0:00:14 > 0:00:16Hello and welcome to Debatable.
0:00:16 > 0:00:19Today we're playing a special extra-length edition, because
0:00:19 > 0:00:24silence may be golden but, as we all know, celebrity chat is priceless.
0:00:24 > 0:00:28Today, one player must answer a series of tricky questions to
0:00:28 > 0:00:30try and bag our jackpot of ?3,000.
0:00:30 > 0:00:32But they're not on their own,
0:00:32 > 0:00:34as they will also have a panel of Britain's brightest
0:00:34 > 0:00:37celebrities debating their way to the answer.
0:00:37 > 0:00:39Will they help or will they hinder?
0:00:39 > 0:00:41Well, that is debatable, so let's meet them.
0:00:41 > 0:00:46On today's show we have actress Liz Carr...
0:00:46 > 0:00:49we have entrepreneur Peter Jones...
0:00:49 > 0:00:51and comedian Susan Calman.
0:00:51 > 0:00:52APPLAUSE
0:00:56 > 0:00:58It is a panel that has it all.
0:00:58 > 0:01:00Liz, we know you from Silent witness,
0:01:00 > 0:01:02where your forensic character works stuff out.
0:01:02 > 0:01:06I'm assuming you will be bringing none of that to today's show.
0:01:06 > 0:01:10Thank you, absolutely none at all, no. No science knowledge.
0:01:10 > 0:01:13I hope there's no science questions and nothing about forensics.
0:01:13 > 0:01:15I love the way you're talking down your part here before we even start.
0:01:15 > 0:01:18Then it can only improve. That's what I'm saying. Yeah.
0:01:18 > 0:01:20It can. On the other side, we have Susan Calman,
0:01:20 > 0:01:23one of the smartest people I know on this earth. Wow!
0:01:23 > 0:01:25Are you going to...?
0:01:25 > 0:01:28Well, I mean, you should see the people I hang out with.
0:01:28 > 0:01:31So what are you going to bring to today, Susan?
0:01:31 > 0:01:34What I have is a breadth of knowledge,
0:01:34 > 0:01:37but not a detailed knowledge of anything.
0:01:37 > 0:01:40So... And an awful lot of enthusiasm, as always.
0:01:40 > 0:01:43So even if I get it wrong, I'll do it with a smile.
0:01:43 > 0:01:46OK, now, you also studied law, so we have Liz on one side,
0:01:46 > 0:01:48Peter Jones, we have Susan on the other.
0:01:48 > 0:01:51Are you going to be chairing this debate today?
0:01:51 > 0:01:54This is quite impressive, isn't it? I've never sat next to two lawyers either side of me
0:01:54 > 0:01:57unless it's been in the dock, but...
0:01:57 > 0:01:59I think it's going to be fun. I'm really...
0:01:59 > 0:02:02Obviously I know Susan very well.
0:02:02 > 0:02:04In fact, I don't call her Susan, I call her Soogle,
0:02:04 > 0:02:07which is short for sort of my S-version of Google,
0:02:07 > 0:02:11because she is literally, as you say, incredibly knowledgeable.
0:02:11 > 0:02:13So forget Google, it's all about Soogle.
0:02:13 > 0:02:15You can tell by the look on her face she is already nicking that.
0:02:15 > 0:02:18She is nicking that for future reference. Yep.
0:02:18 > 0:02:23OK, it is a perfectly formed and rounded panel full of intelligence.
0:02:23 > 0:02:25It can only go downhill from here.
0:02:25 > 0:02:28Let's see who is playing today's game with them.
0:02:28 > 0:02:29It is Asghar Iqbal from Cardiff.
0:02:29 > 0:02:31APPLAUSE
0:02:33 > 0:02:36Right, Asghar, how are you doing? Yeah, good, thank you.
0:02:36 > 0:02:39Tell us about yourself, apart from the fact that you have the most
0:02:39 > 0:02:42magnificent gun show I have seen on the show.
0:02:42 > 0:02:45My name is Asghar. I'm 21, a student paramedic. Originally from Cardiff.
0:02:45 > 0:02:49I'm studying in the University of Hertfordshire. What hobbies do have?
0:02:49 > 0:02:52Well, being Welsh, I'm a big rugby fan.
0:02:52 > 0:02:54Definitely have to support Wales.
0:02:54 > 0:02:57Also do a bit of charity work with things like St John Ambulance.
0:02:57 > 0:03:00I'm a Scout leader as well, so quite a variety of things going on.
0:03:00 > 0:03:02OK, we wish you all the best.
0:03:02 > 0:03:05Let's get this Debatable show on the road as we play Round 1.
0:03:08 > 0:03:10OK, As, this round is multiple choice.
0:03:10 > 0:03:12Each question has four possible answers.
0:03:12 > 0:03:14Only one of them is correct.
0:03:14 > 0:03:19Helping you find your way to the answer is our panel.
0:03:19 > 0:03:21Will you go with what they say or will you go your own way?
0:03:21 > 0:03:23It's entirely up to you.
0:03:23 > 0:03:24Three questions in this round.
0:03:24 > 0:03:28Each correct answer is worth ?200, which will go into your prize pot
0:03:28 > 0:03:31which you will be playing for at the end of the show in the Final Debate.
0:03:31 > 0:03:32Happy to play? Yep.
0:03:32 > 0:03:35OK, let's get cracking - here comes your first question.
0:03:51 > 0:03:53Um...something's pointing me towards bowls
0:03:53 > 0:03:57so maybe that's... My initial thought would be bowls.
0:03:57 > 0:03:59All right, your initial thought is bowls.
0:03:59 > 0:04:02Let's see what our panel says. Your debate starts now.
0:04:02 > 0:04:03Right, what do we think?
0:04:03 > 0:04:06Well, lots of sports are suggested for the Olympics.
0:04:06 > 0:04:08As future ones. In the future.
0:04:08 > 0:04:13Yeah, so darts... I know Barry Hearn, I think he's the president or
0:04:13 > 0:04:16the chairman of the Darts Association, the Pro Darts.
0:04:16 > 0:04:19He's issued a statement to say he doesn't believe they'll get in
0:04:19 > 0:04:21until 2024.
0:04:21 > 0:04:23So that hasn't been in. That hasn't been in.
0:04:23 > 0:04:26Snooker, I think, is another one - they tried to get into Tokyo...
0:04:26 > 0:04:28They did try and they didn't get in.
0:04:28 > 0:04:30So they're now 2024. So it's cricket or bowls.
0:04:30 > 0:04:33I think... I'm leaning towards bowls because I think it's
0:04:33 > 0:04:35a sport that's been played for a long...
0:04:35 > 0:04:38We're talking about one that used to be one that has been taken out of the Olympics.
0:04:38 > 0:04:40It's a historic thing, yeah.
0:04:40 > 0:04:43I would veer more towards cricket, because...
0:04:43 > 0:04:47Really? Yeah, because there's a lot more history to cricket.
0:04:47 > 0:04:49The reason I don't think cricket,
0:04:49 > 0:04:52cricket is only played by certain countries.
0:04:52 > 0:04:57Whereas bowls is played all over the world. OK, you're going bowls.
0:04:57 > 0:05:01No, no, you're the chairman, so I'm going bowls. I'm going bowls.
0:05:01 > 0:05:05I think it probably is bowls. Yeah. Bowls. But you said cricket.
0:05:05 > 0:05:07No, but you know what, this is about a collaboration,
0:05:07 > 0:05:11and I think... You can overrule us. Two-to-one, I'm not doing that.
0:05:11 > 0:05:14There is no chance, not against lawyers. I'm going with you.
0:05:14 > 0:05:17Is this how the show is going to go?
0:05:17 > 0:05:20We've decided, I think. The panel have decided.
0:05:20 > 0:05:24The sport that was a former Olympic sport is bowls.
0:05:25 > 0:05:29And that look on Peter Jones's face means he's not convinced
0:05:29 > 0:05:32himself, but he has gone along with the panel.
0:05:32 > 0:05:34Susan believes it's bowls.
0:05:34 > 0:05:36So what are you thinking?
0:05:36 > 0:05:40Um, I think "former Olympic event" is the key bit there.
0:05:40 > 0:05:42I think initially it might have been thrown in, but maybe the viewings
0:05:42 > 0:05:47weren't so great for bowls, being quite a slow-paced game.
0:05:47 > 0:05:50Some good views, a lot of confliction there,
0:05:50 > 0:05:54but I think I'm going to lock in bowls as my former Olympic event.
0:05:54 > 0:05:57So As is going with our panel.
0:05:59 > 0:06:02For ?200, is bowls the correct answer?
0:06:08 > 0:06:10Oh, no!
0:06:10 > 0:06:13Cricket! Peter, you should have gone with what you thought!
0:06:13 > 0:06:15That's your fault! Don't listen to us.
0:06:15 > 0:06:17Absolutely your fault, Peter.
0:06:17 > 0:06:19We are not responsible for what happened there.
0:06:19 > 0:06:21So, Susan Calman,
0:06:21 > 0:06:24who completely persuaded the panel to go with bowls... Sorry.
0:06:24 > 0:06:28..over cricket, says the panel are not responsible for that answer.
0:06:28 > 0:06:33They're all adults. And to be fair, I did doubt myself. Yep.
0:06:33 > 0:06:36Cricket made its only Olympic appearance at
0:06:36 > 0:06:38the 1900 Paris Olympics.
0:06:38 > 0:06:42There was only one match and it was between Great Britain and France.
0:06:42 > 0:06:44Well! Great Britain won. It was 50-50.
0:06:44 > 0:06:45Funny, that.
0:06:45 > 0:06:48Unfortunately, As, you were wrong to go with the panel,
0:06:48 > 0:06:50but there's still loads of cash up there.
0:06:50 > 0:06:53Let's see if we can get it out. Here's your next question.
0:07:09 > 0:07:11I probably don't think it's boomerang.
0:07:11 > 0:07:15Boomerang has quite an Aussie twang to it anyway.
0:07:15 > 0:07:18Same with, I think, didgeridoo.
0:07:18 > 0:07:21I think kangaroo, they say kanga for short, maybe...
0:07:22 > 0:07:24So my initial thought would be koala.
0:07:24 > 0:07:27Your first thought would be koala. Let's see if our panel
0:07:27 > 0:07:30can bring their Neighbours expertise to this.
0:07:30 > 0:07:32Your debate starts now.
0:07:32 > 0:07:35Well... Well... Liz? Soogle?
0:07:35 > 0:07:39Well, fortunately, I was a huge fan of Neighbours...
0:07:39 > 0:07:42Do you know this? Yes. She does.
0:07:42 > 0:07:46Good, because I have no idea. And the Minogues. Both of them.
0:07:46 > 0:07:52And in Smash Hits in approximately 1989...
0:07:52 > 0:07:53they revealed,
0:07:53 > 0:07:59I'm pretty sure, that Kylie means boomerang in Aboriginal language.
0:07:59 > 0:08:02Because it was a big thing at the time - what does Kylie mean?
0:08:02 > 0:08:05Do you have any recollection of this, Liz? I sort of do,
0:08:05 > 0:08:10because I was a big Neighbours fan as well. Yes. I'm pretty sure...
0:08:10 > 0:08:14that it's boomerang. And you're pretty sure as well, Liz.
0:08:14 > 0:08:15And if you think about it now,
0:08:15 > 0:08:19her career, she keeps coming back... Exactly. ..doesn't she?
0:08:19 > 0:08:21She has lived the life of a boomerang.
0:08:21 > 0:08:23She has lived the life of her name.
0:08:23 > 0:08:27I've got a pair of hot pants like hers. That I look forward to...
0:08:27 > 0:08:30I never wear them in public, it's fine.
0:08:30 > 0:08:32OK, before we get that visual...
0:08:32 > 0:08:34I think the panel have decided. Yep.
0:08:34 > 0:08:40The panel have decided that Kylie is the Aboriginal name for boomerang.
0:08:40 > 0:08:45So our panel have not gone into any Australian history whatsoever
0:08:45 > 0:08:48or linguistics of the Aboriginal people,
0:08:48 > 0:08:50they have gone to Smash Hits in 1989
0:08:50 > 0:08:52and a profile on Kylie Minogue.
0:08:52 > 0:08:56I mean, I can't really argue with that, the certainty for that.
0:08:56 > 0:08:58It's not quite my expertise, so...
0:08:58 > 0:09:01I think I'm going to stick with the panel.
0:09:01 > 0:09:05Again, hopefully, it'll come out right with boomerang.
0:09:05 > 0:09:11OK. For ?200, is Kylie the Aboriginal name for boomerang?
0:09:18 > 0:09:20It is! APPLAUSE
0:09:21 > 0:09:22It is.
0:09:22 > 0:09:24Well done, As. Very well done.
0:09:24 > 0:09:28The word came into Australian English from Noongar,
0:09:28 > 0:09:30an Aboriginal language.
0:09:30 > 0:09:33All right, As, we're up and running. ?200 in the prize pot.
0:09:36 > 0:09:38Let's see if we can get it up to 400.
0:09:38 > 0:09:39Last question of the round.
0:10:00 > 0:10:03Some very big names, obviously, with some great inventions.
0:10:03 > 0:10:06I'm drawn to Isaac Newton bringing in the whole gravity...
0:10:06 > 0:10:09idea...with the fallen apple.
0:10:09 > 0:10:11I think that would be quite an old-age idea.
0:10:11 > 0:10:16So my initial thought would be to bring out Isaac Newton.
0:10:16 > 0:10:17Isaac Newton.
0:10:17 > 0:10:20Here we go, panel. Let's see if you can sort this out.
0:10:20 > 0:10:22Your debate starts now.
0:10:22 > 0:10:25So, erm... What did they all do?
0:10:25 > 0:10:27So, Baird, television. Yes.
0:10:27 > 0:10:33Bell, telephone. Telephone. Newton? Gravity. Watt? Electricity.
0:10:33 > 0:10:34The leccy.
0:10:34 > 0:10:40What ones can we definitely rule out that were not 1700s?
0:10:40 > 0:10:42Sir Alexander Graham Bell...
0:10:42 > 0:10:46So he would be the nearest to us now, so he'd be 1800s,
0:10:46 > 0:10:49so it won't be him. Not him. And Logie Baird. Logie Baird similarly.
0:10:49 > 0:10:53Yeah. Yeah. So it's not the top two, so it's between Newton and Watt.
0:10:53 > 0:10:58And I think Newton would be in the 1600s. I think he's earlier.
0:10:58 > 0:11:04Much before it. Yeah. Because we've had gravity for quite a long time.
0:11:04 > 0:11:05We have!
0:11:05 > 0:11:08Otherwise we'd all have fallen off!
0:11:08 > 0:11:12It's got to be James Watt, hasn't it? It makes the most sense.
0:11:12 > 0:11:15And we're definitely sure about Isaac Newton?
0:11:15 > 0:11:20Yeah, I'm pretty sure. The pictures I've seen of him, he looks older.
0:11:20 > 0:11:23Was he ever playing bowls in the pictures? He wasn't playing bowls!
0:11:23 > 0:11:26OK. I think it makes sense to go with him, doesn't it?
0:11:26 > 0:11:28James Watt? Yeah. Yeah.
0:11:28 > 0:11:29We agreed? Yeah.
0:11:29 > 0:11:32The panel have decided that the inventor that was born in
0:11:32 > 0:11:34the 1700s is James Watt.
0:11:35 > 0:11:40OK, As, has that brought any clarity to the issue?
0:11:40 > 0:11:43Liz making a very good point that gravity has been around for
0:11:43 > 0:11:46a very long time! It has, yeah.
0:11:46 > 0:11:50I think they've sort of confirmed my idea that Isaac Newton was old,
0:11:50 > 0:11:52but they've just confirmed he might be even older than I thought.
0:11:52 > 0:11:56So... I seem like I'm agreeing with the panel every single time,
0:11:56 > 0:12:00but James Watt would be my final choice.
0:12:00 > 0:12:03OK, you're going for James Watt.
0:12:03 > 0:12:08For ?200, was James Watt born in the 1,700?
0:12:13 > 0:12:16He was! APPLAUSE
0:12:16 > 0:12:17He was!
0:12:17 > 0:12:19Well played, well worked out there, As.
0:12:19 > 0:12:22It was James Watt who improved steam-engine technology.
0:12:22 > 0:12:26He was born in 1736. There he is.
0:12:26 > 0:12:29Well done, As, that's another ?200 in your prize pot,
0:12:29 > 0:12:32bringing your total to ?400 at the end of the round!
0:12:36 > 0:12:38Very well done.
0:12:38 > 0:12:41So, out of our panel, out of Liz, out of Peter and out of Susan,
0:12:41 > 0:12:43who is standing out for you?
0:12:43 > 0:12:45Two of the panellists are very vocal,
0:12:45 > 0:12:49and I think Liz has come in with some really key points
0:12:49 > 0:12:52that have been sort of sometimes overshadowed,
0:12:52 > 0:12:54so at the moment Liz is standing out to me.
0:12:54 > 0:12:56Liz is the standout member of...
0:12:56 > 0:12:59It feels like some form of beauty parade where we're sitting here
0:12:59 > 0:13:02being judged, like...
0:13:02 > 0:13:05It's quite... The competition! It's quite stressful, isn't it?
0:13:05 > 0:13:08And now Peter Jones will lead the swimsuit...
0:13:10 > 0:13:13Let's see how they cope with pictures. It's time for Round 2.
0:13:16 > 0:13:18As Round 2 is our picture round,
0:13:18 > 0:13:23all you have to do is place three pictures in the correct order.
0:13:23 > 0:13:25There are three questions in this round,
0:13:25 > 0:13:28just ?300 up for grabs for each correct answer.
0:13:28 > 0:13:30So best of luck. Here we go.
0:13:46 > 0:13:48Some big personalities. Um...
0:13:48 > 0:13:50Starting with the fewest, I'd probably say the Dalai Lama,
0:13:50 > 0:13:55followed by Simon Cowell and then Donald Trump with the most.
0:13:55 > 0:13:59OK. Liz is nodding. Let's see what our panel can make of this.
0:13:59 > 0:14:01Your debate starts now.
0:14:01 > 0:14:05Liz, do you know? Are you on Twitter, Liz? What is Twitter?
0:14:05 > 0:14:07Right.
0:14:07 > 0:14:10Yes! OK, OK. I wasn't quite expecting that. Yes.
0:14:10 > 0:14:12No, not actually ON Twitter.
0:14:12 > 0:14:17So, as a comparator, Liz, let's see how many followers we both have.
0:14:17 > 0:14:20How many have you got, Peter?
0:14:20 > 0:14:22I think just over a million. SUSAN LAUGHS
0:14:22 > 0:14:24So, good... Um...
0:14:26 > 0:14:31And the thing is that Trump was popular and is now even bigger,
0:14:31 > 0:14:34because he's running for president...
0:14:34 > 0:14:37Yeah. ..so my first instinct would be...
0:14:39 > 0:14:41..that he would have the most.
0:14:41 > 0:14:43I don't think Simon Cowell...
0:14:43 > 0:14:46I think he's got a lot, but I don't think he's got more than Trump.
0:14:46 > 0:14:47I think he's had his day.
0:14:47 > 0:14:50Do you think? I think Cowell's had his day so I think
0:14:50 > 0:14:52you've got him right in the middle. I think As has got him right.
0:14:52 > 0:14:54Cowell in the middle. Yeah. Right.
0:14:54 > 0:14:56So I think Cowell in the middle.
0:14:56 > 0:14:57I wonder if it's swapped.
0:14:57 > 0:15:00I just think... Dalai Lama? I know we all think and Trump thinks
0:15:00 > 0:15:03everybody knows him and everybody's thinking about him... Yeah.
0:15:03 > 0:15:07..but I think, over the years, the Dalai Lama might have picked up
0:15:07 > 0:15:09a few more fans. Well, when you think... Yeah.
0:15:09 > 0:15:13I know that the Pope has a lot of followers and I think the same.
0:15:13 > 0:15:16I think actually Cowell and Trump would love to have
0:15:16 > 0:15:18as many followers as the Dalai Lama and the Pope.
0:15:18 > 0:15:22So who has the fewest? If we're saying the Dalai Lama has the most.
0:15:22 > 0:15:25You think, Liz...? Next one should be, you think...?
0:15:25 > 0:15:26I think Cowell's in the middle. Cowell.
0:15:26 > 0:15:30And you think Trump? I think Cowell has the least.
0:15:30 > 0:15:31God, this is a tough one.
0:15:31 > 0:15:34But it's longevity. It's 50/50.
0:15:34 > 0:15:36So what's your gut, Mr Jones?
0:15:36 > 0:15:39My gut tells me to leave it as it is. It's up to you.
0:15:39 > 0:15:41Go for it. Mm-hm. You happy? Yep.
0:15:41 > 0:15:45Well, the panel has decided that the fewest Twitter followers
0:15:45 > 0:15:50is Simon Cowell, then Donald Trump, and Dalai Lama has the most.
0:15:52 > 0:15:55OK, As, that's what our panel think.
0:15:55 > 0:15:57Yeah, lots of conflicting views.
0:15:57 > 0:16:00I, personally, want to change that around slightly.
0:16:00 > 0:16:03I think with Donald Trump and what he had with
0:16:03 > 0:16:07the presidential candidacy, and America's quite a big place,
0:16:07 > 0:16:10I think...I still think he would have the most.
0:16:10 > 0:16:13Simon Cowell, again, yeah, he's had his day,
0:16:13 > 0:16:16he was probably popular when X Factor was still in its heyday.
0:16:16 > 0:16:21So I think I'm going to stick with Dalai Lama as the fewest,
0:16:21 > 0:16:24followed by Simon Cowell and then Donald Trump with the most.
0:16:25 > 0:16:28OK, you're going against the panel here, As.
0:16:28 > 0:16:31You believe the Dalai Lama has the fewest,
0:16:31 > 0:16:35then Simon Cowell, and the most Twitter followers is
0:16:35 > 0:16:37Donald Trump.
0:16:37 > 0:16:39For ?300, is that the correct order?
0:16:47 > 0:16:50It's the wrong order, As. Let's have a look
0:16:50 > 0:16:51at the correct order.
0:16:53 > 0:16:54Panel also wrong.
0:16:56 > 0:17:00Donald Trump, then Simon Cowell, then the Dalai Lama.
0:17:00 > 0:17:01Liz was actually right.
0:17:01 > 0:17:04Donald Trump, nine million followers,
0:17:04 > 0:17:11Simon Cowell, 12.6, the Dalai Lama, 12.8 million followers.
0:17:11 > 0:17:12So, As, you got that wrong.
0:17:12 > 0:17:17Our panel also got it wrong. It means that you remain on ?400.
0:17:19 > 0:17:20APPLAUSE
0:17:20 > 0:17:24OK, here comes your second picture question.
0:17:38 > 0:17:39Wow.
0:17:41 > 0:17:44So, first of all, starting with the earliest,
0:17:44 > 0:17:47probably Christ the Redeemer I'd say is probably the oldest,
0:17:47 > 0:17:51followed by the Golden Gate Bridge and then Sydney Opera House.
0:17:51 > 0:17:54OK. We have a well-travelled panel who will sort this out,
0:17:54 > 0:17:57I'm sure, very quickly.
0:17:57 > 0:17:59Panel, your debate starts now.
0:17:59 > 0:18:01OK.
0:18:01 > 0:18:04Well, certainly Sydney Opera House, that's... It's quite recent.
0:18:04 > 0:18:06That's quite recent.
0:18:06 > 0:18:10But the Golden Gate Bridge was back in the '30s or '40s, wasn't it?
0:18:10 > 0:18:14See, to me, the Golden Gate Bridge was
0:18:14 > 0:18:20an architectural wonder of the world in the early, kind of, 1900s
0:18:20 > 0:18:23because it was one of the biggest suspension bridges... Yep.
0:18:23 > 0:18:28..at that time. To me, my initial instinct is the Golden Gate Bridge
0:18:28 > 0:18:29is the earliest of them.
0:18:29 > 0:18:32Let's look at it in terms of... Does anyone know when
0:18:32 > 0:18:34the Christ the Redeemer statue
0:18:34 > 0:18:37was built at all, never mind completed?
0:18:37 > 0:18:38No, but it kind of looks earlier.
0:18:38 > 0:18:41I don't know whether that's a good reason. Yes.
0:18:41 > 0:18:44But there's something about it. But in terms of, again...
0:18:44 > 0:18:47That is not one piece of stone. That's, again,
0:18:47 > 0:18:50a feat of engineering... Yeah. ..to get that, because it's very high up,
0:18:50 > 0:18:52isn't it, over Rio? Over Rio, yeah.
0:18:52 > 0:18:57So to get that there seems to me to be more modern
0:18:57 > 0:18:58than the Golden Gate Bridge.
0:18:58 > 0:19:01I think it's really old. My instinct tells me that's really old.
0:19:01 > 0:19:03What do you think, Liz?
0:19:03 > 0:19:04I think they're in the right order.
0:19:04 > 0:19:07I think Golden Gate Bridge, Christ the Redeemer... Sydney Opera House.
0:19:07 > 0:19:09..the most recent. But, you know what, I'm...
0:19:09 > 0:19:11I agree with Liz, actually.
0:19:11 > 0:19:13I feel like I've been here before.
0:19:14 > 0:19:17Now, last time you agreed with us, we got it wrong.
0:19:17 > 0:19:20There is no chance, I'm not disagreeing with you.
0:19:20 > 0:19:21I'm going with you. So...
0:19:23 > 0:19:25The panel have decided the order
0:19:25 > 0:19:27of which these landmarks were completed,
0:19:27 > 0:19:30starting with the earliest, is
0:19:30 > 0:19:32the Golden Gate Bridge,
0:19:32 > 0:19:34Christ the Redeemer
0:19:34 > 0:19:36and Sydney Opera House.
0:19:37 > 0:19:41So, As, Peter not convinced but he's gone with the panel.
0:19:41 > 0:19:43The Golden Gate Bridge, Christ the Redeemer,
0:19:43 > 0:19:44Sydney Opera House.
0:19:44 > 0:19:46I'm sort of agreeing with Peter here.
0:19:46 > 0:19:49I do think Christ the Redeemer is older.
0:19:49 > 0:19:52I'm just trying to think of the materials they're made out of.
0:19:52 > 0:19:55I'm just thinking between iron and whatever the Golden Bridge
0:19:55 > 0:19:58is made of.
0:19:58 > 0:20:00I think it's sort of in the middle.
0:20:00 > 0:20:02So, As, the order you'd like to go with is...?
0:20:02 > 0:20:05So I think Christ the Redeemer is the earliest,
0:20:05 > 0:20:08followed by the Golden Gate Bridge, and then finishing off
0:20:08 > 0:20:10with Sydney Opera House.
0:20:10 > 0:20:12So you're sticking with your initial thought,
0:20:12 > 0:20:15you're going against the panel but you are actually going
0:20:15 > 0:20:17with Peter Jones on this.
0:20:17 > 0:20:20For ?300, is that the correct answer?
0:20:26 > 0:20:29It is the correct order!
0:20:30 > 0:20:32Very well done.
0:20:32 > 0:20:35Well played, As. You were right to stick with your first thought.
0:20:35 > 0:20:36Let's have a look at them.
0:20:36 > 0:20:42Christ the Redeemer statue, 1931, the Golden Gate Bridge, 1937...
0:20:42 > 0:20:45Aw! ..Sydney Opera House, 1973.
0:20:45 > 0:20:48Well played, though. You went your own way on that, As,
0:20:48 > 0:20:49you were right to do that.
0:20:49 > 0:20:53300 quid into the prize pot, you're now up to ?700.
0:20:53 > 0:20:55APPLAUSE
0:20:58 > 0:20:59OK, As, well played.
0:20:59 > 0:21:01Let's have a look at your third question in this round.
0:21:01 > 0:21:02Here it comes.
0:21:20 > 0:21:21Comic-book fan, As?
0:21:21 > 0:21:24Not the biggest, not the biggest. But I'm basing it on
0:21:24 > 0:21:26the films that have come out.
0:21:26 > 0:21:30I would probably put Captain America as the earliest,
0:21:30 > 0:21:33followed by Batman and then Spider-Man as the latest.
0:21:33 > 0:21:35So nothing to do with the comic books,
0:21:35 > 0:21:37just based on the look of the films?
0:21:37 > 0:21:40Yeah, and the story behind them and where they were based.
0:21:40 > 0:21:43OK. Panel, over to you. Your debate starts now.
0:21:43 > 0:21:45I can't wait to get into this.
0:21:45 > 0:21:47I absolutely love comics
0:21:47 > 0:21:49but I have absolutely no idea of the answer to this question.
0:21:49 > 0:21:51LAUGHTER
0:21:51 > 0:21:52Do you like comic books?
0:21:52 > 0:21:55I used to like Twinkle and Bunty. Right, good.
0:21:55 > 0:21:57But I have no idea.
0:21:57 > 0:21:59OK. We're down to one.
0:21:59 > 0:22:04Well, I have a fully functioning Batman costume and...
0:22:04 > 0:22:06Just for the house.
0:22:06 > 0:22:09Are you wearing that under your clothes at the moment?
0:22:09 > 0:22:11Of course I'm not, of course I'm not!
0:22:11 > 0:22:14I'm dressed normally. It's for when I get post delivered.
0:22:14 > 0:22:17Nothing cheers a postman up more than a little lady
0:22:17 > 0:22:19answering the door in a Batman costume.
0:22:20 > 0:22:22What I know is this...
0:22:23 > 0:22:26Spider-Man is the latest, in my view.
0:22:26 > 0:22:30He was a later edition to the comic-book canon. OK.
0:22:30 > 0:22:31Without question.
0:22:31 > 0:22:33It's between Batman and Captain America.
0:22:33 > 0:22:37Now, Captain America was a World War II propaganda tool...
0:22:38 > 0:22:43..and that was later on in World War II, when America joined
0:22:43 > 0:22:44the Second World War.
0:22:44 > 0:22:48So I know that Captain America was the early 1940s.
0:22:48 > 0:22:51Question is - was Batman before that? And my gut says yes,
0:22:51 > 0:22:54but what do you all think?
0:22:54 > 0:22:56I have no idea, but I'm definitely with you.
0:22:56 > 0:22:58Everything you've said sounds spot-on.
0:22:58 > 0:23:00You were quite convincing, to be honest. Yeah.
0:23:00 > 0:23:04And you are Soogle. Yes. Now, every time you say that, Peter,
0:23:04 > 0:23:06it goes horribly wrong for me.
0:23:06 > 0:23:09Every time you point out that I sometimes know things,
0:23:09 > 0:23:10it always goes horribly wrong.
0:23:10 > 0:23:13It did make me giggle when you said about your costume,
0:23:13 > 0:23:16cos, although I don't do these kind of comics and
0:23:16 > 0:23:19I haven't for years... Yes? ..I do have a Spider-Man costume.
0:23:19 > 0:23:21Do you? And it's got the muscles.
0:23:21 > 0:23:23It's kind of... Yeah.
0:23:23 > 0:23:25When do you wear that?
0:23:25 > 0:23:27Pretty much high days and holidays. Yes.
0:23:27 > 0:23:30I like to keep that, it's like Sunday, hat day,
0:23:30 > 0:23:33and Saturday, wear your superhero costume. Yes, of course.
0:23:33 > 0:23:35So if I buy a Captain America costume,
0:23:35 > 0:23:37do you think we can all get together some time?
0:23:37 > 0:23:39Listen... I think that's a programme.
0:23:39 > 0:23:41That's got a caravan trip for BBC Two written all over it.
0:23:41 > 0:23:43LAUGHTER
0:23:43 > 0:23:45There's a scientific survey - this is true -
0:23:45 > 0:23:48that if you stand for five minutes in a superhero pose
0:23:48 > 0:23:51at the start of the day, you feel more confident throughout the day.
0:23:51 > 0:23:54Exactly, that's it. You feel so much better if you stand
0:23:54 > 0:23:56in the morning.
0:23:56 > 0:23:57On that note, I think the panel have agreed.
0:23:57 > 0:24:00Should we put them in order? Should we put them in order?
0:24:00 > 0:24:02So we're saying... You're saying Batman.
0:24:02 > 0:24:04Batman first. Spider-Man.
0:24:04 > 0:24:07Captain America, and then Spider-Man last.
0:24:07 > 0:24:09So the panel have decided that it's the order of which
0:24:09 > 0:24:14they first appeared was Batman, Captain America and Spider-Man.
0:24:16 > 0:24:19So Susan says it is just a hunch.
0:24:19 > 0:24:22However, she convinced us with World War II facts.
0:24:22 > 0:24:25The panel has gone along with Susan on this one.
0:24:27 > 0:24:30I'm fairly happy with Spider-Man being the youngest of
0:24:30 > 0:24:32the superheroes.
0:24:32 > 0:24:36I'm still trying to debate whether Captain America
0:24:36 > 0:24:39being based around the war but actually being put into
0:24:39 > 0:24:42a comic might have been later as opposed to Batman.
0:24:42 > 0:24:43Um...
0:24:43 > 0:24:45I think I'm going to agree with the panel.
0:24:45 > 0:24:47I'm going to put Batman as my earliest,
0:24:47 > 0:24:50following by Captain America and then Spider-Man
0:24:50 > 0:24:51as my latest.
0:24:51 > 0:24:56So you're going for Batman, Captain America and Spider-Man?
0:24:56 > 0:25:01The superpowers of Susan Calman has changed your mind.
0:25:01 > 0:25:02Let's all hold the pose, As.
0:25:04 > 0:25:06Is that the correct order?
0:25:08 > 0:25:12Please let it be right. Please let it be right.
0:25:12 > 0:25:14Please let it be right!
0:25:14 > 0:25:18Yes! It is the correct order, well done!
0:25:18 > 0:25:19Well played.
0:25:19 > 0:25:21And good knowledge, Susan.
0:25:21 > 0:25:22Let's have a look at them here.
0:25:22 > 0:25:26Batman was 1939, Captain America was in the middle of
0:25:26 > 0:25:30the Second World War, 1941, and quite a distance then,
0:25:30 > 0:25:34Spider-Man, 1962, came a fair bit later.
0:25:34 > 0:25:37As, very well done, I have to say. You've been playing the game
0:25:37 > 0:25:40really well. At the end of round two, your prize pot
0:25:40 > 0:25:42is up to ?1,000. Whoo!
0:25:45 > 0:25:49So how's our panel doing so far, As?
0:25:49 > 0:25:51I think they've all been equally strong.
0:25:51 > 0:25:54Initially I thought Susan was swaying everyone
0:25:54 > 0:25:56and getting things wrong but she's coming up
0:25:56 > 0:25:58and pulled it out the bag with that last one.
0:25:58 > 0:26:00So, Liz, Peter or Susan, if you had to bring one
0:26:00 > 0:26:02into your final debate, who would it be?
0:26:02 > 0:26:07At this point in time, it would probably be Peter, at this point.
0:26:07 > 0:26:08OK. It's moving.
0:26:08 > 0:26:11So started with Liz, going with Peter.
0:26:11 > 0:26:14There's still one round left. Can we sway you over
0:26:14 > 0:26:17to the Calman before the end of the show?
0:26:17 > 0:26:21There's still ?1,500 up for grabs as we play Round 3.
0:26:24 > 0:26:27OK, As, in this round, you will face questions that contain
0:26:27 > 0:26:30three statements about a person, a place or a thing
0:26:30 > 0:26:32but only one of those statements is correct.
0:26:32 > 0:26:35You must decide which one. Three questions in this round
0:26:35 > 0:26:37because it is our final round.
0:26:37 > 0:26:41?500 for each correct answer. So lots of cash up there.
0:26:41 > 0:26:43Let's see if we can get it all.
0:26:43 > 0:26:44Here we go.
0:27:04 > 0:27:07I mean, I wouldn't put it past him having a misspelt name.
0:27:07 > 0:27:08But...
0:27:09 > 0:27:10I think maybe...
0:27:12 > 0:27:15One of his children was born sort of late '90s.
0:27:15 > 0:27:19I would probably say that he is shorter than Ryan Giggs.
0:27:19 > 0:27:22OK, that's your first thought. You think he's shorter than Ryan Giggs.
0:27:22 > 0:27:24Let's go for the long and the short of this.
0:27:24 > 0:27:25Panel, your debate starts now.
0:27:25 > 0:27:30Can I just check who he is? Yes, he is a popular soccer player... Oh.
0:27:30 > 0:27:32..from earlier in the day.
0:27:34 > 0:27:35You must know him.
0:27:35 > 0:27:40I do know him. Yep. And...yeah. Although I was on with
0:27:40 > 0:27:42Michael McIntyre and he says this..."send to all".
0:27:42 > 0:27:46Do you know this "text to all" game? Yeah.
0:27:46 > 0:27:49And Beckham was on there and his reply was, "Who's this?"
0:27:50 > 0:27:53So whilst I might know him, I'm not sure he knows me. Right.
0:27:53 > 0:27:55But it might be because I know the answer to this question.
0:27:55 > 0:27:57Oh, do you? What is it? Oh.
0:27:57 > 0:28:01It is definitely a misspelt tattoo of his wife's name. Right.
0:28:01 > 0:28:04And I think it is... I don't know what language the name
0:28:04 > 0:28:07was written in, because it didn't spell Victoria.
0:28:07 > 0:28:10But I'm pretty sure it's got... It's spelled Victoria
0:28:10 > 0:28:13with an H or an M in it. One of the letters, anyway, was wrong.
0:28:13 > 0:28:16Right, right. So I'm pretty confident about the fact
0:28:16 > 0:28:18that it's a misspelt tattoo of his wife's name.
0:28:18 > 0:28:21You'd think if you had a tattoo of your wife's name,
0:28:21 > 0:28:23I mean, I would pretty much check that.
0:28:23 > 0:28:26Also, with all that money, you'd think you'd get it redone. Yes.
0:28:26 > 0:28:28Cos there's programmes on TV. You can just go to
0:28:28 > 0:28:30somewhere in Brighton. Well, yes, you can.
0:28:30 > 0:28:32That's a really good point. Why doesn't he get that done?
0:28:32 > 0:28:34Do you have a tattoo, Peter?
0:28:34 > 0:28:37I don't know why he doesn't get that done.
0:28:37 > 0:28:38No, I don't.
0:28:38 > 0:28:40I didn't... You don't have a tattoo?
0:28:40 > 0:28:43No, I don't. Do you have a tattoo? No, I don't.
0:28:43 > 0:28:45Do you have a tattoo?
0:28:45 > 0:28:47So I think it's definitely... LAUGHTER
0:28:47 > 0:28:49No, I don't, I don't.
0:28:49 > 0:28:50What do we think? Do we agree?
0:28:50 > 0:28:53I think you seem very certain of it. I think if you know this one...
0:28:53 > 0:28:55I'm pretty sure that I think... We're in agreement.
0:28:55 > 0:28:57Yeah, yeah, absolutely. You know the score.
0:28:57 > 0:28:59You go for it. The panel are in agreement that
0:28:59 > 0:29:03David Beckham has a misspelt tattoo of his wife's name.
0:29:04 > 0:29:07So, As, apart from the fact that I've fallen slightly in love
0:29:07 > 0:29:10with Liz that you watch Tattoo Fixers as well -
0:29:10 > 0:29:12I thought I was the only one -
0:29:12 > 0:29:14Peter Jones believes that
0:29:14 > 0:29:17David Beckham has misspelt his wife's name in a tattoo.
0:29:17 > 0:29:20Yeah, I think I'm pretty happy with that myself.
0:29:20 > 0:29:22I think I did hear it on one of these late-night chat shows
0:29:22 > 0:29:25where they did take the mick out of him for having a misspelt name,
0:29:25 > 0:29:28especially in a different language, but, yeah, I'm going to stay with
0:29:28 > 0:29:30"he has a misspelt tattoo of his wife".
0:29:30 > 0:29:33So, you initially went with "shorter than Ryan Giggs".
0:29:33 > 0:29:36Our panel have now persuaded you, indeed Peter Jones has
0:29:36 > 0:29:40persuaded everyone, that he has a misspelt tattoo of his wife's name.
0:29:40 > 0:29:43If this is correct, it's ?500 into the prize pot.
0:29:43 > 0:29:45The correct answer is...
0:29:51 > 0:29:53Yes! He does.
0:29:53 > 0:29:55He does.
0:29:55 > 0:29:57He's on his way to Brighton
0:29:57 > 0:29:58to get that sorted out, Liz.
0:29:58 > 0:30:02He has a misspelt tattoo of his wife's name. There it is.
0:30:02 > 0:30:05His Hindi-script forearm tattoo, which is translated into English,
0:30:05 > 0:30:10has a H in Victoria. Good knowledge there, Peter Jones.
0:30:10 > 0:30:12Brooklyn was born in 1999.
0:30:12 > 0:30:17David Beckham is 183 centimetres and Ryan Giggs is 180 centimetres.
0:30:17 > 0:30:20Very well done, As, very well played, Peter.
0:30:20 > 0:30:24We've added ?500 to the prize pot. You're now up to ?1,500.
0:30:24 > 0:30:26APPLAUSE
0:30:28 > 0:30:31OK, here comes the second question of Round 3.
0:30:51 > 0:30:54University of Cambridge, I've got a couple of friends that go there
0:30:54 > 0:30:56but I'm not quite up about the history.
0:30:56 > 0:30:59Before the Battle of Hastings - 1066, that's quite a while ago.
0:31:02 > 0:31:05I would put C initially as being true.
0:31:05 > 0:31:07So you feel that Christopher Wren...
0:31:07 > 0:31:11I feel that Christopher Wren might have designed
0:31:11 > 0:31:13part of one of their schools.
0:31:13 > 0:31:16OK, panel, over to you. Your debate starts now.
0:31:16 > 0:31:17OK...
0:31:18 > 0:31:22I've no idea about the boat races. That's 50-50 for me. Do you...
0:31:22 > 0:31:26I mean, I don't follow the boat races. Me and sport, isn't it?
0:31:26 > 0:31:28Yeah. Another sport element.
0:31:28 > 0:31:31No, although I'm sort of thinking it could be that one. Yeah.
0:31:31 > 0:31:32It could be. Could be.
0:31:32 > 0:31:35Founded... Battle of Hastings, 1066?
0:31:35 > 0:31:37I mean, I get it's possible.
0:31:37 > 0:31:40I'm sure it wasn't founded before 1066. I'd get rid of the middle one.
0:31:40 > 0:31:42So it's either Christopher Wren
0:31:42 > 0:31:44or the boat races. I...
0:31:45 > 0:31:47What's your feeling? Liz? What's your gut?
0:31:47 > 0:31:51That's all I can go on - my gut reaction would be the boat race.
0:31:51 > 0:31:53Yeah? Hmm.
0:31:53 > 0:31:55My gut instinct was Christopher Wren,
0:31:55 > 0:31:59but Liz seems to have been quite the fortune-teller.
0:31:59 > 0:32:02So you think it's won fewer university boat races than Oxford?
0:32:02 > 0:32:04You think that? Hmm.
0:32:04 > 0:32:06I'm going to go with whatever you think because I really don't know.
0:32:06 > 0:32:09It's those two, one of those two, isn't it? Let's go with that one.
0:32:09 > 0:32:12Peter? No, we're going to go with Liz, because I don't know.
0:32:12 > 0:32:14I don't know either, so go for it. OK. Yeah.
0:32:14 > 0:32:16The panel has decided that the University of Cambridge
0:32:16 > 0:32:19has won fewer boat races than Oxford.
0:32:19 > 0:32:22So, As, not that much knowledge brought in there,
0:32:22 > 0:32:25although they do all believe that the University of Cambridge
0:32:25 > 0:32:28wasn't founded before the Battle of Hastings.
0:32:28 > 0:32:31You initially thought Christopher Wren, they're going boat race.
0:32:31 > 0:32:34Anything in there to make you change your mind?
0:32:34 > 0:32:36I do remember, I think Oxford won the last...
0:32:36 > 0:32:38I do remember seeing it on the telly
0:32:38 > 0:32:40that they won the last boat race.
0:32:40 > 0:32:43Maybe I'm again getting confused. I'm happy that it wasn't founded
0:32:43 > 0:32:46before the Battle of Hastings,
0:32:46 > 0:32:48but then Christopher Wren, I mean,
0:32:48 > 0:32:50I'm not quite up-to-date with that, but...
0:32:50 > 0:32:52I'm going to go with the panel.
0:32:52 > 0:32:55I do think the university has won fewer than Oxford.
0:32:57 > 0:33:00OK, we're locking it in. You're not entirely sure
0:33:00 > 0:33:03but we're going with the panel, we're all in agreement.
0:33:03 > 0:33:08For ?500, has Cambridge won fewer university boat races than Oxford?
0:33:08 > 0:33:10The correct answer is...
0:33:16 > 0:33:21Oh! Oh, no. Part of the university was designed by Christopher Wren.
0:33:21 > 0:33:23Susan had that in her gut.
0:33:25 > 0:33:26I'm sorry about that, As.
0:33:26 > 0:33:29Two chapels in Cambridge were designed by Wren,
0:33:29 > 0:33:33those at Pembroke and Emmanuel colleges.
0:33:33 > 0:33:37Oxford has won 79 races, Cambridge has won 82.
0:33:37 > 0:33:40Cambridge is considered to have been founded around 1209,
0:33:40 > 0:33:45and the Battle of Hastings, which everybody seemed to know, 1066.
0:33:45 > 0:33:48OK, As, not to worry, you didn't get that question right
0:33:48 > 0:33:51but it means you still have ?1,500 in your prize pot.
0:33:51 > 0:33:53APPLAUSE
0:33:55 > 0:33:58Let's see if you can get it up to two grand. Here we go, for ?500.
0:34:17 > 0:34:19What's your first thoughts, As?
0:34:19 > 0:34:21I might be confusing these princesses but
0:34:21 > 0:34:25I think Princess Anne is quite big on horses and things like dressage,
0:34:25 > 0:34:29so initially I would think that she might have been in...a Olympic,
0:34:29 > 0:34:31so I would think that she has won an Olympic medal.
0:34:31 > 0:34:34So the possibility that she's been in the Olympics,
0:34:34 > 0:34:37so she may have won a medal. Panel, your debate starts now.
0:34:39 > 0:34:42OK, so she was in an Olympics... Yeah.
0:34:42 > 0:34:46..because, fact fans, she's the only competitor in an Olympics
0:34:46 > 0:34:49never to have been sex-tested in the Olympics she went to,
0:34:49 > 0:34:51because she was the Queen's daughter
0:34:51 > 0:34:52and therefore they accepted she was...
0:34:52 > 0:34:56It was around the time of the Russian athletes and doping scandals
0:34:56 > 0:34:57and she wasn't sex-tested.
0:34:57 > 0:34:58I don't think she won, though.
0:34:58 > 0:35:04Her daughter won... Zara. Zara, I'm sure, won in the 2012 Olympics.
0:35:04 > 0:35:07It's tough, because the top one seems almost too easy,
0:35:07 > 0:35:11because I would just assume that her children do have...
0:35:11 > 0:35:13I've never heard...
0:35:13 > 0:35:16Well, maybe they don't use them, but do you know?
0:35:16 > 0:35:19I'm good friends with Mike Tindall, I play a lot of golf with him.
0:35:19 > 0:35:21Right. I've had a few evenings out, we've had a lot of fun,
0:35:21 > 0:35:26Zara's been around, but I am pretty sure that Princess Anne
0:35:26 > 0:35:29has not won an Olympic medal. I think you're right. Yeah.
0:35:29 > 0:35:31I'm also pretty sure that her husband,
0:35:31 > 0:35:34and I can't remember his surname, Timothy somebody,
0:35:34 > 0:35:37and I remember he is Sir Timothy,
0:35:37 > 0:35:40and I think five or six years ago he was knighted.
0:35:40 > 0:35:42This is her second husband. This is her second husband. Yes.
0:35:42 > 0:35:45So I think her husband was knighted by the Queen.
0:35:45 > 0:35:47Sir Timothy...
0:35:47 > 0:35:49What's his surname? Dalton.
0:35:49 > 0:35:50LAUGHTER
0:35:50 > 0:35:54Spall. Sir Timothy something, isn't it? I can't remember.
0:35:54 > 0:35:58I'll go with you, Peter. Are we OK on that? Shall we decide?
0:35:58 > 0:35:59Peter, I'm with you all the way.
0:35:59 > 0:36:01The panel has decided
0:36:01 > 0:36:05that Princess Anne's husband was knighted by the Queen.
0:36:06 > 0:36:09So, our panel have worked this one through.
0:36:09 > 0:36:13They think that it was Zara Phillips, not Princess Anne,
0:36:13 > 0:36:14that won an Olympic medal.
0:36:14 > 0:36:17They think that Princess Anne competed in the Olympics
0:36:17 > 0:36:20and we believe that her husband,
0:36:20 > 0:36:24who is either Timothy Spall or Timothy Dalton,
0:36:24 > 0:36:26was knighted by the Queen.
0:36:26 > 0:36:28Yes, some good points by the panel.
0:36:28 > 0:36:32Definitely I was confusing Princess Anne with her daughter
0:36:32 > 0:36:35during the Olympics, so I'm happy to rule B out.
0:36:35 > 0:36:38I do think that whenever they do mention Zara's name,
0:36:38 > 0:36:40if she was a duchess or something,
0:36:40 > 0:36:43they would say Zara, Duchess of so-and-so.
0:36:43 > 0:36:47Not heard that anywhere at all, so process of elimination,
0:36:47 > 0:36:49I'm going to go with Peter,
0:36:49 > 0:36:53and assuming he knows him better than I do, C is the answer.
0:36:54 > 0:36:55So you're going for C.
0:36:55 > 0:36:58Our panel have managed to convince you to change your mind.
0:36:58 > 0:37:01You're going for "her husband was knighted by the Queen".
0:37:01 > 0:37:05For ?500, to get the prize pot up to ?2,000,
0:37:05 > 0:37:07which statement is true about Princess Anne?
0:37:14 > 0:37:16Yes! It was C.
0:37:16 > 0:37:17APPLAUSE
0:37:17 > 0:37:21Her husband was knighted by the Queen. Well done.
0:37:21 > 0:37:26Princess married Timothy Laurence... Oh! ..in 1992.
0:37:26 > 0:37:31He was knighted by the Queen in 2011. Well done there, Peter.
0:37:31 > 0:37:34Her two children, Peter and Zara, don't have royal titles.
0:37:34 > 0:37:37She didn't win any medals at the Olympics but she was the first
0:37:37 > 0:37:40member of the British royal family to compete in the Olympic Games.
0:37:40 > 0:37:42Good knowledge, panel.
0:37:42 > 0:37:44Well played, As, and so at the end of Round 3
0:37:44 > 0:37:46your prize pot is up to ?2,000.
0:37:46 > 0:37:48APPLAUSE
0:37:51 > 0:37:54And that's the amount you're going to be playing for
0:37:54 > 0:37:55in today's final debate, As.
0:37:55 > 0:37:58There's just one question that stands between you and that cash
0:37:58 > 0:38:00and that is today's final debate question.
0:38:00 > 0:38:04There are six possible answers and we need three correct answers
0:38:04 > 0:38:05to win that two grand.
0:38:05 > 0:38:07As before, though, you're not going to play alone.
0:38:07 > 0:38:09As this is the final debate,
0:38:09 > 0:38:12we're going to allow you to access just one celebrity from the panel.
0:38:12 > 0:38:16You and your celebrity will have 45 seconds to debate the question,
0:38:16 > 0:38:20so based on performance today, who's it going to be?
0:38:20 > 0:38:23Liz, Peter or Susan to play in the final debate?
0:38:32 > 0:38:35I think based on performance and some of the answers they've given,
0:38:35 > 0:38:38I will choose Peter to be my companion. Yeah!
0:38:38 > 0:38:39OK, Peter, all right?
0:38:39 > 0:38:43Step this way, sir, as we play today's final debate.
0:38:43 > 0:38:45APPLAUSE
0:38:49 > 0:38:52So, Peter, As has chosen you for the final debate.
0:38:52 > 0:38:56I'm assuming you're ready, raring to go. Bit nervous, actually!
0:38:56 > 0:39:00I'm trying to be calm, but no, I'm not calm at all. I'm quite nervous.
0:39:00 > 0:39:02I'm a bit sweaty and palmy.
0:39:02 > 0:39:04Yeah, but I'm twice as sweaty as you, I think.
0:39:04 > 0:39:07So I wouldn't be good at catching. Come on, we can do this.
0:39:07 > 0:39:08This is the type of confidence
0:39:08 > 0:39:11that we need going into this final round, As(!) OK, yeah.
0:39:11 > 0:39:14OK, look, because it is the final debate, As,
0:39:14 > 0:39:16we're going to give you a choice of two categories,
0:39:16 > 0:39:19so have a look at this, tell us which one you fancy.
0:39:25 > 0:39:30I mean, I would be more drawn toward Celebrities but what about yourself?
0:39:30 > 0:39:33Yeah, let's go with Celebrities, because Sport, apart from tennis
0:39:33 > 0:39:38and a bit of golf, that's the end of my sport so we could do Celebrities.
0:39:38 > 0:39:39I think we're happy with Celebrities.
0:39:39 > 0:39:42He was quite good on the David Beckham tattoo. Absolutely.
0:39:42 > 0:39:44So we're going for... Celebrities.
0:39:44 > 0:39:47OK, let's lock it in. Celebrities.
0:39:49 > 0:39:52For ?2,000, As, 45 seconds on the clock,
0:39:52 > 0:39:54here is your final debate question.
0:40:18 > 0:40:22So, As, Peter, for the final time today, your 45 seconds starts now.
0:40:22 > 0:40:25What do you think? I believe Rod Stewart's had four wives.
0:40:25 > 0:40:28I saw him at the weekend, actually, at a concert,
0:40:28 > 0:40:30so I'm happy he's got four wives.
0:40:30 > 0:40:34Paul McCartney, there was the big divorce, and I was only aware of...
0:40:34 > 0:40:37So only two, probably. Yeah. Elizabeth Taylor...
0:40:37 > 0:40:40Elizabeth Taylor's famous, she married Burton twice.
0:40:40 > 0:40:41Yeah. Two under her belt.
0:40:41 > 0:40:45No, I think Elizabeth Taylor has been married six or seven times.
0:40:45 > 0:40:47OK, so she's up there, definitely.
0:40:47 > 0:40:52And Joan Collins, she's been married four or five times.
0:40:52 > 0:40:54So Rod Stewart, you say Rod Stewart's four...
0:40:54 > 0:40:56Rod Stewart is on four.
0:40:56 > 0:41:00Marilyn Monroe... Did she ever get married? Maybe. Maybe once.
0:41:00 > 0:41:01So can we rule her out?
0:41:01 > 0:41:03I think we can rule out Marilyn Monroe and Paul McCartney.
0:41:03 > 0:41:08I'd be going for Elizabeth Taylor, Frank Sinatra and Joan Collins. OK.
0:41:08 > 0:41:10Time is up.
0:41:10 > 0:41:12As, I need three answers, please.
0:41:13 > 0:41:16Yeah... I had no idea about Elizabeth Taylor but that's...
0:41:16 > 0:41:22that's a good shout. We'll put Elizabeth Taylor as one,
0:41:22 > 0:41:25Frank Sinatra and then Joan Collins.
0:41:25 > 0:41:29Elizabeth Taylor, Frank Sinatra, Joan Collins.
0:41:29 > 0:41:33OK, As, if they are the three correct answers, it's two grand.
0:41:33 > 0:41:36If one of them is wrong, I'm afraid you do leave with nothing.
0:41:36 > 0:41:38Best of luck. Here we go.
0:41:38 > 0:41:40First up, Elizabeth Taylor.
0:41:40 > 0:41:43Is Elizabeth Taylor a correct answer?
0:41:50 > 0:41:52APPLAUSE
0:41:52 > 0:41:55She's a correct answer. She was married eight times
0:41:55 > 0:41:58and you were right, Peter, twice to Richard Burton.
0:41:58 > 0:42:01Let's have a look at Joan Collins.
0:42:01 > 0:42:03Has she been married the most?
0:42:08 > 0:42:10APPLAUSE
0:42:10 > 0:42:11It's a correct answer.
0:42:11 > 0:42:14Joan Collins has been married five times,
0:42:14 > 0:42:16so it's all down to Frank Sinatra.
0:42:16 > 0:42:18You said that you saw Rod Stewart at the weekend.
0:42:18 > 0:42:22You think he was married four times. Peter suggested Frank Sinatra.
0:42:22 > 0:42:24You went with Frank Sinatra in the end.
0:42:24 > 0:42:28If Frank Sinatra is the right answer, it's ?2,000.
0:42:28 > 0:42:31Fingers and toes crossed here, As.
0:42:32 > 0:42:36?2,000, is Frank Sinatra one of the three celebrities
0:42:36 > 0:42:37who've been married the most?
0:42:48 > 0:42:50It's a correct answer!
0:42:50 > 0:42:53CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:42:53 > 0:42:56Well done! Thank you so much. Very well played.
0:42:56 > 0:42:57Frank Sinatra, married four times.
0:42:57 > 0:43:00Rod Stewart, who you saw at the weekend, married three times.
0:43:00 > 0:43:04Marilyn Monroe and Paul McCartney also married three times.
0:43:04 > 0:43:06Really well played, guys.
0:43:06 > 0:43:08Give it up one more time for As.
0:43:08 > 0:43:10CHEERING AND APPLAUSE
0:43:10 > 0:43:13And good work. Good work, Peter.
0:43:13 > 0:43:17Congratulations, As. You won ?2,000.
0:43:17 > 0:43:20APPLAUSE
0:43:20 > 0:43:22Very nice work. That is it for Debatable.
0:43:22 > 0:43:25There's just enough time for me to thank our fantastic panel,
0:43:25 > 0:43:28to Liz Carr, to Peter Jones and Susan Calman.
0:43:28 > 0:43:31APPLAUSE
0:43:31 > 0:43:33I do hope you've enjoyed watching. We will see you next time
0:43:33 > 0:43:36for more heated debate. For now, it's goodbye from me.