:00:02. > :00:07.Hello, and welcome to Inside Out South West - stories from where you
:00:07. > :00:14.live. Tonight, the devastating impact of glass attacks in pubs and
:00:14. > :00:21.clubs. One Cornish victim's campaign to ban the bottle. People
:00:21. > :00:24.go out to enjoy themselves, not to have their life changed in minutes.
:00:24. > :00:30.Also tonight, why conservationists are in a spin over plans to produce
:00:30. > :00:34.power from South West rivers. The salmon and sea trout have been
:00:34. > :00:41.running this system for years, thousands of years. Why should we
:00:42. > :00:44.take away their breeding grounds? Why?
:00:44. > :00:49.And Adam Hart-Davis on how a chemist helped Smeaton find the
:00:49. > :00:53.right formula for his tower. There was a real problem about how they
:00:53. > :01:00.were going to stick it together but Cockworthy had a bright idea. Wow!
:01:00. > :01:10.That is amazing. That's what, half a kilogram of rock?
:01:10. > :01:21.
:01:21. > :01:25.I'm Sam Smith and this is Inside This week, the police in Newquay
:01:25. > :01:28.are due to take strong action against this nightclub. They're
:01:28. > :01:30.asking the council to review its licence because of a series of
:01:30. > :01:36.attacks here where classes and glass bottles have been used as
:01:36. > :01:46.weapons. As we discovered, they're not the only ones who say we should
:01:46. > :01:48.
:01:48. > :01:53.now call time on glass on places like this.
:01:53. > :02:00.A night on the town. It'll leave some with a banging headache others
:02:01. > :02:08.banged up in the cells. But for the unlucky few, this kind of mayhem
:02:08. > :02:10.changes life forever... Then it'll give a little bit, then you'll feel
:02:10. > :02:14.the resistance, but don't move past the resistance. 22-year-old Jack
:02:14. > :02:19.Nutting doesn't like these hospital sessions. The therapy on his
:02:19. > :02:22.paralysed arm reminds him and his girlfriend Pippa of what he's lost.
:02:22. > :02:32.You hear all the time about people getting attacked or bottled or
:02:32. > :02:33.
:02:33. > :02:43.glassed in a pub, but you never see the outcome of it. Life changing.
:02:43. > :02:43.
:02:43. > :02:48.It's horrible. The last test Jack took was to get into medical school.
:02:48. > :02:54.Now he struggles to solve a simple puzzle. Brain damage has affected
:02:54. > :03:02.his concentration, his memory and his eyesight. The left hand side of
:03:02. > :03:07.his body is paralysed. The cause - a single blow from a glass bottle.
:03:07. > :03:17.Soon Jack will face his attacker in court. I'm dreading it. It's
:03:17. > :03:25.actually seeing him, that's the bit I'm dreading. I don't know why.
:03:25. > :03:32.the meantime, Jack's on a mission. He's campaigning for a ban on glass
:03:32. > :03:39.in pubs and clubs. Glasses and bottles, you might as well go to a
:03:39. > :03:46.shop and give out knives cos they can do the same damage. People go
:03:46. > :03:51.out to enjoy themselves, not to have their life changed in minutes.
:03:51. > :03:56.Jack's life changed in September 2010. He was fit and sporty and
:03:56. > :04:02.hoped to become a doctor. But it all went wrong in a London pub
:04:02. > :04:06.where he worked. Basically it was my night off. I wasn't working so I
:04:06. > :04:14.thought, I'll go to the pub for a couple of drinks and meet a few
:04:14. > :04:18.friends up there. In early hours, a fight started between two girls.
:04:18. > :04:24.Just an instant reaction, really. I decided to go in and try and split
:04:24. > :04:27.them up. But the boyfriend of one of the girls saw red. It was a
:04:27. > :04:31.couple of metres from where I was sitting, I stopped and just got
:04:31. > :04:37.cracked around the back of my head. I remember being drenched and
:04:37. > :04:42.having the taste of cider. I touched my head where I got him and
:04:42. > :04:45.saw blood on my hand. The sheer force of the blow caused the brain
:04:46. > :04:52.damage. The wound you see is from surgery to remove a huge blood clot
:04:52. > :04:56.which is the shown as the white area on the left of this scan. Jack
:04:56. > :04:59.was in intensive care for a month. There are thousands of glass
:04:59. > :05:04.attacks every year. Jack believes the answer is simple - ban glass
:05:04. > :05:09.from venues where there's a risk of trouble. He and Pippa are
:05:10. > :05:13.campaigning online and in the street. He's got the backing of
:05:13. > :05:19.police and a local MP. But many pubs and clubs still use glass and
:05:19. > :05:24.Jack wants to find out why. Two years ago the government asked
:05:24. > :05:29.designers to come up with a way to stop glassings and here it is... A
:05:29. > :05:36.super-tough, or tempered, pint glass. We spoke to police officers,
:05:36. > :05:39.paramedics, surgeons, pub and club owners. It seemed like the biggest
:05:40. > :05:49.safety issue was when a glass was smashed and turned into a pointed,
:05:49. > :05:53.jagged weapon. In this footage from Cornwall, the man on the right of
:05:53. > :05:57.the frame appears to try and do just that. He bangs his glass hard
:05:57. > :06:06.on the table in front of him then smashes it on the face of the man
:06:06. > :06:12.in front. Toughened glass probably wouldn't have broken... It is very
:06:12. > :06:15.strong. This is designed for the initial attacks that go on in bars.
:06:16. > :06:20.So you don't want it to break straight away, you want it to be
:06:20. > :06:26.tough. But when it does break you want it to break in a controlled
:06:26. > :06:33.way. It gives the victims time to react. If it does break, you get
:06:33. > :06:36.harmless, rounded fragments. But its strength worries Jack. How it
:06:36. > :06:45.shatters is perfect. The only thing I dislike is the strength, how
:06:45. > :06:50.strong you have to hit something for it to shatter. At the moment
:06:50. > :06:59.it's a blunt object. Next stop Newquay, where there have been 44
:06:59. > :07:01.glassings in the last two years. A big worry here is glass bottles.
:07:01. > :07:06.Police want them banned from certain venues and replaced with
:07:06. > :07:13.plastic alternatives. But not all clubs are complying. This one faces
:07:13. > :07:19.a licence review this week for that reason. Jack's come to meet the
:07:19. > :07:22.officer cracking down on glass. We're doing a couple of things to
:07:22. > :07:26.try and reduce glass attacks in Newquay. The first one is trying to
:07:26. > :07:29.move over to tempered glass. I know you've brought some here today. The
:07:29. > :07:32.other thing is trying to get rid of bottles, because bottles can't be
:07:32. > :07:36.toughened. We're trying to introduce plastic bottles into the
:07:36. > :07:41.pubs and clubs in Newquay. I'm told that popular ranges aren't
:07:41. > :07:44.available in plastic. That's a big problem because the clubs are
:07:44. > :07:48.saying to me, we don't want to reduce our biggest range and I'm
:07:48. > :07:51.going to speak to my MP about this because I'd like regulation that if
:07:51. > :07:56.you're going to sell alcohol in the UK, that you've got to have plastic
:07:56. > :08:02.as an option. If you the pubs and clubs can then purchase the plastic
:08:02. > :08:05.instead of the glass. We asked two big drinks firms why some of their
:08:05. > :08:11.brands only came in glass. The makers of Sol, told us that its
:08:11. > :08:16.biggest sellers came in plastic. But it said for smaller and
:08:16. > :08:20.imported brands this was impossible to do. Jack was hit by one of these.
:08:20. > :08:23.The makers said there had not been the demand for it to come in
:08:23. > :08:26.plastic because it was a relatively new product. The bottom line is
:08:26. > :08:33.cost. The ultra-strong pint glass costs 15% more than the
:08:33. > :08:38.conventional alternative. Plastic bottles are up to 10p more. And
:08:38. > :08:41.licensees say the problem isn't just packaging, but people.
:08:42. > :08:45.Certainly, packaging is something that could be changed and looked up.
:08:45. > :08:53.It's a small number of people who don't know how to behave themselves
:08:53. > :08:56.in polite company. They have a low tolerance to alcohol, perhaps
:08:56. > :09:01.there's something wrong with them that they feel the need to grab a
:09:01. > :09:10.weapon and hit someone. Don't to do it. You potentially could kill
:09:10. > :09:15.somebody. On the street, Jack and Pippa are worried will the public
:09:15. > :09:23.agree that glass isn't really the issue? Or will they back the
:09:23. > :09:27.campaign? Good luck, all the best. Thank you. I think it's a good idea.
:09:27. > :09:29.I think it's safe for children and families who like to sit in a pub
:09:29. > :09:35.and when these yobbos start chucking things around, they are
:09:35. > :09:43.not going to be hurt with plastic. If it doesn't stop the violence it
:09:43. > :09:46.stops the injuries, so why not? Cheers. You have got locals round
:09:46. > :09:53.here saying it's ridiculous. At least I'm not the only one that
:09:53. > :09:56.thinks that now. I'm chuffed. in London, justice is about to be
:09:56. > :10:03.served on Jack's attacker. Peter Rowley, who's hiding his face, has
:10:03. > :10:08.already pleaded guilty. This is his last taste of freedom for a long
:10:08. > :10:16.time. Jack was in court to hear Rowley get seven years - and
:10:16. > :10:24.apologise. He said he didn't mean to do what he did, he didn't intend
:10:24. > :10:34.to cause the damage. Did that mean anything to you? Not really. I'm
:10:34. > :10:35.
:10:35. > :10:42.just glad it's over now. Just move on. Is it like a line in the sand
:10:42. > :10:46.for you? Yeah, carry on with my life now - I've got a new one.
:10:46. > :10:49.number of cities have now piloted glass bans. They didn't turn back
:10:49. > :10:54.the tide of drunken violence, but they did cut the number of serious
:10:54. > :11:04.injuries. Jack might not become a doctor, but with his campaign, he
:11:04. > :11:09.
:11:09. > :11:12.could yet save lives. Water has powered the South West
:11:12. > :11:21.for centuries and now, the modern- day equivalent of this is causing
:11:21. > :11:24.something of a stir in the region. I've been investigating.
:11:24. > :11:30.There's a tussle going on in our rivers between those who want to
:11:30. > :11:33.harness their power... We do need urgently to reduce our addiction to
:11:33. > :11:38.fossil fuels and to carbon burning. And those who say they're sacred
:11:38. > :11:43.ground for species like the salmon. Salmon and sea trout have been
:11:43. > :11:53.running this system for thousands of years. Why should we take away
:11:53. > :11:57.their breeding grounds? Why? battle is over schemes that turn
:11:57. > :12:05.water into electricity. Chris Elliot's company installs them and
:12:05. > :12:10.he's never been busier. This is just where we've opened up the leat.
:12:10. > :12:12.It's brought a lot of extra leaves down. The reason for all this
:12:12. > :12:18.activity? The government's drive to produce more energy from so-called
:12:18. > :12:23.green sources like wind, sun and water. Schemes like this are being
:12:23. > :12:27.encouraged with generous subsidies. And that's led to a big increase in
:12:28. > :12:30.the number being applied for and installed. The nation's power
:12:31. > :12:35.companies are oiling the wheels by paying a special high price, called
:12:35. > :12:39.a feed-in tariff, for electricity generated this way. The cost is
:12:39. > :12:42.passed on to their ordinary customers. But it means schemes
:12:42. > :12:49.like this owned by the National Trust can potentially turn a profit
:12:49. > :12:52.more quickly. The feed-in tariff has allowed a lot of people who
:12:52. > :12:56.have had long-term ideas of doing this to actually look into it and
:12:56. > :12:59.for that investment to make some sense. And it can make
:12:59. > :13:05.environmental sense too, according to the agency charged with
:13:05. > :13:11.protecting our rivers. We do need urgently to reduce our addiction to
:13:11. > :13:18.fossil fuels and to carbon burning. It is important that hydro power
:13:18. > :13:21.schemes, wherever possible, are permitted by the Environment Agency.
:13:21. > :13:25.But small river schemes will only ever make a tiny contribution to
:13:25. > :13:30.the nation's electricity needs. And elsewhere, not everyone agrees it's
:13:30. > :13:40.the right course. This is the Walkham, an important breeding
:13:40. > :13:41.
:13:41. > :13:44.ground for the iconic and endangered salmon. It's a place
:13:44. > :13:54.artist Robin Armstrong's known for 30 years not only drawing the river,
:13:54. > :13:58.
:13:58. > :14:02.but once policing it too as a water bailiff. The perfect excuse is to
:14:02. > :14:05.be able to go down and to be able to be on the river and perhaps see
:14:06. > :14:15.something I might want to sketch. Bob's your uncle, you can just take
:14:16. > :14:17.
:14:17. > :14:20.out your sketch pad and away you go. Today Robin is as passionate about
:14:20. > :14:24.the Walkham as ever. But he fears for its future, because a
:14:24. > :14:27.hydroelectric scheme is planned here. A developer wants to divert
:14:27. > :14:37.up to two thirds of the river flow into an old mill stream or leat,
:14:37. > :14:44.
:14:44. > :14:48.The female digs a hollow and the gravel with her tail, where she
:14:48. > :14:53.lays her eggs. There then fertilised by the Milky sperm of
:14:53. > :14:59.the male. Spawning is believed to be triggered by fast-flowing water,
:14:59. > :15:03.which also keeps Beggs free from silt. Robin fears reducing the
:15:03. > :15:09.river flow could be disastrous for the salmon and other species on the
:15:09. > :15:13.Eddystone Reef. Per to ensure abstraction of any
:15:14. > :15:18.kind will affect the habitat. At that -- if it affects the habitat
:15:18. > :15:22.it affects the creatures in it. Salmon and sea-trout have been
:15:22. > :15:28.running this system for thousands of years. Why should we take away
:15:28. > :15:32.their breeding grounds? Why? question for the Environment Agency.
:15:33. > :15:39.It approved the scheme last week and said it would tolerate at 20 %
:15:39. > :15:44.fall in salmon numbers. Angling campaigners are dismayed.
:15:44. > :15:50.To roars, that is absolutely horrendous. For the agency supposed
:15:50. > :15:53.to protect fisheries to be considering licensing a scheme with
:15:53. > :15:57.a 20 % adverse effect, we don't think that is the right balance
:15:57. > :16:02.between looking after the fish and the relatively small bit of
:16:02. > :16:07.electricity that will be generated. -- small amount of electricity.
:16:07. > :16:11.The agency says that salmon numbers historically very by 20 % anyway.
:16:11. > :16:17.A anything more than that would indicate the hydropower scheme is
:16:17. > :16:20.causing a problem for fish and we would intervene to make sure that
:16:21. > :16:26.was stopped. The agency has insisted developers
:16:26. > :16:29.build something like this, a fish ladder. Such measures would count
:16:29. > :16:34.for little if such measures would - - if anything went disastrously
:16:35. > :16:41.wrong. In September last year, Nick was greeted with an extraordinary
:16:41. > :16:45.sight in Surrey. One morning driving across the
:16:45. > :16:51.river, I thought it was exceptionally low Mac. I drove to
:16:51. > :16:55.the other side and I thought there was actually no flow at all. --
:16:55. > :16:59.exceptionally low. He must have thought, what has
:16:59. > :17:03.happened? I thought, who on earth has nicked
:17:03. > :17:07.the river? You could walk across in your best Sunday shoes, my
:17:07. > :17:13.neighbour and her grandson were bound with me pondering where the
:17:13. > :17:18.river had gone. The core upstream of neck is a hydropower scheme.
:17:18. > :17:23.Local anglers believe a design fault means at times it effectively
:17:23. > :17:27.damns up the river. The Environment Agency says it has found no direct
:17:27. > :17:31.evidence of that, but it is investigating. There are thing is,
:17:31. > :17:34.you think with all our great minds and the concern vote for the
:17:34. > :17:39.Environment and the mode of thought that must have gone into it, you
:17:39. > :17:44.feel disappointed we can't get this sort of thing right today, and it
:17:44. > :17:49.bodes badly for other schemes. Back on the Walkham, the
:17:49. > :17:53.Environment Agency says the schemes here will be closely monitored.
:17:53. > :17:59.They point out that a report commissioned by the scheme's
:17:59. > :18:03.applicant says fish will not be affected. However, the agency's own
:18:03. > :18:07.local fisheries officers appear to have strong concerns. In a report
:18:07. > :18:12.last year, they said reducing the floor had the potential to impede
:18:12. > :18:19.the migration of salmon and trout. Those concerns were expressed
:18:19. > :18:22.internally, but those officers are known -- now convinced this scheme
:18:22. > :18:31.will ensure good protection for the environment and may improve the
:18:31. > :18:35.passage of fish because of the improved Fisk pass. -- fish pass.
:18:35. > :18:39.What of fish that end up in the drubbing? This, say campaigners, is
:18:39. > :18:43.evidence not from the South West of the grisly fate that awaits.
:18:43. > :18:46.Screens should keep the fish out, but campaigners say they do not
:18:46. > :18:52.always work. It is a bit like a colander full of
:18:52. > :18:58.potato peelings. It could over floor and the fish could going to
:18:58. > :19:01.the leet, and the fail-safe, back- up screen it is proposed will have
:19:01. > :19:04.a larger spacing, so fish could go through that and then through the
:19:04. > :19:09.carbine. And that would be lethal?
:19:09. > :19:16.Yes, the type of car buying that is proposed here is effectively a fish
:19:16. > :19:20.masher. -- the type of probing. The Walkham scheme now needs
:19:20. > :19:30.planning permission. All sides are hoping that water power turns out
:19:30. > :19:35.
:19:35. > :19:38.to be a wise course rather than a Smeaton's Tower is one of the South
:19:38. > :19:46.West's most iconic buildings, a marvel of technology and triumph of
:19:46. > :19:50.design. But, for all Smeaton's est genius, his tower might never have
:19:50. > :19:56.been built without the help of a local chemist, as Adam Hart-Davis
:19:56. > :20:00.has been finding out. The Eddystone Reef that for
:20:00. > :20:07.centuries these forbidding rocks have been responsible for wrecking
:20:07. > :20:13.countless ships. But, by 1,700, an enterprising Essex merchant had
:20:13. > :20:19.done the impossible and built a lighthouse here. Henry Winstanley's
:20:19. > :20:23.tower had a stone based largely made of wood. He was so confident
:20:23. > :20:27.it could largely to withstand the Rev -- that it could withstand the
:20:27. > :20:37.weather he joined the lighthouse keepers for what turned out to be
:20:37. > :20:45.
:20:45. > :20:49.the biggest storm ever to put Winstanley and his tower were gone.
:20:49. > :20:53.The second lighthouse was built by a Londoner, and that lasted for 50
:20:53. > :20:58.years. It was built like a ship, out of wood, but unfortunately
:20:58. > :21:03.caught fire in the 17 50s and burnt down to the sea. That was the end
:21:03. > :21:07.of that one, and the end of another lighthouse keeper. The one you can
:21:07. > :21:12.see now was built by the Victorians in the 1880s. The one we are
:21:12. > :21:18.interested in was built by John Smeaton, and the remains are still
:21:18. > :21:24.standing there, known as Smeaton's stump. Back in 1756, no one thought
:21:24. > :21:31.a stone tower built at sea could work. It might not have, without
:21:31. > :21:36.the help of Plymouth chemist and quicker, William Cookworthy. --
:21:36. > :21:42.Quaker. He is better known as the father of the china clay industry.
:21:42. > :21:47.The pioneer of English porcelain. It was perhaps his pioneering
:21:47. > :21:53.spirit that made him admire Young's Smeaton -- young Smeaton, the
:21:53. > :21:57.Engineer who came to lodge with them. Smeaton's audacious plan was
:21:57. > :22:02.to build his tower from interlocking stone blocks, each
:22:02. > :22:08.course neatly dovetailed into the next. But, he needed a waterproof
:22:08. > :22:13.mortar to join the blocks together, and one simply did not exist.
:22:13. > :22:19.Fairly soon, cookware the was helping Smeaton with this gigantic
:22:19. > :22:23.task to build a lighthouse on the Eddystone Reef rocks. There was a
:22:23. > :22:29.real problem about how to stick it together, but Cookworthy had a
:22:29. > :22:36.bright idea. Smeaton knew some mortars were better than others for
:22:36. > :22:40.what work, but it was Cookworthy who held the key. I have come to
:22:40. > :22:45.Plymouth City Museum to see an extraordinary book. And to find out
:22:45. > :22:49.more. Experiments to ascertain the
:22:49. > :22:55.complete composition for water cements with their results. This
:22:55. > :23:00.whole chapter is about cement? That is right. If incredible detail.
:23:00. > :23:04.It is very much what the narrative is about. It partly explains why
:23:04. > :23:07.Smeaton is the father of Civil Engineering, the detailed planning
:23:07. > :23:11.he put into every component of a project.
:23:11. > :23:14.A N this whole enterprise, how important was Cookworthy?
:23:14. > :23:19.I think he was very important indeed, experimenting with
:23:19. > :23:25.different mixes to find a hydraulic line mortar that would go off in
:23:25. > :23:31.the wet conditions. Of course, ordinary line the more trouble wash
:23:31. > :23:35.away. The yes, it needed to go off in wet conditions.
:23:35. > :23:40.That he was working with William Cookworthy, who get a mention.
:23:41. > :23:46.Yes, if I can think of the paragraph...
:23:46. > :23:50.I therefore replied to my friend, Mr Cookworthy, who I found at all
:23:50. > :23:54.times ready to afford meet his assistance, he taught me to analyse
:23:54. > :24:00.Langstone. That analysis allowed in three and
:24:00. > :24:07.Smeaton to invent a mortar that would set underwater. -- Cookworthy
:24:07. > :24:11.and Smeaton. I have got mortar expert Phil Brown to help out.
:24:11. > :24:16.Not too wet. Right, so sticky like this?
:24:16. > :24:24.Yes, this is a building more to her. Are you telling me that is good
:24:24. > :24:29.enough to stick things together? Yes. Enough for stones.
:24:29. > :24:33.So if I put a stone there, each and I'd put another stone on top, you
:24:33. > :24:38.say this will not fall of? It should hold together.
:24:38. > :24:42.For comparison, Phil is also making a traditional mortar. This upsets
:24:42. > :24:48.initially by driving as the water evaporates, but that does not
:24:48. > :24:51.happen in wet conditions. Cookworthy and Smeaton found that
:24:51. > :24:59.adding a special type of clay it would cause the water to set even
:24:59. > :25:05.underwater. We have ten minutes, so we could nip off and have a bacon
:25:05. > :25:10.sandwich. Let's leave them to it. Let's check the traditional water
:25:10. > :25:18.first. Even I can predict this one will not. They have come apart.
:25:18. > :25:25.There is not even address -- a trace of the line left on it. --
:25:25. > :25:33.mortar left on it. And you think this will set underwater?
:25:33. > :25:42.Fairly confident. Wow!
:25:42. > :25:49.That is amazing. Can I buy shoot on the concrete and see if it breaks?
:25:49. > :25:55.Try it? Well, you can do it, but it really
:25:55. > :26:02.sticks, and that is how Smeaton built his lighthouse.
:26:02. > :26:06.The errors something up with the Eddystone Reef four-cornered, but
:26:06. > :26:10.it does not stop us going in for a closer look. The thing that amazes
:26:10. > :26:14.me about it is the quality of the pointing. Just look at that white
:26:14. > :26:18.cement between the stones. He did that 250 years ago, and it looks
:26:18. > :26:23.like it has been done yesterday, even though it has been exposed to
:26:23. > :26:31.this terrible Atlantic weather. The only place it is wearing a way is
:26:31. > :26:35.at the top, where they have done nothing at all to protect it.
:26:35. > :26:40.Smeaton's Tower stood for 120 years before cracks appeared, not in the
:26:40. > :26:44.tower but on the rocks below it. The tower had become a national
:26:44. > :26:50.icon and was rebuilt on Plymouth Hoe, the entire cost paid by public
:26:50. > :26:54.subscription. Time to meet the chap in charge of its recent restoration
:26:54. > :27:03.fulls of the you build this thing, didn't you?
:27:03. > :27:08.To I am not that old! Chris, you really know about this
:27:08. > :27:12.building. What makes a good love this White House?
:27:12. > :27:16.To sum it up, I would say it is a design prototype, it was the first
:27:16. > :27:22.of its kind. There are very few buildings in the world you can
:27:22. > :27:28.point to and say that was the first of its kind, and this is an example.
:27:28. > :27:31.He stayed with his elderly local gent, William Cookworthy. Didn't
:27:31. > :27:36.Cookworthy want to tell them to be more sensible?
:27:36. > :27:40.No, I think on the contrary Cookworthy was intrigued and front
:27:40. > :27:45.of -- fascinated by what he was proposing. It was an exciting
:27:45. > :27:52.project. Cookworthy, although he was established in the local
:27:52. > :28:02.community as a Quaker, was open to radical thinking, and I think very
:28:02. > :28:04.
:28:04. > :28:09.I love this building. It seemed like an impossible project when
:28:09. > :28:19.Smeaton took it on, and yet he did it. I hope within this film I have
:28:19. > :28:32.