0:00:00 > 0:00:00be done, it ought to be done. I am quite sure the honourable lady's
0:00:00 > 0:00:05point will have been noted by the Treasury bench. There are no further
0:00:05 > 0:00:13points of order. We now come to the backbench motion on baby you'd leave
0:00:13 > 0:00:22for Members of Parliament. Harriet Harman -- baby leave. Can I join in
0:00:22 > 0:00:26wishing you a happy birthday? You honestly do not need to worry about
0:00:26 > 0:00:31numbers. I am 67 and I have discovered that I know a lot more as
0:00:31 > 0:00:35I get older that I did not used to know when I was younger. There is
0:00:35 > 0:00:40nothing wrong with getting older.I would like to thank the honourable
0:00:40 > 0:00:44member for Gateshead and the members of the Backbench Business Committee
0:00:44 > 0:00:48which he chairs for agreeing to the subject of our motion today. As the
0:00:48 > 0:00:52backbench business was one of the things that was introduced when I
0:00:52 > 0:00:56was Leader of the House, I was very glad that when I went before them to
0:00:56 > 0:01:01ask for this, they did not turn me down. I can see the honourable
0:01:01 > 0:01:04member for Basingstoke, the right honourable member, is in her place
0:01:04 > 0:01:13and I would like to thank her for all the work she has done on this
0:01:13 > 0:01:15issue. Very much a joint enterprise between her and me on this. I cannot
0:01:15 > 0:01:20speak highly enough about her work as chair of the very excellent Women
0:01:20 > 0:01:23and Equalities Committee and I do not usually say good things about
0:01:23 > 0:01:28people who have been in the Cabinet in Tory governments but she really
0:01:28 > 0:01:34has been... She is very important to all of us in that role. I would like
0:01:34 > 0:01:40to thank the other 52 members from all parties that supported this
0:01:40 > 0:01:44application for this motion, right honourable and honourable members,
0:01:44 > 0:01:48honourable friends, on the side of the House, many of whom are here
0:01:48 > 0:01:52today, thank you for attending, and members of the Scottish National
0:01:52 > 0:01:59Party who have been very active and supportive and co-workers on this
0:01:59 > 0:02:03issue, as have the Liberal Democrats, and many honourable
0:02:03 > 0:02:09members on the Tory benches. This is very much a cross-party issue. I am
0:02:09 > 0:02:16very pleased to see that you, Madam Deputy Speaker, that the Leader of
0:02:16 > 0:02:20the House is in her place and responding personally to the debate
0:02:20 > 0:02:28in a week that has not been an -- in the week that has been busy, I think
0:02:28 > 0:02:32it is testament to the commitment she has that this issue, along with
0:02:32 > 0:02:38the Shadow Leader of the House. This is something which Mr Speaker's
0:02:38 > 0:02:45reference group has also looked at. This motion, asked the House for
0:02:45 > 0:02:49it's in principle agreement to make arrangements for when a member has a
0:02:49 > 0:02:54baby or adopts a child because at the moment we do not have any such
0:02:54 > 0:03:01arrangements. In this House, we set the rules for parents outside of the
0:03:01 > 0:03:03House having babies or adopting a child and we do that because we
0:03:03 > 0:03:07think it is important for the child and it is important for the parents.
0:03:07 > 0:03:12We do it because we do not want new parents to to have to ask the
0:03:12 > 0:03:16favours but to be clear where they stand, but there is no such system
0:03:16 > 0:03:21for members of this House.I thank my right honourable friend for
0:03:21 > 0:03:25giving way and for bringing forward this important debate. The sheer
0:03:25 > 0:03:30agree with me that as we set the rules for people outside the House
0:03:30 > 0:03:33to take maternity, paternity and shared parental leave, we have a
0:03:33 > 0:03:38system that makes this place less family friendly than most workplaces
0:03:38 > 0:03:48in the UK? -- does she agree with me.She is right. No one wants us to
0:03:48 > 0:03:53be given better conditions than those outside, but we are now
0:03:53 > 0:03:56lagging behind and we are in danger of setting a very bad example. I
0:03:56 > 0:04:02give way.I thank my right honourable friend for giving way. I
0:04:02 > 0:04:06pay tribute to her for bringing this motion to the House but also for her
0:04:06 > 0:04:10work over more than 30 years to advance equality for women in this
0:04:10 > 0:04:19place and the wider world. I visited a girls' secondary school, they
0:04:19 > 0:04:22asked me how it is being a woman in the House of Commons, I mentioned
0:04:22 > 0:04:26there was no maternity leave for women members, there were gasps.
0:04:26 > 0:04:31Which you agree with me, we owe it to a drain oration of young women
0:04:31 > 0:04:35now thinking about their future to make this place somewhere where they
0:04:35 > 0:04:39feel welcome and they feel they have the same rights as every other woman
0:04:39 > 0:04:43in workplaces around the country -- we owe it to a generation of young
0:04:43 > 0:04:48women.She puts it spot on. Erskine May, our Parliamentary rules Bible,
0:04:48 > 0:04:59says absolutely nothing about pregnancy. That is no surprise, no
0:04:59 > 0:05:00surprise at all. LAUGHTER
0:05:00 > 0:05:04It used to be the case that the overwhelming majority of members
0:05:04 > 0:05:10were men and it was not that the men were not parents, it was just that
0:05:10 > 0:05:15they regarded a baby as the sole responsibility of their wives. There
0:05:15 > 0:05:22were hardly any women in this House, and mostly they were older women
0:05:22 > 0:05:26whose children had either grown-up or who had no children. That was
0:05:26 > 0:05:31certainly the case when I had my three children as a young member of
0:05:31 > 0:05:35this House. Then I was the only woman in the House at that time
0:05:35 > 0:05:39having babies, but now things have changed and the sight of growing
0:05:39 > 0:05:44pregnant bumps in our division lobbies is commonplace and
0:05:44 > 0:05:50celebrated on all sides. LAUGHTER
0:05:50 > 0:05:56Speaking of pregnant bumps...I thank my honourable friend for
0:05:56 > 0:05:59making an excellent contribution and speech and I declare my interest as
0:05:59 > 0:06:04one of those members with a growing bump. Does she agree with me that
0:06:04 > 0:06:08this highlights the urgency is by which we have to address this issue?
0:06:08 > 0:06:13I am not the only member currently pregnant. We are working to a
0:06:13 > 0:06:16deadline because babies, it will not stay in there forever, which she
0:06:16 > 0:06:21agree with me?I certainly do and I congratulate and I am looking
0:06:21 > 0:06:25forward to meeting the new arrival. The reason why we are proposing this
0:06:25 > 0:06:31change now is that the House has changed, it has changed profoundly
0:06:31 > 0:06:37in its attitudes and membership. Now many men want and expect to play
0:06:37 > 0:06:44their part with a new baby.I am extremely grateful to my right
0:06:44 > 0:06:49honourable friend. In 1992 when I informed the Chief Whip that my wife
0:06:49 > 0:06:55was going into hospital and that I intended to be at the birth, I was
0:06:55 > 0:07:01told, that is all right, as long as you are here on Monday night to vote
0:07:01 > 0:07:05on my strict matters. My daughter was born on the Sunday and I was
0:07:05 > 0:07:09able to leave the hospital to stay until 2:30am but that dilemma
0:07:09 > 0:07:15applies to men as well.It really did and it was an acceptable then
0:07:15 > 0:07:21and it is even more unacceptable now. I will give way.Which you
0:07:21 > 0:07:25agree with me that it is a crying shame that even though the last
0:07:25 > 0:07:29Labour government introduce shared parental leave, only around 5% of
0:07:29 > 0:07:33fathers take it and I do not think there is any provision in this House
0:07:33 > 0:07:40for new dads to do that?Absolutely. One of the things about this is
0:07:40 > 0:07:44talking to colleagues on all sides of the House, it really is something
0:07:44 > 0:07:49felt as strongly by fathers in this House now as well as mothers and
0:07:49 > 0:07:56that is a real change. It is gratifying to me to see younger men
0:07:56 > 0:08:00who are determined not only to be excellent members of this House but
0:08:00 > 0:08:06also sharing parents and responsible fathers who do not see their baby
0:08:06 > 0:08:11just ask their wife's business, most members' wives work and their
0:08:11 > 0:08:19husbands in the House want to support them. I will give way.Sorry
0:08:19 > 0:08:26to be able not to stay for long, partly for this problem. Can I
0:08:26 > 0:08:29congratulate her on a motion which does not talk about men and women,
0:08:29 > 0:08:36it talks about members? When my wife was elected, my younger son was two.
0:08:36 > 0:08:40The slippery slope, we ought to talk about a staircase, and at some
0:08:40 > 0:08:44stage, if this goes through, what about people hospitalised or have to
0:08:44 > 0:08:51take time off her elderly parents in some extreme emergency?Well, that
0:08:51 > 0:08:54might well be the case in the future, but for the moment, we are
0:08:54 > 0:09:01talking about maternity, paternity and adoption. And we should focus on
0:09:01 > 0:09:06that. Madam Deputy Speaker, I never thought I would see the day when the
0:09:06 > 0:09:13sons of the women's movement arrived in the Scouse, but they are here. -
0:09:13 > 0:09:17Rucker in this House. They want and expect to play pop with a new baby
0:09:17 > 0:09:23and all credit to them -- in this House. They want and expect to play
0:09:23 > 0:09:28a proper role with the new baby. My wife and I had my son, Patrick, two
0:09:28 > 0:09:32weeks before the general election last year, a member told me, loved
0:09:32 > 0:09:38brother for our daughter who is three. My wife is and remains a star
0:09:38 > 0:09:41who like other MPs' partners has to put up with so much because of this
0:09:41 > 0:09:47job and the need to be away from home. I wish I could have had some
0:09:47 > 0:09:51paternity leave. So that at least just after he was born, I could have
0:09:51 > 0:09:55been a great help than I have been. My wife has never complained and
0:09:55 > 0:09:59like others, she got on with it, but she deserved more support than I was
0:09:59 > 0:10:04able to give her and I hope we can fix this for other MPs and I hope
0:10:04 > 0:10:08that is what we will do. Of course, there are more women members than
0:10:08 > 0:10:14ever before, on all sides of the house, over 200, and younger women
0:10:14 > 0:10:18as well. It is a democratic imperative that we have women in
0:10:18 > 0:10:24this House as well as men, to make the House representative of this
0:10:24 > 0:10:27country. It is a biological inevitability that young women will
0:10:27 > 0:10:33have babies. There have already been 17 babies born to women members
0:10:33 > 0:10:39since 2010. I give way.I thank the right honourable lady for giving way
0:10:39 > 0:10:42and I congratulate her on the amazing work she has done on this
0:10:42 > 0:10:47issue and on her speech and will she agree that given that we are
0:10:47 > 0:10:50apparently by definition the gayest parliament in the world and we have
0:10:50 > 0:10:56many LGBT members, there will be many young gay and female members
0:10:56 > 0:11:00who like myself at some point want to have children and it is important
0:11:00 > 0:11:06that this motion supports them as well? Whether it is adoption or
0:11:06 > 0:11:09biological birth.I thank the honourable lady who has been
0:11:09 > 0:11:14unstinting in her support and we have worked together on this. That
0:11:14 > 0:11:18is why I called it baby leave rather than maternity and paternity leave
0:11:18 > 0:11:27and why I talk at about parents and their children. There have been 17
0:11:27 > 0:11:30babies born to women and countless pawn to mail Members of Parliament
0:11:30 > 0:11:40but which we do not know about. -- countless born at two male Members
0:11:40 > 0:11:46of Parliament. LAUGHTER
0:11:46 > 0:11:50Madam Deputy Speaker, in the absence of any official recognition of these
0:11:50 > 0:11:56babies being born to members, the way things work currently is that
0:11:56 > 0:12:02women MPs giving birth or male MPs who want time with their baby, they
0:12:02 > 0:12:06asked the whips, and they make an arrangement with the whips on the
0:12:06 > 0:12:09other side. The situation in relation to the whips is nothing
0:12:09 > 0:12:14like it was when I was having the first of our three children 34 years
0:12:14 > 0:12:19ago, when I had to ask for a few weeks off from the whips office when
0:12:19 > 0:12:23most of them thought that a woman should not be in the House of
0:12:23 > 0:12:28Commons, let alone a pregnant woman. I know that attitudes in the whips
0:12:28 > 0:12:32office are completely different to what they were before, but it is
0:12:32 > 0:12:36still the case that each member individually has to ask. We would
0:12:36 > 0:12:40not agree to that happening in any other workplace, and it is in the
0:12:40 > 0:12:50discretion of not just one whips office but two to get...Both whips
0:12:50 > 0:12:56offices have to agree. I speak as a whip, SNP work, our party does not
0:12:56 > 0:12:59take part in pairings, I commend what has been brought forward today
0:12:59 > 0:13:03because I am uncomfortable with it, to have to go through a pairing
0:13:03 > 0:13:09arrangement. I support what she is saying.That is a really important
0:13:09 > 0:13:13point and I hope we can think of some arrangements that can be made
0:13:13 > 0:13:21until such time as we zoom in this process through to deal with the
0:13:21 > 0:13:25issue of honourable members from the SNP. Granting or with holding a pair
0:13:25 > 0:13:28is an important role for the opposition whips office and no one
0:13:28 > 0:13:33can accuse me of not knowing the importance of fighting in opposition
0:13:33 > 0:13:38because tragically, that is what I have been doing for 20 years of my
0:13:38 > 0:13:42parliamentary life. But a woman giving birth should not be a matter
0:13:42 > 0:13:47of wrangling between whips office is or an opportunity to take advantage
0:13:47 > 0:13:53over the Government, however much they would deserve it. I give way.
0:13:53 > 0:14:01I congratulate you on securing this debate. Would you agree with me that
0:14:01 > 0:14:07the Parliamentary report into six and 16 says that we must accommodate
0:14:07 > 0:14:15facilitate a project member and co-parent. Particularly of limits,
0:14:15 > 0:14:20this change being sorted is really long overdue.I think the honourable
0:14:20 > 0:14:24Lady makes a very good point. That the good Parliament report also
0:14:24 > 0:14:28reports on all the Parliaments around the world how in their own
0:14:28 > 0:14:33way have started to do with this. This Madam Deputy Speaker is not
0:14:33 > 0:14:37just a matter for the wishes of parents. It is about the rights of
0:14:37 > 0:14:43our constituents. When an MP is paired, it is recorded that they
0:14:43 > 0:14:53simply have not voted. I'll give way.Thank you for giving way. The
0:14:53 > 0:14:56negotiation between whips is important in other circumstances,
0:14:56 > 0:14:59but I am sure there are many women in this House who take time off to
0:14:59 > 0:15:05be with their babies during the first two weeks want to practise
0:15:05 > 0:15:15representing their constituencies.I think she is absolutely right on
0:15:15 > 0:15:22this. Why should that constituencies lose the right for the voting -- for
0:15:22 > 0:15:26the vote in their name to be cast because they're MP is having a baby?
0:15:26 > 0:15:30Madam Deputy Speaker, when you are in a birthing pool, you cannot be
0:15:30 > 0:15:40voting. But your constituency has a right to have its voice heard.I
0:15:40 > 0:15:47thank you for giving way. Further to the important part, mothers and
0:15:47 > 0:15:51fathers that aren't able to be here when they are looking after their
0:15:51 > 0:16:01children, I note it registers the fact that I have just voted... Does
0:16:01 > 0:16:05she concur with me that something should be rectified without websites
0:16:05 > 0:16:09reflect best fact that parents aren't here because they are looking
0:16:09 > 0:16:15after the children?I think she makes a very important point.
0:16:15 > 0:16:20Actually, we do need to do this for defence of reason because people,
0:16:20 > 0:16:25women who were off having babies or men who are off with their newborn
0:16:25 > 0:16:28babies, they are criticised and therefore that is wrong. I think it
0:16:28 > 0:16:35is even more important than that. It is actually our constituencies
0:16:35 > 0:16:43should have their voices heard.I thank you for giving away and all
0:16:43 > 0:16:49the work that you have done on these important issues. I am responsible
0:16:49 > 0:16:55for two of the 17 babies that have been born since 2010. When my first
0:16:55 > 0:17:00child was born, almost five years ago, one of the campaigning
0:17:00 > 0:17:03organisations who e-mails constituencies about votes, e-mailed
0:17:03 > 0:17:07my constituents is to say that I hadn't bothered to turn up to a
0:17:07 > 0:17:09vote. I would have liked to have turned up to vote out all those
0:17:09 > 0:17:14issues, but with a very young baby, that is impossible. And that needs
0:17:14 > 0:17:18to be rectified as well. In the minds of our constituency, we are
0:17:18 > 0:17:22not there, we are absent, we are not representing them. But we are doing
0:17:22 > 0:17:27very important work at home.She is absolutely right on this. It chimes
0:17:27 > 0:17:34very much with what another one of my friend said, she says as a mother
0:17:34 > 0:17:42of four, she thinks just because women are having babies, that should
0:17:42 > 0:17:46not mean that their constituents are not represented by their MP casting
0:17:46 > 0:17:55their vote. My honourable friend new son was only 35 years old when they
0:17:55 > 0:18:02had a crucial vote on Brexit and I know this is an issue for you.
0:18:02 > 0:18:12Hours? Did I say Dave? You said years. Sorry. He was only 35 hours
0:18:12 > 0:18:18old when we have the crucial Brexit vote. His wife, Nicki, had had an
0:18:18 > 0:18:22early induction because of her pregnancy being high risk. He says
0:18:22 > 0:18:26that with that vote that he knew was fixed, coming up, but his wife in
0:18:26 > 0:18:37labour, that it actually. It actually put his fundamental role as
0:18:37 > 0:18:41an MP against his fundamental role as a man, husband and a father. He
0:18:41 > 0:18:48it bought brought an edge to the delivery room when she says is
0:18:48 > 0:18:53unhealthy. He says, surely, it is easier to move Parliament then to
0:18:53 > 0:18:57hold back the majestic and existential forces of the arrival of
0:18:57 > 0:19:00new life. Well, let's show that we can actually manage to move
0:19:00 > 0:19:06Parliament. The trouble is that even as my right honourable friend said,
0:19:06 > 0:19:10the trouble is that even when you are paired, people outside this
0:19:10 > 0:19:15House don't understand pairing. They just see that they're MP has not
0:19:15 > 0:19:20voted. Social media campaigns, which my honourable friend mentioned,
0:19:20 > 0:19:23criticised MPs who have not voted on important issues unaware that they
0:19:23 > 0:19:28are paired because of childbirth. They get criticised in newspapers
0:19:28 > 0:19:38who run voting league tables. We all know that a hyperactive MP in this
0:19:38 > 0:19:44House featured at number two in the sons list of Britain cos laziest
0:19:44 > 0:19:51MPs. We cannot go on like this. Point is that members...I apologise
0:19:51 > 0:19:58for intervening yet again. I have been responsible for the latest of
0:19:58 > 0:20:03the children being born. I was criticised by a Sunday paper, I am
0:20:03 > 0:20:07not going to name them, when I ran up the political editor, he very
0:20:07 > 0:20:13kindly took my name off the story. That rated me as a second-worst MP
0:20:13 > 0:20:16in this current Parliament. And they did not mention that I had been on
0:20:16 > 0:20:22maternity leave the election.I think that what we need is for you
0:20:22 > 0:20:31to be able to cast your constituencies vote by proxy. The
0:20:31 > 0:20:36point is, that is what the proposal before the House will do. What it
0:20:36 > 0:20:40puts to the House is that we should it agree in principle that members
0:20:40 > 0:20:44should be allowed to choose another member to vote by proxy in the
0:20:44 > 0:20:47division lobby when they have had a new baby or adopted a child. If
0:20:47 > 0:20:51there is an agreement to this in principle, there is then many issues
0:20:51 > 0:20:56of implementation that would have to be considered. Other Parliaments, as
0:20:56 > 0:21:01the good Parliament a port to Mac report make clear, made arrangements
0:21:01 > 0:21:04for baby leave, but we would need to do it in a way that fits with our
0:21:04 > 0:21:09culture and our processes. Another member is rightly concerned that any
0:21:09 > 0:21:16change might have unintended consequences. We rightly jealously
0:21:16 > 0:21:20guard the rules of our democracy. Can I just reassure honourable
0:21:20 > 0:21:24members on a number of matters? The resolution before the House today is
0:21:24 > 0:21:29not that a member would be required to apply for a proxy vote, but that
0:21:29 > 0:21:34they would be able to do so if they chose. Those who want to take no
0:21:34 > 0:21:38leave or to ask for a beer, would be perfectly free to do so as they are
0:21:38 > 0:21:43now. It would not affect pay, which is matter for itself who have
0:21:43 > 0:21:48assured me in writing that how we vote in this House is a matter for
0:21:48 > 0:21:52us not for them. And they would not regard any change in voting as a
0:21:52 > 0:21:56matter which would affect pay in any way. That is just not an issue. It
0:21:56 > 0:22:01would not be open to abuse because whether you have had a baby or
0:22:01 > 0:22:05adopted a child, is not a question of subjective judgement. It is a
0:22:05 > 0:22:12matter of fact. It will be evident that I am not moving this motion as
0:22:12 > 0:22:19a matter of self interest. It is too late for that. 30 years too late. My
0:22:19 > 0:22:24children are already grown up. But I want this for the younger members
0:22:24 > 0:22:31and the future parents in this House. I give way.I am grateful for
0:22:31 > 0:22:38you to giving away. Also happy birthday for me. She has talked
0:22:38 > 0:22:44about her own experiences and she was very fortunate to have a good
0:22:44 > 0:22:49person by her side. She is also talked about pairing. In personal
0:22:49 > 0:22:56life, not everyone is paired. As the chair for single-parent families, is
0:22:56 > 0:23:02she aware that this is an increasingly common form? It is 51%
0:23:02 > 0:23:08in London constituencies. I think 303,600 in my own constituency.
0:23:08 > 0:23:12These problems are exacerbated further for single-parent and could
0:23:12 > 0:23:25she encourage...Just before you answer. The intervention, I have no
0:23:25 > 0:23:31wish what's... Whatsoever to curtail debate which is an excellent debate
0:23:31 > 0:23:35on an important subject. I would draw to your attention that while
0:23:35 > 0:23:38you are absolutely correct, of course to take that into mentioned,
0:23:38 > 0:23:44there is much to be said, I have a great many people who want to speak
0:23:44 > 0:23:50and we don't have a huge amount of time.I withdraw my comments to a
0:23:50 > 0:23:57close. In the centenary year, a hundred years after women first won
0:23:57 > 0:24:01the right to stand for Parliament, I hope that we will agree this motion
0:24:01 > 0:24:05and that the procedure will be looked expeditiously. We have not
0:24:05 > 0:24:10got all the time of the world. At least two more Parliament. Babies
0:24:10 > 0:24:17are in the pipeline. There is one woman who is on with her second, and
0:24:17 > 0:24:22my honourable friend the Member for Lancaster have just spoken. They are
0:24:22 > 0:24:26both expecting. While we tell, nature is taking its course, so
0:24:26 > 0:24:32let's agree this and let's get on with it.The question is on the
0:24:32 > 0:24:39order paper.Thank you, can I echo the good wishes on your birthday. Of
0:24:39 > 0:24:45course, this isn't issue that you have a lot of first-hand knowledge
0:24:45 > 0:24:48about as well. I know you are not able to participate in the debate
0:24:48 > 0:24:53today. I am sure you will be sitting there thinking fondly of your own
0:24:53 > 0:24:56experiences being a pregnant member of Parliament and your wonderful son
0:24:56 > 0:25:07who I have had the pleasure of meeting on a number of occasions.
0:25:07 > 0:25:10She has characterises as joint enterprise. I am not sure whether it
0:25:10 > 0:25:14is the sort of joint enterprise that we have talked about in the legal
0:25:14 > 0:25:18sense. That would be a crime were more than one person is involved.
0:25:18 > 0:25:23But I understand the point that she is making. This has to be a joint
0:25:23 > 0:25:26enterprise. If it is going to be successful. I sense from the
0:25:26 > 0:25:30goodwill that we have already heard here that that joint enterprise will
0:25:30 > 0:25:40be a positive thing. I would like to pay tribute to her. As mother of the
0:25:40 > 0:25:43House who has done so much to set the tone around these issues over
0:25:43 > 0:25:49many, many years. I would also like to pay tribute to those who perhaps
0:25:49 > 0:25:53rolled the pitch on this and made it easier for us to bring this debate
0:25:53 > 0:25:59forward today. Professor Sarah Charles has already been mentioned
0:25:59 > 0:26:02and her work really has been a foundation in much of the
0:26:02 > 0:26:08modernisation we are talking about. Mr Speaker if he were here, I would
0:26:08 > 0:26:13think him as well, again he has set the tone. But also can I just pay
0:26:13 > 0:26:20tribute to my right honourable friend the Leader of the House? He
0:26:20 > 0:26:23is doing a sterling job of making sure that this place can be a modern
0:26:23 > 0:26:29place for us all to work in. And that is important not just for our
0:26:29 > 0:26:35staff but for our members as well. The select committee that I have the
0:26:35 > 0:26:39pleasure you wood pleasure of sharing and others really been
0:26:39 > 0:26:47instrumental in selling the seeds of change. Of course I will give way.
0:26:47 > 0:27:00Thank you for giving way. But to say how important this debate is. How it
0:27:00 > 0:27:08is rooted in room evidence the importance of bringing this House in
0:27:08 > 0:27:13line with policies in other workplaces were absolutely set the
0:27:13 > 0:27:17right tone and precedents for their future particularly in this week,
0:27:17 > 0:27:27when we will be celebrating 100 years since women got the vote.She
0:27:27 > 0:27:31is absolutely right. I think we are uncovering some important ways this
0:27:31 > 0:27:35place is changing and I hope we are identifying ways that need to
0:27:35 > 0:27:40continue to change in the future. It is a great pleasure to work with her
0:27:40 > 0:27:45on that. Being a member of Parliament is a unique position, it
0:27:45 > 0:27:49is a unique honour and a unique responsibility that requires
0:27:49 > 0:27:54complete commitment, but that cannot mean that only those without care
0:27:54 > 0:27:58and responsible news can apply. Indeed, it is that experience that
0:27:58 > 0:28:03we can have as carers that can make us much better members of
0:28:03 > 0:28:06Parliament. That is why I wholeheartedly support this motion
0:28:06 > 0:28:15in its own right.
0:28:15 > 0:28:23She talks about... I want to raise another issue in chairing the force
0:28:23 > 0:28:26that society looking at representation of women in local
0:28:26 > 0:28:30government and it was shocking to discover there that only 2% of local
0:28:30 > 0:28:37authorities have maternity leave policies in place. -- the Fawcett
0:28:37 > 0:28:43Society. The number of women councillors in jobs with babies had
0:28:43 > 0:28:51been sacked. All of us as politicians of political parties
0:28:51 > 0:28:54ought to engage with colleagues in local government to secure the
0:28:54 > 0:28:59necessary changes there to have proper representation of women?The
0:28:59 > 0:29:03right honourable lady is absolutely right, we need to have more women at
0:29:03 > 0:29:10every level of our democratic process. In Basingstoke, my
0:29:10 > 0:29:14constituency, I have a phenomenal team of women, nine out of the 14
0:29:14 > 0:29:19councillors are women and I think that it is even more astonishing
0:29:19 > 0:29:24when I see that a number of them are very young women with very young
0:29:24 > 0:29:28children and I think others should be looking at what is happening in
0:29:28 > 0:29:32councils like mine in Basingstoke to encourage that so that we can see
0:29:32 > 0:29:35more young women coming forward and not seeing this incompatible with
0:29:35 > 0:29:41having a young family. Of course, and then I might make progress.I
0:29:41 > 0:29:45thanked the most right honourable members for bringing this debate and
0:29:45 > 0:29:48the honourable member from Basingstoke makes an important point
0:29:48 > 0:29:53about local government. 23 and 25 years ago, I gave birth to my
0:29:53 > 0:29:59children. I was a senior councillor in Hounslow. Although it was
0:29:59 > 0:30:02difficult, there are two fundamental differences between local government
0:30:02 > 0:30:07and this place. You are near to home and the other is the voting, the
0:30:07 > 0:30:13times you have to vote and be recorded as voting, they are
0:30:13 > 0:30:16measured and occasional. And this place is a very different place for
0:30:16 > 0:30:20both of those reasons.The right honourable lady who used to be a
0:30:20 > 0:30:25member of my committee and I know her well and I have worked with her,
0:30:25 > 0:30:28she is raising something I will touch on later in my remarks. Whilst
0:30:28 > 0:30:32I think the motion before us today is really important, there are other
0:30:32 > 0:30:35aspects of this place which need to be thought about again if we are
0:30:35 > 0:30:39going to make this work for everybody, regardless of their
0:30:39 > 0:30:44caring responsibilities. I will make a great deal of progress now so that
0:30:44 > 0:30:50you do not have to remind me we are short on time, Madam Deputy Speaker.
0:30:50 > 0:30:53I wholeheartedly support this motion because a new addition to the family
0:30:53 > 0:30:59is a wonderful thing but it is a huge change. When the rules and
0:30:59 > 0:31:03conventions of this place were established, women had no place
0:31:03 > 0:31:08here, men had little or no role in their children's lives and the rules
0:31:08 > 0:31:13and conventions were not established based on any research or facts, they
0:31:13 > 0:31:19were established to reflect the way men live their lives many years ago.
0:31:19 > 0:31:24Men's lives have changed, women's lives have changed. Women now can
0:31:24 > 0:31:28become MPs and our lives have changed but the demands of having a
0:31:28 > 0:31:33child have not changed. Allowing MPs to take that decision to take some
0:31:33 > 0:31:38time away from this place without disenfranchising their electorate in
0:31:38 > 0:31:43the process is an important step in its own right and I fully support
0:31:43 > 0:31:49that. But I would like to say, it is just one small step. Speaking as a
0:31:49 > 0:31:54mum of three kids, when I came here, my youngest was three, and it was,
0:31:54 > 0:31:58for me, a very easy transition. I had worked full-time before and I
0:31:58 > 0:32:04had the best childcare in the world, grandparents, there to look after my
0:32:04 > 0:32:09children. But not every member of the it has that built in. Not
0:32:09 > 0:32:14everyone is as lucky as I was -- every Member of Parliament. One
0:32:14 > 0:32:18small step in a workplace culture change in Parliament that is long
0:32:18 > 0:32:25overdue. We recognise the importance of workplace culture in the people
0:32:25 > 0:32:29we represent, whether it is the culture at the BBC that has allowed
0:32:29 > 0:32:33women to be underpaid, the culture in Hollywood that allows the likes
0:32:33 > 0:32:38of Harvey Weinstein to thrive, and abuse the people around them, when
0:32:38 > 0:32:46we scrutinise the effectiveness of laws, and we often conclude it is
0:32:46 > 0:32:51culture that needs to change to make those laws work better, we have
0:32:51 > 0:32:55already heard about the example of shared parental leave which was
0:32:55 > 0:32:58introduced by the coalition government and also the right to
0:32:58 > 0:33:02request flexible working. These are things people want but when we do
0:33:02 > 0:33:07the research, the uptake is low because the culture in the workplace
0:33:07 > 0:33:11has not changed to reflect the changes in the law. As well as
0:33:11 > 0:33:15passing laws, I believe we have a duty to influence culture as well.
0:33:15 > 0:33:20That is why we are bringing, my right honourable friend, the Leader
0:33:20 > 0:33:25of the House, that is why they are bringing a new disciplinary process
0:33:25 > 0:33:29around sexual harassment which is so important, and that is why we also
0:33:29 > 0:33:32need to show we understand that culture change is important around
0:33:32 > 0:33:40families too. Not only MPs with new children but MPs with all sorts of
0:33:40 > 0:33:42wide-ranging caring responsibilities, for older
0:33:42 > 0:33:49children, older members of family, as I do, or for disabled members of
0:33:49 > 0:33:54the family too. As we consider, and I hope agreed, with this motion
0:33:54 > 0:33:58today, I hope it is just a short small step we are taking forward and
0:33:58 > 0:34:04that other steps will follow. I would just like to give one
0:34:04 > 0:34:08particular example. The importance of predictability in working life.
0:34:08 > 0:34:14Before I came to this place, I was a director of an advertising agency, a
0:34:14 > 0:34:17very difficult job, challenging, a job I could do because I could
0:34:17 > 0:34:21determine the way my working life worked for me. It is very difficult
0:34:21 > 0:34:25here to have that level of predictability around foods in
0:34:25 > 0:34:29particular. That is why I would be advocating following this motion
0:34:29 > 0:34:35that we would be looking at issues like voting power to more
0:34:35 > 0:34:39predictability around the way this place works so that people with
0:34:39 > 0:34:43caring responsibilities can better work those responsibilities around
0:34:43 > 0:34:48there overwhelmingly important responsibilities here. For those who
0:34:48 > 0:34:52say introducing baby leave is the thin end of the wedge, I have to
0:34:52 > 0:34:58say, they are right. If it means we showed compassion to a colleague who
0:34:58 > 0:35:04is fighting cancer, show compassion to a colleague having to attend the
0:35:04 > 0:35:08funeral of a close relative, rather than disenfranchising their
0:35:08 > 0:35:13constituents, whilst they are being human beings, we need to make this
0:35:13 > 0:35:19change so that we can actually allow people to get the balance in their
0:35:19 > 0:35:23lives that is so sadly lacking at some points in the Parliamentary
0:35:23 > 0:35:28calendar at the moment. Of course I give way.I thank her for giving way
0:35:28 > 0:35:31and for her very powerful speech and I absolutely support the motion
0:35:31 > 0:35:35before us. I agree that I very much hope this is the thin end of the
0:35:35 > 0:35:39wedge because on the centenary of the representation of the people
0:35:39 > 0:35:43act, we must do more to fix the pipeline issue around encouraging
0:35:43 > 0:35:49more women at a younger age to think about putting themselves forward to
0:35:49 > 0:35:56become Members of Parliament.It is 100 years on since the first woman
0:35:56 > 0:36:01sat in this place but it can for many of us feel like we are still
0:36:01 > 0:36:04operating in an 18th-century model of work. That is something that
0:36:04 > 0:36:09really does need to change.I give way. I am very grateful. I cannot be
0:36:09 > 0:36:15alone in being a man in this House whose partner has an extremely
0:36:15 > 0:36:21important job of her own. She sits as a Supreme Court judge in France.
0:36:21 > 0:36:26That takes her away from home and I therefore have childcare
0:36:26 > 0:36:29responsibilities too and I have one-year-old baby and she does not
0:36:29 > 0:36:35look after herself funnily enough. I wonder whether when we are talking
0:36:35 > 0:36:38about equality, absolutely understand that emphasis on women's
0:36:38 > 0:36:42rights, of course, but this is a human rights, it is about anybody
0:36:42 > 0:36:46who has a responsibility to care for a child or indeed a responsibility
0:36:46 > 0:36:51to care for an adult or has religious obligations that may
0:36:51 > 0:36:56indeed keep them away in different ways.And I think my honourable
0:36:56 > 0:37:01friend makes a very powerful point. It is important to recognise the way
0:37:01 > 0:37:05that many family lives have changed over the years. That is why it was
0:37:05 > 0:37:10so important to frame this motion about MPs, parents, not about men
0:37:10 > 0:37:17and women. We can all have those sorts of caring responsibilities and
0:37:17 > 0:37:24they are not the sole preserve of anyone gender at this point. It
0:37:24 > 0:37:30would be remiss of me to not acknowledge the extraordinary way
0:37:30 > 0:37:36that the whips department has evolved in my time of being in this
0:37:36 > 0:37:40place, since 2005. I remember some of the conversations I had with
0:37:40 > 0:37:45whips when I first got here and I shudder a little because they did
0:37:45 > 0:37:49not really reflect my 20 years working life beforehand. I am
0:37:49 > 0:37:52looking particularly admirable friend and neighbour who was sitting
0:37:52 > 0:37:57on the front bench, but also my other honourable friend, the member
0:37:57 > 0:38:01for Bury St Edmunds, both of whom were also members of my select
0:38:01 > 0:38:07committee, and I know that the whips office is in extraordinarily good
0:38:07 > 0:38:13hands, but we cannot just let this be something which we put to chance
0:38:13 > 0:38:17and we do need to have better rules to give people certainty about what
0:38:17 > 0:38:25they can expect. MPs have a duty to keep our democracy healthy. I do not
0:38:25 > 0:38:30believe MPs can never be treated as employees. Our role demands that we
0:38:30 > 0:38:39are never going to really be subject to a contract. Our contract with the
0:38:39 > 0:38:42people we represent and they demonstrate their views each time
0:38:42 > 0:38:46there is an election. What we can do is modernise the culture of this
0:38:46 > 0:38:51place to reflect the 21st century, not the 18th-century. For our
0:38:51 > 0:38:56employees, of course, those who work for us, but also to those members
0:38:56 > 0:39:01sitting here today and for those who will come after us, to make this an
0:39:01 > 0:39:06attractive place for a more diverse range of people who want to become
0:39:06 > 0:39:11Members of Parliament. Today is one small step, allowing new parents
0:39:11 > 0:39:14some time away from this place to cope with the demands of a new
0:39:14 > 0:39:19family member, and it is long overdue. But following this motion,
0:39:19 > 0:39:22we do need to press forward further with modernisation, particularly
0:39:22 > 0:39:28around the scheduling of this place. I lack of consistency and certainty
0:39:28 > 0:39:34is one issue raised with me, not only because it makes us less
0:39:34 > 0:39:39productive, it also makes us less able to balance our family life too
0:39:39 > 0:39:46-- a lack of consistency. I respectfully disagree with people
0:39:46 > 0:39:49who think this change today is wrong. The health of our democracy
0:39:49 > 0:39:53depends on the strength of the House of Commons and we are strengthened
0:39:53 > 0:39:58if we are truly representative of the community is making up the UK.
0:39:58 > 0:40:02Introducing baby leave for members of Parliament who need it and want
0:40:02 > 0:40:05it is just one small step in opening up membership of this place to more
0:40:05 > 0:40:11people. And seeing fewer people choosing to leave before their time
0:40:11 > 0:40:15because life as an MP is incompatible with the responsibility
0:40:15 > 0:40:20of being a parent. I hope this motion gets the full agreement of
0:40:20 > 0:40:24the House today. Above all, I hope that the procedure committee looks
0:40:24 > 0:40:30at it swiftly so that those members here today with imminent arrivals
0:40:30 > 0:40:36can look forward to their pregnancies and the birth without a
0:40:36 > 0:40:43question as to how they will deal with it with the whips.Order. This
0:40:43 > 0:40:48debate has to finish just before 3pm. Therefore, we will have a time
0:40:48 > 0:40:58limit now of about eight minutes. No, not about. The debate has to
0:40:58 > 0:41:05finish at about three o'clock. But the time limit is exactly eight
0:41:05 > 0:41:09minutes. Sorry, I had in my mind there the terror that I felt the day
0:41:09 > 0:41:12I told the Chief Whip I was going to have a baby.
0:41:12 > 0:41:16LAUGHTER It had only happened once before in
0:41:16 > 0:41:21the Conservative Party. It was causing palpitations again. Exactly
0:41:21 > 0:41:28eight minutes. Emma Reynolds.Thank you. I will keep to exactly eight
0:41:28 > 0:41:31minutes. I want to thank the right honourable lady for her contribution
0:41:31 > 0:41:35which I found to be incredibly thoughtful and I agree with every
0:41:35 > 0:41:40single word she said. I want to pay particular special tribute to my
0:41:40 > 0:41:45right honourable friend, for Camberwell in Peckham. Not only for
0:41:45 > 0:41:50bringing forward these proposals today and doing so much work on this
0:41:50 > 0:41:54issue, but for all the work she has done since she joined this House
0:41:54 > 0:41:58many years ago, I do not know how many, but I know she is the mother
0:41:58 > 0:42:04of the House, all the work she has done to make sure we have greater
0:42:04 > 0:42:07gender equality in our country and our Parliament and we have made huge
0:42:07 > 0:42:12progress thanks to her work. But as today's motion demonstrates, we
0:42:12 > 0:42:19still have quite some way to go. I want to just recount what happened
0:42:19 > 0:42:24in 2017. My husband and I were expecting a baby in April. We were
0:42:24 > 0:42:32hoping for a quiet year on the work front, let's say. We thought, this
0:42:32 > 0:42:36is great, the bump will be around three years old at the time of the
0:42:36 > 0:42:44next election because it seemed the Prime Minister was absolutely
0:42:44 > 0:42:47determined to really respect the Fixed-term Parliaments Act. I gave
0:42:47 > 0:42:54birth at 2am on Good Friday. As those of you who have been there
0:42:54 > 0:42:58before me know, it is a very physically demanding and tiring
0:42:58 > 0:43:04process. Four days later, I was lying on my bed at home in the
0:43:04 > 0:43:09morning, breast-feeding baby Theo, and my mother actually used a few
0:43:09 > 0:43:14expletives looking at her phone and I said, what has happened? She said,
0:43:14 > 0:43:19the Prime Minister has called an election. I said, no, that can't be
0:43:19 > 0:43:24right. She was adamant she would not. Unlike some of you here who
0:43:24 > 0:43:28were watching the podium and noticing there were not... There was
0:43:28 > 0:43:31not any writing. I did not know she was making a statement. My husband
0:43:31 > 0:43:38came in and my mum said, Richard, there is going to be an election. He
0:43:38 > 0:43:43said, you have to check, I don't believe it. We were in a state of
0:43:43 > 0:43:47disbelief for quite some hours, days and weeks, actually. We wondered how
0:43:47 > 0:43:50on earth we would cope with the newborn, this brand-new little
0:43:50 > 0:43:54person we had in our lives who we've already struggling to cope with in
0:43:54 > 0:43:59the night because he was up most of the night and we had to do that and
0:43:59 > 0:44:04organise an election campaign as well.
0:44:04 > 0:44:12I want to think the vast majority of my constituents who were so
0:44:12 > 0:44:17supportive and I lost can't of the number of messages and cards and the
0:44:17 > 0:44:20number of people who were on the doorstep or asked about how I was
0:44:20 > 0:44:27and how my child was getting on. I have to say, there were a a small
0:44:27 > 0:44:30handful of people who said to me that once the election was called,
0:44:30 > 0:44:34they assumed that I would not stand again. And I politely said to them,
0:44:34 > 0:44:40would you ask the same question if my husband was the MP? And the
0:44:40 > 0:44:44answer did not come back because the answer was obvious. Of course they
0:44:44 > 0:44:49would not. I believe that new mums a new dads in this place should have
0:44:49 > 0:44:54the same rights that we have a legislative four for men and women
0:44:54 > 0:44:59across our country. I cannot believe we are dragging our feet on this
0:44:59 > 0:45:04what the meant when we have made such market improvement.I enjoyed
0:45:04 > 0:45:10listening to her experiences. I've just gone on to the procedure
0:45:10 > 0:45:13committee and attended for the first time yesterday and it is on our
0:45:13 > 0:45:18agenda to have investigated the Mac investigation and make a report on
0:45:18 > 0:45:24this. And I think that I would just like I wanted to put it on record
0:45:24 > 0:45:29that we are going to be looking at that.I urge them to do it quickly
0:45:29 > 0:45:33because there aren't various colleagues who have a very tight
0:45:33 > 0:45:37deadline that you should be working to that we have already discussed. I
0:45:37 > 0:45:42want to put on record my thanks to my husband's employer because as
0:45:42 > 0:45:47members of this House will know, new dads do have a right to share
0:45:47 > 0:45:51parental leave, but they have to give several weeks notice. And it
0:45:51 > 0:45:56happens to be eight weeks notice, which is about the same time as an
0:45:56 > 0:46:00election campaign. Thankfully his employer agreed to bring his
0:46:00 > 0:46:04parental leave forward. Because had my husband and working full-time at
0:46:04 > 0:46:08the same time is me running the campaign, I am not sure we would
0:46:08 > 0:46:13have been able to cope. I am really grateful to them for doing that. I
0:46:13 > 0:46:20would encourage new dads to take up that right. I do think that only 5%
0:46:20 > 0:46:26at the moment to take up that right. After the election and we did get
0:46:26 > 0:46:36through. And I did start... A week after I gave birth, a whole bunch of
0:46:36 > 0:46:42people came to help. And someone in the Sunday paper came with
0:46:42 > 0:46:56photographers. My baby Pete everywhere. And anyway. Now I an
0:46:56 > 0:47:05experienced in it. I was having this meeting to... They got a photo of me
0:47:05 > 0:47:11in the baby and I was very tired and eggs -- they insisted on driving me
0:47:11 > 0:47:19on the campaign trail. I didn't want to because I was very tired. I
0:47:19 > 0:47:26should have gone home, and I did suffer from it physically. Then I
0:47:26 > 0:47:32had a rest. We had all the deadlines for letters and leaflets and as much
0:47:32 > 0:47:37stuff as you can basically get out. Especially given it was such a short
0:47:37 > 0:47:46campaign.I think her for giving way. What she just said made me feel
0:47:46 > 0:47:49so uncomfortable because it is actually illegal to work for two
0:47:49 > 0:47:54weeks after giving birth. The situation she describes is just
0:47:54 > 0:47:58intolerable. We really do have to do something about this.I admit I
0:47:58 > 0:48:03broke the law and I should not have. I must say the motion before us
0:48:03 > 0:48:08today would not have helped me in my situation and there were other
0:48:08 > 0:48:12members here who were in the same situation. There were three new mums
0:48:12 > 0:48:17with election was called. I suspect there isn't anything that can be
0:48:17 > 0:48:21done when this happens. We were very very unlucky with the timing. I do
0:48:21 > 0:48:25think there is something we can do for after that. That is what I am
0:48:25 > 0:48:29coming on too now. We had the election, I retain my seat, but the
0:48:29 > 0:48:36weeks after that, I was required to come in in swearing or I don't get
0:48:36 > 0:48:41paid. I was required to come in and vote on the Queen's speech. I was
0:48:41 > 0:48:44asked to come in to vote on and select committee chairs which I
0:48:44 > 0:48:49really want to do. Because they've usually indoor for five years, but
0:48:49 > 0:48:52let's see what happens. I did not have a say on that. I infect
0:48:52 > 0:49:00e-mailed Mr Speaker cut -- I in fact e-mailed Mr Speaker but there wasn't
0:49:00 > 0:49:06much he could do on this. I think it is only right that I constituents
0:49:06 > 0:49:12are represented in this place and we should have the choice to appoint a
0:49:12 > 0:49:16call into vote on our behalf. I know that some colleagues are
0:49:16 > 0:49:19uncomfortable with this because they would only want to be the ones
0:49:19 > 0:49:26voting and that's why, and I think the right honourable Lady has taken
0:49:26 > 0:49:29this on board, it should be a choice. If you become a new mum or
0:49:29 > 0:49:33dad, you should be able to appoint a proxy for the time that you are on
0:49:33 > 0:49:39leave. I must say I am very hugely grateful to the web's office.
0:49:39 > 0:49:43Particularly my honourable friend who has been so brilliant and
0:49:43 > 0:49:49flexible. Not only after the election when I gave birth, but when
0:49:49 > 0:49:54I was pregnant. It is very tiring coming to this place when you are
0:49:54 > 0:50:02really big. The whip's offices in all seriousness have made a huge
0:50:02 > 0:50:07amount of progress. I have spoken to many colleagues who have had babies,
0:50:07 > 0:50:11ten or 20 years ago and indeed yourself Mattern Deputy Speaker when
0:50:11 > 0:50:18you didn't really have that kind of leave that we have. But we should
0:50:18 > 0:50:22not have to ask for it. This should be our right. And in other
0:50:22 > 0:50:27workplaces you don't have to ask, you have the right to it. We are
0:50:27 > 0:50:32dragging our feet. I just want to echo what was said earlier by one of
0:50:32 > 0:50:40my honourable friends who talked about a website. I e-mailed them
0:50:40 > 0:50:45just before going on maternity leave to see if they would reflect on
0:50:45 > 0:50:50their website the fact that I was going to be on leave. And they sort
0:50:50 > 0:50:56of filed me off. They said we will look at and they didn't do anything.
0:50:56 > 0:51:01And I think they should consider qualifying things on their website.
0:51:01 > 0:51:06Many of us have been criticised by national newspapers and it is not
0:51:06 > 0:51:10right. It damages our reputation, whether they issue an apology or
0:51:10 > 0:51:13not. It is a damage your reputation and we should not be in that
0:51:13 > 0:51:22position. In conclusion, I just want to pay tribute to all the honourable
0:51:22 > 0:51:26members who have gone before me and I want to single out a few people.
0:51:26 > 0:51:37Not only you Madam Deputy Speaker. I want to also pay tribute and say
0:51:37 > 0:51:42things to some other people who weren't... The First Minister to
0:51:42 > 0:51:50give birth in office. I have been inspired by many other colleagues.
0:51:50 > 0:51:54There was one member who had two babies while she was in the Shadow
0:51:54 > 0:52:01Cabinet. Juggling family life and being an MP. I say to young women
0:52:01 > 0:52:16don't be deterred, come in and do it. Thank you Madam Deputy Speaker.
0:52:16 > 0:52:23My friend famously fought a by election whilst having a child. And
0:52:23 > 0:52:29she was one of the first MPs having a child in this House. She was a
0:52:29 > 0:52:34real example. I want to congratulate her for bringing the work. Since
0:52:34 > 0:52:40then, we have made steady, but I think, literally slow progress as to
0:52:40 > 0:52:46become a child friendly workplace. We now have a on-site nursery. I was
0:52:46 > 0:52:50in the building when it was concreted and it was a site where a
0:52:50 > 0:52:55bar once existed. I think a much improved replacement. As we have
0:52:55 > 0:53:01heard in this debate, there are so many more modernising reforms that
0:53:01 > 0:53:07are desperately needed. I think we need more baby friendly spaces, more
0:53:07 > 0:53:13spaces for buggies, nappy PINS, places to breast-feed. Represent --
0:53:13 > 0:53:20the opportunity that it presents for the diversity of this chamber. The
0:53:20 > 0:53:25example that we can set for the rest of the country. If I can just say, I
0:53:25 > 0:53:31think it is fitting that this issue is discussed today. Since the last
0:53:31 > 0:53:36time to talk date, I've had a baby and as a new mum, I am acutely aware
0:53:36 > 0:53:44for new mums and for women to keep a close eye on their mental health.
0:53:44 > 0:53:56Northeast, forgive me... My BB was just four weeks off when -- my baby
0:53:56 > 0:54:01was just four weeks old when the election was called. It wasn't -- it
0:54:01 > 0:54:16was an incredibly stressful.. Many people will have mental health
0:54:16 > 0:54:23issues. There are many diseases that increase after childbirth. We know
0:54:23 > 0:54:29that one of the triggers to mental health is stress and anxiety in the
0:54:29 > 0:54:33workplace. This is especially true when a mum or dad returns to work
0:54:33 > 0:54:37after the birth of their child. These issues affect people inside
0:54:37 > 0:54:48and outside of this House just why this debate is so important. I have
0:54:48 > 0:54:58two polling -- it is a privilege to stand here for Mike disaster ensues.
0:54:58 > 0:55:05While I was able to keep on with the constituency casework, last June I
0:55:05 > 0:55:12had to leave my constituency and travel to come down to London to
0:55:12 > 0:55:18Parliament. First to swear in and while I am very grateful to the
0:55:18 > 0:55:22whips, I was asked to come in and vote on a couple of occasions. In
0:55:22 > 0:55:27June, when my baby was just three months old and again in September
0:55:27 > 0:55:30for some important votes when she was just five months old. In
0:55:30 > 0:55:35September, I was in the team room with my baby and we were there until
0:55:35 > 0:55:40after ten o'clock at night. Arguably that was not the right place for my
0:55:40 > 0:55:49baby at that time of night. As a breast-feeding mum, all my baby came
0:55:49 > 0:55:53in with me. Colleagues will know it is of huge responsibility looking
0:55:53 > 0:56:02after a tiny human. I was a slummy mummy. It is a challenge some days
0:56:02 > 0:56:06just to take a shower. Let alone to get up and get out of the House, to
0:56:06 > 0:56:12get to the station, to change the baby on the train that is moving at
0:56:12 > 0:56:21a miles an hour. The crying. To get on the tube often using escalator
0:56:21 > 0:56:28stairs because there is no lift. For an important overnight trip which
0:56:28 > 0:56:32for some babies will be the first time they are outside, it can be
0:56:32 > 0:56:39quite traumatic for them. I think the vote on the motion today, proxy
0:56:39 > 0:56:46voting, it is a simple means to count a member's vote without having
0:56:46 > 0:56:51them to pass physically through the voting lobbies. I think that will
0:56:51 > 0:56:55mean that the representative role of any MP can continue without being
0:56:55 > 0:56:59disrupted. It is not only an issue of fairness for the parents, it is a
0:56:59 > 0:57:04matter of fairness for our constituents. As with all the
0:57:04 > 0:57:09representation we make in this House, the work we do on the
0:57:09 > 0:57:13campaigns, the contributions we make for the country, to improve the
0:57:13 > 0:57:17first 1001 days of a child's life, to give children the best start in
0:57:17 > 0:57:23life, when we highlight the importance of attachment, when we
0:57:23 > 0:57:28address the breast-feeding rates that we have in our country, Madam
0:57:28 > 0:57:33Deputy Speaker, we need to lead by example and we need to give
0:57:33 > 0:57:38children, the children of MPs the best start as well. Some people
0:57:38 > 0:57:50might say this is a dangerous leap modernity I have heard that. Proxy
0:57:50 > 0:57:57voting was known here. It records until 1868 lords who were not
0:57:57 > 0:58:01present could vote by proxy. Since then, no attempt has been made to
0:58:01 > 0:58:11suspend the laws to allow the revival of this practise. In the
0:58:11 > 0:58:14comments, proxies were allowed in the mediaeval Parliament. This is
0:58:14 > 0:58:18not a leap in the dark, but in unearthing of a fine old
0:58:18 > 0:58:23Parliamentary tradition.
0:58:23 > 0:58:27To deny our constituents of voice because of this House not
0:58:27 > 0:58:33modernising, it is an affront. Providing new parents with the
0:58:33 > 0:58:37ability to register a vote by a ensures our constituents can still
0:58:37 > 0:58:44be heard. We know the physical arrangements are about to undergo
0:58:44 > 0:58:51huge changes. Our work continues and our democracy in June was. I hope
0:58:51 > 0:58:55that as we contemplate those changes, following yesterday's wrote
0:58:55 > 0:58:59about the refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster, we will focus
0:58:59 > 0:59:04on ways we can continue to become more child friendly and welcoming --
0:59:04 > 0:59:09yesterday's vote. The small but significant changes, so should every
0:59:09 > 0:59:13workplace and every factory, office, there are practical ways to help
0:59:13 > 0:59:16people when parents return to work after having a baby or having
0:59:16 > 0:59:22adopted. I think many stressful situations can be averted through
0:59:22 > 0:59:28small changes and if we are serious about improving the nation's mental
0:59:28 > 0:59:33health, it is an important factor. For over 35 years, the member for
0:59:33 > 0:59:36Camberwell and Peckham has fought for equality and fairness at
0:59:36 > 0:59:39Westminster and in the country. I think proxy voting would be another
0:59:39 > 0:59:44valuable part of honouring the mother of our Parliament's
0:59:44 > 0:59:48continuing contribution to our public life and I sincerely hope the
0:59:48 > 0:59:51House approves this measure and the Speaker will move towards a system
0:59:51 > 0:59:56of proxy voting without delay.We have to reduce the time limit to
0:59:56 > 1:00:05seven minutes. Yvette Cooper.Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. You and I
1:00:05 > 1:00:11had to work out how to hang -- handle pregnancy and Parliament some
1:00:11 > 1:00:16years ago, lovely to have you in the chair. Can I pay tribute to the
1:00:16 > 1:00:22brilliant speeches to my honourable friends, their speeches alone ought
1:00:22 > 1:00:28to persuade everybody, without any doubt, that this is a motion that
1:00:28 > 1:00:34should go through, but also should be very swiftly dealt with by the
1:00:34 > 1:00:38procedure committee? Frankly, it feels like it is a no-brainer. 100
1:00:38 > 1:00:43years since women got the vote, it is frankly an embarrassment that we
1:00:43 > 1:00:50do not have in Parliament a system for maternity, paternity and baby
1:00:50 > 1:00:55leave, that my right honourable friend describes, because if other
1:00:55 > 1:01:01organisations can do it, why can't we? If shops and factories and
1:01:01 > 1:01:05businesses and doctors surgeries and police forces, every other
1:01:05 > 1:01:09organisation manages to find a way of doing it, why on earth can't we?
1:01:09 > 1:01:14Especially when we are the organisation that has told so many
1:01:14 > 1:01:18of those organisations that they have to do it, they have to have
1:01:18 > 1:01:22arrangements for leave, but we cannot sort it out for ourselves. I
1:01:22 > 1:01:26think maternity arrangements are not strong enough across the country. I
1:01:26 > 1:01:32think there is not enough provision, the culture changes still need to
1:01:32 > 1:01:35take place. There are still too many difficulties and obstacles put in
1:01:35 > 1:01:38people's way and I think there is a serious problem about maternity
1:01:38 > 1:01:42discrimination under way in which the law is not enforced or arguably
1:01:42 > 1:01:47is not strong enough to make sure women are not ending up finding
1:01:47 > 1:01:52themselves made redundant or demoted or losing responsibilities when they
1:01:52 > 1:01:57take maternity leave or at the same time, for men, feeling that they
1:01:57 > 1:02:02cannot take paternity leave for fear those things will happen. How can we
1:02:02 > 1:02:06end this House challenge errant employers saying, it is too too
1:02:06 > 1:02:12difficult, we are two special, we cannot possibly provide for people
1:02:12 > 1:02:18having babies, if we do not sort it out ourselves customer that is why I
1:02:18 > 1:02:22am paying tribute to my right honourable friend who has pioneered
1:02:22 > 1:02:27so many of these debates, led the way for so many of us to follow, and
1:02:27 > 1:02:32I know it was much easier for me to be able to take maternity leave as
1:02:32 > 1:02:40an MP but also as a minister because of the support I got, personal
1:02:40 > 1:02:44support as well as leadership shown, by my right honourable friend, and
1:02:44 > 1:02:50it is hugely important she is doing the same still for each generation
1:02:50 > 1:02:54of women and each generation of men as well. I pay tribute too to the
1:02:54 > 1:02:58right honourable member for Basingstoke and the work she has
1:02:58 > 1:03:01done on the women equality select committee to support this and
1:03:01 > 1:03:06promote this. I agree with her that there should be wider reforms,
1:03:06 > 1:03:09across the country, and I know this has support from other parties as
1:03:09 > 1:03:17well. I think given we all know, having a baby is normal, it is why
1:03:17 > 1:03:22we are all here, and Parliament ought to be able to cope with what
1:03:22 > 1:03:28is normal. Parliament ought to show the leadership by making it
1:03:28 > 1:03:33possible. Of course, it will always be a challenge and there will always
1:03:33 > 1:03:37be chaos that comes. For me, a lot of that chaos would come from the
1:03:37 > 1:03:42travelling to and fro with small children, not just with a baby, I am
1:03:42 > 1:03:47a dab hand at changing nappies on a fast moving train, but the potty
1:03:47 > 1:03:52training was more challenging. A few sticky moments with a portable potty
1:03:52 > 1:03:59with a lid on, putting it up on the shelf on a fast moving train. There
1:03:59 > 1:04:03will always be some complexities in having small children and being the
1:04:03 > 1:04:08Members of Parliament and the honour that comes from representing
1:04:08 > 1:04:12constituents, but it ought to be made possible to manage both things
1:04:12 > 1:04:16in a way that too often it isn't. Another honourable friend of ours
1:04:16 > 1:04:23who has since left who had a baby and who was asked to come in for
1:04:23 > 1:04:27votes when the baby was very small and she came also at a time when we
1:04:27 > 1:04:33were not even allowed to take babies through the voting lobbies. We ended
1:04:33 > 1:04:37up in this baby really, we took it in turns to vote and carry the baby
1:04:37 > 1:04:41while she went through to vote and we would each hold the baby, great
1:04:41 > 1:04:45for us, we got to cuddle a tiny baby, but neither seen he there the
1:04:45 > 1:04:52baby should have been here, but it was a tight vote -- neither she or
1:04:52 > 1:04:58the baby. It should not depend on favours, not on special deals and
1:04:58 > 1:05:01arrangements, on the whips, it should just be a very sensible,
1:05:01 > 1:05:06practical arrangement, it should not be beyond the wit of this house when
1:05:06 > 1:05:09we come up with practical arrangements for other organisations
1:05:09 > 1:05:13across the country to come up with a practical way of working that works
1:05:13 > 1:05:20too. To recognise the truth is for any working mum, often for working
1:05:20 > 1:05:25parents, there is always the sense of conflicting guilt and
1:05:25 > 1:05:28responsibility, guilt towards the newborn that you are trying to do
1:05:28 > 1:05:32your constituency casework at the same time, guilt towards
1:05:32 > 1:05:38constituents but you should be in Parliament or at a meeting. The
1:05:38 > 1:05:42sense of responsibility towards Parliament, constituents, baby,
1:05:42 > 1:05:45family, but also, the sense of responsibility towards so many other
1:05:45 > 1:05:49women who also might be finding it hard to take maternity leave to show
1:05:49 > 1:05:54it is possible and we do not have to pretend to be superwomen and pretend
1:05:54 > 1:05:57to have to be able to do it all at once otherwise somehow that means
1:05:57 > 1:06:02you are not doing your job properly. We want people in all walks of life
1:06:02 > 1:06:06to be able to combine parenthood and employment because it is normal,
1:06:06 > 1:06:11that is what we do, and we should end the muddling through and put
1:06:11 > 1:06:15proper arrangements in place. Final thought I would ask the ministers
1:06:15 > 1:06:18also have another look at the arrangements for ministerial
1:06:18 > 1:06:23maternity leave. When I first took ministerial maternity leave 16 years
1:06:23 > 1:06:27ago, we again were muddling through, we attempted to put some
1:06:27 > 1:06:29arrangements in place after that that were more formal, but they
1:06:29 > 1:06:37disappeared. They need to be revised as well. 100th anniversary of women
1:06:37 > 1:06:42getting the vote, what better time to get this sorted and get it sorted
1:06:42 > 1:06:47really, really fast. So that this can be about our next step around
1:06:47 > 1:06:52not just equality for people in this House but for us being able to keep
1:06:52 > 1:06:57being confident pioneers for equality across the country as well.
1:06:57 > 1:07:01Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. A massive honour to follow all of the
1:07:01 > 1:07:08speeches and I feel that honourable friends across the house today and
1:07:08 > 1:07:12in today's debate. I should register not an interest but a total
1:07:12 > 1:07:18disinterest in ever having another child again. This will not benefit
1:07:18 > 1:07:24me, even in the slightest, I could not be more disinterested. Listening
1:07:24 > 1:07:33to the testimony of my friend from Wolverhampton North East, I found it
1:07:33 > 1:07:37to be incredibly moving, pushing the right back at that moment when I was
1:07:37 > 1:07:4222 and a new mum and I was terrified that I was going to break this
1:07:42 > 1:07:50little thing. I have. Expected the things... I will not put you through
1:07:50 > 1:07:52it, Mr Deputy Speaker, but some of the things that happen to a woman's
1:07:52 > 1:07:58body immediately after she has a baby, they are terrifying, you do
1:07:58 > 1:08:04not expect it. I thought my internal organs were falling out.
1:08:04 > 1:08:07LAUGHTER The thought I would have to get up
1:08:07 > 1:08:14and get to the meeting...It is not me that is worried but I am worried
1:08:14 > 1:08:21about the member for Lancaster! LAUGHTER
1:08:21 > 1:08:24Forewarned is forearmed in these situations. You are not dying, that
1:08:24 > 1:08:29is what I would say to my friend from Lancaster. But we all thought
1:08:29 > 1:08:34that we were. The idea I would have to get up at that moment, terrified,
1:08:34 > 1:08:39suffering and fear, real fear for the first time and have to go to a
1:08:39 > 1:08:43constituency member's meeting, it is absolutely horrifying. The thought
1:08:43 > 1:08:51of you doing that at the. Sorry, not you. The thought of the member for
1:08:51 > 1:08:55Wolverhampton North East doing that is absolutely terrifying to me. --
1:08:55 > 1:09:01the thought of you doing that... Sorry, not you. Massive credit to
1:09:01 > 1:09:06all of the women here who have had babies. I want to, because I quite
1:09:06 > 1:09:10like a row, to head off at the pass some of the things I have heard in
1:09:10 > 1:09:14this place about why this could not happen. We're pretty much all here
1:09:14 > 1:09:19to support it today, largely, but I have heard quite a lot of
1:09:19 > 1:09:27mutterings, they are mutterings, they sound like this... Amazing... I
1:09:27 > 1:09:30have heard an awful lot of that and I want to address some of them. Some
1:09:30 > 1:09:35of them from women in this House, I have heard squeamishness about
1:09:35 > 1:09:40wanting to ask for a right because MPs, we are criticised for talking
1:09:40 > 1:09:45about ourselves, very insular, we all know those fake news on the
1:09:45 > 1:09:49internet where they show a really busy Chamber when we are talking
1:09:49 > 1:09:52about our salary and an empty Chamber when we are talking about
1:09:52 > 1:09:59something else, just for the public outside, a total lie. The idea we
1:09:59 > 1:10:03should be asking for something for ourselves, the rightful people here,
1:10:03 > 1:10:07it is totally and utterly acceptable. I have had to talk to
1:10:07 > 1:10:12women in the Labour Party and as the chair of the women's Parliamentary
1:10:12 > 1:10:16Labour Party, to say, I am not going to feel afraid about asking for
1:10:16 > 1:10:21something for you, writes for the people in this building, because if
1:10:21 > 1:10:27I worked... When I worked at Woman's Age, I fought for them to have
1:10:27 > 1:10:31better maternity services for parental leave, no matter where I
1:10:31 > 1:10:35worked, I would be fighting for the women to have better rights and we
1:10:35 > 1:10:39should not be embarrassed about fighting for them here either. I
1:10:39 > 1:10:43want to put that to bed, the idea it is somehow selfish. It isn't, it is
1:10:43 > 1:10:49a right we should be entitled to. The other chuntering I have heard
1:10:49 > 1:10:55some people have mentioned, the thin end of the wedge, where will this
1:10:55 > 1:11:00lead? It will lead to being exactly like every other employer in the
1:11:00 > 1:11:05country. The idea of the thin end of the wedge, as the right honourable
1:11:05 > 1:11:09member for Basingstoke said, the thin end of the wedge where we are
1:11:09 > 1:11:13kind and nice employers, the big end of the wedge is decency and
1:11:13 > 1:11:20humanity, I am more all right with that. We are asking for something a
1:11:20 > 1:11:25very specific reason and when people do not... They say, you cannot have
1:11:25 > 1:11:30other people voting for you, as if they have the divine right of kings
1:11:30 > 1:11:35when we come into this place, our vote is handed to us by God and it
1:11:35 > 1:11:41is so special, nobody else could say how I might feel about fisheries
1:11:41 > 1:11:46industries, it is frankly ridiculous. The idea that people
1:11:46 > 1:11:53feel that they are so special that nobody could ever cast their vote
1:11:53 > 1:11:59for them, I assume they have never followed the whip and deciding
1:11:59 > 1:12:03always exactly what they will vote for all by their little selves, I
1:12:03 > 1:12:09find that highly unlikely. I think Caroline Lucas, the member for
1:12:09 > 1:12:14Brighton Pavilion, she might be the only person who could say that.I
1:12:14 > 1:12:17thank my honourable friend for giving way and making this
1:12:17 > 1:12:20incredibly powerful speech. Would she agreed that the thin end of the
1:12:20 > 1:12:25wedge is not the thin end of erosion of our democracy but a thin end of
1:12:25 > 1:12:30how we balance work and family life when circumstances might be
1:12:30 > 1:12:35unpredictable? Two months ago, my mother had a stroke and while she is
1:12:35 > 1:12:40a lot better now, I was in a position of having to put in place
1:12:40 > 1:12:45with my sisters and brother 24-hour care for someone who we were used to
1:12:45 > 1:12:50caring for us and whilst I know and understand the issues that there
1:12:50 > 1:12:57will be with parents, to have to be in that position and to then
1:12:57 > 1:13:00struggle for the flexibility to manage that alongside being a Member
1:13:00 > 1:13:03of Parliament, it is something that I would want to see us change and
1:13:03 > 1:13:10have the courage to change.I couldn't agree more, as somebody who
1:13:10 > 1:13:15has similarly cared for my own mother when she was dying, the
1:13:15 > 1:13:19amount of pressure that gets put on and I have to say it is largely the
1:13:19 > 1:13:24women in society when you are in the middle and you are caring for
1:13:24 > 1:13:30children and you are also caring for dying relatives or very sick
1:13:30 > 1:13:34relatives, we have got to, as a nation, get better at dealing with
1:13:34 > 1:13:40that, and why not start here? The other issue, I went for lunch with a
1:13:40 > 1:13:47gentleman yesterday, with my husband -- my husband's listening, it wasn't
1:13:47 > 1:13:54him. He talked about how he had hoped to intend to take shared
1:13:54 > 1:13:58parental leave other colleagues has spoken about and he said, as soon as
1:13:58 > 1:14:03I said, OK, I will take three months off, it started to creep in, what if
1:14:03 > 1:14:10my clients get given to somebody else? What if people judge me for
1:14:10 > 1:14:13leaving? I thought, my heart bleeds for you, my tiny violin, that is
1:14:13 > 1:14:20what we have to put up with for ever.
1:14:20 > 1:14:28Because I have lived that life. The truth of the matter is is that we
1:14:28 > 1:14:32have got to make sure that when we make these changes that it is not
1:14:32 > 1:14:39only the women in this building that take this leave. And that the man in
1:14:39 > 1:14:44this building take it as well. Frankly, I think some of the men in
1:14:44 > 1:14:49this building and some of the backtalk that I have heard when I
1:14:49 > 1:14:57have talked about this should be ashamed of bragging about being here
1:14:57 > 1:15:01moments when their baby were born. For standing up and saying and
1:15:01 > 1:15:09committees, point of order, my wife just had a baby. Point of order, I
1:15:09 > 1:15:12divorce you if you are my husband. There is one plays a man should be
1:15:12 > 1:15:20when their baby is born and that is by the side of their partner. And
1:15:20 > 1:15:24that, I think, in this place, we have got to say, this is not about
1:15:24 > 1:15:28the women getting something better. This is about the parents getting
1:15:28 > 1:15:32something better. Because we have got to lead by example. And I know
1:15:32 > 1:15:37just not for the Member for Wolverhampton from Northeast. There
1:15:37 > 1:15:41are husbands in this building who are starting to take that leaves and
1:15:41 > 1:15:45we have got to stand as an example to that. So, basically when this
1:15:45 > 1:15:55comes in, I am coming in for you. To the men in his house to take it.
1:15:55 > 1:16:03Thank you for calling this important debate. It is very important for me
1:16:03 > 1:16:08to be here because I did have a baby a year and a half ago. As a sitting
1:16:08 > 1:16:13MP. While I will not go into detail about what happened to my insides...
1:16:13 > 1:16:18LAUGHTER I do want to talk a little bit about
1:16:18 > 1:16:23the impact of the pregnancy and the birth on me. I won't go into
1:16:23 > 1:16:28details, but I did say -- I would say I had a 40 hour long labour
1:16:28 > 1:16:33which resulted in an emergency C-section. After that, I got an
1:16:33 > 1:16:41infection and so did the baby. I was looked after for nine days, even
1:16:41 > 1:16:46when I was on the hospital bed, I had to do e-mails and I had to sign
1:16:46 > 1:16:49things offer my office simply because there was no one else to do
1:16:49 > 1:16:52it and I could not really nominate someone to take care of crucial
1:16:52 > 1:16:57matters. And there were some crucial matters which I will elaborate in a
1:16:57 > 1:17:04moment. I am not describing this details because I want sympathy I'm
1:17:04 > 1:17:07doing it because before I had a child, I did not quite realise the
1:17:07 > 1:17:14physical impact childbirth has on your body. I have been around
1:17:14 > 1:17:17children and babies, but I still did not realise quite what would happen
1:17:17 > 1:17:23to your body when you went through a 40 hour ordeal in the way that I did
1:17:23 > 1:17:25and after the emergency C-section where I physically could not move
1:17:25 > 1:17:29from the bed and I had to ask everyone for help which is not easy
1:17:29 > 1:17:36when I'm used to doing for myself. It was not easy, but because I was
1:17:36 > 1:17:40in a seat that had been a very marginal seat, the lady that I had
1:17:40 > 1:17:45taken over from only one deceived by 42 votes, I had only won it by just
1:17:45 > 1:17:49over a thousand votes. I did not feel like I could look like my
1:17:49 > 1:17:52constituents. I came back to work very quickly afterwards. As a result
1:17:52 > 1:17:59because my body did not recover, I developed a very terrible infection.
1:17:59 > 1:18:05And anyone who has had disinfection knows what it does to your body. I
1:18:05 > 1:18:09went to my GP and I told him that I was overworked and had come back to
1:18:09 > 1:18:13work very early. In my sleep deprived state I knew I had to do
1:18:13 > 1:18:16something. I tabled an early day motion asking if we could change the
1:18:16 > 1:18:21way the voting system worked. Even I was getting e-mails saying why have
1:18:21 > 1:18:26you not turned up for this vote? In the six weeks, I was being asked why
1:18:26 > 1:18:35I had not turned up for a certain meeting. And if you know our
1:18:35 > 1:18:41constituencies, they look up your your voting record. I wanted to make
1:18:41 > 1:18:45it clear that we have got to change the voting system. This is the time
1:18:45 > 1:18:49to do it where there are more women than ever before. Having children in
1:18:49 > 1:18:54Parliament. I wanted to point out how our position here in Parliament
1:18:54 > 1:19:00lags behind in other countries. In Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia,
1:19:00 > 1:19:05members of Parliament may be granted leave of 12 ones in case of child
1:19:05 > 1:19:08birth, pregnancy or adoption. This is the same in Estonia Finland and
1:19:08 > 1:19:17Luke Latvia. In the Netherlands, there are no formal maternity leave,
1:19:17 > 1:19:21but they can be replaced by another MP from the same political group so
1:19:21 > 1:19:25they are not penalised for their absence. The fact that we are behind
1:19:25 > 1:19:32these countries with our attitudes to parental leave is compounded with
1:19:32 > 1:19:38her attitude with our Parliamentary voting system. Scotland, he India
1:19:38 > 1:19:48and Ireland and the European Union are all have electronic voting.I
1:19:48 > 1:19:53just want to say to my friend making an incredibly powerful speech, would
1:19:53 > 1:19:57she agree with me by the time we are done with this, we should match or
1:19:57 > 1:20:01better the best Parliaments in the world. And also just to say
1:20:01 > 1:20:04physically, having the second is harder.
1:20:04 > 1:20:12LAUGHTER. I would like to thank my honourable friend for the note of
1:20:12 > 1:20:15confidence, but I absolutely agree with what she is saying. If we want
1:20:15 > 1:20:19to make Parliament a welcoming place for female representatives and if we
1:20:19 > 1:20:23want to act in the way that my constituency Labour Party did when
1:20:23 > 1:20:29they categorically said one after another we want more people not
1:20:29 > 1:20:36women in Parliament, that is what we should all be encouraging in the
1:20:36 > 1:20:44House of Commons where we sit.I thank you for giving way and an
1:20:44 > 1:20:47excellent speech. She mentioned Scotland, so I could not miss the
1:20:47 > 1:20:51opportunity to jump in. We have been in debates on this motion before.
1:20:51 > 1:20:56She mentioned electronic voting and she will know as well as I do that
1:20:56 > 1:21:03some of the arguments against proxy and electronic voting is that this
1:21:03 > 1:21:08chamber does not fit half of the members of this House. We all have
1:21:08 > 1:21:11modern technology we can all watch at home, there is a reason not to do
1:21:11 > 1:21:18this.We have had discussions about this and we do feel that Parliament
1:21:18 > 1:21:23needs to become more modern and we need to encourage more things like
1:21:23 > 1:21:27electronic voting. Maybe that will be next on the agenda. I wanted to
1:21:27 > 1:21:31touch on the fact that I have a lot of support for my constituency
1:21:31 > 1:21:35Labour Party when I ran to be an MP. When I was a young woman, they
1:21:35 > 1:21:40thought I would have children and there were questions raised about
1:21:40 > 1:21:48it. One person said what is the problem is MPs have children? It's
1:21:48 > 1:21:51good for their constituency. He also pointed out that apparently
1:21:51 > 1:21:55politicians with children get more votes, I do not know if that is
1:21:55 > 1:22:01true. I just want to talk a little bit about the support I received in
1:22:01 > 1:22:04Parliament. The staff at the nursery were really fantastic when I first
1:22:04 > 1:22:11took my child. I want to pay tribute to them. The member who was sitting
1:22:11 > 1:22:16here earlier on is my neighbouring MP and right at the beginning when I
1:22:16 > 1:22:18had morning sickness, he was the first to ring and say if there are
1:22:18 > 1:22:22any meetings that you would like me to cover for you, I am happy to go.
1:22:22 > 1:22:26Because his wife had gone through the same thing. Another member on a
1:22:26 > 1:22:34trip to Paris carried my suitcase up and down the stairs when I
1:22:34 > 1:22:38physically could not lift the suitcase. And on the same trip to
1:22:38 > 1:22:43Paris to explore how we tackle anti-Semitism, the former MP for...
1:22:43 > 1:22:47I'm trying to think, for Brentwood said to me he is happy to be the
1:22:47 > 1:22:52godfather for my child and whether I wanted to name my daughter Erica
1:22:52 > 1:22:58after him which I declined. Another MP gave me a wristband to monitor
1:22:58 > 1:23:05the number time my babies kicked. There was a sense of real spirit
1:23:05 > 1:23:09among members of the other side who I would talk to. About what we did
1:23:09 > 1:23:18as young women who had children but also wanted to be good MPs. When my
1:23:18 > 1:23:22ever-growing bomb, and when you are four foot 11, your bob really does
1:23:22 > 1:23:30stand out also -- when your bump really stands out when you are four
1:23:30 > 1:23:40foot 11. Perhaps the memory that most stands out was when right after
1:23:40 > 1:23:46I had the baby, I got an urgent call from my office, the result man whose
1:23:46 > 1:23:52wife had been in a Ron who was detained with her small child. I had
1:23:52 > 1:23:56just had my baby obviously when my office called, I had to meet with
1:23:56 > 1:24:00them because there was no one I could delegate that responsibility
1:24:00 > 1:24:03to when I spoke to him on the phone he said why don't you come over to
1:24:03 > 1:24:08my house and I said that is a good idea. And he said is there any idea
1:24:08 > 1:24:12that the leader of the Labour Party could also meet me? I ran and I said
1:24:12 > 1:24:16I just had a baby but there is a really urgent Kates and we need to
1:24:16 > 1:24:21meet near my flat because I'm breast-feeding. And he said why
1:24:21 > 1:24:26don't I come over to your flat and we will have a meeting there? So are
1:24:26 > 1:24:31in the meeting and I had a tiny baby in my arm, the man whose wife had
1:24:31 > 1:24:35been detained and why breast-feed, we discussed the Iranian authorities
1:24:35 > 1:24:39and talked about how to get my constituent back into the country.
1:24:39 > 1:24:44At one point my baby was very unsettled and I had to take some
1:24:44 > 1:24:49notes so I said to the member, could you hold the baby for bid why write
1:24:49 > 1:24:53notes? Now the baby had been quite unsettled, but for some reason as
1:24:53 > 1:24:59soon as I handed her over, she settled down and went to sleep.
1:24:59 > 1:25:10LAUGHTER. I don't want to say but there may be a point about kinder
1:25:10 > 1:25:14gentler cuddling. I wanted to tell people in the chamber is that that
1:25:14 > 1:25:19was a real defining moment for me. Both men in that room demonstrated
1:25:19 > 1:25:23serious comrade Rees. For me. Taking time to come to my house because I
1:25:23 > 1:25:28did not feel like I could leave. Not batting an eyelid when I breast-fed.
1:25:28 > 1:25:32I think that is the tiny ethos we need to bring into this House. If
1:25:32 > 1:25:36you are an MP and you have an urgent case and you still want to fulfil
1:25:36 > 1:25:41your duties, there are ways to do it. If you can do in my flat in
1:25:41 > 1:25:47North London, we can do it here as well. I sit on a committee where we
1:25:47 > 1:25:51scrutinise legislation around other people's maternity and if we cannot
1:25:51 > 1:25:58lead by example, we should not be sitting here. I commend this motion.
1:25:58 > 1:26:01Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, but I'm not sure how I'm going to
1:26:01 > 1:26:07follow. It is an honour to take part in this debate. I would like to pay
1:26:07 > 1:26:10tribute to the right honourable members for securing it today. And
1:26:10 > 1:26:16say that for me it is actually what we like to say at home and little
1:26:16 > 1:26:21treat. Around 20 years ago, we were able -- a few years ago I was able
1:26:21 > 1:26:28to interview a member about how she planned to change the working
1:26:28 > 1:26:34landscape for families in this country. I actually had just
1:26:34 > 1:26:42finished my maternity leave at the BBC at the time and I have to say
1:26:42 > 1:26:45that she was right even back in those dark distant days of the past,
1:26:45 > 1:26:52the BBC words you -- were able to put out news bulletins even though I
1:26:52 > 1:26:57was not there. Employers find a way. I have to say the landscape for
1:26:57 > 1:27:03families has changed dramatically. Children who were born back then and
1:27:03 > 1:27:08are becoming parents now benefit from a whole raft of legislation
1:27:08 > 1:27:12which makes it easier for them to be with their partner and their child
1:27:12 > 1:27:16to bond as a family immediately after the child is born except of
1:27:16 > 1:27:20course unless they are a member of Parliament. It seems ridiculous that
1:27:20 > 1:27:27we in this place should be so far behind the very people that we are
1:27:27 > 1:27:36here to represent and to help. I have to say also I have no intention
1:27:36 > 1:27:40of having another child and although I have found that this debate at
1:27:40 > 1:27:45times moving and entertaining, it is also been frankly horrifying. If
1:27:45 > 1:27:52there had been any doubt I would not be having another child now. The
1:27:52 > 1:27:56gender bias of this House has also changed completely since I've been
1:27:56 > 1:28:01here. There are now 200 women many of them young enough to be starting
1:28:01 > 1:28:04or expanding their families. And many of the male colleagues are as
1:28:04 > 1:28:11well. I think we have to bear in mind that for many of us who have
1:28:11 > 1:28:15constituencies, many hundreds of miles away, that will not mean being
1:28:15 > 1:28:19home late at night for an hour or a couple of hours or travelling
1:28:19 > 1:28:23although that must be difficult to high-speed train with a small child.
1:28:23 > 1:28:31It will mean being away for a week at a time.
1:28:31 > 1:28:35Separated from them at the most important time in a child's life,
1:28:35 > 1:28:39not helping our partners through the sorts of ordeals we have heard about
1:28:39 > 1:28:42from other members, and we know that some of the younger male members of
1:28:42 > 1:28:49this house have already had to do. We should not be asking parents to
1:28:49 > 1:28:58choose between voting and providing that support. Not when an
1:28:58 > 1:29:02alternative is already there. It was there in the 19th century, we have
1:29:02 > 1:29:06heard today. It is there every time we go to the ballot box. You can
1:29:06 > 1:29:10have a proxy vote. You can have someone to go to exercise democratic
1:29:10 > 1:29:16right. We should not be excluding ourselves from that possibility. One
1:29:16 > 1:29:25other thing, all of the changes which have come about in the last
1:29:25 > 1:29:3020-30 years, maternity and parental leave act, working families act, the
1:29:30 > 1:29:33Children and Families Act, the Equalities Act, they all aimed at
1:29:33 > 1:29:37creating a level playing field so that when young women went in for a
1:29:37 > 1:29:41job, they were not judged on whether they might be leaving to have
1:29:41 > 1:29:45maternity leave and a young man who came in would not present the same
1:29:45 > 1:29:50problem, he would also be taking baby leave. And yet, we do not seem
1:29:50 > 1:29:55to have taken it into account that when selecting members for this
1:29:55 > 1:30:00House, selecting candidates, perhaps local parties would be faced with
1:30:00 > 1:30:06the same dilemma. If they choose the young woman, married, maybe about to
1:30:06 > 1:30:10start a family, they are going to lose her from the House. If they
1:30:10 > 1:30:16choose to young man, they might think they would not. So we are
1:30:16 > 1:30:20making it difficult for ourselves to pursue that stated goal of making
1:30:20 > 1:30:24this place more representative of the country that we seek to
1:30:24 > 1:30:31represent. We need more young women and more young men, we need more
1:30:31 > 1:30:36people from every section of society, and by making this simple
1:30:36 > 1:30:42difference, this simple change, we can make it easier to encourage
1:30:42 > 1:30:48young people who are about to start families to think, you know, it
1:30:48 > 1:30:52might just be possible, I might just be able to go and continue to
1:30:52 > 1:30:56represent the people I want to represent when I have my child, I
1:30:56 > 1:31:00can have someone else vote for me, when we adopt a child, someone else
1:31:00 > 1:31:06can do it, it is the simplest thing possible. And yet we have not done
1:31:06 > 1:31:17it. If we are going to be truly representative, then we have is to
1:31:17 > 1:31:20represent all of our constituents. We are falling short on that in this
1:31:20 > 1:31:25and all I would say today is we have the opportunity to put that last
1:31:25 > 1:31:32piece of the jigsaw in place, to make it possible to vote, it seems
1:31:32 > 1:31:36ridiculous that they could do it in the 19th century, and in the 21st,
1:31:36 > 1:31:42we are even asking the question. Thank you.I congratulate my right
1:31:42 > 1:31:49honourable friend for securing this important debate. I also thank other
1:31:49 > 1:31:56honourable and right honourable members and Deputy Speaker, making
1:31:56 > 1:32:00good progress over the last few years on this issue. As a new
1:32:00 > 1:32:05member, I had no idea the day nursery used to be a wine bar. The
1:32:05 > 1:32:08day nursery being there seems normal and that is good progress. I declare
1:32:08 > 1:32:13my interest as the father of an eight-week-old and husband to my
1:32:13 > 1:32:19wife, Lucy. Ophelia was able to join me here last week to vote for the
1:32:19 > 1:32:23first time against the third reading of the EU withdrawal bill and for
1:32:23 > 1:32:29those that have shared concern about bringing babies into the voting
1:32:29 > 1:32:34lobby, let me pay tribute to the clerks who very astutely did not
1:32:34 > 1:32:38count her vote when I walked through and quite rightly, I have no ideas
1:32:38 > 1:32:41what her views are on the Government's Brexit strategy. I
1:32:41 > 1:32:46support this important motion today because from my own experience of
1:32:46 > 1:32:50going on paternity leave a little earlier than expected in the run-up
1:32:50 > 1:32:55to Christmas, I was a book as a backbench MP to clear my diary
1:32:55 > 1:33:04easily and my constituents were very supportive but I needed to be and
1:33:04 > 1:33:07there were important votes I wanted to vote on, but the ability to use
1:33:07 > 1:33:11proxy voting or I can see the clerks use and iPad, maybe there is an app
1:33:11 > 1:33:16we could access. It would be welcome progress. In the early days, as
1:33:16 > 1:33:20other honourable friends have said, my duty as a husband and father is
1:33:20 > 1:33:24to be there to help in any way I can at home and having to leave for
1:33:24 > 1:33:29sometimes many hours to vote when I could do it from home or by a proxy,
1:33:29 > 1:33:34it would be very helpful. Formalising the process would be
1:33:34 > 1:33:36helpful too. The whips were very helpful but there was a presumption
1:33:36 > 1:33:41I would be here apart from those I negotiated not to be here for. I
1:33:41 > 1:33:47would argue it was the other way round. French reds, the Brexit ones,
1:33:47 > 1:33:51I'm sure Ophelia would have said that she wanted me to be here -- on
1:33:51 > 1:33:56the crunch ones. The assumption needs switching. In the short amount
1:33:56 > 1:34:02of time I have, it is important we set the tone in this place, it is
1:34:02 > 1:34:06right, as others have said, we should be doing the same as what we
1:34:06 > 1:34:10have legislated for in the country, that seems perfectly sensible. It is
1:34:10 > 1:34:15right to set the tone for what we wish to see. Parenting should not be
1:34:15 > 1:34:19a gender issue and I am of the firm view a family friendly and gender
1:34:19 > 1:34:22balanced economy is not just the right thing to do but would be good
1:34:22 > 1:34:26for economic growth and well-being as well. The House may not be
1:34:26 > 1:34:35surprised to hear that I think my wife is a remarkable and talented
1:34:35 > 1:34:38woman and I say that not least because in the snap election went at
1:34:38 > 1:34:43that stage we were two months pregnant, I made it clear I stood no
1:34:43 > 1:34:47chance of winning the election whatsoever and that I would be able
1:34:47 > 1:34:51to apply for shared parental leave in my previous job as a lawyer. To
1:34:51 > 1:34:55make it worse, having actually won when I said I would not, although I
1:34:55 > 1:35:00am very honoured to be here of course, the local BBC News, they
1:35:00 > 1:35:04noticed a slight bump, they announced our pregnancy to 1.3
1:35:04 > 1:35:09million people in the region without checking first, so we had text
1:35:09 > 1:35:11messages saying, congratulations. We thought it was about the election
1:35:11 > 1:35:15and we realised it was about Ophelia, we had not had the three
1:35:15 > 1:35:21months can, how does everyone know? My wife had a bumpy process in
1:35:21 > 1:35:24becoming a mum involved with a parliamentarian and my wife is also
1:35:24 > 1:35:36my constituent and she has said it is OK for me to say that it has been
1:35:36 > 1:35:44quite distressing and it has been quite difficult because my wife as
1:35:44 > 1:35:48director of public policy at an energy company receiving government
1:35:48 > 1:35:52funding in a senior role, doing very well, and after the announcement of
1:35:52 > 1:35:55her pregnancy, she was made redundant and told her role was no
1:35:55 > 1:36:00longer needed. Very distressing to her. Having worked so hard to
1:36:00 > 1:36:05achieve what she had. But my wife is also a formidable woman, she took
1:36:05 > 1:36:09them to the employment tribunal. As a litigant in person, whilst
1:36:09 > 1:36:14pregnant, cross-examined her former employers, in front of a judge, who
1:36:14 > 1:36:20said that since the Supreme Court had decided the fees were illegal
1:36:20 > 1:36:23for employment tribunal cases, his time was increasingly being taken up
1:36:23 > 1:36:27by these types of cases. The atmosphere and environment, can you
1:36:27 > 1:36:32imagine, as one of only two women of ten in the tribunal room, without
1:36:32 > 1:36:38gender balance unemployment tribunal 's, it was clearly very distressing
1:36:38 > 1:36:43and I take that issue up now with the president of the employment
1:36:43 > 1:36:46tribunal... The fact of the matter is, I should say, my wife sadly lost
1:36:46 > 1:36:52that case and perhaps we should have the debate about the application of
1:36:52 > 1:36:55burden of proof rules in this country where it is up to women to
1:36:55 > 1:36:58establish the burden of proof that discrimination could have taken
1:36:58 > 1:37:01place before employers have to bring forward witnesses and documents to
1:37:01 > 1:37:05show it did not take place at a time when they said the documents did not
1:37:05 > 1:37:09exist, it makes it very difficult for women bringing those claims. The
1:37:09 > 1:37:14fact is that as a father and a husband, I think it is perfectly
1:37:14 > 1:37:28sensible and normal for me to want to lean in, for dads to
1:37:30 > 1:37:33lean my wife to achieve her aspirations and together we want to
1:37:33 > 1:37:35give the best upbringing to our children so I support this motion
1:37:35 > 1:37:38not just because Parliament should be in line with what is happening in
1:37:38 > 1:37:41the rest of the country but it gives us the opportunity to set the tone
1:37:41 > 1:37:43of what we expect in a modern Britain and I hope that through
1:37:43 > 1:37:45reforming Parliament, looking at companies that receive public money
1:37:45 > 1:37:48who have these issues, we may also look at reforming rules in the
1:37:48 > 1:37:49judiciary, maybe even having gender balance and hopefully achieving
1:37:49 > 1:37:54change in the wider economy too. I commend this motion to the House and
1:37:54 > 1:38:00I look forward to supporting it in any way I can.Extremely grateful,
1:38:00 > 1:38:03Mr Deputy Speaker. I am really glad to see you in your seat in this
1:38:03 > 1:38:07debate which I guess maybe on some levels bittersweet but reminds us
1:38:07 > 1:38:10very strongly there are fantastic parents here in Parliament and I
1:38:10 > 1:38:16have to say in all honesty that those of us who have grappled with
1:38:16 > 1:38:22the experience of being the custodians of a child, being a
1:38:22 > 1:38:27parent, and I have met few finer examples than those people I work
1:38:27 > 1:38:30alongside here in Westminster, you have heard some of those stories
1:38:30 > 1:38:33here today were ready, I will not rehearse the points already made but
1:38:33 > 1:38:37I want to pay tribute to the members for Peckham and Basingstoke for
1:38:37 > 1:38:40bringing this forward. It has been something we have been discussing
1:38:40 > 1:38:45for a period of time. As one small change that might make life a little
1:38:45 > 1:38:49bit easier it what is an incredibly difficult hard and job and I wanted
1:38:49 > 1:38:56to say as well I do not believe we should be exempt or we should not
1:38:56 > 1:38:59acknowledge the freedom and flexibility to do a job for which we
1:38:59 > 1:39:03are well paid and for which we love the opportunity to do so, it should
1:39:03 > 1:39:08be hard, it should cost us something, but if we can make small
1:39:08 > 1:39:12incremental improvements that improve the lives of people here as
1:39:12 > 1:39:16well, I do not think it is just as that will benefit, it is the whole
1:39:16 > 1:39:22of society. In a week in which we discussed last night the renewal of
1:39:22 > 1:39:27this Parliament and today our own arrangements, it can perhaps seem
1:39:27 > 1:39:29indulgent for parliamentarians to spend their time talking about
1:39:29 > 1:39:34themselves, but I would simply point out we are the only ones that can
1:39:34 > 1:39:37have this conversation, we are the ones that determine our working
1:39:37 > 1:39:42practices and rightly so. My honourable friend for Birmingham
1:39:42 > 1:39:50Yardley referred to the famous internet meme when MPs are packed in
1:39:50 > 1:39:55when talking about the own conditions and absolutely absent
1:39:55 > 1:39:59when some important issue is being talked about, that is absolutely
1:39:59 > 1:40:04untrue. It would be good for them to talk about this, we are relatively
1:40:04 > 1:40:09sparse here today, everyone is taking one position, but I have
1:40:09 > 1:40:15spoken to many young fathers, they have said to me that they really do
1:40:15 > 1:40:20want this change. They really do.My honourable friend from the committee
1:40:20 > 1:40:27says that we are voicing one view here today. He is right. But surely
1:40:27 > 1:40:33if anyone had a view that differed, they would be here?I couldn't agree
1:40:33 > 1:40:37more and that is why I feel confident that this motion be
1:40:37 > 1:40:41brought forward and moved forward and I feel we should take confidence
1:40:41 > 1:40:44than that -- from that and encouraged the procedure committee
1:40:44 > 1:40:48to look at it swiftly, I know they have done preliminary work on how
1:40:48 > 1:40:54such a system could work. The model of caring for a child in that first
1:40:54 > 1:40:59year of the child's life, the split between two different parents, it
1:40:59 > 1:41:03sets the pattern of child rearing right the way through the child's
1:41:03 > 1:41:15life, all of the studies seem to show that. Therefore, if we want
1:41:15 > 1:41:17people to live up to the expectation of being present for their children,
1:41:17 > 1:41:20we should try to reflect that here in our practice as well. I have
1:41:20 > 1:41:22for-year-old daughter and I have always juggled life in this
1:41:22 > 1:41:25Parliament and I have made the most of the flexibility offered around
1:41:25 > 1:41:32floats to try to be present in her life -- around votes. We make it
1:41:32 > 1:41:36work, whatever way of life we are in, whether it means using time on
1:41:36 > 1:41:40Monday, getting back for the school run on Thursday, shifting days
1:41:40 > 1:41:44around at the weekend, being able to take a day out in the middle but
1:41:44 > 1:41:48turn up the votes later, I would just say, I have never had a formal
1:41:48 > 1:41:52conversation with my whips office to talk about the indications of me
1:41:52 > 1:41:55having a child, I have never said, here is my working pattern, I have
1:41:55 > 1:42:03really broadcast up until now what that looks like. Two fears, probably
1:42:03 > 1:42:07play on the minds of young fathers as well as young mothers, the first
1:42:07 > 1:42:12being what if it leaves you open to criticism that you are not hard at
1:42:12 > 1:42:17work? I have to say, when I headed up my first year in Parliament, I
1:42:17 > 1:42:22did that exercise, excluding the commuting, I worked out at 70-80
1:42:22 > 1:42:26hour week in that job, and it has eased off as I have got better at
1:42:26 > 1:42:31it, frankly, but that is not a concern that should be legitimate.
1:42:31 > 1:42:35There is no shortage of work and we are all doing it and when we are
1:42:35 > 1:42:41not, it is fairly obvious... I will give way.Apologies for not being
1:42:41 > 1:42:44here for the full debate and interrupting now. Can I thank the
1:42:44 > 1:42:47honourable member for allowing the back row allowing me to spend more
1:42:47 > 1:42:52time with my children by winning the seat in 2010 and leaving me another
1:42:52 > 1:42:56five years before I personally got into Parliament? Making a really
1:42:56 > 1:42:59important point about constituents expecting this to work very hard but
1:42:59 > 1:43:03at the same time we have to put process in place so it is not
1:43:03 > 1:43:07unnecessarily difficult and I think that is what we have at the moment,
1:43:07 > 1:43:10ridiculous processes making it unnecessarily difficult, whereas the
1:43:10 > 1:43:14rest of the country has moved on. Generous to me in 2010 and generous
1:43:14 > 1:43:23to me now. The second reason why I have never sat down and had a formal
1:43:23 > 1:43:26conversation is we worry that sometimes it looks like a lack of
1:43:26 > 1:43:31professionalism, a lack of hunger to get on, and actually, it is true, it
1:43:31 > 1:43:34is much harder to have sharp elbows in this place and force your way to
1:43:34 > 1:43:39the front if you make choices about supporting your own family. I am
1:43:39 > 1:43:43fortunate to structure my own work time to be present around my
1:43:43 > 1:43:46daughter but most people's experience of having children and
1:43:46 > 1:43:49being in this place is completely frazzled all of the time. Trying to
1:43:49 > 1:43:56find a way to make it work.
1:43:56 > 1:44:01Very sadly my own relationship with my daughter's mum broke down and I
1:44:01 > 1:44:04want to take full responsibility for that, but equally we need to be
1:44:04 > 1:44:07honest about the working practises of this place and the implications
1:44:07 > 1:44:16that there are. I was told that between my intake of 20 ten and
1:44:16 > 1:44:212015, a quarter of marriages broke down during that term. And we have
1:44:21 > 1:44:24to be honest about the implications of this place. And the effect that
1:44:24 > 1:44:34it has. There are real issues. For example shared parental leave is not
1:44:34 > 1:44:40only difficult, it is impossible because we don't have that formal
1:44:40 > 1:44:44employment relationship. Secondly just to make the point we make
1:44:44 > 1:44:48reasonable accommodations in all sorts of ways for other members's
1:44:48 > 1:44:53issues. I do not believe that we should dial down our parenthood to
1:44:53 > 1:44:56be representatives in this place I think we should amplify it. I think
1:44:56 > 1:45:01we should talk about it, we should normalise it. I think by doing so we
1:45:01 > 1:45:08might be able to get to a fairer society and close the gender pay
1:45:08 > 1:45:18gap. We can also approach other issues in a different lens. I want
1:45:18 > 1:45:22to make one final point, Mr Deputy Speaker, it is actually a procedural
1:45:22 > 1:45:29one. At the moment, the procedures invest to make exist that we work
1:45:29 > 1:45:38with the whips office in my case two weeks after the birth of my
1:45:38 > 1:45:47daughter, you know longer. -- longer amounts of time. I just want to say
1:45:47 > 1:45:55that our pairing arrangements we know that there are some members who
1:45:55 > 1:46:02are not going to be around for a lot of time. For example, select
1:46:02 > 1:46:06committee visit which cannot go ahead because we have already pared
1:46:06 > 1:46:10out what we can do on the basis of illness or on the basis of child
1:46:10 > 1:46:16care. I, myself, have never, it is not a brag, I have never made a
1:46:16 > 1:46:19request to be let off the whip for personal circumstances. I've
1:46:19 > 1:46:25actually never missed a vote because I've been ill, I've always been
1:46:25 > 1:46:29present. I do not think people abuse that system, but there are
1:46:29 > 1:46:31restrictions that are put in place and I do not actually believe this
1:46:31 > 1:46:37would take power away or give power to the whips offices. Whenever
1:46:37 > 1:46:43you're particular... It were actually professionalize it and make
1:46:43 > 1:46:52it much easier. In my own party standing orders requiring me if I
1:46:52 > 1:46:59were to take paternity leave for example, baby care, to sign over my
1:46:59 > 1:47:03proxy vote to the Chiefs. I am comfortable with that. There are
1:47:03 > 1:47:09ways around this. This should not be something that should be... Overall,
1:47:09 > 1:47:13this is a change which is required. It is a change that will have a
1:47:13 > 1:47:20profound impact on how we work here. It is the T one to -- thin end of
1:47:20 > 1:47:27the wedge. We need to become better at looking after ourselves on the
1:47:27 > 1:47:33basis that we don't want to put unnecessary strain. This job should
1:47:33 > 1:47:36be hard. Public leadership and sacrifice should be that
1:47:36 > 1:47:41sacrificial. Putting in place artificial barriers will not just
1:47:41 > 1:47:47hold that women in this place, but met as well.It is a pleasure to
1:47:47 > 1:47:57speak in this debate. Because I'm leaving for the S&P, my name had to
1:47:57 > 1:48:04come off the motion. I pay a tribute to the honourable Lady for ringing
1:48:04 > 1:48:10this debate. They are two women in this place that I hold in highest
1:48:10 > 1:48:14regard. I think that the debate today has been completely consensual
1:48:14 > 1:48:18as it should be on this issue. Not just in this place, but across
1:48:18 > 1:48:26society. I moved to say the words we're here not in our efforts to be
1:48:26 > 1:48:31lawbreakers, but in our efforts to be to get to speak today and to be
1:48:31 > 1:48:41part of what hopefully will come forward is very important weird
1:48:41 > 1:48:50because as the owner member said you know we have to reflect society but
1:48:50 > 1:48:54we also have to lead society. And I think 100 years on from women
1:48:54 > 1:48:59getting the vote that is hugely important. When I was thinking about
1:48:59 > 1:49:01standing for election, it was something I thought very carefully
1:49:01 > 1:49:06about whether I could do for two reasons. One, I knew I needed to
1:49:06 > 1:49:09come out and do with my sexuality and secondly I wanted to have
1:49:09 > 1:49:24children. -- deal with my sexuality. Nonetheless regardless of that being
1:49:24 > 1:49:28able to know that there are members across this place that support this
1:49:28 > 1:49:33process means that hopefully the next generation of parliamentarians,
1:49:33 > 1:49:38whether they are male, female whenever disability, whatever their
1:49:38 > 1:49:41sexuality is, they will look at this place and other Parliaments across
1:49:41 > 1:49:47the UK and think that is something that I can and want to be a part of.
1:49:47 > 1:49:52I think it has been an incredible debate. As we look across the world,
1:49:52 > 1:49:58we have the Prime Minister of New Zealand who was about to have a baby
1:49:58 > 1:50:04with her partner. We are taking steps forward and the testimonies
1:50:04 > 1:50:17that were read out mentioned. I would also like to refer to my
1:50:17 > 1:50:23honourable friend from Glasgow Central who got an interesting
1:50:23 > 1:50:28e-mail during the 2015 election. I'm just going to read out the question
1:50:28 > 1:50:34and the answer because I think it typifies the debate. It just shows
1:50:34 > 1:50:41how far we have to go. Dear Alison, I am in favour in the back of many
1:50:41 > 1:50:47of the S&P's Parliament to make policies. But I am very worried to
1:50:47 > 1:50:54find out that you are a mother of a very young family. It would help to
1:50:54 > 1:51:01know your solution... Your solution peer to me it is quite incredible
1:51:01 > 1:51:05that anybody would write to a potential candidate and saying that
1:51:05 > 1:51:18the fact that -- having children would be a problem. It is spoken
1:51:18 > 1:51:27that we let me read you the response. Thank you very much for
1:51:27 > 1:51:37your e-mail. I apologise for the delayed playback late reply. I am
1:51:37 > 1:51:41not alone amongst male and female candidates who have been lucky
1:51:41 > 1:51:50enough to have a family. Indeed, the mail Parliament member has a family.
1:51:50 > 1:51:57The average age of MP were 50, more than 62% of the MPs are white men
1:51:57 > 1:52:04aged over 40, I think Westminster out to be more representative of the
1:52:04 > 1:52:08people it serves without more women. Inequality affects policy and
1:52:08 > 1:52:18governance. I believe with the poor gender balance they have made poor
1:52:18 > 1:52:33decisions in things with families. Making the law the right to
1:52:33 > 1:52:36breast-feed. Over the last five years... She goes on to talk about
1:52:36 > 1:52:45being a councillor. There was another person who is a councillor
1:52:45 > 1:52:48in Aberdeen with very small children. I will cross whatever
1:52:48 > 1:52:54other bridges are necessary when the votes are cast. I think I is an
1:52:54 > 1:53:02excellent response.I thank you for giving way. I welcome the
1:53:02 > 1:53:11contributions that making. She is talking about what candidates might
1:53:11 > 1:53:17face when they are a new parent. I want to reflect on the abuse that I
1:53:17 > 1:53:24received. This person took to Twitter to criticise me for not
1:53:24 > 1:53:29attending a debate in the evening. He accused me of being timid for my
1:53:29 > 1:53:33refusal to attend an election debate. And I told that candidate
1:53:33 > 1:53:38that I did not refuse to do any debates, but with a newborn baby,
1:53:38 > 1:53:42evening events would be impossible and that I would gladly take on any
1:53:42 > 1:53:46day. He responded to say that he didn't realise that we were still
1:53:46 > 1:53:511950s when only a woman can look after a child. He said he thought
1:53:51 > 1:53:57the Labour Party believed in shared paternity. And I told him that we do
1:53:57 > 1:54:06and we champion it. To remind him that I wasn't expecting a general
1:54:06 > 1:54:09election and also he didn't know my personal circumstances and that as
1:54:09 > 1:54:15far as I was aware men still could not breast-feed. I suggested that he
1:54:15 > 1:54:24might want to stop digging. But I wanted to share this because the
1:54:24 > 1:54:28point that the honourable member makes at what happens at election
1:54:28 > 1:54:32time and how candidates treat other candidate shows back in 2017 we
1:54:32 > 1:54:40still have an issue to address.I completely agree. This vote on this
1:54:40 > 1:54:43issue is just not about a technicality of how we cast our
1:54:43 > 1:54:50votes. It is very important and my honourable friend has highlighted to
1:54:50 > 1:54:58me the importance the thin end of the wedge and I agree on that. It is
1:54:58 > 1:55:07proximity. Also with weather and geography. It's about the discourse
1:55:07 > 1:55:10and the narrative that we have in politics with each other, that the
1:55:10 > 1:55:20press has with us. And the digital environment how all the systems and
1:55:20 > 1:55:24processes that are around politics and around how we do politics need
1:55:24 > 1:55:28to be more transparent, need to be more reflective. If we have the
1:55:28 > 1:55:37positive system then it will be much more positive. I just want to prefer
1:55:37 > 1:55:45briefly and paid tribute to my honourable friend in the Scottish
1:55:45 > 1:55:51Parliament, and a gender balance Cabinet secretaries. They have had
1:55:51 > 1:55:57children in office and they for me have paved the way inspired me to
1:55:57 > 1:56:06stand. But the Scottish Parliament made clear from the outset. It was
1:56:06 > 1:56:11said there is a seed for everyone. Voting only takes a few seconds. And
1:56:11 > 1:56:22in the best practises phase things were drawn up to make sure that we
1:56:22 > 1:56:35can learn from our mistakes. We have a crush in the Scottish Parliament.
1:56:35 > 1:56:47We have child care in the Scottish permit. Some of the challenges of
1:56:47 > 1:56:50bringing children to this place where the family room is sometimes
1:56:50 > 1:56:56misused by other members or for meetings. He has had a great deal of
1:56:56 > 1:57:03support in that, but we do need to look at that as well. And there are
1:57:03 > 1:57:09many inclusive practises how business is done, so finishing at
1:57:09 > 1:57:12five o'clock. I do not want to talk too much about it. The Other Place I
1:57:12 > 1:57:20want to focus. My honourable friend from Aberdeen North talks about how
1:57:20 > 1:57:28she travels to Westminster biplane. And most don't let people 36 weeks
1:57:28 > 1:57:33pregnant fly. Also after having a baby you cannot fly for a week
1:57:33 > 1:57:41probably more like a fortnight. So, if she had a baby and she did say
1:57:41 > 1:57:50that she did not have any intentions of having more, she may have put
1:57:50 > 1:57:56women off having children. I have to say I remain undeterred. She says
1:57:56 > 1:58:00being away from Westminster. Because she could not travel gear would be
1:58:00 > 1:58:02very unfair to her constituents and would mean they would be
1:58:02 > 1:58:12unrepresented.
1:58:12 > 1:58:16He has fantastic staff ensuring everything was covered in the
1:58:16 > 1:58:21constituency but these matters need to be formalised. It seems
1:58:21 > 1:58:25incredible that 100 years after women got the vote, we are debating
1:58:25 > 1:58:30the fact they cannot take part fully for their constituents and fully in
1:58:30 > 1:58:34debates. We know Parliamentary work is not just about walking through
1:58:34 > 1:58:37the voting lobbies, it is about being in your constituency, but
1:58:37 > 1:58:43having an open Parliament will make sure that people from whatever walk
1:58:43 > 1:58:49of life, particularly women and aspiring parents and parents, they
1:58:49 > 1:58:54will think they can be part of democracy, stand for election, and
1:58:54 > 1:58:59it will make those women particularly who are going to have
1:58:59 > 1:59:02children very soon, parliamentarians, it will make their
1:59:02 > 1:59:05lives significantly easier. I hope the House and the public are
1:59:05 > 1:59:11listening carefully to the testimony from today.Thank you. Can I
1:59:11 > 1:59:14associate myself with the remarks made by my noble friend for Luton
1:59:14 > 1:59:18South? Good to see you in your place. I say to the honourable
1:59:18 > 1:59:22friend from Luton South, that is what a feminist looks like. Can I
1:59:22 > 1:59:32thank the right honourable a -- right honourable lady? She was a
1:59:32 > 1:59:35formidable role model when she was pregnant and stood in the election,
1:59:35 > 1:59:41I think it was Harry at the time, it is fitting that mother of the house
1:59:41 > 1:59:44should bring forward this debate and it is right for members to debate
1:59:44 > 1:59:49this and for the backbench committee to have allowed this debate. The
1:59:49 > 1:59:54honourable member for Basingstoke is always, as co-sponsor of this
1:59:54 > 1:59:59debate, raising important equality issues on her committee and I am
1:59:59 > 2:00:06sure she will monitor, together with other members, what the procedure
2:00:06 > 2:00:11committee comes up with. Honourable members will remember when the
2:00:11 > 2:00:14former Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister took paternity leave,
2:00:14 > 2:00:20they were celebrated, but as the honourable members for Liverpool,
2:00:20 > 2:00:24Wolverhampton North East, when they have been maternity leave, they have
2:00:24 > 2:00:32suffered abuse. The honourable member, she was a minister,
2:00:32 > 2:00:38surrounded by gurgles and red boxes, they are all formidable campaigners.
2:00:38 > 2:00:43The fat women have suffered abuse and accusations of being lazy is
2:00:43 > 2:00:50unacceptable -- the fact that women have suffered abuse. We want women
2:00:50 > 2:00:54to be Members of Parliament, there are no implications for play, women
2:00:54 > 2:00:57are not away, they want to cast their vote on behalf of their
2:00:57 > 2:01:02constituents -- implications for pay. It is right we should look at
2:01:02 > 2:01:10this, the edition of nodding through in certain circumstances. Ophelia is
2:01:10 > 2:01:14lucky to have a hands-on band, in the constituency member Bristol
2:01:14 > 2:01:20West. It is not compulsory to request this, but in my view, it is
2:01:20 > 2:01:24a compelling case. Proxy voting will have to be in line with party policy
2:01:24 > 2:01:30and proxy voting does not equate to a free vote. This motion does not
2:01:30 > 2:01:35ask to widen proxy voting to other circumstances, just this specific
2:01:35 > 2:01:38one where the member cannot attend the vote because of caring
2:01:38 > 2:01:43responsibilities. All this motion does is enable women MPs to balance
2:01:43 > 2:01:48giving birth, looking after a baby, with their work as an MP, and all my
2:01:48 > 2:01:51honourable friends who have given birth while they have been MPs have
2:01:51 > 2:01:59carried on with their work in the constituency and in the house and as
2:01:59 > 2:02:02honourable members have pointed out, they know in the 21st-century they
2:02:02 > 2:02:08have to respond to e-mails and they do so all the time. The honourable
2:02:08 > 2:02:11member from Birmingham Yardley, she says she doesn't want to have any
2:02:11 > 2:02:15more children, but I want to break it to her, she will be a month
2:02:15 > 2:02:21forever, even when are older, and they have children of their own. --
2:02:21 > 2:02:29a mum for ever. The clerk of the house we submitted a memorandum on
2:02:29 > 2:02:32proxy voting identify members with caring responsibilities limited to
2:02:32 > 2:02:36mothers of young infants as a category of member who might qualify
2:02:36 > 2:02:39for proxy voting. The honourable member is right that matters should
2:02:39 > 2:02:44be looked at by the appropriate committee, the honourable member for
2:02:44 > 2:02:48Peckham and Camberwell, and more work should be done following the
2:02:48 > 2:02:52motion together with their work by Sarah Charles and her report. It is
2:02:52 > 2:02:56going to be more of an issue as women members take their place and
2:02:56 > 2:03:02we move towards parity of MPs. And it is a lovely way to celebrate the
2:03:02 > 2:03:06representation of the people act 1918 giving 6 million women the
2:03:06 > 2:03:12right over the age of 30, first, the right to vote and debating this
2:03:12 > 2:03:17issue as women take our rightful place in the House. The honourable
2:03:17 > 2:03:23member for Camberwell and Peckham and Basingstoke, co-sponsors, all
2:03:23 > 2:03:27the members speaking in the debate, they are wonderful role models,
2:03:27 > 2:03:34Ophelia, Emilio, Theo and Ruby, the wonderful babies born to members in
2:03:34 > 2:03:38the time I have been in the house, your parents and every single
2:03:38 > 2:03:42honourable member has pushed back the boundaries today towards a good
2:03:42 > 2:03:52and more equal Parliament. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. Can I say
2:03:52 > 2:03:56what a huge pleasure it is to see you in your place today?There have
2:03:56 > 2:04:01been some excellent and very personal speeches and I think they
2:04:01 > 2:04:06have been so informative and they take me back to the horrors of those
2:04:06 > 2:04:10early days and also, Mr Deputy Speaker, I have to reflect that
2:04:10 > 2:04:12following the debate yesterday where I opened by saying this is a debate
2:04:12 > 2:04:17that should have taken place 40 years ago, this is a debate that
2:04:17 > 2:04:22should have taken place 40 years ago too. Let me start by paying tribute
2:04:22 > 2:04:25to the right honourable member for Camberwell and Peckham for the way
2:04:25 > 2:04:29in which she opened today's debate, a consistent champion of these
2:04:29 > 2:04:34issues throughout her career and it is certainly fitting she is mother
2:04:34 > 2:04:45of the House has secured this debate today. I want to recognise the total
2:04:45 > 2:04:47commitment of my right honourable friend for Basingstoke as chairman
2:04:47 > 2:04:50of the women and equality select committee who has supported and
2:04:50 > 2:04:52promoted so many issues affecting women and equality is in this house.
2:04:52 > 2:04:58I absolutely agree with all members here that it is essential we address
2:04:58 > 2:05:03and deal with the issue of baby leaves. Mr Deputy Speaker, the
2:05:03 > 2:05:07motion before the House today presents two issues for
2:05:07 > 2:05:10consideration, the first is the need for Members of Parliament to be able
2:05:10 > 2:05:14to take baby leave, I think we can all agree new parents must spend
2:05:14 > 2:05:20time with their babies, they must be enabled to do that. The second issue
2:05:20 > 2:05:24concerns how we reconcile this with the question of how and whether
2:05:24 > 2:05:28members should be able to vote in the House of Commons during any such
2:05:28 > 2:05:34leave. I want to thank the all-party Parliamentary group for women, until
2:05:34 > 2:05:37recently chaired by my honourable friend for Eastleigh and now by my
2:05:37 > 2:05:42honourable friend for Redditch for their hard work promoting equality
2:05:42 > 2:05:45for women and also the Commons reference group on representation
2:05:45 > 2:05:50and inclusion which is chaired by Mr Speaker and it is tasked with
2:05:50 > 2:05:58following and implementing where possible the recommendations made in
2:05:58 > 2:06:02the Good Parliament report. I want to say thanks for the important work
2:06:02 > 2:06:07of these groups. As the House may be aware, I have championed the vital
2:06:07 > 2:06:10importance of secure early attachment for many years and I have
2:06:10 > 2:06:14worked with a number of charities on this vital issue and I was chairman
2:06:14 > 2:06:18and trustee of a charity than nine years, helping parents who are
2:06:18 > 2:06:23struggling to form a secure bond with their babies. When I became MP
2:06:23 > 2:06:27for South Northamptonshire, I set up a Northamptonshire parent and infant
2:06:27 > 2:06:32partnership to provide help to all those new parents struggling across
2:06:32 > 2:06:36the county and even persuaded my honourable friend, the member for
2:06:36 > 2:06:41Banbury, to become a founding trustee. Now through the national
2:06:41 > 2:06:45charity I set up, there are five further parenting for partnerships
2:06:45 > 2:06:49across the country and I am delighted more families are unable
2:06:49 > 2:06:53to seek support for the earliest relationships which is probably the
2:06:53 > 2:06:59most important relationship we ever have because the baby's lifelong
2:06:59 > 2:07:06emotional health is profoundly impacted by his or her earliest
2:07:06 > 2:07:11experiences in the 1001 critical days of the perinatal period and I
2:07:11 > 2:07:16was proud to hear the honourable lady, the member for Liverpool way
2:07:16 > 2:07:20victory, mention the cross-party 1001 critical days campaign is set
2:07:20 > 2:07:26up in 2011 and it does command support from across the House. I
2:07:26 > 2:07:33absolutely agree that the mental health white paper published just
2:07:33 > 2:07:37before Christmas does include the need to commission further research
2:07:37 > 2:07:40into interventions that support better attachment and improve the
2:07:40 > 2:07:46understanding amongst professionals of the importance of low stress,
2:07:46 > 2:07:51healthy pregnancies and secure attachment. Like the two right
2:07:51 > 2:07:55honourable ladies, my own children are a bit older than babies, my
2:07:55 > 2:07:59eldest is 22, but that excellent speeches take me back to my early
2:07:59 > 2:08:04experiences when I was not in this place and I had a 46 hour delivery,
2:08:04 > 2:08:08I think, and a good dose, having just been promoted to a senior
2:08:08 > 2:08:12executive in the bank I was working in, they required me back after 11
2:08:12 > 2:08:16weeks. I had a good dose of postnatal depression to deal with
2:08:16 > 2:08:21following that. I totally empathise with all of those members who talk
2:08:21 > 2:08:24about their own experiences here and very committed to ensuring those who
2:08:24 > 2:08:28come after us do not have to suffer those same problems. I would just
2:08:28 > 2:08:32draw attention to my honourable friend for Worcester who sat next to
2:08:32 > 2:08:35me in the first part of the debate who was telling me his brother who
2:08:35 > 2:08:39works for the civil service is looking forward to six months shared
2:08:39 > 2:08:43parental leave next February and he himself is expecting a baby with his
2:08:43 > 2:08:50wife and he is asking nicely for two weeks. How is that? Today's debate
2:08:50 > 2:08:58is timely.I wonder if she remembers the first time we met she was
2:08:58 > 2:09:03pregnant? A few years ago now. Does she... We were on the selection
2:09:03 > 2:09:08trail as well. Does she agree with me that this is as important as it
2:09:08 > 2:09:15is a first step in trying to make this place and much easier place to
2:09:15 > 2:09:19not just be a parent but actually to be somebody who cares for their
2:09:19 > 2:09:25broader family as well?Of course, my right honourable friend is
2:09:25 > 2:09:29exactly right, there is a lot more to life than this place. It may seem
2:09:29 > 2:09:33extraordinary to all of us but we are all human beings, we are
2:09:33 > 2:09:37parents, daughters and sons, we have responsibilities. Today's debate is
2:09:37 > 2:09:43timely as we continue to break down the barriers that could discourage
2:09:43 > 2:09:49women and men from pursuing a career in Parliament. The motion today
2:09:49 > 2:09:53suggest a way to resolve the issue of baby leave is with the
2:09:53 > 2:09:57introduction of proxy voting, whilst I absolutely support the need to
2:09:57 > 2:10:02make this house more accessible for new parents, it is also important we
2:10:02 > 2:10:06recognise the possible consequences of any reforms, so with that in
2:10:06 > 2:10:08mind, I wrote to my honourable friend, the member for Broxbourne,
2:10:08 > 2:10:13the chair of the procedure committee in November, copying my right
2:10:13 > 2:10:26honourable friend, the chair of the women and
2:10:29 > 2:10:31equality is asked the committee to consider the matter of baby leave
2:10:31 > 2:10:34and proxy voting and for that committee to set out its views to
2:10:34 > 2:10:37the House. I also wrote to every member of the Cabinet and I can say
2:10:37 > 2:10:39that my right honourable friend the Prime Minister replied to me and
2:10:39 > 2:10:42agrees this is an important matter. She wrote, I quote, being a member
2:10:42 > 2:10:45of the and is a demanding job and it is important we give due
2:10:45 > 2:10:47consideration to the impact this can have on work life balance, childcare
2:10:47 > 2:10:50and they believe -- a member of the in. She has made clear her support.
2:10:50 > 2:10:54Following my letter to the procedure committee, my honourable friend has
2:10:54 > 2:10:58said should the motion be agreed today, the committee will undertake
2:10:58 > 2:11:02an inquiry into proxy voting. I welcome this as it is clear from
2:11:02 > 2:11:06this debate there are a number of important questions that need to be
2:11:06 > 2:11:10considered. Some of which I will set out briefly now. Giving Members of
2:11:10 > 2:11:14Parliament the right to baby leave raises a number of potential
2:11:14 > 2:11:17questions around the duties of Members of Parliament and the rules
2:11:17 > 2:11:23by which they are regulated. As colleagues will know, Members of
2:11:23 > 2:11:29Parliament are appointed representatives of their
2:11:29 > 2:11:31constituencies and they are not regulated by the same employment
2:11:31 > 2:11:33rules applying to other members of the workforce. Introducing baby
2:11:33 > 2:11:37leave might lead some to suggest MPs should be treated as employees which
2:11:37 > 2:11:41could have wider implications that we need to look at. The introduction
2:11:41 > 2:11:46of proxy voting would mark a departure from conventional voting
2:11:46 > 2:11:50practices in the House. For example, when members vote in a division, it
2:11:50 > 2:11:53is expected they do so having had the opportunity to attend the
2:11:53 > 2:11:58Chamber. I think we can all agree that television and 24-hour
2:11:58 > 2:12:04reporting, let alone Twitter and everything else, it gives members
2:12:04 > 2:12:07the opportunity to follow business from further afield, but any change
2:12:07 > 2:12:11will need to be carefully considered, including who would act
2:12:11 > 2:12:17as a proxy and how this would be regulated. It is also important to
2:12:17 > 2:12:21note Members of Parliament are elected by their constituents as
2:12:21 > 2:12:26individuals and it is implied upon election that their votes cannot be
2:12:26 > 2:12:31transferred to another empty so appointing a proxy voter could be
2:12:31 > 2:12:33perceived as reducing personal accountability. Any changes will
2:12:33 > 2:12:39need to ensure that personal accountability is maintained. In
2:12:39 > 2:12:43addition to these questions, and as I said in my letter to the procedure
2:12:43 > 2:12:48committee, a number of alternative suggestions have been made, aimed at
2:12:48 > 2:12:52addressing the needs of new parents undertaking the duties of an MP
2:12:52 > 2:12:56while also making sure their constituents have adequate
2:12:56 > 2:13:00representation in parliament. One such example is that all political
2:13:00 > 2:13:04parties represented in the House could agree a memorandum of
2:13:04 > 2:13:08understanding agreeing to the same terms which would allow their MPs to
2:13:08 > 2:13:12take parental leave and to formalise pairing arrangements across all
2:13:12 > 2:13:19parties.I am grateful. I appreciate the thoughtful way in which she is
2:13:19 > 2:13:22approaching this from first principles and laying out some of
2:13:22 > 2:13:29the issues mentioned by other members. I would just like her to go
2:13:29 > 2:13:32slightly further and acknowledge that there is a reputational issues
2:13:32 > 2:13:37around Members of Parliament not being present to vote and being
2:13:37 > 2:13:41reported as being absent when actually they are taking up
2:13:41 > 2:13:48responsibilities she herself has said a vitally important.
2:13:48 > 2:13:53I am not advocating one group over another. I am merely pointing out to
2:13:53 > 2:13:56the House that these issues need careful consideration, which is why
2:13:56 > 2:14:02I wrote to the procedure committee and why I'm delighted that they will
2:14:02 > 2:14:09have an inquiry. In addition, a helpful memorandum has been created
2:14:09 > 2:14:15and is available on the website. I encourage members to read it. It
2:14:15 > 2:14:19talks about very important issues including other approaches in other
2:14:19 > 2:14:25Parliament. Also alluding to our mediaeval tradition of voting by
2:14:25 > 2:14:29proxy. I am sure there were not very many pregnant women there in those
2:14:29 > 2:14:35days, but nevertheless they found a way. So Mr Deputy Speaker, should an
2:14:35 > 2:14:39inquiry be launched, I would inquire your colleagues to submit their own
2:14:39 > 2:14:44views. I have no doubt that the many insightful contributions made here
2:14:44 > 2:14:49will be great value to the committee. This is an important
2:14:49 > 2:14:52debate which has really caught the attention of Parliament. As Leader
2:14:52 > 2:14:56of the House, I want to make it absolutely clear that if we can
2:14:56 > 2:15:00agree on a way forward on they believe, I will drive that forward
2:15:00 > 2:15:06with my total commitment. Thank you. Thank you very much Mr Deputy
2:15:06 > 2:15:10Speaker and I welcome you back to the chair. It is great to see you
2:15:10 > 2:15:14here with us. I think this has been a really important debate and I
2:15:14 > 2:15:18think all members who've contributed from all sides. People who have
2:15:18 > 2:15:23spoken in deeply personal team to wood terms. They have shown a
2:15:23 > 2:15:29passion for their family and their constituents. Nobody has actually
2:15:29 > 2:15:33spoken against it. I think this has been a very important debate to
2:15:33 > 2:15:38shape the proceedings of the procedure committee. The committee
2:15:38 > 2:15:42needs to take it forward with some focus and with some clarity and wit
2:15:42 > 2:15:47some expedition. We do not want after debate such as we have had to
2:15:47 > 2:15:51date for it to go wrestling into the long grass. That will not be
2:15:51 > 2:15:56acceptable. I would like to conclude by thanking everyone who spoke in
2:15:56 > 2:16:00this debate. And say we must all be in alliance for progress on this.
2:16:00 > 2:16:06All of us here must make sure that this actually happens and does not
2:16:06 > 2:16:10disappear for more decades. I'm sure that we can have that purpose and
2:16:10 > 2:16:15intent. I would also like to say, that I apologise for the fact for
2:16:15 > 2:16:20not inking about the situation of SNP members who don't even have
2:16:20 > 2:16:27pairing. I feel sort of embarrassed about that. I feel as such time,
2:16:27 > 2:16:31when the committee comes out how we do proxy voting, we need to make
2:16:31 > 2:16:34some arrangements which reflect the situation for the S&P right away.
2:16:34 > 2:16:41Thank you Mr Speaker.The question on the order papers are many of that
2:16:41 > 2:16:53opinion say ayes. The ayes have it. We now come to the backbench motion
2:16:53 > 2:17:03on Hospital car parking charges. Thank you. I beg to move that we
2:17:03 > 2:17:10move to take consultation to identify the most effective means
2:17:10 > 2:17:17for Hospital parking. And provide a time step treatment timescale for
2:17:17 > 2:17:20the application. I think the bench batch committee for excepting this
2:17:20 > 2:17:37debate. I think my colleagues who supported me in the debate.
2:17:40 > 2:17:46I also think the various organisations that have been
2:17:46 > 2:17:49actively supporting this campaign through their own research and on
2:17:49 > 2:17:59social media. Other organisations representing drivers. They are just
2:17:59 > 2:18:03a few of the bodies were offering their help and support to bring an
2:18:03 > 2:18:10end to the extortion of car park charging. We all know that being a
2:18:10 > 2:18:14patient or visitor can be a stressful and emotional time. The
2:18:14 > 2:18:17last thing anyone should be worrying about is whether they have change
2:18:17 > 2:18:22for the car park or if they can afford the rates that are charged. I
2:18:22 > 2:18:29started this campaign in 2014 after finding out that hospitals in
2:18:29 > 2:18:34England were charging staff and visitors up to £500 a week to use
2:18:34 > 2:18:45on-site parking facilities. As a result, in that year, we published
2:18:45 > 2:18:54guidance urging them to cut their fees. Caps or cuts should be
2:18:54 > 2:19:01available for staff and others. While some of these charges have
2:19:01 > 2:19:04fallen since 2014, I was shocked to discover that last year when we
2:19:04 > 2:19:09carried out further research that 47% of hospitals have actually
2:19:09 > 2:19:16increased the parking charges and almost have charge blue badge people
2:19:16 > 2:19:30to park. The average is £53. And people on average paid £1 98.I'm
2:19:30 > 2:19:35grateful for him giving way. And I congratulate him for bringing this
2:19:35 > 2:19:42issue to the House of Commons. It has been announced with no
2:19:42 > 2:19:47consultation, that they air opposing parking charges on blue badge
2:19:47 > 2:19:51holders and a site that people are doing it everywhere else in the NHS.
2:19:51 > 2:19:58It is an NHS wide issue. Does he therefore not agree with me that it
2:19:58 > 2:20:05needs to be looked at to get rid of Lou badge holders Chargers?Many of
2:20:05 > 2:20:11these charges are done without any consultation or fair consultation. I
2:20:11 > 2:20:18completely agree with him. Of course, because of what the Speaker
2:20:18 > 2:20:23said to me, I won't take too many interruptions.Thank you for giving
2:20:23 > 2:20:33way. I agree with the member who just spoke. A lot of the hospital
2:20:33 > 2:20:41charges are part of the PFI. I think this should be looked at you could
2:20:41 > 2:20:48argue it is a tax.That is the sad thing that many private companies
2:20:48 > 2:20:55are making profit out of the taxpayers. And the most vulnerable
2:20:55 > 2:21:02people of our society. This has got to stop. This has happy to --
2:21:02 > 2:21:16happened under both governments. Now there is still a lottery with
2:21:16 > 2:21:22different hospitals charging wildly different fees. The goal of the NHS
2:21:22 > 2:21:26is to provide free health care for all, but the charges are a stealth
2:21:26 > 2:21:32tax. The parking charges are the bane of people's lives. No one goes
2:21:32 > 2:21:38to hospital out of choice. They go because they have to. No one chooses
2:21:38 > 2:21:42to be ill. You rely on doctors and nurses to look after us. And I urge
2:21:42 > 2:21:45the Health Secretary and the Minister who was here today to take
2:21:45 > 2:21:52urgent action to end this. And to introduce substantial legislation to
2:21:52 > 2:21:59ensure hospitals scrap their parking charges.Thank you for giving way.
2:21:59 > 2:22:07You have been most generous. I have tremendous sympathy with my
2:22:07 > 2:22:11honourable friend in this respect. And I have campaigned hard on
2:22:11 > 2:22:16charges my cell. The one difficulty that I do have is the fact that my
2:22:16 > 2:22:18hospital is located right in the town centre and the difference we
2:22:18 > 2:22:23have is that people use it because it's free to go off and go shopping
2:22:23 > 2:22:27pair that has happened in the past. I'm just looking for suggestions and
2:22:27 > 2:22:36solutions in that area.I am very proud to work with you on that. What
2:22:36 > 2:22:41he said is a very important point and I hope that you would just wait
2:22:41 > 2:22:44a few minutes I hope I will be able to answer the concerns that he has
2:22:44 > 2:22:52expressed. I mentioned Mr Deputy Speaker, earlier that in 2014
2:22:52 > 2:22:55guidelines on concession for patients and visitors peered this
2:22:55 > 2:22:59was welcome. I welcome it. It was a sign that the Government was aware
2:22:59 > 2:23:04of the extortion costs facing hospital users. But the problem with
2:23:04 > 2:23:10the guidance is that none of that is mandatory. In fact the guidance
2:23:10 > 2:23:12encourages the postcode lottery. The guideline states that charges should
2:23:12 > 2:23:19be reasonable for the area. Trusts are free to set their own fees. It
2:23:19 > 2:23:27means people working in South London or charge the most. I asked what is
2:23:27 > 2:23:34a reasonable charge and I'm consistently told, first hospital
2:23:34 > 2:23:42car parks charges are for local NHS hospital., they are supposed to
2:23:42 > 2:23:49follow published guidance and the Department of Health has discussed
2:23:49 > 2:23:55car park charges with local trusts. I gave away the last time because I
2:23:55 > 2:23:58want to be fair to what the Deputy Speaker has asked me before the
2:23:58 > 2:24:07debate.Thank you. Do you accept that the national health service is
2:24:07 > 2:24:11not best place for ministry in car parks at all? And that if we take
2:24:11 > 2:24:15car parking charges away, we should also take the whole provision of car
2:24:15 > 2:24:19park away from the national health service and make sure they don't
2:24:19 > 2:24:26lose out financially?The crucial thing is that the NHS does not lose
2:24:26 > 2:24:30out financially. I think that is the substance of what he is saying. The
2:24:30 > 2:24:35guidance is that the superficial. I have been unable to work out what is
2:24:35 > 2:24:40a reasonable charge. The Government isn't able or willing to keep trusts
2:24:40 > 2:24:50in check. Since 2013, the campaign to scrap car park charges has
2:24:50 > 2:24:54actually gained speed. Now more and more leading UK charities in its
2:24:54 > 2:24:57associations representing drivers carrying out research into the
2:24:57 > 2:25:07negative effects of this on patients and drivers. This sick and
2:25:07 > 2:25:08vulnerable are disproportionately hit, particularly those with
2:25:08 > 2:25:13long-term or severe illnesses that require lengthy stays in the
2:25:13 > 2:25:17hospital. Research has shown that cancer patients and patients of
2:25:17 > 2:25:26premature babies face the greatest financial of the glances. There is a
2:25:26 > 2:25:30wonderful charity supporting and people with cancer found that
2:25:30 > 2:25:37families were paying about £37 a month. Some families paying up to
2:25:37 > 2:25:50£10 per day. They also say that one in four parents,, over that, 29%...
2:25:50 > 2:25:57The sentiment is mirrored. It is said that patients in England are
2:25:57 > 2:26:08paying extortionist card charges. There are some babies who only stay
2:26:08 > 2:26:12in the neonatal unit for a few days, some parents have to pay up to £250
2:26:12 > 2:26:17at their babies stays for eight weeks. And some, they say, many
2:26:17 > 2:26:24parents are cannot even afford to go and see their baby because of the
2:26:24 > 2:26:31car park charges. Let me just quote another charity, which I think sums
2:26:31 > 2:26:42up the whole debate. They say recently, they do a lot of work in
2:26:42 > 2:26:48terms of brain injured see to injury. We support a family that's
2:26:48 > 2:26:53been more than £1500 in parking charges in 15 weeks. They needed to
2:26:53 > 2:26:57be at the bedside of their son who was frightened after sustaining
2:26:57 > 2:27:03brain surgery. What parent would not want to be there day and I? Yet they
2:27:03 > 2:27:10were faced with a huge appeal to the next Bill. This is putting people
2:27:10 > 2:27:17into huge debt at a time when they already have enough to cope with.
2:27:17 > 2:27:20Another charity say that dialysis patients who have to go three times
2:27:20 > 2:27:28a week and that takes four hours suggests that the average cost of
2:27:28 > 2:27:39parking for that time is £3 .28. You can imagine how the costs stack up.
2:27:39 > 2:27:45It is extraordinary that despite the Government guidance almost half the
2:27:45 > 2:27:51hospitals charge disabled drivers. They don't go out of choice. It is
2:27:51 > 2:27:56hard for them to use public transport. Yet they have to pay
2:27:56 > 2:27:59significant charges. Even the ones that allow free parking have a lot
2:27:59 > 2:28:09of conditions attached. The scope -- scope, a charity, support the
2:28:09 > 2:28:26sentiment. It is not just charities that do valuable work. The RAC do
2:28:26 > 2:28:32support this as well. I have worked with a person for a number of years
2:28:32 > 2:28:45from this organisation.
2:28:45 > 2:28:5295% of respondents want hospital parking fees scrapped or set at a
2:28:52 > 2:29:03maximum fee of £1. The RAC carried out a survey. Two thirds named
2:29:03 > 2:29:08hospitals as one of the places they dislike paying for parking the most.
2:29:08 > 2:29:21The campaign is growing. Charities represent the most vulnerable. Two
2:29:21 > 2:29:29main motoring organisations representing motorists in the UK. We
2:29:29 > 2:29:33must not forget our incredibly hard-working NHS staff. Some of whom
2:29:33 > 2:29:38are charged to go to work. Other public sector workers, police
2:29:38 > 2:29:43officers and teachers are right with the most part able to park for free
2:29:43 > 2:29:51on their premises, whether it is a police station or school. The
2:29:51 > 2:29:52guidance from the government suggests concessions should be
2:29:52 > 2:29:58available for all hospital staff working shifts that make public
2:29:58 > 2:30:07transport use difficult. But so much of the USDAW workforce cannot reply
2:30:07 > 2:30:19on public transport to get to work. Hospital porter would have to spend
2:30:19 > 2:30:27over an hour on two buses to get to work. Many work anti-social hours in
2:30:27 > 2:30:30the health service. We have no choice but to use hospital car
2:30:30 > 2:30:36parks. Of hospitals seem to offer discounted parking scheme based on
2:30:36 > 2:30:43pay band or salary, or by allocating a limited number of discounted staff
2:30:43 > 2:30:51spaces, NHS staff are charged to work anti-social hours. My noble
2:30:51 > 2:30:59friend was told that they cannot afford the parking charges of the
2:30:59 > 2:31:08half to park on nearby unlit streets which leaves them vulnerable. I was
2:31:08 > 2:31:13contacted recently by a resident who was delighted to hear of the
2:31:13 > 2:31:16campaign but came from a different angle. Southpark in the residential
2:31:16 > 2:31:24roads around hospital to avoid being charged to go to work. The influx of
2:31:24 > 2:31:27cars everyday game in their driveways are blocked, there is more
2:31:27 > 2:31:32traffic on the road and residents are only able to go about their
2:31:32 > 2:31:36daily business. I realise that hospital parking charges can be a
2:31:36 > 2:31:40source of income for hospitals. They're certainly a gold mine for
2:31:40 > 2:31:44some private companies. But the government has previously stated,
2:31:44 > 2:31:51and I quote, providing free parking at NHS hospitals would result in 200
2:31:51 > 2:31:56million per year taken from clinical care budgets to make up the
2:31:56 > 2:32:04shortfall. When considered in terms of the 120 billion plus to be spent
2:32:04 > 2:32:10in the running of the NHS, that 200 million figure is to be put in
2:32:10 > 2:32:13perspective. And going on the assumption that free hospital
2:32:13 > 2:32:18parking would cost 200 million per year, I think there are a number of
2:32:18 > 2:32:21funding options which would mean hospitals were not left out of
2:32:21 > 2:32:27pocket and clinical care budgets were not affected. The government
2:32:27 > 2:32:32have said that with better procurement in the NHS they would
2:32:32 > 2:32:36bring in over 1 billion per year, and I just asking for 200 million
2:32:36 > 2:32:44from that. The Department of Health financial accounts for 2016 suggests
2:32:44 > 2:32:52they underspent their revenue budget by 0.5%. Could some of that money
2:32:52 > 2:32:56not go towards covering parking costs for patients and staff? It
2:32:56 > 2:33:00might be time to look at other areas of government where we spend a
2:33:00 > 2:33:04significant amount of money and perhaps look at reallocating a very
2:33:04 > 2:33:11small amount of that money. The 200 million of the take in order to
2:33:11 > 2:33:18scrap hospital car parking charges. Another concern is that free parking
2:33:18 > 2:33:24in hospitals would be exploited by shoppers. This could be easily
2:33:24 > 2:33:30solved using parking tokens validated by ward staff. Some NHS
2:33:30 > 2:33:36hospitals in England provide free parking, including the
2:33:36 > 2:33:40Northamptonshire NHS Trusts and the Leicestershire partnership trust. It
2:33:40 > 2:33:46shows it is possible to deliver free parking for patients, visitors and
2:33:46 > 2:33:50staff, and discourage abuse of the system with tokens are barriers.
2:33:50 > 2:33:55Having contacted hospitals in Scotland and Wales directly, I know
2:33:55 > 2:34:00there are numerous parking solutions in order to ensure that free parking
2:34:00 > 2:34:04is not exploited. Alongside the abolition of hospital car parking
2:34:04 > 2:34:09charges, a system could be introduced whereby the ticket or
2:34:09 > 2:34:18presented to staff at the beginning and is validated at the end. In
2:34:18 > 2:34:29conclusion, because I see the look. It is time to end the hospital car
2:34:29 > 2:34:33parking problems once and for all. The NHS is supposed to be free at
2:34:33 > 2:34:37the point of access. It was never envisaged that people with cars
2:34:37 > 2:34:42would have to pay on top of taxation for the National Health Service.
2:34:42 > 2:34:49Instead, patients and staff are charged access for vital services.
2:34:49 > 2:34:56Patients with sick children, patients suffering from long-term
2:34:56 > 2:35:01illnesses. The cause of major social injustice and clearly the government
2:35:01 > 2:35:04guidance is not working. I urge the government to look into the most
2:35:04 > 2:35:09efficient way to scrap hospital car parking charges and bring an end to
2:35:09 > 2:35:17the stealth tax on drivers once and for all.Can I bring in an eight
2:35:17 > 2:35:24minute limit?Thank you. I'm very grateful to be part of this
2:35:24 > 2:35:38important debate and I congratulate the Member for Havel and others. The
2:35:38 > 2:35:41Diana Princess of Wales Hospital site in Great Grimsby provides a
2:35:41 > 2:35:48whole range of health and well-being services. Everything from A&E to
2:35:48 > 2:35:54child development, mercenary, eating disorder unit and health education
2:35:54 > 2:35:59spaces. The site covers such a huge range of different services that
2:35:59 > 2:36:05deliver to a very wide community. As part of this debate, there are two
2:36:05 > 2:36:08main areas I want to try and address. The first is the
2:36:08 > 2:36:12difficulties for patients and the challenges of ever-increasing
2:36:12 > 2:36:16parking tariffs, and also the issues for staff around car parking, which
2:36:16 > 2:36:23has been raised with me on a number of occasions. In Grimsby, I know I
2:36:23 > 2:36:28can go and park in the Iceland car park for £1 per hour in the centre
2:36:28 > 2:36:35of our town. If I need to park for over two hours, I might park in the
2:36:35 > 2:36:40multistorey and I might pay £3 50 for the privilege of four hours
2:36:40 > 2:36:43parking. Having worked in places like Yorkie, I know I should be
2:36:43 > 2:36:49grateful for the seemingly small amounts that it costs to park in the
2:36:49 > 2:36:53centre of our town, but when these smaller amounts are set against what
2:36:53 > 2:36:58people are expected to be in hospital parking charges, it feels
2:36:58 > 2:37:03very much to my constituents that the NHS is over inflating the
2:37:03 > 2:37:07expense and adding an unnecessary burden to patients and families. Its
2:37:07 > 2:37:13recently increased to £2 ten for one hour's parking at the Diana Princess
2:37:13 > 2:37:25of Wales Hospital. Double what it is in the centre of town. On a good
2:37:25 > 2:37:29day, it might take just a few minutes to collect a prescription.
2:37:29 > 2:37:40On top of those costs, I'm paying another £2 ten to collect my
2:37:40 > 2:37:52prescription. Last week I went in to get a blood test. This is not to
2:37:52 > 2:37:56bemoan the cost to my personal pocket. I know I can afford this,
2:37:56 > 2:38:01but there are many and my constituency who cannot. It is
2:38:01 > 2:38:06prohibitive. And happy to give way. I thank my noble friend for giving
2:38:06 > 2:38:16way. Does she agree with me that the example she races shows the
2:38:16 > 2:38:26opportunity for greater flexibility. Some leisure centres have free
2:38:26 > 2:38:30parking for half an hour. Recognising the need to be
2:38:30 > 2:38:37proportionate.She raises an important point. There is room for
2:38:37 > 2:38:40flexibility and all trusts should be looking at what they can do to make
2:38:40 > 2:38:44parking less prohibitive for people and not put them all. It is galling
2:38:44 > 2:38:49for my constituents to know that in other parts of town the parking fees
2:38:49 > 2:38:56are lower, and they all have the issue of maintenance and lighting
2:38:56 > 2:39:00but are still not charging the high rate, so does feel like profiteering
2:39:00 > 2:39:05off the back of people have no choice but to be at hospital for
2:39:05 > 2:39:09themselves, friends or relatives. There are concessions the trust
2:39:09 > 2:39:13offers. Lower costs for blue badge holders, although not exempt
2:39:13 > 2:39:17charges. Parent staying overnight with Pirelli children or those
2:39:17 > 2:39:26having cancer treatment. When the justification for charging is it
2:39:26 > 2:39:32pays for the maintenance of the site, it doesn't seem to stack up
2:39:32 > 2:39:35compared to other parking sites. We have recently had the new automated
2:39:35 > 2:39:42numberplate recognition system installed. This led to even more
2:39:42 > 2:39:47frustration for constituents because while this fantastic new system was
2:39:47 > 2:39:52supposed to make things quicker and easier, all it did was cause an
2:39:52 > 2:39:58additional delays and cost for people because people try to pay
2:39:58 > 2:40:04further parking and it caused havoc. There were cheers going around the
2:40:04 > 2:40:09block with people tripping over into the next pay band and paying even
2:40:09 > 2:40:14more. It caused an extraordinary amount of frustration and reflected
2:40:14 > 2:40:21very pearly on the trust, which is a real shame. The knock-on effect of
2:40:21 > 2:40:27the charges as I think the surrounding streets, all residential
2:40:27 > 2:40:36streets with limited on street parking, get filled with cars of
2:40:36 > 2:40:41those attending hospital. I know there is nothing illegal about that.
2:40:41 > 2:40:48But it really irritates residents, if it crosses a dropped curb or
2:40:48 > 2:40:52impinges on people's driveways, it is an incredible frustration, and is
2:40:52 > 2:40:58also giving rise to increasing concerns about road safety,
2:40:58 > 2:41:03particularly around school hours. A broader point is that we now that
2:41:03 > 2:41:09people with disabilities or long-term illnesses are generally
2:41:09 > 2:41:17financially worse off than the rest of the population. That additional
2:41:17 > 2:41:20costs really represents significant inconvenience and potential hardship
2:41:20 > 2:41:24put on people who can least afford it. Briefly, turning to the issues
2:41:24 > 2:41:28that staff face because it has been an increasing issue that staff have
2:41:28 > 2:41:33been talking to me about, particularly on this side, there
2:41:33 > 2:41:36have been discussions with staff about increasing the amount they
2:41:36 > 2:41:41already pay in order to go to work. That has been postponed for now, but
2:41:41 > 2:41:45the opportunity for that to be brought back next year understand is
2:41:45 > 2:41:48very much on the table and they would see significant increases
2:41:48 > 2:41:55going forward. As the honourable member for Harlow has indicated,
2:41:55 > 2:41:58where not just talking about consultants who might be earning a
2:41:58 > 2:42:03very good wage or senior executives, we're talking about porters and
2:42:03 > 2:42:05health care assistants, medical secretaries, people behind the
2:42:05 > 2:42:09scenes to keep the hospital going, expected to pay even more. The
2:42:09 > 2:42:13frustrations that has brought about from staff are immense because they
2:42:13 > 2:42:17already say they struggle to get a parking space as it is, not least
2:42:17 > 2:42:21because of the shifts run over, the idea you might do an eight-hour
2:42:21 > 2:42:32shift in
2:42:47 > 2:42:49the NHS is negligible because most people through their own goodwill by
2:42:49 > 2:42:52giving more to the NHS and working beyond their shift, they don't want
2:42:52 > 2:42:54to leave their patients in the middle of an incident. And saw the
2:42:54 > 2:42:56number of parking spaces available for people is reduced. People are
2:42:56 > 2:42:59leaving home and off a lot earlier, an hour or an hour and a half
2:42:59 > 2:43:02earlier than their shift starts, so increasing their working day in many
2:43:02 > 2:43:05slaves. Most of it is not just about travel time. It is about people in
2:43:05 > 2:43:07the car parks driving around trying to find a space. It is incredibly
2:43:07 > 2:43:10frustrating people are paying for a space to go to work, they can't get
2:43:10 > 2:43:13a space and sometimes it is making them late to go into work. I'm happy
2:43:13 > 2:43:17to give way.
2:43:17 > 2:43:21You make a good point about people trying to find parking spaces and
2:43:21 > 2:43:25they're not being enough, could be compromised and that hospitals
2:43:25 > 2:43:30charge a reasonable flat rate rather than abolishing completely? By
2:43:30 > 2:43:33abolishing charges completely with that exacerbate the very thing that
2:43:33 > 2:43:36the honourable lady is talking about? Hello Mac I thank the
2:43:36 > 2:43:42honourable gentleman for that intervention and I think that is
2:43:42 > 2:43:46worth looking at.What we need is a system where it does not put people
2:43:46 > 2:43:48off either attending their appointments and does not inhibit
2:43:48 > 2:43:54people who are going to work and causing them to arrive late at work,
2:43:54 > 2:44:01so any suggestions are very welcome to reach a sensible solution. And
2:44:01 > 2:44:06finally, just to conclude, to raise the issue that all of this, the car
2:44:06 > 2:44:09parking charges are set in the context of a long-term
2:44:09 > 2:44:14transportation plan including Park and ride systems, increasing
2:44:14 > 2:44:16people's ability to use public transport, cycles and everything
2:44:16 > 2:44:22else. The reality is that not enough has been done on any of those things
2:44:22 > 2:44:26to enable people to use alternative methods of transport to access work
2:44:26 > 2:44:29at the time they need it or access appointments at the time they needed
2:44:29 > 2:44:33and so it is all for nothing and that is why the charges are so
2:44:33 > 2:44:36incredibly prohibitive when there are no other methods of easy
2:44:36 > 2:44:43transport on a regular basis to suit patients and staff.It is a great
2:44:43 > 2:44:47pleasure to follow the honourable member from Grimsby who has given a
2:44:47 > 2:44:51very thoughtful and engaging speech on this very important issue. I am
2:44:51 > 2:44:55glad so many members are able to be here this afternoon to take part in
2:44:55 > 2:44:59this debate. I would like to congratulate the Right Honourable
2:44:59 > 2:45:03member from Harlow for championing this important issue in Parliament
2:45:03 > 2:45:07over many years. He is much admired right across the house taking up
2:45:07 > 2:45:10issues that not everyone chooses to champion and these are the issues
2:45:10 > 2:45:14that so often make the lives of the people he represents, the people I
2:45:14 > 2:45:19represent, so much better so I thank him for that. I was inspired by his
2:45:19 > 2:45:23efforts in this area before they became an MP and I was actually
2:45:23 > 2:45:26campaigning in my constituency of Telford and the whole issue of
2:45:26 > 2:45:33parking charges when at the Princess Royal Hospital the charges went up
2:45:33 > 2:45:41by 75% and created the deal of local upset. My constituents raised their
2:45:41 > 2:45:44concerns on this issue frequently, and in the time I have campaigned on
2:45:44 > 2:45:49this issue I have received over 5000 letters and I see letters, not
2:45:49 > 2:45:53e-mails, on this specific issue. In Telford we really care about this
2:45:53 > 2:45:57and that is why I am here today because I was supposed to be at the
2:45:57 > 2:46:02school giving a speech on the -- giving a speech to the ethical
2:46:02 > 2:46:05debating society which I have to cancel to be here because it matters
2:46:05 > 2:46:10so much, and I apologise to the students. I was told by my hospital
2:46:10 > 2:46:15trust in 2014 that due to the long-term nature of the legally
2:46:15 > 2:46:20binding contract the hospital trust had entered into that it was not
2:46:20 > 2:46:24possible to change the existing arrangement that they had. Clearly,
2:46:24 > 2:46:28even political season long-term contracts eventually expire so we
2:46:28 > 2:46:33must be looking forward to what we can put in place when the contracts
2:46:33 > 2:46:37do. It is not acceptable for those who can effect change to simply
2:46:37 > 2:46:41stand back and wait for orders contracts with public contractors to
2:46:41 > 2:46:47be renewed.I thank my honourable friend forgiving way. As she says
2:46:47 > 2:46:53part of the problem is that so many hospital trusts are locked into a
2:46:53 > 2:46:58long-term contract, many of which were negotiated in the late 90s, and
2:46:58 > 2:47:05to thousands. But which will shortly be coming up for renewal on
2:47:05 > 2:47:08expiring. There she had been at now is the time to be looking on what
2:47:08 > 2:47:13provisions we can put in place to make sure that as they are of
2:47:13 > 2:47:16renewed the do not contain these exploitative provisions that allow
2:47:16 > 2:47:23hospital trusts to take patients and their families and visitors for
2:47:23 > 2:47:30remarks by overcharging them for parking?My honourable friend makes
2:47:30 > 2:47:34an important point and makes it eloquently. This is a timely debate
2:47:34 > 2:47:37and that is why it is so important that we are are here to make the
2:47:37 > 2:47:46case. Sadly, my local hospital trust has gone on increasing the price of
2:47:46 > 2:47:50hospital parking charges in a way that some do feel is faultless and
2:47:50 > 2:47:55has been described to me as a cavalier manner. Following rises in
2:47:55 > 2:48:012017 it is now cheaper to park near my local shopping centre in Telford
2:48:01 > 2:48:05than it is to go to hospital to visit a sick relative so there is
2:48:05 > 2:48:09clearly something wrong with the model that operate in this way
2:48:09 > 2:48:15because as many other members have mentioned no one chooses to go to
2:48:15 > 2:48:21hospital. Telford is a new town much like my right honourable friend's
2:48:21 > 2:48:23constituency of Harlow and like many new towns that are problems around
2:48:23 > 2:48:27the way they are designed because right or wrong way it is all about
2:48:27 > 2:48:32road users as together with major roads and read about systems --
2:48:32 > 2:48:36roundabout systems which are much loved in Telford, everything is
2:48:36 > 2:48:40focused on the car. It was never intended that the pedestrian be able
2:48:40 > 2:48:46to walk from A to B and this is one of the problems that make it such an
2:48:46 > 2:48:49important issue locally. We do not have good public transport and we
2:48:49 > 2:48:53can just hop on a bus or hop on a chip or as I see a walk to the local
2:48:53 > 2:48:58hospital as you might do in many other areas. We have to take several
2:48:58 > 2:49:01buses and so many people find themselves being driven to hospital
2:49:01 > 2:49:06or driving themselves and having to pay. Some of the reasons my trust
2:49:06 > 2:49:11gave to me about the increase in charges was they said that the
2:49:11 > 2:49:14charges are lower elsewhere in the country which I did not think how
2:49:14 > 2:49:18much teeth to it because London is a very different environment to
2:49:18 > 2:49:23Telford both in terms of income and accessibility of transport so there
2:49:23 > 2:49:26is a real need to take into consideration local factors when
2:49:26 > 2:49:30trusts are setting these charges, and offering concessions is good,
2:49:30 > 2:49:35and there are concessions at the Princess Royal in Telford but they
2:49:35 > 2:49:39are very contributed to administer and operate and if you you must
2:49:39 > 2:49:41prove you are on benefits and have had your appointment and pretty
2:49:41 > 2:49:45pager charges and all the time health care staff are having to
2:49:45 > 2:49:50administer this, having to cancel charges and operate a refund of
2:49:50 > 2:49:53devout concessions and that is not what they are there for. It is no
2:49:53 > 2:49:56good saying either that if there was more money for hospitals they would
2:49:56 > 2:50:00not need to charge because I think we all know and understand that in
2:50:00 > 2:50:06many cases and seven in my local hospital 50% of the revenue goes to
2:50:06 > 2:50:10the parking contractor and that must be wrong. The other argument we have
2:50:10 > 2:50:15here advanced year-to-date is that if there were no parking charges
2:50:15 > 2:50:18then there would be nowhere for people to park, as anyone who wished
2:50:18 > 2:50:25to produce the hospital car park. Charges it is argued in a
2:50:25 > 2:50:27disincentive to parking and without charges my local hospital trust
2:50:27 > 2:50:31people might stay all day in the hospital cafe is having the
2:50:31 > 2:50:36refreshments rather than leaving the site. Clearly this is complete
2:50:36 > 2:50:40nonsense, first of all because even with charging incredibly high
2:50:40 > 2:50:45charges there is nowhere to park. All of the spaces are filled, the
2:50:45 > 2:50:48grass is filled, the concrete is filled, so the argument that
2:50:48 > 2:50:53everyone is sitting in a cafe is beyond my contravention. And I do
2:50:53 > 2:50:56think this is an issue that needs to be addressed with careful thought
2:50:56 > 2:51:00rather than just seeing charges as an instant panacea to a problem when
2:51:00 > 2:51:06it clearly is not. Bizarrely my hospital trust even tried to justify
2:51:06 > 2:51:11the increase by talking to residents about the number of nurses the
2:51:11 > 2:51:14parking revenue pays for. I don't like that as an argument because
2:51:14 > 2:51:17nurses are paid for by taxpayers to government funding and not the
2:51:17 > 2:51:21parking charges, he increased the Internet it was in fact in the
2:51:21 > 2:51:24contractual agreement and nothing to do with the number of nurses that
2:51:24 > 2:51:30they were employing. So I do worry when hospital managers think that
2:51:30 > 2:51:33this is a charge that is not a big deal because it is cheaper somewhere
2:51:33 > 2:51:37else in the transport is not really their problem, and if they are
2:51:37 > 2:51:41spending too long in cafes then they must live them on by using charges,
2:51:41 > 2:51:44the shoes that they probably did not understand as well as they should
2:51:44 > 2:51:47the people they serve. And if you dig a little bit deeper you find
2:51:47 > 2:51:51that the Princess Royal that the reason it is not possible to park is
2:51:51 > 2:51:56there has been a huge increase in the number of staff working on site
2:51:56 > 2:51:59and parking in the car park and we do need to look at ways of helping
2:51:59 > 2:52:05staff reduced car park use, as this would free up many spaces for
2:52:05 > 2:52:07patients to use throughout the day and we need to think imaginatively
2:52:07 > 2:52:12on how this might be done, perhaps a park-and-ride scheme specifically
2:52:12 > 2:52:17tailored to shift times could help and I think this is something that
2:52:17 > 2:52:21hospitals are looking at. We have heard today that this is a tax on
2:52:21 > 2:52:25the sick and most taxes take account of people's ability to pay and that
2:52:25 > 2:52:30is absolutely right, yet hospital managers and porters pay the same to
2:52:30 > 2:52:34park and it is often the least well off who are hit hardest. If you want
2:52:34 > 2:52:39to tax people and give half of that tax to a car park in company then do
2:52:39 > 2:52:42it to PAYE, it is a bit senseless but do not break nurses and other
2:52:42 > 2:52:47health care staff be involved in enforcement and its is completely
2:52:47 > 2:52:50inefficient to operate it in the way it is being operated. Others have
2:52:50 > 2:52:54talked on the issue of the rigmarole that those of paying for parking,
2:52:54 > 2:52:57whether it is coins are typing in your number plate being video going
2:52:57 > 2:53:01in and out, there is a whole punitive element to this that when
2:53:01 > 2:53:05you are rushing to see someone who is ill or indeed waiting for an
2:53:05 > 2:53:08appointment at -- and the consultant is running over time it had to the
2:53:08 > 2:53:13anxiety and I think in this particular context it is completely
2:53:13 > 2:53:17inappropriate. This is an issue that no one wants to own and so we will
2:53:17 > 2:53:21end up accepting it rather than solving it and too many people see
2:53:21 > 2:53:24it is not our problem and too difficult to fix and it is not that
2:53:24 > 2:53:28important because it is only £8 per day. Too often those in power look
2:53:28 > 2:53:31at the world through their own eyes and not through the eyes of those
2:53:31 > 2:53:34whom they serve. There is little appetite amongst hospital management
2:53:34 > 2:53:40to deal with this. It is not a big-ticket issue, it is not exciting
2:53:40 > 2:53:43or a shiny new hospital, it does not cost £300 million, which is
2:53:43 > 2:53:46something that we spend a lot of time talking about in Telford,
2:53:46 > 2:53:52earlier emergency units that why I am here today, I want to see
2:53:52 > 2:53:55government and hospital managers sit up and take notice of this issue.
2:53:55 > 2:54:00Don't rush it off as at an issue, it is not. By NCH through the eyes of
2:54:00 > 2:54:06others and tackle the issue that faces the everyday users of our
2:54:06 > 2:54:09hospitals. It is something that can be fixed and will make a difference
2:54:09 > 2:54:12to the lives of those who most need hospital services and for that
2:54:12 > 2:54:15reason we should all care about its all for the Right Honourable member
2:54:15 > 2:54:20of Harlow, it is a great service to his constituents and I thank him for
2:54:20 > 2:54:24bringing forward this debate and I support him entirely.It is a
2:54:24 > 2:54:28pleasure to follow the Honourable member from Telford. We all know
2:54:28 > 2:54:33that the NHS is underfunded and the hospital trust in my constituency
2:54:33 > 2:54:39received over £1.5 million in car parking charges in 2016-17 according
2:54:39 > 2:54:45to data released by Freedom of information request, so it might
2:54:45 > 2:54:48seem unusual for me to be calling for the abolition of car parking
2:54:48 > 2:54:52charges when we know that they can provide an income for hospitals
2:54:52 > 2:54:55however I agree with the Honourable member from Telford that much of the
2:54:55 > 2:54:59money does not actually go to the hospital, it often goes to the
2:54:59 > 2:55:04private operator of that car park. I also think that it is the
2:55:04 > 2:55:08government's responsibility to ensure our NHS has the money needs,
2:55:08 > 2:55:13not the patient's not staff and not visitors. We should not expect
2:55:13 > 2:55:18vulnerable people to pay a sickness taxi parking charges. And I also
2:55:18 > 2:55:22agree with my honourable friend's comment from Great Grimsby about the
2:55:22 > 2:55:25impact it has on other residents living in the local area. In the
2:55:25 > 2:55:32street opposite my hospital in Walker Street they have had to issue
2:55:32 > 2:55:36resident permits to stop other people parking on the street so in
2:55:36 > 2:55:40effect the residents that live there have to pay to park their cars
2:55:40 > 2:55:43because staff are parking their cars where they left because staff cannot
2:55:43 > 2:55:47afford to use the car park. The whole system is completely nonsense.
2:55:47 > 2:55:53And of course I am incredibly proud that our Labour Party manifesto
2:55:53 > 2:55:57pledge to strap car parking charges at her suggestion was that any loss
2:55:57 > 2:56:01of income could come from a tax on private health care and insurance
2:56:01 > 2:56:06which would meet the £162 million cost of free parking on all NHS
2:56:06 > 2:56:12hospitals across England. The unfairness of the sickness tax by
2:56:12 > 2:56:16having car parking charges must be felt in context, and I want to tell
2:56:16 > 2:56:22you about a dear friend of mine, a man called Dermot. He has been in
2:56:22 > 2:56:26hospital now for well over 20 days and I am not sure if you are all
2:56:26 > 2:56:29aware but a particularly cruel and unfair consequence of being in
2:56:29 > 2:56:32hospital over 28 days if the ending of his payments for disability
2:56:32 > 2:56:39living allowance and attendance allowance. And if he had been
2:56:39 > 2:56:41receiving PIP instead of the LA that would have been stopped as well. His
2:56:41 > 2:56:46wife's income has been affected as well because she is his carer and he
2:56:46 > 2:56:49has stopped receiving her allowance because Dermot has lost his
2:56:49 > 2:56:54disability living allowance. The nice bits to this study is that
2:56:54 > 2:56:56friends have rallied round and organised fundraising concert for
2:56:56 > 2:57:03their friend and I have to make sure I pronounce this carefully, it was
2:57:03 > 2:57:11cold funk the 28 day rule, which was used to raise money to support
2:57:11 > 2:57:15Dermot. Friends should not have to raise money to compensate our health
2:57:15 > 2:57:20care's system failure to support people. The dramatic fall in his
2:57:20 > 2:57:23family's income makes the added travel at car parking costs
2:57:23 > 2:57:26particularly cruel and they are not the only family facing this but
2:57:26 > 2:57:30their story highlights the unfairness that many families face
2:57:30 > 2:57:34of having to park every day to visit loved ones at a time when their
2:57:34 > 2:57:38income might have dramatically fallen. We all hate to think what
2:57:38 > 2:57:42would happen if one of our loved ones ended up staying in hospital
2:57:42 > 2:57:48for a long time. One of the saddest examples of the sickness tax is what
2:57:48 > 2:57:50the Honourable member for Harlow mention that that is for parents of
2:57:50 > 2:57:56premature sick babies. We know that premature and sick babies, to have
2:57:56 > 2:58:01the best possible outcome, they need hands-on care every day, the daily
2:58:01 > 2:58:05cost of travelling to hospital can be a barrier to parents being with
2:58:05 > 2:58:13the baby. The charity Bliss states that parents spent 32p per week on
2:58:13 > 2:58:20average on car parking charges to visit their baby. -- £32 per week.
2:58:20 > 2:58:23This is an unacceptable cost. All of our new precious babies have the
2:58:23 > 2:58:26right to be with their parents, not just the parents who can afford to
2:58:26 > 2:58:33pay to park their cars there.
2:58:33 > 2:58:42I lady for giving way. I think it is grossly unacceptable for people
2:58:42 > 2:58:49visiting sick babies, or a husband or man with his partner waiting for
2:58:49 > 2:58:59her to give birth, how often does happen that you have paid for three
2:58:59 > 2:59:03hours parking and you require much more? You are stuck. You're required
2:59:03 > 2:59:07to stay with the woman, but you're worried about paying for the
2:59:07 > 2:59:15flipping parking charge. This is wrong. There must be a way around
2:59:15 > 2:59:19this.I completely agree. I know from being with my parents when a go
2:59:19 > 2:59:25in for hospital appointments, my mum sits there with the alarm on her
2:59:25 > 2:59:30phone. It is not what you want to be thinking about when you visit
2:59:30 > 2:59:34hospital. This unfair cost is not just felt by visitors and patients,
2:59:34 > 2:59:38but by staff as well. During my local big conversation event, I
2:59:38 > 2:59:43became aware of the difficulties facing local nurses and other NHS
2:59:43 > 2:59:50professionals in my local hospital. The financial squeeze that NHS
2:59:50 > 2:59:52professionals are facing has been well-documented. For example,
2:59:52 > 2:59:58midwives have lost on average £6,000 per year in real terms since 2010.
2:59:58 > 3:00:04The additional cost of parking their cars seems particularly unfair. An
3:00:04 > 3:00:09investigation by the union Unison found some medics were having to
3:00:09 > 3:00:13rush out in between appointments to move their car to avoid a fine. A
3:00:13 > 3:00:22situation which is ridiculous. Our hospitals are open 24 hours a day,
3:00:22 > 3:00:28every day of the year. Star finish work at different times. We have a
3:00:28 > 3:00:32duty to keep them safe, after they have spent their shift caring for
3:00:32 > 3:00:36others. They should not be having to return to cars parked on dark and
3:00:36 > 3:00:41isolated streets because they can't afford the hospital car park. I urge
3:00:41 > 3:00:46the Minister to take this motion forward and take action. This issue,
3:00:46 > 3:00:51as you can hear, has cross-party support and it would make a real
3:00:51 > 3:01:00difference, a real positive difference to so many people slides.
3:01:00 > 3:01:04It's a pleasure to follow the honourable lady who represents the
3:01:04 > 3:01:10other side of the Humber Bridge. And a pleasure to support the honourable
3:01:10 > 3:01:16member for Harlow. His campaigning skills on issues such as this on the
3:01:16 > 3:01:27backbenches are very welcome. Hopefully we can have success, as we
3:01:27 > 3:01:34have done in the past with campaigns. It's a pleasure to speak
3:01:34 > 3:01:41following the honourable member for Great Grimsby. On this occasion, I
3:01:41 > 3:01:46can't say that I agree with every word said in this House by my member
3:01:46 > 3:01:56of Parliament. It is about getting the balance right. Diluted initial
3:01:56 > 3:01:59burden on patients and their families, particularly at a time
3:01:59 > 3:02:06when they are particularly stressed and perhaps in great distress? Or
3:02:06 > 3:02:14should we put the burden on any limited NHS resources our hospitals
3:02:14 > 3:02:18are having to manage? There is a balance to be achieved, I'm quite
3:02:18 > 3:02:26sure. The reality is that some patients and families can afford to
3:02:26 > 3:02:29pay, as has been mentioned already. But even those in those
3:02:29 > 3:02:38circumstances or perhaps visiting a parent who is coming to the end of
3:02:38 > 3:02:41their life and they suffer just as much distress, whatever their
3:02:41 > 3:02:54financial circumstances. The hospital trust that serves my
3:02:54 > 3:02:59constituency has an income of £2.8 million from car parking last year.
3:02:59 > 3:03:06They told me there was a surplus of three quarters of £1 million spent
3:03:06 > 3:03:12on patient care. That is good news in the sense that that is money they
3:03:12 > 3:03:15desperately need, but it has come out of the pockets of people
3:03:15 > 3:03:30visiting the hospital at difficult times. It is a real burden on many
3:03:30 > 3:03:41hard-working families. I would detain the House is a great deal of
3:03:41 > 3:03:46time if I were to read the 64 page guidance the local trust produces
3:03:46 > 3:03:56for parking on hospital site. It is an appalling burden we place on all
3:03:56 > 3:04:00organisations, be they in the public or private sector, when he have to
3:04:00 > 3:04:06go to such trouble to produce 64 pages guidance on how they operate
3:04:06 > 3:04:14their car park. It is madness. I draw attention to the fact that
3:04:14 > 3:04:22patients in my constituency and the neighbouring areas in many cases
3:04:22 > 3:04:36half to travel much further, many times over the river to Hull. Public
3:04:36 > 3:04:40transport is almost nonexistent from many of the rural villages in my
3:04:40 > 3:04:47constituency and in the wider area served by Grimsby's hospital. I will
3:04:47 > 3:04:53happily give way.He is making a very good point and that is that the
3:04:53 > 3:04:58cost is disproportionate on those who live in rural areas.I thank my
3:04:58 > 3:05:03honourable friend from that point. He rammed his eye sees the point I
3:05:03 > 3:05:08am making. Many patients travel 15 or 20 miles before the actually get
3:05:08 > 3:05:15to the hospital. It is an additional burden they can well do without. My
3:05:15 > 3:05:19honourable friend from Grimsby mentioned the fact that there was a
3:05:19 > 3:05:22problem with management. She mentioned parking in neighbouring
3:05:22 > 3:05:32streets. When all those streets very well. When I was a councillor for
3:05:32 > 3:05:36that area, they used to complain about people blocking their streets
3:05:36 > 3:05:41and I'm sure they complain to their member of Parliament today. It is a
3:05:41 > 3:05:45problem I recognise. There is a problem with commuter parking which
3:05:45 > 3:05:51has to be dealt with, tokens have already been mentioned, simple time
3:05:51 > 3:05:55limits of a couple of hours before charges kicked in might be another
3:05:55 > 3:06:00alternative, as well as the flat charge my honourable friend from
3:06:00 > 3:06:07Southampton mentioned. I urge the government to tackle this. It needs
3:06:07 > 3:06:14government action. It is unreasonable to expect a trust,
3:06:14 > 3:06:17particularly those like Northern Lincolnshire and cool, in special
3:06:17 > 3:06:24measures, with various challenges of their own. In needs government
3:06:24 > 3:06:32action to resolve it. Savings can be made through better procurement
3:06:32 > 3:06:37procedure is. That is one possible route. I'm sure every member in the
3:06:37 > 3:06:41House could identify one particular saving they could identify in order
3:06:41 > 3:06:51to provide this particular -- meet the cost of the 200 million the NHS
3:06:51 > 3:06:56would have to find. It is a major problem, it's a burden on our
3:06:56 > 3:06:59constituents, one could so easily be resolved and I urge the government
3:06:59 > 3:07:08to get on with it and resolve it pretty quickly. Thank you.I would
3:07:08 > 3:07:10also like to thank the Right honourable member for Harlow for
3:07:10 > 3:07:24securing this important debate. If I parked at the hospital car park in
3:07:24 > 3:07:28my constituency, it would cost me a third more than if I parked in a
3:07:28 > 3:07:34council owned car park. How is that acceptable? Is this not NHS Trusts
3:07:34 > 3:07:37profiteering from the sick and vulnerable? When you're in a rush,
3:07:37 > 3:07:42taking a sick friend or relative to the hospital, you won't necessarily
3:07:42 > 3:07:47consider where is cheaper to park. Unho Park in the closest car park
3:07:47 > 3:07:51and sort it out later. If you're having to attend hospital on a
3:07:51 > 3:07:57regular occasion, you'll get free parking. At Huddersfield Royal
3:07:57 > 3:08:01Infirmary, a 2.5 hour stay three times a week every week of the year
3:08:01 > 3:08:07will cost you needy pounds. That is 700 needy pounds to support someone
3:08:07 > 3:08:15receiving medical treatment. Even for some who are disabled blue badge
3:08:15 > 3:08:25holders, £780.I thank the honourable lady for giving way. I
3:08:25 > 3:08:29think I speak on behalf of all of us, but I find it in equities that
3:08:29 > 3:08:35anyone with a blue badge should have to pay a penny when they go to
3:08:35 > 3:08:43hospital.I am in complete agreement with you. How am I constituents
3:08:43 > 3:08:48meant to afford these excessive costs? Hard-working nurse, doctor,
3:08:48 > 3:08:54Porter, cleaner, receptionists, they all go to work to help people. They
3:08:54 > 3:09:07are paying 1000 pounds -- £1600 per year to work 12 hour shift to for
3:09:07 > 3:09:15people. Paying to save lives. How is this acceptable by anyone's
3:09:15 > 3:09:18standards? How does anyone think it is right that these hard-working
3:09:18 > 3:09:23professionals are paying nearly £2000 a year to help people and cure
3:09:23 > 3:09:34for people? I can tell you, it isn't. I appreciate that trusts are
3:09:34 > 3:09:37following national guidelines, but patients and staff feel like they
3:09:37 > 3:09:45are being treated just like cash cows by NHS Trusts. My local trust
3:09:45 > 3:09:52remains nearly £15 million in deficit from last year. In the
3:09:52 > 3:09:59annual reports, the trust recorded 1.4 million income from car parking.
3:09:59 > 3:10:07In 2016, this rose to 2.7 million. The extra money the trust makes
3:10:07 > 3:10:10helps plug the hole from the underfunded from the government, but
3:10:10 > 3:10:16it shouldn't have to. Our NHS should be fully funded, not depending on
3:10:16 > 3:10:19car parking fees. I urge the government to consider the comments
3:10:19 > 3:10:25being made today by members from across this House and act swiftly to
3:10:25 > 3:10:38resolve this issue.It takes me back a long way to when I was shadow
3:10:38 > 3:10:44Health Minister back in 2006. This issue with car parking charges was
3:10:44 > 3:10:51around then. Successive governments have talks about addressing this,
3:10:51 > 3:10:57but it is a regressive tax. It is a tax on everybody that needs the NHS,
3:10:57 > 3:11:03that's why the earlier. And for the staff to be taxed even more, to be
3:11:03 > 3:11:12able to go to work in a very difficult shift pattern is even more
3:11:12 > 3:11:16of a regressive tax for them. It is frankly unacceptable. I've raised
3:11:16 > 3:11:20this issue many times before. Members of the House might remember
3:11:20 > 3:11:25I used to be a firefighter. Firefighters don't pay to park in
3:11:25 > 3:11:33the yard of the fire station. The Ambulance Service doesn't pay, the
3:11:33 > 3:11:38drive to work, they go to the depot to pick up the ambulance and go to
3:11:38 > 3:11:48work. So why another emergency worker to be charged in this way is
3:11:48 > 3:11:54something fundamentally wrong, it's been going back and forth across
3:11:54 > 3:11:59this House the matter who is in government. Contracts were signed by
3:11:59 > 3:12:03this government and previous ones, hugely expensive ones, particularly
3:12:03 > 3:12:13the PFI once. We need to do something about that.Thank you. It
3:12:13 > 3:12:19seems to me again that you have a staff car park and you should have a
3:12:19 > 3:12:24setup where staff have a separate parking arrangement so that staff do
3:12:24 > 3:12:30not block the public going in and staff have a guaranteed slot, so
3:12:30 > 3:12:40they are not late further shift.In some parts of the world, in Luton
3:12:40 > 3:12:46and Dunstable, that's what they do. I went to visit someone in
3:12:46 > 3:12:59palliative care. I didn't know how long I was going to be seeing them.
3:13:00 > 3:13:05I parked and paid where I thought I was in a public car park. I was in
3:13:05 > 3:13:09the staff car park. So when I went to try and get out, the barrier
3:13:09 > 3:13:14wouldn't go up. I pressed the button and the said I had parked illegally.
3:13:14 > 3:13:21I said I have got a ticket. Fortunately they had no idea who I
3:13:21 > 3:13:33was. Eventually I said, if you're going to find me, finally. I will
3:13:33 > 3:13:40see you in court. I had paid in an NHS car park that you have
3:13:40 > 3:13:43designated. Eventually they just said, go our way. I have been
3:13:43 > 3:13:47waiting for the fine to come through. It probably will now and I
3:13:47 > 3:14:02will see them in court. We have heard quite rightly about maternity.
3:14:02 > 3:14:08Babies come out when they want to, not when we want them to and not
3:14:08 > 3:14:13based on how much time you have in the car park. People are getting
3:14:13 > 3:14:17signed every day in this country because they have overrun their time
3:14:17 > 3:14:24in the car park. How can the right?
3:14:24 > 3:14:28I was told by a member who cannot be here today, volunteer drivers, what
3:14:28 > 3:14:35would we do without them? They are fantastic. They pay to be in
3:14:35 > 3:14:40hospital car parks to take patients home. Because the annual service is
3:14:40 > 3:14:42struggling so much. What is happening in some parts of the
3:14:42 > 3:14:46country and I know this is happening in my part, is because the car
3:14:46 > 3:14:51parking facilities are so bad people are saying I want the patient
3:14:51 > 3:14:55transport. Putting more of a burden on patient transport because they
3:14:55 > 3:14:59can't find a parking space and will be with her that appointment. If
3:14:59 > 3:15:01they are they for the appointment because of the patient transport
3:15:01 > 3:15:05that is OK but if you can't find the parking space to pay then you are a
3:15:05 > 3:15:09bad person. We have heard of people parking outside. Blue badge holders
3:15:09 > 3:15:13being charged in a car park when they can park for free on the road
3:15:13 > 3:15:18which is what they do. We know that is what is happening and that is
3:15:18 > 3:15:25where it is very wrong. I know when the minister stands up and he is a
3:15:25 > 3:15:29good man and an honourable man but he will almost certainly say this is
3:15:29 > 3:15:32devolved to NHS trusts and it is for them to decide how they run their
3:15:32 > 3:15:37facilities. For those of us who are members of Parliament the NHS trusts
3:15:37 > 3:15:41are completely unaccountable. We can go and moan about this and they will
3:15:41 > 3:15:46not listen in the slightest. They will be looking at whether they can
3:15:46 > 3:15:51get away with it and how much they can raise. It is not just about
3:15:51 > 3:15:55money, it is about space. For instance we have heard already that
3:15:55 > 3:16:00if we do not charge it will be full of people from the town centre. My
3:16:00 > 3:16:05hospital was closed, the excellent Hemel Hampstead hospital and we said
3:16:05 > 3:16:09if you move all of the acute care to Watford in the middle of Watford
3:16:09 > 3:16:12town centre next to a football stadium, apparently Watford play
3:16:12 > 3:16:17there. My constituents will be very upset when the Jamie being
3:16:17 > 3:16:21derogatory about Watford but they have huge fans and on one occasion I
3:16:21 > 3:16:25went to Watford Hospital on Saturday morning to visit a constituent of
3:16:25 > 3:16:32mine. I parked and paid. When I came out there was a group of parking
3:16:32 > 3:16:35people who clearly wanted to give me a ticket. I had paid in the football
3:16:35 > 3:16:40pitch. That was designated to Watford football club when playing
3:16:40 > 3:16:44at home. What does that have to do with going to see and look after our
3:16:44 > 3:16:50call to a hospital, an NHS hospital? Unfortunately Madam Deputy Speaker
3:16:50 > 3:16:54they didn't recognise the other very apologetic, but I don't think that
3:16:54 > 3:16:59is right. If they had no dry was the ticket was coming. How on earth
3:16:59 > 3:17:04Madam Deputy Speaker can you have a feel Acute Hospital in the middle of
3:17:04 > 3:17:10a town as big as Watford next to a football stadium and call it a
3:17:10 > 3:17:15modern NHS hospital? The parking facilities for staff and patients is
3:17:15 > 3:17:17frankly almost nonexistent not least because lots of it has been carved
3:17:17 > 3:17:22for the football club. I want Watford to be very successful but
3:17:22 > 3:17:27what I want on her part of the world is a brand-new hospital, Greenfield
3:17:27 > 3:17:31hospital with proper parking facilities away from the town centre
3:17:31 > 3:17:34so we don't have any of these concerns about whether or not people
3:17:34 > 3:17:38will go shopping or stay there all day. But at the moment I don't have
3:17:38 > 3:17:42that, I have Watford as an Acute Hospital, it has come out of special
3:17:42 > 3:17:46measures and wish them well, and Hemel Hempstead Hospital which is
3:17:46 > 3:17:52basically a clinic these days, and they charge the staff Madam Deputy
3:17:52 > 3:17:59Speaker and the patients to park there. It is empty. There is hardly
3:17:59 > 3:18:03anybody parked there because there's nothing on the site any more. But
3:18:03 > 3:18:07they still insist on charging. That pushes the patient outside so we
3:18:07 > 3:18:12have restricted parking outside which is an issue for the town
3:18:12 > 3:18:18centre. Is it cheaper to park in the town centre and the council car park
3:18:18 > 3:18:21or they go to an empty car park literally empty car park because
3:18:21 > 3:18:28there are so few facilities there. This has to be sorted out from
3:18:28 > 3:18:30central government. Central government guidelines have to be
3:18:30 > 3:18:37enforceable. We can issue as many notices from the Department, if you
3:18:37 > 3:18:44do not actually come out with the stick, nothing will happen. Could
3:18:44 > 3:18:48the money be raised other ways? Could there be savings in the NHS?
3:18:48 > 3:18:52We have already heard about the amount of money in the pot of things
3:18:52 > 3:18:57is peanuts and if we wanted to save some money instantly one of the more
3:18:57 > 3:19:00recent chief executives of my very small acute trust was on a package
3:19:00 > 3:19:07of over £300,000 per year. Take a look at the salaries of the top
3:19:07 > 3:19:12people in the NHS. Look after the people at the bottom and do not
3:19:12 > 3:19:17charge them to park when they go to work.Thank you Madam Deputy Speaker
3:19:17 > 3:19:21and it is a pleasure to speak in this debate and to follow the
3:19:21 > 3:19:27honourable member for Hemel Hampstead. Much of what he has said
3:19:27 > 3:19:32echoes the complaints that have come to my constituency office. I also
3:19:32 > 3:19:36want to thank the honourable member for Harlow for bringing this debate.
3:19:36 > 3:19:40This is a subject very close to my heart because I used to work for the
3:19:40 > 3:19:45NHS and I remember very well be time when car parking charges were
3:19:45 > 3:19:51actually introduced for patients, carers, visitors and staff. In a
3:19:51 > 3:19:55member the controversies cost at the time and it still causes that
3:19:55 > 3:20:03controversy now. This issue has not gone away. I work for the NHS as a
3:20:03 > 3:20:07political scientists but I was a workplace red Ford Unite, the trade
3:20:07 > 3:20:14union. And I remember the resistance that all of the health union split
3:20:14 > 3:20:17up towards the introduction of car parking charges which we saw then
3:20:17 > 3:20:26and still see now as a tax on staff coming to work, attacks on patients,
3:20:26 > 3:20:32on visitors and carers. The practice of charging for car parking in my
3:20:32 > 3:20:36area was started by Central Manchester hospital and the reason
3:20:36 > 3:20:42that Mac the issue that has been referred to of people using the free
3:20:42 > 3:20:44parking at hospital and going somewhere else was the reason why
3:20:44 > 3:20:49they introduced those charges, but once the debt that all of the other
3:20:49 > 3:20:54hospitals in greater Manchester followed suit. The hospital I worked
3:20:54 > 3:20:58at, North Manchester General, the only reason anyone would go there
3:20:58 > 3:21:02was because they worked there, or there getting treatment there or
3:21:02 > 3:21:07they were visiting India capacity as either a friend relative or a carer,
3:21:07 > 3:21:10there was no other reason for someone to be visiting the hospital,
3:21:10 > 3:21:17so there was no real reason to start to charge people to park there. But
3:21:17 > 3:21:22the trust claimed that the money taken would be put towards improving
3:21:22 > 3:21:28the car parking facilities which I have to admit at the time were
3:21:28 > 3:21:31absolutely dire, we used to park one answer that potholed areas and at
3:21:31 > 3:21:36least eventually they will improve once the car parking system, the
3:21:36 > 3:21:40charging system had become embedded, so that was one positive thing that
3:21:40 > 3:21:47came out of it. And I do remember initially that the hospital trust
3:21:47 > 3:21:50purchased some wheel clamps and friends and those who did not pay
3:21:50 > 3:21:54with clamping. I did work with some interesting people in the NHS and
3:21:54 > 3:21:59one colleague of mine decided he was going to buy his own personal wheel
3:21:59 > 3:22:05clamp, he attached it to his car when he parked in the morning, which
3:22:05 > 3:22:09served two purposes because it was not the muscle that areas, it
3:22:09 > 3:22:12immobilises Karin kept secure and it also gave the impression that he had
3:22:12 > 3:22:16been penalised for not being able to park and within a few weeks his
3:22:16 > 3:22:23wheel clan had paid for itself. However, not everyone was that
3:22:23 > 3:22:29inventors, and gradually the idea of paying to park at a hospital became
3:22:29 > 3:22:32commonplace if not accepted, although the trade unions always
3:22:32 > 3:22:36strongly opposed the practice. And the wheel clamps were actually very
3:22:36 > 3:22:41quickly phased out, rumour had it that the trust had been successfully
3:22:41 > 3:22:44sued over we can never find out the full facts of that but the trust
3:22:44 > 3:22:51then began to impose fines on those deemed to have breached the rules.
3:22:51 > 3:22:57The whole issue of car parking fees and fines, it generated a huge
3:22:57 > 3:23:02amount of controversy, discussion and debate. Not to mention a huge
3:23:02 > 3:23:07sum of visits, phone calls and e-mails to the trading in office.
3:23:07 > 3:23:10And anyone who might question the need to give trading in rats
3:23:10 > 3:23:14facility time to do their job might like to reflect upon the massive
3:23:14 > 3:23:20pressure put upon them by issues like this. When I left the trust
3:23:20 > 3:23:26when I was elected to this place I was paying £20 per month in car
3:23:26 > 3:23:32parking charges, which was taken directly out of my salary. And that
3:23:32 > 3:23:38staff three is now £22.10, which might not sound a lot but it is an
3:23:38 > 3:23:43increase of over 10% over the last three years, and that pays scant
3:23:43 > 3:23:48regard to the fact that NHS staff have had their pay either frozen or
3:23:48 > 3:23:53capped to a maximum of just 1%. It is completely disproportionate. As
3:23:53 > 3:23:58an NPI have held many constituents who have been sent a demand for car
3:23:58 > 3:24:03parking fines by a company called civil enforcement Ltd, who are
3:24:03 > 3:24:07contracted by my local hospital trusts, Pennine acute, to pursue
3:24:07 > 3:24:13those who are deemed to have breached car parking regulations. I
3:24:13 > 3:24:18have had constituents aggressively chased by -- aggressively chased for
3:24:18 > 3:24:21payment when they have inadvertently parked in the staff parking space by
3:24:21 > 3:24:26mistake. The practices of this company do seem to lack the human
3:24:26 > 3:24:31touch, most people attending hospital usually have more important
3:24:31 > 3:24:35matters on their mind and could be forgiven for being slightly
3:24:35 > 3:24:38distracted while trying to work out the myriad instructions posted on
3:24:38 > 3:24:42the hospital car park prior to visiting sick relatives are going
3:24:42 > 3:24:49for treatment themselves. The charges can be prohibitive, £1 for
3:24:49 > 3:24:54one hour, £4 for eight hours, £8 for up to 24 hours. As many members have
3:24:54 > 3:24:59pointed out, most of the time the patient, the visitor does not know
3:24:59 > 3:25:02how long they are going to be in the hospital for and most people here on
3:25:02 > 3:25:06the side of caution and pay more than they should. The ticket
3:25:06 > 3:25:10machines do not take banknotes, when I worked at the hospital I was
3:25:10 > 3:25:14regularly asked for change by patients and visitors struggling to
3:25:14 > 3:25:18feed these machines. And I'm sure that all those people have more
3:25:18 > 3:25:22important things to deal with and could have done without additional
3:25:22 > 3:25:28stress. I accept that my local trust will provide a ticket for £15 and
3:25:28 > 3:25:32will make arrangements for those with long-term illness, but this is
3:25:32 > 3:25:35not immediately clear to patients and visitors and requires action on
3:25:35 > 3:25:41their part at an already stressful time. The motion calls upon the
3:25:41 > 3:25:46government to provide a need whereby car park in charges may be abolished
3:25:46 > 3:25:50and I fully support that but hand-in-hand with that must be an
3:25:50 > 3:25:54improved public transport system so that staff, patients, carers and
3:25:54 > 3:25:59visitors are not as reliant on private cars. Sadly in my
3:25:59 > 3:26:03constituency we have just had a bus service between Rochdale, Middleton
3:26:03 > 3:26:07and North Manchester General Hospital withdrawn. Retrograde steps
3:26:07 > 3:26:13like this do nothing to reduce the demand on hospital car parks, and we
3:26:13 > 3:26:17absolutely need a comprehensive public transport policy to support
3:26:17 > 3:26:21the abolition of Hospital car parking charges. And the other step
3:26:21 > 3:26:26we need to take is to reduce the dependence of NHS trusts upon income
3:26:26 > 3:26:31from car parking. The Department of Health guidelines used to stipulate
3:26:31 > 3:26:34that income earned from car parking should only be spent upon the
3:26:34 > 3:26:38maintenance and running of the car parks, however these guidelines now
3:26:38 > 3:26:44appear to have been relaxed and cash-strapped trust are using that
3:26:44 > 3:26:47income for patient care. In fact when I visited North Manchester
3:26:47 > 3:26:51recently I was disappointed to see our staff car park which had been in
3:26:51 > 3:26:55a very first aid and I worked there many years ago had been allowed to
3:26:55 > 3:26:58deteriorate even further and clearly not income had been spent there on
3:26:58 > 3:27:05improving conditions for staff. Pennine acute trust alone made £3
3:27:05 > 3:27:09million from car parking charges last year, the NHS underfunding
3:27:09 > 3:27:12issue must be addressed in any consideration of the abolition of
3:27:12 > 3:27:21car parking charges.Thank you very much Madam Deputy Speaker. I would
3:27:21 > 3:27:24like to first of all thank the honourable member from Harlow for
3:27:24 > 3:27:28having secured and initiated such an important debate which affects so
3:27:28 > 3:27:34many within my constituency and indeed across our country. For many,
3:27:34 > 3:27:40attending hospital is a vulnerable time, whether seeking treatment for
3:27:40 > 3:27:44ourselves or a loved one. Our hospitals are indeed underfunded and
3:27:44 > 3:27:49overstretched but it is not for sick patients, anxious relatives and
3:27:49 > 3:27:54already hard-pressed NHS staff to be filling the funding gaps. We have
3:27:54 > 3:28:00heard that hospital car parking charges raise funds, however many
3:28:00 > 3:28:04hospital trusts up and down the country have increased their charges
3:28:04 > 3:28:10without public consultation. The very people they are there for. Some
3:28:10 > 3:28:14trusts allow private contractors to manage car parking sites leading to
3:28:14 > 3:28:16penalties and points as we have already heard in this important
3:28:16 > 3:28:24debate, for patients and visitors. At a time when the cost of living is
3:28:24 > 3:28:26increasing and those who work in the public sector have had their pay
3:28:26 > 3:28:34capped, the rising cost of hospital car parking increases increases the
3:28:34 > 3:28:37financial burden on many in our constituencies. Madam Deputy Speaker
3:28:37 > 3:28:43it is not just the patients that are deterred by high charges, family and
3:28:43 > 3:28:47friends might be discouraged from visiting patients at her bedside,
3:28:47 > 3:28:50which must surely have a negative impact on the mental well-being of
3:28:50 > 3:28:57the patient. We -- and would increase pressure on nursing staff.
3:28:57 > 3:29:00From personal experience in that many patients rely on relatives and
3:29:00 > 3:29:05friends to act as interpreters or advocates, such elements are
3:29:05 > 3:29:10seemingly overlooked when surveys and reports are undertaken, but
3:29:10 > 3:29:15patient care can really be impacted where high charges deter people from
3:29:15 > 3:29:23providing this kind of crucial systems.
3:29:24 > 3:29:30Thank you I wanted to reflect on the fact we have heard a lot about
3:29:30 > 3:29:35staff, patients and families, we did hear a reference about volunteers.
3:29:35 > 3:29:39You are talking about the importance of support for patients. Would you
3:29:39 > 3:29:44agree with me it is therefore particularly short-sighted that any
3:29:44 > 3:29:51hospital trust should charge volunteers to pay to park their car
3:29:51 > 3:29:58when you're giving up their free time?I couldn't agree more. We've
3:29:58 > 3:30:04heard previously about volunteer drivers. It is just not fair and
3:30:04 > 3:30:11nonsensical to be asking them to dig further into the pockets. When it
3:30:11 > 3:30:16comes to hard-working staff who have gone for years without a decent pay
3:30:16 > 3:30:21rise, they also face this is unfair and unnecessary burden. Some
3:30:21 > 3:30:26hospitals offer free or discounted parking, in relation to specific
3:30:26 > 3:30:31kinds of treatment or four people in receipt of specific benefits. There
3:30:31 > 3:30:36are significant variations in fees across trusts in the same region.
3:30:36 > 3:30:41Wrexham Park hospital in my constituency has some of the highest
3:30:41 > 3:30:50parking charges in the region. £3 after the first 30 minutes and an
3:30:50 > 3:30:56increase to £8 for five hours. That trust is only doing what is being
3:30:56 > 3:31:02done by all other trusts within government guidelines. What I do not
3:31:02 > 3:31:06want is for older and vulnerable patients to be deterred from
3:31:06 > 3:31:09attending hospital. We should be able to get their appointment and
3:31:09 > 3:31:14are comfortable, dignified and affordable manner, and within a
3:31:14 > 3:31:18reasonable time. Most NHS car parking charges have been abolished
3:31:18 > 3:31:24in Scotland and Wales. And I know the government has issued guidance
3:31:24 > 3:31:29to NHS Trusts on the implementation of car parking charges, including
3:31:29 > 3:31:36the provision of discounted or free parking. These guidelines are not
3:31:36 > 3:31:42based on legislation and appear to have had little effect. The Labour
3:31:42 > 3:31:48government in 2010 left fully costed plans to phase out the charges in
3:31:48 > 3:31:54patients and their visitors. In 2015, a Private Members' Bill gained
3:31:54 > 3:31:59cross-party support published October. Clearly, many across the
3:31:59 > 3:32:04country in the House want to see an end to hospital parking charges.
3:32:04 > 3:32:10Let's send a clear message today that there is another way for word.
3:32:10 > 3:32:20And this tax on the vulnerable must end. Thank you.Thank you. It's a
3:32:20 > 3:32:24pleasure to follow the honourable member for Slough and also can I
3:32:24 > 3:32:29commend the Member for Harlow on his extremely powerful speech and for
3:32:29 > 3:32:39raising this very important issue? Congratulations. My daughter started
3:32:39 > 3:32:45to show signs of acute appendicitis. We could quickly bundled our
3:32:45 > 3:32:50daughter in agony into the car, drove to the hospital, not a calm
3:32:50 > 3:32:53journey, and I'm sure there are many members of the House have had some
3:32:53 > 3:32:58sort of experience along those lines. Panicking, we were scrambling
3:32:58 > 3:33:08for change, taking it in turns to move the car or top of the ticket.
3:33:08 > 3:33:12Obviously this was a one off and bearable. Sadly for many it is not a
3:33:12 > 3:33:17one-off experience Andrew to chronic illness they are forced to take
3:33:17 > 3:33:21several trips a week. People going through the worst of times. This
3:33:21 > 3:33:26cynical approach of charging them to park is unacceptable. Being ill is
3:33:26 > 3:33:32not anyone's choice and should not be exploited. New figures show money
3:33:32 > 3:33:39brought in from NHS car park run by private firms has increased by half
3:33:39 > 3:33:55£1 million everyday. It is equivalent to 0.0001% of NHS
3:33:55 > 3:34:09spending but private companies pocket most of the benefits. Past
3:34:09 > 3:34:16NHS parking staff get parking charges deducted from their wages,
3:34:16 > 3:34:21sometimes when they can't find a space in the correct pay, they get
3:34:21 > 3:34:26fined for parking in the wrong way. In my constituency, the bus that
3:34:26 > 3:34:34used to connect our local hospital has been cancelled, forcing more
3:34:34 > 3:34:46people to use car, incurring parking costs. My own hospital charges after
3:34:46 > 3:34:4920 minutes. There is a reduction on blue badge holders, but we still
3:34:49 > 3:34:56have to pay. There is a stress inducing pay on exit system and it
3:34:56 > 3:35:01is quite a complex process to get car parking concessions approved by
3:35:01 > 3:35:09hospital staff on the day. Not an ideal situation. I will give way.
3:35:09 > 3:35:14Does she agree with me that in the 21st-century means testing at the
3:35:14 > 3:35:19point of delivery, which is what we are talking about here, is morally
3:35:19 > 3:35:25unacceptable in an NHS that we should be proud of?I'm so glad he
3:35:25 > 3:35:28raced that. This concession is only available to the patient and not to
3:35:28 > 3:35:32the low paid and might have driven that patient there are. So whilst
3:35:32 > 3:35:40you are the probably person, you're the one who has to go and get the
3:35:40 > 3:35:44concession for the car parking. It's unfair. After a Freedom of
3:35:44 > 3:35:49information request by Unison, it was revealed that some people are
3:35:49 > 3:35:59being charged up to £100 per month. Costs for parking impact on
3:35:59 > 3:36:03surrounding streets. I have been contacted by local residents
3:36:03 > 3:36:07complaining that those who cannot afford car parking charges are think
3:36:07 > 3:36:12he might have to stay for several hours are parking on the residential
3:36:12 > 3:36:15streets, blocking their driveways and making it difficult to park
3:36:15 > 3:36:21outside their own homes. Free hospital parking would end this.
3:36:21 > 3:36:27Whilst we now trusts are struggling to balance the books after years of
3:36:27 > 3:36:31underfunding by this government, we must ensure they are not forced to
3:36:31 > 3:36:36fill this gap by charging sick and pearly patients, their visitors and
3:36:36 > 3:36:44relatives and hard-pressed NHS staff. Car parking charges are an
3:36:44 > 3:36:50attack on serious illness. Labour would raise insurance tax on private
3:36:50 > 3:36:58health care to 20% to meet the £162 million worth of parking charges at
3:36:58 > 3:37:06NHS hospitals across England. Charities, trade unions and the
3:37:06 > 3:37:12public are all Colin out for this government to please listen. In
3:37:12 > 3:37:17Scotland and Wales, they have appointed -- abolished car parking
3:37:17 > 3:37:24charges in all but a handful of hospitals. We should show some
3:37:24 > 3:37:30humanity and do the same. I support this motion.I congratulate the
3:37:30 > 3:37:36Member for Harlow for securing this important debate. It is clear from
3:37:36 > 3:37:40speakers that the scandal of hospital parking charges must come
3:37:40 > 3:37:45to an end. Gravely ill people or people visiting relatives must not
3:37:45 > 3:37:52be treated as cash cows by hospital parking operators. Last year, half
3:37:52 > 3:37:57of all trusts charge disabled people for parking in some or all of their
3:37:57 > 3:38:01disabled parking spaces. Winning to redress this ridiculous
3:38:01 > 3:38:06inconsistency of the situation that in Wales and Scotland hospital
3:38:06 > 3:38:11parking is mainly free, but in Northern Ireland and England, trusts
3:38:11 > 3:38:15charge for parking. It's time that all hospitals abolished parking fees
3:38:15 > 3:38:21and drivers must not be punished for being sick, visiting loved ones or
3:38:21 > 3:38:25attending appointments. People don't choose to be ill and should not be
3:38:25 > 3:38:29asked to pay for a hospital visit. In my constituency, I've been
3:38:29 > 3:38:34approached by many constituents over this issue. Mother contacted me to
3:38:34 > 3:38:38say that after her husband took their son to accident and emergency
3:38:38 > 3:38:41with breathing difficulties in the middle of the night, he was later
3:38:41 > 3:38:47presented with a parking charge notice. I don't believe people
3:38:47 > 3:38:50rushing to hospital with gravely ill children should be put in the
3:38:50 > 3:38:54position of having to worry about such matters. Imagine if my
3:38:54 > 3:38:59constituent had spent extra precious moments scrambling for change for
3:38:59 > 3:39:03parking while his son struggle to breathe. With that have been
3:39:03 > 3:39:07sensible or responsible thing for a parent of a seriously ill child to
3:39:07 > 3:39:15do? Of course not. If that reason why we must get rid of these
3:39:15 > 3:39:17charges. Been contacted by a father who had to take his young daughter
3:39:17 > 3:39:23to the emergency department. He had to leave and return to his daughter
3:39:23 > 3:39:26throughout the night in order to feed more money into the car park
3:39:26 > 3:39:30metre. She was being kept in for a long period of time. My constituent
3:39:30 > 3:39:36kept paying at the machines, which failed to give him the seats when
3:39:36 > 3:39:42requested. He was unsure of the times he had left. He reported that
3:39:42 > 3:39:45seeing other people in various states of distress walking around
3:39:45 > 3:39:51the car park, they all seemed unsure of what to do. Two weeks later, he
3:39:51 > 3:39:54received the parking notice, telling him he had not paid for all the time
3:39:54 > 3:39:59he had been in the car park. We must ask, is this an appropriate way to
3:39:59 > 3:40:05treat the parents of very ill children? We've heard in the press
3:40:05 > 3:40:09about desperately ill patients forced to quit work are left with
3:40:09 > 3:40:13bills for hundreds of pounds due to frequent hospital visits. Then there
3:40:13 > 3:40:19are hugely unfair cases of NHS staff who have had parking charges
3:40:19 > 3:40:22deducted from their wages but have been unable to get a space and have
3:40:22 > 3:40:30been fined for parking in the wrong way. I've been contacted by several
3:40:30 > 3:40:36elderly patients about this issue. This Sunday is world cancer day. I'm
3:40:36 > 3:40:44sure many of us know people who've had treatment for cancer. Anyone
3:40:44 > 3:40:48knows the effects of chemotherapy and how debilitating treatment can
3:40:48 > 3:40:53be. They will often need a carer with them to make the journey home.
3:40:53 > 3:40:56Considering the frequency of treatments for cancer and other
3:40:56 > 3:41:04illnesses, surely car parking charges are nothing more than a tax
3:41:04 > 3:41:08on the sick? Many people have no choice but to drive to the local
3:41:08 > 3:41:13hospital, due to the infrequency of public transport.Thank you for
3:41:13 > 3:41:17giving way. He has spoken about the difficulty of travel. Does he agree
3:41:17 > 3:41:21with me that the reduction in bus services in many areas have cost to
3:41:21 > 3:41:29be no alternative to parking on hospital car parks? In a
3:41:29 > 3:41:34constituency like mine, it means frequent journeys for people who
3:41:34 > 3:41:39require treatment.She makes an excellent point. People in rural
3:41:39 > 3:41:45areas or areas far away from a local hospital, they are unfairly affected
3:41:45 > 3:41:50by the situation of having transport networks, to ferry them to hospital.
3:41:50 > 3:41:56So they have no choice but to by car. The Right honourable member for
3:41:56 > 3:42:01Hemel Hempstead net a valid point about other emergency workers not
3:42:01 > 3:42:06been required to pay for parking at police or fire stations. In
3:42:06 > 3:42:11addition, hospital staff are reducing the number of spaces for
3:42:11 > 3:42:17patients and visitors. NHS staff should be able to park free, but we
3:42:17 > 3:42:23should also be able to afford to live nearer to the hospital. It's
3:42:23 > 3:42:27therefore ironic wearing a situation whereby NHS Trust are forced to sell
3:42:27 > 3:42:32land they could have been used to house NHS staff locally. Another
3:42:32 > 3:42:39pressure on my local hospital has been the fact that as the A&E
3:42:39 > 3:42:44department at another hospital has been closed, it has resulted in more
3:42:44 > 3:42:49visitors to the A&E department at North Middlesex. Between Christmas
3:42:49 > 3:42:54and New Year, the hospital ran out of acute beds. One can only imagine
3:42:54 > 3:43:04how busy the car park was during that period. It is time these unfair
3:43:04 > 3:43:10charges were scrapped and the NHS was properly funded. For the sake of
3:43:10 > 3:43:16NHS staff, parents and visitors. I asked the Minister to bring forward
3:43:16 > 3:43:23measures to scrap car parking charges as soon as possible.
3:43:23 > 3:43:28Many thanks, it is an honour to speak in this debate and indeed any
3:43:28 > 3:43:32debate where the NHS is at the heart of what we are discussing. I would
3:43:32 > 3:43:36like to thank the honourable member for Harlow for bringing the debate,
3:43:36 > 3:43:41it is extremely important as has already been discussed, it is
3:43:41 > 3:43:46important to patients, charities, emergency workers, to our volunteers
3:43:46 > 3:43:50and carers and our NHS staff so it is a credit to the honourable member
3:43:50 > 3:43:55that he has brought this debate. He set out his case elegantly and
3:43:55 > 3:43:59offensively. The SNP Scottish Government as has already been
3:43:59 > 3:44:02mentioned scrapped hospital car parking charges approximately ten
3:44:02 > 3:44:06years ago in all car parks and by the NHS is all I would urge the UK
3:44:06 > 3:44:12Government to follow both this principle and policy. As an NHS
3:44:12 > 3:44:17employee for over 20 years I must declare an interest. I was part of
3:44:17 > 3:44:23the campaign all those many years ago to scrap the NHS parking charges
3:44:23 > 3:44:27as at Unite grep and I was so pleased when we succeeded because it
3:44:27 > 3:44:31has made a great difference to so many people and has saved some of
3:44:31 > 3:44:35the most vulnerable from spending money on parking when they are
3:44:35 > 3:44:43already facing so many difficulties financially.She has kindly been
3:44:43 > 3:44:46generous in giving way and I thank her for her remarks. Would you not
3:44:46 > 3:44:51agree that actively given that the hospital parking charges for the
3:44:51 > 3:44:54most part have been scrapped in Scotland you have been able to do
3:44:54 > 3:44:57with the problems of people possibly misusing the car parks for shopping
3:44:57 > 3:45:05and whatever the needy?I thank the honourable member and indeed
3:45:05 > 3:45:08whenever there is a welfare is away with this one. It can happen and can
3:45:08 > 3:45:12be done and it is a matter of prioritising it in terms of making
3:45:12 > 3:45:18it happen and that is something that we can raise a point with the
3:45:18 > 3:45:26Minister today. As we have heard, the changes, the charges in the
3:45:26 > 3:45:31hospital prior to the changes hit the most vulnerable people in our
3:45:31 > 3:45:33society and disabled people, those were chronically ill and those who
3:45:33 > 3:45:40act cannily ill including families caring for terminally ill children,
3:45:40 > 3:45:42those who require repeat appointments and mentally hospital
3:45:42 > 3:45:47stays. Like one of the other members who raised the issue earlier I also
3:45:47 > 3:45:51heard of families have their cars impounded because they were in the
3:45:51 > 3:45:56maternity unit, and their partner was giving birth and it did not go
3:45:56 > 3:46:00quite to time as these things often don't do, Madam Deputy Speaker, and
3:46:00 > 3:46:05they were unable to feed the meter. So at a time of utmost family
3:46:05 > 3:46:08importance that is one of the last things that you want to have on your
3:46:08 > 3:46:15mind. NHS staff, particularly those on community-based shifts are often
3:46:15 > 3:46:19penalised and often have no choice but to use their cars from hospital
3:46:19 > 3:46:22to community visits and therefore cannot travel by public transport to
3:46:22 > 3:46:27the hospital-based. There is fundamentally something wrong with
3:46:27 > 3:46:32charging our valued NHS staff to get to their work saving lives when
3:46:32 > 3:46:38their pay has already been affected for so many years by caps. The SNP
3:46:38 > 3:46:42are clear that the founding principle of the NHS is to have
3:46:42 > 3:46:46services that are free for everyone, services that are not out for
3:46:46 > 3:46:49profit, and we have heard today from honourable members that sometimes it
3:46:49 > 3:46:53has even been cheaper to park town centres Andrew Parker hospitals,
3:46:53 > 3:47:03that cannot be right. So by 2015 we understand that getting rid of
3:47:03 > 3:47:07hospital charges has saved staff in hospital over £25 million. Parking
3:47:07 > 3:47:12charges are basically a tax on NHS treatment and it cannot be allowed
3:47:12 > 3:47:17to go on. As chair of the all-party Parliamentary group for disability
3:47:17 > 3:47:20and protect -- I am particularly concerned that people with
3:47:20 > 3:47:23disabilities who we know are more likely to speed poverty are being
3:47:23 > 3:47:28doubly financially penalised if they require medical treatment and having
3:47:28 > 3:47:34in England to pay for hospital parking. The honourable member for
3:47:34 > 3:47:39Harlow is correct, there are pragmatic ways to address the issue.
3:47:39 > 3:47:44The issues that are raised which are set to repeat and prevent this
3:47:44 > 3:47:49coming about can be overcome. We discussed tokens and other such
3:47:49 > 3:47:52ideas and these are all pragmatic and can be put in place and can
3:47:52 > 3:47:57work. We have made it work, we have made it a success and it can happen
3:47:57 > 3:48:02with the will. I would like to take a brief moment if I need to extend
3:48:02 > 3:48:06the issue from hospital parking charges to also address parking for
3:48:06 > 3:48:12NHS staff in health centres. All are free I believe in my own
3:48:12 > 3:48:15constituency, aside from the new Hunter health centre of the story
3:48:15 > 3:48:22car park. I have been in somewhat intransigent negotiations with NHS
3:48:22 > 3:48:26Lanarkshire for over a year now as only a limited amount of permanent
3:48:26 > 3:48:30parking has been made available for staff. This has unfortunately meant
3:48:30 > 3:48:37that some staff often in lower pay bands such as administration staff
3:48:37 > 3:48:41have extortionate weekly charges for getting to work. I believe it is
3:48:41 > 3:48:45unprincipled, it is also unfair and why should we penalised staff who
3:48:45 > 3:48:52work in a particular health centre? I have taken on my Friday, Madam
3:48:52 > 3:48:57Deputy Speaker, to monitoring the free spaces on the car park and I
3:48:57 > 3:49:02can assure the house that it is half empty every single Friday, it is an
3:49:02 > 3:49:07extremely busy day usually elsewhere for car parks so there are enough
3:49:07 > 3:49:14spaces for staff. I would urge the NHS Chief Executive once again to
3:49:14 > 3:49:21reverse the decision and ensure that permits for staff as requested are
3:49:21 > 3:49:26restored and that this principle step is taken. Again I am writing to
3:49:26 > 3:49:32him after this debate which I'm sure he will look forward to the ways
3:49:32 > 3:49:36does and I will let him know that he has been mentioned in the House of
3:49:36 > 3:49:44Commons once again. So I would like to just some of my thank you to all
3:49:44 > 3:49:48of the honourable members have taken part from all sides of a house in
3:49:48 > 3:49:51today's debate, the honourable member for Great Grimsby and great
3:49:51 > 3:49:54Telfer, the honourable member for Kingston-upon-Hull, from Cleethorpes
3:49:54 > 3:50:00who actually raised important issues about people in rural areas being
3:50:00 > 3:50:04badly affected, the honourable member for the coal Valley, the law
3:50:04 > 3:50:07member from Hemel Hempstead who spoke about volunteer drivers which
3:50:07 > 3:50:10I think is an extremely pertinent point. The honourable member for
3:50:10 > 3:50:16Hayward and Middleton who worked with NHS as a fellow Unite grep in
3:50:16 > 3:50:20my time at who has done great work in her years for the NHS. The
3:50:20 > 3:50:28honourable member for Slough and spent her for Enfield Southgate.
3:50:28 > 3:50:32Everyone who has spoken has urged the government to act. We do not
3:50:32 > 3:50:37need any superficial metric but we do need action. So I would ask the
3:50:37 > 3:50:42Minister and the government to act by putting NHS patients, staff,
3:50:42 > 3:50:47carers and relatives and volunteers first. Our emergency workers and
3:50:47 > 3:50:53those who care about NHS are all request in change and this must be
3:50:53 > 3:51:04taken forward and I trust that the Minister will do so.Thank you. I am
3:51:04 > 3:51:06really pleased to have the opportunity to reply in this debate
3:51:06 > 3:51:11on this very important subject. I am grateful to the honourable member
3:51:11 > 3:51:20for Harlow for bringing this subject forward. I know that he and I agree
3:51:20 > 3:51:28on most aspects of the subject. I am grateful to members on all sides of
3:51:28 > 3:51:31the house, it seems that there is much agreement you today and it is
3:51:31 > 3:51:36heartening to see members raising the issues of the impact and
3:51:36 > 3:51:42understanding of the impact of -- on patients and carers and NHS staff.
3:51:42 > 3:51:48The member for Great Grimsby also made the point of the effect on
3:51:48 > 3:51:53greater transportation system and how that ought to be impacted.
3:51:53 > 3:51:56Powerful speeches were made from the member from Telford and Cleethorpes
3:51:56 > 3:52:01in the com ballet, accused the system of being one of profiteering.
3:52:01 > 3:52:06A very important point made an heavy stuff here from Middleton and the
3:52:06 > 3:52:11member for how Hamstead on the burden of having to pay for going to
3:52:11 > 3:52:20work. Raising the issues of personal family issues where people are taken
3:52:20 > 3:52:27away from a Sikh family member's bed to replenish parking meters. I would
3:52:27 > 3:52:32like to say no one likes to pay to park, to pay to park at a hospital
3:52:32 > 3:52:38really does add insult to injury. We are not talking about a luxury
3:52:38 > 3:52:41experience, a shopping trip or fun night out. We are talking about
3:52:41 > 3:52:47paying to visit a hospital where people are not queueing up to go to
3:52:47 > 3:52:50the hospital cafe as people pointed out. No one goes to the hospital
3:52:50 > 3:52:55because they want to, they go because they are sick. They go for
3:52:55 > 3:52:58treatment, surged, chemotherapy, dialysis, and they go to visit loved
3:52:58 > 3:53:04ones. Hospitals are not destinations of choice. People go because they
3:53:04 > 3:53:09must and I am quite shocked that it is free to park at the local
3:53:09 > 3:53:14shopping centre but I must pay to park at my local hospital. During
3:53:14 > 3:53:18the last three years I have spent hours and hours visiting my mother
3:53:18 > 3:53:23in hospital. I have often gone backwards or forwards to three times
3:53:23 > 3:53:25a day sitting in hospital visits roadwork and other commitments and I
3:53:25 > 3:53:29must say it is all very distressing. And as I leave the hospital each
3:53:29 > 3:53:34night worried, wondering what tomorrow will bring, the last thing
3:53:34 > 3:53:40I want to do is stand outside in the cold queueing to pay for my parking.
3:53:40 > 3:53:46This burden is of course in addition to the actual cost. Some car parks
3:53:46 > 3:53:49demand payment in advance as we have heard tonight and this brings its
3:53:49 > 3:53:52own set of problems where patients and visitors must judge how long
3:53:52 > 3:53:56each hospital visit the last and then have to leave the water and
3:53:56 > 3:54:00treatment room to feed the ever hungry parking machine. Of course
3:54:00 > 3:54:07running to and from the car park when hooked onto dialysis machine.
3:54:07 > 3:54:11Many dialysis patients suffer from multiple conditions and so paying to
3:54:11 > 3:54:16park the times a week for dialysis sessions each lasting 4-5 hours is a
3:54:16 > 3:54:23real financial burden for them and their carers. People in my
3:54:23 > 3:54:28constituency are on a weekly Carer's Allowance and say they are forced to
3:54:28 > 3:54:30give up work to provide round-the-clock care for her husband
3:54:30 > 3:54:36who suffered a stroke. He has been in hospital. She has been in
3:54:36 > 3:54:41hospital for two or three hours a day to comfort her husband. This
3:54:41 > 3:54:44cost £20 per week at the time she has paid for petrol have for
3:54:44 > 3:54:49allowances gone. We have a National Health Service that was set up to be
3:54:49 > 3:54:52free at the point of delivery, established in 1948 to make health
3:54:52 > 3:54:56care are right for all. That is not what is happening. Even though
3:54:56 > 3:55:00hospital car parking is free in Scotland and Wales during England
3:55:00 > 3:55:04hospital users are forced to pay off an extortionate rates, charges
3:55:04 > 3:55:10varying from £1 50 per hour to £4 per hour. We are charging the
3:55:10 > 3:55:15chronically ill, the terminally ill, their carers and visitors over half
3:55:15 > 3:55:20of those aged over 76 years have conditions that require regular
3:55:20 > 3:55:22hospital appointments. Hospital car parking charges are an extra burden
3:55:22 > 3:55:26for them and their families. The Alzheimer Society report that their
3:55:26 > 3:55:31patients with dementia stay 5-7 times longer in hospital than other
3:55:31 > 3:55:35patients aged over 65 and hospitals can be frightening places for those
3:55:35 > 3:55:39with these conditions. Rely on family and carers visiting to give
3:55:39 > 3:55:44them support. Parking charges are an extra burden that these families
3:55:44 > 3:55:48could do without. The Patients' Association commented that for
3:55:48 > 3:55:52patients parking charges and genetics of charge for being ill,
3:55:52 > 3:55:54appointment of delayed last longer than the expected to sort even if
3:55:54 > 3:55:58you're paying for parking you could end up being fined when you click it
3:55:58 > 3:56:05runs out. Visiting hospital is stressful enough. But Cancer
3:56:05 > 3:56:10support, the corporate blogs NHS is to provide key health -- free health
3:56:10 > 3:56:14care for all of the point of access. But many are paying extortionate car
3:56:14 > 3:56:17parking charges in order to access treatment for life-threatening
3:56:17 > 3:56:25diseases. Bliss, the charity for babies born prematurely or sick said
3:56:25 > 3:56:28that the very real cost having a premature or sick baby can
3:56:28 > 3:56:31contribute to the financial burden many families face when their babies
3:56:31 > 3:56:37need neo-natal care. In the midst of this misery the average hospital
3:56:37 > 3:56:41clusters making £1 million of profit from car parking charges, and
3:56:41 > 3:56:43several hospitals the length and breadth of the country report
3:56:43 > 3:56:50profits of over £3 million. Last year NHS hospitals made a record 100
3:56:50 > 3:56:53and some did for million from charging patients visitors and
3:56:53 > 3:56:59staff. -- 174 million. Some people point out that public transport is
3:56:59 > 3:57:03an option that avoid parking charges in me say this, public transport
3:57:03 > 3:57:06provision has been reduced in response to funding cuts but even
3:57:06 > 3:57:12where it exists there are many further this is not an option. Some
3:57:12 > 3:57:16patients are too unwell or frail to travel on a bus and others including
3:57:16 > 3:57:20cancer patients attending for chemotherapy have reduced in unity
3:57:20 > 3:57:26and must avoid contact with the general public.You are making a
3:57:26 > 3:57:30compelling case like most have here today. Public transport has its
3:57:30 > 3:57:32place for outpatients and things like that where it is available.
3:57:32 > 3:57:38Imagine going into labour and think and I wait for the number two bus,
3:57:38 > 3:57:42please? This is farcical. We need car parks to be there for people
3:57:42 > 3:57:46when we need them other than as a cash cow.Thank you I entirely agree
3:57:46 > 3:57:52with the honourable gentleman. Further to this I would say there
3:57:52 > 3:57:56are other people, patients and carers who are often balancing work
3:57:56 > 3:58:02and other commitments who have time -- tight time schedule is that
3:58:02 > 3:58:08preclude public transport. I have spoken to parents of a terminally
3:58:08 > 3:58:11ill child who only left their child's bedside to tend to the needs
3:58:11 > 3:58:16of the other children. There has been no discussion of cause of
3:58:16 > 3:58:19hospital car parking charges that would be complete without
3:58:19 > 3:58:25consideration of the impact on NHS staff as has been mentioned earlier.
3:58:25 > 3:58:33Staff who pay to go to work and who are not guaranteed a space. Some
3:58:33 > 3:58:38hospital staff his chef overruns because attending to the needs of
3:58:38 > 3:58:41patients face fines for overstaying their parking time. This is clearly
3:58:41 > 3:58:47no way to treat health professionals, no wonder we face a
3:58:47 > 3:58:52crisis in retention. Governor action has been limited to a series of
3:58:52 > 3:58:55recommendations in relation to hospital car parking. The government
3:58:55 > 3:58:57recommends that the hospital car parking charges should not be
3:58:57 > 3:59:01applied to blue badge holders, carers, visitors with relatives who
3:59:01 > 3:59:06are gravely ill and patients are frequent outpatient appointments. In
3:59:06 > 3:59:09reality these recommendations came for very little and in fact the
3:59:09 > 3:59:12trend is to increase car parking charges and to reduce the number of
3:59:12 > 3:59:15those who are exempt. Many hospital trusts have even begun to charge
3:59:15 > 3:59:20without all this. It is not good enough for the government to
3:59:20 > 3:59:24abdicate response ability. This is a matter of principle. Scandalously,
3:59:24 > 3:59:28Conservative members have argued in this chamber on previous occasions
3:59:28 > 3:59:34that the NHS needs the income from car parking. I have no doubt that
3:59:34 > 3:59:38the NHS needs this revenue, it is common knowledge that since 2010 the
3:59:38 > 3:59:42service has been starved of funding. I would ask, is it right that we
3:59:42 > 3:59:50fund our health service by taxing sick?
3:59:50 > 3:59:53We on the Labour benches while none of this. I'm proud of the next
3:59:53 > 4:00:01Labour government will ensure a red -- our NHS is properly funded and we
4:00:01 > 4:00:07will abolish all parking charges at hospitals. No hospital will lose
4:00:07 > 4:00:14funding as a result of our policy. In 2015, I asked the government to
4:00:14 > 4:00:19exempt carers from hospital car parking charges. At that time, that
4:00:19 > 4:00:23relatively modest proposal was met with derision from the government
4:00:23 > 4:00:27benches. My attempt to help to remove this financial burden was
4:00:27 > 4:00:33dismissed as a worthy aim but not worthy enough for the government to
4:00:33 > 4:00:36support. Conservative members went to great lengths to top the bill out
4:00:36 > 4:00:42of time. I hope times have changed. Today I'm asking along with the
4:00:42 > 4:00:47honourable member for Harlow that the government move to remove all
4:00:47 > 4:00:51car parking charges at NHS hospitals. Today we ask the
4:00:51 > 4:00:56government to do the decent thing, to remove this tax on the sick and
4:00:56 > 4:01:04take action to ensure we truly have an NHS free at the point of access.
4:01:04 > 4:01:10Thank you. Me I begin by commending the Member for Harlow on securing
4:01:10 > 4:01:17this debate. It is an issue on which I think members across the House
4:01:17 > 4:01:24recognise Yes campaign and for some time. And an issue on which he has
4:01:24 > 4:01:29already had some success, as reflected in government guidelines
4:01:29 > 4:01:32issued in 2004. And I think it's right in light of the concerns
4:01:32 > 4:01:37raised across the House that this issue is revisited. And I think
4:01:37 > 4:01:41that's been reflected in what has been a constructive debate on behalf
4:01:41 > 4:01:45of the backbench committee and a member or members of the House who
4:01:45 > 4:01:49have contributed and informed the House through their experience of
4:01:49 > 4:01:53what is happening in their own constituencies. I don't think there
4:01:53 > 4:02:00is any issue anywhere in the House on the desirability of scrapping car
4:02:00 > 4:02:07parking charges. I think all of us as English members of Parliament, I
4:02:07 > 4:02:11know amongst SNP colleagues it will be different, but the Member for
4:02:11 > 4:02:21Great Grimsby said we pay these charges and we know they are
4:02:21 > 4:02:26unpopular with constituents. They are a concern for staff working hard
4:02:26 > 4:02:33within the NHS. As the Member for Hemel Hempstead highlighted, they
4:02:33 > 4:02:38also predate this government. This has been an issue that has long been
4:02:38 > 4:02:42debated on the House and has been debated with the parties on
4:02:42 > 4:02:47respective sides of the House. I don't think the issue is the
4:02:47 > 4:02:53desirability of what is shot by the Member for Harlow, the issue is the
4:02:53 > 4:02:56execution. How would that be done in a way that does not cause unintended
4:02:56 > 4:03:02consequences? And how might that be mitigated if their were to be the
4:03:02 > 4:03:09case? I think we got a flavour of some of those unintended
4:03:09 > 4:03:11consequences from contributions from members constructively across the
4:03:11 > 4:03:18House. Implicit in the motion is that car parking charges are applied
4:03:18 > 4:03:28to all NHS hospitals, or the impression from the debate. As you
4:03:28 > 4:03:34will be well aware, 67% of NHS sites don't charge at all at present. So
4:03:34 > 4:03:41we are talking about a sub sect within the NHS where charges apply.
4:03:41 > 4:03:49Albeit that is concentrated amongst the acute sector. For example,
4:03:49 > 4:03:56mental health patients are often the most vulnerable constituents seeking
4:03:56 > 4:04:00support do not face charges because those parking facilities are not
4:04:00 > 4:04:06charged. So this tends to be an issue within the acute sector.I
4:04:06 > 4:04:10thank him for his kind words but I have to say I disagree with what he
4:04:10 > 4:04:15has just set. Hospital car parking charges in England are widespread.
4:04:15 > 4:04:24You have to go from one hospital to another. 50% of hospitals are
4:04:24 > 4:04:31charging the disabled, for example. It is a statement of fact confirmed
4:04:31 > 4:04:37by my officials that 67% of NHS sites do not charged. The definition
4:04:37 > 4:04:45of hospitals covers more than acute hospitals, but the point I was
4:04:45 > 4:04:52seeking to make was that this is an issue concentrated in acute
4:04:52 > 4:04:56hospitals and this is the issue that is before us today. The Member for
4:04:56 > 4:05:01Great Grimsby recognise that the thin trusts there is considerable
4:05:01 > 4:05:06room for flexibility. One of the key issues from the debate was the
4:05:06 > 4:05:10distinction between charges that are covering the maintenance of car
4:05:10 > 4:05:27parks and how a reduction in the facilities would be affected. There
4:05:27 > 4:05:30was a concern raised on profiteering, going beyond the cost
4:05:30 > 4:05:36of maintenance. I add that into place with the current guidelines in
4:05:36 > 4:05:48place. And we heard highlighted the charges from the hospital compared
4:05:48 > 4:05:57with the local authority. Concerns were raised regarding blue badge
4:05:57 > 4:06:06holders. You could have an affluent blue badge holder being spared a
4:06:06 > 4:06:10charge and the less affluent other visitor to our hospital being
4:06:10 > 4:06:14charged, but again the transparency as to how the guidance is being
4:06:14 > 4:06:24applied as a factor within that. Blue badge is quite rightly or not
4:06:24 > 4:06:29means tested. It is to do with ability to access. It doesn't matter
4:06:29 > 4:06:35how much money they have in the bank. If they hospital and have a
4:06:35 > 4:06:41blue badge, surely it should be free and as close to the point of access
4:06:41 > 4:06:51as possible?That is part of what the guidance points to. Am very
4:06:51 > 4:07:02happy to look at the reason why it is 164 pages. It speaks to how
4:07:02 > 4:07:10concessions and guidance...I have huge respect for my honourable
4:07:10 > 4:07:17friend, but the fact is the guidelines are not working. Up to
4:07:17 > 4:07:2150% of hospitals according to the Freedom of information request are
4:07:21 > 4:07:25still charging disabled people to park. Was no point in talking about
4:07:25 > 4:07:29the guidelines if people with disabilities are still being charged
4:07:29 > 4:07:36to park in hospitals in England.The point I was saying to my honourable
4:07:36 > 4:07:42friend is to firstly look at cases and speak to trusts to better
4:07:42 > 4:07:47understand that. Part of the complexity is simply deducing the
4:07:47 > 4:07:53charges and how that is managed. Every worker at the example of
4:07:53 > 4:08:04Inverness where the hospital car park is being used by people for the
4:08:04 > 4:08:14airport. That makes access more difficult. That's why some of these
4:08:14 > 4:08:22issues have a local flavour in terms of how they are applied. That was
4:08:22 > 4:08:28recognised by the Member for Hayward and Middleton when he spoke of the
4:08:28 > 4:08:39distinction between the North Manchester site where visitors are
4:08:39 > 4:08:46not using your store car park. So the point is that there are local
4:08:46 > 4:08:52factors, just as there are with legacy PFI contracts, including in
4:08:52 > 4:08:58Scotland and Wales when there are contracts going back to 2008 which
4:08:58 > 4:09:01are still charging.With the Minister accept that people being
4:09:01 > 4:09:08ill and suffering distress at hospitals is not a local issue, it's
4:09:08 > 4:09:13a national issue. The burden of hospital car parking charges
4:09:13 > 4:09:20wherever they occur to be a concern of the government.Of course, but
4:09:20 > 4:09:24the point the honourable Lady must equally recognise is that for
4:09:24 > 4:09:28example if you had a PFI agreement put in place by the previous
4:09:28 > 4:09:34government in 2008 with the Saudis are still being applied, back does
4:09:34 > 4:09:38seem that there are often complexities in what can be done in
4:09:38 > 4:09:48different factors. That is why a trusts have local discretion. We
4:09:48 > 4:09:51need to understand the transparency around that and how that is being
4:09:51 > 4:10:01applied.
4:10:02 > 4:10:08I'm sure we have time for this important issue. He raises the issue
4:10:08 > 4:10:17of complexity. Some would be easier to do than others and I accept that.
4:10:17 > 4:10:24Some of these ludicrous PFIs that in place before the previous
4:10:24 > 4:10:27administration and some since. To the easy ones first. That's the
4:10:27 > 4:10:33answer. That's what Scotland did. But ruling out changing anything at
4:10:33 > 4:10:38all because there are some difficult issues surely is not the way to go
4:10:38 > 4:10:43forward.Again, one comes to some of the issues there are, so again
4:10:43 > 4:10:48turning to one of the points raised was in terms of whether free parking
4:10:48 > 4:10:57could address through tokens and barriers. The concern raised from
4:10:57 > 4:11:01colleagues within the NHS would be the burden on staff. We heard
4:11:01 > 4:11:09examples where frequent users of hospitals are able to access
4:11:09 > 4:11:13concessionary schemes, but those visiting hospitals for a one-off
4:11:13 > 4:11:17would be any potential impact on them in terms of how they might be
4:11:17 > 4:11:21expected to assist in the administration of that. Another
4:11:21 > 4:11:29point raised was the impact on staff members. That was an issue raised by
4:11:29 > 4:11:36members across the House. I have been visited recently by the Royal
4:11:36 > 4:11:46College of Nursing regarding wider pay discussions. It's very helpful
4:11:46 > 4:11:51to have the contributions of the House in terms of this understanding
4:11:51 > 4:11:55some of the benefits and pressures and issues before them, as part of
4:11:55 > 4:12:02this debate. There is no question I think across the House as reflected
4:12:02 > 4:12:09by the Member for Harlow on the desirability in addressing
4:12:09 > 4:12:15iniquities variants and scope to ensure that compliance with the
4:12:15 > 4:12:19guidelines is followed. But at the same time we do need to be mindful
4:12:19 > 4:12:24that we don't have unintended consequences, particularly in
4:12:24 > 4:12:27constraining the available car parking available for those that
4:12:27 > 4:12:32need it. I'm happy to continue discussions with my honourable
4:12:32 > 4:12:36friend in terms of this policy and I commend him and other colleagues
4:12:36 > 4:12:45from what has been a very constructive debate.Thank you. I'd
4:12:45 > 4:12:48like to thank the honourable members have spoken from both sides of the
4:12:48 > 4:12:54House. I think the Minister who has heard about the madness of the
4:12:54 > 4:13:00guidelines not working and the problems with public transport and
4:13:00 > 4:13:08parking being given over to football club supporters, about the moving
4:13:08 > 4:13:12stories of families and the problems people with severe illness have had
4:13:12 > 4:13:18to face. I have to say, I'm incredibly disappointed with his
4:13:18 > 4:13:23response today. I gave him my speech in advance because I wanted him to
4:13:23 > 4:13:28look at this seriously. I think a lot of what he has read is very much
4:13:28 > 4:13:37what officials might want -- would be what you think would come from
4:13:37 > 4:13:41officials. I think this is a great disappointment. Europe and this
4:13:41 > 4:13:45saying he believes in the desirability of this and men did not
4:13:45 > 4:13:57give any indication of how. It is not beyond the wit of man to develop
4:13:57 > 4:14:00a number plate recognition system to deal with the problems of people
4:14:00 > 4:14:09misusing hospital car parking. I think that my feeling is he has said
4:14:09 > 4:14:12we will try and make sure the guidelines work. Even if the
4:14:12 > 4:14:17guidelines were working, they would still mean many hospitals would
4:14:17 > 4:14:22charge millions of patients and visitors. On both sides of the
4:14:22 > 4:14:35House, we constantly talk about billions being spent on the NHS, the
4:14:35 > 4:14:39fact is it is hard to understand from most members of the public but
4:14:39 > 4:14:42when there is something real that affects millions of people, when
4:14:42 > 4:14:46they go to hospital on a regular basis, as has been said again and
4:14:46 > 4:14:51again today, not out of choice but because they have to do, this is
4:14:51 > 4:14:55something real and substantive and does not cost a huge amount of money
4:14:55 > 4:14:59in terms of the overall NHS budget. There are different solutions in
4:14:59 > 4:15:04which to pay for that, so the NHS is not harmed. I just urge him strongly
4:15:04 > 4:15:11to look at this issue again and realise there is a cross-party
4:15:11 > 4:15:17consensus in this House.
4:15:17 > 4:15:21There are many members on our side of the house that one is changed and
4:15:21 > 4:15:26they returned that when this comes back, have a more substantive
4:15:26 > 4:15:30solution to scrap hospital car park charges.The question is as on the
4:15:30 > 4:15:34order paper, as many are others that opinion say aye, to the contrary
4:15:34 > 4:15:45now. I think the ayes have it, the ayes have it. Petition, Kate Green.
4:15:45 > 4:15:51Thank you very much. I rise to present the petition on behalf of my
4:15:51 > 4:15:57constituents, which has 356 signatures from people seeking to
4:15:57 > 4:16:00see an end to the violence and persecution of the raw anger Muslim
4:16:00 > 4:16:09community in the Armagh and the addition questions that the House of
4:16:09 > 4:16:12Commons makes representation to the government of my Armagh to cease all
4:16:12 > 4:16:23violence, and further to call for further aids to Myanmar and for
4:16:23 > 4:16:29others to no longer supply metal very training or eight. And we must
4:16:29 > 4:16:32ensure that the perpetrators are brought to the International Court
4:16:32 > 4:16:40of Justice to be tried for crimes against the malady. -- crimes
4:16:40 > 4:16:42against humanity.
4:16:49 > 4:16:59Petition, ten the Mac's Muslim ethnic minority. -- Myanmar's Muslim
4:16:59 > 4:17:07ethnic minority.The question is that this house do now adjourn.I am
4:17:07 > 4:17:10grateful to you Mr Speaker for granting me this debate and I want
4:17:10 > 4:17:16to welcome my honourable friend the Minister to his role and to the
4:17:16 > 4:17:21opportunity to hear about my constituency. My constituency covers
4:17:21 > 4:17:25the lower tiers of local planning authorities, and Essex County
4:17:25 > 4:17:29Council with responsibility for waste and minerals, which explains
4:17:29 > 4:17:33bad and deputy speaker in part why the honourable Minister's department
4:17:33 > 4:17:36hold such a high volume of correspondence from me on the half
4:17:36 > 4:17:41of my constituents. If the Minister visits my constituency and he is
4:17:41 > 4:17:48very welcome to do so, he will see at first hand the boundless economic
4:17:48 > 4:17:52potential of this part of Essex and indeed the entire county. He will
4:17:52 > 4:17:55also see appetite amongst the local communities to take a positive and
4:17:55 > 4:18:00practical approach to housing, planning and infrastructure. Many
4:18:00 > 4:18:02parishes are working on neighbourhood development plans and
4:18:02 > 4:18:07watch to deliver the localism agenda advocated by our government. They
4:18:07 > 4:18:11want to use the powers that their disposal to allocate preferred site
4:18:11 > 4:18:15for housing business use and protection and we want to deliver
4:18:15 > 4:18:19ambitious plans to support economic growth and bring more local homes to
4:18:19 > 4:18:24our local communities. We want and need new infrastructure to support
4:18:24 > 4:18:29growth including the widening of a 12, upgrading the A1 20 and
4:18:29 > 4:18:32investment in the great eastern mainline. I welcome the announcement
4:18:32 > 4:18:38today of over £7 million at the Heybridge flood alleviation and
4:18:38 > 4:18:42regeneration screen -- scheme just outside my constituency and I hope
4:18:42 > 4:18:46that more investment can come through in future to support
4:18:46 > 4:18:49planning and development. We also recognise that development brings
4:18:49 > 4:18:51with it implement opportunities, investment in infrastructure, new
4:18:51 > 4:18:57public services and GP services. But that does not mean housing at any
4:18:57 > 4:19:02cost and in any location. So I want to use this debate to draw the
4:19:02 > 4:19:05Minister's attention to some of the issues and cases of concern were
4:19:05 > 4:19:09localism is being undermined and were opportunities to deliver
4:19:09 > 4:19:13locally led planning are being missed. And I fully appreciate and
4:19:13 > 4:19:15respect that the Minister cannot give detailed responses on specific
4:19:15 > 4:19:20planning cases that are currently alive and under consideration but I
4:19:20 > 4:19:23do hope that he and his department can reflect upon them. First of all
4:19:23 > 4:19:27the Minister will be aware that the Secretary of State decided to call
4:19:27 > 4:19:31in planning applications for two sites in Hatfield, stone Park
4:19:31 > 4:19:36Meadows in Gleneagles way for up to 260 new dwellings. A hearing took
4:19:36 > 4:19:39place in December and I would like to pay tribute Madam Deputy Speaker
4:19:39 > 4:19:45to my local residents and our parish council who came together to oppose
4:19:45 > 4:19:51these unwelcome developments. Their dedication to the local community
4:19:51 > 4:19:56has been outstanding and what we have seen here at -- is that both
4:19:56 > 4:19:59sites outside of the settlement boundary and emerging neighbourhood
4:19:59 > 4:20:02plan because these would be detrimental to the countryside. It
4:20:02 > 4:20:08would also place unacceptable pressure is already on the GP
4:20:08 > 4:20:10practices was no guarantees of financial contributions being
4:20:10 > 4:20:15offered to ensure that they can be enhanced. Our local schools are
4:20:15 > 4:20:20full, but no cogitations are being sought because of the silk filling
4:20:20 > 4:20:23restrictions and the applicants think that it is acceptable for
4:20:23 > 4:20:26primary school pupils, for children to be forced to walk over two miles
4:20:26 > 4:20:34along the busy a 12 to a school in Wootton. As for secondary school
4:20:34 > 4:20:40pupils axing the number 72 but it that connects happened to two
4:20:40 > 4:20:44academies and so there will be no direct bus for pupils in the village
4:20:44 > 4:20:50to use. We are not opposed to housing, quite the opposite, the
4:20:50 > 4:20:52wonderful village is already set to accommodate new housing in the
4:20:52 > 4:20:56American local plan, focused everywhere in the village and a
4:20:56 > 4:21:00conference we develop that any covering land between a 12 and
4:21:00 > 4:21:05Eastern mainline and that is some 250 new dwellings already going
4:21:05 > 4:21:09through. The village has taken its fair share of new housing and cannot
4:21:09 > 4:21:13take any more. There are many other reasons why these two applications
4:21:13 > 4:21:17are totally unsuitable for development. So I trust that the
4:21:17 > 4:21:21Minister and the Secretary of State will consider these points in the
4:21:21 > 4:21:28strong objections when he gets the report of the findings. Although the
4:21:28 > 4:21:30Minister cannot comment on the specifics of the application that
4:21:30 > 4:21:34are wider issues that have arisen when I would welcome this
4:21:34 > 4:21:40classification. Firstly councils like Braintree died in the process
4:21:40 > 4:21:43of putting in a local plan sent neighbourhood plans are embracing
4:21:43 > 4:21:48the principles of localism but they are being undermined by planning
4:21:48 > 4:21:54applications and on many occasions -- many cases undermining the
4:21:54 > 4:21:59democratic processes. These communities need protecting. And
4:21:59 > 4:22:02they need the government to allow them time to get their plans in
4:22:02 > 4:22:07place. Secondly the issue of the five-year land supply deliverable
4:22:07 > 4:22:13sites, speculative and predatory developers are seeking to exploit
4:22:13 > 4:22:18the council's claim that it has a five-year land supply. The main
4:22:18 > 4:22:23reason for Braintree having an identified surprise shortfall is due
4:22:23 > 4:22:27to the failure of the last Labour government's regional spatial
4:22:27 > 4:22:34strategy with housing targets lower than those with assessed housing
4:22:34 > 4:22:37need research. I hope the Minister can ensure local communities in the
4:22:37 > 4:22:40district that they will not be punished because of the last Labour
4:22:40 > 4:22:45government's failure in the decision-makers can exercise
4:22:45 > 4:22:49discretion over the housing supply figures. Councils do need
4:22:49 > 4:22:52flexibility on this issue and that includes being able to use a
4:22:52 > 4:22:56Liverpool method very best suits, including sites in draft
4:22:56 > 4:22:59allocations. I hope the Minister and speak to this and give assurances
4:22:59 > 4:23:05that, too. The third point is the issue of effectiveness on the
4:23:05 > 4:23:11pre-consultation issue. In my region one applicant issued a consultation
4:23:11 > 4:23:14which contained false information about health provision which the
4:23:14 > 4:23:19applicant had not bothered to check in such to frighten my residence.
4:23:19 > 4:23:22The also put in a planning application within a few weeks of
4:23:22 > 4:23:26securing rights from landowners to promote the site and less than two
4:23:26 > 4:23:28working days after holding a pre-application discussion with
4:23:28 > 4:23:33council officers that is now time to take account of local comment at
4:23:33 > 4:23:38all. And when the council and local community were taken to resolve
4:23:38 > 4:23:41issues that have been raised as a result of the applicants failure,
4:23:41 > 4:23:47such as the impact on schools and NHS and landscape, the applicant had
4:23:47 > 4:23:50the audacity to threaten to take the application to the planning
4:23:50 > 4:23:55Inspectorate. For other sites in the district such as referrals and
4:23:55 > 4:24:00planning inspectorate to deliver decision-making, this is abuse of
4:24:00 > 4:24:08the -- this abuse of the planning system must stop. There are good
4:24:08 > 4:24:11examples of positive engagement in local amenities and we must make
4:24:11 > 4:24:13sure that one of this happens and those who fiddle consultations and
4:24:13 > 4:24:16circumvent the application engagement should be sanctioned for
4:24:16 > 4:24:21doing so. Madam Deputy Speaker, another major development issue
4:24:21 > 4:24:24affecting my constituency is the proposed garden settlement for
4:24:24 > 4:24:30Colchester Borough and the border. This proposal has the deliver --
4:24:30 > 4:24:34this proposal has the potential to deliver thousands of new homes in
4:24:34 > 4:24:37infrastructure upgrades and public is. The government agonised this and
4:24:37 > 4:24:43has provided over £1.3 million to Colchester Borough Council's work on
4:24:43 > 4:24:46this project. However, a number of questions and concerns have been
4:24:46 > 4:24:51raised about the proposals. Whenever you leave usually to infrastructure
4:24:51 > 4:24:54and public services, residents want to be assured that if the project
4:24:54 > 4:24:58gets the green light there will be significant new infrastructure and
4:24:58 > 4:25:02public services put in place to meet demand. There is no point in putting
4:25:02 > 4:25:05the infrastructure and services into one of the developments until the
4:25:05 > 4:25:09development are being occupied. The needed in advance and a clear
4:25:09 > 4:25:14timetable. And that means that the Department for Transport, the
4:25:14 > 4:25:17tragedy, local councils and the private sector needs to come
4:25:17 > 4:25:23together to ensure that funding is in place to upgrade a 120, increase
4:25:23 > 4:25:26capacity on the great Eastern mainline with a passing grade as
4:25:26 > 4:25:30well as providing for new GP surgeries and schools. There have
4:25:30 > 4:25:34also been questions raised about the delivery vehicle, local engagement,
4:25:34 > 4:25:38availability of implement opportunities and how the councils
4:25:38 > 4:25:42have spent the money provided to them by the government. The garden
4:25:42 > 4:25:45settlement proposals are currently in the process of being examined as
4:25:45 > 4:25:49part of the local plan process but I urge the Minister and Secretary of
4:25:49 > 4:25:53State to be careful of these matters. Some residents are opposed
4:25:53 > 4:25:56to this project, others are in favour, however, it is essential
4:25:56 > 4:25:59that this major project goes ahead it is done correctly and in the
4:25:59 > 4:26:04right way. One of other reasons why there are concerns about garden
4:26:04 > 4:26:07settlement is because of the appalling record of Colchester
4:26:07 > 4:26:11Borough Council. An planning matters as Lib Dem and Labour run council is
4:26:11 > 4:26:15rotten to the corner. The Minister has the background and will know
4:26:15 > 4:26:18that last year the Secretary of State granted planning permission
4:26:18 > 4:26:21for a new leisure and retail development known as Tollgate
4:26:21 > 4:26:23Village. This development was supported by overwhelming majority
4:26:23 > 4:26:30of local people and to transform derelict site into a developer
4:26:30 > 4:26:34creating hundreds of new local jobs and tens of millions of pounds of
4:26:34 > 4:26:36inward investment. However, the council tried everything to block
4:26:36 > 4:26:41it. They claimed it would be a loss of land and even though there was no
4:26:41 > 4:26:45interest in using the site in this way they try to put doggy relativist
4:26:45 > 4:26:49Colchester town centre and the even tried to smear me by making up a
4:26:49 > 4:26:55false claim that my representations were somehow improper. They behaved
4:26:55 > 4:27:00disgracefully and not a single officer or political figure has
4:27:00 > 4:27:02taken responsibility. They blocked the creation of jobs, prevented
4:27:02 > 4:27:08investment in waste of public money. Close to this site a council has
4:27:08 > 4:27:12behaved in a similar way on a scheme called Stein Park, the private
4:27:12 > 4:27:16investment project which they blocked but which was granted
4:27:16 > 4:27:19consent on appeal. Also in Stanway on the Lakeland housing developer to
4:27:19 > 4:27:22the council completely neglected and ignored residents, causing the loss
4:27:22 > 4:27:32of green space in an area of land known as a parcel SR six. Is area of
4:27:32 > 4:27:35land should have been landscaped and it was not and the council failed to
4:27:35 > 4:27:38enforce a planning condition. It was then designated for protection as
4:27:38 > 4:27:44open space in the council's local plan but behind closed doors and
4:27:44 > 4:27:47without any consultation the council allowed a new master plan to be
4:27:47 > 4:27:50approved and designated that site for intensive housing. Residents
4:27:50 > 4:27:55were only made aware of this when he reserved matters application was
4:27:55 > 4:27:58made in 2015, despite complaints and concerns about the process the
4:27:58 > 4:28:03council approved the construction of 27 new dwellings and a lot of the
4:28:03 > 4:28:07space in 2016. This matter has been with the local government must win
4:28:07 > 4:28:11for over a year and due to the complexity of the issues involved
4:28:11 > 4:28:13but it shows once again that Colchester council is problematic
4:28:13 > 4:28:16and not fit for purpose, they allowed an area which should have
4:28:16 > 4:28:20been a green open space to be lost without any consultation and they
4:28:20 > 4:28:28kept local resident in the dark for years on this particular matter.
4:28:28 > 4:28:43I beg to move that this House do now adjourned.Continue.Thousands of my
4:28:43 > 4:28:54constituents and residents across Essex and beyond are deeply
4:28:54 > 4:28:57concerned about an incinerator which was given planning permission by the
4:28:57 > 4:29:02last Labour government weeks before the general election in 2010. Since
4:29:02 > 4:29:08then, the applicants have paid a number of changes to the site. The
4:29:08 > 4:29:14recycling capacity has been reduced. Incineration capacity has been
4:29:14 > 4:29:27increased from 65%. Another planning application is being considered.
4:29:27 > 4:29:31Given concerns with the incinerator, the impact on the environment, the
4:29:31 > 4:29:35new proposals put forward on waste from the government, the incinerator
4:29:35 > 4:29:45is not only unwelcome, it is out of date. It has no energy recovery
4:29:45 > 4:29:53methods. I trust the Minister will convey this message to the Secretary
4:29:53 > 4:29:56of State and look at all the submissions that will be coming his
4:29:56 > 4:30:02way. My constituent John Patrick has a long chain of correspondence and
4:30:02 > 4:30:06representation with my honourable friend's Department and is well
4:30:06 > 4:30:10known to them. He runs a rural nursery business growing plants.
4:30:10 > 4:30:17When he moved there, it was living accommodation on site. A long and
4:30:17 > 4:30:24protracted planning dispute has taken place with the local planning
4:30:24 > 4:30:27authority. He feels planning policies justify him being able to
4:30:27 > 4:30:32operate his business on the site. I ask the Minister to review the case
4:30:32 > 4:30:41and learn the lessons from it. Finally, the last case I want to
4:30:41 > 4:30:49highlight involves the development outside by constituency. The
4:30:49 > 4:30:54developer is involved in the development of a site in archers
4:30:54 > 4:31:04field District Council. This company could be prevented from providing
4:31:04 > 4:31:13much-needed social housing. As the Minister can see, my constituency
4:31:13 > 4:31:20has arrays -- a wide range of planning and development issues.
4:31:20 > 4:31:24There are many more that time has prevented me from raising with. I
4:31:24 > 4:31:29want to leave him with this message from my constituency. Were needed
4:31:29 > 4:31:34new minister of housing, planning and local government to deliver
4:31:34 > 4:31:38sustainable developments and the housing we need, prevent unwelcome
4:31:38 > 4:31:42developments and abuses in the planning system, make sure that
4:31:42 > 4:31:50intervention takes place in the cases listed, and ensures that local
4:31:50 > 4:31:59people can be supported with infrastructure and public transport.
4:31:59 > 4:32:03Can I start by congratulating my right honourable friend for securing
4:32:03 > 4:32:08this debate about housing, planning and infrastructure in Essex. It was
4:32:08 > 4:32:16great to see her supported in the chamber by her county colleagues. My
4:32:16 > 4:32:19honourable friend is a strong campaigner for her constituency. I
4:32:19 > 4:32:26can tell the House the sheer volume of cases and correspondence from her
4:32:26 > 4:32:29held by the Ministry is a testament to lead diligent way she pursues
4:32:29 > 4:32:36these issues. I thank her very much for the opportunity to discuss these
4:32:36 > 4:32:47very important topics. As she can be acknowledged in her remarks, I am
4:32:47 > 4:32:55not in a position to comment in detail on the planning applications
4:32:55 > 4:32:59that are ongoing. The case she referred to in the village is being
4:32:59 > 4:33:02considered by a planning inspector who will provide the Secretary of
4:33:02 > 4:33:08State of the report friend to consider in due course. All material
4:33:08 > 4:33:11matters associated with these proposals will be considered as part
4:33:11 > 4:33:15of the process and my right honourable friend can be assured
4:33:15 > 4:33:21that the comments she has made will no doubt be noted. In respect of the
4:33:21 > 4:33:26applications related to the waste management facility for the former
4:33:26 > 4:33:30airfield, she has provided some of the background. The current planning
4:33:30 > 4:33:35applications submitted are a matter for Essex County Council, as the
4:33:35 > 4:33:40relevant planning authority, to consider. However, the ministry is
4:33:40 > 4:33:43aware of the requests made for these applications to be called in and
4:33:43 > 4:33:50these requests will be considered in the appropriate way. Turning next to
4:33:50 > 4:33:54John Patrick and the points you raised about his case, I can assure
4:33:54 > 4:34:01my right all the friend that we will carefully consider and reply to Mr
4:34:01 > 4:34:07Patrick's correspondence. As an aside, representing a highly rural
4:34:07 > 4:34:11constituency myself, like her, I fully recognise the importance of
4:34:11 > 4:34:16rural enterprise in driving prosperity. I was interested to hear
4:34:16 > 4:34:23about the case mentioned involving the District Council. I'm not in a
4:34:23 > 4:34:28position to comment on current planning application, but on the
4:34:28 > 4:34:32general point on the provision of affordable housing, we are keen to
4:34:32 > 4:34:36see approach is taken to deliver more affordable housing and as set
4:34:36 > 4:34:40out in the housing paper the government is keen to promote more
4:34:40 > 4:34:43opportunities for small and medium-sized developers to deliver
4:34:43 > 4:34:48that housing. My right honourable friend made reference to her
4:34:48 > 4:34:53concerns with Colchester Borough Council. The case she had referred
4:34:53 > 4:34:56to on the Lakeland site is currently with the local government ombudsman
4:34:56 > 4:35:02and we will take note of the outcome of their enquiries, but as she knows
4:35:02 > 4:35:08we cannot intervene directly in that process. In relation to the village
4:35:08 > 4:35:14project, an inspector conducting the appeal enquiry produced a report
4:35:14 > 4:35:15which the Secretary of State carefully considered before
4:35:15 > 4:35:19accepting the recommendation to be grant planning permission. We are
4:35:19 > 4:35:26aware of the council's position and my right honourable friend's
4:35:26 > 4:35:34concerns with the cancel's reply. As for every single local authority,
4:35:34 > 4:35:37ultimate accountability comes through the ballot box. I know
4:35:37 > 4:35:45first-hand that my right honourable friend is a top rate campaigner. She
4:35:45 > 4:35:48touched in her speech about the North Essex garden communities. This
4:35:48 > 4:35:54is one of 24 new locally led garden cities, towns and villages the
4:35:54 > 4:35:58government is currently supporting. Together, I can tell the House they
4:35:58 > 4:36:04have the potential to deliver 220,000 new homes across England. In
4:36:04 > 4:36:08general terms, the government believes garden communities offer
4:36:08 > 4:36:12the potential to secure considerable new housing, employment
4:36:12 > 4:36:15opportunities, modern physical infrastructure and new public
4:36:15 > 4:36:19services. This is why the government provides some funding to support
4:36:19 > 4:36:32local authorities like those in Essex to develop these proposals.I
4:36:32 > 4:36:36congratulate my honourable friend for this debate. We are all here
4:36:36 > 4:36:42because we are concerned about the effects of these garden communities,
4:36:42 > 4:36:45that they must produce quality communities. I know the department
4:36:45 > 4:36:49is concerned these are not just about housing numbers, the are about
4:36:49 > 4:36:54creating quality communities and with the infrastructure. There are
4:36:54 > 4:37:00vital pieces of infrastructure which must be upgraded in advance of these
4:37:00 > 4:37:08new homes being created. Would he took that into consideration?My
4:37:08 > 4:37:13honourable and right honourable friend are both right to raise
4:37:13 > 4:37:19constituent concerns this additional housing is supported by
4:37:19 > 4:37:23infrastructure and public services are right time. Something the
4:37:23 > 4:37:27government and I wholeheartedly agree and pie in the autumn budget
4:37:27 > 4:37:32the government more than doubled housing infrastructure fund, and it
4:37:32 > 4:37:38additional £2.7 billion of funding, bringing the total fund to £5
4:37:38 > 4:37:42billion.Thank you for giving way. I would like to congratulate my right
4:37:42 > 4:37:48honourable friend and your neighbour for being an Essex champion and for
4:37:48 > 4:37:55initiating the debate. Could I ask my honourable friend, given the
4:37:55 > 4:37:58things you said, in terms of new housing and infrastructure, does he
4:37:58 > 4:38:05not agree there should be support for substantial regeneration in
4:38:05 > 4:38:09towns like Harlow but have real problems because the toners decaying
4:38:09 > 4:38:15over everything being built at the same time. We need desperate
4:38:15 > 4:38:20regeneration of the town centre, for example.He makes an excellent
4:38:20 > 4:38:27point. The boundless economic optimism we heard of Earl is
4:38:27 > 4:38:31something the government is keen to see and should actively support
4:38:31 > 4:38:35through these proposals and through the infrastructure and investment in
4:38:35 > 4:38:38places like Harlow, you can make a difference. The housing
4:38:38 > 4:38:43infrastructure fund is designed to provide exactly the kind of projects
4:38:43 > 4:38:50that both my right honourable friend and my honourable friend spoke of,
4:38:50 > 4:38:57key infrastructure to unlock housing growth. Just today, the government
4:38:57 > 4:39:01announced 133 successful project which will help unlock the potential
4:39:01 > 4:39:06200,000 new homes. As my right honourable friend mentioned, that
4:39:06 > 4:39:10includes £7.3 million for a flood relief scheme next door to her
4:39:10 > 4:39:16constituency in mould and. And £5.5 million of funding to unlock over
4:39:16 > 4:39:24500 homes in Colchester by accelerating the delivery of a
4:39:24 > 4:39:27housing development. I'm sure he will welcome that investment. Of
4:39:27 > 4:39:36forward fund element will also be available for a small number of
4:39:36 > 4:39:43strategic and high impact infrastructure projects with bids of
4:39:43 > 4:39:47up to £250 million. Expressions of interest for this funding are being
4:39:47 > 4:39:51assessed. I'm delighted to tell the House that the county of Essex have
4:39:51 > 4:39:57applied to this fund, including four infrastructure specifically to
4:39:57 > 4:40:00support the North Essex garden communities. The best proposals from
4:40:00 > 4:40:05across the county will be short listed to go through to core
4:40:05 > 4:40:08development in the coming weeks. Local authorities will then submit
4:40:08 > 4:40:13final business cases the successful bids being announced as early as
4:40:13 > 4:40:18this autumn. More generally, my right honourable friend is right to
4:40:18 > 4:40:20highlight that garden settlement community proposals are still
4:40:20 > 4:40:26subject to examination, as part of the local plan process. The hearings
4:40:26 > 4:40:32with respect to plans concluded last month, as she will now. I can
4:40:32 > 4:40:35reassure my right honourable friend that any formal responses her
4:40:35 > 4:40:40constituents have made either to the planning Inspectorate or to the
4:40:40 > 4:40:45council as part of the draft plan consultation will be considered by
4:40:45 > 4:40:51the inspector in his determination. Further, I understand that the
4:40:51 > 4:40:55planning Inspectorate has sought reassurance that all matters raised
4:40:55 > 4:41:00by consultees on the draft plan have in fact been provided and will hold
4:41:00 > 4:41:05further hearings if procedurally necessary. My right honourable
4:41:05 > 4:41:12friend spoke in detail about local plans. New homes need to be provided
4:41:12 > 4:41:16through up-to-date local plans, which are produced in consultation
4:41:16 > 4:41:23with local people. I welcome the progress which various councils have
4:41:23 > 4:41:28made with local plan preparations. Up-to-date plans produced in
4:41:28 > 4:41:31consultation with local communities are a vital element of the planning
4:41:31 > 4:41:35system. They are the starting point for planning decisions by local
4:41:35 > 4:41:40planning authorities and planning inspectors. As my right honourable
4:41:40 > 4:41:44friend mentioned, local authorities are required to identify a five-year
4:41:44 > 4:41:53land supply of deliverable housing stock. Identifying sites provides
4:41:53 > 4:41:55clarity to local communities and developers work where homes should
4:41:55 > 4:42:00be built so development is planned rather than as a result of
4:42:00 > 4:42:03speculative application. However, where there is insufficient land
4:42:03 > 4:42:06available on which housing can realistically be delivered, there
4:42:06 > 4:42:13are measures in place that help identify suitable sites. As my right
4:42:13 > 4:42:15honourable friend acknowledged, government guidance states that
4:42:15 > 4:42:21local authorities should aim to deal with undersupply within five years
4:42:21 > 4:42:25were possible. However, decision-makers have the flexibility
4:42:25 > 4:42:31to consider each case on its merit and it is for local authorities to
4:42:31 > 4:42:35present their particular case to the relevant decision makers. Are
4:42:35 > 4:42:38housing high Paper acknowledges the current policy on five-year land
4:42:38 > 4:42:43supply has been effective in delivering homes, but has had some
4:42:43 > 4:42:47negative effects including an increased number of appeals. Through
4:42:47 > 4:42:51our housing White Paper, the government propose reforms to land
4:42:51 > 4:42:57supply is calculated to give more certainty. The proposal offers local
4:42:57 > 4:43:01authorities the opportunity to have their plan agreed on an annual basis
4:43:01 > 4:43:06and fix for a one-year period. It is intended that this ability to fix
4:43:06 > 4:43:11will reduce the number and complexity of appeals by providing
4:43:11 > 4:43:16greater certainty to all parties. The White Paper also indicated that
4:43:16 > 4:43:20clearer and more transparent guidance will set out how the
4:43:20 > 4:43:28five-year land supply should be calculated.
4:43:28 > 4:43:31Revised national planning guidance will be published for comment
4:43:31 > 4:43:35alongside the consultation of the National planning policy framework
4:43:35 > 4:43:40before Easter of this year. My right honourable friend next referred to
4:43:40 > 4:43:44the production of neighbourhood plans and the role that they play in
4:43:44 > 4:43:50empowering local communities. I note with delight that neighbourhood
4:43:50 > 4:43:54planning is being embraced in her constituency with at least ten
4:43:54 > 4:43:59neighbourhood planning groups being active. And as she sets doing their
4:43:59 > 4:44:03best to support the government's localism agenda. The government
4:44:03 > 4:44:09wants to support such groups and we have made £23 million available from
4:44:09 > 4:44:132018 through a neighbourhood planning support programme. She
4:44:13 > 4:44:18highlighted her concerns about whether neighbourhood plans in
4:44:18 > 4:44:22development get the status they deserve in the planning process,
4:44:22 > 4:44:27especially if communities are in her words bombarded with applications. I
4:44:27 > 4:44:32can tell her that the national planning policy framework is clear,
4:44:32 > 4:44:37that weight must be given to emerging neighbourhood plans. We
4:44:37 > 4:44:42have also laid out guidance to set out where circumstances might
4:44:42 > 4:44:48justify the refusal of planning permission on grounds that this
4:44:48 > 4:44:57would be premature in relation to an emerging neighbourhood plan. Coming
4:44:57 > 4:45:02next to comments about the application consultation. The
4:45:02 > 4:45:04government agrees that effective consultation is an important part of
4:45:04 > 4:45:09the planning process. Government has clear and detailed expectations,
4:45:09 > 4:45:15both statutory and in guidance regarding the consultations of
4:45:15 > 4:45:19parties who are affected by planning applications. It is for the local
4:45:19 > 4:45:24planning authority to ensure that this consultation takes place
4:45:24 > 4:45:27properly and in accordance with these guidelines. If there are
4:45:27 > 4:45:31points of concern these should be raised with the local authority as
4:45:31 > 4:45:38soon as possible. In conclusion, Madam Deputy Speaker, we have
4:45:38 > 4:45:42covered an extensive range of topics in this very short debate this
4:45:42 > 4:45:47evening. It seems to me that the Business Secretary and indeed the
4:45:47 > 4:45:51Chancellor should take note that my right honourable friend is
4:45:51 > 4:45:56single-handedly doing her bit to drive up British productivity. But
4:45:56 > 4:46:00this in seriousness is a testament to the energy and passion with which
4:46:00 > 4:46:04my right honourable friend cares about her constituents and once they
4:46:04 > 4:46:09are concerns aired and listen to by government. I commend her for doing
4:46:09 > 4:46:17exactly that this evening.The question is that this house do our
4:46:17 > 4:46:24journey. As many as all of that opinion say aye. I. The ayes have
4:46:24 > 4:46:31it. Order, order.