0:00:10 > 0:00:13APPLAUSE
0:00:13 > 0:00:18Hello and welcome to Debatable, the quiz show where talk is cheap,
0:00:18 > 0:00:21but celebrity chat can win a contestant money.
0:00:21 > 0:00:25Today, one player must answer a series of tricky questions to
0:00:25 > 0:00:29try and bag our jackpot of ?3,000.
0:00:29 > 0:00:31But they are not on their own, they'll also have
0:00:31 > 0:00:35a panel of celebrity brainboxes debating their way to the answer.
0:00:35 > 0:00:39Will they help or will they hinder? Well, that's debatable.
0:00:39 > 0:00:40So, let's meet them.
0:00:42 > 0:00:46On today's show, we have former England cricketer Phil Tufnell.
0:00:46 > 0:00:48We have broadcaster Jennie Bond.
0:00:48 > 0:00:51And TV presenter Angelica Bell.
0:00:51 > 0:00:53APPLAUSE
0:00:56 > 0:00:58So, Jennie, you're in the middle of our panel.
0:00:58 > 0:01:00Are you going to be driving this
0:01:00 > 0:01:02or are you going to be harnessing the knowledge?
0:01:02 > 0:01:07I am going to be taking a view, when we are divided, which we may be.
0:01:07 > 0:01:09And I'm hoping very much that they both know
0:01:09 > 0:01:12a very great deal more than I do. OK.
0:01:12 > 0:01:14Phil Tufnell is known as "the sieve",
0:01:14 > 0:01:17he knows everything and forgets it immediately.
0:01:17 > 0:01:19Listen, I've got a great team.
0:01:19 > 0:01:22I'm confident, we can't go wrong tonight. What a team.
0:01:22 > 0:01:23We've got all the bases covered.
0:01:23 > 0:01:25The worst thing about this
0:01:25 > 0:01:26is I've actually been on Question Of Sport
0:01:26 > 0:01:29with Phil and he's actually said that at the start of the
0:01:29 > 0:01:31show, and we lose as well. I know.
0:01:31 > 0:01:34But every time he says it, I believe you, I believe you every time.
0:01:34 > 0:01:37Come on, confidence. Come on.
0:01:37 > 0:01:40We also have Angelica, who is a politics graduate.
0:01:40 > 0:01:44I know, shhh! Don't tell anyone. No, no, we can't keep this quiet, this is the stuff that we need.
0:01:44 > 0:01:47I know, yeah, I have a degree in politics. And I like history.
0:01:47 > 0:01:49I just like strange, weird facts.
0:01:49 > 0:01:52I remember one year I asked for a periodic table to be bought for
0:01:52 > 0:01:54me so I could just flick through it at night.
0:01:54 > 0:01:56I just like to know weird things.
0:01:56 > 0:01:59So hopefully all that sort of weird knowledge will be useful today.
0:01:59 > 0:02:00This is the moment that all of that
0:02:00 > 0:02:02has been building to. Yes. It really is.
0:02:02 > 0:02:04OK, that is our panel,
0:02:04 > 0:02:07let's see who's going to be playing with them today.
0:02:07 > 0:02:09It is Tony Doyle from Manchester.
0:02:09 > 0:02:12APPLAUSE
0:02:12 > 0:02:15Hiya, Tony. Paddy. Nice to meet you. How's things? Good, thank you.
0:02:15 > 0:02:18Tell us a little bit about yourself. Good firm handshake there.
0:02:18 > 0:02:21My name's Tony, from Manchester, now living in Salford.
0:02:21 > 0:02:24I'm in the fire service, have been for 22 years.
0:02:24 > 0:02:27And I now live in Salford with my partner, Jo, for the last 16 years.
0:02:27 > 0:02:31Tell us what you do in your spare time. I like my cricket.
0:02:31 > 0:02:32Well, like it, I love my cricket.
0:02:32 > 0:02:35I play cricket for Didsbury Cricket Club in Manchester,
0:02:35 > 0:02:38and I've been their captain for ten years for the third team.
0:02:38 > 0:02:40I'm also a singer in a punk band,
0:02:40 > 0:02:43some friends of ours in a band, called Chaos.
0:02:43 > 0:02:46And we get together and play and we have some good fun.
0:02:46 > 0:02:49So, are you glad to see Tuffers on the panel? Absolutely, yeah.
0:02:49 > 0:02:52He's a legend, isn't he, of the game? Big fan of his. All right.
0:02:52 > 0:02:54What do we make of the panel today?
0:02:54 > 0:02:57Are you happy with the players we've assembled on your behalf, Tony?
0:02:57 > 0:03:01I think they're a fantastic looking team. And Phil. And...
0:03:01 > 0:03:03LAUGHTER
0:03:03 > 0:03:05It's all down to you, darling.
0:03:05 > 0:03:08There's a lot of intelligence across the team,
0:03:08 > 0:03:10they're very well spread out as well.
0:03:10 > 0:03:12All right, well, look, let's see how they do,
0:03:12 > 0:03:14let's get this Debatable show on the road,
0:03:14 > 0:03:16as we play round one, Tony.
0:03:19 > 0:03:21This round is multiple choice.
0:03:21 > 0:03:23Each question has four possible answers,
0:03:23 > 0:03:25only one of those is correct.
0:03:25 > 0:03:28Helping you, it says here, is our panel.
0:03:28 > 0:03:30Will you go with what they say, or will you go your own way?
0:03:30 > 0:03:32It's entirely up to you, Tony.
0:03:32 > 0:03:35There are three questions in this round.
0:03:35 > 0:03:36200 quid for each correct answer,
0:03:36 > 0:03:39so let's see if we can get some cash on the board.
0:03:39 > 0:03:41Here we go.
0:03:47 > 0:03:49Jennie has her head in her hands.
0:04:01 > 0:04:05OK. I'm glad Jennie's on the panel for a start,
0:04:05 > 0:04:08she's almost royalty herself. She is almost royalty herself.
0:04:08 > 0:04:11So I'd love to know what the panel have to say about it.
0:04:11 > 0:04:14So, if you had to guess, what's your gut reaction to start with?
0:04:14 > 0:04:16I'd go with James I.
0:04:16 > 0:04:20Let's see if our panel can bring their regal knowledge to this,
0:04:20 > 0:04:24the debate starts now. Jennie. Oh, thanks.
0:04:24 > 0:04:28I do modern monarchy, I don't do this, I don't do this.
0:04:28 > 0:04:32But we have to have a stab at it. Is there a rhyme or something.
0:04:32 > 0:04:35There is. I've actually got a ruler at home that
0:04:35 > 0:04:39has the rhyme and the list of British monarchs.
0:04:39 > 0:04:43Can you remember the rhyme? No. No, me neither.
0:04:43 > 0:04:48Mary ruled for a very short time. Yes. Elizabeth was later.
0:04:48 > 0:04:511500s, yeah?
0:04:51 > 0:04:52There's not a George...
0:04:52 > 0:04:55Well, I think George is more 1700s, something like that.
0:04:55 > 0:04:58Which ones can we discount? Which ones can we discount?
0:04:58 > 0:05:01I think George we can discount. What about Elizabeth I?
0:05:01 > 0:05:03And Elizabeth, I think, we can discount.
0:05:03 > 0:05:06I think it's between Mary and James. I don't know.
0:05:06 > 0:05:09Do you know anything about James? No, not really.
0:05:09 > 0:05:14I'm veering towards James. The original James? Then Mary.
0:05:15 > 0:05:19Then Elizabeth, then George. I'm thinking Mary, James.
0:05:19 > 0:05:21Or Mary and James. One of those two.
0:05:21 > 0:05:24So we all think James might be in there in the mix,
0:05:24 > 0:05:30and Tony thinks it's James. James I sounds closer to us.
0:05:30 > 0:05:35Mary sounds a long way away. Mary I. Yeah, Mary I.
0:05:35 > 0:05:37Oh, we've got to reach a decision.
0:05:37 > 0:05:39The Mary thing is just annoying me a bit, the Mary thing's...
0:05:39 > 0:05:42Mary's annoying you? In that you think it might be Mary?
0:05:42 > 0:05:45I don't know. OK, the panel... Go with what you think.
0:05:45 > 0:05:47Don't... No, go with what you think.
0:05:47 > 0:05:50The panel is going to go for James I,
0:05:50 > 0:05:52with absolutely no confidence whatsoever.
0:05:54 > 0:05:56Anything up there to make you change your mind?
0:05:56 > 0:05:58I'm between James and Mary.
0:05:58 > 0:06:02I've just got something about James I being maybe from Scotland,
0:06:02 > 0:06:04maybe, I don't know.
0:06:04 > 0:06:06I'm going to stick, go with the panel,
0:06:06 > 0:06:09stick with my first answer, which was James I.
0:06:09 > 0:06:14OK, it was your first thought. Our panel also suggested James.
0:06:14 > 0:06:17Is James I correct, for ?200?
0:06:25 > 0:06:28It was Mary. Oh, no!
0:06:28 > 0:06:31Mary ruled from 1553 to 1558.
0:06:31 > 0:06:36Elizabeth ruled after her, from 1558 to 1603.
0:06:36 > 0:06:41James was then after Elizabeth from 1603 to 1625.
0:06:41 > 0:06:47And George I ruled from 1714 to 1727.
0:06:47 > 0:06:52Mary I was the first Queen of England to rule England in
0:06:52 > 0:06:54her own right.
0:06:54 > 0:06:56And there she is.
0:06:56 > 0:06:59Unfortunately, Tony, there's nothing in the prize pot for that.
0:06:59 > 0:07:01Loads of time to get the cash up, though,
0:07:01 > 0:07:03here comes your next question.
0:07:21 > 0:07:24Just trying to think maybe low cloud, maybe
0:07:24 > 0:07:28suggesting smoke rather than smoke itself. All plausible.
0:07:31 > 0:07:34Reykjavik's probably further north.
0:07:36 > 0:07:38I'll definitely listen to the panel on this one.
0:07:38 > 0:07:41I've got a feeling, maybe, for Reykjavik.
0:07:41 > 0:07:45Let's see if our panel can sort this out. Your debate starts now.
0:07:45 > 0:07:46Well, when the question came up,
0:07:46 > 0:07:49I had a sort of inkling that I know this answer.
0:07:49 > 0:07:53From some bizarre memory.
0:07:53 > 0:07:58And I do love Scandinavia, I've been to it a few times.
0:07:58 > 0:08:02Now, I don't know why I think the answer is this,
0:08:02 > 0:08:04but I think it is Reykjavik.
0:08:04 > 0:08:07Well, there's a lot of geysers in Reykjavik.
0:08:07 > 0:08:10That could be the smoke. That could be the smoke.
0:08:10 > 0:08:14There's a lot of those sulphur, sulphur things burning up,
0:08:14 > 0:08:16isn't there? Yeah. But I was thinking "hagan".
0:08:16 > 0:08:19Copenhagen. Does hagan mean Bay?
0:08:19 > 0:08:23Hagan? Copenhagen. Is Reykjavik on the coast?
0:08:23 > 0:08:25It's only little, Iceland. I think everything is on the coast.
0:08:25 > 0:08:28Yes, actually, I think you're right. Because it is too cold.
0:08:28 > 0:08:32It is too cold inland. Helsinki. What goes on there? Smoked fish.
0:08:32 > 0:08:36They smoke a lot of fish. Herrings, isn't it? That is a good thought.
0:08:36 > 0:08:40What do you think? For some reason, Reykjavik stood out as well.
0:08:40 > 0:08:44For obscure reasons. I think it's Reykjavik. She's confident.
0:08:44 > 0:08:47I like "smoky", as in meaning the old geysers and the sulphury stuff.
0:08:47 > 0:08:51So that's two reasons. Yeah. She's confident, he's got a reason.
0:08:51 > 0:08:55The panel is going to go with Reykjavik. Oh, man!
0:08:56 > 0:09:00You've heard what our panel say, but what do you think?
0:09:00 > 0:09:02Again, well reasoned out, I was impressed by Angelica,
0:09:02 > 0:09:05she sort of seemed to know it straightaway.
0:09:05 > 0:09:07I'm still going to go for the educated guess of
0:09:07 > 0:09:09Angelica with Reykjavik.
0:09:09 > 0:09:12So, you're going with the panel.
0:09:12 > 0:09:15ANGELICA: Please let it be Reykjavik.
0:09:15 > 0:09:18For ?200, is Reykjavik the correct answer?
0:09:26 > 0:09:29Yes! It is the correct answer.
0:09:29 > 0:09:31APPLAUSE
0:09:31 > 0:09:33Nice work. Very nice work.
0:09:33 > 0:09:35The Vikings named the place Reykjavik,
0:09:35 > 0:09:41meaning "smoky bay", after the steam rising from the hot springs.
0:09:41 > 0:09:43Tuffers, well played.
0:09:43 > 0:09:47Ironically, it is now known as the "smokeless city" due to its
0:09:47 > 0:09:50full adoption of geothermal energy.
0:09:50 > 0:09:53Well played, Tony, we're up and running, ?200 in the prize pot.
0:09:53 > 0:09:56APPLAUSE
0:09:56 > 0:10:00OK, here comes your third question in round one.
0:10:20 > 0:10:23When I saw the question, I knew it was a funny name,
0:10:23 > 0:10:27so I wasn't expecting a traditional Christian name to come up.
0:10:27 > 0:10:30I wasn't expecting those names either, to be fair.
0:10:32 > 0:10:35Obviously you've got The Muppets link there, but for some reason I'm
0:10:35 > 0:10:37drawn to Fozzie.
0:10:38 > 0:10:40For no real reason.
0:10:40 > 0:10:43I knew it was a strange name and I just can't imagine someone
0:10:43 > 0:10:46calling their daughter Kermit.
0:10:46 > 0:10:48OK, first thoughts, Fozzie.
0:10:48 > 0:10:51Let's get the first thoughts and the final thoughts of the panel.
0:10:51 > 0:10:53Your debate starts now.
0:10:53 > 0:10:56Fozzie does... Would that be shortened?
0:10:56 > 0:10:58That's her actual name, is it?
0:10:58 > 0:11:01It's not a shortening for a name, it's her actual name?
0:11:02 > 0:11:08Rowlf sounds to me as if it could be a surname from, in her family.
0:11:08 > 0:11:10And therefore used as a middle name. But...
0:11:10 > 0:11:14Who's going to call their kid Edith Gonzo Roosevelt?
0:11:15 > 0:11:20Fozzie sounds the most feminine out of those. I think Fozzie might be...
0:11:20 > 0:11:22Might mean something else?
0:11:22 > 0:11:25Yeah, might be shortened for, or a pet name or something. Yeah.
0:11:25 > 0:11:28Yes. It's not going to be Kermit, is it?
0:11:28 > 0:11:31Kermit was only invented when the frog turned up.
0:11:31 > 0:11:34When The Muppets turned up, there wasn't a Kermit.
0:11:34 > 0:11:36So it's not Kermit. We're sure it's not Kermit.
0:11:36 > 0:11:38I'm torn between Fozzie and Rowlf.
0:11:38 > 0:11:41Yeah, they're more sensible names, aren't they?
0:11:41 > 0:11:44They are sort of more family names that could be...
0:11:46 > 0:11:48..passed down from generation to generation.
0:11:49 > 0:11:54No Gonzo, we don't fancy Gonzo. I don't fancy Gonzo. Can't be Gonzo.
0:11:54 > 0:11:58So your first thought was? Fozzie. OK.
0:11:58 > 0:12:01Well, yeah, I mean, just because it's a lady, it sounds...
0:12:01 > 0:12:04Fozzie or Rowlf, for me.
0:12:04 > 0:12:07I'll go with Angelica, Fozzie.
0:12:07 > 0:12:09The panel have decided, for what it's worth,
0:12:09 > 0:12:13that it was Lady Edith Fozzie Roosevelt.
0:12:15 > 0:12:17What do you think?
0:12:17 > 0:12:19When I first saw the question, I knew it was a funny name.
0:12:19 > 0:12:22If it had been Rowlf, I wouldn't have classed that as being a funny
0:12:22 > 0:12:25name. So I'm actually ruling out Rowlf.
0:12:25 > 0:12:26I think any of the three, it could be,
0:12:26 > 0:12:31I remember it being quite a silly name.
0:12:31 > 0:12:33But I did think Fozzie.
0:12:33 > 0:12:37But I wouldn't be surprised if it comes up as Kermit or Gonzo.
0:12:37 > 0:12:41But... So I'm going to go with my first instinct, which was Fozzie.
0:12:41 > 0:12:46Let's lock it in. Your first instinct was Fozzie.
0:12:46 > 0:12:51The panel think Fozzie, for ?200.
0:12:51 > 0:12:53The correct answer is...
0:13:02 > 0:13:06Kermit?! No! Kermit?! Kermit.
0:13:06 > 0:13:10No way! Oh, for goodness' sake.
0:13:10 > 0:13:12Kermit! I know, Tuffers. Why?
0:13:12 > 0:13:17Her middle name was the surname of her paternal great uncle,
0:13:17 > 0:13:20Robert Kermit. Tony, I'm afraid nothing for that.
0:13:20 > 0:13:23It means at the end of round one, you're on ?200.
0:13:23 > 0:13:26APPLAUSE
0:13:27 > 0:13:30How do we think our panel are doing so far, Tony?
0:13:30 > 0:13:32Well, they're struggling a bit, Paddy, aren't they?
0:13:32 > 0:13:34I was just about to say, yeah. LAUGHTER
0:13:34 > 0:13:37If there was one that would stand out for you, because you are going
0:13:37 > 0:13:41to have to choose one to play the final debate at the end of the show, who's standing out at the moment?
0:13:41 > 0:13:44I think Angelica at this moment in time, I think she's...
0:13:44 > 0:13:47Her instincts seem to be good apart from her Fozzie instincts.
0:13:47 > 0:13:50OK, well, let's see how our panel cope with pictures.
0:13:50 > 0:13:51It is time for round two.
0:13:54 > 0:13:57Tony, round two is our picture round.
0:13:57 > 0:14:01All you have to do is to put three pictures in the correct order.
0:14:01 > 0:14:04There are three questions in this round,
0:14:04 > 0:14:07each correct answer is worth ?300. Plenty of cash up there.
0:14:07 > 0:14:10Let's see if we can get some of it in your prize pot. Here we go.
0:14:26 > 0:14:28My initial answer, I'd be looking at,
0:14:28 > 0:14:31I think Stone Age was first.
0:14:31 > 0:14:34Then I think it was the Bronze Age.
0:14:37 > 0:14:39Or is it iron?
0:14:39 > 0:14:42Bronze is a by-product, is it, of iron?
0:14:42 > 0:14:44Or the other way round.
0:14:44 > 0:14:47I think stone's first.
0:14:47 > 0:14:49Then it's a mix-up after that.
0:14:49 > 0:14:50I'll definitely see what the panel have to say.
0:14:50 > 0:14:52OK, so you're pretty sure that Stone Age is first.
0:14:52 > 0:14:55Let's see if the panel can sort the rest out for you.
0:14:55 > 0:14:57Your debate starts now.
0:14:57 > 0:15:00Stone first. I'm definitely with Tony on that. Yeah.
0:15:00 > 0:15:06And then I think, I vaguely remember that Bronze came before Iron.
0:15:06 > 0:15:10Because Bronze, they made their swords out of bronze.
0:15:10 > 0:15:13And they were soft, they weren't very good.
0:15:13 > 0:15:17And so then they made their swords out of iron,
0:15:17 > 0:15:19which were then a harder metal.
0:15:19 > 0:15:23Because it was copper, wasn't it? Copper... Is it?
0:15:23 > 0:15:25So they had floppy swords? They had floppy swords.
0:15:25 > 0:15:28They had floppy swords, but they were good swords.
0:15:28 > 0:15:31For cutting and things. Better than stone. Better than flint.
0:15:31 > 0:15:33I might be totally wrong.
0:15:33 > 0:15:37Well, I think we're united on Stone being a long, long time ago.
0:15:37 > 0:15:41So that's this end. Neolithic or something. So that's that end.
0:15:41 > 0:15:43OK. And then it's... Any ideas?
0:15:43 > 0:15:46I think I'm leaning towards what you're saying as well.
0:15:46 > 0:15:50My first instinct was Stone Age, then the Bronze Age,
0:15:50 > 0:15:52then the Iron Age.
0:15:52 > 0:15:56I think we find a lot more fossils or whatever, bits and pieces,
0:15:56 > 0:16:00implements from the Iron Age, don't we? Yeah. Iron Age. Yes...
0:16:00 > 0:16:03It's a tougher metal. Does that come...
0:16:03 > 0:16:05So then why would they then...?
0:16:05 > 0:16:08Why would you have the Iron Age and then have the Bronze Age
0:16:08 > 0:16:10after it, if it wasn't as tough? If you're right about your swords.
0:16:10 > 0:16:14If I'm right about my floppy swords, it's got to be Bronze Age second.
0:16:14 > 0:16:16Very logical. Do you reckon? OK.
0:16:16 > 0:16:20The panel have decided, first it was the Stone Age,
0:16:20 > 0:16:23then it was the Bronze Age, and then it was the Iron Age.
0:16:25 > 0:16:29So, Phil has gone for the classic floppy sword
0:16:29 > 0:16:31argument here, Tony.
0:16:31 > 0:16:35Has that managed to convince you? Bizarrely, I think it has. Really?
0:16:35 > 0:16:37I was looking at that kind of order.
0:16:37 > 0:16:39Stone, then the Bronze, then the Iron.
0:16:39 > 0:16:41I definitely agree with the panel on this.
0:16:41 > 0:16:45So, let's put them in order, starting with the earliest. Stone.
0:16:45 > 0:16:49Then we went Bronze, and then Iron.
0:16:49 > 0:16:51OK, it's locked in.
0:16:51 > 0:16:53You're agreed with the panel.
0:16:53 > 0:16:55Is this the correct order, for ?300?
0:17:04 > 0:17:06It is! APPLAUSE
0:17:06 > 0:17:08Well done! Yay! The floppy sword!
0:17:10 > 0:17:14Tuffers knows his floppy swords. He does.
0:17:14 > 0:17:17The Stone Age, the Bronze Age and the Iron Ages together
0:17:17 > 0:17:20form the three-age system.
0:17:20 > 0:17:23This system is used to classify prehistoric artefacts
0:17:23 > 0:17:27according to the successive stages of technological development.
0:17:27 > 0:17:30Very well done, very well worked out, Tony.
0:17:30 > 0:17:34That's ?300 added to your prize pot, giving you a total, now, of ?500.
0:17:34 > 0:17:36APPLAUSE
0:17:36 > 0:17:39INAUDIBLE
0:17:39 > 0:17:43So, you're on 500. Another 300 up for grabs with our next question.
0:17:43 > 0:17:45Tony, here it comes.
0:18:03 > 0:18:04A tricky one this, really.
0:18:04 > 0:18:06There was a period where we didn't
0:18:06 > 0:18:08qualify for a couple of tournaments.
0:18:08 > 0:18:11Lineker, I think, played in a couple.
0:18:11 > 0:18:15Rooney came to the European Championships 2004.
0:18:15 > 0:18:18I think, possibly, Wayne's got the most.
0:18:18 > 0:18:20Gary Lineker's got the fewest.
0:18:20 > 0:18:22Followed by Alan Shearer
0:18:22 > 0:18:23and Wayne Rooney.
0:18:23 > 0:18:24But I'd love to know
0:18:24 > 0:18:25what the panel think.
0:18:25 > 0:18:28Jennie's nodding. Yeah.
0:18:28 > 0:18:30Panel, your debate starts now.
0:18:31 > 0:18:34I thought Shearer might be the least.
0:18:34 > 0:18:37See, with the opportunities they had to play... And...
0:18:37 > 0:18:39It's the opportunities. Now, how many's Wayne Rooney been in?
0:18:39 > 0:18:42He started quite young. He started so young.
0:18:42 > 0:18:43Around 17, 18, or something.
0:18:43 > 0:18:47Yeah, 17 or 18, he started. Because I think...
0:18:47 > 0:18:51I think Rooney might be in the middle, the middle.
0:18:51 > 0:18:53Surely Lineker was in loads, wasn't he?
0:18:53 > 0:18:56No, because we didn't qualify for too many around that time.
0:18:56 > 0:18:59I think Gary Lineker hasn't played in as many as we think.
0:18:59 > 0:19:01Because we just didn't get there.
0:19:01 > 0:19:03Cos we just get there, and that would've been his time.
0:19:03 > 0:19:05Then he had that great run when he scored all the goals...
0:19:05 > 0:19:07Take that. What, we didn't even qualify?
0:19:07 > 0:19:11Shearer, in a World Cup, might not have played in many. I think he
0:19:11 > 0:19:12has done the least. That's what I think.
0:19:12 > 0:19:14Can you remember Alan Shearer
0:19:14 > 0:19:15playing in a World Cup?
0:19:15 > 0:19:17All I remember is him scoring loads for Newcastle.
0:19:17 > 0:19:21I can remember him playing in the Euros. So maybe he didn't.
0:19:21 > 0:19:23When he was paying for Southampton, Blackburn...
0:19:23 > 0:19:26I think Shearer, Gary Lineker, and Wayne Rooney
0:19:26 > 0:19:28because I don't remember Shearer.
0:19:28 > 0:19:30I can't see him playing in that many World Cups,
0:19:30 > 0:19:33whereas, obviously, I've seen... He's more prominent.
0:19:33 > 0:19:35But then, like you said... Weren't so many. There weren't so many.
0:19:35 > 0:19:39What are you leaning towards? I think...
0:19:39 > 0:19:42I think you might be right. Has Alan Shearer played in a World Cup?
0:19:42 > 0:19:45Yeah, I just don't remember watching the World Cup seeing... But then...
0:19:45 > 0:19:47I would've thought he had, personally.
0:19:47 > 0:19:49OK, we've got to reach a decision. Yeah.
0:19:49 > 0:19:51I think that's not a bad shout,
0:19:51 > 0:19:54but then with a view that it could be that way or that way
0:19:54 > 0:19:56if you know a little bit more than us.
0:19:56 > 0:20:00Do you want to change it? No, I'm going to keep that one there.
0:20:00 > 0:20:03OK. Sweet. Least, most. All right.
0:20:04 > 0:20:06For what it's worth, the panel has decided
0:20:06 > 0:20:10that it is Alan Shearer, Gary Lineker, and Wayne Rooney.
0:20:13 > 0:20:15So, Tony, has any of that helped?
0:20:15 > 0:20:17Actually still think it's
0:20:17 > 0:20:18Gary Lineker who's had the fewest.
0:20:20 > 0:20:22It's a tough one now between Rooney and Shearer
0:20:22 > 0:20:24as the most, if I'm honest.
0:20:24 > 0:20:26I'm going to change what I said.
0:20:26 > 0:20:28And disagree with the panel, sorry.
0:20:28 > 0:20:31I'm going to go with the fewest being Lineker,
0:20:31 > 0:20:33then Rooney, then Shearer.
0:20:35 > 0:20:39OK. You're saying Lineker, Rooney, Shearer.
0:20:39 > 0:20:42Is that the correct order for ?300?
0:20:51 > 0:20:53It's the wrong order, Tony.
0:20:53 > 0:20:55Let's have a look at the right order.
0:20:55 > 0:20:57Rooney's played the...
0:20:57 > 0:20:59The panel were right. Oh!
0:20:59 > 0:21:01Alan Shearer has the fewest... Yes!
0:21:01 > 0:21:03..then Gary Lineker, then Wayne Rooney.
0:21:03 > 0:21:05I couldn't be more wrong, could I?
0:21:05 > 0:21:09Alan Shearer only played in one World Cup, in France 1998.
0:21:09 > 0:21:13Gary Lineker won the Golden Boot at the World Cup in Mexico in '86.
0:21:13 > 0:21:14He then played in Italia '90.
0:21:14 > 0:21:21Wayne Rooney, three World Cups - 2006, 2010 and 2014.
0:21:21 > 0:21:24The highest number of appearances in the World Cup
0:21:24 > 0:21:28are five by Antonio Carbajal of Mexico
0:21:28 > 0:21:30and Lothar Matthaus. Yeah.
0:21:30 > 0:21:32Matthaus has been in five World Cups.
0:21:32 > 0:21:34Unfortunately, Tony, you didn't get that one,
0:21:34 > 0:21:37but you still have ?500 in the price pot.
0:21:37 > 0:21:40APPLAUSE
0:21:40 > 0:21:44OK, Tony, let's have a look at your third picture question.
0:21:44 > 0:21:46Here it comes.
0:22:05 > 0:22:07Just trying to do it as history.
0:22:07 > 0:22:09I know Tower Bridge is beside the Tower of London.
0:22:09 > 0:22:11But that bridge isn't quite as old
0:22:11 > 0:22:13as I think people think it is.
0:22:15 > 0:22:17But I'd say Admiralty Arch first,
0:22:17 > 0:22:20Nelson's Column, Tower Bridge.
0:22:20 > 0:22:22But I'll be interested to know
0:22:22 > 0:22:24what the local panel have to say.
0:22:24 > 0:22:26Let's see what our panel make of this.
0:22:26 > 0:22:28Your debate starts now.
0:22:28 > 0:22:31Tower Bridge is mechanical. Yeah.
0:22:31 > 0:22:33But I think that was completed...
0:22:33 > 0:22:35And the only reason I know this is because
0:22:35 > 0:22:38I just did that yachting challenge with The One Show.
0:22:38 > 0:22:41That's right. And we came into London,
0:22:41 > 0:22:44and they had to raise the bridge, they stopped all the traffic.
0:22:44 > 0:22:46And everyone was going, "It's amazing, it's amazing."
0:22:46 > 0:22:50So I looked it up - Tower Bridge, as you do - and I think
0:22:50 > 0:22:52that was completed...
0:22:52 > 0:22:5518...90 something.
0:22:55 > 0:22:59Well, when was the Armada? When was Nelson's do?
0:22:59 > 0:23:01This, I think, was... A long time before that.
0:23:01 > 0:23:03I think that was before that. Yeah.
0:23:03 > 0:23:05I think let's put Tower Bridge with me.
0:23:05 > 0:23:07I think Nelson's Column... So that's there.
0:23:07 > 0:23:09You don't think Nelson's column would come first?
0:23:09 > 0:23:12No, I'm first, I think. Oh, OK. The earliest is over there.
0:23:14 > 0:23:16Admiralty Arch Is obviously...
0:23:16 > 0:23:20Somewhere I think this was to do with Victoria. I think.
0:23:20 > 0:23:23I don't know why, but I think it was. So 18...
0:23:23 > 0:23:25Well, she died in 19.. What, 1901?
0:23:25 > 0:23:27So 18, maybe, 60...?
0:23:27 > 0:23:30No, I think it might be a memorial to her, is what I'm thinking.
0:23:30 > 0:23:33So it might be post 1900.
0:23:33 > 0:23:36Well, I think that belongs there, definitely. The column, yeah. Yeah.
0:23:36 > 0:23:40So it's a question of Admiralty Arch or Tower Bridge.
0:23:40 > 0:23:43I think this was completed in
0:23:43 > 0:23:46the 1890s. Right. I think. I think this was completed
0:23:46 > 0:23:48in the 1900s.
0:23:48 > 0:23:50Cos it's to do... That's 19...
0:23:50 > 0:23:52Hundreds. 1890s is...
0:23:52 > 0:23:54No, I mean literally 1900s. Oh, right.
0:23:54 > 0:23:5619 something-or-other.
0:23:56 > 0:23:58That's at the beginning of The Mall, isn't it?
0:23:58 > 0:24:00To get you down to Buck Pal. I think this is the most modern.
0:24:00 > 0:24:03That there? You think that's the most modern?
0:24:03 > 0:24:06Admiralty, I think, yeah. Yeah, OK.
0:24:06 > 0:24:08Are you happy with this? Yeah. All right.
0:24:08 > 0:24:10For better or worse,
0:24:10 > 0:24:13our answer is that earliest was Nelson's Column,
0:24:13 > 0:24:17followed by Tower Bridge, followed by Admiralty Arch.
0:24:17 > 0:24:19Good luck. PANEL CHUCKLE
0:24:19 > 0:24:21So you had Admiralty Arch as the first.
0:24:21 > 0:24:23Yeah, I just thought it's a very old...
0:24:23 > 0:24:25The Admiralty itself is very old.
0:24:25 > 0:24:27I not sure when the arch was put in,
0:24:27 > 0:24:29and that might be something that Jennie was saying,
0:24:29 > 0:24:30as a tribute to Victoria.
0:24:30 > 0:24:33So that kind of threw me a little bit.
0:24:33 > 0:24:35I'm tempted to...swap
0:24:35 > 0:24:38the Tower Bridge and the Admiralty round.
0:24:39 > 0:24:42So you're going for, starting with the earliest, you want to go with...
0:24:42 > 0:24:44Nelson's Column,
0:24:44 > 0:24:46then the Admiralty,
0:24:46 > 0:24:47and then Tower Bridge.
0:24:50 > 0:24:51Let's lock it in.
0:24:53 > 0:24:56For ?300, is that the correct answer, Tony?
0:25:05 > 0:25:08Oh, man! It's the wrong order.
0:25:08 > 0:25:10Let's see the correct order.
0:25:11 > 0:25:14Oh, sorry. It was Nelson's Column... We got it right. We did.
0:25:14 > 0:25:16..Tower Bridge and Admiralty Arch.
0:25:16 > 0:25:18The panel were right. Sorry, Jennie.
0:25:18 > 0:25:20Let's have a look at it here.
0:25:20 > 0:25:25Nelson's Column, completed in 1843,
0:25:25 > 0:25:27Tower Bridge, 1894,
0:25:27 > 0:25:28Admiralty Arch, 1912.
0:25:28 > 0:25:31Jennie, you were right, the 1900s.
0:25:31 > 0:25:35So, Angelica, you were right about 1894 with Tower Bridge.
0:25:35 > 0:25:37Nelson's Column was to commemorate
0:25:37 > 0:25:39the Battle of Trafalgar, which was 1805,
0:25:39 > 0:25:41where Britain fought the Spanish and the French.
0:25:41 > 0:25:44But it wasn't completed until 1843.
0:25:44 > 0:25:47And Admiralty Arch, 1912.
0:25:47 > 0:25:49Jennie, you were right, the 1900s. Ah, right.
0:25:49 > 0:25:52The four bronze lions that sit at the base of Nelson's Column
0:25:52 > 0:25:56sit in the same position, but they are actually not identical.
0:25:56 > 0:25:59Tower Bridge took eight years to build.
0:25:59 > 0:26:01The Admiralty Arch was commissioned by Edward VII
0:26:01 > 0:26:03in memory of his mother Queen Victoria,
0:26:03 > 0:26:07but he didn't live to see its completion in 1912.
0:26:07 > 0:26:10Tony, unfortunately, you didn't manage to bank anything there,
0:26:10 > 0:26:12but that means the total amount banked
0:26:12 > 0:26:14at the end of that round is ?500.
0:26:14 > 0:26:17APPLAUSE
0:26:17 > 0:26:21So, Tony, is the panel still proving useful?
0:26:21 > 0:26:24Yeah, I should've listened to them a little bit more, Paddy, yeah.
0:26:24 > 0:26:26They were bang on there again. They were bang on in that round.
0:26:26 > 0:26:29Three out of three in that round for the panel.
0:26:29 > 0:26:32There's still loads of cash, Tony.
0:26:32 > 0:26:35?1,500 up for grabs as we play round three.
0:26:38 > 0:26:41OK, Tony, in this round, you'll face questions that contain
0:26:41 > 0:26:43three statements about a person, a place or a thing,
0:26:43 > 0:26:46but only one of those statements is true.
0:26:46 > 0:26:48You must decide which one.
0:26:48 > 0:26:50Three questions in the round. There's loads of cash up there.
0:26:50 > 0:26:52?500 for each correct answer.
0:26:52 > 0:26:56So, let's see if we can get it all added to the prize pot.
0:26:56 > 0:26:57Best of luck. Here we go.
0:27:20 > 0:27:22So maybe it is the chemical element.
0:27:22 > 0:27:24A tricky one.
0:27:24 > 0:27:26Interested on the panel, on the periodic table.
0:27:26 > 0:27:28THEY CHUCKLE Hmm...
0:27:28 > 0:27:32OK, you're thinking it may be the chemical element.
0:27:32 > 0:27:34Panel, your debate starts now.
0:27:35 > 0:27:38The Theory Of Everything is based on Stephen Hawking.
0:27:38 > 0:27:40Stephen Hawking, yeah. Stephen Hawking.
0:27:40 > 0:27:43I don't recall a chemical element being named after him.
0:27:43 > 0:27:48An "ein"? A "stein"?! A "bert"? Yeah. An "al"?
0:27:48 > 0:27:52I can recall his face being on...money.
0:27:52 > 0:27:54So, we're all veering towards the banknote, aren't we? Yeah.
0:27:54 > 0:27:57Shall we go with the banknote?
0:27:57 > 0:27:59Yeah. Hold on. Well, have you seen him on a bank...?
0:27:59 > 0:28:02You've been to America. Yeah, I'm sure...
0:28:02 > 0:28:04Isn't the fella...? No, isn't George Washington on the banknote?
0:28:04 > 0:28:05He certainly WAS.
0:28:05 > 0:28:08I mean, they're changing it all the time, aren't they?
0:28:08 > 0:28:10If it was down to me, I think I'd say banknote.
0:28:10 > 0:28:12You'd say banknote. Yeah, I think so. And you don't know.
0:28:12 > 0:28:15I think banknote, just because I can't think of an element.
0:28:15 > 0:28:17Yeah, I've never heard of that. But... All right, well...
0:28:17 > 0:28:19OK. JENNIE SIGHS
0:28:19 > 0:28:23OK, Tony, the panel thinks that Albert Einstein
0:28:23 > 0:28:25currently features on a US banknote.
0:28:28 > 0:28:31The panel have decided that Albert Einstein
0:28:31 > 0:28:32features on a US banknote.
0:28:32 > 0:28:37Do slip someone an Albert, or do you smell an Albert?
0:28:37 > 0:28:40That's essentially what it's boiled down to, Tony.
0:28:40 > 0:28:43I think, a chemical element, they're quite well established, aren't they?
0:28:43 > 0:28:44They've been around for a long time.
0:28:44 > 0:28:47I think we would've heard if of it if they'd named one after him.
0:28:47 > 0:28:52I think we'll go for his face currently features on a US banknote.
0:28:52 > 0:28:54Go with the panel.
0:28:54 > 0:28:56100% record in the last round, the panel.
0:28:56 > 0:28:59Let's see if they can keep their winning streak going.
0:28:59 > 0:29:01For ?500, the correct statement.
0:29:01 > 0:29:04What is true about Albert Einstein?
0:29:11 > 0:29:13Oh, no! Oh, no!
0:29:13 > 0:29:17Chemical element is named after him. Sorry. Sorry.
0:29:17 > 0:29:21In 1952 a new chemical element was discovered
0:29:21 > 0:29:24after the fallout of thermonuclear explosions.
0:29:24 > 0:29:28I didn't know that. It was named Einsteinium.
0:29:28 > 0:29:31Einsteinium! It's catchy.
0:29:31 > 0:29:33It is catchy. Einsteinium.
0:29:33 > 0:29:39After his pioneering work in physics made such an experiment possible.
0:29:39 > 0:29:40Wow.
0:29:40 > 0:29:42The Theory Of Everything tells the story Stephen Hawking,
0:29:42 > 0:29:44not Albert Einstein.
0:29:44 > 0:29:45You were right about that, guys.
0:29:45 > 0:29:47Although we was a German American citizen,
0:29:47 > 0:29:52his face has not made it onto a US banknote. Sorry.
0:29:52 > 0:29:55So no money, but there's still some cash up there.
0:29:55 > 0:29:59Let's see if we can find it. Here is your next question.
0:30:26 > 0:30:31You a fan of Adele, Tony? Yeah. She's a wonderful, wonderful singer.
0:30:31 > 0:30:34I don't think she's had more number ones than the Spice Girls.
0:30:34 > 0:30:36I think they were quite prolific in their time.
0:30:36 > 0:30:38So I'm veering towards B and C.
0:30:38 > 0:30:42I don't think she's had more number ones than the Spice Girls. OK.
0:30:42 > 0:30:45You don't think she's had more number ones than the Spice Girls.
0:30:45 > 0:30:47You're not sure about the other two.
0:30:47 > 0:30:50Panel, let's see if we can sort it out. The debate starts now.
0:30:50 > 0:30:53I agree with Tony. I don't think she's had more than the Spice Girls.
0:30:53 > 0:30:58They were mahoosive. She is sparse with the records she puts out,
0:30:58 > 0:31:00isn't she? Number of singles? Yeah. She's very careful with that.
0:31:00 > 0:31:03And the UK's best selling in 2015,
0:31:03 > 0:31:05that would have been Skyfall, would it?
0:31:05 > 0:31:07I thought it would have been Hello.
0:31:07 > 0:31:11I thought Hello came out in 2015. Didn't it? At the end of?
0:31:11 > 0:31:14What are we in now? 2016. I'm pretty...
0:31:14 > 0:31:16Was it the end of 2015?
0:31:16 > 0:31:18Pretty sure I remember seeing it the very end of last year.
0:31:18 > 0:31:20Sort of December or something.
0:31:20 > 0:31:23Then how could it have been the biggest selling single
0:31:23 > 0:31:25of 2015 when it came out at the end of the year? Oh!
0:31:25 > 0:31:28Unless it just exploded. But it did explode.
0:31:28 > 0:31:30I mean, gosh, you heard it...
0:31:30 > 0:31:32I was travelling earlier this year around Australia
0:31:32 > 0:31:36and South East Asia and wherever you went you heard Hello.
0:31:37 > 0:31:41So were they playing it off YouTube?
0:31:41 > 0:31:45Is a billion... I mean, I know a billion's a lot but, I mean,
0:31:45 > 0:31:47is that obtainable on YouTube?
0:31:47 > 0:31:50Hits. I suppose it's worldwide. It could be.
0:31:51 > 0:31:55Could be. We think it's one of the last two anyway. Yeah.
0:31:55 > 0:32:01I have an idea I saw a news story saying although it had been released
0:32:01 > 0:32:06late in the year, it shot to being the biggest selling single of 2015.
0:32:06 > 0:32:10That's what my head is telling me. Do you know your YouTube?
0:32:10 > 0:32:12I mean, billion is plausible.
0:32:12 > 0:32:14Cos, I mean, you have to think about it - people watch things over
0:32:14 > 0:32:17and over again. It's not a separate one billion people.
0:32:17 > 0:32:19People, you know... If you love your music, you will watch
0:32:19 > 0:32:21something over and over again. And there are billions of people.
0:32:21 > 0:32:24If it's had a billion hits on YouTube, it must have been the
0:32:24 > 0:32:27UK's biggest selling...
0:32:27 > 0:32:30My first instinct was, yeah, the biggest selling single.
0:32:30 > 0:32:33But we have the million dollar question,
0:32:33 > 0:32:36was it actually released in 2015? I don't know.
0:32:41 > 0:32:45I think I'd go with B, the biggest selling single. I agree with C.
0:32:45 > 0:32:50You're going with YouTube. I'm going to say B.
0:32:50 > 0:32:53The panel has decided that Adele
0:32:53 > 0:32:57released the UK's biggest selling single of last year, 2015.
0:32:59 > 0:33:03So, Tony, Angellica thinks it's plausible that Hello
0:33:03 > 0:33:06has been viewed over one billion times on YouTube, however,
0:33:06 > 0:33:08overruled by Jennie and Phil,
0:33:08 > 0:33:14who think that Adele released the biggest selling single of 2015.
0:33:14 > 0:33:17Any logic in there to help you?
0:33:17 > 0:33:20I think Hello was this year and I think it might have been
0:33:20 > 0:33:22for Skyfall, for the film.
0:33:22 > 0:33:24The YouTube one's jumping out at me as well.
0:33:24 > 0:33:30It's terrible. I'm going to go with my first thought and my instinct, B.
0:33:31 > 0:33:34You're sticking with your first instinct. Yeah.
0:33:34 > 0:33:37You're going with the panel.
0:33:37 > 0:33:40For ?500, the correct answer is...
0:33:49 > 0:33:52Oh, no! It was C. You were right again.
0:33:52 > 0:33:56The video for the single Hello has been viewed over one billion
0:33:56 > 0:33:59times on YouTube and rising.
0:33:59 > 0:34:01Angellica was right.
0:34:01 > 0:34:05Adele's Hello took only 87 days to reach one billion views.
0:34:05 > 0:34:10There she is. The Spice Girls have had nine UK number ones.
0:34:10 > 0:34:12Adele has only had two.
0:34:12 > 0:34:16She had the sixth biggest selling single of 2015 with Hello.
0:34:16 > 0:34:21The biggest selling single of 2015 was Uptown Funk by Bruno Mars
0:34:21 > 0:34:24and Mark Ronson.
0:34:24 > 0:34:29Just so you know, Tony, Skyfall was released in 2012. Crikey.
0:34:29 > 0:34:31Unfortunately nothing for that.
0:34:31 > 0:34:34It means that your prize pot at the moment stays at ?500.
0:34:34 > 0:34:36APPLAUSE
0:34:38 > 0:34:42Let's see if we can double that up to ?1,000 for our Final Debate.
0:34:42 > 0:34:43Here comes your last question.
0:35:06 > 0:35:08I think she did write under a pseudonym.
0:35:08 > 0:35:10I don't think it was that name.
0:35:11 > 0:35:15Might have been Emily Bronte that did Wuthering Heights, I think.
0:35:15 > 0:35:19But I am aware she did have two sisters who were also
0:35:19 > 0:35:24published authors. So my hankering on this one would be C.
0:35:24 > 0:35:27Angelica is nodding. Panel, your debate starts now.
0:35:27 > 0:35:30Emily Bronte did write Wuthering Heights.
0:35:30 > 0:35:31That was her only novel.
0:35:31 > 0:35:34Right. She did have two sisters. The Bronte sisters...
0:35:34 > 0:35:37Charlotte, Emily and Dorothy?
0:35:37 > 0:35:39No, no. No, she wasn't Dorothy.
0:35:39 > 0:35:42Leaning is that all the sisters were published. Were published.
0:35:42 > 0:35:46So Wuthering Heights definitely wrong. Ellis Bell. No idea.
0:35:46 > 0:35:50Never heard of. We'd have heard of them, surely.
0:35:50 > 0:35:54Yeah, that would have known. Yeah. Yeah, would ring a bell. Hee-hee!
0:35:54 > 0:35:57Ha-ha! So I think you're bang on, actually.
0:35:57 > 0:36:00I think two sisters who were also published authors must be right.
0:36:00 > 0:36:03You're still laughing at your own joke? I'm not. I'm not.
0:36:03 > 0:36:07Bronte sisters, very famous, isn't it? The Bronte sisters? Yes.
0:36:07 > 0:36:11Who was the third one then? No idea. They were that famous.
0:36:11 > 0:36:14THEY LAUGH Well, anyway.
0:36:14 > 0:36:17I think we're agreed, are we? Yes? Yeah.
0:36:17 > 0:36:21Tony, the panel says that Charlotte Bronte had two sisters
0:36:21 > 0:36:23who were also published authors.
0:36:26 > 0:36:31So, Tony, little bit of knowledge there from Angellica
0:36:31 > 0:36:33has led the panel to C.
0:36:34 > 0:36:36Also your first thought. It was, yeah.
0:36:36 > 0:36:39And kind of worded out by the guys there, really.
0:36:39 > 0:36:41I think she did have two sisters. I can't think of the third.
0:36:41 > 0:36:43I think it might be Anne, but I'm not 100% sure.
0:36:43 > 0:36:47I think she definitely had two sisters who were published authors.
0:36:47 > 0:36:50That's why I'd go with my answer, C.
0:36:50 > 0:36:53OK. Going along with the panel.
0:36:53 > 0:36:56For ?500, to double your prize pot to ?1,000.
0:36:56 > 0:37:00The correct statement about Charlotte Bronte is...
0:37:08 > 0:37:11APPLAUSE Yes! Yes!
0:37:11 > 0:37:14Well done, well done. Well done, well done.
0:37:14 > 0:37:16She had two sisters, Emily and Anne.
0:37:16 > 0:37:18Good knowledge, Tony.
0:37:18 > 0:37:20Both were published authors. Oh, good.
0:37:20 > 0:37:23She wrote under the pseudonym of Currer Bell.
0:37:23 > 0:37:26Ellis was Emily Bronte's pseudonym.
0:37:26 > 0:37:30Charlotte wrote Jane Eyre, Villette and Shirley.
0:37:30 > 0:37:32Emily wrote Wuthering Heights.
0:37:32 > 0:37:34Well done, Tony. We're back on track.
0:37:34 > 0:37:37At the end of the third round, you've managed to put
0:37:37 > 0:37:40?1,000 in your prize pot. APPLAUSE
0:37:43 > 0:37:47And that is the amount you'll be playing for in today's Final Debate.
0:37:47 > 0:37:51OK, Tony, ?1,000. If you manage to get that today, what are your plans?
0:37:51 > 0:37:54I've booked a holiday in Crete and I've not really thought about
0:37:54 > 0:37:57how I'm going to pay for it yet, so that'll go some way towards it. OK.
0:37:57 > 0:37:59Fingers crossed.
0:37:59 > 0:38:02There's just one question that stands between you and the cash today, and that is the Final Debate.
0:38:02 > 0:38:05In the Final Debate, you will face one question.
0:38:05 > 0:38:09That question will have six possible answers, but only three of those are correct.
0:38:09 > 0:38:13In order to win the money today, I need all three correct answers.
0:38:13 > 0:38:15As before, you're not playing alone.
0:38:15 > 0:38:18You're going to choose one of these fine human beings to help you
0:38:18 > 0:38:20with your Final Debate question.
0:38:20 > 0:38:23You and your celeb will have 45 seconds on the clock
0:38:23 > 0:38:27to debate the question, then I'm going to need the answers from you.
0:38:27 > 0:38:30So, based on the performance of our panel today,
0:38:30 > 0:38:34as they straighten themselves up and look presentable,
0:38:34 > 0:38:39who would you like to join you, Tony, in today's debate - Angellica, Jennie or Phil?
0:38:39 > 0:38:42I think they've all been really good, to be honest with you.
0:38:42 > 0:38:45I think I've let them down more than anything else.
0:38:45 > 0:38:47I think... Consistently throughout, I think, Angellica's been
0:38:47 > 0:38:50a bit of a font of knowledge. Sorry, Angellica, I'm going to choose you.
0:38:50 > 0:38:53Angellica, would you please join us for the Final Debate?
0:38:57 > 0:39:01So, Angellica, Tony has chosen you for the Final Debate.
0:39:01 > 0:39:03This is what happens when you know stuff. I know.
0:39:03 > 0:39:07But I'm feeling the pressure of Tony's Crete holiday
0:39:07 > 0:39:09on my shoulders right now.
0:39:09 > 0:39:13But hopefully some of that knowledge will be useful and we work together.
0:39:13 > 0:39:16Absolutely. Yeah? Yeah. I want to do well.
0:39:16 > 0:39:17OK, guys, best of luck.
0:39:17 > 0:39:21Because it's the Final Debate, Tony, we're going to give you two options.
0:39:21 > 0:39:23Have a look and choose from these.
0:39:31 > 0:39:33Two categories I quite like.
0:39:35 > 0:39:38I'm going to go with History.
0:39:40 > 0:39:42ANGELLICA GULPS
0:39:42 > 0:39:44If you'd just seen the look on Angellica's face!
0:39:44 > 0:39:48How are you with History, Angellica? I'm OK. I'm OK.
0:39:48 > 0:39:51OK, you've chosen History. Let's lock it in.
0:39:51 > 0:39:56For ?1,000, here is today's Final Debate question.
0:40:20 > 0:40:24Tony and Angellica, for the final time, your 45 seconds start now.
0:40:25 > 0:40:30OK, I'm thinking Julius Caesar, Augustus, possibly.
0:40:30 > 0:40:34OK. Nero. He fiddled when Rome was on fire. I thought of Nero.
0:40:34 > 0:40:36Commodus. Wasn't he...?
0:40:36 > 0:40:39Did he...? Just thinking from the Gladiator film.
0:40:39 > 0:40:42Yeah, exactly. That's what... Did he become emperor?
0:40:42 > 0:40:44Let's rule out Alexander the Great. Oh, yes.
0:40:44 > 0:40:46Rule out Alexander the Great. Rule out Cyrus. I don't know Cyrus.
0:40:46 > 0:40:47I don't know Cyrus.
0:40:47 > 0:40:50So, Julius Caesar, Nero came into my head...
0:40:50 > 0:40:52Yeah. And you're thinking Augustus.
0:40:52 > 0:40:55Only because Commodus was the son of an emperor. That's right. Yes.
0:40:55 > 0:40:57And I don't know whether he then became the emperor.
0:40:57 > 0:40:59The three that came to my head straightaway -
0:40:59 > 0:41:02Augustus, Julius Caesar, Nero. But then was like, "Oh, Commodus."
0:41:02 > 0:41:05But if you think those are the three that you want to do... Blaming me.
0:41:05 > 0:41:07No, I'm saying that I agree. No, I get...
0:41:07 > 0:41:10Commodus, I get where you're coming from with that. Yeah.
0:41:10 > 0:41:12But I think he was the son. OK, guys. Time is up.
0:41:12 > 0:41:15Tony, I need three answers. I'm going to go for
0:41:15 > 0:41:18Augustus, Julius Caesar, and Nero.
0:41:19 > 0:41:23Augustus, Julius Caesar and Nero. They are locked in.
0:41:23 > 0:41:28If they are the three Roman emperors, it's ?1,000.
0:41:28 > 0:41:31If one of them is wrong, Tony, you do know you'll leave with nothing.
0:41:31 > 0:41:36So here we go. Best of luck. We're looking for three Roman emperors.
0:41:36 > 0:41:41First up, is Augustus a Roman emperor?
0:41:49 > 0:41:51Yes! APPLAUSE
0:41:51 > 0:41:53Augustus was the first Roman emperor.
0:41:55 > 0:41:57So we're up and running. Here we go.
0:41:59 > 0:42:02Was Nero a Roman emperor?
0:42:12 > 0:42:14Oh! APPLAUSE
0:42:14 > 0:42:20He was! Well played. He was the fifth Roman emperor.
0:42:20 > 0:42:22So it's all down to this one, Tony.
0:42:22 > 0:42:27For ?1,000, was Julius Caesar a Roman emperor?
0:42:38 > 0:42:40No! He wasn't.
0:42:43 > 0:42:46Julius Caesar was a general and a statesman.
0:42:46 > 0:42:49He never was an emperor. Who was it?
0:42:49 > 0:42:52No! Gosh. The correct answer is...
0:42:52 > 0:42:55It was Commodus.
0:42:55 > 0:42:57You mentioned Commodus, Tony.
0:42:57 > 0:43:00Commodus was a Roman emperor.
0:43:00 > 0:43:04He ruled from 177-180CE with his father
0:43:04 > 0:43:08and alone from 180-192CE.
0:43:09 > 0:43:11There we go, Tony. You played the game so well.
0:43:11 > 0:43:13Give it up one more time for Tony. APPLAUSE
0:43:13 > 0:43:15Thank you so much.
0:43:16 > 0:43:20Hard luck, fella. That is it for Debatable.
0:43:20 > 0:43:23There's just enough time for me to thank our fantastic panel -
0:43:23 > 0:43:25Angellica Bell, Phil Tufnell and Jennie Bond.
0:43:25 > 0:43:27APPLAUSE
0:43:27 > 0:43:29I do hope you've enjoyed watching.
0:43:29 > 0:43:31We will see you next time for more heated debates.
0:43:31 > 0:43:33For now, it's goodbye from me.