:00:10. > :00:11.Hello and welcome to One Hundred Days Plus.
:00:12. > :00:14.The White House pushes back against reports that President Trump
:00:15. > :00:16.released damaging classified intelligence to the Russians.
:00:17. > :00:18.But some American allies now wonder whether it's safe to share
:00:19. > :00:26.sensitive information with this administration.
:00:27. > :00:29.The White House sends its national security advisor out
:00:30. > :00:32.to defend the President - his message, Mr Trump did not
:00:33. > :00:44.It is wholly appropriate for the president to share whatever
:00:45. > :00:47.information he thinks is necessary to ensure the security of the
:00:48. > :00:52.American people. That is what he did.
:00:53. > :00:55.Our fight is against Isis, as General McMaster said -
:00:56. > :00:57.and I know he feels that we had a great meeting.
:00:58. > :00:59.But senior Republicans join Democrats in criticising
:01:00. > :01:00.the President with questions about credibility,
:01:01. > :01:09.I think we could do with the little less drama from the White House on a
:01:10. > :01:11.lot of things. on some of the world's
:01:12. > :01:14.most notorious strongmen. And one of them is today
:01:15. > :01:17.a guest at the White House. President Erdogan of Turkey,
:01:18. > :01:19.who is not altogether happy the US And, news that Ford might soon be
:01:20. > :01:23.shedding 200,000 jobs? We'll tell you why the car company
:01:24. > :01:37.may be hitting a speed bump. Hello, I am Katty Kay in Washington,
:01:38. > :01:40.Christian Fraser is in London. Are reports that Donald Trump gave
:01:41. > :01:45.classified intelligence to Russian officials a storm in a tea cup
:01:46. > :01:48.or a major breach of The administration
:01:49. > :01:52.says it's the former. Critics say this marks a serious
:01:53. > :01:55.violation of an ally's confidence. The White House is not
:01:56. > :01:57.denying the information concerning Islamic State was given
:01:58. > :02:00.to Russia, it just says it was no big deal -
:02:01. > :02:03.in fact, "wholly appropriate" is how the national security advisor
:02:04. > :02:07.described it a short time ago. HR McMaster said a report
:02:08. > :02:10.in the Washington Post accusing the President of giving away
:02:11. > :02:26.intelligence was not accurate. I stand by my statement I said
:02:27. > :02:30.yesterday. The premise of that article was false, that in any way
:02:31. > :02:35.the president had the conversation that was an appropriate resulted in
:02:36. > :02:39.a lapse of national security. The real issue and what I would like to
:02:40. > :02:42.see debated more, is that our national-security has been put at
:02:43. > :02:43.risk by those violating confidentiality.
:02:44. > :02:45.And in the past hour this is what President Trump had
:02:46. > :02:49.to say about his meeting with the Russians.
:02:50. > :02:59.We had a very successful meeting with the Foreign Minister of Russia.
:03:00. > :03:02.Our fighters against Isis, as HR McMaster said, I know he is said and
:03:03. > :03:07.he feels that we had a great meeting with the Foreign Minister, so we are
:03:08. > :03:11.going to have a lot of great success over the coming years and we want to
:03:12. > :03:12.get as many to help fight terrorism as possible.
:03:13. > :03:19.Let's go to Jane O'Brien who is at the White House for us.
:03:20. > :03:24.To clarify, is the White House saying that everything in the
:03:25. > :03:32.Washington Post report is false or not quite that clear? You tell me.
:03:33. > :03:36.It is as clear as mud because certainly last night the White House
:03:37. > :03:41.was saying the story is false and today they are saying the
:03:42. > :03:46.conversation was appropriate in the context in which it was hard, so
:03:47. > :03:51.does that mean President Trump giveaway classified information are
:03:52. > :03:55.not? Again, General McMaster couldn't clarify that because he
:03:56. > :03:59.couldn't say what information was classified or not and that is a
:04:00. > :04:04.matter of policy and he wouldn't divulge it. So we are still no clear
:04:05. > :04:11.as to the context of content of what was said. Certainly the White House
:04:12. > :04:13.is saying that it was appropriate and didn't jeopardise
:04:14. > :04:20.national-security and the focus from the White House as it so often is is
:04:21. > :04:26.on the leaks, and how did the media and the Washington Post get to hear
:04:27. > :04:29.about any of this? Was that actually appropriate to sheer intelligence
:04:30. > :04:32.that had been provided by a third country? With the CIA deem it
:04:33. > :04:36.appropriate when the commander-in-chief seems to have
:04:37. > :04:38.been sloop orally briefed on the sensitivity of that information that
:04:39. > :04:39.he casually dropped it into conversation.
:04:40. > :04:42.This afternoon one European official warned that his country might soon
:04:43. > :04:44.stop sharing classified information with the US for fear
:04:45. > :04:47.Maybe an indication of the damage that has been caused.
:04:48. > :04:50.Also joining us now is Former CIA counter terrorism
:04:51. > :05:03.Thanks for joining us. Let's take a step back. Explain to us what cold
:05:04. > :05:12.water classified intelligence is and who has access to it. One of the
:05:13. > :05:16.things that people has in the classified work is our top secret
:05:17. > :05:21.security clearance, but codeword is to do with specific things that are
:05:22. > :05:24.happening. When I was working counterterrorism in Iraq I had
:05:25. > :05:28.codeword access to a variety of special platforms but I wouldn't
:05:29. > :05:31.have other access to the North Korean nuclear programme codeword
:05:32. > :05:37.information, because I had no reason to have it, so this is a way the
:05:38. > :05:41.United States and most of the intelligence community around the
:05:42. > :05:44.world compartmentalised as information, so one person can never
:05:45. > :05:49.know anything apart from the folks at the top, the president and
:05:50. > :05:52.national security adviser and others. The point is that this would
:05:53. > :05:56.be information he would maybe not even sure what his own cabinet but
:05:57. > :06:03.which he saw fit to share with the Russians? And that is the
:06:04. > :06:07.interesting thing. If you have information, and one of the other
:06:08. > :06:10.things is that it is a originator controlled, so we had this
:06:11. > :06:14.understanding across the US government but also with allies
:06:15. > :06:17.across the world, that if someone gives us information we will protect
:06:18. > :06:21.it not provided to other countries unless the originating country
:06:22. > :06:28.actually provides the assurance that we can do so. The New York Times
:06:29. > :06:33.about 20 minutes ago just said it was Israel that provided this
:06:34. > :06:35.original information, so it is going to be rather interesting that Donald
:06:36. > :06:39.Trump is going to Israel in the coming days when they will see why
:06:40. > :06:45.did you share this information with the Russians? Israel is specifically
:06:46. > :06:48.concerned about providing information to Moscow because what
:06:49. > :06:51.Moscow was doing in Syria is cooperating with the Syrian
:06:52. > :06:59.government and the Iranians, who are obviously very predisposed towards
:07:00. > :07:04.belligerence, towards the Israelis, so it is a huge mess these people
:07:05. > :07:08.are try to figure out in the next weeks. You have been listening and
:07:09. > :07:13.that has been reported by NBC as well, that it was the Israelis. You
:07:14. > :07:18.have listened to HR McMaster unseen everything that has come out of the
:07:19. > :07:21.White House in the last 24 hours. What is your bottom line take on
:07:22. > :07:26.this? How damaging was the intelligence that was given by
:07:27. > :07:32.President Trump to the Russians and how damaging is it potentially to
:07:33. > :07:35.intelligence relationships with allies? Intelligence is a team sport
:07:36. > :07:40.and even though the United States has global reach and the Burmese
:07:41. > :07:44.military and we spend lots of money, we need our allies, and if our
:07:45. > :07:48.allies cannot depend on the United States to maintain its secrets we
:07:49. > :07:54.have a real problem. Maybe the next time somebody has the crown jewels
:07:55. > :08:01.of information, they may not be so helpful in future. The United States
:08:02. > :08:06.occupies a central role in the intelligence world, especially
:08:07. > :08:10.fighting Isis and Al-Qaeda, but on other peripheral issues, people may
:08:11. > :08:16.have second thoughts and that is the major problem we are going to see in
:08:17. > :08:19.the months and years ahead. So, just to be clear, not so much the actual
:08:20. > :08:23.specific intelligence that might have been revealed that meeting that
:08:24. > :08:27.could cause problems for the White House, it is the damage this could
:08:28. > :08:34.do to allies and getting intelligence from them in the
:08:35. > :08:38.future? What we don't know if the actual contents of the intelligence
:08:39. > :08:42.provided to the Russians. Only Donald Trump and the Russians really
:08:43. > :08:47.know what they were talking about. It is really what we can do in the
:08:48. > :08:52.future. This time it is about Isis, maybe next time it is Russia or
:08:53. > :08:57.Eastern Europe on North Korea, and in a set of braggadocio the
:08:58. > :09:01.president may be talking about extremely sensitive things that
:09:02. > :09:04.another country has given us in confidence, and that is something
:09:05. > :09:10.the United States has to be very careful about providing to other
:09:11. > :09:14.people. One of the things HR McMaster said was that he didn't
:09:15. > :09:18.know where the information really came from. That is concerning as
:09:19. > :09:22.well. As the president doesn't know where the sources of information
:09:23. > :09:30.coming from, weird and hot water. I was going to ask you very question.
:09:31. > :09:34.The difficulty the NSA had was that President Trump had mentioned this
:09:35. > :09:37.off the cuff and he didn't seem to know, an even clearer which is more
:09:38. > :09:45.serious, how sensitive this information was. One theory put
:09:46. > :09:49.forward is that the president likes everything condensed, he doesn't
:09:50. > :09:54.like these reams of documents, he likes things in bullet form and in
:09:55. > :09:56.charts, and maybe that is the problem. He picked out this nugget
:09:57. > :10:03.of information without realising what the source was. One of the
:10:04. > :10:09.things you realise information that you have to know your sources and
:10:10. > :10:12.where it comes from and to the information received and what is the
:10:13. > :10:18.damage of this was provided to other places. Everybody in the
:10:19. > :10:21.intelligence community knows you cannot give it intelligence
:10:22. > :10:24.willy-nilly and if you don't know your sources, and something as
:10:25. > :10:29.extremely sensitive as a potential plot in the Middle East given to us
:10:30. > :10:32.by another country, if the information is the equivalent of
:10:33. > :10:36.what you read in a blog and you can differentiate between the two, we
:10:37. > :10:40.have a real problem in the White House and in our intelligence
:10:41. > :10:44.community, and other countries that rely on the United States, and we
:10:45. > :10:49.rely on them, are going to be very troubled by this event. Senior
:10:50. > :10:50.figures today talking about whether the president is doing his homework
:10:51. > :10:52.fully enough. If senior Republicans were wary
:10:53. > :10:54.of speaking out in the wake of James Comey's dismissal,
:10:55. > :10:56.no such concerns this time. The head of the Senate Foreign
:10:57. > :10:59.Relations Committee, Bob Corker, a Trump supporter said
:11:00. > :11:14.the allegations were troubling. Very troubling, in fact, and
:11:15. > :11:18.obviously they are enabling or spiral right now. He went on to say
:11:19. > :11:18.they have to come to grips with all that is happening.
:11:19. > :11:21.Joining me in the studio is Susan Page - the Washington
:11:22. > :11:31.politics for a long time and you covered Donald Trump's campaign and
:11:32. > :11:35.administration. Does this incident of sharing intelligence with the
:11:36. > :11:40.Russians seem different somehow do you? The past week seems different
:11:41. > :11:44.because firstly at the firing of the FBI director James call me at least
:11:45. > :11:50.in part because he was the leader of the investigation. And now we have
:11:51. > :11:57.the disclosure of what seems like loose talk with Russian officials by
:11:58. > :12:02.the president. There raw two things that General McMaster said, that
:12:03. > :12:04.were quite amazing. One was that the president wasn't aware of the
:12:05. > :12:09.sources and methods of misinformation and that he made the
:12:10. > :12:13.decision to disclose it on the fly. There had not been a careful process
:12:14. > :12:21.that this would be a useful thing to do, so both those incidents, raises
:12:22. > :12:28.questions about whether the president act on impulse and that
:12:29. > :12:32.that causes him great controversy. I do think his situation now is more
:12:33. > :12:37.troubling than it has been in his first 100 days. I was struck last
:12:38. > :12:43.night as this news broke by how quickly Republicans came and
:12:44. > :12:51.criticised. We saw Bob Corker and John McCain, who has been a critic
:12:52. > :12:55.before, but we also saw Paul Ryan. You had senior Republicans, can see
:12:56. > :13:01.it was concerning. Democrats are already inflamed about Donald Trump
:13:02. > :13:08.but for Republicans, you now see them publicly criticising him. We
:13:09. > :13:13.had a local Republican member of Congress for the Virginia suburbs
:13:14. > :13:16.put out a briefing -- request asking for a briefing from the intelligence
:13:17. > :13:21.committees so that they knew at least as much as the Russians! That
:13:22. > :13:26.is quite the statement from somebody who is from the president was my own
:13:27. > :13:29.party and who will face a tough the election bid as will many other
:13:30. > :13:34.Republicans. You see them starting to put some light between themselves
:13:35. > :13:38.and the president. This could cause problems for the president with his
:13:39. > :13:41.own party. I was just wondering whether Leon
:13:42. > :13:45.Panetta, talking about this earlier today, that there are very few
:13:46. > :13:51.people in the Oval Office right now who will speak truth to power and
:13:52. > :13:54.say, Mr President, you cannot just say or tweet what you want because
:13:55. > :14:01.it demeans the office and it demeans you. We know that the President's
:14:02. > :14:07.advisers, some of them have told him to stop treating. This is causing
:14:08. > :14:10.problems for him. We have seen that his own supporters say to stop
:14:11. > :14:15.tweeting and they don't think it is helpful. It is one thing we thought
:14:16. > :14:20.General Webmaster would be willing to do in a way that General Flynn
:14:21. > :14:25.was not. We have after the filing of James Comey that there might be a
:14:26. > :14:28.staff shake-up and they would try to do things differently. What do you
:14:29. > :14:33.think will be the result in the White House of this incident? There
:14:34. > :14:45.was continuing top today are the big shake-up coming. The problem is that
:14:46. > :14:50.the president, it has not been his staffers but his own tweets, so I'm
:14:51. > :14:52.not sure about changing the secretary or his strategist is going
:14:53. > :14:58.to make a difference in terms of how the White House operates. It
:14:59. > :15:01.revolves around the President's own conduct. One thing that is
:15:02. > :15:07.interesting that to hearing from allies of the United States is that
:15:08. > :15:11.they had been concerned about the foreign policy team and foreign
:15:12. > :15:14.policy in general. There is no more stabilisation and they think there's
:15:15. > :15:20.a good team in place with HR McMaster, but there are increasing
:15:21. > :15:24.concerns about the President's character, and whether this White
:15:25. > :15:27.House is just too impetuous and I think that gets to the issue of
:15:28. > :15:33.whether there is competency in the White House, and what Bob Corker was
:15:34. > :15:39.seeing, they have to get better at dealing with this kind of crisis.
:15:40. > :15:43.The issue of bringing the president into line, you wonder whether some
:15:44. > :15:48.put this stuff out there hoping they've is huge blow back and that
:15:49. > :15:52.makes shock into changing his ways. Credibility is hard-won and easily
:15:53. > :15:58.lost. What we saw today, and we didn't get it with the filing of the
:15:59. > :16:00.FBI director last week, but senior Republicans now coming out and
:16:01. > :16:08.talking about his competence as a president. Those are a few
:16:09. > :16:13.Republicans, and I will push back a little bit on how broad that
:16:14. > :16:17.criticism of competency is. Susan raised it and you have voices are
:16:18. > :16:23.raising now, but you also have people saying, you have affected
:16:24. > :16:27.people in there, a national security adviser under Defence Secretary is
:16:28. > :16:32.good, they think the Secretary of State is good, and the question of
:16:33. > :16:37.the president instead he knowingly give information to the Russians
:16:38. > :16:40.that was sensitive, or did he not knowingly give information to the
:16:41. > :16:45.Russians that was sensitive, and which would be worse two that seems
:16:46. > :16:46.to be the question. That has been a lot happening today.
:16:47. > :16:48.President Trump is under scrutiny because of Russia -
:16:49. > :16:50.but his affection for Turkey's increasingly autocratic leader
:16:51. > :16:53.Recep Tayyip Erdogan was at the White House today
:16:54. > :16:56.for what Mr Trump described as a strong and solid discussion.
:16:57. > :16:58.Turkey is of course a critical alliance for the Americans.
:16:59. > :17:03.But while many Europeans are alarmed at the way Mr Erdogan is behaving,
:17:04. > :17:05.Mr Trump recently described him as "a great guy."
:17:06. > :17:08.So what can the White House get in exchange get for its favourable
:17:09. > :17:17.We're joined now by Soner Cagaptay - he's the director of
:17:18. > :17:19.the Turkish Research Program at the Washington Institute
:17:20. > :17:22.and author of "the New Sultan: Erdogan and the Crisis of Modern
:17:23. > :17:41.Use of President Erdogan getting the red carpet treatment and I imagine
:17:42. > :17:45.that is the image she wants beamed back into Turkey to show he is being
:17:46. > :17:52.rehabilitated in the West after the referendum? That is correct. Erdogan
:17:53. > :17:58.has just won with a very narrow margin of victory a referendum that
:17:59. > :18:03.makes an style president, but it was a narrow margin of victory and were
:18:04. > :18:08.large-scale irregularities. They may or may not have been large enough to
:18:09. > :18:12.flip the outcome, but he wants to dismiss those allegations and move
:18:13. > :18:15.forward. The first thing he did after the referendum was to call it
:18:16. > :18:23.to Western leaders to recognise the result. Turkey has had elections
:18:24. > :18:28.fair and square since 1950, so if he is calling for this affirmation that
:18:29. > :18:31.is like a Freudian slip, one thing that affirmation to come from
:18:32. > :18:37.President Trump, and he got exactly that. He was already 50% happy at
:18:38. > :18:48.being invited year saw it was bound to be a good meeting because he got
:18:49. > :18:54.what he wanted. The sticky issue is the Syrian Kurds that the Americans
:18:55. > :19:02.are looking to get involved and tacky is against this. Would you see
:19:03. > :19:06.them going on this? The regional factions, President Erdogan is
:19:07. > :19:16.looking the other way as the United States works with them to take Raqqa
:19:17. > :19:21.from Isis. They will look the other way as they move against Isis
:19:22. > :19:27.stronghold in arrack and to me it seems this is the deal struck today
:19:28. > :19:33.at the White House going forward. We will see this with the liberation of
:19:34. > :19:38.Raqqa with Turkish assistance, and support against factions in arrack
:19:39. > :19:43.will come after that especially after Mosul is liberated. They have
:19:44. > :19:46.promised assistance to Turkey against criminal fundraising
:19:47. > :19:53.networks in Europe, so in this regard party has received strong
:19:54. > :19:57.report regarding the PKK presence in return for giving Washington the
:19:58. > :20:04.green light and promising not to be a spoiler regarding US plans to take
:20:05. > :20:08.Isis. Although you imagine this is a particularly good day to get a deal
:20:09. > :20:12.with Donald Trump because under so much pressure? That is correct. He
:20:13. > :20:18.probably has other things going on in the back of his mind. He arrived
:20:19. > :20:23.in Washington on the day the US President's mind is preoccupied with
:20:24. > :20:31.the major domestic crisis, and I think Erdogan therefore probably was
:20:32. > :20:37.unlucky in the strep and maybe got a sympathetic ear regarding other
:20:38. > :20:41.issues raised. This is a moment that will help them take Kentucky's
:20:42. > :20:45.secular democratic system. Once they took it down and they both wanted
:20:46. > :20:57.the country to themselves and what ensued was a real power struggle, so
:20:58. > :21:02.they have become -- if he found a sympathetic ear from President Trump
:21:03. > :21:05.in this regard, in the sense that he listens to his concerns, that will
:21:06. > :21:12.also make Erdogan happy going forward. Thank you for being with
:21:13. > :21:18.us. Last week, Henry Kissinger was brought into the White House to
:21:19. > :21:25.school, probably a good work, Donald Trump on what he needs to do going
:21:26. > :21:29.to the Middle East next week. In mind of what has been going on in
:21:30. > :21:31.the last 24 hours, a lot of people will be rather nervous about what he
:21:32. > :21:36.will be speaking about in these meetings?
:21:37. > :21:40.As was pointed out, he will have Israel on his agenda when he goes on
:21:41. > :21:43.this trip as well, and if these reports are right that this
:21:44. > :21:49.intelligence that was given to the Russians came from Israel, that will
:21:50. > :21:53.be one tricky conversation. Nato still want the assurance Donald
:21:54. > :21:57.Trump is fully committed to article five. Members of the G-7 confused
:21:58. > :22:00.about what this administration's policies are around the world,
:22:01. > :22:07.National is a more protectionism, they will want the assurance to.
:22:08. > :22:09.This is the message I keep wanting from diplomats in Washington, that
:22:10. > :22:15.they don't really know what they are dealing with. What is said one day
:22:16. > :22:19.can be countermanded the next day, when one person speaks are speaking
:22:20. > :22:23.for the President or not? That is causing a lot of concern among
:22:24. > :22:27.American allies. We have to deal with the White House but they have
:22:28. > :22:28.to figure out exactly how to go about that process. Is that trip
:22:29. > :22:30.will be fascinating because of that. Donald Trump hasn't been the only
:22:31. > :22:32.one under fire for his alleged A photo in the Washington post -
:22:33. > :22:36.revealed something that perhaps It's a photo of the president
:22:37. > :22:43.and that's his bodyguard Keith Schiller - who's carrying
:22:44. > :22:46.a stack of papers. Attached to the top
:22:47. > :22:48.is a yellow sticky note - which clearly says "Jim,
:22:49. > :22:50.Mad Dog, Mattis", along with the defence secretary -
:22:51. > :23:04.Jim Mattis' mobile phone number. Here's the thing. So mad is this
:23:05. > :23:08.news cycle that the Washington Post didn't even know they had printed
:23:09. > :23:15.that until a reader said, I have spotted this phone number. So the
:23:16. > :23:23.pool. The picture and said, are, yes! They called it and got his
:23:24. > :23:29.voice mail. The two things to say, Keith Schiller, the President's
:23:30. > :23:32.bodyguard, is employing the sticky note to hide very sensitive
:23:33. > :23:36.information like this mobile phone number, and the other thing is that
:23:37. > :23:42.even when they are jotted down on yellow post notes, the actually
:23:43. > :23:46.refer to him as Mad Dog, he is Mad Dog even to his colleagues! I
:23:47. > :23:50.thought it was as that refer to him as that but even in the White House
:23:51. > :23:54.years Mad Dog. That is how do we always referred to
:23:55. > :24:00.you, Christian cool presenter Fraser! That is a lie! There are
:24:01. > :24:01.other names are not repeatable on here.
:24:02. > :24:03.An award-winning Mexican journalist who reported extensively
:24:04. > :24:05.on the activities of drug cartels has been murdered.
:24:06. > :24:08.Javier Valdez was killed by gunmen who opened fire on his car
:24:09. > :24:12.Four journalists have been killed in Mexico in just
:24:13. > :24:29.Turkey and Mexico both very dangerous countries for journalists
:24:30. > :24:30.and we have been speaking about them today.
:24:31. > :24:32.The UN security council has strongly condemned North Korea's recent
:24:33. > :24:34.ballistic missile test - and warned of further sanctions.
:24:35. > :24:37.North Korea says the missile it tested successfully on Sunday
:24:38. > :24:40.was a new type of mid to long range rocket, capable of carrying
:24:41. > :24:43.But he 15 member security council, that includes North Korea's closest
:24:44. > :24:47.ally China, has demanded that Pyongnang put a stop to the tests.
:24:48. > :24:50.Here in the UK - The leader of the Labour party, Jeremy Corbyn,
:24:51. > :24:52.has officially launched the party's general election manifesto.
:24:53. > :24:54.The programme includes plans to re-nationalise
:24:55. > :24:56.the water companies, as well as the railways
:24:57. > :25:00.The Labour Party says the pledges will be paid for by more tax
:25:01. > :25:02.on businesses and higher earners - Some of the details
:25:03. > :25:19.And just to say, viewers in the UK can get up
:25:20. > :25:22.to date with all the events in the General Election campaign
:25:23. > :25:27.in the Election Wrap, which follows One Hundred Days Plus.
:25:28. > :25:32.That's on the BBC News Channel, from 7:30 across the UK.
:25:33. > :25:41.You're watching 100 Days Plus from BBC News.
:25:42. > :25:43.with Russian officials in the Oval Office -
:25:44. > :25:45.Former Defence Secretary William Cohen will be
:25:46. > :25:50.here to tell us what this means for national security.
:25:51. > :25:53.And we will look at Ford's plan to cut 10% of its global workforce.
:25:54. > :26:07.That's still to come on 100 Days Plus, from BBC News.
:26:08. > :26:12.Hello there. A real mixed bag of weather across the UK today. It will
:26:13. > :26:16.be a similar idea tomorrow but the main thing is it's going to be rainy
:26:17. > :26:17.around particular leave