:00:08. > :00:11.In just an hour, we'll know President Trump's decision
:00:12. > :00:18.Will he withdraw entirely, stay in, or craft some middle ground?
:00:19. > :00:24.There are huge consequences, for America and the world.
:00:25. > :00:26.From Berlin to Beijing, they are urging Mr Trump today not
:00:27. > :00:36.It's also important that the American society,
:00:37. > :00:39.all other societies and the business community, mobilise themselves
:00:40. > :00:42.to preserve the Paris Agreement as a central piece to guarantee
:00:43. > :00:45.the future of our children and grandchildren.
:00:46. > :00:49.And, one week today, UK voters head to the polls.
:00:50. > :01:01.With the race tightening, we'll hear what's driving this election.
:01:02. > :01:03.Welcome to 100 Days+. I'm Katty Kay in Washington.
:01:04. > :01:10.In an hour, we will find out if America First really
:01:11. > :01:14.Or, to be more precise, America in the company
:01:15. > :01:21.If President Trump pulls out of the Paris climate accord,
:01:22. > :01:23.that's who the US will join as the only countries
:01:24. > :01:26.in the world not to have signed the landmark 2015 agreement.
:01:27. > :01:29.It will signal a withdrawal of American leadership on perhaps
:01:30. > :01:32.the most critical issue of our time, with enormous implications
:01:33. > :01:34.for the future of the planet, politics and jobs worldwide.
:01:35. > :01:42.Under it, countries committed to capping global warming
:01:43. > :01:45.at 2 degrees Celcius with an "endeavour to limit" temperature
:01:46. > :01:49.Rich countries also agreed to provide "climate finance" to help
:01:50. > :01:59.They pledged $100 billion a year by 2020, many countries wanted more.
:02:00. > :02:02.Today, the top ten greenhouse gas emitters make up over 70%
:02:03. > :02:03.of total emissions, China overtook America
:02:04. > :02:11.as the world's biggest emitter in 2007.
:02:12. > :02:26.For more on the announcement, we can speak to
:02:27. > :02:36.will he keep his campaign pledge to the important constituency, the
:02:37. > :02:38.blue-collar workers in the industrial heartland, who believed
:02:39. > :02:43.his rhetoric that the climate accord is killing their jobs. More widely
:02:44. > :02:47.to Republican constituencies who believe it is a bad deal and puts
:02:48. > :02:51.them at economic disadvantage. Does he listen to everybody else backing
:02:52. > :02:56.him to stay in the accord? International allies, the UN head,
:02:57. > :02:58.the Pope, large parts of the business community in America, some
:02:59. > :03:02.White House advisers, even his daughter are worried about the
:03:03. > :03:08.possibility of removing the Americans from the accord, not least
:03:09. > :03:11.because of the environment, but also because the benighted States would
:03:12. > :03:14.be isolated. And its global leadership will be affected. There
:03:15. > :03:20.has been some discussion of possible middle ground, not completely
:03:21. > :03:25.pulling out, but with re-negotiating the targets that the United States
:03:26. > :03:31.will keep. It is not clear where that is going. It will not only be
:03:32. > :03:37.Americans watching, that is for sure. It will be people around the
:03:38. > :03:40.world. Those are the voices that the White House and the president is
:03:41. > :03:43.listening to. We will know in an hour. We will bring full coverage to
:03:44. > :03:46.you on the BBC across the world. Well, among the American officials
:03:47. > :03:49.who were key in getting the US sign on to the climate agreement
:03:50. > :03:52.in Paris was Ernest Moniz. He served as President
:03:53. > :04:03.Obama's secretary of You were the grandfather of this
:04:04. > :04:10.deal, you got it on the table in Paris. Secretary Kerry was the lead
:04:11. > :04:15.negotiator. How are you feeling today? The prospect of America
:04:16. > :04:20.pulling out of a deal that you worked so hard to see come together.
:04:21. > :04:23.First of all, I am curious to see what the announcement will be. But
:04:24. > :04:29.if the United States, if the president announces, polls out of
:04:30. > :04:33.the Paris Agreement, it would be a terrible mistake on many grounds.
:04:34. > :04:39.Fundamentally, it is rejecting science. It is adding to, and
:04:40. > :04:43.unfortunately, increasing loss of confidence in the ability of the
:04:44. > :04:49.United States in meeting agreements. And especially when combined with
:04:50. > :04:52.the budget, the first budget, the president put forward to Congress.
:04:53. > :04:57.Frankly, it will undermine our competitiveness in a multitrillion
:04:58. > :05:01.dollar arena energy economy. What about the counter argument on the
:05:02. > :05:05.science, we don't really need the Paris accord anyway, because market
:05:06. > :05:11.forces mean that America is emitting less and less as it is. The reality
:05:12. > :05:16.is, we are well on our way towards the Paris target. It has nothing to
:05:17. > :05:21.do with climate policy at the moment. But I would take the
:05:22. > :05:28.opposite conclusion, natural gas and renewable growth in the United
:05:29. > :05:31.States has got us down 12-14%. Other countries, who have made comparable
:05:32. > :05:37.or stronger commitments, don't have that advantage of an abundance of
:05:38. > :05:41.natural gas. Why is this a bad deal? I have never heard it explained, I
:05:42. > :05:47.just hear the words that it is a bad deal. After Kyoto, the issue was,
:05:48. > :05:54.the emerging economies are not in here. The Paris deal puts them in
:05:55. > :05:59.here. We don't have flexibility. We have flexibility. We are doing quite
:06:00. > :06:07.well in this direction. However, we do need Paris. We do need to have
:06:08. > :06:14.policy that will guide us. I remind you, not just to the Paris goals,
:06:15. > :06:18.but even more carbon reduction is required. Clearly the people in the
:06:19. > :06:25.United States that objects do so two France, they don't like America not
:06:26. > :06:29.having sovereignty over its own climate deals. And the workers who
:06:30. > :06:33.are employed in the fossil fuels industries, whether it is coal or
:06:34. > :06:42.oil, feel the agreement might cost them their jobs. First of all, there
:06:43. > :06:45.is no evidence that today has been experiencing job loss, quite the
:06:46. > :06:51.contrary. We know there have been substantial losses in coal mining,
:06:52. > :06:55.which started long before this. It is technology, it is mechanisation,
:06:56. > :06:58.and most recently it is in fact the abundance of natural gas that has
:06:59. > :07:05.displaced coal as a market phenomenon on. That is the reality.
:07:06. > :07:10.That is not going to be reversed. What we need to do, and we did in
:07:11. > :07:15.the Obama administration, instead, we put $6 billion into play to
:07:16. > :07:18.develop the technologies that would allow coal to be used in a low
:07:19. > :07:22.carbon world. Let's look forward, let's develop the technologies,
:07:23. > :07:26.let's use our innovation, and then we can have all of the above
:07:27. > :07:30.involved. Spent hours sitting around the table with global counterparts
:07:31. > :07:35.discussing the issues of climate change. If resident John pulled out,
:07:36. > :07:39.do you think other countries will decide they don't need to stick to
:07:40. > :07:44.their image and targets? I don't believe that. I believe there is no
:07:45. > :07:47.going back. We are going to a low carbon future. That has been made
:07:48. > :07:52.loud and clear by American business leaders. They say, we are not going
:07:53. > :07:57.to make investments in a high carbon future. Investments last decades.
:07:58. > :08:01.The states and cities are moving forward. We are going forward. All
:08:02. > :08:05.this does, if in fact we pull out, all this will do is make it harder
:08:06. > :08:10.and more expensive for the United States to play, and will diminish
:08:11. > :08:12.our competitiveness in that future market. Thank you for coming in.
:08:13. > :08:18.President Trump has a lot of supporters here
:08:19. > :08:22.Among them is Phil Kerpen, president of American Commitment,
:08:23. > :08:24.a group dedicated to free markets and economic growth.
:08:25. > :08:31.You were hearing the deck with Terry, Ernest Moniz, saying that
:08:32. > :08:34.America loses nothing by being in the Paris accord, and gains the
:08:35. > :08:40.advantage that emerging countries are in a global accord as well. What
:08:41. > :08:44.do you make of that? Yeah, that's highly inaccurate. In fact, the cost
:08:45. > :08:50.to the United States is considerable. This agreement will be
:08:51. > :08:57.used as a pretext for litigation, to force the clean power plan to come
:08:58. > :09:05.into effect. It has meant higher electricity prices. There is a
:09:06. > :09:08.direct cash transfer in the agreement, $100 billion per year
:09:09. > :09:12.from the advanced countries do the developing world. The lion's share
:09:13. > :09:15.of that will come from the United States if we remain in the
:09:16. > :09:20.agreement. We will be paying higher energy prices, and paying more
:09:21. > :09:23.foreign aid abroad. Two big losses for the American people. But in
:09:24. > :09:28.terms of jobs, as you know, most economists seem to believe that the
:09:29. > :09:31.job growth that comes from the renewable industry is actually equal
:09:32. > :09:36.to any job losses that there might be in the fossil fuel industry.
:09:37. > :09:43.Though it's not a job loser, being part of the Paris accord. It's a big
:09:44. > :09:48.job loser on an economy work bases. It takes a lot more labour to
:09:49. > :09:51.produce energy from renewables than it does from fossil sources, because
:09:52. > :09:56.they are much less efficient and productive. If you spend more and
:09:57. > :09:59.have more labour-intensive production and higher energy prices,
:10:00. > :10:02.you may employ more people in the energy sector, but it will be harder
:10:03. > :10:06.to employ people in manufacturing and the other sectors of the economy
:10:07. > :10:11.that consume energy, as well as being more expensive for individual
:10:12. > :10:15.consumers as world. The economy wide impact of energy prices is very
:10:16. > :10:20.negative indeed. This idea that we have brought the developing world
:10:21. > :10:25.into it, and this is the framework, it ignores the reality on the
:10:26. > :10:29.ground. First, commitments made in India and China, they do not limit
:10:30. > :10:34.emissions levels. They will not meet the promises that they have made.
:10:35. > :10:38.India has 370 coal power plant in the planning stages. It is
:10:39. > :10:41.impossible to meet their Paris commitments with that plan. They
:10:42. > :10:46.won't meet the promises they have made. Germany has had their image
:10:47. > :10:51.and increase in age of the last two years. What is making countries
:10:52. > :10:55.angry about the president right now, instead of ignoring his commitment,
:10:56. > :10:58.because there is no enforcement in this agreement, he is doing this the
:10:59. > :11:01.honest way and saying we will withdraw from this because we will
:11:02. > :11:06.not meet the obligation. That is a much better form of leadership,
:11:07. > :11:07.being honest, than what we are seeing from other countries. Thank
:11:08. > :11:13.you for joining us. And underlining the splits in
:11:14. > :11:16.the Republican part on this issue, this was the tweet from former
:11:17. > :11:18.Republican presidential "Affirmation of the #ParisAgreement
:11:19. > :11:23.is not only about the climate, it is also about America
:11:24. > :11:36.remaining the global leader." Ron, is this about science and jobs
:11:37. > :11:41.and the economy, or is it about American leadership in the world?
:11:42. > :11:45.All of the above. When you look at the fact that the United States is
:11:46. > :11:50.committing itself to an accord that is not a treaty, it gives a lot of
:11:51. > :11:54.people on Capitol Hill concern. If it is such a monumental agreement,
:11:55. > :11:57.as people have said, why didn't the United States submitted to the
:11:58. > :12:01.Senate for ratification? Why did we not have hearings on it? Why did we
:12:02. > :12:08.not reject it will ratify it? I was going to ask the point, this impacts
:12:09. > :12:12.America come the perception of America around the world. America on
:12:13. > :12:16.a critical issue has decided to withdraw leadership. Something a lot
:12:17. > :12:20.of people had wondered if the president would actually do. How
:12:21. > :12:25.would you respond to that? Is it a concern of yours? You have questions
:12:26. > :12:27.about the Paris accord in America, are you concerned about the
:12:28. > :12:32.leadership issue? I am. Perception is reality. The perception here is
:12:33. > :12:37.that the United States would be pulling away from 195 plus other
:12:38. > :12:40.countries in the world, and not leading on an issue. Mr Trump might
:12:41. > :12:45.not agree on the science, and he might not agree on America's role,
:12:46. > :12:47.but I am worried how America will be perceived as a global leader, which
:12:48. > :12:52.we always have been. Frankly, it looks like we might have an American
:12:53. > :12:55.president, since he doesn't believe that climate change exists,
:12:56. > :13:00.therefore America doesn't believe that. That sends a very interesting
:13:01. > :13:02.signal. Stay with us. Breaking news now. Reports coming in from the
:13:03. > :13:10.Philippines of gunfire and explosions outside a complex in the
:13:11. > :13:15.capital Manila. It is situated next to the International Airport. Fire
:13:16. > :13:19.trucks and police have gone to the area, when we get more on it, we
:13:20. > :13:22.will bring you it as the story develops in the Philippines. Back to
:13:23. > :13:26.the Paris accord is now. Nature and politics both abhor
:13:27. > :13:29.a vacuum and if America cedes leadership on climate change,
:13:30. > :13:33.other country's will step in. Angela Merkel today described
:13:34. > :13:36.Paris as an "essetial" accord. A leaked statement from the EU
:13:37. > :13:38.and China shows they are already planning a joint announcement
:13:39. > :13:40.maintaining their And Beijing, the world's biggest
:13:41. > :13:44.polluter, promises to stick to the terms of the accord,
:13:45. > :13:49.whatever Mr Trump does. TRANSLATION: China will continue
:13:50. > :13:52.to implement promises made in the Paris agreement,
:13:53. > :13:56.to move towards the 2030 goals step But of course, we also hope to do
:13:57. > :14:10.this incorporation with others. The Europeans will also taking more
:14:11. > :14:13.of a leadership role on the issue. Laurence Tubiana was the French
:14:14. > :14:16.ambassador for climate negotiations that led to the Paris Agreement.
:14:17. > :14:25.She joins from Paris. Thank you for joining us. How much
:14:26. > :14:33.of a blow will this actually be to the Paris accords if America pulls
:14:34. > :14:38.out? Of course, it's a big deception, because the US has had a
:14:39. > :14:46.key role in drafting this agreement together with many others. So on
:14:47. > :14:51.that side, it's a pity. And it's a pity, essentially, for US society,
:14:52. > :14:57.US diplomacy, but frankly, when I look at the reaction all over the
:14:58. > :15:04.world, from Europe, from China, from even BGE six countries recently in
:15:05. > :15:09.Taormina, again, the elements really of what Prime Minister Rudy said
:15:10. > :15:20.recently in saying again, certainly tomorrow in France, really there is
:15:21. > :15:22.an overwhelming recommitment of every country to the Paris
:15:23. > :15:30.Agreement. I don't think this is really a blow, meaning it is a pity.
:15:31. > :15:36.It is deceitful. I'm sorry for this big achievement, I'm sorry for them
:15:37. > :15:41.the US in particular, but I think the train has left the station. If
:15:42. > :15:47.you listen to all the other experts around the table early on, I think
:15:48. > :15:50.the train really is there. The modernity, the transformation of the
:15:51. > :15:55.local economy is irreversible. That is what is written in the
:15:56. > :16:02.declaration between EU and China. I think it is a pity because, the US
:16:03. > :16:07.has the lead in technology, and capacity to lead on that aspect. But
:16:08. > :16:12.now, I think the ball will move on with other countries, and other
:16:13. > :16:18.directions. It is a pity for the US economy in particular. We haven't
:16:19. > :16:22.had an announcement is yet, we will announce it in 45 minutes time, if
:16:23. > :16:27.President Trump surprises us all and said America is staying in the Paris
:16:28. > :16:35.climate accords, how much better off we'll plan it be? Oh, anyway, I will
:16:36. > :16:41.be happy, because it is a collective endeavour. The withdrawal of the US,
:16:42. > :16:47.anyway, will slow the movement, of course. So it's very important that
:16:48. > :16:51.the US stays, and the US with all its capacity, to help other
:16:52. > :16:54.countries, and to show were dirty and the transformation of the
:16:55. > :17:01.economy. So it would be very, very good news. I will be listening to it
:17:02. > :17:05.later on, but in the case not, I do think it's a blow for the Paris
:17:06. > :17:08.Agreement. The Paris Agreement demonstrated resilience, not only
:17:09. > :17:11.because of government, because of the capacity of many other
:17:12. > :17:16.stakeholders that was the conception of Paris, really having a City, the
:17:17. > :17:20.states, the businesses, really committing to the global growth of
:17:21. > :17:26.Paris and the trans-formation. That is really there, and I think the
:17:27. > :17:35.wave is amplified by the reaction of the US announcement today. Thank you
:17:36. > :17:43.for joining us. I want to pick up on something that has been talked
:17:44. > :17:47.about, actually, if President Trump says that America is pulling out of
:17:48. > :17:52.the Paris accord, the truth is that states and cities are already doing
:17:53. > :17:54.a lot to reduce emissions. We have California, the governor of
:17:55. > :17:57.California who told the BBC that they are going to stay on the path
:17:58. > :18:04.and Wilma Ghost Lake themselves with China and Europeans. You also heard
:18:05. > :18:15.that New York would maintain the Paris Agreement. We hear the United
:18:16. > :18:22.States is abdicating leadership, we have heard that there were no
:18:23. > :18:26.Republican voices in Paris in the accord. I wonder whether this is
:18:27. > :18:30.truly speaking for the entire United States government and us as a
:18:31. > :18:35.democracy, or whether it speaks for the Democratic party. Look at the
:18:36. > :18:38.number of American businesses, Rex Tillerson, the Secretary of State,
:18:39. > :18:43.who is a Republican, has also said that America should stay in the
:18:44. > :18:48.Paris accord. Two different things. The negotiation in December, 2015,
:18:49. > :18:52.it was all Democrats. You may have many CEOs. If it was a bipartisan
:18:53. > :18:58.party that went to Paris, we may not have what we are having to date? You
:18:59. > :19:04.had 22 Republicans saying they were rejecting it. Split sides. Thank
:19:05. > :19:05.you. There have been other things going on in Washington as we wait
:19:06. > :19:15.for the Paris announcement. The former FBI director,
:19:16. > :19:17.James Comey, is to testify next Thursday before
:19:18. > :19:18.a Senate Intelligence committee investigating allegations
:19:19. > :19:20.of Russian interference Mr Comey, who was fired
:19:21. > :19:23.by the President last month, is expected to testify
:19:24. > :19:25.on conversations he had with President Trump about
:19:26. > :19:27.dropping the FBI's investigation into his then National Security
:19:28. > :19:29.Adviser, Michael Flynn, We will bring you all about when it
:19:30. > :19:34.comes. Donald Trump has decided not to move
:19:35. > :19:37.the US embassy in Israel The President signed
:19:38. > :19:40.the legal waiver that keeps The White House says Donald Trump
:19:41. > :19:45.remains committed to eventually moving the embassy to Jerusalem,
:19:46. > :19:49.but the delay is intended to maximise the chances
:19:50. > :19:51.of negotiating a peace deal Pakistan has rejected Afghan
:19:52. > :19:56.allegations that it was involved Pakistan was accused of supporting
:19:57. > :20:02.the Afghan-affiliated Haqqani network, which
:20:03. > :20:04.the Afghan intelligence service No armed group has
:20:05. > :20:08.officially claimed 90 people died in the bombing,
:20:09. > :20:13.which struck in Kabul's The British politician,
:20:14. > :20:20.Nigel Farage, who's a Trump ally and the driving force behind last
:20:21. > :20:24.year's Brexit referendum, has described as hysterical,
:20:25. > :20:27.reports that he too is a person of interest
:20:28. > :20:30.in the FBI investigation. He said it was extremely
:20:31. > :20:33.doubtful he could be a person of interest since he had
:20:34. > :20:36.no connections to Russia. A week today Brits will decide
:20:37. > :20:39.who they want to run their country, and negotiate their departure
:20:40. > :20:41.from the European Union. It was supposed to be a slam dunk
:20:42. > :20:45.of a victory for the Conservative but right now Theresa May's party
:20:46. > :20:47.is only just ahead So with seven days to go, is it
:20:48. > :20:57.starting to look like a real race. Today, out on the campaign trail,
:20:58. > :21:00.both the Prime Minister and Jeremy Corbyn focused
:21:01. > :21:02.on the big issue, Brexit. I'm confident that we can fulfil
:21:03. > :21:05.the promise of Brexit together, and build a Britain that is stronger,
:21:06. > :21:07.fairer, and even more prosperous Theresa May says no deal
:21:08. > :21:13.is better than a bad deal. Let's be clear, no deal
:21:14. > :21:16.is in fact a bad deal. One area of the UK that voted
:21:17. > :21:24.to leave the European Union was Cornwall in the South West
:21:25. > :21:27.of England, despite it receiving millions of dollars in EU subsidies.
:21:28. > :21:39.Ros Atkins is there for us. What are they making of the election
:21:40. > :21:46.in Cornwall and how the polls are tightening? Hi to all of you
:21:47. > :21:52.watching, Brexit as you mentioned is a huge political issue here. One of
:21:53. > :21:58.the key consequences of a positive vote for Brexit was that lots of
:21:59. > :22:01.people that supported the Ukip party are considering switching
:22:02. > :22:03.allegiances to the Conservatives, the national polls have suggested
:22:04. > :22:09.this could be happening as well. That is one lived for the
:22:10. > :22:12.Conservatives. The counter is that at the last election, the
:22:13. > :22:17.Conservatives in Cornwall got a clean sweep. All six constituencies
:22:18. > :22:21.went blue. The Lib Dems say, vote for us, we will give you a second
:22:22. > :22:25.referendum once the Brexit deal is negotiated. For those people in
:22:26. > :22:30.Cornwall but don't want Brexit do happen, that is proving attractive.
:22:31. > :22:33.The key dynamic here is, how can the Tories shore up their position, and
:22:34. > :22:39.how much progress can the Lib Dems may? I am sure you were watching the
:22:40. > :22:42.debate last night, Theresa May wasn't there. Have you heard any
:22:43. > :22:47.voters in Cornwall complaining that she wasn't there? Or did she think
:22:48. > :22:54.her stand in Amber Rudd did a good job? I will tell you a couple of
:22:55. > :22:59.things directly relevant to that, if we bring the camera around, this
:23:00. > :23:05.beautiful beach in Falmouth. You have picked the nicest place! It was
:23:06. > :23:09.full of tourists and locals enjoying the sunshine. We spent half an hour,
:23:10. > :23:12.me and a couple of producers, trying to find anyone on this beach who
:23:13. > :23:18.watched that debate. We have failed to. Which told me that perhaps, a
:23:19. > :23:23.lot of ordinary people don't engage in big, media events in the same way
:23:24. > :23:28.that the media does. The second interesting conversation I had...
:23:29. > :23:32.God forbid! One man sitting behind a windbreak said, I am fed up with
:23:33. > :23:36.Theresa May for not showing up. I am a conservative. I feel she should
:23:37. > :23:40.have done it. I have not been impressed by her performance in this
:23:41. > :23:42.campaign, but I am still going to vote for her despite those
:23:43. > :23:49.reservations. That's the challenge, by most commentators's
:23:50. > :23:52.acknowledgement, Jeremy Corbyn has had a strong campaign, but that
:23:53. > :24:00.there is an as is airily mean he has done enough to persuade gentlemen --
:24:01. > :24:04.but that doesn't necessarily mean. Whether voters do that will very
:24:05. > :24:09.much decide the outcome of the election. We will find out in a
:24:10. > :24:11.week's time. I hope you make sure that you peek equally de Ligt
:24:12. > :24:16.locations through the British Isles through the next week. I wouldn't
:24:17. > :24:24.want you to see you anywhere rainy. God forbid it rains X Mac I will do.
:24:25. > :24:27.See you soon. An update on the breaking news out
:24:28. > :24:32.of the Philippines a few minutes ago, there have been gunfire and
:24:33. > :24:36.explosions outside a shopping complex in the capital Manila.
:24:37. > :24:40.Employees have fled the scene, and spoke of a masked gunmen on the
:24:41. > :24:45.second floor of one hotel who was firing at guests. Reuters said that
:24:46. > :24:49.police are now in full control of the situation. We will bring you
:24:50. > :24:57.that constantly as the story unfolds. I want to bring one back
:24:58. > :25:01.in. You have been with me all week, it has been an incredibly busy week
:25:02. > :25:04.in Washington. As we get to the end of the week, and we have the
:25:05. > :25:07.President's announcement coming up, and we have talked through the week
:25:08. > :25:12.about the Russian investigations, it occurs to me that there is a common
:25:13. > :25:17.theme, Americans leadership in the world is under scrutiny, almost like
:25:18. > :25:23.never before. What can the president do to prove the perception of
:25:24. > :25:26.America right now? I think he needs to project leadership and have a
:25:27. > :25:30.strong sense of purpose of what it means for him to be president of the
:25:31. > :25:36.United States, what is his vision? How does he articulated? And can he
:25:37. > :25:40.get people to follow him? We have seen tweets and a lot of odd
:25:41. > :25:43.statements coming out of the White House, which seems very
:25:44. > :25:47.dysfunctional, and frankly, doesn't have a coherent message. He need
:25:48. > :25:51.adult supervision to help him in the White House, for him to do those
:25:52. > :25:56.tasks. Great to have you in the studio. I have had a lot of fun.
:25:57. > :26:01.Christian is back on Monday, back from the South of France, we will
:26:02. > :26:02.keep one, too, though. You are watching 100 days plus, have a great
:26:03. > :26:14.weekend. See you on Monday. There is a change to the weather on
:26:15. > :26:15.the way and