Live Budget 2017

Download Subtitles

Transcript

0:00:00 > 0:00:06So Prime Minister's Questions comes to an end and.

0:00:06 > 0:00:19Thank you. Border. Dashboard.

0:00:31 > 0:00:39Copies of the speech will be available in the library afterwords.

0:00:39 > 0:00:43I now call the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the right honourable

0:00:43 > 0:00:52Philip Hammond. Mr Deputy Speaker, I report today on

0:00:52 > 0:00:56an economy which continues to grow, continues to create more jobs than

0:00:56 > 0:00:59ever before, and continues to confound those who seek to talk it

0:00:59 > 0:01:08down. An economy is set on a path to a new relationship with our European

0:01:08 > 0:01:17neighbours and a new future outside the European Union. A future that

0:01:17 > 0:01:20will be full of change, full of new challenges and above all, full of

0:01:20 > 0:01:24new opportunities. And in this Budget, we express our resolve to

0:01:24 > 0:01:28look forwards, not backwards. To embrace that change, to meet those

0:01:28 > 0:01:36challenges head-on, and to seize those for Britain. For negotiations

0:01:36 > 0:01:41on a relationship with the EU are in a critical phase. My right

0:01:41 > 0:01:44honourable friend the Prime Minister has been clear we seek a deep and

0:01:44 > 0:01:49special partnership based on free and frictionless trading goods,

0:01:49 > 0:01:53close collaboration on security and strong mutual respect and

0:01:53 > 0:01:57friendship. As Chancellor, Mr Deputy Speaker, I am clear that one of the

0:01:57 > 0:02:01biggest boosts we can provide to businesses and families, one of the

0:02:01 > 0:02:06best ways to protect British jobs and prosperity, as we build that new

0:02:06 > 0:02:11future, is to make early progress in delivering my right honourable

0:02:11 > 0:02:14friend's vision. With an implementation agreement that allows

0:02:14 > 0:02:19businesses to plan and invest with confidence. And this government will

0:02:19 > 0:02:25make the pursuit of that progress is a top priority in the weeks ahead.

0:02:25 > 0:02:30But Mr Deputy Speaker, while we work to achieve this deep and special

0:02:30 > 0:02:34partnership, we are determined to ensure that the country is prepared

0:02:34 > 0:02:42for every possible outcome. We have already invested almost £700 million

0:02:42 > 0:02:49in Brexit preparations, and today, I am setting aside over the next two

0:02:49 > 0:02:52years, another £3 billion, and I stand ready to allocate further sums

0:02:52 > 0:02:58if and when needed. Mr Deputy Speaker, no one should doubt our

0:02:58 > 0:03:05resolve. But this Budget is about much more than Brexit. The world is

0:03:05 > 0:03:08on the brink of a technological revolution, one that will change the

0:03:08 > 0:03:14way that we work and live, and transform our living standards for

0:03:14 > 0:03:19generations to come. And we face a choice. Either we embrace the

0:03:19 > 0:03:25future, seize the opportunities that lie within our grasp, and build on

0:03:25 > 0:03:29Britain's great global success story, or as the party opposite

0:03:29 > 0:03:34advocates, rejects change and turn inwards to the failed and irrelevant

0:03:34 > 0:03:42dogmas of the past. Mr Deputy Speaker, we have no doubt we choose

0:03:42 > 0:03:52the future. We choose, we choose to run towards change, not away from

0:03:52 > 0:03:59it. To prepare our people to meet the challenges ahead, not to hide

0:03:59 > 0:04:05from them. And the prize will be enormous. For the first time in

0:04:05 > 0:04:08decades, Britain is genuinely at the forefront of this technological

0:04:08 > 0:04:14revolution. Not just in our universities and research

0:04:14 > 0:04:18institutes, but this time in the commercial development labs of our

0:04:18 > 0:04:21great companies and on factory floors and business parks across

0:04:21 > 0:04:27this land. But we must invest to secure this bright future for

0:04:27 > 0:04:32Britain, and that this Budget, that is what we choose to do. But Mr

0:04:32 > 0:04:37Deputy Speaker, we are listening, and we understand the frustration of

0:04:37 > 0:04:42families where real incomes or under pressure. So at this Budget we

0:04:42 > 0:04:47choose a balanced approach. Yes, maintaining fiscal responsibility as

0:04:47 > 0:04:54we last see our debt Peking. Continuing to invest in the skills

0:04:54 > 0:04:58and infrastructure that will support the jobs of the future. Building the

0:04:58 > 0:05:04homes that will make good on our promise to the next generation. But

0:05:04 > 0:05:10crucially, also helping families to cope with the cost of living. Mr

0:05:10 > 0:05:14Deputy Speaker, as we invest in our country's future, I have a clear

0:05:14 > 0:05:18vision of what that global Britain looks like. A prosperous and

0:05:18 > 0:05:23inclusive economy. Where everybody has the opportunity to shine.

0:05:23 > 0:05:29Wherever in these islands they live, and whatever their background. Where

0:05:29 > 0:05:34talent and hard work are rewarded. Where the dream of home ownership is

0:05:34 > 0:05:42a reality for all generations. A hub of enterprise and innovation. A

0:05:42 > 0:05:47beacon of creativity. A civilised and tolerant place that cares for

0:05:47 > 0:05:51the vulnerable and nurtures the talented. And outward looking free

0:05:51 > 0:06:00trading nation, a full good in the world. That is the Britain that I

0:06:00 > 0:06:05want to leave to my children, Mr Deputy Speaker. A Britain we can be

0:06:05 > 0:06:10proud of. A country fit for the future. I know we will not build it

0:06:10 > 0:06:19overnight, but in this Budget today we will lay the foundations. I'm

0:06:19 > 0:06:22being tempted with something a little more exotic here, but I will

0:06:22 > 0:06:37stick to plain water. I did take the precaution... I did take the

0:06:37 > 0:06:39precaution of asking my right honourable friend to bring a packet

0:06:39 > 0:06:52of cough sweets just in case. LAUGHTER

0:06:52 > 0:07:07Mr Deputy Speaker, Mr Deputy Speaker...Order, order. I think it

0:07:07 > 0:07:15might be a hearing aid we all need if this continues.Mr Deputy

0:07:15 > 0:07:21Speaker, I shall first report to the House on the economic forecast of

0:07:21 > 0:07:24the independent OBR. This is the bit with the long economic words in it.

0:07:24 > 0:07:35LAUGHTER Once again, I thank Robert Chote and

0:07:35 > 0:07:39his team for their hard work over the last few weeks. I believe

0:07:39 > 0:07:43passionately that the best way to improve the lives of people across

0:07:43 > 0:07:47the length and breadth of this country is to help them get into

0:07:47 > 0:07:52work. Mr Deputy Speaker, I am acutely aware that 1.4 million

0:07:52 > 0:08:04people out of work is 1.4 million to many. So today... Today I welcome

0:08:04 > 0:08:10the OBR forecast that there will be another 600,000 people in work by

0:08:10 > 0:08:172022. And I am immensely proud of this government's record in having

0:08:17 > 0:08:23created over 3 million new jobs since 2010.

0:08:23 > 0:08:29A far cry from the 1.2 million job losses the right honourable member

0:08:29 > 0:08:35for Hayes and Harlington predicted in 2011 but in no doubt this

0:08:35 > 0:08:38government will continue its focus on getting more people into work,

0:08:38 > 0:08:43giving them security and peace of mind of a regular wage. I want work

0:08:43 > 0:08:50to be a good well-paid and regrettably our productivity

0:08:50 > 0:08:57performance continues to disappoint. The OBR assumed at each of the last

0:08:57 > 0:09:0116 fiscal events that productivity growth would return to its precrisis

0:09:01 > 0:09:07trend of about 2% per year, but it has remained stubbornly flat. Today

0:09:07 > 0:09:12they revised down the outlook for productivity growth, business

0:09:12 > 0:09:18investment and GDP growth across the forecast period. They now expect to

0:09:18 > 0:09:28see GDP grow 1.5% in 2017, one .4 in 2018, one .3 in 2019 and 2020,

0:09:28 > 0:09:38before picking up to 1.5% and finally 1.6% in 2022. With inflation

0:09:38 > 0:09:43peaking at 3% in this quarter before falling back to target in the next

0:09:43 > 0:09:51year. I reaffirm the remit that the Monetary Policy Committee and its

0:09:51 > 0:09:56inflation target. We took over an economy with the highest budget

0:09:56 > 0:10:03deficit in peacetime history. Since then, thanks to the hard work of the

0:10:03 > 0:10:09British people, that deficit has been shrinking. Next year, it will

0:10:09 > 0:10:17be below 2%. Our debt is still too high and we need to get it down. Not

0:10:17 > 0:10:22for and ideological reason, but because successive debt undermines

0:10:22 > 0:10:27economic security leaving is vulnerable to shocks. It passes the

0:10:27 > 0:10:32burden unfairly to the next generation. And because it simply

0:10:32 > 0:10:37cannot be right to spend more on our debt interest than on police and

0:10:37 > 0:10:42Armed Forces combined. I am pleased to tell the House OBR expects debt

0:10:42 > 0:10:48to peak this year and then gradually fall as a share of GDP. They turning

0:10:48 > 0:10:59point in the recovery. Mr Deputy Speaker, apparently, not everyone

0:10:59 > 0:11:04shares the view that falling debt is good news. I heard representations

0:11:04 > 0:11:10from the party opposite suggesting increasing the debt by £500 billion.

0:11:10 > 0:11:16Taking us back to square one, wasting an extra £7 billion a year

0:11:16 > 0:11:22on debt interest. If they carry on like that, there will be plenty of

0:11:22 > 0:11:35others joining Kezia Dugdale saying, I'm Labour, get me out of here. Mr

0:11:35 > 0:11:41Deputy Speaker, I have rejected these representations and instead I

0:11:41 > 0:11:45reaffirm our pledge of fiscal responsibility and our commitment to

0:11:45 > 0:11:50the fiscal rules set out last autumn. Now I choose to use some of

0:11:50 > 0:11:55the headroom I established then so that as well as reducing debt, we

0:11:55 > 0:12:02can also invest in Britain's future, support key public services, keep

0:12:02 > 0:12:06taxes low and provide a little help to families and businesses under

0:12:06 > 0:12:11pressure. A balanced approach that will prepare Britain for the future,

0:12:11 > 0:12:18not seek to hide from it. Today the OBR confirmed we are on track to

0:12:18 > 0:12:23meet our fiscal rules, borrowing is forecast to be 49.9 billion this

0:12:23 > 0:12:30year, 8.4 billion lower than forecast at the spring budget. After

0:12:30 > 0:12:34taking account of all decisions since the spring budget, the GDP

0:12:34 > 0:12:40revision and measures I will announce borrowing will fall in

0:12:40 > 0:12:48every year of the forecast from 39.5 billion next year, to 25.6 point

0:12:48 > 0:12:536,000,000,020 2-23 to reach its lowest level in 20 years. As a

0:12:53 > 0:13:01percentage of GDP falls from 2.4% to 1.9% next year, then 1.6, 1.5, 1.3

0:13:01 > 0:13:10and finally 1.1% in 22-3. The OBR forecast the structural deficit to

0:13:10 > 0:13:18be 1.3% of GDP in 2021, giving 14.8 billion of headroom against our 2%

0:13:18 > 0:13:30target. Debt will peak at 86.5% of GDP this year and then fall to 86.4,

0:13:30 > 0:13:39then 86.1, 83.1, 79.3 and 79.1 in 22 - 23, the first sustained decline in

0:13:39 > 0:13:49debt in 17 years. Under Conservative led governments, the hard work of

0:13:49 > 0:13:53the British people is steadily clearing up the mess left behind by

0:13:53 > 0:14:05Labour. At the heart of global Britain must be a dynamic and

0:14:05 > 0:14:10innovative economy. On Monday, the Prime Minister set out key elements

0:14:10 > 0:14:14of our modern industrial strategy, which will raise productivity and

0:14:14 > 0:14:18wages in all parts of the country and guarantee a brighter future we

0:14:18 > 0:14:22have promised to the next generation. The Business Secretary

0:14:22 > 0:14:28will present a White Paper in the next few days. This is not just an

0:14:28 > 0:14:34economic plan. It is a key part of our vision for a fairer Britain, a

0:14:34 > 0:14:39Britain where every one of our citizens can contribute to and share

0:14:39 > 0:14:43in the benefits of prosperity. And the key to raising the wages of

0:14:43 > 0:14:49British workers is raising investment, public and we are

0:14:49 > 0:14:55investing in Britain's future, half £1 trillion since 2010, the biggest

0:14:55 > 0:14:59rail programme since Victorian times, the largest road-building

0:14:59 > 0:15:04programme since the 1970s, the biggest increase in science and

0:15:04 > 0:15:09innovation funding in four decades and the two largest infrastructure

0:15:09 > 0:15:14projects in Europe, Crossrail and HS2. When I took this job I

0:15:14 > 0:15:18committed to make the battle to raise Britain's productivity and the

0:15:18 > 0:15:25nation's pay the central mission of the Treasury. Last autumn, I

0:15:25 > 0:15:31launched the national productivity investment funds to provide an

0:15:31 > 0:15:34additional £23 billion of investment over five years, to upgrade the

0:15:34 > 0:15:38economic infrastructure for the 21st century. Today I announce I will

0:15:38 > 0:15:47extend the fund a further year and expand it to over £31 billion.

0:15:47 > 0:15:53Meaning that public investment under this government will on average be

0:15:53 > 0:15:57£25 billion per year higher in real terms than under the last Labour

0:15:57 > 0:16:05government. We are allocating a further £2.3 billion for investment

0:16:05 > 0:16:16in R&B and will increase the main RND tax credit to 12% -- R&D. To

0:16:16 > 0:16:24drive up investment across the economy to 2.4% of GDP. Britain is

0:16:24 > 0:16:28the world's sixth-largest economy. London is the number one

0:16:28 > 0:16:32international financial services sector and we have some of the

0:16:32 > 0:16:35world's Best companies and a commanding position in a raft of

0:16:35 > 0:16:40tech and digital industries that will form the backbone of the global

0:16:40 > 0:16:46economy. Those who under estimate Britain do so at their peril.

0:16:46 > 0:16:51Because we will harness this potential and turn it into the

0:16:51 > 0:16:55high-paid, high productivity jobs of tomorrow. Others may choose to

0:16:55 > 0:17:01reject the future, we choose to embrace it. A new tech business is

0:17:01 > 0:17:10founded in Britain every hour. I want that to be every half-hour.

0:17:10 > 0:17:13Today, we invest over £500 million in a range of initiatives from

0:17:13 > 0:17:18artificial intelligence to five G and four fibre broadband and support

0:17:18 > 0:17:21regulation with the new Pioneer fund and a new geospatial data commission

0:17:21 > 0:17:30to develop... You should listen. To develop a strategy for using the

0:17:30 > 0:17:35government location data to support economic growth and to help tech

0:17:35 > 0:17:41start-ups reach scale we asked for a review of availability of capital.

0:17:41 > 0:17:46Today we are publishing an action plan to unlock over £20 billion of

0:17:46 > 0:17:50new investment in UK knowledge intensive scale up businesses

0:17:50 > 0:17:55including through a new fund in the British business bank seeded with

0:17:55 > 0:18:01£2.5 billion of public money by facilitating pension-fund access to

0:18:01 > 0:18:08long-term investment sum by doubling investments limits for knowledge

0:18:08 > 0:18:12intensive companies while ensuring EI S is not used as a shelter for

0:18:12 > 0:18:17low risk capital preservation schemes. We stand ready to step in

0:18:17 > 0:18:23to replace European investment fund lending is necessary. There is

0:18:23 > 0:18:28perhaps no technology as symbolic of the Revolution gathering pace as

0:18:28 > 0:18:31driverless vehicles.

0:18:40 > 0:18:45They surely do not want me to make the joke about the Labour Party

0:18:45 > 0:18:49again, Mr Deputy Speaker? I know Jeremy Clarkson does not like them

0:18:49 > 0:18:54but there are many other good reasons to pursue this technology.

0:18:54 > 0:19:00Today, we step up support for it. I'm sorry, Jeremy, definitely not

0:19:00 > 0:19:09the first time you have been snubbed by Hammond and May. Allah future

0:19:14 > 0:19:21-- our future vehicles will be driverless but there they will be

0:19:21 > 0:19:25electric first and that is a change that needs to come as soon as

0:19:25 > 0:19:30possible for the planet. We will establish a £400 million structure

0:19:30 > 0:19:34fund and invest an extra hundred million per plug-in car Grant and

0:19:34 > 0:19:41more for R&D. I will clarify the law so that people who charge electric

0:19:41 > 0:19:45vehicles at work will not face a benefit in kind charge from next

0:19:45 > 0:19:51year. The tax system can play an important role in protecting our

0:19:51 > 0:19:55environment. We owe it to our children the air they breathe is

0:19:55 > 0:19:59clean and we published the air quality plan this year and said then

0:19:59 > 0:20:06we would fund it through taxes on new diesel cars. From April 2018,

0:20:06 > 0:20:09the first year rate for diesel cars that do not meet the latest

0:20:09 > 0:20:16standards will go up by £1 and the existing supplement in company car

0:20:16 > 0:20:20tax will increase by one percentage point and drivers buying a new car

0:20:20 > 0:20:26will avoid this charge as soon as manufacturers bring forward the next

0:20:26 > 0:20:30generation of cleaner diesels. We only apply this measure to cars.

0:20:30 > 0:20:37Before the headline writers start to limber up, let me be clear. No white

0:20:37 > 0:20:50van man or woman will be hit by these measures. This levy will fund

0:20:50 > 0:20:54a new £220 million cleaner fund to provide support for the

0:20:54 > 0:20:59implementation of local air quality plans, improving the quality of air

0:20:59 > 0:21:06in cities and towns in the UK. Our air quality is sadly not our only

0:21:06 > 0:21:13environmental challenge. Audiences in the country glued to Blue Planet

0:21:13 > 0:21:17have been reminded of the problems of plastics pollution. The UK lead

0:21:17 > 0:21:21the world on climate change agreements and pioneers protecting

0:21:21 > 0:21:26marine environment and I want us to be a world leader in tackling the

0:21:26 > 0:21:30scourge of plastic littering the planet and oceans. With my right

0:21:30 > 0:21:34honourable friend the Environment Secretary I will investigate how the

0:21:34 > 0:21:41tax system and charges on single use plastic items can reduce waste. We

0:21:41 > 0:21:45cannot keep our promise to the next generation to build an economy fit

0:21:45 > 0:21:53for the future unless we ensure our planet has a future. Meeting the

0:21:53 > 0:21:58challenge of change head on means giving our people the confidence to

0:21:58 > 0:22:02embrace it and the skills to reap the rewards and we have a plan to do

0:22:02 > 0:22:08so. We are delivering 3 million apprenticeships by 2020 thanks to

0:22:08 > 0:22:13the apprenticeship levy and I will review the flexibility levy payers

0:22:13 > 0:22:18have to spend this. We are introducing T levels and I am

0:22:18 > 0:22:24providing £20 million to support colleges to prepare for them.

0:22:24 > 0:22:29Knowledge of maths is key to the high-tech, cutting edge jobs in our

0:22:29 > 0:22:33digital economy. It is useful in less glamorous roles like front line

0:22:33 > 0:22:41politics! We will expand the teaching for mastery of maths

0:22:41 > 0:22:47programme to further 3000 schools and provide 40 million to train

0:22:47 > 0:22:52maths teachers and introduce a £600 maths premium for schools for every

0:22:52 > 0:23:01additional people who takes a level maths and invite proposals for new

0:23:01 > 0:23:05maths schools across England so highly talented young mathematicians

0:23:05 > 0:23:07can release their potential wherever they live and what ever their

0:23:07 > 0:23:14background.

0:23:14 > 0:23:18More maths for everyone. Don't let anyone say I don't know how to show

0:23:18 > 0:23:28the nation a good time! Computer science is also at the

0:23:28 > 0:23:35heart of this revolution. So we will ensure every secondary school pupil

0:23:35 > 0:23:40can study computing by tripling the number of trained computer science

0:23:40 > 0:23:46teachers to 12,000. And we will work with industry to create a new

0:23:46 > 0:23:49national centre for computing. But Mr Deputy Speaker, rapid

0:23:49 > 0:23:54technological change means we also need to help people we train during

0:23:54 > 0:23:59their working lives, ensuring our

0:23:59 > 0:24:00workforce is equipped with the skills they need for the workplace

0:24:00 > 0:24:04of the future. Today, my right honourable friend the Education

0:24:04 > 0:24:08Secretary and I are launching an historic partnership between

0:24:08 > 0:24:13government, the CBI and the TUC to set the strategic direction for a

0:24:13 > 0:24:18national retraining scheme. Its first priority will be to boost

0:24:18 > 0:24:21digital skills and support expansion of the construction centre. To make

0:24:21 > 0:24:26a start immediately, we will invest £30 million in the development of

0:24:26 > 0:24:29digital skills distance learning courses, so people can learn

0:24:29 > 0:24:34wherever they are and whenever they want. I'm pleased to be able to

0:24:34 > 0:24:45accept the representation that I have

0:24:47 > 0:24:50received from the TUC, to continue to fund union learn which I

0:24:50 > 0:24:56recognise as a valuable part of our support to workplace learning. Mr

0:24:56 > 0:25:07Deputy Speaker, I got an e-mail from Len asking me especially, backing

0:25:07 > 0:25:11skills is key to unlocking growth nationally, but far too much of our

0:25:11 > 0:25:15economic strength is concentrated in our capital city. If we are truly to

0:25:15 > 0:25:19build an economy that is fit for the future, then we have to get all

0:25:19 > 0:25:24parts of the UK firing on all cylinders, and that is what our

0:25:24 > 0:25:30modern industrial strategy is all about. Today, we back the Northern

0:25:30 > 0:25:33Powerhouse, the Midlands engine and elected mayors across the UK. We

0:25:33 > 0:25:40back them with a new 1.7 £1.7 billion transforming cities fund,

0:25:40 > 0:25:45half of it to be shared with the six areas with Metro mayors, to give

0:25:45 > 0:25:49them power to deal with transport priorities, and the remainder will

0:25:49 > 0:25:56be opened to competition in other cities in England. We are investing

0:25:56 > 0:25:59£300 million to assure HS2 infrastructure will incorporate

0:25:59 > 0:26:05Northern Powerhouse and Midland engine improvements. I am also

0:26:05 > 0:26:11providing money to trial digital solutions on the trans-Pennine

0:26:11 > 0:26:22route. We are developing a punch with Manchester and I'm pleased to

0:26:22 > 0:26:27announce a second devolution deal with Andy Street and we will find

0:26:27 > 0:26:32the replacement of the 40 old rolling stock on the Tyne at where

0:26:32 > 0:26:38Metro and a total investment of 337 million pounds. We will invest £123

0:26:38 > 0:26:51million in the Redcar steel steelwork sites to support the work

0:26:51 > 0:26:59of those leading the fight for prosperity in that area. Mr Deputy

0:26:59 > 0:27:03Speaker, we are piloting 100% business rates retention in London

0:27:03 > 0:27:09next year, and continuing to work with TFL on the funding and

0:27:09 > 0:27:14financing of Crossrail two. We will also make over £1 billion of

0:27:14 > 0:27:18discounted lending available to local authorities across the country

0:27:18 > 0:27:21to support high-value infrastructure projects. A Conservative government

0:27:21 > 0:27:29giving power back to the people of Britain, and driving prosperity and

0:27:29 > 0:27:32greater fairness across our United Kingdom.

0:27:32 > 0:27:38The decisions taken in this Budget also mean £2 billion more for the

0:27:38 > 0:27:46Scottish Government, £1.2 billion more for the Welsh Government, and

0:27:46 > 0:27:51156 mg more for the Northern Ireland Executive. I can confirm today

0:27:51 > 0:27:57progress is being made on the city 's deal for Terry and Stirling. I'm

0:27:57 > 0:28:03getting used to the experience of having my ear bent by 13

0:28:03 > 0:28:11Conservatives Scottish colleagues. Most recently on the issue of

0:28:11 > 0:28:19Scottish police and fire VAT. The SNP knew the rules, they knew the

0:28:19 > 0:28:21consequences of introducing these bodies and they ploughed ahead

0:28:21 > 0:28:32anyway. My Scottish Conservative colleagues have persuaded me that

0:28:32 > 0:28:36the Scottish people should not lose out just because of the obstinacy of

0:28:36 > 0:28:48the SNP government. So we will legislate to allow VAT refunds from

0:28:48 > 0:28:53April 20 18. And in response to yet more representations from my

0:28:53 > 0:28:57honourable Scottish friends, aided and abetted by my honourable friend

0:28:57 > 0:29:02for Waverley, from November 2018, we will introduce agile is there a tax

0:29:02 > 0:29:08history for transfers of gas in the North Sea, an innovative tax policy

0:29:08 > 0:29:12which will bring fresh investment to a base on which still holds up to 20

0:29:12 > 0:29:19billion barrels of oil. We will begin negotiations towards great

0:29:19 > 0:29:24deals the North Wales and mid Wales, and we will abolish tolls on the

0:29:24 > 0:29:29Severn Bridge as promised by the end of next year. We will deliver on our

0:29:29 > 0:29:34commitment to review the effect of VAT and APD on tourism in Northern

0:29:34 > 0:29:39Ireland, reporting on next year's Budget and we will open negotiations

0:29:39 > 0:29:43for a Belfast city deal as part of our commitment to an ambitious set

0:29:43 > 0:29:48of city deals across Northern Ireland. A Conservative government

0:29:48 > 0:29:57delivering for all parts of our United Kingdom. It is only by

0:29:57 > 0:30:01supporting our regions and nations, dealing with our debts and investing

0:30:01 > 0:30:05in skills and infrastructure for the long term, that we can build an

0:30:05 > 0:30:09economy fit for the future. But I recognise that many people are

0:30:09 > 0:30:13feeling pressure on their budgets now. And because we are all in

0:30:13 > 0:30:19politics to make people's lives better, in the short term as well as

0:30:19 > 0:30:23the long-term, we will take further measures in this Budget to help

0:30:23 > 0:30:29families and businesses where we can. The switch to Universal Credit

0:30:29 > 0:30:35is a long overdue and necessary reform. Replacing Labour's broken

0:30:35 > 0:30:40system that discouraged people from working more than 16 hours a week

0:30:40 > 0:30:45and trapped 1.4 million on out of work benefits for nearly a decade,

0:30:45 > 0:30:49Universal Credit delivers a modern welfare system where work always

0:30:49 > 0:30:58pays and people are supported to earn. But I recognise, Mr Deputy

0:30:58 > 0:31:01Speaker, the genuine concerns on both sides of the House at about the

0:31:01 > 0:31:03operational delivery of this benefit, and today we will act on

0:31:03 > 0:31:09those concerns. First, we will remove the seven-day waiting period

0:31:09 > 0:31:13applied at the beginning of a benefit claim, so that entitlement

0:31:13 > 0:31:18to Universal Credit will start on the day of the claim. To provide

0:31:18 > 0:31:21greater support during the waiting period, we will change the advance

0:31:21 > 0:31:26the system to ensure any household needs it can access a full month's

0:31:26 > 0:31:31payment within five days of applying. We will make it possible

0:31:31 > 0:31:37to apply for an advanced online. We will extend the repayment period for

0:31:37 > 0:31:42advances from six months to 12 months, and any new Universal Credit

0:31:42 > 0:31:46claimant in receipt of housing benefit at the time of the claim

0:31:46 > 0:31:51will continue to receive that housing benefit for a further two

0:31:51 > 0:31:57weeks, making it easier for them to pay their rent. This, Mr Deputy

0:31:57 > 0:32:01Speaker, is a £1.5 billion package to address concerns about the

0:32:01 > 0:32:09delivery of the benefit. My right honourable friend the Secretary of

0:32:09 > 0:32:11State for Work and Pensions will give further details in a statement

0:32:11 > 0:32:16to the House tomorrow. We also want to help low income households in

0:32:16 > 0:32:21areas where rents have been rising fastest. In the long run, of course,

0:32:21 > 0:32:26the answer lies in increasing the amount of housing available, a theme

0:32:26 > 0:32:30I shall return to. In the meantime, the best way to help them is by

0:32:30 > 0:32:35increasing the rate of support in those areas where rents are least

0:32:35 > 0:32:40affordable. We will increase targeted affordability funding by

0:32:40 > 0:32:45£125 million over the next two years, benefiting 140,000 people. We

0:32:45 > 0:32:51will always listen to genuine concerns and act where we can to

0:32:51 > 0:32:57help. Making work pay is core to the philosophy of this government. That

0:32:57 > 0:33:03is why we introduced the National Living Wage in 2016. In April, it

0:33:03 > 0:33:13will rise by 4.4%, from £7 50 an hour, to £7 83, handing full-time

0:33:13 > 0:33:18workers a further £600 pay increase, taking their total pay rise since

0:33:18 > 0:33:25its introduction to over £2000 a year. We also accept the low pay

0:33:25 > 0:33:29commission's recommendations on national minimum wage rates,

0:33:29 > 0:33:33supporting our young people with the largest increase in youth rates in

0:33:33 > 0:33:42ten years, delivering a pay rise for over 2 million minimum wage workers

0:33:42 > 0:33:45of all ages across the country. The facts are these. Income inequality

0:33:45 > 0:33:51today is at its lowest level in 30 years. The top 1% are paying a

0:33:51 > 0:33:55larger share of income taxes than at any time under the last Labour

0:33:55 > 0:34:01government. The poorest 10% in Britain have seen their real incomes

0:34:01 > 0:34:06grow faster than 2010 than the richest 10%, and the proportion of

0:34:06 > 0:34:14full-time jobs that are low paid is at its lowest level for 20 years. A

0:34:14 > 0:34:21Conservative government delivering a fairer Britain. But as well as

0:34:21 > 0:34:25making work pay, we want families to keep more of the money they earn.

0:34:25 > 0:34:31When we came into office, the personal allowance stood at £6,475 a

0:34:31 > 0:34:38year. From April, I will increase the personal allowance to £11,850,

0:34:38 > 0:34:46and the higher rate threshold to £46,350, making progress towards our

0:34:46 > 0:34:51manifesto commitments, which I reiterate today. The typical basic

0:34:51 > 0:34:56rate taxpayer will be £1075 a year better off than 2010, and a

0:34:56 > 0:35:01full-time worker on the National Living Wage will take home more than

0:35:01 > 0:35:06£3800 extra. This Conservative government delivering for Britain's

0:35:06 > 0:35:16workers. Mr Deputy Speaker, I turn now to duties. The tobacco duty

0:35:16 > 0:35:23escalator will continue with an extra 1% duty on hand-rolling duty

0:35:23 > 0:35:27this year and minimum excise duty on cigarettes will also rise. Excessive

0:35:27 > 0:35:32alcohol consumption and the most vulnerable people is all too often

0:35:32 > 0:35:36through cheap high-strength low quality products, especially

0:35:36 > 0:35:40so-called white ciders. I want to pay tribute to the campaign led by

0:35:40 > 0:35:45my honourable friend for Congleton on this issue, and so following our

0:35:45 > 0:35:50recent consultation, we will legislate to increase duty on these

0:35:50 > 0:35:53products from 2019. But recognising the pressure on household budgets,

0:35:53 > 0:35:58and backing our great British pubs, duties on other sliders, wines,

0:35:58 > 0:36:09spirits and on beer will be frozen. This will mean a bottle of whiskey

0:36:09 > 0:36:14will be £1.15 less in 2018 than if we had continued with Labour's

0:36:14 > 0:36:20plans, and a pint of beer 12p less. So Merry Christmas, Mr Deputy

0:36:20 > 0:36:27Speaker. The cost of travel is also an important factor for families and

0:36:27 > 0:36:31businesses. From April 2019, I will again freeze short-haul air

0:36:31 > 0:36:36passenger duty rates, and I will also frees long-haul economy rates,

0:36:36 > 0:36:41paid for by an increase on premium class tickets and on private jets.

0:36:41 > 0:36:48Sorry, Lewis. For those who do not stretch to a private jet, I can

0:36:48 > 0:36:53announce a new Railcard for those aged 26 to 30, giving 4.5 million

0:36:53 > 0:37:01more young people a third of their rail fares. And I will once again

0:37:01 > 0:37:06cancel the fuel duty rise for both petrol and diesel that is scheduled

0:37:06 > 0:37:15for April. Since 2010, we will have saved the average car driver £850,

0:37:15 > 0:37:21and the average van driver over £2100, compared to Labour's

0:37:21 > 0:37:26escalator plans. Fuel duty has now been frozen for the longest period

0:37:26 > 0:37:34in 40 years, at a total cost to the Exchequer of £46 billion, is since

0:37:34 > 0:37:392010. Mr Deputy Speaker, our NHS is one of our great institutions. An

0:37:39 > 0:37:45essential part of what we are as a nation. And a source of pride the

0:37:45 > 0:37:49length and breadth of the country. Its values are the values of the

0:37:49 > 0:37:55British people, and we will always back it. Dedicated NHS staff are

0:37:55 > 0:38:00handling the challenges of an ageing population and the rapidly advancing

0:38:00 > 0:38:04technology with skill and commitment and we salute them. Mr Deputy

0:38:04 > 0:38:08Speaker, although you would not think so to listen to the Leader of

0:38:08 > 0:38:15the Opposition, as he regularly talks down the achievements of the

0:38:15 > 0:38:19NHS, the number of patients being treated is at record levels, cancer

0:38:19 > 0:38:24survival rates are at the highest ever level, 17 million people are

0:38:24 > 0:38:28now able to access GP appointments in the evenings and weekends, and

0:38:28 > 0:38:33public satisfaction among hospital inpatients is at its highest level

0:38:33 > 0:38:38in more than 20 years.

0:38:38 > 0:38:43It is central to this government's vision everyone has access to the

0:38:43 > 0:38:50NHS free at the point of need which is why we endorsed and funded the

0:38:50 > 0:38:53five-year forward view in 2014 but even with this additional funding we

0:38:53 > 0:38:57acknowledge the service remains under pressure and today we respond.

0:38:57 > 0:39:03First, we will deliver an additional £10 billion package of capital

0:39:03 > 0:39:08investment in front line services over the course of this Parliament,

0:39:08 > 0:39:13to support the sustainability and transformation plans that will make

0:39:13 > 0:39:18our NHS more resilient, investing for an NHS fit for the future. We

0:39:18 > 0:39:25also recognise that the NHS is under pressure right now. I am therefore

0:39:25 > 0:39:28exceptionally and outside the spending review process making an

0:39:28 > 0:39:33additional commitment of resource funding of £2.8 billion to the NHS

0:39:33 > 0:39:41in England. £350 million immediately to allow trusts to plan for this

0:39:41 > 0:39:49winter. 1.6 billion in 2018-19 but the balance in 19-20, taking the

0:39:49 > 0:39:59extra resource into the NHS next year to £3.75 billion in total.

0:39:59 > 0:40:08Meaning, Mr Deputy Speaker, our NHS will receive a £7.5 billion increase

0:40:08 > 0:40:15to its resource budget over this year and next. Our nation's nurses

0:40:15 > 0:40:21provide invaluable support to us all in our time of greatest need and

0:40:21 > 0:40:25deserve our deepest gratitude for their tireless efforts. My right

0:40:25 > 0:40:29honourable friend the Health Secretary has begun discussions with

0:40:29 > 0:40:36health unions on pay structure modernisation for staff to improve

0:40:36 > 0:40:40recruitment and retention. He will submit evidence to the independent

0:40:40 > 0:40:45pay review body in due course. I want to assure NHS staff and

0:40:45 > 0:40:50patients and members that if the Health Secretary's talks bear fruit,

0:40:50 > 0:40:53I will protect patient services by providing additional funding for

0:40:53 > 0:41:03such a settlement. Just as our public services must be fit for the

0:41:03 > 0:41:08future, so too must our tax system. It must remain competitive to

0:41:08 > 0:41:12attract the brightest and best to establish and grow businesses of the

0:41:12 > 0:41:17future. It must raise revenue we need to fund public services and it

0:41:17 > 0:41:22must be robust against abuse so it is fair to all. We have heard talk

0:41:22 > 0:41:25recently from the party opposite about what they would do to crack

0:41:25 > 0:41:33down on tax avoidance and evasion, but the truth is, they did not. It

0:41:33 > 0:41:37is this government that has clamped down on avoidance and evasion, this

0:41:37 > 0:41:42government has seen the tax gap cut by a quarter to a record low and

0:41:42 > 0:41:49this government that has raked in an extra £160 billion over seven years

0:41:49 > 0:41:52for our public services by collecting taxes due so I will take

0:41:52 > 0:42:01no lectures, but I will take action and this budget continues the work

0:42:01 > 0:42:06of the last seven years with a further package of measures that is

0:42:06 > 0:42:13forecast to raise £4.8 billion by 2022-3, doing the job Labour failed

0:42:13 > 0:42:22to do for 13 years in office. Our long-term phased reduction of

0:42:22 > 0:42:26corporation tax has generated investment and jobs and raised £20

0:42:26 > 0:42:32billion extra for public services. We are committed to maintaining

0:42:32 > 0:42:35competitive corporation tax rates that there is a case for removing

0:42:35 > 0:42:40the anomaly of the index allowance for capital gains bringing the

0:42:40 > 0:42:45corporate tax system into line with personal capital gains tax system. I

0:42:45 > 0:42:49will freeze this allowance so companies receive relief for

0:42:49 > 0:42:55inflation up to January 2018 but not thereafter. I am grateful to the

0:42:55 > 0:43:00office for tax simplification on their report on VAT registration

0:43:00 > 0:43:07threshold. At £85,000 the UK VAT threshold is by far the highest in

0:43:07 > 0:43:15the OECD, by contrast in Germany it is £15,600. I note the conclusion

0:43:15 > 0:43:21that it distorts competition and dis- incentivise is business growth

0:43:21 > 0:43:25and note the Federation of Small Businesses concerns about the cliff

0:43:25 > 0:43:30edge of the threshold but such a high threshold has the benefit of

0:43:30 > 0:43:35keeping the majority of small businesses out of VAT altogether so

0:43:35 > 0:43:44I am not minded to reduce the threshold. I will consult on whether

0:43:44 > 0:43:48it -- its design could better incentivise growth and we will

0:43:48 > 0:43:53maintain it at the current level for the next two years. We cannot build

0:43:53 > 0:44:01an economy fit for the future without supporting its backbone, our

0:44:01 > 0:44:055.5 million small businesses, who are responsible for nearly half our

0:44:05 > 0:44:11private sector jobs. They give the economy its vibrancy and resilience.

0:44:11 > 0:44:17I recognise many are feeling under pressure. I know that it is hard

0:44:17 > 0:44:21work to get a business off the ground and get it to grow, so today

0:44:21 > 0:44:27I want to do what we can to ease that pressure. Business rates

0:44:27 > 0:44:33represent a high fixed cost for small businesses. At budget 2016 we

0:44:33 > 0:44:39introduced a package of business rate relief worth almost £9 billion

0:44:39 > 0:44:45with a further £435 million in the spring budget. Today I go further.

0:44:45 > 0:44:49We have listened to concerns about the potential costs of the annual up

0:44:49 > 0:44:55rating of business rates in April. Today I will accept the

0:44:55 > 0:44:59representation of the British Chambers of Commerce, CBI and others

0:44:59 > 0:45:06and bring forward the planned switch from RPI to CPI by two years to

0:45:06 > 0:45:11April 2018, a move that is worth £2.3 billion to business over the

0:45:11 > 0:45:17next five years. I have listened to businesses affected by the so-called

0:45:17 > 0:45:23staircase tax. We will change the law to ensure where a businesses

0:45:23 > 0:45:27impacted by the ruling, it can have its original bill reinstated if it

0:45:27 > 0:45:33chooses and backdated and I hope I can expect cross-party backing to

0:45:33 > 0:45:39speed that measure through Parliament. Three simple steps to

0:45:39 > 0:45:46solve the staircase tax. What do they expect, it is the tax section?

0:45:46 > 0:45:51To support the thousands of small pubs at the heart of many

0:45:51 > 0:45:55communities, we will extend the £1000 discount with the rateable

0:45:55 > 0:46:05value of less than the amount to March 20 19. I have heard the

0:46:05 > 0:46:08concerns about the five-year reevaluation system and shorter

0:46:08 > 0:46:12periods will reduce the size of changes in valuation that I can

0:46:12 > 0:46:17announce after the next revaluation future revaluation will take place

0:46:17 > 0:46:20every three years. This Conservative government is listening to small

0:46:20 > 0:46:27business. There is a wider concern across this House and in the

0:46:27 > 0:46:31business community about the tax system in the digital age. Along

0:46:31 > 0:46:36with innovation and growth it brings, digitalisation poses

0:46:36 > 0:46:40challenges for the sustainability and fairness of our tax system but

0:46:40 > 0:46:45this challenge can only properly be solved on an international basis and

0:46:45 > 0:46:51the UK is leading the charge in the OECD and G20 to find solutions.

0:46:51 > 0:46:56Today we publish a paper on the tax challenge posed by the digital

0:46:56 > 0:47:00economy, setting out emerging thinking about potential solutions,

0:47:00 > 0:47:07but in the meantime we will take what action we can. Multinational

0:47:07 > 0:47:10digital businesses pay billions in royalties to jurisdictions where

0:47:10 > 0:47:17they are not taxed and some of these royalties relate to UK sales. From

0:47:17 > 0:47:21April 2019 and in accordance with international obligations we will

0:47:21 > 0:47:26apply income tax to royalties relating to UK sales when those

0:47:26 > 0:47:31royalties are paid to a low tax jurisdiction, even if they do not

0:47:31 > 0:47:38fall to be taxed in the UK under current rules. This will raise about

0:47:38 > 0:47:44£200 million a year. It does not solve the problem, but it sends a

0:47:44 > 0:47:48signal of our determination and we will continue to work in the

0:47:48 > 0:47:52international arena to find a sustainable and fair long-term

0:47:52 > 0:47:55solution that properly taxes digital businesses that operate in

0:47:55 > 0:48:00cyberspace. Following representations from a number of

0:48:00 > 0:48:05honourable friends we are taking action to address online VAT fraud

0:48:05 > 0:48:11that costs the taxpayer £1.2 billion per year, by making all online

0:48:11 > 0:48:17marketplaces jointly liable with their sellers for VAT, ensuring

0:48:17 > 0:48:22sellers operating through them pay the right VAT just we expect

0:48:22 > 0:48:28retailers on the high street to do. I want to turn to the challenge of

0:48:28 > 0:48:33the housing market. Before I do, I want to touch on the aftermath of

0:48:33 > 0:48:38the appalling events at Grenfell Tower. We have provided financial

0:48:38 > 0:48:43support for victims of this terrible tragedy and today I announce we will

0:48:43 > 0:48:49provide Kensington and Chelsea Council with a further £28 million

0:48:49 > 0:48:53for mental health and counselling services, the generation support and

0:48:53 > 0:48:59to provide a new community space for residents. This tragedy should never

0:48:59 > 0:49:06have happened and we must ensure nothing like it ever happens again.

0:49:06 > 0:49:11All local authorities and housing associations must carry out any

0:49:11 > 0:49:16identified necessary safety work as soon as possible. If any local

0:49:16 > 0:49:20authority cannot access funding to pay for essential fire safety work,

0:49:20 > 0:49:25they should contact us immediately, and I have said before and will

0:49:25 > 0:49:30again today, we will not allow financial constraints to get in the

0:49:30 > 0:49:37way of essential fire safety work. I want to also address the issue of

0:49:37 > 0:49:43empty properties. It cannot be right to leave property empty when so many

0:49:43 > 0:49:48are desperate for a place to live. We will legislate to give local

0:49:48 > 0:49:53authorities the power to charge a 100% council tax premium on empty

0:49:53 > 0:49:59properties. We will also launch a consultation on barriers to longer

0:49:59 > 0:50:02tenancies in the private rented sector and how we might encourage

0:50:02 > 0:50:07landlords to offer them to tenants who want extra security. I want to

0:50:07 > 0:50:13say something about rough sleeping. It is not acceptable in 21st-century

0:50:13 > 0:50:19Britain people are sleeping on the streets. We will invest today £28

0:50:19 > 0:50:24million in three new housing first pilots in the West Midlands,

0:50:24 > 0:50:29Manchester and in Liverpool, and we will establish a task force as part

0:50:29 > 0:50:33of our commitment to halving rough sleeping by 2022 and eliminating it

0:50:33 > 0:50:41by 2027. I would like to thank the many colleagues who submitted ideas

0:50:41 > 0:50:46on how to tackle the challenge of the housing market, including my

0:50:46 > 0:50:49honourable friends for North East Hampshire, Eastleigh and

0:50:49 > 0:50:55Weston-Super-Mare in particular. By continuing to invest in Britain's

0:50:55 > 0:51:00infrastructure, skills and R&D, we will ensure productivity and

0:51:00 > 0:51:05economic growth that is the key to delivering a stronger, fairer and

0:51:05 > 0:51:10more balanced economy and the assurance to the next generation of

0:51:10 > 0:51:13their economic security, but however successful in that endeavour, there

0:51:13 > 0:51:18is an area where young people will rightly feel concerned about their

0:51:18 > 0:51:23future prospects and that is in the housing market. House prices are

0:51:23 > 0:51:28increasingly out of reach. It takes too long to save for a deposit and

0:51:28 > 0:51:35rents absorbed too high a portion of monthly income. The number of 25-34

0:51:35 > 0:51:41year old is owning their own home has dropped from 59% to 38% in 13

0:51:41 > 0:51:47years. Put simply, successive governments over decades have failed

0:51:47 > 0:51:52to build enough homes to deliver the homeowning dream this country has

0:51:52 > 0:51:58always been proud of, or indeed to meet the needs of those who rent. In

0:51:58 > 0:52:02Manchester a few weeks ago the Prime Minister made a pledge to the

0:52:02 > 0:52:06younger generation that she would dedicate her premiership to fixing

0:52:06 > 0:52:10this problem and today we take the next steps to delivering on that

0:52:10 > 0:52:16pledge. By choosing to build we send a message to the next generation

0:52:16 > 0:52:23that getting on the housing ladder is not just a dream of your parents

0:52:23 > 0:52:27passed, but a reality for your future. We have started with schemes

0:52:27 > 0:52:31like help to buy that has helped 320,000 people buy a home. We have

0:52:31 > 0:52:42increased the supply of homes. By more than 1.1 billion since 2010.

0:52:42 > 0:52:48Including almost 350,000 affordable homes -- by more than 1.1 million.

0:52:48 > 0:52:56The latest figures show that over 217,000 additional homes were added

0:52:56 > 0:53:01to the stock last year, that is a remarkable achievement, but we need

0:53:01 > 0:53:06to do better still if we are to see affordability improved. This is a

0:53:06 > 0:53:13complex challenge and there is no single magic bullet. If we don't

0:53:13 > 0:53:17increase the supply of land for new homes, more money will simply

0:53:17 > 0:53:22inflate prices and make matters worse. If we don't do more to

0:53:22 > 0:53:26support the growth of the SMT house-building sector that was all

0:53:26 > 0:53:33but wiped out by Labour's great recession, we will remain dependent

0:53:33 > 0:53:38on the major national house-builders that dominate the industry. --

0:53:38 > 0:53:46growth of the SME house-building sector. Solving this challenge will

0:53:46 > 0:53:51require money and it will require planning reform and it will require

0:53:51 > 0:53:56intervention. So today we set out an ambitious plan to tackle the housing

0:53:56 > 0:54:02challenge. Over the next five years we will commit a total of at least

0:54:02 > 0:54:07£44 billion of capital funding, loans and guarantees to support our

0:54:07 > 0:54:11housing market, to boost the supply of skills, resources and building

0:54:11 > 0:54:18land and to create the financial incentives to deliver 300,000 net

0:54:18 > 0:54:23additional homes on average by the mid-20 20s, the biggest annual

0:54:23 > 0:54:28increase in housing supply

0:54:28 > 0:54:35New money for the fund to get SME house-building began, a £30 million

0:54:35 > 0:54:41fund, a further £2.7 billion to more than double the housing

0:54:41 > 0:54:46infrastructure fund, £400 million more for a state regeneration, air

0:54:46 > 0:54:50£1.1 billion fund to unlock strategic sites, including new

0:54:50 > 0:54:58settlements and urban regeneration schemes, a listing of H R eight caps

0:54:58 > 0:55:01for councils in high demand areas to get them building again and £8

0:55:01 > 0:55:06billion of new financial guarantees to support house-building and the

0:55:06 > 0:55:10private rented sector. Because we need a workforce to build these new

0:55:10 > 0:55:14homes, we are providing an additional 30 formally in pounds to

0:55:14 > 0:55:18develop construction skills across the country. Mr Deputy Speaker,

0:55:18 > 0:55:22solving the housing challenge takes more than money, it takes planning

0:55:22 > 0:55:27reform. We will focus on the urban areas where people want to live, and

0:55:27 > 0:55:33where most jobs are created, making best use of our urban land and

0:55:33 > 0:55:41continuing the strong protection of our green belt. In particular,

0:55:41 > 0:55:44building high-quality high density homes in city centres and around

0:55:44 > 0:55:50major transport hubs. And to put the needs of our young people first, we

0:55:50 > 0:55:56will insure that councils in high demand areas permit more homes for

0:55:56 > 0:56:00first-time buyers and affordable renters. The Communities Secretary

0:56:00 > 0:56:05will set out more detailed in a statement to the House in due

0:56:05 > 0:56:10course. However, one thing is very clear, there is a significant gap

0:56:10 > 0:56:13between the number of planning permission is granted, and the

0:56:13 > 0:56:22number of homes built. In London alone, there are 270,000 residential

0:56:22 > 0:56:30planning permission is an built. We need to understand why -- not built.

0:56:30 > 0:56:35I'm establishing an urgent review to look at the gap between planning

0:56:35 > 0:56:39permissions and housing starts. It will be chaired by the member for

0:56:39 > 0:56:47West Dorset and will deliver an interim report in time for the

0:56:47 > 0:56:52spring statement next year. And if that report finds that fighter Lee

0:56:52 > 0:56:58needed land is being withheld from the market for commercial rather

0:56:58 > 0:57:02than technical reasons, we will intervene to change the incentives

0:57:02 > 0:57:07to ensure such land is brought forward for development, using

0:57:07 > 0:57:11direct intervention, compulsory purchase powers as necessary. My

0:57:11 > 0:57:16right honourable friend the Prime Minister has said we will fix this

0:57:16 > 0:57:23problem, and no one should doubt the Government's determination to do so.

0:57:23 > 0:57:29But the solution will not deliver itself. Local authorities will need

0:57:29 > 0:57:36help and support. Developers will need encouragement and persuasion.

0:57:36 > 0:57:40Infrastructure to facilitate higher density development must be funded

0:57:40 > 0:57:45undelivered. So the Homes and Communities Agency will expand to

0:57:45 > 0:57:50become homes England bringing together money, expertise and

0:57:50 > 0:57:54planning and compulsory purchase powers with a clear remit to

0:57:54 > 0:57:59facilitate delivery of sufficient new homes where they are most

0:57:59 > 0:58:01needed, to deliver a sustained improvement in housing

0:58:01 > 0:58:08affordability. The battle to achieve and sustain affordability will be a

0:58:08 > 0:58:13long-term one, so we also need to look beyond this Parliament, to

0:58:13 > 0:58:17long-term measures. We will use new town development corporations to

0:58:17 > 0:58:22kick-start five new locally agreed garden towns in areas of demand

0:58:22 > 0:58:27pressure, delivered through public-private partnerships,

0:58:27 > 0:58:28designed to attract long-term capital investment from around the

0:58:28 > 0:58:35world. Last week, the National in the structure commission published

0:58:35 > 0:58:39their report on the Cambridge Milton Keynes Oxford corridor. Today, we

0:58:39 > 0:58:45back their vision and commit to building up to 1 million homes by

0:58:45 > 0:58:492050, completing the road and rail infrastructure to support them. As a

0:58:49 > 0:58:54down payment on this plan, we have agreed an ambitious housing deal

0:58:54 > 0:59:01with Oxfordshire, to deliver 100,000 homes by 2031. Capitalising on the

0:59:01 > 0:59:06global reputations of our two most famous universities and Britain's

0:59:06 > 0:59:10biggest new town, to create a dynamic new growth corridor for the

0:59:10 > 0:59:1621st century. Mr Deputy Speaker, this is our plan to deliver on the

0:59:16 > 0:59:22pledge we have made to the next generation. That the dream of home

0:59:22 > 0:59:27ownership will become a reality in this country once again. But I also

0:59:27 > 0:59:32want to take action today to help young people who are saving to own a

0:59:32 > 0:59:37home. One of the biggest challenges facing young first-time buyers is

0:59:37 > 0:59:42the cash required upfront. We have put £10 billion more money into Help

0:59:42 > 0:59:48to Buy equity loan to help those saving for a deposit, but I want to

0:59:48 > 0:59:51do more still. I have received representations for a temporary

0:59:51 > 0:59:56stamp duty holiday to first-time buyers, but this would only help

0:59:56 > 1:00:01those who are ready to purchase now, and would offer nothing for the many

1:00:01 > 1:00:07who will need to save for years. So with effect from today, for all

1:00:07 > 1:00:12first-time buyer purchases up to £300,000, I am abolishing stamp duty

1:00:12 > 1:00:21altogether.

1:00:37 > 1:00:42If you want more, you are going to have to let the Chancellor finish!

1:00:42 > 1:00:47Chancellor of the Exchequer.And Mr Deputy Speaker, to ensure this

1:00:47 > 1:00:54release also helps first-time buyers in very high-priced areas like

1:00:54 > 1:00:58London, it will also be available on the first £300,000 on the purchase

1:00:58 > 1:01:06price of properties up to £500,000. Meaning an effective reduction of

1:01:06 > 1:01:13£5,000. Mr Deputy Speaker, that is a stamp duty cut for 95% of all

1:01:13 > 1:01:19first-time buyers who pay stamp duty, and no stamp duty at all of

1:01:19 > 1:01:2380% of first-time buyers from today. When we say we will revive the

1:01:23 > 1:01:28homeowning dream in Britain, we mean it. We do not underestimate the

1:01:28 > 1:01:33scale of the challenge, but today we have made a substantial down

1:01:33 > 1:01:40payment. Mr Deputy Speaker, one of the things that I love most about

1:01:40 > 1:01:45this country is its sense of opportunity. I have always felt it

1:01:45 > 1:01:50and I want young people growing up today to have that same sense of

1:01:50 > 1:01:55boundless opportunity. In this Budget, I have set out a vision for

1:01:55 > 1:02:00Britain's future, and a plan for delivering it. But by getting our

1:02:00 > 1:02:03debt down, by supporting British families and businesses, by

1:02:03 > 1:02:08investing in the technologies and the skills of the future, by

1:02:08 > 1:02:11creating the homes and infrastructure our country needs, we

1:02:11 > 1:02:17are at a turning point in our history, and we resolve to look

1:02:17 > 1:02:21forwards, not backwards. To build on the strengths of the British

1:02:21 > 1:02:26economy, to embrace change, not hide from it. To seize the opportunities

1:02:26 > 1:02:31ahead of us, and together, to build a Britain fit for the future. I

1:02:31 > 1:02:41commend this statement to the House. STUDIO:

1:02:51 > 1:03:00Understanding order 51, will the Chancellor of the Exchequer praise

1:03:00 > 1:03:09move formally? The questionnaires to be sued question five of the

1:03:09 > 1:03:14provisional collection of taxes act 1968 will be given to the following

1:03:14 > 1:03:30motions. Stamp duty land tax relief motion number 36. Tobacco products,

1:03:30 > 1:03:40rates motion number 40. As many as a rock that opinion say aye. The ayes

1:03:40 > 1:03:50have it. I now call upon the Chancellor of the Exchequer to move

1:03:50 > 1:04:09the motion entitled income tax. It is intended that this will be put

1:04:09 > 1:04:20towards the House on Tuesday 28 November.

1:04:22 > 1:04:26The public resolution should have statutory effect on the provisional

1:04:26 > 1:04:32collection of taxes act 1968. I now call the Leader of the Opposition,

1:04:32 > 1:04:47the right honourable Jeremy Corbyn. Thank you, Mr Speaker.

1:04:47 > 1:04:47Test of the Budget is how it affects the reality of people's lives all

1:04:47 > 1:04:55around this country. I would submit that the reality...If somebody

1:04:55 > 1:05:01wants to go for an early cup of tea, please do so. I am told there are

1:05:01 > 1:05:06men despise waiting. But what I will have is the Leader of the Opposition

1:05:06 > 1:05:11listened to and quietly from this side in the same way I expected the

1:05:11 > 1:05:17other side of the House. Jeremy Corbyn.Thank you, Mr Deputy

1:05:17 > 1:05:22Speaker. The reality test of this Budget has to be how it affects

1:05:22 > 1:05:27ordinary people's lives, and I believe as the days go ahead and

1:05:27 > 1:05:32this Budget unravels, the reality will be a lot of people will be no

1:05:32 > 1:05:39better off and the misery many R.N. Will be continuing. Paid, Mr Speaker

1:05:39 > 1:05:47is now lower than it was in 2010 and wages are now falling again.

1:05:47 > 1:05:55Economic growth in the first three quarters of this year is the lowest

1:05:55 > 1:06:01since 2009, and the slowest of the major economies in the G7. It is a

1:06:01 > 1:06:08record of failure with the forecast of more to come. Economic growth has

1:06:08 > 1:06:14been revised down, productivity growth has been revised down,

1:06:14 > 1:06:17business investment revised down, people's wages and living standards

1:06:17 > 1:06:23revised down. What sort of strong economy is that? What sort of fit

1:06:23 > 1:06:31for the future is that? You may recall, Mr Deputy Speaker, the

1:06:31 > 1:06:43deficit was due to be eradicated by 2015. Then that moved to 2016. Then

1:06:43 > 1:06:53to 2017. Then 2020 and now we are looking at 2025. They are missing

1:06:53 > 1:07:00their major targets, but the failed and damaging policy of austerity

1:07:00 > 1:07:08remains. The number of people sleeping rough has doubled since

1:07:08 > 1:07:162010, and this Christmas, this Christmas 120,000 children will

1:07:16 > 1:07:22spend Christmas in temporary accommodation. Three new pilot

1:07:22 > 1:07:26schemes to look at rough sleeping across the whole country simply

1:07:26 > 1:07:32doesn't cut it. We want action now to help those poor people that

1:07:32 > 1:07:38forced to sleep on our streets and beg...Order. I think the whip know

1:07:38 > 1:07:49better. We do not need any more from you or leave the Chamber.The point

1:07:49 > 1:07:54I am making is three new pilot schemes for rough sleepers simply

1:07:54 > 1:07:58doesn't cut it. It is a disaster for those people sleeping on our

1:07:58 > 1:08:02streets, forced to beg for money for a night shelter. They are looking

1:08:02 > 1:08:06for action now from government to give them a roof over their heads.

1:08:06 > 1:08:12In some parts of the country, life expectancy is actually beginning to

1:08:12 > 1:08:16fall. The last Labour government lifted 1 million children out of

1:08:16 > 1:08:23poverty. It was an amazing achievement. Under this government,

1:08:23 > 1:08:26an extra 1 million children will be plunged into poverty by the end of

1:08:26 > 1:08:32this Parliament.

1:08:32 > 1:08:361.9 million pensioners, one in six of all pensioners living in poverty,

1:08:36 > 1:08:42the worst rate anywhere in Western Europe. It is falling pay, slow

1:08:42 > 1:08:48growth, rising poverty and this is what the Chancellor has the cheek to

1:08:48 > 1:08:55call a strong economy. His predecessor said they would put the

1:08:55 > 1:09:02burden on those with the broader shoulders. How has that turned out?

1:09:02 > 1:09:13The poorest tenth of households will lose 10% of their income by 2022

1:09:13 > 1:09:22while the richest will lose just 1%. So much for tackling burning

1:09:22 > 1:09:27injustices, this is a government tossing fuel on the fire. Personal

1:09:27 > 1:09:36debt levels are rising. 8.3 million people over indebted. If he wants to

1:09:36 > 1:09:41help people out of debt, he should back Labour's policy for a real

1:09:41 > 1:09:54living wage of £10 per hour by 2020. Working-class young people now

1:09:54 > 1:10:00leaving university with £57,000 of debt because this government, his

1:10:00 > 1:10:03government, troubled tuition fees and the new government policy is to

1:10:03 > 1:10:17win over young people by keeping fees at the same rate per year --

1:10:17 > 1:10:24trebled tuition fees. That is just one of the multitudes of injustices

1:10:24 > 1:10:28presided over by this government and another is Universal Credit which we

1:10:28 > 1:10:33called on ministers to pause and fix. That is the view of this House

1:10:33 > 1:10:41and the verdict of those on the front line.To shout out, keep

1:10:41 > 1:10:46going, he will, but you will be going out of the chamber.Jeremy

1:10:46 > 1:10:51Corbyn. I would rather people staged to listen, actually, Mr Deputy

1:10:51 > 1:11:07Speaker. To the reality.Silence! It will be in silence.Thank you, Mr

1:11:07 > 1:11:13Speaker. Maybe those opposite would like to listen to Martin's

1:11:13 > 1:11:22experience. A full-time worker on a minimum wage, he said, I get paid

1:11:22 > 1:11:27four weekly meeting my pay date is different each month and because

1:11:27 > 1:11:31under the Universal Credit system he was paid twice in a month and deemed

1:11:31 > 1:11:37to have earned too much Universal Credit was cut off and lead to rent

1:11:37 > 1:11:41arrears and he had to use a food bank for the first time in his life.

1:11:41 > 1:11:46That is the humiliation he and many others have gone through because of

1:11:46 > 1:11:50the problems of Universal Credit. Would it not be better to pause the

1:11:50 > 1:11:58whole thing and look at the problems it has caused? The Chancellor's

1:11:58 > 1:12:03solution to a failing system causing more debt is to offer a loan and the

1:12:03 > 1:12:09six-week wait with 20% waiting longer simply becomes a five-week

1:12:09 > 1:12:17wait. This system has been run down by £3 billion of cuts to work

1:12:17 > 1:12:25allowances, the two child limit and the perverse and appalling clause

1:12:25 > 1:12:28that caused evictions because housing benefit is not paid direct

1:12:28 > 1:12:33to the landlord. I say put this system on hold so it can be fixed

1:12:33 > 1:12:39and keep 1 million of our children out of poverty. For years, we have

1:12:39 > 1:12:45had the rhetoric of a long-term economic plan that never meets its

1:12:45 > 1:12:52targets. When all too many are experiencing long-term economic

1:12:52 > 1:12:58pain. And the hardest hit are disabled people, single parents and

1:12:58 > 1:13:04women. It is disappointing the Chancellor did not back the campaign

1:13:04 > 1:13:11by my honourable friend to end period poverty. He could have done

1:13:11 > 1:13:17that. Well done to her on the campaign, shame on him for not

1:13:17 > 1:13:21supporting it. The Conservative manifesto in the last election

1:13:21 > 1:13:26disappeared off its website after three days, and now some ministers

1:13:26 > 1:13:30opposite have put forward some half decent proposals, conspicuously

1:13:30 > 1:13:38borrowed from the Labour manifesto. Let me tell the Chancellor, as

1:13:38 > 1:13:43socialists we are happy to share ideas. The Communities Secretary is

1:13:43 > 1:13:48called the borrowing to invest in house-building presumably the Prime

1:13:48 > 1:13:52Minister slapped him down for wanting to bankrupt Britain. Where

1:13:52 > 1:13:57is the money to fund the pay rise if he says the pay cap is over? The

1:13:57 > 1:14:05Chancellor has not been clear for NHS workers, police, firefighters,

1:14:05 > 1:14:10teachers and assistants, bin collectors, Armed Forces personnel.

1:14:10 > 1:14:14Will the Chancellor listen to Claire, who says her mum works for

1:14:14 > 1:14:23the NHS and she goes above and beyond for her patients. Why does

1:14:23 > 1:14:25the government think it OK to underpay, over stress and under

1:14:25 > 1:14:32appreciate all those who work in the NHS? The NHS chief executive says

1:14:32 > 1:14:37the budget for the NHS next year is short of what is currently needed.

1:14:37 > 1:14:42From what the Chancellor has said, it is still going to be well short

1:14:42 > 1:14:51of what is needed. He said in 2015 they would fund another 5000 GPs. In

1:14:51 > 1:15:00the last year, 1200, we have had 1200 fewer GPs and we have lost

1:15:00 > 1:15:04community and mental health nurses. The Chancellor promised

1:15:04 > 1:15:1010,000,000,020 15 and delivered 4.5. If you don't mind, we will wait for

1:15:10 > 1:15:16the small print on the announcement but even what he said falls well

1:15:16 > 1:15:19short of the 6 billion Labour would have delivered from our June

1:15:19 > 1:15:25manifesto. Over 1 million of our elderly are not receiving the care

1:15:25 > 1:15:36they need. Over... Over 6 billion will have been cut from social care

1:15:36 > 1:15:41budgets by next March. I hope he begins to understand what it is like

1:15:41 > 1:15:46to wait for social care, stuck in a hospital bed, with other people

1:15:46 > 1:15:56having to give up work to care for them. The uncaring, uncouth attitude

1:15:56 > 1:16:09of certain members...Order. Carry on.

1:16:10 > 1:16:19Mr Speaker, that is why social care budgets are so important for so many

1:16:19 > 1:16:28desperate people in our country. Our schools will be 5% worse off by

1:16:28 > 1:16:322019, despite the Conservative manifesto promising no school would

1:16:32 > 1:16:42be worse off. 5000 headteachers from 25 counties wrote to the Chancellor

1:16:42 > 1:16:45saying, we are simply asking for the money that has been taken out of the

1:16:45 > 1:16:51system to be returned. A senior science technician wrote to me,

1:16:51 > 1:16:58Robert, saying, my pay has been reduced by over 30%. I have seen

1:16:58 > 1:17:03massive cuts at my school, good teachers and support staff leave.

1:17:03 > 1:17:10That is what does for the morale of both teachers and students.

1:17:10 > 1:17:15According to this government, 5000 headteachers are wrong, Robert is

1:17:15 > 1:17:22wrong, the IFS is wrong, everybody is wrong, except the Chancellor. And

1:17:22 > 1:17:27if the Chancellor bothered to listen to what local government is saying,

1:17:27 > 1:17:32they have been warning services for the most vulnerable children are

1:17:32 > 1:17:36under more demand than ever. More children being taken into care, more

1:17:36 > 1:17:43in desperate need of help and support, yet they are labouring with

1:17:43 > 1:17:47a 2 billion shortfall in the cost of dealing with vulnerable children.

1:17:47 > 1:17:56Because local councils have lost 80%, will have lost 80% of direct

1:17:56 > 1:18:03funding by 2020. The reality of this, across the country, is

1:18:03 > 1:18:09winning's refuges closing, youth centres and libraries and museums

1:18:09 > 1:18:13closing, public facilities understaffed, under resourced and

1:18:13 > 1:18:18underfinanced. It could be so different, but compassion can cost

1:18:18 > 1:18:23very little. Just £10 million is needed to establish the child

1:18:23 > 1:18:29funeral fund, campaigned for brilliantly by my honourable friend

1:18:29 > 1:18:33the member for Swansea East. Why could not the Chancellor at least

1:18:33 > 1:18:39have agreed to fund that? Under this government there are also 20,000

1:18:39 > 1:18:45fewer police officers and another 6000 community support officers and

1:18:45 > 1:18:4811,000 Fire Service staff cut as well. You cannot keep communities

1:18:48 > 1:18:56safe on the cheap. Tammy explains this. Our police presence has been

1:18:56 > 1:19:01taken away from the village, meaning an increase in crime, as a single

1:19:01 > 1:19:04parent I no longer feel safe in the village where I live, particularly

1:19:04 > 1:19:12at night. 5.5 million workers earn less than living wage, 1 million

1:19:12 > 1:19:18more than five years ago. The Chancellor last Sunday could not

1:19:18 > 1:19:24even see 1.4 million people unemployed in this country. There is

1:19:24 > 1:19:32a crisis of low pay and insecure work affecting one in four women and

1:19:32 > 1:19:39one in six men, a record 7.4 million people in working households living

1:19:39 > 1:19:45in poverty. If we want workers earning better pay, less dependent

1:19:45 > 1:19:50on in work benefits, we need strong trade unions, the most effective way

1:19:50 > 1:19:56of boosting workers pay. Instead, this government weakened trade

1:19:56 > 1:20:00unions and introduced employment Tribunal fees, now scrapped, thanks

1:20:00 > 1:20:05to the victory in the courts by Unison, a trade union representing

1:20:05 > 1:20:11members. Why did the Chancellor not take the opportunity to make two

1:20:11 > 1:20:19changes to control debt? First, to cap credit card debt so nobody pays

1:20:19 > 1:20:24back more than they borrowed. And second, to stop credit card

1:20:24 > 1:20:29companies increasing people'scredit limit without their say-so. Debt is

1:20:29 > 1:20:33being racked up because the government is weak on those who

1:20:33 > 1:20:38exploit people such as rail companies hiking fares above

1:20:38 > 1:20:43inflation, and water companies and energy suppliers. During the general

1:20:43 > 1:20:49election he promised an energy cap to benefit around 17 million

1:20:49 > 1:20:53families on standard variable tariffs. But every bill tells

1:20:53 > 1:20:59millions the government has broken that promise. And with 10 billion in

1:20:59 > 1:21:03housing benefit going into the pockets of private landlords every

1:21:03 > 1:21:08year, housing is a key factor in driving up the welfare bill. Not too

1:21:08 > 1:21:13many words from the Chancellor about excessive levels of rent in the

1:21:13 > 1:21:16private rented sector. With this government delivering the worst rate

1:21:16 > 1:21:29of house building since the 20s, and a quarter... And a quarter of a

1:21:29 > 1:21:34million fewer council homes, any commitment would be welcome. But we

1:21:34 > 1:21:39have been here before. The government promised 200,000 starter

1:21:39 > 1:21:45homes, three years ago, and not a single one has yet been built in

1:21:45 > 1:21:50those three years. We need a large scale publicly funded house-building

1:21:50 > 1:21:54programme, not this government's accounting tricks and empty

1:21:54 > 1:21:59promises. We back the abolition of stamp duty for first-time buyers

1:21:59 > 1:22:07because it was another Labour policy in our manifesto in June, not a Tory

1:22:07 > 1:22:11one. This government continues preference for spin over substance,

1:22:11 > 1:22:17that means across this country, in the words wolf powerhouse and

1:22:17 > 1:22:23Midlands engine, now met with derision. Yorkshire and Humber get

1:22:23 > 1:22:29only one tenth of the transport investment per head given to London.

1:22:29 > 1:22:35And government figures show every region in the of England has seen a

1:22:35 > 1:22:42fall in spending on services since 2012. The Midlands, East and west is

1:22:42 > 1:22:48receiving less than 8% of total transport infrastructure investment

1:22:48 > 1:22:54compared with 50% going to London. In the east and West Midlands one in

1:22:54 > 1:22:58four workers are paid less than the living wage, so much for the

1:22:58 > 1:23:02Midlands engine. We announced funding for the trans-Pennine rail

1:23:02 > 1:23:09route will not cut it and the other announcements today will not redress

1:23:09 > 1:23:12that balance. Combined with counter-productive forced Erraid

1:23:12 > 1:23:16Davies lack of investment has consequences in sluggish growth and

1:23:16 > 1:23:20shrinking pay packets. Public investment has virtually halved.

1:23:20 > 1:23:24Under this government Britain has the lowest rate of public investment

1:23:24 > 1:23:32in the G7. But it is now investing in driverless cars. After months of

1:23:32 > 1:23:40road testing back-seat driving in the government.

1:23:40 > 1:23:50By moving from RPI to CPI indexes non-business rates, the Chancellor

1:23:50 > 1:23:55has adopted another Labour policy. But why don't they go further and

1:23:55 > 1:24:03adopt Labour's entire business rates including the annual revaluation of

1:24:03 > 1:24:08business rates. Nowhere have their chaos been more evident than over

1:24:08 > 1:24:12Brexit. Following round after round of fruitless Brexit negotiations,

1:24:12 > 1:24:15the Brexit secretary has been shunted out for the Prime Minister

1:24:15 > 1:24:20who has got no further. Every major business organisation has written to

1:24:20 > 1:24:25the Government telling them to pull their finger out and get on with it.

1:24:25 > 1:24:28Businesses are delaying crucial investment decisions because of this

1:24:28 > 1:24:32government doesn't get its act together soon, they will be taking

1:24:32 > 1:24:38relocation decisions. Crashing out with no deal and turning Britain

1:24:38 > 1:24:44into a tax haven would damage people's jobs and living standards

1:24:44 > 1:24:49would serve only a wealthy few. It is not as if this government isn't

1:24:49 > 1:24:58doing its best to protect tax havens and its clients in the meantime. The

1:24:58 > 1:25:02Paradise Papers exposed how a super-rich elite gets away with

1:25:02 > 1:25:06dodging taxes. This government has opposed measure after measure in

1:25:06 > 1:25:11this House and their Tory colleagues in the European Parliament, to clamp

1:25:11 > 1:25:15down on the tax havens that facilitate this outrageous leaching

1:25:15 > 1:25:23from our public purse. Nonpaid tax, clever reinvestment to get away with

1:25:23 > 1:25:27tax, actually, it is hospitals, schools, housing and it hit the

1:25:27 > 1:25:31poorest and most needy in our society. There is nothing immoral

1:25:31 > 1:25:34about dodging tax. There is everything in moral about evading

1:25:34 > 1:25:40it. Mr Speaker, too often it feels like there is one rule for the

1:25:40 > 1:25:47super-rich and another for the rest of us. The horrors of Grenfell Tower

1:25:47 > 1:25:54were a reflection of a system which puts profits before people, that

1:25:54 > 1:25:58failed to listen to working-class communities. In 2013, the Government

1:25:58 > 1:26:03received advice in a krona's report that sprinklers should be fitted in

1:26:03 > 1:26:11all high-rise buildings. Today, once again, the Government failed to fund

1:26:11 > 1:26:13the £1 billion investment needed. The Chancellor says council should

1:26:13 > 1:26:20contact them. But not in house, Westminster house and they have been

1:26:20 > 1:26:27refused. Nothing was offered to them. We have the privilege to be

1:26:27 > 1:26:32members of Parliament, in a building that is about to be retrofitted with

1:26:32 > 1:26:37sprinklers, to protect us. The message is pretty clear. This

1:26:37 > 1:26:42government cares more about what happens here then happens to people

1:26:42 > 1:26:50living in high-rise homes. In effect saying they matter less. Our

1:26:50 > 1:26:55country, Mr Speaker, is marked by growing inequality and injustice. We

1:26:55 > 1:27:02were promised a revolutionary Budget, the reality is nothing has

1:27:02 > 1:27:06changed. People were looking for help from this Budget and they have

1:27:06 > 1:27:11been let down. Let down by a government, that like the economy be

1:27:11 > 1:27:16presided over, is weak and unstable and in need of urgent change. They

1:27:16 > 1:27:22called this a Budget fit for the future. The reality is, this is a

1:27:22 > 1:27:31government no longer fit for office. Nicky Morgan.

1:27:31 > 1:27:37STUDIO: And Jeremy Corbyn sits down after a long and wide-ranging

1:27:37 > 1:27:41response to the Budget. If you wish to continue to watch what is

1:27:41 > 1:27:45happening in the House of Commons, you can switch to the BBC Parliament

1:27:45 > 1:27:50channel and that will tell you what is going on there. Here, we will go

1:27:50 > 1:27:50through

1:28:05 > 1:28:09I'm happen to to continue that tradition. Much of his speech was

1:28:09 > 1:28:16pre-written. I suspect he'll want to look at more of the detail. Today, I

1:28:16 > 1:28:24think it is perhaps the Chancellor who's had the hardest task. More

1:28:24 > 1:28:28public spending, rising economic uncertainty. He has taken a

1:28:28 > 1:28:32common-sense approach which will no doubt displease many on both sides

1:28:32 > 1:28:37of the chamber. It is only thanks to seven years of common-sense,

1:28:37 > 1:28:41concerted efforts by Conservative and Conservative-led Governments to

1:28:41 > 1:28:44reduce the deficit and restore credibility to the public finances

1:28:44 > 1:28:47that the UK has the resilience necessary to face the challenges

1:28:47 > 1:28:54ahead. Reclassification of Housing Association, may have given the

1:28:54 > 1:28:59Chancellor some timely room for man over, it does not alter the

1:28:59 > 1:29:06underlying picture. Although the OBR has made a more negative assessment

1:29:06 > 1:29:10of productivity, it is forecasting a relatively benign breaks the with no

1:29:10 > 1:29:17cliff edge in March 2019. But that can the no be guaranteed. Even

1:29:17 > 1:29:21though a transitional arrangement for a smooth adjustment is in the

1:29:21 > 1:29:27interests of both the UK and the EU, it may not happen. The Treasury

1:29:27 > 1:29:30committee will be looking closely at failing to reach a deal on

1:29:30 > 1:29:34transition and expectings to make a report in the House in the coupling

1:29:34 > 1:29:38weeks. Beyond the public finances, household balance sheets are under

1:29:38 > 1:29:45pressure. Rising interest rates, high inflation, lower wage growth, a

1:29:45 > 1:29:49working age benefits freeze, all these put pressure on ordinary

1:29:49 > 1:29:54households. The Chancellor set out two important principles for

1:29:54 > 1:29:58Conservative-led Governments. Firstly, work should always pay and

1:29:58 > 1:30:03secondly, people should keep more of the money they earn. I'm happy to

1:30:03 > 1:30:08subscribe and those on these benches are happy to support him with those

1:30:08 > 1:30:11two principles. Pressures on household finances which the

1:30:11 > 1:30:18committee will be looking at as part of our inquiry, will be exacerbated,

1:30:18 > 1:30:22particularly for the younger again ration, if action's not taking with

1:30:22 > 1:30:27the housing market. I welcome the measures the chops letter's

1:30:27 > 1:30:33announced on housing. It he's announce add package on land

1:30:33 > 1:30:40availability and incentives to get building. You know there's an issue

1:30:40 > 1:30:43when the member for West Dorset is sent for to solve a particular

1:30:43 > 1:30:48problem. He is going to look at the gap between permissions granted and

1:30:48 > 1:30:54those houses being built. Why that gap exists. I also hugely welcome,

1:30:54 > 1:30:57as I think honourable members on this side of the House will, the

1:30:57 > 1:31:01stamp duty cut for first time buyers. As the Chancellor said, this

1:31:01 > 1:31:06will make home ownership a reality for more young people. The committee

1:31:06 > 1:31:10will be intending to hear from housing experts as part of our

1:31:10 > 1:31:14Budget scrutiny and will investigates whether the rousing war

1:31:14 > 1:31:18time rhetoric of my right honourable friend matches the reality of what

1:31:18 > 1:31:24has been announced today. Of course, the pressure's on the public

1:31:24 > 1:31:29finances and households balance sheet can only be alleviated if

1:31:29 > 1:31:33productivity growth improves. I welcome his further investment in

1:31:33 > 1:31:37the national productivity investment fun. He was right to 'em fast sides

1:31:37 > 1:31:41the challenge of productivity which is the weakest in the G7 in the UK

1:31:41 > 1:31:46in his speech. The average UK worker has to slog from 5 to produce 9- the

1:31:46 > 1:31:52same value output as a worker in Germany produces between the hours

1:31:52 > 1:31:56of 9 and 3. I welcome what the Chancellor said about more

1:31:56 > 1:32:00devolution. I don't know where the Leader of the Opposition has the

1:32:00 > 1:32:04idea we don't take seriously the northern powerhouse or the Midlands

1:32:04 > 1:32:08engine on this side of the House. I can tell him as a Midlands member of

1:32:08 > 1:32:13Parliament, we take them very seriously. This side of the House

1:32:13 > 1:32:18believes in devolution. There are no easy solutions to the UK's weak

1:32:18 > 1:32:24productivity performance. We can do two things to help with the puzzle.

1:32:24 > 1:32:30The first is better infrastructure, including digital infrastructure.

1:32:30 > 1:32:33The big political divide in infrastructure policy is not between

1:32:33 > 1:32:38the parties but action and inaction. The Chancellor must act on the

1:32:38 > 1:32:41commission's recommendations when published. I welcome his commitment

1:32:41 > 1:32:46today to implement the commission's recommendation from the Oxford,

1:32:46 > 1:32:49Milton Keynes corridor. And the discount of lending to local

1:32:49 > 1:32:53authorities so they can invest in infrastructure. The second answer to

1:32:53 > 1:32:58productivity is to retain the UK's historic commitment to openness,

1:32:58 > 1:33:02#2r5ied, investment and to migration. Global Britain must be a

1:33:02 > 1:33:07reality and not just a slogan. The economic case for leaving the EU has

1:33:07 > 1:33:12always rested and continues to rest on openness. We must not allow the

1:33:12 > 1:33:18Brexit process to mark the start of a decent into economic nationalism.

1:33:18 > 1:33:23It is only through productivity growth households can be weaned off

1:33:23 > 1:33:26consumer credit without cutting back consumption and reducing living

1:33:26 > 1:33:33standards. It is only through productivity growth the Chancellor

1:33:33 > 1:33:40can Meade things can pries ops bes NHS, public #1ek9er pay and bricks

1:33:40 > 1:33:49the cop tinge Si methods. For the avoidance of doubt. Let us dismiss

1:33:49 > 1:33:53the idea that Brexit induced fiscal windfall will reduce the pressures

1:33:53 > 1:34:02op our health service. There are no easy choices or a pot of gold under

1:34:02 > 1:34:08the Brexit rainbow. At the cost of long-term damage to trust in

1:34:08 > 1:34:13politics. The Chancellor's right to have identified the technology

1:34:13 > 1:34:17revolution and say Britain is at the forefront of it. He is right to

1:34:17 > 1:34:21identify the need for more young people to learn maths and computer

1:34:21 > 1:34:26science to a higher level. We have to find a way of exciting everyone

1:34:26 > 1:34:31in this country, the next generation and their parents and grandparents

1:34:31 > 1:34:34about the technology revolution to give them the confidence and skills

1:34:34 > 1:34:39to meet demand of a fuel or labour market, not to be frightened by

1:34:39 > 1:34:45change in the 21st Century. This is a key part of our plan for a fairer

1:34:45 > 1:34:49BritainI thank the Right Honourable Member for giving way. Can I just

1:34:49 > 1:34:56pick up on The Mount about education funding. The education proposals,

1:34:56 > 1:35:01the Government proposed three billion of cuts and that was reduced

1:35:01 > 1:35:06to justnd £2 billion. There's a gap of £2 billion education funding cuts

1:35:06 > 1:35:09in our system. The Chancellor has said nothing about how schools will

1:35:09 > 1:35:18cope with that. Does she agree with me we should have had some thinking

1:35:18 > 1:35:24and investment in our schools in order to prevent them reversing the

1:35:24 > 1:35:29progress that has been made?I can say to the honourable lady, who I'm

1:35:29 > 1:35:34very pleased to serve on the Treasury committee with, we have

1:35:34 > 1:35:37seen education fanned Ards improve dramatically in this country over

1:35:37 > 1:35:42the last seven years. I don't recognise the figure she has said.

1:35:42 > 1:35:46The Secretary of State for Education announced an extra £1.3 billion in

1:35:46 > 1:35:50July. This Government's spending more on schools than any Government

1:35:50 > 1:35:54has ever spent before. If she's really concerned, she will want to

1:35:54 > 1:35:58address the interest on the debt this Government is still paying off,

1:35:58 > 1:36:01we are spending almost as much on debt interest as on our schools

1:36:01 > 1:36:06budget. Let me turn to tax. The Chancellor announced a number of new

1:36:06 > 1:36:11tax mesh use. He was very pleased he said our tax system can help protect

1:36:11 > 1:36:15our environment. It is an important signal to send to those concerned

1:36:15 > 1:36:18about the environment and to the next generation. I really want to

1:36:18 > 1:36:24welcome... I will, yeah.I'm grateful to the chair of the

1:36:24 > 1:36:28treasury committee for giving way. On that point, can I we can the

1:36:28 > 1:36:36measure in the budget which would grant an ex-etchings on the zero

1:36:36 > 1:36:41emissions. Can I also, through my honourable friend urge the

1:36:41 > 1:36:45Chancellor to bring forward that measure so it kicks in earlier than

1:36:45 > 1:36:49April 2019. Many of those vehicles will be on the road from next month.

1:36:49 > 1:36:55We want drivers to be able to take advantage of these new zero emission

1:36:55 > 1:37:01capable environmentally friendly taxes.

1:37:01 > 1:37:03THE SPEAKER:If we have interventions, please make them

1:37:03 > 1:37:07short.It is a pleasure to serve in the honourable gentleman on the

1:37:07 > 1:37:11Treasury committee. The Chancellor's heard what he says and is looking

1:37:11 > 1:37:15forward to appearing before the committee on 6th December when we

1:37:15 > 1:37:22can ask him those questions directly. I'll give way believely.

1:37:22 > 1:37:28Hidden in the budget book is really terrible news of no new money for

1:37:28 > 1:37:32renewables until 2025 at the same time the chaps letter' giving away

1:37:32 > 1:37:36money, more tax breaks to oil and gas. How is that compatible with a

1:37:36 > 1:37:40forward looking country that is serious about climate change?I

1:37:40 > 1:37:44think this Government's done incredibly well on supporting

1:37:44 > 1:37:49renewables industry. The energy industry in the Midlands. I can see

1:37:49 > 1:37:53a thriving industry. But that's something again the committee may

1:37:53 > 1:37:56well want to take up with the Chancellor. I want to welcome the

1:37:56 > 1:38:00move on business rates. The move from RPI to CPI is very, very

1:38:00 > 1:38:05welcome. I want to welcome the move on the staircase tax which is

1:38:05 > 1:38:09something the Chancellor was asked about when he appeared before the

1:38:09 > 1:38:13committee recently and builds on the evidence he gave. I hope he's right

1:38:13 > 1:38:17about the cross-party support that he can receive on that measure.

1:38:22 > 1:38:25Would my right honourable friend agree that the changes to business

1:38:25 > 1:38:31rates are going to be particularly valuable for other shops, businesses

1:38:31 > 1:38:34and other places in outer London were they as we could win a bright

1:38:34 > 1:38:37lights of London and out-of-town shopping centres and the Chris

1:38:37 > 1:38:40Cusiter business rate is particularly owners?That is an

1:38:40 > 1:38:43excellent point and I would agree with my honourable friend Matt and I

1:38:43 > 1:38:48was going to talk about the Chancellor's announcement on digital

1:38:48 > 1:38:51businesses as well which is important for bricks and mortar

1:38:51 > 1:38:54businesses and perhaps modest, it is an important printable that has been

1:38:54 > 1:38:58established about the tax on digital businesses doing business here. I

1:38:58 > 1:39:01welcome what the Chancellor said about tax avoidance and evasion

1:39:01 > 1:39:05measures. I think you said we were going to spend £155 billion on

1:39:05 > 1:39:11HMRC's collecting ability to collect £2.3 billion, which sounds

1:39:11 > 1:39:17encouraging but the committee will private estimate. -- 100 £55

1:39:17 > 1:39:22million. I wanted to match my honourable friend for beginning to

1:39:22 > 1:39:24publish the income distribution analysis showing how different

1:39:24 > 1:39:28households are affected by the budget. That analysis provides an

1:39:28 > 1:39:30unprecedented level of transparency about the consequences of the budget

1:39:30 > 1:39:35for ordinary people which only emerge as a result of pressure by

1:39:35 > 1:39:38the Treasury committee in the last two parliaments. There may be more

1:39:38 > 1:39:42work for the committee to doing this one. What is not included in the

1:39:42 > 1:39:46Treasury's analysis yet is an assessment of the gender impact of

1:39:46 > 1:39:49the budget, an analysis of how much men and women stand to gain or lose

1:39:49 > 1:39:53from the Chancellor's decisions. It will come as no surprise that as the

1:39:53 > 1:39:57first female chair of the Treasury Select Committee, the committee will

1:39:57 > 1:40:00be taking gritting evidence including from the women's budget

1:40:00 > 1:40:03group on the merits of such an analysis. Before concluding, I would

1:40:03 > 1:40:07like to remind the house about the role of the Treasury committee in

1:40:07 > 1:40:10scrutinising the OBR and upholding its independence. I think there is

1:40:10 > 1:40:13widespread agreement, Mr Deputy Speaker, across this house, that the

1:40:13 > 1:40:18creation of the OBR as last improved the credibility and quality of

1:40:18 > 1:40:21economic and fiscal forecasting and empowered members of Parliament to

1:40:21 > 1:40:26hold government to account for its fiscal policy. But in this free bar

1:40:26 > 1:40:30political atmosphere, we must member the OBR is still young. Its hard-won

1:40:30 > 1:40:40reputation could be fatally undermined if the motives and good

1:40:40 > 1:40:43faith of its leadership are impugned by those who disagree with its

1:40:43 > 1:40:45finding. The OBR as a powerful line of accountability to Parliament

1:40:45 > 1:40:47thanks to the committee's statutory veto over the appointment and is the

1:40:47 > 1:40:50will of the senior leadership, we will seek assurances the OBR has

1:40:50 > 1:40:52done its work without political interference. We will subject its

1:40:52 > 1:40:54forecast to critical scrutiny as necessary and defend its integrity.

1:40:54 > 1:40:57The committee looks forward to hearing as I said from the

1:40:57 > 1:41:00Chancellor on the measures he has announced and the economic and

1:41:00 > 1:41:04fiscal outlook when he appears before us in two weeks' time. Mr

1:41:04 > 1:41:07Deputy Speaker, the UK faces many challenges. Brexit hangs over this

1:41:07 > 1:41:12place and the UK like a cloud. Some people think there is a silver

1:41:12 > 1:41:16lining. Some people think there will be more rain and fog. It was

1:41:16 > 1:41:19important that today's budget should show the government's determination

1:41:19 > 1:41:24is to do more than just negotiate our path out of the EU. I believe

1:41:24 > 1:41:26the Chancellor has more than announced that with everything he

1:41:26 > 1:41:35has announced today.Ian Black. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. I

1:41:35 > 1:41:39mean, I want to wish the Chancellor all the best. He talks about

1:41:39 > 1:41:44preparing for the future but let's look at the reality of the figures

1:41:44 > 1:41:49contained in the OBR book. What we are faced with is the United Kingdom

1:41:49 > 1:41:57falling to the bottom of growth in the G7. When we look at GDP per

1:41:57 > 1:42:06capita, for the years 2019 and 2020, what we see is that the OBR have

1:42:06 > 1:42:20reduced forecasts from 1.7%, to 0.7% in 2019, and in 2020, from 1.9%, to

1:42:20 > 1:42:260.7%. Mr Deputy Speaker, that is what post-Brexit Britain is going to

1:42:26 > 1:42:34look like. An absolute shredding of growth forecasts that the next two

1:42:34 > 1:42:42years. The OBR talks about GDP... I will not because this is the third

1:42:42 > 1:42:45party speech and it is the practice that there is not to be

1:42:45 > 1:42:52interventions. The change in GDP that we will see in the OBR book is

1:42:52 > 1:43:01a cut to GDP of 2.7%. That is what this government is presiding over.

1:43:01 > 1:43:04It is a threat to the wages, to the living standards and to the job

1:43:04 > 1:43:10prospects of people up and down the United Kingdom. Frankly, it is a

1:43:10 > 1:43:16government that should be ashamed of itself. And when you look at the

1:43:16 > 1:43:19rhetoric of the budget speech, and I can see honourable members laughing,

1:43:19 > 1:43:24but when you look at the fiscal loosening that we have in this

1:43:24 > 1:43:29budget, it is a fiscal loosening of 0.1%. That does not take into

1:43:29 > 1:43:32account the reality of the risks that the people of the United

1:43:32 > 1:43:43Kingdom face. Mr Deputy Speaker, let me welcome the removal of VAT on

1:43:43 > 1:43:49police and Fire Services. But can I remind the Chancellor of the

1:43:49 > 1:43:53Exchequer that together with his friend, the Secretary of State for

1:43:53 > 1:43:57Scotland, that they were given the opportunity to support an SNP

1:43:57 > 1:44:03amendment to the Finance Bill in 2015 that would have removed VAT

1:44:03 > 1:44:06from Scotland and I can see the remarks coming from the benches

1:44:06 > 1:44:11opposite but I will remind them that the Conservative Party in their

1:44:11 > 1:44:15manifesto supported the establishment of police Scotland. It

1:44:15 > 1:44:20was the vindictiveness and the nasty nurse of the Tory government that

1:44:20 > 1:44:26imposed VAT on Scotland. That has ripped £114 million out of our front

1:44:26 > 1:44:33line services. And when the Chancellor of the Exchequer and the

1:44:33 > 1:44:39Secretary of State for Scotland were given the opportunity in the Finance

1:44:39 > 1:44:44Bill of 2015, they failed. So it is a disgrace that we have had 140

1:44:44 > 1:44:50million taken out of front line spending.Point of order. Mr Debord

1:44:50 > 1:44:54is bigger, just a point of clarification, just to clarify, we

1:44:54 > 1:44:57are allowed to intervene on the honourable member's speech, whether

1:44:57 > 1:45:04he takes it or not is something else.Just a second. Just a moment.

1:45:04 > 1:45:09The rules are that it is the Chancellor of the Exchequer, it is

1:45:09 > 1:45:14the Leader of the Opposition, who are not intervened on but what I

1:45:14 > 1:45:19would say is that the courtesies go to the leader of the SNP, who may

1:45:19 > 1:45:24wish not to be intervened, that is his choice, and what I suggest...

1:45:24 > 1:45:29What I suggest... Order, order. What I will tell you is that he has made

1:45:29 > 1:45:33it quite clear that he wants the same courtesy that has been

1:45:33 > 1:45:36established so in which case come he won't be giving way. It will save us

1:45:36 > 1:45:43a lot of time if the bust standing up.Thank you very much Mr Deputy

1:45:43 > 1:45:46Speaker, it is about time the Scottish Conservatives actually

1:45:46 > 1:45:49showed some proper respect, not just to the SNP year but to the Scottish

1:45:49 > 1:45:55Government in Edinburgh. To return to the point, it is an absolute

1:45:55 > 1:46:00disgrace we have had £140 million taken out of front line spending by

1:46:00 > 1:46:04a Tory government ahead of this announcement. VAT should never have

1:46:04 > 1:46:09been charged to Scottish police and fire and the blame for that, the

1:46:09 > 1:46:13sole blame for that lies with the Conservative government. Mr Deputy

1:46:13 > 1:46:20Speaker... Andrew Green order, you are a normal, gentle person, a man

1:46:20 > 1:46:26who normally shows such dignity.I'm hoping he will show dignity today.

1:46:26 > 1:46:31Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. The SNP have spoken out here and in

1:46:31 > 1:46:36Holyrood 140 times before the government finally saw sense. But

1:46:36 > 1:46:41what about the 140 million that has been paid? The Chancellor has

1:46:41 > 1:46:45confirmed today what we knew all along, it was a political choice to

1:46:45 > 1:46:49charge VAT on our emergency services. He has accepted that he

1:46:49 > 1:46:54was wrong but I'm calling on the Chancellor today and his friends

1:46:54 > 1:46:59from Scotland on the Tory benches to make sure that we push for a refund

1:46:59 > 1:47:05of the VAT that has been paid over the course of the last three years.

1:47:05 > 1:47:13Mr Deputy Speaker, the Chancellor has painted a picture of our

1:47:13 > 1:47:18economy, ready for the impending economic disaster Brexit. We all

1:47:18 > 1:47:22have to wonder, just exactly what planet is the Chancellor on Western

1:47:22 > 1:47:25Mark most workers are seeing a decline in their living standards

1:47:25 > 1:47:29and have done so since the financial crisis. We are living through the

1:47:29 > 1:47:36worst decade of wage growth for 210 years. Young people are going to be

1:47:36 > 1:47:45poorer than their parents. Housing has become unaffordable for many.

1:47:45 > 1:47:48The austerity economic model has failed millions. The Prime Minister

1:47:48 > 1:47:55alluded to this when she talked about the "Just about managing". Mr

1:47:55 > 1:47:59Deputy Speaker, today's budget was an opportunity to address these

1:47:59 > 1:48:04challenges and make this a budget for people and prosperity. The

1:48:04 > 1:48:07reality is, there is nothing in this budget that deals with the

1:48:07 > 1:48:12challenges that we face. We have the impending UK exit from Europe. We

1:48:12 > 1:48:18know the government is preparing for a no deal. Yet the Chancellor made

1:48:18 > 1:48:25no mention of how the economy would cope with that. The cliff edge is

1:48:25 > 1:48:30before us and the Chancellor sits transfixed, unable or incapable of

1:48:30 > 1:48:37rising to the challenge. No doubt the Chancellor recognises the

1:48:37 > 1:48:40economic self harm that comes with leaving the single market and the

1:48:40 > 1:48:48customs union. But has failed to act. Why? Because the Brexiteers

1:48:48 > 1:48:50have set the agenda for this government and the Chancellor is

1:48:50 > 1:48:55without the authority to challenge the madness. The Chancellor, like

1:48:55 > 1:49:03his government, is in office but not in power. We know that the Prime

1:49:03 > 1:49:07Minister has two present a financial settlement to the EU 27 over the

1:49:07 > 1:49:10coming days. Yet there was no mention of that in this statement,

1:49:10 > 1:49:15none at all. This government has to take its head out of the sand and

1:49:15 > 1:49:21except that the future -- accept that the future indicates the

1:49:21 > 1:49:26likelihood of significant economic self arm. Mr Deputy Speaker, before

1:49:26 > 1:49:29the winds of Brexit hit us, the starting position for millions of

1:49:29 > 1:49:32people is that by then, we will have already been struggling with nine

1:49:32 > 1:49:38years austerity. The cuts being imposed on public services, meaning

1:49:38 > 1:49:42that service delivery has been impacted in public service workers

1:49:42 > 1:49:47in particular, are feeling the squeeze. This is a budget that shows

1:49:47 > 1:49:50a Chancellor that is either blind to what is going on or that he is

1:49:50 > 1:49:55behaving like a frightened rabbit caught in headlights. Either way,

1:49:55 > 1:49:58people are going to pay the price for his lack of leadership. Well, I

1:49:58 > 1:50:04can see the Chancellor saying an extra £2 billion for Scotland. Let

1:50:04 > 1:50:10me tell this allows the reality. Let me tell you the reality. -- this

1:50:10 > 1:50:15house. It is a £250 million cut in real terms. That is what the

1:50:15 > 1:50:21government here is delivering to the people of Scotland. Mr Deputy

1:50:21 > 1:50:25Speaker, this government used to speak of the empty rhetoric of the

1:50:25 > 1:50:30long-term economic plan. It has failed to deliver a vision and has

1:50:30 > 1:50:33no plan for delivering prosperity. The long-term economic plan has

1:50:33 > 1:50:39given way to no plan. Scratch the surface of the economy and you will

1:50:39 > 1:50:45see a structure barely coping with the state of society, a structure

1:50:45 > 1:50:48that is so unfairly built in favour of the wealthy, we have created a

1:50:48 > 1:50:53situation where we have the worst wage growth in 200 years and the IFS

1:50:53 > 1:50:57tell us an additional 400,000 children will be in absolute poverty

1:50:57 > 1:51:02within six years due to the benefit cuts that are to come because let's

1:51:02 > 1:51:08remind ourselves, there is still £12 billion of cuts to welfare to come

1:51:08 > 1:51:16from this Tory government. The case, Mr Deputy Speaker, is that working

1:51:16 > 1:51:18people are paying the price for this government's ideological accession

1:51:18 > 1:51:23with austerity because make no mistake, it is an ideological

1:51:23 > 1:51:30accession. I mean, it is a pity that people watching and listening to

1:51:30 > 1:51:37this cannot see the Tory benches sitting and laughing when people in

1:51:37 > 1:51:39our country are paying the price. They should be utterly ashamed of

1:51:39 > 1:51:46themselves. Effective stewardship of our economy has to recognise the

1:51:46 > 1:51:50importance of fiscal and monetary policy working in tandem to create

1:51:50 > 1:51:57the circumstances of sustainable and inclusive economic growth. Any

1:51:57 > 1:52:01disconnect leads to failure to deliver an economy that works for

1:52:01 > 1:52:05all, which is precisely what is happening. A failure to deliver a

1:52:05 > 1:52:09budget for prosperity hit all workers, in particular those in the

1:52:09 > 1:52:13public sector. Mr Deputy Speaker, in September, the Scottish cosmid

1:52:13 > 1:52:16became the first in the UK to announce it will scrap the public

1:52:16 > 1:52:23sector pay gap. Our nurses, teachers, police officers and

1:52:23 > 1:52:26firefighters deserve a fair deal for the future. Future pay rises will be

1:52:26 > 1:52:30based on the cost of living and today, the Chancellor betrayed

1:52:30 > 1:52:36public sector workers by refusing to fund a fair pay rise. But it is not

1:52:36 > 1:52:40just the squeeze on pay which is leaving low earners are struggling

1:52:40 > 1:52:44to get by. The UK Government's Social Security cuts are

1:52:44 > 1:52:49specifically designed to remove the welfare state. The SNP will never

1:52:49 > 1:52:54accept this ideological attack on the most vulnerable in our society.

1:52:54 > 1:52:56The damaging and destructive Universal Credit system must be

1:52:56 > 1:53:02halted and fixed. Now, I welcome some of the things we have heard to

1:53:02 > 1:53:08date but it simply does not go far enough. We still have cuts to the

1:53:08 > 1:53:10work allowance is taking place and while young people are pushed into

1:53:10 > 1:53:16poverty, Universal Credit as is, is not fit for purpose. The Chancellor

1:53:16 > 1:53:19of the Exchequer should call thoughts today and reform the system

1:53:19 > 1:53:26properly. -- call a halt today. We also call on the Chancellor to scrap

1:53:26 > 1:53:35the two child policy and immoral... According to the IFS, the two child

1:53:35 > 1:53:41cap on tax credits will mean around 600,000 families with three children

1:53:41 > 1:53:46lose £2500 per year on average, and 300,000 families with four or more

1:53:46 > 1:53:50children will lose a whopping £7,000 per year on average, and most of

1:53:50 > 1:53:54these families are in work. If you want to make work pay, then let's

1:53:54 > 1:53:56remove that clause.

1:54:01 > 1:54:08There is nothing in this budget for Wimborne in the 19 50s, we're seeing

1:54:08 > 1:54:12a rise in pensionable age up to six years without proper notice.

1:54:12 > 1:54:16Depriving millions of a pension they paid for, they were entitled to.

1:54:16 > 1:54:19Time and time again, the Government's been asked to slow down

1:54:19 > 1:54:23the current rate of increase and women's pensionable age which is

1:54:23 > 1:54:27increasing at three months for each calendar month. Either the

1:54:27 > 1:54:32Chancellor decides to act now and deliver fairness to 1950s women or

1:54:32 > 1:54:38he will find Parliament will do it for him. There is a Private Members

1:54:38 > 1:54:44Bill calling for mitigation to be put in place for 1950s women. Let me

1:54:44 > 1:54:48say to the Government, recognise the cross-party nature of this bill and

1:54:48 > 1:54:55actor face defeat. Whilst the Tories attack on benefits pushing more

1:54:55 > 1:54:58families into poverty, the financial squeeze on household income

1:54:58 > 1:55:04continues as Brexit bites. Today, inflation sits at 3%. Prices are

1:55:04 > 1:55:09risings at a faster rate than wages. The Resolution Foundation calculated

1:55:09 > 1:55:143% inflation combined with the benefits freeze will impact 7.3

1:55:14 > 1:55:17million children, 2.4 million disabled people and 800,000 people

1:55:17 > 1:55:22looking for work. There is no answer to that for the Chancellor. Nothing

1:55:22 > 1:55:26in this budget. Let me tell the Chancellor those on the Tory

1:55:26 > 1:55:32benches, what life is like outside the guilded rooms of Whitehall.

1:55:32 > 1:55:37Electricity bills have increased by 9%. You laugh, you laugh when people

1:55:37 > 1:55:43in Scotland and the rest of the UK have seen electricity prices rise by

1:55:43 > 1:55:479%. You should be ashamed of yourself. I hope your electorate

1:55:47 > 1:55:53holds you to account. That, by the way, was the so-called honourable

1:55:53 > 1:56:00member for Ayr. Children's clothing has increased by 6.7% in price.

1:56:00 > 1:56:05Butter has increased by 12% in price. Travel, bus and coach traffic

1:56:05 > 1:56:11has increased by 13%. Train fairs by 3.4%. Transport insurance up by

1:56:11 > 1:56:201.6%. Motor vehicle insurance 13%. Travel insurance 10 rest. That's the

1:56:20 > 1:56:24reality for ordinary working people in Scotland and the UK. Inflation is

1:56:24 > 1:56:30making the cost of a weekly shop soar and wages are falling. There is

1:56:30 > 1:56:34nothing in this budget to address that. The rise in inflation and

1:56:34 > 1:56:42squeeze on wages is creating a crisis for low income earners.

1:56:42 > 1:56:51Between 2010 sand 201, official GDP per employee had risen by 3.5% real

1:56:51 > 1:56:59waging are 1.2% -- 1.1% lower. If inflation is calculated to include

1:56:59 > 1:57:03housings costs, real wages are down by 7.2%. That's the economic record

1:57:03 > 1:57:09of the Tory Government. The collapse of UK productivity growth has driven

1:57:09 > 1:57:13low growth and stagnant wages. But whilst many of my constituencients

1:57:13 > 1:57:18and families across the UK rely on credit cards to put forward on the

1:57:18 > 1:57:25table, a different story is unfolding in the city. Under this

1:57:25 > 1:57:34Tory Government, boardroom pay has soared. From 2010-1016 the average

1:57:34 > 1:57:43ewe numeration for CEOs almost doubled. From 1.5-3.1 million. Mr

1:57:43 > 1:57:47Deputy Speaker, the inequality goes much deeper. European Commission

1:57:47 > 1:57:52figures revealed the UK had the biggest increase in the EU's gender

1:57:52 > 1:57:59pay gap in 2015. The difference in average hourly pay for male and

1:57:59 > 1:58:07female workers jumped from 19.7% in 2014 to 70.8% in 2015. That means in

1:58:07 > 1:58:12event women are working unpaid for more than two months a year in

1:58:12 > 1:58:17comparison to men. This Government has not only driven thousands into

1:58:17 > 1:58:23poverty, it has completely failed to investment in building an inclusive

1:58:23 > 1:58:28economy fit for future generations. Legacy this Chancellor leaves is an

1:58:28 > 1:58:34economy which only works for the rich and reckless. We need tad fifty

1:58:34 > 1:58:39to create circumstances to include sustainable economic growth with

1:58:39 > 1:58:44unthat would encourage investment strive up productivity and living

1:58:44 > 1:58:48standards, which recognises monetary and fiscal policy have to work in

1:58:48 > 1:58:53UNISON. What we've had is a focus on monetary policy that's given up

1:58:53 > 1:58:56house prices, stocks and shares but failed to drive investment in the

1:58:56 > 1:59:03real economy. Back in 2009 quantitative easing was an obvious

1:59:03 > 1:59:07choice to be part of restoring confidence in growth provided it was

1:59:07 > 1:59:13matched with fiscal measures. Particularly in vestings in

1:59:13 > 1:59:16infrastructure and building capacity in our economy. A chance to invest

1:59:16 > 1:59:21in the economy to kick-start growth and productivity. But under the

1:59:21 > 1:59:25steer of this Government it was invested to benefit the wealthy and,

1:59:25 > 1:59:29in the end, has done nothing but exacerbate the gap between rich and

1:59:29 > 1:59:33poor. The Bank of England recognise the negative effect caused by this

1:59:33 > 1:59:41policy. In 2012, they said although quantitative easing had increased as

1:59:41 > 1:59:44set prices this had disproportionately benefitted the

1:59:44 > 1:59:49top 5% of the households. I can see the Chancellor waiving his hands.

1:59:49 > 1:59:54This is something which is important. Something that he

1:59:54 > 1:59:59ultimately has to take responsibility for. Mr Deputy

1:59:59 > 2:00:04Speaker, last year inflating as set prices had exacerbated the gap

2:00:04 > 2:00:10between rich and poor. They found the 10% wreathiest of households

2:00:10 > 2:00:17held 56% of net financial as sets in 2015. By 2014, the proportion of the

2:00:17 > 2:00:21nation's welts had increased to 6 a %. It is easy to see why the Tories

2:00:21 > 2:00:25don't want to change this policy. Reducing inequality has never been

2:00:25 > 2:00:31one of their aims. The #e6ed is stark. Quantitative easing has

2:00:31 > 2:00:36mostly benefitted those who started with considerable wealth. The FTSE

2:00:36 > 2:00:45100 was sitting at 3,805 on 18th March 2009 ahead of the QE programme

2:00:45 > 2:00:52being launched. Last night, there was a growth of 95% in just over

2:00:52 > 2:00:58eight years. The Government has stuffed cash into the pockets of the

2:00:58 > 2:01:03wealthy whilst ordinary folk have paid the price for austerity. The

2:01:03 > 2:01:07cry, there's no money, flies in the face of the Government's own agenda.

2:01:07 > 2:01:13A further £70 billion was invested in QE after the Brexit vote taking

2:01:13 > 2:01:20the programme to £435 billion. That is £435 billion on to our debt with

2:01:20 > 2:01:27no plan, no plan as to how this will be repaid. We could have invested in

2:01:27 > 2:01:30our infrastructure, in housing, dealing with the demand for housing

2:01:30 > 2:01:34and dampening the rise in house prices to affordable level as one

2:01:34 > 2:01:40example. Investing in connectivity, transport and digital, to allow our

2:01:40 > 2:01:43citizens and businesses compete effectively and not caught in the

2:01:43 > 2:01:48slow lane of transport snarl-ups and fighting to get decent broadband or

2:01:48 > 2:01:52mobile connectivity. This investment would have grown the economy, tax

2:01:52 > 2:01:55receipts and allowed us to cut the deficit. There would have been a pay

2:01:55 > 2:02:00pack. That could have supported businesses at the same time as

2:02:00 > 2:02:06supporting people. Don't tell us there's no money when you can invest

2:02:06 > 2:02:11an additional £70 billion in QE at the drop of a hat. Take proper

2:02:11 > 2:02:14responsibility for creating the circumstances for inclusive growth

2:02:14 > 2:02:19and prosperity. Of course, taking responsibility is not something that

2:02:19 > 2:02:27this Government does. £6.9 billion is lost to our schools and 4079s

2:02:27 > 2:02:33every year because this Government I'm calling on the Government to

2:02:33 > 2:02:37take tough new action to ensure the richest in society and the biggest

2:02:37 > 2:02:42corporations pay the taxes they owe in full. They have chosen to cut

2:02:42 > 2:02:46public spending while protects the super rich. Of course, the Tories

2:02:46 > 2:02:51are the party of the super rich. If they won't take the ass required,

2:02:51 > 2:02:54devolve the powers needed to canle the issue to the Scottish

2:02:54 > 2:03:00Parliament. For I ask the Chancellor last month on any assessment he has

2:03:00 > 2:03:03made on the inter relationship between monetary and fiscal policy,

2:03:03 > 2:03:08the answer I got was that monetary responsibility was the

2:03:08 > 2:03:11responsibility of the bang Bank of England. There was no regard for a

2:03:11 > 2:03:17link between the two. It is left to the Bank of England to shine the

2:03:17 > 2:03:22light on the failure the Chancellor to engaged and joined up thinking.

2:03:22 > 2:03:26The Bank of England #5ed mitted the steep rises in house prices in the

2:03:26 > 2:03:29decade proceeding the crisis together the with a fall in

2:03:29 > 2:03:34long-term interest rates has led to a sharp rise in inter generational

2:03:34 > 2:03:37dis-Persian of wealth benefitting in particular older people who had

2:03:37 > 2:03:43already entered the market before prices began to rise. This

2:03:43 > 2:03:45Government has avoided every opportunity to invest in young

2:03:45 > 2:03:54people. What hope... The Chancellor says rubbish. I'm giving facts from

2:03:54 > 2:03:56respected institutions, not least the Bank of England. Is the

2:03:56 > 2:04:01Chancellor really saying 9 bank of the Bank of England is wrong as

2:04:01 > 2:04:05well? I think they might have something to say. What hope it

2:04:05 > 2:04:10Millenials have to cling on to? Robbed of their housing allowance.

2:04:10 > 2:04:14Lumbered with chronic student debt, this Government's gone out of its

2:04:14 > 2:04:17way to avoid investing in young people. The inter generational

2:04:17 > 2:04:21wealth and fairness is creating the perfect storm for future

2:04:21 > 2:04:26generations. Research from the Resolution Foundation shows today's

2:04:26 > 2:04:3327-year-olds are earning the same amount 27-year-olds did a quarter of

2:04:33 > 2:04:39a century ago. A typical millennial has earned £8,000 less in their

2:04:39 > 2:04:42twenty than those in the proceeding generation. We've missed chance

2:04:42 > 2:04:48after chance to invest in inclusive growth opportunities. The Government

2:04:48 > 2:04:52has been the proverbial one club golfer relying on monetary measures

2:04:52 > 2:04:57in a vacuum. Even the IFS warned the Chancellor on his calculations.

2:04:57 > 2:05:03First of all, we had George Osborne pro claim he wanted to balance the

2:05:03 > 2:05:09books by 2015. That didn't happen. Now the current Chancellor wants to

2:05:09 > 2:05:15eliminate borrowing by 2020. Even the IFS called on him to abandon his

2:05:15 > 2:05:20fanciful fiscal targets. There is more uncertainty on forecast now

2:05:20 > 2:05:25than ever before. The Chancellor himself told the Treasury committee

2:05:25 > 2:05:29a cloud of uncertainty is acting as a temporary dampner and we need to

2:05:29 > 2:05:34remove it as soon as possible. Well, there was nothing in that budget

2:05:34 > 2:05:41today to remove it. But, I'm in a giving mood. I'll give the

2:05:41 > 2:05:47Chancellor a bit of fundamental economic advice. End the suicidal

2:05:47 > 2:05:51flirtation with a no deal scenario. Give business something to invest in

2:05:51 > 2:05:56and work on keeping the UK in the single market. The stupidity and

2:05:56 > 2:06:00recklessness of some on front bench who rode around on a famous red bus

2:06:00 > 2:06:05has been the most damaging economic pledge in modern history. £350

2:06:05 > 2:06:09million a week, they said for the NHS. Well, they're silent on that

2:06:09 > 2:06:13now. The Foreign Secretary and the Environment Secretary should listen

2:06:13 > 2:06:19up. Here are some home truths about the mess they've created. The Bank

2:06:19 > 2:06:24of England confirmed 75,000 jobs are at risk in the financial sector due

2:06:24 > 2:06:28to Brexit. The LSE revealed Scotland's towns and cities could

2:06:28 > 2:06:34lose up to £340 billion over five years. Brexit would cost Scotland up

2:06:34 > 2:06:40to 80,000 jobs and see camings fall by £2,000 a head per year. Now the

2:06:40 > 2:06:47Chancellor is planning for a no deal. A complete catastrophe. That's

2:06:47 > 2:06:52unfolding under his watch. He knows how devastating such a math would be

2:06:52 > 2:06:57for the UK economy. He's given departments £250 million to carry

2:06:57 > 2:07:06out work in preparation. To put this in contest, that would pay for

2:07:06 > 2:07:1011,553 new starter nurses, teachers or police officers. It is not just

2:07:10 > 2:07:14the funding Brexit that's costing commune. Leaving the EU will cut off

2:07:14 > 2:07:17the financial social funds we've benefitted from for so long. This

2:07:17 > 2:07:22will be devastating for communities where poverty and destitution at the

2:07:22 > 2:07:28hands of the Tories have vene volunteers pick up the pieces. As

2:07:28 > 2:07:33the UK haemorrhages EU funding and the Chancellor pro claims austerity

2:07:33 > 2:07:37is essential he managed to find £1 billion for the DUP. Quite

2:07:37 > 2:07:43remarkable. The Chancellor found £1 billion for devolved areas in the

2:07:43 > 2:07:48Northern Ireland executive to spend but no additional funds provided for

2:07:48 > 2:07:51Scotland or any other part of the you can. Cash for votes, not very

2:07:51 > 2:07:56honourable at all. What use are they? The Scottish Conservative

2:07:56 > 2:08:01benches who pledge to work as a block to protect Scotland's

2:08:01 > 2:08:07interests that was your chance to shine. A golden opportunity to show

2:08:07 > 2:08:13they were prepared to put politics aside and stand up for Scotland. But

2:08:13 > 2:08:16no, party loyalty prevailed and Scotland is being overlooked in this

2:08:16 > 2:08:20dodgy deal. This money cannot be post Tested until the discussions

2:08:20 > 2:08:23have concluded on the appropriateness and the way in which

2:08:23 > 2:08:30the UK Government decided to provide the addition financial support. The

2:08:30 > 2:08:35Barnet rules mean Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are entitled to

2:08:35 > 2:08:39an extra £2.9 billion as a result of deal. Where the Scottish Tories

2:08:39 > 2:08:45standing can up for that £2.9 billion Scotland he is defshs? Gone

2:08:45 > 2:08:49are the calls for the Scottish Tories, UK Government to match the

2:08:49 > 2:08:54deal for Northern Ireland. They've been found wanting. Year after year,

2:08:54 > 2:08:58the UK Government continues to let down our world-class oil and gas

2:08:58 > 2:09:03industry in the north-east of Scotland.

2:09:03 > 2:09:07Two years ago, Mr Deputy Speaker, the Conservatives boasted about the

2:09:07 > 2:09:11creation of a new oil and gas ambassador. It would promote the

2:09:11 > 2:09:15North Sea around the world and boost investment. How embarrassing, then,

2:09:15 > 2:09:21for the Chancellor that the role, two years later, has yet to be

2:09:21 > 2:09:24built. It seems that the Chancellor and his cabinet colleagues have

2:09:24 > 2:09:28simply forgotten about our North Sea industry once again. Despite the

2:09:28 > 2:09:34Chancellor's tight grip restraining skull and's economic potential, the

2:09:34 > 2:09:42SNP in Scotland have delivered our people.Anna Soubry.Mr Deputy

2:09:42 > 2:09:46Speaker, is it in order for honourable members to make speeches

2:09:46 > 2:09:51where they completely ignore the contents of the budget that the

2:09:51 > 2:09:57Chancellor has just delivered? Order, order. There's two good

2:09:57 > 2:10:01things, isn't there? We've got a slight break. One, it was definitely

2:10:01 > 2:10:05not a point of order and you know it wasn't, completely not a point of

2:10:05 > 2:10:08order. The fact is, we've had a running commentary from you all the

2:10:08 > 2:10:12way through. I think I've heard more than enough from the time being and

2:10:12 > 2:10:19I certainly want to get to the end of the leader of the SNP.Thank you,

2:10:19 > 2:10:24Mr Deputy Speaker. In Scotland, international exports are up 41%

2:10:24 > 2:10:29between 2007-2015, the latest on imported figures show that Scotland

2:10:29 > 2:10:34has higher unemployment rate and lower implement rates with UK and

2:10:34 > 2:10:37use and continues to outperform UK. The Scottish Government the filled

2:10:37 > 2:10:40its commitment to reduce youth unemployment for years ahead of

2:10:40 > 2:10:43schedule, that is how you make visible targets, it is not just

2:10:43 > 2:10:46about the ability of the Scottish Government to deliver an inclusive

2:10:46 > 2:10:49society that works for all, it is our vision for an economy that

2:10:49 > 2:10:57benefits all and the UK Government chose the break clause, the Scottish

2:10:57 > 2:11:01Government chose the baby box. When the UK Government tripled tuition

2:11:01 > 2:11:03fees, the Scottish Government maintained a Brisbane Roar free

2:11:03 > 2:11:06tuition for all. When the Conservatives pushed for a dementia

2:11:06 > 2:11:09tax, the Scottish Government stood by free personal care for the

2:11:09 > 2:11:14elderly. We know that an economy is not just a tool for inclusive growth

2:11:14 > 2:11:18but it is central to the social fabric of the society which we grow

2:11:18 > 2:11:25up. It is time for an economy that benefits all. And damaging austerity

2:11:25 > 2:11:28agenda and stop the catastrophic ideological obsession with a Brexit

2:11:28 > 2:11:38no deal.Just, order. Just to say, we are going over to ten minute

2:11:38 > 2:11:42speeches and it will be ten minutes from when we start but I have a

2:11:42 > 2:11:47point of order.Mr Deputy Speaker, this morning in Cabinet questions,

2:11:47 > 2:11:50the first Secretary of State claimed the consultation on the contaminated

2:11:50 > 2:11:54blood scandal had been extended until the end of October this year

2:11:54 > 2:11:59at the request of the APPG, this was not correct and in fact the APPG had

2:11:59 > 2:12:02asked for an extension of the original date of the consultation

2:12:02 > 2:12:06which was in August 2000 17. Many people have contacted me you are

2:12:06 > 2:12:12concerned that this is now being made on the announcement of the

2:12:12 > 2:12:15chair and terms of reference and I wondered if there is a way of

2:12:15 > 2:12:20correcting the record?I think you have achieved that I do have

2:12:20 > 2:12:23corrected the record and put it on the record for now. Right, let's

2:12:23 > 2:12:29continue with a ten minute remit, Nadim Zahawi 's.Thank you Mr Deputy

2:12:29 > 2:12:35Speaker and it is a relief to rise after the previous speech from the

2:12:35 > 2:12:40SNP spokesman. It was actually longer than the official opposition

2:12:40 > 2:12:47response, and it was riveting. Mr Deputy Speaker, the budget

2:12:47 > 2:12:54resolutions always tend to be about figures and statements which can be

2:12:54 > 2:12:58quite dry and are very often leaked before the actual budget speech

2:12:58 > 2:13:04itself. I was delighted today, absolutely delighted, that of the

2:13:04 > 2:13:10headline measures in this speech, the removal of the 300,000... Sorry,

2:13:10 > 2:13:15removal of stamp duty on properties up to £300,000 was to be scrapped.

2:13:15 > 2:13:19-- the stamp duty on properties. I'm delighted that measure was not

2:13:19 > 2:13:25leaked and was an exciting moment, and one of the are many measures...

2:13:25 > 2:13:28I thank my honourable friend were giving way, something the benches

2:13:28 > 2:13:32opposite were not prepared to do for whatever reason. Does my honourable

2:13:32 > 2:13:36friend really believe that the policy announced by the Chancellor

2:13:36 > 2:13:39in respect of stamp duty presents an almighty challenge to the Scottish

2:13:39 > 2:13:44Government? Their land buildings and transaction tax has been an

2:13:44 > 2:13:49unmitigated disaster. Does she think that the leader of the SNP should be

2:13:49 > 2:13:52going to the First Minister and suggesting that the policy is

2:13:52 > 2:13:57followed in Scotland?I'm very sure that they have had the honourable

2:13:57 > 2:14:02member's point and will be taking at Ford, I imagine tomorrow. -- they

2:14:02 > 2:14:05have heard. Mr Deputy Speaker, one of the issues about homeownership in

2:14:05 > 2:14:09the UK is it is very close to my heart, it is actually the reason I

2:14:09 > 2:14:14became a Conservative MP in the first base. We are seeing now in

2:14:14 > 2:14:19these measures today one of the biggest and most... It's a

2:14:19 > 2:14:25revolution in house-building in the UK, 300,000 homes per year, plus the

2:14:25 > 2:14:28establishment of homes England which will bring together all of the

2:14:28 > 2:14:35strands that we need to make this target possible. Taking, looking at

2:14:35 > 2:14:42those... The planning applications, the training of skilled Artisans and

2:14:42 > 2:14:45workmen to build those homes. Homes England is going to be an authority

2:14:45 > 2:14:49that will be required to drive forward to that degree of

2:14:49 > 2:14:51homeownership but it is sometimes very easy to forget what

2:14:51 > 2:14:57homeownership means to so many people. We haven't seen measures

2:14:57 > 2:15:03like this introduced in the UK since the 1970s. And I think that probably

2:15:03 > 2:15:06in this house, I may be one of the members who understands the value of

2:15:06 > 2:15:12homeownership more than most. I was, I lived in a council house until I

2:15:12 > 2:15:20was in my late 20s. And I was reminded of this in 2017 when I was

2:15:20 > 2:15:27canvassing in a constituency which is not mine, in Luton, in Stockley

2:15:27 > 2:15:32Ward. When I knocked at the Lady's door, she said, "I know you, you are

2:15:32 > 2:15:37not standing here but I wouldn't vote for you anyway because you

2:15:37 > 2:15:42support homeownership". And I found this quite remarkable because I was

2:15:42 > 2:15:48on a private, well appointed home. -- I was at a private. She told me,

2:15:48 > 2:15:52we had a discussion which was a similar moment for me. She says,

2:15:52 > 2:16:00"The thing is, I'm a trade unionist and I don't want, I bore Right To

2:16:00 > 2:16:02Buy, I abhor homeownership because people who have mortgages to pay

2:16:02 > 2:16:04won't strike"

2:16:04 > 2:16:08people who have mortgages to pay won't strike". We went on to have a

2:16:08 > 2:16:13discussion about how people, when they buy their own homes, regard

2:16:13 > 2:16:18their own private capital over and above social capital and she was a

2:16:18 > 2:16:22very principled lady, I believed. She had very strong points of view

2:16:22 > 2:16:27and I never want to diminish zombie 's's point of view, it is just as

2:16:27 > 2:16:31relevant as mine. She can ball homeownership to the same extent

2:16:31 > 2:16:35that I adore homeownership. -- she can a poor homeownership. But we had

2:16:35 > 2:16:42an sting last sentence when she told me it was her own home, not private

2:16:42 > 2:16:45rented accommodation. That was an interesting moment but I took a

2:16:45 > 2:16:50points on board. But I tried to explain to her the reason why,

2:16:50 > 2:16:54because she said to me, "You shouldn't be a conservative, you

2:16:54 > 2:16:57should be a Labour politician, you have come from a council estate I

2:16:57 > 2:16:59know your background"

2:16:59 > 2:17:00have come from a council estate I know your background". It was really

2:17:00 > 2:17:05interesting because I did, and I witnessed what happens to people

2:17:05 > 2:17:10when they are given the opportunity to buy their own home. I will try to

2:17:10 > 2:17:15give a description of what it is like to not own your own house

2:17:15 > 2:17:18because so many people are in that position right now. On the estate I

2:17:18 > 2:17:21lived in, every door was painted the same colour. It was painted by the

2:17:21 > 2:17:28council. The gardens on the ground floors were divided by packing cases

2:17:28 > 2:17:32and palettes, wooden pallets. There were no flowers and what were

2:17:32 > 2:17:38gardens had become patches of mud. Life was pretty great and people

2:17:38 > 2:17:42worked at Ford and nobody had any particular aspiration to do anything

2:17:42 > 2:17:47else. But when people began to own those council houses, it was as

2:17:47 > 2:17:51though it changed overnight. People started to paint their own front

2:17:51 > 2:17:55doors, their own colours, expressing their individuality. The packing

2:17:55 > 2:17:59cases were ripped up and painted fences were put in their place.

2:17:59 > 2:18:05Flowers were planted in the gardens. People started working overtime. The

2:18:05 > 2:18:08very first car was bought and arrived in our road. My mother, who

2:18:08 > 2:18:13was a teacher, was almost giving knightly class to people knocking on

2:18:13 > 2:18:17the door and wanting to have lessons because they wanted to go out, women

2:18:17 > 2:18:22who wanted to go out to work. I regarded homeownership at that time

2:18:22 > 2:18:27as a driver for equality for women because women and almost a reason to

2:18:27 > 2:18:34break free on the kitchen sink and get out to work. -- from the kitchen

2:18:34 > 2:18:37sink. I saw a transformation happen on the estate I lived because of

2:18:37 > 2:18:45homeownership. It is about family stability also because people who

2:18:45 > 2:18:48don't own their own homes, rent, families rent and that is the most

2:18:48 > 2:18:52unstable position for a family to live in, you are facing may be

2:18:52 > 2:18:55having to move every six months, you are facing not the kind of

2:18:55 > 2:18:59properties you want to live in, not the areas you want to live in which

2:18:59 > 2:19:03is why people being able to buy their own homes, decide where they

2:19:03 > 2:19:07live, where they send their children to school... I will give way.I

2:19:07 > 2:19:11thank my honourable friend for giving way, making a typically

2:19:11 > 2:19:16powerful argument and is she aware that this drives people to aspire to

2:19:16 > 2:19:21own their own home, so 80% of people who read want to own?Absolutely and

2:19:21 > 2:19:26that is exactly the point I'm coming on to. I have spoken to a number of

2:19:26 > 2:19:31people who actually work here, our staff. One of the most startling

2:19:31 > 2:19:35facts about our staff who work here is that they have to wait until they

2:19:35 > 2:19:41are in at least their mid-30s before they can even think of putting

2:19:41 > 2:19:45effort on the property ladder and what I hope these measures that have

2:19:45 > 2:19:48been announced today will do is help those people, the abolition of the

2:19:48 > 2:19:51stamp duty and all the measures that we putting in place to become

2:19:51 > 2:19:58homeowners. Of course.I'm listening carefully to what she says and I've

2:19:58 > 2:20:02been a long-standing supporter and champion of people being able to own

2:20:02 > 2:20:07their own homes but has she read what the OBR says about the stamp

2:20:07 > 2:20:12duty, that in fact, it won't help first-time buyers, it will push up

2:20:12 > 2:20:19prices by far more than they would actually save?I thank my honourable

2:20:19 > 2:20:23friend for that contribution and that is exactly what the point the

2:20:23 > 2:20:26Chancellor made during his speech, he made the point that other

2:20:26 > 2:20:29measures also needed to be made in conjunction with the abolition of

2:20:29 > 2:20:32the stamp duty, which is the investment had a lot I will give way

2:20:32 > 2:20:39once more because it only ten minutes.The desire to purchase your

2:20:39 > 2:20:42own them and I have a niece who lived in a council flat until three

2:20:42 > 2:20:45years ago and she chose to purchase the flat before the Scottish

2:20:45 > 2:20:52Government banned the sale of houses and would have denied her ownership

2:20:52 > 2:20:58and in purchasing have flat, she saved £150 per month.I thank the

2:20:58 > 2:21:00honourable gentleman for that statement and it is another

2:21:00 > 2:21:03illustration of how important it is for people to be able to purchase

2:21:03 > 2:21:08their own homes. In response to the honourable lady, I can go through

2:21:08 > 2:21:15the list, abolishing stamp duty, investing an additional 15 billion

2:21:15 > 2:21:19for house building, taking £44 billion, the total, for this

2:21:19 > 2:21:23parliament, it is the other measures along with stamp duty. People can't

2:21:23 > 2:21:27own their own homes, though, if there are not people to build those

2:21:27 > 2:21:34homes. I welcome the review into looking at, just in London alone,

2:21:34 > 2:21:36the 270,000 planning permissions, I welcome the review into looking at

2:21:36 > 2:21:41why those homes have not been built. It is not just in London but in my

2:21:41 > 2:21:44constituency and all across the country. Measures have been put in

2:21:44 > 2:21:48place to help councils build more, it is vitally important we have more

2:21:48 > 2:21:51council homes, authorities need to be able to have the powers and

2:21:51 > 2:21:56ability to do that. We need those targets, Brown, urban sites,

2:21:56 > 2:22:04brownfield sites which have laid dormant. We all know the areas

2:22:04 > 2:22:07around Heathrow and those areas in outer London. People work in London

2:22:07 > 2:22:10and they want to live in London and be able to afford to buy in London,

2:22:10 > 2:22:13not have to travel two hours commute into London to be able to work. I

2:22:13 > 2:22:16believe all this is being looked at which will enable so many young

2:22:16 > 2:22:20people in this capital, who want to be able to buy their home and simply

2:22:20 > 2:22:24have not been able to do so but not just in the capital, in my

2:22:24 > 2:22:28constituency in mid-Bedfordshire. One of the complaints I hear more

2:22:28 > 2:22:32often than any other in my mailbox is young people who want to stay and

2:22:32 > 2:22:35live in mid-Bedfordshire and buy their home in mid-Bedfordshire but

2:22:35 > 2:22:40simply are unable to do so and are forced out. You know, not everybody

2:22:40 > 2:22:44in my constituency will work on my words that I want to see more

2:22:44 > 2:22:47house-building but I absolutely do because we have to accept now is the

2:22:47 > 2:22:52time, when we have got to the position where we need to build more

2:22:52 > 2:22:56homes and I have been distressed for the last 12 years that the entire

2:22:56 > 2:23:00time I have been here, there has been little emphasis on the need, on

2:23:00 > 2:23:05the understanding, of the psyche of people and the desire people have to

2:23:05 > 2:23:09live in their own homes and to purchase their own homes. I am

2:23:09 > 2:23:15delighted today, relieved that that is finally being addressed. I think

2:23:15 > 2:23:20I would like to finish, Mr Deputy Speaker, by saying that the

2:23:20 > 2:23:25Chancellor also mentioned in his speech today, in the budget

2:23:25 > 2:23:29resolution, the East-West Ark, the Varsity arc, the Cambridge to Oxford

2:23:29 > 2:23:34arc which is going to have road and rail investment. That will go right

2:23:34 > 2:23:39past my constituency in mid-Bedfordshire. I am delighted

2:23:39 > 2:23:42that it will bring high-tech jobs, it will build skills and

2:23:42 > 2:23:45infrastructure and will drive growth forward. As the Chancellor said,

2:23:45 > 2:23:50that is going to be embracing innovation, embracing the future and

2:23:50 > 2:23:55change, it is what we are going to need in a post-Brexit Britain. We

2:23:55 > 2:23:59need those high-tech jobs. We need those gross corridors as winners in

2:23:59 > 2:24:03the Midlands, the West and East Link has been needed for so long but

2:24:03 > 2:24:07never been addressed. It is vital and important and it is essential

2:24:07 > 2:24:14for post-Brexit growth, when I think we are going to become an island of

2:24:14 > 2:24:16opportunity, an island of development, an island of investment

2:24:16 > 2:24:21and growth and the announcements that have been made today, as well

2:24:21 > 2:24:24as the financial measures put in for Brexit and the preparation for

2:24:24 > 2:24:29Brexit, I think we are going to be ready to embrace that post-Brexit

2:24:29 > 2:24:32world, with the East-West corridor, the Midlands grows, the Northern

2:24:32 > 2:24:35Powerhouse and all the other measures that have been mentioned

2:24:35 > 2:24:37today which I wholly welcome.

2:24:41 > 2:24:47It is a privilege to follow the honourable lady for Mid

2:24:47 > 2:24:50Bedfordshire. A fear the budget today delivers more of the say and

2:24:50 > 2:24:53does very little to help people in the every day economy struggling to

2:24:53 > 2:24:58get by, to get a foot on the housing ladder, to grow their business or to

2:24:58 > 2:25:03get security in work. I'm going to focus on two particular aspects of

2:25:03 > 2:25:09budget in my remarks. First that will be on GDP and productivity and

2:25:09 > 2:25:14secondly, as the honourable lady for mid-Behred Ford shire, on the issue

2:25:14 > 2:25:21of housing supply and house prices. First of all on GDP and

2:25:21 > 2:25:24productivity, the biggest influence on our standard of living, whether

2:25:24 > 2:25:28we can afford to pay the bills. How we're doing. Whether our families

2:25:28 > 2:25:33can get on and do better than the generation before is how fast the

2:25:33 > 2:25:38economy's growing. From that most important metric, I think, today, we

2:25:38 > 2:25:41can only regard the budget as a failure in Government economic

2:25:41 > 2:25:48policy. In every single year of the forecast period, economic growth's

2:25:48 > 2:25:51revised downwards. That is not from particularly high levels in the

2:25:51 > 2:25:55first place. But this is a further downward revision since just March

2:25:55 > 2:26:00of this year. I think that is very worrying for many families all

2:26:00 > 2:26:10across our country in all of cower constituencies. By 2022, believe GDP

2:26:10 > 2:26:15will be 7% low enthan it was predicted in March. About 80% of

2:26:15 > 2:26:22that downgrade in the level of our GDP is because of lower productivity

2:26:22 > 2:26:27in that period. It is expected to be 27% lower than it would have been if

2:26:27 > 2:26:31it had carried on growing at its pre-crisis levels. This is

2:26:31 > 2:26:35incredibly worrying. If we are going to compete with countries all around

2:26:35 > 2:26:41the world outside of the European Union we need to boost our product

2:26:41 > 2:26:45specificity, research, development, business investment, investment in

2:26:45 > 2:26:50infrastructure and all the numbers from budget of responsibility today

2:26:50 > 2:26:54suggest we're doing the opposite. Going in the wrong direction in

2:26:54 > 2:26:58those most important economic numbers on GDP and on productivity.

2:26:58 > 2:27:06We are already, as you know, 20% behind the United States, Japan and

2:27:06 > 2:27:11ge any Germany in terms of productivity. We cannot afford to

2:27:11 > 2:27:15have further downgrades in productivity. They have a real

2:27:15 > 2:27:18effect on Government borrowing and Government debt. Over the forecast

2:27:18 > 2:27:25period, over the next five years, this downgrade to productivity adds

2:27:25 > 2:27:30a staggering £90 billion to our borrowing trajectory. Worrying for

2:27:30 > 2:27:33standards of living but in terms of the public finances. We are not able

2:27:33 > 2:27:40to put the money we need into Universal Credit, infrastructure,

2:27:40 > 2:27:44National Health Service, our schools because we are not delivering on

2:27:44 > 2:27:48those productive, well paid jobs. The Government have to take

2:27:48 > 2:27:53responsibility for that. I look forward to the industrial strategy

2:27:53 > 2:27:57White Paper being published next week. But I have to say to the

2:27:57 > 2:28:02Government, it has to be a lot better than the Green Paper we saw

2:28:02 > 2:28:05alar this year which was incredibly disappointing and simply won't

2:28:05 > 2:28:08deliver the types of prod you can I've tiffity and performance we

2:28:08 > 2:28:12need. It is 18 months since the Government's productivity strategy.

2:28:12 > 2:28:16Since then, every estimate of productivity has been downwards and

2:28:16 > 2:28:19not upwards. What a failed opportunity and what a failed

2:28:19 > 2:28:26strategy. I will give way.She's making in extremely powerful speech.

2:28:26 > 2:28:30Will she agree prod you can tiff I will never increase while we exclude

2:28:30 > 2:28:35important parts of society. The industrial strategy didn't mention

2:28:35 > 2:28:38disabled people neither did the Chancellor today. The budget is

2:28:38 > 2:28:44simply not inclusive. ThatThat is a very good point. To ensure everybody

2:28:44 > 2:28:47benefits from a growing economy, we've just about got growth but not

2:28:47 > 2:28:52very much of it, to ensure everyone benefits, we need to have an

2:28:52 > 2:28:54incluesive economy and economic strategy that works for everybody in

2:28:54 > 2:29:00all of our communities. The Government might respond by saying

2:29:00 > 2:29:04it's OK, Labour members, there's a productivity investment fund worth

2:29:04 > 2:29:10£7 billion. But the money doesn't start until 2022/23. Five years we

2:29:10 > 2:29:16have to wait for a productivity investment fund. Why is that? We all

2:29:16 > 2:29:20recognise there is a desperate need to improve productivity why wait

2:29:20 > 2:29:23five years before we put money and support into doing that? I thought

2:29:23 > 2:29:26that would have been an urgent priority at this budget not

2:29:26 > 2:29:32something that can be kicked down the road and we put into place in

2:29:32 > 2:29:37five years' time. I want to come to the issue of housing. I'm afraid I'm

2:29:37 > 2:29:42much less optimistic about the Government's plans today compared

2:29:42 > 2:29:48with the honourable member for Mid Bedfordshire. Over the last hour or

2:29:48 > 2:29:53so, I've been looking at the Office for Budget Responsibility's economic

2:29:53 > 2:29:57and fiscal outlook. The truth is, if you read this, I know not everybody

2:29:57 > 2:30:01likes to listen to experts, I'm one of those people who still thinks

2:30:01 > 2:30:09they are worth listening to. If you believe what the experts at the

2:30:09 > 2:30:12office Office for Budget Responsibility are saying, they say,

2:30:12 > 2:30:15the measures taken in totality, not just the stamp duty measure but the

2:30:15 > 2:30:21whole lot of measures on housing in this budget will increase house

2:30:21 > 2:30:26prices by 0.3% and there will be no change in the supply of housing

2:30:26 > 2:30:31compared with the budget in March. So, despite all the fanfare today,

2:30:31 > 2:30:39the verdict of the Office for Budget Responsibility, on page 53 of their

2:30:39 > 2:30:42document, says impact no change in supply and an increase in house

2:30:42 > 2:30:46prices. The opposite of what we need if we want to ensure more young

2:30:46 > 2:30:51people and families can get on the housing ladder. Something we all

2:30:51 > 2:30:57share as an objective but not set by the measures today.I can understand

2:30:57 > 2:31:01the honourable lady interpreting that report and having concerns. For

2:31:01 > 2:31:06an area like St Albans where the average house price is over

2:31:06 > 2:31:09£500,000, the previous Chancellor helped young people on to the ladder

2:31:09 > 2:31:13and this Chancellor will help them save money towards house prices. It

2:31:13 > 2:31:18will be welcomed by many high house price areas. Surely she must accept

2:31:18 > 2:31:23the stamp duty is a welcome measure. I'm not making my own forecast, it

2:31:23 > 2:31:29is from the Office for Budget Responsibility. What people in St

2:31:29 > 2:31:32Albans, Mid Bedfordshire and Leeds West is affordable housing, to be

2:31:32 > 2:31:39able to get on to the housing ladder. For that, we need stable

2:31:39 > 2:31:43house prices and an increase in supply. But there will be no

2:31:43 > 2:31:47improvement in housing supply on the basis of the measures today and that

2:31:47 > 2:31:51also house prices will be 0.3% higher than they would otherwise

2:31:51 > 2:31:56have been. So, it's not going to have the desired effect. I

2:31:56 > 2:32:02understand the honourable lady wants her constituents to get those

2:32:02 > 2:32:05opportunities. The measures her Chancellor's taken today doesn't

2:32:05 > 2:32:10sound like it will achieve. In fact, I would say it will have the

2:32:10 > 2:32:21opposite affect. I'll make a little more progress. In a north box they

2:32:21 > 2:32:27say on the basis of their analysis, post the changes to stamp duty, the

2:32:27 > 2:32:31prices paid by first time buyers would be higher with the relief than

2:32:31 > 2:32:36without it. And thus, they argue, the main gainers from the policy on

2:32:36 > 2:32:40stamp duty today are people who already own their property not the

2:32:40 > 2:32:45first time buyers themselves. I would say, I think that's a terrible

2:32:45 > 2:32:50indictment of the policies on housing. If that was supposed to be

2:32:50 > 2:32:54the fanfare of the budget today, I'm afraid it ends up a bit of a damp

2:32:54 > 2:33:02squib. I'll give way to my honourable friend.Doesn't my

2:33:02 > 2:33:07honourable friend think it is absurd to have a stamp duty limit for first

2:33:07 > 2:33:16time buyers of 500,000 which implies an income of £150,000.If you look

2:33:16 > 2:33:19at the earnings forecast, it is another impediment for people

2:33:19 > 2:33:24getting on the housing ladder. You need incomes keeping pace with the

2:33:24 > 2:33:28rising cost of living and house prices and forecast for average

2:33:28 > 2:33:30earnings suggest it will be harder still for many people to get on the

2:33:30 > 2:33:37housing ladder. I'll take a short intervention.Would she accept and

2:33:37 > 2:33:42agree with me an injection of 300,000 homes per year, if that

2:33:42 > 2:33:47target's reached will have an affect of stabilising the price of homes at

2:33:47 > 2:33:51the very least because the supply will be increased in a way it's

2:33:51 > 2:33:57never been since the 1970s?Isle I'll say this argument is not with

2:33:57 > 2:34:02me, it is for the budge the of responsibility. They say these

2:34:02 > 2:34:05measures will benefit existing house owners rather than those trying to

2:34:05 > 2:34:10get on the housing leaded ladder. That's disappointing. The additional

2:34:10 > 2:34:13300,000 homes a year is like the productivity investment fund. They

2:34:13 > 2:34:19are not set to be delivered until the mid-2020s. The honourable lady

2:34:19 > 2:34:22and all honourable members across the house will recognise we need to

2:34:22 > 2:34:28be building the houses now. We don't have seven or eight years to wait.

2:34:28 > 2:34:34People need those homes today. I will finish my speech with a couple

2:34:34 > 2:34:41of remarks about Europe. The truth is, the biggest economic

2:34:41 > 2:34:44announcements, really, for the rest of this year will be the decisions

2:34:44 > 2:34:48made in the middle of December about whether or not to move the talks on

2:34:48 > 2:34:54between the European Commission and the UK Government on to trade and

2:34:54 > 2:34:59the final agreement between the UK and EU about future trading

2:34:59 > 2:35:05relationships. While the Chancellor makes these announcements today, the

2:35:05 > 2:35:09most important announces for our constituents will be made in just a

2:35:09 > 2:35:12fee weeks' time. I would urge the Government in that time to reflect

2:35:12 > 2:35:16on some of the evidence heard by my select committee in the last couple

2:35:16 > 2:35:21of weeks. Honda gave evidence to our select committee saying the cost of

2:35:21 > 2:35:28exporting a car would be about £1,800 more than it is today. That

2:35:28 > 2:35:31amount far outweighs their profit margins risking investment and jobs

2:35:31 > 2:35:37in this country. We also heard evidence from Aston Martin who said

2:35:37 > 2:35:42if they cannot get their vehicles certificated by the agency in this

2:35:42 > 2:35:46country they'd have to stop production whilst they seek that

2:35:46 > 2:35:50authorisation from the European Union. Yesterday, we took evidence

2:35:50 > 2:35:53from the Aerospace sector from Airbus. Airbus said there are

2:35:53 > 2:35:57country knocking on their doors asking to build the wings of

2:35:57 > 2:36:03aeroplanes in their country. The risks of friction in trade will have

2:36:03 > 2:36:06very real implications for their businesses and very many others. I

2:36:06 > 2:36:11would just end by urging the Government, in the next fee walks,

2:36:11 > 2:36:15to do everything -- weeks, to do everything they can to move talks on

2:36:15 > 2:36:21to the next level in Europe. If they don't issues about prod you can I've

2:36:21 > 2:36:26tiffity, housing, earnings, will be pretty meaningless if those jobs

2:36:26 > 2:36:33move overseas and we can't have that free trade and frictionless trade we

2:36:33 > 2:36:38benefit so much from today.I remind the House of the business interests

2:36:38 > 2:36:43I declared in the register. A few weeks Alling, I strongly criticised

2:36:43 > 2:36:49for some for daring to say we wanted realistically optimistic forecasts.

2:36:49 > 2:36:53I'm delighted the latest set of official forecasts are more

2:36:53 > 2:36:56realistically optimistic than the forecasts immediately after the

2:36:56 > 2:37:01referendum vote. We were told we'd plunge into recession, the British

2:37:01 > 2:37:05economy would be badly damaged. I thought that was completely wrong at

2:37:05 > 2:37:09the time, I'm pleased to have been on the winning side. It is welcome

2:37:09 > 2:37:14today to see a more realistic set of forecasts. I think they're still a

2:37:14 > 2:37:18tad pessimistic for next year and the year after but are broadly in

2:37:18 > 2:37:22the right direction. The reason they've been downgraded in the way

2:37:22 > 2:37:26some on the Labour side are objecting, is the OBR now doesn't

2:37:26 > 2:37:30think we can get back the rate of productivity growth we had before

2:37:30 > 2:37:33the crash because the rate of productivity growth has been very

2:37:33 > 2:37:39disappointed around the world. I now find I'm facing extremely distorted

2:37:39 > 2:37:44interpretations of something I wrote more recently. I would like to

2:37:44 > 2:37:48absolutely sure the House then, as now, I'm extremely confident about

2:37:48 > 2:37:53the prospects for the British economy. There's been a lot of

2:37:53 > 2:37:56inward investment into the UK economy. Those inward involvement

2:37:56 > 2:38:00people are very wise. I think the UK's a great place for people who

2:38:00 > 2:38:06want to set up a factory, expand a business, take on commercial space,

2:38:06 > 2:38:10hire a good workforce. I see they think it is ridiculous. That Haas

2:38:10 > 2:38:14always been my view. Anyone who suggests that is not my view is

2:38:14 > 2:38:19making it up. I would like to get that very firmly on the record. They

2:38:19 > 2:38:23should read the whole article and understand the point I was making

2:38:23 > 2:38:28but clearly they weren't able to. Can we get productivity up? The

2:38:28 > 2:38:32Chancellor's made some very good proposals in his budget. But it will

2:38:32 > 2:38:37take time. What it really comes down to is education, mentoring,

2:38:37 > 2:38:40training, it is about taking our economy on that next part of the

2:38:40 > 2:38:47journey. The recovery since the crash of 2009 has been gradual but

2:38:47 > 2:38:51progressive. The Government rightly takes pride in the success that many

2:38:51 > 2:38:55British businesses and people to generate three million extra jobs

2:38:55 > 2:38:59and get many more people into work. The next part of the journey is to

2:38:59 > 2:39:04try and get people into better paid work. That is about the Government

2:39:04 > 2:39:07and the FE colleges and the universities and schools working

2:39:07 > 2:39:11with young people and with people already in work on training

2:39:11 > 2:39:14programmes so they get the extra skills they can adapt and improve.

2:39:14 > 2:39:19It is easier to get a better paid job from a job than to get one from

2:39:19 > 2:39:26unemployment.

2:39:26 > 2:39:32And also building on the apprenticeship scheme which has been

2:39:32 > 2:39:35doing such a good job in getting young people forward on a different

2:39:35 > 2:39:40route.Yes, indeed and I hope the public sector will take this on

2:39:40 > 2:39:55board as well as the private sector. We are going to face a very major

2:39:55 > 2:40:00revolution, as the Chancellor has been indicating, from robots,

2:40:00 > 2:40:03artificial intelligence, all kinds of applications of the digital

2:40:03 > 2:40:08economy. We see how great companies are making huge changes and having a

2:40:08 > 2:40:12big knock-on effect on more traditional businesses. So, we need

2:40:12 > 2:40:16to put all our weight behind a government which wishes to

2:40:16 > 2:40:19understand that revolution and to try and make sure that more people

2:40:19 > 2:40:22are winners from it, by changing jobs

2:40:22 > 2:40:27are winners from it, by changing jobs, developing new skills, so that

2:40:27 > 2:40:32their career can respond. Quite rightly the attention in this budget

2:40:32 > 2:40:36is on whether there will be enough money to do a decent job for public

2:40:36 > 2:40:41services. I also want to make sure that my local schools have enough

2:40:41 > 2:40:46money to pay good features and to have enough teachers. And I want to

2:40:46 > 2:40:49make sure that my local hospital and surgeries have enough financial

2:40:49 > 2:40:55support to do a good job. And I see from this particular budget that

2:40:55 > 2:41:04there is a £6 billion overall fiscal relaxation in 2018-19 and £10

2:41:04 > 2:41:08billion the following year. I'm sure from what the Chancellor said that

2:41:08 > 2:41:15as some relaxation of the pay agreements occurs, when we will see

2:41:15 > 2:41:19money coming forward in order to meet those bills. It is very

2:41:19 > 2:41:22important that the Health Service and schools have the money to be

2:41:22 > 2:41:28able to meet those particular requirements. I think a very modest

2:41:28 > 2:41:31fiscal relaxation like that is eminently affordable, I don't think

2:41:31 > 2:41:35the current levels of debt or deficit are alarming. I'm very

2:41:35 > 2:41:38pleased to see the government thinks the level of debt as a percentage of

2:41:38 > 2:41:43GDP will be coming down very shortly. But I think we also need to

2:41:43 > 2:41:48take into account the fact that the state owns quite a lot of the debt

2:41:48 > 2:41:52itself now, which I think does make a bit of a difference. And when we

2:41:52 > 2:41:55look at what the United States of America is doing, they are now

2:41:55 > 2:42:00embarking on a programme of actually cancelling and reducing debts,

2:42:00 > 2:42:03because it controls both sides of that balance sheet through the

2:42:03 > 2:42:07Federal reserve board. I want to concentrate a little more on

2:42:07 > 2:42:12house-building and housing, because I'm very pleased that the government

2:42:12 > 2:42:15is going to have a speedy and I hope some interesting and into the issue

2:42:15 > 2:42:20of how existing learning permissions can be better used and translated

2:42:20 > 2:42:28into more homes more quickly. This is a problem that is very much a big

2:42:28 > 2:42:31issue in the Wokingham Borough part of my constituency, where the

2:42:31 > 2:42:37borough has issued around 11,000 planning permissions for individual

2:42:37 > 2:42:43homes, more than enough you would think to have a fast build rate, as

2:42:43 > 2:42:47is required under the agreements in the local plan is. But there has

2:42:47 > 2:42:51been considerable delay in bringing forward some of those houses. And

2:42:51 > 2:42:54then there is a wish by others to try and get planning permissions

2:42:54 > 2:42:59elsewhere and build outside the areas where the plan would prefer

2:42:59 > 2:43:03the building to go. There is a lot to be said for concentrating the

2:43:03 > 2:43:07areas of building, because then the monies can be applied to the

2:43:07 > 2:43:12surgeries, the primary schools and extra road capacity that is needed

2:43:12 > 2:43:18in a planned and predictable way, whereas if inspectors, because of a

2:43:18 > 2:43:23slow build rate, grant permissions in a variety of different places

2:43:23 > 2:43:26around the borough, then we would need far more capital to keep up

2:43:26 > 2:43:30with the demands, because distance becomes an issue for people getting

2:43:30 > 2:43:35to those particular facilities. Looking at the national feature on

2:43:35 > 2:43:40house-building, I welcome the idea that we should be able to have five

2:43:40 > 2:43:45new garden cities. I think the garden town movement was a very fine

2:43:45 > 2:43:50one many years ago Edu there were some great successes with new towns

2:43:50 > 2:43:54and cities in our country. I am not going to start choosing places where

2:43:54 > 2:43:59they should go, because none of them will be my constituency, because we

2:43:59 > 2:44:05already have an awful lot of and development going on.Can the

2:44:05 > 2:44:11honourable member confirm that the Chancellor never mentioned homes for

2:44:11 > 2:44:16social went? Can he confirm that he also never heard the Chancellor

2:44:16 > 2:44:21mentioning homes for social went?I think the honourable lady is wrong,

2:44:21 > 2:44:24I think he did and I think it is clearly part of the government's

2:44:24 > 2:44:30plan. Homes for rent and homes for purchase. But I would like to see

2:44:30 > 2:44:35new settlements, where a suitable location can be found and I am

2:44:35 > 2:44:40pleased to hear that there is already some agreement over the

2:44:40 > 2:44:43university arc from Cambridge through to Oxford via Milton Keynes,

2:44:43 > 2:44:47where there are all sorts of exciting opportunities. One of the

2:44:47 > 2:44:50good things about the UK economy now is the momentum that is clearly

2:44:50 > 2:44:55gathering pace in technology, investment and technology business

2:44:55 > 2:45:01setup, and it's obviously easier to do that close to great centres of

2:45:01 > 2:45:06learning and where there is very extremely good workforce to recruit,

2:45:06 > 2:45:10who may well be some of the entrepreneurs as well. So, I think

2:45:10 > 2:45:13it is excellent that we reinforce success and see that as a very major

2:45:13 > 2:45:18part of the country. I agree with my honourable friend who said that

2:45:18 > 2:45:25within the housing issue, it is very important to promote homeownership.

2:45:25 > 2:45:31There is clearly a great yearning for homeownership and I do think it

2:45:31 > 2:45:35is one of the big social problems of our day, that people under the age

2:45:35 > 2:45:39of 35 in many cases are unable to afford a first home, and I welcome

2:45:39 > 2:45:53anything that would make the gap a bit more Bridget.

2:45:58 > 2:46:02-- a bit more Bridget will.In my fast and remote constituency,

2:46:02 > 2:46:06first-time buyers welcomed abolition of stamped duty. Will here agree

2:46:06 > 2:46:10with his colleague who has now left the Chamber that it would be high

2:46:10 > 2:46:13time that the Scottish Government followed suit and abolished the same

2:46:13 > 2:46:17stamp duty, because we don't want to marry inequality disadvantage in

2:46:17 > 2:46:24Scots.That is fine by me, I have no problem with that but nor do I have

2:46:24 > 2:46:28any constituency interest in it. It is interesting how the SNP have not

2:46:28 > 2:46:41staged to follow that through.There is one!But yes, it is a sensible

2:46:41 > 2:46:45proposal and I think it is very welcome. Those who say that allowing

2:46:45 > 2:46:50some remission of stamp duty right up to 500,000 is unrealistic, I

2:46:50 > 2:46:53think the earnings multiples now being applied are rather greater

2:46:53 > 2:46:57than the one the honourable lady was suggesting. And I do think some

2:46:57 > 2:47:01relief for people struggling to buy in London is as necessary as

2:47:01 > 2:47:05elsewhere in the country, and you do need to take into account the much

2:47:05 > 2:47:18higher prices in London. In summary, I welcome the new forecast. I think

2:47:18 > 2:47:22the UK is a great place to invest in, I think the growth should fairly

2:47:22 > 2:47:27steady from here, the productivity plans need rolling out and

2:47:27 > 2:47:33developing much more. It's going to have to be done, because they are

2:47:33 > 2:47:35about influencing behaviour and opportunity in thousands of

2:47:35 > 2:47:38companies around the country, and working with the educational and

2:47:38 > 2:47:44training establishments to achieve what we need to bring about. And it

2:47:44 > 2:47:47is above all I think about government being open and conscious

2:47:47 > 2:47:54of the need for it to adapt itself very quickly to the huge changes

2:47:54 > 2:47:56that technology is producing. I would welcome experiments within the

2:47:56 > 2:48:04public sector on how we can greatly improve public sector productivity.

2:48:04 > 2:48:10And in a positive way, by wanting to ensure that people keep their jobs,

2:48:10 > 2:48:14the but the jobs are enriched and more rewarding, and I think it would

2:48:14 > 2:48:19be really good to have some pioneering examples in parts of the

2:48:19 > 2:48:23public sector, and if the public sector is good at it, when it might

2:48:23 > 2:48:27be demonstrated to the private sector. I wish the government every

2:48:27 > 2:48:36success with this. The House has wanted to be in a very fractious

2:48:36 > 2:48:39mood today but we live in hope that in due course people will see that

2:48:39 > 2:48:44this country is on a very exciting journey and that joint work to crack

2:48:44 > 2:48:49the productivity problem would be very welcome.It is a pleasure to

2:48:49 > 2:48:53follow the member for working. The OBR forecast which was published

2:48:53 > 2:49:00today has really demonstrated that we're in a downgraded economy. --

2:49:00 > 2:49:04the member for Wokingham. Real wages are down. Business investment is

2:49:04 > 2:49:09down. Productivity is downgraded now and far into the future. So, no

2:49:09 > 2:49:14wonder, Madame Deputy Speaker, that the growth is down from the

2:49:14 > 2:49:18Chancellor's modest forecast in March of this year. He's presented

2:49:18 > 2:49:22news today of a slowing economy for the next three years, an economy

2:49:22 > 2:49:28which is forecast to be six to £5 billion smaller in 2020 from what

2:49:28 > 2:49:36they expected only last year. Aside from setting apart £3 billion to

2:49:36 > 2:49:40plan for Brexit, which is more than he gave to the NHS, he made no

2:49:40 > 2:49:46mention of the £40 billion or so divorce payment which is presumably

2:49:46 > 2:49:52going to be agreed with the EU soon. And he used head room and some

2:49:52 > 2:49:57reclassification of housing association debt to announce some

2:49:57 > 2:50:02tinkering, but fundamentally, to use a phrase, Madame Deputy Speaker,

2:50:02 > 2:50:07nothing has changed with this budget. It's a eighth, or austerity

2:50:07 > 2:50:12budget in a row. And it's taking place against a backdrop of an

2:50:12 > 2:50:18economy in the doldrums. We were told by George Osborne in his first

2:50:18 > 2:50:23austerity budget that we all had to make sacrifices to eliminate a

2:50:23 > 2:50:28deficit caused by the global financial crisis. Entirely

2:50:28 > 2:50:32predictably, that five-year plan failed. So, the pain was extended

2:50:32 > 2:50:36for another five years. And now we're told that the second five-year

2:50:36 > 2:50:40plan has failed, too. And so this Chancellor is extending it for

2:50:40 > 2:50:46another five years, until 2025. That is already a 10-year delay on what

2:50:46 > 2:50:53was meant to be a five-year recovery plan. It's 15 years of austerity,

2:50:53 > 2:50:59cut after cut, pressure on public services year in, year out which no

2:50:59 > 2:51:04end in sight. And this austerity policy has huge human cost, which we

2:51:04 > 2:51:09on this side of the House siege daily in our advice surgeries.

2:51:09 > 2:51:14Homelessness and destitution on the rise, food bank use soaring, a and

2:51:14 > 2:51:17if its system failing most of those who have to rely on it through no

2:51:17 > 2:51:24fault of their own. Now, the Conservative Party is enthralled to

2:51:24 > 2:51:28a right-wing libertarian ideology. They want to shrink the size of the

2:51:28 > 2:51:33state as a deliberate political aim. They want state expenditure to be as

2:51:33 > 2:51:37low as a percentage of GDP as possible, despite be increasing

2:51:37 > 2:51:42demands of an ageing population and the need to make our economy fit for

2:51:42 > 2:51:46the future in rapidly changing times. They expect people to sink or

2:51:46 > 2:51:50swim, and they aren't that concerned about providing them with any

2:51:50 > 2:51:56lifeboats. They saw an opportunity... Well, the right

2:51:56 > 2:52:01honourable gentleman has just spoken. He can go off and advise his

2:52:01 > 2:52:05clients on investing their money abroad. Madame Deputy Speaker, they

2:52:05 > 2:52:12saw an opportunity to pursue this minimal state agenda in the

2:52:12 > 2:52:16aftermath of the global financial crash, and they've done so at great

2:52:16 > 2:52:20cost too many. They made a deliberate choice that cuts to

2:52:20 > 2:52:24public spending would bear 80% of the cost of eliminating the deficit,

2:52:24 > 2:52:30with only 20% being accounted for by tax changes. And we now know that

2:52:30 > 2:52:32these cuts have fallen disproportionately on the most

2:52:32 > 2:52:38vulnerable and least able to look after themselves. The Chancellor's

2:52:38 > 2:52:41predecessor liked to claim that we were all in this together, but he

2:52:41 > 2:52:45cut the top rate of tax for his super-rich friends at the same time

2:52:45 > 2:52:50as ensuring that public sector workers what a decade of pay freezes

2:52:50 > 2:52:54and falling living standards. Meanwhile this government has

2:52:54 > 2:52:57systematically reduced the social safety net to tatters for some of

2:52:57 > 2:53:02the most vulnerable people in our society. By 2021 my local authority

2:53:02 > 2:53:09in Wirral will have had its funding cut by 40% since 2010. Efficiency

2:53:09 > 2:53:15savings, Madame Deputy Speaker, are not cover cuts on this scale, and it

2:53:15 > 2:53:19is no surprise that this level of cuts decimates council services such

2:53:19 > 2:53:23as adult social care, which wasn't mentioned in the budget for a second

2:53:23 > 2:53:32time and has seen a 26% cut between 2011 and 2016. This means that

2:53:32 > 2:53:36essential care for the elderly is not available and people in dire

2:53:36 > 2:53:40need are being left with little or no help. In education cuts have led

2:53:40 > 2:53:47to a loss of £149 per pupil and 29 teachers in Wallasey alone. Will and

2:53:47 > 2:53:52Cheshire NHS is being told to cut £1 billion in the next five years.

2:53:52 > 2:53:56Merseyside Fire Brigade used to have 40 fire engines to save lives check

2:53:56 > 2:54:03if they now have 28.

2:54:03 > 2:54:07I do welcome the VAT announcement today for the Scottish fire rescue

2:54:07 > 2:54:13and police service. But does my honourable friend not agree with me

2:54:13 > 2:54:18that the reinstatement of VAT exemption is far too late and his

2:54:18 > 2:54:22led for years and yeared of added deduction in the fire and police

2:54:22 > 2:54:28service?That's right. Merseyside Police will have suffered cuts of

2:54:28 > 2:54:34£183 million by 2021. 1,000 officers and 700 support staff down. Little

2:54:34 > 2:54:40wonder crime levels are now the highest in a decade. I could go on

2:54:40 > 2:54:45but I think you get the point. Austerity has extracted a brutal

2:54:45 > 2:54:50cost from the most vulnerable. This budget takes place against a

2:54:50 > 2:54:53backdrop of unparalleled uncertainty and danger for our country. This is

2:54:53 > 2:54:57a Government paralysed by its own disagreements over Brexit. It is a

2:54:57 > 2:55:02Government unable to resolve its own internal contradictions around the

2:55:02 > 2:55:06Cabinet table, let alone chart the path to a successful conclusion of

2:55:06 > 2:55:09the Article 50 negotiation in the Brussels. We have a Prime Minister

2:55:09 > 2:55:15who puts the interests of her party above those of the country. And a

2:55:15 > 2:55:19Tory Party, half of whom would rather us crash out of the EU

2:55:19 > 2:55:27without any deal than stay in a moment longer. Go on!Does she not

2:55:27 > 2:55:31acknowledge that preparing for no deal is an essential ingredient of

2:55:31 > 2:55:36securing a good deal. Has she ever bought a second-hand car? Did she go

2:55:36 > 2:55:39in and tell the salesman she had to leave with a car and yet expect a

2:55:39 > 2:55:45discount?I have to say, I would certainly buy a second-hand car from

2:55:45 > 2:55:52the honourable gentleman! The Chancellor, who is regarded with the

2:55:52 > 2:55:55utmost suspicion by the Brexit extremists on his own side was

2:55:55 > 2:55:59warned he had to produce a game changer of a budget or his career

2:55:59 > 2:56:04would be over. They want rid of him. They don't think he's eurosceptic

2:56:04 > 2:56:08enough. The Prime Minister's already shown her faith in him by make can

2:56:08 > 2:56:13him disappear for the entire length of recent general election campaign.

2:56:13 > 2:56:16After his outing on the Sunday Politics show at the weekend when he

2:56:16 > 2:56:20claimed no-one in Britain was unemployed you can see what they're

2:56:20 > 2:56:25worried about. No wonder he declined to get in that driverless car they

2:56:25 > 2:56:30were going to put him in for a pre-budget hi-tech photo op. The

2:56:30 > 2:56:35party opposite is responsible for the slowest recovery from recession

2:56:35 > 2:56:39since the Napoleonic War and the largest squeeze on living standards

2:56:39 > 2:56:44since Victorian times. Their presiding over record levels of

2:56:44 > 2:56:49wealth inequality. This is not a record to be proud of. This budget

2:56:49 > 2:56:55has done nothing to address these abject and fundamental failures.

2:56:55 > 2:56:58Since the crash, Gross Domestic Product per head has increased by

2:56:58 > 2:57:062.4%. During the 19900 recession the comparticle figure was 21%. Driven

2:57:06 > 2:57:13by the significant decline in the value of the pound in the referendum

2:57:13 > 2:57:18vote inflation roseto 3% double the rate in the eurozone and growth in

2:57:18 > 2:57:24the UK is anaemic by our historic trend. And as the off the BR said,

2:57:24 > 2:57:30is on a downward path. Wages are lower now than in 2010. The living

2:57:30 > 2:57:34standard squeeze has returned as prices are outstripping wage

2:57:34 > 2:57:38increases once more. In the public sector, there's been a decade of

2:57:38 > 2:57:43falling wages which is causing real hardship. The TUC calculated as a

2:57:43 > 2:57:50result of the public sector pay freeze paramedics and die Tests are

2:57:50 > 2:57:57worse off. Firefighters are £2,900 lower down and Crown Prosecution

2:57:57 > 2:58:03Service in our courts, 4,500 worse off a year. Their polling shows 15%

2:58:03 > 2:58:08of staff in our public services have skipped meals to make ends meet.

2:58:08 > 2:58:11Meanwhile, in Tory Britain, workers are not only struggling with

2:58:11 > 2:58:15stagnant or falling pay levels, they're experiencing a huge increase

2:58:15 > 2:58:21in job insecurity. One in ten of the workforce, had an is 3.2 million

2:58:21 > 2:58:28people, now face insecurity at work, including 800,000 on zero hours

2:58:28 > 2:58:32contracts, 760,000 on nonstandard forms of temporary work, including

2:58:32 > 2:58:37agency and casual work and 1.7 million who are in low paid

2:58:37 > 2:58:40self-employment earning below the Government's modest so-called living

2:58:40 > 2:58:47wage. Little wonder that tax receipts have fallen as employers

2:58:47 > 2:58:51take advantage of tax structures which innocent vies less secure

2:58:51 > 2:58:58forms of employment. Little wonder the Bank of England figures show

2:58:58 > 2:59:01household levels of unsecured consumer debt are rising at the

2:59:01 > 2:59:05fastest rate since the global FM crass. Up over 10% last year and now

2:59:05 > 2:59:11higher than it was in 2008. The budget had nothing in it to address

2:59:11 > 2:59:15any of these important issues. There are a few people who are doing

2:59:15 > 2:59:21really well out of the current system. Pay ratios between FTSE 100

2:59:21 > 2:59:26CEOs and the rest continue to wide when. They're now paid at a

2:59:26 > 2:59:30staggering 160 times more than the average worker. This means they made

2:59:30 > 2:59:36more money by the first Wednesday of 2017 than the average worker could

2:59:36 > 2:59:42earn for working all year. 5% of households now earn 40% of all the

2:59:42 > 2:59:46wealth in Britain. Is this really the kind of society we wish to

2:59:46 > 2:59:51create? Boosting productivity is the key to economic growth and pay

2:59:51 > 2:59:56increases. Yet, in the last decade. The UK's productivity performance

2:59:56 > 3:00:02has the the worst of any G7 country. Since 2010, the Government's failure

3:00:02 > 3:00:05to invest in infrastructure and skills has seen our productivity

3:00:05 > 3:00:11flat line. We're 15% lower than the G7 average. So bad has been this

3:00:11 > 3:00:18Government's record on productivity that the OBR's revised down its

3:00:18 > 3:00:22assumptions on productivity growth. We've the lowest levels of

3:00:22 > 3:00:27investment in the G7 driven by the the Government's failure to invest

3:00:27 > 3:00:31in businesses. This is nowhere near enough to retool our economy and

3:00:31 > 3:00:36make it fit for the future. Yet, addressing this problem must be at

3:00:36 > 3:00:42the heart of any Government's industrial strategy. This budget

3:00:42 > 3:00:47might have been the time when the Chancellor decided to tackle the

3:00:47 > 3:00:51regional disparity in economic performance. When he took the

3:00:51 > 3:00:54opportunity to invest in our infrastructure and skills base. When

3:00:54 > 3:00:59he finally gave Britain the pay rise it so badly needs. But he didn't.

3:00:59 > 3:01:04This is a budget of missed opportunities. Once more, nothing on

3:01:04 > 3:01:10social care. A bits and pieces budget that fails to rise to the

3:01:10 > 3:01:18huge challenges that this country faces.Thank you very much. I'm

3:01:18 > 3:01:23pleased to follow the honourable lady for Wallasey. But what her

3:01:23 > 3:01:27speech showed is that the party opposite has not learnt anything

3:01:27 > 3:01:32about how to run a successful, modern economy. The Chancellor in

3:01:32 > 3:01:38his speech used the figure of the party opposite increasing our

3:01:38 > 3:01:43national debt by £500 billion. The easiest thing in the world is to

3:01:43 > 3:01:48spend more money and borrow more money, which is precisely the

3:01:48 > 3:01:52situation the party opposite left us in 2010. That's why we've had to

3:01:52 > 3:01:55have the austerity budgets we've had in the last few years. Indeed, I

3:01:55 > 3:02:02went to a lunch recently and I met one of our major director of one of

3:02:02 > 3:02:05our major banks, the party opposite should listen to this. He said our

3:02:05 > 3:02:10focus of attention has changed from Brexit. We'll cope with whatever the

3:02:10 > 3:02:15politicians dloe at us for Brexit. Our focus of attention has changed

3:02:15 > 3:02:18to political risk, the risk of a Labour Government ruining this

3:02:18 > 3:02:24economy. In contrast to that, what we saw today was my right honourable

3:02:24 > 3:02:30friend's budget. It was a prudent budget, a fiscal loosening budget,

3:02:30 > 3:02:35but, at the same time, we've been able to stabilise our national debt,

3:02:35 > 3:02:39put more money into our public services, particularly into NH

3:02:39 > 3:02:43skchlt and education. More moon into infrastructure and deal with some of

3:02:43 > 3:02:47the tax evasion. I'm particularly pleased to see the PAC

3:02:47 > 3:02:53recommendations on which I sit on the PAC, the recommendations on VAT,

3:02:53 > 3:03:00fraud, have been closed. I pay tribute to my honourable friend for

3:03:00 > 3:03:03their hard work on doing that. I'd like to say something about housing.

3:03:03 > 3:03:07The recent Government White Paper said the UK needs to build 250,000

3:03:07 > 3:03:13new houses a year. It certainly does. If in a high housing price

3:03:13 > 3:03:17area like the Cotswolds, if you ask any of our teachers or nurses where

3:03:17 > 3:03:22they live, nine times out of ten, they will not live in the cots

3:03:22 > 3:03:28Wolds. Cotswolds. Anything that can be done to produce housing for lower

3:03:28 > 3:03:33paid people must be a good thing.In my parliamentary division, the

3:03:33 > 3:03:37difficulty is private builders will not address that portion of the

3:03:37 > 3:03:41market where the need is greatest. The bottom and mid-market. Equally,

3:03:41 > 3:03:47such is the increase in supply that is required to drive down the price,

3:03:47 > 3:03:52it's questionable as to whether it would be in the interests of

3:03:52 > 3:04:00independent builders to secure such a reduction in price. The greatest

3:04:00 > 3:04:03increase in the market was achieved through building through the public

3:04:03 > 3:04:09sector. Does he see that as a possibility?I'm grateful for my

3:04:09 > 3:04:14honourable friend's intervention. The need to build more houses is

3:04:14 > 3:04:17about providing houses for those that can't afford to buy on the

3:04:17 > 3:04:20housing ladder. There are lots of way in the affordable housing

3:04:20 > 3:04:26sectors to do that. Affordable rent to buy, staircasing, that is what we

3:04:26 > 3:04:29need to pay attention to. I want to say something about the planning

3:04:29 > 3:04:33system in a minute. The structure of house ownership has changed in the

3:04:33 > 3:04:40last ten years. There is a statistic in the last ten years, the number of

3:04:40 > 3:04:43under-45-year-olds who own their own houses has dropped by a million.

3:04:43 > 3:04:48That I think is something we need to address. That ask why I find it

3:04:48 > 3:04:53extraordinary the party opposite should be carping about the very

3:04:53 > 3:04:59welcome announcedments by the Chancellor today on the stamp duty

3:04:59 > 3:05:05exemption for first time buyers for 300,000 and 500,000 limit in London.

3:05:05 > 3:05:09They carp about how it will increase the market for first time buyers.

3:05:09 > 3:05:14But a cut in stamp duty is likely to excite any increase in the house

3:05:14 > 3:05:19prices by that. I think we should welcome that. I think we should

3:05:19 > 3:05:23welcome the measures the Government are introducing to build more

3:05:23 > 3:05:28houses. The use of new town development corporation. It was used

3:05:28 > 3:05:32successfully by the Conservative Government in the 1980s and created

3:05:32 > 3:05:38whole new towns like Milton Keynes. What it does is, it is a partnership

3:05:38 > 3:05:43of the Government, local authorities and of the private sector and the

3:05:43 > 3:05:48social housing sector to build more houses. It worked in the 1980s. We

3:05:48 > 3:05:52should do it again and make sure those new town corporations are able

3:05:52 > 3:05:57to get access to Morland. I have a suggestion of two ways on how to

3:05:57 > 3:06:02alter the planning system. We need to alter the planning system in the

3:06:02 > 3:06:05material start system so when builders get planning permission

3:06:05 > 3:06:10always it should only be for three years. It should have to build out a

3:06:10 > 3:06:14site in its entirety for services. That would stop house builders

3:06:14 > 3:06:20sitting on land banking for an unacceptable peered and stop the

3:06:20 > 3:06:25current system where they use a vacant site to gain planning

3:06:25 > 3:06:29permissions on other sites they want to get. That, I think I, would be an

3:06:29 > 3:06:35important improvement. I'd like to go on to talk about the Brexit deaf

3:06:35 > 3:06:39others bill which the honourable lady, to be fair, did touch on. This

3:06:39 > 3:06:42is the biggest liability this country faces for the next few

3:06:42 > 3:06:49years. It has been rumoured that we'll pay £38 billion which, of

3:06:49 > 3:06:56course, includes obligations for outstanding contribution, overseas

3:06:56 > 3:07:02aid and decommissions liabilities. But, effort nevertheless, in a

3:07:02 > 3:07:06negotiation for a second-hand car, you don't go in and pay an excessive

3:07:06 > 3:07:11price. The clever negotiator pays the right price. The minimum price

3:07:11 > 3:07:14they can get away with. I think that's what we should be doing with

3:07:14 > 3:07:22the EU. To put this £38 billion into perspective. It is isn't just £38

3:07:22 > 3:07:26billion, it is the additional two years, an additional £8 billion a

3:07:26 > 3:07:35year. An additional £16 billion, so up to some £56 billion. It is more

3:07:35 > 3:07:39than our entire transport budget and almost as much as our entire defence

3:07:39 > 3:07:44budget. This is what we've to think about with these very large figures.

3:07:44 > 3:07:52I contrast that with the fact in 1945, the USA loaned us £2.2 billion

3:07:52 > 3:07:57as war rap arations, that's £87 billion adjusted in today's money.

3:07:57 > 3:08:01It took us over 50 years to pay it off. I hope, at the very least,

3:08:01 > 3:08:05we'll do two things with this payment if we actually agree to it

3:08:05 > 3:08:08with the EU. One it is it should be paid over a significant number of

3:08:08 > 3:08:15years. And, secondly, it should be linked to our ability to earn money

3:08:15 > 3:08:18from it, trade deals and other deals that will help us eastern it and

3:08:18 > 3:08:24therefore pay it off. I'd like to go on to technology. Technology is

3:08:24 > 3:08:30really important. It's really important to this country to remain

3:08:30 > 3:08:34competitive with our foreign competitors and our productivity is

3:08:34 > 3:08:40to increase. We, thankfully in this country, seen a huge growth in

3:08:40 > 3:08:45digital innovation. However, we have a shortfall of around 40,000 people

3:08:45 > 3:08:50with the necessary stem skills to meet the demands of our economy. I'm

3:08:50 > 3:08:54delighted to learn now maths is our most pop lair subject. I see my

3:08:54 > 3:08:58honourable friend for higher education is here. Maths is our most

3:08:58 > 3:09:06popular subject in schools. I'm delighted with the extra money

3:09:06 > 3:09:11encouraging children to take maths at A-level. That our national inflay

3:09:11 > 3:09:18structure fund is rising from 23 billion to 33 million. And the R&D

3:09:18 > 3:09:23to invest in more infrastructure will be main taped. It was an

3:09:23 > 3:09:28amazing figure the Chancellor mentioned that every hour a new

3:09:28 > 3:09:35hi-tech company is emerging. He wants to up that to half an hour.

3:09:35 > 3:09:45Finally, I'd like to talk about education.

3:09:45 > 3:09:48Funding for our primary and secondary schools was to be

3:09:48 > 3:09:51maintained so that every jar in this country gets a budget which is

3:09:51 > 3:09:56increasing in real terms every year and also that every child in this

3:09:56 > 3:10:10country, their budget in secondary schools should move up to £4800.

3:10:15 > 3:10:22And that announcement, an extra £1.3 billion in our manifesto and

3:10:22 > 3:10:26committed to spending that money, has made a difference in Cotswold

3:10:26 > 3:10:35schools of £450,000. And that is a really welcome boost. Finally,

3:10:35 > 3:10:38Madame Deputy Speaker, I would just like to talk about small businesses.

3:10:38 > 3:10:43The Chancellor had some very, very welcome announcements for small

3:10:43 > 3:10:47businesses in the budget. There after all 5.5 million small

3:10:47 > 3:10:53businesses in this country, as e-mail clear, they are the engine of

3:10:53 > 3:10:57growth, jobs and growth, in this country, and therefore we need to

3:10:57 > 3:11:02make sure that they prosper. And I welcome the fact that is contrary to

3:11:02 > 3:11:06the leaks about the budget, which thank goodness are often wrong, that

3:11:06 > 3:11:10we're not going to reduce the VA Taper showed, because that would not

3:11:10 > 3:11:13only produce more bureaucracy for small businesses, it would also

3:11:13 > 3:11:17bring them within the business digital threshold as well, which

3:11:17 > 3:11:27would produce even more bureaucracy. -- reduce the VAT threshold. On the

3:11:27 > 3:11:30subject of bureaucracy for small businesses, doesn't he agree that

3:11:30 > 3:11:33one of the biggest generators of bureaucracy is if new arrangements

3:11:33 > 3:11:41are introduced in terms of customs? As he knows, the Public Accounts

3:11:41 > 3:11:46Committee have done a lot of work on customs and I'm hopeful that with

3:11:46 > 3:11:50new IT and with the new introduction of the customs declaration service

3:11:50 > 3:11:54replacing the existing IT service, airing in mind that customs are

3:11:54 > 3:11:59great to have a huge increase in the number of VAT declarations when we

3:11:59 > 3:12:04leave the EU, customs have a really difficult job to police goods which

3:12:04 > 3:12:07are wrongly coming into this country. So I think customs really

3:12:07 > 3:12:11need to take that into account. But I've almost come to the end of what

3:12:11 > 3:12:15I wanted to say. Bureaucracy for small businesses, and it is

3:12:15 > 3:12:20essential that we try and keep it down and we try and help small

3:12:20 > 3:12:24businesses wherever possible. I was especially pleased, and I'm sure

3:12:24 > 3:12:27businesses in the Cotswold will be pleased to see that we're

3:12:27 > 3:12:32maintaining the small business rate relief. For small businesses often

3:12:32 > 3:12:37with a premises, where they're paying quite high rent and rates in

3:12:37 > 3:12:42an area like the Cotswolds, rates can become a real burden. Those who

3:12:42 > 3:12:45have been able to be taken out of the rates gambit altogether by this

3:12:45 > 3:12:49will be glad to hear that they're not going to be brought back into it

3:12:49 > 3:12:55this coming year, which is what they feared. Residents and businesses in

3:12:55 > 3:12:59a large rural area like mine, the Cotswolds, will be glad to see the

3:12:59 > 3:13:03freeze on fuel duty for yet another year. Incidentally I'm sure

3:13:03 > 3:13:08individuals in the Cotswolds and indeed the entire country, will be

3:13:08 > 3:13:13really pleased to see the freeze on wine and spirits and cider. I'm sure

3:13:13 > 3:13:18that will be particularly welcome. To sum up, I think this has been a

3:13:18 > 3:13:21prudent budget, it is nothing more than I would expect from my right

3:13:21 > 3:13:25honourable friend. I think he is doing the great job for this country

3:13:25 > 3:13:28in terms of his economic stewardship. I'm sure that our

3:13:28 > 3:13:32economy will go from strength to strength, our education we will get

3:13:32 > 3:13:38better, we will have more high-tech jobs, we will continue in to employ

3:13:38 > 3:13:42a record number of jobs. And if the party opposite had anything to cheer

3:13:42 > 3:13:46about, it would surely be that we are employing a record number of

3:13:46 > 3:13:49people in this country. And I would have thought they would be

3:13:49 > 3:13:52particularly pleased with the Chancellor's announcement that

3:13:52 > 3:13:56poverty is reducing in this country, and child poverty has reduced by

3:13:56 > 3:13:59over a million in the last ten years. That is what the Chancellor

3:13:59 > 3:14:06said. I know the party opposite would not like these figures, but

3:14:06 > 3:14:09the fact is that this is what's happening. Thank you, Madame Deputy

3:14:09 > 3:14:15Speaker. Thank you, Madame Deputy Speaker. It is a pleasure to follow

3:14:15 > 3:14:20the honourable gentleman from the Cotswolds. Here's a great

3:14:20 > 3:14:23parliamentarian and serves with distinction along with me on the

3:14:23 > 3:14:27Public Accounts Committee. For those of us who have been in this House

3:14:27 > 3:14:31for a number of years, we feel it is like groundhog day. We have seen it

3:14:31 > 3:14:36all before. The difference in this budget is that usually after a

3:14:36 > 3:14:40general election, the Chancellor has two dole out the medicine and the

3:14:40 > 3:14:45British public ridge just voted the government in, have to take it. The

3:14:45 > 3:14:49difficulty this Chancellor faces is, he has to please all people of all

3:14:49 > 3:14:54persuasions. I've no doubt, when he fetched to the media that he wanted

3:14:54 > 3:14:58to reduce the VAT threshold for businesses, he was put off when he

3:14:58 > 3:15:03looked towards his Irish colleagues. I'm sure the freeze did not come out

3:15:03 > 3:15:08of economic prudence but political this city. But I have to say, this

3:15:08 > 3:15:12speech is no different to any that we've heard before. It begins with a

3:15:12 > 3:15:16number of lame jokes, which I'm sorry, the Chancellor is no

3:15:16 > 3:15:23comedian. Who did not see that joke about cough sweets coming a mile

3:15:23 > 3:15:28off? I'm sorry, but it's no laughing matter. The elephant in the room for

3:15:28 > 3:15:34this budget, and the previous one has been Brexit. In the previous

3:15:34 > 3:15:37budget, the Chancellor only dedicated a few lines to China. This

3:15:37 > 3:15:42is the most seminal moment in post-war British history. We are

3:15:42 > 3:15:48leaving the European Union. Now, the Chancellor said early on in his

3:15:48 > 3:15:51speech that the Prime Minister has set out a clear vision. Well, I must

3:15:51 > 3:15:58be the only one who does not know what this vision looks like.

3:15:58 > 3:16:02Actually, all we have seen is the Chancellor saying they're putting £3

3:16:02 > 3:16:09billion towards any consequences of what could happen in Brexit. Does he

3:16:09 > 3:16:13not agree with me that in fact the simplest thing that the Chancellor

3:16:13 > 3:16:16could have done to support business would have been to announce here at

3:16:16 > 3:16:20the dispatch box that he's going to keep the United Kingdom in the

3:16:20 > 3:16:24single market and Customs union? Well, at least I would have liked to

3:16:24 > 3:16:27hear some sort of plan about the single market and Customs union. And

3:16:27 > 3:16:33I will say this, and I will divert if you will allow me, Madame Deputy

3:16:33 > 3:16:35Speaker, those of us who are concerned about Brexit and about

3:16:35 > 3:16:43getting the best possible deal, have been attacked unfairly by opponents

3:16:43 > 3:16:46as remote as, when simply we want to get the best deal for this country

3:16:46 > 3:16:53in Brexit. We see £3 billion put aside for Brexit but we have heard

3:16:53 > 3:17:00nothing from the Chancellor about the £350 million a week for the NHS.

3:17:00 > 3:17:03Perhaps the Chancellor wants to drag the Foreign Secretary here to talk

3:17:03 > 3:17:08about where that £350 million is. Because I haven't seen it. And when

3:17:08 > 3:17:12he's doing that perhaps he wants to talk to the nurses. I give way.I'm

3:17:12 > 3:17:19very grateful. Buttrick Minford has worked out that if we move to free

3:17:19 > 3:17:23trade, that £350 million WILL be available for the NHS, but only

3:17:23 > 3:17:28after we've left the European Union, which hasn't happened yet.I respect

3:17:28 > 3:17:31the honourable gentleman as a parliamentarian but I believe he is

3:17:31 > 3:17:35wrong on this. He knows that was a false statement made by the Leave

3:17:35 > 3:17:39side to try to con people into voting that way. And he knows that.

3:17:39 > 3:17:44And there is no point in standing by that any more. But the one thing is,

3:17:44 > 3:17:48we hear nothing about Brexit. All we heard is, this is not going to be a

3:17:48 > 3:17:52budget of unaided by Brexit. Well, I'm afraid the Chancellor is wrong.

3:17:52 > 3:17:56Every budget from here on in will be dominated by the consequences of

3:17:56 > 3:18:03leaving the European Union. And so the budget went on and on and on. We

3:18:03 > 3:18:07heard terms which the Tories would love - a strong government, we will

3:18:07 > 3:18:13be resolute in our determination to bring about a strong economy... But

3:18:13 > 3:18:16it took eight pages before we got to the real story of this budget. Quite

3:18:16 > 3:18:22simply, productivity growth is down, and it has continued to fall. This

3:18:22 > 3:18:26is the first Chancellor who has stood before that dispatch box and

3:18:26 > 3:18:31has said that growth will be below 2% since World War II. That's

3:18:31 > 3:18:38something they should be proud of. It gets worse. 1.5% in 2017, 1.4%

3:18:38 > 3:18:47the year after and 1.3% in the next two years, and hopefully picking up

3:18:47 > 3:18:54to 1.5% and finally 1.6% in 2022. At the same point, debt will be at its

3:18:54 > 3:19:00highest level ever. And right the government is being overoptimistic.

3:19:00 > 3:19:05And if we're not going to talk about Brexit, at least talk about the

3:19:05 > 3:19:09fundamental weakness in our economy. It is productivity. Productivity has

3:19:09 > 3:19:14failed to return to pre-crash levels, and it doesn't look like

3:19:14 > 3:19:20it's going to happen any time soon. The OBR has revised its estimates of

3:19:20 > 3:19:23long-term productivity and economic growth. They say it means the

3:19:23 > 3:19:27economy will not bounce back from the financial crisis and output per

3:19:27 > 3:19:33worker probably will not recover to its pre-rices rate of 2.1%. The

3:19:33 > 3:19:38productivity prices will mean larger budget deficits in future years and

3:19:38 > 3:19:41depressed earnings, which will mean future tax revenues will take a

3:19:41 > 3:19:48serious long-term hit. The downgrade creates a £20 billion black hole in

3:19:48 > 3:19:54the UK's public finances according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

3:19:54 > 3:19:59We cannot hide this problem any more. Now, if the government wasn't

3:19:59 > 3:20:04so timid and scared of its friends from Ireland, I'm sure we would need

3:20:04 > 3:20:09radical solutions. Things have not worked, we can all go on all the

3:20:09 > 3:20:13time with this rhetoric that things are going to improve. We have to

3:20:13 > 3:20:17take action, and that action must be taken now. For me, the most

3:20:17 > 3:20:20fundamental error that this government has made since it came

3:20:20 > 3:20:28into power is its failure to get to grips with the banking system. We

3:20:28 > 3:20:31need to boost business investment through a network of regional banks.

3:20:31 > 3:20:38Germany has thousands of banks, including state run and co-operative

3:20:38 > 3:20:41is, many focused on lending specifically to small and

3:20:41 > 3:20:47medium-sized businesses. In Britain, just five banks own 85% of all

3:20:47 > 3:20:51current accounts of. The Chancellor could learn from the German modelled

3:20:51 > 3:20:55by enabling a new generation of mutually owned building societies

3:20:55 > 3:20:58and saving banks to focus on long-term investment rather than

3:20:58 > 3:21:03short-term dividends for the shareholders.Might the Chancellor

3:21:03 > 3:21:09not also rethink the future of the World Bank of Scotland hammered at

3:21:09 > 3:21:11the moment the government is committed to privatising back at

3:21:11 > 3:21:22some future point, but surely taking the opportunity to set a future for

3:21:22 > 3:21:27RBS as a mutual, perhaps the royal building society of Scotland, might

3:21:27 > 3:21:31be a better way to encourage competition in the banking market?I

3:21:31 > 3:21:36think my honourable friend speaks from experience and here is

3:21:36 > 3:21:40absolutely right. We need a thriving co-operative sector in this country.

3:21:40 > 3:21:45And again, if we want to talk about the past and talk about the reason

3:21:45 > 3:21:49we haven't got a strong mutual sector in this country is because of

3:21:49 > 3:21:55what the Tory has allowed on many of our banks, the most famous of which

3:21:55 > 3:21:59is Bradford & Bingley, allowing people to become members and then

3:21:59 > 3:22:07turning them to plc is.Does he agree with me that one of the worst

3:22:07 > 3:22:11decisions of the Conservatives in the night in 80s was the destruction

3:22:11 > 3:22:18of the great regional institutions that were building societies, so

3:22:18 > 3:22:21that institutions like the Halifax building society which created

3:22:21 > 3:22:25wealth and retained it in the regions were destroyed?I agree with

3:22:25 > 3:22:30my honourable friend. If ever there was something tearing into the

3:22:30 > 3:22:33fabric of British society, that was it. It is terrible when you walk

3:22:33 > 3:22:37down the street and so many of the famous building societies are no

3:22:37 > 3:22:40longer there. That needs to change and we need to start talking about

3:22:40 > 3:22:47alternative corporative models. We need to talk about more mutual in

3:22:47 > 3:22:52our society and business, including employees share ownership schemes

3:22:52 > 3:22:58and other things. But I think as well it is time now to talk about

3:22:58 > 3:23:03the NHS. Our nurses do a fantastic job. They're at the front line. When

3:23:03 > 3:23:08someone is in need, they are there. But very often, this government has

3:23:08 > 3:23:13not been there for them. And still today, instead of giving the nurses

3:23:13 > 3:23:17a pay rise, which I think all of us agree they deserve, what we got was

3:23:17 > 3:23:28a very vague statement about maybe...

3:23:31 > 3:23:35I also think about all those people on Universal Credit. Again, this is

3:23:35 > 3:23:41all about a sop to those who are in need. There should have been an

3:23:41 > 3:23:45announcement today to pause it and look at it and eventually change it.

3:23:45 > 3:23:48It is no good plunging the most vulnerable people we have into

3:23:48 > 3:23:55abject poverty. But this is what this government is about. This

3:23:55 > 3:23:59government I feel is very good at warm words. Of course every

3:23:59 > 3:24:03Chancellor's speech has to end with a flourish, and resorted there. The

3:24:03 > 3:24:08wedding of the paper as the Chancellor stood up and in his

3:24:08 > 3:24:14uninspiring tones announced that he was going to abolish stamp duty for

3:24:14 > 3:24:21those with houses up to 300,000.

3:24:21 > 3:24:25Straightaway, minutes after, which happens after all of his speeches.

3:24:25 > 3:24:28It happened last time with national insurance contributions, we get the

3:24:28 > 3:24:33real story. Hidden on page 154 of the report, it states clearly that

3:24:33 > 3:24:41the temporary holiday on stamp duty will increase house prices by 0.3%.

3:24:41 > 3:24:48The honourable gentleman is shouting at me... Judging by the ability of

3:24:48 > 3:24:52the OBR to predict the future, does it honestly think they are only

3:24:52 > 3:24:57going to go up by 0.3%? It might come down. Hopefully the honourable

3:24:57 > 3:25:02gentleman. The point the Chancellor is missing, many of these people

3:25:02 > 3:25:07can't afford a deposit to buy a house. So really he should have been

3:25:07 > 3:25:12looking, as well as reducing stamp duty, something people can save to

3:25:12 > 3:25:17buy a house. We've heard about the home-buyers I said, many people

3:25:17 > 3:25:20didn't take it up. It's those kind of things we need. In closing, I've

3:25:20 > 3:25:24spoken for a long time, taking a lot of interventions. I will say this,

3:25:24 > 3:25:29this was a speech where the Chancellor was boxed in. He held up

3:25:29 > 3:25:35his red box that was a symbol of how he was boxed in. Boxed in by his

3:25:35 > 3:25:40government, in by the aquatic Ulster Unionists and boxed in by his party

3:25:40 > 3:25:44as well.

3:25:45 > 3:25:48In terms of Brexit and the productivity problems we have in

3:25:48 > 3:25:51this country, we needed radical reform. That government can't

3:25:51 > 3:25:55provide it any more. I say to them, stop clinging onto power and let's

3:25:55 > 3:26:03go back to the country.Andrew Mitchell.It's a pleasure to follow

3:26:03 > 3:26:07the honourable gentleman. I fear my speech will take a slightly

3:26:07 > 3:26:13different view from his. I draw to the house's attention my interests

3:26:13 > 3:26:17that are registered in the House of Commons register. I want, if I may,

3:26:17 > 3:26:22to start by saying I think the Chancellor faced a pretty difficult

3:26:22 > 3:26:27task today. He was said to be between a rock and a hard place. But

3:26:27 > 3:26:33I think this is a sensible and pragmatic budget. The Chancellor

3:26:33 > 3:26:36will be well content with that analysis. Madam Deputy Speaker I

3:26:36 > 3:26:42want to start with the Midlands because that is the area, part of

3:26:42 > 3:26:48the area, which I represent. Very pleased indeed to see we now have

3:26:48 > 3:26:51the second devolution deal. I think the support, and you will understand

3:26:51 > 3:26:57how much this matters in the West Midlands for the automobile

3:26:57 > 3:27:01industry, for driverless cars, for electric cars, is enormously

3:27:01 > 3:27:06important. The Midlands is the centre of this. We are leaders in

3:27:06 > 3:27:10technology, design and production. Internationally we very much welcome

3:27:10 > 3:27:17that support. More of which is to be announced later this week. Secondly,

3:27:17 > 3:27:22the £200 million we received for cleaning up Brownfield land is

3:27:22 > 3:27:28thanks to the vigour and vision of Andy Street, our mayor. He's doing a

3:27:28 > 3:27:31very good job. I hope the Treasury will consider providing more funding

3:27:31 > 3:27:39when that £200 million has been used. The importance of spending

3:27:39 > 3:27:43money cleaning up Brownfield land is immense because it means we then

3:27:43 > 3:27:48don't have to build on green belt. We should only ever do that as last

3:27:48 > 3:27:55resort. I would also like to say we are delighted that we are to be part

3:27:55 > 3:28:00of a national pilot of housing first. This is a particular priority

3:28:00 > 3:28:05of Andy Street, our mayor's programme. This pilot will allow us

3:28:05 > 3:28:11to address rough sleeping across the West Midlands in a decisive way. We

3:28:11 > 3:28:16are very determined to do that. Fourthly, from today 's

3:28:16 > 3:28:19announcement, I want to express my gratitude to the government for the

3:28:19 > 3:28:23announcement on Birmingham Children's Hospital where resources

3:28:23 > 3:28:28will now be made available for children's emergency medicine and

3:28:28 > 3:28:33paediatric care centre. Many of us have been campaigning for this and

3:28:33 > 3:28:37the news is excellent. I give way to my honourable friend.If I can take

3:28:37 > 3:28:41him back to housing for a moment, does he agree the budget needs to be

3:28:41 > 3:28:48seen in the round-up of government announcements and opportunities in

3:28:48 > 3:28:54the White Paper for local authorities to build once again?My

3:28:54 > 3:28:58right honourable friend makes his point exceedingly eloquently. Madam

3:28:58 > 3:29:01Deputy Speaker, the second point I wanted to make was really to

3:29:01 > 3:29:07underline to the house that free enterprise, open markets has been

3:29:07 > 3:29:10and is the greatest engine of social and economic advancement known to

3:29:10 > 3:29:15man. I think we need to stand up for these more than we perhaps have in

3:29:15 > 3:29:21the recent past against the opposing views espoused by the Shadow

3:29:21 > 3:29:24Chancellor and large numbers of young people who were not around to

3:29:24 > 3:29:29learn some of the pretty basic economic troops many of us learned

3:29:29 > 3:29:37in the 1970s and 1980s. Having said that, capitalism has always required

3:29:37 > 3:29:42governments and regulators to set boundaries to human activity and,

3:29:42 > 3:29:48inevitably commit human greed. That chimes in very well with the

3:29:48 > 3:29:52activist views our Prime Minister has expressed since she took up that

3:29:52 > 3:29:58job. I want to point to three areas briefly, by way of example, where I

3:29:58 > 3:30:03think this regulation of capitalism is the most important. The first is

3:30:03 > 3:30:07that the debates that have taken place across the house an open

3:30:07 > 3:30:11ownership registers, in particular for the British embassy's

3:30:11 > 3:30:15territories, this was an initiative of the Cameron government. We've

3:30:15 > 3:30:21imposed upon ourselves in Britain this transparency and we need to do

3:30:21 > 3:30:25it on the overseas territories as well. Many in this house care deeply

3:30:25 > 3:30:30about this. My honourable friend for Staffordshire for Amber Valley, the

3:30:30 > 3:30:34right honourable ladies for Barking and Don Valley. It is important the

3:30:34 > 3:30:39Treasury recognises this point in the Finance Bill. I very much hope

3:30:39 > 3:30:44they will. Second become in terms of energy prices, the government is

3:30:44 > 3:30:48absolutely right to pursue this. There is a monopolistic situation

3:30:48 > 3:30:52which is working against the interests of consumers. Regulation

3:30:52 > 3:30:56is absolutely the right way to deal with this rather than

3:30:56 > 3:31:01renationalisation, which because of the regulatory regime is entirely

3:31:01 > 3:31:04necessary. Thirdly, this point has been raised in this debate already,

3:31:04 > 3:31:09but I make it again. A recent study of the annual reports of the FTSE

3:31:09 > 3:31:17100 companies shows the average pay for chief executives has risen from

3:31:17 > 3:31:27£5 million ahead in 2014 to five and half million pounds in 2015. What I

3:31:27 > 3:31:30believe is offensive and totally unjustifiable with this, that is 140

3:31:30 > 3:31:37times the average salary of their employees. It is noteworthy Madam

3:31:37 > 3:31:40Deputy Speaker that only a quarter of FTSE 100 companies pay the

3:31:40 > 3:31:47voluntary living wage to their employers. Now the scale of this

3:31:47 > 3:31:51inequality, vastly greater than previously, gives capitalism a bad

3:31:51 > 3:31:57name. At a time when inequality more generally has been falling, with

3:31:57 > 3:32:00income inequality currently at its lowest rate for 30 years, this is

3:32:00 > 3:32:04something the government needs to address through regulation. I will

3:32:04 > 3:32:11give way.The honourable member will come I'm sure, be aware the OECD

3:32:11 > 3:32:14found there was a relationship between inequality and growth,

3:32:14 > 3:32:22namely more inequality means less growth. Is also what when you

3:32:22 > 3:32:26analyse the genie coefficients, the normal way of evaluating inequality,

3:32:26 > 3:32:31the UK is the highest and fastest growing inequality in Europe.I

3:32:31 > 3:32:35don't agree with the last point, but the honourable gentleman makes. I

3:32:35 > 3:32:40will rest on the recently published statistics that the income

3:32:40 > 3:32:45inequality is now at a 30 year low in Britain. My third and final point

3:32:45 > 3:32:51is a point that has also been raised generally today about

3:32:51 > 3:32:54intergenerational fairness. Of course it's absolutely right that

3:32:54 > 3:33:02housing inequality is right at the top of the list. We want future

3:33:02 > 3:33:04generations to have the opportunities that our generations

3:33:04 > 3:33:09have had in terms of ownership. Not only in ownership. It is also in

3:33:09 > 3:33:15part ownership and rental. The importance, I think of the decisions

3:33:15 > 3:33:20that were announced today in the budget is that they give a real

3:33:20 > 3:33:25boost to the creative use of space Maria Lenk a regiment to using the

3:33:25 > 3:33:33Brownfield land I spoke about. Quite right to attack the issue of the

3:33:33 > 3:33:36misuse of land banks. And be creative in terms of building new

3:33:36 > 3:33:41communities. We need far more imagination. I would like to see the

3:33:41 > 3:33:46government committing to 1 million new housing starts over the next

3:33:46 > 3:33:49three years. Slightly further than the government has gone today. I

3:33:49 > 3:33:54think we need to recognise that this is absolutely at the top of

3:33:54 > 3:33:59everyone's agenda. Building new communities, focusing on

3:33:59 > 3:34:03infrastructure, looking at Garden cities. I think many people will be

3:34:03 > 3:34:06delighted to see what the government has said today. In the Midlands we

3:34:06 > 3:34:13want to see the Black Country garden city developed, so far an idea

3:34:13 > 3:34:16without much flesh on the bones. We need to see far more flesh added to

3:34:16 > 3:34:23the bones. But we must build in the right places and progress will

3:34:23 > 3:34:27become ever more bogged down if we start to attack the green belt. In

3:34:27 > 3:34:30my view it's very important the government doesn't do that. This

3:34:30 > 3:34:35should be the top priority. I want to end my remarks, Madam Deputy

3:34:35 > 3:34:40Speaker, making this point. When it comes to intergenerational fairness,

3:34:40 > 3:34:44everyone agrees this is a vital topic. Do not let us forget that

3:34:44 > 3:34:49excessive borrowing makes it worse. The last six months, Germany had a

3:34:49 > 3:34:53public spending surplus of £8 billion. Ours was a deficit of

3:34:53 > 3:34:58something like 26 billion. This will have to be repaid. It is a cruel and

3:34:58 > 3:35:01unfair deception on the next generation if we do not make it

3:35:01 > 3:35:06clear that if our generation does not repay it, their generation will

3:35:06 > 3:35:12have two. Austerity is not optional, it is not a Tory vice, Madam Deputy

3:35:12 > 3:35:16Speaker, it is fiscal responsibility. We have to return to

3:35:16 > 3:35:23living within our means. The final point I want to make on into general

3:35:23 > 3:35:27fairness is, one of the best investment in future generations is

3:35:27 > 3:35:29Britain's contribution to international development. The work

3:35:29 > 3:35:36Britain is doing, the commitment which we make across the house to

3:35:36 > 3:35:39the .7 drives real change in the world, does a huge amount to help

3:35:39 > 3:35:46some of the poorest in the world today. It contributes directly to

3:35:46 > 3:35:52making the world a safer and more prosperous place for future

3:35:52 > 3:35:55generations. It tackles directly the international dangers from climate

3:35:55 > 3:35:59change, migration, Terra, pandemics and protectionism. The government

3:35:59 > 3:36:04should make more of this. This is something the government of which I

3:36:04 > 3:36:08was proud to be apart some five years ago has done an immense

3:36:08 > 3:36:12amount. It is very important in addressing intergenerational

3:36:12 > 3:36:19inequity. And also in making more of it, the government will note it is

3:36:19 > 3:36:22very strongly supported by people across our country under the age of

3:36:22 > 3:36:2835. A cohort suspect during sleep absent from Tory voters at the last

3:36:28 > 3:36:37election. I end by saying how pleased I am too the government has

3:36:37 > 3:36:43given a body that does good work in Zimbabwe amongst elderly people £1.3

3:36:43 > 3:36:48million from the libel finds. On behalf of all those involved, I'd

3:36:48 > 3:36:52like to express my gratitude to the Treasury and Chancellor of the

3:36:52 > 3:36:57Exchequer for making that very wise decision.It would be obvious to the

3:36:57 > 3:37:01house a great many people still wish to take part in today's debate and

3:37:01 > 3:37:04there is limited time, so I have to reduce the time limit to eight

3:37:04 > 3:37:11minutes. Jo Swinson.Thank you very much indeed Madam Deputy Speaker.

3:37:11 > 3:37:17The British economy today faces three key challenges. We have,

3:37:17 > 3:37:19firstly, low productivity, with the associated wage stagnation that

3:37:19 > 3:37:23comes with that. And of course the reduced tax receipts. We have high

3:37:23 > 3:37:27public sector debt, and we must recognise the constraints that

3:37:27 > 3:37:31places on what is possible economically. We have to be honest

3:37:31 > 3:37:35about some of the hard choices that need to be made. Thirdly, there is

3:37:35 > 3:37:40Brexit. As has already been called the elephant in the room. The

3:37:40 > 3:37:43uncertainty it is creating for businesses and investment in the

3:37:43 > 3:37:47country, the impact on our economy. Indeed also the opportunity cost of

3:37:47 > 3:37:51all of the energy and money being spent on preparing for Brexit that

3:37:51 > 3:37:55could otherwise be directed elsewhere. Now the Chancellor is a

3:37:55 > 3:38:01serious man. We had our differences in coalition by significant

3:38:01 > 3:38:05differences, but in recent months he has appeared to be one of the few

3:38:05 > 3:38:09voices of reason in the Cabinet on Brexit. He has the unenviable task

3:38:09 > 3:38:12coming to the house today in a picture where there is higher

3:38:12 > 3:38:18inflation, lower growth, lower productivity and higher levels of

3:38:18 > 3:38:23debt. It really is bleak, the economy will be £45 billion smaller

3:38:23 > 3:38:28in 2021 than had been projected in March this year. So I'm afraid his

3:38:28 > 3:38:32attempts to paint a cheerful vision of the future were rather less

3:38:32 > 3:38:38successful than his jokes. The truth is, as the Chancellor knows, this

3:38:38 > 3:38:42budget and the next budget, and the budget after that, and all future

3:38:42 > 3:38:46budgets, are made all the more difficult because of Brexit. And

3:38:46 > 3:38:48because of the extreme approach to Brexit that this government is

3:38:48 > 3:38:56pursuing. You making clear that an exit from the Single Market and the

3:38:56 > 3:39:00customs union is a red line for the government, aided and abetted by the

3:39:00 > 3:39:04front bench of the Labour Party, this in peril is the future of the

3:39:04 > 3:39:08UK economy and the Chancellor knows it. The honourable member for

3:39:08 > 3:39:12Loughborough said there was no pot of gold at the end of the Brexit

3:39:12 > 3:39:17rainbow, she is right but I think the metaphor of a thunderstorm is

3:39:17 > 3:39:23better. The cost of reparations, not just the 700 million already

3:39:23 > 3:39:27allocated but a further £3 billion, more than could be found for the

3:39:27 > 3:39:33NHS, which tells its own story. You add on top of that the exit bill

3:39:33 > 3:39:38which may be 20, 30, £40 billion and the hits to the economy which the

3:39:38 > 3:39:43OECD has said could be £40 billion. No surprise these figures were not

3:39:43 > 3:39:49on the side of a bus in the referendum campaign. To promote the

3:39:49 > 3:39:53health of the economy we have long needed to use the advantage of low

3:39:53 > 3:39:57borrowing rates to increase investment in the economy so I

3:39:57 > 3:39:59welcome the measures to unlock new house-building but it isn't

3:39:59 > 3:40:05ambitious enough. As ever the budget is in the detail. The headline

3:40:05 > 3:40:11figure touted was 44 billion. Only 15 billion was actually new and just

3:40:11 > 3:40:146 billion was extra for increasing housing supply. As the honourable

3:40:14 > 3:40:22member for Bath dead, next to no money for social housing which is

3:40:22 > 3:40:28badly needed -- the member for Bath said. The Chancellor's response does

3:40:28 > 3:40:34not come close. The new revenue peaks at 1.9 billion next year and

3:40:34 > 3:40:39then drops to 1.1 billion. We appreciate that hard choices need to

3:40:39 > 3:40:43be made and if we want to resource the NHS and social care properly we

3:40:43 > 3:40:48need to look at how to find the funds which is why we propose an

3:40:48 > 3:40:52increase in income tax of 1p in the pound specifically for the NHS and

3:40:52 > 3:40:56social care. Social care is something the Chancellor did not

3:40:56 > 3:41:01even think was worth mentioning in his remarks.I think the lady for

3:41:01 > 3:41:06giving way. I wonder if she has done the calculation on what £350 million

3:41:06 > 3:41:12a week for the NHS over a year would amount to. I think it is 18 billion.

3:41:12 > 3:41:17How much is the Chancellor offering? Next year, 1.9 billion, falling

3:41:17 > 3:41:22significantly short of that. I'm sure the Foreign Secretary will be

3:41:22 > 3:41:27beating a path to his door to try and make that happen or perhaps not.

3:41:27 > 3:41:33On social care we need serious responses and cross-party work to

3:41:33 > 3:41:37find long-term solutions is that of the half baked policies put up in

3:41:37 > 3:41:42secret that the government offered in the last election. On taxation in

3:41:42 > 3:41:46addition to that increase in income tax that my party has suggested to

3:41:46 > 3:41:52find the NHS there was a missed opportunity to increase capital

3:41:52 > 3:41:55gains tax, corporate gains tax. Instead of a race to the bottom to

3:41:55 > 3:42:01get to 17% we keep it at a competitive rate of 20% and get the

3:42:01 > 3:42:05additional funds it generates. The Chancellor was right to say that

3:42:05 > 3:42:08international action is needed to create fairer taxation but he failed

3:42:08 > 3:42:14to address the role of the overseas territories. We should require them

3:42:14 > 3:42:16to comply with UK standards on transparency or be prevented from

3:42:16 > 3:42:24doing business in the UK. In the spirit of being transparent, my

3:42:24 > 3:42:30husband works for transparency International UK. In the concept of

3:42:30 > 3:42:32rocketing executive pay it is impossible to escape the contrasts

3:42:32 > 3:42:38between the rich who can hide their assets and avoid tax, those on

3:42:38 > 3:42:43middle incomes who are facing real terms JCats and De Paula, many of

3:42:43 > 3:42:49whom, working or not, rely on benefits to make ends meet -- real

3:42:49 > 3:42:57terms pay cut. There is a £12 billion cut to benefits to come,

3:42:57 > 3:43:02that the Lib Dems blocked in coalition. The rise in the income

3:43:02 > 3:43:07tax threshold is welcome but benefits are being frozen. That was

3:43:07 > 3:43:13bad enough last year and the year before but in the face of a 3%

3:43:13 > 3:43:18inflation level it is going to cause real hardship. We see some changes

3:43:18 > 3:43:22to Universal Credit but wider problems are ignored, not least £3

3:43:22 > 3:43:27billion of cuts introduced in 2015. Universal Credit should be paused

3:43:27 > 3:43:31while the problems are ironed out. There is merit to the simple

3:43:31 > 3:43:36assistant but using it to make cuts undermines the principles underlying

3:43:36 > 3:43:42Universal Credit. On the environment welcome the consideration of new

3:43:42 > 3:43:44charges on single use plastics, a Lib Dem idea but there was precious

3:43:44 > 3:43:48little else to show that the government appreciates the scale of

3:43:48 > 3:43:54the threat. They cut subsidies for solar and renewable heat,

3:43:54 > 3:43:57privatising the investment bank and scrapping the Department for energy

3:43:57 > 3:44:02and climate change. Today we saw no new resources for tidal, carbon

3:44:02 > 3:44:05capture and storage, they don't have a strong record on the environment.

3:44:05 > 3:44:12On a positive note, I welcome a couple of things in the budget.

3:44:12 > 3:44:16Investment in technology come in a eye, driverless cars and geospatial

3:44:16 > 3:44:22data. And ethics must be at the heart of how we proceed. Whether we

3:44:22 > 3:44:27can do something is not the same as whether we should do. I was

3:44:27 > 3:44:30delighted to read on page 45 of the red book that the government intends

3:44:30 > 3:44:36to establish a state of -- a centre for data ethics which is urgently

3:44:36 > 3:44:41needed and we should be leading the way on the issue. On that I say well

3:44:41 > 3:44:46done to the government and I look forward to exploring those issues. I

3:44:46 > 3:44:48welcome the national retraining scheme, especially the partnership

3:44:48 > 3:44:52with the CPI and the TUC to make it work with a focus on digital and

3:44:52 > 3:44:57construction skills in the first instance. I would also save

3:44:57 > 3:45:02particularly in the context of the automation challenge we face to our

3:45:02 > 3:45:06workforce, we should be looking more at the care sector. There are

3:45:06 > 3:45:12certain things that robots cannot do in the future and caring and human

3:45:12 > 3:45:16empathy is one of those things. We face a demographic time bomb so we

3:45:16 > 3:45:20should be investing in the care sector to change it from a low

3:45:20 > 3:45:24status profession to one that we should recognise is high skilled and

3:45:24 > 3:45:30we should ensure there is proper resource. In conclusion, our country

3:45:30 > 3:45:32faces big challenges and opportunities. There is a bleak

3:45:32 > 3:45:38economic outlook, low productivity, effect of climate change, the pace

3:45:38 > 3:45:42of technology change and the impact of automation. These challenges are

3:45:42 > 3:45:47enough to give any government awake at night. They need attention,

3:45:47 > 3:45:52innovation and new ideas. Instead we have a government obsessed and

3:45:52 > 3:45:58consumed by Brexit. It isn't even doing that competently. The economic

3:45:58 > 3:46:01picture outlined by the Chancellor today makes it clearer than ever

3:46:01 > 3:46:10that we need an exit from Brexit. Priti Patel.Thank you madam Deputy

3:46:10 > 3:46:16Speaker. It is a pleasure to follow the honourable lady. It is the first

3:46:16 > 3:46:20time in a while that we have debated together. I want to commend my

3:46:20 > 3:46:26friend the Chancellor on the budget and especially because I know from

3:46:26 > 3:46:29my own time in the Treasury during my apprenticeship three years ago, I

3:46:29 > 3:46:36recall the great efforts that the Chancellor took to bring the budget

3:46:36 > 3:46:41together especially as ministers are lobbied constantly by a range of

3:46:41 > 3:46:45interests and of course it is a challenge to balance the needs with

3:46:45 > 3:46:50the responsibility to keep the public finances in sound order. The

3:46:50 > 3:46:55Treasury should be commended for navigating those pressures and

3:46:55 > 3:47:00continuing to put the stability at the core of the budget. Economic

3:47:00 > 3:47:04stability should rightly stand at the core of every budget and it's

3:47:04 > 3:47:07worth reminding members, especially those opposite, of the progress that

3:47:07 > 3:47:12has been made in putting the public finances back in order from the

3:47:12 > 3:47:19appalling situation in 2010. Back then the deficit was exceeding £150

3:47:19 > 3:47:23billion, more than we were spending on health, education, police and the

3:47:23 > 3:47:26Armed Forces, a level of spending financed by borrowing that was

3:47:26 > 3:47:32unsustainable. We know that the party opposite never want to take

3:47:32 > 3:47:35responsibility for how it mishandled public finances and loves pointing

3:47:35 > 3:47:39the finger of blame elsewhere. It is a fact that before the financial

3:47:39 > 3:47:43crisis the then Labour government wrapped up an eye watering about of

3:47:43 > 3:47:50debt. I will give way.In 2010 the Conservative government said it was

3:47:50 > 3:47:55very to eliminate the deficit by 2015. They were aware of the deficit

3:47:55 > 3:48:01at that stage. Why have they failed? I think the answer is the scale of

3:48:01 > 3:48:07Labour's economic mismanagement. In 2008, the budget is planned for was

3:48:07 > 3:48:12a £43 billion deficit, more than all the revenues raised in excise duties

3:48:12 > 3:48:16so it says everything we need to know about financial management by

3:48:16 > 3:48:24Labour.I thank my friend for giving way. Does she think that the

3:48:24 > 3:48:29opposition have the brass neck to intervene in that way, having on the

3:48:29 > 3:48:33one hand in the chamber criticised the government for not cutting the

3:48:33 > 3:48:37deficit fast enough and yet on every occasion they've been invited to

3:48:37 > 3:48:42support the deficit cutting strategy they've voted against it.My right

3:48:42 > 3:48:45honourable friend is absolutely right and of course there are many

3:48:45 > 3:48:50occasions since 2010 when the party opposite have not only not supported

3:48:50 > 3:48:54the government approach on deficit reduction but have failed to vote

3:48:54 > 3:48:59and support policies as well that support the reduction of deficit and

3:48:59 > 3:49:02also bring in sound financial economic management back into the

3:49:02 > 3:49:07public finances. We have come a long way when it comes to bringing the

3:49:07 > 3:49:11deficit down but also understanding the reasons as to why it sound

3:49:11 > 3:49:16financial management matters. Of course that is because we need the

3:49:16 > 3:49:19money available to invest in our public services and to have an

3:49:19 > 3:49:24economy that embraces enterprise and can bring the tax receipts needed to

3:49:24 > 3:49:29pay for hospitals, schools, police and Armed Forces. Today's budget

3:49:29 > 3:49:33recognises that and touches on this fundamental issue. While we heard

3:49:33 > 3:49:38criticism in the debate earlier on about the NHS, our NHS of course is

3:49:38 > 3:49:41a great is the Jewish in and it's right that the Chancellor today has

3:49:41 > 3:49:49committed more public funds into the NHS -- great institution. I'm

3:49:49 > 3:49:56delighted to see new support, capital investment coming into the

3:49:56 > 3:50:01NHS because for 30 years under Labour, there was underfunding. I

3:50:01 > 3:50:07speak again and make the point that my friend did, the party opposite

3:50:07 > 3:50:10have a brass neck to criticise the work we've done and the investments

3:50:10 > 3:50:15that have been made. One of the great successes we've had since 2010

3:50:15 > 3:50:23has been record levels of job creation in the economy. I like many

3:50:23 > 3:50:26honourable friends recall sitting in these debates from 2010 onwards

3:50:26 > 3:50:29hearing the doom and gloom and scaremongering from the party

3:50:29 > 3:50:36opposite about unemployment and recession. As we know, their

3:50:36 > 3:50:40predictions have proven wrong. The point now is in the budget today

3:50:40 > 3:50:46we've heard about greater investment, in key sectors going

3:50:46 > 3:50:50forward where we know we have to think about the future of the Labour

3:50:50 > 3:50:55market, where automation will be coming in and also looking at how we

3:50:55 > 3:51:04can invest in construction and key services. I will give way.Doesn't

3:51:04 > 3:51:11she recognise that under the Labour government the economy grew by 40%

3:51:11 > 3:51:20in ten years to 2008, that the government doubled debt from 45% in

3:51:20 > 3:51:2590% of the economy and now we have the lowest growth in the G7. Surely

3:51:25 > 3:51:30that isn't a success.In my constituency we have seen the

3:51:30 > 3:51:35claimant count falling from 70% from under its peak under Gordon Brown

3:51:35 > 3:51:42and there has been growth in small enterprises, more jobs in Essex, and

3:51:42 > 3:51:48we should be welcoming that. I will give way.Her speech reminds me to

3:51:48 > 3:51:51ask this question, can she recall an occasion when the party opposite has

3:51:51 > 3:51:56talked up the economy? It seems they are always about more spending and

3:51:56 > 3:52:02borrowing, more debt and benefits. My honourable friend is absolutely

3:52:02 > 3:52:07right, we have 32 million people in work, an opposition party that talks

3:52:07 > 3:52:14our economy down. They seem to hold a pathological hatred of enterprise

3:52:14 > 3:52:18aspiration free markets, calling for higher tax on businesses to serve

3:52:18 > 3:52:22their agenda to tighten controls on free markets, to stifle innovation

3:52:22 > 3:52:26and style businesses from succeeding. As we know that would

3:52:26 > 3:52:31harm the economy in the long-running -- stop businesses from succeeding.

3:52:31 > 3:52:37As we've seen in the budget, great Conservative budgets of sport

3:52:37 > 3:52:40aspiration and opportunity and freedom and this is why this party

3:52:40 > 3:52:44has been on the side of people who work hard and want to get on and own

3:52:44 > 3:52:48their own homes. We've seen the budget making welcome changes to

3:52:48 > 3:52:54stamp duty to help people get on the property ladder with 95% of

3:52:54 > 3:52:59first-time buyers benefiting and 80% paying no stamp duty. There is the

3:52:59 > 3:53:02right action that will support homeownership and increase supply

3:53:02 > 3:53:05through the investment that has been now announced today in the budget. I

3:53:05 > 3:53:11want to stress to my honourable friends on the front bench the

3:53:11 > 3:53:15importance of ensuring there is investment in infrastructure with

3:53:15 > 3:53:20new housing from five it as well as public sources. In Essex in

3:53:20 > 3:53:22particular we've been working assiduously to secure investment

3:53:22 > 3:53:30with the government, the rail route north of Witton, upgrading the a

3:53:30 > 3:53:34120, critical investments that will support house-building in that part

3:53:34 > 3:53:38of Essex but also we are working to ensure greater public funding, not

3:53:38 > 3:53:45just private funding, but innovative financial products to reduce the

3:53:45 > 3:53:51risk to the public purse and increase private contributions to

3:53:51 > 3:54:01see the increase in construction. Deputy Speaker, it was right that we

3:54:01 > 3:54:05saw the budget setting us on a course to be able to make the most

3:54:05 > 3:54:07out of the new long-term opportunities that Britain has. Of

3:54:07 > 3:54:13course that means a global beacon for free trade, a place that

3:54:13 > 3:54:17welcomes investment from overseas, more enterprise. But also finding

3:54:17 > 3:54:22ways in which we unlock the talent of this country. Again I welcome the

3:54:22 > 3:54:24new investment we've heard today from my right honourable friend the

3:54:24 > 3:54:28Chancellor when it comes to skills, critical sectors and investing in

3:54:28 > 3:54:33people. There are fantastic opportunity is not just for the City

3:54:33 > 3:54:37of London but for our country. There are plenty of reasons not just to be

3:54:37 > 3:54:40optimistic, but looking at how we can trade with the world and grow

3:54:40 > 3:54:49our economy. Looking outwards rather than inwards. A budget will

3:54:49 > 3:54:52facilitate a positive international vision for Britain. I believe that

3:54:52 > 3:54:56is how it would be judged in years that ahead. This budget stands in

3:54:56 > 3:55:00marked contrast to the policies of the party opposite you want to tax

3:55:00 > 3:55:05more, harm our country and economy, but importantly this budget lays a

3:55:05 > 3:55:15foundation for a Britain that be fit for the future.Gareth Thomas.A

3:55:15 > 3:55:18pleasure to follow the right honourable lady for Witham, shall

3:55:18 > 3:55:21not be surprised I take a slightly different view about the decisions

3:55:21 > 3:55:27our country has made on Brexit. I thought she nevertheless gave an

3:55:27 > 3:55:33interesting speech. I was also interested in the comments by her

3:55:33 > 3:55:36colleague, the right honourable gentleman for, if you'll forgive me,

3:55:36 > 3:55:41somewhere in the Midlands. About the... Sutton Coldfield, thank you

3:55:41 > 3:55:48very much. To reform capitalism. I thought his proposals were rather

3:55:48 > 3:55:53timid. They were a star in terms of recognising how corporate culture

3:55:53 > 3:55:58needs to change. I would encourage and there are forms of public

3:55:58 > 3:56:01ownership that he should look at with more enthusiasm than his

3:56:01 > 3:56:09remarks today suggested he might do. If I have time I hope to pick some

3:56:09 > 3:56:16of those up. Today the most striking feature of the budget thus far has

3:56:16 > 3:56:22been the revelations about the cost of Brexit. The downgrade by the OBR

3:56:22 > 3:56:27in growth forecasts means for the first time in modern history

3:56:27 > 3:56:32official UK GDP growth forecast for every single year over the period

3:56:32 > 3:56:41being forecast are under 2%. The setting aside of an extra £3 billion

3:56:41 > 3:56:47to fund the cost of Brexit is quite extraordinary. I don't remember any

3:56:47 > 3:56:56of the Leave campaign mentioning or even hinting at such costs. Earlier

3:56:56 > 3:57:01this month the Bank of England governor gave his verdict on the

3:57:01 > 3:57:07economy and said Britain, in his words, would be moving if it was not

3:57:07 > 3:57:10for the Brexit effect. With favourable conditions and stronger

3:57:10 > 3:57:15growth in other parts of the world, sadly, notably, in the Eurozone,

3:57:15 > 3:57:19Britain has fallen from the top to the bottom of the league of G-7

3:57:19 > 3:57:24leading economies in the year since the Brexit vote. Perhaps most

3:57:24 > 3:57:28strikingly, foreign investment in Britain is 20% lower than the Bank

3:57:28 > 3:57:34of England were forecasting before the referendum result. So it's easy,

3:57:34 > 3:57:39I think, to be concerned even more than we might have been about the

3:57:39 > 3:57:44cost of Brexit. But the evidence that businesses are beginning to

3:57:44 > 3:57:50come forward with it to explain why they are holding back on investment

3:57:50 > 3:57:55decisions is perhaps not surprising when the Cabinet themselves cannot

3:57:55 > 3:57:58decide what kind of trading relationship they want with our

3:57:58 > 3:58:03European partners. The truth is ordinary households are paying the

3:58:03 > 3:58:08price of that situation. A report published this month by the Centre

3:58:08 > 3:58:15for economic performance found the impact of inflation and the weaker

3:58:15 > 3:58:18pound since the referendum means the average worker had experienced a

3:58:18 > 3:58:24real term cut of almost £450 in annual pay, the equivalent of a

3:58:24 > 3:58:28weak's salary. Sadly the government marches on, insisting we'll leave

3:58:28 > 3:58:33the customs union and single market, and that no deal may well be an

3:58:33 > 3:58:37acceptable outcome. Either striking the evidence we've heard recently

3:58:37 > 3:58:45from car manufacturers such as Honda about the potential cost of leaving

3:58:45 > 3:58:50the customs union. Up to £850,000 for some manufacturers every year.

3:58:50 > 3:58:55Underestimate it would take their 18 month to set up the warehouses and

3:58:55 > 3:58:59procedures they would need if Britain left the customs union.

3:58:59 > 3:59:06Something the government insists will happen in 17 months' time.

3:59:06 > 3:59:11Genuinely worrying for the future of jobs in this country. The general

3:59:11 > 3:59:15election confirmed there is no mandate for a hard Brexit so even at

3:59:15 > 3:59:19this late stage I urge the Minister 's opposite, and indeed if I may do

3:59:19 > 3:59:24so generally, my own front bench, to again explore soft Brexit options.

3:59:24 > 3:59:28Such as EEA membership. Which allow potentially new arrangements on

3:59:28 > 3:59:32issues of concern to the British people such as judicial authority

3:59:32 > 3:59:34and freedom of movement, but which would crucially give significant

3:59:34 > 3:59:42economic certainty going forward. The second area I wanted to touch on

3:59:42 > 3:59:45was the failure of this budget to tackle the crisis in funding for

3:59:45 > 3:59:48public services. I thought it was striking the Chancellor, given the

3:59:48 > 3:59:54terrorist attacks our country has had this year, made absolutely no

3:59:54 > 3:59:58mention of additional funding for the police or indeed additional

3:59:58 > 4:00:06funding to invest in tackling the threat, the ongoing threat of

4:00:06 > 4:00:13terrorism in this country. For Harrow we've lost 173 police

4:00:13 > 4:00:18officers since 2010. Violent crime, particularly crime involving a

4:00:18 > 4:00:28knife, is up by 60% in Harrow. There are stabbings, stabbings in South

4:00:28 > 4:00:33Harrow and Harrow town centre. Something my constituency has not

4:00:33 > 4:00:36experienced for a considerable period of time. The fear of crime is

4:00:36 > 4:00:40therefore stand Julie on the increase. I'll give way to my

4:00:40 > 4:00:48honourable friend.He mentioned the police numbers and crime rising,

4:00:48 > 4:00:51knife crime. The West Midlands has lost over 2000 policeman, how will

4:00:51 > 4:00:55you tackle knife crime when you are reducing the police force and other

4:00:55 > 4:01:00crimes for that matter. When we talk about public services, instead of

4:01:00 > 4:01:04the government telling public services the police and fire brigade

4:01:04 > 4:01:07and medical profession, why don't they give them a decent wage? It's

4:01:07 > 4:01:11the best way to thank them for the service they give us.I strongly

4:01:11 > 4:01:18support my honourable friend's point. I worry that the government

4:01:18 > 4:01:26has chosen to do nothing about the threat, the real threat in funding

4:01:26 > 4:01:31terms, of a further loss of 3-4000 police officers. Which the

4:01:31 > 4:01:33commission of the Metropolitan Police, Cressida Dick, outlined what

4:01:33 > 4:01:38would happen if there was no increase in the Metropolitan

4:01:38 > 4:01:44Police's budget going forward. The consequences of that lack of funding

4:01:44 > 4:01:51mean Harrow will be merged with Barnet and Brent. Barnett increased

4:01:51 > 4:01:56burglary rates, Brent a significant gang problem. Many of my

4:01:56 > 4:01:59constituents fear the police will be taken out of our borough to tackle

4:01:59 > 4:02:06problems in those two other borrowers. And that crime in Harrow

4:02:06 > 4:02:11will not be tackled in a way that they might have hoped. On the

4:02:11 > 4:02:16National Health Service it is significant, I think, that the extra

4:02:16 > 4:02:20resources which the Kings fund and of the NHS said were necessary have

4:02:20 > 4:02:27not been met. There have been some increases and uplift and I welcome

4:02:27 > 4:02:31that. It is striking that just last year there were two and a half

4:02:31 > 4:02:35million people waiting longer than four hours in accident and emergency

4:02:35 > 4:02:39compared to the 350,000 when we left office. 4 million people at the

4:02:39 > 4:02:44moment on a waiting list for treatment in an English hospital. In

4:02:44 > 4:02:49terms of Norfolk Park which serves my constituency, it is the second

4:02:49 > 4:02:54busiest trust in London following the government's decision to close

4:02:54 > 4:02:56the accident and emergency department at Hammersmith and

4:02:56 > 4:03:01Central Middlesex. We in my constituency worry that Ealing

4:03:01 > 4:03:05Hospital accident and emergency department is due to close as well.

4:03:05 > 4:03:10When one considers that our trust has entered the last financial year

4:03:10 > 4:03:15some £60 million in deficit with an underlying deficit of almost 100

4:03:15 > 4:03:21million, and is expected to make savings of 50 million in the current

4:03:21 > 4:03:24financial year, which the leadership of the trust is an unprecedented

4:03:24 > 4:03:29challenge, and one I think you can understand why my constituents, I

4:03:29 > 4:03:31think, will be deeply worried about the implications of this budget for

4:03:31 > 4:03:37the hospital going. Many of my schools are under considerable

4:03:37 > 4:03:44financial pressure. Having to see teaching assistants, vacancies not

4:03:44 > 4:03:49being filled, experienced staff when they are leaving replaced by newly

4:03:49 > 4:03:53qualified teachers. Again, this budget does nothing to address those

4:03:53 > 4:03:59particular problems. Nothing on adult social care and the financial

4:03:59 > 4:04:05prices. Nothing on the increasing crisis in children's services. Going

4:04:05 > 4:04:10forward. Lack of time prevents me picking up the challenge the

4:04:10 > 4:04:13honourable gentleman for Sutton Coldfield laid down about a debate

4:04:13 > 4:04:18on how one reforms capitalism going forward, but I do think a series of

4:04:18 > 4:04:22cooperative and mutual solutions might offer a potential for that.

4:04:22 > 4:04:27There needs to be an increase in cooperative housing. The Royal Bank

4:04:27 > 4:04:30of Scotland should be converted into a building society going forward.

4:04:30 > 4:04:37And far more needs to be done to encourage an increase in energy

4:04:37 > 4:04:40cooperatives to challenge the dominance of the big six players at

4:04:40 > 4:04:45the moment.It's a pleasure to follow the honourable gentleman for

4:04:45 > 4:04:50Harrow West. I agree with his remarks at the end about the role of

4:04:50 > 4:04:53cooperatives in financial services and other parts of our economy, he

4:04:53 > 4:04:58and I spoke about that previously. This was a budget fit for the

4:04:58 > 4:05:02future. Said the Chancellor. In many ways all budgets are fit for the

4:05:02 > 4:05:07future because it's the future we face. Some, like many the previous

4:05:07 > 4:05:10Chancellor had to deal with, had to cure the ills of the past, today we

4:05:10 > 4:05:16see some of that pressure and pain this economy has had to take the

4:05:16 > 4:05:22input right. Some of these benefits coming forward in a number of ways.

4:05:22 > 4:05:25My right honourable friend for Sutton Coldfield was right, much is

4:05:25 > 4:05:30spoken about intergenerational issues. The worst intergenerational

4:05:30 > 4:05:39burden you can leave is to load the next generation with the debt from

4:05:39 > 4:05:42your reckless spending. When the Leader of the Opposition said in his

4:05:42 > 4:05:46speech today how different it could all have been, so right he was. A

4:05:46 > 4:05:55deficit denied not more money spent, more tax raised. Little benefit. The

4:05:55 > 4:05:59reality is our constituents are bearing the brunt of that. Madam

4:05:59 > 4:06:02Deputy Speaker, the Chancellor was right to point out the OBR is

4:06:02 > 4:06:08independent and also it gives a view on the best economic forecasting

4:06:08 > 4:06:19available. All forecasting bears risks. If you had a look at the OBR

4:06:19 > 4:06:23book, it brings out interesting things. The honourable gentleman

4:06:23 > 4:06:26opposite made the point several times about productivity and his

4:06:26 > 4:06:28right to make that, it is the central challenge of this economy.

4:06:28 > 4:06:34The honourable lady for the Liberal Democrats made the same point. It's

4:06:34 > 4:06:39fascinating to note, because of course as an economic historian of

4:06:39 > 4:06:43relatively modern times, it's worth remembering of course the previous

4:06:43 > 4:06:47Administration had to redefine productivity because it was falling

4:06:47 > 4:06:51so fast under their watch. It is right to say that the OBR is making

4:06:51 > 4:06:56the point and it is a disappointment that although it is picking up its

4:06:56 > 4:07:02not reaching precrisis levels. Which is why it should be welcoming inside

4:07:02 > 4:07:07the detail of the red book today the schemes that are for retraining

4:07:07 > 4:07:13older people as much as the skills given to new people. If you look

4:07:13 > 4:07:17inside the OBR one of the biggest problems being highlighted is the

4:07:17 > 4:07:25participation rate, as we have an increasingly elderly population

4:07:25 > 4:07:30without the skills to tackle some of the new industries that are so

4:07:30 > 4:07:34obviously going to be there. I particularly welcome the retraining

4:07:34 > 4:07:38partnership skills we'll be putting there. The Chancellor was right in

4:07:38 > 4:07:43that he was saying there is much to be done in terms of maths and

4:07:43 > 4:07:50computing. So the welcome to continue there, so we can take the

4:07:50 > 4:07:54challenge of the future... The other thing that is clearly evident...

4:07:54 > 4:07:59There is an awful lot in this book in terms of the detail of this

4:07:59 > 4:08:06budget. Often Chancellor 's hope you'll pick a rabbit out of the hat,

4:08:06 > 4:08:08the headline will be there, you won't be looking at the detail. Much

4:08:08 > 4:08:13of the good stuff is in the detail. One thing worth mentioning is that

4:08:13 > 4:08:19the Universal Credit announcements today showed the Chancellor was

4:08:19 > 4:08:22listening. He has to be right, it has to be a modern welfare system.

4:08:22 > 4:08:28So that work is always encouraging. What is really interesting today,

4:08:28 > 4:08:33already, one of the real experts, David Orr, chief executive of the

4:08:33 > 4:08:38National Housing foundation, which owns most of the housing

4:08:38 > 4:08:41associations, says we welcome the changes to Universal Credit

4:08:41 > 4:08:45including advance payments, it'll make a direct and positive impact on

4:08:45 > 4:08:51the lives of Housing association tenants. I will give way.

4:08:52 > 4:08:58I thank the member for giving way. Whatever the motive behind Universal

4:08:58 > 4:09:05Credit, in my wide reaching constituency the lack of Internet

4:09:05 > 4:09:09axis is there, it is an immovable obstacle and it cuts against the

4:09:09 > 4:09:13best intentions of government. Does the government front bench recognise

4:09:13 > 4:09:22this massive problem?The gentleman is right, it is a problem alongside

4:09:22 > 4:09:25infrastructure. You will have noted a number of infrastructure

4:09:25 > 4:09:29announcements today, that the roll-out of broadband is being

4:09:29 > 4:09:37accelerated. I'm pleased the front bench is doing something about it.

4:09:37 > 4:09:41At a constituency level can two things, the announcement of the

4:09:41 > 4:09:46Meyler review, and some money going to Saint Georges mental health

4:09:46 > 4:09:52trust, which will welcome, as will the announcement that Crossrail two

4:09:52 > 4:09:55is proceeding although at a pace most of us would like to see faster

4:09:55 > 4:10:03than the trains, we hope. I think the key announcements around

4:10:03 > 4:10:06infrastructure, what was particularly interesting was the

4:10:06 > 4:10:09amount of money government is giving to transforming cities to provide

4:10:09 > 4:10:16local transport and give cities and may is the flexibility to express

4:10:16 > 4:10:21the new urban design in terms of incorporating new industries of the

4:10:21 > 4:10:28future -- cities and mayors. Especially local councils to have

4:10:28 > 4:10:36discounted lending, for high-value infrastructure projects that they

4:10:36 > 4:10:42think will bring extra facilities to local people. It is key. By not ring

4:10:42 > 4:10:48fencing the money for any particular project but allowing it to be

4:10:48 > 4:10:51brought forward so some of the new urban design ideas coming forward

4:10:51 > 4:10:57can be utilised. I've been particularly keen recently to

4:10:57 > 4:11:00contribute to the housing and finance institute's recent papers on

4:11:00 > 4:11:07how you make sure you bring sites forward in a way that brings the

4:11:07 > 4:11:13housing and services that come with it. Often what frustrates major and

4:11:13 > 4:11:17sometimes small applications is the fact that it isn't just the roads

4:11:17 > 4:11:21and rail, it's the atrocity, water and whatever. The recent report by

4:11:21 > 4:11:28was part of landed on the Chancellor's desk. -- it's the

4:11:28 > 4:11:34electricity. It has made an impact because I can see that he's

4:11:34 > 4:11:38establishing Homes England. It may have been missed by many. By

4:11:38 > 4:11:44widening the scope and allowing the government's major house-building

4:11:44 > 4:11:50directive for infrastructure to have a wide and encompassing remit will

4:11:50 > 4:11:53be, I suspect, bringing forward a number of projects more quickly,

4:11:53 > 4:11:56especially a view combine that with some measures that the Chancellor

4:11:56 > 4:12:03has mentioned in the red book today. The strategic sites fund is steadily

4:12:03 > 4:12:06to be welcomed if you combine it with the announcement of Homes

4:12:06 > 4:12:11England. It seems there is some grown-up and connected thinking in

4:12:11 > 4:12:16the Treasury and I welcome it. My friend on the front bench smiles but

4:12:16 > 4:12:21he was always guilty of that even if not always evident to everybody

4:12:21 > 4:12:30else. Two other things have been noticeable, clearly the problem with

4:12:30 > 4:12:35housing market is supply, everyone talks about it, and clearly the big

4:12:35 > 4:12:39projects. If you look across your constituencies there will be numbers

4:12:39 > 4:12:43of small sites that aren't being brought forward and that's the

4:12:43 > 4:12:47reason we've seen the decline of the small builder. The extension of the

4:12:47 > 4:12:53house-building fund, small sites and most importantly the loan guarantee

4:12:53 > 4:12:58to small builders, is likely to bring forward more sites and it may

4:12:58 > 4:13:05be at an incremental level, it may not mean, every ten, 25 and up and I

4:13:05 > 4:13:11think it is particular welcome. Also particularly welcome from a regional

4:13:11 > 4:13:14basis, the first time there has been some regional accept that house

4:13:14 > 4:13:18prices are not the same everywhere in the country and the announcement

4:13:18 > 4:13:25on stamp duty I think will be particularly welcome inside London.

4:13:25 > 4:13:31The patient capital review. Often the structures in the past that have

4:13:31 > 4:13:35been put in place did not recognise the need to have the emphasis on

4:13:35 > 4:13:39high risk and high growth. It's right that if you're going to get

4:13:39 > 4:13:41these funds and advantages they should be for high-growth, high

4:13:41 > 4:13:47risk. It is a benefit to see the announcement from the Chancellor,

4:13:47 > 4:13:51especially if it works alongside private industry to bring forward

4:13:51 > 4:13:567.5 million into the in screws of the future. There is much to welcome

4:13:56 > 4:14:00in the budget -- into the industries of the future. The devil is in the

4:14:00 > 4:14:06details and I commend it.It is a pleasure to follow the honourable

4:14:06 > 4:14:09member for Wimbledon although I'm uncertain that we'll find a great

4:14:09 > 4:14:15deal of agreement. In the run-up to the budget, during the Chancellor's

4:14:15 > 4:14:19speech today, we've heard a lot about building a Briton fit for the

4:14:19 > 4:14:27future. But many of my constituents do not share his confidence in that

4:14:27 > 4:14:32the government's proposals will achieve such a vision. I've always

4:14:32 > 4:14:36considered Enfield a fantastic place to live, I've been there over 20

4:14:36 > 4:14:43years, and a great place to raise a family. But for far too many Enfield

4:14:43 > 4:14:45North residents now, especially hard-working and hard-pressed

4:14:45 > 4:14:52families, the last in years of Tory austerity have led to greater

4:14:52 > 4:14:56insecurity, poorer public services and in some cases abject poverty.

4:14:56 > 4:15:01Child poverty has risen to its highest level since 2010. I

4:15:01 > 4:15:04mentioned this earlier to the Prime Minister in Prime Minister's

4:15:04 > 4:15:08Questions when I pointed out that these to Jude for fiscal studies and

4:15:08 > 4:15:14the Joseph Rowntree foundation are predicting an additional 1.2 million

4:15:14 > 4:15:18children will be pushed into poverty by 2021 on top of the four million

4:15:18 > 4:15:27in 2015-60 -- the Institute for Fiscal Studies. It is a moral issue

4:15:27 > 4:15:31facing the country and this government. Enfield is the worst

4:15:31 > 4:15:35affected are in London with almost one third of our children living in

4:15:35 > 4:15:41poverty. And the Chancellor seems to be emphatic that this was being

4:15:41 > 4:15:47dealt with. Let me tell the house, the comment on today's budget, the

4:15:47 > 4:15:50Chief Executive of the child poverty action group Alison Graham said this

4:15:50 > 4:15:55should have been the budget that ushered in much-needed structural

4:15:55 > 4:15:58reform of Universal Credit to revise the promised to strengthen the

4:15:58 > 4:16:04rewards from work. That didn't happen. She went on to say that our

4:16:04 > 4:16:08new analysis finds that while effective tax rates may have been

4:16:08 > 4:16:12fruitful for some families, big falls in family income caused by

4:16:12 > 4:16:19cuts and changes to Universal Credit have left many worse off overall,

4:16:19 > 4:16:21overwhelming any gains from increases in the National Living

4:16:21 > 4:16:26Wage, personal tax allowances and help for childcare. Families on

4:16:26 > 4:16:31Universal Credit who want to get better off through earnings gain

4:16:31 > 4:16:36little from today's budget." I'm more inclined to accept what the

4:16:36 > 4:16:40Chief Executive of the child poverty action group as to say then I am the

4:16:40 > 4:16:47empty words of the Chancellor.I'm very grateful to the honourable lady

4:16:47 > 4:16:53for giving way. She is making a very interesting point. I think when

4:16:53 > 4:16:56she's had another Trinity to study the impact on households, the

4:16:56 > 4:16:59distribution of analysis accompanying the budget, I'm sure

4:16:59 > 4:17:04she'd want to welcome the analysis showing that since 2010, households

4:17:04 > 4:17:10across all income areas have seen growth in their disposable incomes

4:17:10 > 4:17:13on average. I think that is good news and I'm sure she'd want to

4:17:13 > 4:17:22welcome it.Well I think if the honourable lady sat in my surgery

4:17:22 > 4:17:28and listen to what families in Enfield, over one third of children

4:17:28 > 4:17:30living in poverty, I think she'd find that disposable income is a

4:17:30 > 4:17:36major problem and that most families feel that the rising costs and

4:17:36 > 4:17:44particularly in rentals have hugely wiped out any possible gain. Nearly

4:17:44 > 4:17:50six in ten Londoners in poverty live in a working family. So the picture

4:17:50 > 4:17:54of poverty has changed. These aren't people who are what others sometimes

4:17:54 > 4:17:59referred to as grounders, they are working people trying to get on in

4:17:59 > 4:18:09life. -- with referred to as scroungers. The government failure

4:18:09 > 4:18:14to address these issues has meant that many families are unable to

4:18:14 > 4:18:19just about manage today, let alone build for tomorrow. Enfield is the

4:18:19 > 4:18:27fourth highest borough in London for food bank usage. Last year 5970

4:18:27 > 4:18:3243-day emergency food supplies were provided to people in Enfield, of

4:18:32 > 4:18:38which 2434 were given to children. The roll-out of Universal Credit in

4:18:38 > 4:18:41Enfield starting this month will make a bad situation even worse. The

4:18:41 > 4:18:49Trussell trust has said that emergency food parcels is 30% higher

4:18:49 > 4:18:55in areas where Universal Credit is being implemented. Every week I see

4:18:55 > 4:18:59so many hard-working families in my constituency surgery who are living

4:18:59 > 4:19:07on or below the breadline. I'd like to say a few words about housing. A

4:19:07 > 4:19:11great many people who have come to see me, my constituents, see me

4:19:11 > 4:19:14about problems with their housing or problems related in some way to

4:19:14 > 4:19:18their housing, especially those living in the insecure private

4:19:18 > 4:19:26rental sector. The risk of falling into rent arrears and the risk of

4:19:26 > 4:19:30eviction and debt because of Universal Credit has only added to

4:19:30 > 4:19:38their concerns. Stagnant wages, fast rising rents and a crisis in the

4:19:38 > 4:19:42housing supply have created a perfect storm in Enfield. We have

4:19:42 > 4:19:46the highest infection rates in the capital. Levels of homelessness

4:19:46 > 4:19:53accept and zis have risen by 82% in the last two years alone. Enfield

4:19:53 > 4:19:56has the second-highest number of temporary accommodation placements

4:19:56 > 4:19:59in London putting even more pressure on an already strained housing

4:19:59 > 4:20:06market. Again this isn't a record of which the Chancellor can be proud.

4:20:06 > 4:20:10And to referred to some of what he said today, he said house prices are

4:20:10 > 4:20:15increasingly out of reach for many. They are, it takes too long to save

4:20:15 > 4:20:22for a deposit, it does, if you can do that at all. And rents absorb too

4:20:22 > 4:20:28high a proportion of monthly income. We've heard how the Office for

4:20:28 > 4:20:31Budget Responsibility report makes it clear that house prices will

4:20:31 > 4:20:35actually rise because of the measures today. And the member from

4:20:35 > 4:20:41along the benches earlier asked about whether anything was said

4:20:41 > 4:20:49about houses for social rent. And the member for Woking insisted that

4:20:49 > 4:20:53it had been referred to. I'd look through the speech and I could see

4:20:53 > 4:20:57nothing that says that and I have heard nothing. It does say,

4:20:57 > 4:21:02including nearly 350,000 affordable homes. The question is, affordable

4:21:02 > 4:21:08for whom? There's nothing in here about houses at a social rent and I

4:21:08 > 4:21:11think that's a disgrace and completely ignores the very

4:21:11 > 4:21:18desperate need...We heard opposite earlier that the amendment referring

4:21:18 > 4:21:24to how bad it was in the 1970s and learning lessons from there, the

4:21:24 > 4:21:30lesson is that if I was brought up in a council house in the 1970s,

4:21:30 > 4:21:33which was a tremendous base for me in my life, we should be proud of

4:21:33 > 4:21:38that. Those opposite should learn from that and treat them with some

4:21:38 > 4:21:43respect.I completely agree with my friend, I was also brought up in a

4:21:43 > 4:21:46council house and we were proud of our home and considered it the next

4:21:46 > 4:21:51best thing to owning your own home. We hardly drew a distinction on that

4:21:51 > 4:21:56basis. That is the case today and being able to offer anybody a

4:21:56 > 4:22:01council house is becoming any possibility. I want to make a bit of

4:22:01 > 4:22:09progress. I want to say a few words about public services, hard-working

4:22:09 > 4:22:14families rely on our public services but the veneers of austerity have

4:22:14 > 4:22:20stretched the services to breaking point. Enfield Council have tried

4:22:20 > 4:22:23their best to protect families from the immense pressures that they are

4:22:23 > 4:22:30under. But given that their government grant has been reduced by

4:22:30 > 4:22:35£93 million, what they are able to do is so much less and the level of

4:22:35 > 4:22:40cuts local authorities are taking is unsustainable. I noticed that when

4:22:40 > 4:22:46we talk about social care, when we talk about the environment, we talk

4:22:46 > 4:22:51about policing, every time, the answer we get from government is,

4:22:51 > 4:22:54local authorities, local authorities. They are slashing their

4:22:54 > 4:22:58budgets on one hand and pushing all their responsibilities to local

4:22:58 > 4:23:03authorities on the other hand. They know that this is a circle that

4:23:03 > 4:23:08can't be squared, it's an impossible task. They are undermining our

4:23:08 > 4:23:14public services and local councils. In education, our schools in

4:23:14 > 4:23:21Enfield, primary and secondary, are due to lose one third of £50 million

4:23:21 > 4:23:25by 2020, heads will have to cut more teaching posts, affecting every

4:23:25 > 4:23:30child's ability to reach their best. In health, my constituents deserve

4:23:30 > 4:23:37good quality services but we've seen Tory government closing the accident

4:23:37 > 4:23:40and emergency and maternity unit and cutting the number of beds by more

4:23:40 > 4:23:45than 400. North Middlesex Hospital, the other one that we now use and

4:23:45 > 4:23:50rely on has been placed under increasing pressure and constantly

4:23:50 > 4:23:55faces a crisis as a result. The Royal College of General

4:23:55 > 4:23:59practitioners and says that Enfield needs a deformed more general

4:23:59 > 4:24:01practitioners by 2020 and I have little confidence that the

4:24:01 > 4:24:07government will provide that. In terms of policing we've seen a 70%

4:24:07 > 4:24:12increase in Enfield over the last seven years in rising violent crime

4:24:12 > 4:24:16and we've seen huge cuts in a number of uniformed officers on our

4:24:16 > 4:24:21streets. There is a relationship between them. The government is

4:24:21 > 4:24:27behaving in such a way, no mention today of this, no mention

4:24:27 > 4:24:31whatsoever... Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, has done everything he

4:24:31 > 4:24:36can to protect front-line policing. The Chancellor failed to commit or

4:24:36 > 4:24:41even mention additional funding for London's police force. We're in a

4:24:41 > 4:24:46situation where this government is making London less safe for

4:24:46 > 4:24:50Londoners, tourists and everybody who lives in it. This is in a year

4:24:50 > 4:24:54when we've seen five major terrorist attacks. London is less safe under

4:24:54 > 4:25:21the Tories. This budget helps nobody.

4:25:21 > 4:25:26This is a budget that ensures we prepare for Brexit, prepare for the

4:25:26 > 4:25:29future of this country. And to make sure we embrace that future and get

4:25:29 > 4:25:35the best of that future for our children and grandchildren. I want

4:25:35 > 4:25:39to commend the Chancellor for the level of thought and consideration

4:25:39 > 4:25:43he put into it and indeed, his excellent budget speech and

4:25:43 > 4:25:47presentation today. I think the Chancellor did a brilliant job and

4:25:47 > 4:25:50has brought forward a really positive budget. I want to welcome

4:25:50 > 4:25:59in particular the measures to ensure there is an allegation of up to £3

4:25:59 > 4:26:03billion for preparations for Brexit. This matters, as we know, the Dover

4:26:03 > 4:26:08front line and Channel ports, to make sure we have a smooth

4:26:08 > 4:26:11transition and to make sure there are no hold backs, no gridlock, no

4:26:11 > 4:26:18queues. Now, I know some honourable members in this house quite like the

4:26:18 > 4:26:22idea of queues at the Channel ports, they look forward to it being a

4:26:22 > 4:26:27disaster on Brexit. Not this side of the house. I'm glad to see this

4:26:27 > 4:26:31Chancellor is making sure the investment and money is available to

4:26:31 > 4:26:36make sure we can avoid that eventuality. Gridlock at Dover will

4:26:36 > 4:26:40mean gridlock for the entire British economy. If the Midlands engine

4:26:40 > 4:26:46cannot get essential component it'll come out. If the Northern Powerhouse

4:26:46 > 4:26:49doesn't get the supplies it needs it will cease to work. That is why it

4:26:49 > 4:26:54is so important for each and every one of us to do all we can to ensure

4:26:54 > 4:26:58Brexit is a success and ensure we get the investment we need and the

4:26:58 > 4:27:04preparations we need to make sure we undock seamlessly from the European

4:27:04 > 4:27:10Union and go out into the world to make a success for the future of

4:27:10 > 4:27:14Britain. It really can be success. Let's remember what's coming down

4:27:14 > 4:27:18the tracks, so well placed for the next revolution of automation, so

4:27:18 > 4:27:22well-placed for autonomous vehicles, for the fourth Industrial

4:27:22 > 4:27:27Revolution. I know even the opposition doesn't share my view, he

4:27:27 > 4:27:31wants to tax innovation and put a stop to all this, this idea that it

4:27:31 > 4:27:35might create a transition in our economy. That he is scared of this

4:27:35 > 4:27:39prospect. But I would simply say that is commonly the case whenever

4:27:39 > 4:27:44there is change and evolution and innovation in our economy, people

4:27:44 > 4:27:49are scared. The Luddites were very scared. People were scared at the

4:27:49 > 4:27:51Industrial Revolution, people were scared in the 1980s with the

4:27:51 > 4:27:58revolution in our economy. Each time we saw a leap forward, a massive

4:27:58 > 4:28:01jump in productivity, each time we saw our economy move ahead and

4:28:01 > 4:28:07Britain become stronger, more successful, leading in the world.

4:28:07 > 4:28:11That is why the Chancellor is absolutely right to set up such a

4:28:11 > 4:28:16positive vision in this budget and reject the Luddite frontbencher view

4:28:16 > 4:28:20opposite. A Luddite view that I know most of the backbenchers, who ought

4:28:20 > 4:28:24to be on the front benches opposite, reject as well. Even know their Dan

4:28:24 > 4:28:30Lobb say it for fear of deselection, for fear the Labour front bench will

4:28:30 > 4:28:35mobilise membership and gain momentum to sweep them away. Can I

4:28:35 > 4:28:40say how much I welcome the innovations made to help the least

4:28:40 > 4:28:47well off? We've created 3 million jobs since 2010. We've seen massive

4:28:47 > 4:28:51increase in the personal allowance, nearly at £12,000. We sing the

4:28:51 > 4:28:56national living wage, which also makes a huge difference. Close to my

4:28:56 > 4:29:01heart, we're also seeing the fuel duty frees, for years and years, so

4:29:01 > 4:29:06since 2010 hard hard-working motorists and white van drivers,

4:29:06 > 4:29:10hauliers, are seeing a massive reduction in the effective costs of

4:29:10 > 4:29:18duty. Each car owner benefits to the tune of £850 a year. For a person on

4:29:18 > 4:29:21average wages it makes a massive difference and for a person who has

4:29:21 > 4:29:26to drive in remote areas such as Scotland, as a member of the SNP

4:29:26 > 4:29:30kindly decided to remain present to our deliberations, I should mention

4:29:30 > 4:29:35Scotland and I welcome the fact he's in the house. In that area it makes

4:29:35 > 4:29:40a huge difference to people who have to drive much further to much more

4:29:40 > 4:29:43about areas. I welcome the fact it has made such a difference to

4:29:43 > 4:29:48hard-working people. I also welcome the fact we're taking firmer action

4:29:48 > 4:29:54against large businesses which are too often given to industrial tax

4:29:54 > 4:30:01avoidance, which is an acceptable. I want to welcome the work taken,

4:30:01 > 4:30:07joint liability for online platforms like Amazon, if enabled overseas

4:30:07 > 4:30:11retailers to gain our VAT system, get competitive advantage, against

4:30:11 > 4:30:15smaller businesses in this country. Put them out of business and not

4:30:15 > 4:30:20paid their fair share of taxes. A campaign cross-party with the Public

4:30:20 > 4:30:23Accounts Committee members, many of us have fought for a long time. I

4:30:23 > 4:30:28really welcome the measures taken today to bring justice and fairness

4:30:28 > 4:30:34and a contested if playing field to the tax system. Service competitive

4:30:34 > 4:30:37playing field. The Chancellor is to be commended for doing the right

4:30:37 > 4:30:42thing, making sure we get revenues as well. So we have extra cash for

4:30:42 > 4:30:47schools and hospitals. I really want to finish with one thing. I think we

4:30:47 > 4:30:52do need to go further with these multinationals. I think there is a

4:30:52 > 4:30:55problem we have. Too many multinationals think they are not

4:30:55 > 4:30:59subject to the rule of law of this country. They behave like they are

4:30:59 > 4:31:04over mighty medieval barons that laws don't apply to in some way. I

4:31:04 > 4:31:09say this house should call time on that viewpoint. We need to make sure

4:31:09 > 4:31:16Amazon, Facebook, all the rest of them, pay a fair share of taxes in

4:31:16 > 4:31:19this country, that they should be subject to the rule of law in this

4:31:19 > 4:31:23country. That these social media outfits should also be subject to

4:31:23 > 4:31:31our laws of libel and laws against terrorism. Laws that exist for the

4:31:31 > 4:31:33protection of people and the fair dealing and fair treatment of

4:31:33 > 4:31:37people. I think we need to take a stronger and firmer measure. They

4:31:37 > 4:31:45will say, but we're in America, you is. I say we're leaving the EU, we

4:31:45 > 4:31:49can take back control of Internet access and trade policy. We need to

4:31:49 > 4:31:55think along those lines. I give way. Would he therefore also like to

4:31:55 > 4:32:00welcome the online VAT fraud extending the powers to overseas

4:32:00 > 4:32:05businesses which I think is a really important part of bringing these

4:32:05 > 4:32:08multinationals in the modern trading areas into line. I think it's a very

4:32:08 > 4:32:12good move.My right honourable friend makes a powerful point, she

4:32:12 > 4:32:16is absolutely right. There are various areas where we need to look

4:32:16 > 4:32:21to making sure social media outfits in general. Generally technology

4:32:21 > 4:32:25companies are subject to rules of law on libel, an identity of who

4:32:25 > 4:32:30they are rather than fake accounts which bully people, mistreat people.

4:32:30 > 4:32:35It is not acceptable. We should not ever tolerate it. They should pay

4:32:35 > 4:32:40their fair share of tax, be tougher on terror, as we are, and seek to

4:32:40 > 4:32:43join the government and support the authorities in this country in

4:32:43 > 4:32:50cracking down on terror. Cracking down on crime and mistreatment of

4:32:50 > 4:32:53our fellow people. They need to respect our laws and values as a

4:32:53 > 4:32:58country if they are trading year. They need to respect that.Does the

4:32:58 > 4:33:01honourable gentleman agree with me there has been a significant rise in

4:33:01 > 4:33:09anti-Semitism through social media? And anti-Semitic abuse? This is a

4:33:09 > 4:33:12disgraceful form of abuse and one we should do something about

4:33:12 > 4:33:17immediately. And the government should act immediately.I completely

4:33:17 > 4:33:20agree with the honourable lady, she's absolutely right. The

4:33:20 > 4:33:27disgusting and vile abuse we've seen, anti-Semitism, racism, all of

4:33:27 > 4:33:31those mistreatment of people, all of it has got to stop. We need to have

4:33:31 > 4:33:34a culture of respect on the Internet. We need to not tolerate

4:33:34 > 4:33:39those who will not show fair respect and fair treatment on the Internet.

4:33:39 > 4:33:44It's gone on too long, it's unacceptable. It's got to stop. That

4:33:44 > 4:33:49is why I say it's time to bring the rule of law, the rule of law in this

4:33:49 > 4:33:51house, this Parliament, this country, to those on social media

4:33:51 > 4:33:56and those multinationals not currently playing by the rules as

4:33:56 > 4:33:58they should.Catherine McIlorum.

4:34:03 > 4:34:05I've been inundated with correspondence about what they did

4:34:05 > 4:34:10or didn't want to see in this budget from concerns on beer duty, business

4:34:10 > 4:34:15rates, fuel duty, green belt protection, Equitable Life and

4:34:15 > 4:34:18proposals to make the private rented sector more secure and affordable. I

4:34:18 > 4:34:23have diligently raised every issue that I've been contacted about a

4:34:23 > 4:34:26head of this budget. I'm quite sure the Chancellor and his team may have

4:34:26 > 4:34:32been concerned they gained a new pen pal in the process. However, I think

4:34:32 > 4:34:36most people would confess that they did not have high hopes for this

4:34:36 > 4:34:43budget. And the Chancellor in this regard hasn't fallen short. This is

4:34:43 > 4:34:46a budget that has its head buried in the sand. When it comes to the

4:34:46 > 4:34:50enormity of the challenges facing our economy. The downgrading of our

4:34:50 > 4:34:56growth productivity and investment protections, and the imprecations

4:34:56 > 4:34:58this will have flawed and airy households up and down the country

4:34:58 > 4:35:03as they continue to face the misery of this cost of living squeeze. Not

4:35:03 > 4:35:09to mention, the Brexit uncertainty and its implications that loom

4:35:09 > 4:35:14ahead. However, I wanted to focus today on a number of issues of

4:35:14 > 4:35:20particular interest to the north-east. We finally received in

4:35:20 > 4:35:24the budget today confirmation that the government is minded to devolve

4:35:24 > 4:35:28funding and power to the north of time areas, ending months of

4:35:28 > 4:35:31uncertainty around this issue. I look forward to seeing the details

4:35:31 > 4:35:38in the days and weeks ahead. I also welcome the long-awaited

4:35:38 > 4:35:40announcement of the funding to replace the Tyne and Wear Metro's

4:35:40 > 4:35:44rolling stock over a year after the government received a full business

4:35:44 > 4:35:48case from the region for this investment. About 40 million

4:35:48 > 4:35:52passengers use the Metro every year but the poor reliability of the

4:35:52 > 4:35:55system has been causing problems for constituents on a daily basis and we

4:35:55 > 4:35:59must have that investment in new trains by 2021 if the Metro is not

4:35:59 > 4:36:04to grind to a halt. I'd be grateful if the Minister could confirm that

4:36:04 > 4:36:09Nexus will be able to go to market this year in order to meet the time

4:36:09 > 4:36:11scale necessary given the first tranche of funding won't be made

4:36:11 > 4:36:20available until 2020. Despite clear commitments from the former Prime

4:36:20 > 4:36:26Minister and Chancellor, that further devolution to Scotland

4:36:26 > 4:36:28wouldn't be allowed to economically disadvantaged parts of the UK, we

4:36:28 > 4:36:32are still to receive from the current Chancellor a commitment as

4:36:32 > 4:36:35to how he intends to mitigate the impact of devolving air passenger

4:36:35 > 4:36:41duty to the Scottish Government and English regional airports. Newcastle

4:36:41 > 4:36:44International Airport is in my constituency, it supports 19,000

4:36:44 > 4:36:49jobs across the north-east. It'll be most affected, according to the

4:36:49 > 4:36:53government own assessment, by the Scottish devolution plans to cut

4:36:53 > 4:37:00passenger duty. I believe, I first raised this issue in Parliament

4:37:00 > 4:37:05February 2016 and still haven't had an answer. Wait and see isn't good

4:37:05 > 4:37:08enough on this key, vital infrastructure issue. Of course we

4:37:08 > 4:37:11know the government is struggling to make a decision on anything at the

4:37:11 > 4:37:17moment. Trapped as it is within this post Brexit election...

4:37:17 > 4:37:21Post-election quagmire of its own making.I'll give way. I thank the

4:37:21 > 4:37:25honourable member for giving way. Would she perhaps agree with me that

4:37:25 > 4:37:30really the ideal solution to avoid this, I speak as a Scottish MP, is

4:37:30 > 4:37:35to get rid of the air duty altogether across the UK?It's

4:37:35 > 4:37:39incumbent on the government to come up with a solution but I'm sure they

4:37:39 > 4:37:44will take on board the honourable gentleman's suggestion. Combined

4:37:44 > 4:37:47with the continued uncertainty about the Prime Minister's ability to

4:37:47 > 4:37:52deliver a deal that won't have a devastating impact on the UK economy

4:37:52 > 4:37:58on investment, an jobs, I fear this zombie government threatens to set

4:37:58 > 4:38:03our economy back decades. If it doesn't rapidly get a grip.

4:38:03 > 4:38:06Particularly for net exporting regions like the north-east. How can

4:38:06 > 4:38:10we possibly compete for business on a post Brexit global stage if we

4:38:10 > 4:38:14struggle to make infrastructure decisions that have been dragging on

4:38:14 > 4:38:19for years in this country? Like on Heathrow? And, finally, on Tyne &

4:38:19 > 4:38:24Wear Metro. How can the government be serious about rebalancing the

4:38:24 > 4:38:26economy and creating a Northern Powerhouse when countless businesses

4:38:26 > 4:38:32are still none the wiser as to what is actually being meant. Just last

4:38:32 > 4:38:35week the north-east chair of the Federation of small business said

4:38:35 > 4:38:38three years on from the first mention of the Northern Powerhouse,

4:38:38 > 4:38:42it is still hard to find concrete manifestations of it. With a week to

4:38:42 > 4:38:44go until the budget, we'd like to see the Chancellor takes a

4:38:44 > 4:38:49meaningful steps towards getting the show on the road. He also said, we

4:38:49 > 4:38:54need cast-iron guarantees about EU funding, post Brexit. Firms across

4:38:54 > 4:38:57the north-east are benefiting from EU support to the tune of millions

4:38:57 > 4:39:01every year. One thing is for sure, we won't have a Northern Powerhouse

4:39:01 > 4:39:05unless that money is replaced. Yet again, though, this budget does not

4:39:05 > 4:39:13give the answer is that those businesses need.

4:39:13 > 4:39:17If we are to achieve our full potential we need a Chancellor who

4:39:17 > 4:39:21is on our side, who is prepared to genuinely rebalance investment to

4:39:21 > 4:39:26support sustainable economic growth and one that can give businesses

4:39:26 > 4:39:32confidence to invest. In highlighting the pre-budget demands

4:39:32 > 4:39:34the Northeast chamber of commerce said that if the government is

4:39:34 > 4:39:39serious about securing closing the gap between London and the regions

4:39:39 > 4:39:44there is a major work needed to change the distribution of public

4:39:44 > 4:39:47and private investment bank Canna activity in the UK. This trend has

4:39:47 > 4:39:53built up over decades. Listening to the voice of businesses in our

4:39:53 > 4:39:58region is essential to achieving that. It is increasingly clear that

4:39:58 > 4:40:03the challenges we face in reducing unemployment in regions like the

4:40:03 > 4:40:10Northeast that we must also solve this productivity crisis, to tackle

4:40:10 > 4:40:13the epidemic of low paid and insecure work now affecting our

4:40:13 > 4:40:19communities. Research published this year by the TUC highlighted that the

4:40:19 > 4:40:24Northeast has become the UK capital of insecure work. With the

4:40:24 > 4:40:27equivalent of two thirds of jobs created in the region over the last

4:40:27 > 4:40:32five years without guaranteed pay. People's wages are lower now than in

4:40:32 > 4:40:36real terms than they were in 2010 and it is little wonder that we are

4:40:36 > 4:40:40seeing household debt rising and more and more children living in

4:40:40 > 4:40:47poverty. In conclusion, there is a raft of issues we could have covered

4:40:47 > 4:40:50today, many of which I have raised countless times before and of which

4:40:50 > 4:40:57we still have not seen any meaningful solution in the budget.

4:40:57 > 4:41:00Hundreds of families in Newcastle suffered misery after the Universal

4:41:00 > 4:41:06Credit roll-out. We've seen some announcements but they don't go far

4:41:06 > 4:41:11enough. Many in financial difficulty as a result of this discrimination

4:41:11 > 4:41:15against women. Local schools are struggling to balance books because

4:41:15 > 4:41:20of the government's real: budget cuts. We have the NHS and social

4:41:20 > 4:41:24care system on its knees with services deteriorating because

4:41:24 > 4:41:30funding has not been ring fenced. They are overstretched and

4:41:30 > 4:41:32undervalued, public sector workers have seen a significant fall in

4:41:32 > 4:41:41living standards as a result of this long-standing 1% pay cap. It

4:41:41 > 4:41:44includes constituents who are now feeling the brunt of the £221

4:41:44 > 4:41:52million of cuts in Newcastle City Council since 2010 and the £124

4:41:52 > 4:41:54million of cuts imposed on Northumbria Police over the same

4:41:54 > 4:42:00period with more to come. All of which could have been addressed by

4:42:00 > 4:42:01the Chancellor today if the government were serious about

4:42:01 > 4:42:07tackling tax avoidance and dealing with the cost of living crisis. All

4:42:07 > 4:42:11of which risks falling down further down the government agenda as the

4:42:11 > 4:42:16Chancellor sets aside £3 billion to cover the anticipated costs of the

4:42:16 > 4:42:20Prime Minister's potential failure to secure a Brexit deal. All of

4:42:20 > 4:42:25which are further away from being addressed than ever before with

4:42:25 > 4:42:27growth, business investment and productivity forecasts all

4:42:27 > 4:42:34dramatically downgraded. Once again my constituents in Newcastle, and in

4:42:34 > 4:42:38the north-east have been failed by this budget and it has succeeded

4:42:38 > 4:42:42only in living up to the expectations of not being up to the

4:42:42 > 4:42:50job.It is a pleasure to follow the lady for Newcastle upon Tyne who

4:42:50 > 4:42:57speaks so passionately about her university town. I hope that there

4:42:57 > 4:43:00will be some businesses and people in her town who will benefit from

4:43:00 > 4:43:04the measures in the budget, particularly for example the changes

4:43:04 > 4:43:08that have been made on Universal Credit because I feel the Chancellor

4:43:08 > 4:43:14has listened and I'm sure he would welcome feedback. I think this has

4:43:14 > 4:43:19been a budget for change and I would particularly like to welcome some

4:43:19 > 4:43:26changes. For example, the additional money that has come in for the

4:43:26 > 4:43:31Brexit preparations, that is a major change for this country. £700

4:43:31 > 4:43:37million for the immediate preparations with £3 billion

4:43:37 > 4:43:41promised for the future, very important because we must try and

4:43:41 > 4:43:44create an environment where we don't have uncertainty about the economic

4:43:44 > 4:43:51impact. The money will go towards providing more certainty in that

4:43:51 > 4:43:55area. Can I welcome the ONS report accompanying the budget today which

4:43:55 > 4:44:00said that the public finances have performed better than expected. I

4:44:00 > 4:44:05think that was a welcome relief for the Chancellor. I think that the

4:44:05 > 4:44:10forecast for jobs was also to be welcomed because they estimate that

4:44:10 > 4:44:17employment will increase from 31.7 million in 2016, two dirty to buy 7

4:44:17 > 4:44:26million in 2022 -- to 2.7 million. £7 million for further education

4:44:26 > 4:44:30ologies and the increase in computer science teachers and the maths

4:44:30 > 4:44:36uplift and schools building on apprenticeships, which will help to

4:44:36 > 4:44:40equip young people for those jobs so they can take advantage of the

4:44:40 > 4:44:46growth in business. I also think that the announcement of research

4:44:46 > 4:44:49and develop that for business, especially in driverless cars will

4:44:49 > 4:44:56be of great use, not only to people who are early adopters of new

4:44:56 > 4:45:00technology but also of those people who are disabled and getting on in

4:45:00 > 4:45:05our society. I think that they will bring great innovations which will

4:45:05 > 4:45:09assist them. I mentioned in an intervention from my friend the

4:45:09 > 4:45:19member for Dover, and I welcome the vat number display provisions that

4:45:19 > 4:45:24were mentioned in the red book. I commend my constituent Richard Allen

4:45:24 > 4:45:29who I know has played a major part in providing information to the

4:45:29 > 4:45:35Treasury and assisting and improving and tightening up the law in this

4:45:35 > 4:45:41area so that people who owe money to the Exchequer are held to account.

4:45:41 > 4:45:48The National Health Service is very important in my area and I was

4:45:48 > 4:45:52pleased to see there was more money for that health service. Can I in

4:45:52 > 4:45:57particular welcome that the Chilton and Aylesbury Vale CCG bid for eight

4:45:57 > 4:46:02private community care homes I believe has been accept it and that

4:46:02 > 4:46:12will be a welcome addition to the health of my constituency. But it is

4:46:12 > 4:46:17change that worries me in this budget and therefore I have two

4:46:17 > 4:46:22turned to the national infrastructure commission report on

4:46:22 > 4:46:27Cambridge: Milton Keynes and the Oxford corridor which identifies a

4:46:27 > 4:46:31lack of housing activity putting future success at risk. The report

4:46:31 > 4:46:35emphasises a joint apology required in infrastructure and homes and

4:46:35 > 4:46:43recommends the construction of an east-west rail project, an Oxford

4:46:43 > 4:46:45Cambridge Expressway, accompanied by a massive house-building programme

4:46:45 > 4:46:51which could see as many as 150,000 houses coming into Buckinghamshire.

4:46:51 > 4:46:54I acknowledge the desperate need for affordable housing, we've all had

4:46:54 > 4:46:58people in our surgeries saying that children can't get houses in their

4:46:58 > 4:47:05area. We know that we need more and I support connectivity but the

4:47:05 > 4:47:08government should step back and see what's happening in Buckinghamshire

4:47:08 > 4:47:13so we can have a cohesive approach to the area. Admin eja Tivoli we are

4:47:13 > 4:47:18facing a potential Wii organisation of local government --

4:47:18 > 4:47:22administratively. Something may be announced before Christmas which

4:47:22 > 4:47:28means any changes would be limited before the May 2020 elections which

4:47:28 > 4:47:33would take a lot of time and effort -- would be implemented. At the same

4:47:33 > 4:47:39time there is the added burdens placed on them by HS2, which is not

4:47:39 > 4:47:47a minor project. It is causing, using up a lot of resources in the

4:47:47 > 4:47:51county. Local Enterprise Partnerships are not exactly

4:47:51 > 4:47:59streamlined, we have two. Although one has done sterling work on the

4:47:59 > 4:48:04economic plan, they are going to find that they will have to make

4:48:04 > 4:48:10some changes if the infrastructure commission's plans is accepted and

4:48:10 > 4:48:16put into action. The environment is also a very fragile in the Chilterns

4:48:16 > 4:48:28and the new proposals are for £150,000 150,000 -- 150,000 houses

4:48:28 > 4:48:31which looks to be bigger than Milton Keynes already as well as doubling

4:48:31 > 4:48:36the size of Milton Keynes. Our environment in Buckinghamshire is of

4:48:36 > 4:48:40great importance to residents and provides many people who come to the

4:48:40 > 4:48:44area of outstanding national beauty with an away since of natural beauty

4:48:44 > 4:48:48and the fact that it has received a national designation should mean it

4:48:48 > 4:48:52has been highest level of protection. The report emphasises

4:48:52 > 4:48:57connectivity and this was one of the reasons for HS2 but there is no

4:48:57 > 4:49:01connection proposed between the east-west rail link and HS2. I think

4:49:01 > 4:49:05there should be an immediate review of whether it is desirable to link

4:49:05 > 4:49:12these railways and if so, what changes would be required for HS2.

4:49:12 > 4:49:18Had the proposed route through Milton Keynes been accepted, it

4:49:18 > 4:49:21would have reduced the environmental damage in Buckinghamshire. Change

4:49:21 > 4:49:26needs to be managed and there are currently too many changes and

4:49:26 > 4:49:30initiatives coming down the track which will impact in a major way on

4:49:30 > 4:49:35the Co-op Buckinghamshire. Unless matters are coordinated I think we

4:49:35 > 4:49:40may face unsustainable burdens that do the reverse of what was intended

4:49:40 > 4:49:45by some of the welcome announcements today. I'd be grateful if the

4:49:45 > 4:49:48Chancellor could meet with me and other members of Parliament in

4:49:48 > 4:49:52Buckinghamshire to look at how we can maximise the opportunities that

4:49:52 > 4:49:58he's providing for the country and county in this budget rather than

4:49:58 > 4:50:02the local resources being swamped by a change. This is a budget for

4:50:02 > 4:50:05change but it must be managed effectively to achieve the

4:50:05 > 4:50:14beneficial outcomes that we would all like to see.Thank you for the

4:50:14 > 4:50:19opportunity to contribute to this important debate today. Although I

4:50:19 > 4:50:22think across the benches on this side of the house we have heard

4:50:22 > 4:50:29considerable pessimism, there is -- I rise to welcome the statement from

4:50:29 > 4:50:32the Chancellor today and in particular the increased investment

4:50:32 > 4:50:39across the United Kingdom which will bring an additional £660 million of

4:50:39 > 4:50:45benefit to Northern Ireland. This is much needed. It has been a difficult

4:50:45 > 4:50:51number of years. Significant budget pressures across all departments in

4:50:51 > 4:50:57Northern Ireland combined with a constructed or limited real term

4:50:57 > 4:51:01budget growth every year has led to significant challenges. Hard and

4:51:01 > 4:51:09difficult decisions have to be made and it was people and services in

4:51:09 > 4:51:12Northern Ireland that suffered. I support the principle of fiscal

4:51:12 > 4:51:19responsibility but austerity did feel punishing too many. This was

4:51:19 > 4:51:22especially acute in Northern Ireland because we were still struggling to

4:51:22 > 4:51:26emerge from decades of underinvestment due to a long period

4:51:26 > 4:51:36of violence. We were still trying to rebalance our too public sector

4:51:36 > 4:51:39reliant economy. I welcome the fiscal loosening that was outlined

4:51:39 > 4:51:44today in the budget. We would like to see further loosening in relation

4:51:44 > 4:51:54to the years ahead, especially in reference to the plight of the Waspy

4:51:54 > 4:52:02women in relation to pensions. Additional pay sector award funds

4:52:02 > 4:52:04should not come from within budgets and put pressure on front line

4:52:04 > 4:52:11services. In relation to this specific budget there is an emphasis

4:52:11 > 4:52:14in relation to the capital and in Northern Ireland we have huge

4:52:14 > 4:52:18pressures, especially in relation to education and health which requires

4:52:18 > 4:52:25revenue resource investment along with capital. I acknowledge that

4:52:25 > 4:52:28capital is very important in terms of growing the economy and investing

4:52:28 > 4:52:33in the infrastructure but it is the resource pressures that often impact

4:52:33 > 4:52:36on front line services and I hope that in the years ahead we'll

4:52:36 > 4:52:41continue to have very positive conversations in relation to easing

4:52:41 > 4:52:48on those matters. Public services, especially health, need significant

4:52:48 > 4:52:54investment to transform and become truly fit for purpose. Northern

4:52:54 > 4:52:58Ireland is in a slightly different situation to some others across the

4:52:58 > 4:53:03house in that we will have a Barnett consequential from the budget so

4:53:03 > 4:53:08there will be less ability in relation to be prioritised Asian of

4:53:08 > 4:53:16those funds and that £660 million -- prioritisation. An aspect of the

4:53:16 > 4:53:20budget will benefit Northern Ireland in a positive way, for example

4:53:20 > 4:53:26Northern Ireland is ready to play its part in the technological

4:53:26 > 4:53:30revolution to make the UK the true world leader in this area. This is

4:53:30 > 4:53:35indeed the future.

4:53:35 > 4:53:41We have very highly skilled base, and employment base, we have low

4:53:41 > 4:53:46staff turnover and we have much innovation. Our universities, such

4:53:46 > 4:53:50as Queens University in my own constituency of south Belfast, are

4:53:50 > 4:53:55prepared and determine to play a full part in this digital and tech

4:53:55 > 4:53:59revolution. I also welcome that the Budget goes some way in

4:53:59 > 4:54:06acknowledging the difficulty of the way the last two years have been in

4:54:06 > 4:54:12Northern Ireland. The addition of the pay cap and I welcome in

4:54:12 > 4:54:19relation to nurses' pay. The stamp duty exemption and increase in

4:54:19 > 4:54:22personal allowance will bring much support to those who are genuinely

4:54:22 > 4:54:26is struggling. These will apply directly in Northern Ireland. In

4:54:26 > 4:54:31conclusion, I just want to touch on the issue about the Barnett

4:54:31 > 4:54:34consequential and the decisions which need to be made in Northern

4:54:34 > 4:54:39Ireland in relation to the Budget. It grieves me that there is no

4:54:39 > 4:54:42executive in place to examine the proposals today and make those

4:54:42 > 4:54:49decisions. We need an executive to look at what is coming forward from

4:54:49 > 4:54:54this Budget, to listen to the people on the ground in Northern Ireland,

4:54:54 > 4:54:58organisations, those who benefit from public services, those whose

4:54:58 > 4:55:05businesses need to grow. We need somebody to listen and to prioritise

4:55:05 > 4:55:09into our own Northern Ireland Budget. We in the Democratic

4:55:09 > 4:55:13Unionist Party I doing everything we can to bring government back to

4:55:13 > 4:55:20Northern Ireland. But we will not and cannot be held to ransom by

4:55:20 > 4:55:23narrow and divisive cultural identity politics. This is a

4:55:23 > 4:55:27terrible situation in Northern Ireland. Although that has been much

4:55:27 > 4:55:31talk in the House today about the impact of wrecks it, in Northern

4:55:31 > 4:55:35Ireland, we are in the twilight zone. We have a senior civil

4:55:35 > 4:55:40servants in charge of departments, with no accountability, because we

4:55:40 > 4:55:46neither have direct rule ministers or local ministers. There is no

4:55:46 > 4:55:48constitutional democratic accountability in Northern Ireland

4:55:48 > 4:55:53for public spend and there hasn't been for ten months. This is an

4:55:53 > 4:55:58appalling situation, and I urge the Government to step in and do

4:55:58 > 4:56:02everything you can to either support the Executive in terms of getting

4:56:02 > 4:56:06re-established, or bring in direct rule ministers, because this

4:56:06 > 4:56:13democratic accountability cannot continue.

4:56:13 > 4:56:19Which she perhaps agree with some suggestions that may be the MLAs pay

4:56:19 > 4:56:21should be suspended until they managed to get together and form the

4:56:21 > 4:56:27Executive?I have only three minutes left so I will not get into that

4:56:27 > 4:56:32specific issue. Only to say that many MLAs across Northern Ireland

4:56:32 > 4:56:36are working hard to try and restore government in Northern Ireland, and

4:56:36 > 4:56:41to work to deliver to people in very, very difficult circumstances.

4:56:41 > 4:56:46The entire of Northern Ireland are being held to ransom. It is health

4:56:46 > 4:56:50and education which is being held to ransom. This is all the more

4:56:50 > 4:56:54important in relation to Brexit. I welcome the investment in terms of

4:56:54 > 4:56:58the Budget today, in terms of ensuring a sensible and positive

4:56:58 > 4:57:03Brexit. That will require investment. That is particularly

4:57:03 > 4:57:07important in Northern Ireland. However, again, because of the lack

4:57:07 > 4:57:10of a Northern Ireland Executive, it is incredibly difficult to be making

4:57:10 > 4:57:17our case and ensuring we get the best possible position to Northern

4:57:17 > 4:57:19Ireland. There has been a lot of nonsense spoken about this issue in

4:57:19 > 4:57:24recent days, and in fact, in the Republic of Ireland, almost hysteria

4:57:24 > 4:57:28has been whipped up in relation to this. It is vitally important in

4:57:28 > 4:57:33terms of the economy, and in terms of the report today, things will be

4:57:33 > 4:57:37challenging in terms of growth, things will be challenging in terms

4:57:37 > 4:57:41of productivity, but we are absolutely keen, we are absolutely

4:57:41 > 4:57:45there to fight the Northern Ireland through all of this and get the best

4:57:45 > 4:57:51possible deal in relation to Brexit. In conclusion, it is a disgrace that

4:57:51 > 4:57:55there is no finance committee sitting in place to examine this

4:57:55 > 4:57:59Budget. It is a disgrace that there are no ministers to make decisions.

4:57:59 > 4:58:02It is the people on the ground who are suffering and they are suffering

4:58:02 > 4:58:09because Sinn Fein are refusing to go back into government. Today, and I

4:58:09 > 4:58:13was astounded by this, our finance minister, who is currently not in

4:58:13 > 4:58:16place, instead of examining this Budget, instead of bringing forward

4:58:16 > 4:58:20proposals, and we should have at this time in Northern Ireland, a

4:58:20 > 4:58:23Budget being brought forward for the Northern Ireland Assembly for next

4:58:23 > 4:58:32year, instead of doing that, what is he doing today? He is standing

4:58:32 > 4:58:35outside Queens University at a student protest. That is a disgrace.

4:58:35 > 4:58:44People are suffering. I welcome the Budget statement today. We will

4:58:44 > 4:58:48continue to work in Northern Ireland to ensure there is the best deal.

4:58:48 > 4:58:52This is a bad solution. The Government needs to work with us to

4:58:52 > 4:58:58find solutions and deliver across all communities in Northern Ireland.

4:58:58 > 4:59:02Thank you, Mr Speaker. It is a particular pleasure to follow the

4:59:02 > 4:59:06honourable member for Belfast South. Michael, I want to see a devolved

4:59:06 > 4:59:12government making decisions again and then examined around Northern

4:59:12 > 4:59:19Ireland -- like her, I want to see a devolved government. It is

4:59:19 > 4:59:23unacceptable and it is right to be moved forward. She is right to make

4:59:23 > 4:59:30our observations about the roles one or two other parties have made who

4:59:30 > 4:59:41are not here. With that, I go on to welcoming the Budget, and also the

4:59:41 > 4:59:46general tenet that it set going out. I want to look at particularly what

4:59:46 > 4:59:50it means for those living in my own constituency. That means starting

4:59:50 > 4:59:54with the impact that raising the basic allowance will have for many

4:59:54 > 4:59:59families. It is hard to think that not that long ago, someone earning

4:59:59 > 5:00:03less than £7,000 the year would be deemed to be earning enough to pay

5:00:03 > 5:00:08income tax. Now the threshold is heading up to £11,800, it means

5:00:08 > 5:00:16those on low pay keeping more of what they are earning. And also the

5:00:16 > 5:00:20freezing fuel duty as well, that makes a difference for those on low

5:00:20 > 5:00:24incomes for him transport will be an increasing cost. It is not just

5:00:24 > 5:00:29those who are car drivers, it is those who use all forms of transport

5:00:29 > 5:00:36which rely on fuel. It is very welcome to see this. I am conscious,

5:00:36 > 5:00:39given my PPS role, I have to restrict some of what I say around

5:00:39 > 5:00:42the housing element, but it is absolutely right that we welcome the

5:00:42 > 5:00:47huge amount that has been done and has been announced today. Certainly

5:00:47 > 5:00:50getting towards 300,000 homes a year would be a great achievement and

5:00:50 > 5:00:54would make a real difference. Certainly, it is they welcome to see

5:00:54 > 5:01:02some of the reviews that will be launched particularly looking at

5:01:02 > 5:01:04some of the issues in the planning system. And I certainly welcome the

5:01:04 > 5:01:07change on stamp duty. That tax change will make it easier for many

5:01:07 > 5:01:11first-time buyers. When I bought my first home, one of the nasty

5:01:11 > 5:01:14surprises you get is you think you have got the money together to

5:01:14 > 5:01:18purchase the property, you have your deposit and then you are presented

5:01:18 > 5:01:22with a lovely bill of several thousand pounds which you have to

5:01:22 > 5:01:24pay almost immediately, putting instant pressure on those who have

5:01:24 > 5:01:29already had to save for a higher deposit. I have heard some of the

5:01:29 > 5:01:41complaints from those opposite. If they feel that way there will be a

5:01:41 > 5:01:44chance to divide the House and a chance for them to tell the

5:01:44 > 5:01:46constituents why they have opposed this change, why they will tell

5:01:46 > 5:01:49first-time buyers that they do not think it is the right idea. It is a

5:01:49 > 5:01:52bit strange to spend the afternoon in the House of Commons complaining

5:01:52 > 5:01:54about something and then to go away and support it. It will make a

5:01:54 > 5:01:59difference to first-time buyers in Torbay. Given the age demographic of

5:01:59 > 5:02:03the population in the bay it is welcome to hear about funding and

5:02:03 > 5:02:08the extra money for winter pressures. I hope that can be used

5:02:08 > 5:02:12particularly around parts of A&E and also looking at some of the

5:02:12 > 5:02:16pressures in each area which are created by its demographics. Torbay

5:02:16 > 5:02:20is very much driven by an older population. Other areas will have

5:02:20 > 5:02:24different challenges which require funding to be put in. There is an

5:02:24 > 5:02:27ongoing discussion about social care, but I think it is right to say

5:02:27 > 5:02:31that will never be resolved in just one Budget. That is something which

5:02:31 > 5:02:35needs to be part of a long-term discussion, probably on a

5:02:35 > 5:02:38cross-party basis to provide a solution, as it is something that no

5:02:38 > 5:02:49one parliament will be able to

5:02:51 > 5:02:54resolve in a way that will give confidence to the public going

5:02:54 > 5:02:56forward. The effort is an -- the effort to increase productivity is

5:02:56 > 5:02:59welcome. I can see that the investment on the link road has

5:02:59 > 5:03:02helped people getting between the Newton Abbot and Torquay. It shows

5:03:02 > 5:03:05the difference in the structure investment can have I hope we will

5:03:05 > 5:03:08see more of that, particularly with the 8 billion productivity

5:03:08 > 5:03:17investment fund being announced. Would he not share my disappointment

5:03:17 > 5:03:20at the paltry recognition of the south-west that we're seeing today's

5:03:20 > 5:03:25Budget? It does not even warrant a headline in the red book. What does

5:03:25 > 5:03:35this say about this government's hole approach to the economy?I

5:03:35 > 5:03:43thank the member for Bristol South's intervention. I can just say two

5:03:43 > 5:03:50words: Stonehenge tunnel. Decades have been wasted on that. I will be

5:03:50 > 5:03:54judging this government on what it does, not what it spends. Moving

5:03:54 > 5:03:58back to the point, I also welcome the 2.3 billion which will be going

5:03:58 > 5:04:02into research and development and I hope that will include in the long

5:04:02 > 5:04:07run, having ended is to to to technology based around the South

5:04:07 > 5:04:09Devon College in Paignton, delivering some of the highest

5:04:09 > 5:04:14levels of skills training in our local community. Torbay is famous

5:04:14 > 5:04:20for its beaches and tourism industry, but also has a vibrant the

5:04:20 > 5:04:24tonics industry which needs more people with skills and also knowing

5:04:24 > 5:04:27that their training will be the high scale will make it more likely that

5:04:27 > 5:04:32they would wish to come and invest in our area and grow and expand and

5:04:32 > 5:04:36give local people those opportunities. I know it is a baby

5:04:36 > 5:04:42that is going in, literally as we speak, and I think it very welcome.

5:04:42 > 5:04:47Turning to other issues in the bay, there are some problems when it

5:04:47 > 5:04:51comes around alcohol and substance abuse. Therefore it is welcome to

5:04:51 > 5:04:55hear the Chancellor's comments around certain super-strength

5:04:55 > 5:04:59ciders. Certainly, there are issues on preloading which affect our

5:04:59 > 5:05:03night-time economy, and many of those are connected to side which is

5:05:03 > 5:05:07cheaper than mineral water but has a strength far stronger than most

5:05:07 > 5:05:11other things on the market. I think it is right, they approach the

5:05:11 > 5:05:16Chancellor is making on it. It will be interesting to see what comes out

5:05:16 > 5:05:20of Scotland and what happens there. I have to say I'm not at the moment

5:05:20 > 5:05:23persuaded by the arguments on minimum pricing but it will be

5:05:23 > 5:05:26interesting to see the difference that is made in Scotland, and

5:05:26 > 5:05:30something that can be learned from in future. It is it works, we'll

5:05:30 > 5:05:35have an example, and if it doesn't, the other way round, we will have an

5:05:35 > 5:05:37example. Also welcomed the announcement is around Universal

5:05:37 > 5:05:41Credit and the changes being made there. It will be lamented in Torbay

5:05:41 > 5:05:46and rolled out a full service in May 2018 and some of the changes being

5:05:46 > 5:05:49made a very welcome. I will look forward to hearing the statement

5:05:49 > 5:05:53tomorrow to get some more detail on that, but I think again it is good

5:05:53 > 5:06:03to know that the Government has listened, particularly to some of

5:06:03 > 5:06:05the comments that were made in last Thursday's debate in the Chamber.

5:06:05 > 5:06:08Torbay is famous as well for many small businesses and therefore, no

5:06:08 > 5:06:10change to the VAT threshold is something that people will welcome,

5:06:10 > 5:06:17and keeps many small businesses going and I also welcome the action

5:06:17 > 5:06:22to crack down on online tax avoidance. That is a key issue

5:06:22 > 5:06:26because it does not make any sense that you can avoid tax if you have a

5:06:26 > 5:06:30very large website. If you have a small business based in a shopping

5:06:30 > 5:06:35centre in Torbay, there is little you can do to avoid it. Again, it is

5:06:35 > 5:06:38welcome. And given some of the comments we have had today, if some

5:06:38 > 5:06:49of these things were so easy to deal with, why weren't they in the past?

5:06:49 > 5:06:52It is welcome to see the change. It was a cross-party spirit in the

5:06:52 > 5:06:54Public Accounts Committee, and some of the rhetoric we are hearing in

5:06:54 > 5:06:57this chamber does not really fit with some people's records in terms

5:06:57 > 5:07:02of dealing with these areas. A final one, having spent the weekend

5:07:02 > 5:07:07talking with Daniel Maddox who is campaigning around the issue of

5:07:07 > 5:07:12potholes, it is always good to see the reference in the red book to the

5:07:12 > 5:07:1645 million to dealing with them. Although it might be minor compared

5:07:16 > 5:07:20with building a new tunnel around Stonehenge or delivering a major

5:07:20 > 5:07:23piece of infrastructure, but it is the sort of thing that annoys those

5:07:23 > 5:07:28who pay their taxes and want to see a service in return. I do think this

5:07:28 > 5:07:32is a welcome Budget. It will help people which their aspirations. It

5:07:32 > 5:07:36will help people buy their home and it is a Budget which will help

5:07:36 > 5:07:39Britain move forward and have technology industries and a vibrant

5:07:39 > 5:07:51private sector as we approach Brexit.

5:08:02 > 5:08:04That is a welcome Budget. It is a Budget which will make Britain fit

5:08:04 > 5:08:07for the future and it should be supported by this House.Before I

5:08:07 > 5:08:10start I want to pay tribute to a working-class hero whose funeral is

5:08:10 > 5:08:12place today, Derek Robinson who said I can sleep sound at night because I

5:08:12 > 5:08:17never betray workers. Mr Speaker, Cabinet source is quoted as saying

5:08:17 > 5:08:22this Budget had the worst build-up in history. I don't think he was

5:08:22 > 5:08:26wrong. Members on the opposite bench have gone bananas about the Budget

5:08:26 > 5:08:30ahead of today. What is clear to me if this Budget caps off seven years

5:08:30 > 5:08:34of abject failure, first by the coalition and now by the

5:08:34 > 5:08:41Conservative minority government.

5:08:41 > 5:08:45Contrary to the warm words we have heard from the opposite benches,

5:08:45 > 5:08:49this budget has proved that the Government is out of touch, has no

5:08:49 > 5:08:53idea about the lives of ordinary people and certainly no plans of

5:08:53 > 5:08:59improvement. What we are seeing here is an irrational ideology, actually

5:08:59 > 5:09:04tromping plain common sense.They are driven by a neoliberal ideology

5:09:04 > 5:09:08which has proven that they are certainly not a Government for the

5:09:08 > 5:09:14many. I have to say, Mr Speaker, where the help of world War paid

5:09:14 > 5:09:18workers. The measures that the Chancellor is announced on the

5:09:18 > 5:09:21Universal Credit were absolutely pathetic and it's also worth noting

5:09:21 > 5:09:25that the don't come into effect before Christmas either, so people

5:09:25 > 5:09:29will be left penniless over the Christmas period. Will is the

5:09:29 > 5:09:35support for public sector workers? Public sector workers, the defending

5:09:35 > 5:09:39a decent society. I didn't hear any Member -- mention of support for

5:09:39 > 5:09:45them. Wood is the significant support for the infrastructure this

5:09:45 > 5:09:49country desperately needs. Where is the best for health and education

5:09:49 > 5:09:54and local Government? Social care is an absolute crisis. Support for

5:09:54 > 5:09:57vulnerable children is another area and dictators. We have the

5:09:57 > 5:10:01Chancellor say he is good to make money available for fire safety, but

5:10:01 > 5:10:05when local authorities have approached the Government for

5:10:05 > 5:10:09support with installing, retrofitting sprinklers, that

5:10:09 > 5:10:14support has been refused. The IMS have estimated that local Government

5:10:14 > 5:10:23funding will fall by 79% by 2020. Ahead of this budget, the NHS chief

5:10:23 > 5:10:28executive warned that without funding, waiting lists will claim

5:10:28 > 5:10:33further, the 5 million, and the 18 week target will be scrapped. The

5:10:33 > 5:10:40key targets such as 62 day cancer treatment targets, will be missed

5:10:40 > 5:10:42and the extra money that has been announced will not tackle that

5:10:42 > 5:10:51crisis. Last year, we saw 40%, a 40% cut in the adult skills budget.

5:10:51 > 5:10:57Meaning that 1.3 million less adult learners as a consequence of that.

5:10:57 > 5:11:02We said that the -- we have the chance see he said he wanted the two

5:11:02 > 5:11:05make the dream of home ownership a reality. With a cynical punter will

5:11:05 > 5:11:12all mimic -- working-class people to buy their own home? Where's the

5:11:12 > 5:11:15house-building programme? The former Chancellor promised that austerity

5:11:15 > 5:11:21would wipe out the deficit, well, we certainly haven't achieved that. The

5:11:21 > 5:11:25failure to do that means that hostility has permitted to nothing

5:11:25 > 5:11:30more than conscious cruelty. They have failed to eliminate the debt as

5:11:30 > 5:11:35well and this Chancellor today said that it is peaking. It seems to me

5:11:35 > 5:11:41that all he is doing is fiddling while Britain burns. Fiddling around

5:11:41 > 5:11:45with the housing association, taking that off the balance sheet, that is

5:11:45 > 5:11:50nothing more than the tragedy. We have seen a spectacular failure by

5:11:50 > 5:11:53this Government on any measure in relation to the debts and the

5:11:53 > 5:11:59deficit. It's a case of rearranging the deck chairs in the range to the

5:11:59 > 5:12:03debt. I wonder whether the Chancellor made to have a new job as

5:12:03 > 5:12:08a deckchair attendant on debating beach when he sacked from this

5:12:08 > 5:12:12place. He has gone on to say that there are more jobs than ever but

5:12:12 > 5:12:20the problem is that after seven years of hostility, probable --

5:12:20 > 5:12:26productivity, the productivity forecast has been wrong and causing

5:12:26 > 5:12:30them to significantly downgraded protections. -- projections.

5:12:30 > 5:12:34Businesses are simply not investing because they lack confidence in the

5:12:34 > 5:12:39economy. The Tory ideology is wrong, the doctrine that Daniel Lubbers --

5:12:39 > 5:12:42neoliberalism says that the state should be rolled back but it is

5:12:42 > 5:12:51clear we need an entrepreneurial state. I wonder if my colleagues the

5:12:51 > 5:12:55lies that the Government has been indulging in wilful sabotaging of

5:12:55 > 5:13:05the economy, the adult skills budget last year. That has resulted in an

5:13:05 > 5:13:101.23 million fewer adult learners. Little wonder that the forecasts are

5:13:10 > 5:13:18so anaemic for the dues: forward. The previous Chancellor also said

5:13:18 > 5:13:21that he wouldn't balance the books on the backs of the power but that

5:13:21 > 5:13:25is precisely what the Government has done, with £12 billion more in

5:13:25 > 5:13:30social security cuts for working age people in the pipeline. The NHS

5:13:30 > 5:13:35waiting lists, as we've heard, are going to increase and the extra

5:13:35 > 5:13:40funding for the NHS will simply not actually tank all that very real

5:13:40 > 5:13:46problem. We've also seen a skewed level of investment and a different

5:13:46 > 5:13:50region, we have the wooded spectacle of investment on real in my region

5:13:50 > 5:13:56of the East Midlands running at £91 per head, whereas in London is

5:13:56 > 5:14:00running at £746 per head. We need a different approach. It doesn't have

5:14:00 > 5:14:03to be like this, Mr Speaker. Labour would operate a different approach.

5:14:03 > 5:14:09We would enter public sector pick-up, pause fixing of the

5:14:09 > 5:14:13Universal Credit to and he was a real weapon which, bring in an

5:14:13 > 5:14:18energy price cap, bring forward infrastructure development in every

5:14:18 > 5:14:24place in the country, studying ways to -- large-scale house-building

5:14:24 > 5:14:29programme and also have controls over rent, scrap tuition fees and

5:14:29 > 5:14:32stop penalising people for getting a higher education, reverse the tax

5:14:32 > 5:14:37cuts tip corporations and the super-rich and content on the

5:14:37 > 5:14:41disgraceful industrial scale tax avoidance that takes place in this

5:14:41 > 5:14:44country and rejected the toady's Brexit cliff edge and the race to

5:14:44 > 5:14:50the bottom that will turn Britain into a deregulated tax haven. The

5:14:50 > 5:14:53Chancellor claimed that he was embracing the future but the truth

5:14:53 > 5:14:59is this Government is stuck in a Thatcherite past. Its dogmatic in

5:14:59 > 5:15:02its commitment to neoliberalism, despite the fact that it is not

5:15:02 > 5:15:06working. Government administered will remember, no doubt, from the

5:15:06 > 5:15:10ideological training in the public schools and elite universities that

5:15:10 > 5:15:15the market is supposed to treat wealth as an invisible hand, it's as

5:15:15 > 5:15:19if the Tories believe in ghosts. This budget shows that they still

5:15:19 > 5:15:24believe in the invisible hand of the market, but in reality no such thing

5:15:24 > 5:15:30exists. They are deluding themselves, pointy by ideology. What

5:15:30 > 5:15:33Britain needs is a stealing hand of an entrepreneurial state. What

5:15:33 > 5:15:37Britain needs can Mr Speaker, as a Labour Government that will provide

5:15:37 > 5:15:46it. Rachel McLean.Thank you very much Mr Speaker and it's a great

5:15:46 > 5:15:50privilege to fall all of the Honourable members. As the Member of

5:15:50 > 5:15:59-- I will take issue with the Member for Derby North, on red Robbo, who

5:15:59 > 5:16:07know from my campaigning. I was sure the Honourable Member that a number

5:16:07 > 5:16:12of supporters swore that he would -- they would never support level again

5:16:12 > 5:16:17after what he said about destroying the industry. It's a great privilege

5:16:17 > 5:16:20for me to speak in this budget debate is a new Member of Parliament

5:16:20 > 5:16:25for the very first time and I really do welcome this budget Mr Speaker --

5:16:25 > 5:16:29and welcome this budget, Mr Speaker. We on the site are always aware it

5:16:29 > 5:16:34is not Government money that is being spent, it is people's money.

5:16:34 > 5:16:39Taxes must be raised and the question is how. We have just heard

5:16:39 > 5:16:44from the Honourable Member op. Cit., who is flooding the Communist party

5:16:44 > 5:16:50plans. It's a stark choice. I did not hear the Leader of the

5:16:50 > 5:16:52Opposition, in his response to my Right Honourable Friend the

5:16:52 > 5:16:57Chancellor explain how he would fund anything that he proposes. Our

5:16:57 > 5:17:02plans, in contrast, are well thought out. We understand the business is

5:17:02 > 5:17:08and what is needed to support them. That is why the Federation of Small

5:17:08 > 5:17:10Businesses welcomes the budget announced today and we made a choice

5:17:10 > 5:17:19today between raising taxes on private jets, which we are doing and

5:17:19 > 5:17:24rewarding them for young people try to buy their first House. I was an

5:17:24 > 5:17:30entrepreneur for a 25 years before I came into this place and, as my

5:17:30 > 5:17:32Right Honourable Friend says, the understand how difficult it is to

5:17:32 > 5:17:37get a small buses off the ground. I understand that, I have lived and

5:17:37 > 5:17:42produced it. I am delighted to see measures which are backing

5:17:42 > 5:17:47entrepreneurial activity in this country. Measures have already

5:17:47 > 5:17:52created 197,000 jobs in our area since 2010. In my constituency of

5:17:52 > 5:17:56Redditch, we have seen 275 new businesses being created, testament

5:17:56 > 5:18:03to the spirit, the innovative spirit of the people in my constituency.

5:18:03 > 5:18:09Until it also that we have seen 6310 new apprenticeships and these are

5:18:09 > 5:18:13good jobs. We are on the side of working people and the Chancellor

5:18:13 > 5:18:19today is going further by bringing an Apis for ordinary working people

5:18:19 > 5:18:28on the basic rate of tax of £1075. This makes people better off. I

5:18:28 > 5:18:33welcome this budget. This is a budget which advances country and

5:18:33 > 5:18:36does not proceed as the members op. Cit., some of them, would want to

5:18:36 > 5:18:42do. In the words of Robert Peel, he talked about we must make a choice

5:18:42 > 5:18:45between advancing or receding. He understood the trade and that is

5:18:45 > 5:18:51where we are going on the side of the House. What we have seen, Mr

5:18:51 > 5:18:55Speaker, we have seen corporation tax receipts up by 20 billion since

5:18:55 > 5:19:022010. We have seen 5.5 million more small businesses and think how many

5:19:02 > 5:19:06more schools and hospitals can be funded by this type of tax receipt

5:19:06 > 5:19:10that is coming into the tragedy. These are the business rates, that

5:19:10 > 5:19:14is why I welcome the announcement today from the Chancellor to remove

5:19:14 > 5:19:19staircase tax and reform of business rates relief. What they would do is

5:19:19 > 5:19:25borrow more and they totally lacked any coherent narrative. What we have

5:19:25 > 5:19:31done as we saw borrowing, when we came into Government that 73.2

5:19:31 > 5:19:396,000,000,020 ten. That was 3.8% of GDP. Now it's ten to 49 billion,

5:19:39 > 5:19:42which is 2.4% of GDP and the Chancellor has said that how it will

5:19:42 > 5:19:48fall further. My constituency and Redditch will welcome that sensible

5:19:48 > 5:19:52approach to managing the economy. We know that boardroom war does not

5:19:52 > 5:19:56work. We have already tried that experiment. It crashed the

5:19:56 > 5:19:59experiment and it was order working people like my constituents in

5:19:59 > 5:20:05Redditch that paid the price. I welcome the Chancellor 's focus on

5:20:05 > 5:20:10the Midlands engine and as a Midlands MP myself, I have seen for

5:20:10 > 5:20:14myself the higher work -- hard work that went into the devolution deal

5:20:14 > 5:20:18which will benefit others in Redditch as well. Make no mistake, I

5:20:18 > 5:20:22will also be bending the Chancellor 's year of further to make sure that

5:20:22 > 5:20:25Redditch benefits from this, with measures like an Institute of

5:20:25 > 5:20:29technology for Redditch to harness the skills and make a Redditch call

5:20:29 > 5:20:36further and also an express train from the Redditch to Birmingham. I

5:20:36 > 5:20:38recognise that the restore productivity gap between diligent in

5:20:38 > 5:20:41our country and between cities and towns outside and inside our cities,

5:20:41 > 5:20:45for example, Redditch. That is why I welcome the productivity fund and

5:20:45 > 5:20:50the increase in RND and that has been welcomed by the Royal Society

5:20:50 > 5:20:54as well who say that this shows the Government is focused on the UK's

5:20:54 > 5:20:58technological future and the crucial pipeline of skills necessary to make

5:20:58 > 5:21:02sure we are at the forefront of the technological revolution. And so I

5:21:02 > 5:21:11am delighted also that we have seen more technical business started, and

5:21:11 > 5:21:17the Chancellor wants to see more, more every hour, and as a former

5:21:17 > 5:21:24tech business myself, I will welcome this. I mention the taxes that we

5:21:24 > 5:21:27have already raised in this Government and we will continue to

5:21:27 > 5:21:31lose through the budget measures. I am very delighted to see that the

5:21:31 > 5:21:36taxes are going into our hospitals. £10 billion for the NHS and of

5:21:36 > 5:21:40course the Chancellor will not be supplied that I will be lobbying him

5:21:40 > 5:21:43and his Right Honourable Friend the Secretary of State for Health for

5:21:43 > 5:21:47more money to the hospital in my constituency. We have seen funds

5:21:47 > 5:21:51pledged the old lady and I am guided to see that underpinned the day. I

5:21:51 > 5:22:02want to see that also going to fund the winter pressures and I have been

5:22:02 > 5:22:04award being quite strenuously for that. Young families in Redditch

5:22:04 > 5:22:06will welcome the measures on housing. I have received an e-mail

5:22:06 > 5:22:09from a constituent, Mr Andrew Bolt, who is currently buying a small

5:22:09 > 5:22:15House. He is due to save 200 and 80p, handy just before Christmas.

5:22:15 > 5:22:19Some people are absolutely delighted about the measures, so I am quite

5:22:19 > 5:22:23shocked by some of the negativity I have heard on the other side. We

5:22:23 > 5:22:28should be getting an outward looking vision of country from beyond the

5:22:28 > 5:22:32four walls of this House to the outside world and so I will just

5:22:32 > 5:22:36finished, again, when I was listening to the words of my Right

5:22:36 > 5:22:39Honourable Friend to deliver his budget, I was struck once again by

5:22:39 > 5:22:44the presence of the world dislike the words of Robert Peel, we face a

5:22:44 > 5:22:47choice between shaping the future or retreating into the past. The choice

5:22:47 > 5:22:54between an open and innovative society or a closed, narrowed one.

5:22:54 > 5:22:58We -- me on these benches make our choice. A country welcoming change,

5:22:58 > 5:23:01welcoming the future and so therefore I welcome this budget.

5:23:06 > 5:23:11I always think it is worth trying to find a few small mercies at the

5:23:11 > 5:23:14beginning of a Budget analysis. The Chancellor has gone to the trouble

5:23:14 > 5:23:21of an hour-long speech and there have got to be a few things. There

5:23:21 > 5:23:26are some mitigating changes for the impact of Universal Credit but there

5:23:26 > 5:23:32are still many worries for our constituents and the impact on the

5:23:32 > 5:23:36severely disabled, for example. I'm glad there were some changes that

5:23:36 > 5:23:40might help with housing, although talking to my City Council in

5:23:40 > 5:23:45Nottingham, they have concerns that many of the announcements are to be

5:23:45 > 5:23:49competitively bid for funds that the housing revenue account cap

5:23:49 > 5:23:53relaxation may be only for areas of high demand, so it is not clear that

5:23:53 > 5:24:00will necessarily help cities outside London. And of course we remain with

5:24:00 > 5:24:04a 70% discount on council house sales, so even if they do build more

5:24:04 > 5:24:08stock, there is of course the opportunity that it will be depleted

5:24:08 > 5:24:13very quickly. I was particularly disappointed the Chancellor didn't

5:24:13 > 5:24:19mention social care at all in his speech. It beggars belief, really,

5:24:19 > 5:24:25that we had some discussion about the NHS, but the big issue that is

5:24:25 > 5:24:30strategically a block for many of the problems we have within the NHS,

5:24:30 > 5:24:34social -- social care was just disregarded and I believe we need to

5:24:34 > 5:24:38mention that in future days. If I was to step back and think

5:24:38 > 5:24:43strategically, what is the story of this Budget, I think it is the very

5:24:43 > 5:24:47start and depressing statistics in the figures contained in the

5:24:47 > 5:24:52Treasury Redbook. An enormous downgrade of economic growth.

5:24:52 > 5:24:58Dreadful figures from all over the years from here on in. We're waving

5:24:58 > 5:25:02goodbye to 2% levels of growth because it is below those levels now

5:25:02 > 5:25:07henceforth. A big downgrade in productivity, the biggest, in fact,

5:25:07 > 5:25:12since the office of the budget responsibility was created. And a

5:25:12 > 5:25:17big broken promise when it comes to the deficit. Stretching now, as it

5:25:17 > 5:25:23does, until 2022 and beyond. The promise of that budget surplus seems

5:25:23 > 5:25:28to have gone. Why is this the case? It is fundamentally because the dark

5:25:28 > 5:25:34clouds and the cold wind of Brexit are looming large, and they are

5:25:34 > 5:25:40already being felt. And any analysis of our economic outlook or our

5:25:40 > 5:25:47fiscal prospects cannot possibly ignore this Brexit question. As I

5:25:47 > 5:25:53say, I think the impact is being felt on business investment because

5:25:53 > 5:25:58the uncertainty about trade and tariffs is holding back firms from

5:25:58 > 5:26:03putting money into things that would otherwise help create productivity.

5:26:03 > 5:26:08And that lack of productivity has fed into this growth downgrade,

5:26:08 > 5:26:15which in turn has created a big hole in forecasts of Treasury revenues,

5:26:15 > 5:26:19which we vitally need to pay for schools, hospitals and transport

5:26:19 > 5:26:24schemes, all of those vital public services that we have. When the Bank

5:26:24 > 5:26:30of England surveys on their decision panel further prospects of

5:26:30 > 5:26:34investment, they are getting worse and worse quarter after quarter, of

5:26:34 > 5:26:38the quarter, looking into the future, we can see the negative

5:26:38 > 5:26:41effect that the clouds of Brexit are having on our business investment

5:26:41 > 5:26:46and productivity. When you look at the impact of the devaluation of

5:26:46 > 5:26:55sterling compared to the exchange rate index, 17.5% lower than its

5:26:55 > 5:26:58peak in 2015, that has hit all of our constituents in their pockets to

5:26:58 > 5:27:05a significant degree. It is estimated around £600 per household

5:27:05 > 5:27:10already now hitting households in terms of reduction in real available

5:27:10 > 5:27:15income that they have at their disposal. We still have no idea

5:27:15 > 5:27:20about a transitional status for what might happen after that fabled cliff

5:27:20 > 5:27:26edge in 2019, and therefore the impact of uncertainty is likely to

5:27:26 > 5:27:31cast that shadow for very many years to come. Hopefully we will have some

5:27:31 > 5:27:35resolution at the European Council meeting before Christmas. But it

5:27:35 > 5:27:40seems to be quite a tall order. And when you look at perhaps the biggest

5:27:40 > 5:27:48issue, the money, the fiscal impact, the £3 billion committed for Brexit

5:27:48 > 5:27:50preparations, what a waste of resources when this is money that

5:27:50 > 5:27:54should have been invested in the health service, in our schools and

5:27:54 > 5:27:59in our public services. In fact, in 2019 more money is committed to

5:27:59 > 5:28:03Brexit preparations than was committed for extra result of the

5:28:03 > 5:28:07NHS. I think that if anything sums up the dysfunction of this whole

5:28:07 > 5:28:13scenario that we are faced with and I think that statistic does that.

5:28:13 > 5:28:17This is all before the massive divorce bill, of course, that is

5:28:17 > 5:28:24supposed to come. It wasn't the 350 pounds a week on the side of the

5:28:24 > 5:28:30bus. For the NHS! That is long on! Potentially £67 billion of a divorce

5:28:30 > 5:28:40Bill. -- that is long gone. That is two years of a budget deficit bill.

5:28:40 > 5:28:47It is on page 17 of the Treasury's Redbook, where I think we really get

5:28:47 > 5:28:50that triple whammy, that real kick about the impact Brexit will be

5:28:50 > 5:28:55having on our public services, because it is an enormous downgrade

5:28:55 > 5:29:02in revenues. If you look at that table, Mr Speaker, you will see that

5:29:02 > 5:29:13in 2019, eight billion fewer receipts forecast in 2020, in 2021

5:29:13 > 5:29:17even more. These are enormous figures and they really ought to be

5:29:17 > 5:29:20a wake-up call for all Members of Parliament, certainly for the

5:29:20 > 5:29:24government, but for all members, because this is a fate that does not

5:29:24 > 5:29:30need to be set in stone. This is a situation that can still be avoided.

5:29:30 > 5:29:37We know, of course, that the people who were in voting leave saying,

5:29:37 > 5:29:42this is all done and dusted, Brexit will take us over the cliff, there

5:29:42 > 5:29:46are choices that we in Britain can make, and I would say to my

5:29:46 > 5:29:52honourable friends, as much to the Government, it is our responsibility

5:29:52 > 5:29:56to avoid the Brexit austerity that is likely to cast a shadow over the

5:29:56 > 5:29:59decade ahead, because this austerity is something that will be the

5:29:59 > 5:30:05responsibility of all of us unless we opt to remain in the single

5:30:05 > 5:30:09market and remain in the customs union, to retain that tariff-free

5:30:09 > 5:30:13trade that we have with our nearest neighbours in order to avoid these

5:30:13 > 5:30:21problems. I give way.I've just looked at page 17 of the Redbook and

5:30:21 > 5:30:26the table he refers to. 1.2. That shows the deficit going down from

5:30:26 > 5:30:3958.3 billion to... That is the receipts forecast, not indicating a

5:30:39 > 5:30:44reduction because of Brexit.It is a reduction in receipts. He will see

5:30:44 > 5:30:51the budget deficit was forecast in spring to be £16 billion in 2021. In

5:30:51 > 5:30:57this Budget it is predicted to be 33. The level of borrowing is

5:30:57 > 5:31:00predicted to go up very significantly, largely driven by the

5:31:00 > 5:31:08fall in that 20 billion of receipts. I think the figures are quite clear.

5:31:08 > 5:31:12The government might say, well, we don't need to take it from public

5:31:12 > 5:31:15services now, we will add it to borrowing, but that will be added

5:31:15 > 5:31:20onto the debt interest and have to be paid. But my suspicion is that

5:31:20 > 5:31:23this will involve more fiscal tightening and more austerity

5:31:23 > 5:31:27towards the tail end of these years ahead. And when you add up the

5:31:27 > 5:31:32wasted money on Brexit preparation, when you add the extra money of the

5:31:32 > 5:31:37divorce Bill, when you look at the level of receipts that are falling,

5:31:37 > 5:31:40because of low productivity, because of lower growth forecasts, which in

5:31:40 > 5:31:46turn are driven by that dark cloud of Brexit, this is the real story of

5:31:46 > 5:31:51the Budget. It needn't be the fate of this country, though, if we take

5:31:51 > 5:31:56decisions, and I urge all honourable members - let's not be responsible

5:31:56 > 5:32:00for this level of austerity in the future. We need a different fate and

5:32:00 > 5:32:04we need to make sure we intervene and retain that single market and

5:32:04 > 5:32:10Customs union membership.I'm sorry I haven't been in for the whole of

5:32:10 > 5:32:14the debate. I've been at the exiting the European Union Select Committee

5:32:14 > 5:32:20debating one of our reports, and we have been firmly exercising split

5:32:20 > 5:32:24infinitive and making sure apostrophes are in the right place,

5:32:24 > 5:32:28and all those important matters, but it took me away from the chamber. It

5:32:28 > 5:32:34is a pleasure to follow the honourable member, the council of

5:32:34 > 5:32:41Dublin East. But we often disagree quite firmly. -- of Nottingham East.

5:32:41 > 5:32:48In the context of Brexit we are always told the end of the world is

5:32:48 > 5:32:52nigh, it will all be terrible, and yet when we look at the Redbook, we

5:32:52 > 5:32:56know the figures we've had so far are better in spite of the Treasury

5:32:56 > 5:33:04and others saying it would all be a disaster. So borrowing in 2017-18 is

5:33:04 > 5:33:1049.9, 8 billion lower than forecast, why? Because receipts are higher.

5:33:10 > 5:33:14More money is coming in and that is indicative of the economy

5:33:14 > 5:33:18strengthening. On the page following it indicates spending decisions and

5:33:18 > 5:33:25tax decisions that have been taken in the Budget. But I do have a

5:33:25 > 5:33:29specific question for the Treasury bench which may have been raised by

5:33:29 > 5:33:36my honourable friend, the member for Dover. On page 82, and it is copied

5:33:36 > 5:33:44from page 142 -- 114 of the OBR book, in 2022-23, it is said there

5:33:44 > 5:33:50will be a £3.5 billion a resources contribution to the EU. I cannot

5:33:50 > 5:33:55believe those white figures could have made a schoolboy error of

5:33:55 > 5:33:59assuming money paid out in one year would be so indefinitely. But it is

5:33:59 > 5:34:04missing the point that by then we will have left the EU, the

5:34:04 > 5:34:07implementation period will have ended, the whole concept of own

5:34:07 > 5:34:12resources will have ceased to exist, and this is rather like spotting an

5:34:12 > 5:34:21error in the Rag'n'Bone Man. It is where to do and I think we will

5:34:21 > 5:34:28discover this is not intended. -- Anette error in the cricketers'

5:34:28 > 5:34:36book. The error assumes we are still members so I think there is an error

5:34:36 > 5:34:40there. But I do think this ties in with the points made very elegantly

5:34:40 > 5:34:47earlier on by the honourable gentleman that the key to this

5:34:47 > 5:34:52Budget has to be Brexit. That what we are doing currently is in the

5:34:52 > 5:34:55context of Europe leaving the European Union. Of course I give

5:34:55 > 5:35:01way.I would very much like to respond to the point he has just

5:35:01 > 5:35:05made on the subject of the forecast. Those forecasts were made by the

5:35:05 > 5:35:13OBR. They were provided with the Prime Minister's Florence speech,

5:35:13 > 5:35:17the basis on which we are negotiating with the EU, and it is

5:35:17 > 5:35:20up to them to make their own independent forecasts. My

5:35:20 > 5:35:26understanding is that you will have to speak directly to the OBR about

5:35:26 > 5:35:30that, but they have used an average of other independent forecasts that

5:35:30 > 5:35:36have been prepared.I am grateful but I don't think it works for the

5:35:36 > 5:35:40resources figure because they have made assumptions about our net

5:35:40 > 5:35:44contribution to the EU and they have assumed those monies will be spent

5:35:44 > 5:35:47domestically in the UK, and therefore there is no fiscal

5:35:47 > 5:35:51advantage, but there is still a £3.5 million negative income from own

5:35:51 > 5:35:57resources. It is hard to think the OBR would have taken that from other

5:35:57 > 5:36:01forecasters because that is a matter directly understandable from the

5:36:01 > 5:36:04Treasury, that the Treasury can give an authoritative view on, and it

5:36:04 > 5:36:08would be very odd if they hadn't explained that own resources will

5:36:08 > 5:36:13end at the point that we leave the EU. It has two. Only member states

5:36:13 > 5:36:18of the EU can make own resources contribution is the very obvious

5:36:18 > 5:36:22reasons. Though I've always disliked the term own resources. I've always

5:36:22 > 5:36:25been with Margaret Thatcher that it is our money and we would quite like

5:36:25 > 5:36:30to keep it, thank you very much! But I would like to go back to the

5:36:30 > 5:36:34original point that the Budget is inevitably encompassed by Brexit and

5:36:34 > 5:36:39productivity. And I think this is where the challenge is. The OBR has

5:36:39 > 5:36:43very gloomy forecasts on productivity, and these lead to a

5:36:43 > 5:36:56reduction in potential output in 2021-20 two by 3%. -- 2021-22. The

5:36:56 > 5:37:00question is, how do they make Brexit work to ensure we get a productivity

5:37:00 > 5:37:04boost, and this is where I was so encouraged by what the Chancellor to

5:37:04 > 5:37:09stay, because he said this would be a free trade government and this is

5:37:09 > 5:37:13the real opportunity that comes from Brexit. It is to open up our markets

5:37:13 > 5:37:17to the rest of the world freely. We have to remember that the customs

5:37:17 > 5:37:23union, which the honourable gentleman is so keen to stay in, is

5:37:23 > 5:37:26actually a protectionist union that stops people in the UK buying the

5:37:26 > 5:37:31cheapest available goods, and by and large, protect industry that the UK

5:37:31 > 5:37:37does not have. The overwhelming majority of the protection and the

5:37:37 > 5:37:43customs union is for things like German coffee processors or Spanish

5:37:43 > 5:37:47orange growers. Those types of things that we are not doing. Our

5:37:47 > 5:37:52industries receive very marginal protection from the customs union

5:37:52 > 5:37:56but it is a very high cost to British consumers. It is thought

5:37:56 > 5:38:01that the cost of food is 20%, and the next highest level of tariffs

5:38:01 > 5:38:06comes on clothing and footwear. And the opportunity here for the poorest

5:38:06 > 5:38:10in our society to see their standard of living boosted and their wages

5:38:10 > 5:38:16rise is really quite fundamental, that it will mean that their weekly,

5:38:16 > 5:38:20monthly, annual expenditure will be reduced, their real income will

5:38:20 > 5:38:24rise, and this will make available funds for other expenditures or

5:38:24 > 5:38:29indeed the saving and reinvestment in British industry. But equally, it

5:38:29 > 5:38:36will mean that because we lose the cosy protectionism, we cease to

5:38:36 > 5:38:39subsidise continental inefficient businesses and we also ensure we

5:38:39 > 5:38:43concentrate on what we are best but, and that ought to leave off itself

5:38:43 > 5:38:47to a boost in productivity, and indeed this is the lesson of

5:38:47 > 5:38:51history. When you move to free trade, and the removal not only

5:38:51 > 5:38:57formal tariffs but also nontariff barriers, and this, if things go

5:38:57 > 5:39:02correctly and the correct policies are adopted, is whether £350 million

5:39:02 > 5:39:04a week can ultimately be provided for the National Health Service. The

5:39:04 > 5:39:10figures produced by Sir Patrick Minford and his very distinguished

5:39:10 > 5:39:15team at Cardiff University indicate that there will be a boon of £135

5:39:15 > 5:39:22billion between 2020 and 2025 and £40 billion a year after, which will

5:39:22 > 5:39:27be possible to have both tax cuts and make it possible to fund the

5:39:27 > 5:39:31health service. And it is very encouraging to see that the

5:39:31 > 5:39:34Chancellor has already begun this process and is making more money

5:39:34 > 5:39:39available for the health service at this stage, because I think it is

5:39:39 > 5:39:41important that politicians deliver on the spirit of their promises as

5:39:41 > 5:39:49well is on the detailed nit-picking small print element of their

5:39:49 > 5:39:54policies. So I think it is right that that should be made possible,

5:39:54 > 5:39:58and having a free-trade developer and of economic policy is going to

5:39:58 > 5:40:02be crucial to that and it is very welcome the Chancellor has put this

5:40:02 > 5:40:10in his Budget speech today.

5:40:10 > 5:40:15The other issue important to our voters is the issue of housing and

5:40:15 > 5:40:18here I would encourage the Chancellor to call further. I think

5:40:18 > 5:40:22it is absolutely right that we have more house-building. It is

5:40:22 > 5:40:26absolutely right that the Government is supporting that but the key to

5:40:26 > 5:40:30that is going to be reform of the planning system. The thing that

5:40:30 > 5:40:33makes housing so expensive in this country is that suppliers

5:40:33 > 5:40:37controlled. As the Chancellor rightly said in his budget speech,

5:40:37 > 5:40:43actions to help demand are likely to put prices up and what we need to

5:40:43 > 5:40:48see as prices, at least in relation to incomes, called down and that

5:40:48 > 5:40:52means increasing supply and to increase supply in a way that people

5:40:52 > 5:40:59want to live. The one question I would raise on the budget, Mr

5:40:59 > 5:41:03Speaker, as when the Chancellor said the ruble to ensure that housing was

5:41:03 > 5:41:06primarily in an urban setting, but actually when you ask people what

5:41:06 > 5:41:12housing they want to 11, the, 80% of people say they want to live in

5:41:12 > 5:41:16houses with gardens and this means we're going to have to build on the

5:41:16 > 5:41:20green fields and it would be wise to review the green belt, because there

5:41:20 > 5:41:25are some areas of it which are not actually essential to life and the

5:41:25 > 5:41:32pursuit of happiness. What we really want, Mr Speaker as a whole

5:41:32 > 5:41:35succession of places around the country, because that's what people

5:41:35 > 5:41:45want to live in.Liz Kendall. Thank you Mr Speaker, and as always, it is

5:41:45 > 5:41:50a pleasure to follow the comparable gentleman. Mr Speaker, the challenge

5:41:50 > 5:41:55facing any Government and any budget is to boost her strengths, tackle

5:41:55 > 5:41:59our weaknesses and prepare the Government -- the country for the

5:41:59 > 5:42:03future. I am afraid the Government has failed to rise to these

5:42:03 > 5:42:07challenges, not least in its inadequate budget, but in its

5:42:07 > 5:42:10damaging approach to Brexit and I wanted to take each of these point

5:42:10 > 5:42:17entirely. First, our economic strengths. We are rightly proud of

5:42:17 > 5:42:22our world leading car manufacturers, pharmaceutical and Aerosmith

5:42:22 > 5:42:25countries, creative industries and universities and financial services.

5:42:25 > 5:42:31We want and need these to expand and thrive to create more good quality

5:42:31 > 5:42:35jobs and help 's fund our vital public services. But all of these

5:42:35 > 5:42:41facing huge uncertainties because of the Government 's determination to

5:42:41 > 5:42:45boot is out -- Bill was out of the single market and Customs union and

5:42:45 > 5:42:50because of not just the acceptance but the active desire of some

5:42:50 > 5:42:55members opposite, to leave the EU with no ordeal and fall back on WTO

5:42:55 > 5:43:00rules. The risk of new tariffs and custom barriers, or financial

5:43:00 > 5:43:04services losing their passport ingrates and restrictions on trade

5:43:04 > 5:43:10with the largest market of 500 million consumers on our doorstep,

5:43:10 > 5:43:15is a major cause of the war than expected levels of business

5:43:15 > 5:43:25investment and

5:43:28 > 5:43:31productivity and growth figures that we have heard in today's budget. The

5:43:31 > 5:43:33Government cannot escape that, no matter how much they want to sweep

5:43:33 > 5:43:36it under the carpet. But it is not just that the Government approach to

5:43:36 > 5:43:38Brexit is risking our economic or strengths, they are also failing to

5:43:38 > 5:43:40address our underlying economic weaknesses. I want to be clear here,

5:43:40 > 5:43:46many of these existed before Brexit and indeed before the financial

5:43:46 > 5:43:50crisis, which I fear the Government approach to Brexit will make far

5:43:50 > 5:43:55worse. The fundamental problem we have is that the Dove -- British

5:43:55 > 5:44:00economy is no longer delivering the rising earnings for the majority of

5:44:00 > 5:44:05the population. We are in the longest proceeded -- period of waste

5:44:05 > 5:44:09-- the longest period of wage stagnation for 150 years. While I

5:44:09 > 5:44:14welcome our high levels of employment, many of the jobs are

5:44:14 > 5:44:19insecure and low paid and Child poverty is arising. Britain is also

5:44:19 > 5:44:25one of the most geographical and balanced economies in Europe. 40% of

5:44:25 > 5:44:28our economic output comes from London and the south-east. Indeed,

5:44:28 > 5:44:32these are the only two regions in the country that has seen the

5:44:32 > 5:44:37economies get back to precrisis levels and we are also one of the

5:44:37 > 5:44:42most unequal, not just in terms of income inequality but wealth

5:44:42 > 5:44:47inequality, which, as the IMF says, really, really matters because more

5:44:47 > 5:44:52unequal countries have shorter and weaker periods of growth and, Mr

5:44:52 > 5:44:57Speaker, for far too long our economy has been plagued by shot

5:44:57 > 5:45:01terrorism, pure productivity -- power productivity and a low-level

5:45:01 > 5:45:05supple public and private investment. I am afraid that nothing

5:45:05 > 5:45:10the Chancellor said today indicates that the Government understands the

5:45:10 > 5:45:17sheer scale of this problem or has a plan for reforming our economy, for

5:45:17 > 5:45:20reforming capitalism so it works for the majority of people in every

5:45:20 > 5:45:27single part of the country. And this leaves me, Mr Speaker, to my final

5:45:27 > 5:45:32point about preparing the cobbler -- the country for the future. We face

5:45:32 > 5:45:37a big, big challenges alongside that of Brexit. Deeper globalisation as

5:45:37 > 5:45:41emerging economies to the east and this is increasingly compete on

5:45:41 > 5:45:46high-value products and services, not just the basic manufacturing.

5:45:46 > 5:45:59Our ageing population and the implications this has for

5:46:01 > 5:46:03pensions, the NHS and social care. Technological change, which is

5:46:03 > 5:46:05opening up huge opportunities for some but the risks leaving those

5:46:05 > 5:46:08without the skills they need behind and, the continuing need to check

5:46:08 > 5:46:10all -- to chuckle climate change. I am glad the Chancellor announced

5:46:10 > 5:46:12measures to that encourage more young people to take A-level

5:46:12 > 5:46:15mathematics and invest in driverless car a spot where was the plan to

5:46:15 > 5:46:19transform the skills in this country? Where was the plan to

5:46:19 > 5:46:24invest in the early years so every child starts ready to learn? Where

5:46:24 > 5:46:28children from the previous parts of my constituency start school 20

5:46:28 > 5:46:31months behind with these should be, they play catch up for the rest of

5:46:31 > 5:46:36their lives. Where was the plan to help the 5 million adults without

5:46:36 > 5:46:51basic skills who will never cope with the changes technology and

5:46:52 > 5:46:55globalisation £2.8 billion extra in the next few years but the NHS, said

5:46:55 > 5:46:57the Chancellor. That is pathetically inadequate and unless the £3 billion

5:46:57 > 5:47:00on preparing for Brexit -- less than £3 billion preparing for Brexit and

5:47:00 > 5:47:03nothing in the budget for social care to get older and disabled

5:47:03 > 5:47:07people and their families, who are desperately to cope, the health and

5:47:07 > 5:47:13support they need. That, Mr Speaker, brings me back to Brexit. The single

5:47:13 > 5:47:16most important thing we want in this budget is that there will be slower

5:47:16 > 5:47:25growth every year for five years. That means £65 billion less to spend

5:47:25 > 5:47:28on transforming this country and the life chances of the people we

5:47:28 > 5:47:34represent than we thought it just one year ago. On any economic test,

5:47:34 > 5:47:39these forecasts are a disaster and the Government only has itself to

5:47:39 > 5:47:46blame.Can I just advise the House in the situation we find ourselves.

5:47:46 > 5:47:51One Honourable Member has offered to speak on another day. Others are

5:47:51 > 5:47:55surely seized on the importance of them speaking today. I completely

5:47:55 > 5:47:58understand that but the fact is that eight people wish to speak and deaf

5:47:58 > 5:48:03ear to do so by seven o'clock, they can do the arithmetic for

5:48:03 > 5:48:08themselves. That is the reality. There is no good reporting --

5:48:08 > 5:48:13complaining to the whip. Have two recognise the responsibility they

5:48:13 > 5:48:16have. There were lots of interventions and that the

5:48:16 > 5:48:24situation.I will try to tailor my remarks with that in mind. It is a

5:48:24 > 5:48:32pleasure to follow the Honourable Lady from Leicester West and with

5:48:32 > 5:48:37what she says, but she speaks with passion and verve and I have to say,

5:48:37 > 5:48:41don't want to embarrass horror or her Honourable Friend but I can that

5:48:41 > 5:48:48with what I heard from the Leader of Opposition earlier, a lot of noise

5:48:48 > 5:48:51and colour but not necessarily any discernible theme that I could pick

5:48:51 > 5:48:56up. Everyone on both sides of this House wants to see good public

5:48:56 > 5:49:01services. They want to see them well supported, delivering for our

5:49:01 > 5:49:05constituents. I welcome, as the Honourable Lady from the DUP said

5:49:05 > 5:49:09earlier, the slight fiscal loosening of the next two or three years as a

5:49:09 > 5:49:15recognition of need other public sector and perhaps Independent paid

5:49:15 > 5:49:19reviews will give us some leeway in that direction as well. That is

5:49:19 > 5:49:23right and appropriate but it is also great it is executed in the context

5:49:23 > 5:49:26of a broader plan in which our national debt is being brought under

5:49:26 > 5:49:32control we will over this forecast, from my back of the envelope

5:49:32 > 5:49:37register deaths at the level it was an 2001 when the Honourable

5:49:37 > 5:49:40gentlemen and ladies opposite were running the Government, as far as I

5:49:40 > 5:49:45recall, back in 2001, that was the last year which load very sensibly,

5:49:45 > 5:49:50the fiscal envelope be dictated by merit Honourable Friend, the number

5:49:50 > 5:49:54for Rushcliffe. The next year, our total debt as a percentage of the

5:49:54 > 5:50:03East -- DGP will decline by a single point. Fiscal hole of historic

5:50:03 > 5:50:07proportions that we inherited. Reducing the deficit is not

5:50:07 > 5:50:11glamorous or popular but it is necessary. The businesses in the up

5:50:11 > 5:50:19the resilience for future shocks. It is necessary on the grounds of

5:50:19 > 5:50:23simple fairness to our generations but to maintain that process of debt

5:50:23 > 5:50:29reduction and sustain her investment in public services, the Chancellor

5:50:29 > 5:50:35is absolutely right to focus on productivity puzzle. I respected the

5:50:35 > 5:50:38APR, I respect the economic forecast that have been referred difficultly

5:50:38 > 5:50:42this afternoon. I personally feel more optimistic as the pace of

5:50:42 > 5:50:47growth goes, but they are forecasts, the Co-op, they go down and that is

5:50:47 > 5:50:52the nature of forecast. As they will be our itself says, the outlook for

5:50:52 > 5:50:58potential productivity growth is the most important yet uncertain element

5:50:58 > 5:51:05predicting growth. They are right on both counts. Which is why I applaud

5:51:05 > 5:51:12the Chancellor in embracing new technologies. We have an excellent

5:51:12 > 5:51:17record on unemployment. Bob then my constituency and nationally, what a

5:51:17 > 5:51:20thousand jobs today being treated as 2010. The challenge as a country and

5:51:20 > 5:51:28not just this country but there are challenges to make sure that our

5:51:28 > 5:51:31employees received the investment, the education, the infrastructure

5:51:31 > 5:51:36and the support two hours to drive up productivity and enhance further

5:51:36 > 5:51:39growth. I welcome the measures in this budget directly aimed at

5:51:39 > 5:51:46long-term improvement in productivity. A further 2.3 billion

5:51:46 > 5:51:51in art indeed, enhancement to the R&D tax credit, the website and the

5:51:51 > 5:51:56investment target of 2.4% of GDP. As someone who sees the UK as a liberal

5:51:56 > 5:52:01country open to the world, I am delighted at the approach is laid

5:52:01 > 5:52:04out in the red book to attract the best scientific talent anywhere in

5:52:04 > 5:52:09the world to work and flourish here in the UK. On education, which was

5:52:09 > 5:52:13referred to as the Honourable Lady from Leicester West, eye on them --

5:52:13 > 5:52:19-- I welcome the new approaches to education. Schools that plays a huge

5:52:19 > 5:52:26important on Stem subjects, such as Horsham who provide extra resources

5:52:26 > 5:52:29for students who want to embrace these new technology.I just want to

5:52:29 > 5:52:33enter up to say that I know the Honourable Gentleman extremely well

5:52:33 > 5:52:37and he speaks in his mellifluous tone with great eloquence and he is

5:52:37 > 5:52:40correct is right capable of doing so at any length, short or long and now

5:52:40 > 5:52:45that he will want to have regard to the simmering temperature of the

5:52:45 > 5:52:48Honourable Gentleman for Wrexham, who is to follow him and other

5:52:48 > 5:52:50colleagues who also wish to contribute and therefore I speak of

5:52:50 > 5:52:58some confidence and seeing his time is nigh.Mr Speaker, I promised I

5:52:58 > 5:53:01would be brief and there will be belief. Education, I welcome it and

5:53:01 > 5:53:07the infrastructure, more housing, I welcome it. This is a wide budget

5:53:07 > 5:53:12with a lot to commend it. At the problems of the past were sitting at

5:53:12 > 5:53:16the foundations for the future. I am sorry and not able to entertain the

5:53:16 > 5:53:19House at any greater length but that is powerful it clear that others

5:53:19 > 5:53:21should have the shed and with that I commend

5:53:27 > 5:53:34Thank you. I am grateful for him at allowing us to speak as he has been

5:53:34 > 5:53:39here since 11:30am today. I want to talk about regional policy. I have

5:53:39 > 5:53:44obviously restricted the amount I am going to speak today but I want to

5:53:44 > 5:53:48raise one particular issue relating to the HMRC in my constituency in

5:53:48 > 5:53:53Wrexham. It is directly connected to regional policy. There was a time

5:53:53 > 5:53:58when the party opposite talked about rebalancing the economy. There was a

5:53:58 > 5:54:01time when there seemed to be a commitment to something called the

5:54:01 > 5:54:07northern powerhouse. I recall a committee that I attended a couple

5:54:07 > 5:54:14of years ago with the then Chancellor of the ex-Jack -- the

5:54:14 > 5:54:16Chancellor of the Exchequer, when they talked about the investment in

5:54:16 > 5:54:22the north of England. I have had some time to read the Redbook today.

5:54:22 > 5:54:29There is quite a large section about investment in the Cambridge, Milton

5:54:29 > 5:54:33Keynes, Oxford corridor. One of the most affluent places in the United

5:54:33 > 5:54:37Kingdom. I believe in an economy that serves the whole of this

5:54:37 > 5:54:45country. What I want to tell the Honourable secretary of the Treasury

5:54:45 > 5:54:50is another corridor that exists between Manchester and Holyhead and

5:54:50 > 5:54:58contains some of the world leading companies in the UK - Airbuses, JVC

5:54:58 > 5:55:06- and that is an area of the country that the private sector is investing

5:55:06 > 5:55:11in. In Wrexham, Virgin Media is investing in superfast broadband

5:55:11 > 5:55:15networks, and had a company announced last week they will move

5:55:15 > 5:55:20into Wrexham with the creation of 250 jobs. They have confidence in

5:55:20 > 5:55:24the area. Unfortunately, the Government is moving away the local

5:55:24 > 5:55:35HMRC office in Wrexham, unbelievably to central Cardiff! So that the only

5:55:35 > 5:55:38office of the HMRC in Wales that will exist is going to be in the

5:55:38 > 5:55:44city centre in Cardiff, which is the most expensive place in the country.

5:55:44 > 5:55:48How any sane government can pursue a regional policy of that type is

5:55:48 > 5:55:53completely beyond me. Because not only is it wrong in terms of

5:55:53 > 5:55:59regional policy, it is taking away wealth from another part of Wales.

5:55:59 > 5:56:02And any sensible government would actually be doing exactly the

5:56:02 > 5:56:08opposite. Because a sensible government, the Welsh government, is

5:56:08 > 5:56:11setting up a development plan for Wales in Wrexham as opposed to

5:56:11 > 5:56:22Cardiff. I would like the Chief Secretary to go away and to rethink.

5:56:22 > 5:56:26To rethink what I think is the worst decision and most incomprehensible

5:56:26 > 5:56:29decision that any government department has made in the time I've

5:56:29 > 5:56:34been in this House. I think this Government will you need to reflect

5:56:34 > 5:56:38on whether it really believes in the United Kingdom, about whether it

5:56:38 > 5:56:44really believes in investment in our regions and our nations, because

5:56:44 > 5:56:48every indication that I've seen from what we've seen today is that they

5:56:48 > 5:56:55don't support investment in infrastructure in the regions and

5:56:55 > 5:57:00nations of the United Kingdom. In North Wales we've had three separate

5:57:00 > 5:57:05Budgets where we've been told that plans for North Wales growth deal

5:57:05 > 5:57:12are in hand. This is the hat-trick. This is the hat-trick budget. We are

5:57:12 > 5:57:16yet to see a penny piece of investment in North Wales from the

5:57:16 > 5:57:24UK Government. In our transport infrastructure. We are yet to see a

5:57:24 > 5:57:30penny invested in our rail network for which this Government has

5:57:30 > 5:57:33responsibility since 2010. They ought to be ashamed. It is about

5:57:33 > 5:57:44time they put their finger out and do things differently.Thank you. So

5:57:44 > 5:57:54much for the fudge it Budget. Virtually no mention of Brexit, and

5:57:54 > 5:57:58we know there are 58 sector reports that he will be in contempt if he

5:57:58 > 5:58:03doesn't reveal them to this House and he didn't reveal them at all in

5:58:03 > 5:58:06his Budget speech. Even before Budget, we saw the government

5:58:06 > 5:58:13increase debt as a proportion of GDP from 45 to 95%, doubled since 2010.

5:58:13 > 5:58:21Our debt is now 1.8 trillion, 30,000 per person. Under Labour we saw

5:58:21 > 5:58:27growth of 40% over ten years up to 2008 before the banking crisis, so

5:58:27 > 5:58:33that sets the context of how appalling things have been under the

5:58:33 > 5:58:39Tories. We've seen hopeless productivity and growth. With senior

5:58:39 > 5:58:43policy of quantitative easing, which basically pumped money in, inflated

5:58:43 > 5:58:47assets, and anybody with assets like houses would be richer, and those

5:58:47 > 5:58:52without them would be poorer. We know from the OECD that growth is

5:58:52 > 5:58:56related to inequality. There is more inequality and less growth. We know

5:58:56 > 5:59:02from the European studies using the normal methodology is that the level

5:59:02 > 5:59:06of inequality has grown fastest and at the highest level in the UK. And

5:59:06 > 5:59:10we know from the United Nations that the cuts have hit the disabled

5:59:10 > 5:59:15harder than anyone else, disproportionately and grotesquely,

5:59:15 > 5:59:19so their rights have been abused, and the UN has asked the way we

5:59:19 > 5:59:24change the way we deliver Universal Credit. It is appalling. Turning to

5:59:24 > 5:59:32Brexit itself, nobody on the other side has mentioned the £40 billion

5:59:32 > 5:59:37divorce Bill, the lender being in the region of £1000 per person.

5:59:37 > 5:59:42People have talked about free trade. This is the biggest withdrawal from

5:59:42 > 5:59:46free trade in UK history. We are turning our back on the biggest and

5:59:46 > 5:59:51most established marketplace in the world and we hope to have a

5:59:51 > 5:59:54relationship with other markets, but they are coalescing in their own

5:59:54 > 6:00:00trade agreements. We are likely to pay massive tariffs to the EU and

6:00:00 > 6:00:04the WTO, and given most of the exports are services, even more to

6:00:04 > 6:00:09those. We have seen depreciation produce of a stroke everybody's

6:00:09 > 6:00:16assets and wages by ten and 15% and we have got inflation eating away at

6:00:16 > 6:00:21people'shousehold incomes, whether it is in terms of food or energy. We

6:00:21 > 6:00:25have seen growth at the bottom of the G7 and we are now seeing skills

6:00:25 > 6:00:31leaving the country, going back to parts of Europe and Poland, as we

6:00:31 > 6:00:35are gaining restricted market access and disinvestment. So the prospects

6:00:35 > 6:00:42for Britain are appalling. Obviously I welcome a few things. The clean

6:00:42 > 6:00:50air bill today, many years after Tony Benn. So I welcome some of the

6:00:50 > 6:00:57things about clean air, but there is no increase in diesel duty. That

6:00:57 > 6:01:02could be hypothecated to pay for electric buses in our city centres.

6:01:02 > 6:01:10I welcome the initiative on taxes. I would have liked to see the Swansea

6:01:10 > 6:01:17clean air focused in here because they cannot be exploited if we are

6:01:17 > 6:01:23not to see climate change. And I would like to see a Swansea Metro

6:01:23 > 6:01:27for my constituents. Unfortunately, we have a future now whereby we will

6:01:27 > 6:01:32be forced into the grabbing hands of Donald Trump and the trade

6:01:32 > 6:01:36relationships where we will be on the back foot, and we will have to

6:01:36 > 6:01:40accept what we are given. I do fear for the future and I solemnly

6:01:40 > 6:01:47believe that the British people on the margin, when they were given a

6:01:47 > 6:01:50mandatory reason for leaving Europe, that they should be given the final

6:01:50 > 6:01:56say in 2018 as to whether what they are getting now represents what they

6:01:56 > 6:02:03understood they would get in 2016. I will leave my remarks there.I would

6:02:03 > 6:02:10like to start by reminding the House that the Bristol economy is a net

6:02:10 > 6:02:13contributor of about £10 billion annually and I ask, what do we get

6:02:13 > 6:02:17for it? I have looked in the red book and it's not there. A few

6:02:17 > 6:02:20paltry comments. Once again we have been short-changed by this

6:02:20 > 6:02:28Government. In Bristol the reality of low-paid jobs is masked. Young

6:02:28 > 6:02:35people are least likely in the country to go to university and our

6:02:35 > 6:02:39people are least likely to end up on apprenticeships. We have 20% of our

6:02:39 > 6:02:44people living with a life affecting visibility. This is a scandalous

6:02:44 > 6:02:50loss of people. I welcome the Chancellor's commitment to

6:02:50 > 6:02:54house-building as this is crucial for my constituency but with house

6:02:54 > 6:02:58inflation at 14% in Bristol, the cut in stamp duty will not be of much

6:02:58 > 6:03:04help. And I look forward to hearing whether the council will be able to

6:03:04 > 6:03:08borrow more to build much-needed council houses to rent in the

6:03:08 > 6:03:13future. We have young people in Bristol ready to build these houses

6:03:13 > 6:03:16to feed the supply chain but we desperately need an opportunity to

6:03:16 > 6:03:20train them. The wage differential for housing construction

6:03:20 > 6:03:24apprenticeships is good compared to others but most of our young people

6:03:24 > 6:03:29don't get on good apprenticeships. Last November the city of Bristol

6:03:29 > 6:03:32College was awarded pipeline status to get a construction centre built

6:03:32 > 6:03:37in my constituency. The previous member visited with me earlier this

6:03:37 > 6:03:41year and I pointed out to him the site where it can be built, but

6:03:41 > 6:03:44still the Local Enterprise Partnership have not invested the

6:03:44 > 6:03:48money. There was no coherence in the Department for Education at the

6:03:48 > 6:03:50moment for capital money and investment and the Chancellor needs

6:03:50 > 6:03:54to stop wasting that money and invest where it is needed. We have

6:03:54 > 6:04:00also heard a lot this week about apprenticeships, about the pledge of

6:04:00 > 6:04:06driverless cars and other sectors the Government believes a priority.

6:04:06 > 6:04:11Contrast that with the money for technical qualifications. I have

6:04:11 > 6:04:16supported apprenticeship schemes in this House for a long time but

6:04:16 > 6:04:24focusing on new starts means quantity over quality. May I remind

6:04:24 > 6:04:31the Chancellor of the 61% levy and the target will not be meant. Isn't

6:04:31 > 6:04:36good enough today to refer to the levy he will keep. I also welcome

6:04:36 > 6:04:40the commitment to technical education as part of an attempt to

6:04:40 > 6:04:43fill the skills gap. But again there is no money in this further

6:04:43 > 6:04:48education. A mere £20 million. Another group -- acutely aware that

6:04:48 > 6:04:53have been huge delays in rolling out this programme. We are losing

6:04:53 > 6:04:58critical time. If the issues stem from a lack of funding than I would

6:04:58 > 6:05:02it expect to see something more in this budget. Instead, my local

6:05:02 > 6:05:11college is facing cuts since 2030 and participation rates have halved.

6:05:11 > 6:05:20More than 2000 adults failed to be eligible, more wasted potential. We

6:05:20 > 6:05:23also have the lowest attainment rates for higher education in the

6:05:23 > 6:05:28country. Disadvantage starts in early years and in schools. There

6:05:28 > 6:05:31are £1.9 million of cuts coming to schools in Bristol and the lower

6:05:31 > 6:05:38inflation funding formula will represent a funding decrease. And on

6:05:38 > 6:05:43health, on the Public Accounts Committee last year, we nailed the

6:05:43 > 6:05:47lie that the NHS got to ask for lost time. That's not get into this again

6:05:47 > 6:05:50next time. Of course you bunny is welcome but it is not sufficient to

6:05:50 > 6:05:56do the job that the government have asked the NHS to do. -- of course

6:05:56 > 6:06:02the money is welcome. And we have heard about the silent misery of

6:06:02 > 6:06:07families living in the social care crisis. I've not heard a single Tory

6:06:07 > 6:06:11defend those reforms. The destruction of that act is apparent

6:06:11 > 6:06:17to us all. Nobody in charge locally to do anything about it.It is a

6:06:17 > 6:06:23real pleasure to follow the member for Bristol South. And to speak in

6:06:23 > 6:06:27this Budget debate. The outlook for the economy is bleak. The worst

6:06:27 > 6:06:31five-year forecast of GDP since the office the budget responsibility was

6:06:31 > 6:06:35set up. Against the backdrop of the drop in sterling and the increase in

6:06:35 > 6:06:41inflation. As the Chancellor stood up to speak, the cost of Brexit was

6:06:41 > 6:06:49clear. In excess of £3 billion. Let's put that on the side of a bus.

6:06:49 > 6:06:53My constituency has been starved of funding for the last seven years and

6:06:53 > 6:06:58the capacity for us to educate and care for our citizens as well as

6:06:58 > 6:07:02keep them safe has deteriorated and will fall further. While London

6:07:02 > 6:07:07remains seemingly a vibrant economy, there is a yawning gap between the

6:07:07 > 6:07:11haves and have-nots. Earlier in the debate, the honourable member for

6:07:11 > 6:07:15Wrexham spoke of his region and his concerns about his region. But there

6:07:15 > 6:07:20is inequality within a region as well. Because often in London, we

6:07:20 > 6:07:27walked the same streets but inhabit different worlds. Wages are flat,

6:07:27 > 6:07:30household debt is up, transport and infrastructure continue to stall,

6:07:30 > 6:07:34having negative effect on industry and workers alike. Housing across

6:07:34 > 6:07:38the three housing ten years either hoping to buy, private-sector

6:07:38 > 6:07:43renters and those languishing on housing lists are all in desperate

6:07:43 > 6:07:49housing need. -- the three housing groups. Disappointingly, the rough

6:07:49 > 6:07:52sleeping initiative in the speech did not include tackling rough

6:07:52 > 6:07:57sleeping in the capital. I think we all noticed as we went to our

6:07:57 > 6:08:01meetings and the Budget debate this morning that there were two homeless

6:08:01 > 6:08:05men sleep outside the door of the House of Commons. I think that is

6:08:05 > 6:08:10what we would like to tackle here as Labour members, and sadly, I fear

6:08:10 > 6:08:15that when we come to do this next year, there may even be more

6:08:15 > 6:08:19homeless people lying in sleeping bags outside the doors of the House

6:08:19 > 6:08:24of Commons. While London remains one of the top destinations for business

6:08:24 > 6:08:29and international talent, transport and infrastructure continue to

6:08:29 > 6:08:34stall, and it's time we all woke up to that. The borough of Haringey has

6:08:34 > 6:08:41seen a 40% real terms reduction in funding since 2010, resulting in

6:08:41 > 6:08:46£160 million of savings, affecting disabled people, basic municipal

6:08:46 > 6:08:49services, children with special educational needs and generally

6:08:49 > 6:08:54having a depressing effect on the local economy. This worrying trend

6:08:54 > 6:08:58is set to continue, with 20 million more to be found in one London

6:08:58 > 6:09:04Borough's finances. A dangerous cocktail of growing demand, cost and

6:09:04 > 6:09:07inflation combined with funding cuts is putting unsustainable pressure on

6:09:07 > 6:09:12local government finances. Core funding from central government is

6:09:12 > 6:09:19set to have fallen 63% in real terms over the decade 2019-20. I tell the

6:09:19 > 6:09:24children when I go into schools, it is like your mum gives you £1 and

6:09:24 > 6:09:29then the next day, 30p, and that is what it is like the council 's these

6:09:29 > 6:09:33days. People in Hornsey and Wood Green know this well. There is a

6:09:33 > 6:09:37desperate shortage of housing but also issues with health and we are

6:09:37 > 6:09:44very concerned that so many trusts...She will want to introduce

6:09:44 > 6:09:48some balance in her speech because she is fair-minded. What does she

6:09:48 > 6:10:00welcome, the investment in housing, transport or the cut in stamp duty?

6:10:00 > 6:10:05What I would like to see, rather than the millions wasted on the

6:10:05 > 6:10:09Brexit shambles is more than a billion for the NHS, it is under

6:10:09 > 6:10:15what she is saying that we need. In the 37 out of 37 schools having the

6:10:15 > 6:10:25budget tool between 20 1516 and 201920, teaching assistants are all

6:10:25 > 6:10:29calling for desperately needed change. English and is well to

6:10:29 > 6:10:32police funding cuts which are barely got a mention, that looks like the

6:10:32 > 6:10:36Home Office is swept -- said to have to swallow the 400 million cut to

6:10:36 > 6:10:40the police. In the affluent suburb of Highgate, I was out on Monday

6:10:40 > 6:10:49morning speaking the terrified mothers who had things are stolen by

6:10:49 > 6:10:53mopeds driving youngster to head smashed in the wonders of the cafe,

6:10:53 > 6:10:56it has happened four times as they moved into the high street. We are

6:10:56 > 6:11:00facing a claim with London and it does need to be addressed. Finally,

6:11:00 > 6:11:09I would like to briefly mention the 797 million or £410 cut per person

6:11:09 > 6:11:15in the North Central London area. Many members will be aware that

6:11:15 > 6:11:18there are huge pressures, particularly on mental health and

6:11:18 > 6:11:25use shorts of cups, £510 per person will have a huge cut -- a huge

6:11:25 > 6:11:29impact on people with serious mental health problems. Just finally, can I

6:11:29 > 6:11:34just say that I do welcome element of the changes to small business

6:11:34 > 6:11:37approaches within taxation but I also think that we must go further

6:11:37 > 6:11:42on that. As our population continues to call and people work in different

6:11:42 > 6:11:46ways, including in small business, we need to be ever made of

6:11:46 > 6:11:52supporting them. Thank you Madam Deputy Speaker.Thank you Madam

6:11:52 > 6:11:55Deputy Speaker, will try to rush through this as quickly as I

6:11:55 > 6:11:59possibly can. We in the SNP called for a budget to keep the drag the

6:11:59 > 6:12:07people and prosperity at its heart. I'm afraid we have not seen that.

6:12:07 > 6:12:12There was nothing today on renewable energy. Despite the warm words for

6:12:12 > 6:12:17ministers just reaching -- years on from the betrayal that might the

6:12:17 > 6:12:19betrayal by George Osborne over Peterhead, there is nothing on

6:12:19 > 6:12:24carbon capture and storage, the call to what we need for the future. Very

6:12:24 > 6:12:29little on oil and gas holder we welcome at long last the

6:12:29 > 6:12:33transitional tax as to the move. Nowhere to be seen as the oil and

6:12:33 > 6:12:37gas ambassador that was promised. This phantom appointment two years

6:12:37 > 6:12:42in the waiting, when it could have been doing good for the North Sea

6:12:42 > 6:12:47industry. No acknowledgement of the monumental error of judgment that is

6:12:47 > 6:12:51frankly see nuclear investment. Where a public appearance committee

6:12:51 > 6:12:55said today there were grave strategic errors over this and they

6:12:55 > 6:13:00had given no thoughts to consumers before walking into a 35 year deal

6:13:00 > 6:13:05and it falls the National Audit Office publicity and expensive

6:13:05 > 6:13:10judgment twice the price of new offshore, consumers paying the

6:13:10 > 6:13:13price. The committee said the poor I had the hardest. This is not a

6:13:13 > 6:13:20budget for people, like the one for posterity. -- prosperity. We find

6:13:20 > 6:13:26there would be 3.5 billion spent on the Brexit users. Web as spend that

6:13:26 > 6:13:32on the edge and stash by the NHS instead. We could have heard support

6:13:32 > 6:13:36for our farmers, or gently, who need a clear explanation of the nature

6:13:36 > 6:13:40and timetable for the guarantee of all European Union funding

6:13:40 > 6:13:45programmes, not at 2020 but for the period beyond. The thing to do with

6:13:45 > 6:13:48the skills and Labour shortages now being caused by the Brexit shambles

6:13:48 > 6:13:57and uncertainty. Nothing about the traces that has been caused for NHS

6:13:57 > 6:14:03fish processing, tourism sectors, to name just a few. The fact that is

6:14:03 > 6:14:07that we don't know what is happening it for EU nationals and we are

6:14:07 > 6:14:11seeing people leaving the industry. Much was made earlier about it

6:14:11 > 6:14:15technology and yet nothing about broadband, no increase in ambition

6:14:15 > 6:14:21has been shown in this budget, to match the 100% coverage promised by

6:14:21 > 6:14:28Scotland. If it was left to the UK Government and the Highlands, only

6:14:28 > 6:14:3321% of the India would have access to fibre. It has taken the Scottish

6:14:33 > 6:14:38Government stepping up with a £400 billion to bring it to 84% and on

6:14:38 > 6:14:43track to 100%. Where we are on Scotland, Madam Deputy Speaker, the

6:14:43 > 6:14:51£2.9 billion cut that we have seen is not matched. 1.1 billion of this

6:14:51 > 6:14:55is in financial attractions which has two B depict the UK Treasury and

6:14:55 > 6:15:02it has over three years. Edin Dzeko term cut of £32 million. Where was

6:15:02 > 6:15:07the movement won a wasp in? These women have been waiting far too long

6:15:07 > 6:15:11to get something from the Chancellor to sort them out. He said the -- you

6:15:11 > 6:15:14said earlier we are all in politics to make people's lives better. We

6:15:14 > 6:15:20had a big opportunity to do that today but she missed it. He could

6:15:20 > 6:15:24have halted it and fix the Universal Credit. After four years since the

6:15:24 > 6:15:28pilot then my constituency in 2013, we have been telling the UK

6:15:28 > 6:15:38Government things they could do to sort this. I will steps, but let's

6:15:38 > 6:15:40not get dazzled. This is not going to change much. The £1.5 billion

6:15:40 > 6:15:44invention announce sounds good but if you look at the blue book, it is

6:15:44 > 6:15:51£21 million today and goes up to 2023. That is less confusing alcohol

6:15:51 > 6:15:59duty. The one-week production to five weeks is also welcome and it's

6:15:59 > 6:16:05something but again, it will be of little help to many. 25% of Clement

6:16:05 > 6:16:08are already waiting longer and the cuts are pushing people further into

6:16:08 > 6:16:18crisis. They could help by decoupling the housing benefit. That

6:16:18 > 6:16:22would help enormously. It could have helped ease burdens as a woman's

6:16:22 > 6:16:28budget could have pointed out, by April 2021, employed individuals

6:16:28 > 6:16:33claiming Universal Credit will be £1200 a year worse off and 57% of

6:16:33 > 6:16:38that is due to be a cut work allowance. His failure to hold

6:16:38 > 6:16:43Universal Credit means that he is doing nothing to help families

6:16:43 > 6:16:47waiting for months without payment. Nothing to sort the systemic failure

6:16:47 > 6:16:58systemic failure -- failure is

6:16:58 > 6:17:00nothing to the disabled, no help or guarantees to those facing eviction

6:17:00 > 6:17:03or facing having no money this Christmas. No attempt to remove,

6:17:03 > 6:17:05finally, the cruellest features, the wait for a cancer patient or the

6:17:05 > 6:17:07terminally ill. He could have done something that costs absolutely

6:17:07 > 6:17:13nothing today, Madam Deputy Speaker, he could have removed the new

6:17:13 > 6:17:16requirement for Universal Credit for self certification of those people

6:17:16 > 6:17:28facing terminal illness. This is not the budget for people or facility.

6:17:28 > 6:17:32Thank you very much Madam Deputy Speaker. I am please to fold

6:17:32 > 6:17:34Honourable Member for Inverness and to take part in the budget debate

6:17:34 > 6:17:38today. The British economy has basically got to problems. It has a

6:17:38 > 6:17:44low productivity growth, a worker in France or Germany can go home on a

6:17:44 > 6:17:48first in eight, having produced except a number of things. The

6:17:48 > 6:17:52British worker has to continue until Friday night to have made the same

6:17:52 > 6:17:57amount of staff. The second problem we have in this economy at the

6:17:57 > 6:18:02moment is a high level of uncertainty and I think Honourable

6:18:02 > 6:18:06Member is probably now the pound fell again after the Chancellor

6:18:06 > 6:18:11stood down. Now, the forecast shows that this is not getting better GDP

6:18:11 > 6:18:21growth is down productivity growth is down. In June one, there is no

6:18:21 > 6:18:26productivity growth. The amount of money that we will have will be £40

6:18:26 > 6:18:30billion less to spend and do or have tax cuts at the end of the forecast

6:18:30 > 6:18:37period, than we thought at this time last year. As a consequence, the

6:18:37 > 6:18:42forecast also is showing average earnings are fallen. What the

6:18:42 > 6:18:47Chancellor do to tackle this productivity problem. This is a

6:18:47 > 6:18:50long-running problem, obviously there aren't instant solutions.

6:18:50 > 6:18:54Nobody would be foolish enough to think that. One thing that I think

6:18:54 > 6:18:59it's worth noting is that the productivity problem has original

6:18:59 > 6:19:04dimensions. The IPPR have found that productivity outside the south-east

6:19:04 > 6:19:09is 44% award than elsewhere. So, when Honourable Member stalk about

6:19:09 > 6:19:13investing in the regions, this is not just a matter of social justice,

6:19:13 > 6:19:18it is also a matter of economic efficiency. At the moment, the

6:19:18 > 6:19:26north-east gets 200 per head spent on transport, well London gets 1940.

6:19:26 > 6:19:32Almost ten times as much. Why doesn't the Government reorder its

6:19:32 > 6:19:37investment projects and do HSP, linking Newcastle to Liverpool,

6:19:37 > 6:19:42before it does a chest to. Let's take a look at what was in the

6:19:42 > 6:19:47budget for the north-east. Tiny sums of money. The north of Tyne

6:19:47 > 6:19:53devolution deal, £20 million a year. Time and we are metal, the money

6:19:53 > 6:19:58would be released until 2022. That is five years from now. Redcar

6:19:58 > 6:20:03steelworks, the only new money was £5 million. Tees Valley, they are

6:20:03 > 6:20:06being offered something that has no price tag at all, they are being

6:20:06 > 6:20:11invited to enter discussions and it's not just the north-east.

6:20:11 > 6:20:17Midland connect is getting £6 million. But the London business

6:20:17 > 6:20:23rate retention which is being piloted is going to give London £7.5

6:20:23 > 6:20:27billion and, with the stamp duty cut in my constituency, the average

6:20:27 > 6:20:32House price is a. People want to benefit this might not gone to

6:20:32 > 6:20:43benefit from it at all. The second aspect of this is obviously skills.

6:20:43 > 6:20:51In my constituency, there is an excellent further education college.

6:20:51 > 6:21:00It plays a vital role. Between 2009 and 2015, further education has been

6:21:00 > 6:21:04cut by 27%. Adult education has been cut by 50%. The Chancellor announced

6:21:04 > 6:21:12extra money. £60 million. It is 2% more, tiny percent -- tiny compared

6:21:12 > 6:21:21to the massive cuts. We must start investing more in our skills. The

6:21:21 > 6:21:25original disparities here as well. Of course it is true that people

6:21:25 > 6:21:28don't have jobs for life but if we want to help them through this

6:21:28 > 6:21:36transition, we need to do more for adult education. I thought the

6:21:36 > 6:21:39manifesto had some very sensible things in it. Instead we should

6:21:39 > 6:21:43spend another £200 on 16 to 19-year-olds, it said we should

6:21:43 > 6:21:52extend child benefits to people who are doing A-levels. And they said we

6:21:52 > 6:21:57should spend money on public transport for young people. In my

6:21:57 > 6:22:01constituency, young person on the young savers ticket, going from the

6:22:01 > 6:22:10field to Bishop Auckland has a weekly Bill of £31 a week. The young

6:22:10 > 6:22:14person going from Bishopton from Arlington has a higher Bill. These

6:22:14 > 6:22:19are substantial numbers. The most disappointing thing is that the

6:22:19 > 6:22:25Chancellor has not won more battles on the Brexit. And that he has not

6:22:25 > 6:22:32been able to see of those people who want a cliff edge from the 1st of

6:22:32 > 6:22:38April 2019. We all thought when the premise to meet our love -- Forum

6:22:38 > 6:22:42speech that the Chancellor had won this argument. We were all extremely

6:22:42 > 6:22:47pleased by this on the side of the House. It seems that this was not

6:22:47 > 6:22:52so. Businesses want certainty now. It is nearly Christmas. Ministers to

6:22:52 > 6:23:02get skates on.The question is that the debate be now adjourned. As many

6:23:02 > 6:23:11are of that opinion see eye. I think the ayes have it. The debate is to

6:23:11 > 6:23:18be resilient on what day? Tomorrow. The model. Now, with the Leader of

6:23:18 > 6:23:27the House, I would like to take motions to 27 together. Motions to

6:23:27 > 6:23:29and seven on international development, the Minister to move? I

6:23:29 > 6:23:35make the move. The question is as on the order paper, as many are that

6:23:35 > 6:23:42opinion see high. On the contrary now. The ayes have it. Petition

6:23:42 > 6:23:42Kevin Foster.

6:23:48 > 6:23:55I rise to present the petition from the residents of Torbay around bus

6:23:55 > 6:23:59services. I would particularly like to pay tribute to the work of

6:23:59 > 6:24:06Rosemary Shaw, who has collected the signatures of thousands of people,

6:24:06 > 6:24:16both in person and online. The bus service being cancelled or have a

6:24:16 > 6:24:21detrimental effect on residents and particularly elderly residents.

6:24:21 > 6:24:26Would they commit to reinstating the service of the number 32 for local

6:24:26 > 6:24:32residents as soon as is the? -- as possible?

6:24:39 > 6:24:47Petition to local bus services in Torbay.The question is that this

6:24:47 > 6:24:56House do now adjourn.Thank you. I am grateful for the opportunity to

6:24:56 > 6:25:00raise the important issue of the future of safety critical guards on

6:25:00 > 6:25:04Merseyrail trains in this chamber this evening. All of us value the

6:25:04 > 6:25:09work of the people who keep our country moving, be it guards,

6:25:09 > 6:25:12drivers, signal workers, track workers, ticket office workers,

6:25:12 > 6:25:17cleaners and station staff. I represent my home city in This Place

6:25:17 > 6:25:21and it is a privilege to be able to speak up for my constituents and

6:25:21 > 6:25:25working people, and it is worth rendering that when workers want to

6:25:25 > 6:25:31raise issues as important as public safety and protecting decent jobs

6:25:31 > 6:25:34for the future, they are all too often have to take industrial

6:25:34 > 6:25:37action, putting their own livelihoods at risk, something I

6:25:37 > 6:25:44don't have to do making this speech tonight.I'm very grateful to him.

6:25:44 > 6:25:50On that very point about nobody wanting this to happen, he will have

6:25:50 > 6:26:01seen the letter from the city region by the six council leaders on the

6:26:01 > 6:26:0816th of November, which they called for, both parties in the dispute, to

6:26:08 > 6:26:13agree to engage in a process of independent reconciliation, starting

6:26:13 > 6:26:17with no preconditions, with the intent of finding a negotiated

6:26:17 > 6:26:23settlement. Doesn't he think that is a reasonable suggestion?I thank my

6:26:23 > 6:26:27honourable friend for his intervention and I will lay out my

6:26:27 > 6:26:33arguments, including comments on that issue as I continue. I want to

6:26:33 > 6:26:39use the debate outline why guards are so important for safety,

6:26:39 > 6:26:42security, service and accessibility, and highlight the level of public

6:26:42 > 6:26:47support for retaining guards on trains. They are a safety critical

6:26:47 > 6:26:51function and they are valuable, protecting the personal safety of

6:26:51 > 6:26:55all passengers. Over the last 30 years there has been a creeping

6:26:55 > 6:26:59introduction of driver only operation. DOI oh is opposed by the

6:26:59 > 6:27:04rail unions and is unpopular with the public. Since January 2011 there

6:27:04 > 6:27:08have been at least ten serious incidents of passenger-train

6:27:08 > 6:27:17interface. Eight of these involved DOO, operating without a safety

6:27:17 > 6:27:27critical member on the train. It is now proposed to move all of

6:27:27 > 6:27:32Merseyrail's 207 guards. This decision comes after a 30 year £460

6:27:32 > 6:27:35million contract from new rolling stock was signed by the transport

6:27:35 > 6:27:44authority.Will he give way? I thank him for that. Does he welcome this

6:27:44 > 6:27:48new rolling stock, which will have the best accessibility for disabled

6:27:48 > 6:27:53people in the whole of the country? Does he therefore think that

6:27:53 > 6:27:56negotiations to resolve industrial issues are a matter of urgency so

6:27:56 > 6:28:01the people of Merseyside can join these new trains when they arrive?

6:28:01 > 6:28:07Of course negotiations are critical to resolving this dispute and I

6:28:07 > 6:28:10welcome the new trains. They are long overdue and they are something

6:28:10 > 6:28:15the unions have also campaigned for. And they will be publicly owned by

6:28:15 > 6:28:19the people of the Liverpool city region, forecast to be 30% cheaper

6:28:19 > 6:28:25for the taxpayer then using the failed Roscoe releasing model. The

6:28:25 > 6:28:28latter are like the loan sharks of the railway and it is right that

6:28:28 > 6:28:31they are rejected in Liverpool, and perhaps the minister might like to

6:28:31 > 6:28:35say a few words on why his department persists in using them

6:28:35 > 6:28:40across the rest of the rail network. However, there is not a choice

6:28:40 > 6:28:45between having new trains and keeping a fully staffed service. The

6:28:45 > 6:28:49two are not mutually exclusive. In fact, these new carriage list trains

6:28:49 > 6:28:53with a more open feature allow the guard to pass more easily down the

6:28:53 > 6:28:57length of the train. Mersey travel originally said they wanted both

6:28:57 > 6:29:03when the new train contract was first announced and Liam Robinson

6:29:03 > 6:29:06said, in an ideal world, we would like to have a second member of

6:29:06 > 6:29:11staff on every train but we don't have the resources to do that. I'm

6:29:11 > 6:29:19grateful to him this assistance in the lead up this debate. The pitiful

6:29:19 > 6:29:22investment in public infrastructure in the North has rightly been spoken

6:29:22 > 6:29:29about. Tory cuts to local councils and grant in the city region,

6:29:29 > 6:29:33because of these, the local levy has been cut by £32 million in real

6:29:33 > 6:29:37terms, which represents a third of the transport budget locally being

6:29:37 > 6:29:42lost. Faced with these cuts, we must defend and maintain the standards we

6:29:42 > 6:29:47have, protect jobs and passenger safety and expose unjustifiable

6:29:47 > 6:29:52profiteering from the travelling public. Our return to the role of

6:29:52 > 6:29:56local representatives, the transport authority and government later in my

6:29:56 > 6:30:01remarks, but first let me set out where the first step is to agree the

6:30:01 > 6:30:05principle that keeping the guards on the train is essential so we can

6:30:05 > 6:30:10move to a more constructive debate which looks at solutions. -- I will

6:30:10 > 6:30:15return to the role of local representatives. There are four

6:30:15 > 6:30:21railway stations in my constituency. The loss of policemen from the

6:30:21 > 6:30:24budget is having a devastating impact on our communities and the

6:30:24 > 6:30:29ability of the police to protect the public. Data released by the British

6:30:29 > 6:30:34Transport Police shows the number of violent attacks on mainline and

6:30:34 > 6:30:40underground trains has increased by 12.5% in the last year, including

6:30:40 > 6:30:45the spike in hate crime. Reported sexual offences on trains have more

6:30:45 > 6:30:51than doubled in the past five years and figures obtained under a Freedom

6:30:51 > 6:30:53of Information request submitted by the RMT has found that in the last

6:30:53 > 6:30:59five years there were over 1200 on-train crimes on Merseyrail. The

6:30:59 > 6:31:07figures also show that almost 900, or 72% of crimes, took place before

6:31:07 > 6:31:148am, the time when Merseyrail have indicated they would seek to retain

6:31:14 > 6:31:18a second person on the train, which begs the question, if Merseyrail

6:31:18 > 6:31:21acknowledge the need for a second person on the train after 8pm, why

6:31:21 > 6:31:28not before? And just as when you cut police numbers you make the public

6:31:28 > 6:31:33more vulnerable to crime, when you remove front line rail staff you

6:31:33 > 6:31:38almost jeopardise passenger safety. A report produced for Mersey travel

6:31:38 > 6:31:45by Passenger Focus in April 2014, the future Merseyrail rolling stock,

6:31:45 > 6:31:51what passengers wanted was clear. The fact that emerged us by far the

6:31:51 > 6:31:55most important to improve from a passenger perspective was personal

6:31:55 > 6:32:02security on the train. It showed passenger satisfaction with personal

6:32:02 > 6:32:07security was high, at 86%, and the report said that this aspect is a

6:32:07 > 6:32:10strength upon which it is important to maintain focus and development.

6:32:10 > 6:32:15It went on to state that the importance of this messenger --

6:32:15 > 6:32:18measure to passengers suggests that if satisfaction with personal

6:32:18 > 6:32:26security were to decrease in future, this would have a severe negative

6:32:26 > 6:32:31effect on overall satisfaction with the service as a whole. Subsequent

6:32:31 > 6:32:35polling found that among women passengers, 84% said they would feel

6:32:35 > 6:32:41less safe without a guard. And for people over 55, 80 5% said they

6:32:41 > 6:32:48would feel less safe without guards. -- 85%. Perhaps the best

6:32:48 > 6:32:55demonstration of how God is our valued with a recent petition which

6:32:55 > 6:32:58gained thousands of persistent -- thousands of signatures. -- of how

6:32:58 > 6:33:06guards are valued. The guards took extra steps to make her and other

6:33:06 > 6:33:11female passengers are secure in a situation she and others faced. Too

6:33:11 > 6:33:14much of the debate has focused on issues like who will operate the

6:33:14 > 6:33:23doors and whether the DOO can lead to conditions. Neither government --

6:33:23 > 6:33:26neither the government nor the regulators have made any assessment

6:33:26 > 6:33:31of the additional risks to passengers. Risks to passengers once

6:33:31 > 6:33:36the train has left the platform with or without a guard on the train. How

6:33:36 > 6:33:40can any decision claim to take passenger safety seriously before

6:33:40 > 6:33:48these assessments have even been made? Duties include protecting the

6:33:48 > 6:33:52train, safely securing the doors and dealing with emergencies such as

6:33:52 > 6:33:58derailments, evacuation, fires and capacity, and if there is a failure

6:33:58 > 6:34:01of train systems. Following a collision between a train and a road

6:34:01 > 6:34:10vehicle in Merseyrail in August 2016, the guard played -- placed

6:34:10 > 6:34:17isolating equipment on the track and evacuated passengers while the

6:34:17 > 6:34:25driver remained in his cab leading communications. Without this,

6:34:25 > 6:34:31incidents would be dealt with by intercom to passengers from a place

6:34:31 > 6:34:36miles away. It cannot be deemed that this is safer. There are many more

6:34:36 > 6:34:41stories like this but as I'm pushed for time I will carry on. Disabled

6:34:41 > 6:34:46passengers, people with a visual or hearing impairment, or those with

6:34:46 > 6:34:50anxiety, rely on the practical assistance and reassurance of staff

6:34:50 > 6:34:59on platforms and on trains. The disabled protection policy says

6:34:59 > 6:35:04people on platforms and on trains are designed to help you. In the

6:35:04 > 6:35:122017 report they talked about the future of accessible travel. I

6:35:12 > 6:35:22believe it is worth fighting to keep good jobs for the future. Losing

6:35:22 > 6:35:27over 200 Rob is in no way progressive. The public still

6:35:27 > 6:35:34overwhelmingly backed the guards. Recent polling shows 87% oppose the

6:35:34 > 6:35:40removal of these guards from Merseyrail. Labour Party policy is

6:35:40 > 6:35:46clear - to oppose any extension of driver only operation. The Welsh

6:35:46 > 6:35:49government has now guaranteed a guard on every train for future

6:35:49 > 6:35:53franchises and Scotland has made similar long-term arrangements. The

6:35:53 > 6:35:58Secretary of State wrote last week telling them a labour government

6:35:58 > 6:36:01would hold any plans to extend driver only operation. Mersey

6:36:01 > 6:36:07travel's former chair remains opposed to removing the guards,

6:36:07 > 6:36:11saying common sense should prevail. It has never been clearer that we

6:36:11 > 6:36:15need a new structure for our railways. Labour would take back

6:36:15 > 6:36:19control by bringing back our rail network into public ownership. By

6:36:19 > 6:36:24reinvesting the revenues that are currently disappearing into the

6:36:24 > 6:36:28pockets of shareholders, a Labour government would ensure affordable

6:36:28 > 6:36:35fares, state-of-the-art trains, safe staffing levels and an end to DOO.

6:36:35 > 6:36:39We would preserve safety along with jobs. This Government doesn't have a

6:36:39 > 6:36:43plan for our rail network. It is writing job cuts into rail contract

6:36:43 > 6:36:46and it stands by when private companies mismanage services while

6:36:46 > 6:36:53making eye watering profits. Almost a quarter of Merseyrail income from

6:36:53 > 6:36:58passengers is swallowed up in profits. Merseyrail's owners Seb Coe

6:36:58 > 6:37:08and a billion can expect to see average dividends of £6.7 million

6:37:08 > 6:37:16each. It cannot be right that our money funds but why our loan --

6:37:16 > 6:37:23while our network pays the price. Is it too much to ask that they take a

6:37:23 > 6:37:27smaller slice of the profit in order to ask that their passengers, who

6:37:27 > 6:37:35fronted their profits, might get a safe and secure service?I'm

6:37:35 > 6:37:42grateful. Does he know that, or is he aware that in Holland, the

6:37:42 > 6:37:49state-owned operator actually has guards on the train, yet they are

6:37:49 > 6:37:55proposing on their Mersey franchise to run the service without?I do

6:37:55 > 6:37:59find it incredible and I think it's not good enough. It's not good

6:37:59 > 6:38:04enough for the people of Merseyside to go without guards and that the

6:38:04 > 6:38:07people of countries who are profiting from the money from their

6:38:07 > 6:38:15tickets to benefit from guards. The government could make safety

6:38:15 > 6:38:19critical guards non-negotiable for all rail franchises. Better still

6:38:19 > 6:38:25would be to scrap the legislation that says only the private sector

6:38:25 > 6:38:28can run passenger train services. Some if the minister wants to argue

6:38:28 > 6:38:31this is a devolved issue, he must explain why Mersey travel are

6:38:31 > 6:38:36prohibited to run their trains in the public sector. I went because I

6:38:36 > 6:38:43am just pushed for time.

6:38:43 > 6:38:47I believe that the basis of any resolution has to be the principle

6:38:47 > 6:38:52of keeping the guard on the train. Merseyrail last week has appointed a

6:38:52 > 6:38:56new managing director and perhaps this is an opportunity for fresh

6:38:56 > 6:39:00thinking. We have seen the same issues resolved elsewhere. They RMT

6:39:00 > 6:39:04has exceeded new deals with a number of new companies -- other companies,

6:39:04 > 6:39:10including time Pennine express and also ScotRail. In the case of

6:39:10 > 6:39:18ScotRail, BR, later Merseyrail, born to buy at the allele. F at Balliol

6:39:18 > 6:39:21and Scotland can agree to keep the card on the chin, why can't a

6:39:21 > 6:39:32Balliol in the Merseyside? -- Abelio. I want to see this through

6:39:32 > 6:39:38-- dispute resolved as quickly as possible. The basis of this is to be

6:39:38 > 6:39:43the agreement of the principle of keeping the guard on the train. I

6:39:43 > 6:39:46hope that the representatives in the Liverpool region will appreciate the

6:39:46 > 6:39:51points made in the debate today that in the face of the cuts by the

6:39:51 > 6:39:56Government and transport authority, private -- privateering out of

6:39:56 > 6:40:00control and failed Tory ideology that runs right through our rail

6:40:00 > 6:40:03network, it's inevitable that we end up in a situation where we have

6:40:03 > 6:40:07given for his choice -- we have the false choice between embracing new

6:40:07 > 6:40:13technology and protecting secure and public safety.Minister Paul

6:40:13 > 6:40:20Maynard. Thank you. Can I can graduate the Honourable Member for a

6:40:20 > 6:40:25Liverpool Walton on prosecuting the office that ideal opportunity for

6:40:25 > 6:40:31this debate today but for delivering his thoughts so well-balanced.

6:40:31 > 6:40:35Members from both sides of Mersey and indeed beyond the Mersey, I

6:40:35 > 6:40:41think it demonstrates the importance, I know that so many in

6:40:41 > 6:40:50the Merseyside area attached to this issue. I am sure many more will be

6:40:50 > 6:40:55paying attention to it in the city region. I am sure all members and

6:40:55 > 6:41:00all that debates are worthwhile opportunities to raise worthwhile

6:41:00 > 6:41:10constituency matters -- matters.

6:41:16 > 6:41:20Since 2003, matters concerning the Merseyrail have been entirely

6:41:20 > 6:41:25devolved and are at the of the transport authority, Mersey travel

6:41:25 > 6:41:30and the chain of -- operators themselves. Those that prevent him

6:41:30 > 6:41:32from commenting directly on many of the points he has raised today, I

6:41:32 > 6:41:36will try to do my best to give him a worthwhile contribution that looks

6:41:36 > 6:41:41at the wider issues he is seeking to raise and as tempted as I am too try

6:41:41 > 6:41:46to engage on his points and Labour Party policy, sadly, time it

6:41:46 > 6:41:52probably doesn't permit me to fully engage with why I think the idea of

6:41:52 > 6:41:55a state monopoly should fill every single passenger had nothing but

6:41:55 > 6:42:00tread at the thought of that. Given the lack of time available at is

6:42:00 > 6:42:08only fair that after our interventions, they can choose the

6:42:08 > 6:42:12moment to launch themselves in my collection because I suspect

6:42:12 > 6:42:19interventions will grow as my speech echoes. Merseyside in particular has

6:42:19 > 6:42:24seen the reminiscence of an passenger rail service driven

6:42:24 > 6:42:27something to 96. Before we see more about Merseyrail in particular, I

6:42:27 > 6:42:30would like to take a moment to look at the bigger picture as a whole.

6:42:30 > 6:42:34Just a few weeks ago, Weise published our real spend commitments

6:42:34 > 6:42:42until 2024. 34 billion investment in the region, 30.2 billion from

6:42:42 > 6:42:46private sources, including network charges and fears. This carries

6:42:46 > 6:42:50another decade, the greatest investment in the the way since the

6:42:50 > 6:42:54time of Queen Victoria, to deliver the improvement in punctuality and

6:42:54 > 6:42:57reliability for passengers as well as supporting thousands of jobs in

6:42:57 > 6:43:02the supply chain and the wider economy. Why are we making this

6:43:02 > 6:43:06money available? It's quite a simple reason. It's because of

6:43:06 > 6:43:10privatisation of Railways has succeeded and I will never apologise

6:43:10 > 6:43:20for repeating the statistics. Passenger the Tories have doubled

6:43:20 > 6:43:23since 1995. We now have the most improved the way in Europe and the

6:43:23 > 6:43:27safest major railway as well. Because Merseyrail is a devolved

6:43:27 > 6:43:33concession, decisions are made at the local level. Merseyrail holds a

6:43:33 > 6:43:4125 year concession which commenced in 2003, with reviews undertaken

6:43:41 > 6:43:52every five years. The terms and conditions of contract devolved from

6:43:52 > 6:43:56the DFP back in 2003. Indeed, the Merseyrail concession is different

6:43:56 > 6:44:00from most train franchise contracts which are rewarded by the Department

6:44:00 > 6:44:04for Transport. The only other franchise which is even remotely

6:44:04 > 6:44:09similar is the London Underground network and this local concession

6:44:09 > 6:44:13agreement is that both Mersey travel and Merseyrail work closely together

6:44:13 > 6:44:18to respond to local demands and needs and ultimately the greatest

6:44:18 > 6:44:22beneficiaries are of the passengers. The concession of 25 years

6:44:22 > 6:44:26distinguishes Merseyrail from many other train operating companies

6:44:26 > 6:44:30which contracts are added seven and ten years. This reason Merseyrail

6:44:30 > 6:44:33and Mersey travel are in the enviable position of being able to

6:44:33 > 6:44:39take a longer-term perspective on investment and development in the

6:44:39 > 6:44:43services. It's an arrangement that means the control of the concession

6:44:43 > 6:44:57rests wholly in the city region. Would show with a strong local focus

6:44:57 > 6:45:06the nature of the concession sees Mersey travel working in close the

6:45:06 > 6:45:11indication for the ultimate benefit of passengers. In the previous

6:45:11 > 6:45:15franchise ended in back in 2003, local politicians wanted quickly

6:45:15 > 6:45:20right to respond to the needs of local rail users much better. And

6:45:20 > 6:45:25implement changes that would improve the network for the benefit of

6:45:25 > 6:45:29passengers and for a growth of the region 's economy. They wanted a

6:45:29 > 6:45:34longer term partnership approach with the operator to allow ongoing

6:45:34 > 6:45:43investment programmes to continue with risks being shared. Following a

6:45:43 > 6:45:48robust procurement process back in 2000 the, the transfer of

6:45:48 > 6:45:53responsibility for the heavy rail franchise from what was then the

6:45:53 > 6:45:59strategic rail authority to Mersey travel.I will happily give way.I

6:45:59 > 6:46:03thank the Minister for giving way and then my speech I congratulated

6:46:03 > 6:46:08Mersey travel on the ability to secure provision of these trends in

6:46:08 > 6:46:12the public sector, which means that they will be 30% cheaper than if

6:46:12 > 6:46:18they were bought through private means and through private loans. But

6:46:18 > 6:46:25the one thing we cannot do is have a publicly run Neil -- rail network

6:46:25 > 6:46:28across Merseyside, because the legislation of the UK Government. It

6:46:28 > 6:46:35is OK for a Dutch rail lease, Dutch public railways and poker with other

6:46:35 > 6:46:40countries to come and our Railways, but does the Minister not think that

6:46:40 > 6:46:47has Government might like to run the railway system at some point?I

6:46:47 > 6:46:50heard his point earlier and my response to that is that is not

6:46:50 > 6:46:55Government policy nor do I ever see it being Government policy will my

6:46:55 > 6:46:59party remains in power. I do not think that the opportunity to have a

6:46:59 > 6:47:02public monopoly on our Railways is in the passengers interests. It may

6:47:02 > 6:47:07be in the interest of the party opposite. It's not in the interest

6:47:07 > 6:47:11of passengers. The agreement that we have with Mersey travel is worth

6:47:11 > 6:47:22hundreds of millions of pounds. Indeed -- indeed, in 2017 it's close

6:47:22 > 6:47:27to plan major long-term investment and that is why into 2000 -- sense

6:47:27 > 6:47:32to those in the quality of train stations and the running of the

6:47:32 > 6:47:39network has been transformed. Merseyrail has to be seen as an

6:47:39 > 6:47:43exemplar, local decision-making with it is practical to do so. On the day

6:47:43 > 6:47:48of devolution, Mersey travel greatly stated its ambition was to shed the

6:47:48 > 6:47:53label of misery rail by pitting passengers first and within a year,

6:47:53 > 6:47:58the transformation was apparent. Customer satisfaction, particularly

6:47:58 > 6:48:04with punctuality. By autumn, 2004, Miller said it was top of the

6:48:04 > 6:48:10National customer satisfaction week, for the first time in its history.

6:48:10 > 6:48:13Since 2000 date, satisfaction has never dropped below 90%, a major

6:48:13 > 6:48:17contribution to this has been the club partnership in the operator and

6:48:17 > 6:48:23Mersey travel. But the concession agreement that says the demanding

6:48:23 > 6:48:28specifications, flexibility of local control allowing both parties to

6:48:28 > 6:48:33allow a stream of initiatives to increase capacity, tether fears and

6:48:33 > 6:48:41services to local markets and stations being improved. I will

6:48:41 > 6:48:47happily give way although I know that time is short.I hope you will

6:48:47 > 6:48:53respond to my Honourable Member -- my Honourable Friend pots point

6:48:53 > 6:48:56about the cut in funding that this forcing Mersey travel to make

6:48:56 > 6:49:01decisions that they wouldn't want to make the hand of -- they had funds

6:49:01 > 6:49:05available.We have committed £82 million in this current year. That

6:49:05 > 6:49:08gives them the confidence to make the investment and rolling stock

6:49:08 > 6:49:14which they are then choosing how the invested. I think members opposite

6:49:14 > 6:49:19will be deeply disappointed, indeed apoplectic, I was to start

6:49:19 > 6:49:22questioning the decisions of the elected both said the Mere of

6:49:22 > 6:49:28Liverpool and the city region Amir. The point of devolution that local

6:49:28 > 6:49:30people, through their representatives, have to take these

6:49:30 > 6:49:38decisions and that is what they are doing. The investment we have made

6:49:38 > 6:49:44has facilitated the implementation of longer trained in 2000 date,

6:49:44 > 6:49:49doubling the Senate -- the services from Chester to Liverpool in 2013.

6:49:49 > 6:49:54All of that, to me, as an example of investment are cutting in

6:49:54 > 6:49:59Merseyrail. Indeed, regularly, they have jointly funded extra weekday

6:49:59 > 6:50:07trains during special events. The approach has been a great success.

6:50:07 > 6:50:16Passenger demand has consistently exceeded targets, 27 million a year

6:50:16 > 6:50:29ago 12/25 -- 35 million now. Enclosing, I hope I have been able

6:50:29 > 6:50:33to demonstrate how the public and private partnership to Mersey travel

6:50:33 > 6:50:38and Merseyrail has helped transform the real services in Liverpool over

6:50:38 > 6:50:41the past 14 years and that there is no reason to suspect that local

6:50:41 > 6:50:45politicians and Liverpool are not able to take positions in the

6:50:45 > 6:50:48interests of the city region, given I have a short time with it would be

6:50:48 > 6:50:54churlish of me not to give way.The Minister isn't at all addressing the

6:50:54 > 6:50:58issue of a second safety critical person on the train. This isn't only

6:50:58 > 6:51:03a position in the Merseyrail, it's a position in the franchises around

6:51:03 > 6:51:09the country. Clearly, the Minister should have a position on a second

6:51:09 > 6:51:18safety critical person on the exchange.As you will be aware,

6:51:18 > 6:51:21sufficiently discussed it is the issue of cards and Merseyrail

6:51:21 > 6:51:28trains. As Honourable Member 's obstacle now the complicity of local

6:51:28 > 6:51:33Labour politicians they can be discussing this with. All of them

6:51:33 > 6:51:39have stood behind this decision. If we truly believe in devolving and

6:51:39 > 6:51:46transport powers, we have to respect those decisions that are taken. Let

6:51:46 > 6:51:51me just to restate once again, the congratulating him on the kid in the

6:51:51 > 6:51:55debate and I am sure he has had a ready audience across America said

6:51:55 > 6:52:00for his comment and I am sure that that was not the intended audience

6:52:00 > 6:52:03for what he -- I am sure that was the intended audience for what he

6:52:03 > 6:52:07had to say. I'm sure the conversation will continue and I

6:52:07 > 6:52:13will watch with interest what occurs.The question is that this

6:52:13 > 6:52:17House do now adjourned. As many are of that opinion that the eye. The

6:52:17 > 6:52:19ayes have it. Order, order.