Eye'll Be Back

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:00. > :00:00.on five people on Thursday night in which acid was sprayed

:00:00. > :00:00.on their faces in order to steal their motorbikes.

:00:00. > :00:07.Now on BBC News, it's time for Click.

:00:08. > :00:15.The cyborgs are coming, the eyeborgs are watching,

:00:16. > :00:47.the bar staff are serving, and Lara photographs a banana!

:00:48. > :00:49.This is Adam Jensen, star of the video game

:00:50. > :01:01.Set in 2027, the poor chap has to undergo extensive

:01:02. > :01:02.cybernetic modifications after being severely injured.

:01:03. > :01:05.Well, just ten years before those events might occur,

:01:06. > :01:20.that plot line doesn't seem that far off.

:01:21. > :01:22.For years now people have been body hacking,

:01:23. > :01:24.giving themselves extra abilities and, as our understanding

:01:25. > :01:26.of robotics has advanced, so has our creativity.

:01:27. > :01:29.Meet Rob Spence, like the cyborg in the video game,

:01:30. > :01:36.It doesn't have Terminator vision like this, yet,

:01:37. > :01:40.Inside a prosthetic eye, which is an odd shape,

:01:41. > :01:42.they're not a sphere, a prosthetic eye, they're actually

:01:43. > :01:48.Inside that is a battery, a video camera and a video

:01:49. > :01:51.transmitter all attached to a circuit board so they can

:01:52. > :02:09.The camera is turned on and off with a magnet.

:02:10. > :02:13.It doesn't look at all comfortable, is it in anyway comfortable?

:02:14. > :02:20.The first consideration that looks the most uncomfortable,

:02:21. > :02:23.it looks like a 90s iMac, you can see all the goods inside.

:02:24. > :02:26.Like the battery and the wires, but that's covered by smooth

:02:27. > :02:31.I don't have open wires and batteries, you know.

:02:32. > :02:43.That kind of made my stomach drop a little bit when I saw that.

:02:44. > :02:46.Rob damaged his eye when he was nine and in 2009 began exploring

:02:47. > :02:50.As a film-maker himself, he was fascinated with the idea

:02:51. > :03:06.It's like an absurd toy for a one-eyed film-maker.

:03:07. > :03:11.I used to watch the Bionic Man when I was a kid, The $6 Million Man.

:03:12. > :03:14.I had the action figure, you looked through the back of his head,

:03:15. > :03:19.I was looking at my Nokia flip phone at the time I was like -

:03:20. > :03:23.That's in fact who I called, I called Nokia.

:03:24. > :03:26.They said - well, we'll call the camera module people in China.

:03:27. > :03:30.It's very small, it's very challenging.

:03:31. > :03:34.It does visual dropouts, which is the visual language

:03:35. > :03:36.of all video from the future, including Princess Leia

:03:37. > :03:45.Since the initial prototype, Rob and his engineers have gone

:03:46. > :03:50.He now has one eye that glows red when it films and another camera eye

:03:51. > :03:55.I get calls from and emails from mom's whose kid has just lost

:03:56. > :03:59.an eye because it's some sort of fun thing to show a kid this maniac

:04:00. > :04:03.running around on videos and glowing red eye cameras and stuff.

:04:04. > :04:08.They're now looking working on ways to transfer the technology to other

:04:09. > :04:12.We're doing 3D scans of those now and then that creates a space that

:04:13. > :04:16.you can take into software to map on the technology that we're

:04:17. > :04:20.Some people golf, I like to make fake eye cameras and, you know,

:04:21. > :04:45.Right, that's the eye upgraded - now let's do the rest of the body.

:04:46. > :04:50.MIT's media lab is home to some of the most innovative tech

:04:51. > :04:53.research in the world, but there's one room here I find

:04:54. > :04:59.The mission of this lab is probably one of the most

:05:00. > :05:01.important goals of our time, they're trying to essentially

:05:02. > :05:05.They want to make it so that if you lose a limb,

:05:06. > :05:09.it won't have any impact on your quality of life and they're

:05:10. > :05:25.So we work on everything from creating new motors and designs

:05:26. > :05:28.for ankles and knees and artificial joints, all the way to marrying

:05:29. > :05:31.these biomechatronic devices with the human body through novel

:05:32. > :05:35.Evidence of this work can be seen with people like Ryan Cannon,

:05:36. > :05:38.complications after a broken leg left him needing an amputation.

:05:39. > :05:41.What's special about his new robotic leg is that it's doing something

:05:42. > :05:44.the human body can do instinctively, but it's extremely

:05:45. > :05:57.The motor is able to work in such a way that simulates a real

:05:58. > :06:00.It uses on board sensors to interfere whether the leg is,

:06:01. > :06:04.for example, in the air or on the ground and perform actions

:06:05. > :06:06.that to the person feel much more like real walking

:06:07. > :06:08.than they would get from a passive prothesis.

:06:09. > :06:14.For amputees like Ryan such innovations are life-changing.

:06:15. > :06:18.I can move in a more rhythmic, symmetrical way and being able

:06:19. > :06:21.to move in that manner allows me to walk at a faster pace

:06:22. > :06:25.for a longer distance and to do more activities during the day.

:06:26. > :06:28.This is not relying just on straight physics and mechanical design,

:06:29. > :06:41.Not all of the research here is about solving disability,

:06:42. > :06:43.this exoskeleton project is about augmenting humans.

:06:44. > :06:46.It allows the body to use much less energy when running or walking.

:06:47. > :06:49.It improves your ability to walk by 25%.

:06:50. > :06:52.So what that means is, if you were to walk 100 miles,

:06:53. > :06:54.it would only feel to you that you walked 75.

:06:55. > :06:58.We're able to do that today, right and those are devices that

:06:59. > :07:00.I would expect to see rolling out commercially in the

:07:01. > :07:05.We're already beginning to see this kind of technology deployed

:07:06. > :07:08.US retail chain, Lowes, is experimenting with kitting

:07:09. > :07:11.out its staff with exoskeletons, designed in Virginia,

:07:12. > :07:13.which could give their employees more stamina at work.

:07:14. > :07:16.With this in mind, the lab at MIT is now looking

:07:17. > :07:20.to the next huge question - how close are we to the point

:07:21. > :07:23.where people might actually want these kind of prosthetics instead

:07:24. > :07:27.I definitely think that we are entering an age in which the line

:07:28. > :07:29.between biological systems and synthetic systems

:07:30. > :07:53.But what might be some of the drawbacks of having these

:07:54. > :07:57.As there's widespread uptake, that they might only be available

:07:58. > :08:08.to people who have the financial ability to pay for them.

:08:09. > :08:24.Welcome to the week in Tech. This week saw some interesting activity

:08:25. > :08:28.on Facebook, and saw Wiz Khalifa take over as the most watched

:08:29. > :08:37.YouTube video. It has been viewed a staggering 2.9 million times. Elon

:08:38. > :08:41.Musk launched a new vehicle, it is supposed to be more affordable than

:08:42. > :08:53.the previous efforts, which cost $200,000. Faraday future have

:08:54. > :08:59.scrapped plans to build a plant in Nevada, which leaves questions about

:09:00. > :09:03.their new vehicle. And this is not a digital version of the Ministry of

:09:04. > :09:07.silly walking, but this is artificial intelligence attempting

:09:08. > :09:14.to learn how to walk. So far, research is being led in virtual

:09:15. > :09:18.environments, but it could help robots learn how to navigate

:09:19. > :09:28.unfamiliar spaces. And, finally, a former scientist built a super

:09:29. > :09:31.Psycho which can fire a jet of water at over 200 mph. At least you'll see

:09:32. > :09:34.it coming -- super-soaker. It says - fashion, style,

:09:35. > :09:48.outfit, that's you. Sometimes it's not that easy to put

:09:49. > :09:53.into words what you want to search for online, and that's why companies

:09:54. > :09:56.are working on ways of us being able to take a simple picture and then

:09:57. > :10:02.search using that image. Pinterest is a place

:10:03. > :10:05.all about images and ideas, they've had a form of visual search

:10:06. > :10:08.for a couple of years now, allowing you to focus

:10:09. > :10:11.in on a particular object Through a combination of image

:10:12. > :10:14.recognition and the data points attached to that image,

:10:15. > :10:16.including the hundreds of thousands of boards it may

:10:17. > :10:19.have been pinned to, This January, they upped their game,

:10:20. > :10:36.though, launching Pinterest Lens, a way of being able to search

:10:37. > :10:40.through a photo with no other data And from that search term,

:10:41. > :10:44.it aims to come up with similar There we go, we've got a picture

:10:45. > :10:48.and something is emerging. Right, those are definitely

:10:49. > :10:51.shoes, but they don't Black shoe with blue

:10:52. > :10:54.laces, some men's shoes. So there are two parts

:10:55. > :10:58.to visual search. The first is computer vision,

:10:59. > :11:01.which is a way of translating the information coming

:11:02. > :11:03.in through the camera into words. The second is the data

:11:04. > :11:06.set and the data set So with Pinterest Lens,

:11:07. > :11:12.when you point your camera at something in the real world,

:11:13. > :11:15.the computer inside the phone translates that image into text

:11:16. > :11:19.and then it takes the text and it takes the image and runs a search

:11:20. > :11:21.against 100 billion pins on Pinterest to find the ones that

:11:22. > :11:29.seem the most relevant. OK, it knows it's a lemon,

:11:30. > :11:32.that's definitely a good start. OK, I think you scroll through it

:11:33. > :11:36.and some of the results make sense, which is sort

:11:37. > :11:40.of like when you search with words because often you search then

:11:41. > :11:43.and a lot of the things don't make And having come up with those words,

:11:44. > :11:52.I've got a series of recipes So we've got a lemon drizzle cake,

:11:53. > :11:56.a lemon polenta cake. We've now got some

:11:57. > :11:57.artwork of lemons. It's a lot better than it did

:11:58. > :12:01.on my boots and this's probably because this is a very simple image

:12:02. > :12:04.to recognise and understand. Pinterest Lens is also powering

:12:05. > :12:06.Vision, the image search function in Samsung's Bixby

:12:07. > :12:09.which is currently only available And so today we're announcing

:12:10. > :12:14.a new initiative called Google Lens. Google Lens is also

:12:15. > :12:16.due for release soon. The company says it'll be a new way

:12:17. > :12:20.of the computer being able to see and even act on its surroundings

:12:21. > :12:30.whilst you're talking Also working in this space

:12:31. > :12:34.is a chat bot called Glamix, which is a way of photographing any

:12:35. > :12:38.item that you like, sending it to them via Facebook messenger

:12:39. > :12:41.and receiving a response that should tell you where you can

:12:42. > :12:43.buy a similar item. So let's give this a go

:12:44. > :12:47.on my boots to start with. It works with pictures found

:12:48. > :12:54.on Instagram or your phone, eventually allowing you to narrow

:12:55. > :12:57.down results based on price The bot uses artificial

:12:58. > :13:01.intelligence, machine learning and what it calls 'content based

:13:02. > :13:04.image recognition' to search As well as shopping for individual

:13:05. > :13:13.items, it aims to be able to help Making clicking through to items

:13:14. > :13:17.so easy is of course amazing for retailers,

:13:18. > :13:19.but also if you're So if someone passes

:13:20. > :13:23.you by and they're wearing something you really like,

:13:24. > :13:26.you need to be quick. Having spent a while testing both,

:13:27. > :13:34.the results were sometimes surprisingly accurate, and other

:13:35. > :13:36.times, kind of questionable. But it is early days and the more

:13:37. > :13:40.this sort of technology is used, the more data it collects

:13:41. > :13:42.and the more reliable Well, that explains

:13:43. > :13:46.the weird birthday present Now, earlier we looked

:13:47. > :13:56.at human beings attempts to become more robotic,

:13:57. > :13:59.but there's a whole lot of research that's attempting

:14:00. > :14:01.to make robots more human. It's not actually taking place

:14:02. > :14:04.at a robot art school like this, but it's nice to think it might

:14:05. > :14:07.be, isn't it? There is a long way to go

:14:08. > :14:10.in robotics, just picking up all those weirdly shaped everyday

:14:11. > :14:13.objects is still an enormous challenge, requiring a robot

:14:14. > :14:16.to recognise a given object and to decide how

:14:17. > :14:20.exactly to pick it up. But a team at Berkeley says that

:14:21. > :14:23.Dex-Net here is the most effective When not playing with Lego,

:14:24. > :14:27.it's being taught and building up a huge database of 3D objects

:14:28. > :14:30.by its masters. When something new comes along,

:14:31. > :14:33.it uses its 3D sensor to compare it to this list,

:14:34. > :14:36.it then uses its neural network to figure out the best way to grasp

:14:37. > :14:41.it and it is said to get it right The springy legs of this creature

:14:42. > :14:49.were 3D painted at UC San Diego, they're designed to be able to more

:14:50. > :14:52.easily traverse difficult environments, such

:14:53. > :14:56.as disaster areas. As we know, even walking

:14:57. > :14:59.on flat surfaces is still Well, I say ouch, but of course

:15:00. > :15:09.these things don't feel pain. That said, there are those of us

:15:10. > :15:13.who are asking whether even feelings might one day be part

:15:14. > :15:18.of a robot's mind. At the simplest level it makes

:15:19. > :15:23.sense, robots are pretty expensive, you don't want them to run

:15:24. > :15:26.willy-nilly into fire and acid But at a more complex level,

:15:27. > :15:33.we're looking ahead to a time when robots might interact with us

:15:34. > :15:36.on a more personal level as companion robots for the elderly,

:15:37. > :15:39.for those who are sick or are in pain and perhaps maybe

:15:40. > :15:42.they need to understand the similar sort of experience and perhaps

:15:43. > :15:44.develop something like Pain is not just about us

:15:45. > :15:48.saying ouch, there's an emotional element to this

:15:49. > :15:50.as well, isn't there? So are we actually talking about

:15:51. > :15:56.programming some kind of emotions We don't really understand

:15:57. > :16:05.what emotions are in human beings. Like you say, you might assume

:16:06. > :16:08.there's some sort of phenomenon that So hypothetically if we developed

:16:09. > :16:13.systems that worked like pain, might emotion develop off the back

:16:14. > :16:16.of that as well? There are those robots that

:16:17. > :16:18.do look so life-like, the Boston Dynamics' Big Dog

:16:19. > :16:21.and the walking robots, we actually feel quite sorry

:16:22. > :16:24.for them when they fall over or even When those videos were released

:16:25. > :16:29.online the reaction was like - oh no, you're bullying them,

:16:30. > :16:31.don't hurt them. They don't at this stage have

:16:32. > :16:34.that technology at all. There's no suggestion they do feel

:16:35. > :16:37.pain, but the human reaction So is that going to inform

:16:38. > :16:41.how we behave towards Is that where you're looking

:16:42. > :16:45.at applying our sympathies? I mean, I think science fiction

:16:46. > :16:48.model of a human-like entity There may be more kind

:16:49. > :16:53.of cute models we've seen already of robots that,

:16:54. > :16:56.sort of, pull on our heart strings in a more child-like way and there's

:16:57. > :16:59.those that suggest that we shouldn't have anything that looks human-like

:17:00. > :17:02.at all because it's disingenuous, it's cheating and it's tricking us

:17:03. > :17:05.into treating them like they're The doctor thinks that appearing

:17:06. > :17:11.to feel pain may make us treat Of course what many people

:17:12. > :17:18.are worried about is how much respect the robots will have for us

:17:19. > :17:22.and, most of all, our jobs. Last week Caterpillar invested

:17:23. > :17:26.seven million in this Australian Now robots can build houses

:17:27. > :17:34.at the rate of 1,000 bricks an hour. Ambition in the area

:17:35. > :17:36.is huge and for the first time out of the lab,

:17:37. > :17:39.ETH in Switzerland is working on much more ambitious structures

:17:40. > :17:42.like this undulating wall which has Now an increasingly robotic

:17:43. > :17:52.workforce raises a number of issues and along with the worry

:17:53. > :17:55.of what jobs will actually be left to us in the future,

:17:56. > :17:58.there is another one. Fewer workers earning a wage,

:17:59. > :18:02.means fewer workers paying income tax on their earnings and that means

:18:03. > :18:09.less money going into the economy. Now some tech brains,

:18:10. > :18:12.including that of Bill Gates, are calling for a robot tax

:18:13. > :18:15.to counter that and Cat Hawkins went Almost everyone in the world

:18:16. > :18:24.who works pays tax on the money they earn, but at this restaurant

:18:25. > :18:27.in San Francisco there are no waiting staff

:18:28. > :18:32.and robots plate the food. That work is currently not taxable

:18:33. > :18:35.and politician Jane Kim is now looking into how this is changing

:18:36. > :18:40.the city's economy. So what we're seeing

:18:41. > :18:43.is after automation that you can hire less people in order to deliver

:18:44. > :18:46.products maybe quicker But it's one of the questions

:18:47. > :18:52.that we have, it's true this is really convenient,

:18:53. > :18:54.but at what cost? It's not just restaurants, this

:18:55. > :18:59.picture is now seen across the city, from hotels and hospitals

:19:00. > :19:01.to the latest addition to the autonomous family,

:19:02. > :19:05.self-driving cars. Policy makers have noticed, every

:19:06. > :19:08.time a robot take as human job, The research is showing us that jobs

:19:09. > :19:16.are going to get lost over the next ten years and if before

:19:17. > :19:18.the Great Depression we could have predicted

:19:19. > :19:21.what would come afterwards, if government could have prepared

:19:22. > :19:23.for the job loss that occurred, That is the level at which we are

:19:24. > :19:28.looking at potentially over the next ten years,

:19:29. > :19:31.in terms of job loss Estimations of how many jobs will be

:19:32. > :19:37.wiped out vary widely from study to study,

:19:38. > :19:42.but a recent report especially has It's estimated that robots

:19:43. > :19:46.will replace 37% jobs in the United States

:19:47. > :19:49.by the early 2030s. So the biggest concern

:19:50. > :19:52.is mass job displacement, lack of true, meaningful,

:19:53. > :19:55.high wage work. We are already seeing a decrease

:19:56. > :19:59.of that in San Francisco where we have the fastest growing

:20:00. > :20:01.income gap in the country and a wealth gap that is akin

:20:02. > :20:08.to the country of Rwanda, and so we have a shrinking

:20:09. > :20:12.middle-class and we have this growing imminent threat that

:20:13. > :20:16.many of our meaningful, working-class and even

:20:17. > :20:19.middle-class jobs may go away At Cafe X, again a human worker has

:20:20. > :20:25.been replaced by a robot. An Americano with milk,

:20:26. > :20:29.served by a robot. Now, the human has a different role,

:20:30. > :20:33.advising on coffee beans and showing customers how to use the tablet

:20:34. > :20:37.to operate the robot. The owner is not sure about the idea

:20:38. > :20:41.of a tax on the replacement. I guess I find it a little odd

:20:42. > :20:44.because what robots are supposed That means it allows a shift

:20:45. > :20:51.in labour from doing highly repetitive, low productivity tasks

:20:52. > :20:57.to more useful things. So in order to have this machine

:20:58. > :21:06.operate, there has to be a lot of engineers on software,

:21:07. > :21:09.hardware and manufacturing to build Jobs like this require training

:21:10. > :21:12.and that's what Supervisor Kim wants If you're a childcare worker

:21:13. > :21:17.or you're an in home support services worker,

:21:18. > :21:20.working with a senior or individual with disability,

:21:21. > :21:23.you often work three or four hours So one of the ideas was,

:21:24. > :21:30.why not tax robots and invest in these poverty jobs and make them

:21:31. > :21:33.truly living wage This would mean a robot tax

:21:34. > :21:38.potentially subsidising low paying, but essential jobs,

:21:39. > :21:41.so that the human employees Currently, many people are working

:21:42. > :21:46.but not earning enough to live, leading several politicians around

:21:47. > :21:49.the world to float the idea This would be expensive

:21:50. > :21:55.for governments and Supervisor Kim is suggesting an automation tax

:21:56. > :21:59.could be a solution. If there's one thing that

:22:00. > :22:01.San Francisco is known for, it's leading the conversation

:22:02. > :22:06.on technology and innovation, but as harder and harder questions

:22:07. > :22:09.are asked about automation and what this really means

:22:10. > :22:12.for people's jobs it seems appropriate that this city,

:22:13. > :22:14.which has added so much to the problem, is also grappling

:22:15. > :22:21.with what could be the solution. But the rise of robotic workers

:22:22. > :22:25.is playing out on a global scale and San Francisco is not the only

:22:26. > :22:28.place trying to lead In the EU, a proposal to tax robot

:22:29. > :22:36.was voted down earlier in the year and one of the Commissioners who did

:22:37. > :22:40.so says robots will create more They are worried because they say

:22:41. > :22:44.robots they will take their jobs, Progress always created more jobs

:22:45. > :22:50.than progress used to destroy. The train is moving and speed

:22:51. > :22:55.is high and now it's up to us to be on that train or to stay and to wave

:22:56. > :23:05.to the leaving train. Concerns about automation replacing

:23:06. > :23:08.human jobs has been felt sense the Industrial Revolution and more

:23:09. > :23:11.recently workers in the manufacturing industry

:23:12. > :23:13.have seen jobs disappear As the issue of a robot tax

:23:14. > :23:20.begins to spread further, a fundamental question still needs

:23:21. > :23:22.to be answered - In the context of robots of course

:23:23. > :23:29.automation is much broader They gave this definition

:23:30. > :23:36.more than 100 years ago. Politicians can no longer

:23:37. > :23:38.ignore the robots creeping into the workplace and while many

:23:39. > :23:41.of the big questions are still being thrashed out,

:23:42. > :23:44.it's clear that the issue of robot workers is becoming more

:23:45. > :23:53.and more of a political one. Yeah, really interesting

:23:54. > :23:57.issues, aren't they? That was Cat Hawkins

:23:58. > :24:00.and this's it for this week. You can follow us on Twitter

:24:01. > :24:02.@BBC Click throughout the week and like us

:24:03. > :24:05.on Facebook, too. Thanks for watching

:24:06. > :24:33.and we will see you soon. Some decent, dry, and also for some

:24:34. > :24:37.sunny weather around this weekend. But there will be a lot

:24:38. > :24:40.of cloud around at times, threatening some rain,

:24:41. > :24:42.particularly on Saturday. And throughout Saturday,

:24:43. > :24:45.the air gets warmer and more muggy.