:00:00. > :00:17.Every year we send 145 billion texts ` tonight we follow the team using
:00:18. > :00:22.texts to crack crime. I'm an applied linguist, I do linguists and I
:00:23. > :00:27.displayed languages. The language I happen to describe is on criminal
:00:28. > :00:31.cases. Also on the show we ask ` how much
:00:32. > :00:34.should we be doing to protect communities from flooding and do we
:00:35. > :00:36.need to start thinking more radically?
:00:37. > :00:45.That's all coming up on tonight's Inside Out, with me, Mary Rhodes.
:00:46. > :00:49.But first: What does a text message say about you? For most of us
:00:50. > :00:52.they're just a quick and easy way of keeping in touching, but what if
:00:53. > :00:55.your motives are more sinister? Anthony Bartram was given exclusive
:00:56. > :01:05.access to the team who are tracking down the criminals trying to conceal
:01:06. > :01:14.their crimes with a text. This film contains details that some
:01:15. > :01:18.may find upsetting. I just knew things were not right. I
:01:19. > :01:23.did not feel like things were correct on the net. I could not
:01:24. > :01:29.understand how they people could get out of the fire and Amanda did not.
:01:30. > :01:37.She would have gone through hot coals to get her children out.
:01:38. > :01:47.At first this looked like a tragic accident. Her killer sent texts from
:01:48. > :01:49.her phone to cover her tracks. The messages that Beverley Bates
:01:50. > :01:56.received from her daughter did not ring true. I picked the phone up and
:01:57. > :02:05.looked at the text messages, they did not look correct. The kisses
:02:06. > :02:08.were not correct. Her son`in`law, Christopher Birks,
:02:09. > :02:14.escape from the fire with the two young children. In the eyes of
:02:15. > :02:20.Beverley, he was the prime suspect. Things did not feel right. I really
:02:21. > :02:27.thought it was him but I could not prove it.
:02:28. > :02:32.When a complex case needs unlocking, detectives often call an expert
:02:33. > :02:36.witness, in this case Staffordshire Police new route to ring. How do you
:02:37. > :02:42.prove who is holding the phone or capping the keyboard. Even the best
:02:43. > :02:48.detectives need help. We have got some of the best in the world here
:02:49. > :02:53.in Birmingham. I am a forensic linguist, the language I happen to
:02:54. > :02:56.describe is to do with criminal cases.
:02:57. > :03:04.Does that mean he is a text detective? Text detective or CE SI
:03:05. > :03:14.chat room, it is not real. `` CSI chat room.
:03:15. > :03:19.The box case was one of the first cases I worked on. We try to knock
:03:20. > :03:25.on doors and collected the text messages. It was on the foundation
:03:26. > :03:28.of the technical skills and old fashioned skills and the sheer
:03:29. > :03:34.effort of the police that we were able to draw any conclusions. 50
:03:35. > :03:42.miles away in Stoke`on`Trent, Amanda's mother has custody of Jack
:03:43. > :03:46.and Amelia. The children were present when this
:03:47. > :03:55.happened and they still cry for their mother. Especially if they are
:03:56. > :03:58.not well. Jack feels guilty. He thinks that had he been there on
:03:59. > :04:06.that day he could have saved his mother. He is only an age`old boy.
:04:07. > :04:09.Christopher Birks has a history of the mess the violence, he admitted
:04:10. > :04:14.strangling his wife and setting the fire. Even though he was jailed for
:04:15. > :04:19.life, five years later the children still have lots of questions as to
:04:20. > :04:25.what he did. The children need to know the truth and get answers. Even
:04:26. > :04:29.though, Jack still questions things and wants answers. Aston
:04:30. > :04:36.University's Centre for forensic with this `` Logistics now has a
:04:37. > :04:44.worldwide reputation. Detectives in Nottingham Cobden in to help with an
:04:45. > :04:49.unusual missing persons inquiry. In March 2012 we were asked to look
:04:50. > :04:53.into this. We made inquiries about to her friends and associates were.
:04:54. > :04:57.When they spoke to those people, they all reported a common theme
:04:58. > :05:02.that they had been receiving e`mails over the course of the preceding
:05:03. > :05:04.years from someone purporting to be deadly but they all felt was not
:05:05. > :05:13.today and they were suspicious of those e`mails. `` Debbie.
:05:14. > :05:18.They were looking for a woman who had not been seen for two years.
:05:19. > :05:24.Debbie Cooper became Mrs Debbie Starbuck in 2010. One monthly target
:05:25. > :05:33.took off on a round trip of a lifetime. 32 countries covering
:05:34. > :05:35.Europe, Asia, Africa, America. When he realised that people were
:05:36. > :05:43.getting suspicious, he made an attempt, more of an attempt to use
:05:44. > :05:47.disguise. Detectives gathered hundreds of the Couples' e`mails.
:05:48. > :05:54.They used them for linguists to pull apart. We can distinguish between
:05:55. > :06:02.small groups and pairs of individuals. We cannot tell someone
:06:03. > :06:05.was my personality. It received a threatening letter, we cannot tell
:06:06. > :06:11.you it was a psychopath who wrote it. All we can do as tell you about
:06:12. > :06:15.their social linguistic background, what their age or personality is
:06:16. > :06:20.like. In January last year, Jamie Starbuck
:06:21. > :06:24.dropped his disguise, returns to Britain and confessed to killing his
:06:25. > :06:28.wife, nine days after they were married. While she never left the
:06:29. > :06:34.country and police never phoned her remains, Mr Starbuck raided ?75,000
:06:35. > :06:39.of her savings to fund his globetrotting. He was a pathetic
:06:40. > :06:45.coward. This was all about money, financially motivated. It would not
:06:46. > :06:52.have occurred to him that people like Dr Grant existed.
:06:53. > :06:58.The science was also Christopher Birks's undoing. I talked to
:06:59. > :07:04.Beverley and her mother and showed them how it was applied to the
:07:05. > :07:09.investigation. At least we can see how things have worked out and how
:07:10. > :07:12.he has got all the evidence against Christopher.
:07:13. > :07:17.But the doctor is used to working in academic isolation and has never met
:07:18. > :07:22.a victim from one of his cases. That is about to change.
:07:23. > :07:30.Yes, I am slightly daunted by I hope I can provide answers that Beverley
:07:31. > :07:35.is looking for. The case we are talking about today
:07:36. > :07:41.is Amanda Birks who died in a house fire. Sitting alongside his
:07:42. > :07:47.students, Beverley hopes to find the answers to some of her grandchildren
:07:48. > :07:53.byes`mac questions. You get down to 1240 on the day of the fire and
:07:54. > :07:57.after that, all the text messages contain Christopher Birks Plisner
:07:58. > :08:01.features. What we get in that description are some things that are
:08:02. > :08:06.only used by Amanda and never by Christopher and others vice versa.
:08:07. > :08:10.This has been a personal lecture by Beverley who knows she was right to
:08:11. > :08:14.be suspicious and can then see for herself how the work of Dr Grant can
:08:15. > :08:17.cooperate with the evidence of police to prove that Amanda was
:08:18. > :08:26.murdered at lunchtime, eight hours before Christopher started the fire.
:08:27. > :08:29.Next, the doctor is going to show us a simple social media experiment to
:08:30. > :08:34.prove that we all have an individual text identity.
:08:35. > :08:40.You are all going to tweak the same message to me. You are coming into a
:08:41. > :08:45.lecture but your boss is broken down so you know you will not make it.
:08:46. > :08:49.The result was what he expected. We all had the same message to send and
:08:50. > :08:54.only 140 characters to play with, but none of the tweets are the same.
:08:55. > :08:59.For Beverley it has been both fascinating and very personal. I
:09:00. > :09:03.have clung to those text messages for 24 hours, thinking that was my
:09:04. > :09:13.last point of contact with my daughter. That was then snatched
:09:14. > :09:18.away. It was really devastating. I can understand that and it is the
:09:19. > :09:23.amount of time. It was not a crime in the moment. The university has
:09:24. > :09:27.the greatest concentration of forensic linguists on the planet.
:09:28. > :09:33.Combining teaching, research and real criminal cases.
:09:34. > :09:37.These are not crossword puzzles we are dealing with, these are real
:09:38. > :09:40.people, there are devastated families behind a lot of these cases
:09:41. > :09:48.and you must be aware of that. These are human stories, this is not an
:09:49. > :09:51.ivory tower. Beverley has learned there is far
:09:52. > :09:58.more to this place than tracking phones. It is amazing, you would not
:09:59. > :10:03.think that you could pick that out of the text. You would not believe
:10:04. > :10:14.that you could get that evidence from a few simple text messages. It
:10:15. > :10:17.could be used in a tile. You're watching Inside Out for the
:10:18. > :10:21.West Midlands. Next, at the moment pretty much anyone can open a tattoo
:10:22. > :10:23.studio, you don't even need training. Public Health England
:10:24. > :10:26.recently launched new national guidelines but critics say those
:10:27. > :10:28.aren't tough enough to protect the public. Stuart Woodman's been
:10:29. > :10:37.investigating what happens when tattoos go wrong.
:10:38. > :10:43.Getting a tattoo can take minutes, the regrets can last for years.
:10:44. > :10:47.Sometimes you look at a tattoo and you have got to be very diplomatic
:10:48. > :10:53.which is the hardest part, because sometimes you look at it and think
:10:54. > :10:58.what the hell happened! I usually just say, I have seen worse. Some of
:10:59. > :11:03.them really are terrible. Bob runs a tattoo laser removal
:11:04. > :11:09.service in Derby and says business has never been impressed. I have had
:11:10. > :11:14.children coming into me who have had tattoo is done by tattoo artists,
:11:15. > :11:22.Sobel it was painful and they had to stop. Misspellings, it is all
:11:23. > :11:27.frightening. Bob's clients include people who have had bad artwork and
:11:28. > :11:31.practical jokes tattooed into their skin but everyone who visits has one
:11:32. > :11:38.view in common, they are unhappy with the ink. What are you having
:11:39. > :11:49.done today? Something removed from my back. People who have not had a
:11:50. > :11:55.tattoo do not realise the risks. It is supposed to be Chinese writing,
:11:56. > :12:02.it says the names of my children in Chinese with a son around it. But
:12:03. > :12:10.instead it says hot lesbian. It needs to come off!
:12:11. > :12:15.Tattooists use a device that works in a similar way to a sewing
:12:16. > :12:19.mission, more and more needles here is the skin and with heavy puncher,
:12:20. > :12:23.illegal inserts tiny drops of ink. Because it breaks the skin, for
:12:24. > :12:29.hygiene is Paul, captaining carry serious health risks. I went to a
:12:30. > :12:34.local tattooists in Derby and I had come up with a big design, a planted
:12:35. > :12:38.flower bulb that looked like it was coming out of my skin. I went in for
:12:39. > :12:45.a three hour session which was quite painful, it was the first one I had
:12:46. > :12:50.had were it seems really bad. I went home and looked after that but woke
:12:51. > :12:55.up the next day and my foot was two to three times the size it had been
:12:56. > :12:59.the day before. Gemma contacted the studio which carried out the work.
:13:00. > :13:04.They dismissed her concerns claiming her tattoo was on a sensitive area
:13:05. > :13:09.and that this was a normal reaction. Things became so painful that it
:13:10. > :13:13.pained Gemma and she had to admit herself to hospital. Then I went
:13:14. > :13:20.into the hospital, they diagnosed me with septicaemia, blood poisoning.
:13:21. > :13:25.Is this person still tackling in Derby? Yes, the art. Gemma asked us
:13:26. > :13:35.not to contact the tattoo studio responsible, because she is
:13:36. > :13:41.concerned about reprisal. You can get really bad infections, things
:13:42. > :13:47.inflamed, things not even properly. You name it, we see it all the time
:13:48. > :13:51.`` things not healing properly. Apart from infection and poor
:13:52. > :13:55.design, there are other concerns, the law states people undertaking
:13:56. > :14:00.cannot get a tattoo. But the EU Summit is often ignored. I was 14 at
:14:01. > :14:06.the time and saw this design I really liked and I wanted to be the
:14:07. > :14:10.first one at school to get one. I went to someone who was a trainee
:14:11. > :14:16.but I knew he did under age, but it was not the best. It is raised and
:14:17. > :14:22.bumpy, the ink is not black and the lanes are not straight. You were 14
:14:23. > :14:29.years old, was there no questions asked? No. What has happened to the
:14:30. > :14:36.problem DIY tattoo is you can on the Internet. Anna Symns knows only too
:14:37. > :14:42.well how Tatooine at home can lead to long`term regrets. I had them
:14:43. > :14:46.done by an ex`boyfriend who did it with a piece of kit that he bought
:14:47. > :14:51.off of the Internet. They have not gone in properly and I certainly
:14:52. > :14:57.don't want any more. What to do you think about it looking at it now? It
:14:58. > :15:02.is a mess and that is why I am having them removed. Some tattoo 's
:15:03. > :15:06.look like someone has taken a Bible pen and done a scrawl all over the
:15:07. > :15:12.back. I had the mother and father who got
:15:13. > :15:17.their 17`year`old son and and he had this scrawl all over his neck.
:15:18. > :15:22.Ironically, while the current rules and regulations governing the tattoo
:15:23. > :15:27.industry are relaxed, using a laser to remove them is not properly
:15:28. > :15:32.regulated either. Derby tattooist, Kevin Paul, started his own campaign
:15:33. > :15:35.to clean up the industry. He has taken these concerns to the top and
:15:36. > :15:39.recently went to Westminster to talk to the Health Secretary. These are
:15:40. > :15:45.some of the problems we are getting. You must be registered. Today he is
:15:46. > :15:48.meeting Chris Williamson MP who is backing his campaign and lobbying
:15:49. > :15:52.for change. These are horrific and it has
:15:53. > :15:56.convinced me that we need proper regulation to ensure that these
:15:57. > :16:02.sorts of practices are stabbed out. It will be difficult because this is
:16:03. > :16:05.often done at home but every can regulate the availability of
:16:06. > :16:08.materials, we can make sure that the studios are proper regulated and
:16:09. > :16:13.that would be a big step in the correct direction. You are selling
:16:14. > :16:16.me these guidelines are not enough? The toolkit is a welcome step.
:16:17. > :16:23.Unless you have statutory backing for it, people will ignore it. The
:16:24. > :16:27.good guys will follow it as best practice, but it is the rolled
:16:28. > :16:31.tattooists, the people who are not properly set up, those Tatooine at
:16:32. > :16:36.home or importing these inferior materials which are the real problem
:16:37. > :16:49.and that is what we need to deal with. This is blood`born diseases.
:16:50. > :16:54.You cannot buy it off eBay and on your way. It's shocking you're
:16:55. > :16:58.allowed to do it. Both Chris and Kevin welcome the guidelines, but
:16:59. > :17:03.they're not convinced they are the underlying problem and unless new
:17:04. > :17:09.laws are introduced they are certain there will be more cases like Gemma.
:17:10. > :17:15.She says she had a lucky escape and wants to warn others. You see this
:17:16. > :17:20.as a smaller form of cosmetic surgery. It is something that will
:17:21. > :17:25.be there for the rest of your life. If you were changing another part of
:17:26. > :17:29.your body you wouldn't go to someone who wasn't qualified or certified
:17:30. > :17:35.and it shouldn't be like that with tattooing.
:17:36. > :17:38.It just goes to show, you can't be too careful. Remember, you can keep
:17:39. > :17:46.up`to`date with the programme by going to our website.
:17:47. > :17:53.We are in Bewdley, a town that's breathing a sigh of relief, because
:17:54. > :17:58.it escaped the recent flooding. It stayed dry thanks to new flood
:17:59. > :18:03.defences which are coming down, but Colm and Mary Howell remember how it
:18:04. > :18:07.used to be. You have been in Bewdley since 1945, so how do the floods of
:18:08. > :18:15.the lasting week compare with previous floods? I can only describe
:18:16. > :18:19.it as a tiddler, because in 1947, though we didn't have the barriers,
:18:20. > :18:27.it came right up the main street to the George Hotel. And that really
:18:28. > :18:32.was a massive flood. One thing I suppose just postwar and we were
:18:33. > :18:40.used to the flooding and everything was quite normal. You just got the
:18:41. > :18:49.local authority and the police and one or two others together. There
:18:50. > :18:54.was no bureaucracy. Keep calm and carry on. The defences have worked
:18:55. > :18:58.here, but as we have seen, the water has to go somewhere. David Gregory
:18:59. > :19:02.Kumar has been looking at other possible solutions to the problem of
:19:03. > :19:19.flooding, which might not be good news for everyone.
:19:20. > :19:27.We have had some extraordinary weather conditions over past several
:19:28. > :19:31.weeks. In fact, England's had its wettest January since 1766 and
:19:32. > :19:37.what's more, in some parts of the area, this is said to be the wettest
:19:38. > :19:41.winter for 250 years. Scientists can't say for certain whether or not
:19:42. > :19:46.all of this is down to climb change. But what we do know is here in the
:19:47. > :19:51.Midlands, after decades of little or no major flooding, in the last 16
:19:52. > :19:57.years we have been faced with four huge flooding events. So, while this
:19:58. > :20:01.may or may not be climate change, this is a scene with which we are
:20:02. > :20:06.all becoming more family. `` familiar. There are four main types
:20:07. > :20:11.of flooding, coastal fleding. Not such a problem in the Midlands, what
:20:12. > :20:15.with us not having a coast. Then there's ground water flooding and
:20:16. > :20:19.surfacewater flooding and then there's river flooding. It occurs
:20:20. > :20:22.when the volume of flow of water just overwhele ms the river and here
:20:23. > :20:29.in the Midlands we have got some really big rivers. `` this is the
:20:30. > :20:33.seven in Worcester, the longest river in the UK but the Wye, Avon
:20:34. > :20:41.and Trent are no babbling brooks either. Prior to 1998, there hadn't
:20:42. > :20:46.been any major floods in the region for decades and people, me included,
:20:47. > :20:50.were simply caught by surprise. I've been reporting on a lot of floods,
:20:51. > :20:56.and it's true in the last 16 years we have learnt an awful lot and done
:20:57. > :21:01.an awful lot to try to stop the worst effects, but properties are
:21:02. > :21:05.still being flooded. It's really interests looking back and seeing
:21:06. > :21:11.how things have changed. I remember this helicopter flight. It was
:21:12. > :21:14.awful. You can see the trees which normally marks the boundaries of the
:21:15. > :21:19.river on the bank. The river is now up to five or six times wider than
:21:20. > :21:25.this in parts. You wouldn't see that any more. The defences are in there
:21:26. > :21:31.now. Look at the tarmac. But there are flood defences which are keeping
:21:32. > :21:34.Ironbridge dry. You forget how shellshocked were in 1998 and then
:21:35. > :21:39.the floods kept on coming. We don't get scenes like that. 1300 homes are
:21:40. > :21:42.now protected up and down the River Severn, but this year, we are still
:21:43. > :21:47.seeing flooded properties. I guess my question is ` are we tackling
:21:48. > :21:52.flood defences in the right way here in the Midlands? After all, as the
:21:53. > :22:01.Prime Minister him sex has said... Money is `` himself has said. Money
:22:02. > :22:06.is no object. What should we be spending money on that on? In the
:22:07. > :22:11.Netherlands they are familiar with flooding. But even the water`savvy
:22:12. > :22:16.Dutch were caught out in 1995, when extreme flooding forced the
:22:17. > :22:22.evacuation of 250,000 people, with many more homes affected.
:22:23. > :22:25.Traditionally, the Dutch have always relied on a vast network of dykes to
:22:26. > :22:30.protect them, but following huge floods in 1995 they decided on a
:22:31. > :22:33.whole new approach to flood defences. They've actually been
:22:34. > :22:36.lowering the dykes and encouraging flooding in some parts of the
:22:37. > :22:45.Netherlands. It sounds completely ill logical, but it's all part of a
:22:46. > :22:52.cunning plan. It's part of a ?1.8 billion project called Room for the
:22:53. > :22:57.River. The premise is simple enough, by pushing the dykes back they are
:22:58. > :23:02.creating more of an overflow for the river, so now when the water reaches
:23:03. > :23:07.a critical level, it has a new flood plain to spill on to. But to create
:23:08. > :23:12.this, the Dutch had to evict over 200 homeowners and farms are. And I
:23:13. > :23:17.can't imagine that would be too popular around here. Not everyone
:23:18. > :23:23.was evicted though and some Dutch farmers had their farms rebuilt on
:23:24. > :23:26.top of mounds. Could we see ideas like that introduced here in the
:23:27. > :23:30.Midlands? Take Worcester for example. The floodwaters may be
:23:31. > :23:37.going down now, but could all of this have been avoided altogether?
:23:38. > :23:43.To find out more I have arranged to meet professor Nigel Wright, an
:23:44. > :23:46.expert if flood management. What about radical solutions like
:23:47. > :23:50.Holland? That's just the sort of thing we need to look at and maybe
:23:51. > :23:54.other measures, but we need to think differently. What is the choice we
:23:55. > :23:57.have to make? Widen the river or broaden it in places? That will
:23:58. > :24:01.displace farmers and shops and businesses and people. That may be
:24:02. > :24:03.what is needed to be done and there has to be a discussion and
:24:04. > :24:07.negotiation and in the end people need to be compensated for that.
:24:08. > :24:12.It's not going to be popular with farmers? No, it's not. None of this
:24:13. > :24:15.is popular with anybody. Who are the lambs? You can see areas which could
:24:16. > :24:19.be flooded, but there are people farming there at moment, so there
:24:20. > :24:23.has to be a negotiates with them. There `` negotiation with them. That
:24:24. > :24:27.would certainly be radical, but it wouldn't be cheap. It costs a lot,
:24:28. > :24:31.but is that better in the long term? Do you save money? That's the
:24:32. > :24:34.calculation you have to make, but do you spend a lot of money now, but it
:24:35. > :24:39.means in the future you wouldn't be spending money to clean up. That's
:24:40. > :24:43.what the Dutch are trying. But we are no strangers to schemes
:24:44. > :24:47.ourselves. The Jubilee River was created in the late 1990s and
:24:48. > :24:52.rerouted parts of the Thames around Windsor, Eton and Maidenhead. It's
:24:53. > :24:57.not been entirely popular, because whilst in recent weeks those towns
:24:58. > :25:00.have remained dry, other places, particularly Wraysbury, have been
:25:01. > :25:04.flooded and some are blaming the river. That's the thing with water,
:25:05. > :25:09.it's got to go somewhere. Nigel, could we have a Jubilee River here?
:25:10. > :25:13.Yeah. We could trace the channel around here, but I've cut across a
:25:14. > :25:17.number of roads, including the M5. Very expensive and disruptive. There
:25:18. > :25:22.you have it. An idea based on Dutch principles that could in theory work
:25:23. > :25:28.and a solution to reroute the River Severn that might not be so pract
:25:29. > :25:32.kele. `` practical. What would the people feel about something like
:25:33. > :25:35.this? Their city centre was cut off for days when the main bridge was
:25:36. > :25:39.closed because of flooding and many were forced to vacate their
:25:40. > :25:48.properties. Surely they would want the shorts to try anything, wouldn't
:25:49. > :25:53.they? One of the options might be to flood some of the farmland further
:25:54. > :25:57.up to protect Worcester? I don't agree with that. Even all the flood
:25:58. > :26:02.barriers they put up, some poor soul down the line gets all the water. I
:26:03. > :26:07.don't know, because I'm not clever enough to say what needs to be done.
:26:08. > :26:16.I would like a greater plan, a better plan. If David Cameron said
:26:17. > :26:20.money no object... We'll see. Are businesses working more `` worth
:26:21. > :26:25.more than a farmer upstream? That is tricky, especially some of my family
:26:26. > :26:28.are in farming. Subsidise the farmers. It's not the point. I
:26:29. > :26:35.wouldn't like to be flooded. Would you like to see it priority tied in
:26:36. > :26:39.towns rather than the countryside? I would say so, because it's clearly
:26:40. > :26:44.going to be hugely expensive, so I think in order to get the best value
:26:45. > :26:50.for money you are probably going to help more people by do it in the
:26:51. > :26:57.towns. Anyone got any other bright ideas? We'll have a hot summer and
:26:58. > :27:00.dry it all up. Thank you very much. That's what the people on the street
:27:01. > :27:02.think, but what about the authorities? We asked the
:27:03. > :27:42.Environment Agency and they said: It seems unlikely we'll see any
:27:43. > :27:46.major changes any time soon then, but people will no doubt continue to
:27:47. > :27:50.ask questions as the clear`up from these floods begins. There's always
:27:51. > :27:54.going to be flooding, but I think the age of the big individual scheme
:27:55. > :27:59.defending a town or a village is over now. Instead, we need to look
:28:00. > :28:03.at the whole river catchment and whole Midlands and make difficult
:28:04. > :28:07.choices about areas we might sacrifice to try to save places like
:28:08. > :28:15.Worcester and whatever we decide to do, some people are going to be left
:28:16. > :28:20.very unhappy. Some interesting ideas there. Bound
:28:21. > :28:21.to provoke debate. If you've got a story you think I should know about,
:28:22. > :28:27.drop me an e`mail. For tonight, from the banks of the
:28:28. > :28:42.River Severn in Bewdley, good night. Mary and the team are back next
:28:43. > :28:45.week, when they investigate the rise in students using sugar daddies to
:28:46. > :29:08.help pay their tuition fees. Hello, I'm Ellie Crisell with your
:29:09. > :29:09.90 second update. Two women and four