The Grave Robber

Download Subtitles

Transcript

0:16:50 > 0:16:57.

0:17:15 > 0:17:18I am the court reporter.

0:17:18 > 0:17:20Since 1674,

0:17:20 > 0:17:22every trial that's been played out

0:17:22 > 0:17:25between these walls at London's Old Bailey court,

0:17:25 > 0:17:26every single one of them,

0:17:26 > 0:17:30has been faithfully recorded by a reporter like me.

0:17:30 > 0:17:32I sit just here.

0:17:34 > 0:17:36I write down what was said by whom.

0:17:36 > 0:17:39And now, you, somewhat later,

0:17:39 > 0:17:41can listen in.

0:17:41 > 0:17:43You can put your ear to the walls

0:17:43 > 0:17:46and hear, once again, these voices from the past.

0:17:49 > 0:17:53Now, here's a case that sends a shiver down the spine.

0:17:56 > 0:17:58A grisly crime.

0:17:58 > 0:18:00A dark deed indeed.

0:18:02 > 0:18:05Even the dead, it seems, are not safe from thieves.

0:18:06 > 0:18:09This is a case of body snatching.

0:18:09 > 0:18:12The dead dug up.

0:18:19 > 0:18:21The year is 1843.

0:18:24 > 0:18:26But it's a curious one, this.

0:18:26 > 0:18:28As medical science blossomed,

0:18:28 > 0:18:30body snatching had become such a concern

0:18:30 > 0:18:32that they introduced an act

0:18:32 > 0:18:36to set out a legal avenue for students to access corpses,

0:18:36 > 0:18:39to aid the study of anatomy and disease.

0:18:39 > 0:18:42That was 1832.

0:18:42 > 0:18:4511 years later and up pops this mysterious case.

0:18:53 > 0:18:57John White Bridgman and Isaac Bridgman,

0:18:57 > 0:19:00indicted for unlawfully breaking and entering

0:19:00 > 0:19:03the grave of Thomas Ghorst Tawney

0:19:03 > 0:19:05and taking away the said body.

0:19:06 > 0:19:10Here accused are a man of the church and his son.

0:19:10 > 0:19:12The minister and guardian, no less,

0:19:12 > 0:19:15of the village chapel where the crime occurred.

0:19:15 > 0:19:17A father, the son

0:19:17 > 0:19:20and the wholly unholy business of the dead undone.

0:19:20 > 0:19:24And in the very place where they should rest in peace.

0:19:26 > 0:19:27Gentlemen.

0:19:27 > 0:19:30We're here, are we not, for such a fleeting time.

0:19:30 > 0:19:33And when our journey on this earth is done,

0:19:33 > 0:19:35when we go to meet our maker,

0:19:35 > 0:19:38what do we ask for but the simplest request -

0:19:38 > 0:19:40to rest in peace.

0:19:42 > 0:19:44Imagine, then, to discover

0:19:44 > 0:19:47that your family, duly laid to rest,

0:19:47 > 0:19:49found that peace shattered.

0:19:49 > 0:19:52Their coffins forced open,

0:19:52 > 0:19:54their bones tossed asunder.

0:19:56 > 0:19:57I call my first witness,

0:19:57 > 0:20:00Mr James Dodsley Tawney.

0:20:07 > 0:20:09I swear by Almighty God

0:20:09 > 0:20:11that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth,

0:20:11 > 0:20:14the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

0:20:14 > 0:20:16Mr Tawney,

0:20:16 > 0:20:18your family has a vault at the chapel of St John's,

0:20:18 > 0:20:19is that correct?

0:20:19 > 0:20:21That's correct.

0:20:21 > 0:20:24My father, the late Thomas Ghorst Tawney,

0:20:24 > 0:20:27died in November of 1803 and was buried there.

0:20:27 > 0:20:31My elder brother Thomas and my mother both died in 1837

0:20:31 > 0:20:33and were buried in the same vault.

0:20:33 > 0:20:36Mr Tawney, please can you explain to the court

0:20:36 > 0:20:41how you came to discover that your family tomb had been disturbed?

0:20:41 > 0:20:44I was at home, on Cheapside,

0:20:44 > 0:20:46and I came in receipt of some information

0:20:46 > 0:20:49in consequence of which I went to the house of Mr Bridgman.

0:20:53 > 0:20:55'I told Mr Bridgman I came there for the purpose

0:20:55 > 0:20:57'of opening my family vault.

0:20:57 > 0:20:59'He said nothing.

0:20:59 > 0:21:01'I said, "I will view my family vault,"

0:21:01 > 0:21:02'and I walked into the passage.

0:21:02 > 0:21:05'Still, Mr Bridgman said nothing to me.

0:21:07 > 0:21:08'Could you describe what you found?

0:21:11 > 0:21:14'When I got to the vault, I saw that the large stone at the top

0:21:14 > 0:21:17'had evidently been removed and the brickwork damaged.

0:21:18 > 0:21:19'When I looked inside,

0:21:19 > 0:21:22'I could see my mother's coffin was turned on its side

0:21:22 > 0:21:25'and my father's coffin was gone.

0:21:25 > 0:21:28'There were some pieces of wood lying at the bottom of the tomb

0:21:28 > 0:21:32'and a patch of hair about the size of my hand.'

0:21:32 > 0:21:34Did you seek to speak with Mr Bridgman again?

0:21:34 > 0:21:37I went directly back through the chapel and into Mr Bridgman's house,

0:21:37 > 0:21:40not exceeding ten minutes after I'd first arrived.

0:21:41 > 0:21:44I could not find Mr Bridgman.

0:21:44 > 0:21:47You then sought a warrant through appropriate channels

0:21:47 > 0:21:49to search the premises, correct?

0:21:49 > 0:21:50Yes, that's correct.

0:21:51 > 0:21:55'When I had the warrant, I went to the chapel yard.

0:21:55 > 0:21:58'There, I observed a spot where the earth had been recently removed.

0:22:00 > 0:22:04'It was 15 yards from the defendant's back premises.

0:22:09 > 0:22:13'I found three skulls and then, in another spot, quite close by,

0:22:13 > 0:22:15'I found another skull.'

0:22:16 > 0:22:19On what grounds do you stand that some of this material

0:22:19 > 0:22:22might be taken from your father's grave?

0:22:22 > 0:22:25The fragments of wood that I'd found in the tomb

0:22:25 > 0:22:27were applied to the coffin.

0:22:27 > 0:22:29When the whole was put together,

0:22:29 > 0:22:31it fitted exactly.

0:22:31 > 0:22:33Thank you, Mr Tawney.

0:22:35 > 0:22:36Four skulls.

0:22:36 > 0:22:39He said four skulls.

0:22:39 > 0:22:40Does that not beg the question

0:22:40 > 0:22:44that perhaps Mr Tawney's poor father might not be the only one disturbed?

0:22:44 > 0:22:46And is it not a bit baffling

0:22:46 > 0:22:48that you might dig the bones up in one place

0:22:48 > 0:22:51and then bury them again a short distance away?

0:22:51 > 0:22:54Whatever purpose they served, would it not make more sense

0:22:54 > 0:22:56to put them back where you found them afterward?

0:22:58 > 0:23:01I will show that the accused, Mr Isaac Bridgman,

0:23:01 > 0:23:04was not at home in Walworth on the night in question -

0:23:04 > 0:23:05Wednesday, 6th of September.

0:23:06 > 0:23:09I should like to call Mrs Margaret Thompson.

0:23:15 > 0:23:17Mrs Thompson,

0:23:17 > 0:23:21please tell the court where you saw Mr Bridgman on September 6th last.

0:23:21 > 0:23:25I was with Mr Bridgman in Ramsgate on Wednesday morning.

0:23:25 > 0:23:31I spoke to him and was in company with him for an hour and a half,

0:23:31 > 0:23:34watching the ships come from Ramsgate pier.

0:23:34 > 0:23:37I asked him to dine with me that evening, which he did.

0:23:37 > 0:23:39Are you able to state, on your oath,

0:23:39 > 0:23:42that he dined with you on Wednesday, 6th September?

0:23:42 > 0:23:46Certainly, I've not the slightest doubt about it.

0:23:46 > 0:23:49I dined at six o'clock and that I told him.

0:23:49 > 0:23:52It was rather later that day,

0:23:52 > 0:23:56being in consequence of some little addition made.

0:23:56 > 0:23:57He had been to chapel

0:23:57 > 0:24:00and he told me the text and particulars.

0:24:00 > 0:24:01Do you remember the text?

0:24:01 > 0:24:06Yes, it was, "Fear not to go down into Egypt,

0:24:06 > 0:24:09"for I will go with thee."

0:24:09 > 0:24:11Or something of that sort.

0:24:11 > 0:24:15I should like to add I have known him ten or 12 years

0:24:15 > 0:24:19and always considered him a most excellent man.

0:24:19 > 0:24:22Mrs Thompson has sworn

0:24:22 > 0:24:25that Mr Bridgman dined with her on the evening of September 6th,

0:24:25 > 0:24:28rendering it impossible that that same night

0:24:28 > 0:24:31he might also be a half day's journey away, in Walworth.

0:24:31 > 0:24:34No further questions, thank you.

0:24:36 > 0:24:41Gentlemen, I will turn my attention to the younger Mr Bridgman.

0:24:41 > 0:24:44I have witnesses who place him indisputably

0:24:44 > 0:24:47at the scene of the crime.

0:24:47 > 0:24:50I would like to call the Bridgmans' neighbour, Mr George Garford.

0:24:54 > 0:24:57Mr Garford, please tell the court where you were

0:24:57 > 0:24:59on the night of September 6th, and what you saw.

0:24:59 > 0:25:01'At the time in question,

0:25:01 > 0:25:03'I resided next door to Mr Bridgman's.

0:25:06 > 0:25:08'I went to bed about 11 o'clock.

0:25:09 > 0:25:12'I fancied I saw something moving in the burial ground.

0:25:15 > 0:25:16'I looked again

0:25:16 > 0:25:21'and I observed two men going in the direction of Mr Tawney's tomb.

0:25:22 > 0:25:25'One of the persons appeared to have nothing on

0:25:25 > 0:25:27'but a shirt and a cloak over it.

0:25:27 > 0:25:30'The other was dressed in plain black.

0:25:32 > 0:25:34'I did not see the tomb opened.

0:25:34 > 0:25:36'I observed that it was open.

0:25:39 > 0:25:43'I saw one of the men descend into the tomb with a lantern.

0:25:44 > 0:25:46'I saw some ropes.

0:25:48 > 0:25:51'I saw something carried away by the two of them,

0:25:51 > 0:25:53'one carrying it at each end.'

0:25:56 > 0:25:58Had you, in the course of this time,

0:25:58 > 0:26:02an opportunity to observe the identity of the persons?

0:26:03 > 0:26:05'I could not see his face,

0:26:05 > 0:26:08'but I have known the young Bridgman for a long time.

0:26:08 > 0:26:11'The wind blew about his cloak,

0:26:11 > 0:26:15'which gave me an opportunity of seeing his person and appearance.'

0:26:16 > 0:26:18Can you elaborate? If you could not see his face,

0:26:18 > 0:26:20what do you mean by his appearance?

0:26:20 > 0:26:23I had observed his style and gait before.

0:26:23 > 0:26:26I cannot say that there's anything peculiar about it,

0:26:26 > 0:26:30but I was familiar with his mode of moving quickly.

0:26:31 > 0:26:33And I would say I am quite sure it was him.

0:26:33 > 0:26:36Did you attempt to speak with him?

0:26:36 > 0:26:40'I immediately hurried on what clothes I could and went downstairs.

0:26:40 > 0:26:42'When I got down, I heard Mr Bridgman's door open

0:26:42 > 0:26:45'and I observed a man come from the door.

0:26:45 > 0:26:47'He turned his head and saw me

0:26:47 > 0:26:50'and then he ran as fast as he could.

0:26:50 > 0:26:53'I ran after him for some time, but lost sight of him.'

0:26:55 > 0:26:59I then thought it my duty to examine the tomb to see to whom it belonged

0:26:59 > 0:27:01and, on ascertaining the name, I examined the directory,

0:27:01 > 0:27:03which led me to Mr Tawney's office,

0:27:03 > 0:27:07to whom I sent a note disclosing all I had seen.

0:27:07 > 0:27:09Thank you very much, Mr Garford.

0:27:10 > 0:27:12I should like to call my next witness,

0:27:12 > 0:27:14a servant to the Courtnall residence

0:27:14 > 0:27:17on the other either side of the chapel - Miss Priscilla Terry.

0:27:23 > 0:27:27Miss Terry, you are in service at Mr Courtnall's, are you not?

0:27:27 > 0:27:29Yes, sir, I am.

0:27:29 > 0:27:32And I understand that young Mr Bridgman

0:27:32 > 0:27:35called some weeks previous to the night in question

0:27:35 > 0:27:37to enquire about a dog.

0:27:37 > 0:27:38Yes, sir.

0:27:38 > 0:27:41There was a lodger at the Courtnall residence who had a dog,

0:27:41 > 0:27:44which disturbed us by constantly barking.

0:27:44 > 0:27:49About a fortnight or three weeks before this tomb was disturbed,

0:27:49 > 0:27:52the younger Mr Bridgman called to borrow the dog.

0:27:52 > 0:27:56He said that his father had a horse that shied at dogs

0:27:56 > 0:27:59and he wanted to make it used to dogs.

0:27:59 > 0:28:01He returned the dog in about a week,

0:28:01 > 0:28:03saying that the horse was cured

0:28:03 > 0:28:05and he had no further need of it.

0:28:05 > 0:28:08Did the dog bark then in the same way it used to do?

0:28:10 > 0:28:14If strangers came into the ground, it would bark.

0:28:16 > 0:28:18He never barked at Bridgman after that.

0:28:20 > 0:28:22Thank you.

0:28:22 > 0:28:24Gentlemen, I would suggest to you

0:28:24 > 0:28:27that the young Mr Bridgman had good reason

0:28:27 > 0:28:31to make this neighbour's dog acquainted with himself,

0:28:31 > 0:28:34that it would not disturb his night-time activity

0:28:34 > 0:28:36in the graveyard.

0:28:36 > 0:28:38And all of this, gentlemen,

0:28:38 > 0:28:43begs the question - why would young Mr Bridgman go to such lengths?

0:28:45 > 0:28:48I should like to call my next witness - Mr Colson.

0:28:55 > 0:28:59Mr Colson, please tell the court the nature of your acquaintance

0:28:59 > 0:29:03with Mr Bridgman and your impression of him.

0:29:03 > 0:29:05I'm an officer of Guy's Hospital,

0:29:05 > 0:29:07the younger defendant has been a student of surgery there

0:29:07 > 0:29:09for some time.

0:29:09 > 0:29:12The young Mr Bridgman is certainly dedicated

0:29:12 > 0:29:17to the extent he is a most assiduous and zealous student.

0:29:18 > 0:29:21Mr Colson, in your opinion, what might a medical student want

0:29:21 > 0:29:24with a body some six years buried?

0:29:24 > 0:29:25It is not usual.

0:29:27 > 0:29:28I have no answer.

0:29:30 > 0:29:32Thank you, Mr Colson. No further questions.

0:29:34 > 0:29:38Gentlemen, it is now for you to decide,

0:29:38 > 0:29:42in the light of detached examination of the evidence before you,

0:29:42 > 0:29:44whether the defendants bear responsibility

0:29:44 > 0:29:46for the crime in question.

0:29:46 > 0:29:50For breaking and entering the Tawney family tomb.

0:29:57 > 0:30:00Well, well, well. Father and son.

0:30:00 > 0:30:03But, remember, the court are here charged

0:30:03 > 0:30:05only to answer the legal question

0:30:05 > 0:30:09of who is responsible for breaking and entering the Tawney tomb.

0:30:13 > 0:30:15That didn't take long.

0:30:22 > 0:30:25Gentlemen, have you reached a verdict?

0:30:27 > 0:30:32On the charge of breaking and entering the Tawney family tomb,

0:30:32 > 0:30:35we find the defendant Isaac Bridgman

0:30:35 > 0:30:37not guilty.

0:30:37 > 0:30:39On the same charge,

0:30:39 > 0:30:42we find the defendant John W Bridgman

0:30:42 > 0:30:44guilty.

0:30:47 > 0:30:50Isaac Bridgman, you are free to go.

0:30:51 > 0:30:53John W Bridgman,

0:30:53 > 0:30:56I sentence you to 12 months' imprisonment.

0:31:00 > 0:31:03So, the legal question has been answered.

0:31:03 > 0:31:06Young Bridgman did it.

0:31:06 > 0:31:10But it raises, does it not, so many more questions.

0:31:10 > 0:31:13If Mr Bridgman Junior was a student of surgery,

0:31:13 > 0:31:16then the suggestion is he was seeking a corpse

0:31:16 > 0:31:18on which to hone his surgical skills.

0:31:18 > 0:31:23But poor Mr Tawney's father had been in the ground some six years.

0:31:23 > 0:31:25So what would he want with a box of bones?

0:32:08 > 0:32:11Subtitles by Red Bee Media Ltd