Live Treasury Questions

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:02:47. > :02:52.Welcome to BBC Parliament's live coverage of the House of Commons. In

:02:53. > :02:55.an hour, the leader of the house, Chris Grayling, will table a motion

:02:56. > :02:59.making time for a Commons debate and vote on military action in Syria, to

:03:00. > :03:03.take place in the chamber tomorrow. The main business today will be the

:03:04. > :03:07.remaining stages of the Immigration Bill, which introduces the new

:03:08. > :03:11.offence of illegal working and gives the state the power to seize the

:03:12. > :03:14.wages of illegal workers. That will be followed by motions on Northern

:03:15. > :03:20.Ireland and High Speed two rail network. Join me for a round-up of

:03:21. > :03:24.the day in both Houses of Parliament at 11 o'clock this evening. First,

:03:25. > :03:25.we have questions to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne,

:03:26. > :03:59.and his team of ministers. Order, order. Questions to Mr

:04:00. > :04:05.Chancellor of the Exchequer. The Chancellor. I would like to answer

:04:06. > :04:08.this question along with question number 11. This government knows

:04:09. > :04:12.there cannot be a successful economy without support for business and

:04:13. > :04:16.enterprise. That is why we are cutting corporation tax, increasing

:04:17. > :04:20.the employment allowance and setting a permanently high investment

:04:21. > :04:23.allowance. It is why we also increased our support for industrial

:04:24. > :04:27.policy including a boost for science and announced a double small

:04:28. > :04:33.businesses which relief next jet, helping 600,000 small businesses.

:04:34. > :04:38.How will my right honourable friend help small businesses compete with

:04:39. > :04:42.the de facto subsidy that businesses with complex overseas tax structures

:04:43. > :04:47.get, which results in them paying no or very low tax in the UKs

:04:48. > :04:53.articulately given small business Saturday is coming up this weekend?

:04:54. > :04:55.The small business Saturday is an important initiative and one that I

:04:56. > :05:03.think everyone in this house should support. Mata mix of good point

:05:04. > :05:07.about the international tax rules. The good news is that they have

:05:08. > :05:10.started to change. We have an agreement in the OECD and Britain is

:05:11. > :05:16.amongst those countries implement those changes the. The best example

:05:17. > :05:18.is the diverted profits tax, which is already raising revenue and

:05:19. > :05:23.tackles these big knotty nationals who do not pay their fair share of

:05:24. > :05:31.tax in the UK -- big multinationals. At the same time, we are cutting tax

:05:32. > :05:37.for small businesses. Thanks to the government's long-term economic plan

:05:38. > :05:43.'s, we have seen a record number of company registrations in my

:05:44. > :05:47.constituency, with 202 companies registered in Gillingham during the

:05:48. > :05:50.first quarter. One company, which the Chancellor visited with me, have

:05:51. > :05:53.asked me to ask the Chancellor to clarify the government position on

:05:54. > :06:00.the annual investment allowance for businesses. It is fantastic to hear

:06:01. > :06:03.about the good news in Gillingham and the new companies being

:06:04. > :06:08.registered and the jobs being created there. Thanks to the strong

:06:09. > :06:12.economy and the long-term economic plan that my honourable friend

:06:13. > :06:16.refers to add a strong parliament making sure the infrastructure comes

:06:17. > :06:23.to that part of Kent, the annual investment allowance will now be set

:06:24. > :06:27.at ?200,000, a permanent rate, much higher than the rate we inherited

:06:28. > :06:30.from the last government. That will help companies like that fantastic

:06:31. > :06:38.business which I visited with him continue to grow and expand. The

:06:39. > :06:41.Chancellor announced some significant tax rises for business

:06:42. > :06:45.in his spending review, and also cut quite a lot of business grants

:06:46. > :06:50.through his spending settlement through the department for business.

:06:51. > :06:56.But can he give an expression for table 3.7 of the OBR bluebook, which

:06:57. > :07:02.downgrades productivity for the UK economy? Pocket -- productivity per

:07:03. > :07:09.hour is due to fall from the previous forecast for 2016 and 2017

:07:10. > :07:13.and 42018. What is the reason behind the OBR's downgrading of

:07:14. > :07:18.productivity? The OBR have made their assessment, but it shows that

:07:19. > :07:21.productivity actually picks up through this Parliament. He and I

:07:22. > :07:24.have had many discussions about this. I think we agree that

:07:25. > :07:32.productivity is a long-term challenge for the UK. We are trying

:07:33. > :07:40.to solve that through things like the apprenticeship levy, which will

:07:41. > :07:45.be one of those so-called taxes he describes. It is not a tax, in the

:07:46. > :07:50.sense that companies get their money back. It is the kind of thing we

:07:51. > :07:56.need to do to deal with productivity challenges. As part of the need to

:07:57. > :08:02.look at fiscal steps to support businesses, will the Chancellor also

:08:03. > :08:06.give consideration to the extension of the rural fuel rebate scheme to

:08:07. > :08:15.other regions that have not been considered? I am happy to give

:08:16. > :08:18.consideration to that. We are operating within the maximum

:08:19. > :08:25.flexibility that the European Union rules allow us on this. Any postcode

:08:26. > :08:31.that qualifies, we have put forward for the scheme we injured used in

:08:32. > :08:34.the last Parliament. I am happy to look at specific cases in Northern

:08:35. > :08:38.Ireland to see if they qualify. The Chancellor said the apprenticeship

:08:39. > :08:43.levy is a levy, but what many businesses see is a tax on

:08:44. > :08:50.employment, collected through PAYE. Does the Chancellor think that is

:08:51. > :08:56.compatible with the lock on taxes on business, and could he also say what

:08:57. > :08:59.estimate he has made of the cost of the apprenticeship levy to the

:09:00. > :09:11.public sector, which I can find in the Redbook? Firstly, because the

:09:12. > :09:15.apprenticeship levy is set up in such a way that a large company that

:09:16. > :09:18.is employing high-quality apprentices will be able to receive

:09:19. > :09:26.back from the government more than it puts in, that sets it aside from

:09:27. > :09:32.classic payroll taxes and has been broadly welcomed by the business

:09:33. > :09:37.community, although they accept the additional burden it represents. We

:09:38. > :09:44.made the calculation is for the impact on the public sector in our

:09:45. > :09:49.public finance projections. I can write to him with the precise

:09:50. > :09:57.number. Can the Chancellor confirm that in addition to the 17% cut to

:09:58. > :10:01.the business department's funding, the Autumn Statement added ?11

:10:02. > :10:10.billion to the tax bill of businesses? It was mainly driven by

:10:11. > :10:13.the apprenticeship levy. I would have hoped that the Scottish

:10:14. > :10:18.Nationalist party would support an apprenticeship levy where we use the

:10:19. > :10:24.money to create 3 million apprentices in this part of the UK,

:10:25. > :10:28.and make sure there are arrangements to pass the money to the Scottish

:10:29. > :10:31.Government so that they can improve skills in Scotland. But if one looks

:10:32. > :10:34.at the record of the Scottish nationalist government, you can see

:10:35. > :10:39.that they have been cutting FE places in Scotland. As usual, they

:10:40. > :10:46.say one thing here and do things differently in Scotland. The

:10:47. > :10:50.question was about the 11 billion extra tax cost for business and the

:10:51. > :10:53.cut to the business department, something the Chancellor doesn't

:10:54. > :10:56.want to talk about. So given that there was no increase in retail

:10:57. > :11:04.sales in the last quarter, the CBI trends survey is down. Consumer

:11:05. > :11:08.confidence is down, the deficit is colossal and manufacturing output is

:11:09. > :11:12.down. Why does this Chancellor think that cutting the business department

:11:13. > :11:18.by 17% and adding 11 billion to business costs over the spending

:11:19. > :11:21.period is remotely sensible? Because we on this side do not equate the

:11:22. > :11:28.health of the business sector with the size of the business department.

:11:29. > :11:32.We have increased money going into innovation by raising the budget for

:11:33. > :11:37.the catapult centres. We have boosted the budget for science, a UK

:11:38. > :11:44.strength which would be undermined if Scotland became independent. And

:11:45. > :11:49.in the independent OBR forecast, growth is up, jobs are up, living

:11:50. > :11:52.standards are up, wages are up, all part of a successful economic plan

:11:53. > :11:59.delivering the goods for the whole UK. As my right honourable friend

:12:00. > :12:04.will know, the tech economy in the west of England is one of the

:12:05. > :12:08.fastest in the UK, and start-up businesses like one in my

:12:09. > :12:10.constituency of Bath have done that because of government investment.

:12:11. > :12:15.Does he agree that businesses like these will help lead our economic

:12:16. > :12:22.recovery, creating jobs and productivity in the west of England?

:12:23. > :12:29.I pay tribute to the successful and thriving tech businesses in Bath and

:12:30. > :12:33.across the West Country. There is an opportunity now, with the investment

:12:34. > :12:39.in cyber security and GCHQ not too far from Bath in Cheltenham, to

:12:40. > :12:42.create a culture of small start-up businesses to ensure that on the

:12:43. > :12:46.back of our national security, we have commercially successful

:12:47. > :12:53.companies building those businesses in the West Country. Can the

:12:54. > :12:56.Chancellor confirm what measures he introduced in the Autumn Statement

:12:57. > :13:04.to support the UK renewable energy businesses? We committed to double

:13:05. > :13:11.the investment in renewable energy over the next five years. But what

:13:12. > :13:18.did we actually get from this Chancellor last week? The ?1 billion

:13:19. > :13:24.fund to develop carbon capture and storage, cut. Subsidies for solar

:13:25. > :13:29.panels, cut. National projects like the Swansea -based tidal lagoon, not

:13:30. > :13:33.a mention. Britain at the bottom of the European league for renewables.

:13:34. > :13:39.Does the Chancellor agree that with companies like Tesco, IKEA, Vodafone

:13:40. > :13:42.and Unilever, that his renewable energy cutbacks now pose a risk to

:13:43. > :13:48.UK businesses and undermine confidence in investment? We should

:13:49. > :13:51.all be proud of the fact that in this country, jobs are being

:13:52. > :13:57.created, and the economy is growing and our carbon emissions fell by 8%

:13:58. > :14:01.in the last year. We are doubling our investment in renewable energy.

:14:02. > :14:04.At the same time, we are putting investment into things like a low

:14:05. > :14:08.carbon nuclear power and small modular reactors, something which

:14:09. > :14:13.will benefit South Yorkshire and the north-west of England. We don't

:14:14. > :14:20.actually believe the way to help save the Earth is by piling costs on

:14:21. > :14:25.people's electricity bills, so we also take action to make sure our

:14:26. > :14:26.home efficiency scheme was more efficient so that people's household

:14:27. > :14:38.energy bills will go down by ?30. HMRC and that's the plans locations

:14:39. > :14:45.for its future regional centres based on a number of key principles.

:14:46. > :14:49.In addition the cost, HMRC has taken account of local transport links,

:14:50. > :14:53.the local labour market and future workforce supply and the need to

:14:54. > :14:55.retain the staff and skills they need to continue their

:14:56. > :15:03.transformation. This will reduce their estate costs by ?100 million a

:15:04. > :15:06.year by 2025. Will he accept that basing the regional office in

:15:07. > :15:10.Bradford would be cheaper for the taxpayer. Does he accept there is a

:15:11. > :15:15.suitable location available in Bradford and there is not in Leeds?

:15:16. > :15:20.And effective northern powerhouse does not mean basing everything in

:15:21. > :15:27.Leeds in west Yorkshire. Will he think again? My honourable friend is

:15:28. > :15:30.as ever and advocate for the interests of his constituents. The

:15:31. > :15:34.point I would make to him is that this is a regional centre for the

:15:35. > :15:40.whole of the Yorkshire and Humber area. In order to paint as many

:15:41. > :15:45.members of staff as possible and reduce redundancy costs, HMRC's

:15:46. > :15:49.assessment is that leaders better location but those working in York

:15:50. > :15:56.or York or Sheffield or Hull, where there is a direct train service to

:15:57. > :16:00.Leeds. The honourable gentleman is an illustrious fellow and

:16:01. > :16:05.distinguished philosopher, but I think he is in the wrong side of the

:16:06. > :16:09.Pennines for this question. Question number three, Mr Speaker. The

:16:10. > :16:14.government has announced a radical reshaping of the state. At the end

:16:15. > :16:19.of the Parliament local government will retain 100% of business rates.

:16:20. > :16:24.The government will begin consultation shortly on these

:16:25. > :16:32.reforms. My local authority -- authority estimates it will lose ?30

:16:33. > :16:37.million a year as a result of this. In comparison, Westminster Council

:16:38. > :16:42.will have their income increased tenfold. When will the council

:16:43. > :16:46.publish clarity for councils like mine that mean they will be able to

:16:47. > :16:52.plug a significant shortfall in funding? The devolution of business

:16:53. > :16:57.rates swell retain the system of pop-ups and tariffs that currently

:16:58. > :17:01.exist, so that there will be no immediate lost any local authority

:17:02. > :17:08.as a consequence of devolution. If the power to local authorities so

:17:09. > :17:12.that they have got stronger incentives to boost growth and local

:17:13. > :17:20.authorities that grasp that opportunity will see their business

:17:21. > :17:24.rates revenue increase. Would he agree with me that the point about

:17:25. > :17:28.the announcement last week is that it is a defining moment for local

:17:29. > :17:31.authorities? The local authorities that except the devolution of

:17:32. > :17:37.business rates can incentivise strong local business growth, have a

:17:38. > :17:45.strong local economy. That is the key point. He's absolutely right.

:17:46. > :17:49.That is the key point. It is about assuring that local authorities have

:17:50. > :17:53.the incentives to boost growth and local people can hold those local

:17:54. > :17:57.authorities account. What consideration has been given to

:17:58. > :17:59.doing something about business rates to support the steel industry in

:18:00. > :18:07.line with the outcome is agreed at the steel stomach chaired by the

:18:08. > :18:12.Business Secretary? As my right honourable friend the Chancellor

:18:13. > :18:16.made clear, the business rates review will be completed next year

:18:17. > :18:22.and we are looking at all the representation to receive in the

:18:23. > :18:30.context of that review. Question number four. Mr Speaker, the

:18:31. > :18:39.National Living Wage will mean a full-time minimum wage worker will

:18:40. > :18:43.earn over ?4700 more by 2025, a 40% pay rise. Additionally, due to the

:18:44. > :18:48.ripple effect of higher wages, up to a quarter of workers will see some

:18:49. > :18:53.benefit. Economy wide which are expected to be on average not .4%

:18:54. > :19:02.higher in 2020. There has been a widespread welcome for the national

:19:03. > :19:06.minimum wage but inevitably this has a major effect on traditionally low

:19:07. > :19:10.with sex is, in particular social and residential care. Does my

:19:11. > :19:13.honourable friend accept that the government and local councils must

:19:14. > :19:17.be mindful of the need to ensure that these are adjusted to ensure

:19:18. > :19:25.that the viability of these set tourist? He is absolutely right that

:19:26. > :19:31.it will be many of the 900,000 workers who work in the social care

:19:32. > :19:36.sector who will benefit from the new National Living Wage, including many

:19:37. > :19:40.working in residential care. That is why last week and the Autumn

:19:41. > :19:42.Statement we made an announcement and that councils will have the

:19:43. > :19:47.power over the course of the Parliament to come to access money

:19:48. > :19:50.that they may need to increase the amount that the paper they're social

:19:51. > :19:58.and residential care with new revenue streams for social care

:19:59. > :20:01.worth up to 3.5 by 2020. The National Living Wage does not apply

:20:02. > :20:04.to people who are self-employed who are self-employed whose wages have

:20:05. > :20:08.been stagnating and pension contributions of fallen every year

:20:09. > :20:12.for five years. Can the Minister tell the house why self-employed

:20:13. > :20:16.people were not mentioned in the productivity plan and what she will

:20:17. > :20:20.do to tackle low pay and omissions in self-employment? The honourable

:20:21. > :20:26.gentleman speaks very powerfully of the importance of the self-employed

:20:27. > :20:30.to our economy and we would like to pay tribute to the excellent work

:20:31. > :20:33.that so many self-employed people do, including many people in my

:20:34. > :20:39.family, to generate economic growth in this country. He is right that as

:20:40. > :20:45.the wages across the economy grew and as we put more spending power

:20:46. > :20:50.into budgets for social care for residential care, that we would

:20:51. > :20:58.expect that to be passed on also to those who are self-employed.

:20:59. > :21:02.Question number five. Mr Speaker, the government is committed to

:21:03. > :21:07.having the stability employment Jon Curran figures would mean helping

:21:08. > :21:10.around 1 million extra people find work. The impact of meeting this on

:21:11. > :21:16.the public finances depends on fact is we cannot predict, such as what

:21:17. > :21:22.people are likely to be paid. This is about more than just a fiscal

:21:23. > :21:25.impact. The government wants to help disabled people benefit from the

:21:26. > :21:29.security of employment which is why we have announced a real terms

:21:30. > :21:36.funding increase to help people with disabilities and health conditions

:21:37. > :21:39.to find work. I am pleased to say a delegation of young people with

:21:40. > :21:44.autism of visiting Parliament today to discuss how we can in prove the

:21:45. > :21:49.transition from school to work for people with autism. Improving the

:21:50. > :21:52.written to work for people with autism or other disabilities would

:21:53. > :21:58.be a great thing for a national finances and for the young people

:21:59. > :22:05.themselves? I join the honourable member in welcoming so many disabled

:22:06. > :22:10.people to Parliament today. I agree with him on the importance of doing

:22:11. > :22:16.more to help disabled people enter work. That is why we extended the

:22:17. > :22:19.access to work scheme, we lunched the disability confident scheme to

:22:20. > :22:23.work with employers to ensure that they better understand the benefits

:22:24. > :22:36.of recruiting and retaining disabled workers. Around 3.2 million people

:22:37. > :22:39.with disabilities are in work now and the government is looking to see

:22:40. > :22:45.this number increased dramatically over the next few years? He is

:22:46. > :22:50.absolutely right. This is one of the most important aspects of the

:22:51. > :22:56.government's work. He is correct that disability employment is not up

:22:57. > :23:02.3.2 million, which is an increase of 340,000 since 2013 and 74% the year.

:23:03. > :23:07.We are increasing real terms spending on disability employment by

:23:08. > :23:17.around 15% at the end of this Parliament. Question number six.

:23:18. > :23:24.Total local government spending will be higher in cash terms in 2019-20

:23:25. > :23:29.than it is this year. The government is also the Volvo and 100% of

:23:30. > :23:33.business rates than enough for the first time since 1990 local areas

:23:34. > :23:36.will see the full benefits of local business rate growth in their

:23:37. > :23:39.budgets. When it comes to local economies I am sure that the

:23:40. > :23:45.honourable lady will join me in welcoming the fact that unemployment

:23:46. > :23:51.has fallen by more than 25% over the last year in her constituency. Will

:23:52. > :23:55.city -- Hull City Council lost a third of its budget from government

:23:56. > :24:00.funding since 2010 whilst wealthier areas have increased their budgets

:24:01. > :24:06.in some areas. The business rate proposal will benefit well-heeled

:24:07. > :24:09.areas. Can the chief Secretary say to my constituents hyped taking tens

:24:10. > :24:15.of millions of pounds out of the local economy will assist the

:24:16. > :24:19.Chancellor's plan for the Northern Powerhouse for cities like old? To

:24:20. > :24:26.be precise, local government funding is being detected in cash terms.

:24:27. > :24:29.There is a 6.1 William reduction in central government grants and that

:24:30. > :24:32.is more than offset by 6.3 billion increase in other sources of

:24:33. > :24:40.income. When she mentions the Northern Powerhouse we announced

:24:41. > :24:44.yesterday the appointment of the chairman of transport for the North.

:24:45. > :24:51.We announced ?200 million for transport for the North over this

:24:52. > :24:54.Parliament to transform transport connectivity in this region to make

:24:55. > :25:01.sure that the Northern Powerhouse becomes a reality. I welcome the

:25:02. > :25:04.measures might last week by the Chancellor to allow local government

:25:05. > :25:10.to keep the proceeds from business rates. My local authority is one of

:25:11. > :25:14.the smaller ones and therefore the receipts actual and potential will

:25:15. > :25:17.always be slightly less. Can you give me an assurance that smaller

:25:18. > :25:22.local authorities like this will see the benefits from this measure?

:25:23. > :25:27.Yes, there will be a consultation on changes to the local government

:25:28. > :25:34.finance system launched shortly, to be implemented in the financial year

:25:35. > :25:39.16-17 and we to be clear that the 2% increase in the precept to fund

:25:40. > :25:45.adult social care will be across-the-board, including rural

:25:46. > :25:52.areas for councils that are making social care pressures. The Prime

:25:53. > :25:57.Minister eloquent piece set out the difficulties facing public services

:25:58. > :26:02.as a result of the Chancellor's cuts in correspondence to his own local

:26:03. > :26:07.authority. In light of the ?27 billion windfall for the Chancellor

:26:08. > :26:12.why is he still pursuing ?12 billion on Social Security cuts under 5% cut

:26:13. > :26:15.to this Scottish Government? He mentions the Scottish Government

:26:16. > :26:19.budget, which I am not sure is within the scope of the question.

:26:20. > :26:26.The Scottish Government budget has done relatively well and there is a

:26:27. > :26:29.40% real terms increase in capital spending over the course of this

:26:30. > :26:35.Parliament and the reduction in resorts spending is only in real

:26:36. > :26:41.terms and is far less than a lot of UK Government departments. Does my

:26:42. > :26:44.right honourable friend agree that local economies like mind in

:26:45. > :26:49.Somerset have an exceptional opportunity to benefit from the

:26:50. > :26:53.devolution of business rates in the spending that this government will

:26:54. > :27:01.conduct the? He is absolutely right. Which is why it is so important that

:27:02. > :27:04.local authorities be able to keep the proceeds of growing their local

:27:05. > :27:08.business rates if that is what they are radio and capable of doing. I am

:27:09. > :27:15.sure my honourable friend will play his full part in the track in more

:27:16. > :27:18.business to his constituency. Commenting upon the Chancellor's

:27:19. > :27:24.proposals to allow local authorities to raise council tax by up to 2% in

:27:25. > :27:27.order to fund social care, the Conservative vice chair of the Local

:27:28. > :27:31.Government Association has reverted the creation of a postcode lottery,

:27:32. > :27:35.stating that if you are in one of those areas but the low concept --

:27:36. > :27:39.council taxpayers what you're likely to be saying is that unless you

:27:40. > :27:43.physically cannot get out of bed you're going to get no help at all,

:27:44. > :27:48.so I asked the Chancellor what equalisation measures will he take

:27:49. > :27:52.to ensure that there is no disparity between local authorities in terms

:27:53. > :27:58.of the funding they receive and the resultant quality of service they

:27:59. > :28:02.can provide? One of the other announcements the honourable lady

:28:03. > :28:06.might have missed was the extra going into an improved better care

:28:07. > :28:12.fund, thanks to this government. She quotes the vice-chair of the LGA but

:28:13. > :28:18.you could also have quoted from the chairman, also a Conservative, who

:28:19. > :28:21.said the LGA has long called for further flexibility in the setting

:28:22. > :28:25.up Council Tax and that is right that Greg Clark and Greg hands have

:28:26. > :28:34.listened to the concerns set out by local government. Question number

:28:35. > :28:39.seven. With your permission I would like to hand to this question along

:28:40. > :28:43.with question it. This government backs saving and home ownership and

:28:44. > :28:47.that support is exemplified by the Help To Buy I becomes available

:28:48. > :28:53.today. It provides direct government support to anyone saving for their

:28:54. > :28:57.deposit on their first home. Every 200 point you saved the government

:28:58. > :29:01.will help you with another 50 fine. The government will give you up to

:29:02. > :29:07.?3000 to which first home, all part of a plan to help working people.

:29:08. > :29:11.One of the best ways to help people build up their savings so they can

:29:12. > :29:16.buy a Help To Buy Isis is to make sure that they have good jobs with

:29:17. > :29:23.good wages, so will my right honourable friend say what steps he

:29:24. > :29:31.will take the drive employment in my constituency? -- ISA. I was in the

:29:32. > :29:34.West Midlands yesterday looking at the fantastic investment that Jaguar

:29:35. > :29:38.Land Rover are making there. Alongside that we are investing in

:29:39. > :29:42.the infrastructure in the West Midlands. We just signed an

:29:43. > :29:46.agreement with the authorities in the West Midlands across the parties

:29:47. > :29:51.to put over ?1 billion into the West Midlands over the next couple of

:29:52. > :29:52.decades, so there is a long-term commitment to the Midlands engine

:29:53. > :30:03.and the jobs in his constituency. Last month, a local paper reported

:30:04. > :30:08.that some areas in Cornwall had seen a 15% rise in house prices over the

:30:09. > :30:13.last year. Could my right honourable friend outline what additional

:30:14. > :30:18.action is being taken to assist first-time buyers in beautiful parts

:30:19. > :30:22.of the country like Cornwall, which are popular with second home

:30:23. > :30:28.owners, and what difference the increase in stamp duty will make? My

:30:29. > :30:30.honourable friend always speaks passionately on behalf of her

:30:31. > :30:37.constituents, in this case those seeking to buy their first home. The

:30:38. > :30:41.Help To Buy Isa is available in Cornwall and will help her

:30:42. > :30:44.constituents. The new stamp duty charge on second homes and buy to

:30:45. > :30:48.let will raise money, and a portion of that money will be given to local

:30:49. > :30:54.authorities in areas like Cornwall, where there are a lot of second

:30:55. > :31:01.homes. Low interest rate have meant that many have had their saving

:31:02. > :31:08.vehicles affected like buy to let is. What measures is he giving to

:31:09. > :31:14.elderly people who are looking for better savings returns? There is

:31:15. > :31:18.agreement across this House that we should have a level playing field so

:31:19. > :31:21.that people trying to buy their first home are not disadvantaged

:31:22. > :31:25.against those trying to buy a second home or a buy to let property. The

:31:26. > :31:31.changes we have injured used help to do that. Alongside that, we have

:31:32. > :31:37.made the Isa more generous. We have helped people get the most out of

:31:38. > :31:40.their pensions. And interest rates, decided independently, are part of

:31:41. > :31:50.the vital support for our economy going forward. On the work the

:31:51. > :31:56.Chancellor has done on tackling the buy to let market, can I ask whether

:31:57. > :32:02.he would consider extending it by cutting further the tax relief on

:32:03. > :32:04.buy to let properties? We have to widen the space for first-time

:32:05. > :32:09.buyers to get into the market, particularly in London. I welcome

:32:10. > :32:16.the support the honourable lady gives. The problems of getting on

:32:17. > :32:20.the housing ladder are particularly acute for first-time buyers in

:32:21. > :32:23.London. In the summer budget, we announced changes to mortgage tax

:32:24. > :32:31.relief for the buy to let market so that those with higher incomes saw

:32:32. > :32:36.that reliefs go back over the coming years. What we have set out now with

:32:37. > :32:41.the stamp duty and the changes in the summer budget represent a fair

:32:42. > :32:44.package for homeowners, both those by a buy to let property and those

:32:45. > :32:50.buying their first home. Could the Chancellor explain how first-time

:32:51. > :32:55.home-buyers will benefit from his blueprint for a better deal, what

:32:56. > :33:03.the Daily Mail calls a blitz on rip-off monopolies? I am glad my

:33:04. > :33:09.honourable friend read that document. We are making sure that

:33:10. > :33:13.mortgage fees are more transparent. We are making sure utility bills are

:33:14. > :33:17.more competitive for families, cutting the electricity tariffs we

:33:18. > :33:21.talked about earlier, but also making sure people can get a better

:33:22. > :33:30.deal from their water company, all part of driving down costs for

:33:31. > :33:33.families. What will really support people with home ownership is

:33:34. > :33:38.massively increasing the supply of new homes, not, as the Autumn

:33:39. > :33:43.Statement does, simply subsidising people to bid up the prices of

:33:44. > :33:48.existing homes. After five and a half years in office, it is time the

:33:49. > :33:52.Chancellor took some responsibility. He has a woeful record on housing,

:33:53. > :33:56.exacerbating the market failure which has led to restricted supply

:33:57. > :34:03.and consequently high prices. When will the government increases supply

:34:04. > :34:10.by starting a real programme of mass house-building of homes for rent as

:34:11. > :34:13.well as to buy? Over this decade, we will have built more social homes

:34:14. > :34:20.than the entire period that the Labour Party was in government. But

:34:21. > :34:24.affordable housing should also be housing that people can afford to

:34:25. > :34:28.buy as well as rent. We are doubling the housing budget and undertaking

:34:29. > :34:35.the biggest housing building programme since the 1970s. It is a

:34:36. > :34:38.shame he was not with me in Wolverhampton yesterday, seeing the

:34:39. > :34:41.new jobs being created at the engine plant and making sure we build new

:34:42. > :34:51.homes for those working at that plant. As we remove gender

:34:52. > :34:55.inequality, women born between 1953 and 1955 will receive their state

:34:56. > :34:59.pension at the same age as men or earlier. The government has written

:35:00. > :35:05.to all those affected by increases to state pension age and has acted

:35:06. > :35:09.to ease the timetable at the cost of ?1 billion, ensuring that 81% of all

:35:10. > :35:14.women affected see a rise of a year or less under the 2011 act. As

:35:15. > :35:20.announced by the Chancellor last week, the basic state pension will

:35:21. > :35:27.rise next year by ?3.35 to ?119.30 a week, the largest real terms

:35:28. > :35:32.increase for 15 years. It is good to see the pension going up, but

:35:33. > :35:37.research by the pensions policy Institute and Age UK shows that a

:35:38. > :35:41.third of women at work are ineligible for automatic enrolment

:35:42. > :35:47.into a workplace pension, leaving them at risk of not having a decent

:35:48. > :35:51.income later in life. What research has he or the Department for Work

:35:52. > :35:55.and Pensions carried out to understand what difficulties they

:35:56. > :35:59.will have in the future? This continues a process which has been

:36:00. > :36:07.going on since the mid-90s to equalise the state pension age and

:36:08. > :36:11.the process in 2011 to increase the state pension age to make sure it

:36:12. > :36:14.can be more affordable overall in terms of being able to meet our

:36:15. > :36:19.commitments under the triple lock and the big increase I mentioned

:36:20. > :36:23.earlier. I did not hear all of the honourable gentleman's quenching,

:36:24. > :36:29.but I think he mentioned Age UK and the charity director of Age UK said

:36:30. > :36:32.this. She called it a significant financial commitment from the

:36:33. > :36:36.government at a difficult time. This will give a much-needed six-month

:36:37. > :36:45.respite to all the women who would have had to work an extra two years.

:36:46. > :36:50.Question ten, please. The long-term economic plan is securing the UK

:36:51. > :36:54.recovery. We were the fastest-growing G7 economy in 2014

:36:55. > :36:57.and 2013, joint fastest this year. The deficit has more than halved and

:36:58. > :37:00.the national debt is set to fall this year. But the job is not yet

:37:01. > :37:05.done and the government will continue working through the plan to

:37:06. > :37:10.ensure Britain's long-term economic security. It was great to hear the

:37:11. > :37:13.Chancellor last week talk about rehabilitating our prisoners. Does

:37:14. > :37:17.the minister agree that the sale of old Victorian prisons is an example

:37:18. > :37:21.of how economic and social reform can go hand-in-hand, bringing sales

:37:22. > :37:28.to the Exchequer, working positively with prisoners and creating new

:37:29. > :37:31.places in our cities for homes? My honourable friend has campaigned

:37:32. > :37:35.consistently on these issues since 2010. The justice reforms are an

:37:36. > :37:37.exemplary element of the long-term economic plan, combining savings

:37:38. > :37:43.with social reform and delivering economic dividends from improved up

:37:44. > :37:47.the ability to sites of 3000 new homes. It is because of the strength

:37:48. > :37:51.of the economy, thanks to the long-term plan, that we have

:37:52. > :37:56.invested in building the new prisons and closing the old ones. Last

:37:57. > :37:59.night, I launched the all-party parliament regroup on adult

:38:00. > :38:04.education, in recognition that at a time when we are all living longer,

:38:05. > :38:08.having many different jobs and careers, when whole industries are

:38:09. > :38:15.being allowed to die, our long-term economic security depends on

:38:16. > :38:19.investing in adult education. The Chancellor was persuaded not to

:38:20. > :38:21.slash the further education budget. Will he now acknowledged that

:38:22. > :38:28.investing in further education is the future? She rightly identifies

:38:29. > :38:30.the importance of continuing in further education and the fact that

:38:31. > :38:35.more people will have multiple careers in their lives and the

:38:36. > :38:39.availability of retraining is important. I welcome the protection

:38:40. > :38:46.of that budget and the availability of loans for part-time students. The

:38:47. > :38:49.government's economic plan rightly prioritise infrastructure and I

:38:50. > :38:54.welcome yesterday's announcement of a new chairman to transport of the

:38:55. > :38:59.north. Does my right aggro agree with me -- right honourable friend

:39:00. > :39:04.agree with me that the regeneration of the north is vital to rebalancing

:39:05. > :39:08.the economy? He is right and that is what is at the heart of the

:39:09. > :39:10.enterprise zones and the concept of the Northern Powerhouse, making sure

:39:11. > :39:14.the cities of the north at up to something that is more than the sum

:39:15. > :39:18.of the parts. Transport for the north is a vital part of that. What

:39:19. > :39:23.assessment has he made of the impact of the long-term economic plan to

:39:24. > :39:27.grow the economy of the policies made and the promises being put

:39:28. > :39:33.forward at the Green junket in Paris this week? In the mistaken belief

:39:34. > :39:37.that by piling pounds onto power bills, you can somehow change the

:39:38. > :39:41.world's climate? We recognise the challenges that come with energy

:39:42. > :39:44.costs. It is also true that the green sector supports a number of

:39:45. > :39:52.jobs in this country. It is important that we seek to lead in

:39:53. > :39:58.terms of research and development. Question number 12. The government

:39:59. > :40:04.is committed to raising the income tax personal allowance from ?10,600

:40:05. > :40:07.to ?12,500 by the end of this Parliament. This is alongside our

:40:08. > :40:12.commitment to raise the higher rate threshold to raise the higher rate

:40:13. > :40:14.threshold of ?50,000. Over 30 million individuals will benefit

:40:15. > :40:23.from these changes. The summer Budget confirmed an increase to the

:40:24. > :40:27.personal budget to ?11,200 in 2017. In the light of what my honourable

:40:28. > :40:33.friend has said, will he reassure me that as the economy continues to

:40:34. > :40:37.recover, the government will follow sound conservative principles of

:40:38. > :40:47.allowing people to keep more of the money they earn to spend as they

:40:48. > :40:49.wish? Well, yes. And if we are going to continue to raise the personal

:40:50. > :40:55.allowance and meet our commitments on income tax, we also need to make

:40:56. > :40:59.sure we show discipline in terms of government department or spending

:41:00. > :41:05.and the welfare budget. Number 13. With unemployment level of 31.2

:41:06. > :41:09.million, there are more people in work than before. Over the past

:41:10. > :41:12.year, implement growth has been driven by full-time employees and

:41:13. > :41:15.high and medium skill occupations, showing we are now moving into the

:41:16. > :41:19.next phase of our recovery, with high-quality employment helping to

:41:20. > :41:25.boost productivity and raising standards across the country.

:41:26. > :41:28.Against a backdrop of redundancies and potential redundancies in my

:41:29. > :41:31.constituency in the mining and power sector, can the minister tell the

:41:32. > :41:36.House what support is available to businesses of all sizes in my area

:41:37. > :41:42.to ensure that the trend of rising employment we have seen since 2010

:41:43. > :41:48.continues? I commend my honourable friend on his endeavours, including

:41:49. > :41:53.the Selby district jobs first. He mentioned energy intensive

:41:54. > :41:57.industries. We recognise the challenges that some businesses in

:41:58. > :42:00.those sectors face. We cannot change world price levels, but we will

:42:01. > :42:07.bring forward compared session and we will legislate to exempt them

:42:08. > :42:09.from renewables policy costs, providing greater business

:42:10. > :42:14.certainty. Businesses will also benefit from further cuts to

:42:15. > :42:17.corporation tax. I have been approached by constituents who have

:42:18. > :42:22.been excited to get their first 15 hour week job, hoping it would lead

:42:23. > :42:25.to full-time employment. At in retail, there is a trend where over

:42:26. > :42:30.two years later, more part-time employees are being recruited, but

:42:31. > :42:34.no full-time job for those in post. Could the minister look into this

:42:35. > :42:38.and make sure there are no perverse incentives for employers to create

:42:39. > :42:43.lots of small part-time jobs without the opportunity for those people to

:42:44. > :42:47.progress? The honourable lady raises an important point. Full-time

:42:48. > :42:52.workers account for almost three quarters of the employment growth

:42:53. > :42:57.since 2010. But the crucial reforming the welfare and social

:42:58. > :43:02.system is universal credit, which six specifically to get over these

:43:03. > :43:07.spikes you find in the hours scale so that it always pays to be in

:43:08. > :43:17.work, and it also pays to move up the hours scale. Number 14. Since

:43:18. > :43:19.the financial crisis, households' financial positions have improved.

:43:20. > :43:28.Household debt as a proportion of income has fallen to 144% in the

:43:29. > :43:38.second quarter of 2015, down from a peak of 168% in the first quarter of

:43:39. > :43:42.2008. However, a large number of my constituents have been alarmed that

:43:43. > :43:45.mistakes made by HMRC in overpayments to working tax credits

:43:46. > :43:50.have been recovered without warning from their child tax credit

:43:51. > :43:53.entitlements. Is this now the policy of the department to push people

:43:54. > :44:00.into poverty by punishing them for HMRC's mistakes?

:44:01. > :44:06.She may remember the terrible roar like Ron Howard government was in

:44:07. > :44:11.power with working tax credits. I can assure the honourable lady that

:44:12. > :44:18.we will continue to improve the administration of these and ensure

:44:19. > :44:23.that unlike when her party was in power when you could have a ?25,000

:44:24. > :44:36.change to your income without it affecting your working tax credits,

:44:37. > :44:38.he got that down to ?2500. Household debt will be kept low thanks to

:44:39. > :44:46.government support for savers such as the Help To Buy ISA is launched

:44:47. > :44:53.today. Will the Minister encouraged me to encourage buyers to take

:44:54. > :44:58.advantage of this? I am delighted that my honourable friend on the

:44:59. > :45:04.half of his constituents has noticed the fact that the Help To Buy ISA

:45:05. > :45:08.scheme launches today. There are 14 financial institutions that are

:45:09. > :45:11.already offering this exciting opportunity to save for a home and

:45:12. > :45:17.they hope that many of his constituents will take advantage of

:45:18. > :45:20.it. Citizens advice said that household bills are now the chief

:45:21. > :45:26.source of problems that people are coming to them for help with. What

:45:27. > :45:30.will the government do to make sure the guarantor and logbook loans are

:45:31. > :45:33.properly regulated so they don't simply replace payday loans as a

:45:34. > :45:40.source of properly regulated credit? As the honourable lady

:45:41. > :45:47.Hampshire will welcome in the last Parliament we took steps to bring

:45:48. > :45:51.credit under the regulation of the Financial Conduct Authority and we

:45:52. > :45:55.would welcome the fact as a result of that payday lending has dropped

:45:56. > :45:59.sharply. We are also backing credit unions are many different ways in

:46:00. > :46:02.this country to make sure that people have an opportunity to save

:46:03. > :46:08.through their work this credit union. If she will work with me high

:46:09. > :46:10.can assure her that we will continue to ensure that households who have

:46:11. > :46:23.the lowest proportion of death at the moment will continue... We could

:46:24. > :46:30.not be more grateful. The government has committed to raise the personal

:46:31. > :46:34.alliance to ?12,500 and the higher rate threshold of ?50,000 by the end

:46:35. > :46:38.of this Parliament. The government took the first steps to meeting

:46:39. > :46:42.these commitments by increasing the personal alliance to ?11,000 and

:46:43. > :46:50.raising the higher rate threshold of ?43,000. 29 billion people will pay

:46:51. > :46:58.less tax act the these changes -- 29 million people. Kiddie outline what

:46:59. > :47:01.measures have already been taken to help married couples keep more of

:47:02. > :47:06.what they earn and will he consider helping stay at home parents by

:47:07. > :47:15.increasing the marriage alliance for all taxpayers? Since 2015-16 married

:47:16. > :47:22.couples and civil partnerships have been able to transfer 10% of their

:47:23. > :47:27.earnings to their spice. This will increase in proportion to ending --

:47:28. > :47:33.to any increases in the personal alliance that the government has

:47:34. > :47:37.committed to raise the ?12,500. Given seventh -- a savings ratio to

:47:38. > :47:43.household debt has gone from 11.8% in the first quarter of 2010 and is

:47:44. > :47:46.not under 5% on the Trent lipstick will continue downwards, why is the

:47:47. > :47:52.government is not taking steps to reverse this trend? The government

:47:53. > :47:55.is delivering one of the biggest increases in living standards we

:47:56. > :48:06.have seen for many years. We have got record levels of import --

:48:07. > :48:09.employment. We are one of the strongest economies in the G-7 and

:48:10. > :48:17.that is helping finance is up and down the country. Can he say what

:48:18. > :48:21.measures will be taken to ensure their parents returning to work on

:48:22. > :48:27.my constituency don't spend every single penny they have on

:48:28. > :48:31.childcare? He makes a very important points. From September 2017 the

:48:32. > :48:36.government is doubling the free childcare entitlement up to 30 hours

:48:37. > :48:42.a week for working families with three and four-year-olds, worth up

:48:43. > :48:46.to ?5,000 per child and from early 2017 tax free childcare will also be

:48:47. > :48:54.introduced providing support for up to ?2000 a year to help with

:48:55. > :48:59.childcare costs. Topical question number one. The core purpose of the

:49:00. > :49:03.Treasury is to ensure that the asperity of the UK economy. I can

:49:04. > :49:07.tell Baha'is that the date of the budget next year will be whether the

:49:08. > :49:12.March the 16th. My right honourable friend has

:49:13. > :49:15.announced the closure of the compensation scheme for extra life

:49:16. > :49:21.policyholders at the end of this month. We will then know exactly how

:49:22. > :49:24.many claimants there are and has no right honourable friend any plans to

:49:25. > :49:31.extend the amount of money that is being given to the aims of this

:49:32. > :49:37.scam? I am always of course happy to listen to representations that they

:49:38. > :49:41.have put a very substantial sum in the compensating people who lost out

:49:42. > :49:46.through Equitable Life and we have made sure through our payment system

:49:47. > :49:52.that those payments have been made. That is why the scheme is coming to

:49:53. > :50:00.a close. The Chancellor vowed the Labour pressure last week and he

:50:01. > :50:07.made a U-turn on tax credit, but while tax credits will not be cut in

:50:08. > :50:11.the New Year as planned, cuts the Universal Credit are still going

:50:12. > :50:16.ahead in full, so he has not reversed his cuts the family income

:50:17. > :50:19.but just delayed them. I am sure the Chancellor has looked at the impact

:50:20. > :50:23.of these changes in some detail so can I ask and could you tell Baha'is

:50:24. > :50:28.how much a single parent with one child working part-time on the

:50:29. > :50:34.so-called National Living Wage would lose as a result of his planned

:50:35. > :50:38.changes to Universal Credits? Let me say I did not feel a huge amount of

:50:39. > :50:44.Labour pressure last week but I am happy to see him at the dispatch

:50:45. > :50:48.box. We are introducing with Universal Credit the fundamental

:50:49. > :50:52.improvement to benefit system and anyone on tax credits, including the

:50:53. > :50:55.case that he repairs to, he has moved on to Credits from next year

:50:56. > :51:03.will have their cash rewards protect that. Let me explain to the

:51:04. > :51:06.Chancellor exactly what that single parent with one child working

:51:07. > :51:13.part-time on the National Living Wage would lose. They would lose on

:51:14. > :51:19.average ?2800 a year as a result of the cuts the Universal Credits. This

:51:20. > :51:23.was not an Autumn Statement that will support families but one that

:51:24. > :51:30.will punish them because 2.6 million families will still be on average

:51:31. > :51:34.were soft life ?1600. Let me just offered the Chancellor and other way

:51:35. > :51:37.out. If he reverses the tax giveaways to the wealthy which he

:51:38. > :51:41.announced in the summer budget, the Chancellor could reverse the league

:51:42. > :51:47.these cuts the family incomes while still achieving his fiscal mandate.

:51:48. > :51:54.Wilbur Chancellor and address the threat to these families? Universal

:51:55. > :51:59.Credits is indeed benefit where it is always going to pay to work,

:52:00. > :52:03.always pay to expand the number of hours that to work and will get rid

:52:04. > :52:07.of complex systems of benefits and that will help working families. Let

:52:08. > :52:13.me make this point since the gang of four on the other side of the house

:52:14. > :52:17.art chuntering away. The member for Leeds East he is a shadow Treasury

:52:18. > :52:22.Minister has not bothered to turn up today because he is marching on the

:52:23. > :52:26.Labour Party's headquarters on stop the War march and the truth is

:52:27. > :52:30.this, until the shadow Treasury team can get attacked together in this

:52:31. > :52:37.chamber there are cases will not be listened too seriously. With my

:52:38. > :52:44.right honourable friend is join me in welcoming the 60% reduction in

:52:45. > :52:49.unemployment in my constituency since 2010, the 100% rise in house

:52:50. > :52:56.building since 2014 and the fact that Helmsley once the best market

:52:57. > :53:01.town? I don't wish to be unkind, we have not time for these lists. What

:53:02. > :53:08.we need a single sentence questions? The AA 64 is still a

:53:09. > :53:16.bottleneck to investment and the traffic blackspot, with the

:53:17. > :53:23.Chancellor look again at further investment for this route? We

:53:24. > :53:27.certainly want to hear the good news about what is going on in Yorkshire

:53:28. > :53:32.and what I can say to him is with the a 64 we have committed billions

:53:33. > :53:38.of pounds to improvement in the road network. We have specifically

:53:39. > :53:44.created a ?475 million parts for a local major roads and this is the

:53:45. > :53:51.sort of bid that should be put in. As the Chancellor was on his feet

:53:52. > :54:00.next week, ?1 billion of funding was removed from carbon capture and

:54:01. > :54:06.storage, a breach of Tory party manifesto. How can you justify this

:54:07. > :54:15.decision which will jeopardise 600 jobs in Peterhead? We are doubling

:54:16. > :54:19.investment in renewable electricity and energy and much of that

:54:20. > :54:22.investment is going into Scotland, but we also increase the capital

:54:23. > :54:26.budget for the Scottish Government so instead of dropping us for

:54:27. > :54:32.capital projects then I had the resources to pay for it themselves.

:54:33. > :54:39.I attended the skills show in Birmingham recently. Does my

:54:40. > :54:47.honourable friend agree with me that the levy he announced in the Autumn

:54:48. > :55:00.Statement is an excellent further step to help young people earn and

:55:01. > :55:04.learn? You have two provide ad better example for your colleagues,

:55:05. > :55:09.simply too long. I was very excited to hear about the skills show in

:55:10. > :55:12.Birmingham and I think the point my honourable friend mates is

:55:13. > :55:18.absolutely right. By investing in apprenticeships, creating 3 million

:55:19. > :55:24.apprentices that addresses a great weakness in the economy which is a

:55:25. > :55:35.low skills base. The Chancellor's excitement is of no interest to the

:55:36. > :55:37.chair. Pettiness is the point. The Chancellor is looking into airport

:55:38. > :55:43.expansion. Given that the outcomes of the committee are vital to the

:55:44. > :55:49.north and we were promised a response by Christmas, when can we

:55:50. > :55:52.expect this response? I completely understand that the honourable lady

:55:53. > :55:57.is interested in the subject, it is a subject that arise is a lot of

:55:58. > :56:01.interest across the country. I am afraid she will just have to be

:56:02. > :56:05.patient and see the response from the government to this important

:56:06. > :56:10.report. I congratulate my right honourable friend and his Autumn

:56:11. > :56:14.Statement which continued to put signs as a priority. Does he agree

:56:15. > :56:18.that indeed Cheshire science corridor Enterprise Zone will not

:56:19. > :56:25.only play an important role locally, but also to the UK and the northern

:56:26. > :56:30.powerhouse? He is absolutely right. This support for Cheshire science

:56:31. > :56:36.schools across the county and particularly supports the brilliant

:56:37. > :56:40.work being done in Macclesfield by the many companies that have come

:56:41. > :56:48.onto this estate, something that I know he champions. Wilbur Chancellor

:56:49. > :56:53.in form Baha'is and he expects the UK to regain its triple-A credit

:56:54. > :56:57.rating? As she knows, she has asked me about this before, and we have a

:56:58. > :57:03.triple-A credit rating with one of the agencies and we will let the

:57:04. > :57:08.others make their own decisions. Train services from Twickenham are

:57:09. > :57:13.inadequate, they need to be faster, more frequent. With the Chancellor

:57:14. > :57:17.look into what one thing he can provide to improve services today

:57:18. > :57:28.and services tomorrow with the Crossrail project? Crossrail two is

:57:29. > :57:31.scheduled to go through my constituency also. She will know

:57:32. > :57:36.that the government has committed some money to help feasibility

:57:37. > :57:39.studies in this Parliament. The National infrastructure commission

:57:40. > :57:41.has been passed with reviewing further investment in London and

:57:42. > :57:50.will report back to government before the 2016 budget. What recent

:57:51. > :57:53.assessment has the Chancellor made of the performance of the UK

:57:54. > :58:00.guarantee scheme? When that was lobster Treasury said it would

:58:01. > :58:03.dramatically -- dramatically accelerate major infrastructure

:58:04. > :58:07.investment. The only thing that has dramatically accelerated since then

:58:08. > :58:15.has been a national debts who has missed every target he has set

:58:16. > :58:22.himself. The guarantee scheme has already provided, has already been

:58:23. > :58:28.approved for aid projects, the Mersey bridge, Hinkley Point see

:58:29. > :58:32.nuclear power station. It has not always been necessary. A further 18

:58:33. > :58:41.projects worth almost 9 billion have been supported without actually

:58:42. > :58:45.having the need for a guarantee. As chair of women in enterprise, I am

:58:46. > :58:49.happy that there are more women working in Britain today. A barrier

:58:50. > :58:53.to stopping more female business owners is a lack of reliable

:58:54. > :58:57.information on how minute there currently are. Would he meet with me

:58:58. > :59:05.to discuss this issue and look at possible solutions? Can I

:59:06. > :59:12.congratulate my honourable friend on the appointment to this APPG. I look

:59:13. > :59:16.forward to working closely with him to provide the data that he seeks.

:59:17. > :59:20.By what date does the government expect to pay the National Living

:59:21. > :59:24.Wage doll of its employees and contractors employed by the

:59:25. > :59:33.government? The National Living Wage is coming in next April so we will

:59:34. > :59:36.of course comply with that. Does the Chancellor agree with me the only

:59:37. > :59:42.way to continue to attract investment into the region is good

:59:43. > :59:48.infrastructure and neither is the time to upgrade the 810 from

:59:49. > :59:51.Cambridge? We put a huge amount of investment in the Cambridge

:59:52. > :59:56.including the renovation of the famous Cavendish laboratories. I

:59:57. > :00:00.congratulate her on the strong start she has made him championing her

:00:01. > :00:06.constituency. That has been continued today.

:00:07. > :00:15.The Chancellor promised twice at the Scottish referendum and in his

:00:16. > :00:20.manifesto for carbon capture facility at Peterhead. Why has he

:00:21. > :00:23.broken his permit is? Investment in renewables is doubling and much of

:00:24. > :00:27.that is going to the Scottish Government. The Scottish that the

:00:28. > :00:30.lists have got some extra money. They have increased capital

:00:31. > :00:34.spending. If they want to do invest in carbon capture and storage in

:00:35. > :00:42.Scotland, they can. It is called devolution. Peter bone. Star

:00:43. > :00:49.speaker, every three weeks, British taxpayers send more than ?1 billion

:00:50. > :00:53.to Brussels. If the British vote to come out of the EU, could the

:00:54. > :00:59.excellent Chancellor tell us how much earlier we would eliminate the

:01:00. > :01:03.deficit? I will not get into the debate about our membership of the

:01:04. > :01:06.European Union, but I will say that thanks to the hard negotiating of

:01:07. > :01:13.our right honourable friend the Prime Minister, we have cut the EU

:01:14. > :01:17.budget. By some mistake, there doesn't seem to be a Treasury

:01:18. > :01:24.question today on the deficit anywhere on the order paper. Apart

:01:25. > :01:31.from the interesting intervention that was just made. So can ask the

:01:32. > :01:33.Chancellor the question he would and answer in response to the Autumn

:01:34. > :01:38.Statement. Does he believe that by the time he leaves the Treasury, he

:01:39. > :01:53.will have finally dealt with our country's deficit? That is certainly

:01:54. > :01:56.the plan. The development at Primark's new warehouse is bringing

:01:57. > :01:58.thousands of new jobs to East Northamptonshire, but is bringing

:01:59. > :02:02.thousands of new jobs to East Northamptonshire, but isn't the

:02:03. > :02:06.added bonus that will be able to keep the windfall that arises? My

:02:07. > :02:12.honourable friend has been a powerful advocate of that product.

:02:13. > :02:15.And the devolution of business rates will help that project not only

:02:16. > :02:21.succeed, but also make a big contribution to the local economy.

:02:22. > :02:24.Given the answer to my honourable friend from Wirral and given that

:02:25. > :02:27.the Chancellor has not met a single one of his own targets on economic

:02:28. > :02:30.performance, is he therefore intending to go on and on to the

:02:31. > :02:38.delight of the Home Secretary and the Merit London? -- the Mayor of

:02:39. > :02:41.London? We promise to turn around the British economy, and that is

:02:42. > :02:45.exactly what we have done. I know he is out of sorts with the cultural

:02:46. > :02:49.revolution taking place on the front bench at the moment, but I hope in

:02:50. > :02:56.the modern Labour Party, they let 100 flowers bloom. The entrepreneur

:02:57. > :03:00.hi relief is a costly relief, and the Chancellor is right to reform it

:03:01. > :03:03.earlier this year, but it is an important way to incentivise our

:03:04. > :03:08.entrepreneurs to invest in businesses and create jobs. But my

:03:09. > :03:11.right honourable friend give some comfort and reassure our

:03:12. > :03:13.entrepreneurs that he remains committed to this relief and will

:03:14. > :03:20.take it forward in the years to come? Of course, we want

:03:21. > :03:25.entrepreneurs' relief to be directed at entrepreneurs, and that is why we

:03:26. > :03:30.made the changes. But during our time in office, we have doubled and

:03:31. > :03:35.we doubled the entrepreneurs' relief, so we support this help for

:03:36. > :03:40.our enterprise economy. Last, but not least, and with commendable

:03:41. > :03:48.brevity, I feel sure, Mr Greg Mulholland. British pubs currently

:03:49. > :03:53.have 0.5% of British turnover, and yet paid 2.8% of business rates.

:03:54. > :03:58.Will the Chancellor meet with me and the save the pub group to discuss

:03:59. > :04:02.how we can better support pubs in the taxation system? Of course, the

:04:03. > :04:06.pub industry has been supported by both the reduction in beer duty, the

:04:07. > :04:11.increase in the employment allowance, which is a huge benefit

:04:12. > :04:14.to many pubs, and the extension of small business rates relief which we

:04:15. > :04:17.announced last week. I am happy to see what more we can do to support

:04:18. > :04:22.the great British pub industry and I look forward to hearing his ideas. I

:04:23. > :04:27.am grateful to the Chancellor and two colleagues. Treasury questions

:04:28. > :04:31.always bust the box office records. Far more people want to take part

:04:32. > :04:35.that there is time to accommodate, so I think colleagues will

:04:36. > :04:42.understand. Order. Statement, business statement, no less, the

:04:43. > :04:46.Leader of the House. Mr Christopher Grayling. Mr Speaker, with your

:04:47. > :04:49.permission I should like to make a short business statement regarding

:04:50. > :04:52.tomorrow's business. The main business for tomorrow will now be a

:04:53. > :05:00.debate on a motion relating Isil in Syria. United Nations Security

:05:01. > :05:02.Council resolution to 249. The business for Thursday remains as

:05:03. > :05:05.previously announced, which is the second reading of the charities,

:05:06. > :05:10.protection and social investment Bill, Lords. Members will wish to

:05:11. > :05:14.know that subject to the agreement of the House later today, oral

:05:15. > :05:19.questions to the Cabinet Office and to the Prime Minister will not be

:05:20. > :05:22.taken tomorrow. The oral questions will be republished and Cabinet

:05:23. > :05:25.Office questions will take place on Wednesday the 9th of December. The

:05:26. > :05:29.results of the ballots for both Question Time 's will be retained,

:05:30. > :05:31.and members will not need to resubmit their questions. I will

:05:32. > :05:33.make my