:00:00. > :00:38.Morning, folks, welcome to the Daily Politics.
:00:39. > :00:43.PMQS is back but will it be back with a bang?
:00:44. > :00:45.Teresa May faces Jeremy Corbyn across the Despatch Box
:00:46. > :00:51.We're all talking Brexit strategy - or the lack of it.
:00:52. > :00:55.But does that really interest the Labour leader?
:00:56. > :00:56.Downing Street's keen-eyed photographers capture government
:00:57. > :01:04.But is everyone in the cabinet behind the idea?
:01:05. > :01:06.Labour MPs back plans allowing them to elect members
:01:07. > :01:11.A pragmatic way of making the party work together
:01:12. > :01:15.or an attempt to "hobble" Jeremy Corbyn's leadership?
:01:16. > :01:18.And if your holiday reading was more Nick Hornby than Nick Clegg,
:01:19. > :01:22.then we have just the thing to get you back in the mood.
:01:23. > :01:31.Yes, political book season is upon us!
:01:32. > :01:38.Did you read these books? Every single one. I'm glad, there will be
:01:39. > :01:41.a test later. All that in the next 90
:01:42. > :01:43.minutes of public sector And with us for the duration,
:01:44. > :01:47.two politicians who declined to appear on Strictly Come Dancing,
:01:48. > :01:50.the Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire Chief Secretary to the Treasury,
:01:51. > :01:54.David Gauke, and Shadow Justice This afternoon the Chairman
:01:55. > :02:06.of the Bank of England Mark Carney appears before the Treasury Select
:02:07. > :02:08.Committee, where he'll be quizzed over that cut in interest
:02:09. > :02:10.rates last month. Some are questioning
:02:11. > :02:13.whether the governor was too hasty And whether he was to negative about
:02:14. > :02:23.Brexit during the referendum. And yesterday, four big banking
:02:24. > :02:28.beasts, JP Morgan, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley, all abandoned
:02:29. > :02:43.predictions of a post EU So, did you over egged the pudding
:02:44. > :02:46.in the referendum, David Gauke? It is too early to tell, but there are
:02:47. > :02:51.encouraging signs and there is always attempt Asian after a
:02:52. > :02:59.referendum for both people to pick out things which confirmed their own
:03:00. > :03:09.prejudices -- there is always an attempt after a referendum. But
:03:10. > :03:14.speaking from the Remain camp, the last surveys of various businesses
:03:15. > :03:19.are looking encouraging. When you say vote leave and the economy
:03:20. > :03:25.suffers, you can't say you weren't warned? If there is a downturn, but
:03:26. > :03:30.it was right for those of us who believed in a Remain vote that we
:03:31. > :03:34.made clear what the risks were. But you didn't say a scum use said vote
:03:35. > :03:43.leaves and the economy suffers -- but you didn't say if, you said vote
:03:44. > :03:49.leave and the economy suffers. The risks are still to be played out,
:03:50. > :03:56.but as a Remain voter, there are encouraging signs but I don't think
:03:57. > :04:02.we can be complacent. These are early days, but we can have a look
:04:03. > :04:05.at the figures. The major banks are basically admitting they were wrong,
:04:06. > :04:12.in predicting an immediate recession, and the Chancellor also
:04:13. > :04:16.predicted a recession, the former Chancellor, your former boss will
:04:17. > :04:23.stop the implement rate is at its highest rate and consumer spending
:04:24. > :04:31.is up -- the employment rate is at its highest rate. Even industrial
:04:32. > :04:36.production, manufacturing fell in August, as predicted, but industrial
:04:37. > :04:42.production was up overall in July. Where is the bit that you got right
:04:43. > :04:44.about this? In terms of being a Treasury minister and hearing the
:04:45. > :04:49.positive state of the economy is something which encourages me and we
:04:50. > :04:53.all want the UK economy to succeed. The only point I would make, we
:04:54. > :04:58.can't be complacent and there are still challenges because of
:04:59. > :05:02.uncertainty as to exactly what the future relationship will be and
:05:03. > :05:10.because we will need to adjust to the new circumstances. Did the
:05:11. > :05:14.Remain campaign... And he is quite right, there's a long way to go, and
:05:15. > :05:18.more figures to come out in the months ahead, but did they overdo,
:05:19. > :05:29.from what we know so far, the gloom and doom? To be reasonable, we can
:05:30. > :05:33.say both sides operated a kind of politics of fear and there were
:05:34. > :05:39.things said which were all about frightening voters, on both sides of
:05:40. > :05:41.the debate. What is worrying is a lack of a plan from the
:05:42. > :05:47.Conservatives, they must have entertained the possibility... You
:05:48. > :05:51.mean to get out, and we are going to come onto that. But are you
:05:52. > :06:00.surprised that the British economy is reasonably robust? I say
:06:01. > :06:05.reasonably. Overall industrial production was up, and German
:06:06. > :06:13.industrial production is not at a 20 month low. Overall it is not bad. --
:06:14. > :06:16.is now at a 20 month low. When I hear what Australia and Japan says
:06:17. > :06:21.about trade deals, that is what concerns me. I'm just talking about
:06:22. > :06:30.the figures at the moment. Were you enthusiastic about Remain? I was
:06:31. > :06:31.definite about it. I have long-standing reviews about the
:06:32. > :06:40.weaknesses within the European Union. -- long-standing views. But
:06:41. > :06:47.when it comes to the choice of stay or leave, I believed we should stay
:06:48. > :06:49.and I strongly held that view. If George Osborne has stayed as
:06:50. > :06:56.Chancellor, on the figures we have so far, there would be no need for
:06:57. > :07:05.his threatened punishment budget? Two points about the short-term and
:07:06. > :07:08.long-term, and... I asked the question, he threatened a punishment
:07:09. > :07:14.budget, if we voted to leave, but we can agree there is no case for that
:07:15. > :07:20.kind of budget? George Osborne made it clear when he was Chancellor,
:07:21. > :07:24.after the referendum, that he was not going to come forward with a
:07:25. > :07:29.punishment budget. He made it clear he wasn't going to do that... He
:07:30. > :07:35.would wait to see. Because he was wrong. You said he would wait to see
:07:36. > :07:41.the economic impact. I don't want to fight the referendum campaign again.
:07:42. > :07:45.No! LAUGHTER We are relieved about that. There
:07:46. > :07:51.might be long-term consequences for the UK economy. Contrary to the
:07:52. > :07:54.claims that there will be extra money knocking around, there might
:07:55. > :07:58.be less and we will have to take action to deal with that. But the
:07:59. > :08:05.economy has proven to be pretty strong and that is encouraging or
:08:06. > :08:08.stop no recession? Growth has been downgraded, but we will wait to see
:08:09. > :08:13.what we have in the Autumn Statement.
:08:14. > :08:15.Now yesterday afternoon, Labour MPs and peers voted in favour
:08:16. > :08:17.of reinstating elections to the Shadow Cabinet,
:08:18. > :08:19.taking away the power to appoint from the leader,
:08:20. > :08:23.So, if approved, would it be a pragmatic way of making
:08:24. > :08:24.a seemingly divided party work together.
:08:25. > :08:36.Did you back the proposal? I voted for the leader to retain the right
:08:37. > :08:40.to appoint the Shadow Cabinet. Why? I think this is a distraction but
:08:41. > :08:43.I'm relaxed either way and the party will decide shortly whether the
:08:44. > :08:49.Shadow Cabinet is appointed in the same way or elected in some way. Is
:08:50. > :08:54.this not going to go ahead, even though MPs have actually decided to
:08:55. > :08:58.back that proposal? The National executive committee has got to look
:08:59. > :09:03.at it. And you think they might not pass it? I don't know, but I'm
:09:04. > :09:09.relaxed either way. However the Shadow Cabinet is put in place, the
:09:10. > :09:14.key thing is for all Labour MPs, whoever is elected, is to get the
:09:15. > :09:20.hind the elected leader, Owen Smith or Jeremy Corbyn, and take the fight
:09:21. > :09:23.to the Conservatives. All the polls indicate Jeremy Corbyn is going to
:09:24. > :09:28.win the leadership. It will not solve the problem that 172 MPs, your
:09:29. > :09:37.colleagues, don't have confidence in Jeremy Corbyn as leader. The fact
:09:38. > :09:42.they might elect themselves into the shower -- Shadow Cabinet when change
:09:43. > :09:46.that. He appointed as Shadow Cabinet which reflected a wide spectrum of
:09:47. > :09:52.people from across the political party. That is not my question.
:09:53. > :09:57.Let's assume Jeremy Corbyn is the leader and we have 172 MPs who say
:09:58. > :10:02.they have no confidence in him, they are elected to the Shadow Cabinet.
:10:03. > :10:06.My first question to one of those MPs would be, do you have faith in
:10:07. > :10:13.Jeremy Corbyn and they will say no. Some people have reconsidered the
:10:14. > :10:16.hasty things they said in the aftermath of the referendum result,
:10:17. > :10:19.but what I will say, if Owen Smith is elected leader of the Labour
:10:20. > :10:32.Party I would serve him loyally and if Andy Burnham, for example,
:10:33. > :10:35.had been elected from the last leadership election, I would have
:10:36. > :10:40.supported him. Whoever wins, there is a responsibility from the
:10:41. > :10:44.Parliamentary Labour Party to take the fight to the Conservatives and
:10:45. > :10:48.to do the job we are elected to do. Sometimes in democracy we don't get
:10:49. > :10:52.the job we want. You are expecting your colleagues, who said they'd
:10:53. > :11:01.wouldn't have any confidence in Jeremy Corbyn, you are expecting
:11:02. > :11:08.them to lie and say they have faith in him? -- who said they didn't have
:11:09. > :11:13.any confidence in Jeremy Corbyn. If Jeremy Corbyn is elected as the
:11:14. > :11:16.leader, I think they will focus on the job in hand, which is to say
:11:17. > :11:21.that we want a Labour government with Jeremy Corbyn as leader and we
:11:22. > :11:30.will work night and day for that. If they don't, what will happen to
:11:31. > :11:35.them? I hope they will, and I think if Jeremy Corbyn is elected again as
:11:36. > :11:39.leader, what proportion of the Labour Parliamentary party rolls up
:11:40. > :11:47.their sleeves and gets on with the task at hand. Have you met enough of
:11:48. > :11:51.your colleagues? Tristram Hunt, Emma Reynolds, Rachel Reeves, for
:11:52. > :11:59.example, if they were elected to the Shadow Cabinet, with they serve
:12:00. > :12:03.under Jeremy Corbyn? -- would they. There are people who are prepared to
:12:04. > :12:06.serve if they are elected again and that includes people who are not
:12:07. > :12:12.holding Shadow ministerial jobs at the moment. But they might not be
:12:13. > :12:16.the one selected by their peers. We have got to see how the decision is
:12:17. > :12:22.taken about how the Shadow Cabinet is put in place. The decision about
:12:23. > :12:28.how it is put in place is rather inward, a distraction in a way. You
:12:29. > :12:31.have got to serve as a Parliamentary opposition and a leader needs the
:12:32. > :12:36.support of the MPs, though. If they are going to elect each other into
:12:37. > :12:39.the Shadow Cabinet, it would be difficult for Jeremy Corbyn to be
:12:40. > :12:43.able to command the Shadow Cabinet in a way which takes the fight to
:12:44. > :12:53.the Tories? You must be worried about lap. Who is ever elected
:12:54. > :12:57.leader, they would have a big mandate, 640,000 people have the
:12:58. > :13:02.chance to vote in this election, that is a big responsibility. If
:13:03. > :13:07.Owen Smith is elected, I will respect the mandate. I would
:13:08. > :13:11.encourage my colleagues to do the right thing and do the same in the
:13:12. > :13:16.event of Jeremy Corbyn being elected. You think this proposal has
:13:17. > :13:22.been an attempt to hobble Jeremy Corbyn? There are issues, the lack
:13:23. > :13:28.of a plan from the government in terms of the situation when Britain
:13:29. > :13:34.leaves the EU. But the problem will be there is not a Parliamentary
:13:35. > :13:37.party that is one. I would urge my colleagues to look outwards, there
:13:38. > :13:43.is the caricature that it is those who are characterised on the left of
:13:44. > :13:46.the party who are inward looking but I think we need to be outward
:13:47. > :13:51.looking, and we should not be letting down the people who elected
:13:52. > :13:57.us. They did not elect us to spend our time constitutional wrangling,
:13:58. > :14:00.with Parliamentary plots, we are elected to hold the Conservative
:14:01. > :14:05.government to account, and whoever is elected Labour leader will have a
:14:06. > :14:12.huge mandate and should be supported. If they don't represent
:14:13. > :14:17.the leader and the majority of the members, do you think they should be
:14:18. > :14:22.deselected? The talk of deselection and other things is a distraction.
:14:23. > :14:28.It has been talked about. Someone a few days ago was talking about how
:14:29. > :14:31.to deselect your local MP. That is an inward looking distraction, and
:14:32. > :14:34.I'm urging people to look outwards and take the fight to the
:14:35. > :14:39.Conservatives and stop fighting amongst ourselves. Labour MPs have
:14:40. > :14:43.more in common with each other than that which divides them ideological
:14:44. > :14:51.way. It would be good if you could point to some of those examples.
:14:52. > :14:58.We've got 20 of time exclaim macro -- we've got plenty of time!
:14:59. > :15:01.So it's the start of a new term, we've got Theresa May's second PMQs
:15:02. > :15:04.coming up shortly, where no doubt she'll face some tough questions
:15:05. > :15:05.about her priorities for the coming months,
:15:06. > :15:07.though leadership challenger Owen Smith doesn't think so.
:15:08. > :15:10.He's sent Mr Corbyn his own list of questions to ask.
:15:11. > :15:12.Anyway, what is clogging up the Prime Minister's in-tray,
:15:13. > :15:14.and what can we expect her to focus on?
:15:15. > :15:19.Top of the agenda is, of course, Brexit, with the all
:15:20. > :15:21.important question being - when will Theresa May trigger
:15:22. > :15:29.Article 50 and start formal exit negotiations with the EU?
:15:30. > :15:31.She's got a trio of Brexit ministers on the case,
:15:32. > :15:33.but the Prime Minister is keeping tight lipped
:15:34. > :15:36.about what our future relationship with the EU might look like.
:15:37. > :15:38.With Downing Street rebuking the Brexit Minister David Davis
:15:39. > :15:40.for saying on Monday that it is "very improbable"
:15:41. > :15:43.that the UK will remain a member of the single market, a spokesman
:15:44. > :15:52.Other big decisions looming are whether to give the go-ahead to
:15:53. > :15:57.and to a third runway at Heathrow Airport.
:15:58. > :15:59.Theresa May will personally chair a cabinet committee,
:16:00. > :16:08.tasked with making the final decision on airport expansion.
:16:09. > :16:11.We haven't been waiting long, of course!
:16:12. > :16:13.The economy will take centre stage for Philip Hammond's
:16:14. > :16:15.first Autumn Statement, when we'll get the first
:16:16. > :16:17.official economic forecasts since the referendum.
:16:18. > :16:19.And find out how the new Chancellor plans to 'reset'
:16:20. > :16:24.As if that wasn't enough to be getting on with,
:16:25. > :16:27.documents photographed being carried into Downing Street reveal a Cabinet
:16:28. > :16:32.split over plans to create new grammar schools.
:16:33. > :16:34.Theresa May is thought to be in favour, but Education Secretary
:16:35. > :16:38.Justine Greening wants new grammars to be "presented as an option",
:16:39. > :16:41.and "only pursued" once they have explored how to "avoid
:16:42. > :16:51.disadvantaging those who don't get in".
:16:52. > :16:58.Thank you. David Gauke, do you support the creation of new grammar
:16:59. > :17:02.schools? There is a lot of press speculation at the moment about any
:17:03. > :17:10.future announcement that may be made on education policy. In terms of,
:17:11. > :17:15.I'm not going to comment on the specific, some of these specific
:17:16. > :17:19.proposals. I know that, I am asking you a simple question, do you
:17:20. > :17:23.support the creation of new grammar schools? What is important is we
:17:24. > :17:28.have an education system that gives more people the opportunity to have
:17:29. > :17:32.excellent education. Lets take that for granted. With the creation of
:17:33. > :17:37.new grammar schools be part of that process? I think that's where we
:17:38. > :17:43.start to get into details of announcements, and looking at, if
:17:44. > :17:49.you like, a package of announcements. Should the creation
:17:50. > :17:53.of new grammar schools be part of a package for education? The point I
:17:54. > :18:00.would make is our objective is to ensure we can find ways in which
:18:01. > :18:04.more people get a good education. Every politician... The question is
:18:05. > :18:09.how do you do it? I will try one more time. Do you think that in
:18:10. > :18:13.efforts to improve social mobility and help kids, brighter kids from
:18:14. > :18:18.poor backgrounds, with the creation of new grammar schools be part of
:18:19. > :18:25.that process? As I say, and you can ask the question again, we have to
:18:26. > :18:29.look at the overall context of the announcements that could be made,
:18:30. > :18:33.the reforms that could be made. The objective, we have been very clear
:18:34. > :18:39.about that, is about increasing those opportunities. OK, the viewers
:18:40. > :18:47.will come to their own conclusions with your answers to that question.
:18:48. > :18:51.Europe and Brexit. David Davis made a comment to the Commons this week
:18:52. > :18:55.about Brexit plans, what did he tell us we didn't know already? I think
:18:56. > :19:03.it was a helpful update to Parliament, setting out some of the
:19:04. > :19:09.thinking going into this. I think in terms of... Of the content, it
:19:10. > :19:12.really was just helpful to outline to Parliament some of the engagement
:19:13. > :19:17.going on, some of the things we are looking at. We are not rushing into
:19:18. > :19:24.this. I think we have worked that out! What was new? It is now over
:19:25. > :19:29.two months since the vote on the 23rd of June, well over two months,
:19:30. > :19:34.coming up to three. What has he been able to tell us we didn't know
:19:35. > :19:41.already? Well, I can understand from your perspective, always looking for
:19:42. > :19:47.a news story. Two and a half months. We would like a clear idea of the
:19:48. > :19:52.path ahead. What did he tell us that gave us a clear idea? I think he set
:19:53. > :19:56.out information about the new government department that has been
:19:57. > :20:01.set up to lead and coordinate this. What did he tell us about it? In
:20:02. > :20:04.terms of practical points on the work they are doing, the staff they
:20:05. > :20:10.have taken on and so on. He talked about being gay judgment with other
:20:11. > :20:14.countries. This is one of the most complicated. -- he talked about the
:20:15. > :20:20.engagement with other countries. We know all of that. It is ten weeks
:20:21. > :20:26.since we voted to leave. Surely the Government... We are not asking for
:20:27. > :20:31.the detailed blueprint, but surely the Government, after ten weeks
:20:32. > :20:35.could give us a slightly clear indication of what that route is
:20:36. > :20:40.ahead. So far you've been able to tell me nothing about this route
:20:41. > :20:44.that we didn't know already this comes back to the wide appointment
:20:45. > :20:50.of the plan Richard has touched on a couple of times. We will be engaging
:20:51. > :20:57.in an important negotiation with the EU 27 member states. It is an
:20:58. > :21:05.negotiation where we are seeking a unique deal for the United Kingdom.
:21:06. > :21:10.It's not about taking an off-the-shelf particular route. We
:21:11. > :21:16.are setting out we want to achieve that unique deal, we are negotiating
:21:17. > :21:20.with other member states. I was doing better on grammar schools even
:21:21. > :21:23.though I was getting nowhere there either! You don't think there is a
:21:24. > :21:28.road map and it is clear from them what the minister said many might
:21:29. > :21:32.agree, but do you think... When do you believe Article 50 should be
:21:33. > :21:38.triggered? First of all I don't think that Labour or any party
:21:39. > :21:41.should engage in any wrangling which makes it look like they are trying
:21:42. > :21:45.to wriggle out of the decision the British people took. I said earlier
:21:46. > :21:51.democracy does not always yield the result we want. Unlike Owen Smith,
:21:52. > :21:55.you don't think, whenever we do finally do this deal to leave and
:21:56. > :21:58.see exactly what the blueprint is, you don't think measure be a
:21:59. > :22:05.referendum on that as Mr Smith has called for? My belief is a second
:22:06. > :22:11.referendum would run the risk of making the British people feel the
:22:12. > :22:15.self appointed elite is asking the same question again, to get the
:22:16. > :22:20.answer they want. When do you think Article 50 should be triggered? We
:22:21. > :22:24.do need a clear plan but I would like to make this point. I'd like
:22:25. > :22:29.you to answer the question. I'd like to make this point. Wendy think
:22:30. > :22:33.Article 50 should be triggered? I was disappointed the other day David
:22:34. > :22:36.Davis didn't give a more comprehensive answer. They must have
:22:37. > :22:40.entertained the possibility, at least when they called the
:22:41. > :22:44.referendum, the British people might decide to vote to Leave. They were
:22:45. > :22:49.telling department not to plan for it. I think we have established we
:22:50. > :22:53.didn't learn very much that was new from David Davis, that is clear.
:22:54. > :22:58.What I am trying to get from you is an idea of Labour's policy. When do
:22:59. > :23:05.you think Article 50 should be triggered? The end of this year, the
:23:06. > :23:08.beginning of next year, when? I think we need to discuss this in
:23:09. > :23:14.great detail before any decisions are taken. Should Parliament have a
:23:15. > :23:20.vote on it? On? Triggering Article 50? The onus is on the Government,
:23:21. > :23:25.who got us into this situation, Australia are saying they won't
:23:26. > :23:33.enter into a trade deal with Britain and we have left the EU. Japan...
:23:34. > :23:37.They said they would be happy to begin a scoping exercise. I didn't
:23:38. > :23:42.ask you about Australia. First I asked when Article 50 should be
:23:43. > :23:45.triggered? The answer they came was nothing. Then should Parliament
:23:46. > :23:48.focused on the Government says it doesn't need a vote of parliament to
:23:49. > :23:55.trigger Article 50, what is your view? My view is the onus is on the
:23:56. > :24:03.Government to set a path forward. OK. Early days! It is.
:24:04. > :24:05.Now, we might have a new Prime Minister,
:24:06. > :24:12.And I'm not talking about what you've just been watching!
:24:13. > :24:14.Yesterday a senior civil servant accidentally leaked government
:24:15. > :24:16.policy on grammar schools through the time-honoured method
:24:17. > :24:20.of flashing a secret memo to photographers outside Number 10.
:24:21. > :24:27.State secrets have been revealed in this way, including by the head of
:24:28. > :24:28.security. I must not leak government
:24:29. > :24:35.secrets to the press! I want you to write it out 100 times
:24:36. > :24:38.in Latin. But if you're a top mandarin worried
:24:39. > :24:41.about leaks, help is at hand. You just need to get your hands
:24:42. > :24:44.one of these. Introducing our very own anti-leak
:24:45. > :24:46.device - And when you're not using it
:24:47. > :24:54.to drink coffee, you can conceal top But if you want one you have
:24:55. > :25:02.to enter our Guess Yes, to be in with a chance
:25:03. > :25:09.of winning, see if you can tell us There could be a second
:25:10. > :25:19.bomb device, get back! Right back, across
:25:20. > :25:21.the end of the street. Right back, out of
:25:22. > :25:31.the way, right back. He was reported missing
:25:32. > :25:40.by the captain of the ship. # Although I search myself, it's
:25:41. > :25:46.always someone else I see...# # And it's you girl,
:25:47. > :25:59.making it spin...# # Shake your body, turn
:26:00. > :26:10.it out if you can, man # Move it back to the
:26:11. > :26:13.side, if you can, can # Everybody in the
:26:14. > :26:15.house do the Bartman # Shake your body, turn it
:26:16. > :26:23.out if you can, man.# To be in with a chance of winning
:26:24. > :26:29.a Daily Politics mug, Send your answer to our special
:26:30. > :26:34.quiz email address - Entries must arrive by 12.30 today,
:26:35. > :26:38.and you can see the full terms and conditions for Guess The Year
:26:39. > :26:41.on our website - Why have they got to be in by 12.30?
:26:42. > :26:52.I don't know. It's coming up to midday here -
:26:53. > :26:56.just take a look at Big Ben - Not seen that for a while. There it
:26:57. > :27:03.is. It is humid. Prime Minister's
:27:04. > :27:05.Questions is on its way. And that's not all -
:27:06. > :27:08.fresh from her trip to the G20 in China with Theresa May,
:27:09. > :27:22.Laura Kuenssberg is here. Or Theresa May was with her! I'm
:27:23. > :27:32.talking of Laura. Good to have you back. It is nice to be here. After
:27:33. > :27:35.PMQs, the state Prime Minister will give a statement on the G20's. She
:27:36. > :27:40.came under pressure about Brexit and what her plans are. What did you
:27:41. > :27:44.take away from this? I think you had a really interesting thing happen in
:27:45. > :27:48.the last 48 hours. Whether it is on one side of the world or here at
:27:49. > :27:52.home, Theresa May is facing the same questions, what on earth is this
:27:53. > :27:56.going to mean? And what does this phrase Brexit mean? That has gone
:27:57. > :28:01.round the world. Even the White House press corps asked the Prime
:28:02. > :28:04.Minister what Brexit means. There has been this decision by the
:28:05. > :28:07.Government, whether it is because they don't know or they want to keep
:28:08. > :28:11.it a secret, that they are just not going to be the kind of operation
:28:12. > :28:15.where they are going to set up their goals publicly before they are sure
:28:16. > :28:19.that they can get somewhere on them. It occurs to me there is a really
:28:20. > :28:24.striking difference between Theresa May and her first month son David
:28:25. > :28:26.Cameron. He was sort of decision first, headline first, details
:28:27. > :28:46.later. She is the polar opposite. I think
:28:47. > :28:48.in the statement she will give after Prime Minister's Questions, we will
:28:49. > :28:51.get a strong message from her, you are just going to have to wait and
:28:52. > :28:54.see. Of course, that comes with huge political risk. We saw that
:28:55. > :28:56.yesterday when David Davis said it is not likely we will stay in the
:28:57. > :28:59.single market. That created a huge backlash from number ten. When there
:29:00. > :29:02.is a blank page, people filling the space for you. We will speak more
:29:03. > :29:05.about Brexit after PMQs and whatever else is raised. At the G20's, was
:29:06. > :29:07.there a sense of optimism or a sense of concern about the overall course
:29:08. > :29:10.of the global economy? I think there was a thank goodness it isn't as bad
:29:11. > :29:13.as we thought it might have been a couple of months ago. Before the
:29:14. > :29:18.summer, bigger concerns about how bad things would be in China, how
:29:19. > :29:23.shaky was the world? Were we looking at a significant slowdown or were we
:29:24. > :29:27.looking at a change in tempo? There was a bit vague, we might have
:29:28. > :29:31.missed something quite bad, but we still have concerns. Brexit was one
:29:32. > :29:36.of the concerns lots of countries were talking about, the Japanese,
:29:37. > :29:43.the Italians. President Obama making no secret at all... It wasn't good.
:29:44. > :29:49.He basically said, I think you voted the long way. Maybe there is a bit
:29:50. > :29:56.of, well you didn't listen to me, did you? But he's off in a couple of
:29:57. > :30:01.months. He and there will be a new Congress and a new president. There
:30:02. > :30:06.must be concern about a new Congress and President among the G20. There
:30:07. > :30:11.is uncertainty on the global scene, not just with Brexit? Yes. What
:30:12. > :30:14.happens in the US and how it unfolds must have been in the backs of
:30:15. > :30:18.everyone's mind. That was one of the themes at the T20, talking about how
:30:19. > :30:23.to guard against protection, which is something coming up the rails in
:30:24. > :30:28.many questions around the world. -- at the G20. And in France and
:30:29. > :30:33.Germany. Yes. And the Labour Party in Britain. It was one of the things
:30:34. > :30:39.Theresa May was trying to use to mould this new USP for Britain as
:30:40. > :30:42.being the global leader in free trade, and trying to push back at
:30:43. > :30:47.the populism happening in other countries. But nothing like that new
:30:48. > :30:50.brand coming out of Britain is going to have much impact until the much
:30:51. > :30:55.bigger questions about what happens about leaving the EU are answered.
:30:56. > :30:58.We never thought Mrs May cared very much on you very much about foreign
:30:59. > :31:04.affairs. She was Home Secretary for six years. Do you think she enjoyed
:31:05. > :31:10.this global stage? I think... In actual fact, these things are 36
:31:11. > :31:14.hours gone, there was a difference in how she was at the end and the
:31:15. > :31:19.very beginning. When she walked onto the stage with President Obama she
:31:20. > :31:22.looked nervous, a little bit unsettled. They just had an hour
:31:23. > :31:27.meeting, that we know was not an easy meeting at all. I have closing
:31:28. > :31:31.press conference she looked ten times more relaxed and ten times
:31:32. > :31:36.more at ease. Who wouldn't be nervous, turning up to see 19 of the
:31:37. > :31:40.world's most powerful people? I'm not sure if she's going to be the
:31:41. > :31:43.kind of person who will really enjoy these kind of grand occasions. You
:31:44. > :31:47.can see how leaders handle themselves when the cameras are
:31:48. > :31:50.there. Everyone rushes up to go and stand next to the American
:31:51. > :32:03.president, give him a high five and stand next to the most important
:32:04. > :32:05.person in the May didn't do that. That is not her style. She was
:32:06. > :32:08.trying to find allies and friends. We saw her and Angela Merkel went
:32:09. > :32:10.together at one point. Her and Christina Lang guard. Fascinating.
:32:11. > :32:12.Laura, we can go straight to the Commons on the first Prime
:32:13. > :32:22.Minister's Questions of the new season.
:32:23. > :32:32.I would like to congratulate the British Olympic team on a great
:32:33. > :32:37.medical -- medal haul, finishing second, in front of China. CHEERING
:32:38. > :32:41.I know everyone would wish to give the very best wishes to our
:32:42. > :32:46.Paralympic athletes and wish them the best of success. This morning I
:32:47. > :32:48.had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, and I will
:32:49. > :32:58.have further such meetings later today. May I add my warm wishes to
:32:59. > :33:02.those, all Paralympians and those from Bristol in particular, they
:33:03. > :33:12.will do us Brown. The whole house will be delighted that this house
:33:13. > :33:18.houses a disproportionate number of the worlds finest university -- that
:33:19. > :33:23.this country. However, some are being shutout in anticipation of
:33:24. > :33:26.Brexit, this is so important for scientific, medical, engineering and
:33:27. > :33:34.other research, and for our economic prosperity. Can the Prime Minister
:33:35. > :33:43.please tell us what her strategy is? Can I first of all say come out very
:33:44. > :33:46.good it is to see her in this house. We agree of the importance of
:33:47. > :33:55.valuable adversities and the work they do and the research and
:33:56. > :34:01.collaboration they have -- of the value of our universities. We have
:34:02. > :34:04.given certain guarantees to universities in relation to funding
:34:05. > :34:08.decisions which have been taken by the European Union and we are
:34:09. > :34:14.standing by them because we recognise the value they bring to
:34:15. > :34:19.the country. Neil Parish. Thank you, Mr Speaker. I welcome the statement
:34:20. > :34:25.from the Chancellor on support payments for farmers after 2020, to
:34:26. > :34:28.give confidence to farming and the countryside, but with trade deals
:34:29. > :34:35.now being done, bridges farmers produce some of the best welfare and
:34:36. > :34:39.friendly food in the world and we need to make sure they are not both
:34:40. > :34:43.farming... We need to make sure the food industry is protected through
:34:44. > :34:49.trade deals in the future and I seek reassurance from the Prime Minister.
:34:50. > :34:54.-- British farmers. You are right, the announcement I referred to just
:34:55. > :34:57.now, to answer the first question the Chancellor gave, gave guarantees
:34:58. > :35:02.to the farming industry about the support available to them after 2020
:35:03. > :35:05.but we need to recognise the very significant role that the food and
:35:06. > :35:10.farming industry plays in the United Kingdom and we will be looking to
:35:11. > :35:13.work with the sector. The Environment Secretary will be doing
:35:14. > :35:17.that to see how we can develop those industries looking into the future.
:35:18. > :35:22.And looking at the trade deals we will be doing and how they will play
:35:23. > :35:30.their part. Jeremy Corbyn. Thank you. Can I join the Prime Minister
:35:31. > :35:34.in congratulating the entirety of the Olympic team for their fantastic
:35:35. > :35:40.achievements at the Olympics in Rio and wish the Paralympic team all the
:35:41. > :35:47.best and can she tell us, did this set the visit off to China in a good
:35:48. > :35:53.way or was there a bit of tension? If bragging rights were allowed. The
:35:54. > :35:59.average house price in Britain is now ?215,000 and over eight times
:36:00. > :36:03.the average wage. The average price of a first-time buyers home has
:36:04. > :36:11.risen by 12% in the past year. Isn't the dream of home ownership for many
:36:12. > :36:18.people just that? A dreamer? First of all, in response to the first
:36:19. > :36:21.point, I actually... The Chinese president congratulated me on the
:36:22. > :36:27.success of the United Kingdom in the Olympic Games. He raises the issues
:36:28. > :36:29.of housing which he has raised on a number of occasions with my
:36:30. > :36:35.predecessor and also with me before we broke for the summer recess. Of
:36:36. > :36:42.course it is important for us to look at helping people get their
:36:43. > :36:46.first... Their step on the first rung of the housing ladder or stop
:36:47. > :36:51.that is why I'm pleased that house-building has been up under a
:36:52. > :36:56.Conservative government compared to Labour, but we are not complacent
:36:57. > :36:59.and we will be doing more. We will have more houses being built under
:37:00. > :37:02.this Conservative government and also providing support for people to
:37:03. > :37:08.make sure they have the financial support which helps them to own
:37:09. > :37:11.their own home. House-building under this government is 45,000 a year
:37:12. > :37:22.less than it was under the last Labour government. And for those who
:37:23. > :37:31.are desperate to get their own place, I referred the Prime Minister
:37:32. > :37:36.to an note I received from a lady called Jenny, her partner and
:37:37. > :37:40.herself work in a supermarket, they are trying to get a mortgage and
:37:41. > :37:48.they have been told they can borrow ?73,000. Not much hope for them,
:37:49. > :37:53.then. The former Prime Minister promised there would be a wonderful
:37:54. > :37:59.one replacement for every council house that is sold under right to
:38:00. > :38:04.buy -- there would be a one for one. Sadly there is only one for every
:38:05. > :38:08.five that are sold. Will the prime to give us a commitment on the one
:38:09. > :38:14.for one replacement and when will it be a reality? Can I say to Jenny
:38:15. > :38:16.that I fully understand and appreciate the concerns that
:38:17. > :38:22.individuals have about wanting to be able to have their own home and to
:38:23. > :38:27.set up that home and I recognise the difficulties that they are after
:38:28. > :38:31.some people in doing that. I have to say, in relation to the figures on
:38:32. > :38:36.council houses, he is wrong, we have delivered on the one for one
:38:37. > :38:43.replacement on leave to buy. I'm very interested. I noticed that the
:38:44. > :38:50.right honourable gentleman had asked his Twitter followers what questions
:38:51. > :38:54.he should ask me this week and I thought I would love to see what
:38:55. > :38:57.responses he would receive, and I thought the first one was quite good
:38:58. > :39:09.-- I would look. He might want to stay sitting down. Lewis writes,
:39:10. > :39:16.does she know that in a recent Paltan who would make a better Prime
:39:17. > :39:19.Minister, -- does she know that in a recent poll on who would make a
:39:20. > :39:26.better Prime Minister, don't know rated higher than Jeremy Corbyn. We
:39:27. > :39:32.do know that we're not going to let Labour anywhere near power again.
:39:33. > :39:37.The number of first-time buyers has halved in the last 20 years and the
:39:38. > :39:44.average age has increased a great deal. There is a housing crisis in
:39:45. > :39:48.Britain. 10 million people now live in the private rented sector and
:39:49. > :39:54.many are forced to claim housing benefit to cover costs of rents.
:39:55. > :40:01.Devastating figures released over the summer show that ?9.3 billion of
:40:02. > :40:06.public money is paid through housing benefit directly into the pockets of
:40:07. > :40:11.private landlords. Does the Prime Minister think this ?9.3 billion
:40:12. > :40:20.into the private rental market is really money well spent? I have to
:40:21. > :40:25.say, he talks about the importance of people being able to buy their
:40:26. > :40:29.own homes and then challenge is one of the measures which helps people
:40:30. > :40:32.to get into their own homes through housing benefit, support in the
:40:33. > :40:37.private rented sector, so it might be that he has an ideological
:40:38. > :40:41.objection to the private rented sector, but what this government is
:40:42. > :40:44.doing is making sure that what we are doing is looking across the
:40:45. > :40:48.board so we will see more houses being built. We are looking to make
:40:49. > :40:53.sure there is a diversity of opportunity for people in terms of
:40:54. > :41:01.getting their own home, but I have to say, everything he says tells us
:41:02. > :41:04.all we need to know about modern Labour, the train has left the
:41:05. > :41:08.station, the seats are empty, the leader is on the floor, and even on
:41:09. > :41:16.rolling stock they are a laughing stock. CHEERING
:41:17. > :41:32.Mr Speaker... Mr Speaker... Her predecessor... Mr Speaker, her
:41:33. > :41:36.predecessor in discussing this issue said the simple point is that every
:41:37. > :41:43.penny you spend on housing subsidy is money you can't spend on building
:41:44. > :41:49.houses. And if landlords rent outhouses in a very bad state, such
:41:50. > :41:53.as heavy damp wet walls, no working toilet, they need to be getting
:41:54. > :41:57.fined. The government has got to regulate, that is what choice wrote
:41:58. > :42:03.to me, and the citizens advice bureau says one sixth of housing
:42:04. > :42:10.benefit goes to private sector landlords renting out on safe homes,
:42:11. > :42:18.is this really a satisfactory state of affairs gridlock -- on safe. What
:42:19. > :42:23.I would say, if he thinks housing benefit is actually such a bad
:42:24. > :42:25.thing, why was it that when we change the rules on housing benefit
:42:26. > :42:33.the Labour Party opposed those changes that we took? He talks about
:42:34. > :42:36.bad landlords, we have changed the rules on selective licensing and we
:42:37. > :42:42.are making changes and we have given councils free reign to impose
:42:43. > :42:49.burdens of the Chrissy on landlords -- burdens of bureaucracy on
:42:50. > :42:55.landlords, we think that will lead to problems in the market with high
:42:56. > :43:00.costs on tenants and landlords. We are looking at all of these issues.
:43:01. > :43:05.I recognise as every MP does the problems that people have when they
:43:06. > :43:09.are living in accommodation that is not up to the standard that we would
:43:10. > :43:13.wish to see people living in. That is why we are looking and changing
:43:14. > :43:19.the rules and we are making sure that the regulations are there. That
:43:20. > :43:22.is extremely interesting. Only a year ago the Prime Minister voted
:43:23. > :43:27.against a Labour amendment to the housing bill which simply said all
:43:28. > :43:34.homes for rent in the private rented sector should be fit for human
:43:35. > :43:42.habitation. Just over a year ago the Treasury estimated that it is losing
:43:43. > :43:47.half ?1 billion per year on unpaid tax on landlords renting in the
:43:48. > :43:52.private rented sector. ?9.5 billion in housing benefit, half a billion
:43:53. > :43:56.not being collected and a large number of homes not really fit for
:43:57. > :44:00.human habitation. Does this require government intervention on the side
:44:01. > :44:07.of the tenant and those in housing need? The right honourable gentleman
:44:08. > :44:11.asks for the government to intervene, and the government has
:44:12. > :44:16.the housing and panning act introduced further tough measures --
:44:17. > :44:20.planning act. Banning orders for serious offenders and repayment
:44:21. > :44:24.orders, we have provided money so local authorities can conduct more
:44:25. > :44:28.inspections of properties, people's homes, we have seen more people and
:44:29. > :44:32.more properties being inspected, we now have thousands of landlords
:44:33. > :44:36.facing further action. Far from not taking action in this area, the
:44:37. > :44:45.government has. But I say to the right John -- honourable gentleman,
:44:46. > :44:47.he might have a vision of society where he doesn't want private
:44:48. > :44:51.landlords and he would like the government deliberating on
:44:52. > :44:55.everything about that is not what we want. We want opportunities for
:44:56. > :45:00.people -- but that is not what we want. They're big difference between
:45:01. > :45:08.him and me is that we want people to take opportunities. We want to make
:45:09. > :45:10.sure that those living in the private rented sector are properly
:45:11. > :45:18.treated and not having to pay excessive levels of rent. Womens Aid
:45:19. > :45:22.has said that two thirds of women refugees are going to close because
:45:23. > :45:30.of the benefit cap when it comes into force and that 87% of women and
:45:31. > :45:34.children who are in those refuges will suffer as a result and most of
:45:35. > :45:40.those refuges require an income level which comes mainly from
:45:41. > :45:44.housing benefit, 90% from vat. Does the Prime Minister recognised that
:45:45. > :45:48.these are very vulnerable women in those refuges and the closure of
:45:49. > :45:51.them would be devastating for them and very dangerous for the most
:45:52. > :45:56.vulnerable people within our society? Will should take action to
:45:57. > :46:05.make sure the cat doesn't apply to Womens Aid refuges? -- the cap.
:46:06. > :46:09.The right honourable gentleman raises a very important issue. On
:46:10. > :46:14.the issue of domestic violence we should come across this house, do
:46:15. > :46:20.all we can to stop these crimes taking place and provide support to
:46:21. > :46:26.the victims and survivors of these crimes. We are working on exempting
:46:27. > :46:31.refuges from the cap. I would also remind him of the very good record
:46:32. > :46:35.that we have on domestic violence. It was a Conservative government
:46:36. > :46:43.that introduced the new offence of coercive control, that put into
:46:44. > :46:47.practice those laws, that putting ?80 million to support domestic
:46:48. > :46:51.violence victims in the period up to 2020. We are listening to these
:46:52. > :46:56.problems and we are responding to them and we all take this very
:46:57. > :47:01.seriously indeed. But I say to the right honourable gentleman, it is 50
:47:02. > :47:06.days since he and I last met across this dispatch box. It would be nice
:47:07. > :47:11.to see you, he said. It is nice to see him sitting in his place.
:47:12. > :47:15.LAUGHTER And I have to say, if we just look
:47:16. > :47:20.at the contrast is what -- of what has been done over the summer, the
:47:21. > :47:26.Conservative government has been working tirelessly to support
:47:27. > :47:31.everyone. Yanuyanutawa ?250 million of loans
:47:32. > :47:35.to small businesses, introduced the racial disparity audit, looking at
:47:36. > :47:39.public services and how they treat people and setting the groundwork
:47:40. > :47:47.for new trade deals around the world.
:47:48. > :47:51.What we have seen, what a contrast. What a contrast with the party
:47:52. > :47:55.opposite, divided amongst themselves, and I'm capable of
:47:56. > :48:00.uniting our country. What we do know is there is only one party that is
:48:01. > :48:04.going to provide a country, a government, and economy, a society
:48:05. > :48:15.that works for everyone, and that's the Conservative Party! CHEERING
:48:16. > :48:19.. Last week the children Society published a report that showed 10%
:48:20. > :48:24.of children feel their lives have little meaning or purpose. I know
:48:25. > :48:28.the Prime Minister understands the importance of tackling mental
:48:29. > :48:33.health, because she raised in her Downing Street speech. What further
:48:34. > :48:36.action does she propose to increase mental health support in our
:48:37. > :48:40.schools? My honourable friend raises a very
:48:41. > :48:44.important point. I think there has been a collective concern about the
:48:45. > :48:50.issue of the way in which mental health is dealt with. That is why we
:48:51. > :48:53.put a record ?1.4 billion into transforming the dedicated mental
:48:54. > :48:58.health support available to young people across the country. That
:48:59. > :49:01.includes ?150 million for services to support children and young people
:49:02. > :49:05.with eating disorders. There are other things, we are publishing a
:49:06. > :49:10.blueprint for school counselling services. The role schools play is
:49:11. > :49:12.very important in this. I know that my right honourable friend the
:49:13. > :49:21.Education Secretary will be looking very closely at the report to see
:49:22. > :49:24.what more we can do. May I join with the Prime Minister and leader of the
:49:25. > :49:30.Labour Party in praising all Olympians. This is the first day of
:49:31. > :49:35.the Paralympics, an inspiration to us all. Mr Speaker, there is very
:49:36. > :49:41.real concern and worry about the prospect of Brexit, especially in
:49:42. > :49:46.Scotland, where the of people voted Remain in the EU. The UK Government
:49:47. > :49:52.has had all summer to come up with a plan, to come up with a strategy. So
:49:53. > :49:56.far we've just had waffle. Can I ask the Prime Minister a very simple
:49:57. > :50:03.question, she want the UK to remain fully in the single market?
:50:04. > :50:08.What I want the UK is we put in place, into practice the vote taken
:50:09. > :50:14.by UK people to leave the European Union. That we get the right deal
:50:15. > :50:17.for the trade in goods and services with the European Union, a new
:50:18. > :50:22.relationship we will be building with them and we also introduce
:50:23. > :50:25.control of the movement of people from the European Union into the
:50:26. > :50:30.United Kingdom. I say we can approach the vote that took place on
:50:31. > :50:34.the 23rd of June in two ways. We can try and go back neck, have a second
:50:35. > :50:40.referendum, say we didn't really believe it. Actually, we are
:50:41. > :50:45.respecting the views of the people. -- we can go back on it. But more
:50:46. > :50:49.than that, we will be seizing the opportunities that leaving the
:50:50. > :50:55.European Union now gives us, to forge a new role for the United
:50:56. > :50:58.Kingdom in the wild. We on these benches respect the
:50:59. > :51:11.views of the people of Scotland who voted to Remain. The European single
:51:12. > :51:16.market... One mast be heard, and he will be heard. Mr Angus Robertson.
:51:17. > :51:20.The European single market is the biggest market in the world and it
:51:21. > :51:25.really matters to our businesses and it really matters to our economy. I
:51:26. > :51:31.asked the Prime Minister a very, very simple question. It's either in
:51:32. > :51:36.or out answer. Let me ask again, does she want the United Kingdom to
:51:37. > :51:41.remain fully part of the European single market? Yes or no?
:51:42. > :51:48.The right honourable gentleman doesn't quite seem to understand...
:51:49. > :51:54.What the vote on the 23rd of June was about. The United Kingdom will
:51:55. > :51:59.leave the European Union and we will build a new relationship with the
:52:00. > :52:03.European Union. That new relationship will include control of
:52:04. > :52:07.the movement of people from the EU into the UK and it will include the
:52:08. > :52:12.right deal for trade in goods and services. That is how to approach
:52:13. > :52:15.it. I also say this to the right honourable gentleman, in looking at
:52:16. > :52:23.negotiations it would not be right for me or this government to give a
:52:24. > :52:34.running commentary on negotiations. Or... Order, order. Just as the
:52:35. > :52:37.right honourable gentleman must've been heard, the Prime Minister's
:52:38. > :52:43.answer be heard. It would not be right for us to
:52:44. > :52:46.prejudge those negotiations. We will be ensuring we achieve opportunities
:52:47. > :52:50.for growth and prosperity across the UK, including growth and prosperity
:52:51. > :52:54.in Scotland. As we saw from figures released this summer, what gives
:52:55. > :52:59.growth and prosperity in Scotland is being a member of the United
:53:00. > :53:04.Kingdom. Thank you Mr Speaker. Last week
:53:05. > :53:07.hundreds of local residents and businesses attended my faster
:53:08. > :53:14.broadband fair. Many of those with the very slowest speeds a ?500 about
:53:15. > :53:16.voucher to fund an alternative broadband connection capable of
:53:17. > :53:22.delivering at least 10 megabits per second. Will the Prime Minister join
:53:23. > :53:28.me in congratulating Somerset County Council on this excellent scheme and
:53:29. > :53:33.confirm the Government remains committed of delivering a service of
:53:34. > :53:37.10 megabits a second by 2020? I am happy to give my assurance and join
:53:38. > :53:41.with him in paying tribute to his council and the work they are doing,
:53:42. > :53:45.and all those involved in that innovative scheme. High-speed
:53:46. > :53:48.broadband is an important part of 21st-century infrastructure. We will
:53:49. > :53:51.be doing everything we can to ensure it is there and available for
:53:52. > :53:58.people, because that will enable us to have jobs and prosperity in this
:53:59. > :54:02.country. Penman engineering established in
:54:03. > :54:12.1859 was forced into administration in my constituency this week. I
:54:13. > :54:15.can't name the debtor, it is an impossible decision. They have to
:54:16. > :54:20.continue to trade with this debtor as well as pursuing the debt. Will
:54:21. > :54:23.the Prime Minister put me in touch with the Business Secretary to
:54:24. > :54:27.discuss support that can be given on how we can ensure these companies,
:54:28. > :54:31.who receive enormous amounts of public money, don't hold our supply
:54:32. > :54:36.chain to ransom and pay bills on time?
:54:37. > :54:38.First of all, I said the honourable gentleman that of course our
:54:39. > :54:44.thoughts are with all those families who are affected by what has to
:54:45. > :54:47.Penman engineering. The administrator has a role in ensuring
:54:48. > :54:52.any sale of the business protects the maximum number of jobs and my
:54:53. > :54:55.right honourable friend the Scottish Secretary has made clear that that
:54:56. > :54:58.is his priority. I hope the Scottish Government will offer their support
:54:59. > :55:02.of this long-standing business. Our thoughts are with all those who have
:55:03. > :55:06.been affected and the administrator will be looking to ensure the best
:55:07. > :55:17.possible options are found for the company.
:55:18. > :55:21.In adding my congratulations to the Prime Minister, can I say following
:55:22. > :55:24.the EU referendum and under her leadership, I feel more confident
:55:25. > :55:33.about the future of this country than ever in my lifetime.
:55:34. > :55:43.And we'll surely beware of those who are trying to make leaving the
:55:44. > :55:49.European Union ever more complicated and protracted, and to that end.
:55:50. > :55:54.Order, order. Progress is very slow. There is too much noise.
:55:55. > :56:00.The honourable gentleman will be heard. Will she confirm there is no
:56:01. > :56:03.basis in law to require the Government to seek the permission of
:56:04. > :56:09.parliament before invoking Article 50?
:56:10. > :56:12.Prime Minister I thank my honourable friend for his comments.
:56:13. > :56:17.He is absolutely right. The Government's position is very clear.
:56:18. > :56:23.This is a prerogative power. It is a power that can be exercised by the
:56:24. > :56:26.Government. As he alludes to in his question I don't think anyone should
:56:27. > :56:30.be in any doubt that those people who are trying to prolong the
:56:31. > :56:33.process by their legal references in relation to Parliament are not those
:56:34. > :56:36.who want to see us successfully leaving the European Union, they are
:56:37. > :56:44.those who want to stop us leaving the European Union. The Prime
:56:45. > :56:48.Minister seems less keen than her predecessor on the northern
:56:49. > :56:54.powerhouse, but she also says post Brexit Britain is open for business.
:56:55. > :57:03.Where better in 2025 than the great city of Manchester to host the world
:57:04. > :57:11.Expo, where the atom was split and where graphene was invented, to
:57:12. > :57:15.showcase the best of Britain's world. Will she back our bid?
:57:16. > :57:21.I say to the honourable gentleman I'm interested to hear the lobby he
:57:22. > :57:25.is making for Manchester. And can I say how pleased I am Manchester will
:57:26. > :57:31.be hosting the parade for are Olympic athletes.
:57:32. > :57:36.In this process Brexit world, will the Prime Minister agree with me
:57:37. > :57:39.that Nato is more important cornerstone than ever, particularly
:57:40. > :57:44.article five that lays down an attack on one is an attack on all.
:57:45. > :57:48.Any politician who will not sign up to that commitment or even worse,
:57:49. > :57:55.who tells Nato they should give up, go home and go away, is recklessly
:57:56. > :57:58.risking the defence of all? I absolutely agree on all the points
:57:59. > :58:02.my right honourable friend made. We must never forget the importance of
:58:03. > :58:05.Nato, is the cornerstone of our defence and security and that
:58:06. > :58:11.strength is based on the fact that all of those partners within Nato
:58:12. > :58:16.have committed to article five and operating under the basis of article
:58:17. > :58:21.five. Anybody who says, rejects that, is rejecting that security on
:58:22. > :58:25.that defence, they'd be undermining our national security and the
:58:26. > :58:29.National security of our allies. What we know from the Labour Party
:58:30. > :58:33.is far from delivering stronger defence, they would cut defence
:58:34. > :58:40.spending, undermine Nato and they've scrapped the nuclear deterrent.
:58:41. > :58:45.Prime Minister, I have just had a debate in Westminster Hall on the
:58:46. > :58:48.police ombudsman's report into the Northern Ireland massacre, in which
:58:49. > :58:55.six men were shot dead by the UVF in a period of direct rule in my
:58:56. > :58:58.constituency. I have a letter from my predecessor in which he
:58:59. > :59:04.acknowledged this unspeakable evil and said the Government accepts the
:59:05. > :59:08.police ombudsman's report and any allegations of police misconduct are
:59:09. > :59:13.taken very seriously. Will the Prime Minister detail what action she will
:59:14. > :59:16.take to ensure prosecutions are pursued, an apology is forthcoming
:59:17. > :59:22.from the Government and compensation is provided for lost lives?
:59:23. > :59:28.I say to the honourable lady she is absolutely right. What happened was
:59:29. > :59:32.a terrible, terrible evil. I am sure that everybody across the House will
:59:33. > :59:36.want to join me in expressing our sympathies to all of those who were
:59:37. > :59:41.affected by the appalling atrocity. As she has said, and as my right
:59:42. > :59:45.honourable friend for Whitney said, the Government accepts the
:59:46. > :59:48.ombudsman's report. It is important that where there are allegations of
:59:49. > :59:52.police misconduct they are taken seriously, and properly looked into,
:59:53. > :59:56.if there has been wrong doing it must be pursued. Obviously it is a
:59:57. > :00:02.matter for the PSM eye, although I would remind the Chief Constable has
:00:03. > :00:06.been very clear he wants to be sure he is determined where there is
:00:07. > :00:09.wrongdoing people will be brought to justice. A long-running review into
:00:10. > :00:15.hospital services in Bedford and Milton Keynes was an abject failure.
:00:16. > :00:20.By publishing recommendations for significant changes to services and
:00:21. > :00:24.refusing to answer any questions. Can the Prime Minister assure me
:00:25. > :00:26.their sustainability and transformation plans for
:00:27. > :00:31.Bedfordshire and elsewhere, to be released by NHS England will be
:00:32. > :00:34.subject to proper local accountability and for local
:00:35. > :00:40.decision authority? I say to my honourable friend it is
:00:41. > :00:44.it is absolutely the point of these plans, that they should be locally
:00:45. > :00:47.driven, that they will be considered locally, they should be taking into
:00:48. > :00:52.account the concerns and interests locally, not just by commissioning
:00:53. > :00:57.groups but Local Authorities and the public. These must be planned that
:00:58. > :01:03.are driven from the locality. I give my honourable friend that assurance.
:01:04. > :01:06.Nearly 2 million people signed up to vote in the European Union
:01:07. > :01:09.referendum earlier this year. It surely right that constituency
:01:10. > :01:14.should be based on the actual electorate that want to vote. Is the
:01:15. > :01:20.Prime Minister concerned the review going ahead next week without
:01:21. > :01:23.including those 2 million voters? I'd say to the honourable gentleman
:01:24. > :01:27.all parties across this house supported the proposal that the
:01:28. > :01:32.commission would follow this timetable, bring forward these
:01:33. > :01:37.proposals and by 2018 those commission proposals would be put in
:01:38. > :01:43.place. All parties supported that and I continue to support that. Does
:01:44. > :01:49.the Prime Minister share my anger that on the weekend of the 23rd of
:01:50. > :01:54.July, up to 250,000 people on the road to Dover were stuck in gridlock
:01:55. > :01:57.in the sweltering heat for up to 17 hours without food, water or even
:01:58. > :02:01.able to go to the toilet and will she support my campaign to make sure
:02:02. > :02:06.we get better infrastructure to the Channel ports, starting with a lorry
:02:07. > :02:11.car park and getting some proper motorways to Dover? I say to my
:02:12. > :02:15.honourable friend he has been a passionate advocate for the support
:02:16. > :02:20.for his local area, given some of the pressures that Dover finds
:02:21. > :02:23.itself under as a cross Channel port. It is an important issue. We
:02:24. > :02:28.are committed to providing support. The money for the lorry park was
:02:29. > :02:32.announced last November. The site was announced in July and I believe
:02:33. > :02:37.consultation is taking place on the design for that particular site. On
:02:38. > :02:41.the issue of the possible dualling of the A2-macro, we do want to
:02:42. > :02:43.support local infrastructure to handle the growth in traffic,
:02:44. > :02:48.particularly given their right expansion plans for the port. I
:02:49. > :02:53.assure him Dover will be considered as part of that plan.
:02:54. > :02:55.As many children return to school this week I am sure the Prime
:02:56. > :03:00.Minister will join me in wishing them all the very best of the school
:03:01. > :03:05.year ahead. Will she also provide reassurance to my constituents and
:03:06. > :03:08.to children across London that the objectives of changes to the
:03:09. > :03:11.school's funding formula will be achieved by levelling up, not
:03:12. > :03:16.levelling down on funding for schools in London will not be cut by
:03:17. > :03:21.up to 20%? I join the honourable lady in
:03:22. > :03:25.wishing all those going to school, many for the first time, well in
:03:26. > :03:29.their education. I hope what we will be aiming to do is ensuring every
:03:30. > :03:33.child has the education right for them and the opportunities that are
:03:34. > :03:36.right for them. It is right that we look at the National funding
:03:37. > :03:43.formula. That will be done carefully to see what the impacts will be
:03:44. > :03:48.across the country. Our world leading universities are one of our
:03:49. > :03:53.country's great assets. When I next meet with the Vice Chancellor of
:03:54. > :03:57.York University, to discuss Brexit and higher education, what
:03:58. > :04:00.assurances can I pass to him from my right honourable friend the Prime
:04:01. > :04:04.Minister that our universities will continue to receive the vital
:04:05. > :04:10.funding they need to thrive beyond 2020?
:04:11. > :04:14.I say to my honourable friend again he raises an important point about
:04:15. > :04:17.the relevance and significance of our universities. My right
:04:18. > :04:20.honourable friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer was able to give
:04:21. > :04:23.confidence and reassurance to universities in the summer about the
:04:24. > :04:27.funding arrangements that will continue while we are still members
:04:28. > :04:31.of the European Union and while we are members of the European Union we
:04:32. > :04:34.will maintain our full rights of obligation and obligations of
:04:35. > :04:39.membership and expect others to deal with us on that same basis. Looking
:04:40. > :04:43.ahead we have a higher education Bill going through this house, which
:04:44. > :04:47.is about how we can ensure we are seeing the places, the university
:04:48. > :04:50.places available in this country, to provide the education we want to
:04:51. > :04:55.provide. We have a great record on higher education in this country, we
:04:56. > :05:02.want to build on that and develop it for the future. I would like to put
:05:03. > :05:04.to the Prime Minister a request I know she will think is reasonable.
:05:05. > :05:08.My local hospital, Saint Helena Hospital, which delivers, which is a
:05:09. > :05:13.high performing hospital and delivers excellent care, built in
:05:14. > :05:17.the 1930s and is in need of very substantial investment, will she
:05:18. > :05:22.agree to earmark the first two weeks of the ?350 million is going to be
:05:23. > :05:27.available each week post Brexit to spend on the reconstruction of my
:05:28. > :05:32.hospital? I have to say to the honourable
:05:33. > :05:35.gentleman his question tempts me to go down a number of routes and
:05:36. > :05:39.answering him. What I would say is I recognise the importance of his
:05:40. > :05:42.local hospital trust. I'm pleased to say that over the last six years
:05:43. > :05:48.we've seen more doctors and nurses in that trust able to provide more
:05:49. > :05:54.services and more facilities and since 2010 the capital spend on the
:05:55. > :05:59.trust has already gone up. ?72.7 million. We will be looking to
:06:00. > :06:02.ensure we provide the health service that is right for everyone in this
:06:03. > :06:08.country. At the moment there rather AET
:06:09. > :06:13.vulnerable elderly patients in Kettering General Hospital awaiting
:06:14. > :06:17.delayed transfer to social care. The national guideline says there should
:06:18. > :06:23.be 25. In the next few weeks the number is likely to rise to 200, the
:06:24. > :06:26.highest in the country, with a similar number in Northampton
:06:27. > :06:32.General Hospital, because of proposals by Northamptonshire County
:06:33. > :06:37.Council to extend it from three days to four weeks. In order to prevent
:06:38. > :06:44.this crisis, will the Prime Minister organise a joint meeting of
:06:45. > :06:49.government and ministers, the local NHS and Council to bang heads to
:06:50. > :06:54.prevent this crisis happening? What I will say to my honourable friend
:06:55. > :06:58.is ensure the health Department is aware of the request he has put
:06:59. > :07:03.forward. Everybody I think in this house is well aware of the challenge
:07:04. > :07:06.we have in relation to the interaction of social care with
:07:07. > :07:09.hospitals. This is an issue we have already looked at. We've put money
:07:10. > :07:14.into the better care fund. We've been looking at the better working
:07:15. > :07:18.together of health services and social care and social services and
:07:19. > :07:21.Local Authorities. It is one of the challenges we see. There are some
:07:22. > :07:24.areas where this has been done very well and I think it's right we look
:07:25. > :07:27.at those and try to spend, spread that good practice. I will make sure
:07:28. > :07:34.the health Department is aware of that concern.
:07:35. > :07:37.Nine months after signing the Paris climate agreement the Government
:07:38. > :07:40.still hasn't ratified the treaty. According to the committee on
:07:41. > :07:45.climate change it lacks half the policies it needs to reach its
:07:46. > :07:50.climate targets. With the delayed carbon induction plan and the risk
:07:51. > :07:53.of missing our energy targets, or will the Prime Minister take this
:07:54. > :07:59.opportunity to reassure people it remains committed to climate action
:08:00. > :08:03.and follow the example of 26 states that have ratified, will it give us
:08:04. > :08:08.a firm date for ratification before the follow-up negotiations in
:08:09. > :08:10.November. What I'm happy to give the honourable lady is the assurance we
:08:11. > :08:16.will be ratifying the Paris agreement. My right honourable
:08:17. > :08:19.friend, the current Home Secretary, then as energy secretary, played a
:08:20. > :08:22.key role in ensuring that Paris agreement was actually achieved. I
:08:23. > :08:26.would also hope the honourable lady will want to congratulate the
:08:27. > :08:30.Government. We've been identified as being the second best country in the
:08:31. > :08:39.world for tackling climate change. I would have hoped she would have
:08:40. > :08:48.congratulated us on that. Today is the day designed to bring
:08:49. > :08:52.attention to the muscle wasting disease. Will the Prime Minister
:08:53. > :08:57.join me in welcoming the recent announcement that a drug is now
:08:58. > :09:02.going to be available to these young boys in NHS England and will she
:09:03. > :09:10.congratulate my constituent Archie hill, Mustard dystrophy UK and all
:09:11. > :09:19.the colleagues in this house. -- muscular dystrophy. I am very happy
:09:20. > :09:22.to join my right honourable friend in congratulating all of those
:09:23. > :09:27.involved in making sure this innovative drug available. I thank
:09:28. > :09:31.her for weight raising awareness of an important issue. I know the right
:09:32. > :09:37.honourable member for Whitney as Prime Minister met Archie, the young
:09:38. > :09:40.man with muscular dystrophy and was inspired by him. I am sure all
:09:41. > :09:43.members across this house will welcome the fact that this
:09:44. > :09:47.innovative drug is now available on the NHS. We are committed to making
:09:48. > :09:51.sure that patients with rare conditions get access to the latest
:09:52. > :09:58.medicines and are taking some bold steps to speed up the process. Will
:09:59. > :10:02.the Prime Minister join me, and I'm sure the rest of the House, in
:10:03. > :10:06.sending our deepest sympathy and sincere condolences to the family
:10:07. > :10:17.and friends of Roseanne Cooper and her ten-year-old nephew, who were
:10:18. > :10:21.mown down by a stolen car last week in Penge. And send best wishes to
:10:22. > :10:26.the three young girls also involved. Whilst enquiries by the police and
:10:27. > :10:28.the Independent Police Complaints Commission are undertaken on the
:10:29. > :10:33.matter is now before the courts, I will say no more about this specific
:10:34. > :10:37.case, other than to ask the Prime Minister, if she is aware of the
:10:38. > :10:41.widespread public concern that the law on causing death by dangerous
:10:42. > :10:46.driving is wholly inadequate, and will she undertake a review, both of
:10:47. > :10:50.its suitability and its applicability as the courts enact
:10:51. > :10:55.it? Can I first of all join the
:10:56. > :10:59.honourable member in expressing our sympathies to all those who were
:11:00. > :11:04.involved in this terrible accident that took place, this terrible
:11:05. > :11:07.tragedy, when this stolen car mowed down two people and affected others
:11:08. > :11:12.as well. I'm aware of the concern that there is about the law in
:11:13. > :11:15.relation to dangerous driving. I've had a particular case about the
:11:16. > :11:20.daughter of someone in my constituency, who was killed as a
:11:21. > :11:23.result of dangerous driving and they have raised concerns with me
:11:24. > :11:25.specifically about their case. This is a matter I believe the Justice
:11:26. > :11:43.Department is looking at. Order. I thought Jeremy Corbyn might well
:11:44. > :11:46.go on the continued sale of arms to Saudi Arabia, after the war
:11:47. > :11:52.continues in Yemen and the abuse of human rights, but that was not to be
:11:53. > :11:55.the case. Jeremy Corbyn went on housing, using all six questions on
:11:56. > :12:01.house prices and house-building, housing benefit, very important
:12:02. > :12:07.subject, but not one right on the agenda. Since foreign affairs did
:12:08. > :12:13.not feature as it really does in Prime Minister's Questions, we have
:12:14. > :12:18.big news out of Texas. The Dallas morning News has endorsed Hillary
:12:19. > :12:24.Clinton for president in November. That is big news because the Dallas
:12:25. > :12:33.morning News has not endorsed a Democrat since 1945. 1944, to be
:12:34. > :12:40.exact. We will see what our panel thought of PMQs in a moment. Martin
:12:41. > :12:45.Jamieson said from Stockport said, housing, housing, I know it is
:12:46. > :12:52.important, but Brexit, G20, the future of the nation, Jeremy, anyone
:12:53. > :12:56.in? This one says it is good to see Jeremy Corbyn is in June with the
:12:57. > :13:01.needs of vulnerable people and their housing predicament stashed tune. It
:13:02. > :13:07.is good that he sticks to real issues. Martin Bristow says he
:13:08. > :13:10.doesn't know how Jeremy Corbyn is going to get any traction and he
:13:11. > :13:17.seems to be suggesting social housing is the answer to the housing
:13:18. > :13:22.crisis, but he is not speaking to a big enough constituency to win a
:13:23. > :13:26.general election. Another one says I see the prime in a star has already
:13:27. > :13:35.resorted to ridicule of her opposite number -- the Prime Minister has
:13:36. > :13:39.already resorted. Another one says, Theresa May says people voted for
:13:40. > :13:49.some control, but we wanted control, what does she mean by it some
:13:50. > :13:55.control? That is it. Any reason for going for housing? We are hardly
:13:56. > :13:59.likely to see big headlines about what Jeremy Corbyn raised in Primus
:14:00. > :14:05.'s questions even though housing is a big issue and it has always been
:14:06. > :14:10.one of his favourite subjects -- raised in Prime Minister's
:14:11. > :14:15.Questions. But given that Parliament is just back in Theresa May is back
:14:16. > :14:19.from China and there are questions about leaving the European Union,
:14:20. > :14:23.picking housing is not going to land Jeremy Corbyn with a huge boost in
:14:24. > :14:31.terms of the political cycle, it's just not. He ignored the advice of
:14:32. > :14:37.Owen Smith. Funny, that. He wanted him to ask questions about Europe
:14:38. > :14:50.and Brexit. Maybe he avoided that because, if Theresa May was a
:14:51. > :14:59.reluctant remain campaigner, so was Jeremy Corbyn, times two. That is
:15:00. > :15:02.right. There might be another opportunity for Jeremy Corbyn to ask
:15:03. > :15:07.questions about Brexit next time, but maybe he won't. Angus Robertson
:15:08. > :15:13.was the person asking the questions about the trade-off between the run
:15:14. > :15:20.it and the freedom of movement. -- between the single market. Which she
:15:21. > :15:24.couldn't quite answer. It was interesting, Angus Robertson asking
:15:25. > :15:29.the biggest question of the day. Rather than Jeremy Corbyn. He
:15:30. > :15:35.ploughed his own furrow. But in terms of getting traction, he didn't
:15:36. > :15:38.get far. He chose to go with housing with all six questions and you would
:15:39. > :15:44.assume he would do all his homework on housing. Why did he allow the
:15:45. > :15:50.Prime Minister to save the Conservatives were building more
:15:51. > :15:56.homes than Labour? -- to say. Jeremy Corbyn was correct to focus on one
:15:57. > :15:59.topic and it keeps the pressure on Theresa May, the Conservatives have
:16:00. > :16:03.failed on housing, but what I thought was so good about the
:16:04. > :16:08.questions, it linked what happens in Parliament what happens in people's
:16:09. > :16:11.constituencies. MPs with their weekend surgeries, I know housing is
:16:12. > :16:17.usually the biggest issue that comes up. I understand that. But if you
:16:18. > :16:21.have done your homework and if the Prime Minister says something which
:16:22. > :16:26.is believed not to be true, why would the Leader of the Opposition
:16:27. > :16:33.not come straight back? Why does he simply move on to the next question?
:16:34. > :16:38.Why does he not replied to the replies he gets? Why doesn't he
:16:39. > :16:43.think on his feet? I think he does, but he doesn't want to get involved
:16:44. > :16:50.in the kind of tit-for-tat political theatrics which goes on. Theresa May
:16:51. > :16:55.really delivered very well pre-scripted joke about trains but
:16:56. > :17:01.doesn't interest people. Yes, that is the work of a scriptwriter, but
:17:02. > :17:05.I'm talking about house-building. Do you believe the government is
:17:06. > :17:10.building more homes than the last Labour government? No, I don't,
:17:11. > :17:17.there is a crisis can we have reached a situation where getting a
:17:18. > :17:22.council house or a mortgage is a pipe dream for so many people. What
:17:23. > :17:26.would you do about it? We need house-building programme of council
:17:27. > :17:31.houses and truly affordable homes. How would you do that? We need to
:17:32. > :17:37.get the economy moving by investing and we need to put as a priority
:17:38. > :17:41.truly affordable homes. The way they are defined at the moment is the 80%
:17:42. > :17:45.of the market value and that is not affordable for most people watching
:17:46. > :17:52.this programme. It is untrue to say, David Gauke, that the government is
:17:53. > :18:00.building more homes than the last Labour government? They are building
:18:01. > :18:08.more council homes. That is not what she said. In terms of
:18:09. > :18:11.house-building, following the crash there was a significant fall but
:18:12. > :18:15.we're now seeing a recovery terms of more planning permission being
:18:16. > :18:21.granted and more homes starts as I understand it. But there is more
:18:22. > :18:25.work to be done, as I acknowledge. You are not building more homes in
:18:26. > :18:35.the last Labour government. I have got the figures. Sticking with
:18:36. > :18:41.completions. Early 2000, 140,000 houses a year, not enough, no one is
:18:42. > :18:48.saying the last Labour government's policy regarding housing was great.
:18:49. > :18:51.It then came down after the crash. Under the Conservatives it has
:18:52. > :18:58.stayed flat, only by 2014 did it start to rise and only now after you
:18:59. > :19:02.have been in power for six years, 140,000, you are still 20,000 below
:19:03. > :19:06.per year where it was under the last Labour government. These are your
:19:07. > :19:09.official government figures, so it is not true to say you are building
:19:10. > :19:16.more homes than the last Labour government. It is true to say that
:19:17. > :19:21.we are building more homes than the level we inherited when we came to
:19:22. > :19:27.office. You inherited a crash. Yes, there is more for us to do, that is
:19:28. > :19:32.why we had one of the biggest housing packages in the last Autumn
:19:33. > :19:40.Statement. In terms of our ambition on things like right to buy... In
:19:41. > :19:45.the last 12 months you have only started 140,000 more homes and you
:19:46. > :19:50.are still way below the start rate of 180,000 before the crash. Eight
:19:51. > :19:57.years since the crash and you are still way behind even the starting
:19:58. > :20:02.of new building than you were compared to the Labour government in
:20:03. > :20:08.2008. Not a great record. In terms of planning permission being
:20:09. > :20:12.granted. It is not showing up in the starts. I'm quite happy to
:20:13. > :20:17.acknowledge that there is more that we need to do. There was a big
:20:18. > :20:20.announcement with the Autumn Statement last year in terms of a
:20:21. > :20:23.number of things and that will not come through immediately. When will
:20:24. > :20:29.it come through? We would hope to see that over the next few years,
:20:30. > :20:34.but that depends upon the state of the economy. As Theresa May was very
:20:35. > :20:39.clear, we are not complacent, there is a need to do more. We have made
:20:40. > :20:44.reforms to the planning system which was the biggest problem we have.
:20:45. > :20:49.Just today we are publishing a planning Bill which will make
:20:50. > :20:54.further house-building easier. There is progress which we are making. Let
:20:55. > :21:01.me come back to this issue regarding the Brexit timetable. You have
:21:02. > :21:05.briefings with G20 and you are mixing with government ministers. Do
:21:06. > :21:11.we have any clear idea of what will happen between now and the New Year?
:21:12. > :21:15.Article 50 will not be triggered this side of the New Year, I
:21:16. > :21:21.understand. Can it go beyond the first quarter? It is very difficult
:21:22. > :21:25.to imagine that it will be a case that we are sitting here at Easter
:21:26. > :21:28.and nothing has happened, because the political pressure will make it
:21:29. > :21:32.on tenable and I think by the time you get to party conference that the
:21:33. > :21:38.Prime Minister will give more detail about what she plans to do. -- on
:21:39. > :21:42.tenable. Although Jeremy Corbyn did not go on this, there was question
:21:43. > :21:47.after question from various MPs about universities, Angus Robertson
:21:48. > :21:52.talking about the single market and immigration, so she will have to
:21:53. > :21:57.reveal her hand. She was a time and again that is not what they want to
:21:58. > :22:01.do, but ambition and political reality often smashed up against
:22:02. > :22:04.each other, she has three ministers who are not exactly wallflowers who
:22:05. > :22:13.are in charge of this will stop or best friends. The idea that they can
:22:14. > :22:18.all keep their powder dry for five months seems for the birds. Someone
:22:19. > :22:21.said they will have to invent a new whipping system for those three
:22:22. > :22:26.ministers to make sure they behave. There is a serious point. You can't
:22:27. > :22:35.deal with a vacuum in politics for very long time. OK, we will leave it
:22:36. > :22:38.there. The other 27 members of the European Union will be meeting next
:22:39. > :22:44.week to discuss their own negotiating positions. Formerly we
:22:45. > :22:50.will not be in the room, but informally it is a different picture
:22:51. > :22:52.-- formally. And elections next year in France and Germany. Thanks for
:22:53. > :22:58.joining us. So Party Conference season
:22:59. > :23:00.is round the corner, Yes, it is the time that politicians
:23:01. > :23:05.like to release their memoirs. So which will be the best sellers
:23:06. > :23:07.of the season? The Guardian's John Crace
:23:08. > :23:19.has been having a read. First up we have
:23:20. > :23:25.Nick Clegg's Politics. This is the story of basically how
:23:26. > :23:30.Nick Clegg thinks the Lib Dems were Let's hope that their seven
:23:31. > :23:37.remaining MPs buy the book. Next we have Malcolm Rifkind's
:23:38. > :23:40.Power And Pragmatism. This one is very much
:23:41. > :23:46.for the political nerd only. He also omits his most recent claim
:23:47. > :23:48.to fame, which is being caught in a sting
:23:49. > :23:50.over cash for access. Now we come to Chris Mullin which
:23:51. > :23:56.is my own particular favourite. He is also one of the few
:23:57. > :24:03.politicians who is able And finally we come
:24:04. > :24:12.to Ed Balls's Speaking Out. The underlying subtext
:24:13. > :24:14.of the book is that Ed Balls But the two biggest stars
:24:15. > :24:21.of the political season The first is Margaret Hodge,
:24:22. > :24:30.who was chair of the Public She was famous for holding the rich
:24:31. > :24:34.and powerful to account. So let's hope that the lawyers
:24:35. > :24:45.and his editors haven't got to him. And let's hope our next guest is
:24:46. > :24:50.equally indiscreet. And Andrew Gimson, who's latest book
:24:51. > :25:00.The Adventures of Boris Johnson, Welcome to the Daily Politics. Your
:25:01. > :25:07.book is an updated version of Boris, the adventures of Iris Johnson.
:25:08. > :25:13.Three tremendous surprises that basically no one predicted. The
:25:14. > :25:16.referendum result, then Boris in pole position, knocked out by the
:25:17. > :25:21.very person he had been campaigning with the six months and then people
:25:22. > :25:28.thought he might scrape back into the Cabinet if he was lucky and
:25:29. > :25:32.Boris as Foreign Secretary. The most exciting political summer in living
:25:33. > :25:39.memory. What was your take on it, because it was incredible? My take
:25:40. > :25:43.is Boris has benefited. Boris and Theresa May needed each other. Which
:25:44. > :25:46.ever one won, the other one had to be in there at the top, because
:25:47. > :25:50.otherwise the Tory party would be permanently split into these two
:25:51. > :25:54.factions. There was an interest between them that did not emerge,
:25:55. > :26:02.but they were in touch the weekend after the referendum and Boris...
:26:03. > :26:08.Michael Gove made the decision from Boris, you can't win. Boris had the
:26:09. > :26:11.guts to retreat, as though he was scorned. We did the prudent thing,
:26:12. > :26:19.didn't fight to the death. He didn't. How many books do think you
:26:20. > :26:28.will sell of this tumultuous summer? I would think well into double
:26:29. > :26:36.figures! Ten? LAUGHTER Customer I could buy one it 11. More
:26:37. > :26:43.than Malcolm Rifkind's memoirs. People want Boris to sign it and say
:26:44. > :26:47.it's rubbish. The attraction of writing a political book in this
:26:48. > :26:51.instance was obvious, a bit like the opening days of the coalition. But
:26:52. > :26:56.generally, what is the attraction of writing a political book that is not
:26:57. > :27:04.really going to get red? Vanity, that's why people buy books. Is that
:27:05. > :27:09.it? No but mostly. My wife informed me on a number of occasions I was on
:27:10. > :27:13.the cusp of becoming an old and forgot and unless I thought I'd
:27:14. > :27:22.start writing books. May be that is for me! The BBC is fortunately still
:27:23. > :27:27.a well funded organisation. That is not the only reason. Is it all about
:27:28. > :27:34.serialisation? It's not. The author is quite annoying in a way. Isn't
:27:35. > :27:38.that what really promotes it? What's in the book is much more than what
:27:39. > :27:42.can be serialised. Serialisation, although it is nice if you get paid
:27:43. > :27:45.money for Anya pleased by the attention, if you care about the
:27:46. > :27:50.book it's sort of a distraction. Which book looking at this little
:27:51. > :27:55.selection are you going to read? From this handsome choice of
:27:56. > :28:04.books... Ed Balls' autobiography? It is here. I will have a read of that
:28:05. > :28:09.one. Very loyal. And you? The same. Having been in the opposite Treasury
:28:10. > :28:14.team for many years I would be very interested to read what Ed Balls has
:28:15. > :28:18.to say. A lighter celebrity memoir, it might be quite good! Ken Clarke
:28:19. > :28:24.will be wonderful, I think. Thank you for coming in.
:28:25. > :28:26.There's just time to put you out of your misery and give
:28:27. > :28:38.David press that big red buzzer there and pick the winner.
:28:39. > :28:43.Mark Lynch from Huddersfield. Well done, you have won the mug.
:28:44. > :28:49.The one o'clock news is starting over on BBC One now.
:28:50. > :28:58.Joe will be on her own tomorrow. And with Ed Balls. He has a book to
:28:59. > :29:00.plug, that's why he's coming on. Goodbye.