0:00:08 > 0:00:09You're watching Beyond 100 Days.
0:00:09 > 0:00:13President Trump keeps the world waiting on the Iran nuclear deal.
0:00:13 > 0:00:15Ahead is an important deadline tomorrow and we still
0:00:15 > 0:00:22don't know if he plans to reimpose US sanctions.
0:00:22 > 0:00:25Mr Trump is under pressure from Europeans and his own national
0:00:25 > 0:00:27security team to stick with the nuclear deal.
0:00:27 > 0:00:29He also faces pressure from the Russia investigation
0:00:29 > 0:00:31but insists, repeatedly there was never any collusion.
0:00:34 > 0:00:35Also on the programme...
0:00:35 > 0:00:37Searching for survivors - eight people are still missing
0:00:37 > 0:00:39after the mudslides and flash floods in southern California
0:00:39 > 0:00:46that left 17 dead.
0:00:46 > 0:00:48The New York Times was barred from publishing any more classified
0:00:48 > 0:00:52documents about the Vietnam war.
0:00:52 > 0:00:55The Pentagon, a newspaper and power - we sit down with Steven Spielberg
0:00:55 > 0:01:00to hear about his latest film, The Post.
0:01:00 > 0:01:04Get in touch with us using the hashtag #Beyond100Days.
0:01:11 > 0:01:13Hello and welcome - I'm Katty Kay in Washington
0:01:13 > 0:01:15and Christian Fraser is in London.
0:01:15 > 0:01:17The clock is ticking and President Trump has just one day
0:01:17 > 0:01:20to make an important decision on the Iran deal.
0:01:20 > 0:01:22The trouble is that even at this late stage, no one knows
0:01:22 > 0:01:25whether he's going to bring back US sanctions against Tehran
0:01:25 > 0:01:27tomorrow or not.
0:01:27 > 0:01:29In a deliberate display of unity, Britain, France, Germany
0:01:29 > 0:01:31and the European Union today all urged him not
0:01:31 > 0:01:41to blow up the deal.
0:01:41 > 0:01:43It's known as the JCPOA.
0:01:43 > 0:01:45British foreign secretary Boris Johnson went so far
0:01:45 > 0:01:47as to challenge Mr Trump to prove there was something better
0:01:47 > 0:01:48than the current Iran deal.
0:01:48 > 0:01:51The EU's foreign policy chief also stressed that the deal is working
0:01:51 > 0:01:54and Iran is in compliance.
0:01:54 > 0:01:57The European Union remains committed to support the full and effective
0:01:57 > 0:02:01implementation of the agreement is, including to make sure that the
0:02:01 > 0:02:06lifting of nuclear related sanctions has a positive impact on trade and
0:02:06 > 0:02:10economic relations with Iran, including benefits for the uranium
0:02:10 > 0:02:16people. -- for the Iranians are people. The agreement has allowed
0:02:16 > 0:02:24for continuous dialogue with Iran on all issues.I don't think anybody
0:02:24 > 0:02:30has so far produced a better alternative to the JCPOA. As a way
0:02:30 > 0:02:37of preventing the Iranians from going ahead with the acquisition of
0:02:37 > 0:02:39military nuclear capability. I don't think anybody has come up with a
0:02:39 > 0:02:45better idea. I think it is incumbent on those who oppose the JCPOA to
0:02:45 > 0:02:51come up with a better solution, because we haven't seen it so far.
0:02:51 > 0:02:55We know that it is absolutely necessary to have the signal that it
0:02:55 > 0:03:00is possible, by the dramatic approaches, to prevent the
0:03:00 > 0:03:03development of nuclear weapons, in a time when other parts of the world
0:03:03 > 0:03:10are discussing how to get nuclear weapons, and it would send a very
0:03:10 > 0:03:14dangerous signal to the rest of the world if the only agreement which
0:03:14 > 0:03:22prevents us from the proliferation of nuclear weapons would be negative
0:03:22 > 0:03:27effect. We very much agree on this point.They are all asking what
0:03:27 > 0:03:28America is going to do.
0:03:28 > 0:03:30And a brief time ago we got reaction from
0:03:30 > 0:03:32Democratic Senator Chris Coons, who sits on the Foreign
0:03:32 > 0:03:34Relations Committee.
0:03:34 > 0:03:37What are the chances, realistically, that the President is going to defy
0:03:37 > 0:03:42all of the European expertise on this, as well as his own national
0:03:42 > 0:03:45security team, and actually reimpose American sanctions on Iran?That is
0:03:45 > 0:03:49one of the challenges we face with our President. When he was a
0:03:49 > 0:03:52candidate, he promised he would be unconventional and unpredictable. He
0:03:52 > 0:03:59certainly outperformed in that Tata Group, so far as President. I am
0:03:59 > 0:04:02hopeful he will take seriously the advice of his National Security
0:04:02 > 0:04:05Adviser, his secretary of defence and state, and the concerns and
0:04:05 > 0:04:09interests of our vital European allies, and that he will recertify
0:04:09 > 0:04:14our continued participation in the JCPOA. I am also hopeful he will
0:04:14 > 0:04:18announce new sanctions on Iran that we can impose on their ballistic
0:04:18 > 0:04:22missile programme, on human rights violations, or on their support for
0:04:22 > 0:04:26terrorism in the region.Boris Johnson, the British Foreign
0:04:26 > 0:04:28Secretary, has challenged the White House to come up with something
0:04:28 > 0:04:33better than the existing deal. Is there something?There is nothing we
0:04:33 > 0:04:37are going to have enacted in the next few days. We need to continue
0:04:37 > 0:04:41this journey with our European partners of constraining Iran's
0:04:41 > 0:04:45nuclear weapon programme through the JCPOA. But we can and should work
0:04:45 > 0:04:48together to address some of the future challenges we will face
0:04:48 > 0:04:54because of sunsets in the JCPOA. Some diplomats have suggested that
0:04:54 > 0:04:58they are hearing that Iran is seriously considering walking away
0:04:58 > 0:05:02from this deal. If the President reimpose sanctions, is that they
0:05:02 > 0:05:06risk?Yes, if he were to reimpose nuclear related sanctions, they
0:05:06 > 0:05:10would be justified in walking away from JCPOA, because we would be
0:05:10 > 0:05:14breaking one of the core principles of the deal. If the President
0:05:14 > 0:05:17imposes sanctions that are specifically targeted at the
0:05:17 > 0:05:20ballistic missile programme, for example, that is clearly permitted
0:05:20 > 0:05:25under the JCPOA and clearly justified by Iran's ongoing
0:05:25 > 0:05:29aggressive behaviour and violation of UN Security Council resolutions.
0:05:29 > 0:05:35You and your colleagues on the foreign relations committee, your
0:05:35 > 0:05:38Democrat colleagues, have gathered evidence from European allies about
0:05:38 > 0:05:43Russian interference in democracies. You put out a report this week, 200
0:05:43 > 0:05:46pages long, an extraordinary read. You documented evidence of Russian
0:05:46 > 0:05:53operations in 19 European countries. That's right. A stunning moment in
0:05:53 > 0:05:58our history as a nation. We have such a clear and well documented
0:05:58 > 0:06:02assault, not just on America's democracy, but on the democracies
0:06:02 > 0:06:06and the electoral systems of so many of our allies across Europe and the
0:06:06 > 0:06:11West in the democratic world. Our President is failing to call this
0:06:11 > 0:06:13clearly for what it is. And organised Russian campaign of
0:06:13 > 0:06:19aggression to undermine democracy. He is failing to step up and prepare
0:06:19 > 0:06:22the United States for its next election, and to come to the aid and
0:06:22 > 0:06:26support of vital allies in Europe, as your elections continue to be
0:06:26 > 0:06:29threatened and undermined by this behaviour by Russia, it is
0:06:29 > 0:06:33flabbergasting. It is a failure of leadership to protect not just the
0:06:33 > 0:06:36United States and our homeland, but what makes us a democracy and our
0:06:36 > 0:06:43vital allies.What about the investigations? You also sit on the
0:06:43 > 0:06:46Judiciary Committee, the intelligence committee and the house
0:06:46 > 0:06:48intelligence committee, they all have investigation is ongoing. You
0:06:48 > 0:06:53came out of the Judiciary Committee and you said you are at an impasse,
0:06:53 > 0:06:59the politics is now getting in the way of the investigations. Explain?
0:06:59 > 0:07:02Unfortunately, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary
0:07:02 > 0:07:05Committee has been trying to move into a different direction, to
0:07:05 > 0:07:09investigate different things, either far past actions or actions somehow
0:07:09 > 0:07:13related to Hillary Clinton and her campaign, rather than working with
0:07:13 > 0:07:18the minority leader and focusing on supporting an ongoing investigation
0:07:18 > 0:07:24into Russia's meddling and oversight of the obstruction of justice
0:07:24 > 0:07:30allegations, where the firing of former FBI director Jim Comey is one
0:07:30 > 0:07:34of the core issues. The Senate Judiciary Committee is responsible
0:07:34 > 0:07:37for the oversight of the American Department of Justice and the
0:07:37 > 0:07:43Federal bureau of investigation. It is in our jurisdiction to bring in
0:07:43 > 0:07:46witnesses, hold testimony. Sadly, on a partisan basis, the investigation
0:07:46 > 0:07:53has ground to a halt.Thank you for joining us.
0:07:54 > 0:07:58If you are trying to bring North Korea to the table, it sets a
0:07:58 > 0:08:01dangerous precedent if you walk away from a deal you have already signed
0:08:01 > 0:08:06with Iran, particularly when you're trying to get Korea to unilaterally
0:08:06 > 0:08:10disarm. When you're trying to prop up the moderates, there are
0:08:10 > 0:08:15investors that want to go there, but they are nervous. Every time we get
0:08:15 > 0:08:20a rhetorical flourish from Trump, they think, should we invest or
0:08:20 > 0:08:25might we lose money? You have heard there that they might be justified
0:08:25 > 0:08:29to walk away from a deal?I think that is part of the reason why
0:08:29 > 0:08:32people in Iran have been frustrated, they say that they were promised so
0:08:32 > 0:08:35much from the sanctions relief, it did not come because there have not
0:08:35 > 0:08:39been foreign investors. Iran is the the reason that European diplomats
0:08:39 > 0:08:42feel that they have to find a way to work with this unusual
0:08:42 > 0:08:46administration. I spoke to a top European diplomat just this week
0:08:46 > 0:08:50that was saying that we don't know, so close to this deadline on the
0:08:50 > 0:08:53sanctions waver, we just don't know which way the White House is going
0:08:53 > 0:08:57to go. That is a problem, when they are trying to craft their own
0:08:57 > 0:09:01policies. Iran is a huge factor in America's relations with its
0:09:01 > 0:09:05European allies at the moment.
0:09:06 > 0:09:08As we have just heard Donald Trump has repeatedly insisted
0:09:08 > 0:09:10there was no collusion between his campaign and Russia.
0:09:10 > 0:09:13He accuses Democrats of carrying out a witch hunt and suggests
0:09:13 > 0:09:15Republicans should take charge of the investigations.
0:09:15 > 0:09:18He also says it is Hillary Clinton who should be investigated not him.
0:09:18 > 0:09:20At a press conference yesterday, the President used the phrase
0:09:20 > 0:09:29"no collusion" seven times in just one answer.
0:09:29 > 0:09:33There has been no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians, or
0:09:33 > 0:09:37Trump and Russians. No collusion. There is no pollution, there is no
0:09:37 > 0:09:40collusion. There was absolutely no pollution. But it has been
0:09:40 > 0:09:44determined there is no pollution. They have no collusion and nobody
0:09:44 > 0:09:49has found any collusion.No collusion.
0:09:52 > 0:10:00We can speak to the CEO of news Max. Clearly, the President is frustrated
0:10:00 > 0:10:03by this investigation. You speak to Donald Trump on a regular basis.
0:10:03 > 0:10:06What does he tell you about it and what he feels about the
0:10:06 > 0:10:15investigation?He tells me there is no collusion! I think he is exactly
0:10:15 > 0:10:20right in that. You know, they say, the President repeats himself a lot,
0:10:20 > 0:10:26there must be something wrong in the President, Donald Trump is a bit
0:10:26 > 0:10:31theatrical. He has a theatrical flair and he thinks that this is a
0:10:31 > 0:10:34way of reinforcing his message. He has been doing this for years where
0:10:34 > 0:10:39he repeats himself. There is nothing unusual. It is funny how I take it
0:10:39 > 0:10:43as normal and somebody else says it is strange that he keeps... He has a
0:10:43 > 0:10:49mantra, no collusion, because this President has been very cooperative,
0:10:49 > 0:10:54I think a lot more cooperative than I would ever advise them to be,
0:10:54 > 0:10:56certainly any other President under investigation, turning over
0:10:56 > 0:11:06documents, not exerting executive privilege, allowing key aides to be
0:11:06 > 0:11:09interviewed, opening himself up to questions, which I think he will be
0:11:09 > 0:11:15answering soon. I was not involved in the campaign, because I run
0:11:15 > 0:11:18Newsmax and we are independent. I have always been a friend of the
0:11:18 > 0:11:21President, I know a lot of people involved, and I don't think there is
0:11:21 > 0:11:27any evidence whatsoever of collusion between the Trump campaign and the
0:11:27 > 0:11:31Russians.You're right that it is effective, we picked that up and ran
0:11:31 > 0:11:35that for him several times in a row. Does he feel that this
0:11:35 > 0:11:38investigation, from Capitol Hill or the FBI, is overshadowing his
0:11:38 > 0:11:45presidency?Yes, I think he thinks it is being used as a blunt
0:11:45 > 0:11:51instrument against him, and certainly the media focus on it. You
0:11:51 > 0:11:54go on certain networks, which I will not name, cable news channels, all
0:11:54 > 0:11:58they do is talk about this. What I think is frustrating to him and his
0:11:58 > 0:12:03close friends and supporters is they have taken nothing and created it
0:12:03 > 0:12:09into something. Let me give you an example. If you look at this, this
0:12:09 > 0:12:16whole story, there is no evidence that there has been collusion with
0:12:16 > 0:12:21the Russians. We have two indictments and two plea agreements
0:12:21 > 0:12:29from Robert Mueller, and there is no evidence there. A lot of it starts
0:12:29 > 0:12:32with the so-called dossier, which comes to Britain, because all
0:12:32 > 0:12:37hearsay, it was a a lot of garbage. We have Ikea: going to
0:12:37 > 0:12:40Czechoslovakia, to Prague, for a secret meeting with the Russians,
0:12:40 > 0:12:47and he testified he has never been to Czechoslovakia and have no
0:12:47 > 0:12:51dealings with this people. It was just a lot of hearsay and gossip in
0:12:51 > 0:12:55a report. To have a major investigation come out of gossip, it
0:12:55 > 0:13:00is very bizarre.Of course, Chris, if we believe what is in Michael
0:13:00 > 0:13:03Wolff's group, Steve Bannon thinks the meetings between Donald Junior
0:13:03 > 0:13:10and the Russians was treasonous. That aside, is it easier, with
0:13:10 > 0:13:13Bannon out of the way, for the President to reach across the aisle
0:13:13 > 0:13:21and start to do some deals?Well, I disagree with Steve's treasonous, I
0:13:21 > 0:13:24don't think was not the way the meeting went down, but I think most
0:13:24 > 0:13:27campaigns would have taken the meeting in some shape or form. I
0:13:27 > 0:13:33don't think it was treasonous. I think Bannon was a weight on the
0:13:33 > 0:13:37President and was preventing him from moving to the centre. I believe
0:13:37 > 0:13:40the President's success and importance for the United States is
0:13:40 > 0:13:45that he moved to the centre of things like immigration,
0:13:45 > 0:13:47infrastructure, education, even national security issues. I think
0:13:47 > 0:13:51the Donald Trump I have known, I met him 20 years ago, will do that in
0:13:51 > 0:13:56short order. We are seeing signs of it. We are living through a very
0:13:56 > 0:13:59polarising period here. But I think he is the guy that can break
0:13:59 > 0:14:04through.When you say you have known him for 20 years, do you think
0:14:04 > 0:14:11sometimes he is conflicted in the way that he has to appeal to his
0:14:11 > 0:14:19base? Sometimes, I suspect that his instincts are Democrat?Well, I
0:14:19 > 0:14:24think he is more of a centrist. When I first knew him, he was a Democrat.
0:14:24 > 0:14:30I would say a conservative business Democrat, but a Democrat. He is a
0:14:30 > 0:14:33unifying guy. He is not an ideologue, that is the important
0:14:33 > 0:14:38thing you have to know about Donald Trump, Steve Bannon is and was an
0:14:38 > 0:14:43ideologue. He is not rigid, he likes getting deals done, he is very
0:14:43 > 0:14:47pragmatic. He will look at an issue and say, we need infrastructure, the
0:14:47 > 0:14:50country needs this modernisation and we need to be competitive around the
0:14:50 > 0:14:53world, a conservative might say we don't have the money, the Liberals
0:14:53 > 0:14:57say that the project should go for different things, Trump is more
0:14:57 > 0:15:00about, let's get this done for the good of the country.Chris, when did
0:15:00 > 0:15:09you last speak to the President and what is his mood?I saw him about
0:15:09 > 0:15:15ten days ago, I guess, when he was down in Florida. He was down here
0:15:15 > 0:15:23for that period of time over the holidays. He was happy, very
0:15:23 > 0:15:28gregarious. He had just gotten the tax bill through and he was looking
0:15:28 > 0:15:32forward to... In fact, he told me he thought he could do a lot of
0:15:32 > 0:15:35bipartisan legislation this year and that the Democrats, he thought, were
0:15:35 > 0:15:41very open to working with him.OK, thank you very much for joining us,
0:15:41 > 0:15:43always good to have you on the programme, please come back again
0:15:43 > 0:15:48soon.Thank you so much.
0:15:49 > 0:15:53It is nice and sunny in Florida, always interesting to get his
0:15:53 > 0:15:55thoughts, he is one of the people that has been close to the President
0:15:55 > 0:15:59for a long time. He downplayed it a little bit, but I know he speaks to
0:15:59 > 0:16:03him on a regular basis. You know, to try to get a sense of how the
0:16:03 > 0:16:07President is feeling, sometimes we get the perception between the
0:16:07 > 0:16:10Michael Wolff book, the tweets about nuclear buttons, that there is a lot
0:16:10 > 0:16:14of stress being pent up in the White House. Interesting to see whether
0:16:14 > 0:16:18that is being felt by his friends, and the degree to which they will
0:16:18 > 0:16:23tell us that.The thing for me, he talks about no collusion, I wonder
0:16:23 > 0:16:27if Robert Mueller has moved past that, he is looking at
0:16:27 > 0:16:30money-laundering, he has two guilty pleas, he is looking at obstruction
0:16:30 > 0:16:36of justice, not just solely about collusion. He has brought in a cyber
0:16:36 > 0:16:40expert we have heard. You wonder how ready Donald Trump to sit down with
0:16:40 > 0:16:45Robert Mueller. He said he was 100% ready to do it in summer, I am not
0:16:45 > 0:16:53sure he is 100% now.He kind of urged that and so yesterday. -- he
0:16:53 > 0:16:54kind of fudged that answer.
0:16:54 > 0:16:56In California, rescue teams are searching for eight people
0:16:56 > 0:16:58who are still missing after the flash floods
0:16:58 > 0:16:59and mudslides on Tuesday.
0:16:59 > 0:17:0217 people are known to have died when a torrent of mud carrying
0:17:02 > 0:17:05boulders the size of small cars smashed through the
0:17:05 > 0:17:06town of Montecito.
0:17:06 > 0:17:0965 homes have been destroyed - the area in Santa Barbara county
0:17:09 > 0:17:11was only just recovering from the recent
0:17:11 > 0:17:12devastating wildfires.
0:17:12 > 0:17:13Our correspondent James Cook is there.
0:17:13 > 0:17:14Turn around!
0:17:14 > 0:17:16The flash flood is right there!
0:17:16 > 0:17:17Get out of here, go!
0:17:17 > 0:17:19This is the moment it began.
0:17:19 > 0:17:21Oh, my God!
0:17:26 > 0:17:27And then panic.
0:17:27 > 0:17:29Close the door!
0:17:31 > 0:17:34It was a million miles an hour in slow motion,
0:17:34 > 0:17:35if that makes sense.
0:17:35 > 0:17:40I clicked in survival gear, survival mode.
0:17:40 > 0:17:43Every second, it is just roaring and banging against the house
0:17:43 > 0:17:51and the most vicious and violent sounds you have ever heard.
0:17:51 > 0:17:53Montecito has only just grasped the scale of the disaster
0:17:53 > 0:18:01which will bear its name.
0:18:01 > 0:18:04For this idyllic little town of just 9000 people,
0:18:04 > 0:18:05recovery will be long and hard.
0:18:05 > 0:18:06This was somebody's driveway.
0:18:06 > 0:18:07There are three cars destroyed.
0:18:11 > 0:18:12Buried inside that rubble.
0:18:12 > 0:18:14Looking at this house, it is difficult to believe anyone
0:18:14 > 0:18:16on this street survived, but many did and their
0:18:17 > 0:18:22stories are remarkable.
0:18:22 > 0:18:25People walked the dogs through here, there are trails, my kids have grown
0:18:25 > 0:18:26up riding their bikes.
0:18:26 > 0:18:28Noelle fled with her three children just before the storm.
0:18:28 > 0:18:31But many of her neighbours did not.
0:18:31 > 0:18:33Two young boys were swept out of their home,
0:18:33 > 0:18:34along with their mother.
0:18:34 > 0:18:35In the middle of the night.
0:18:35 > 0:18:36And the dog is gone.
0:18:36 > 0:18:38And they are lucky to be fine.
0:18:38 > 0:18:40It is like a war zone here.
0:18:40 > 0:18:45There are homes that are just missing.
0:18:45 > 0:18:48And I walk down the street and I see balls, and toys, and bicycles
0:18:48 > 0:18:55and shoes and socks. And knives and hammers.
0:18:55 > 0:18:58It looks like people's lives are just washed to the ocean.
0:18:58 > 0:19:01Much of the wreckage ended up clogging the main coastal motorway.
0:19:01 > 0:19:03The mountains above are scarred by rivers of debris.
0:19:03 > 0:19:05Southern California was once famed for its agreeable climate.
0:19:05 > 0:19:07These days, it reels from drought, fire and flood.
0:19:07 > 0:19:17James Cook, BBC News, Montecito.
0:19:20 > 0:19:23Steven Spielberg believes the Trump administration is using the same
0:19:23 > 0:19:25tactics as President Nixon used to try to silence the press.
0:19:25 > 0:19:27The Oscar-winning director was speaking to our arts editor,
0:19:27 > 0:19:30Will Gompertz, ahead of the release of his latest film The Post,
0:19:30 > 0:19:35starring Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep.
0:19:35 > 0:19:37This is a devastating security breach that was leaked
0:19:37 > 0:19:38out of the Pentagon.
0:19:38 > 0:19:41Before the Watergate Scandal, there were the Pentagon Papers.
0:19:41 > 0:19:44The first expose a of a cover-up in the Nixon government
0:19:44 > 0:19:46by the Washington Post, led by its legendary editor Ben
0:19:46 > 0:19:48Bradlee and publisher Kay Graham.
0:19:50 > 0:19:51Do you have the papers?
0:19:52 > 0:19:53Set in 1971.
0:19:53 > 0:19:54Yes.
0:19:54 > 0:19:57But you have described it as a timely movie.
0:19:57 > 0:20:03Well, obviously if you flip the 1 and the 7, or the 7 and the 1,
0:20:03 > 0:20:08you really get to see the great arc of the pendulum that has brought us
0:20:08 > 0:20:10right back to the same tactics that Richard Nixon used
0:20:10 > 0:20:15to try to silence the press.
0:20:15 > 0:20:17I'm talking about the current administration and their absolute
0:20:17 > 0:20:19broadsiding of media, social media, news,
0:20:19 > 0:20:27anybody that offends.
0:20:27 > 0:20:29You know, there is a label that is immediately attached
0:20:29 > 0:20:33to them, well, that can't be true, because they're all fake news.
0:20:33 > 0:20:36I mean, it's a lot more insidious today, by the way,
0:20:36 > 0:20:37than it was in 1971.
0:20:38 > 0:20:40If you publish, we'll be in the Supreme Court next week.
0:20:40 > 0:20:42Meaning?
0:20:42 > 0:20:45We could all go to prison.
0:20:45 > 0:20:48There's been another massive press expose the last six months,
0:20:48 > 0:20:51it looks like the endemic sexual harassment and exploitation
0:20:51 > 0:20:56of women in Hollywood.
0:20:56 > 0:20:59I mean, you're a really senior figure in Hollywood and you've
0:20:59 > 0:21:01been around a long time.
0:21:01 > 0:21:04Do you ever think, you know what, I think I could
0:21:04 > 0:21:06have done a bit more to stop this?
0:21:06 > 0:21:09Well, you know, I can only basically react to that question
0:21:09 > 0:21:13within my own workplace environment.
0:21:13 > 0:21:16Within my organisation, there weren't incidences,
0:21:16 > 0:21:19except for a couple of years and years ago, that I would say
0:21:19 > 0:21:21gave me the experiences to be the authority
0:21:21 > 0:21:22on that question you ask.
0:21:22 > 0:21:25What happened in those incidences?
0:21:25 > 0:21:28Just a couple of incidences, I don't want to go into detail on them,
0:21:28 > 0:21:30but they happened years and years ago, where we had
0:21:30 > 0:21:33to let somebody go.
0:21:33 > 0:21:36People are concerned about having a woman in charge of the paper.
0:21:36 > 0:21:38Think she doesn't have the resolve to make the tough choices.
0:21:38 > 0:21:43Thank you for your frankness.
0:21:43 > 0:21:46My prediction is that this watershed moment for women,
0:21:46 > 0:21:48in extolling the courage of women who, like Katherine Graham,
0:21:48 > 0:21:51with the Pentagon Papers, with her decision to publish or not
0:21:51 > 0:21:54to publish, so many women have found their voices and they have
0:21:54 > 0:21:58been given so much support.
0:21:58 > 0:22:02Not just by other women, but also by certain men.
0:22:02 > 0:22:05I think this is not just another news cycle.
0:22:05 > 0:22:09I think this is a permanent change in the culture.
0:22:09 > 0:22:11Maybe.
0:22:11 > 0:22:13But as Kay Graham showed with her courageous leadership
0:22:13 > 0:22:15of the Washington Post, exposing deeply rooted corrupt
0:22:15 > 0:22:17behaviour is one thing - changing it is quite another.
0:22:17 > 0:22:25Will Gompertz, BBC News.
0:22:25 > 0:22:29I can't wait to see that movie. Have you seen it?Not yet, looking
0:22:29 > 0:22:35forward to it.Apparently it is really good, she is meant to be
0:22:35 > 0:22:37great as Kay Graham.
0:22:37 > 0:22:39We've talked this week about the buzz surrounding Oprah Winfrey -
0:22:39 > 0:22:42I think it's Christian's favourite story - and whether she's planning
0:22:42 > 0:22:45to run for President after giving a rousing speech at the Golden
0:22:45 > 0:22:46Globes.
0:22:46 > 0:22:48Well she got a bit more backing today.
0:22:48 > 0:22:51In an interview with the BBC's Andrew Marr Show, both Meryl Streep
0:22:51 > 0:22:53and Tom Hanks were asked whether they thought
0:22:53 > 0:22:58Oprah Winfrey is running - here's their glowing endorsement.
0:22:58 > 0:23:02Well, I don't know if she was thinking that specifically, although
0:23:02 > 0:23:09I do here now that she is really considering it. But she certainly
0:23:09 > 0:23:12set the bar pretty high for anybody else that decides to run, because no
0:23:12 > 0:23:24one can speak in less lofty terms and adhere to principle and passion
0:23:24 > 0:23:28in a legal campaign, because we have seen it as possible. That is how you
0:23:28 > 0:23:33rouse people. That was the voice of a leader. You know, I pity whoever
0:23:33 > 0:23:40does try to run.I believe Oprah is some other kind of social force, one
0:23:40 > 0:23:42of the kind that has never existed before, quite attractive. I believe
0:23:42 > 0:23:46she wakes up in the morning, both personally and professionally,
0:23:46 > 0:23:49wonders what she can do, specifically, in order to make the
0:23:49 > 0:23:53world a better place. Maybe it is a very local event, maybe it is going
0:23:53 > 0:23:58out and giving voice to something that needs to be given voice to. We
0:23:58 > 0:24:02had proven, I think, in the last few years, that if you want to be
0:24:02 > 0:24:05President of the United States, guess what, there is a way that can
0:24:05 > 0:24:11happen, because...That is one thing Trump has shown.Indeed.Here is
0:24:11 > 0:24:15where I see the problem for Oprah Winfrey. When we talk about Donald
0:24:15 > 0:24:19Trump, there is a tweet for every occasion, you can go back to 2009,
0:24:19 > 0:24:23and find one to fit the occasion. Imagine if you did that with Oprah
0:24:23 > 0:24:27Winfrey. She has been a chat show host for 25 years. People could go
0:24:27 > 0:24:31back and find out her thoughts on everything, right across the social
0:24:31 > 0:24:36spectrum. How would she survived that sort of scrutiny?I have two
0:24:36 > 0:24:43words for you, Access Hollywood. Donald Trump survived revelations we
0:24:43 > 0:24:46never thought he would do. We thought his campaign was totally
0:24:46 > 0:24:51sunk by those comments he made about women on tape. And he is now
0:24:51 > 0:24:55President of the United States. Here is the interesting thing for me,
0:24:55 > 0:24:58watching two liberal media stars, Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep saying it
0:24:58 > 0:25:03would be great if she won, she has set the bar high. Those are the same
0:25:03 > 0:25:06people who said Donald Trump should never run for office, he has no
0:25:06 > 0:25:09experience, does not know how to be President and has never been elected
0:25:09 > 0:25:13to anything. If they apply that standard to Donald Trump, I am not
0:25:13 > 0:25:21sure how they can't apply it to Oprah Winfrey, which I think is the
0:25:21 > 0:25:23fear of some Democrats, that this builds momentum and she is not
0:25:23 > 0:25:26qualified, that she cannot make it to the election process.2020 is so
0:25:26 > 0:25:35far away, isn't it?It will come in a nanosecond!Who will come out of
0:25:35 > 0:25:38the Democrat would work? The one thing in her favour is that she has
0:25:38 > 0:25:40the star factor, something the Democrats are desperately looking
0:25:40 > 0:25:42for.
0:25:44 > 0:25:46This is Beyond 100 Days from the BBC.
0:25:46 > 0:25:49Coming up for viewers on the BBC News Channel and BBC World News -
0:25:49 > 0:25:52why countries around the world are lining up to condemn Myanmar
0:25:52 > 0:25:54over the arrest of two journalists who the government wants to charge
0:25:54 > 0:25:56with breaking the Official Secrets Act.
0:25:56 > 0:25:59And a freedom of speech issue or a question of tone?
0:25:59 > 0:26:01The online vlogger who's fallen out of favour with YouTube
0:26:01 > 0:26:03after posting the body of a suicide victim.
0:26:03 > 0:26:06That's still to come.
0:26:12 > 0:26:16Hello. If the truth were known, it has been something of a mishmash of
0:26:16 > 0:26:20a day across the British Isles, at its very best. There was pledge of
0:26:20 > 0:26:26sunshine on offer in Wales and spots elsewhere. The truth of the matter
0:26:26 > 0:26:30is that there was a lot of clout to be had and some mist and fog
0:26:30 > 0:26:34lingered through the course of the day. One of those lead in January
0:26:34 > 0:26:36days. There you can see on the satellite imagery that there were
0:26:36 > 0:26:40some decent islands of sunshine. Through the evening and overnight,
0:26:40 > 0:26:45we will find that the cloud will part in one or two locations, and
0:26:45 > 0:26:51that will lead to some fog, a death like we had last night. Where the
0:26:51 > 0:26:55skies stay clear, particularly so in the West, there could be a touch of
0:26:55 > 0:26:58frost around proceedings and especially so in the countryside,
0:26:58 > 0:27:02just that fraction milder towards the east. Friday morning, I think
0:27:02 > 0:27:05there are no great issues with fog across the north-western quarter of
0:27:05 > 0:27:10Scotland. As soon as you drift a little further east down into the
0:27:10 > 0:27:13Borders, there could be a little bit of an issue. Northern Ireland, not
0:27:13 > 0:27:17such an issue. If there was any fog overnight, I think it will be blown
0:27:17 > 0:27:21away, the commute of the morning. Quite a chilly start across western
0:27:21 > 0:27:26parts. I think this is where we will see the densest of the fog, through
0:27:26 > 0:27:30the East, East Anglia, parts of the south-east, I don't think it will be
0:27:30 > 0:27:34much of an issue. A lot of cloud and dry whether to be had on Friday. The
0:27:34 > 0:27:38best of the sunshine through western parts, cross high ground as well,
0:27:38 > 0:27:41helping to break up some of the cloud. Again, it will be Aprilia
0:27:41 > 0:27:48leaden sort of day. Friday into Saturday, we freshen up those winds,
0:27:48 > 0:27:52which will help with the fog situation we have had over the last
0:27:52 > 0:27:58couple of nights. It is freshening up, the wind, head of a said of
0:27:58 > 0:28:04weather fronts, bringing a wet day into Northern Ireland. Gradually
0:28:04 > 0:28:07easing further east, the weather front, taking the prospect of rain
0:28:07 > 0:28:11into western Scotland, western England, through Wales. Dry
0:28:11 > 0:28:14conditions to finish the day in Northern Ireland. From Saturday into
0:28:14 > 0:28:18Sunday, join the dots, that is the old weather front. A new one showing
0:28:18 > 0:28:22at hand across the western quarter of the British Isles. Not the
0:28:22 > 0:28:26coldest days by any means at all. Make the most of it because once the
0:28:26 > 0:28:29weather front comes through during the course of Monday, the rest of
0:28:29 > 0:28:35the week is much colder and a tad more wintry.
0:30:06 > 0:30:09This is Beyond 100 Days, with me Katty Kay in Washington -
0:30:09 > 0:30:10Christian Fraser's in London.
0:30:10 > 0:30:12Our top stories -
0:30:12 > 0:30:15European powers call on President Trump to uphold a deal
0:30:15 > 0:30:17on Iran's nuclear programme - struck by his predecessor
0:30:17 > 0:30:26Barack Obama in 2015.
0:30:26 > 0:30:31When he was a candidate he promised that he would be unconventional and
0:30:31 > 0:30:32unpredictable. He
0:30:32 > 0:30:33that he would be unconventional and unpredictable. He certainly
0:30:33 > 0:30:36outperformed in that category so far as president.
0:30:36 > 0:30:39Some incredible pictures to share with you from California,
0:30:39 > 0:30:41the moment a car was caught in the devastating mudslides
0:30:41 > 0:30:44which have killed 17 people - eight others are still missing.
0:30:44 > 0:30:47Coming up in the next half hour -
0:30:47 > 0:30:52He was the Brexiteer-in-chief, so why is Nigel Farage
0:30:52 > 0:30:57warming to the idea of another EU referendum?
0:30:57 > 0:31:00And raiding the Ritz - two robbers remain on the run
0:31:00 > 0:31:03after stealing millions of dollars worth of jewels, from
0:31:03 > 0:31:03the glitzy hotel in Paris.
0:31:03 > 0:31:05Let us know your thoughts by using the hashtag.
0:31:05 > 0:31:08'Beyond-One-Hundred-Days'.
0:31:14 > 0:31:19Earlier this week we had Nigel Farage on the programme,
0:31:19 > 0:31:21the Brexiteer in chief, talking about his trip to Brussels
0:31:21 > 0:31:24and his meeting with the EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier.
0:31:24 > 0:31:27Today Mr Farage said he is close to backing a second EU referendum
0:31:27 > 0:31:29in order to end the "whinging and whining" of
0:31:29 > 0:31:30anti-Brexit campaigners.
0:31:30 > 0:31:32It's probably the first time the former UK Independence Party
0:31:32 > 0:31:35leader and the Pro-EU campaigners have seen eye to eye.
0:31:35 > 0:31:45"Bring it on" said the Remainers today.
0:31:47 > 0:31:51Maybe, just maybe, I've reached a point in thinking that we should
0:31:51 > 0:31:57have a second referendum...On what? On EU membership.The whole thing?
0:31:57 > 0:32:00Of course!
0:32:00 > 0:32:02Let's bring in our chief political correspondent Vicki Young
0:32:02 > 0:32:03who's in Westminster.
0:32:03 > 0:32:08He's been doing his radio programme on LBC radio this evening, he said
0:32:08 > 0:32:14he was meeting Michel Barnier on Monday, and he is now convinced that
0:32:14 > 0:32:18Michel Barnier will not "Give us a good deal". I'm saying this to
0:32:18 > 0:32:23Leavers, do not be complacent.He is elaborating on comments he made
0:32:23 > 0:32:28earlier. There has been a backlash for Nigel Farage, the man getting
0:32:28 > 0:32:33that referendum and who has long advocated the UK's departure from
0:32:33 > 0:32:38the EU, suggesting that he welcomed a second referendum. A lot of
0:32:38 > 0:32:41leading Brexiteers have said that is the wrong thing to do, even members
0:32:41 > 0:32:47of Ukip, of which Nigel Farage the former leader is still a member of,
0:32:47 > 0:32:52they say that is not part of the policy. On his radio programme
0:32:52 > 0:32:55tonight, he has said that he does not want there to be a second
0:32:55 > 0:32:59referendum but after his meeting with Michel Barnier, as you say, he
0:32:59 > 0:33:03came away thinking that UK wasn't going to get a good deal and in that
0:33:03 > 0:33:08eventuality he thought the British parliament would say rather than
0:33:08 > 0:33:14walk away from the EU that there should be a second vote. He suggests
0:33:14 > 0:33:21that Leavers, those who want the UK to depart from the EU should not be
0:33:21 > 0:33:24complacent but gear up for the possibility of another referendum,
0:33:24 > 0:33:28he said that there could be another dramatic battle go to come.Alex,
0:33:28 > 0:33:33talk about political odd couples, this puts Labour Nigel Farage in the
0:33:33 > 0:33:38same bracket with Remainer, Tony Blair. I cannot believe either of
0:33:38 > 0:33:42them have a lot of time for one another but they seem convinced if
0:33:42 > 0:33:47there was a second referendum that their side would win?That is what
0:33:47 > 0:33:51is interesting about this, not just Tony Blair but other Labour MPs,
0:33:51 > 0:33:55Liberal Democrats in the UK say that they welcomed the idea of another
0:33:55 > 0:33:59referendum. Looking at opinion polls, broadly speaking they are not
0:33:59 > 0:34:04clear, it depends on the question they are asked. You can summarise
0:34:04 > 0:34:09that there has been a shift towards people wanting to get on with
0:34:09 > 0:34:16Brexit, including people who wanted the UK to remain before. There a
0:34:16 > 0:34:23rise in the number of people who thought the outcome of the
0:34:23 > 0:34:26referendum was wrong. We don't know the result but as you say both sides
0:34:26 > 0:34:31are convinced that their side would win if it were to be rerun and a
0:34:31 > 0:34:35strange combination of Nigel Farage, cheap Brexiteer, the bedfellow of
0:34:35 > 0:34:43some hard remainders, albeit with others for different reasons.There
0:34:43 > 0:34:46was Nigel Farage on his radio programme saying that he wanted to
0:34:46 > 0:34:49send Tony Blair into outer space, this would decide it once and for
0:34:49 > 0:34:56all. But if there were to be a second referendum, he's proposing
0:34:56 > 0:34:59the same as before, but if it goes the other way, would this be the
0:34:59 > 0:35:07best-of-3?Brexiteers would say that it was close last time, let's have a
0:35:07 > 0:35:18best-of-5.Like kids playing Rock paper scissors? What is interesting,
0:35:18 > 0:35:23Arron Banks, one of the finances behind the league campaign, he is
0:35:23 > 0:35:28also behind the idea of having a second referendum, he said that Tony
0:35:28 > 0:35:35Blair and the likes of Lord Adonis and Nick Clegg, all of the Remainers
0:35:35 > 0:35:38out in force in the last few weeks... You have to wonder what
0:35:38 > 0:35:42they make of this in Brussels! It does not really play to their
0:35:42 > 0:35:46chances of getting a good deal if everyone is talking about a second
0:35:46 > 0:35:52referendum but that's another debate!
0:35:52 > 0:35:54President Trump's national security team is reportedly advising him not
0:35:54 > 0:35:55to re-impose US sanctions on Iran.
0:35:55 > 0:35:58The European partners to the nuclear deal came together in Brussels today
0:35:58 > 0:36:01to urge the President to maintain the waiver on sanctions.
0:36:01 > 0:36:03But what if he doesn't?
0:36:03 > 0:36:13A short while ago he was asked on this.Thank you.On Iran...You will
0:36:13 > 0:36:19be finding out soon. Thank you. Finding out very soon, he likes to
0:36:19 > 0:36:20keep us on tenterhooks!
0:36:20 > 0:36:24Karim Sadjapour is an Iran expert with the Carnegie Endowment.
0:36:24 > 0:36:29I spoke to him a short while ago. Why is President Trump prevaricating
0:36:29 > 0:36:33over the sanctions and the waiver? He made it clear he hates the deal
0:36:33 > 0:36:39and he wants to rip it up? That's right, he's always been sceptical of
0:36:39 > 0:36:44the deal, he called it the worst deal in history. The other thing
0:36:44 > 0:36:50about President Trump is that he is sceptical of what he calls "Expert
0:36:50 > 0:36:53opinion and conventional wisdom". He likes to think he's thought of these
0:36:53 > 0:36:58on a few occasions and the blowback hasn't been what people expected but
0:36:58 > 0:37:05in this case, almost all of his senior national security advisers
0:37:05 > 0:37:10have advised him not to blow up the nuclear deal. In some ways, he is
0:37:10 > 0:37:15doing this against his own instincts quite reluctantly.If the sanctions
0:37:15 > 0:37:21were reimposed, would it indeed blow up the deal?If you sanction around
0:37:21 > 0:37:25because you say they are not in compliance with the nuclear deal,
0:37:25 > 0:37:33which according to them, they are still in compliance, that would be
0:37:33 > 0:37:38because the US has reneged on its end of the deal and therefore it
0:37:38 > 0:37:43will reconstitute nuclear activities. Therefore, nuclear
0:37:43 > 0:37:48related sanctions against Iran could unravel the nuclear deal.You phrase
0:37:48 > 0:37:55it interestingly, the president, basically, the problem is America
0:37:55 > 0:38:00faces a choice where if it isolates Iran further, you drive it in the
0:38:00 > 0:38:05direction of North Korea and then it becomes more like South Korea,
0:38:05 > 0:38:08embracing it and engaging it, is that message getting through to the
0:38:08 > 0:38:15White House?It's a very compact challenge for the White House and
0:38:15 > 0:38:21the US Congress, in that, again, if you want to present agriculture
0:38:21 > 0:38:26event the regime that has required economic isolation, the US
0:38:26 > 0:38:31government has done that well against Iran but if you try and help
0:38:31 > 0:38:35Iranians society become like South Korea it requires more political and
0:38:35 > 0:38:38economic reintegration and in some ways, these policies are at
0:38:38 > 0:38:44loggerheads, they contradict one another and I would argue that the
0:38:44 > 0:38:51nuclear deal is one way of checking both boxes. The deal keeps Iran
0:38:51 > 0:38:55tethered to its nuclear obligations, to greater transparency. But at the
0:38:55 > 0:39:02same time, it helps Iran's economy, certainly not reintegrate with the
0:39:02 > 0:39:06United States but with other parts of the world that are interested in
0:39:06 > 0:39:11doing business with Iran, whether it is Europe or Asia.And briefly, what
0:39:11 > 0:39:19about the recent riots playing into the US's calculations?He feels that
0:39:19 > 0:39:25a time when the Iranian regime is using overwhelming force to harm
0:39:25 > 0:39:29citizens aspirations for a greater economy and more pluralism, why
0:39:29 > 0:39:33should we be agreeing to economic sanctions and lifting economic
0:39:33 > 0:39:38sanctions against Iran which simply provide the regime with more
0:39:38 > 0:39:43resources to be oppressive?OK, thank you.
0:39:43 > 0:39:45Myanmar is in the spotlight again after sentencing two Reuters
0:39:45 > 0:39:47journalists to prison for 14 years.
0:39:47 > 0:39:49The pair were charged with offences under
0:39:49 > 0:39:49the Official Secrets Act in Myanmar.
0:39:52 > 0:39:54Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo were arrested last month
0:39:54 > 0:39:59after meeting police.
0:39:59 > 0:40:02They were covering the situation in Rakhine state where more
0:40:02 > 0:40:02'S
0:40:02 > 0:40:04than half a million Muslims have fled a deadly military crackdown.
0:40:04 > 0:40:07Steven Butler is the Asia programme coordinator for the Committee
0:40:07 > 0:40:12to Protect Journalists and joins me now.
0:40:12 > 0:40:16thank you for coming in. What more do we know on the circumstances of
0:40:16 > 0:40:20these journalists, how they are being held and what they are accused
0:40:20 > 0:40:24of doing?They are accused of holding documents the government
0:40:24 > 0:40:28deems to be secret. They are being held in prison and so far as we know
0:40:28 > 0:40:31they've not been mistreated, they've told their families that and their
0:40:31 > 0:40:35lawyer. They should be out of jail, they shouldn't be in there in the
0:40:35 > 0:40:48first place.That 14 year sentence, it's fixed,
0:40:48 > 0:40:51could it be lifted?They haven't been sentenced, they've been charged
0:40:51 > 0:40:53under the official secrets act and if they are convicted they face
0:40:53 > 0:40:55potentially 14 years in prison. We don't know what will happen. There's
0:40:55 > 0:40:58another hearing on the 23rd, the lawyers have asked for bail and the
0:40:58 > 0:41:01trial is yet to take place.The aim is to intimidate foreign press, or
0:41:01 > 0:41:06the press more generally?Yes, to prevent journalists from covering
0:41:06 > 0:41:11the tragedy unfolding in the racking state with the range of people.And
0:41:11 > 0:41:16you have suggested that there is some evidence that perhaps this was
0:41:16 > 0:41:21a setup?Absolutely, if you look at what they told their families, they
0:41:21 > 0:41:24were invited to meet police and given documents before they left,
0:41:24 > 0:41:28told that they could read the documents when they arrived home but
0:41:28 > 0:41:33immediately as soon as they left they were arrested. With the
0:41:33 > 0:41:41documents that form the basis of the charges.It is always tricky, in
0:41:41 > 0:41:45this situation, do you speak out publicly or do interviews? What's
0:41:45 > 0:41:57the best way to operate? You want to do the best for those in custody?I
0:41:57 > 0:42:02think first of all, you provide them with legal help, that is happening
0:42:02 > 0:42:06and secondly, you work with other organisations like the committee to
0:42:06 > 0:42:09protect journalists and other groups, mobilising governments to
0:42:09 > 0:42:16put pressure on the Myanmar regime. That is happening, there's a
0:42:16 > 0:42:21unanimous voice. That this is unfair.How far can bemoan my
0:42:21 > 0:42:28government to sustain that kind of international opprobrium at the
0:42:28 > 0:42:32moment? Wouldn't it add to condemnation?We don't know the
0:42:32 > 0:42:38answer to that, we have seen Myanmar had a military role and survived for
0:42:38 > 0:42:43decades from this kind of pressure. You have to wonder, perhaps they are
0:42:43 > 0:42:47getting ready to face that again? We don't know the answer but I do think
0:42:47 > 0:42:54the international pressure is the only realistic tool in their arsenal
0:42:54 > 0:42:59to make changes there.Steven Butler, thank you. Thank you for
0:42:59 > 0:43:02coming in. Our thoughts go to those two journalists in Myanmar facing
0:43:02 > 0:43:08these long prison sentences. The crackdown on journalism around the
0:43:08 > 0:43:12world, press freedom is under threat in countries like Myanmar, where
0:43:12 > 0:43:16there is a lot of political pressure. They do have writers
0:43:16 > 0:43:20behind them and that puts them in a slightly stronger position. Reuters
0:43:20 > 0:43:23can rally attention and legal resources, there are many
0:43:23 > 0:43:27journalists who are freelancers without that kind of backing.It
0:43:27 > 0:43:32does make a difference, I have been there. I used to be a correspondence
0:43:32 > 0:43:36in Cairo and I was once arrested near the border near Gaza. We were
0:43:36 > 0:43:42in prison for most of the day and you think, this will be all right...
0:43:42 > 0:43:46Then that is part of you that thinks, maybe it won't? But it
0:43:46 > 0:43:50certainly helps, when the BBC is involved and the BBC's name around
0:43:50 > 0:43:55the world. I'm sure that's the case for Reuters. Those charges they are
0:43:55 > 0:43:59facing and the sentence, in actual fact, the law they are operating on
0:43:59 > 0:44:05is British law. A secret law that Britain implemented in the country
0:44:05 > 0:44:11back in the 1920s when it was Burma. Let's hope that they are free soon
0:44:11 > 0:44:15and can go back to their families. Let's stay in the country.
0:44:15 > 0:44:18Well, still in the country and the Myanmar military has
0:44:18 > 0:44:20admitted for the first time to killing a group of ten Rohingya
0:44:20 > 0:44:22men in Rakhine State and dumping their bodies
0:44:22 > 0:44:23in a mass grave.
0:44:23 > 0:44:26The incident took place in the village of Inn Din.
0:44:26 > 0:44:28The army says it was in the region to fight Rohingya
0:44:28 > 0:44:33militants known as ARSA.
0:44:33 > 0:44:35This satellite image here shows what remains
0:44:35 > 0:44:37of Inn Din after clashes with the security forces.
0:44:37 > 0:44:40To give you a sense of the scale of destruction, this picture shows
0:44:40 > 0:44:41the village before the clashes.
0:44:41 > 0:44:44The ten men found in the mass grave - had been arrested
0:44:44 > 0:44:45as suspected members of ARSA.
0:44:45 > 0:44:48The army said they didn't have trucks to transport them
0:44:48 > 0:44:55to the police station - so they executed them on the spot.
0:44:55 > 0:44:57Certainly we need journalists in the country.
0:44:57 > 0:45:00New York is suing five oil companies, accusing them
0:45:00 > 0:45:01of contributing to global warming.
0:45:01 > 0:45:03The mayor, Bill de Blasio, said the city was seeking
0:45:03 > 0:45:05damages from BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil
0:45:05 > 0:45:07and Royal Dutch Shell , to protect residents
0:45:07 > 0:45:12from the effects of climate change.
0:45:12 > 0:45:15More than 300 people were arrested in Tunisia during a third night
0:45:15 > 0:45:16of anti-government protests.
0:45:16 > 0:45:18There were violent clashes between police and demonstrators
0:45:18 > 0:45:23in several cities, including the capital, Tunis.
0:45:23 > 0:45:26The South Korean justice ministry is preparing a law to ban
0:45:26 > 0:45:27the trading of digital currencies like Bitcoin.
0:45:27 > 0:45:30The announcement comes just days after the country's largest virtual
0:45:30 > 0:45:32currency exchanges were raided for alleged tax evasion.
0:45:32 > 0:45:34South Korea is a hub for crypto-currencies and shares
0:45:34 > 0:45:39in Bitcoin have dropped sharply.
0:45:39 > 0:45:41The new US ambassador to the Netherlands has refused
0:45:41 > 0:45:44to explain comments he made in 2015 that Muslims had brought chaos
0:45:44 > 0:45:46to the country by "burning cars and politicians".
0:45:46 > 0:45:48Ambassador Peter Hoekstra was asked repeatedly by Dutch reporters
0:45:48 > 0:45:51whether he still stood by the remarks, in which he said
0:45:51 > 0:45:53there were 'no-go areas' in the Netherlands.
0:45:53 > 0:46:02But he refused to engage, only expressing regret at the comments.
0:46:09 > 0:46:12Police in France are hunting for two men who stole millions of euros
0:46:12 > 0:46:16worth of jewels in a smash and grab raid on the Ritz hotel in Paris.
0:46:16 > 0:46:18Some of the jewellery but not all of it has been recovered.
0:46:18 > 0:46:21The armed gang - five of them in all -
0:46:21 > 0:46:24burst into the Ritz on Wednesday evening and smashed the display
0:46:24 > 0:46:25windows of jewellery shops in the hotel.
0:46:25 > 0:46:27Three of them were arrested immediately - two others
0:46:27 > 0:46:29are still on the run.
0:46:29 > 0:46:32Dan Johnson reports.
0:46:32 > 0:46:34A large police response outside the Paris Ritz after a gang,
0:46:34 > 0:46:40armed with axes, carried out a violent raid.
0:46:40 > 0:46:42It isn't just the Christmas lights that sparkle here.
0:46:42 > 0:46:45There are jewels on display to match the wealth of the guests
0:46:45 > 0:46:50at one of the world's most exclusive hotels.
0:46:50 > 0:46:58The robbers arrived in Place Vendome on scooters at around six
0:46:58 > 0:47:00in the evening local time, smashing windows on the ground
0:47:00 > 0:47:04floor of the hotel.
0:47:04 > 0:47:07It is estimated they took jewels worth 4 million euros.
0:47:07 > 0:47:09But police officers interrupted the raid and arrested
0:47:09 > 0:47:14three of the five men.
0:47:14 > 0:47:16Paris has seen this before.
0:47:16 > 0:47:20In October, 2016, US reality TV star Kim Kardashian had a gun put
0:47:20 > 0:47:22to her head as a gang stole 10 million euros-worth
0:47:22 > 0:47:23of her jewellery.
0:47:23 > 0:47:28Only one piece was ever seen again.
0:47:28 > 0:47:31It is not clear how much was recovered from this latest raid.
0:47:31 > 0:47:33Police are still searching for two of the men involved.
0:47:33 > 0:47:40Don Johnson, BBC News.
0:47:40 > 0:47:41This is Beyond 100 Days.
0:47:41 > 0:47:43Still to come - Putting a prince on the spot,
0:47:43 > 0:47:48why May 19th is turning out to be a clash of Royal proportions
0:47:48 > 0:47:58for Prince William.
0:48:02 > 0:48:05Theresa May has pledged to improve Britain's environment but how
0:48:05 > 0:48:10practical is it a they without plastic? They tried to do that in
0:48:10 > 0:48:14Penzance, Cornwall, as John Kay has been finding out...
0:48:14 > 0:48:20A rubbish day at Saint Hilary school...Who has straws in their
0:48:20 > 0:48:24drinks?A lesson in pollution and waste. If Theresa May wants to reach
0:48:24 > 0:48:28out to the young with her green strategy, these kids would be 30
0:48:28 > 0:48:35years old at the end of her 25 year plan... Here in Penzance, they are
0:48:35 > 0:48:42trying to be Britain's first plastic Freetown. -- free town. They are
0:48:42 > 0:48:46making some progress. Businesses like this cafe have signed up and it
0:48:46 > 0:48:51is backed by the council... But at the local supermarket, the challenge
0:48:51 > 0:48:57is clear.Some apples wrapped in plastic...John likes the
0:48:57 > 0:48:59government's new strategy but wonders if it will make much
0:48:59 > 0:49:09difference.Plastic, plastic, plastic... You can't get away from
0:49:09 > 0:49:14it.Most shoppers told us that they would try plastic free aisles, but
0:49:14 > 0:49:18some, like Roxanne, worried that it may not be practical.It might not
0:49:18 > 0:49:23be the most hygienic route to go down, maybe? Having the meat next to
0:49:23 > 0:49:28the eggs or the cheese, for example? This is why people around here are
0:49:28 > 0:49:33so concerned about the long-term impact of plastic.Found on a local
0:49:33 > 0:49:37beach, recently, a lollipop stick from when I was growing up in the
0:49:37 > 0:49:431970s. It hasn't broken down at all. And a packet of peanuts, test before
0:49:43 > 0:49:501983. -- best before. The Prime Minister insists her plan has a
0:49:50 > 0:49:54wider vision. She says it's about more than plastic and more than the
0:49:54 > 0:50:05coast. John Kay, BBC News, Cornwall.
0:50:05 > 0:50:11This is Beyond 100 Days.
0:50:11 > 0:50:13Video bloggers can do big business
0:50:13 > 0:50:15online on sites such as YouTube.
0:50:16 > 0:50:18Some of the most famous post videos which are watched by millions
0:50:18 > 0:50:21and millions of people around the world and make millions
0:50:21 > 0:50:22for the vloggers themselves.
0:50:22 > 0:50:25But now YouTube has cut some business ties with the video blogger
0:50:25 > 0:50:27Logan Paul, after he was heavily criticised for posting a video
0:50:27 > 0:50:30appearing to show the body of a suicide victim in Japan.
0:50:30 > 0:50:31Here's our Media Editor Amol Rajan.
0:50:31 > 0:50:36We are going to take a break from vlogging and each other.
0:50:36 > 0:50:39Low-budget, confessional and often astonishingly popular.
0:50:39 > 0:50:44This couple announced they were breaking up on YouTube
0:50:44 > 0:50:48in a video seen 15 million times.
0:50:48 > 0:50:51And if I can do it, you can do it...
0:50:51 > 0:50:53They are part of a phenomenon called vlogging or video blogging,
0:50:53 > 0:50:57very often on Google-owned YouTube.
0:50:57 > 0:51:00This 21st century cottage industry has created a vast new fleet
0:51:00 > 0:51:04of online celebrities.
0:51:04 > 0:51:06Many vloggers have a commited following among those
0:51:06 > 0:51:13aged between 18 and 34, a demographic prized by advertisers.
0:51:13 > 0:51:14Vloggers like Logan Paul.
0:51:14 > 0:51:18The 22-year-old American is a YouTube star, or was.
0:51:18 > 0:51:21I think this definitely marks a moment in YouTube history.
0:51:21 > 0:51:25This morning YouTube cut business ties with him
0:51:25 > 0:51:28after he naively posted a video from Japan's Aokigahara Forest,
0:51:28 > 0:51:30infamous as a suicide spot.
0:51:30 > 0:51:33Paul issued an apology to his 15 million subscribers on YouTube.
0:51:33 > 0:51:39I have made a severe and continuous lapse of my judgment and I don't
0:51:39 > 0:51:41expect to be forgiven.
0:51:41 > 0:51:45I'm simply here to apologise.
0:51:45 > 0:51:47In a statement, YouTube said: Vlogging is now hugely popular
0:51:56 > 0:51:58Vlogging is now hugely popular
0:51:58 > 0:52:01business with the likes of Logan Paul making vast sums
0:52:01 > 0:52:06of money in a variety of ways.
0:52:06 > 0:52:10They get paid up to £3 per 1000 clicks and can top up their income
0:52:10 > 0:52:12through merchandising and deals with brands, and they do all of that
0:52:12 > 0:52:15without the more stringent controls applied to traditional media.
0:52:15 > 0:52:17The boss of Britain's biggest media agency wants
0:52:17 > 0:52:24to see smarter regulation.
0:52:24 > 0:52:26I would definitely like to see vloggers with this much reach
0:52:26 > 0:52:28and influence to have the sorts of regulation traditional
0:52:28 > 0:52:32broadcasters have got to adhere to, particularly around content that can
0:52:32 > 0:52:34be dangerous, can be glamorising or condoning anti-social behaviour,
0:52:34 > 0:52:42dangerous behaviour, that can be copied by children.
0:52:42 > 0:52:46I'm going to be the biggest entertainer on the planet...
0:52:46 > 0:52:49Logan Paul and his ilk portend a new kind of celebrity.
0:52:49 > 0:52:51One that it intimate, incessant and ever more devotional.
0:52:51 > 0:52:55For all of the glory of the open web, the danger is that his kind
0:52:55 > 0:52:59of immaturity exposes audiences to material that is
0:52:59 > 0:53:00in nobody's interest.
0:53:00 > 0:53:02I'm just getting warmed up.
0:53:02 > 0:53:08Amol Rajan, BBC News.
0:53:08 > 0:53:13This is interesting, I was speaking about this to my daughter, Poppy,
0:53:13 > 0:53:18very familiar with his work. It was the only news story that she was
0:53:18 > 0:53:23aware of, the whole controversy surrounding him, unsurprising that
0:53:23 > 0:53:2650 million subscribers last year, last year he made $12.5 million and
0:53:26 > 0:53:32now there is criticism of YouTube and it took them 12 days to respond,
0:53:32 > 0:53:36that they did not take the video down, Logan Paul took it down.
0:53:36 > 0:53:40Should they have done something faster? We are hearing this kind of
0:53:40 > 0:53:44criticism about all social media companies. Do they need more
0:53:44 > 0:53:49regulation?He doesn't work for YouTube, he posts on a social
0:53:49 > 0:53:52platform. When you work for a big organisation like the BBC there is a
0:53:52 > 0:53:57code of ethics and the ethics of communication. YouTube provide
0:53:57 > 0:54:01guidance and puts trust in people who are quite young and you are
0:54:01 > 0:54:05asking them to get it right all the time. It is a big ask and part of
0:54:05 > 0:54:08the problem. The other issue made today is that very often the
0:54:08 > 0:54:13sanctions are not strong enough for people who digress, and they need to
0:54:13 > 0:54:16impose those sanctions more than they do.Yes.
0:54:16 > 0:54:21A firm that supplied lingerie to the Queen has lost its royal
0:54:21 > 0:54:23warrant after releasing a book, called 'Storm in a D-Cup',
0:54:23 > 0:54:25which revealed details of royal bra fittings.
0:54:25 > 0:54:27The company Rigby & Peller, had held the royal warrant
0:54:28 > 0:54:29for more than 50 years.
0:54:29 > 0:54:31It said it was "deeply saddened" by the decision.
0:54:31 > 0:54:33Buckingham Palace has said it does not "comment
0:54:33 > 0:54:38on individual companies".
0:54:38 > 0:54:43Nor will I comment on that particular story!No, moving along!
0:54:43 > 0:54:45We're going to stick with the royal theme,
0:54:45 > 0:54:51and that's because Prince William's been put on the spot
0:54:51 > 0:54:54over his brother, Prince Harry's wedding on the 19th of May.
0:54:54 > 0:54:56Wills, who's second in line to the throne, was filming
0:54:56 > 0:54:59for a mental health charity with former England football
0:54:59 > 0:55:01captain Rio Ferdinand, and London DJ Roman Kemp -
0:55:01 > 0:55:02when this happened.
0:55:02 > 0:55:05There is the matter of a small wedding that will happen this year -
0:55:05 > 0:55:08of course, your brother - we're very happy for him...
0:55:08 > 0:55:10It was a big decision.
0:55:10 > 0:55:14Are we going to Wembley, or are we going to...
0:55:14 > 0:55:17LAUGHTERStill working it out.
0:55:17 > 0:55:18I'll have to see what I can do.
0:55:18 > 0:55:22I think, you know, having that that, and the skin of
0:55:37 > 0:55:41I'm not sure what royal protocol is that I don't think you can snub the
0:55:41 > 0:55:48future King of England as the best man, can you?Not without causing a
0:55:48 > 0:55:52lot of sibling rivalry and problems! The fact he's had to go on
0:55:52 > 0:55:56television and say that he hasn't asked me yet, how long has it been
0:55:56 > 0:55:59since they announced their engagement? He's had long enough!
0:55:59 > 0:56:04Carrie, get on with it!I don't think he realises how much work goes
0:56:04 > 0:56:08into planning the stag do, you've got to get on with it!I'm sure he's
0:56:08 > 0:56:15aware of that! I think he will do a good job there!Coming up, Ros
0:56:15 > 0:56:18Atkins is here with Outside Source, and then all of the latest
0:56:18 > 0:56:24headlines. We are here on Monday evening! It has been a long week!
0:56:24 > 0:56:31See you then. Have a good weekend.