Episode 22

Download Subtitles

Transcript

0:00:14 > 0:00:18Hello, and welcome to Debatable, the quiz show where talk is cheap,

0:00:18 > 0:00:22but celebrity chat can win a contestant money.

0:00:22 > 0:00:26This week, we'll be playing five extra-long editions of the show,

0:00:26 > 0:00:29because celebrity chat, as we all know, is priceless.

0:00:29 > 0:00:33One player must answer a series of tricky questions to try to win

0:00:33 > 0:00:37our jackpot of ?3,000, but they're not on their own,

0:00:37 > 0:00:41as they will also have a panel of celebrity brainboxes

0:00:41 > 0:00:43debating their way to the answer.

0:00:43 > 0:00:45Will they help or will they hinder? Well, that's debatable.

0:00:45 > 0:00:47So, let's meet them.

0:00:47 > 0:00:49On today's show, we have...

0:01:01 > 0:01:04That's our panel. Let's meet today's contestant.

0:01:04 > 0:01:06It is Hilary Leighter from Middlesex.

0:01:09 > 0:01:12How are you doing? Hello. Welcome to the show.

0:01:12 > 0:01:14Thank you very much. Tell us a bit about yourself.

0:01:14 > 0:01:17I'm Hilary Leighter, I'm 59,

0:01:17 > 0:01:21I live in Ruislip in Middlesex with my lovely husband, Graydon,

0:01:21 > 0:01:23and our beautiful cat, Bertie,

0:01:23 > 0:01:28who's one year old, and I am humanist celebrant.

0:01:28 > 0:01:30Yes, she is. I am.

0:01:30 > 0:01:32This is a magnificent job that you do.

0:01:32 > 0:01:35Yes, it is. Tell us what you celebrate.

0:01:35 > 0:01:42I create, with people, personal, nonreligious wedding ceremonies,

0:01:42 > 0:01:45baby naming ceremonies and funeral ceremonies.

0:01:45 > 0:01:47Apart from today, on this show,

0:01:47 > 0:01:50what's the most unusual ceremony that you've performed?

0:01:50 > 0:01:54Well, last year, I performed a most marvellous wedding

0:01:54 > 0:01:57in Shakespeare's Globe Theatre.

0:01:57 > 0:02:00Unfortunately, they didn't allow us to do it on the stage,

0:02:00 > 0:02:02which I would have liked to have done,

0:02:02 > 0:02:06but we were in the basement, which is a beautiful, huge space

0:02:06 > 0:02:08with a large tree.

0:02:08 > 0:02:10I felt as if I was doing Midsummer Night's Dream

0:02:10 > 0:02:12and we were up on a plinth,

0:02:12 > 0:02:15and it was romantic and it was just beautiful.

0:02:15 > 0:02:17Midsummer Night's Dream is one of your favourite plays, Konnie.

0:02:17 > 0:02:22It is indeed. And we could do that, couldn't we? I played... Chris?

0:02:22 > 0:02:24What have I played in Midsummer Night's Dream?

0:02:24 > 0:02:27I love the fact that Nigel says, "I played... What did I play?"

0:02:27 > 0:02:29I did, I played Puck. I played Puck. Did you?

0:02:29 > 0:02:33I played Puck! In fact, I was the best Puck at the park that year.

0:02:33 > 0:02:35You've played Puck as well? And I would like to say... No!

0:02:35 > 0:02:39I would like to say that the Wembley Observer wrote,

0:02:39 > 0:02:42"Hilary Leighter delighted as the sprightly Puck."

0:02:42 > 0:02:45Isn't that funny? Three of us have played Puck! Extraordinary.

0:02:45 > 0:02:47It's a good role. It is a good role.

0:02:47 > 0:02:49And out of the five of us here,

0:02:49 > 0:02:52I think that's probably the best review that any of us have ever had!

0:02:52 > 0:02:56Right, Hilary, let's get this Debatable show on the road,

0:02:56 > 0:02:57as we play round one.

0:03:00 > 0:03:02This round is multiple choice, Hilary.

0:03:02 > 0:03:06Each question has four possible answers, but only one is correct.

0:03:06 > 0:03:10Helping you find the correct answer is our panel.

0:03:10 > 0:03:13Now, will you go with what they say or will you go your own way?

0:03:13 > 0:03:16It is entirely up to you. There's three questions in this round.

0:03:16 > 0:03:20We have ?200 up for grabs with each correct answer.

0:03:20 > 0:03:22Ready to play? Yes. OK, best of luck. Here we go.

0:03:41 > 0:03:43My first thought is

0:03:43 > 0:03:45that I'm pretty sure I would find a post office,

0:03:45 > 0:03:47though that probably, of course,

0:03:47 > 0:03:49means that's the one thing you wouldn't find.

0:03:49 > 0:03:50And for any of the others,

0:03:50 > 0:03:53I'd be interested to hear what the panel have said.

0:03:53 > 0:03:56So, for the first time, panel, can we shed some light on this?

0:03:56 > 0:03:58Your debate starts now.

0:03:58 > 0:04:01Have either of you been to Buckingham Palace? Many times.

0:04:01 > 0:04:03Many times? Many times. Are you a constant guest? I go there...

0:04:03 > 0:04:06I was there only a week ago. I was at a garden party.

0:04:06 > 0:04:09I was at that one! Were you there? The Prince's Trust?

0:04:09 > 0:04:12Yeah. Wasn't it fantastic? Great! I wasn't there!

0:04:12 > 0:04:14Anyway... I couldn't make it! Back to the quiz.

0:04:14 > 0:04:17The thing is this - have you been around the back?

0:04:17 > 0:04:19I have, and I know that there's a swimming pool there.

0:04:19 > 0:04:20There's a swimming pool.

0:04:20 > 0:04:22As you're at the back of the palace,

0:04:22 > 0:04:25it's on the left-hand side, and it's a sort of separate room.

0:04:25 > 0:04:27I would have agreed with you.

0:04:27 > 0:04:29I would have thought there was a post office.

0:04:29 > 0:04:30Why would there be a post office?

0:04:30 > 0:04:33Because she is the Queen and the Queen doesn't go out to a postbox!

0:04:33 > 0:04:35But she has people to go and post letters for her.

0:04:35 > 0:04:38No, no, she loves posting her letters. OK.

0:04:38 > 0:04:40I sort of agree with that. They must have a lot of mail.

0:04:40 > 0:04:43There must be a cinema in there, because, let's be honest,

0:04:43 > 0:04:44they like to watch a lot of movies.

0:04:44 > 0:04:46I think there's definitely a cinema.

0:04:46 > 0:04:48I can't picture the Queen bowling, somehow.

0:04:48 > 0:04:50The only reason I think a bowling alley...

0:04:50 > 0:04:53If the President of the United States of America came...

0:04:53 > 0:04:55Yes. In the White House, there is a bowling alley.

0:04:55 > 0:04:58Is there? Yes. You've been to the White House? Many, many times.

0:05:00 > 0:05:02I feel that when she needs to sort of play something,

0:05:02 > 0:05:04she plays croquet.

0:05:04 > 0:05:06Yes, and you don't see her bowling. Do you both agree?

0:05:06 > 0:05:09Bowling alley would be the thing you would not find at Buckingham Palace?

0:05:09 > 0:05:11Absolutely. I am pretty sure.

0:05:11 > 0:05:14Our answer is...bowling alley.

0:05:15 > 0:05:18They have come to a decision with conviction,

0:05:18 > 0:05:21that a bowling alley is not in Buckingham Palace.

0:05:21 > 0:05:24OK, so, to be honest, I agree with them.

0:05:24 > 0:05:27I like the way that Biggins says there is definitely

0:05:27 > 0:05:30a swimming pool because he's seen it, so I'm going to agree

0:05:30 > 0:05:34with the panel and go with bowling alley, and I bet it's post office!

0:05:34 > 0:05:36But I'll go with bowling alley. OK.

0:05:36 > 0:05:39You're putting your trust in the panel,

0:05:39 > 0:05:42which could be a very, very dangerous thing.

0:05:43 > 0:05:46To get you up and running... Yes. ..here we go.

0:05:46 > 0:05:50For ?200, is there no bowling alley in Buckingham Palace?

0:05:54 > 0:05:58It's the correct answer. Well done. Thank you. Thank you so much.

0:05:58 > 0:06:01Thank you. Thank you. Well done.

0:06:01 > 0:06:04Biggins was, of course, right. There is the swimming pool.

0:06:04 > 0:06:06It's on the right-hand side as you look at that picture,

0:06:06 > 0:06:08by those trees on the corner.

0:06:08 > 0:06:09OK. It's lovely. It's a lovely position.

0:06:09 > 0:06:12You can swim whilst looking at the trees.

0:06:14 > 0:06:16And Nigel Havers was correct -

0:06:16 > 0:06:19there is a bowling alley in the basement of the White House.

0:06:19 > 0:06:23We all knew that! We all knew that! We've all been there! Liar!

0:06:25 > 0:06:28Hilary, you're up and running. ?200 in the bank.

0:06:31 > 0:06:33OK, here comes question two.

0:06:52 > 0:06:57And, as our panel have a terrified, unknowing look in their eyes,

0:06:57 > 0:07:00we shall ask Hilary for her first thoughts on this. OK.

0:07:00 > 0:07:02Amongst my many qualifications,

0:07:02 > 0:07:08I am actually a diploma holder of the faculty of astrological studies!

0:07:08 > 0:07:10Yeah!

0:07:12 > 0:07:15And I like talking to people - that's what I do -

0:07:15 > 0:07:19and people have their Saturn return in 29 years.

0:07:19 > 0:07:21That's when you become mature.

0:07:21 > 0:07:27Before 29, you're not really an adult, and when you're 29, you are.

0:07:27 > 0:07:29Wow! It's true!

0:07:29 > 0:07:32Congratulations! It'd better be right, hadn't it?

0:07:34 > 0:07:37Let's see if our panel can add anything to this.

0:07:37 > 0:07:40Your debate starts now. What do you think, scientist Konnie?

0:07:40 > 0:07:42I think Saturn. Really?

0:07:42 > 0:07:46I distinctly remember Saturn is 29.4 years, and Mars is a bit less,

0:07:46 > 0:07:48I think, and the others are a bit more.

0:07:48 > 0:07:51Yes. And Ur-anus? Er, my a... Oh!

0:07:53 > 0:07:57Best not talk about that for a minute! Do you mean Ura-nus?

0:07:57 > 0:08:00I think the correct pronunciation is Ura-nus.

0:08:00 > 0:08:04That was a cheap gag and not worthy of you, Havers. I...

0:08:04 > 0:08:06So this means that...

0:08:06 > 0:08:10I've seen this go around twice, then, in my lifetime, 29 years.

0:08:10 > 0:08:15And you've only seen it once. Er, yes. And I've hardly seen it at all!

0:08:15 > 0:08:18No, I think... What do you honestly think?

0:08:18 > 0:08:20I think it's definitely Saturn. Yes.

0:08:20 > 0:08:23We're going to go with Saturn. We're all going with Saturn.

0:08:23 > 0:08:25Our answer is Saturn.

0:08:26 > 0:08:29So, Hilary, obviously, you have some knowledge on this.

0:08:29 > 0:08:33By coincidence, all our panel knew that it was Saturn!

0:08:35 > 0:08:39We're all in agreement? I hope so. I hope so, too. Yes.

0:08:39 > 0:08:41For ?200, is Saturn the correct answer?

0:08:46 > 0:08:52It is the correct answer! Thank you. Well done, Hilary.

0:08:52 > 0:08:53Thank you. Well done. Well done, panel.

0:08:56 > 0:09:01Mars orbits the sun every 686 days. Uh-huh.

0:09:01 > 0:09:05Jupiter orbits the sun every 11.8 Earth years.

0:09:05 > 0:09:09Uranus... 84. ..orbits the sun every 84 Earth years.

0:09:09 > 0:09:11So, Hilary, you've got that question right.

0:09:11 > 0:09:13It's another ?200 into the prize pot.

0:09:13 > 0:09:15You're up to ?400.

0:09:18 > 0:09:19Phew!

0:09:19 > 0:09:23OK, here comes the final question of the round. 100% record so far.

0:09:45 > 0:09:49The only one I don't think it is is the Burma to Myanmar,

0:09:49 > 0:09:52because I think that's part of

0:09:52 > 0:09:56the reasonably current government's decision.

0:09:56 > 0:09:58And I'd be very interested

0:09:58 > 0:10:01in hearing the panel on the other three.

0:10:01 > 0:10:03I think we all would be very interested

0:10:03 > 0:10:05in hearing the panel on the other three.

0:10:05 > 0:10:07And so your debate starts now.

0:10:07 > 0:10:10Biggins, what do you think? I agree with Hilary on the Burma.

0:10:10 > 0:10:13So I think, probably, the first one

0:10:13 > 0:10:17was Persia to Iran.

0:10:17 > 0:10:20I can remember Ceylon to Sri Lanka.

0:10:20 > 0:10:22Yes, Ceylon and Burma are definitely recent.

0:10:22 > 0:10:27Siam to Thailand, we can remember. Some of us.

0:10:27 > 0:10:31So it's either between Persia to Iran...

0:10:31 > 0:10:34Or Siam to Thailand. Indeed. Yes, and I think it's Persia.

0:10:34 > 0:10:36And I go along with that. Yep. Yeah.

0:10:36 > 0:10:39What about you, Konnie? Yeah, Persia feels very old-fashioned.

0:10:39 > 0:10:42Yes, it does. Reminds you of historical references

0:10:42 > 0:10:44from other centuries gone by. Exactly.

0:10:44 > 0:10:47Poor Hilary is so confused there, look!

0:10:47 > 0:10:49OK, the panel thinks, I think,

0:10:49 > 0:10:51Persia to Iran.

0:10:53 > 0:10:56So the panel think that Persia to Iran happened first.

0:10:56 > 0:11:00They have a good political reason for this.

0:11:00 > 0:11:03Konnie believes it just sounds more old-fashioned.

0:11:03 > 0:11:05It's a good argument, no?

0:11:05 > 0:11:08Anything in there to make you change your mind? I don't know.

0:11:08 > 0:11:10Basically, as I said,

0:11:10 > 0:11:13I think Burma would have gone with this previous government.

0:11:13 > 0:11:16Yep. I think that Sri Lanka would have become Sri Lanka

0:11:16 > 0:11:18when they became independent from the UK,

0:11:18 > 0:11:22which I think would have been in the 1960s, I think.

0:11:22 > 0:11:25I think Persia to Iran would have happened

0:11:25 > 0:11:29after the First World War, when Iran and Iraq were started.

0:11:29 > 0:11:32But the Thailand thing - it's interesting to me

0:11:32 > 0:11:35that both Biggins and Nigel, who are about the same age as me,

0:11:35 > 0:11:38to be really honest, think they've seen it.

0:11:38 > 0:11:41The real question is, do I believe them?

0:11:41 > 0:11:43Yes, you got to factor that in, haven't you? Yeah.

0:11:46 > 0:11:49Need an answer, Hilary. I'm going to stay with Thailand.

0:11:49 > 0:11:52Siam to Thailand.

0:11:52 > 0:11:55OK, first time Hilary has disagreed with the panel.

0:11:55 > 0:11:57The correct answer is...

0:12:04 > 0:12:06It was Persia to Iran, Hilary. So sorry.

0:12:06 > 0:12:08You should have gone with the panel.

0:12:08 > 0:12:11I promise I will believe you next time! No, no, no, don't be silly.

0:12:11 > 0:12:15It was a difficult one. Persia to Iran was 1935.

0:12:15 > 0:12:18Siam to Thailand was 1939.

0:12:18 > 0:12:21Ceylon to Sri Lanka, 1972.

0:12:21 > 0:12:26And Burma to Myanmar was 1989.

0:12:26 > 0:12:29Not to worry, though, Hilary. Still plenty of cash up there. Yes.

0:12:29 > 0:12:31And you've done very well in the first round.

0:12:31 > 0:12:33You're on ?400.

0:12:34 > 0:12:35Thank you.

0:12:39 > 0:12:43So, Hilary, how do you think our panel has performed so far?

0:12:43 > 0:12:45I think they are brilliant,

0:12:45 > 0:12:47and I think that I should listen to them more!

0:12:47 > 0:12:50No, no, I don't think you should. No, I shall, I shall!

0:12:50 > 0:12:54Our panel has got three out of three so far. That's true, isn't it?

0:12:54 > 0:12:56At the end of the show, you're going to have to choose

0:12:56 > 0:12:59one of our panel to play our final debate.

0:12:59 > 0:13:03Based on their performances so far, who do we believe is standing out?

0:13:03 > 0:13:05I think the answer is that I refuse to speak

0:13:05 > 0:13:07on the grounds I may incriminate myself,

0:13:07 > 0:13:10because I don't want to put anybody off,

0:13:10 > 0:13:11so gentlemen, ladies,

0:13:11 > 0:13:15please give it your best and then I'll make a decision at the end.

0:13:15 > 0:13:19Very well said. Well said. That's a showbiz answer!

0:13:19 > 0:13:22"You just keep doing what you do and I'll choose later on"! Yes!

0:13:23 > 0:13:27OK, let's see how our panel cope with pictures.

0:13:27 > 0:13:28It is time for round two.

0:13:31 > 0:13:34Round two is our picture round.

0:13:34 > 0:13:37All you have to do is place three pictures in the correct order.

0:13:37 > 0:13:39There are three questions in this round.

0:13:39 > 0:13:42Each correct answer is now worth ?300.

0:13:42 > 0:13:43So here we go.

0:14:00 > 0:14:02Yes. I mean, this is an award-winning panel here. Exactly!

0:14:02 > 0:14:06Who will easily sort this out. Exactly. The debate starts now.

0:14:06 > 0:14:09Right... Let's... Let's put these up. Put them up.

0:14:09 > 0:14:15I think that the Brits was the most recent. Yes.

0:14:15 > 0:14:18Because it doesn't feel... And I think the first one...

0:14:18 > 0:14:21I agree with you, and I think the first one is the Academy Awards,

0:14:21 > 0:14:25cos I think then the Television Awards follow that.

0:14:25 > 0:14:28That is, I think, correct. And then we go to Konnie's.

0:14:28 > 0:14:30Have you ever won an Academy Award?

0:14:30 > 0:14:34No, but you've been to the Academy Awards. I did go to the... Yes.

0:14:34 > 0:14:38When Chariots Of Fire was up for a few Oscars, David Puttnam,

0:14:38 > 0:14:41the producer, said, you know, "Let's all go."

0:14:41 > 0:14:43He said, "We won't win anything,"

0:14:43 > 0:14:46but, you know, go for the beer, as they say.

0:14:46 > 0:14:49And we came away with four. Wow! Yeah. Yeah.

0:14:49 > 0:14:52It was such a wonderful film. It was kind of amazing.

0:14:52 > 0:14:54Do you know what month the Academy Awards...?

0:14:54 > 0:14:58It follows the Baftas, so it's sort of... March, isn't it?

0:14:58 > 0:15:01End of February, beginning of March. It's somewhere around about there.

0:15:01 > 0:15:03Are we shuffling them around?

0:15:03 > 0:15:06Yes, I think I want that one. Academy goes first.

0:15:06 > 0:15:08And I think this comes after.

0:15:08 > 0:15:11That's definitely in the right place. Yes, yes.

0:15:11 > 0:15:14These two are similar timing, are they?

0:15:14 > 0:15:15I... Let me think.

0:15:15 > 0:15:20No, I think these are after. Yeah, OK, good. I think... Yes.

0:15:20 > 0:15:23So the panel thinks that, starting with the earliest,

0:15:23 > 0:15:26it's the Academy Awards, then the National TV Awards,

0:15:26 > 0:15:28followed by the Brit Awards.

0:15:28 > 0:15:31That's what we think. Don't we? We do. Yes.

0:15:31 > 0:15:32So, Hilary, you hadn't a clue.

0:15:32 > 0:15:36You were putting all your faith in the panel. What do you think?

0:15:36 > 0:15:37I utterly agree with them.

0:15:37 > 0:15:41I liked the way that Konnie said that the Brit Awards would be last,

0:15:41 > 0:15:44and I like the way that I think Biggins was,

0:15:44 > 0:15:47who said he thought the Academy Awards would be the first,

0:15:47 > 0:15:50so I'm going entirely with their decision.

0:15:50 > 0:15:53So you have absolute conviction in our panel?

0:15:53 > 0:15:55I have a million times more conviction in them

0:15:55 > 0:15:58than myself on this topic, so yes.

0:15:58 > 0:16:02OK. If this is correct, ?300 in the prize pot.

0:16:02 > 0:16:04Is that the correct order?

0:16:11 > 0:16:15It's the wrong order. What's the right one?

0:16:15 > 0:16:17Let's see the correct order.

0:16:18 > 0:16:22Oh, no! Completely the opposite, in fact. That's my fault.

0:16:22 > 0:16:25The National Television Awards on 20th January,

0:16:25 > 0:16:29then the Brit Awards on 24th February 2016,

0:16:29 > 0:16:33then the Academy Awards on 28th February.

0:16:33 > 0:16:35And that is the look of a panel

0:16:35 > 0:16:39that got that question absolutely and completely wrong.

0:16:39 > 0:16:40I mean, they are very close.

0:16:40 > 0:16:44I mean, they're very close to each other, and I, seriously,

0:16:44 > 0:16:47gentlemen and lady, would not have known the answer,

0:16:47 > 0:16:49so thank you, keep on going.

0:16:49 > 0:16:51Ah, Hilary, thank you. We were so certain, weren't we?

0:16:51 > 0:16:54So certain. It's very interesting. I mean, they're days away.

0:16:54 > 0:16:58You see, the thing is, if you're not nominated, who cares?

0:17:02 > 0:17:04Unfortunately, Hilary, you did get that wrong.

0:17:04 > 0:17:07It means that you still have ?400 in your prize pot, though.

0:17:12 > 0:17:15OK, Hilary, here comes your second picture question.

0:17:30 > 0:17:34Yes! You're smiling, Hilary. I am, yes. This is good news?

0:17:34 > 0:17:37Yes, it's certainly better than the last question, for me.

0:17:37 > 0:17:40So Scafell Pike is the highest mountain in England,

0:17:40 > 0:17:42and I believe it's in the Lake District.

0:17:42 > 0:17:45Mount Snowdon's in Wales. I have actually been there.

0:17:45 > 0:17:50Ben Nevis, though, is in Scotland, so the real question is,

0:17:50 > 0:17:53is it east or west of Scafell Pike?

0:17:53 > 0:17:58And that is something I would really like to hear the panel's opinions.

0:17:58 > 0:18:03So, panel... What a shame, Hilary, you'd like to hear from us!

0:18:03 > 0:18:07For a moment, Hilary, I thought you were really going to nail this one.

0:18:07 > 0:18:09So that's some good knowledge there.

0:18:09 > 0:18:11Let's see if our panel can fill in the gaps.

0:18:11 > 0:18:13Panel, the debate starts now.

0:18:13 > 0:18:16It seems like it's fairly obvious, in a way, isn't it? Yes, it is.

0:18:16 > 0:18:20Snowdon, being in Wales, would be the furthest west. Yeah. Mm.

0:18:20 > 0:18:23Pike, being in the Lake District, in England, would be the central one.

0:18:23 > 0:18:28The middle one. And then I'm sure that Ben Nevis is east.

0:18:28 > 0:18:32But then Scotland does a bit of... The country does a bit of a...

0:18:32 > 0:18:35Juts out. I know, but even so, I think it's...

0:18:35 > 0:18:38I don't know, I think it's that way, isn't it? I think... Hang on.

0:18:38 > 0:18:41Have you climbed...? All three. I was going to say.

0:18:41 > 0:18:46Before I came here this morning! You've probably climbed one of them.

0:18:46 > 0:18:47Oh, yeah, all three. All three?

0:18:47 > 0:18:49You must have done one. No, I haven't.

0:18:49 > 0:18:51I've been up Mount Snowdon, but not climbing. Oh.

0:18:51 > 0:18:53I've been to one, but I've never set foot on it.

0:18:53 > 0:18:56I've seen Ben Nevis from afar, from...

0:18:56 > 0:19:00Where in Scotland were you when you saw it? Oh, that's a good point!

0:19:00 > 0:19:02Just beneath Ben Nevis, I was!

0:19:02 > 0:19:05Whereabouts in Scotland was that? All right!

0:19:05 > 0:19:08Gave me a funny look then, Hilary! Whereabouts? Well, I don't know.

0:19:08 > 0:19:12I was touring around. I honestly do believe it's east.

0:19:12 > 0:19:15I do believe it's east. So, is it a trick?

0:19:15 > 0:19:16You know, because the Lake District

0:19:16 > 0:19:19does sort of jut out west a bit, does it not?

0:19:19 > 0:19:23I feel - but I could be wrong - it's not that far from Loch Lomond,

0:19:23 > 0:19:26but I could be totally wrong.

0:19:26 > 0:19:30The obvious one is Snowdon being the furthest west, correct? Yes.

0:19:30 > 0:19:33I'm going to put Snowdon there. OK. Furthest west.

0:19:33 > 0:19:37And I'm going to keep Ben Nevis here. And I'll keep Scafell Pike.

0:19:37 > 0:19:41Have we settled? I think we're settled. Yeah, settled.

0:19:41 > 0:19:46So, we, as the panel, think that the mountains, in geographical,

0:19:46 > 0:19:47from west to east, go...

0:19:47 > 0:19:49Mount Snowdon,

0:19:49 > 0:19:51Scafell Pike,

0:19:51 > 0:19:53and then Ben Nevis.

0:19:54 > 0:19:57That's the order of our panel.

0:19:57 > 0:19:59Konnie, of course, has been to Mount Snowdon.

0:19:59 > 0:20:02Biggins has looked up at Ben Nevis.

0:20:02 > 0:20:05But they've decided to go with Nigel's instinct

0:20:05 > 0:20:10of Snowdon, Scafell Pike and then Ben Nevis.

0:20:10 > 0:20:12I would like to, yet again, agree with them,

0:20:12 > 0:20:15especially because I think it was Konnie who said that Ben Nevis

0:20:15 > 0:20:16was near Loch Lomond,

0:20:16 > 0:20:20and I have been to Loch Lomond - it's near Glasgow.

0:20:20 > 0:20:24I believe that would be east of the Lake District.

0:20:24 > 0:20:27I sincerely trust that it is correct.

0:20:27 > 0:20:29Let's see. Let's see, Hilary.

0:20:29 > 0:20:31You're going with the panel.

0:20:31 > 0:20:35You are saying it's Snowdon, then Scafell Pike,

0:20:35 > 0:20:39and then Ben Nevis, from west to east, for ?300.

0:20:40 > 0:20:42Correct order is...

0:20:45 > 0:20:47Ooh! It's the wrong order.

0:20:47 > 0:20:50Oh, what a shame. Go on, what's right?

0:20:50 > 0:20:52Konnie has her head in her hands. You may be right.

0:20:52 > 0:20:54Let's see the correct order.

0:20:55 > 0:20:58Oh! Really? Ben Nevis is furthest west.

0:20:58 > 0:21:01Well, then it can't be near Loch Lomond. No.

0:21:01 > 0:21:04So, let's have a look where they actually are on the map.

0:21:04 > 0:21:06Ben Nevis... It's the jut.

0:21:06 > 0:21:09..just west of Snowdon. Oh, that's so close.

0:21:09 > 0:21:11Snowdon is one of the oldest mountains in the world,

0:21:11 > 0:21:14around 400 million years old.

0:21:14 > 0:21:16So, Hilary, that was the wrong answer.

0:21:16 > 0:21:19Our panel were doing so well straight out of the blocks

0:21:19 > 0:21:21in the first round, with a 100% record.

0:21:21 > 0:21:25This round, they haven't got any right. Neither have you.

0:21:25 > 0:21:27There's still plenty of opportunities to get the cash up.

0:21:27 > 0:21:29You remain on ?400.

0:21:32 > 0:21:35OK, let's have a look at a third picture question.

0:21:55 > 0:21:58You a tennis fan? Yes, sort of.

0:21:58 > 0:22:00Martina I love because she's the same age as me!

0:22:00 > 0:22:05Yeah. And I would always put her as the top.

0:22:05 > 0:22:07And if she's not, she ought to be!

0:22:07 > 0:22:10But, again, I would like to hear what the panel have to say. OK.

0:22:10 > 0:22:14I'm assuming this panel has ate many strawberries and quaffed much

0:22:14 > 0:22:18champagne at Wimbledon over the years. Panel, can we sort this out?

0:22:18 > 0:22:21Your debate starts now. Yes, this is a tough one. Mm, tricky.

0:22:21 > 0:22:25Slightly tricky question, because it says "singles titles". Yeah.

0:22:25 > 0:22:28Martina played a lot of doubles and she won lots of doubles titles.

0:22:28 > 0:22:31But she also won a lot of singles. She did. I mean, I think she...

0:22:31 > 0:22:32I agree with Hilary.

0:22:32 > 0:22:35I mean, I think she's the great player of all of them,

0:22:35 > 0:22:38but Serena Williams, of course, is a dark horse because

0:22:38 > 0:22:41she, in fact, has won a lot, hasn't she?

0:22:41 > 0:22:45Well, as years roll by, Martina's been retired for some...

0:22:45 > 0:22:49She has, but she did have an amazing run of luck.

0:22:49 > 0:22:52She had a long stretch. Or rather run of good play.

0:22:52 > 0:22:54Roger Federer, I think, is...

0:22:54 > 0:22:56I think we could safely put him least, somehow.

0:22:56 > 0:22:58He's won maybe eight titles.

0:22:58 > 0:23:01Yeah, but I think the girls have won a lot more. I agree.

0:23:01 > 0:23:05Let's put Roger... Do you agree with that? Yeah, I'm going with that.

0:23:05 > 0:23:09The least amount of singles titles there.

0:23:09 > 0:23:14Sounds amazing, cos he's won lots. I know. And he's a brilliant player.

0:23:14 > 0:23:15Serena... I know Serena's won so many times

0:23:15 > 0:23:18and I now wish she wouldn't win! Yes.

0:23:18 > 0:23:19I know that sounds a bit mean,

0:23:19 > 0:23:22but she keeps winning every year, and I want to see...

0:23:22 > 0:23:26Give someone else a chance! However, erm...

0:23:26 > 0:23:29Martina did hold that record for a very long time. She did.

0:23:29 > 0:23:30I don't remember anyone saying,

0:23:30 > 0:23:32"Serena's overtaken Martina's record."

0:23:32 > 0:23:33You'd have heard some sort of...

0:23:33 > 0:23:36It would have been a big thing. So I think...

0:23:36 > 0:23:37I think we are in the right order.

0:23:37 > 0:23:42So, the panel have come to the agreement now that the

0:23:42 > 0:23:45champions, in order of number of Wimbledon singles they have won,

0:23:45 > 0:23:53go Roger Federer the least, Serena second, and the most, Martina.

0:23:55 > 0:23:57So, Hilary, they have agreed with you.

0:23:57 > 0:24:00They think that Martina has won the most, and that's the order they

0:24:00 > 0:24:01put the other two in.

0:24:01 > 0:24:06They think Roger Federer has won the fewest and Serena in the middle.

0:24:06 > 0:24:08Well, I'm very, very interested

0:24:08 > 0:24:11to hear what they were saying about Serena and Roger.

0:24:11 > 0:24:15I am going to go with them and hope that this time we're going to

0:24:15 > 0:24:16be correct.

0:24:16 > 0:24:19It is interesting to me - my perception is there is more

0:24:19 > 0:24:21competition with the men

0:24:21 > 0:24:26and that the men's singles title changes more frequently, whereas,

0:24:26 > 0:24:30as you say, Serena has a row of luck and Martina has a row of luck.

0:24:30 > 0:24:33Let's go with it. NIGEL: I like that. Yes, exactly.

0:24:33 > 0:24:37So I will go entirely with what the panel have said.

0:24:37 > 0:24:42So, once again, Hilary has gone with the panel.

0:24:43 > 0:24:46Let's see if this works out any better than our mountains.

0:24:46 > 0:24:50Roger Federer, Serena Williams and Martina Navratilova.

0:24:50 > 0:24:52Is this the right order?

0:24:58 > 0:25:00It's the wrong order! So, go on.

0:25:00 > 0:25:02Well, just don't tell me... What is the right answer?

0:25:02 > 0:25:05Let's see the correct order.

0:25:05 > 0:25:08Serena Williams has won the fewest,

0:25:08 > 0:25:09then Roger Federer,

0:25:09 > 0:25:11then Martina Navratilova.

0:25:11 > 0:25:16Serena Williams has six Wimbledon singles titles, then Roger Federer

0:25:16 > 0:25:22has seven singles titles, then Martina Navratilova has nine.

0:25:22 > 0:25:24That's a tough question, if I may say so. I agree.

0:25:24 > 0:25:28It is a tough question - that's why we need intelligence from our

0:25:28 > 0:25:32panel, which... Sadly... ..which we have today!

0:25:32 > 0:25:33Hilary, unfortunately,

0:25:33 > 0:25:37you didn't manage to bank anything for that question and nothing

0:25:37 > 0:25:40in the picture round, so at the end of round two, you're still

0:25:40 > 0:25:43on ?400!

0:25:43 > 0:25:45Tricky questions! Oh, yeah.

0:25:45 > 0:25:50So, our panel, out of the blocks, did so well in the first round.

0:25:50 > 0:25:56No help whatsoever in the second round! If there was one person...

0:25:56 > 0:25:59Yes. ..that you could choose to play the final debate, who would that be?

0:25:59 > 0:26:01Tell the truth. I'm still refusing to speak

0:26:01 > 0:26:05on the grounds I may incriminate myself. Still refusing to speak?

0:26:05 > 0:26:06Also, to be honest,

0:26:06 > 0:26:10I like the way that they do interact and they do help me. They do.

0:26:10 > 0:26:13Yes. And the fact that we all got it wrong is just sad. It's true.

0:26:13 > 0:26:17They get it wrong in such an entertaining way. They do, they do.

0:26:17 > 0:26:21They really do. We look good when we get it wrong! Yeah.

0:26:21 > 0:26:23You look good all the time, let's be clear. Never mind, Hilary.

0:26:23 > 0:26:29Still ?1,500 up for grabs in round three. Yes!

0:26:29 > 0:26:33OK, Hilary. In this round, you'll face questions that contain

0:26:33 > 0:26:35three statements about a person, a place or a thing.

0:26:35 > 0:26:38Only one of those statements, though, is true.

0:26:38 > 0:26:40You have to decide which one.

0:26:40 > 0:26:43Three questions in this round. Because it's our final round,

0:26:43 > 0:26:47each question is worth ?500, so still loads of cash up there.

0:26:47 > 0:26:50Best of luck. Here's your first question.

0:27:11 > 0:27:13There's a good question.

0:27:13 > 0:27:18OK, I know that A is wrong because "stannous" is tin, and therefore

0:27:18 > 0:27:21a stannary would be a tin mine. So that has to be wrong.

0:27:21 > 0:27:27So it could be B or C. I have been to the Eiffel Tower.

0:27:27 > 0:27:30Would you build a tower from iron? Might be.

0:27:30 > 0:27:36I know that in bronze, there is copper. But is there also iron?

0:27:37 > 0:27:39Over to the panel, please. This is good.

0:27:39 > 0:27:43Very good knowledge there from Hilary. She's ruling out A.

0:27:43 > 0:27:46Let's see if our panel can sort the other two out.

0:27:46 > 0:27:50Your debate starts now. Wish we could! No, I think we can.

0:27:50 > 0:27:53I think you're absolutely right, a stannary is tin.

0:27:53 > 0:27:56St is the chemical sign for tin...

0:27:56 > 0:28:00Yeah. So it's not that. And iron isn't used to make bronze...

0:28:00 > 0:28:03I mean, I don't... I think the Eiffel Tower...

0:28:03 > 0:28:06What is bronze made of? Bronze is made from...

0:28:06 > 0:28:10Isn't it copper and tin? Yes, it's... It's not iron.

0:28:10 > 0:28:13I've got two heads of myself made from bronze and I'm sure

0:28:13 > 0:28:14there's no iron in it.

0:28:14 > 0:28:16No...

0:28:16 > 0:28:17Anyway...

0:28:17 > 0:28:20But doesn't it seem somewhat obvious for the Eiffel Tower

0:28:20 > 0:28:21to be built entirely out of...?

0:28:21 > 0:28:24No, I don't think it is, because I think that's what they did

0:28:24 > 0:28:25in those days. Yeah.

0:28:25 > 0:28:29I think that was a perfectly very strong metal to make

0:28:29 > 0:28:31something as extraordinary...

0:28:31 > 0:28:35What else could you make the Eiffel Tower out of? Er, paper.

0:28:35 > 0:28:36I know, but the chemical...

0:28:36 > 0:28:41Cake! Cake?! Gold? Gold! The thing about gold is, it's very malleable.

0:28:41 > 0:28:44The chemical symbol for tin is Sn, actually.

0:28:44 > 0:28:48But... No, I think, seriously, I think the Eiffel Tower is...

0:28:48 > 0:28:51Yeah, and it's not the last one and, yeah,

0:28:51 > 0:28:53I don't think it's the first one, either. Very good.

0:28:53 > 0:28:56I think we have our answer. I think we do.

0:28:56 > 0:29:02The answer is that the Eiffel Tower is built almost entirely of iron.

0:29:02 > 0:29:06I say that with such authority! It is authoritative.

0:29:06 > 0:29:08Is it correct, Hilary?

0:29:08 > 0:29:14Now, you thought that tin was mined in an area called a stannary. Yes.

0:29:14 > 0:29:16Scientific knowledge from Konnie - she thinks that bronze is

0:29:16 > 0:29:18made from copper and tin.

0:29:18 > 0:29:21I'm going to say that the point of Konnie is that she knows that

0:29:21 > 0:29:24there is no iron in bronze. Now I'm doubting!

0:29:24 > 0:29:29And I'm going to go with the panel with B and let's hope for the best.

0:29:29 > 0:29:31Absolutely no pressure here, Konnie!

0:29:31 > 0:29:34Scientific knowledge brought to the fore.

0:29:34 > 0:29:40For ?500, is the Eiffel Tower built almost entirely from iron?

0:29:45 > 0:29:49Yes! It's the correct answer! Thank you, Konnie. Well done, Hilary.

0:29:49 > 0:29:53Thank you! Well played. Well done, panel. Good knowledge from Konnie.

0:29:53 > 0:29:57The Eiffel Tower was built almost entirely from iron.

0:29:57 > 0:30:02The Eiffel Tower is nicknamed the Iron Lady. Is it? It is.

0:30:02 > 0:30:05Tin is mined in a stannary - you were right about that -

0:30:05 > 0:30:08and bronze is traditionally composed of...

0:30:08 > 0:30:11Copper and tin. ..copper and tin. Phew!

0:30:11 > 0:30:15And the good news is that our panel is back on track. Yes! Yes!

0:30:17 > 0:30:19Good knowledge all round.

0:30:19 > 0:30:22That's 500 quid added to the prize pot, giving you a new total,

0:30:22 > 0:30:23Hilary, of ?900!

0:30:26 > 0:30:29Let's see if we can stick another 500 in the prize pot.

0:30:29 > 0:30:30Here comes your next question.

0:30:53 > 0:30:54How's your movie knowledge?

0:30:55 > 0:30:59I'm hoping that the panel have a better movie knowledge than I,

0:30:59 > 0:31:02especially about whether he does win Oscars or not.

0:31:02 > 0:31:06I'm hoping that they will be able to name what they believe is the

0:31:06 > 0:31:09world's highest-grossing film of all time and whether they would

0:31:09 > 0:31:11tell me whether that was something we...

0:31:11 > 0:31:14I would then know whether Harrison Ford was in it.

0:31:14 > 0:31:17And as for Indiana Jones, my theory is that, actually,

0:31:17 > 0:31:19that might be true.

0:31:19 > 0:31:21I know it was at least three, but, actually,

0:31:21 > 0:31:25it might have had a four-times. Or was it a five? I don't know.

0:31:25 > 0:31:27So I'm going to hand over to them.

0:31:27 > 0:31:29That's what we would all like them to tell us.

0:31:29 > 0:31:34We have two actors on the panel. This will be sorted out so quickly.

0:31:34 > 0:31:37Panel, the debate starts now. We can sort this out.

0:31:37 > 0:31:41The highest-grossing film was, for a long time, Titanic. Yes.

0:31:41 > 0:31:43And then Avatar overtook it. Overtook it, right.

0:31:43 > 0:31:46And now Avatar, I think, is the highest-grossing film.

0:31:46 > 0:31:49Star Wars pretty close behind. Yeah.

0:31:49 > 0:31:51But I don't think they are the highest-grossing film.

0:31:51 > 0:31:55I think that rubs that one out. Yes. I don't think he's won an Oscar.

0:31:55 > 0:31:58I don't think he's won an Oscar. Do you, Konnie?

0:31:58 > 0:32:03I would have remembered the acceptance speech. Exactly, and...

0:32:03 > 0:32:06He's a very laid-back guy. Certainly not for Witness, too, either.

0:32:06 > 0:32:09I think that's... That was... I think it was a very good film.

0:32:09 > 0:32:13Yeah. It was a good film. The only thing I worry about the last, C,

0:32:13 > 0:32:16has he played Indiana Jones in a feature film four times,

0:32:16 > 0:32:18I wonder whether it's more than four times.

0:32:18 > 0:32:21Yes, that worried me, too. But I think there were three

0:32:21 > 0:32:24and then there was a big gap. Yes, and then they did the fourth.

0:32:24 > 0:32:28Raiders Of The Lost Ark, Temple Of Doom, Last Crusade.

0:32:28 > 0:32:30And they're now making a fifth. Then no doubt a sixth.

0:32:30 > 0:32:35He'll be 105! I think we have to go with C, in a way. And I think we do.

0:32:35 > 0:32:39What do you...? Konnie, are you...? I think so. OK. Yeah.

0:32:39 > 0:32:42So the panel thinks it's C, Harrison Ford

0:32:42 > 0:32:44has played Indiana Jones four times.

0:32:46 > 0:32:49So, Hilary, that is the knowledge from the panel.

0:32:49 > 0:32:53Has that led you to change your mind or do you agree with the panel?

0:32:53 > 0:32:55No, I agree with the panel.

0:32:55 > 0:32:59I think I originally said that I thought it was Indiana Jones

0:32:59 > 0:33:03four times. I'm hoping that we all agree. Let's hope it's right.

0:33:03 > 0:33:05Let's hope it's right. If it is correct,

0:33:05 > 0:33:08we stick another 500 into that prize pot.

0:33:08 > 0:33:12Has Harrison Ford played Indiana Jones in a feature film four times?

0:33:17 > 0:33:23It's the correct answer! Thank you. Thank you very much. Very well done.

0:33:23 > 0:33:25Very well done, panel. Well worked out.

0:33:25 > 0:33:29The four films were Raiders Of The Lost Ark, The Temple Of Doom,

0:33:29 > 0:33:33The Last Crusade and The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull.

0:33:33 > 0:33:35He was nominated for an Oscar in Witness...

0:33:35 > 0:33:39Yep. ..because it was a very good movie. His only nomination.

0:33:39 > 0:33:43And he's never won. He has never won an Oscar.

0:33:43 > 0:33:47Avatar is the world's highest- grossing film and he wasn't in it.

0:33:47 > 0:33:48No.

0:33:49 > 0:33:53So, well done. That's another 500 added to the prize pot,

0:33:53 > 0:33:55giving you a new total of ?1,400!

0:33:58 > 0:34:03And our panel are back on track. Yes. Here's question three.

0:34:20 > 0:34:22My first thought is A,

0:34:22 > 0:34:27because of the whole concept of Mr Micawber and the debtors' prison.

0:34:27 > 0:34:31I'm pretty sure that he'd be in Poets' Corner in Westminster Abbey.

0:34:31 > 0:34:34But that is a guess, to be honest. But I'm pretty sure.

0:34:34 > 0:34:38And I don't think the Nobel Prize was going as early as

0:34:38 > 0:34:40Charles Dickens, but, again, could be wrong.

0:34:40 > 0:34:44So I would be very interested to hear what the panel have to say.

0:34:44 > 0:34:45So, initially, you think...

0:34:45 > 0:34:49A. You think A, you think his father spent time in prison.

0:34:49 > 0:34:53Our panel, of course, extremely well read! Ha! Sorry.

0:34:53 > 0:34:54Your debate starts now.

0:34:54 > 0:34:57The thing is, I feel that all three could be correct,

0:34:57 > 0:35:00but I think Hilary's right about he's not buried in St Paul's.

0:35:00 > 0:35:06No, I know that he's not buried in St Paul's.

0:35:06 > 0:35:10Without doubt. I think it is Westminster. And I have a feeling...

0:35:10 > 0:35:13I'd go with Hilary, because I don't think the Nobel Prize...

0:35:13 > 0:35:16Was it around in those days, the Nobel Prize?

0:35:16 > 0:35:19Well, you know, I've seen and read about Dickens and seen

0:35:19 > 0:35:21a couple of films and it's never mentioned that he won a Nobel Prize.

0:35:21 > 0:35:26No. But I think it does fit in with his father spending time in prison.

0:35:26 > 0:35:28Yeah. A lot of that literature...

0:35:28 > 0:35:32That would have made the Nobel Prize, though, in the end of...

0:35:32 > 0:35:35sort of 1890-something. 1880s. '80, yes.

0:35:35 > 0:35:37I think... Would it be...?

0:35:37 > 0:35:43What's the earliest Nobel Prize that you can think of? It's definitely...

0:35:43 > 0:35:47Isn't it 1900? I think you're right. You gave it out, didn't you?

0:35:47 > 0:35:48Yes!

0:35:48 > 0:35:53Well, I think, certainly, his father spent time in prison is your answer.

0:35:53 > 0:35:56Yes. And if it's wrong, we're all wrong, you can't blame us.

0:35:56 > 0:35:59- No, that's a very good point. - I never blame you!

0:35:59 > 0:36:00So we're going to go...

0:36:00 > 0:36:03We've made up our minds, panel? Yes, I think so.

0:36:03 > 0:36:06The panel thinks it's A, Charles Dickens' father

0:36:06 > 0:36:08spent time in prison.

0:36:10 > 0:36:14So, Hilary, they're not quite sure when the Nobel Prize for Literature

0:36:14 > 0:36:17was first awarded, but they think it was after Charles Dickens.

0:36:17 > 0:36:22Biggins pretty sure that he's not buried in St Paul's Cathedral.

0:36:22 > 0:36:25They're going with you. They believe his father spent time in prison.

0:36:25 > 0:36:30Well, I do think that he got the whole concept of Mr Micawber

0:36:30 > 0:36:34and not wanting to spend more than you actually earn from the

0:36:34 > 0:36:37fact that his father spent time in a debtors' prison.

0:36:37 > 0:36:40I would like to stay with the panel and stay with A.

0:36:40 > 0:36:43OK, we're all agreed. For ?500, the correct answer is...

0:36:50 > 0:36:55It's the correct answer! Well done! Very nice work.

0:36:55 > 0:36:58Very nice work from our panel.

0:36:58 > 0:37:01Dickens' father went to prison for debt. You were correct about that.

0:37:01 > 0:37:04He was buried in Poets' Corner at Westminster Abbey.

0:37:04 > 0:37:06Correct there, Biggins.

0:37:06 > 0:37:09And the Nobel Prize for Literature was introduced in 1901,

0:37:09 > 0:37:1231 years after Dickens's death.

0:37:12 > 0:37:16Hilary, good Dickens knowledge, I have to say. Yes! Well done.

0:37:16 > 0:37:18And well played, panel, once again.

0:37:18 > 0:37:20At the end of that round, we've really got the cash up.

0:37:20 > 0:37:22Your prize pot - ?1,900!

0:37:26 > 0:37:29And that's the amount that you are going to be playing for

0:37:29 > 0:37:32in today's final debate. Yes. Now, quite a lot of money, Hilary.

0:37:32 > 0:37:34What would you do with that cash?

0:37:34 > 0:37:39Well, my husband is going to be 50 next year, and so I asked him

0:37:39 > 0:37:42a couple of years ago, "Where would you like to go?"

0:37:42 > 0:37:45And he said Florence. He's never been there, in Italy,

0:37:45 > 0:37:50and me being me, I immediately got the guidebooks, got the map and

0:37:50 > 0:37:51I've worked it all out

0:37:51 > 0:37:54and I will use the money to take him to Florence.

0:37:54 > 0:37:56OK, so a lovely romantic break in Florence.

0:37:56 > 0:37:59All right, Hilary, there's only one question that stands between

0:37:59 > 0:38:02you and the money, and that is today's final debate.

0:38:02 > 0:38:06Now, in our final debate, Hilary, you will face only one question.

0:38:06 > 0:38:10That question will have six possible answers, with only three correct.

0:38:10 > 0:38:14As before, you're not playing alone, but as this is the final debate,

0:38:14 > 0:38:15we're going to make things a little more tricky,

0:38:15 > 0:38:20as you must choose one member of our panel to play with you.

0:38:20 > 0:38:23You and your celebrity will have 45 seconds on the clock to debate the

0:38:23 > 0:38:27question. So, who are you going to ask to join you in the final debate?

0:38:38 > 0:38:42Well, it breaks my heart to have to choose one person, and I don't want

0:38:42 > 0:38:45the other two to feel in any way that they didn't contribute,

0:38:45 > 0:38:46because they did.

0:38:46 > 0:38:48I'm going to have to choose Biggins!

0:38:50 > 0:38:53Slightly surprised himself!

0:38:53 > 0:38:56Biggins, would you please join us as we play today's final debate?

0:39:03 > 0:39:06So, Biggins, Hilary has chosen you for the final debate.

0:39:06 > 0:39:08Yes. Very excited! Yes, thank you. You're excited.

0:39:08 > 0:39:10Are you feeling confident? Yes, I am.

0:39:10 > 0:39:12I mean, it's touch-and-go, this game.

0:39:12 > 0:39:14You never know quite what the answer is. But we'll be all right,

0:39:14 > 0:39:16won't we? Yes. We will. Yes.

0:39:16 > 0:39:18OK, it's looking like a good team. Best of luck.

0:39:18 > 0:39:21Because it is the final debate, Hilary, we're going to give you

0:39:21 > 0:39:25the choice of two categories, so have a look at this.

0:39:34 > 0:39:36This is down to you, darling!

0:39:36 > 0:39:39I know. I used to be a Liberal Democrat candidate.

0:39:39 > 0:39:42We won't go for that, then! No, let's not! So let's go with...

0:39:42 > 0:39:45No, no. Seriously, let's go with the UK.

0:39:45 > 0:39:49Yeah, I think probably better, yes. I think so. More scope. Exactly.

0:39:49 > 0:39:53We'll go with the UK. All right, we're going with the UK.

0:39:53 > 0:39:55So, six possible answers up there.

0:39:55 > 0:40:00I need all three in order to win the money. ?1,900 up for grabs.

0:40:00 > 0:40:0245 seconds on the clock.

0:40:02 > 0:40:05Hilary, here is today's final debate question.

0:40:31 > 0:40:34Right. OK... So, Hilary and Biggins, for the final time today,

0:40:34 > 0:40:39your 45 seconds starts now. I think it's Birmingham, Glasgow, Sheffield.

0:40:39 > 0:40:43Well, I couldn't agree more. Seriously? Seriously, I couldn't...

0:40:43 > 0:40:45Because I know it's not Edinburgh.

0:40:45 > 0:40:49Which is EH. Exactly. Nor Glasgow. Well, it was...

0:40:49 > 0:40:51No, it IS Glasgow. Oh, it is...

0:40:51 > 0:40:53What did you say? Edinburgh, Glasgow, Sheffield.

0:40:53 > 0:40:56Sorry, Birmingham, Glasgow, Sheffield.

0:40:57 > 0:40:59Ah! What did you think it was, then?

0:40:59 > 0:41:05I thought it was Birmingham, Sheffield and Newcastle. But...

0:41:05 > 0:41:09OK, so we don't think it's Leeds, so we do know it's Birmingham and

0:41:09 > 0:41:12Sheffield, so is it Glasgow or is it Newcastle?

0:41:12 > 0:41:15What do you think the...? Do you know the postcode for Glasgow?

0:41:15 > 0:41:17I would assume it's just G2 or G20.

0:41:17 > 0:41:21It's where there's a lot of government things.

0:41:21 > 0:41:22You'd think it would be...

0:41:22 > 0:41:27Time up, guys. Hilary, I need three answers, please.

0:41:29 > 0:41:33I'm still going to stay with Birmingham, Glasgow, Sheffield.

0:41:33 > 0:41:35Birmingham, Glasgow and Sheffield.

0:41:35 > 0:41:38OK, Hilary, we need three correct answers for that ?1,900.

0:41:38 > 0:41:43First up, we had Birmingham. Is Birmingham a correct answer?

0:41:49 > 0:41:51It is! Yes! OK. APPLAUSE

0:41:53 > 0:41:55The letter B.

0:41:55 > 0:41:57Then it was Sheffield.

0:41:57 > 0:42:00Is Sheffield a correct answer, to keep us on track for 1,900?

0:42:06 > 0:42:10It is! Yes! Right. OK, OK. APPLAUSE

0:42:10 > 0:42:13So, it brings us to Glasgow. OK.

0:42:13 > 0:42:17Now, straight out of the blocks, you thought you were in agreement. Yes!

0:42:17 > 0:42:21It turns out you weren't. I wasn't sure. Biggins suggested Newcastle.

0:42:21 > 0:42:24You decided to go with Glasgow. Yes.

0:42:24 > 0:42:28Hilary, if it is the correct answer, it's ?1,900. OK.

0:42:28 > 0:42:31If not, I'm afraid you do leave with nothing. Fine. Here we go.

0:42:31 > 0:42:36For ?1,900, is Glasgow correct?

0:42:44 > 0:42:48It is! Yes! Oh! Mwah!

0:42:48 > 0:42:52Fantastic! Well done! Thank you. Well done.

0:42:52 > 0:42:55Hilary, congratulations. Very well done.

0:42:55 > 0:42:57Well played. Thank you.

0:42:57 > 0:43:02Birmingham is B, Sheffield is S, Glasgow is G.

0:43:02 > 0:43:04Edinburgh is EH,

0:43:04 > 0:43:08Newcastle is NE, Leeds is LS.

0:43:08 > 0:43:10Liverpool is L. Well worked out.

0:43:10 > 0:43:14Very well played. Yeah, well done. You leave today with ?1,900.

0:43:14 > 0:43:16Let's hear it for Hilary! APPLAUSE

0:43:16 > 0:43:19Brilliant! Thank you, thank you.

0:43:19 > 0:43:20That is it for Debatable.

0:43:20 > 0:43:23There's just enough time for me to thank our fantastic panel,

0:43:23 > 0:43:25Christopher Biggins, Konnie Huq and Nigel Havers!

0:43:25 > 0:43:29APPLAUSE I do hope you've enjoyed watching.

0:43:29 > 0:43:31We will see you next time for more heated debates.

0:43:31 > 0:43:33For now, it's goodbye from me.

0:43:33 > 0:43:36Well done! Thank you. Very well done.

0:44:17 > 0:44:20BROODING STING