:00:07. > :00:11.Everything around us, from the ground we stand on, to the air we
:00:12. > :00:18.breathe, and the sky above us, is all made of the same fundamental
:00:19. > :00:25.stuff. How it all stuck together was a mystery, until one man came up
:00:26. > :00:32.with a theory. Here in Stockholm, tomorrow afternoon, that man will be
:00:33. > :00:35.awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics. It's unquestionably the greatest
:00:36. > :00:37.honour in his field and marks the culmination of a story that has
:00:38. > :00:48.lasted half a century. Peter Higgs published a scientific
:00:49. > :00:52.paper in 1964, it took almost 50 years, and the construction of the
:00:53. > :00:57.largest and most complex machine in human history to prove the theory he
:00:58. > :01:01.had come up with while working at Edinburgh University. This is the
:01:02. > :01:06.story of how a quiet, modest man became a physics superstar and why
:01:07. > :01:07.he is now here in Stockholm to become Scotland's newest Nobel
:01:08. > :01:19.Laureate. Earlier this year, I interviewed
:01:20. > :01:23.Peter Higgs about the recent discovery of the Higgs boson, the
:01:24. > :01:27.subatomic particle he predicted almost 50 years ago. I asked whether
:01:28. > :01:34.he paid any attention to the speculation surrounding the
:01:35. > :01:43.discovery? Do you see yourself as a contender for a Nobel Prize? Well,
:01:44. > :01:50.yes, obviously. I should say that it... It's not particularly new as
:01:51. > :01:58.a, well, as a promise or a threat, or however you perceive it,
:01:59. > :02:04.because... I mean the first outbreak of publicity, at least in the
:02:05. > :02:13.particle physics community, came with this conference in 1972. An old
:02:14. > :02:18.friend of mine, one of his colleagues at the time he visited
:02:19. > :02:24.Edinburgh in 1980 was on the Nobel Committee and revealed that my name
:02:25. > :02:30.was already on their list then. So, I was made aware of what would...
:02:31. > :02:36.What might happen if the experimentalists eventually found
:02:37. > :02:40.the thing. Peter Higgs has won the Nobel Prize for Physics, one of the
:02:41. > :02:47.dwraet greatest achievements in science. That prediction was proved
:02:48. > :02:54.right quicker than his one about had been had been. In October, Peter
:02:55. > :02:57.Higgs and the Belgium professor, Francois Englert were named as this
:02:58. > :03:00.year's Nobel Laureates for the work they had done separately back in
:03:01. > :03:05.1964 in the field of particle physics. Peter Higgs doesn't do too
:03:06. > :03:09.many media interviews, he had to be coaxed into taking part in a press
:03:10. > :03:14.conference just a few days after the announcement. I wanted to catch up
:03:15. > :03:18.with the professor to see how he was coping with the worldwide attention
:03:19. > :03:23.the Nobel announcement had unleashed. I had given my colleagues
:03:24. > :03:27.the impression I was going off to hide somewhere in the western
:03:28. > :03:35.highlands. I said that some weeks ago. In the event, I didn't do that.
:03:36. > :03:39.I just made sure I was out to lunch on Tuesday when the announcement
:03:40. > :03:43.came. What was your reaction when you learned that you were a Nobel
:03:44. > :03:49.Laureate? Sort of relief that it was going to be over soon because it has
:03:50. > :03:54.been coming a long time. Last year, when I think the press office in the
:03:55. > :04:01.University of Edinburgh seemed to think it was coming that year, they
:04:02. > :04:06.managed to induce panic in me. I said it would be premature, I think
:04:07. > :04:11.I was right. I was really prepared for it. It was... I thought it was
:04:12. > :04:15.bound to happen pretty soon. Few people outside the world of particle
:04:16. > :04:20.physics knew much about Peter Higgs, that was until last year when this
:04:21. > :04:24.happened. A discovery by scientists at the CERN laboratory near Geneva
:04:25. > :04:28.is being ranked alongside those of Newton and Einstein. Scientists say
:04:29. > :04:32.they have found a particle which is vital to understanding how the
:04:33. > :04:37.physical fabric of the universe is held together. What exactly is the
:04:38. > :04:42.Higgs boson and why did it take so long to find it? It is really
:04:43. > :04:46.simple, well the answers are quite complicated, but the fundamental
:04:47. > :04:50.questions are straight-forward enough. Think about stuff.
:04:51. > :04:54.Everything is made of it. It's easy to take it for granted. Why is this
:04:55. > :04:56.shaped like this? Why does the world, the universe around us, all
:04:57. > :05:08.cling together and take shape? The matter which makes up us, the
:05:09. > :05:12.world and everything is made of atoms and Deepwater inside them the
:05:13. > :05:16.fundamental particles that aren't made up of anything smaller some of
:05:17. > :05:19.them have mass. Mass make it is possible for those fundamental
:05:20. > :05:26.particles to bind together to start forming, well, all this stuff. What
:05:27. > :05:33.exactly does that mean? Time to go back to university. Mass is
:05:34. > :05:36.eventually a lump of matter, according to Chambers Dictionary
:05:37. > :05:41.it's a collection of coherent body of madder. What is the difference
:05:42. > :05:46.between that and weight? Well, this duster weighs something. If I drop
:05:47. > :05:50.it, gravity will pull it towards the centre of the earth. It if I took
:05:51. > :05:53.this into the weightlessness of space, it will still have mass. You
:05:54. > :05:59.would still need energy to push it about. But back at the Big Bang, how
:06:00. > :06:04.did some fundamental particles acquire that mass and start sticking
:06:05. > :06:10.together and to the things we see around us? That's what Peter Higgs
:06:11. > :06:15.set out to solve. Who is he? Peter Higgs was born in 1929, he was a
:06:16. > :06:19.bookish child, and by the time he reached the end of his secondary
:06:20. > :06:26.schooling, he was clearly heading towards science. I was going in the
:06:27. > :06:31.direction of theoretical physics by then, for various reasons,ing one
:06:32. > :06:43.being my interest in structure of matter at this deeper level than
:06:44. > :06:48.chemistry provided. And, in terms of my abilities I clearly had some
:06:49. > :06:54.mathematical skills and it wasn't clear what sort of skills I had. You
:06:55. > :07:00.know, other kinds of activity in physics. In fact, I was already, I
:07:01. > :07:09.think, at the age of 18, showing signs of being incompetent in the
:07:10. > :07:13.lab. Undeterred, Peter studied physics at King's College London
:07:14. > :07:18.where he was drawn towards the new theories dealing with fundamental
:07:19. > :07:22.particles. The science journalist Ian Sample has written about Peter
:07:23. > :07:27.and the history of the Higgs boson. He would stuff up experiments left
:07:28. > :07:31.right and centre. He was lucky in joining King's College when they
:07:32. > :07:35.just introduced a theoretical physics module. He was the first one
:07:36. > :07:41.to take it in his year. Around this time he obviously started to shine
:07:42. > :07:45.in that area. One of the issues that the course tutors had was, here we
:07:46. > :07:48.had one guy, on a course, theoretical physics, all the other
:07:49. > :07:51.students have to do exams when they finish their year, what do we do
:07:52. > :07:55.about Peter Higgs? We have never set this course before. They scratched
:07:56. > :07:59.their chins and instead of coming up with a question for him to answer in
:08:00. > :08:04.the exam, an exam for him to ina, they look in the literature they go
:08:05. > :08:08.flirting around in the new academic journals. They found a paper that
:08:09. > :08:11.had come out, Higgs Higgs wouldn't have seen, can't really have known
:08:12. > :08:16.about, they reword the paper, the question in the paper and they set
:08:17. > :08:20.it for Peter as a question. Just to see how he will get on. What is
:08:21. > :08:25.lovely about it, Peter sits the exam and answers the question correctly,
:08:26. > :08:31.he comes up with an elegant solution than the original author who had
:08:32. > :08:35.written the paper. His tutor was blown away. That gives you an idea
:08:36. > :08:41.that Peter was something special, at least when it came to theoretical
:08:42. > :08:43.physics. In the early 1960s Peter moved to Edinburgh University where
:08:44. > :08:47.he would spend the rest of his career. It was in Edinburgh that he
:08:48. > :08:52.wrote two academic papers which would change our understanding of
:08:53. > :08:55.the universe. A number of theoretical physicists around the
:08:56. > :08:59.world were trying to explain how some fundamental particles came to
:09:00. > :09:05.have mass. Peter's papers explained how this could happen. The second
:09:06. > :09:08.was the more important. The penultimate paragraph that he put in
:09:09. > :09:12.that paper was the first time anyone mentioned, if these theories are
:09:13. > :09:16.true, then you gate new particle that weighs something. That is what
:09:17. > :09:21.becomes known as the Higgs boson. So that second paper is where the idea
:09:22. > :09:24.of a new particle first appears in print. He is the first one to
:09:25. > :09:28.suggest it will happen. That paper then goes on to become this
:09:29. > :09:34.absolutely seminal paper in physics. Of all the physicists working in
:09:35. > :09:38.this area, only Peter Higgs stated explicitly that there would be a
:09:39. > :09:41.particle, a boson, that's what makes him important.
:09:42. > :09:48.Scientists are essentially model makers, they observe, build a
:09:49. > :09:51.theoretical model and then test it. In particle physics they have built
:09:52. > :09:55.what is known as the "standard model" it explains the relationship
:09:56. > :10:02.between the fundamental bits and pieces of "stuff." Every time the
:10:03. > :10:04.scientists built the model of the fundamental building blocks of
:10:05. > :10:07.matter, they found there was a problem. There was a bit missing.
:10:08. > :10:11.How did the particles that had mass, get their mass in the first place?
:10:12. > :10:19.It was Peter Higgs who came up with the missing piece. His
:10:20. > :10:23.groundbreaking work described a need gave some particles mass, the way
:10:24. > :10:29.that gravity gives objects weight and he showed how we could see it.
:10:30. > :10:32.You think of the Higgs field as this field that pervades the vaccum,
:10:33. > :10:35.stretches throughout space, throughout everything, throughout
:10:36. > :10:40.you, throughout me, and it gives mass to the fundamental particles of
:10:41. > :10:43.nature. Things like electrons and other subatomic particles. The field
:10:44. > :10:48.is there to give mass to particles and the boson comes with the field.
:10:49. > :10:52.It tells you the field is there. If the field wasn't there, what would
:10:53. > :11:01.the union vicious be like -- universe be like? If the Higgs field
:11:02. > :11:04.was not around, as you say, then the fundamental particles that build up
:11:05. > :11:07.atoms wouldn't have any mass. That means those particles would be
:11:08. > :11:10.flying around at the speed of light. If everything is flying around at
:11:11. > :11:14.the speed of light, you can imagine that the universe, as we see it,
:11:15. > :11:18.won't be quite as we see it now. You wouldn't have the struck sturs we
:11:19. > :11:23.see. You will not have galaxies, stars and planets like we know them.
:11:24. > :11:27.You will not have life like we know, probably not life at all. You can't
:11:28. > :11:32.form the kind of particles and chemistry we have around today. You
:11:33. > :11:38.want to imagine how the Higgs field works it might help to have a real
:11:39. > :11:46.field like this one. If I shine a light across the photons don't get
:11:47. > :11:54.bogged down, they slip across them. I'm moving slowly in the mud. If I
:11:55. > :11:57.was playing football the with a ball would get bogged down. That is how
:11:58. > :12:00.the Higgs field work. The more you are bogged down in it, the more mass
:12:01. > :12:05.you have. The difference is of course this field is only two
:12:06. > :12:10.dimensioned, the Higgs field is in every direction across the universe.
:12:11. > :12:15.That's my go at coming up withen analogy for what, after all, is an
:12:16. > :12:19.invisible and universal field describable only in very complex
:12:20. > :12:24.mathematics. Better qualified people have made a better fist of it. The
:12:25. > :12:27.Royal Society of Edinburgh promotes learning around the world. Its
:12:28. > :12:31.exhibition includes other analogies. This is the sort of problem that
:12:32. > :12:36.people like me have to now face, which is to try and explain this to
:12:37. > :12:41.a general audience. This is one of the way that is it's done. It's like
:12:42. > :12:49.a famous scientists entering a cocktail party. That's the
:12:50. > :12:54.mechanism, people cluster around, it increases the mass of the scientists
:12:55. > :13:00.a people cluster around him. Is that a satisfactory explanation for you?
:13:01. > :13:12.Well, it's not the way I would do it myself. It's... It's satisfactory to
:13:13. > :13:19.me, in the sense that I think it not obviously misleading. So I don't
:13:20. > :13:28.object to this particularly because if I go into a crowded room, I don't
:13:29. > :13:35.actually slow down gradually, I sort of zig-zag my way through avoiding
:13:36. > :13:41.people. My speed may not be reduced very much, but the rate at which I
:13:42. > :13:47.move across the room is reduced by all these people. That's not too bad
:13:48. > :13:52.as an explanation. Peter Higgs published his work on the boson in
:13:53. > :13:56.1964. In physics, ideas can take time, and it would be a decade or so
:13:57. > :14:02.before others began building on Peter's work. What was he doing in
:14:03. > :14:08.those years? John Jowett was a student of Peters in the 1970s. I
:14:09. > :14:15.had quite a few courses from him on things like group theory,
:14:16. > :14:20.electrodynamics, I remember them well. His courses were tough. They
:14:21. > :14:25.were very good. He had a different slant from most other lecturers. He
:14:26. > :14:30.went quite fast. It was good stuff. I mean, for the specialists I think
:14:31. > :14:35.he was already a kind of rock star, if you like, if you want to say
:14:36. > :14:41.that. People saw this was a very elegant, fundamental mechanism very
:14:42. > :14:47.important in physics. It was a long way from experimental test. That was
:14:48. > :14:51.the trouble. For a long time all this physics remained theory. Others
:14:52. > :14:56.checked the maths of Peter's work and moved it forward. Who could --
:14:57. > :15:01.how could anyone prove that the Higgs boson, and so the Higgs field,
:15:02. > :15:05.actually existed? In the mid 1970s, a new breed of experimental
:15:06. > :15:12.physicists said they could do just that. So began the era of big
:15:13. > :15:21.physics. When that has happened, we should know whether this that ?400
:15:22. > :15:25.million gamble established Europe as a clear leader in particle physics
:15:26. > :15:30.and whether we are closer to finding that theory of everything. It was
:15:31. > :15:36.like Peter Higgs had written the sheet music but someone had to
:15:37. > :15:39.whether -- build the piano to play it.
:15:40. > :15:45.The energy released in these head on collisions would replicate the first
:15:46. > :15:58.split seconds after the Big Bang. On the biggest and most powerful
:15:59. > :16:04.collider was built right in the heart of Europe. To see it, you have
:16:05. > :16:10.to travel to the outskirts of Geneva.
:16:11. > :16:26.This is CERN, the European European Organisation for Nuclear Research.
:16:27. > :16:33.It is a vast multinational project where scientists gather to conduct
:16:34. > :16:43.some of the most complex experiments ever conceived. Everybody has heard
:16:44. > :16:48.of CERN these days, but it has a history of almost 60 years of
:16:49. > :16:50.searching for the fundamental building blocks of matter. That
:16:51. > :16:55.thing over there, for example, it used to be part of an assembly that
:16:56. > :16:59.collided matter with anti-matter. That is such old hat nowadays now
:17:00. > :17:04.they have the Large Hadron Collider. Here's what it does. The Large
:17:05. > :17:09.Hadron Collider is the biggest machine ever. It is 27 kilometres
:17:10. > :17:14.round and took almost a decade to build. It's 100 meters below ground
:17:15. > :17:19.and fires particle beams together, each travelling at almost the speed
:17:20. > :17:24.of light. When they collide head on, huge detectors analyse the results
:17:25. > :17:32.and look for new fundamental particles in the hunt for the Higgs
:17:33. > :17:42.boson two detectors had to confirm the results, Atlas andkm. -- CPS. --
:17:43. > :17:48.CMS. Atlas is the biggest of the four detectors. It's 45 meters long.
:17:49. > :17:53.25 meters high. So like five storey building. It's the biggest
:17:54. > :17:57.experiment which is run by an international collaboration made of
:17:58. > :18:07.3,000 physicists from all over the world. We have a strong team from
:18:08. > :18:11.Edinburgh University. The funny thing about the Higgs boson, when
:18:12. > :18:14.you give talks about the Higgs years ago it was a joke. We know
:18:15. > :18:18.everything about it, except whether or not it exists and what its mass
:18:19. > :18:26.is. Once you know the mass, you know everything about it. Not knowing
:18:27. > :18:29.what the mass was it could have been found very early if it were very
:18:30. > :18:36.light. It wasn't that we didn't look for it, OK. In fact, in the years
:18:37. > :18:40.proceeding last year, whatever that was, 45 years after the idea came
:18:41. > :18:45.out, I think for the majority of that time people were looking one
:18:46. > :18:50.way or another. We were looking, for sure. All through this period we
:18:51. > :18:53.were looking. We never had, we never had an instrument that would allow
:18:54. > :18:59.us to look everywhere. We had to look where we could, under the
:19:00. > :19:02.lampposts that we had, so to speak. The Large Hadron Collider was
:19:03. > :19:06.switched on in 2008. Last summer rumours started to come out of CERN
:19:07. > :19:10.that something had been found. CERN were desperately trying to contact
:19:11. > :19:16.Peter Higgs and his colleague Alan Walker. There were more and more
:19:17. > :19:20.messages coming saying, a, something interesting will be announced on
:19:21. > :19:24.July 4th. It came clear as the week went on that more people were coming
:19:25. > :19:27.to CERN if you like from the people who contributed in this area. It was
:19:28. > :19:32.only Peter who was not going to be there. It became inevitable when we
:19:33. > :19:37.got a phone call saying that, "I think Peter should come to CERN" an
:19:38. > :19:41.email saying, "I think Peter should come to CERN otherwise he might
:19:42. > :19:46.regret it." I had to rebook our flights. Here at CERN, history was
:19:47. > :19:51.made in the Large Hadron Collider, 100 meters below my feet. History
:19:52. > :19:56.was announced here in this auditorium on July 4th 2012. People
:19:57. > :19:59.weren't sure exactly what was going to be announced. They knew it was
:20:00. > :20:04.going to be something pretty moment muss when they noticed that Peter
:20:05. > :20:08.Higgs was sitting just over there. I think we have success today. We have
:20:09. > :20:16.a discovery, we have discovered a new particle, a boson. Most probably
:20:17. > :20:23.a Higgs boson. I was caught off guard during the presentation when
:20:24. > :20:28.people erupted into applause. There was a gasp in the audience. I
:20:29. > :20:33.remember I then stopped and just said, I thought to myself, I will
:20:34. > :20:37.linger here for a minute. I said something like, "I was lost here a
:20:38. > :20:45.second" I meant to say I was lost in the beauty (inaudible). Many people
:20:46. > :20:47.thought I had spaced out. It was a strong reaction. Peter Higgs was in
:20:48. > :20:57.tears. I'd never been in a scientific
:20:58. > :21:06.meeting like that before because people got up and cheered and stamp
:21:07. > :21:12.and... It was a completely new experience. You must accept they
:21:13. > :21:22.were cheering you? I didn't accept it was me that they were cheering. I
:21:23. > :21:27.regarded it as... As cheers for the home team, as at a football match,
:21:28. > :21:35.the home team were the two experiments, Atlas and CMS with
:21:36. > :21:40.1,500 members each. That was what it was really about, maybe they were
:21:41. > :21:47.cheering me too, but that was a minor issue. But while Peter Higgs
:21:48. > :21:51.is almost painfully modest, his peers recognise his achievements.
:21:52. > :21:58.Well, Peter Higgs is a genius. It's just, you know, he just... He got
:21:59. > :22:05.just the right idea. Sometimes you need this kind of revolutionary
:22:06. > :22:08.ideas. This hint of genius, I will say, the big ingenuity to make a big
:22:09. > :22:14.step forward. To have done something that impacted so many people, that
:22:15. > :22:22.has such a big impact worldwide, such a big impact on science. To see
:22:23. > :22:27.that kind of evolving over decades, but coming to such a nice form of
:22:28. > :22:30.closure, so to speak, where you have definitive evidence, there is no
:22:31. > :22:36.question about it, this is now a big part of science. I think that would
:22:37. > :22:40.have to move anyone. Yet, back home and mulling over his elevation to
:22:41. > :22:46.the Nobel Laureatship, Peter Higgs remains a deeply modest man. The
:22:47. > :22:52.award of the Nobel Prize for Physics puts you in a pantheon of people who
:22:53. > :22:58.inspired you, Nambu, people who inspired the rest of us, like
:22:59. > :23:04.Einstein. Do you feel comfortable in that company now? Not very, no. I
:23:05. > :23:11.mean because I think the people that you have mentioned did vastly more
:23:12. > :23:18.than I ever did. I mean, I'm getting the prize for something which took
:23:19. > :23:24.me two or three weeks in 1964. It is a very small amount of my life.
:23:25. > :23:30.Whereas the achievement of people like, well, if you take Einstein,
:23:31. > :23:42.for example, his achievements were several orders of magnitude greater.
:23:43. > :23:48.The members of the Nobel Committee very obviously don't agree with
:23:49. > :23:58.Peter Higgs' modest self-assessment. This is the Royal Swedish Academy of
:23:59. > :24:02.Sciences. Here we have the old session hall of the Royal Swedish
:24:03. > :24:09.Academy of Sciences. It's here that the press conference is every year
:24:10. > :24:14.at the Nobel Prize announcements which is usually in the beginning of
:24:15. > :24:19.October. Is the desk from which the announcement was made? That is the
:24:20. > :24:22.exact desk, yes. Where does the award of the Nobel Prize for Physics
:24:23. > :24:28.put Peter Higgs now? What does it say about him? Oh, it says he is
:24:29. > :24:34.definitely one of the most important figures in physics and, of course
:24:35. > :24:37.his discovery, this remarkable discovery, that there should be a
:24:38. > :24:42.particle, named after him, as it should be, that was a very
:24:43. > :24:47.interesting theory, had been for very long, it wasn't proven until
:24:48. > :24:51.last year when one was found in two experiments in CERN. It puts him
:24:52. > :24:57.alongside people like Einstein, he doesn't accept that, does he? Well,
:24:58. > :25:03.in some sense he should because what really counts here for the Nobel
:25:04. > :25:13.Prize is impact of the theory, the idea, the discovery or invention, in
:25:14. > :25:17.some cases. That it should be the greatest discovery or invention.
:25:18. > :25:23.This is without doubt a remarkable theoretical discovery from the
:25:24. > :25:27.1960s. The Nobel Prize is a serious business and guarded passionately,
:25:28. > :25:38.but it is also celebrated and respected. Curator Gustav Kallstrand
:25:39. > :25:45.showed me around the noble Museum. When you look at the Noble Award
:25:46. > :25:50.Ceremony you seep the Nobel Laureates accepting your prize you
:25:51. > :25:53.feel you are like at wedding. It's a life altering day. It's an important
:25:54. > :25:59.day of these people's lives. You get the feeling for that. For a man in
:26:00. > :26:09.his mid 80s it's clearing the culmination of a life's work. But
:26:10. > :26:15.you are still an Emeritus professor. You fly around the world to give
:26:16. > :26:20.prizes. Are you going to take it easier? I'm hoping to retire at 85
:26:21. > :26:28.next year. Flying around the world giving lectures is a recent
:26:29. > :26:35.phenomenon because of the build-up to the discovery at CERN. For many
:26:36. > :26:38.years I had a quiet time in retirement I scarcely ever went out
:26:39. > :26:49.to my old department at King's Buildings. One of the embarrassing
:26:50. > :26:52.things about being Professor of Emeritus I discovered the email
:26:53. > :26:57.address in the university, which I really didn't want to have because
:26:58. > :27:05.the email arrived out at King's Buildings, I wasn't there, I had to
:27:06. > :27:11.keep it. My family dissuaded me from trying to resign the title of
:27:12. > :27:14.Professor Emeritus to get rid of it. Before that findal retirement there
:27:15. > :27:21.is a little business to be attended to. This is Stockholm's Concert
:27:22. > :27:25.Hall. It's here where Sweden's King Carl Gustaf will make Peter Higgs
:27:26. > :27:31.this year's Nobel Laureate. It's the greatest honour at the end of a
:27:32. > :27:34.great career. Peter Higgs retired from teaching almost 20 years ago.
:27:35. > :27:38.His biggest idea came nearly half a century ago, the work he did then,
:27:39. > :27:42.the work that was carried forward by scientists at CERN and around the
:27:43. > :27:47.world continues to inspire. Future generations will take it even
:27:48. > :27:52.further. Just for a moment, science will pause here, in the stock to
:27:53. > :27:55.being Concert Hall as Peter Higgs steps onto this stage to rereceive
:27:56. > :28:00.the highest accolade science can bestow. What what do you think your
:28:01. > :28:03.thoughts will be at that moment? -- what do you think your thoughts will
:28:04. > :28:14.be at that moment? That's difficult to predict. I shall probably
:28:15. > :28:19.remember a Swedish film which I saw back in the 1950s, with I found
:28:20. > :28:26.rather moving, it was called Wild Strawberries, I think. Anyway, it
:28:27. > :28:30.Was about a Swedish professor who was travelling I think to the
:28:31. > :28:35.capital to receive some award and remember things from his youth. I
:28:36. > :28:41.shall probably feel the same way.