Karl von Habsburg

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:00. > :00:23.twin sister was taken to Australia by the unidentified couple. Now on

:00:24. > :00:29.BBC News it's time for HARDtalk. Welcome to a special edition of

:00:30. > :00:34.HARDtalk from a very wet Sarajevo. We are marking the centenary of the

:00:35. > :00:43.start of the First World War and it was right here that the incident

:00:44. > :00:53.that led to the First World War occurred. Archduke Frantz Ferdinand

:00:54. > :00:58.who was the next in line to the Habsburg imperial crown was visiting

:00:59. > :01:02.this city and came down the main road, turning around this corner

:01:03. > :01:08.where he came face to face with the young Bosnian Serb radical who

:01:09. > :01:14.killed him. He had a gun and opened fire, killing the Archduke and his

:01:15. > :01:22.wife and Europe was never to be the same again. In little over a month,

:01:23. > :01:26.an unimaginable slaughter had begun that changed the face of this

:01:27. > :01:34.continent forever. Today, my guest is Karl von Habsburg, the grandson

:01:35. > :01:45.of the last Habsburg Emperor. He will reflect on Europe then and

:01:46. > :01:51.now. Karl von Habsburg, welcome to HARDtalk. We are sitting in the

:01:52. > :01:54.museum here in Sarajevo, a few metres from where Archduke Frantz

:01:55. > :02:00.Ferdinand who was the uncle of your grandfather was assassinated. Is it

:02:01. > :02:08.a strange feeling for you? Not really. I haven't experienced that

:02:09. > :02:13.time so I am looking at it as someone who is historically

:02:14. > :02:16.interested who had a big advantage in that I still have a chance to

:02:17. > :02:20.talk to people who were alive at the time who could tell me about it. It

:02:21. > :02:25.doesn't create an emotional attachment to it. I would much

:02:26. > :02:30.rather look at it and see the effects it had on the First World

:02:31. > :02:36.War and the time afterwards and what we can learn from that time. You

:02:37. > :02:45.obviously put a huge amount of distance to wean yourself and the

:02:46. > :02:50.events of June 1914 but it was then that the fate of your family was

:02:51. > :02:57.sealed and that is something that you can never escape from ``

:02:58. > :03:02.between. Of course not but the events that unraveled after that, it

:03:03. > :03:06.was just something that no one at the time had the perspective to see

:03:07. > :03:11.what would come from it. In all of Europe, the scene was set for war

:03:12. > :03:17.and none of the people in power were able to see the dimension of it.

:03:18. > :03:22.Everyone was expecting a small regional conflict and if it had not

:03:23. > :03:27.been for the assassination here in Sarajevo, it would have started

:03:28. > :03:34.somewhere else. The way that your relative, Franz Ferdinand, has been

:03:35. > :03:38.characterized by history is frankly quite negative. He is seen as a man

:03:39. > :03:45.who represented an empire that was dying, that was out of touch. One

:03:46. > :03:51.that had been hollowed out. Is that the way you see him and your

:03:52. > :03:55.family? Of course when I look at the Austro`Hungarian Empire, there were

:03:56. > :04:00.elements of it that were old`fashioned and too slow and not

:04:01. > :04:03.modern enough for the time but there were other elements that were

:04:04. > :04:07.incredibly modern and forward looking. Frantz Ferdinand was

:04:08. > :04:13.someone who saw the difficulties of his time. On one side, he was

:04:14. > :04:17.absolutely loyal to the Emperor and I think he really appreciated it

:04:18. > :04:22.although the relationship was not always described correctly. It was

:04:23. > :04:27.often described as negative. The common perception is that they hated

:04:28. > :04:32.each other. But that is just wrong. The Emperor had to take certain

:04:33. > :04:38.steps due to the marriage that Franz Ferdinand had at the time which were

:04:39. > :04:42.not in line with family rules. But the Emperor always appreciated the

:04:43. > :04:47.loyalty that he was receiving from Franz Ferdinand which he had not

:04:48. > :04:53.received from his son. I suppose, in essence, the picture is of an

:04:54. > :05:00.Austro`Hungarian Empire that was trying to make sense of a huge area

:05:01. > :05:05.it controlled with so many people of different cultures, languages,

:05:06. > :05:11.religions and trying to do it in a way that was preindustrial, still

:05:12. > :05:18.based on the notion of divine right and hereditary principles. And it

:05:19. > :05:21.was time for that to go because Europe was industrializing and being

:05:22. > :05:27.swept by nationalism. You and your family were finished. And other

:05:28. > :05:31.principles like the ability to allow a multitude of languages and

:05:32. > :05:36.religions within its territory and to arrange for a possibility to live

:05:37. > :05:41.together in a positive way which is something that is not often put into

:05:42. > :05:53.perspective. I am thinking of the agreement of 1906 that was the first

:05:54. > :06:01.basis for living together when you are part of different ethnicities.

:06:02. > :06:07.If I may say so, the killer of Franz Ferdinand, if he were in the room

:06:08. > :06:12.and had the ability to join our conversation, he might have a

:06:13. > :06:17.different view of what your Habsburg Empire contributed to the people. He

:06:18. > :06:20.saw his people as being enslaved. But that is what makes the

:06:21. > :06:26.assassination so ridiculous. Franz Ferdinand with somebody who saw the

:06:27. > :06:30.problem of the time and the difficulty under which some of the

:06:31. > :06:37.Slavic people were living and he made the preparations that, once he

:06:38. > :06:40.division between the Hungarian side division between the Hungarian side

:06:41. > :06:44.and the German`speaking side but the Slavic people would also get their

:06:45. > :06:51.side with power of their own and because of that, he had to die

:06:52. > :06:55.because Serbia at the time was interested in being the supreme

:06:56. > :07:01.power over the Slavic people. He was in the way of allowing them to do

:07:02. > :07:05.this by giving the Slavic people more power which makes the

:07:06. > :07:11.assassination interesting. We will never know whether your

:07:12. > :07:17.grandfather, had he lived, would have developed this principle of

:07:18. > :07:20.freedom and tolerance. I can't leave the centenary of the First World War

:07:21. > :07:27.without asking you a direct question. Do you accept a sort of

:07:28. > :07:38.familial guilt for the role of your family in the run`up to war? A sort

:07:39. > :07:42.of responsibility? Of course, by all means. What you have to say when you

:07:43. > :07:48.look at the situation in Europe, all of it was ready for a conflict that

:07:49. > :07:55.was to be a small and regional conflict. Nobody thought of the

:07:56. > :08:01.perspective of the possibility of the war becoming huge. The

:08:02. > :08:07.responsibility is with everyone who shared power at the time which does

:08:08. > :08:14.not exclude my family. It does not. There is the phrase about the

:08:15. > :08:23.sleepwalkers, the leaders and their advisors who led us to war after the

:08:24. > :08:26.murder of Franz Ferdinand. This historian says they were blind to

:08:27. > :08:34.the horror they were about to unleash on the world. The Habsburg

:08:35. > :08:40.family were as blind as any others. I don't agree that they were as

:08:41. > :08:45.blind as the others. You can see many cases where the Emperor and

:08:46. > :08:48.then later my grandfather had a clear perspective on trying to get

:08:49. > :08:54.out of the horrors of the war but the responsibility is collective.

:08:55. > :09:00.That is why I think the question of guilt, when you come to that, it is

:09:01. > :09:08.wrong to point to a country or a person. After the First World War,

:09:09. > :09:13.in postwar Austria, there was this drunk feeling against the Habsburg

:09:14. > :09:23.family and a desire to and make sure that they never reimposed authority

:09:24. > :09:31.`` angry feeling. Your family was banished. That was understandable

:09:32. > :09:38.wasn't it? Yes and no. It was understandable for certain people

:09:39. > :09:40.who were having the correct ideological background to try to

:09:41. > :09:49.make sure that my family would not come back. I would like to point to

:09:50. > :09:52.the fact that my grandfather was being asked to withdraw from

:09:53. > :09:56.political activities and was being guaranteed that there would be a

:09:57. > :10:01.referendum on how the state would continue. What's my grandfather

:10:02. > :10:05.withdrew from the political field, he was not held under the referendum

:10:06. > :10:14.because he was afraid that it would go in favour of my family. It makes

:10:15. > :10:19.it clear that this was not a general feeling against my family. Many

:10:20. > :10:22.people were loyal to my family but to political institutions wanted to

:10:23. > :10:29.make sure that they were really out of the way. Many of your relatives

:10:30. > :10:41.live all across the world. They still do today. At your own father

:10:42. > :10:41.`` but, was always committed to Europe. While he could not live in

:10:42. > :10:50.Austria for a good amount of his life, he lived in Germany and served

:10:51. > :10:53.in the European Parliament there. He seems to believe that there was

:10:54. > :10:58.something about the Habsburg experience and the notion of Europe

:10:59. > :11:03.that he could translate into modern form through the European Union, a

:11:04. > :11:09.pan`European idealism. Can you explain that for me? My father was

:11:10. > :11:15.always a passionate European, even as a very young man after the time

:11:16. > :11:21.of the First World War. He got engaged and started the pan`European

:11:22. > :11:27.movement. He wanted a united Europe. It became clear to a large

:11:28. > :11:31.group of people, amongst them my father, that only a united Europe

:11:32. > :11:35.would be able to ensure that the horrors of the First World War would

:11:36. > :11:43.not happen again. But in between the first two world wars, were not able

:11:44. > :11:48.to push the idea through. For my father, one of the determining

:11:49. > :11:58.factors was the principal of the monarchy, it comes in a expression

:11:59. > :12:06.that cannot be translated which talks about the principle of

:12:07. > :12:10.solidarity. It came out of the Austro`Hungarian monarchy with all

:12:11. > :12:17.of its different nationalities, ethnicities and religions... Just

:12:18. > :12:20.think of the national anthem. There were 12 official language versions

:12:21. > :12:25.and I don't know how many nonofficial ones. Just imagine other

:12:26. > :12:29.countries. If someone would have suggested at the time that their

:12:30. > :12:34.national anthem would be sung in another language. It would have been

:12:35. > :12:40.impossible but it was the spirit of the Austro`Hungarian Empire to keep

:12:41. > :12:45.the cultures and to push them. Even in the military, this was the case.

:12:46. > :13:00.You had the Catholic priesthood would go along with

:13:01. > :13:00.are saying is fascinating but I'm going to interrupt you because it

:13:01. > :13:07.seems that you have, you have equated the

:13:08. > :13:15.Habsburg notion as being beyond nationalism with a European notion

:13:16. > :13:23.of an entity beyond nationalism but the problem is, in both instances,

:13:24. > :13:25.it doesn't relate to democracy. It lacks legitimacy amongst the people

:13:26. > :13:33.of Europe and that is perhaps what we see today. The idea of an ever

:13:34. > :13:36.closer union, the European Union gradually superseding the

:13:37. > :13:45.nationstates of Europe and it doesn't seem to appeal to people

:13:46. > :13:47.across Europe. I disagree. If you look at the Austro`Hungarian

:13:48. > :13:52.monarchy which was one of the first countries where a lot of the

:13:53. > :14:03.Democratic infidels, and I am not including England in this example ``

:14:04. > :14:07.principles, it was there that a lot of the principles were put into

:14:08. > :14:12.place first. This element was certainly there. The legitimacy of

:14:13. > :14:17.all the different people with very strong. This is where the point of

:14:18. > :14:24.nationalism came in and I am sorry, I am always coming back to it but

:14:25. > :14:29.that is the line that comes all the way towards the most recent European

:14:30. > :14:36.elections. You can see the changes that can take place and sweep away

:14:37. > :14:42.the guiding principles that we are experiencing. You have stolen my

:14:43. > :14:46.thunder. I was about to raise the challenge to you that seems to lie

:14:47. > :14:54.in the most recent European election results, not least in your own home

:14:55. > :15:01.country of Austria where a fifth of the vote went to a party which is

:15:02. > :15:04.regarded as extreme far right. The same thing happened in France and in

:15:05. > :15:13.many different countries across Europe. There is an insularity and a

:15:14. > :15:16.return to nationalism across Europe which, for all of the idealism of

:15:17. > :15:20.your family through the past century, seems to be a default for

:15:21. > :15:31.European people. I think you're right, we saw it in

:15:32. > :15:37.the last European elections and a strong way, but it is fascinating to

:15:38. > :15:41.see that, I think in most countries, on a normal democratic basis, we are

:15:42. > :15:43.capable of dealing with that problem. There is a certain

:15:44. > :15:49.percentage there, and we should be able to deal with it. It is very

:15:50. > :15:53.painful, I think, to see the Nationalist movements rising again,

:15:54. > :15:59.they are riding on the wave of very few topics. They are riding on the

:16:00. > :16:03.wave of immigration, foreign cultures being strong in their own

:16:04. > :16:06.country, these are the typical topics that these movements are

:16:07. > :16:11.riding on. They don't have a broad political programme. They only have

:16:12. > :16:17.a programme in specific topics, these are topics that will keep us

:16:18. > :16:22.busy for the next century. I don't think they will go away, definitely

:16:23. > :16:25.not in the way that they held different nationalistic movements

:16:26. > :16:28.that will deal with them, by building up strong borders, getting

:16:29. > :16:32.rid of minorities, not letting people in the country, that is not

:16:33. > :16:36.how it works, not how Europe works, and not how it worked in the past.

:16:37. > :16:41.You could argue the trajectory of Europe right now is in that

:16:42. > :16:46.direction. In the more insular, nationalist direction. After the

:16:47. > :16:49.Second World War, it took us through the expansion and development and

:16:50. > :16:55.the deepening of the European Union, but that deepening process seems to

:16:56. > :16:59.have hit a dead end. If we look at it in a historic perspective, of

:17:00. > :17:03.course, we have to say, what was the basis of the European Union in the

:17:04. > :17:08.beginning? That was after the Second World War. This was when, let's

:17:09. > :17:11.say, the horrors of nationalism was still much more present on

:17:12. > :17:15.everyone's mind, because they all had experienced what can happen

:17:16. > :17:20.through this kind of movement. Most people had experienced that, and

:17:21. > :17:23.they are not around any more or in later call or important positions,

:17:24. > :17:28.the expense of what nationalism can do is in most parts of Europe is not

:17:29. > :17:34.present. Not here, here it is very present. Exactly. It is. Memories

:17:35. > :17:38.are very real, it is at the top of peoples minds. It is the suffering

:17:39. > :17:51.that civilians went through, just 20 years ago. Yet, right here and right

:17:52. > :17:59.now, in, we see a country that is divided on nationalist lines. `` in

:18:00. > :18:04.Bosnia`Herzegovina. We have someone saying that recently the haters

:18:05. > :18:09.worst album was before the war, it isn't getting better. `` the hate is

:18:10. > :18:14.worse now. Where does your optimism about Europe fit in with that? I

:18:15. > :18:17.wish, when I look at the situation in Bosnia, that the European Union,

:18:18. > :18:23.for example, although international community would act more decisively.

:18:24. > :18:26.We have certain principles that we are generally upholding. These are

:18:27. > :18:32.human rights, democratic principles. These principles that

:18:33. > :18:35.should also be applied to state, like Bosnia`Herzegovina. We apply

:18:36. > :18:41.them to a lot of other states, with some success. If we look at Kosovo,

:18:42. > :18:46.it isn't a great success story, but we had a lot of successes. It was

:18:47. > :18:50.when the European Union was acting with more decisiveness in that

:18:51. > :18:54.question, by saying you have the support of the union, but you have

:18:55. > :18:59.to fulfil certain principles. That means accepting certain regional

:19:00. > :19:03.rules, as they are actually happening here. I know, for example,

:19:04. > :19:06.that when there are events happening, where the European Union

:19:07. > :19:11.is inviting the Bosnians to participate, they are sending out

:19:12. > :19:15.invitations to different entities. But does not work. They should send

:19:16. > :19:19.out just want to the president, and he can decide how it is happening in

:19:20. > :19:23.the country. The European Union has showed weakness when it comes to

:19:24. > :19:26.this country which is a pity. That is a message to Europe's current

:19:27. > :19:30.leaders. I want a message to Europe's current leaders. I wonder

:19:31. > :19:33.how fearful you offer Europe today? Particularly considering, for

:19:34. > :19:41.example, the assertiveness of Putin' Russia. It is a question of

:19:42. > :19:45.which perspective you are taking. If the basic idea was to create an area

:19:46. > :19:49.of peace, bringing the traditional enemies, in this case after the

:19:50. > :19:53.Second World War, Germany and France together, by creating a united

:19:54. > :19:57.Europe, I am optimistic and positive about it. The problem is most people

:19:58. > :20:02.take an economic perspective of it, and the economy is not the best one.

:20:03. > :20:06.You can see a lot of flaws, and in the union, critically, in many

:20:07. > :20:09.aspects of it. I do not see breaking. I don't see it

:20:10. > :20:13.disappearing. That is why I am thinking that the European Union is

:20:14. > :20:19.definitely a project for the ball game, even with difficulties that

:20:20. > :20:23.are happening. It is a project for the long ball game. I want to bring

:20:24. > :20:29.it back to the personal. You sit here and Sarajevo with a bottle at

:20:30. > :20:33.your relative behind you. `` with a model. It is an epitome of the old

:20:34. > :20:40.European aristocracy, if Wogan isn't to say, blue loaded royalty. `` if

:20:41. > :20:47.one isn't to save, blue blooded royalty. You argue you have left

:20:48. > :20:49.your values behind `` say. You are still involved in the Hapsberg

:20:50. > :20:54.foundation. I looked at your website, you save" we must stand

:20:55. > :21:03.together for our birthright and fight the present `` preservation of

:21:04. > :21:07.our old ways". Europe has moved on. I want cultural heritage,

:21:08. > :21:12.preservation of our culture, as a multitude of the possibility to

:21:13. > :21:15.develop individually. That is what I am personally staying for. You are

:21:16. > :21:21.still fighting, if I may so`so, your family is fighting for property and

:21:22. > :21:35.restitution of assets, with enjoy the world that has come off

:21:36. > :21:40.the backs of others, and it is time to move on and not claim

:21:41. > :21:43.rightfully yours. If you have properly read, you may see that I

:21:44. > :21:47.have never been involved in that. Some relatives of mine have been

:21:48. > :21:54.involved in what was private property. That is, by far, not as

:21:55. > :21:57.much as you may be putting here. They make a clear definition of what

:21:58. > :22:01.is private property and what was state property used by the family,

:22:02. > :22:07.because the family wealth, actually, came from the husband of a relative

:22:08. > :22:11.who brought in private property. That is where it comes from. They

:22:12. > :22:15.say it has been taken away from us unlawfully, they are fighting for

:22:16. > :22:19.it, OK, that's fine. That's not me, I'm interested in certain political

:22:20. > :22:23.perspectives, a pan`European perspective, it is very modern to

:22:24. > :22:30.say that we have a pis project here, and experience tells us that

:22:31. > :22:37.is something it is worth fighting for `` a pis project here. It is

:22:38. > :22:43.based on traditional values, `` peace. . I am

:22:44. > :22:53.. I am involved in both feats on the ground when we are talking about

:22:54. > :23:01.politics. 100 years on from the great War and the slaughter. Are you

:23:02. > :23:08.confident that you know how to ensure that that sort of conflict or

:23:09. > :23:12.configuration never happens again? They are two expressions that are

:23:13. > :23:16.not expressions that should be used in politics, those expressions

:23:17. > :23:21.probably come from the realm of religion. These are things that

:23:22. > :23:25.don't happen. I am convinced that when we talk about democracy and

:23:26. > :23:30.human rights, these kinds of values are values that we have to fight for

:23:31. > :23:34.every day to keep them. They are an expression of the civilisation we

:23:35. > :23:40.are having. They are not coming to human nature. We have had to fight

:23:41. > :23:45.in the freedom that we are living, in the liberty and world that we

:23:46. > :23:52.have in Europe. That is something we have to fight for every day. ``

:23:53. > :23:56.wealth. I am not dwelling on it, but it is something worth fighting for.

:23:57. > :23:58.Karl von Habsburg, we have to end there, but thank you very much for

:23:59. > :24:40.being on HARDtalk. Thank you. Some of us had a lovely weekend with

:24:41. > :24:42.a good deal of sunshine, others, particularly Scotland and Northern

:24:43. > :24:45.Ireland, had wind. There was some heavy rain around. Settling down

:24:46. > :24:49.through the day today, most places will be fine and dry with good

:24:50. > :24:51.spells of sunshine, it is not completely a dry story, there will