01/02/2018

Download Subtitles

Transcript

0:00:00 > 0:00:00be done, it ought to be done. I am quite sure the honourable lady's

0:00:00 > 0:00:05point will have been noted by the Treasury bench. There are no further

0:00:05 > 0:00:13points of order. We now come to the backbench motion on baby you'd leave

0:00:13 > 0:00:22for Members of Parliament. Harriet Harman -- baby leave. Can I join in

0:00:22 > 0:00:26wishing you a happy birthday? You honestly do not need to worry about

0:00:26 > 0:00:31numbers. I am 67 and I have discovered that I know a lot more as

0:00:31 > 0:00:35I get older that I did not used to know when I was younger. There is

0:00:35 > 0:00:40nothing wrong with getting older.I would like to thank the honourable

0:00:40 > 0:00:44member for Gateshead and the members of the Backbench Business Committee

0:00:44 > 0:00:48which he chairs for agreeing to the subject of our motion today. As the

0:00:48 > 0:00:52backbench business was one of the things that was introduced when I

0:00:52 > 0:00:56was Leader of the House, I was very glad that when I went before them to

0:00:56 > 0:01:01ask for this, they did not turn me down. I can see the honourable

0:01:01 > 0:01:04member for Basingstoke, the right honourable member, is in her place

0:01:04 > 0:01:13and I would like to thank her for all the work she has done on this

0:01:13 > 0:01:15issue. Very much a joint enterprise between her and me on this. I cannot

0:01:15 > 0:01:20speak highly enough about her work as chair of the very excellent Women

0:01:20 > 0:01:23and Equalities Committee and I do not usually say good things about

0:01:23 > 0:01:28people who have been in the Cabinet in Tory governments but she really

0:01:28 > 0:01:34has been... She is very important to all of us in that role. I would like

0:01:34 > 0:01:40to thank the other 52 members from all parties that supported this

0:01:40 > 0:01:44application for this motion, right honourable and honourable members,

0:01:44 > 0:01:48honourable friends, on the side of the House, many of whom are here

0:01:48 > 0:01:52today, thank you for attending, and members of the Scottish National

0:01:52 > 0:01:59Party who have been very active and supportive and co-workers on this

0:01:59 > 0:02:03issue, as have the Liberal Democrats, and many honourable

0:02:03 > 0:02:09members on the Tory benches. This is very much a cross-party issue. I am

0:02:09 > 0:02:16very pleased to see that you, Madam Deputy Speaker, that the Leader of

0:02:16 > 0:02:20the House is in her place and responding personally to the debate

0:02:20 > 0:02:28in a week that has not been an -- in the week that has been busy, I think

0:02:28 > 0:02:32it is testament to the commitment she has that this issue, along with

0:02:32 > 0:02:38the Shadow Leader of the House. This is something which Mr Speaker's

0:02:38 > 0:02:45reference group has also looked at. This motion, asked the House for

0:02:45 > 0:02:49it's in principle agreement to make arrangements for when a member has a

0:02:49 > 0:02:54baby or adopts a child because at the moment we do not have any such

0:02:54 > 0:03:01arrangements. In this House, we set the rules for parents outside of the

0:03:01 > 0:03:03House having babies or adopting a child and we do that because we

0:03:03 > 0:03:07think it is important for the child and it is important for the parents.

0:03:07 > 0:03:12We do it because we do not want new parents to to have to ask the

0:03:12 > 0:03:16favours but to be clear where they stand, but there is no such system

0:03:16 > 0:03:21for members of this House.I thank my right honourable friend for

0:03:21 > 0:03:25giving way and for bringing forward this important debate. The sheer

0:03:25 > 0:03:30agree with me that as we set the rules for people outside the House

0:03:30 > 0:03:33to take maternity, paternity and shared parental leave, we have a

0:03:33 > 0:03:38system that makes this place less family friendly than most workplaces

0:03:38 > 0:03:48in the UK? -- does she agree with me.She is right. No one wants us to

0:03:48 > 0:03:53be given better conditions than those outside, but we are now

0:03:53 > 0:03:56lagging behind and we are in danger of setting a very bad example. I

0:03:56 > 0:04:02give way.I thank my right honourable friend for giving way. I

0:04:02 > 0:04:06pay tribute to her for bringing this motion to the House but also for her

0:04:06 > 0:04:10work over more than 30 years to advance equality for women in this

0:04:10 > 0:04:19place and the wider world. I visited a girls' secondary school, they

0:04:19 > 0:04:22asked me how it is being a woman in the House of Commons, I mentioned

0:04:22 > 0:04:26there was no maternity leave for women members, there were gasps.

0:04:26 > 0:04:31Which you agree with me, we owe it to a drain oration of young women

0:04:31 > 0:04:35now thinking about their future to make this place somewhere where they

0:04:35 > 0:04:39feel welcome and they feel they have the same rights as every other woman

0:04:39 > 0:04:43in workplaces around the country -- we owe it to a generation of young

0:04:43 > 0:04:48women.She puts it spot on. Erskine May, our Parliamentary rules Bible,

0:04:48 > 0:04:59says absolutely nothing about pregnancy. That is no surprise, no

0:04:59 > 0:05:00surprise at all. LAUGHTER

0:05:00 > 0:05:04It used to be the case that the overwhelming majority of members

0:05:04 > 0:05:10were men and it was not that the men were not parents, it was just that

0:05:10 > 0:05:15they regarded a baby as the sole responsibility of their wives. There

0:05:15 > 0:05:22were hardly any women in this House, and mostly they were older women

0:05:22 > 0:05:26whose children had either grown-up or who had no children. That was

0:05:26 > 0:05:31certainly the case when I had my three children as a young member of

0:05:31 > 0:05:35this House. Then I was the only woman in the House at that time

0:05:35 > 0:05:39having babies, but now things have changed and the sight of growing

0:05:39 > 0:05:44pregnant bumps in our division lobbies is commonplace and

0:05:44 > 0:05:50celebrated on all sides. LAUGHTER

0:05:50 > 0:05:56Speaking of pregnant bumps...I thank my honourable friend for

0:05:56 > 0:05:59making an excellent contribution and speech and I declare my interest as

0:05:59 > 0:06:04one of those members with a growing bump. Does she agree with me that

0:06:04 > 0:06:08this highlights the urgency is by which we have to address this issue?

0:06:08 > 0:06:13I am not the only member currently pregnant. We are working to a

0:06:13 > 0:06:16deadline because babies, it will not stay in there forever, which she

0:06:16 > 0:06:21agree with me?I certainly do and I congratulate and I am looking

0:06:21 > 0:06:25forward to meeting the new arrival. The reason why we are proposing this

0:06:25 > 0:06:31change now is that the House has changed, it has changed profoundly

0:06:31 > 0:06:37in its attitudes and membership. Now many men want and expect to play

0:06:37 > 0:06:44their part with a new baby.I am extremely grateful to my right

0:06:44 > 0:06:49honourable friend. In 1992 when I informed the Chief Whip that my wife

0:06:49 > 0:06:55was going into hospital and that I intended to be at the birth, I was

0:06:55 > 0:07:01told, that is all right, as long as you are here on Monday night to vote

0:07:01 > 0:07:05on my strict matters. My daughter was born on the Sunday and I was

0:07:05 > 0:07:09able to leave the hospital to stay until 2:30am but that dilemma

0:07:09 > 0:07:15applies to men as well.It really did and it was an acceptable then

0:07:15 > 0:07:21and it is even more unacceptable now. I will give way.Which you

0:07:21 > 0:07:25agree with me that it is a crying shame that even though the last

0:07:25 > 0:07:29Labour government introduce shared parental leave, only around 5% of

0:07:29 > 0:07:33fathers take it and I do not think there is any provision in this House

0:07:33 > 0:07:40for new dads to do that?Absolutely. One of the things about this is

0:07:40 > 0:07:44talking to colleagues on all sides of the House, it really is something

0:07:44 > 0:07:49felt as strongly by fathers in this House now as well as mothers and

0:07:49 > 0:07:56that is a real change. It is gratifying to me to see younger men

0:07:56 > 0:08:00who are determined not only to be excellent members of this House but

0:08:00 > 0:08:06also sharing parents and responsible fathers who do not see their baby

0:08:06 > 0:08:11just ask their wife's business, most members' wives work and their

0:08:11 > 0:08:19husbands in the House want to support them. I will give way.Sorry

0:08:19 > 0:08:26to be able not to stay for long, partly for this problem. Can I

0:08:26 > 0:08:29congratulate her on a motion which does not talk about men and women,

0:08:29 > 0:08:36it talks about members? When my wife was elected, my younger son was two.

0:08:36 > 0:08:40The slippery slope, we ought to talk about a staircase, and at some

0:08:40 > 0:08:44stage, if this goes through, what about people hospitalised or have to

0:08:44 > 0:08:51take time off her elderly parents in some extreme emergency?Well, that

0:08:51 > 0:08:54might well be the case in the future, but for the moment, we are

0:08:54 > 0:09:01talking about maternity, paternity and adoption. And we should focus on

0:09:01 > 0:09:06that. Madam Deputy Speaker, I never thought I would see the day when the

0:09:06 > 0:09:13sons of the women's movement arrived in the Scouse, but they are here. -

0:09:13 > 0:09:17Rucker in this House. They want and expect to play pop with a new baby

0:09:17 > 0:09:23and all credit to them -- in this House. They want and expect to play

0:09:23 > 0:09:28a proper role with the new baby. My wife and I had my son, Patrick, two

0:09:28 > 0:09:32weeks before the general election last year, a member told me, loved

0:09:32 > 0:09:38brother for our daughter who is three. My wife is and remains a star

0:09:38 > 0:09:41who like other MPs' partners has to put up with so much because of this

0:09:41 > 0:09:47job and the need to be away from home. I wish I could have had some

0:09:47 > 0:09:51paternity leave. So that at least just after he was born, I could have

0:09:51 > 0:09:55been a great help than I have been. My wife has never complained and

0:09:55 > 0:09:59like others, she got on with it, but she deserved more support than I was

0:09:59 > 0:10:04able to give her and I hope we can fix this for other MPs and I hope

0:10:04 > 0:10:08that is what we will do. Of course, there are more women members than

0:10:08 > 0:10:14ever before, on all sides of the house, over 200, and younger women

0:10:14 > 0:10:18as well. It is a democratic imperative that we have women in

0:10:18 > 0:10:24this House as well as men, to make the House representative of this

0:10:24 > 0:10:27country. It is a biological inevitability that young women will

0:10:27 > 0:10:33have babies. There have already been 17 babies born to women members

0:10:33 > 0:10:39since 2010. I give way.I thank the right honourable lady for giving way

0:10:39 > 0:10:42and I congratulate her on the amazing work she has done on this

0:10:42 > 0:10:47issue and on her speech and will she agree that given that we are

0:10:47 > 0:10:50apparently by definition the gayest parliament in the world and we have

0:10:50 > 0:10:56many LGBT members, there will be many young gay and female members

0:10:56 > 0:11:00who like myself at some point want to have children and it is important

0:11:00 > 0:11:06that this motion supports them as well? Whether it is adoption or

0:11:06 > 0:11:09biological birth.I thank the honourable lady who has been

0:11:09 > 0:11:14unstinting in her support and we have worked together on this. That

0:11:14 > 0:11:18is why I called it baby leave rather than maternity and paternity leave

0:11:18 > 0:11:27and why I talk at about parents and their children. There have been 17

0:11:27 > 0:11:30babies born to women and countless pawn to mail Members of Parliament

0:11:30 > 0:11:40but which we do not know about. -- countless born at two male Members

0:11:40 > 0:11:46of Parliament. LAUGHTER

0:11:46 > 0:11:50Madam Deputy Speaker, in the absence of any official recognition of these

0:11:50 > 0:11:56babies being born to members, the way things work currently is that

0:11:56 > 0:12:02women MPs giving birth or male MPs who want time with their baby, they

0:12:02 > 0:12:06asked the whips, and they make an arrangement with the whips on the

0:12:06 > 0:12:09other side. The situation in relation to the whips is nothing

0:12:09 > 0:12:14like it was when I was having the first of our three children 34 years

0:12:14 > 0:12:19ago, when I had to ask for a few weeks off from the whips office when

0:12:19 > 0:12:23most of them thought that a woman should not be in the House of

0:12:23 > 0:12:28Commons, let alone a pregnant woman. I know that attitudes in the whips

0:12:28 > 0:12:32office are completely different to what they were before, but it is

0:12:32 > 0:12:36still the case that each member individually has to ask. We would

0:12:36 > 0:12:40not agree to that happening in any other workplace, and it is in the

0:12:40 > 0:12:50discretion of not just one whips office but two to get...Both whips

0:12:50 > 0:12:56offices have to agree. I speak as a whip, SNP work, our party does not

0:12:56 > 0:12:59take part in pairings, I commend what has been brought forward today

0:12:59 > 0:13:03because I am uncomfortable with it, to have to go through a pairing

0:13:03 > 0:13:09arrangement. I support what she is saying.That is a really important

0:13:09 > 0:13:13point and I hope we can think of some arrangements that can be made

0:13:13 > 0:13:21until such time as we zoom in this process through to deal with the

0:13:21 > 0:13:25issue of honourable members from the SNP. Granting or with holding a pair

0:13:25 > 0:13:28is an important role for the opposition whips office and no one

0:13:28 > 0:13:33can accuse me of not knowing the importance of fighting in opposition

0:13:33 > 0:13:38because tragically, that is what I have been doing for 20 years of my

0:13:38 > 0:13:42parliamentary life. But a woman giving birth should not be a matter

0:13:42 > 0:13:47of wrangling between whips office is or an opportunity to take advantage

0:13:47 > 0:13:53over the Government, however much they would deserve it. I give way.

0:13:53 > 0:14:01I congratulate you on securing this debate. Would you agree with me that

0:14:01 > 0:14:07the Parliamentary report into six and 16 says that we must accommodate

0:14:07 > 0:14:15facilitate a project member and co-parent. Particularly of limits,

0:14:15 > 0:14:20this change being sorted is really long overdue.I think the honourable

0:14:20 > 0:14:24Lady makes a very good point. That the good Parliament report also

0:14:24 > 0:14:28reports on all the Parliaments around the world how in their own

0:14:28 > 0:14:33way have started to do with this. This Madam Deputy Speaker is not

0:14:33 > 0:14:37just a matter for the wishes of parents. It is about the rights of

0:14:37 > 0:14:43our constituents. When an MP is paired, it is recorded that they

0:14:43 > 0:14:53simply have not voted. I'll give way.Thank you for giving way. The

0:14:53 > 0:14:56negotiation between whips is important in other circumstances,

0:14:56 > 0:14:59but I am sure there are many women in this House who take time off to

0:14:59 > 0:15:05be with their babies during the first two weeks want to practise

0:15:05 > 0:15:15representing their constituencies.I think she is absolutely right on

0:15:15 > 0:15:22this. Why should that constituencies lose the right for the voting -- for

0:15:22 > 0:15:26the vote in their name to be cast because they're MP is having a baby?

0:15:26 > 0:15:30Madam Deputy Speaker, when you are in a birthing pool, you cannot be

0:15:30 > 0:15:40voting. But your constituency has a right to have its voice heard.I

0:15:40 > 0:15:47thank you for giving way. Further to the important part, mothers and

0:15:47 > 0:15:51fathers that aren't able to be here when they are looking after their

0:15:51 > 0:16:01children, I note it registers the fact that I have just voted... Does

0:16:01 > 0:16:05she concur with me that something should be rectified without websites

0:16:05 > 0:16:09reflect best fact that parents aren't here because they are looking

0:16:09 > 0:16:15after the children?I think she makes a very important point.

0:16:15 > 0:16:20Actually, we do need to do this for defence of reason because people,

0:16:20 > 0:16:25women who were off having babies or men who are off with their newborn

0:16:25 > 0:16:28babies, they are criticised and therefore that is wrong. I think it

0:16:28 > 0:16:35is even more important than that. It is actually our constituencies

0:16:35 > 0:16:43should have their voices heard.I thank you for giving away and all

0:16:43 > 0:16:49the work that you have done on these important issues. I am responsible

0:16:49 > 0:16:55for two of the 17 babies that have been born since 2010. When my first

0:16:55 > 0:17:00child was born, almost five years ago, one of the campaigning

0:17:00 > 0:17:03organisations who e-mails constituencies about votes, e-mailed

0:17:03 > 0:17:07my constituents is to say that I hadn't bothered to turn up to a

0:17:07 > 0:17:09vote. I would have liked to have turned up to vote out all those

0:17:09 > 0:17:14issues, but with a very young baby, that is impossible. And that needs

0:17:14 > 0:17:18to be rectified as well. In the minds of our constituency, we are

0:17:18 > 0:17:22not there, we are absent, we are not representing them. But we are doing

0:17:22 > 0:17:27very important work at home.She is absolutely right on this. It chimes

0:17:27 > 0:17:34very much with what another one of my friend said, she says as a mother

0:17:34 > 0:17:42of four, she thinks just because women are having babies, that should

0:17:42 > 0:17:46not mean that their constituents are not represented by their MP casting

0:17:46 > 0:17:55their vote. My honourable friend new son was only 35 years old when they

0:17:55 > 0:18:02had a crucial vote on Brexit and I know this is an issue for you.

0:18:02 > 0:18:12Hours? Did I say Dave? You said years. Sorry. He was only 35 hours

0:18:12 > 0:18:18old when we have the crucial Brexit vote. His wife, Nicki, had had an

0:18:18 > 0:18:22early induction because of her pregnancy being high risk. He says

0:18:22 > 0:18:26that with that vote that he knew was fixed, coming up, but his wife in

0:18:26 > 0:18:37labour, that it actually. It actually put his fundamental role as

0:18:37 > 0:18:41an MP against his fundamental role as a man, husband and a father. He

0:18:41 > 0:18:48it bought brought an edge to the delivery room when she says is

0:18:48 > 0:18:53unhealthy. He says, surely, it is easier to move Parliament then to

0:18:53 > 0:18:57hold back the majestic and existential forces of the arrival of

0:18:57 > 0:19:00new life. Well, let's show that we can actually manage to move

0:19:00 > 0:19:06Parliament. The trouble is that even as my right honourable friend said,

0:19:06 > 0:19:10the trouble is that even when you are paired, people outside this

0:19:10 > 0:19:15House don't understand pairing. They just see that they're MP has not

0:19:15 > 0:19:20voted. Social media campaigns, which my honourable friend mentioned,

0:19:20 > 0:19:23criticised MPs who have not voted on important issues unaware that they

0:19:23 > 0:19:28are paired because of childbirth. They get criticised in newspapers

0:19:28 > 0:19:38who run voting league tables. We all know that a hyperactive MP in this

0:19:38 > 0:19:44House featured at number two in the sons list of Britain cos laziest

0:19:44 > 0:19:51MPs. We cannot go on like this. Point is that members...I apologise

0:19:51 > 0:19:58for intervening yet again. I have been responsible for the latest of

0:19:58 > 0:20:03the children being born. I was criticised by a Sunday paper, I am

0:20:03 > 0:20:07not going to name them, when I ran up the political editor, he very

0:20:07 > 0:20:13kindly took my name off the story. That rated me as a second-worst MP

0:20:13 > 0:20:16in this current Parliament. And they did not mention that I had been on

0:20:16 > 0:20:22maternity leave the election.I think that what we need is for you

0:20:22 > 0:20:31to be able to cast your constituencies vote by proxy. The

0:20:31 > 0:20:36point is, that is what the proposal before the House will do. What it

0:20:36 > 0:20:40puts to the House is that we should it agree in principle that members

0:20:40 > 0:20:44should be allowed to choose another member to vote by proxy in the

0:20:44 > 0:20:47division lobby when they have had a new baby or adopted a child. If

0:20:47 > 0:20:51there is an agreement to this in principle, there is then many issues

0:20:51 > 0:20:56of implementation that would have to be considered. Other Parliaments, as

0:20:56 > 0:21:01the good Parliament a port to Mac report make clear, made arrangements

0:21:01 > 0:21:04for baby leave, but we would need to do it in a way that fits with our

0:21:04 > 0:21:09culture and our processes. Another member is rightly concerned that any

0:21:09 > 0:21:16change might have unintended consequences. We rightly jealously

0:21:16 > 0:21:20guard the rules of our democracy. Can I just reassure honourable

0:21:20 > 0:21:24members on a number of matters? The resolution before the House today is

0:21:24 > 0:21:29not that a member would be required to apply for a proxy vote, but that

0:21:29 > 0:21:34they would be able to do so if they chose. Those who want to take no

0:21:34 > 0:21:38leave or to ask for a beer, would be perfectly free to do so as they are

0:21:38 > 0:21:43now. It would not affect pay, which is matter for itself who have

0:21:43 > 0:21:48assured me in writing that how we vote in this House is a matter for

0:21:48 > 0:21:52us not for them. And they would not regard any change in voting as a

0:21:52 > 0:21:56matter which would affect pay in any way. That is just not an issue. It

0:21:56 > 0:22:01would not be open to abuse because whether you have had a baby or

0:22:01 > 0:22:05adopted a child, is not a question of subjective judgement. It is a

0:22:05 > 0:22:12matter of fact. It will be evident that I am not moving this motion as

0:22:12 > 0:22:19a matter of self interest. It is too late for that. 30 years too late. My

0:22:19 > 0:22:24children are already grown up. But I want this for the younger members

0:22:24 > 0:22:31and the future parents in this House. I give way.I am grateful for

0:22:31 > 0:22:38you to giving away. Also happy birthday for me. She has talked

0:22:38 > 0:22:44about her own experiences and she was very fortunate to have a good

0:22:44 > 0:22:49person by her side. She is also talked about pairing. In personal

0:22:49 > 0:22:56life, not everyone is paired. As the chair for single-parent families, is

0:22:56 > 0:23:02she aware that this is an increasingly common form? It is 51%

0:23:02 > 0:23:08in London constituencies. I think 303,600 in my own constituency.

0:23:08 > 0:23:12These problems are exacerbated further for single-parent and could

0:23:12 > 0:23:25she encourage...Just before you answer. The intervention, I have no

0:23:25 > 0:23:31wish what's... Whatsoever to curtail debate which is an excellent debate

0:23:31 > 0:23:35on an important subject. I would draw to your attention that while

0:23:35 > 0:23:38you are absolutely correct, of course to take that into mentioned,

0:23:38 > 0:23:44there is much to be said, I have a great many people who want to speak

0:23:44 > 0:23:50and we don't have a huge amount of time.I withdraw my comments to a

0:23:50 > 0:23:57close. In the centenary year, a hundred years after women first won

0:23:57 > 0:24:01the right to stand for Parliament, I hope that we will agree this motion

0:24:01 > 0:24:05and that the procedure will be looked expeditiously. We have not

0:24:05 > 0:24:10got all the time of the world. At least two more Parliament. Babies

0:24:10 > 0:24:17are in the pipeline. There is one woman who is on with her second, and

0:24:17 > 0:24:22my honourable friend the Member for Lancaster have just spoken. They are

0:24:22 > 0:24:26both expecting. While we tell, nature is taking its course, so

0:24:26 > 0:24:32let's agree this and let's get on with it.The question is on the

0:24:32 > 0:24:39order paper.Thank you, can I echo the good wishes on your birthday. Of

0:24:39 > 0:24:45course, this isn't issue that you have a lot of first-hand knowledge

0:24:45 > 0:24:48about as well. I know you are not able to participate in the debate

0:24:48 > 0:24:53today. I am sure you will be sitting there thinking fondly of your own

0:24:53 > 0:24:56experiences being a pregnant member of Parliament and your wonderful son

0:24:56 > 0:25:07who I have had the pleasure of meeting on a number of occasions.

0:25:07 > 0:25:10She has characterises as joint enterprise. I am not sure whether it

0:25:10 > 0:25:14is the sort of joint enterprise that we have talked about in the legal

0:25:14 > 0:25:18sense. That would be a crime were more than one person is involved.

0:25:18 > 0:25:23But I understand the point that she is making. This has to be a joint

0:25:23 > 0:25:26enterprise. If it is going to be successful. I sense from the

0:25:26 > 0:25:30goodwill that we have already heard here that that joint enterprise will

0:25:30 > 0:25:40be a positive thing. I would like to pay tribute to her. As mother of the

0:25:40 > 0:25:43House who has done so much to set the tone around these issues over

0:25:43 > 0:25:49many, many years. I would also like to pay tribute to those who perhaps

0:25:49 > 0:25:53rolled the pitch on this and made it easier for us to bring this debate

0:25:53 > 0:25:59forward today. Professor Sarah Charles has already been mentioned

0:25:59 > 0:26:02and her work really has been a foundation in much of the

0:26:02 > 0:26:08modernisation we are talking about. Mr Speaker if he were here, I would

0:26:08 > 0:26:13think him as well, again he has set the tone. But also can I just pay

0:26:13 > 0:26:20tribute to my right honourable friend the Leader of the House? He

0:26:20 > 0:26:23is doing a sterling job of making sure that this place can be a modern

0:26:23 > 0:26:29place for us all to work in. And that is important not just for our

0:26:29 > 0:26:35staff but for our members as well. The select committee that I have the

0:26:35 > 0:26:39pleasure you wood pleasure of sharing and others really been

0:26:39 > 0:26:47instrumental in selling the seeds of change. Of course I will give way.

0:26:47 > 0:27:00Thank you for giving way. But to say how important this debate is. How it

0:27:00 > 0:27:08is rooted in room evidence the importance of bringing this House in

0:27:08 > 0:27:13line with policies in other workplaces were absolutely set the

0:27:13 > 0:27:17right tone and precedents for their future particularly in this week,

0:27:17 > 0:27:27when we will be celebrating 100 years since women got the vote.She

0:27:27 > 0:27:31is absolutely right. I think we are uncovering some important ways this

0:27:31 > 0:27:35place is changing and I hope we are identifying ways that need to

0:27:35 > 0:27:40continue to change in the future. It is a great pleasure to work with her

0:27:40 > 0:27:45on that. Being a member of Parliament is a unique position, it

0:27:45 > 0:27:49is a unique honour and a unique responsibility that requires

0:27:49 > 0:27:54complete commitment, but that cannot mean that only those without care

0:27:54 > 0:27:58and responsible news can apply. Indeed, it is that experience that

0:27:58 > 0:28:03we can have as carers that can make us much better members of

0:28:03 > 0:28:06Parliament. That is why I wholeheartedly support this motion

0:28:06 > 0:28:15in its own right.

0:28:15 > 0:28:23She talks about... I want to raise another issue in chairing the force

0:28:23 > 0:28:26that society looking at representation of women in local

0:28:26 > 0:28:30government and it was shocking to discover there that only 2% of local

0:28:30 > 0:28:37authorities have maternity leave policies in place. -- the Fawcett

0:28:37 > 0:28:43Society. The number of women councillors in jobs with babies had

0:28:43 > 0:28:51been sacked. All of us as politicians of political parties

0:28:51 > 0:28:54ought to engage with colleagues in local government to secure the

0:28:54 > 0:28:59necessary changes there to have proper representation of women?The

0:28:59 > 0:29:03right honourable lady is absolutely right, we need to have more women at

0:29:03 > 0:29:10every level of our democratic process. In Basingstoke, my

0:29:10 > 0:29:14constituency, I have a phenomenal team of women, nine out of the 14

0:29:14 > 0:29:19councillors are women and I think that it is even more astonishing

0:29:19 > 0:29:24when I see that a number of them are very young women with very young

0:29:24 > 0:29:28children and I think others should be looking at what is happening in

0:29:28 > 0:29:32councils like mine in Basingstoke to encourage that so that we can see

0:29:32 > 0:29:35more young women coming forward and not seeing this incompatible with

0:29:35 > 0:29:41having a young family. Of course, and then I might make progress.I

0:29:41 > 0:29:45thanked the most right honourable members for bringing this debate and

0:29:45 > 0:29:48the honourable member from Basingstoke makes an important point

0:29:48 > 0:29:53about local government. 23 and 25 years ago, I gave birth to my

0:29:53 > 0:29:59children. I was a senior councillor in Hounslow. Although it was

0:29:59 > 0:30:02difficult, there are two fundamental differences between local government

0:30:02 > 0:30:07and this place. You are near to home and the other is the voting, the

0:30:07 > 0:30:13times you have to vote and be recorded as voting, they are

0:30:13 > 0:30:16measured and occasional. And this place is a very different place for

0:30:16 > 0:30:20both of those reasons.The right honourable lady who used to be a

0:30:20 > 0:30:25member of my committee and I know her well and I have worked with her,

0:30:25 > 0:30:28she is raising something I will touch on later in my remarks. Whilst

0:30:28 > 0:30:32I think the motion before us today is really important, there are other

0:30:32 > 0:30:35aspects of this place which need to be thought about again if we are

0:30:35 > 0:30:39going to make this work for everybody, regardless of their

0:30:39 > 0:30:44caring responsibilities. I will make a great deal of progress now so that

0:30:44 > 0:30:50you do not have to remind me we are short on time, Madam Deputy Speaker.

0:30:50 > 0:30:53I wholeheartedly support this motion because a new addition to the family

0:30:53 > 0:30:59is a wonderful thing but it is a huge change. When the rules and

0:30:59 > 0:31:03conventions of this place were established, women had no place

0:31:03 > 0:31:08here, men had little or no role in their children's lives and the rules

0:31:08 > 0:31:13and conventions were not established based on any research or facts, they

0:31:13 > 0:31:19were established to reflect the way men live their lives many years ago.

0:31:19 > 0:31:24Men's lives have changed, women's lives have changed. Women now can

0:31:24 > 0:31:28become MPs and our lives have changed but the demands of having a

0:31:28 > 0:31:33child have not changed. Allowing MPs to take that decision to take some

0:31:33 > 0:31:38time away from this place without disenfranchising their electorate in

0:31:38 > 0:31:43the process is an important step in its own right and I fully support

0:31:43 > 0:31:49that. But I would like to say, it is just one small step. Speaking as a

0:31:49 > 0:31:54mum of three kids, when I came here, my youngest was three, and it was,

0:31:54 > 0:31:58for me, a very easy transition. I had worked full-time before and I

0:31:58 > 0:32:04had the best childcare in the world, grandparents, there to look after my

0:32:04 > 0:32:09children. But not every member of the it has that built in. Not

0:32:09 > 0:32:14everyone is as lucky as I was -- every Member of Parliament. One

0:32:14 > 0:32:18small step in a workplace culture change in Parliament that is long

0:32:18 > 0:32:25overdue. We recognise the importance of workplace culture in the people

0:32:25 > 0:32:29we represent, whether it is the culture at the BBC that has allowed

0:32:29 > 0:32:33women to be underpaid, the culture in Hollywood that allows the likes

0:32:33 > 0:32:38of Harvey Weinstein to thrive, and abuse the people around them, when

0:32:38 > 0:32:46we scrutinise the effectiveness of laws, and we often conclude it is

0:32:46 > 0:32:51culture that needs to change to make those laws work better, we have

0:32:51 > 0:32:55already heard about the example of shared parental leave which was

0:32:55 > 0:32:58introduced by the coalition government and also the right to

0:32:58 > 0:33:02request flexible working. These are things people want but when we do

0:33:02 > 0:33:07the research, the uptake is low because the culture in the workplace

0:33:07 > 0:33:11has not changed to reflect the changes in the law. As well as

0:33:11 > 0:33:15passing laws, I believe we have a duty to influence culture as well.

0:33:15 > 0:33:20That is why we are bringing, my right honourable friend, the Leader

0:33:20 > 0:33:25of the House, that is why they are bringing a new disciplinary process

0:33:25 > 0:33:29around sexual harassment which is so important, and that is why we also

0:33:29 > 0:33:32need to show we understand that culture change is important around

0:33:32 > 0:33:40families too. Not only MPs with new children but MPs with all sorts of

0:33:40 > 0:33:42wide-ranging caring responsibilities, for older

0:33:42 > 0:33:49children, older members of family, as I do, or for disabled members of

0:33:49 > 0:33:54the family too. As we consider, and I hope agreed, with this motion

0:33:54 > 0:33:58today, I hope it is just a short small step we are taking forward and

0:33:58 > 0:34:04that other steps will follow. I would just like to give one

0:34:04 > 0:34:08particular example. The importance of predictability in working life.

0:34:08 > 0:34:14Before I came to this place, I was a director of an advertising agency, a

0:34:14 > 0:34:17very difficult job, challenging, a job I could do because I could

0:34:17 > 0:34:21determine the way my working life worked for me. It is very difficult

0:34:21 > 0:34:25here to have that level of predictability around foods in

0:34:25 > 0:34:29particular. That is why I would be advocating following this motion

0:34:29 > 0:34:35that we would be looking at issues like voting power to more

0:34:35 > 0:34:39predictability around the way this place works so that people with

0:34:39 > 0:34:43caring responsibilities can better work those responsibilities around

0:34:43 > 0:34:48there overwhelmingly important responsibilities here. For those who

0:34:48 > 0:34:52say introducing baby leave is the thin end of the wedge, I have to

0:34:52 > 0:34:58say, they are right. If it means we showed compassion to a colleague who

0:34:58 > 0:35:04is fighting cancer, show compassion to a colleague having to attend the

0:35:04 > 0:35:08funeral of a close relative, rather than disenfranchising their

0:35:08 > 0:35:13constituents, whilst they are being human beings, we need to make this

0:35:13 > 0:35:19change so that we can actually allow people to get the balance in their

0:35:19 > 0:35:23lives that is so sadly lacking at some points in the Parliamentary

0:35:23 > 0:35:28calendar at the moment. Of course I give way.I thank her for giving way

0:35:28 > 0:35:31and for her very powerful speech and I absolutely support the motion

0:35:31 > 0:35:35before us. I agree that I very much hope this is the thin end of the

0:35:35 > 0:35:39wedge because on the centenary of the representation of the people

0:35:39 > 0:35:43act, we must do more to fix the pipeline issue around encouraging

0:35:43 > 0:35:49more women at a younger age to think about putting themselves forward to

0:35:49 > 0:35:56become Members of Parliament.It is 100 years on since the first woman

0:35:56 > 0:36:01sat in this place but it can for many of us feel like we are still

0:36:01 > 0:36:04operating in an 18th-century model of work. That is something that

0:36:04 > 0:36:09really does need to change.I give way. I am very grateful. I cannot be

0:36:09 > 0:36:15alone in being a man in this House whose partner has an extremely

0:36:15 > 0:36:21important job of her own. She sits as a Supreme Court judge in France.

0:36:21 > 0:36:26That takes her away from home and I therefore have childcare

0:36:26 > 0:36:29responsibilities too and I have one-year-old baby and she does not

0:36:29 > 0:36:35look after herself funnily enough. I wonder whether when we are talking

0:36:35 > 0:36:38about equality, absolutely understand that emphasis on women's

0:36:38 > 0:36:42rights, of course, but this is a human rights, it is about anybody

0:36:42 > 0:36:46who has a responsibility to care for a child or indeed a responsibility

0:36:46 > 0:36:51to care for an adult or has religious obligations that may

0:36:51 > 0:36:56indeed keep them away in different ways.And I think my honourable

0:36:56 > 0:37:01friend makes a very powerful point. It is important to recognise the way

0:37:01 > 0:37:05that many family lives have changed over the years. That is why it was

0:37:05 > 0:37:10so important to frame this motion about MPs, parents, not about men

0:37:10 > 0:37:17and women. We can all have those sorts of caring responsibilities and

0:37:17 > 0:37:24they are not the sole preserve of anyone gender at this point. It

0:37:24 > 0:37:30would be remiss of me to not acknowledge the extraordinary way

0:37:30 > 0:37:36that the whips department has evolved in my time of being in this

0:37:36 > 0:37:40place, since 2005. I remember some of the conversations I had with

0:37:40 > 0:37:45whips when I first got here and I shudder a little because they did

0:37:45 > 0:37:49not really reflect my 20 years working life beforehand. I am

0:37:49 > 0:37:52looking particularly admirable friend and neighbour who was sitting

0:37:52 > 0:37:57on the front bench, but also my other honourable friend, the member

0:37:57 > 0:38:01for Bury St Edmunds, both of whom were also members of my select

0:38:01 > 0:38:07committee, and I know that the whips office is in extraordinarily good

0:38:07 > 0:38:13hands, but we cannot just let this be something which we put to chance

0:38:13 > 0:38:17and we do need to have better rules to give people certainty about what

0:38:17 > 0:38:25they can expect. MPs have a duty to keep our democracy healthy. I do not

0:38:25 > 0:38:30believe MPs can never be treated as employees. Our role demands that we

0:38:30 > 0:38:39are never going to really be subject to a contract. Our contract with the

0:38:39 > 0:38:42people we represent and they demonstrate their views each time

0:38:42 > 0:38:46there is an election. What we can do is modernise the culture of this

0:38:46 > 0:38:51place to reflect the 21st century, not the 18th-century. For our

0:38:51 > 0:38:56employees, of course, those who work for us, but also to those members

0:38:56 > 0:39:01sitting here today and for those who will come after us, to make this an

0:39:01 > 0:39:06attractive place for a more diverse range of people who want to become

0:39:06 > 0:39:11Members of Parliament. Today is one small step, allowing new parents

0:39:11 > 0:39:14some time away from this place to cope with the demands of a new

0:39:14 > 0:39:19family member, and it is long overdue. But following this motion,

0:39:19 > 0:39:22we do need to press forward further with modernisation, particularly

0:39:22 > 0:39:28around the scheduling of this place. I lack of consistency and certainty

0:39:28 > 0:39:34is one issue raised with me, not only because it makes us less

0:39:34 > 0:39:39productive, it also makes us less able to balance our family life too

0:39:39 > 0:39:46-- a lack of consistency. I respectfully disagree with people

0:39:46 > 0:39:49who think this change today is wrong. The health of our democracy

0:39:49 > 0:39:53depends on the strength of the House of Commons and we are strengthened

0:39:53 > 0:39:58if we are truly representative of the community is making up the UK.

0:39:58 > 0:40:02Introducing baby leave for members of Parliament who need it and want

0:40:02 > 0:40:05it is just one small step in opening up membership of this place to more

0:40:05 > 0:40:11people. And seeing fewer people choosing to leave before their time

0:40:11 > 0:40:15because life as an MP is incompatible with the responsibility

0:40:15 > 0:40:20of being a parent. I hope this motion gets the full agreement of

0:40:20 > 0:40:24the House today. Above all, I hope that the procedure committee looks

0:40:24 > 0:40:30at it swiftly so that those members here today with imminent arrivals

0:40:30 > 0:40:36can look forward to their pregnancies and the birth without a

0:40:36 > 0:40:43question as to how they will deal with it with the whips.Order. This

0:40:43 > 0:40:48debate has to finish just before 3pm. Therefore, we will have a time

0:40:48 > 0:40:58limit now of about eight minutes. No, not about. The debate has to

0:40:58 > 0:41:05finish at about three o'clock. But the time limit is exactly eight

0:41:05 > 0:41:09minutes. Sorry, I had in my mind there the terror that I felt the day

0:41:09 > 0:41:12I told the Chief Whip I was going to have a baby.

0:41:12 > 0:41:16LAUGHTER It had only happened once before in

0:41:16 > 0:41:21the Conservative Party. It was causing palpitations again. Exactly

0:41:21 > 0:41:28eight minutes. Emma Reynolds.Thank you. I will keep to exactly eight

0:41:28 > 0:41:31minutes. I want to thank the right honourable lady for her contribution

0:41:31 > 0:41:35which I found to be incredibly thoughtful and I agree with every

0:41:35 > 0:41:40single word she said. I want to pay particular special tribute to my

0:41:40 > 0:41:45right honourable friend, for Camberwell in Peckham. Not only for

0:41:45 > 0:41:50bringing forward these proposals today and doing so much work on this

0:41:50 > 0:41:54issue, but for all the work she has done since she joined this House

0:41:54 > 0:41:58many years ago, I do not know how many, but I know she is the mother

0:41:58 > 0:42:04of the House, all the work she has done to make sure we have greater

0:42:04 > 0:42:07gender equality in our country and our Parliament and we have made huge

0:42:07 > 0:42:12progress thanks to her work. But as today's motion demonstrates, we

0:42:12 > 0:42:19still have quite some way to go. I want to just recount what happened

0:42:19 > 0:42:24in 2017. My husband and I were expecting a baby in April. We were

0:42:24 > 0:42:32hoping for a quiet year on the work front, let's say. We thought, this

0:42:32 > 0:42:36is great, the bump will be around three years old at the time of the

0:42:36 > 0:42:44next election because it seemed the Prime Minister was absolutely

0:42:44 > 0:42:47determined to really respect the Fixed-term Parliaments Act. I gave

0:42:47 > 0:42:54birth at 2am on Good Friday. As those of you who have been there

0:42:54 > 0:42:58before me know, it is a very physically demanding and tiring

0:42:58 > 0:43:04process. Four days later, I was lying on my bed at home in the

0:43:04 > 0:43:09morning, breast-feeding baby Theo, and my mother actually used a few

0:43:09 > 0:43:14expletives looking at her phone and I said, what has happened? She said,

0:43:14 > 0:43:19the Prime Minister has called an election. I said, no, that can't be

0:43:19 > 0:43:24right. She was adamant she would not. Unlike some of you here who

0:43:24 > 0:43:28were watching the podium and noticing there were not... There was

0:43:28 > 0:43:31not any writing. I did not know she was making a statement. My husband

0:43:31 > 0:43:38came in and my mum said, Richard, there is going to be an election. He

0:43:38 > 0:43:43said, you have to check, I don't believe it. We were in a state of

0:43:43 > 0:43:47disbelief for quite some hours, days and weeks, actually. We wondered how

0:43:47 > 0:43:50on earth we would cope with the newborn, this brand-new little

0:43:50 > 0:43:54person we had in our lives who we've already struggling to cope with in

0:43:54 > 0:43:59the night because he was up most of the night and we had to do that and

0:43:59 > 0:44:04organise an election campaign as well.

0:44:04 > 0:44:12I want to think the vast majority of my constituents who were so

0:44:12 > 0:44:17supportive and I lost can't of the number of messages and cards and the

0:44:17 > 0:44:20number of people who were on the doorstep or asked about how I was

0:44:20 > 0:44:27and how my child was getting on. I have to say, there were a a small

0:44:27 > 0:44:30handful of people who said to me that once the election was called,

0:44:30 > 0:44:34they assumed that I would not stand again. And I politely said to them,

0:44:34 > 0:44:40would you ask the same question if my husband was the MP? And the

0:44:40 > 0:44:44answer did not come back because the answer was obvious. Of course they

0:44:44 > 0:44:49would not. I believe that new mums a new dads in this place should have

0:44:49 > 0:44:54the same rights that we have a legislative four for men and women

0:44:54 > 0:44:59across our country. I cannot believe we are dragging our feet on this

0:44:59 > 0:45:04what the meant when we have made such market improvement.I enjoyed

0:45:04 > 0:45:10listening to her experiences. I've just gone on to the procedure

0:45:10 > 0:45:13committee and attended for the first time yesterday and it is on our

0:45:13 > 0:45:18agenda to have investigated the Mac investigation and make a report on

0:45:18 > 0:45:24this. And I think that I would just like I wanted to put it on record

0:45:24 > 0:45:29that we are going to be looking at that.I urge them to do it quickly

0:45:29 > 0:45:33because there aren't various colleagues who have a very tight

0:45:33 > 0:45:37deadline that you should be working to that we have already discussed. I

0:45:37 > 0:45:42want to put on record my thanks to my husband's employer because as

0:45:42 > 0:45:47members of this House will know, new dads do have a right to share

0:45:47 > 0:45:51parental leave, but they have to give several weeks notice. And it

0:45:51 > 0:45:56happens to be eight weeks notice, which is about the same time as an

0:45:56 > 0:46:00election campaign. Thankfully his employer agreed to bring his

0:46:00 > 0:46:04parental leave forward. Because had my husband and working full-time at

0:46:04 > 0:46:08the same time is me running the campaign, I am not sure we would

0:46:08 > 0:46:13have been able to cope. I am really grateful to them for doing that. I

0:46:13 > 0:46:20would encourage new dads to take up that right. I do think that only 5%

0:46:20 > 0:46:26at the moment to take up that right. After the election and we did get

0:46:26 > 0:46:36through. And I did start... A week after I gave birth, a whole bunch of

0:46:36 > 0:46:42people came to help. And someone in the Sunday paper came with

0:46:42 > 0:46:56photographers. My baby Pete everywhere. And anyway. Now I an

0:46:56 > 0:47:05experienced in it. I was having this meeting to... They got a photo of me

0:47:05 > 0:47:11in the baby and I was very tired and eggs -- they insisted on driving me

0:47:11 > 0:47:19on the campaign trail. I didn't want to because I was very tired. I

0:47:19 > 0:47:26should have gone home, and I did suffer from it physically. Then I

0:47:26 > 0:47:32had a rest. We had all the deadlines for letters and leaflets and as much

0:47:32 > 0:47:37stuff as you can basically get out. Especially given it was such a short

0:47:37 > 0:47:46campaign.I think her for giving way. What she just said made me feel

0:47:46 > 0:47:49so uncomfortable because it is actually illegal to work for two

0:47:49 > 0:47:54weeks after giving birth. The situation she describes is just

0:47:54 > 0:47:58intolerable. We really do have to do something about this.I admit I

0:47:58 > 0:48:03broke the law and I should not have. I must say the motion before us

0:48:03 > 0:48:08today would not have helped me in my situation and there were other

0:48:08 > 0:48:12members here who were in the same situation. There were three new mums

0:48:12 > 0:48:17with election was called. I suspect there isn't anything that can be

0:48:17 > 0:48:21done when this happens. We were very very unlucky with the timing. I do

0:48:21 > 0:48:25think there is something we can do for after that. That is what I am

0:48:25 > 0:48:29coming on too now. We had the election, I retain my seat, but the

0:48:29 > 0:48:36weeks after that, I was required to come in in swearing or I don't get

0:48:36 > 0:48:41paid. I was required to come in and vote on the Queen's speech. I was

0:48:41 > 0:48:44asked to come in to vote on and select committee chairs which I

0:48:44 > 0:48:49really want to do. Because they've usually indoor for five years, but

0:48:49 > 0:48:52let's see what happens. I did not have a say on that. I infect

0:48:52 > 0:49:00e-mailed Mr Speaker cut -- I in fact e-mailed Mr Speaker but there wasn't

0:49:00 > 0:49:06much he could do on this. I think it is only right that I constituents

0:49:06 > 0:49:12are represented in this place and we should have the choice to appoint a

0:49:12 > 0:49:16call into vote on our behalf. I know that some colleagues are

0:49:16 > 0:49:19uncomfortable with this because they would only want to be the ones

0:49:19 > 0:49:26voting and that's why, and I think the right honourable Lady has taken

0:49:26 > 0:49:29this on board, it should be a choice. If you become a new mum or

0:49:29 > 0:49:33dad, you should be able to appoint a proxy for the time that you are on

0:49:33 > 0:49:39leave. I must say I am very hugely grateful to the web's office.

0:49:39 > 0:49:43Particularly my honourable friend who has been so brilliant and

0:49:43 > 0:49:49flexible. Not only after the election when I gave birth, but when

0:49:49 > 0:49:54I was pregnant. It is very tiring coming to this place when you are

0:49:54 > 0:50:02really big. The whip's offices in all seriousness have made a huge

0:50:02 > 0:50:07amount of progress. I have spoken to many colleagues who have had babies,

0:50:07 > 0:50:11ten or 20 years ago and indeed yourself Mattern Deputy Speaker when

0:50:11 > 0:50:18you didn't really have that kind of leave that we have. But we should

0:50:18 > 0:50:22not have to ask for it. This should be our right. And in other

0:50:22 > 0:50:27workplaces you don't have to ask, you have the right to it. We are

0:50:27 > 0:50:32dragging our feet. I just want to echo what was said earlier by one of

0:50:32 > 0:50:40my honourable friends who talked about a website. I e-mailed them

0:50:40 > 0:50:45just before going on maternity leave to see if they would reflect on

0:50:45 > 0:50:50their website the fact that I was going to be on leave. And they sort

0:50:50 > 0:50:56of filed me off. They said we will look at and they didn't do anything.

0:50:56 > 0:51:01And I think they should consider qualifying things on their website.

0:51:01 > 0:51:06Many of us have been criticised by national newspapers and it is not

0:51:06 > 0:51:10right. It damages our reputation, whether they issue an apology or

0:51:10 > 0:51:13not. It is a damage your reputation and we should not be in that

0:51:13 > 0:51:22position. In conclusion, I just want to pay tribute to all the honourable

0:51:22 > 0:51:26members who have gone before me and I want to single out a few people.

0:51:26 > 0:51:37Not only you Madam Deputy Speaker. I want to also pay tribute and say

0:51:37 > 0:51:42things to some other people who weren't... The First Minister to

0:51:42 > 0:51:50give birth in office. I have been inspired by many other colleagues.

0:51:50 > 0:51:54There was one member who had two babies while she was in the Shadow

0:51:54 > 0:52:01Cabinet. Juggling family life and being an MP. I say to young women

0:52:01 > 0:52:16don't be deterred, come in and do it. Thank you Madam Deputy Speaker.

0:52:16 > 0:52:23My friend famously fought a by election whilst having a child. And

0:52:23 > 0:52:29she was one of the first MPs having a child in this House. She was a

0:52:29 > 0:52:34real example. I want to congratulate her for bringing the work. Since

0:52:34 > 0:52:40then, we have made steady, but I think, literally slow progress as to

0:52:40 > 0:52:46become a child friendly workplace. We now have a on-site nursery. I was

0:52:46 > 0:52:50in the building when it was concreted and it was a site where a

0:52:50 > 0:52:55bar once existed. I think a much improved replacement. As we have

0:52:55 > 0:53:01heard in this debate, there are so many more modernising reforms that

0:53:01 > 0:53:07are desperately needed. I think we need more baby friendly spaces, more

0:53:07 > 0:53:13spaces for buggies, nappy PINS, places to breast-feed. Represent --

0:53:13 > 0:53:20the opportunity that it presents for the diversity of this chamber. The

0:53:20 > 0:53:25example that we can set for the rest of the country. If I can just say, I

0:53:25 > 0:53:31think it is fitting that this issue is discussed today. Since the last

0:53:31 > 0:53:36time to talk date, I've had a baby and as a new mum, I am acutely aware

0:53:36 > 0:53:44for new mums and for women to keep a close eye on their mental health.

0:53:44 > 0:53:56Northeast, forgive me... My BB was just four weeks off when -- my baby

0:53:56 > 0:54:01was just four weeks old when the election was called. It wasn't -- it

0:54:01 > 0:54:16was an incredibly stressful.. Many people will have mental health

0:54:16 > 0:54:23issues. There are many diseases that increase after childbirth. We know

0:54:23 > 0:54:29that one of the triggers to mental health is stress and anxiety in the

0:54:29 > 0:54:33workplace. This is especially true when a mum or dad returns to work

0:54:33 > 0:54:37after the birth of their child. These issues affect people inside

0:54:37 > 0:54:48and outside of this House just why this debate is so important. I have

0:54:48 > 0:54:58two polling -- it is a privilege to stand here for Mike disaster ensues.

0:54:58 > 0:55:05While I was able to keep on with the constituency casework, last June I

0:55:05 > 0:55:12had to leave my constituency and travel to come down to London to

0:55:12 > 0:55:18Parliament. First to swear in and while I am very grateful to the

0:55:18 > 0:55:22whips, I was asked to come in and vote on a couple of occasions. In

0:55:22 > 0:55:27June, when my baby was just three months old and again in September

0:55:27 > 0:55:30for some important votes when she was just five months old. In

0:55:30 > 0:55:35September, I was in the team room with my baby and we were there until

0:55:35 > 0:55:40after ten o'clock at night. Arguably that was not the right place for my

0:55:40 > 0:55:49baby at that time of night. As a breast-feeding mum, all my baby came

0:55:49 > 0:55:53in with me. Colleagues will know it is of huge responsibility looking

0:55:53 > 0:56:02after a tiny human. I was a slummy mummy. It is a challenge some days

0:56:02 > 0:56:06just to take a shower. Let alone to get up and get out of the House, to

0:56:06 > 0:56:12get to the station, to change the baby on the train that is moving at

0:56:12 > 0:56:21a miles an hour. The crying. To get on the tube often using escalator

0:56:21 > 0:56:28stairs because there is no lift. For an important overnight trip which

0:56:28 > 0:56:32for some babies will be the first time they are outside, it can be

0:56:32 > 0:56:39quite traumatic for them. I think the vote on the motion today, proxy

0:56:39 > 0:56:46voting, it is a simple means to count a member's vote without having

0:56:46 > 0:56:51them to pass physically through the voting lobbies. I think that will

0:56:51 > 0:56:55mean that the representative role of any MP can continue without being

0:56:55 > 0:56:59disrupted. It is not only an issue of fairness for the parents, it is a

0:56:59 > 0:57:04matter of fairness for our constituents. As with all the

0:57:04 > 0:57:09representation we make in this House, the work we do on the

0:57:09 > 0:57:13campaigns, the contributions we make for the country, to improve the

0:57:13 > 0:57:17first 1001 days of a child's life, to give children the best start in

0:57:17 > 0:57:23life, when we highlight the importance of attachment, when we

0:57:23 > 0:57:28address the breast-feeding rates that we have in our country, Madam

0:57:28 > 0:57:33Deputy Speaker, we need to lead by example and we need to give

0:57:33 > 0:57:38children, the children of MPs the best start as well. Some people

0:57:38 > 0:57:50might say this is a dangerous leap modernity I have heard that. Proxy

0:57:50 > 0:57:57voting was known here. It records until 1868 lords who were not

0:57:57 > 0:58:01present could vote by proxy. Since then, no attempt has been made to

0:58:01 > 0:58:11suspend the laws to allow the revival of this practise. In the

0:58:11 > 0:58:14comments, proxies were allowed in the mediaeval Parliament. This is

0:58:14 > 0:58:18not a leap in the dark, but in unearthing of a fine old

0:58:18 > 0:58:23Parliamentary tradition.

0:58:23 > 0:58:27To deny our constituents of voice because of this House not

0:58:27 > 0:58:33modernising, it is an affront. Providing new parents with the

0:58:33 > 0:58:37ability to register a vote by a ensures our constituents can still

0:58:37 > 0:58:44be heard. We know the physical arrangements are about to undergo

0:58:44 > 0:58:51huge changes. Our work continues and our democracy in June was. I hope

0:58:51 > 0:58:55that as we contemplate those changes, following yesterday's wrote

0:58:55 > 0:58:59about the refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster, we will focus

0:58:59 > 0:59:04on ways we can continue to become more child friendly and welcoming --

0:59:04 > 0:59:09yesterday's vote. The small but significant changes, so should every

0:59:09 > 0:59:13workplace and every factory, office, there are practical ways to help

0:59:13 > 0:59:16people when parents return to work after having a baby or having

0:59:16 > 0:59:22adopted. I think many stressful situations can be averted through

0:59:22 > 0:59:28small changes and if we are serious about improving the nation's mental

0:59:28 > 0:59:33health, it is an important factor. For over 35 years, the member for

0:59:33 > 0:59:36Camberwell and Peckham has fought for equality and fairness at

0:59:36 > 0:59:39Westminster and in the country. I think proxy voting would be another

0:59:39 > 0:59:44valuable part of honouring the mother of our Parliament's

0:59:44 > 0:59:48continuing contribution to our public life and I sincerely hope the

0:59:48 > 0:59:51House approves this measure and the Speaker will move towards a system

0:59:51 > 0:59:56of proxy voting without delay.We have to reduce the time limit to

0:59:56 > 1:00:05seven minutes. Yvette Cooper.Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. You and I

1:00:05 > 1:00:11had to work out how to hang -- handle pregnancy and Parliament some

1:00:11 > 1:00:16years ago, lovely to have you in the chair. Can I pay tribute to the

1:00:16 > 1:00:22brilliant speeches to my honourable friends, their speeches alone ought

1:00:22 > 1:00:28to persuade everybody, without any doubt, that this is a motion that

1:00:28 > 1:00:34should go through, but also should be very swiftly dealt with by the

1:00:34 > 1:00:38procedure committee? Frankly, it feels like it is a no-brainer. 100

1:00:38 > 1:00:43years since women got the vote, it is frankly an embarrassment that we

1:00:43 > 1:00:50do not have in Parliament a system for maternity, paternity and baby

1:00:50 > 1:00:55leave, that my right honourable friend describes, because if other

1:00:55 > 1:01:01organisations can do it, why can't we? If shops and factories and

1:01:01 > 1:01:05businesses and doctors surgeries and police forces, every other

1:01:05 > 1:01:09organisation manages to find a way of doing it, why on earth can't we?

1:01:09 > 1:01:14Especially when we are the organisation that has told so many

1:01:14 > 1:01:18of those organisations that they have to do it, they have to have

1:01:18 > 1:01:22arrangements for leave, but we cannot sort it out for ourselves. I

1:01:22 > 1:01:26think maternity arrangements are not strong enough across the country. I

1:01:26 > 1:01:32think there is not enough provision, the culture changes still need to

1:01:32 > 1:01:35take place. There are still too many difficulties and obstacles put in

1:01:35 > 1:01:38people's way and I think there is a serious problem about maternity

1:01:38 > 1:01:42discrimination under way in which the law is not enforced or arguably

1:01:42 > 1:01:47is not strong enough to make sure women are not ending up finding

1:01:47 > 1:01:52themselves made redundant or demoted or losing responsibilities when they

1:01:52 > 1:01:57take maternity leave or at the same time, for men, feeling that they

1:01:57 > 1:02:02cannot take paternity leave for fear those things will happen. How can we

1:02:02 > 1:02:06end this House challenge errant employers saying, it is too too

1:02:06 > 1:02:12difficult, we are two special, we cannot possibly provide for people

1:02:12 > 1:02:18having babies, if we do not sort it out ourselves customer that is why I

1:02:18 > 1:02:22am paying tribute to my right honourable friend who has pioneered

1:02:22 > 1:02:27so many of these debates, led the way for so many of us to follow, and

1:02:27 > 1:02:32I know it was much easier for me to be able to take maternity leave as

1:02:32 > 1:02:40an MP but also as a minister because of the support I got, personal

1:02:40 > 1:02:44support as well as leadership shown, by my right honourable friend, and

1:02:44 > 1:02:50it is hugely important she is doing the same still for each generation

1:02:50 > 1:02:54of women and each generation of men as well. I pay tribute too to the

1:02:54 > 1:02:58right honourable member for Basingstoke and the work she has

1:02:58 > 1:03:01done on the women equality select committee to support this and

1:03:01 > 1:03:06promote this. I agree with her that there should be wider reforms,

1:03:06 > 1:03:09across the country, and I know this has support from other parties as

1:03:09 > 1:03:17well. I think given we all know, having a baby is normal, it is why

1:03:17 > 1:03:22we are all here, and Parliament ought to be able to cope with what

1:03:22 > 1:03:28is normal. Parliament ought to show the leadership by making it

1:03:28 > 1:03:33possible. Of course, it will always be a challenge and there will always

1:03:33 > 1:03:37be chaos that comes. For me, a lot of that chaos would come from the

1:03:37 > 1:03:42travelling to and fro with small children, not just with a baby, I am

1:03:42 > 1:03:47a dab hand at changing nappies on a fast moving train, but the potty

1:03:47 > 1:03:52training was more challenging. A few sticky moments with a portable potty

1:03:52 > 1:03:59with a lid on, putting it up on the shelf on a fast moving train. There

1:03:59 > 1:04:03will always be some complexities in having small children and being the

1:04:03 > 1:04:08Members of Parliament and the honour that comes from representing

1:04:08 > 1:04:12constituents, but it ought to be made possible to manage both things

1:04:12 > 1:04:16in a way that too often it isn't. Another honourable friend of ours

1:04:16 > 1:04:23who has since left who had a baby and who was asked to come in for

1:04:23 > 1:04:27votes when the baby was very small and she came also at a time when we

1:04:27 > 1:04:33were not even allowed to take babies through the voting lobbies. We ended

1:04:33 > 1:04:37up in this baby really, we took it in turns to vote and carry the baby

1:04:37 > 1:04:41while she went through to vote and we would each hold the baby, great

1:04:41 > 1:04:45for us, we got to cuddle a tiny baby, but neither seen he there the

1:04:45 > 1:04:52baby should have been here, but it was a tight vote -- neither she or

1:04:52 > 1:04:58the baby. It should not depend on favours, not on special deals and

1:04:58 > 1:05:01arrangements, on the whips, it should just be a very sensible,

1:05:01 > 1:05:06practical arrangement, it should not be beyond the wit of this house when

1:05:06 > 1:05:09we come up with practical arrangements for other organisations

1:05:09 > 1:05:13across the country to come up with a practical way of working that works

1:05:13 > 1:05:20too. To recognise the truth is for any working mum, often for working

1:05:20 > 1:05:25parents, there is always the sense of conflicting guilt and

1:05:25 > 1:05:28responsibility, guilt towards the newborn that you are trying to do

1:05:28 > 1:05:32your constituency casework at the same time, guilt towards

1:05:32 > 1:05:38constituents but you should be in Parliament or at a meeting. The

1:05:38 > 1:05:42sense of responsibility towards Parliament, constituents, baby,

1:05:42 > 1:05:45family, but also, the sense of responsibility towards so many other

1:05:45 > 1:05:49women who also might be finding it hard to take maternity leave to show

1:05:49 > 1:05:54it is possible and we do not have to pretend to be superwomen and pretend

1:05:54 > 1:05:57to have to be able to do it all at once otherwise somehow that means

1:05:57 > 1:06:02you are not doing your job properly. We want people in all walks of life

1:06:02 > 1:06:06to be able to combine parenthood and employment because it is normal,

1:06:06 > 1:06:11that is what we do, and we should end the muddling through and put

1:06:11 > 1:06:15proper arrangements in place. Final thought I would ask the ministers

1:06:15 > 1:06:18also have another look at the arrangements for ministerial

1:06:18 > 1:06:23maternity leave. When I first took ministerial maternity leave 16 years

1:06:23 > 1:06:27ago, we again were muddling through, we attempted to put some

1:06:27 > 1:06:29arrangements in place after that that were more formal, but they

1:06:29 > 1:06:37disappeared. They need to be revised as well. 100th anniversary of women

1:06:37 > 1:06:42getting the vote, what better time to get this sorted and get it sorted

1:06:42 > 1:06:47really, really fast. So that this can be about our next step around

1:06:47 > 1:06:52not just equality for people in this House but for us being able to keep

1:06:52 > 1:06:57being confident pioneers for equality across the country as well.

1:06:57 > 1:07:01Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. A massive honour to follow all of the

1:07:01 > 1:07:08speeches and I feel that honourable friends across the house today and

1:07:08 > 1:07:12in today's debate. I should register not an interest but a total

1:07:12 > 1:07:18disinterest in ever having another child again. This will not benefit

1:07:18 > 1:07:24me, even in the slightest, I could not be more disinterested. Listening

1:07:24 > 1:07:33to the testimony of my friend from Wolverhampton North East, I found it

1:07:33 > 1:07:37to be incredibly moving, pushing the right back at that moment when I was

1:07:37 > 1:07:4222 and a new mum and I was terrified that I was going to break this

1:07:42 > 1:07:50little thing. I have. Expected the things... I will not put you through

1:07:50 > 1:07:52it, Mr Deputy Speaker, but some of the things that happen to a woman's

1:07:52 > 1:07:58body immediately after she has a baby, they are terrifying, you do

1:07:58 > 1:08:04not expect it. I thought my internal organs were falling out.

1:08:04 > 1:08:07LAUGHTER The thought I would have to get up

1:08:07 > 1:08:14and get to the meeting...It is not me that is worried but I am worried

1:08:14 > 1:08:21about the member for Lancaster! LAUGHTER

1:08:21 > 1:08:24Forewarned is forearmed in these situations. You are not dying, that

1:08:24 > 1:08:29is what I would say to my friend from Lancaster. But we all thought

1:08:29 > 1:08:34that we were. The idea I would have to get up at that moment, terrified,

1:08:34 > 1:08:39suffering and fear, real fear for the first time and have to go to a

1:08:39 > 1:08:43constituency member's meeting, it is absolutely horrifying. The thought

1:08:43 > 1:08:51of you doing that at the. Sorry, not you. The thought of the member for

1:08:51 > 1:08:55Wolverhampton North East doing that is absolutely terrifying to me. --

1:08:55 > 1:09:01the thought of you doing that... Sorry, not you. Massive credit to

1:09:01 > 1:09:06all of the women here who have had babies. I want to, because I quite

1:09:06 > 1:09:10like a row, to head off at the pass some of the things I have heard in

1:09:10 > 1:09:14this place about why this could not happen. We're pretty much all here

1:09:14 > 1:09:19to support it today, largely, but I have heard quite a lot of

1:09:19 > 1:09:27mutterings, they are mutterings, they sound like this... Amazing... I

1:09:27 > 1:09:30have heard an awful lot of that and I want to address some of them. Some

1:09:30 > 1:09:35of them from women in this House, I have heard squeamishness about

1:09:35 > 1:09:40wanting to ask for a right because MPs, we are criticised for talking

1:09:40 > 1:09:45about ourselves, very insular, we all know those fake news on the

1:09:45 > 1:09:49internet where they show a really busy Chamber when we are talking

1:09:49 > 1:09:52about our salary and an empty Chamber when we are talking about

1:09:52 > 1:09:59something else, just for the public outside, a total lie. The idea we

1:09:59 > 1:10:03should be asking for something for ourselves, the rightful people here,

1:10:03 > 1:10:07it is totally and utterly acceptable. I have had to talk to

1:10:07 > 1:10:12women in the Labour Party and as the chair of the women's Parliamentary

1:10:12 > 1:10:16Labour Party, to say, I am not going to feel afraid about asking for

1:10:16 > 1:10:21something for you, writes for the people in this building, because if

1:10:21 > 1:10:27I worked... When I worked at Woman's Age, I fought for them to have

1:10:27 > 1:10:31better maternity services for parental leave, no matter where I

1:10:31 > 1:10:35worked, I would be fighting for the women to have better rights and we

1:10:35 > 1:10:39should not be embarrassed about fighting for them here either. I

1:10:39 > 1:10:43want to put that to bed, the idea it is somehow selfish. It isn't, it is

1:10:43 > 1:10:49a right we should be entitled to. The other chuntering I have heard

1:10:49 > 1:10:55some people have mentioned, the thin end of the wedge, where will this

1:10:55 > 1:11:00lead? It will lead to being exactly like every other employer in the

1:11:00 > 1:11:05country. The idea of the thin end of the wedge, as the right honourable

1:11:05 > 1:11:09member for Basingstoke said, the thin end of the wedge where we are

1:11:09 > 1:11:13kind and nice employers, the big end of the wedge is decency and

1:11:13 > 1:11:20humanity, I am more all right with that. We are asking for something a

1:11:20 > 1:11:25very specific reason and when people do not... They say, you cannot have

1:11:25 > 1:11:30other people voting for you, as if they have the divine right of kings

1:11:30 > 1:11:35when we come into this place, our vote is handed to us by God and it

1:11:35 > 1:11:41is so special, nobody else could say how I might feel about fisheries

1:11:41 > 1:11:46industries, it is frankly ridiculous. The idea that people

1:11:46 > 1:11:53feel that they are so special that nobody could ever cast their vote

1:11:53 > 1:11:59for them, I assume they have never followed the whip and deciding

1:11:59 > 1:12:03always exactly what they will vote for all by their little selves, I

1:12:03 > 1:12:09find that highly unlikely. I think Caroline Lucas, the member for

1:12:09 > 1:12:14Brighton Pavilion, she might be the only person who could say that.I

1:12:14 > 1:12:17thank my honourable friend for giving way and making this

1:12:17 > 1:12:20incredibly powerful speech. Would she agreed that the thin end of the

1:12:20 > 1:12:25wedge is not the thin end of erosion of our democracy but a thin end of

1:12:25 > 1:12:30how we balance work and family life when circumstances might be

1:12:30 > 1:12:35unpredictable? Two months ago, my mother had a stroke and while she is

1:12:35 > 1:12:40a lot better now, I was in a position of having to put in place

1:12:40 > 1:12:45with my sisters and brother 24-hour care for someone who we were used to

1:12:45 > 1:12:50caring for us and whilst I know and understand the issues that there

1:12:50 > 1:12:57will be with parents, to have to be in that position and to then

1:12:57 > 1:13:00struggle for the flexibility to manage that alongside being a Member

1:13:00 > 1:13:03of Parliament, it is something that I would want to see us change and

1:13:03 > 1:13:10have the courage to change.I couldn't agree more, as somebody who

1:13:10 > 1:13:15has similarly cared for my own mother when she was dying, the

1:13:15 > 1:13:19amount of pressure that gets put on and I have to say it is largely the

1:13:19 > 1:13:24women in society when you are in the middle and you are caring for

1:13:24 > 1:13:30children and you are also caring for dying relatives or very sick

1:13:30 > 1:13:34relatives, we have got to, as a nation, get better at dealing with

1:13:34 > 1:13:40that, and why not start here? The other issue, I went for lunch with a

1:13:40 > 1:13:47gentleman yesterday, with my husband -- my husband's listening, it wasn't

1:13:47 > 1:13:54him. He talked about how he had hoped to intend to take shared

1:13:54 > 1:13:58parental leave other colleagues has spoken about and he said, as soon as

1:13:58 > 1:14:03I said, OK, I will take three months off, it started to creep in, what if

1:14:03 > 1:14:10my clients get given to somebody else? What if people judge me for

1:14:10 > 1:14:13leaving? I thought, my heart bleeds for you, my tiny violin, that is

1:14:13 > 1:14:20what we have to put up with for ever.

1:14:20 > 1:14:28Because I have lived that life. The truth of the matter is is that we

1:14:28 > 1:14:32have got to make sure that when we make these changes that it is not

1:14:32 > 1:14:39only the women in this building that take this leave. And that the man in

1:14:39 > 1:14:44this building take it as well. Frankly, I think some of the men in

1:14:44 > 1:14:49this building and some of the backtalk that I have heard when I

1:14:49 > 1:14:57have talked about this should be ashamed of bragging about being here

1:14:57 > 1:15:01moments when their baby were born. For standing up and saying and

1:15:01 > 1:15:09committees, point of order, my wife just had a baby. Point of order, I

1:15:09 > 1:15:12divorce you if you are my husband. There is one plays a man should be

1:15:12 > 1:15:20when their baby is born and that is by the side of their partner. And

1:15:20 > 1:15:24that, I think, in this place, we have got to say, this is not about

1:15:24 > 1:15:28the women getting something better. This is about the parents getting

1:15:28 > 1:15:32something better. Because we have got to lead by example. And I know

1:15:32 > 1:15:37just not for the Member for Wolverhampton from Northeast. There

1:15:37 > 1:15:41are husbands in this building who are starting to take that leaves and

1:15:41 > 1:15:45we have got to stand as an example to that. So, basically when this

1:15:45 > 1:15:55comes in, I am coming in for you. To the men in his house to take it.

1:15:55 > 1:16:03Thank you for calling this important debate. It is very important for me

1:16:03 > 1:16:08to be here because I did have a baby a year and a half ago. As a sitting

1:16:08 > 1:16:13MP. While I will not go into detail about what happened to my insides...

1:16:13 > 1:16:18LAUGHTER I do want to talk a little bit about

1:16:18 > 1:16:23the impact of the pregnancy and the birth on me. I won't go into

1:16:23 > 1:16:28details, but I did say -- I would say I had a 40 hour long labour

1:16:28 > 1:16:33which resulted in an emergency C-section. After that, I got an

1:16:33 > 1:16:41infection and so did the baby. I was looked after for nine days, even

1:16:41 > 1:16:46when I was on the hospital bed, I had to do e-mails and I had to sign

1:16:46 > 1:16:49things offer my office simply because there was no one else to do

1:16:49 > 1:16:52it and I could not really nominate someone to take care of crucial

1:16:52 > 1:16:57matters. And there were some crucial matters which I will elaborate in a

1:16:57 > 1:17:04moment. I am not describing this details because I want sympathy I'm

1:17:04 > 1:17:07doing it because before I had a child, I did not quite realise the

1:17:07 > 1:17:14physical impact childbirth has on your body. I have been around

1:17:14 > 1:17:17children and babies, but I still did not realise quite what would happen

1:17:17 > 1:17:23to your body when you went through a 40 hour ordeal in the way that I did

1:17:23 > 1:17:25and after the emergency C-section where I physically could not move

1:17:25 > 1:17:29from the bed and I had to ask everyone for help which is not easy

1:17:29 > 1:17:36when I'm used to doing for myself. It was not easy, but because I was

1:17:36 > 1:17:40in a seat that had been a very marginal seat, the lady that I had

1:17:40 > 1:17:45taken over from only one deceived by 42 votes, I had only won it by just

1:17:45 > 1:17:49over a thousand votes. I did not feel like I could look like my

1:17:49 > 1:17:52constituents. I came back to work very quickly afterwards. As a result

1:17:52 > 1:17:59because my body did not recover, I developed a very terrible infection.

1:17:59 > 1:18:05And anyone who has had disinfection knows what it does to your body. I

1:18:05 > 1:18:09went to my GP and I told him that I was overworked and had come back to

1:18:09 > 1:18:13work very early. In my sleep deprived state I knew I had to do

1:18:13 > 1:18:16something. I tabled an early day motion asking if we could change the

1:18:16 > 1:18:21way the voting system worked. Even I was getting e-mails saying why have

1:18:21 > 1:18:26you not turned up for this vote? In the six weeks, I was being asked why

1:18:26 > 1:18:35I had not turned up for a certain meeting. And if you know our

1:18:35 > 1:18:41constituencies, they look up your your voting record. I wanted to make

1:18:41 > 1:18:45it clear that we have got to change the voting system. This is the time

1:18:45 > 1:18:49to do it where there are more women than ever before. Having children in

1:18:49 > 1:18:54Parliament. I wanted to point out how our position here in Parliament

1:18:54 > 1:19:00lags behind in other countries. In Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia,

1:19:00 > 1:19:05members of Parliament may be granted leave of 12 ones in case of child

1:19:05 > 1:19:08birth, pregnancy or adoption. This is the same in Estonia Finland and

1:19:08 > 1:19:17Luke Latvia. In the Netherlands, there are no formal maternity leave,

1:19:17 > 1:19:21but they can be replaced by another MP from the same political group so

1:19:21 > 1:19:25they are not penalised for their absence. The fact that we are behind

1:19:25 > 1:19:32these countries with our attitudes to parental leave is compounded with

1:19:32 > 1:19:38her attitude with our Parliamentary voting system. Scotland, he India

1:19:38 > 1:19:48and Ireland and the European Union are all have electronic voting.I

1:19:48 > 1:19:53just want to say to my friend making an incredibly powerful speech, would

1:19:53 > 1:19:57she agree with me by the time we are done with this, we should match or

1:19:57 > 1:20:01better the best Parliaments in the world. And also just to say

1:20:01 > 1:20:04physically, having the second is harder.

1:20:04 > 1:20:12LAUGHTER. I would like to thank my honourable friend for the note of

1:20:12 > 1:20:15confidence, but I absolutely agree with what she is saying. If we want

1:20:15 > 1:20:19to make Parliament a welcoming place for female representatives and if we

1:20:19 > 1:20:23want to act in the way that my constituency Labour Party did when

1:20:23 > 1:20:29they categorically said one after another we want more people not

1:20:29 > 1:20:36women in Parliament, that is what we should all be encouraging in the

1:20:36 > 1:20:44House of Commons where we sit.I thank you for giving way and an

1:20:44 > 1:20:47excellent speech. She mentioned Scotland, so I could not miss the

1:20:47 > 1:20:51opportunity to jump in. We have been in debates on this motion before.

1:20:51 > 1:20:56She mentioned electronic voting and she will know as well as I do that

1:20:56 > 1:21:03some of the arguments against proxy and electronic voting is that this

1:21:03 > 1:21:08chamber does not fit half of the members of this House. We all have

1:21:08 > 1:21:11modern technology we can all watch at home, there is a reason not to do

1:21:11 > 1:21:18this.We have had discussions about this and we do feel that Parliament

1:21:18 > 1:21:23needs to become more modern and we need to encourage more things like

1:21:23 > 1:21:27electronic voting. Maybe that will be next on the agenda. I wanted to

1:21:27 > 1:21:31touch on the fact that I have a lot of support for my constituency

1:21:31 > 1:21:35Labour Party when I ran to be an MP. When I was a young woman, they

1:21:35 > 1:21:40thought I would have children and there were questions raised about

1:21:40 > 1:21:48it. One person said what is the problem is MPs have children? It's

1:21:48 > 1:21:51good for their constituency. He also pointed out that apparently

1:21:51 > 1:21:55politicians with children get more votes, I do not know if that is

1:21:55 > 1:22:01true. I just want to talk a little bit about the support I received in

1:22:01 > 1:22:04Parliament. The staff at the nursery were really fantastic when I first

1:22:04 > 1:22:11took my child. I want to pay tribute to them. The member who was sitting

1:22:11 > 1:22:16here earlier on is my neighbouring MP and right at the beginning when I

1:22:16 > 1:22:18had morning sickness, he was the first to ring and say if there are

1:22:18 > 1:22:22any meetings that you would like me to cover for you, I am happy to go.

1:22:22 > 1:22:26Because his wife had gone through the same thing. Another member on a

1:22:26 > 1:22:34trip to Paris carried my suitcase up and down the stairs when I

1:22:34 > 1:22:38physically could not lift the suitcase. And on the same trip to

1:22:38 > 1:22:43Paris to explore how we tackle anti-Semitism, the former MP for...

1:22:43 > 1:22:47I'm trying to think, for Brentwood said to me he is happy to be the

1:22:47 > 1:22:52godfather for my child and whether I wanted to name my daughter Erica

1:22:52 > 1:22:58after him which I declined. Another MP gave me a wristband to monitor

1:22:58 > 1:23:05the number time my babies kicked. There was a sense of real spirit

1:23:05 > 1:23:09among members of the other side who I would talk to. About what we did

1:23:09 > 1:23:18as young women who had children but also wanted to be good MPs. When my

1:23:18 > 1:23:22ever-growing bomb, and when you are four foot 11, your bob really does

1:23:22 > 1:23:30stand out also -- when your bump really stands out when you are four

1:23:30 > 1:23:40foot 11. Perhaps the memory that most stands out was when right after

1:23:40 > 1:23:46I had the baby, I got an urgent call from my office, the result man whose

1:23:46 > 1:23:52wife had been in a Ron who was detained with her small child. I had

1:23:52 > 1:23:56just had my baby obviously when my office called, I had to meet with

1:23:56 > 1:24:00them because there was no one I could delegate that responsibility

1:24:00 > 1:24:03to when I spoke to him on the phone he said why don't you come over to

1:24:03 > 1:24:08my house and I said that is a good idea. And he said is there any idea

1:24:08 > 1:24:12that the leader of the Labour Party could also meet me? I ran and I said

1:24:12 > 1:24:16I just had a baby but there is a really urgent Kates and we need to

1:24:16 > 1:24:21meet near my flat because I'm breast-feeding. And he said why

1:24:21 > 1:24:26don't I come over to your flat and we will have a meeting there? So are

1:24:26 > 1:24:31in the meeting and I had a tiny baby in my arm, the man whose wife had

1:24:31 > 1:24:35been detained and why breast-feed, we discussed the Iranian authorities

1:24:35 > 1:24:39and talked about how to get my constituent back into the country.

1:24:39 > 1:24:44At one point my baby was very unsettled and I had to take some

1:24:44 > 1:24:49notes so I said to the member, could you hold the baby for bid why write

1:24:49 > 1:24:53notes? Now the baby had been quite unsettled, but for some reason as

1:24:53 > 1:24:59soon as I handed her over, she settled down and went to sleep.

1:24:59 > 1:25:10LAUGHTER. I don't want to say but there may be a point about kinder

1:25:10 > 1:25:14gentler cuddling. I wanted to tell people in the chamber is that that

1:25:14 > 1:25:19was a real defining moment for me. Both men in that room demonstrated

1:25:19 > 1:25:23serious comrade Rees. For me. Taking time to come to my house because I

1:25:23 > 1:25:28did not feel like I could leave. Not batting an eyelid when I breast-fed.

1:25:28 > 1:25:32I think that is the tiny ethos we need to bring into this House. If

1:25:32 > 1:25:36you are an MP and you have an urgent case and you still want to fulfil

1:25:36 > 1:25:41your duties, there are ways to do it. If you can do in my flat in

1:25:41 > 1:25:47North London, we can do it here as well. I sit on a committee where we

1:25:47 > 1:25:51scrutinise legislation around other people's maternity and if we cannot

1:25:51 > 1:25:58lead by example, we should not be sitting here. I commend this motion.

1:25:58 > 1:26:01Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker, but I'm not sure how I'm going to

1:26:01 > 1:26:07follow. It is an honour to take part in this debate. I would like to pay

1:26:07 > 1:26:10tribute to the right honourable members for securing it today. And

1:26:10 > 1:26:16say that for me it is actually what we like to say at home and little

1:26:16 > 1:26:21treat. Around 20 years ago, we were able -- a few years ago I was able

1:26:21 > 1:26:28to interview a member about how she planned to change the working

1:26:28 > 1:26:34landscape for families in this country. I actually had just

1:26:34 > 1:26:42finished my maternity leave at the BBC at the time and I have to say

1:26:42 > 1:26:45that she was right even back in those dark distant days of the past,

1:26:45 > 1:26:52the BBC words you -- were able to put out news bulletins even though I

1:26:52 > 1:26:57was not there. Employers find a way. I have to say the landscape for

1:26:57 > 1:27:03families has changed dramatically. Children who were born back then and

1:27:03 > 1:27:08are becoming parents now benefit from a whole raft of legislation

1:27:08 > 1:27:12which makes it easier for them to be with their partner and their child

1:27:12 > 1:27:16to bond as a family immediately after the child is born except of

1:27:16 > 1:27:20course unless they are a member of Parliament. It seems ridiculous that

1:27:20 > 1:27:27we in this place should be so far behind the very people that we are

1:27:27 > 1:27:36here to represent and to help. I have to say also I have no intention

1:27:36 > 1:27:40of having another child and although I have found that this debate at

1:27:40 > 1:27:45times moving and entertaining, it is also been frankly horrifying. If

1:27:45 > 1:27:52there had been any doubt I would not be having another child now. The

1:27:52 > 1:27:56gender bias of this House has also changed completely since I've been

1:27:56 > 1:28:01here. There are now 200 women many of them young enough to be starting

1:28:01 > 1:28:04or expanding their families. And many of the male colleagues are as

1:28:04 > 1:28:11well. I think we have to bear in mind that for many of us who have

1:28:11 > 1:28:15constituencies, many hundreds of miles away, that will not mean being

1:28:15 > 1:28:19home late at night for an hour or a couple of hours or travelling

1:28:19 > 1:28:23although that must be difficult to high-speed train with a small child.

1:28:23 > 1:28:31It will mean being away for a week at a time.

1:28:31 > 1:28:35Separated from them at the most important time in a child's life,

1:28:35 > 1:28:39not helping our partners through the sorts of ordeals we have heard about

1:28:39 > 1:28:42from other members, and we know that some of the younger male members of

1:28:42 > 1:28:49this house have already had to do. We should not be asking parents to

1:28:49 > 1:28:58choose between voting and providing that support. Not when an

1:28:58 > 1:29:02alternative is already there. It was there in the 19th century, we have

1:29:02 > 1:29:06heard today. It is there every time we go to the ballot box. You can

1:29:06 > 1:29:10have a proxy vote. You can have someone to go to exercise democratic

1:29:10 > 1:29:16right. We should not be excluding ourselves from that possibility. One

1:29:16 > 1:29:25other thing, all of the changes which have come about in the last

1:29:25 > 1:29:3020-30 years, maternity and parental leave act, working families act, the

1:29:30 > 1:29:33Children and Families Act, the Equalities Act, they all aimed at

1:29:33 > 1:29:37creating a level playing field so that when young women went in for a

1:29:37 > 1:29:41job, they were not judged on whether they might be leaving to have

1:29:41 > 1:29:45maternity leave and a young man who came in would not present the same

1:29:45 > 1:29:50problem, he would also be taking baby leave. And yet, we do not seem

1:29:50 > 1:29:55to have taken it into account that when selecting members for this

1:29:55 > 1:30:00House, selecting candidates, perhaps local parties would be faced with

1:30:00 > 1:30:06the same dilemma. If they choose the young woman, married, maybe about to

1:30:06 > 1:30:10start a family, they are going to lose her from the House. If they

1:30:10 > 1:30:16choose to young man, they might think they would not. So we are

1:30:16 > 1:30:20making it difficult for ourselves to pursue that stated goal of making

1:30:20 > 1:30:24this place more representative of the country that we seek to

1:30:24 > 1:30:31represent. We need more young women and more young men, we need more

1:30:31 > 1:30:36people from every section of society, and by making this simple

1:30:36 > 1:30:42difference, this simple change, we can make it easier to encourage

1:30:42 > 1:30:48young people who are about to start families to think, you know, it

1:30:48 > 1:30:52might just be possible, I might just be able to go and continue to

1:30:52 > 1:30:56represent the people I want to represent when I have my child, I

1:30:56 > 1:31:00can have someone else vote for me, when we adopt a child, someone else

1:31:00 > 1:31:06can do it, it is the simplest thing possible. And yet we have not done

1:31:06 > 1:31:17it. If we are going to be truly representative, then we have is to

1:31:17 > 1:31:20represent all of our constituents. We are falling short on that in this

1:31:20 > 1:31:25and all I would say today is we have the opportunity to put that last

1:31:25 > 1:31:32piece of the jigsaw in place, to make it possible to vote, it seems

1:31:32 > 1:31:36ridiculous that they could do it in the 19th century, and in the 21st,

1:31:36 > 1:31:42we are even asking the question. Thank you.I congratulate my right

1:31:42 > 1:31:49honourable friend for securing this important debate. I also thank other

1:31:49 > 1:31:56honourable and right honourable members and Deputy Speaker, making

1:31:56 > 1:32:00good progress over the last few years on this issue. As a new

1:32:00 > 1:32:05member, I had no idea the day nursery used to be a wine bar. The

1:32:05 > 1:32:08day nursery being there seems normal and that is good progress. I declare

1:32:08 > 1:32:13my interest as the father of an eight-week-old and husband to my

1:32:13 > 1:32:19wife, Lucy. Ophelia was able to join me here last week to vote for the

1:32:19 > 1:32:23first time against the third reading of the EU withdrawal bill and for

1:32:23 > 1:32:29those that have shared concern about bringing babies into the voting

1:32:29 > 1:32:34lobby, let me pay tribute to the clerks who very astutely did not

1:32:34 > 1:32:38count her vote when I walked through and quite rightly, I have no ideas

1:32:38 > 1:32:41what her views are on the Government's Brexit strategy. I

1:32:41 > 1:32:46support this important motion today because from my own experience of

1:32:46 > 1:32:50going on paternity leave a little earlier than expected in the run-up

1:32:50 > 1:32:55to Christmas, I was a book as a backbench MP to clear my diary

1:32:55 > 1:33:04easily and my constituents were very supportive but I needed to be and

1:33:04 > 1:33:07there were important votes I wanted to vote on, but the ability to use

1:33:07 > 1:33:11proxy voting or I can see the clerks use and iPad, maybe there is an app

1:33:11 > 1:33:16we could access. It would be welcome progress. In the early days, as

1:33:16 > 1:33:20other honourable friends have said, my duty as a husband and father is

1:33:20 > 1:33:24to be there to help in any way I can at home and having to leave for

1:33:24 > 1:33:29sometimes many hours to vote when I could do it from home or by a proxy,

1:33:29 > 1:33:34it would be very helpful. Formalising the process would be

1:33:34 > 1:33:36helpful too. The whips were very helpful but there was a presumption

1:33:36 > 1:33:41I would be here apart from those I negotiated not to be here for. I

1:33:41 > 1:33:47would argue it was the other way round. French reds, the Brexit ones,

1:33:47 > 1:33:51I'm sure Ophelia would have said that she wanted me to be here -- on

1:33:51 > 1:33:56the crunch ones. The assumption needs switching. In the short amount

1:33:56 > 1:34:02of time I have, it is important we set the tone in this place, it is

1:34:02 > 1:34:06right, as others have said, we should be doing the same as what we

1:34:06 > 1:34:10have legislated for in the country, that seems perfectly sensible. It is

1:34:10 > 1:34:15right to set the tone for what we wish to see. Parenting should not be

1:34:15 > 1:34:19a gender issue and I am of the firm view a family friendly and gender

1:34:19 > 1:34:22balanced economy is not just the right thing to do but would be good

1:34:22 > 1:34:26for economic growth and well-being as well. The House may not be

1:34:26 > 1:34:35surprised to hear that I think my wife is a remarkable and talented

1:34:35 > 1:34:38woman and I say that not least because in the snap election went at

1:34:38 > 1:34:43that stage we were two months pregnant, I made it clear I stood no

1:34:43 > 1:34:47chance of winning the election whatsoever and that I would be able

1:34:47 > 1:34:51to apply for shared parental leave in my previous job as a lawyer. To

1:34:51 > 1:34:55make it worse, having actually won when I said I would not, although I

1:34:55 > 1:35:00am very honoured to be here of course, the local BBC News, they

1:35:00 > 1:35:04noticed a slight bump, they announced our pregnancy to 1.3

1:35:04 > 1:35:09million people in the region without checking first, so we had text

1:35:09 > 1:35:11messages saying, congratulations. We thought it was about the election

1:35:11 > 1:35:15and we realised it was about Ophelia, we had not had the three

1:35:15 > 1:35:21months can, how does everyone know? My wife had a bumpy process in

1:35:21 > 1:35:24becoming a mum involved with a parliamentarian and my wife is also

1:35:24 > 1:35:36my constituent and she has said it is OK for me to say that it has been

1:35:36 > 1:35:44quite distressing and it has been quite difficult because my wife as

1:35:44 > 1:35:48director of public policy at an energy company receiving government

1:35:48 > 1:35:52funding in a senior role, doing very well, and after the announcement of

1:35:52 > 1:35:55her pregnancy, she was made redundant and told her role was no

1:35:55 > 1:36:00longer needed. Very distressing to her. Having worked so hard to

1:36:00 > 1:36:05achieve what she had. But my wife is also a formidable woman, she took

1:36:05 > 1:36:09them to the employment tribunal. As a litigant in person, whilst

1:36:09 > 1:36:14pregnant, cross-examined her former employers, in front of a judge, who

1:36:14 > 1:36:20said that since the Supreme Court had decided the fees were illegal

1:36:20 > 1:36:23for employment tribunal cases, his time was increasingly being taken up

1:36:23 > 1:36:27by these types of cases. The atmosphere and environment, can you

1:36:27 > 1:36:32imagine, as one of only two women of ten in the tribunal room, without

1:36:32 > 1:36:38gender balance unemployment tribunal 's, it was clearly very distressing

1:36:38 > 1:36:43and I take that issue up now with the president of the employment

1:36:43 > 1:36:46tribunal... The fact of the matter is, I should say, my wife sadly lost

1:36:46 > 1:36:52that case and perhaps we should have the debate about the application of

1:36:52 > 1:36:55burden of proof rules in this country where it is up to women to

1:36:55 > 1:36:58establish the burden of proof that discrimination could have taken

1:36:58 > 1:37:01place before employers have to bring forward witnesses and documents to

1:37:01 > 1:37:05show it did not take place at a time when they said the documents did not

1:37:05 > 1:37:09exist, it makes it very difficult for women bringing those claims. The

1:37:09 > 1:37:14fact is that as a father and a husband, I think it is perfectly

1:37:14 > 1:37:28sensible and normal for me to want to lean in, for dads to

1:37:30 > 1:37:33lean my wife to achieve her aspirations and together we want to

1:37:33 > 1:37:35give the best upbringing to our children so I support this motion

1:37:35 > 1:37:38not just because Parliament should be in line with what is happening in

1:37:38 > 1:37:41the rest of the country but it gives us the opportunity to set the tone

1:37:41 > 1:37:43of what we expect in a modern Britain and I hope that through

1:37:43 > 1:37:45reforming Parliament, looking at companies that receive public money

1:37:45 > 1:37:48who have these issues, we may also look at reforming rules in the

1:37:48 > 1:37:49judiciary, maybe even having gender balance and hopefully achieving

1:37:49 > 1:37:54change in the wider economy too. I commend this motion to the House and

1:37:54 > 1:38:00I look forward to supporting it in any way I can.Extremely grateful,

1:38:00 > 1:38:03Mr Deputy Speaker. I am really glad to see you in your seat in this

1:38:03 > 1:38:07debate which I guess maybe on some levels bittersweet but reminds us

1:38:07 > 1:38:10very strongly there are fantastic parents here in Parliament and I

1:38:10 > 1:38:16have to say in all honesty that those of us who have grappled with

1:38:16 > 1:38:22the experience of being the custodians of a child, being a

1:38:22 > 1:38:27parent, and I have met few finer examples than those people I work

1:38:27 > 1:38:30alongside here in Westminster, you have heard some of those stories

1:38:30 > 1:38:33here today were ready, I will not rehearse the points already made but

1:38:33 > 1:38:37I want to pay tribute to the members for Peckham and Basingstoke for

1:38:37 > 1:38:40bringing this forward. It has been something we have been discussing

1:38:40 > 1:38:45for a period of time. As one small change that might make life a little

1:38:45 > 1:38:49bit easier it what is an incredibly difficult hard and job and I wanted

1:38:49 > 1:38:56to say as well I do not believe we should be exempt or we should not

1:38:56 > 1:38:59acknowledge the freedom and flexibility to do a job for which we

1:38:59 > 1:39:03are well paid and for which we love the opportunity to do so, it should

1:39:03 > 1:39:08be hard, it should cost us something, but if we can make small

1:39:08 > 1:39:12incremental improvements that improve the lives of people here as

1:39:12 > 1:39:16well, I do not think it is just as that will benefit, it is the whole

1:39:16 > 1:39:22of society. In a week in which we discussed last night the renewal of

1:39:22 > 1:39:27this Parliament and today our own arrangements, it can perhaps seem

1:39:27 > 1:39:29indulgent for parliamentarians to spend their time talking about

1:39:29 > 1:39:34themselves, but I would simply point out we are the only ones that can

1:39:34 > 1:39:37have this conversation, we are the ones that determine our working

1:39:37 > 1:39:42practices and rightly so. My honourable friend for Birmingham

1:39:42 > 1:39:50Yardley referred to the famous internet meme when MPs are packed in

1:39:50 > 1:39:55when talking about the own conditions and absolutely absent

1:39:55 > 1:39:59when some important issue is being talked about, that is absolutely

1:39:59 > 1:40:04untrue. It would be good for them to talk about this, we are relatively

1:40:04 > 1:40:09sparse here today, everyone is taking one position, but I have

1:40:09 > 1:40:15spoken to many young fathers, they have said to me that they really do

1:40:15 > 1:40:20want this change. They really do.My honourable friend from the committee

1:40:20 > 1:40:27says that we are voicing one view here today. He is right. But surely

1:40:27 > 1:40:33if anyone had a view that differed, they would be here?I couldn't agree

1:40:33 > 1:40:37more and that is why I feel confident that this motion be

1:40:37 > 1:40:41brought forward and moved forward and I feel we should take confidence

1:40:41 > 1:40:44than that -- from that and encouraged the procedure committee

1:40:44 > 1:40:48to look at it swiftly, I know they have done preliminary work on how

1:40:48 > 1:40:54such a system could work. The model of caring for a child in that first

1:40:54 > 1:40:59year of the child's life, the split between two different parents, it

1:40:59 > 1:41:03sets the pattern of child rearing right the way through the child's

1:41:03 > 1:41:15life, all of the studies seem to show that. Therefore, if we want

1:41:15 > 1:41:17people to live up to the expectation of being present for their children,

1:41:17 > 1:41:20we should try to reflect that here in our practice as well. I have

1:41:20 > 1:41:22for-year-old daughter and I have always juggled life in this

1:41:22 > 1:41:25Parliament and I have made the most of the flexibility offered around

1:41:25 > 1:41:32floats to try to be present in her life -- around votes. We make it

1:41:32 > 1:41:36work, whatever way of life we are in, whether it means using time on

1:41:36 > 1:41:40Monday, getting back for the school run on Thursday, shifting days

1:41:40 > 1:41:44around at the weekend, being able to take a day out in the middle but

1:41:44 > 1:41:48turn up the votes later, I would just say, I have never had a formal

1:41:48 > 1:41:52conversation with my whips office to talk about the indications of me

1:41:52 > 1:41:55having a child, I have never said, here is my working pattern, I have

1:41:55 > 1:42:03really broadcast up until now what that looks like. Two fears, probably

1:42:03 > 1:42:07play on the minds of young fathers as well as young mothers, the first

1:42:07 > 1:42:12being what if it leaves you open to criticism that you are not hard at

1:42:12 > 1:42:17work? I have to say, when I headed up my first year in Parliament, I

1:42:17 > 1:42:22did that exercise, excluding the commuting, I worked out at 70-80

1:42:22 > 1:42:26hour week in that job, and it has eased off as I have got better at

1:42:26 > 1:42:31it, frankly, but that is not a concern that should be legitimate.

1:42:31 > 1:42:35There is no shortage of work and we are all doing it and when we are

1:42:35 > 1:42:41not, it is fairly obvious... I will give way.Apologies for not being

1:42:41 > 1:42:44here for the full debate and interrupting now. Can I thank the

1:42:44 > 1:42:47honourable member for allowing the back row allowing me to spend more

1:42:47 > 1:42:52time with my children by winning the seat in 2010 and leaving me another

1:42:52 > 1:42:56five years before I personally got into Parliament? Making a really

1:42:56 > 1:42:59important point about constituents expecting this to work very hard but

1:42:59 > 1:43:03at the same time we have to put process in place so it is not

1:43:03 > 1:43:07unnecessarily difficult and I think that is what we have at the moment,

1:43:07 > 1:43:10ridiculous processes making it unnecessarily difficult, whereas the

1:43:10 > 1:43:14rest of the country has moved on. Generous to me in 2010 and generous

1:43:14 > 1:43:23to me now. The second reason why I have never sat down and had a formal

1:43:23 > 1:43:26conversation is we worry that sometimes it looks like a lack of

1:43:26 > 1:43:31professionalism, a lack of hunger to get on, and actually, it is true, it

1:43:31 > 1:43:34is much harder to have sharp elbows in this place and force your way to

1:43:34 > 1:43:39the front if you make choices about supporting your own family. I am

1:43:39 > 1:43:43fortunate to structure my own work time to be present around my

1:43:43 > 1:43:46daughter but most people's experience of having children and

1:43:46 > 1:43:49being in this place is completely frazzled all of the time. Trying to

1:43:49 > 1:43:56find a way to make it work.

1:43:56 > 1:44:01Very sadly my own relationship with my daughter's mum broke down and I

1:44:01 > 1:44:04want to take full responsibility for that, but equally we need to be

1:44:04 > 1:44:07honest about the working practises of this place and the implications

1:44:07 > 1:44:16that there are. I was told that between my intake of 20 ten and

1:44:16 > 1:44:212015, a quarter of marriages broke down during that term. And we have

1:44:21 > 1:44:24to be honest about the implications of this place. And the effect that

1:44:24 > 1:44:34it has. There are real issues. For example shared parental leave is not

1:44:34 > 1:44:40only difficult, it is impossible because we don't have that formal

1:44:40 > 1:44:44employment relationship. Secondly just to make the point we make

1:44:44 > 1:44:48reasonable accommodations in all sorts of ways for other members's

1:44:48 > 1:44:53issues. I do not believe that we should dial down our parenthood to

1:44:53 > 1:44:56be representatives in this place I think we should amplify it. I think

1:44:56 > 1:45:01we should talk about it, we should normalise it. I think by doing so we

1:45:01 > 1:45:08might be able to get to a fairer society and close the gender pay

1:45:08 > 1:45:18gap. We can also approach other issues in a different lens. I want

1:45:18 > 1:45:22to make one final point, Mr Deputy Speaker, it is actually a procedural

1:45:22 > 1:45:29one. At the moment, the procedures invest to make exist that we work

1:45:29 > 1:45:38with the whips office in my case two weeks after the birth of my

1:45:38 > 1:45:47daughter, you know longer. -- longer amounts of time. I just want to say

1:45:47 > 1:45:55that our pairing arrangements we know that there are some members who

1:45:55 > 1:46:02are not going to be around for a lot of time. For example, select

1:46:02 > 1:46:06committee visit which cannot go ahead because we have already pared

1:46:06 > 1:46:10out what we can do on the basis of illness or on the basis of child

1:46:10 > 1:46:16care. I, myself, have never, it is not a brag, I have never made a

1:46:16 > 1:46:19request to be let off the whip for personal circumstances. I've

1:46:19 > 1:46:25actually never missed a vote because I've been ill, I've always been

1:46:25 > 1:46:29present. I do not think people abuse that system, but there are

1:46:29 > 1:46:31restrictions that are put in place and I do not actually believe this

1:46:31 > 1:46:37would take power away or give power to the whips offices. Whenever

1:46:37 > 1:46:43you're particular... It were actually professionalize it and make

1:46:43 > 1:46:52it much easier. In my own party standing orders requiring me if I

1:46:52 > 1:46:59were to take paternity leave for example, baby care, to sign over my

1:46:59 > 1:47:03proxy vote to the Chiefs. I am comfortable with that. There are

1:47:03 > 1:47:09ways around this. This should not be something that should be... Overall,

1:47:09 > 1:47:13this is a change which is required. It is a change that will have a

1:47:13 > 1:47:20profound impact on how we work here. It is the T one to -- thin end of

1:47:20 > 1:47:27the wedge. We need to become better at looking after ourselves on the

1:47:27 > 1:47:33basis that we don't want to put unnecessary strain. This job should

1:47:33 > 1:47:36be hard. Public leadership and sacrifice should be that

1:47:36 > 1:47:41sacrificial. Putting in place artificial barriers will not just

1:47:41 > 1:47:47hold that women in this place, but met as well.It is a pleasure to

1:47:47 > 1:47:57speak in this debate. Because I'm leaving for the S&P, my name had to

1:47:57 > 1:48:04come off the motion. I pay a tribute to the honourable Lady for ringing

1:48:04 > 1:48:10this debate. They are two women in this place that I hold in highest

1:48:10 > 1:48:14regard. I think that the debate today has been completely consensual

1:48:14 > 1:48:18as it should be on this issue. Not just in this place, but across

1:48:18 > 1:48:26society. I moved to say the words we're here not in our efforts to be

1:48:26 > 1:48:31lawbreakers, but in our efforts to be to get to speak today and to be

1:48:31 > 1:48:41part of what hopefully will come forward is very important weird

1:48:41 > 1:48:50because as the owner member said you know we have to reflect society but

1:48:50 > 1:48:54we also have to lead society. And I think 100 years on from women

1:48:54 > 1:48:59getting the vote that is hugely important. When I was thinking about

1:48:59 > 1:49:01standing for election, it was something I thought very carefully

1:49:01 > 1:49:06about whether I could do for two reasons. One, I knew I needed to

1:49:06 > 1:49:09come out and do with my sexuality and secondly I wanted to have

1:49:09 > 1:49:24children. -- deal with my sexuality. Nonetheless regardless of that being

1:49:24 > 1:49:28able to know that there are members across this place that support this

1:49:28 > 1:49:33process means that hopefully the next generation of parliamentarians,

1:49:33 > 1:49:38whether they are male, female whenever disability, whatever their

1:49:38 > 1:49:41sexuality is, they will look at this place and other Parliaments across

1:49:41 > 1:49:47the UK and think that is something that I can and want to be a part of.

1:49:47 > 1:49:52I think it has been an incredible debate. As we look across the world,

1:49:52 > 1:49:58we have the Prime Minister of New Zealand who was about to have a baby

1:49:58 > 1:50:04with her partner. We are taking steps forward and the testimonies

1:50:04 > 1:50:17that were read out mentioned. I would also like to refer to my

1:50:17 > 1:50:23honourable friend from Glasgow Central who got an interesting

1:50:23 > 1:50:28e-mail during the 2015 election. I'm just going to read out the question

1:50:28 > 1:50:34and the answer because I think it typifies the debate. It just shows

1:50:34 > 1:50:41how far we have to go. Dear Alison, I am in favour in the back of many

1:50:41 > 1:50:47of the S&P's Parliament to make policies. But I am very worried to

1:50:47 > 1:50:54find out that you are a mother of a very young family. It would help to

1:50:54 > 1:51:01know your solution... Your solution peer to me it is quite incredible

1:51:01 > 1:51:05that anybody would write to a potential candidate and saying that

1:51:05 > 1:51:18the fact that -- having children would be a problem. It is spoken

1:51:18 > 1:51:27that we let me read you the response. Thank you very much for

1:51:27 > 1:51:37your e-mail. I apologise for the delayed playback late reply. I am

1:51:37 > 1:51:41not alone amongst male and female candidates who have been lucky

1:51:41 > 1:51:50enough to have a family. Indeed, the mail Parliament member has a family.

1:51:50 > 1:51:57The average age of MP were 50, more than 62% of the MPs are white men

1:51:57 > 1:52:04aged over 40, I think Westminster out to be more representative of the

1:52:04 > 1:52:08people it serves without more women. Inequality affects policy and

1:52:08 > 1:52:18governance. I believe with the poor gender balance they have made poor

1:52:18 > 1:52:33decisions in things with families. Making the law the right to

1:52:33 > 1:52:36breast-feed. Over the last five years... She goes on to talk about

1:52:36 > 1:52:45being a councillor. There was another person who is a councillor

1:52:45 > 1:52:48in Aberdeen with very small children. I will cross whatever

1:52:48 > 1:52:54other bridges are necessary when the votes are cast. I think I is an

1:52:54 > 1:53:02excellent response.I thank you for giving way. I welcome the

1:53:02 > 1:53:11contributions that making. She is talking about what candidates might

1:53:11 > 1:53:17face when they are a new parent. I want to reflect on the abuse that I

1:53:17 > 1:53:24received. This person took to Twitter to criticise me for not

1:53:24 > 1:53:29attending a debate in the evening. He accused me of being timid for my

1:53:29 > 1:53:33refusal to attend an election debate. And I told that candidate

1:53:33 > 1:53:38that I did not refuse to do any debates, but with a newborn baby,

1:53:38 > 1:53:42evening events would be impossible and that I would gladly take on any

1:53:42 > 1:53:46day. He responded to say that he didn't realise that we were still

1:53:46 > 1:53:511950s when only a woman can look after a child. He said he thought

1:53:51 > 1:53:57the Labour Party believed in shared paternity. And I told him that we do

1:53:57 > 1:54:06and we champion it. To remind him that I wasn't expecting a general

1:54:06 > 1:54:09election and also he didn't know my personal circumstances and that as

1:54:09 > 1:54:15far as I was aware men still could not breast-feed. I suggested that he

1:54:15 > 1:54:24might want to stop digging. But I wanted to share this because the

1:54:24 > 1:54:28point that the honourable member makes at what happens at election

1:54:28 > 1:54:32time and how candidates treat other candidate shows back in 2017 we

1:54:32 > 1:54:40still have an issue to address.I completely agree. This vote on this

1:54:40 > 1:54:43issue is just not about a technicality of how we cast our

1:54:43 > 1:54:50votes. It is very important and my honourable friend has highlighted to

1:54:50 > 1:54:58me the importance the thin end of the wedge and I agree on that. It is

1:54:58 > 1:55:07proximity. Also with weather and geography. It's about the discourse

1:55:07 > 1:55:10and the narrative that we have in politics with each other, that the

1:55:10 > 1:55:20press has with us. And the digital environment how all the systems and

1:55:20 > 1:55:24processes that are around politics and around how we do politics need

1:55:24 > 1:55:28to be more transparent, need to be more reflective. If we have the

1:55:28 > 1:55:37positive system then it will be much more positive. I just want to prefer

1:55:37 > 1:55:45briefly and paid tribute to my honourable friend in the Scottish

1:55:45 > 1:55:51Parliament, and a gender balance Cabinet secretaries. They have had

1:55:51 > 1:55:57children in office and they for me have paved the way inspired me to

1:55:57 > 1:56:06stand. But the Scottish Parliament made clear from the outset. It was

1:56:06 > 1:56:11said there is a seed for everyone. Voting only takes a few seconds. And

1:56:11 > 1:56:22in the best practises phase things were drawn up to make sure that we

1:56:22 > 1:56:35can learn from our mistakes. We have a crush in the Scottish Parliament.

1:56:35 > 1:56:47We have child care in the Scottish permit. Some of the challenges of

1:56:47 > 1:56:50bringing children to this place where the family room is sometimes

1:56:50 > 1:56:56misused by other members or for meetings. He has had a great deal of

1:56:56 > 1:57:03support in that, but we do need to look at that as well. And there are

1:57:03 > 1:57:09many inclusive practises how business is done, so finishing at

1:57:09 > 1:57:12five o'clock. I do not want to talk too much about it. The Other Place I

1:57:12 > 1:57:20want to focus. My honourable friend from Aberdeen North talks about how

1:57:20 > 1:57:28she travels to Westminster biplane. And most don't let people 36 weeks

1:57:28 > 1:57:33pregnant fly. Also after having a baby you cannot fly for a week

1:57:33 > 1:57:41probably more like a fortnight. So, if she had a baby and she did say

1:57:41 > 1:57:50that she did not have any intentions of having more, she may have put

1:57:50 > 1:57:56women off having children. I have to say I remain undeterred. She says

1:57:56 > 1:58:00being away from Westminster. Because she could not travel gear would be

1:58:00 > 1:58:02very unfair to her constituents and would mean they would be

1:58:02 > 1:58:12unrepresented.

1:58:12 > 1:58:16He has fantastic staff ensuring everything was covered in the

1:58:16 > 1:58:21constituency but these matters need to be formalised. It seems

1:58:21 > 1:58:25incredible that 100 years after women got the vote, we are debating

1:58:25 > 1:58:30the fact they cannot take part fully for their constituents and fully in

1:58:30 > 1:58:34debates. We know Parliamentary work is not just about walking through

1:58:34 > 1:58:37the voting lobbies, it is about being in your constituency, but

1:58:37 > 1:58:43having an open Parliament will make sure that people from whatever walk

1:58:43 > 1:58:49of life, particularly women and aspiring parents and parents, they

1:58:49 > 1:58:54will think they can be part of democracy, stand for election, and

1:58:54 > 1:58:59it will make those women particularly who are going to have

1:58:59 > 1:59:02children very soon, parliamentarians, it will make their

1:59:02 > 1:59:05lives significantly easier. I hope the House and the public are

1:59:05 > 1:59:11listening carefully to the testimony from today.Thank you. Can I

1:59:11 > 1:59:14associate myself with the remarks made by my noble friend for Luton

1:59:14 > 1:59:18South? Good to see you in your place. I say to the honourable

1:59:18 > 1:59:22friend from Luton South, that is what a feminist looks like. Can I

1:59:22 > 1:59:32thank the right honourable a -- right honourable lady? She was a

1:59:32 > 1:59:35formidable role model when she was pregnant and stood in the election,

1:59:35 > 1:59:41I think it was Harry at the time, it is fitting that mother of the house

1:59:41 > 1:59:44should bring forward this debate and it is right for members to debate

1:59:44 > 1:59:49this and for the backbench committee to have allowed this debate. The

1:59:49 > 1:59:54honourable member for Basingstoke is always, as co-sponsor of this

1:59:54 > 1:59:59debate, raising important equality issues on her committee and I am

1:59:59 > 2:00:06sure she will monitor, together with other members, what the procedure

2:00:06 > 2:00:11committee comes up with. Honourable members will remember when the

2:00:11 > 2:00:14former Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister took paternity leave,

2:00:14 > 2:00:20they were celebrated, but as the honourable members for Liverpool,

2:00:20 > 2:00:24Wolverhampton North East, when they have been maternity leave, they have

2:00:24 > 2:00:32suffered abuse. The honourable member, she was a minister,

2:00:32 > 2:00:38surrounded by gurgles and red boxes, they are all formidable campaigners.

2:00:38 > 2:00:43The fat women have suffered abuse and accusations of being lazy is

2:00:43 > 2:00:50unacceptable -- the fact that women have suffered abuse. We want women

2:00:50 > 2:00:54to be Members of Parliament, there are no implications for play, women

2:00:54 > 2:00:57are not away, they want to cast their vote on behalf of their

2:00:57 > 2:01:02constituents -- implications for pay. It is right we should look at

2:01:02 > 2:01:10this, the edition of nodding through in certain circumstances. Ophelia is

2:01:10 > 2:01:14lucky to have a hands-on band, in the constituency member Bristol

2:01:14 > 2:01:20West. It is not compulsory to request this, but in my view, it is

2:01:20 > 2:01:24a compelling case. Proxy voting will have to be in line with party policy

2:01:24 > 2:01:30and proxy voting does not equate to a free vote. This motion does not

2:01:30 > 2:01:35ask to widen proxy voting to other circumstances, just this specific

2:01:35 > 2:01:38one where the member cannot attend the vote because of caring

2:01:38 > 2:01:43responsibilities. All this motion does is enable women MPs to balance

2:01:43 > 2:01:48giving birth, looking after a baby, with their work as an MP, and all my

2:01:48 > 2:01:51honourable friends who have given birth while they have been MPs have

2:01:51 > 2:01:59carried on with their work in the constituency and in the house and as

2:01:59 > 2:02:02honourable members have pointed out, they know in the 21st-century they

2:02:02 > 2:02:08have to respond to e-mails and they do so all the time. The honourable

2:02:08 > 2:02:11member from Birmingham Yardley, she says she doesn't want to have any

2:02:11 > 2:02:15more children, but I want to break it to her, she will be a month

2:02:15 > 2:02:21forever, even when are older, and they have children of their own. --

2:02:21 > 2:02:29a mum for ever. The clerk of the house we submitted a memorandum on

2:02:29 > 2:02:32proxy voting identify members with caring responsibilities limited to

2:02:32 > 2:02:36mothers of young infants as a category of member who might qualify

2:02:36 > 2:02:39for proxy voting. The honourable member is right that matters should

2:02:39 > 2:02:44be looked at by the appropriate committee, the honourable member for

2:02:44 > 2:02:48Peckham and Camberwell, and more work should be done following the

2:02:48 > 2:02:52motion together with their work by Sarah Charles and her report. It is

2:02:52 > 2:02:56going to be more of an issue as women members take their place and

2:02:56 > 2:03:02we move towards parity of MPs. And it is a lovely way to celebrate the

2:03:02 > 2:03:06representation of the people act 1918 giving 6 million women the

2:03:06 > 2:03:12right over the age of 30, first, the right to vote and debating this

2:03:12 > 2:03:17issue as women take our rightful place in the House. The honourable

2:03:17 > 2:03:23member for Camberwell and Peckham and Basingstoke, co-sponsors, all

2:03:23 > 2:03:27the members speaking in the debate, they are wonderful role models,

2:03:27 > 2:03:34Ophelia, Emilio, Theo and Ruby, the wonderful babies born to members in

2:03:34 > 2:03:38the time I have been in the house, your parents and every single

2:03:38 > 2:03:42honourable member has pushed back the boundaries today towards a good

2:03:42 > 2:03:52and more equal Parliament. Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker. Can I say

2:03:52 > 2:03:56what a huge pleasure it is to see you in your place today?There have

2:03:56 > 2:04:01been some excellent and very personal speeches and I think they

2:04:01 > 2:04:06have been so informative and they take me back to the horrors of those

2:04:06 > 2:04:10early days and also, Mr Deputy Speaker, I have to reflect that

2:04:10 > 2:04:12following the debate yesterday where I opened by saying this is a debate

2:04:12 > 2:04:17that should have taken place 40 years ago, this is a debate that

2:04:17 > 2:04:22should have taken place 40 years ago too. Let me start by paying tribute

2:04:22 > 2:04:25to the right honourable member for Camberwell and Peckham for the way

2:04:25 > 2:04:29in which she opened today's debate, a consistent champion of these

2:04:29 > 2:04:34issues throughout her career and it is certainly fitting she is mother

2:04:34 > 2:04:45of the House has secured this debate today. I want to recognise the total

2:04:45 > 2:04:47commitment of my right honourable friend for Basingstoke as chairman

2:04:47 > 2:04:50of the women and equality select committee who has supported and

2:04:50 > 2:04:52promoted so many issues affecting women and equality is in this house.

2:04:52 > 2:04:58I absolutely agree with all members here that it is essential we address

2:04:58 > 2:05:03and deal with the issue of baby leaves. Mr Deputy Speaker, the

2:05:03 > 2:05:07motion before the House today presents two issues for

2:05:07 > 2:05:10consideration, the first is the need for Members of Parliament to be able

2:05:10 > 2:05:14to take baby leave, I think we can all agree new parents must spend

2:05:14 > 2:05:20time with their babies, they must be enabled to do that. The second issue

2:05:20 > 2:05:24concerns how we reconcile this with the question of how and whether

2:05:24 > 2:05:28members should be able to vote in the House of Commons during any such

2:05:28 > 2:05:34leave. I want to thank the all-party Parliamentary group for women, until

2:05:34 > 2:05:37recently chaired by my honourable friend for Eastleigh and now by my

2:05:37 > 2:05:42honourable friend for Redditch for their hard work promoting equality

2:05:42 > 2:05:45for women and also the Commons reference group on representation

2:05:45 > 2:05:50and inclusion which is chaired by Mr Speaker and it is tasked with

2:05:50 > 2:05:58following and implementing where possible the recommendations made in

2:05:58 > 2:06:02the Good Parliament report. I want to say thanks for the important work

2:06:02 > 2:06:07of these groups. As the House may be aware, I have championed the vital

2:06:07 > 2:06:10importance of secure early attachment for many years and I have

2:06:10 > 2:06:14worked with a number of charities on this vital issue and I was chairman

2:06:14 > 2:06:18and trustee of a charity than nine years, helping parents who are

2:06:18 > 2:06:23struggling to form a secure bond with their babies. When I became MP

2:06:23 > 2:06:27for South Northamptonshire, I set up a Northamptonshire parent and infant

2:06:27 > 2:06:32partnership to provide help to all those new parents struggling across

2:06:32 > 2:06:36the county and even persuaded my honourable friend, the member for

2:06:36 > 2:06:41Banbury, to become a founding trustee. Now through the national

2:06:41 > 2:06:45charity I set up, there are five further parenting for partnerships

2:06:45 > 2:06:49across the country and I am delighted more families are unable

2:06:49 > 2:06:53to seek support for the earliest relationships which is probably the

2:06:53 > 2:06:59most important relationship we ever have because the baby's lifelong

2:06:59 > 2:07:06emotional health is profoundly impacted by his or her earliest

2:07:06 > 2:07:11experiences in the 1001 critical days of the perinatal period and I

2:07:11 > 2:07:16was proud to hear the honourable lady, the member for Liverpool way

2:07:16 > 2:07:20victory, mention the cross-party 1001 critical days campaign is set

2:07:20 > 2:07:26up in 2011 and it does command support from across the House. I

2:07:26 > 2:07:33absolutely agree that the mental health white paper published just

2:07:33 > 2:07:37before Christmas does include the need to commission further research

2:07:37 > 2:07:40into interventions that support better attachment and improve the

2:07:40 > 2:07:46understanding amongst professionals of the importance of low stress,

2:07:46 > 2:07:51healthy pregnancies and secure attachment. Like the two right

2:07:51 > 2:07:55honourable ladies, my own children are a bit older than babies, my

2:07:55 > 2:07:59eldest is 22, but that excellent speeches take me back to my early

2:07:59 > 2:08:04experiences when I was not in this place and I had a 46 hour delivery,

2:08:04 > 2:08:08I think, and a good dose, having just been promoted to a senior

2:08:08 > 2:08:12executive in the bank I was working in, they required me back after 11

2:08:12 > 2:08:16weeks. I had a good dose of postnatal depression to deal with

2:08:16 > 2:08:21following that. I totally empathise with all of those members who talk

2:08:21 > 2:08:24about their own experiences here and very committed to ensuring those who

2:08:24 > 2:08:28come after us do not have to suffer those same problems. I would just

2:08:28 > 2:08:32draw attention to my honourable friend for Worcester who sat next to

2:08:32 > 2:08:35me in the first part of the debate who was telling me his brother who

2:08:35 > 2:08:39works for the civil service is looking forward to six months shared

2:08:39 > 2:08:43parental leave next February and he himself is expecting a baby with his

2:08:43 > 2:08:50wife and he is asking nicely for two weeks. How is that? Today's debate

2:08:50 > 2:08:58is timely.I wonder if she remembers the first time we met she was

2:08:58 > 2:09:03pregnant? A few years ago now. Does she... We were on the selection

2:09:03 > 2:09:08trail as well. Does she agree with me that this is as important as it

2:09:08 > 2:09:15is a first step in trying to make this place and much easier place to

2:09:15 > 2:09:19not just be a parent but actually to be somebody who cares for their

2:09:19 > 2:09:25broader family as well?Of course, my right honourable friend is

2:09:25 > 2:09:29exactly right, there is a lot more to life than this place. It may seem

2:09:29 > 2:09:33extraordinary to all of us but we are all human beings, we are

2:09:33 > 2:09:37parents, daughters and sons, we have responsibilities. Today's debate is

2:09:37 > 2:09:43timely as we continue to break down the barriers that could discourage

2:09:43 > 2:09:49women and men from pursuing a career in Parliament. The motion today

2:09:49 > 2:09:53suggest a way to resolve the issue of baby leave is with the

2:09:53 > 2:09:57introduction of proxy voting, whilst I absolutely support the need to

2:09:57 > 2:10:02make this house more accessible for new parents, it is also important we

2:10:02 > 2:10:06recognise the possible consequences of any reforms, so with that in

2:10:06 > 2:10:08mind, I wrote to my honourable friend, the member for Broxbourne,

2:10:08 > 2:10:13the chair of the procedure committee in November, copying my right

2:10:13 > 2:10:26honourable friend, the chair of the women and

2:10:29 > 2:10:31equality is asked the committee to consider the matter of baby leave

2:10:31 > 2:10:34and proxy voting and for that committee to set out its views to

2:10:34 > 2:10:37the House. I also wrote to every member of the Cabinet and I can say

2:10:37 > 2:10:39that my right honourable friend the Prime Minister replied to me and

2:10:39 > 2:10:42agrees this is an important matter. She wrote, I quote, being a member

2:10:42 > 2:10:45of the and is a demanding job and it is important we give due

2:10:45 > 2:10:47consideration to the impact this can have on work life balance, childcare

2:10:47 > 2:10:50and they believe -- a member of the in. She has made clear her support.

2:10:50 > 2:10:54Following my letter to the procedure committee, my honourable friend has

2:10:54 > 2:10:58said should the motion be agreed today, the committee will undertake

2:10:58 > 2:11:02an inquiry into proxy voting. I welcome this as it is clear from

2:11:02 > 2:11:06this debate there are a number of important questions that need to be

2:11:06 > 2:11:10considered. Some of which I will set out briefly now. Giving Members of

2:11:10 > 2:11:14Parliament the right to baby leave raises a number of potential

2:11:14 > 2:11:17questions around the duties of Members of Parliament and the rules

2:11:17 > 2:11:23by which they are regulated. As colleagues will know, Members of

2:11:23 > 2:11:29Parliament are appointed representatives of their

2:11:29 > 2:11:31constituencies and they are not regulated by the same employment

2:11:31 > 2:11:33rules applying to other members of the workforce. Introducing baby

2:11:33 > 2:11:37leave might lead some to suggest MPs should be treated as employees which

2:11:37 > 2:11:41could have wider implications that we need to look at. The introduction

2:11:41 > 2:11:46of proxy voting would mark a departure from conventional voting

2:11:46 > 2:11:50practices in the House. For example, when members vote in a division, it

2:11:50 > 2:11:53is expected they do so having had the opportunity to attend the

2:11:53 > 2:11:58Chamber. I think we can all agree that television and 24-hour

2:11:58 > 2:12:04reporting, let alone Twitter and everything else, it gives members

2:12:04 > 2:12:07the opportunity to follow business from further afield, but any change

2:12:07 > 2:12:11will need to be carefully considered, including who would act

2:12:11 > 2:12:17as a proxy and how this would be regulated. It is also important to

2:12:17 > 2:12:21note Members of Parliament are elected by their constituents as

2:12:21 > 2:12:26individuals and it is implied upon election that their votes cannot be

2:12:26 > 2:12:31transferred to another empty so appointing a proxy voter could be

2:12:31 > 2:12:33perceived as reducing personal accountability. Any changes will

2:12:33 > 2:12:39need to ensure that personal accountability is maintained. In

2:12:39 > 2:12:43addition to these questions, and as I said in my letter to the procedure

2:12:43 > 2:12:48committee, a number of alternative suggestions have been made, aimed at

2:12:48 > 2:12:52addressing the needs of new parents undertaking the duties of an MP

2:12:52 > 2:12:56while also making sure their constituents have adequate

2:12:56 > 2:13:00representation in parliament. One such example is that all political

2:13:00 > 2:13:04parties represented in the House could agree a memorandum of

2:13:04 > 2:13:08understanding agreeing to the same terms which would allow their MPs to

2:13:08 > 2:13:12take parental leave and to formalise pairing arrangements across all

2:13:12 > 2:13:19parties.I am grateful. I appreciate the thoughtful way in which she is

2:13:19 > 2:13:22approaching this from first principles and laying out some of

2:13:22 > 2:13:29the issues mentioned by other members. I would just like her to go

2:13:29 > 2:13:32slightly further and acknowledge that there is a reputational issues

2:13:32 > 2:13:37around Members of Parliament not being present to vote and being

2:13:37 > 2:13:41reported as being absent when actually they are taking up

2:13:41 > 2:13:48responsibilities she herself has said a vitally important.

2:13:48 > 2:13:53I am not advocating one group over another. I am merely pointing out to

2:13:53 > 2:13:56the House that these issues need careful consideration, which is why

2:13:56 > 2:14:02I wrote to the procedure committee and why I'm delighted that they will

2:14:02 > 2:14:09have an inquiry. In addition, a helpful memorandum has been created

2:14:09 > 2:14:15and is available on the website. I encourage members to read it. It

2:14:15 > 2:14:19talks about very important issues including other approaches in other

2:14:19 > 2:14:25Parliament. Also alluding to our mediaeval tradition of voting by

2:14:25 > 2:14:29proxy. I am sure there were not very many pregnant women there in those

2:14:29 > 2:14:35days, but nevertheless they found a way. So Mr Deputy Speaker, should an

2:14:35 > 2:14:39inquiry be launched, I would inquire your colleagues to submit their own

2:14:39 > 2:14:44views. I have no doubt that the many insightful contributions made here

2:14:44 > 2:14:49will be great value to the committee. This is an important

2:14:49 > 2:14:52debate which has really caught the attention of Parliament. As Leader

2:14:52 > 2:14:56of the House, I want to make it absolutely clear that if we can

2:14:56 > 2:15:00agree on a way forward on they believe, I will drive that forward

2:15:00 > 2:15:06with my total commitment. Thank you. Thank you very much Mr Deputy

2:15:06 > 2:15:10Speaker and I welcome you back to the chair. It is great to see you

2:15:10 > 2:15:14here with us. I think this has been a really important debate and I

2:15:14 > 2:15:18think all members who've contributed from all sides. People who have

2:15:18 > 2:15:23spoken in deeply personal team to wood terms. They have shown a

2:15:23 > 2:15:29passion for their family and their constituents. Nobody has actually

2:15:29 > 2:15:33spoken against it. I think this has been a very important debate to

2:15:33 > 2:15:38shape the proceedings of the procedure committee. The committee

2:15:38 > 2:15:42needs to take it forward with some focus and with some clarity and wit

2:15:42 > 2:15:47some expedition. We do not want after debate such as we have had to

2:15:47 > 2:15:51date for it to go wrestling into the long grass. That will not be

2:15:51 > 2:15:56acceptable. I would like to conclude by thanking everyone who spoke in

2:15:56 > 2:16:00this debate. And say we must all be in alliance for progress on this.

2:16:00 > 2:16:06All of us here must make sure that this actually happens and does not

2:16:06 > 2:16:10disappear for more decades. I'm sure that we can have that purpose and

2:16:10 > 2:16:15intent. I would also like to say, that I apologise for the fact for

2:16:15 > 2:16:20not inking about the situation of SNP members who don't even have

2:16:20 > 2:16:27pairing. I feel sort of embarrassed about that. I feel as such time,

2:16:27 > 2:16:31when the committee comes out how we do proxy voting, we need to make

2:16:31 > 2:16:34some arrangements which reflect the situation for the S&P right away.

2:16:34 > 2:16:41Thank you Mr Speaker.The question on the order papers are many of that

2:16:41 > 2:16:53opinion say ayes. The ayes have it. We now come to the backbench motion

2:16:53 > 2:17:03on Hospital car parking charges. Thank you. I beg to move that we

2:17:03 > 2:17:10move to take consultation to identify the most effective means

2:17:10 > 2:17:17for Hospital parking. And provide a time step treatment timescale for

2:17:17 > 2:17:20the application. I think the bench batch committee for excepting this

2:17:20 > 2:17:37debate. I think my colleagues who supported me in the debate.

2:17:40 > 2:17:46I also think the various organisations that have been

2:17:46 > 2:17:49actively supporting this campaign through their own research and on

2:17:49 > 2:17:59social media. Other organisations representing drivers. They are just

2:17:59 > 2:18:03a few of the bodies were offering their help and support to bring an

2:18:03 > 2:18:10end to the extortion of car park charging. We all know that being a

2:18:10 > 2:18:14patient or visitor can be a stressful and emotional time. The

2:18:14 > 2:18:17last thing anyone should be worrying about is whether they have change

2:18:17 > 2:18:22for the car park or if they can afford the rates that are charged. I

2:18:22 > 2:18:29started this campaign in 2014 after finding out that hospitals in

2:18:29 > 2:18:34England were charging staff and visitors up to £500 a week to use

2:18:34 > 2:18:45on-site parking facilities. As a result, in that year, we published

2:18:45 > 2:18:54guidance urging them to cut their fees. Caps or cuts should be

2:18:54 > 2:19:01available for staff and others. While some of these charges have

2:19:01 > 2:19:04fallen since 2014, I was shocked to discover that last year when we

2:19:04 > 2:19:09carried out further research that 47% of hospitals have actually

2:19:09 > 2:19:16increased the parking charges and almost have charge blue badge people

2:19:16 > 2:19:30to park. The average is £53. And people on average paid £1 98.I'm

2:19:30 > 2:19:35grateful for him giving way. And I congratulate him for bringing this

2:19:35 > 2:19:42issue to the House of Commons. It has been announced with no

2:19:42 > 2:19:47consultation, that they air opposing parking charges on blue badge

2:19:47 > 2:19:51holders and a site that people are doing it everywhere else in the NHS.

2:19:51 > 2:19:58It is an NHS wide issue. Does he therefore not agree with me that it

2:19:58 > 2:20:05needs to be looked at to get rid of Lou badge holders Chargers?Many of

2:20:05 > 2:20:11these charges are done without any consultation or fair consultation. I

2:20:11 > 2:20:18completely agree with him. Of course, because of what the Speaker

2:20:18 > 2:20:23said to me, I won't take too many interruptions.Thank you for giving

2:20:23 > 2:20:33way. I agree with the member who just spoke. A lot of the hospital

2:20:33 > 2:20:41charges are part of the PFI. I think this should be looked at you could

2:20:41 > 2:20:48argue it is a tax.That is the sad thing that many private companies

2:20:48 > 2:20:55are making profit out of the taxpayers. And the most vulnerable

2:20:55 > 2:21:02people of our society. This has got to stop. This has happy to --

2:21:02 > 2:21:16happened under both governments. Now there is still a lottery with

2:21:16 > 2:21:22different hospitals charging wildly different fees. The goal of the NHS

2:21:22 > 2:21:26is to provide free health care for all, but the charges are a stealth

2:21:26 > 2:21:32tax. The parking charges are the bane of people's lives. No one goes

2:21:32 > 2:21:38to hospital out of choice. They go because they have to. No one chooses

2:21:38 > 2:21:42to be ill. You rely on doctors and nurses to look after us. And I urge

2:21:42 > 2:21:45the Health Secretary and the Minister who was here today to take

2:21:45 > 2:21:52urgent action to end this. And to introduce substantial legislation to

2:21:52 > 2:21:59ensure hospitals scrap their parking charges.Thank you for giving way.

2:21:59 > 2:22:07You have been most generous. I have tremendous sympathy with my

2:22:07 > 2:22:11honourable friend in this respect. And I have campaigned hard on

2:22:11 > 2:22:16charges my cell. The one difficulty that I do have is the fact that my

2:22:16 > 2:22:18hospital is located right in the town centre and the difference we

2:22:18 > 2:22:23have is that people use it because it's free to go off and go shopping

2:22:23 > 2:22:27pair that has happened in the past. I'm just looking for suggestions and

2:22:27 > 2:22:36solutions in that area.I am very proud to work with you on that. What

2:22:36 > 2:22:41he said is a very important point and I hope that you would just wait

2:22:41 > 2:22:44a few minutes I hope I will be able to answer the concerns that he has

2:22:44 > 2:22:52expressed. I mentioned Mr Deputy Speaker, earlier that in 2014

2:22:52 > 2:22:55guidelines on concession for patients and visitors peered this

2:22:55 > 2:22:59was welcome. I welcome it. It was a sign that the Government was aware

2:22:59 > 2:23:04of the extortion costs facing hospital users. But the problem with

2:23:04 > 2:23:10the guidance is that none of that is mandatory. In fact the guidance

2:23:10 > 2:23:12encourages the postcode lottery. The guideline states that charges should

2:23:12 > 2:23:19be reasonable for the area. Trusts are free to set their own fees. It

2:23:19 > 2:23:27means people working in South London or charge the most. I asked what is

2:23:27 > 2:23:34a reasonable charge and I'm consistently told, first hospital

2:23:34 > 2:23:42car parks charges are for local NHS hospital., they are supposed to

2:23:42 > 2:23:49follow published guidance and the Department of Health has discussed

2:23:49 > 2:23:55car park charges with local trusts. I gave away the last time because I

2:23:55 > 2:23:58want to be fair to what the Deputy Speaker has asked me before the

2:23:58 > 2:24:07debate.Thank you. Do you accept that the national health service is

2:24:07 > 2:24:11not best place for ministry in car parks at all? And that if we take

2:24:11 > 2:24:15car parking charges away, we should also take the whole provision of car

2:24:15 > 2:24:19park away from the national health service and make sure they don't

2:24:19 > 2:24:26lose out financially?The crucial thing is that the NHS does not lose

2:24:26 > 2:24:30out financially. I think that is the substance of what he is saying. The

2:24:30 > 2:24:35guidance is that the superficial. I have been unable to work out what is

2:24:35 > 2:24:40a reasonable charge. The Government isn't able or willing to keep trusts

2:24:40 > 2:24:50in check. Since 2013, the campaign to scrap car park charges has

2:24:50 > 2:24:54actually gained speed. Now more and more leading UK charities in its

2:24:54 > 2:24:57associations representing drivers carrying out research into the

2:24:57 > 2:25:07negative effects of this on patients and drivers. This sick and

2:25:07 > 2:25:08vulnerable are disproportionately hit, particularly those with

2:25:08 > 2:25:13long-term or severe illnesses that require lengthy stays in the

2:25:13 > 2:25:17hospital. Research has shown that cancer patients and patients of

2:25:17 > 2:25:26premature babies face the greatest financial of the glances. There is a

2:25:26 > 2:25:30wonderful charity supporting and people with cancer found that

2:25:30 > 2:25:37families were paying about £37 a month. Some families paying up to

2:25:37 > 2:25:50£10 per day. They also say that one in four parents,, over that, 29%...

2:25:50 > 2:25:57The sentiment is mirrored. It is said that patients in England are

2:25:57 > 2:26:08paying extortionist card charges. There are some babies who only stay

2:26:08 > 2:26:12in the neonatal unit for a few days, some parents have to pay up to £250

2:26:12 > 2:26:17at their babies stays for eight weeks. And some, they say, many

2:26:17 > 2:26:24parents are cannot even afford to go and see their baby because of the

2:26:24 > 2:26:31car park charges. Let me just quote another charity, which I think sums

2:26:31 > 2:26:42up the whole debate. They say recently, they do a lot of work in

2:26:42 > 2:26:48terms of brain injured see to injury. We support a family that's

2:26:48 > 2:26:53been more than £1500 in parking charges in 15 weeks. They needed to

2:26:53 > 2:26:57be at the bedside of their son who was frightened after sustaining

2:26:57 > 2:27:03brain surgery. What parent would not want to be there day and I? Yet they

2:27:03 > 2:27:10were faced with a huge appeal to the next Bill. This is putting people

2:27:10 > 2:27:17into huge debt at a time when they already have enough to cope with.

2:27:17 > 2:27:20Another charity say that dialysis patients who have to go three times

2:27:20 > 2:27:28a week and that takes four hours suggests that the average cost of

2:27:28 > 2:27:39parking for that time is £3 .28. You can imagine how the costs stack up.

2:27:39 > 2:27:45It is extraordinary that despite the Government guidance almost half the

2:27:45 > 2:27:51hospitals charge disabled drivers. They don't go out of choice. It is

2:27:51 > 2:27:56hard for them to use public transport. Yet they have to pay

2:27:56 > 2:27:59significant charges. Even the ones that allow free parking have a lot

2:27:59 > 2:28:09of conditions attached. The scope -- scope, a charity, support the

2:28:09 > 2:28:26sentiment. It is not just charities that do valuable work. The RAC do

2:28:26 > 2:28:32support this as well. I have worked with a person for a number of years

2:28:32 > 2:28:45from this organisation.

2:28:45 > 2:28:5295% of respondents want hospital parking fees scrapped or set at a

2:28:52 > 2:29:03maximum fee of £1. The RAC carried out a survey. Two thirds named

2:29:03 > 2:29:08hospitals as one of the places they dislike paying for parking the most.

2:29:08 > 2:29:21The campaign is growing. Charities represent the most vulnerable. Two

2:29:21 > 2:29:29main motoring organisations representing motorists in the UK. We

2:29:29 > 2:29:33must not forget our incredibly hard-working NHS staff. Some of whom

2:29:33 > 2:29:38are charged to go to work. Other public sector workers, police

2:29:38 > 2:29:43officers and teachers are right with the most part able to park for free

2:29:43 > 2:29:51on their premises, whether it is a police station or school. The

2:29:51 > 2:29:52guidance from the government suggests concessions should be

2:29:52 > 2:29:58available for all hospital staff working shifts that make public

2:29:58 > 2:30:07transport use difficult. But so much of the USDAW workforce cannot reply

2:30:07 > 2:30:19on public transport to get to work. Hospital porter would have to spend

2:30:19 > 2:30:27over an hour on two buses to get to work. Many work anti-social hours in

2:30:27 > 2:30:30the health service. We have no choice but to use hospital car

2:30:30 > 2:30:36parks. Of hospitals seem to offer discounted parking scheme based on

2:30:36 > 2:30:43pay band or salary, or by allocating a limited number of discounted staff

2:30:43 > 2:30:51spaces, NHS staff are charged to work anti-social hours. My noble

2:30:51 > 2:30:59friend was told that they cannot afford the parking charges of the

2:30:59 > 2:31:08half to park on nearby unlit streets which leaves them vulnerable. I was

2:31:08 > 2:31:13contacted recently by a resident who was delighted to hear of the

2:31:13 > 2:31:16campaign but came from a different angle. Southpark in the residential

2:31:16 > 2:31:24roads around hospital to avoid being charged to go to work. The influx of

2:31:24 > 2:31:27cars everyday game in their driveways are blocked, there is more

2:31:27 > 2:31:32traffic on the road and residents are only able to go about their

2:31:32 > 2:31:36daily business. I realise that hospital parking charges can be a

2:31:36 > 2:31:40source of income for hospitals. They're certainly a gold mine for

2:31:40 > 2:31:44some private companies. But the government has previously stated,

2:31:44 > 2:31:51and I quote, providing free parking at NHS hospitals would result in 200

2:31:51 > 2:31:56million per year taken from clinical care budgets to make up the

2:31:56 > 2:32:04shortfall. When considered in terms of the 120 billion plus to be spent

2:32:04 > 2:32:10in the running of the NHS, that 200 million figure is to be put in

2:32:10 > 2:32:13perspective. And going on the assumption that free hospital

2:32:13 > 2:32:18parking would cost 200 million per year, I think there are a number of

2:32:18 > 2:32:21funding options which would mean hospitals were not left out of

2:32:21 > 2:32:27pocket and clinical care budgets were not affected. The government

2:32:27 > 2:32:32have said that with better procurement in the NHS they would

2:32:32 > 2:32:36bring in over 1 billion per year, and I just asking for 200 million

2:32:36 > 2:32:44from that. The Department of Health financial accounts for 2016 suggests

2:32:44 > 2:32:52they underspent their revenue budget by 0.5%. Could some of that money

2:32:52 > 2:32:56not go towards covering parking costs for patients and staff? It

2:32:56 > 2:33:00might be time to look at other areas of government where we spend a

2:33:00 > 2:33:04significant amount of money and perhaps look at reallocating a very

2:33:04 > 2:33:11small amount of that money. The 200 million of the take in order to

2:33:11 > 2:33:18scrap hospital car parking charges. Another concern is that free parking

2:33:18 > 2:33:24in hospitals would be exploited by shoppers. This could be easily

2:33:24 > 2:33:30solved using parking tokens validated by ward staff. Some NHS

2:33:30 > 2:33:36hospitals in England provide free parking, including the

2:33:36 > 2:33:40Northamptonshire NHS Trusts and the Leicestershire partnership trust. It

2:33:40 > 2:33:46shows it is possible to deliver free parking for patients, visitors and

2:33:46 > 2:33:50staff, and discourage abuse of the system with tokens are barriers.

2:33:50 > 2:33:55Having contacted hospitals in Scotland and Wales directly, I know

2:33:55 > 2:34:00there are numerous parking solutions in order to ensure that free parking

2:34:00 > 2:34:04is not exploited. Alongside the abolition of hospital car parking

2:34:04 > 2:34:09charges, a system could be introduced whereby the ticket or

2:34:09 > 2:34:18presented to staff at the beginning and is validated at the end. In

2:34:18 > 2:34:29conclusion, because I see the look. It is time to end the hospital car

2:34:29 > 2:34:33parking problems once and for all. The NHS is supposed to be free at

2:34:33 > 2:34:37the point of access. It was never envisaged that people with cars

2:34:37 > 2:34:42would have to pay on top of taxation for the National Health Service.

2:34:42 > 2:34:49Instead, patients and staff are charged access for vital services.

2:34:49 > 2:34:56Patients with sick children, patients suffering from long-term

2:34:56 > 2:35:01illnesses. The cause of major social injustice and clearly the government

2:35:01 > 2:35:04guidance is not working. I urge the government to look into the most

2:35:04 > 2:35:09efficient way to scrap hospital car parking charges and bring an end to

2:35:09 > 2:35:17the stealth tax on drivers once and for all.Can I bring in an eight

2:35:17 > 2:35:24minute limit?Thank you. I'm very grateful to be part of this

2:35:24 > 2:35:38important debate and I congratulate the Member for Havel and others. The

2:35:38 > 2:35:41Diana Princess of Wales Hospital site in Great Grimsby provides a

2:35:41 > 2:35:48whole range of health and well-being services. Everything from A&E to

2:35:48 > 2:35:54child development, mercenary, eating disorder unit and health education

2:35:54 > 2:35:59spaces. The site covers such a huge range of different services that

2:35:59 > 2:36:05deliver to a very wide community. As part of this debate, there are two

2:36:05 > 2:36:08main areas I want to try and address. The first is the

2:36:08 > 2:36:12difficulties for patients and the challenges of ever-increasing

2:36:12 > 2:36:16parking tariffs, and also the issues for staff around car parking, which

2:36:16 > 2:36:23has been raised with me on a number of occasions. In Grimsby, I know I

2:36:23 > 2:36:28can go and park in the Iceland car park for £1 per hour in the centre

2:36:28 > 2:36:35of our town. If I need to park for over two hours, I might park in the

2:36:35 > 2:36:40multistorey and I might pay £3 50 for the privilege of four hours

2:36:40 > 2:36:43parking. Having worked in places like Yorkie, I know I should be

2:36:43 > 2:36:49grateful for the seemingly small amounts that it costs to park in the

2:36:49 > 2:36:53centre of our town, but when these smaller amounts are set against what

2:36:53 > 2:36:58people are expected to be in hospital parking charges, it feels

2:36:58 > 2:37:03very much to my constituents that the NHS is over inflating the

2:37:03 > 2:37:07expense and adding an unnecessary burden to patients and families. Its

2:37:07 > 2:37:13recently increased to £2 ten for one hour's parking at the Diana Princess

2:37:13 > 2:37:25of Wales Hospital. Double what it is in the centre of town. On a good

2:37:25 > 2:37:29day, it might take just a few minutes to collect a prescription.

2:37:29 > 2:37:40On top of those costs, I'm paying another £2 ten to collect my

2:37:40 > 2:37:52prescription. Last week I went in to get a blood test. This is not to

2:37:52 > 2:37:56bemoan the cost to my personal pocket. I know I can afford this,

2:37:56 > 2:38:01but there are many and my constituency who cannot. It is

2:38:01 > 2:38:06prohibitive. And happy to give way. I thank my noble friend for giving

2:38:06 > 2:38:16way. Does she agree with me that the example she races shows the

2:38:16 > 2:38:26opportunity for greater flexibility. Some leisure centres have free

2:38:26 > 2:38:30parking for half an hour. Recognising the need to be

2:38:30 > 2:38:37proportionate.She raises an important point. There is room for

2:38:37 > 2:38:40flexibility and all trusts should be looking at what they can do to make

2:38:40 > 2:38:44parking less prohibitive for people and not put them all. It is galling

2:38:44 > 2:38:49for my constituents to know that in other parts of town the parking fees

2:38:49 > 2:38:56are lower, and they all have the issue of maintenance and lighting

2:38:56 > 2:39:00but are still not charging the high rate, so does feel like profiteering

2:39:00 > 2:39:05off the back of people have no choice but to be at hospital for

2:39:05 > 2:39:09themselves, friends or relatives. There are concessions the trust

2:39:09 > 2:39:13offers. Lower costs for blue badge holders, although not exempt

2:39:13 > 2:39:17charges. Parent staying overnight with Pirelli children or those

2:39:17 > 2:39:26having cancer treatment. When the justification for charging is it

2:39:26 > 2:39:32pays for the maintenance of the site, it doesn't seem to stack up

2:39:32 > 2:39:35compared to other parking sites. We have recently had the new automated

2:39:35 > 2:39:42numberplate recognition system installed. This led to even more

2:39:42 > 2:39:47frustration for constituents because while this fantastic new system was

2:39:47 > 2:39:52supposed to make things quicker and easier, all it did was cause an

2:39:52 > 2:39:58additional delays and cost for people because people try to pay

2:39:58 > 2:40:04further parking and it caused havoc. There were cheers going around the

2:40:04 > 2:40:09block with people tripping over into the next pay band and paying even

2:40:09 > 2:40:14more. It caused an extraordinary amount of frustration and reflected

2:40:14 > 2:40:21very pearly on the trust, which is a real shame. The knock-on effect of

2:40:21 > 2:40:27the charges as I think the surrounding streets, all residential

2:40:27 > 2:40:36streets with limited on street parking, get filled with cars of

2:40:36 > 2:40:41those attending hospital. I know there is nothing illegal about that.

2:40:41 > 2:40:48But it really irritates residents, if it crosses a dropped curb or

2:40:48 > 2:40:52impinges on people's driveways, it is an incredible frustration, and is

2:40:52 > 2:40:58also giving rise to increasing concerns about road safety,

2:40:58 > 2:41:03particularly around school hours. A broader point is that we now that

2:41:03 > 2:41:09people with disabilities or long-term illnesses are generally

2:41:09 > 2:41:17financially worse off than the rest of the population. That additional

2:41:17 > 2:41:20costs really represents significant inconvenience and potential hardship

2:41:20 > 2:41:24put on people who can least afford it. Briefly, turning to the issues

2:41:24 > 2:41:28that staff face because it has been an increasing issue that staff have

2:41:28 > 2:41:33been talking to me about, particularly on this side, there

2:41:33 > 2:41:36have been discussions with staff about increasing the amount they

2:41:36 > 2:41:41already pay in order to go to work. That has been postponed for now, but

2:41:41 > 2:41:45the opportunity for that to be brought back next year understand is

2:41:45 > 2:41:48very much on the table and they would see significant increases

2:41:48 > 2:41:55going forward. As the honourable member for Harlow has indicated,

2:41:55 > 2:41:58where not just talking about consultants who might be earning a

2:41:58 > 2:42:03very good wage or senior executives, we're talking about porters and

2:42:03 > 2:42:05health care assistants, medical secretaries, people behind the

2:42:05 > 2:42:09scenes to keep the hospital going, expected to pay even more. The

2:42:09 > 2:42:13frustrations that has brought about from staff are immense because they

2:42:13 > 2:42:17already say they struggle to get a parking space as it is, not least

2:42:17 > 2:42:21because of the shifts run over, the idea you might do an eight-hour

2:42:21 > 2:42:32shift in

2:42:47 > 2:42:49the NHS is negligible because most people through their own goodwill by

2:42:49 > 2:42:52giving more to the NHS and working beyond their shift, they don't want

2:42:52 > 2:42:54to leave their patients in the middle of an incident. And saw the

2:42:54 > 2:42:56number of parking spaces available for people is reduced. People are

2:42:56 > 2:42:59leaving home and off a lot earlier, an hour or an hour and a half

2:42:59 > 2:43:02earlier than their shift starts, so increasing their working day in many

2:43:02 > 2:43:05slaves. Most of it is not just about travel time. It is about people in

2:43:05 > 2:43:07the car parks driving around trying to find a space. It is incredibly

2:43:07 > 2:43:10frustrating people are paying for a space to go to work, they can't get

2:43:10 > 2:43:13a space and sometimes it is making them late to go into work. I'm happy

2:43:13 > 2:43:17to give way.

2:43:17 > 2:43:21You make a good point about people trying to find parking spaces and

2:43:21 > 2:43:25they're not being enough, could be compromised and that hospitals

2:43:25 > 2:43:30charge a reasonable flat rate rather than abolishing completely? By

2:43:30 > 2:43:33abolishing charges completely with that exacerbate the very thing that

2:43:33 > 2:43:36the honourable lady is talking about? Hello Mac I thank the

2:43:36 > 2:43:42honourable gentleman for that intervention and I think that is

2:43:42 > 2:43:46worth looking at.What we need is a system where it does not put people

2:43:46 > 2:43:48off either attending their appointments and does not inhibit

2:43:48 > 2:43:54people who are going to work and causing them to arrive late at work,

2:43:54 > 2:44:01so any suggestions are very welcome to reach a sensible solution. And

2:44:01 > 2:44:06finally, just to conclude, to raise the issue that all of this, the car

2:44:06 > 2:44:09parking charges are set in the context of a long-term

2:44:09 > 2:44:14transportation plan including Park and ride systems, increasing

2:44:14 > 2:44:16people's ability to use public transport, cycles and everything

2:44:16 > 2:44:22else. The reality is that not enough has been done on any of those things

2:44:22 > 2:44:26to enable people to use alternative methods of transport to access work

2:44:26 > 2:44:29at the time they need it or access appointments at the time they needed

2:44:29 > 2:44:33and so it is all for nothing and that is why the charges are so

2:44:33 > 2:44:36incredibly prohibitive when there are no other methods of easy

2:44:36 > 2:44:43transport on a regular basis to suit patients and staff.It is a great

2:44:43 > 2:44:47pleasure to follow the honourable member from Grimsby who has given a

2:44:47 > 2:44:51very thoughtful and engaging speech on this very important issue. I am

2:44:51 > 2:44:55glad so many members are able to be here this afternoon to take part in

2:44:55 > 2:44:59this debate. I would like to congratulate the Right Honourable

2:44:59 > 2:45:03member from Harlow for championing this important issue in Parliament

2:45:03 > 2:45:07over many years. He is much admired right across the house taking up

2:45:07 > 2:45:10issues that not everyone chooses to champion and these are the issues

2:45:10 > 2:45:14that so often make the lives of the people he represents, the people I

2:45:14 > 2:45:19represent, so much better so I thank him for that. I was inspired by his

2:45:19 > 2:45:23efforts in this area before they became an MP and I was actually

2:45:23 > 2:45:26campaigning in my constituency of Telford and the whole issue of

2:45:26 > 2:45:33parking charges when at the Princess Royal Hospital the charges went up

2:45:33 > 2:45:41by 75% and created the deal of local upset. My constituents raised their

2:45:41 > 2:45:44concerns on this issue frequently, and in the time I have campaigned on

2:45:44 > 2:45:49this issue I have received over 5000 letters and I see letters, not

2:45:49 > 2:45:53e-mails, on this specific issue. In Telford we really care about this

2:45:53 > 2:45:57and that is why I am here today because I was supposed to be at the

2:45:57 > 2:46:02school giving a speech on the -- giving a speech to the ethical

2:46:02 > 2:46:05debating society which I have to cancel to be here because it matters

2:46:05 > 2:46:10so much, and I apologise to the students. I was told by my hospital

2:46:10 > 2:46:15trust in 2014 that due to the long-term nature of the legally

2:46:15 > 2:46:20binding contract the hospital trust had entered into that it was not

2:46:20 > 2:46:24possible to change the existing arrangement that they had. Clearly,

2:46:24 > 2:46:28even political season long-term contracts eventually expire so we

2:46:28 > 2:46:33must be looking forward to what we can put in place when the contracts

2:46:33 > 2:46:37do. It is not acceptable for those who can effect change to simply

2:46:37 > 2:46:41stand back and wait for orders contracts with public contractors to

2:46:41 > 2:46:47be renewed.I thank my honourable friend forgiving way. As she says

2:46:47 > 2:46:53part of the problem is that so many hospital trusts are locked into a

2:46:53 > 2:46:58long-term contract, many of which were negotiated in the late 90s, and

2:46:58 > 2:47:05to thousands. But which will shortly be coming up for renewal on

2:47:05 > 2:47:08expiring. There she had been at now is the time to be looking on what

2:47:08 > 2:47:13provisions we can put in place to make sure that as they are of

2:47:13 > 2:47:16renewed the do not contain these exploitative provisions that allow

2:47:16 > 2:47:23hospital trusts to take patients and their families and visitors for

2:47:23 > 2:47:30remarks by overcharging them for parking?My honourable friend makes

2:47:30 > 2:47:34an important point and makes it eloquently. This is a timely debate

2:47:34 > 2:47:37and that is why it is so important that we are are here to make the

2:47:37 > 2:47:46case. Sadly, my local hospital trust has gone on increasing the price of

2:47:46 > 2:47:50hospital parking charges in a way that some do feel is faultless and

2:47:50 > 2:47:55has been described to me as a cavalier manner. Following rises in

2:47:55 > 2:48:012017 it is now cheaper to park near my local shopping centre in Telford

2:48:01 > 2:48:05than it is to go to hospital to visit a sick relative so there is

2:48:05 > 2:48:09clearly something wrong with the model that operate in this way

2:48:09 > 2:48:15because as many other members have mentioned no one chooses to go to

2:48:15 > 2:48:21hospital. Telford is a new town much like my right honourable friend's

2:48:21 > 2:48:23constituency of Harlow and like many new towns that are problems around

2:48:23 > 2:48:27the way they are designed because right or wrong way it is all about

2:48:27 > 2:48:32road users as together with major roads and read about systems --

2:48:32 > 2:48:36roundabout systems which are much loved in Telford, everything is

2:48:36 > 2:48:40focused on the car. It was never intended that the pedestrian be able

2:48:40 > 2:48:46to walk from A to B and this is one of the problems that make it such an

2:48:46 > 2:48:49important issue locally. We do not have good public transport and we

2:48:49 > 2:48:53can just hop on a bus or hop on a chip or as I see a walk to the local

2:48:53 > 2:48:58hospital as you might do in many other areas. We have to take several

2:48:58 > 2:49:01buses and so many people find themselves being driven to hospital

2:49:01 > 2:49:06or driving themselves and having to pay. Some of the reasons my trust

2:49:06 > 2:49:11gave to me about the increase in charges was they said that the

2:49:11 > 2:49:14charges are lower elsewhere in the country which I did not think how

2:49:14 > 2:49:18much teeth to it because London is a very different environment to

2:49:18 > 2:49:23Telford both in terms of income and accessibility of transport so there

2:49:23 > 2:49:26is a real need to take into consideration local factors when

2:49:26 > 2:49:30trusts are setting these charges, and offering concessions is good,

2:49:30 > 2:49:35and there are concessions at the Princess Royal in Telford but they

2:49:35 > 2:49:39are very contributed to administer and operate and if you you must

2:49:39 > 2:49:41prove you are on benefits and have had your appointment and pretty

2:49:41 > 2:49:45pager charges and all the time health care staff are having to

2:49:45 > 2:49:50administer this, having to cancel charges and operate a refund of

2:49:50 > 2:49:53devout concessions and that is not what they are there for. It is no

2:49:53 > 2:49:56good saying either that if there was more money for hospitals they would

2:49:56 > 2:50:00not need to charge because I think we all know and understand that in

2:50:00 > 2:50:06many cases and seven in my local hospital 50% of the revenue goes to

2:50:06 > 2:50:10the parking contractor and that must be wrong. The other argument we have

2:50:10 > 2:50:15here advanced year-to-date is that if there were no parking charges

2:50:15 > 2:50:18then there would be nowhere for people to park, as anyone who wished

2:50:18 > 2:50:25to produce the hospital car park. Charges it is argued in a

2:50:25 > 2:50:27disincentive to parking and without charges my local hospital trust

2:50:27 > 2:50:31people might stay all day in the hospital cafe is having the

2:50:31 > 2:50:36refreshments rather than leaving the site. Clearly this is complete

2:50:36 > 2:50:40nonsense, first of all because even with charging incredibly high

2:50:40 > 2:50:45charges there is nowhere to park. All of the spaces are filled, the

2:50:45 > 2:50:48grass is filled, the concrete is filled, so the argument that

2:50:48 > 2:50:53everyone is sitting in a cafe is beyond my contravention. And I do

2:50:53 > 2:50:56think this is an issue that needs to be addressed with careful thought

2:50:56 > 2:51:00rather than just seeing charges as an instant panacea to a problem when

2:51:00 > 2:51:06it clearly is not. Bizarrely my hospital trust even tried to justify

2:51:06 > 2:51:11the increase by talking to residents about the number of nurses the

2:51:11 > 2:51:14parking revenue pays for. I don't like that as an argument because

2:51:14 > 2:51:17nurses are paid for by taxpayers to government funding and not the

2:51:17 > 2:51:21parking charges, he increased the Internet it was in fact in the

2:51:21 > 2:51:24contractual agreement and nothing to do with the number of nurses that

2:51:24 > 2:51:30they were employing. So I do worry when hospital managers think that

2:51:30 > 2:51:33this is a charge that is not a big deal because it is cheaper somewhere

2:51:33 > 2:51:37else in the transport is not really their problem, and if they are

2:51:37 > 2:51:41spending too long in cafes then they must live them on by using charges,

2:51:41 > 2:51:44the shoes that they probably did not understand as well as they should

2:51:44 > 2:51:47the people they serve. And if you dig a little bit deeper you find

2:51:47 > 2:51:51that the Princess Royal that the reason it is not possible to park is

2:51:51 > 2:51:56there has been a huge increase in the number of staff working on site

2:51:56 > 2:51:59and parking in the car park and we do need to look at ways of helping

2:51:59 > 2:52:05staff reduced car park use, as this would free up many spaces for

2:52:05 > 2:52:07patients to use throughout the day and we need to think imaginatively

2:52:07 > 2:52:12on how this might be done, perhaps a park-and-ride scheme specifically

2:52:12 > 2:52:17tailored to shift times could help and I think this is something that

2:52:17 > 2:52:21hospitals are looking at. We have heard today that this is a tax on

2:52:21 > 2:52:25the sick and most taxes take account of people's ability to pay and that

2:52:25 > 2:52:30is absolutely right, yet hospital managers and porters pay the same to

2:52:30 > 2:52:34park and it is often the least well off who are hit hardest. If you want

2:52:34 > 2:52:39to tax people and give half of that tax to a car park in company then do

2:52:39 > 2:52:42it to PAYE, it is a bit senseless but do not break nurses and other

2:52:42 > 2:52:47health care staff be involved in enforcement and its is completely

2:52:47 > 2:52:50inefficient to operate it in the way it is being operated. Others have

2:52:50 > 2:52:54talked on the issue of the rigmarole that those of paying for parking,

2:52:54 > 2:52:57whether it is coins are typing in your number plate being video going

2:52:57 > 2:53:01in and out, there is a whole punitive element to this that when

2:53:01 > 2:53:05you are rushing to see someone who is ill or indeed waiting for an

2:53:05 > 2:53:08appointment at -- and the consultant is running over time it had to the

2:53:08 > 2:53:13anxiety and I think in this particular context it is completely

2:53:13 > 2:53:17inappropriate. This is an issue that no one wants to own and so we will

2:53:17 > 2:53:21end up accepting it rather than solving it and too many people see

2:53:21 > 2:53:24it is not our problem and too difficult to fix and it is not that

2:53:24 > 2:53:28important because it is only £8 per day. Too often those in power look

2:53:28 > 2:53:31at the world through their own eyes and not through the eyes of those

2:53:31 > 2:53:34whom they serve. There is little appetite amongst hospital management

2:53:34 > 2:53:40to deal with this. It is not a big-ticket issue, it is not exciting

2:53:40 > 2:53:43or a shiny new hospital, it does not cost £300 million, which is

2:53:43 > 2:53:46something that we spend a lot of time talking about in Telford,

2:53:46 > 2:53:52earlier emergency units that why I am here today, I want to see

2:53:52 > 2:53:55government and hospital managers sit up and take notice of this issue.

2:53:55 > 2:54:00Don't rush it off as at an issue, it is not. By NCH through the eyes of

2:54:00 > 2:54:06others and tackle the issue that faces the everyday users of our

2:54:06 > 2:54:09hospitals. It is something that can be fixed and will make a difference

2:54:09 > 2:54:12to the lives of those who most need hospital services and for that

2:54:12 > 2:54:15reason we should all care about its all for the Right Honourable member

2:54:15 > 2:54:20of Harlow, it is a great service to his constituents and I thank him for

2:54:20 > 2:54:24bringing forward this debate and I support him entirely.It is a

2:54:24 > 2:54:28pleasure to follow the Honourable member from Telford. We all know

2:54:28 > 2:54:33that the NHS is underfunded and the hospital trust in my constituency

2:54:33 > 2:54:39received over £1.5 million in car parking charges in 2016-17 according

2:54:39 > 2:54:45to data released by Freedom of information request, so it might

2:54:45 > 2:54:48seem unusual for me to be calling for the abolition of car parking

2:54:48 > 2:54:52charges when we know that they can provide an income for hospitals

2:54:52 > 2:54:55however I agree with the Honourable member from Telford that much of the

2:54:55 > 2:54:59money does not actually go to the hospital, it often goes to the

2:54:59 > 2:55:04private operator of that car park. I also think that it is the

2:55:04 > 2:55:08government's responsibility to ensure our NHS has the money needs,

2:55:08 > 2:55:13not the patient's not staff and not visitors. We should not expect

2:55:13 > 2:55:18vulnerable people to pay a sickness taxi parking charges. And I also

2:55:18 > 2:55:22agree with my honourable friend's comment from Great Grimsby about the

2:55:22 > 2:55:25impact it has on other residents living in the local area. In the

2:55:25 > 2:55:32street opposite my hospital in Walker Street they have had to issue

2:55:32 > 2:55:36resident permits to stop other people parking on the street so in

2:55:36 > 2:55:40effect the residents that live there have to pay to park their cars

2:55:40 > 2:55:43because staff are parking their cars where they left because staff cannot

2:55:43 > 2:55:47afford to use the car park. The whole system is completely nonsense.

2:55:47 > 2:55:53And of course I am incredibly proud that our Labour Party manifesto

2:55:53 > 2:55:57pledge to strap car parking charges at her suggestion was that any loss

2:55:57 > 2:56:01of income could come from a tax on private health care and insurance

2:56:01 > 2:56:06which would meet the £162 million cost of free parking on all NHS

2:56:06 > 2:56:12hospitals across England. The unfairness of the sickness tax by

2:56:12 > 2:56:16having car parking charges must be felt in context, and I want to tell

2:56:16 > 2:56:22you about a dear friend of mine, a man called Dermot. He has been in

2:56:22 > 2:56:26hospital now for well over 20 days and I am not sure if you are all

2:56:26 > 2:56:29aware but a particularly cruel and unfair consequence of being in

2:56:29 > 2:56:32hospital over 28 days if the ending of his payments for disability

2:56:32 > 2:56:39living allowance and attendance allowance. And if he had been

2:56:39 > 2:56:41receiving PIP instead of the LA that would have been stopped as well. His

2:56:41 > 2:56:46wife's income has been affected as well because she is his carer and he

2:56:46 > 2:56:49has stopped receiving her allowance because Dermot has lost his

2:56:49 > 2:56:54disability living allowance. The nice bits to this study is that

2:56:54 > 2:56:56friends have rallied round and organised fundraising concert for

2:56:56 > 2:57:03their friend and I have to make sure I pronounce this carefully, it was

2:57:03 > 2:57:11cold funk the 28 day rule, which was used to raise money to support

2:57:11 > 2:57:15Dermot. Friends should not have to raise money to compensate our health

2:57:15 > 2:57:20care's system failure to support people. The dramatic fall in his

2:57:20 > 2:57:23family's income makes the added travel at car parking costs

2:57:23 > 2:57:26particularly cruel and they are not the only family facing this but

2:57:26 > 2:57:30their story highlights the unfairness that many families face

2:57:30 > 2:57:34of having to park every day to visit loved ones at a time when their

2:57:34 > 2:57:38income might have dramatically fallen. We all hate to think what

2:57:38 > 2:57:42would happen if one of our loved ones ended up staying in hospital

2:57:42 > 2:57:48for a long time. One of the saddest examples of the sickness tax is what

2:57:48 > 2:57:50the Honourable member for Harlow mention that that is for parents of

2:57:50 > 2:57:56premature sick babies. We know that premature and sick babies, to have

2:57:56 > 2:58:01the best possible outcome, they need hands-on care every day, the daily

2:58:01 > 2:58:05cost of travelling to hospital can be a barrier to parents being with

2:58:05 > 2:58:13the baby. The charity Bliss states that parents spent 32p per week on

2:58:13 > 2:58:20average on car parking charges to visit their baby. -- £32 per week.

2:58:20 > 2:58:23This is an unacceptable cost. All of our new precious babies have the

2:58:23 > 2:58:26right to be with their parents, not just the parents who can afford to

2:58:26 > 2:58:33pay to park their cars there.

2:58:33 > 2:58:42I lady for giving way. I think it is grossly unacceptable for people

2:58:42 > 2:58:49visiting sick babies, or a husband or man with his partner waiting for

2:58:49 > 2:58:59her to give birth, how often does happen that you have paid for three

2:58:59 > 2:59:03hours parking and you require much more? You are stuck. You're required

2:59:03 > 2:59:07to stay with the woman, but you're worried about paying for the

2:59:07 > 2:59:15flipping parking charge. This is wrong. There must be a way around

2:59:15 > 2:59:19this.I completely agree. I know from being with my parents when a go

2:59:19 > 2:59:25in for hospital appointments, my mum sits there with the alarm on her

2:59:25 > 2:59:30phone. It is not what you want to be thinking about when you visit

2:59:30 > 2:59:34hospital. This unfair cost is not just felt by visitors and patients,

2:59:34 > 2:59:38but by staff as well. During my local big conversation event, I

2:59:38 > 2:59:43became aware of the difficulties facing local nurses and other NHS

2:59:43 > 2:59:50professionals in my local hospital. The financial squeeze that NHS

2:59:50 > 2:59:52professionals are facing has been well-documented. For example,

2:59:52 > 2:59:58midwives have lost on average £6,000 per year in real terms since 2010.

2:59:58 > 3:00:04The additional cost of parking their cars seems particularly unfair. An

3:00:04 > 3:00:09investigation by the union Unison found some medics were having to

3:00:09 > 3:00:13rush out in between appointments to move their car to avoid a fine. A

3:00:13 > 3:00:22situation which is ridiculous. Our hospitals are open 24 hours a day,

3:00:22 > 3:00:28every day of the year. Star finish work at different times. We have a

3:00:28 > 3:00:32duty to keep them safe, after they have spent their shift caring for

3:00:32 > 3:00:36others. They should not be having to return to cars parked on dark and

3:00:36 > 3:00:41isolated streets because they can't afford the hospital car park. I urge

3:00:41 > 3:00:46the Minister to take this motion forward and take action. This issue,

3:00:46 > 3:00:51as you can hear, has cross-party support and it would make a real

3:00:51 > 3:01:00difference, a real positive difference to so many people slides.

3:01:00 > 3:01:04It's a pleasure to follow the honourable lady who represents the

3:01:04 > 3:01:10other side of the Humber Bridge. And a pleasure to support the honourable

3:01:10 > 3:01:16member for Harlow. His campaigning skills on issues such as this on the

3:01:16 > 3:01:27backbenches are very welcome. Hopefully we can have success, as we

3:01:27 > 3:01:34have done in the past with campaigns. It's a pleasure to speak

3:01:34 > 3:01:41following the honourable member for Great Grimsby. On this occasion, I

3:01:41 > 3:01:46can't say that I agree with every word said in this House by my member

3:01:46 > 3:01:56of Parliament. It is about getting the balance right. Diluted initial

3:01:56 > 3:01:59burden on patients and their families, particularly at a time

3:01:59 > 3:02:06when they are particularly stressed and perhaps in great distress? Or

3:02:06 > 3:02:14should we put the burden on any limited NHS resources our hospitals

3:02:14 > 3:02:18are having to manage? There is a balance to be achieved, I'm quite

3:02:18 > 3:02:26sure. The reality is that some patients and families can afford to

3:02:26 > 3:02:29pay, as has been mentioned already. But even those in those

3:02:29 > 3:02:38circumstances or perhaps visiting a parent who is coming to the end of

3:02:38 > 3:02:41their life and they suffer just as much distress, whatever their

3:02:41 > 3:02:54financial circumstances. The hospital trust that serves my

3:02:54 > 3:02:59constituency has an income of £2.8 million from car parking last year.

3:02:59 > 3:03:06They told me there was a surplus of three quarters of £1 million spent

3:03:06 > 3:03:12on patient care. That is good news in the sense that that is money they

3:03:12 > 3:03:15desperately need, but it has come out of the pockets of people

3:03:15 > 3:03:30visiting the hospital at difficult times. It is a real burden on many

3:03:30 > 3:03:41hard-working families. I would detain the House is a great deal of

3:03:41 > 3:03:46time if I were to read the 64 page guidance the local trust produces

3:03:46 > 3:03:56for parking on hospital site. It is an appalling burden we place on all

3:03:56 > 3:04:00organisations, be they in the public or private sector, when he have to

3:04:00 > 3:04:06go to such trouble to produce 64 pages guidance on how they operate

3:04:06 > 3:04:14their car park. It is madness. I draw attention to the fact that

3:04:14 > 3:04:22patients in my constituency and the neighbouring areas in many cases

3:04:22 > 3:04:36half to travel much further, many times over the river to Hull. Public

3:04:36 > 3:04:40transport is almost nonexistent from many of the rural villages in my

3:04:40 > 3:04:47constituency and in the wider area served by Grimsby's hospital. I will

3:04:47 > 3:04:53happily give way.He is making a very good point and that is that the

3:04:53 > 3:04:58cost is disproportionate on those who live in rural areas.I thank my

3:04:58 > 3:05:03honourable friend from that point. He rammed his eye sees the point I

3:05:03 > 3:05:08am making. Many patients travel 15 or 20 miles before the actually get

3:05:08 > 3:05:15to the hospital. It is an additional burden they can well do without. My

3:05:15 > 3:05:19honourable friend from Grimsby mentioned the fact that there was a

3:05:19 > 3:05:22problem with management. She mentioned parking in neighbouring

3:05:22 > 3:05:32streets. When all those streets very well. When I was a councillor for

3:05:32 > 3:05:36that area, they used to complain about people blocking their streets

3:05:36 > 3:05:41and I'm sure they complain to their member of Parliament today. It is a

3:05:41 > 3:05:45problem I recognise. There is a problem with commuter parking which

3:05:45 > 3:05:51has to be dealt with, tokens have already been mentioned, simple time

3:05:51 > 3:05:55limits of a couple of hours before charges kicked in might be another

3:05:55 > 3:06:00alternative, as well as the flat charge my honourable friend from

3:06:00 > 3:06:07Southampton mentioned. I urge the government to tackle this. It needs

3:06:07 > 3:06:14government action. It is unreasonable to expect a trust,

3:06:14 > 3:06:17particularly those like Northern Lincolnshire and cool, in special

3:06:17 > 3:06:24measures, with various challenges of their own. In needs government

3:06:24 > 3:06:32action to resolve it. Savings can be made through better procurement

3:06:32 > 3:06:37procedure is. That is one possible route. I'm sure every member in the

3:06:37 > 3:06:41House could identify one particular saving they could identify in order

3:06:41 > 3:06:51to provide this particular -- meet the cost of the 200 million the NHS

3:06:51 > 3:06:56would have to find. It is a major problem, it's a burden on our

3:06:56 > 3:06:59constituents, one could so easily be resolved and I urge the government

3:06:59 > 3:07:08to get on with it and resolve it pretty quickly. Thank you.I would

3:07:08 > 3:07:10also like to thank the Right honourable member for Harlow for

3:07:10 > 3:07:24securing this important debate. If I parked at the hospital car park in

3:07:24 > 3:07:28my constituency, it would cost me a third more than if I parked in a

3:07:28 > 3:07:34council owned car park. How is that acceptable? Is this not NHS Trusts

3:07:34 > 3:07:37profiteering from the sick and vulnerable? When you're in a rush,

3:07:37 > 3:07:42taking a sick friend or relative to the hospital, you won't necessarily

3:07:42 > 3:07:47consider where is cheaper to park. Unho Park in the closest car park

3:07:47 > 3:07:51and sort it out later. If you're having to attend hospital on a

3:07:51 > 3:07:57regular occasion, you'll get free parking. At Huddersfield Royal

3:07:57 > 3:08:01Infirmary, a 2.5 hour stay three times a week every week of the year

3:08:01 > 3:08:07will cost you needy pounds. That is 700 needy pounds to support someone

3:08:07 > 3:08:15receiving medical treatment. Even for some who are disabled blue badge

3:08:15 > 3:08:25holders, £780.I thank the honourable lady for giving way. I

3:08:25 > 3:08:29think I speak on behalf of all of us, but I find it in equities that

3:08:29 > 3:08:35anyone with a blue badge should have to pay a penny when they go to

3:08:35 > 3:08:43hospital.I am in complete agreement with you. How am I constituents

3:08:43 > 3:08:48meant to afford these excessive costs? Hard-working nurse, doctor,

3:08:48 > 3:08:54Porter, cleaner, receptionists, they all go to work to help people. They

3:08:54 > 3:09:07are paying 1000 pounds -- £1600 per year to work 12 hour shift to for

3:09:07 > 3:09:15people. Paying to save lives. How is this acceptable by anyone's

3:09:15 > 3:09:18standards? How does anyone think it is right that these hard-working

3:09:18 > 3:09:23professionals are paying nearly £2000 a year to help people and cure

3:09:23 > 3:09:34for people? I can tell you, it isn't. I appreciate that trusts are

3:09:34 > 3:09:37following national guidelines, but patients and staff feel like they

3:09:37 > 3:09:45are being treated just like cash cows by NHS Trusts. My local trust

3:09:45 > 3:09:52remains nearly £15 million in deficit from last year. In the

3:09:52 > 3:09:59annual reports, the trust recorded 1.4 million income from car parking.

3:09:59 > 3:10:07In 2016, this rose to 2.7 million. The extra money the trust makes

3:10:07 > 3:10:10helps plug the hole from the underfunded from the government, but

3:10:10 > 3:10:16it shouldn't have to. Our NHS should be fully funded, not depending on

3:10:16 > 3:10:19car parking fees. I urge the government to consider the comments

3:10:19 > 3:10:25being made today by members from across this House and act swiftly to

3:10:25 > 3:10:38resolve this issue.It takes me back a long way to when I was shadow

3:10:38 > 3:10:44Health Minister back in 2006. This issue with car parking charges was

3:10:44 > 3:10:51around then. Successive governments have talks about addressing this,

3:10:51 > 3:10:57but it is a regressive tax. It is a tax on everybody that needs the NHS,

3:10:57 > 3:11:03that's why the earlier. And for the staff to be taxed even more, to be

3:11:03 > 3:11:12able to go to work in a very difficult shift pattern is even more

3:11:12 > 3:11:16of a regressive tax for them. It is frankly unacceptable. I've raised

3:11:16 > 3:11:20this issue many times before. Members of the House might remember

3:11:20 > 3:11:25I used to be a firefighter. Firefighters don't pay to park in

3:11:25 > 3:11:33the yard of the fire station. The Ambulance Service doesn't pay, the

3:11:33 > 3:11:38drive to work, they go to the depot to pick up the ambulance and go to

3:11:38 > 3:11:48work. So why another emergency worker to be charged in this way is

3:11:48 > 3:11:54something fundamentally wrong, it's been going back and forth across

3:11:54 > 3:11:59this House the matter who is in government. Contracts were signed by

3:11:59 > 3:12:03this government and previous ones, hugely expensive ones, particularly

3:12:03 > 3:12:13the PFI once. We need to do something about that.Thank you. It

3:12:13 > 3:12:19seems to me again that you have a staff car park and you should have a

3:12:19 > 3:12:24setup where staff have a separate parking arrangement so that staff do

3:12:24 > 3:12:30not block the public going in and staff have a guaranteed slot, so

3:12:30 > 3:12:40they are not late further shift.In some parts of the world, in Luton

3:12:40 > 3:12:46and Dunstable, that's what they do. I went to visit someone in

3:12:46 > 3:12:59palliative care. I didn't know how long I was going to be seeing them.

3:13:00 > 3:13:05I parked and paid where I thought I was in a public car park. I was in

3:13:05 > 3:13:09the staff car park. So when I went to try and get out, the barrier

3:13:09 > 3:13:14wouldn't go up. I pressed the button and the said I had parked illegally.

3:13:14 > 3:13:21I said I have got a ticket. Fortunately they had no idea who I

3:13:21 > 3:13:33was. Eventually I said, if you're going to find me, finally. I will

3:13:33 > 3:13:40see you in court. I had paid in an NHS car park that you have

3:13:40 > 3:13:43designated. Eventually they just said, go our way. I have been

3:13:43 > 3:13:47waiting for the fine to come through. It probably will now and I

3:13:47 > 3:14:02will see them in court. We have heard quite rightly about maternity.

3:14:02 > 3:14:08Babies come out when they want to, not when we want them to and not

3:14:08 > 3:14:13based on how much time you have in the car park. People are getting

3:14:13 > 3:14:17signed every day in this country because they have overrun their time

3:14:17 > 3:14:24in the car park. How can the right?

3:14:24 > 3:14:28I was told by a member who cannot be here today, volunteer drivers, what

3:14:28 > 3:14:35would we do without them? They are fantastic. They pay to be in

3:14:35 > 3:14:40hospital car parks to take patients home. Because the annual service is

3:14:40 > 3:14:42struggling so much. What is happening in some parts of the

3:14:42 > 3:14:46country and I know this is happening in my part, is because the car

3:14:46 > 3:14:51parking facilities are so bad people are saying I want the patient

3:14:51 > 3:14:55transport. Putting more of a burden on patient transport because they

3:14:55 > 3:14:59can't find a parking space and will be with her that appointment. If

3:14:59 > 3:15:01they are they for the appointment because of the patient transport

3:15:01 > 3:15:05that is OK but if you can't find the parking space to pay then you are a

3:15:05 > 3:15:09bad person. We have heard of people parking outside. Blue badge holders

3:15:09 > 3:15:13being charged in a car park when they can park for free on the road

3:15:13 > 3:15:18which is what they do. We know that is what is happening and that is

3:15:18 > 3:15:25where it is very wrong. I know when the minister stands up and he is a

3:15:25 > 3:15:29good man and an honourable man but he will almost certainly say this is

3:15:29 > 3:15:32devolved to NHS trusts and it is for them to decide how they run their

3:15:32 > 3:15:37facilities. For those of us who are members of Parliament the NHS trusts

3:15:37 > 3:15:41are completely unaccountable. We can go and moan about this and they will

3:15:41 > 3:15:46not listen in the slightest. They will be looking at whether they can

3:15:46 > 3:15:51get away with it and how much they can raise. It is not just about

3:15:51 > 3:15:55money, it is about space. For instance we have heard already that

3:15:55 > 3:16:00if we do not charge it will be full of people from the town centre. My

3:16:00 > 3:16:05hospital was closed, the excellent Hemel Hampstead hospital and we said

3:16:05 > 3:16:09if you move all of the acute care to Watford in the middle of Watford

3:16:09 > 3:16:12town centre next to a football stadium, apparently Watford play

3:16:12 > 3:16:17there. My constituents will be very upset when the Jamie being

3:16:17 > 3:16:21derogatory about Watford but they have huge fans and on one occasion I

3:16:21 > 3:16:25went to Watford Hospital on Saturday morning to visit a constituent of

3:16:25 > 3:16:32mine. I parked and paid. When I came out there was a group of parking

3:16:32 > 3:16:35people who clearly wanted to give me a ticket. I had paid in the football

3:16:35 > 3:16:40pitch. That was designated to Watford football club when playing

3:16:40 > 3:16:44at home. What does that have to do with going to see and look after our

3:16:44 > 3:16:50call to a hospital, an NHS hospital? Unfortunately Madam Deputy Speaker

3:16:50 > 3:16:54they didn't recognise the other very apologetic, but I don't think that

3:16:54 > 3:16:59is right. If they had no dry was the ticket was coming. How on earth

3:16:59 > 3:17:04Madam Deputy Speaker can you have a feel Acute Hospital in the middle of

3:17:04 > 3:17:10a town as big as Watford next to a football stadium and call it a

3:17:10 > 3:17:15modern NHS hospital? The parking facilities for staff and patients is

3:17:15 > 3:17:17frankly almost nonexistent not least because lots of it has been carved

3:17:17 > 3:17:22for the football club. I want Watford to be very successful but

3:17:22 > 3:17:27what I want on her part of the world is a brand-new hospital, Greenfield

3:17:27 > 3:17:31hospital with proper parking facilities away from the town centre

3:17:31 > 3:17:34so we don't have any of these concerns about whether or not people

3:17:34 > 3:17:38will go shopping or stay there all day. But at the moment I don't have

3:17:38 > 3:17:42that, I have Watford as an Acute Hospital, it has come out of special

3:17:42 > 3:17:46measures and wish them well, and Hemel Hempstead Hospital which is

3:17:46 > 3:17:52basically a clinic these days, and they charge the staff Madam Deputy

3:17:52 > 3:17:59Speaker and the patients to park there. It is empty. There is hardly

3:17:59 > 3:18:03anybody parked there because there's nothing on the site any more. But

3:18:03 > 3:18:07they still insist on charging. That pushes the patient outside so we

3:18:07 > 3:18:12have restricted parking outside which is an issue for the town

3:18:12 > 3:18:18centre. Is it cheaper to park in the town centre and the council car park

3:18:18 > 3:18:21or they go to an empty car park literally empty car park because

3:18:21 > 3:18:28there are so few facilities there. This has to be sorted out from

3:18:28 > 3:18:30central government. Central government guidelines have to be

3:18:30 > 3:18:37enforceable. We can issue as many notices from the Department, if you

3:18:37 > 3:18:44do not actually come out with the stick, nothing will happen. Could

3:18:44 > 3:18:48the money be raised other ways? Could there be savings in the NHS?

3:18:48 > 3:18:52We have already heard about the amount of money in the pot of things

3:18:52 > 3:18:57is peanuts and if we wanted to save some money instantly one of the more

3:18:57 > 3:19:00recent chief executives of my very small acute trust was on a package

3:19:00 > 3:19:07of over £300,000 per year. Take a look at the salaries of the top

3:19:07 > 3:19:12people in the NHS. Look after the people at the bottom and do not

3:19:12 > 3:19:17charge them to park when they go to work.Thank you Madam Deputy Speaker

3:19:17 > 3:19:21and it is a pleasure to speak in this debate and to follow the

3:19:21 > 3:19:27honourable member for Hemel Hampstead. Much of what he has said

3:19:27 > 3:19:32echoes the complaints that have come to my constituency office. I also

3:19:32 > 3:19:36want to thank the honourable member for Harlow for bringing this debate.

3:19:36 > 3:19:40This is a subject very close to my heart because I used to work for the

3:19:40 > 3:19:45NHS and I remember very well be time when car parking charges were

3:19:45 > 3:19:51actually introduced for patients, carers, visitors and staff. In a

3:19:51 > 3:19:55member the controversies cost at the time and it still causes that

3:19:55 > 3:20:03controversy now. This issue has not gone away. I work for the NHS as a

3:20:03 > 3:20:07political scientists but I was a workplace red Ford Unite, the trade

3:20:07 > 3:20:14union. And I remember the resistance that all of the health union split

3:20:14 > 3:20:17up towards the introduction of car parking charges which we saw then

3:20:17 > 3:20:26and still see now as a tax on staff coming to work, attacks on patients,

3:20:26 > 3:20:32on visitors and carers. The practice of charging for car parking in my

3:20:32 > 3:20:36area was started by Central Manchester hospital and the reason

3:20:36 > 3:20:42that Mac the issue that has been referred to of people using the free

3:20:42 > 3:20:44parking at hospital and going somewhere else was the reason why

3:20:44 > 3:20:49they introduced those charges, but once the debt that all of the other

3:20:49 > 3:20:54hospitals in greater Manchester followed suit. The hospital I worked

3:20:54 > 3:20:58at, North Manchester General, the only reason anyone would go there

3:20:58 > 3:21:02was because they worked there, or there getting treatment there or

3:21:02 > 3:21:07they were visiting India capacity as either a friend relative or a carer,

3:21:07 > 3:21:10there was no other reason for someone to be visiting the hospital,

3:21:10 > 3:21:17so there was no real reason to start to charge people to park there. But

3:21:17 > 3:21:22the trust claimed that the money taken would be put towards improving

3:21:22 > 3:21:28the car parking facilities which I have to admit at the time were

3:21:28 > 3:21:31absolutely dire, we used to park one answer that potholed areas and at

3:21:31 > 3:21:36least eventually they will improve once the car parking system, the

3:21:36 > 3:21:40charging system had become embedded, so that was one positive thing that

3:21:40 > 3:21:47came out of it. And I do remember initially that the hospital trust

3:21:47 > 3:21:50purchased some wheel clamps and friends and those who did not pay

3:21:50 > 3:21:54with clamping. I did work with some interesting people in the NHS and

3:21:54 > 3:21:59one colleague of mine decided he was going to buy his own personal wheel

3:21:59 > 3:22:05clamp, he attached it to his car when he parked in the morning, which

3:22:05 > 3:22:09served two purposes because it was not the muscle that areas, it

3:22:09 > 3:22:12immobilises Karin kept secure and it also gave the impression that he had

3:22:12 > 3:22:16been penalised for not being able to park and within a few weeks his

3:22:16 > 3:22:23wheel clan had paid for itself. However, not everyone was that

3:22:23 > 3:22:29inventors, and gradually the idea of paying to park at a hospital became

3:22:29 > 3:22:32commonplace if not accepted, although the trade unions always

3:22:32 > 3:22:36strongly opposed the practice. And the wheel clamps were actually very

3:22:36 > 3:22:41quickly phased out, rumour had it that the trust had been successfully

3:22:41 > 3:22:44sued over we can never find out the full facts of that but the trust

3:22:44 > 3:22:51then began to impose fines on those deemed to have breached the rules.

3:22:51 > 3:22:57The whole issue of car parking fees and fines, it generated a huge

3:22:57 > 3:23:02amount of controversy, discussion and debate. Not to mention a huge

3:23:02 > 3:23:07sum of visits, phone calls and e-mails to the trading in office.

3:23:07 > 3:23:10And anyone who might question the need to give trading in rats

3:23:10 > 3:23:14facility time to do their job might like to reflect upon the massive

3:23:14 > 3:23:20pressure put upon them by issues like this. When I left the trust

3:23:20 > 3:23:26when I was elected to this place I was paying £20 per month in car

3:23:26 > 3:23:32parking charges, which was taken directly out of my salary. And that

3:23:32 > 3:23:38staff three is now £22.10, which might not sound a lot but it is an

3:23:38 > 3:23:43increase of over 10% over the last three years, and that pays scant

3:23:43 > 3:23:48regard to the fact that NHS staff have had their pay either frozen or

3:23:48 > 3:23:53capped to a maximum of just 1%. It is completely disproportionate. As

3:23:53 > 3:23:58an NPI have held many constituents who have been sent a demand for car

3:23:58 > 3:24:03parking fines by a company called civil enforcement Ltd, who are

3:24:03 > 3:24:07contracted by my local hospital trusts, Pennine acute, to pursue

3:24:07 > 3:24:13those who are deemed to have breached car parking regulations. I

3:24:13 > 3:24:18have had constituents aggressively chased by -- aggressively chased for

3:24:18 > 3:24:21payment when they have inadvertently parked in the staff parking space by

3:24:21 > 3:24:26mistake. The practices of this company do seem to lack the human

3:24:26 > 3:24:31touch, most people attending hospital usually have more important

3:24:31 > 3:24:35matters on their mind and could be forgiven for being slightly

3:24:35 > 3:24:38distracted while trying to work out the myriad instructions posted on

3:24:38 > 3:24:42the hospital car park prior to visiting sick relatives are going

3:24:42 > 3:24:49for treatment themselves. The charges can be prohibitive, £1 for

3:24:49 > 3:24:54one hour, £4 for eight hours, £8 for up to 24 hours. As many members have

3:24:54 > 3:24:59pointed out, most of the time the patient, the visitor does not know

3:24:59 > 3:25:02how long they are going to be in the hospital for and most people here on

3:25:02 > 3:25:06the side of caution and pay more than they should. The ticket

3:25:06 > 3:25:10machines do not take banknotes, when I worked at the hospital I was

3:25:10 > 3:25:14regularly asked for change by patients and visitors struggling to

3:25:14 > 3:25:18feed these machines. And I'm sure that all those people have more

3:25:18 > 3:25:22important things to deal with and could have done without additional

3:25:22 > 3:25:28stress. I accept that my local trust will provide a ticket for £15 and

3:25:28 > 3:25:32will make arrangements for those with long-term illness, but this is

3:25:32 > 3:25:35not immediately clear to patients and visitors and requires action on

3:25:35 > 3:25:41their part at an already stressful time. The motion calls upon the

3:25:41 > 3:25:46government to provide a need whereby car park in charges may be abolished

3:25:46 > 3:25:50and I fully support that but hand-in-hand with that must be an

3:25:50 > 3:25:54improved public transport system so that staff, patients, carers and

3:25:54 > 3:25:59visitors are not as reliant on private cars. Sadly in my

3:25:59 > 3:26:03constituency we have just had a bus service between Rochdale, Middleton

3:26:03 > 3:26:07and North Manchester General Hospital withdrawn. Retrograde steps

3:26:07 > 3:26:13like this do nothing to reduce the demand on hospital car parks, and we

3:26:13 > 3:26:17absolutely need a comprehensive public transport policy to support

3:26:17 > 3:26:21the abolition of Hospital car parking charges. And the other step

3:26:21 > 3:26:26we need to take is to reduce the dependence of NHS trusts upon income

3:26:26 > 3:26:31from car parking. The Department of Health guidelines used to stipulate

3:26:31 > 3:26:34that income earned from car parking should only be spent upon the

3:26:34 > 3:26:38maintenance and running of the car parks, however these guidelines now

3:26:38 > 3:26:44appear to have been relaxed and cash-strapped trust are using that

3:26:44 > 3:26:47income for patient care. In fact when I visited North Manchester

3:26:47 > 3:26:51recently I was disappointed to see our staff car park which had been in

3:26:51 > 3:26:55a very first aid and I worked there many years ago had been allowed to

3:26:55 > 3:26:58deteriorate even further and clearly not income had been spent there on

3:26:58 > 3:27:05improving conditions for staff. Pennine acute trust alone made £3

3:27:05 > 3:27:09million from car parking charges last year, the NHS underfunding

3:27:09 > 3:27:12issue must be addressed in any consideration of the abolition of

3:27:12 > 3:27:21car parking charges.Thank you very much Madam Deputy Speaker. I would

3:27:21 > 3:27:24like to first of all thank the honourable member from Harlow for

3:27:24 > 3:27:28having secured and initiated such an important debate which affects so

3:27:28 > 3:27:34many within my constituency and indeed across our country. For many,

3:27:34 > 3:27:40attending hospital is a vulnerable time, whether seeking treatment for

3:27:40 > 3:27:44ourselves or a loved one. Our hospitals are indeed underfunded and

3:27:44 > 3:27:49overstretched but it is not for sick patients, anxious relatives and

3:27:49 > 3:27:54already hard-pressed NHS staff to be filling the funding gaps. We have

3:27:54 > 3:28:00heard that hospital car parking charges raise funds, however many

3:28:00 > 3:28:04hospital trusts up and down the country have increased their charges

3:28:04 > 3:28:10without public consultation. The very people they are there for. Some

3:28:10 > 3:28:14trusts allow private contractors to manage car parking sites leading to

3:28:14 > 3:28:16penalties and points as we have already heard in this important

3:28:16 > 3:28:24debate, for patients and visitors. At a time when the cost of living is

3:28:24 > 3:28:26increasing and those who work in the public sector have had their pay

3:28:26 > 3:28:34capped, the rising cost of hospital car parking increases increases the

3:28:34 > 3:28:37financial burden on many in our constituencies. Madam Deputy Speaker

3:28:37 > 3:28:43it is not just the patients that are deterred by high charges, family and

3:28:43 > 3:28:47friends might be discouraged from visiting patients at her bedside,

3:28:47 > 3:28:50which must surely have a negative impact on the mental well-being of

3:28:50 > 3:28:57the patient. We -- and would increase pressure on nursing staff.

3:28:57 > 3:29:00From personal experience in that many patients rely on relatives and

3:29:00 > 3:29:05friends to act as interpreters or advocates, such elements are

3:29:05 > 3:29:10seemingly overlooked when surveys and reports are undertaken, but

3:29:10 > 3:29:15patient care can really be impacted where high charges deter people from

3:29:15 > 3:29:23providing this kind of crucial systems.

3:29:24 > 3:29:30Thank you I wanted to reflect on the fact we have heard a lot about

3:29:30 > 3:29:35staff, patients and families, we did hear a reference about volunteers.

3:29:35 > 3:29:39You are talking about the importance of support for patients. Would you

3:29:39 > 3:29:44agree with me it is therefore particularly short-sighted that any

3:29:44 > 3:29:51hospital trust should charge volunteers to pay to park their car

3:29:51 > 3:29:58when you're giving up their free time?I couldn't agree more. We've

3:29:58 > 3:30:04heard previously about volunteer drivers. It is just not fair and

3:30:04 > 3:30:11nonsensical to be asking them to dig further into the pockets. When it

3:30:11 > 3:30:16comes to hard-working staff who have gone for years without a decent pay

3:30:16 > 3:30:21rise, they also face this is unfair and unnecessary burden. Some

3:30:21 > 3:30:26hospitals offer free or discounted parking, in relation to specific

3:30:26 > 3:30:31kinds of treatment or four people in receipt of specific benefits. There

3:30:31 > 3:30:36are significant variations in fees across trusts in the same region.

3:30:36 > 3:30:41Wrexham Park hospital in my constituency has some of the highest

3:30:41 > 3:30:50parking charges in the region. £3 after the first 30 minutes and an

3:30:50 > 3:30:56increase to £8 for five hours. That trust is only doing what is being

3:30:56 > 3:31:02done by all other trusts within government guidelines. What I do not

3:31:02 > 3:31:06want is for older and vulnerable patients to be deterred from

3:31:06 > 3:31:09attending hospital. We should be able to get their appointment and

3:31:09 > 3:31:14are comfortable, dignified and affordable manner, and within a

3:31:14 > 3:31:18reasonable time. Most NHS car parking charges have been abolished

3:31:18 > 3:31:24in Scotland and Wales. And I know the government has issued guidance

3:31:24 > 3:31:29to NHS Trusts on the implementation of car parking charges, including

3:31:29 > 3:31:36the provision of discounted or free parking. These guidelines are not

3:31:36 > 3:31:42based on legislation and appear to have had little effect. The Labour

3:31:42 > 3:31:48government in 2010 left fully costed plans to phase out the charges in

3:31:48 > 3:31:54patients and their visitors. In 2015, a Private Members' Bill gained

3:31:54 > 3:31:59cross-party support published October. Clearly, many across the

3:31:59 > 3:32:04country in the House want to see an end to hospital parking charges.

3:32:04 > 3:32:10Let's send a clear message today that there is another way for word.

3:32:10 > 3:32:20And this tax on the vulnerable must end. Thank you.Thank you. It's a

3:32:20 > 3:32:24pleasure to follow the honourable member for Slough and also can I

3:32:24 > 3:32:29commend the Member for Harlow on his extremely powerful speech and for

3:32:29 > 3:32:39raising this very important issue? Congratulations. My daughter started

3:32:39 > 3:32:45to show signs of acute appendicitis. We could quickly bundled our

3:32:45 > 3:32:50daughter in agony into the car, drove to the hospital, not a calm

3:32:50 > 3:32:53journey, and I'm sure there are many members of the House have had some

3:32:53 > 3:32:58sort of experience along those lines. Panicking, we were scrambling

3:32:58 > 3:33:08for change, taking it in turns to move the car or top of the ticket.

3:33:08 > 3:33:12Obviously this was a one off and bearable. Sadly for many it is not a

3:33:12 > 3:33:17one-off experience Andrew to chronic illness they are forced to take

3:33:17 > 3:33:21several trips a week. People going through the worst of times. This

3:33:21 > 3:33:26cynical approach of charging them to park is unacceptable. Being ill is

3:33:26 > 3:33:32not anyone's choice and should not be exploited. New figures show money

3:33:32 > 3:33:39brought in from NHS car park run by private firms has increased by half

3:33:39 > 3:33:55£1 million everyday. It is equivalent to 0.0001% of NHS

3:33:55 > 3:34:09spending but private companies pocket most of the benefits. Past

3:34:09 > 3:34:16NHS parking staff get parking charges deducted from their wages,

3:34:16 > 3:34:21sometimes when they can't find a space in the correct pay, they get

3:34:21 > 3:34:26fined for parking in the wrong way. In my constituency, the bus that

3:34:26 > 3:34:34used to connect our local hospital has been cancelled, forcing more

3:34:34 > 3:34:46people to use car, incurring parking costs. My own hospital charges after

3:34:46 > 3:34:4920 minutes. There is a reduction on blue badge holders, but we still

3:34:49 > 3:34:56have to pay. There is a stress inducing pay on exit system and it

3:34:56 > 3:35:01is quite a complex process to get car parking concessions approved by

3:35:01 > 3:35:09hospital staff on the day. Not an ideal situation. I will give way.

3:35:09 > 3:35:14Does she agree with me that in the 21st-century means testing at the

3:35:14 > 3:35:19point of delivery, which is what we are talking about here, is morally

3:35:19 > 3:35:25unacceptable in an NHS that we should be proud of?I'm so glad he

3:35:25 > 3:35:28raced that. This concession is only available to the patient and not to

3:35:28 > 3:35:32the low paid and might have driven that patient there are. So whilst

3:35:32 > 3:35:40you are the probably person, you're the one who has to go and get the

3:35:40 > 3:35:44concession for the car parking. It's unfair. After a Freedom of

3:35:44 > 3:35:49information request by Unison, it was revealed that some people are

3:35:49 > 3:35:59being charged up to £100 per month. Costs for parking impact on

3:35:59 > 3:36:03surrounding streets. I have been contacted by local residents

3:36:03 > 3:36:07complaining that those who cannot afford car parking charges are think

3:36:07 > 3:36:12he might have to stay for several hours are parking on the residential

3:36:12 > 3:36:15streets, blocking their driveways and making it difficult to park

3:36:15 > 3:36:21outside their own homes. Free hospital parking would end this.

3:36:21 > 3:36:27Whilst we now trusts are struggling to balance the books after years of

3:36:27 > 3:36:31underfunding by this government, we must ensure they are not forced to

3:36:31 > 3:36:36fill this gap by charging sick and pearly patients, their visitors and

3:36:36 > 3:36:44relatives and hard-pressed NHS staff. Car parking charges are an

3:36:44 > 3:36:50attack on serious illness. Labour would raise insurance tax on private

3:36:50 > 3:36:58health care to 20% to meet the £162 million worth of parking charges at

3:36:58 > 3:37:06NHS hospitals across England. Charities, trade unions and the

3:37:06 > 3:37:12public are all Colin out for this government to please listen. In

3:37:12 > 3:37:17Scotland and Wales, they have appointed -- abolished car parking

3:37:17 > 3:37:24charges in all but a handful of hospitals. We should show some

3:37:24 > 3:37:30humanity and do the same. I support this motion.I congratulate the

3:37:30 > 3:37:36Member for Harlow for securing this important debate. It is clear from

3:37:36 > 3:37:40speakers that the scandal of hospital parking charges must come

3:37:40 > 3:37:45to an end. Gravely ill people or people visiting relatives must not

3:37:45 > 3:37:52be treated as cash cows by hospital parking operators. Last year, half

3:37:52 > 3:37:57of all trusts charge disabled people for parking in some or all of their

3:37:57 > 3:38:01disabled parking spaces. Winning to redress this ridiculous

3:38:01 > 3:38:06inconsistency of the situation that in Wales and Scotland hospital

3:38:06 > 3:38:11parking is mainly free, but in Northern Ireland and England, trusts

3:38:11 > 3:38:15charge for parking. It's time that all hospitals abolished parking fees

3:38:15 > 3:38:21and drivers must not be punished for being sick, visiting loved ones or

3:38:21 > 3:38:25attending appointments. People don't choose to be ill and should not be

3:38:25 > 3:38:29asked to pay for a hospital visit. In my constituency, I've been

3:38:29 > 3:38:34approached by many constituents over this issue. Mother contacted me to

3:38:34 > 3:38:38say that after her husband took their son to accident and emergency

3:38:38 > 3:38:41with breathing difficulties in the middle of the night, he was later

3:38:41 > 3:38:47presented with a parking charge notice. I don't believe people

3:38:47 > 3:38:50rushing to hospital with gravely ill children should be put in the

3:38:50 > 3:38:54position of having to worry about such matters. Imagine if my

3:38:54 > 3:38:59constituent had spent extra precious moments scrambling for change for

3:38:59 > 3:39:03parking while his son struggle to breathe. With that have been

3:39:03 > 3:39:07sensible or responsible thing for a parent of a seriously ill child to

3:39:07 > 3:39:15do? Of course not. If that reason why we must get rid of these

3:39:15 > 3:39:17charges. Been contacted by a father who had to take his young daughter

3:39:17 > 3:39:23to the emergency department. He had to leave and return to his daughter

3:39:23 > 3:39:26throughout the night in order to feed more money into the car park

3:39:26 > 3:39:30metre. She was being kept in for a long period of time. My constituent

3:39:30 > 3:39:36kept paying at the machines, which failed to give him the seats when

3:39:36 > 3:39:42requested. He was unsure of the times he had left. He reported that

3:39:42 > 3:39:45seeing other people in various states of distress walking around

3:39:45 > 3:39:51the car park, they all seemed unsure of what to do. Two weeks later, he

3:39:51 > 3:39:54received the parking notice, telling him he had not paid for all the time

3:39:54 > 3:39:59he had been in the car park. We must ask, is this an appropriate way to

3:39:59 > 3:40:05treat the parents of very ill children? We've heard in the press

3:40:05 > 3:40:09about desperately ill patients forced to quit work are left with

3:40:09 > 3:40:13bills for hundreds of pounds due to frequent hospital visits. Then there

3:40:13 > 3:40:19are hugely unfair cases of NHS staff who have had parking charges

3:40:19 > 3:40:22deducted from their wages but have been unable to get a space and have

3:40:22 > 3:40:30been fined for parking in the wrong way. I've been contacted by several

3:40:30 > 3:40:36elderly patients about this issue. This Sunday is world cancer day. I'm

3:40:36 > 3:40:44sure many of us know people who've had treatment for cancer. Anyone

3:40:44 > 3:40:48knows the effects of chemotherapy and how debilitating treatment can

3:40:48 > 3:40:53be. They will often need a carer with them to make the journey home.

3:40:53 > 3:40:56Considering the frequency of treatments for cancer and other

3:40:56 > 3:41:04illnesses, surely car parking charges are nothing more than a tax

3:41:04 > 3:41:08on the sick? Many people have no choice but to drive to the local

3:41:08 > 3:41:13hospital, due to the infrequency of public transport.Thank you for

3:41:13 > 3:41:17giving way. He has spoken about the difficulty of travel. Does he agree

3:41:17 > 3:41:21with me that the reduction in bus services in many areas have cost to

3:41:21 > 3:41:29be no alternative to parking on hospital car parks? In a

3:41:29 > 3:41:34constituency like mine, it means frequent journeys for people who

3:41:34 > 3:41:39require treatment.She makes an excellent point. People in rural

3:41:39 > 3:41:45areas or areas far away from a local hospital, they are unfairly affected

3:41:45 > 3:41:50by the situation of having transport networks, to ferry them to hospital.

3:41:50 > 3:41:56So they have no choice but to by car. The Right honourable member for

3:41:56 > 3:42:01Hemel Hempstead net a valid point about other emergency workers not

3:42:01 > 3:42:06been required to pay for parking at police or fire stations. In

3:42:06 > 3:42:11addition, hospital staff are reducing the number of spaces for

3:42:11 > 3:42:17patients and visitors. NHS staff should be able to park free, but we

3:42:17 > 3:42:23should also be able to afford to live nearer to the hospital. It's

3:42:23 > 3:42:27therefore ironic wearing a situation whereby NHS Trust are forced to sell

3:42:27 > 3:42:32land they could have been used to house NHS staff locally. Another

3:42:32 > 3:42:39pressure on my local hospital has been the fact that as the A&E

3:42:39 > 3:42:44department at another hospital has been closed, it has resulted in more

3:42:44 > 3:42:49visitors to the A&E department at North Middlesex. Between Christmas

3:42:49 > 3:42:54and New Year, the hospital ran out of acute beds. One can only imagine

3:42:54 > 3:43:04how busy the car park was during that period. It is time these unfair

3:43:04 > 3:43:10charges were scrapped and the NHS was properly funded. For the sake of

3:43:10 > 3:43:16NHS staff, parents and visitors. I asked the Minister to bring forward

3:43:16 > 3:43:23measures to scrap car parking charges as soon as possible.

3:43:23 > 3:43:28Many thanks, it is an honour to speak in this debate and indeed any

3:43:28 > 3:43:32debate where the NHS is at the heart of what we are discussing. I would

3:43:32 > 3:43:36like to thank the honourable member for Harlow for bringing the debate,

3:43:36 > 3:43:41it is extremely important as has already been discussed, it is

3:43:41 > 3:43:46important to patients, charities, emergency workers, to our volunteers

3:43:46 > 3:43:50and carers and our NHS staff so it is a credit to the honourable member

3:43:50 > 3:43:55that he has brought this debate. He set out his case elegantly and

3:43:55 > 3:43:59offensively. The SNP Scottish Government as has already been

3:43:59 > 3:44:02mentioned scrapped hospital car parking charges approximately ten

3:44:02 > 3:44:06years ago in all car parks and by the NHS is all I would urge the UK

3:44:06 > 3:44:12Government to follow both this principle and policy. As an NHS

3:44:12 > 3:44:17employee for over 20 years I must declare an interest. I was part of

3:44:17 > 3:44:23the campaign all those many years ago to scrap the NHS parking charges

3:44:23 > 3:44:27as at Unite grep and I was so pleased when we succeeded because it

3:44:27 > 3:44:31has made a great difference to so many people and has saved some of

3:44:31 > 3:44:35the most vulnerable from spending money on parking when they are

3:44:35 > 3:44:43already facing so many difficulties financially.She has kindly been

3:44:43 > 3:44:46generous in giving way and I thank her for her remarks. Would you not

3:44:46 > 3:44:51agree that actively given that the hospital parking charges for the

3:44:51 > 3:44:54most part have been scrapped in Scotland you have been able to do

3:44:54 > 3:44:57with the problems of people possibly misusing the car parks for shopping

3:44:57 > 3:45:05and whatever the needy?I thank the honourable member and indeed

3:45:05 > 3:45:08whenever there is a welfare is away with this one. It can happen and can

3:45:08 > 3:45:12be done and it is a matter of prioritising it in terms of making

3:45:12 > 3:45:18it happen and that is something that we can raise a point with the

3:45:18 > 3:45:26Minister today. As we have heard, the changes, the charges in the

3:45:26 > 3:45:31hospital prior to the changes hit the most vulnerable people in our

3:45:31 > 3:45:33society and disabled people, those were chronically ill and those who

3:45:33 > 3:45:40act cannily ill including families caring for terminally ill children,

3:45:40 > 3:45:42those who require repeat appointments and mentally hospital

3:45:42 > 3:45:47stays. Like one of the other members who raised the issue earlier I also

3:45:47 > 3:45:51heard of families have their cars impounded because they were in the

3:45:51 > 3:45:56maternity unit, and their partner was giving birth and it did not go

3:45:56 > 3:46:00quite to time as these things often don't do, Madam Deputy Speaker, and

3:46:00 > 3:46:05they were unable to feed the meter. So at a time of utmost family

3:46:05 > 3:46:08importance that is one of the last things that you want to have on your

3:46:08 > 3:46:15mind. NHS staff, particularly those on community-based shifts are often

3:46:15 > 3:46:19penalised and often have no choice but to use their cars from hospital

3:46:19 > 3:46:22to community visits and therefore cannot travel by public transport to

3:46:22 > 3:46:27the hospital-based. There is fundamentally something wrong with

3:46:27 > 3:46:32charging our valued NHS staff to get to their work saving lives when

3:46:32 > 3:46:38their pay has already been affected for so many years by caps. The SNP

3:46:38 > 3:46:42are clear that the founding principle of the NHS is to have

3:46:42 > 3:46:46services that are free for everyone, services that are not out for

3:46:46 > 3:46:49profit, and we have heard today from honourable members that sometimes it

3:46:49 > 3:46:53has even been cheaper to park town centres Andrew Parker hospitals,

3:46:53 > 3:47:03that cannot be right. So by 2015 we understand that getting rid of

3:47:03 > 3:47:07hospital charges has saved staff in hospital over £25 million. Parking

3:47:07 > 3:47:12charges are basically a tax on NHS treatment and it cannot be allowed

3:47:12 > 3:47:17to go on. As chair of the all-party Parliamentary group for disability

3:47:17 > 3:47:20and protect -- I am particularly concerned that people with

3:47:20 > 3:47:23disabilities who we know are more likely to speed poverty are being

3:47:23 > 3:47:28doubly financially penalised if they require medical treatment and having

3:47:28 > 3:47:34in England to pay for hospital parking. The honourable member for

3:47:34 > 3:47:39Harlow is correct, there are pragmatic ways to address the issue.

3:47:39 > 3:47:44The issues that are raised which are set to repeat and prevent this

3:47:44 > 3:47:49coming about can be overcome. We discussed tokens and other such

3:47:49 > 3:47:52ideas and these are all pragmatic and can be put in place and can

3:47:52 > 3:47:57work. We have made it work, we have made it a success and it can happen

3:47:57 > 3:48:02with the will. I would like to take a brief moment if I need to extend

3:48:02 > 3:48:06the issue from hospital parking charges to also address parking for

3:48:06 > 3:48:12NHS staff in health centres. All are free I believe in my own

3:48:12 > 3:48:15constituency, aside from the new Hunter health centre of the story

3:48:15 > 3:48:22car park. I have been in somewhat intransigent negotiations with NHS

3:48:22 > 3:48:26Lanarkshire for over a year now as only a limited amount of permanent

3:48:26 > 3:48:30parking has been made available for staff. This has unfortunately meant

3:48:30 > 3:48:37that some staff often in lower pay bands such as administration staff

3:48:37 > 3:48:41have extortionate weekly charges for getting to work. I believe it is

3:48:41 > 3:48:45unprincipled, it is also unfair and why should we penalised staff who

3:48:45 > 3:48:52work in a particular health centre? I have taken on my Friday, Madam

3:48:52 > 3:48:57Deputy Speaker, to monitoring the free spaces on the car park and I

3:48:57 > 3:49:02can assure the house that it is half empty every single Friday, it is an

3:49:02 > 3:49:07extremely busy day usually elsewhere for car parks so there are enough

3:49:07 > 3:49:14spaces for staff. I would urge the NHS Chief Executive once again to

3:49:14 > 3:49:21reverse the decision and ensure that permits for staff as requested are

3:49:21 > 3:49:26restored and that this principle step is taken. Again I am writing to

3:49:26 > 3:49:32him after this debate which I'm sure he will look forward to the ways

3:49:32 > 3:49:36does and I will let him know that he has been mentioned in the House of

3:49:36 > 3:49:44Commons once again. So I would like to just some of my thank you to all

3:49:44 > 3:49:48of the honourable members have taken part from all sides of a house in

3:49:48 > 3:49:51today's debate, the honourable member for Great Grimsby and great

3:49:51 > 3:49:54Telfer, the honourable member for Kingston-upon-Hull, from Cleethorpes

3:49:54 > 3:50:00who actually raised important issues about people in rural areas being

3:50:00 > 3:50:04badly affected, the honourable member for the coal Valley, the law

3:50:04 > 3:50:07member from Hemel Hempstead who spoke about volunteer drivers which

3:50:07 > 3:50:10I think is an extremely pertinent point. The honourable member for

3:50:10 > 3:50:16Hayward and Middleton who worked with NHS as a fellow Unite grep in

3:50:16 > 3:50:20my time at who has done great work in her years for the NHS. The

3:50:20 > 3:50:28honourable member for Slough and spent her for Enfield Southgate.

3:50:28 > 3:50:32Everyone who has spoken has urged the government to act. We do not

3:50:32 > 3:50:37need any superficial metric but we do need action. So I would ask the

3:50:37 > 3:50:42Minister and the government to act by putting NHS patients, staff,

3:50:42 > 3:50:47carers and relatives and volunteers first. Our emergency workers and

3:50:47 > 3:50:53those who care about NHS are all request in change and this must be

3:50:53 > 3:51:04taken forward and I trust that the Minister will do so.Thank you. I am

3:51:04 > 3:51:06really pleased to have the opportunity to reply in this debate

3:51:06 > 3:51:11on this very important subject. I am grateful to the honourable member

3:51:11 > 3:51:20for Harlow for bringing this subject forward. I know that he and I agree

3:51:20 > 3:51:28on most aspects of the subject. I am grateful to members on all sides of

3:51:28 > 3:51:31the house, it seems that there is much agreement you today and it is

3:51:31 > 3:51:36heartening to see members raising the issues of the impact and

3:51:36 > 3:51:42understanding of the impact of -- on patients and carers and NHS staff.

3:51:42 > 3:51:48The member for Great Grimsby also made the point of the effect on

3:51:48 > 3:51:53greater transportation system and how that ought to be impacted.

3:51:53 > 3:51:56Powerful speeches were made from the member from Telford and Cleethorpes

3:51:56 > 3:52:01in the com ballet, accused the system of being one of profiteering.

3:52:01 > 3:52:06A very important point made an heavy stuff here from Middleton and the

3:52:06 > 3:52:11member for how Hamstead on the burden of having to pay for going to

3:52:11 > 3:52:20work. Raising the issues of personal family issues where people are taken

3:52:20 > 3:52:27away from a Sikh family member's bed to replenish parking meters. I would

3:52:27 > 3:52:32like to say no one likes to pay to park, to pay to park at a hospital

3:52:32 > 3:52:38really does add insult to injury. We are not talking about a luxury

3:52:38 > 3:52:41experience, a shopping trip or fun night out. We are talking about

3:52:41 > 3:52:47paying to visit a hospital where people are not queueing up to go to

3:52:47 > 3:52:50the hospital cafe as people pointed out. No one goes to the hospital

3:52:50 > 3:52:55because they want to, they go because they are sick. They go for

3:52:55 > 3:52:58treatment, surged, chemotherapy, dialysis, and they go to visit loved

3:52:58 > 3:53:04ones. Hospitals are not destinations of choice. People go because they

3:53:04 > 3:53:09must and I am quite shocked that it is free to park at the local

3:53:09 > 3:53:14shopping centre but I must pay to park at my local hospital. During

3:53:14 > 3:53:18the last three years I have spent hours and hours visiting my mother

3:53:18 > 3:53:23in hospital. I have often gone backwards or forwards to three times

3:53:23 > 3:53:25a day sitting in hospital visits roadwork and other commitments and I

3:53:25 > 3:53:29must say it is all very distressing. And as I leave the hospital each

3:53:29 > 3:53:34night worried, wondering what tomorrow will bring, the last thing

3:53:34 > 3:53:40I want to do is stand outside in the cold queueing to pay for my parking.

3:53:40 > 3:53:46This burden is of course in addition to the actual cost. Some car parks

3:53:46 > 3:53:49demand payment in advance as we have heard tonight and this brings its

3:53:49 > 3:53:52own set of problems where patients and visitors must judge how long

3:53:52 > 3:53:56each hospital visit the last and then have to leave the water and

3:53:56 > 3:54:00treatment room to feed the ever hungry parking machine. Of course

3:54:00 > 3:54:07running to and from the car park when hooked onto dialysis machine.

3:54:07 > 3:54:11Many dialysis patients suffer from multiple conditions and so paying to

3:54:11 > 3:54:16park the times a week for dialysis sessions each lasting 4-5 hours is a

3:54:16 > 3:54:23real financial burden for them and their carers. People in my

3:54:23 > 3:54:28constituency are on a weekly Carer's Allowance and say they are forced to

3:54:28 > 3:54:30give up work to provide round-the-clock care for her husband

3:54:30 > 3:54:36who suffered a stroke. He has been in hospital. She has been in

3:54:36 > 3:54:41hospital for two or three hours a day to comfort her husband. This

3:54:41 > 3:54:44cost £20 per week at the time she has paid for petrol have for

3:54:44 > 3:54:49allowances gone. We have a National Health Service that was set up to be

3:54:49 > 3:54:52free at the point of delivery, established in 1948 to make health

3:54:52 > 3:54:56care are right for all. That is not what is happening. Even though

3:54:56 > 3:55:00hospital car parking is free in Scotland and Wales during England

3:55:00 > 3:55:04hospital users are forced to pay off an extortionate rates, charges

3:55:04 > 3:55:10varying from £1 50 per hour to £4 per hour. We are charging the

3:55:10 > 3:55:15chronically ill, the terminally ill, their carers and visitors over half

3:55:15 > 3:55:20of those aged over 76 years have conditions that require regular

3:55:20 > 3:55:22hospital appointments. Hospital car parking charges are an extra burden

3:55:22 > 3:55:26for them and their families. The Alzheimer Society report that their

3:55:26 > 3:55:31patients with dementia stay 5-7 times longer in hospital than other

3:55:31 > 3:55:35patients aged over 65 and hospitals can be frightening places for those

3:55:35 > 3:55:39with these conditions. Rely on family and carers visiting to give

3:55:39 > 3:55:44them support. Parking charges are an extra burden that these families

3:55:44 > 3:55:48could do without. The Patients' Association commented that for

3:55:48 > 3:55:52patients parking charges and genetics of charge for being ill,

3:55:52 > 3:55:54appointment of delayed last longer than the expected to sort even if

3:55:54 > 3:55:58you're paying for parking you could end up being fined when you click it

3:55:58 > 3:56:05runs out. Visiting hospital is stressful enough. But Cancer

3:56:05 > 3:56:10support, the corporate blogs NHS is to provide key health -- free health

3:56:10 > 3:56:14care for all of the point of access. But many are paying extortionate car

3:56:14 > 3:56:17parking charges in order to access treatment for life-threatening

3:56:17 > 3:56:25diseases. Bliss, the charity for babies born prematurely or sick said

3:56:25 > 3:56:28that the very real cost having a premature or sick baby can

3:56:28 > 3:56:31contribute to the financial burden many families face when their babies

3:56:31 > 3:56:37need neo-natal care. In the midst of this misery the average hospital

3:56:37 > 3:56:41clusters making £1 million of profit from car parking charges, and

3:56:41 > 3:56:43several hospitals the length and breadth of the country report

3:56:43 > 3:56:50profits of over £3 million. Last year NHS hospitals made a record 100

3:56:50 > 3:56:53and some did for million from charging patients visitors and

3:56:53 > 3:56:59staff. -- 174 million. Some people point out that public transport is

3:56:59 > 3:57:03an option that avoid parking charges in me say this, public transport

3:57:03 > 3:57:06provision has been reduced in response to funding cuts but even

3:57:06 > 3:57:12where it exists there are many further this is not an option. Some

3:57:12 > 3:57:16patients are too unwell or frail to travel on a bus and others including

3:57:16 > 3:57:20cancer patients attending for chemotherapy have reduced in unity

3:57:20 > 3:57:26and must avoid contact with the general public.You are making a

3:57:26 > 3:57:30compelling case like most have here today. Public transport has its

3:57:30 > 3:57:32place for outpatients and things like that where it is available.

3:57:32 > 3:57:38Imagine going into labour and think and I wait for the number two bus,

3:57:38 > 3:57:42please? This is farcical. We need car parks to be there for people

3:57:42 > 3:57:46when we need them other than as a cash cow.Thank you I entirely agree

3:57:46 > 3:57:52with the honourable gentleman. Further to this I would say there

3:57:52 > 3:57:56are other people, patients and carers who are often balancing work

3:57:56 > 3:58:02and other commitments who have time -- tight time schedule is that

3:58:02 > 3:58:08preclude public transport. I have spoken to parents of a terminally

3:58:08 > 3:58:11ill child who only left their child's bedside to tend to the needs

3:58:11 > 3:58:16of the other children. There has been no discussion of cause of

3:58:16 > 3:58:19hospital car parking charges that would be complete without

3:58:19 > 3:58:25consideration of the impact on NHS staff as has been mentioned earlier.

3:58:25 > 3:58:33Staff who pay to go to work and who are not guaranteed a space. Some

3:58:33 > 3:58:38hospital staff his chef overruns because attending to the needs of

3:58:38 > 3:58:41patients face fines for overstaying their parking time. This is clearly

3:58:41 > 3:58:47no way to treat health professionals, no wonder we face a

3:58:47 > 3:58:52crisis in retention. Governor action has been limited to a series of

3:58:52 > 3:58:55recommendations in relation to hospital car parking. The government

3:58:55 > 3:58:57recommends that the hospital car parking charges should not be

3:58:57 > 3:59:01applied to blue badge holders, carers, visitors with relatives who

3:59:01 > 3:59:06are gravely ill and patients are frequent outpatient appointments. In

3:59:06 > 3:59:09reality these recommendations came for very little and in fact the

3:59:09 > 3:59:12trend is to increase car parking charges and to reduce the number of

3:59:12 > 3:59:15those who are exempt. Many hospital trusts have even begun to charge

3:59:15 > 3:59:20without all this. It is not good enough for the government to

3:59:20 > 3:59:24abdicate response ability. This is a matter of principle. Scandalously,

3:59:24 > 3:59:28Conservative members have argued in this chamber on previous occasions

3:59:28 > 3:59:34that the NHS needs the income from car parking. I have no doubt that

3:59:34 > 3:59:38the NHS needs this revenue, it is common knowledge that since 2010 the

3:59:38 > 3:59:42service has been starved of funding. I would ask, is it right that we

3:59:42 > 3:59:50fund our health service by taxing sick?

3:59:50 > 3:59:53We on the Labour benches while none of this. I'm proud of the next

3:59:53 > 4:00:01Labour government will ensure a red -- our NHS is properly funded and we

4:00:01 > 4:00:07will abolish all parking charges at hospitals. No hospital will lose

4:00:07 > 4:00:14funding as a result of our policy. In 2015, I asked the government to

4:00:14 > 4:00:19exempt carers from hospital car parking charges. At that time, that

4:00:19 > 4:00:23relatively modest proposal was met with derision from the government

4:00:23 > 4:00:27benches. My attempt to help to remove this financial burden was

4:00:27 > 4:00:33dismissed as a worthy aim but not worthy enough for the government to

4:00:33 > 4:00:36support. Conservative members went to great lengths to top the bill out

4:00:36 > 4:00:42of time. I hope times have changed. Today I'm asking along with the

4:00:42 > 4:00:47honourable member for Harlow that the government move to remove all

4:00:47 > 4:00:51car parking charges at NHS hospitals. Today we ask the

4:00:51 > 4:00:56government to do the decent thing, to remove this tax on the sick and

4:00:56 > 4:01:04take action to ensure we truly have an NHS free at the point of access.

4:01:04 > 4:01:10Thank you. Me I begin by commending the Member for Harlow on securing

4:01:10 > 4:01:17this debate. It is an issue on which I think members across the House

4:01:17 > 4:01:24recognise Yes campaign and for some time. And an issue on which he has

4:01:24 > 4:01:29already had some success, as reflected in government guidelines

4:01:29 > 4:01:32issued in 2004. And I think it's right in light of the concerns

4:01:32 > 4:01:37raised across the House that this issue is revisited. And I think

4:01:37 > 4:01:41that's been reflected in what has been a constructive debate on behalf

4:01:41 > 4:01:45of the backbench committee and a member or members of the House who

4:01:45 > 4:01:49have contributed and informed the House through their experience of

4:01:49 > 4:01:53what is happening in their own constituencies. I don't think there

4:01:53 > 4:02:00is any issue anywhere in the House on the desirability of scrapping car

4:02:00 > 4:02:07parking charges. I think all of us as English members of Parliament, I

4:02:07 > 4:02:11know amongst SNP colleagues it will be different, but the Member for

4:02:11 > 4:02:21Great Grimsby said we pay these charges and we know they are

4:02:21 > 4:02:26unpopular with constituents. They are a concern for staff working hard

4:02:26 > 4:02:33within the NHS. As the Member for Hemel Hempstead highlighted, they

4:02:33 > 4:02:38also predate this government. This has been an issue that has long been

4:02:38 > 4:02:42debated on the House and has been debated with the parties on

4:02:42 > 4:02:47respective sides of the House. I don't think the issue is the

4:02:47 > 4:02:53desirability of what is shot by the Member for Harlow, the issue is the

4:02:53 > 4:02:56execution. How would that be done in a way that does not cause unintended

4:02:56 > 4:03:02consequences? And how might that be mitigated if their were to be the

4:03:02 > 4:03:09case? I think we got a flavour of some of those unintended

4:03:09 > 4:03:11consequences from contributions from members constructively across the

4:03:11 > 4:03:18House. Implicit in the motion is that car parking charges are applied

4:03:18 > 4:03:28to all NHS hospitals, or the impression from the debate. As you

4:03:28 > 4:03:34will be well aware, 67% of NHS sites don't charge at all at present. So

4:03:34 > 4:03:41we are talking about a sub sect within the NHS where charges apply.

4:03:41 > 4:03:49Albeit that is concentrated amongst the acute sector. For example,

4:03:49 > 4:03:56mental health patients are often the most vulnerable constituents seeking

4:03:56 > 4:04:00support do not face charges because those parking facilities are not

4:04:00 > 4:04:06charged. So this tends to be an issue within the acute sector.I

4:04:06 > 4:04:10thank him for his kind words but I have to say I disagree with what he

4:04:10 > 4:04:15has just set. Hospital car parking charges in England are widespread.

4:04:15 > 4:04:24You have to go from one hospital to another. 50% of hospitals are

4:04:24 > 4:04:31charging the disabled, for example. It is a statement of fact confirmed

4:04:31 > 4:04:37by my officials that 67% of NHS sites do not charged. The definition

4:04:37 > 4:04:45of hospitals covers more than acute hospitals, but the point I was

4:04:45 > 4:04:52seeking to make was that this is an issue concentrated in acute

4:04:52 > 4:04:56hospitals and this is the issue that is before us today. The Member for

4:04:56 > 4:05:01Great Grimsby recognise that the thin trusts there is considerable

4:05:01 > 4:05:06room for flexibility. One of the key issues from the debate was the

4:05:06 > 4:05:10distinction between charges that are covering the maintenance of car

4:05:10 > 4:05:27parks and how a reduction in the facilities would be affected. There

4:05:27 > 4:05:30was a concern raised on profiteering, going beyond the cost

4:05:30 > 4:05:36of maintenance. I add that into place with the current guidelines in

4:05:36 > 4:05:48place. And we heard highlighted the charges from the hospital compared

4:05:48 > 4:05:57with the local authority. Concerns were raised regarding blue badge

4:05:57 > 4:06:06holders. You could have an affluent blue badge holder being spared a

4:06:06 > 4:06:10charge and the less affluent other visitor to our hospital being

4:06:10 > 4:06:14charged, but again the transparency as to how the guidance is being

4:06:14 > 4:06:24applied as a factor within that. Blue badge is quite rightly or not

4:06:24 > 4:06:29means tested. It is to do with ability to access. It doesn't matter

4:06:29 > 4:06:35how much money they have in the bank. If they hospital and have a

4:06:35 > 4:06:41blue badge, surely it should be free and as close to the point of access

4:06:41 > 4:06:51as possible?That is part of what the guidance points to. Am very

4:06:51 > 4:07:02happy to look at the reason why it is 164 pages. It speaks to how

4:07:02 > 4:07:10concessions and guidance...I have huge respect for my honourable

4:07:10 > 4:07:17friend, but the fact is the guidelines are not working. Up to

4:07:17 > 4:07:2150% of hospitals according to the Freedom of information request are

4:07:21 > 4:07:25still charging disabled people to park. Was no point in talking about

4:07:25 > 4:07:29the guidelines if people with disabilities are still being charged

4:07:29 > 4:07:36to park in hospitals in England.The point I was saying to my honourable

4:07:36 > 4:07:42friend is to firstly look at cases and speak to trusts to better

4:07:42 > 4:07:47understand that. Part of the complexity is simply deducing the

4:07:47 > 4:07:53charges and how that is managed. Every worker at the example of

4:07:53 > 4:08:04Inverness where the hospital car park is being used by people for the

4:08:04 > 4:08:14airport. That makes access more difficult. That's why some of these

4:08:14 > 4:08:22issues have a local flavour in terms of how they are applied. That was

4:08:22 > 4:08:28recognised by the Member for Hayward and Middleton when he spoke of the

4:08:28 > 4:08:39distinction between the North Manchester site where visitors are

4:08:39 > 4:08:46not using your store car park. So the point is that there are local

4:08:46 > 4:08:52factors, just as there are with legacy PFI contracts, including in

4:08:52 > 4:08:58Scotland and Wales when there are contracts going back to 2008 which

4:08:58 > 4:09:01are still charging.With the Minister accept that people being

4:09:01 > 4:09:08ill and suffering distress at hospitals is not a local issue, it's

4:09:08 > 4:09:13a national issue. The burden of hospital car parking charges

4:09:13 > 4:09:20wherever they occur to be a concern of the government.Of course, but

4:09:20 > 4:09:24the point the honourable Lady must equally recognise is that for

4:09:24 > 4:09:28example if you had a PFI agreement put in place by the previous

4:09:28 > 4:09:34government in 2008 with the Saudis are still being applied, back does

4:09:34 > 4:09:38seem that there are often complexities in what can be done in

4:09:38 > 4:09:48different factors. That is why a trusts have local discretion. We

4:09:48 > 4:09:51need to understand the transparency around that and how that is being

4:09:51 > 4:10:01applied.

4:10:02 > 4:10:08I'm sure we have time for this important issue. He raises the issue

4:10:08 > 4:10:17of complexity. Some would be easier to do than others and I accept that.

4:10:17 > 4:10:24Some of these ludicrous PFIs that in place before the previous

4:10:24 > 4:10:27administration and some since. To the easy ones first. That's the

4:10:27 > 4:10:33answer. That's what Scotland did. But ruling out changing anything at

4:10:33 > 4:10:38all because there are some difficult issues surely is not the way to go

4:10:38 > 4:10:43forward.Again, one comes to some of the issues there are, so again

4:10:43 > 4:10:48turning to one of the points raised was in terms of whether free parking

4:10:48 > 4:10:57could address through tokens and barriers. The concern raised from

4:10:57 > 4:11:01colleagues within the NHS would be the burden on staff. We heard

4:11:01 > 4:11:09examples where frequent users of hospitals are able to access

4:11:09 > 4:11:13concessionary schemes, but those visiting hospitals for a one-off

4:11:13 > 4:11:17would be any potential impact on them in terms of how they might be

4:11:17 > 4:11:21expected to assist in the administration of that. Another

4:11:21 > 4:11:29point raised was the impact on staff members. That was an issue raised by

4:11:29 > 4:11:36members across the House. I have been visited recently by the Royal

4:11:36 > 4:11:46College of Nursing regarding wider pay discussions. It's very helpful

4:11:46 > 4:11:51to have the contributions of the House in terms of this understanding

4:11:51 > 4:11:55some of the benefits and pressures and issues before them, as part of

4:11:55 > 4:12:02this debate. There is no question I think across the House as reflected

4:12:02 > 4:12:09by the Member for Harlow on the desirability in addressing

4:12:09 > 4:12:15iniquities variants and scope to ensure that compliance with the

4:12:15 > 4:12:19guidelines is followed. But at the same time we do need to be mindful

4:12:19 > 4:12:24that we don't have unintended consequences, particularly in

4:12:24 > 4:12:27constraining the available car parking available for those that

4:12:27 > 4:12:32need it. I'm happy to continue discussions with my honourable

4:12:32 > 4:12:36friend in terms of this policy and I commend him and other colleagues

4:12:36 > 4:12:45from what has been a very constructive debate.Thank you. I'd

4:12:45 > 4:12:48like to thank the honourable members have spoken from both sides of the

4:12:48 > 4:12:54House. I think the Minister who has heard about the madness of the

4:12:54 > 4:13:00guidelines not working and the problems with public transport and

4:13:00 > 4:13:08parking being given over to football club supporters, about the moving

4:13:08 > 4:13:12stories of families and the problems people with severe illness have had

4:13:12 > 4:13:18to face. I have to say, I'm incredibly disappointed with his

4:13:18 > 4:13:23response today. I gave him my speech in advance because I wanted him to

4:13:23 > 4:13:28look at this seriously. I think a lot of what he has read is very much

4:13:28 > 4:13:37what officials might want -- would be what you think would come from

4:13:37 > 4:13:41officials. I think this is a great disappointment. Europe and this

4:13:41 > 4:13:45saying he believes in the desirability of this and men did not

4:13:45 > 4:13:57give any indication of how. It is not beyond the wit of man to develop

4:13:57 > 4:14:00a number plate recognition system to deal with the problems of people

4:14:00 > 4:14:09misusing hospital car parking. I think that my feeling is he has said

4:14:09 > 4:14:12we will try and make sure the guidelines work. Even if the

4:14:12 > 4:14:17guidelines were working, they would still mean many hospitals would

4:14:17 > 4:14:22charge millions of patients and visitors. On both sides of the

4:14:22 > 4:14:35House, we constantly talk about billions being spent on the NHS, the

4:14:35 > 4:14:39fact is it is hard to understand from most members of the public but

4:14:39 > 4:14:42when there is something real that affects millions of people, when

4:14:42 > 4:14:46they go to hospital on a regular basis, as has been said again and

4:14:46 > 4:14:51again today, not out of choice but because they have to do, this is

4:14:51 > 4:14:55something real and substantive and does not cost a huge amount of money

4:14:55 > 4:14:59in terms of the overall NHS budget. There are different solutions in

4:14:59 > 4:15:04which to pay for that, so the NHS is not harmed. I just urge him strongly

4:15:04 > 4:15:11to look at this issue again and realise there is a cross-party

4:15:11 > 4:15:17consensus in this House.

4:15:17 > 4:15:21There are many members on our side of the house that one is changed and

4:15:21 > 4:15:26they returned that when this comes back, have a more substantive

4:15:26 > 4:15:30solution to scrap hospital car park charges.The question is as on the

4:15:30 > 4:15:34order paper, as many are others that opinion say aye, to the contrary

4:15:34 > 4:15:45now. I think the ayes have it, the ayes have it. Petition, Kate Green.

4:15:45 > 4:15:51Thank you very much. I rise to present the petition on behalf of my

4:15:51 > 4:15:57constituents, which has 356 signatures from people seeking to

4:15:57 > 4:16:00see an end to the violence and persecution of the raw anger Muslim

4:16:00 > 4:16:09community in the Armagh and the addition questions that the House of

4:16:09 > 4:16:12Commons makes representation to the government of my Armagh to cease all

4:16:12 > 4:16:23violence, and further to call for further aids to Myanmar and for

4:16:23 > 4:16:29others to no longer supply metal very training or eight. And we must

4:16:29 > 4:16:32ensure that the perpetrators are brought to the International Court

4:16:32 > 4:16:40of Justice to be tried for crimes against the malady. -- crimes

4:16:40 > 4:16:42against humanity.

4:16:49 > 4:16:59Petition, ten the Mac's Muslim ethnic minority. -- Myanmar's Muslim

4:16:59 > 4:17:07ethnic minority.The question is that this house do now adjourn.I am

4:17:07 > 4:17:10grateful to you Mr Speaker for granting me this debate and I want

4:17:10 > 4:17:16to welcome my honourable friend the Minister to his role and to the

4:17:16 > 4:17:21opportunity to hear about my constituency. My constituency covers

4:17:21 > 4:17:25the lower tiers of local planning authorities, and Essex County

4:17:25 > 4:17:29Council with responsibility for waste and minerals, which explains

4:17:29 > 4:17:33bad and deputy speaker in part why the honourable Minister's department

4:17:33 > 4:17:36hold such a high volume of correspondence from me on the half

4:17:36 > 4:17:41of my constituents. If the Minister visits my constituency and he is

4:17:41 > 4:17:48very welcome to do so, he will see at first hand the boundless economic

4:17:48 > 4:17:52potential of this part of Essex and indeed the entire county. He will

4:17:52 > 4:17:55also see appetite amongst the local communities to take a positive and

4:17:55 > 4:18:00practical approach to housing, planning and infrastructure. Many

4:18:00 > 4:18:02parishes are working on neighbourhood development plans and

4:18:02 > 4:18:07watch to deliver the localism agenda advocated by our government. They

4:18:07 > 4:18:11want to use the powers that their disposal to allocate preferred site

4:18:11 > 4:18:15for housing business use and protection and we want to deliver

4:18:15 > 4:18:19ambitious plans to support economic growth and bring more local homes to

4:18:19 > 4:18:24our local communities. We want and need new infrastructure to support

4:18:24 > 4:18:29growth including the widening of a 12, upgrading the A1 20 and

4:18:29 > 4:18:32investment in the great eastern mainline. I welcome the announcement

4:18:32 > 4:18:38today of over £7 million at the Heybridge flood alleviation and

4:18:38 > 4:18:42regeneration screen -- scheme just outside my constituency and I hope

4:18:42 > 4:18:46that more investment can come through in future to support

4:18:46 > 4:18:49planning and development. We also recognise that development brings

4:18:49 > 4:18:51with it implement opportunities, investment in infrastructure, new

4:18:51 > 4:18:57public services and GP services. But that does not mean housing at any

4:18:57 > 4:19:02cost and in any location. So I want to use this debate to draw the

4:19:02 > 4:19:05Minister's attention to some of the issues and cases of concern were

4:19:05 > 4:19:09localism is being undermined and were opportunities to deliver

4:19:09 > 4:19:13locally led planning are being missed. And I fully appreciate and

4:19:13 > 4:19:15respect that the Minister cannot give detailed responses on specific

4:19:15 > 4:19:20planning cases that are currently alive and under consideration but I

4:19:20 > 4:19:23do hope that he and his department can reflect upon them. First of all

4:19:23 > 4:19:27the Minister will be aware that the Secretary of State decided to call

4:19:27 > 4:19:31in planning applications for two sites in Hatfield, stone Park

4:19:31 > 4:19:36Meadows in Gleneagles way for up to 260 new dwellings. A hearing took

4:19:36 > 4:19:39place in December and I would like to pay tribute Madam Deputy Speaker

4:19:39 > 4:19:45to my local residents and our parish council who came together to oppose

4:19:45 > 4:19:51these unwelcome developments. Their dedication to the local community

4:19:51 > 4:19:56has been outstanding and what we have seen here at -- is that both

4:19:56 > 4:19:59sites outside of the settlement boundary and emerging neighbourhood

4:19:59 > 4:20:02plan because these would be detrimental to the countryside. It

4:20:02 > 4:20:08would also place unacceptable pressure is already on the GP

4:20:08 > 4:20:10practices was no guarantees of financial contributions being

4:20:10 > 4:20:15offered to ensure that they can be enhanced. Our local schools are

4:20:15 > 4:20:20full, but no cogitations are being sought because of the silk filling

4:20:20 > 4:20:23restrictions and the applicants think that it is acceptable for

4:20:23 > 4:20:26primary school pupils, for children to be forced to walk over two miles

4:20:26 > 4:20:34along the busy a 12 to a school in Wootton. As for secondary school

4:20:34 > 4:20:40pupils axing the number 72 but it that connects happened to two

4:20:40 > 4:20:44academies and so there will be no direct bus for pupils in the village

4:20:44 > 4:20:50to use. We are not opposed to housing, quite the opposite, the

4:20:50 > 4:20:52wonderful village is already set to accommodate new housing in the

4:20:52 > 4:20:56American local plan, focused everywhere in the village and a

4:20:56 > 4:21:00conference we develop that any covering land between a 12 and

4:21:00 > 4:21:05Eastern mainline and that is some 250 new dwellings already going

4:21:05 > 4:21:09through. The village has taken its fair share of new housing and cannot

4:21:09 > 4:21:13take any more. There are many other reasons why these two applications

4:21:13 > 4:21:17are totally unsuitable for development. So I trust that the

4:21:17 > 4:21:21Minister and the Secretary of State will consider these points in the

4:21:21 > 4:21:28strong objections when he gets the report of the findings. Although the

4:21:28 > 4:21:30Minister cannot comment on the specifics of the application that

4:21:30 > 4:21:34are wider issues that have arisen when I would welcome this

4:21:34 > 4:21:40classification. Firstly councils like Braintree died in the process

4:21:40 > 4:21:43of putting in a local plan sent neighbourhood plans are embracing

4:21:43 > 4:21:48the principles of localism but they are being undermined by planning

4:21:48 > 4:21:54applications and on many occasions -- many cases undermining the

4:21:54 > 4:21:59democratic processes. These communities need protecting. And

4:21:59 > 4:22:02they need the government to allow them time to get their plans in

4:22:02 > 4:22:07place. Secondly the issue of the five-year land supply deliverable

4:22:07 > 4:22:13sites, speculative and predatory developers are seeking to exploit

4:22:13 > 4:22:18the council's claim that it has a five-year land supply. The main

4:22:18 > 4:22:23reason for Braintree having an identified surprise shortfall is due

4:22:23 > 4:22:27to the failure of the last Labour government's regional spatial

4:22:27 > 4:22:34strategy with housing targets lower than those with assessed housing

4:22:34 > 4:22:37need research. I hope the Minister can ensure local communities in the

4:22:37 > 4:22:40district that they will not be punished because of the last Labour

4:22:40 > 4:22:45government's failure in the decision-makers can exercise

4:22:45 > 4:22:49discretion over the housing supply figures. Councils do need

4:22:49 > 4:22:52flexibility on this issue and that includes being able to use a

4:22:52 > 4:22:56Liverpool method very best suits, including sites in draft

4:22:56 > 4:22:59allocations. I hope the Minister and speak to this and give assurances

4:22:59 > 4:23:05that, too. The third point is the issue of effectiveness on the

4:23:05 > 4:23:11pre-consultation issue. In my region one applicant issued a consultation

4:23:11 > 4:23:14which contained false information about health provision which the

4:23:14 > 4:23:19applicant had not bothered to check in such to frighten my residence.

4:23:19 > 4:23:22The also put in a planning application within a few weeks of

4:23:22 > 4:23:26securing rights from landowners to promote the site and less than two

4:23:26 > 4:23:28working days after holding a pre-application discussion with

4:23:28 > 4:23:33council officers that is now time to take account of local comment at

4:23:33 > 4:23:38all. And when the council and local community were taken to resolve

4:23:38 > 4:23:41issues that have been raised as a result of the applicants failure,

4:23:41 > 4:23:47such as the impact on schools and NHS and landscape, the applicant had

4:23:47 > 4:23:50the audacity to threaten to take the application to the planning

4:23:50 > 4:23:55Inspectorate. For other sites in the district such as referrals and

4:23:55 > 4:24:00planning inspectorate to deliver decision-making, this is abuse of

4:24:00 > 4:24:08the -- this abuse of the planning system must stop. There are good

4:24:08 > 4:24:11examples of positive engagement in local amenities and we must make

4:24:11 > 4:24:13sure that one of this happens and those who fiddle consultations and

4:24:13 > 4:24:16circumvent the application engagement should be sanctioned for

4:24:16 > 4:24:21doing so. Madam Deputy Speaker, another major development issue

4:24:21 > 4:24:24affecting my constituency is the proposed garden settlement for

4:24:24 > 4:24:30Colchester Borough and the border. This proposal has the deliver --

4:24:30 > 4:24:34this proposal has the potential to deliver thousands of new homes in

4:24:34 > 4:24:37infrastructure upgrades and public is. The government agonised this and

4:24:37 > 4:24:43has provided over £1.3 million to Colchester Borough Council's work on

4:24:43 > 4:24:46this project. However, a number of questions and concerns have been

4:24:46 > 4:24:51raised about the proposals. Whenever you leave usually to infrastructure

4:24:51 > 4:24:54and public services, residents want to be assured that if the project

4:24:54 > 4:24:58gets the green light there will be significant new infrastructure and

4:24:58 > 4:25:02public services put in place to meet demand. There is no point in putting

4:25:02 > 4:25:05the infrastructure and services into one of the developments until the

4:25:05 > 4:25:09development are being occupied. The needed in advance and a clear

4:25:09 > 4:25:14timetable. And that means that the Department for Transport, the

4:25:14 > 4:25:17tragedy, local councils and the private sector needs to come

4:25:17 > 4:25:23together to ensure that funding is in place to upgrade a 120, increase

4:25:23 > 4:25:26capacity on the great Eastern mainline with a passing grade as

4:25:26 > 4:25:30well as providing for new GP surgeries and schools. There have

4:25:30 > 4:25:34also been questions raised about the delivery vehicle, local engagement,

4:25:34 > 4:25:38availability of implement opportunities and how the councils

4:25:38 > 4:25:42have spent the money provided to them by the government. The garden

4:25:42 > 4:25:45settlement proposals are currently in the process of being examined as

4:25:45 > 4:25:49part of the local plan process but I urge the Minister and Secretary of

4:25:49 > 4:25:53State to be careful of these matters. Some residents are opposed

4:25:53 > 4:25:56to this project, others are in favour, however, it is essential

4:25:56 > 4:25:59that this major project goes ahead it is done correctly and in the

4:25:59 > 4:26:04right way. One of other reasons why there are concerns about garden

4:26:04 > 4:26:07settlement is because of the appalling record of Colchester

4:26:07 > 4:26:11Borough Council. An planning matters as Lib Dem and Labour run council is

4:26:11 > 4:26:15rotten to the corner. The Minister has the background and will know

4:26:15 > 4:26:18that last year the Secretary of State granted planning permission

4:26:18 > 4:26:21for a new leisure and retail development known as Tollgate

4:26:21 > 4:26:23Village. This development was supported by overwhelming majority

4:26:23 > 4:26:30of local people and to transform derelict site into a developer

4:26:30 > 4:26:34creating hundreds of new local jobs and tens of millions of pounds of

4:26:34 > 4:26:36inward investment. However, the council tried everything to block

4:26:36 > 4:26:41it. They claimed it would be a loss of land and even though there was no

4:26:41 > 4:26:45interest in using the site in this way they try to put doggy relativist

4:26:45 > 4:26:49Colchester town centre and the even tried to smear me by making up a

4:26:49 > 4:26:55false claim that my representations were somehow improper. They behaved

4:26:55 > 4:27:00disgracefully and not a single officer or political figure has

4:27:00 > 4:27:02taken responsibility. They blocked the creation of jobs, prevented

4:27:02 > 4:27:08investment in waste of public money. Close to this site a council has

4:27:08 > 4:27:12behaved in a similar way on a scheme called Stein Park, the private

4:27:12 > 4:27:16investment project which they blocked but which was granted

4:27:16 > 4:27:19consent on appeal. Also in Stanway on the Lakeland housing developer to

4:27:19 > 4:27:22the council completely neglected and ignored residents, causing the loss

4:27:22 > 4:27:32of green space in an area of land known as a parcel SR six. Is area of

4:27:32 > 4:27:35land should have been landscaped and it was not and the council failed to

4:27:35 > 4:27:38enforce a planning condition. It was then designated for protection as

4:27:38 > 4:27:44open space in the council's local plan but behind closed doors and

4:27:44 > 4:27:47without any consultation the council allowed a new master plan to be

4:27:47 > 4:27:50approved and designated that site for intensive housing. Residents

4:27:50 > 4:27:55were only made aware of this when he reserved matters application was

4:27:55 > 4:27:58made in 2015, despite complaints and concerns about the process the

4:27:58 > 4:28:03council approved the construction of 27 new dwellings and a lot of the

4:28:03 > 4:28:07space in 2016. This matter has been with the local government must win

4:28:07 > 4:28:11for over a year and due to the complexity of the issues involved

4:28:11 > 4:28:13but it shows once again that Colchester council is problematic

4:28:13 > 4:28:16and not fit for purpose, they allowed an area which should have

4:28:16 > 4:28:20been a green open space to be lost without any consultation and they

4:28:20 > 4:28:28kept local resident in the dark for years on this particular matter.

4:28:28 > 4:28:43I beg to move that this House do now adjourned.Continue.Thousands of my

4:28:43 > 4:28:54constituents and residents across Essex and beyond are deeply

4:28:54 > 4:28:57concerned about an incinerator which was given planning permission by the

4:28:57 > 4:29:02last Labour government weeks before the general election in 2010. Since

4:29:02 > 4:29:08then, the applicants have paid a number of changes to the site. The

4:29:08 > 4:29:14recycling capacity has been reduced. Incineration capacity has been

4:29:14 > 4:29:27increased from 65%. Another planning application is being considered.

4:29:27 > 4:29:31Given concerns with the incinerator, the impact on the environment, the

4:29:31 > 4:29:35new proposals put forward on waste from the government, the incinerator

4:29:35 > 4:29:45is not only unwelcome, it is out of date. It has no energy recovery

4:29:45 > 4:29:53methods. I trust the Minister will convey this message to the Secretary

4:29:53 > 4:29:56of State and look at all the submissions that will be coming his

4:29:56 > 4:30:02way. My constituent John Patrick has a long chain of correspondence and

4:30:02 > 4:30:06representation with my honourable friend's Department and is well

4:30:06 > 4:30:10known to them. He runs a rural nursery business growing plants.

4:30:10 > 4:30:17When he moved there, it was living accommodation on site. A long and

4:30:17 > 4:30:24protracted planning dispute has taken place with the local planning

4:30:24 > 4:30:27authority. He feels planning policies justify him being able to

4:30:27 > 4:30:32operate his business on the site. I ask the Minister to review the case

4:30:32 > 4:30:41and learn the lessons from it. Finally, the last case I want to

4:30:41 > 4:30:49highlight involves the development outside by constituency. The

4:30:49 > 4:30:54developer is involved in the development of a site in archers

4:30:54 > 4:31:04field District Council. This company could be prevented from providing

4:31:04 > 4:31:13much-needed social housing. As the Minister can see, my constituency

4:31:13 > 4:31:20has arrays -- a wide range of planning and development issues.

4:31:20 > 4:31:24There are many more that time has prevented me from raising with. I

4:31:24 > 4:31:29want to leave him with this message from my constituency. Were needed

4:31:29 > 4:31:34new minister of housing, planning and local government to deliver

4:31:34 > 4:31:38sustainable developments and the housing we need, prevent unwelcome

4:31:38 > 4:31:42developments and abuses in the planning system, make sure that

4:31:42 > 4:31:50intervention takes place in the cases listed, and ensures that local

4:31:50 > 4:31:59people can be supported with infrastructure and public transport.

4:31:59 > 4:32:03Can I start by congratulating my right honourable friend for securing

4:32:03 > 4:32:08this debate about housing, planning and infrastructure in Essex. It was

4:32:08 > 4:32:16great to see her supported in the chamber by her county colleagues. My

4:32:16 > 4:32:19honourable friend is a strong campaigner for her constituency. I

4:32:19 > 4:32:26can tell the House the sheer volume of cases and correspondence from her

4:32:26 > 4:32:29held by the Ministry is a testament to lead diligent way she pursues

4:32:29 > 4:32:36these issues. I thank her very much for the opportunity to discuss these

4:32:36 > 4:32:47very important topics. As she can be acknowledged in her remarks, I am

4:32:47 > 4:32:55not in a position to comment in detail on the planning applications

4:32:55 > 4:32:59that are ongoing. The case she referred to in the village is being

4:32:59 > 4:33:02considered by a planning inspector who will provide the Secretary of

4:33:02 > 4:33:08State of the report friend to consider in due course. All material

4:33:08 > 4:33:11matters associated with these proposals will be considered as part

4:33:11 > 4:33:15of the process and my right honourable friend can be assured

4:33:15 > 4:33:21that the comments she has made will no doubt be noted. In respect of the

4:33:21 > 4:33:26applications related to the waste management facility for the former

4:33:26 > 4:33:30airfield, she has provided some of the background. The current planning

4:33:30 > 4:33:35applications submitted are a matter for Essex County Council, as the

4:33:35 > 4:33:40relevant planning authority, to consider. However, the ministry is

4:33:40 > 4:33:43aware of the requests made for these applications to be called in and

4:33:43 > 4:33:50these requests will be considered in the appropriate way. Turning next to

4:33:50 > 4:33:54John Patrick and the points you raised about his case, I can assure

4:33:54 > 4:34:01my right all the friend that we will carefully consider and reply to Mr

4:34:01 > 4:34:07Patrick's correspondence. As an aside, representing a highly rural

4:34:07 > 4:34:11constituency myself, like her, I fully recognise the importance of

4:34:11 > 4:34:16rural enterprise in driving prosperity. I was interested to hear

4:34:16 > 4:34:23about the case mentioned involving the District Council. I'm not in a

4:34:23 > 4:34:28position to comment on current planning application, but on the

4:34:28 > 4:34:32general point on the provision of affordable housing, we are keen to

4:34:32 > 4:34:36see approach is taken to deliver more affordable housing and as set

4:34:36 > 4:34:40out in the housing paper the government is keen to promote more

4:34:40 > 4:34:43opportunities for small and medium-sized developers to deliver

4:34:43 > 4:34:48that housing. My right honourable friend made reference to her

4:34:48 > 4:34:53concerns with Colchester Borough Council. The case she had referred

4:34:53 > 4:34:56to on the Lakeland site is currently with the local government ombudsman

4:34:56 > 4:35:02and we will take note of the outcome of their enquiries, but as she knows

4:35:02 > 4:35:08we cannot intervene directly in that process. In relation to the village

4:35:08 > 4:35:14project, an inspector conducting the appeal enquiry produced a report

4:35:14 > 4:35:15which the Secretary of State carefully considered before

4:35:15 > 4:35:19accepting the recommendation to be grant planning permission. We are

4:35:19 > 4:35:26aware of the council's position and my right honourable friend's

4:35:26 > 4:35:34concerns with the cancel's reply. As for every single local authority,

4:35:34 > 4:35:37ultimate accountability comes through the ballot box. I know

4:35:37 > 4:35:45first-hand that my right honourable friend is a top rate campaigner. She

4:35:45 > 4:35:48touched in her speech about the North Essex garden communities. This

4:35:48 > 4:35:54is one of 24 new locally led garden cities, towns and villages the

4:35:54 > 4:35:58government is currently supporting. Together, I can tell the House they

4:35:58 > 4:36:04have the potential to deliver 220,000 new homes across England. In

4:36:04 > 4:36:08general terms, the government believes garden communities offer

4:36:08 > 4:36:12the potential to secure considerable new housing, employment

4:36:12 > 4:36:15opportunities, modern physical infrastructure and new public

4:36:15 > 4:36:19services. This is why the government provides some funding to support

4:36:19 > 4:36:32local authorities like those in Essex to develop these proposals.I

4:36:32 > 4:36:36congratulate my honourable friend for this debate. We are all here

4:36:36 > 4:36:42because we are concerned about the effects of these garden communities,

4:36:42 > 4:36:45that they must produce quality communities. I know the department

4:36:45 > 4:36:49is concerned these are not just about housing numbers, the are about

4:36:49 > 4:36:54creating quality communities and with the infrastructure. There are

4:36:54 > 4:37:00vital pieces of infrastructure which must be upgraded in advance of these

4:37:00 > 4:37:08new homes being created. Would he took that into consideration?My

4:37:08 > 4:37:13honourable and right honourable friend are both right to raise

4:37:13 > 4:37:19constituent concerns this additional housing is supported by

4:37:19 > 4:37:23infrastructure and public services are right time. Something the

4:37:23 > 4:37:27government and I wholeheartedly agree and pie in the autumn budget

4:37:27 > 4:37:32the government more than doubled housing infrastructure fund, and it

4:37:32 > 4:37:38additional £2.7 billion of funding, bringing the total fund to £5

4:37:38 > 4:37:42billion.Thank you for giving way. I would like to congratulate my right

4:37:42 > 4:37:48honourable friend and your neighbour for being an Essex champion and for

4:37:48 > 4:37:55initiating the debate. Could I ask my honourable friend, given the

4:37:55 > 4:37:58things you said, in terms of new housing and infrastructure, does he

4:37:58 > 4:38:05not agree there should be support for substantial regeneration in

4:38:05 > 4:38:09towns like Harlow but have real problems because the toners decaying

4:38:09 > 4:38:15over everything being built at the same time. We need desperate

4:38:15 > 4:38:20regeneration of the town centre, for example.He makes an excellent

4:38:20 > 4:38:27point. The boundless economic optimism we heard of Earl is

4:38:27 > 4:38:31something the government is keen to see and should actively support

4:38:31 > 4:38:35through these proposals and through the infrastructure and investment in

4:38:35 > 4:38:38places like Harlow, you can make a difference. The housing

4:38:38 > 4:38:43infrastructure fund is designed to provide exactly the kind of projects

4:38:43 > 4:38:50that both my right honourable friend and my honourable friend spoke of,

4:38:50 > 4:38:57key infrastructure to unlock housing growth. Just today, the government

4:38:57 > 4:39:01announced 133 successful project which will help unlock the potential

4:39:01 > 4:39:06200,000 new homes. As my right honourable friend mentioned, that

4:39:06 > 4:39:10includes £7.3 million for a flood relief scheme next door to her

4:39:10 > 4:39:16constituency in mould and. And £5.5 million of funding to unlock over

4:39:16 > 4:39:24500 homes in Colchester by accelerating the delivery of a

4:39:24 > 4:39:27housing development. I'm sure he will welcome that investment. Of

4:39:27 > 4:39:36forward fund element will also be available for a small number of

4:39:36 > 4:39:43strategic and high impact infrastructure projects with bids of

4:39:43 > 4:39:47up to £250 million. Expressions of interest for this funding are being

4:39:47 > 4:39:51assessed. I'm delighted to tell the House that the county of Essex have

4:39:51 > 4:39:57applied to this fund, including four infrastructure specifically to

4:39:57 > 4:40:00support the North Essex garden communities. The best proposals from

4:40:00 > 4:40:05across the county will be short listed to go through to core

4:40:05 > 4:40:08development in the coming weeks. Local authorities will then submit

4:40:08 > 4:40:13final business cases the successful bids being announced as early as

4:40:13 > 4:40:18this autumn. More generally, my right honourable friend is right to

4:40:18 > 4:40:20highlight that garden settlement community proposals are still

4:40:20 > 4:40:26subject to examination, as part of the local plan process. The hearings

4:40:26 > 4:40:32with respect to plans concluded last month, as she will now. I can

4:40:32 > 4:40:35reassure my right honourable friend that any formal responses her

4:40:35 > 4:40:40constituents have made either to the planning Inspectorate or to the

4:40:40 > 4:40:45council as part of the draft plan consultation will be considered by

4:40:45 > 4:40:51the inspector in his determination. Further, I understand that the

4:40:51 > 4:40:55planning Inspectorate has sought reassurance that all matters raised

4:40:55 > 4:41:00by consultees on the draft plan have in fact been provided and will hold

4:41:00 > 4:41:05further hearings if procedurally necessary. My right honourable

4:41:05 > 4:41:12friend spoke in detail about local plans. New homes need to be provided

4:41:12 > 4:41:16through up-to-date local plans, which are produced in consultation

4:41:16 > 4:41:23with local people. I welcome the progress which various councils have

4:41:23 > 4:41:28made with local plan preparations. Up-to-date plans produced in

4:41:28 > 4:41:31consultation with local communities are a vital element of the planning

4:41:31 > 4:41:35system. They are the starting point for planning decisions by local

4:41:35 > 4:41:40planning authorities and planning inspectors. As my right honourable

4:41:40 > 4:41:44friend mentioned, local authorities are required to identify a five-year

4:41:44 > 4:41:53land supply of deliverable housing stock. Identifying sites provides

4:41:53 > 4:41:55clarity to local communities and developers work where homes should

4:41:55 > 4:42:00be built so development is planned rather than as a result of

4:42:00 > 4:42:03speculative application. However, where there is insufficient land

4:42:03 > 4:42:06available on which housing can realistically be delivered, there

4:42:06 > 4:42:13are measures in place that help identify suitable sites. As my right

4:42:13 > 4:42:15honourable friend acknowledged, government guidance states that

4:42:15 > 4:42:21local authorities should aim to deal with undersupply within five years

4:42:21 > 4:42:25were possible. However, decision-makers have the flexibility

4:42:25 > 4:42:31to consider each case on its merit and it is for local authorities to

4:42:31 > 4:42:35present their particular case to the relevant decision makers. Are

4:42:35 > 4:42:38housing high Paper acknowledges the current policy on five-year land

4:42:38 > 4:42:43supply has been effective in delivering homes, but has had some

4:42:43 > 4:42:47negative effects including an increased number of appeals. Through

4:42:47 > 4:42:51our housing White Paper, the government propose reforms to land

4:42:51 > 4:42:57supply is calculated to give more certainty. The proposal offers local

4:42:57 > 4:43:01authorities the opportunity to have their plan agreed on an annual basis

4:43:01 > 4:43:06and fix for a one-year period. It is intended that this ability to fix

4:43:06 > 4:43:11will reduce the number and complexity of appeals by providing

4:43:11 > 4:43:16greater certainty to all parties. The White Paper also indicated that

4:43:16 > 4:43:20clearer and more transparent guidance will set out how the

4:43:20 > 4:43:28five-year land supply should be calculated.

4:43:28 > 4:43:31Revised national planning guidance will be published for comment

4:43:31 > 4:43:35alongside the consultation of the National planning policy framework

4:43:35 > 4:43:40before Easter of this year. My right honourable friend next referred to

4:43:40 > 4:43:44the production of neighbourhood plans and the role that they play in

4:43:44 > 4:43:50empowering local communities. I note with delight that neighbourhood

4:43:50 > 4:43:54planning is being embraced in her constituency with at least ten

4:43:54 > 4:43:59neighbourhood planning groups being active. And as she sets doing their

4:43:59 > 4:44:03best to support the government's localism agenda. The government

4:44:03 > 4:44:09wants to support such groups and we have made £23 million available from

4:44:09 > 4:44:132018 through a neighbourhood planning support programme. She

4:44:13 > 4:44:18highlighted her concerns about whether neighbourhood plans in

4:44:18 > 4:44:22development get the status they deserve in the planning process,

4:44:22 > 4:44:27especially if communities are in her words bombarded with applications. I

4:44:27 > 4:44:32can tell her that the national planning policy framework is clear,

4:44:32 > 4:44:37that weight must be given to emerging neighbourhood plans. We

4:44:37 > 4:44:42have also laid out guidance to set out where circumstances might

4:44:42 > 4:44:48justify the refusal of planning permission on grounds that this

4:44:48 > 4:44:57would be premature in relation to an emerging neighbourhood plan. Coming

4:44:57 > 4:45:02next to comments about the application consultation. The

4:45:02 > 4:45:04government agrees that effective consultation is an important part of

4:45:04 > 4:45:09the planning process. Government has clear and detailed expectations,

4:45:09 > 4:45:15both statutory and in guidance regarding the consultations of

4:45:15 > 4:45:19parties who are affected by planning applications. It is for the local

4:45:19 > 4:45:24planning authority to ensure that this consultation takes place

4:45:24 > 4:45:27properly and in accordance with these guidelines. If there are

4:45:27 > 4:45:31points of concern these should be raised with the local authority as

4:45:31 > 4:45:38soon as possible. In conclusion, Madam Deputy Speaker, we have

4:45:38 > 4:45:42covered an extensive range of topics in this very short debate this

4:45:42 > 4:45:47evening. It seems to me that the Business Secretary and indeed the

4:45:47 > 4:45:51Chancellor should take note that my right honourable friend is

4:45:51 > 4:45:56single-handedly doing her bit to drive up British productivity. But

4:45:56 > 4:46:00this in seriousness is a testament to the energy and passion with which

4:46:00 > 4:46:04my right honourable friend cares about her constituents and once they

4:46:04 > 4:46:09are concerns aired and listen to by government. I commend her for doing

4:46:09 > 4:46:17exactly that this evening.The question is that this house do our

4:46:17 > 4:46:24journey. As many as all of that opinion say aye. I. The ayes have

4:46:24 > 4:46:31it. Order, order.