake LED bulbs are going to be destroyed.

0:34:55 > 0:34:59The reason why we do destroy these things is because they are unsafe.

0:35:01 > 0:35:05It is a dangerous product and can't be allowed for sale within the EU.

0:35:12 > 0:35:16As we have seen on Fake Britain, fake versions of everyday

0:35:16 > 0:35:20items we all buy are pouring into the country every day.

0:35:20 > 0:35:22Take a look at these evidence bags -

0:35:22 > 0:35:26sunglasses, cigarette lighters, and loom bands.

0:35:26 > 0:35:28We've also got much, much more.

0:35:28 > 0:35:31We've been out with Trading Standards and the police to see

0:35:31 > 0:35:35how much fakery can be found in one shop on one high street.

0:35:35 > 0:35:37It could be a high street near you.

0:35:39 > 0:35:43It is early morning somewhere in London.

0:35:43 > 0:35:46Trading Standards officer David Hunt is leading a major

0:35:46 > 0:35:49crackdown on potentially dangerous counterfeit goods

0:35:49 > 0:35:52suspected of being sold from a high street shop.

0:35:52 > 0:35:55Trading Standards will lead the operation into the premises,

0:35:55 > 0:35:57accompanied with the police.

0:35:57 > 0:36:00Introduce ourselves, explain what is happening.

0:36:01 > 0:36:0411 brand representatives from leading companies who

0:36:04 > 0:36:08think their products are being faked are joining forces with Trading

0:36:08 > 0:36:12Standards and the police in a major antique counterfeiting operation.

0:36:12 > 0:36:15All right, this is the premises, here on our left-hand side,

0:36:15 > 0:36:17we're coming to visit.

0:36:17 > 0:36:18Good morning.

0:36:18 > 0:36:22David is straight into the shop for a chat with the shop assistant.

0:36:22 > 0:36:25We are going to carry out an inspection on the shop here today.

0:36:25 > 0:36:27I have a number of brand holders with me, OK?

0:36:27 > 0:36:29We are going to look around the shop.

0:36:29 > 0:36:33Anything we find that is fake, so that has got trademarks or

0:36:33 > 0:36:37copyright applied or anything that is unsafe, we will seize.

0:36:37 > 0:36:40The shop is on the corner of a busy main road,

0:36:40 > 0:36:42so the police have to cordon it off.

0:36:42 > 0:36:44One of the shop assistants isn't terribly happy

0:36:44 > 0:36:46that our film crew is there.

0:36:46 > 0:36:47Can you not film me?

0:36:47 > 0:36:50It might be because of what David has just spotted,

0:36:50 > 0:36:53brazenly on display in broad daylight.

0:36:53 > 0:36:55What we have here is a display of sunglasses.

0:36:55 > 0:36:59A significant number of them have got Ray-Ban's trademark on them.

0:36:59 > 0:37:03When we see fake sunglasses, we do seize them.

0:37:03 > 0:37:06Inside the shop, David finds even more shoddy shades,

0:37:06 > 0:37:09complete with fake ultraviolet protection labelling.

0:37:09 > 0:37:13They have the label on them to say they have been tested for protection.

0:37:13 > 0:37:17The fake ones haven't had the testing done and if people wear them,

0:37:17 > 0:37:18they risk damaging their eyes.

0:37:18 > 0:37:20People buy them thinking they're going to

0:37:20 > 0:37:24protect their eyes from bright sunshine, and they don't.

0:37:24 > 0:37:27These fake sunglasses aren't the only potentially dangerous

0:37:27 > 0:37:30fake goods that David is on the hunt for today.

0:37:30 > 0:37:33It is not long before he spots something else.

0:37:33 > 0:37:38These lighters are manufactured to be copies of the Zippo type lighters,

0:37:38 > 0:37:40with brands on them.

0:37:40 > 0:37:44When you pull the inside out, they're not always tight.

0:37:44 > 0:37:45They are quite loose.

0:37:45 > 0:37:48And there is a chance that if it is filled with lighter fluid,

0:37:48 > 0:37:53that could actually come out around the top of the device

0:37:53 > 0:37:55when you ignite it.

0:37:55 > 0:37:58If the fluid is there, around the side, that will ignite.

0:37:58 > 0:38:02And this could cause serious burns to the hand of the user.

0:38:02 > 0:38:04And there are more fake lighters inside.

0:38:06 > 0:38:11These lighters are actually copies of Clippers.

0:38:11 > 0:38:15Not only are they counterfeit, but they are very unsafe.

0:38:15 > 0:38:18They may explode on the person. Or if you drop them, they break easily.

0:38:18 > 0:38:21The gas will escape, with the risk of explosion.

0:38:21 > 0:38:24By now, the officers have established that this shop is

0:38:24 > 0:38:26selling potentially dangerous goods.

0:38:26 > 0:38:30But they are about to come across something out of the ordinary.

0:38:30 > 0:38:33There are 225 packets of substances known as legal highs.

0:38:33 > 0:38:36And unfortunately, people do consume them.

0:38:36 > 0:38:40And they cause serious illness and possibly psychosis.

0:38:40 > 0:38:43We don't know what effect these have on the human body and we don't

0:38:43 > 0:38:47know the long-term effects and if any permanent damage could be caused.

0:38:47 > 0:38:50While searching through a bag of legal highs,

0:38:50 > 0:38:53the officers have discovered another potentially harmful drug.

0:38:53 > 0:38:57Found four packets of what appear to be Viagra tablets.

0:38:57 > 0:39:02They could be more fake goods and it raises a more serious

0:39:02 > 0:39:05issue of fake tablets being sold on the high street.

0:39:05 > 0:39:08These will have to go to the police to be tested and checked.

0:39:08 > 0:39:10It is over to the police to question the men

0:39:10 > 0:39:13working in the shop about the drugs that have been discovered.

0:39:13 > 0:39:18This is not legal. This is what we believe to be Viagra.

0:39:18 > 0:39:20Well, I usually don't sell these ones, so...

0:39:20 > 0:39:23- But it is behind the counter.- Yeah.

0:39:23 > 0:39:26And you have said today that you are in control of the store.

0:39:26 > 0:39:29Yeah, in control, but usually when the boss is around here,

0:39:29 > 0:39:30I run the small shop.

0:39:32 > 0:39:34So far, it is a successful operation -

0:39:34 > 0:39:38potentially dangerous fake lighters and sunglasses, legal highs

0:39:38 > 0:39:42and Viagra, all being sold out of this high street shop,

0:39:42 > 0:39:45and all of which will be seized.

0:39:45 > 0:39:47As well as selling dangerous fake goods,

0:39:47 > 0:39:50the shop is brimful of something we have seen many

0:39:50 > 0:39:55times on Fake Britain - a bewildering array of fake fashion.

0:39:55 > 0:39:59As the officers bag and tag the fake clothing out on display,

0:39:59 > 0:40:02David is curious about what might be in the basement.

0:40:02 > 0:40:04Section 28 of the Trade Descriptions Act gives me

0:40:04 > 0:40:09the power to enter anywhere on premises that are open for business.

0:40:09 > 0:40:10Your basement,

0:40:10 > 0:40:13I have power to enter as it is part of the business premises.

0:40:13 > 0:40:16But David is not going to be able to see what lies beneath

0:40:16 > 0:40:17without a fight.

0:40:17 > 0:40:20Excuse me, Mr Police Officer, he is not going to allow me

0:40:20 > 0:40:21to go in the basement.

0:40:21 > 0:40:23He has got legal power to go in the basement, all right?

0:40:23 > 0:40:26So he is allowed down in the basement.

0:40:26 > 0:40:29Finally, David gains access to the basement and it is immediately

0:40:29 > 0:40:33clear why the shop assistant didn't want to let him down there.

0:40:33 > 0:40:36There is a large amount of goods stored here.

0:40:36 > 0:40:42We have Yves Saint Laurent, Arctic Monkeys, Chicago Bulls.

0:40:42 > 0:40:45We have Chanel,

0:40:45 > 0:40:46Obey.

0:40:48 > 0:40:50Adidas here.

0:40:50 > 0:40:54Hidden below the shop are thousands of pounds worth of fake clothing.

0:40:54 > 0:40:55There is a large quantity of goods

0:40:55 > 0:40:58here that is all going to need to be looked at...

0:40:59 > 0:41:02..and inspected by the brand holders to see what we have here.

0:41:02 > 0:41:05He didn't want to actually give me access to the basement,

0:41:05 > 0:41:08and now I can see why he didn't want to do that.

0:41:08 > 0:41:10Along with the fake clothes upstairs,

0:41:10 > 0:41:14this subterranean hall will be bagged, tagged, and taken away.

0:41:14 > 0:41:18David feels lucky to have ever found it.

0:41:18 > 0:41:21This wall here was covered in T-shirts.

0:41:22 > 0:41:28And it was so you couldn't actually see the door, but the door is here.

0:41:28 > 0:41:30You gain access to a basement area.

0:41:30 > 0:41:32With the fake clothing taken care of,

0:41:32 > 0:41:36David is still on the hunt for potentially dangerous fakes.

0:41:36 > 0:41:38And he has found some more.

0:41:38 > 0:41:42This time, worryingly, in the form of children's bracelets.

0:41:42 > 0:41:46With the loom bands, what we have is we have requirements in the toy

0:41:46 > 0:41:50safety legislation that they should have certain markings on them.

0:41:50 > 0:41:53These loom bands do have the safety markings,

0:41:53 > 0:41:55but looks can be deceiving.

0:41:55 > 0:41:59And on this one, it has got an EN71 number, which is

0:41:59 > 0:42:02the British standard for child safety,

0:42:02 > 0:42:05but that British standard number wouldn't be made up like that.

0:42:05 > 0:42:08That marking is definitely fake, so they will be seized

0:42:08 > 0:42:12because we cannot be sure that they are a safe product.

0:42:12 > 0:42:16They might look harmless enough, but David knows how dangerous

0:42:16 > 0:42:21these children's bracelets could be for anyone who ends up wearing them.

0:42:21 > 0:42:24Because they have not been tested for chemicals such as phthalates,

0:42:24 > 0:42:26which are banned in Europe.

0:42:26 > 0:42:31They could contain phthalates, which have got a risk of cancer

0:42:31 > 0:42:33and are banned from all products for children.

0:42:35 > 0:42:38There are dozens of packs of the loom bands for sale in this

0:42:38 > 0:42:42high street store, but these looms are doomed.

0:42:42 > 0:42:46For Graham Mogg, of the Anti-Counterfeiting Group, it is

0:42:46 > 0:42:49important that decisive action is taken to make sure these products

0:42:49 > 0:42:51are off the street for good.

0:42:51 > 0:42:53It gives a clear message to retailers that sell

0:42:53 > 0:42:55counterfeit products that it won't be tolerated.

0:42:55 > 0:42:58From a brand's perspective, it shows that we will work...

0:42:58 > 0:43:01Private and public sectors working together is the way forward to try

0:43:01 > 0:43:04and tackle the problem. So it's a fantastic result.

0:43:09 > 0:43:11That is all from Fake Britain. Goodbye.