:00:11. > :00:17.Hello from Bristol where we are going nowhere fast. Tonight, the
:00:17. > :00:21.big cost of the road congestion and ideas to get things moving.
:00:21. > :00:27.ultimate solution is to make sure we have got better provision so
:00:27. > :00:33.people actively switch to different modes of transport. Also, new
:00:33. > :00:39.evidence which suggests we might be falling out of love with the car.
:00:39. > :00:46.He is a classic car but insurance is too much and I cannot afford it.
:00:46. > :00:53.And a graveyard for planes. Aviation afterlife is big business.
:00:53. > :01:03.How much does this sell for? About $1 million. This is Look East in
:01:03. > :01:06.
:01:06. > :01:10.Now, anyone who uses Bristol's roads on a regular basis will agree
:01:10. > :01:12.that they are seriously congested. And despite efforts to get things
:01:12. > :01:18.moving traffic delays cost the local economy hundreds of millions
:01:18. > :01:26.of pounds year. So, with a newly elected mayor poised to tackle the
:01:26. > :01:36.problem, we thought we'd look at I know that Bristol is very
:01:36. > :01:42.
:01:42. > :01:44.difficult to get around. I live here and I cycled to work. My
:01:44. > :01:51.contribution to the billions of miles travelled in the city every
:01:51. > :01:54.year. But the streets just weren't built for it, which is probably why
:01:54. > :01:58.I'm always stuck in traffic. We love our cars in Bristol. But
:01:58. > :02:01.thanks to the congestion, we crawl along at about 15 miles per hour.
:02:01. > :02:04.At a cost to the local economy of �300 million pounds a year. And
:02:04. > :02:07.it's bad for our health. 100,000 people live with too much pollution.
:02:07. > :02:11.So, how did the region's capital end up like this? And what should
:02:11. > :02:21.be done to get us out of gridlock? I'm going on journey across the
:02:21. > :02:25.
:02:25. > :02:29.Like many journeys in Bristol, mine begins stuck in traffic on the M32.
:02:29. > :02:36.Nearly 50,000 cars come into the city centre in the rush hour alone.
:02:36. > :02:45.Maybe that's the problem. Dr Steve Melia should know - he's been
:02:45. > :02:48.studying Bristol's transport for seven years. A city that builds a
:02:48. > :02:51.load of out of town shopping centres, a motorway into the city
:02:51. > :03:01.centre, and 20000 car parking spaces will always end up with a
:03:01. > :03:04.
:03:04. > :03:06.traffic problem. How did we end up like this? Councils, government and
:03:06. > :03:11.private business have, over many years, concentrated on the car and
:03:11. > :03:14.car based development. To ease the congestion, the four councils that
:03:14. > :03:23.run Bristol are hoping to spend over �200 million pounds on a
:03:23. > :03:26.project called Bus Rapid Transit, or BRT. This is a similar scheme in
:03:26. > :03:29.Cambridge. In Bristol, it's going to mean a new network of roads and
:03:29. > :03:35.bus lanes across the city. But Dr Melia says part of it actually a
:03:35. > :03:38.scheme for cars. What they are planning to do is to build a
:03:38. > :03:42.general purpose road which will create a new direct rapid route for
:03:42. > :03:52.cars from the northern suburbs to get straight on to the top of this
:03:52. > :03:52.
:03:52. > :03:55.motorway in order to join this traffic jam here. We still don't
:03:55. > :03:59.know exactly what form BRT will take, but it could have a big
:03:59. > :04:04.impact on Bristol's congestion. And it follows a massive upgrading of
:04:04. > :04:14.some of the city's existing buses. But according to some, the problem
:04:14. > :04:17.isn't the buses themselves, it's the fares. Here and across Britain,
:04:17. > :04:21.local authorities have cut bus fare subsidies. But Bristol has an extra
:04:21. > :04:24.issue. And what about congestion? Is that part of the problem? There
:04:24. > :04:27.are bus lanes and more bus priority measures, but if the congestion
:04:27. > :04:31.gets worse, more buses have to be put on the network, more staff have
:04:31. > :04:36.to be paid and again the passengers are hit by higher fares to pay for
:04:36. > :04:39.those buses. David says, another problem with the buses is the
:04:39. > :04:43.routes, where they over cross the boundaries of the four local
:04:43. > :04:46.authorities that run Bristol. His solution is to take control of
:04:46. > :04:50.transport away from them and give it to a new administration - an
:04:50. > :04:53.Integrated Transport Authority, or ITA. The new mayor, George Ferguson,
:04:53. > :05:03.had the same idea in his manifesto. We asked the councils whether
:05:03. > :05:04.
:05:04. > :05:07.they'd back it. In a joint statement Stace said that they
:05:07. > :05:10.would not. They said their power- sharing arrangement is working well
:05:10. > :05:13.with buses crossing boundaries without a problem. On BRT, they
:05:13. > :05:16.confirmed that cars would benefit but the main focus is on bus users.
:05:17. > :05:20.My journey's brought me to Temple Meads Station - which is due for a
:05:20. > :05:23.multi-million pound upgrade. It is part of a total of �700 million
:05:23. > :05:31.they want to spend improving transport in Bristol, 200 million
:05:31. > :05:37.of which could go on a new Metro David, what do you make of plans
:05:37. > :05:40.for a Greater Bristol Metro? It's a great idea, the services would be
:05:40. > :05:50.improved, more trains, more services, more lines but we need to
:05:50. > :05:52.
:05:52. > :05:57.go much further. We need to look at using the loop around the north of
:05:57. > :06:00.the city. A number of stations are within 50 miles of Bristol. So some
:06:00. > :06:04.interesting ideas from David but they do all require extra money.
:06:04. > :06:07.The good news is Bristol's going to have more freedom to spend money on
:06:07. > :06:13.transport the way it wants. The bad news is, there will be less to go
:06:13. > :06:16.around. That's because devolution is changing the way Bristol is
:06:16. > :06:19.funded from one in which the council bids for each individual
:06:19. > :06:25.project to one in which they get one allocated grant to cover
:06:25. > :06:27.everything. David's dreams might have to wait. But maybe there's
:06:28. > :06:37.another, cheaper way that doesn't involve new buses or trains. Maybe
:06:38. > :06:39.
:06:39. > :06:42.If you look at a city like Manchester, for example, which
:06:42. > :06:50.installed a very successful tram scheme that made less than less
:06:50. > :06:53.0.5% difference to the amount of car driving. If you compare a city
:06:53. > :06:55.like Bristol to the best European cities, you will see that we
:06:55. > :06:59.actually use public transport here almost as much. The real difference
:06:59. > :07:03.is the amount of cycling and walking. Well, I do lots of cycling.
:07:03. > :07:05.Bristol is the cycling city after all. Today, I've come to City Hall.
:07:05. > :07:11.The Department for Transport has been monitoring bike usage
:07:11. > :07:15.throughout Britain. And there's some good news. We've learned that
:07:16. > :07:21.cycling in Bristol has risen - dramatically. That should be music
:07:21. > :07:25.to the ears of Councilor Tim Kent. Until last month's mayoral election,
:07:25. > :07:28.he was Bristol City Council's transport boss. He has left them
:07:28. > :07:34.with plans to spend another �20 million on bike projects in the
:07:34. > :07:42.Tim, what do you think is the long term solution to Bristol's
:07:42. > :07:45.transport woes? The ultimate solution is the bike and the bus.
:07:45. > :07:48.We need to make sure we've got the infrastructure in place and we need
:07:48. > :07:52.to make sure we have far better provision so people actively switch
:07:52. > :07:55.to those modes of transport. We need to be doing this over the next
:07:55. > :07:58.10 years. If we don't do that, the congestion we see now will be
:07:58. > :08:01.nothing to what this city will suffer. Last month, Bristol city
:08:01. > :08:04.councilors backed plans to close roads to cars to encourage more
:08:04. > :08:09.cycling and walking. And what about the other half of Tim's plan, the
:08:09. > :08:13.bus? One problem has been the bad blood between the council and its
:08:13. > :08:16.biggest bus operator, First. feel frustrated that they make
:08:16. > :08:21.changes to their routes and their fares. They don't consult us on
:08:22. > :08:31.these. When they do consult with us, they generally ignore what we've
:08:32. > :08:32.
:08:32. > :08:37.said. What we have said to First is that this situation cannot carry on.
:08:37. > :08:39.We can't go on running our bus network the way it is. And if it
:08:39. > :08:43.doesn't improve, the former transport boss has another radical
:08:43. > :08:47.plan - take buses back under the control of the council for the
:08:47. > :08:51.first time since 1985. So the bus companies would still run the buses,
:08:51. > :09:01.but under our say-so. We would plan the routes and we would set the
:09:01. > :09:04.the routes and we would set the fares. First have said that they do
:09:04. > :09:09.fares. First have said that they do consult but it is between them and
:09:09. > :09:12.the council. They're looking forward to working with the new
:09:13. > :09:15.mayor. And they think if the council controlled the buses again
:09:15. > :09:23.it would be expensive for the taxpayer and might endanger smaller
:09:24. > :09:27.bus companies. A very tricky relationship between the company
:09:27. > :09:36.and Good news about cycling though - but it looks like they need to
:09:36. > :09:39.get a move on. I've heard a lot of solutions today: more buses, more
:09:39. > :09:42.trains, more bikes, but isn't there something more radical out there?
:09:42. > :09:45.This might be it. A Bristol based transport consultant wants nothing
:09:45. > :09:48.less than a street level revolution. It should be much simpler. I would
:09:48. > :09:52.remove traffic signs, road markings, signals, barriers, bollards and all
:09:52. > :09:54.of the street furniture, signs and markings that we tend to rely on.
:09:54. > :09:58.What we find is that produces safer streets, slower, steady movement
:09:58. > :10:02.and much richer communities and important places as a result.
:10:02. > :10:10.sounds like a really bizarre idea. Why do you think that it would
:10:10. > :10:17.work? Drivers become more aware of their surroundings and we get safer
:10:17. > :10:22.streets and a more efficient streets. That is the end of my
:10:22. > :10:30.journey but the Bristol mayor is getting started. Can he get the
:10:30. > :10:40.Coming up, we visit the final resting place for planes after
:10:40. > :10:44.
:10:44. > :10:49.As we have seen, part of the problem in Bristol is our enduring
:10:49. > :10:54.love affair with cars. But we have had exclusive access to a major
:10:54. > :10:59.piece of research published today, suggesting that a love affair could
:10:59. > :11:09.be going cold. A BBC Transport correspondent has been
:11:09. > :11:09.
:11:09. > :11:15.Building roads is controversial. Not building them could be
:11:15. > :11:21.controversial as well. How do the planners get it right? How did they
:11:21. > :11:29.decide whether to spend our taxes on road, or rail. The only way to
:11:29. > :11:34.be sure is to put yourself into the future and we know how easy that is.
:11:34. > :11:40.When these fans were watching their favourite series in the 1960s, we
:11:40. > :11:44.thought we knew how we would be travelling by 2012. We had talk of
:11:44. > :11:49.having a personal car flying. science fiction got it wrong and
:11:49. > :11:55.most of us get around the same way we did 50 years back. Having a jet
:11:55. > :12:05.pack is a distant dream. Ever since I can remember, we have assumed
:12:05. > :12:11.
:12:11. > :12:16.Well, maybe not. In transport circles there is a rumour going
:12:16. > :12:20.round that we are falling out of love with four wheels.
:12:20. > :12:24.They have even given it a name - Peak Car.
:12:24. > :12:27.So what is Peak Car? Well, just look at UK traffic growth in the
:12:28. > :12:30.'60s and '70s when we couldn't get enough cars, but by the '90s the
:12:30. > :12:40.trend was already slowing, and by about 2002 average mileage per
:12:40. > :12:45.
:12:45. > :12:50.person stalled. Is the love affair of the car cooling down? What seems
:12:50. > :12:55.to be happening in very many advanced countries, including
:12:55. > :12:58.America, is traffic growth due to car use is not going ahead at the
:12:58. > :13:01.same rates it used to. Well, now Inside out has been given
:13:01. > :13:05.the first piece of in-depth research into Peak Car in the UK
:13:05. > :13:08.and this report is full of surprises. It shows that while some
:13:08. > :13:15.of us are driving more than ever, others are dramatically changing
:13:15. > :13:19.the way we travel. Take young men for example.
:13:19. > :13:27.Now when I was young, I couldn't wait to get my hands on my dad's
:13:27. > :13:36.mark 4 Cortina with reversing lights. Passing your test was seen
:13:36. > :13:39.as a rite of passage, but apparently that is changing.
:13:39. > :13:42.Market trader, Lee Vernon is 19, but he won't be adding to the
:13:42. > :13:45.traffic around Mansfield Nottinghamshire any time soon. He
:13:45. > :13:55.is selling up because he has just been quoted �2,800 to insure his
:13:55. > :13:58.
:13:58. > :14:03.three-wheeler. I love it. It is a great looking car. A classic car
:14:03. > :14:06.and it is rare. But insurance is too much and I cannot afford it
:14:06. > :14:09.will stop The research shows Lee is not alone.
:14:09. > :14:12.Young men are driving 2,000 miles a year less than they were in 1995.
:14:12. > :14:21.Women though, young and old, are actually driving more than they
:14:21. > :14:26.used to. So what is going on? think what changed his attitude.
:14:26. > :14:30.Everybody gave up and got used to using Facebook and phones and
:14:30. > :14:38.sitting around, using public transport. Nobody cares about cars
:14:38. > :14:45.anymore. One of the big things from this report is young men are not
:14:45. > :14:51.driving so much. A lot of it is a rise in insurance and so on. If
:14:51. > :14:54.that trend carries on, we will see a lot less traffic and a lot less
:14:54. > :14:59.car ownership as well. So what else has the report found?
:14:59. > :15:02.Well, this is the rainy 7.16am from Warwick Parkway to Marylebone. Over
:15:02. > :15:08.the last 2 years the numbers using this line have gone up by a
:15:08. > :15:12.staggering 40%. And according to the report that is
:15:12. > :15:15.in line with a national trend. Since the mid-'90s the distance the
:15:15. > :15:25.average person travels by rail has soared by more than 60%, the last
:15:25. > :15:27.
:15:27. > :15:31.time the trains were this busy was during the war. The key growth we
:15:31. > :15:35.have seen is in two areas. Business travel in the morning using it for
:15:35. > :15:41.work, and leisure travel at weekends were train travel has
:15:41. > :15:45.become cheaper. Fuel prices are increasing, it costs more to travel
:15:45. > :15:49.by car and congestion is increasing. So it is now tilting in favour of
:15:49. > :15:53.rail. Sitting with a laptop on the train.
:15:53. > :15:55.And of course all those gadgets mean you can now work or play on
:15:55. > :15:59.the move. You can even book your next train ticket.
:15:59. > :16:04.While business travel by rail is up, company car mileage is down - by
:16:04. > :16:07.40% between 1995 and 2007 - so that is before any recession.
:16:07. > :16:14.Scrapping tax breaks made the difference and it has had a big
:16:14. > :16:18.impact on traffic in London. Despite more people moving to the
:16:18. > :16:22.capital, there are fewer cars. But the report found in the countryside
:16:22. > :16:28.people seem to be driving as much if not more than ever. Of course in
:16:28. > :16:31.big cities you have a lot more options for getting around.
:16:31. > :16:36.Fairfax Hall runs a London company making specialist gin and vodka and
:16:36. > :16:39.thinks he has distilled the perfect formula for company travel.
:16:40. > :16:48.Whenever they need a car or van they book it from a car club and
:16:48. > :16:56.pick it up from a designated parking space 15 minutes later.
:16:57. > :17:01.are good to go. Like a lot of small start-up
:17:01. > :17:05.businesses we don't have a lot of money. We invested all the money we
:17:05. > :17:12.have into the distillery. Investing money into the van did not seem
:17:12. > :17:17.like a good use of capital, so it is relatively low cost. And then
:17:17. > :17:20.you can just drive it 15 minutes later.
:17:21. > :17:24.So here is a question, what does all this research mean for the
:17:24. > :17:28.future of cars and the car industry? After all, we have had a
:17:28. > :17:35.bit of a boom recently. The UK is on course to produce more
:17:35. > :17:38.cars than at any time since 1972. But that is not because we are all
:17:38. > :17:44.buying ourselves a new motor. 80% are being exported - these Minis
:17:44. > :17:47.are heading to Asia and South America.
:17:47. > :17:57.Last month in London at the RAC's Future Car Challenge another famous
:17:57. > :17:59.
:17:59. > :18:03.sci-fi face was in no doubt what the future holds. I think what is
:18:03. > :18:08.happening is a huge challenge for the car industry. I don't see the
:18:08. > :18:13.car is coming to an end, they are to use all. But we need to rethink
:18:13. > :18:19.the model on how we used cars, car sharing and all that. An electric
:18:19. > :18:23.car in a city makes more sense, you have somewhere to park where it is
:18:23. > :18:27.always charged and ready to use. And it is not just the car industry
:18:27. > :18:30.that will be looking at this research. The Department for
:18:30. > :18:33.Transport is planning a major road building programme based on their
:18:33. > :18:36.model that traffic will increase by a 44% increase over the next two
:18:36. > :18:38.decades or so. But what if they have got it wrong?
:18:38. > :18:44.After all since 1989, successive governments have overestimated
:18:44. > :18:54.traffic growth. This is the range of predictions. The red line is
:18:54. > :19:01.what actually happened. There is always a risk forecasts will be
:19:01. > :19:06.wrong. But it takes a wide and rich sector of data and ensures it is
:19:06. > :19:11.rigorously analysed. There is a lot of useful things in his research to
:19:11. > :19:14.look at. But I am not convinced it shows we have reached Peak Car.
:19:14. > :19:18.The government points out the UK population is predicted to grow by
:19:18. > :19:21.another 10 million in the next 25 years. And the RAC Foundation who
:19:21. > :19:30.helped fund the report says that means we are still going to need
:19:30. > :19:34.more roads. This is not the end of the car. The use of the car has
:19:34. > :19:38.been declining, but the 70% of the population people will need to use
:19:38. > :19:47.cars unless they have railways and buses available and most people
:19:47. > :19:53.won't have those things. This is what we thought travel in the 23rd
:19:53. > :19:57.century would look like. It goes to show just how hard it is to predict
:19:57. > :20:02.the future. The danger is, you just assume it is going to be a bigger
:20:02. > :20:06.version of what we have today. The motor car has been the transport
:20:06. > :20:10.story of the last 50 years. I never thought I would say this, but it
:20:10. > :20:20.might not be the transport story of the next 50.
:20:20. > :20:23.
:20:23. > :20:28.What does this button do again? Don't press that!
:20:28. > :20:31.In our final film tonight, we are looking at a graveyard for
:20:31. > :20:41.aeroplanes that have been criss- crossing the world. We look at what
:20:41. > :20:49.
:20:49. > :20:52.happens to them after they taxi of the runway for the last time.
:20:52. > :20:55.Here, deep in the Cotswolds amidst the chocolate box villages, clotted
:20:55. > :21:03.cream teas and quiet calm, a most extraordinary business has taken
:21:03. > :21:06.off. And the big clue is up there. # Come fly With Me...
:21:06. > :21:09.Ever wondered what happens to redundant jet airliners? Well, so
:21:09. > :21:14.far over 500 have ended up here, the largest and busiest plane
:21:14. > :21:17.recycling business in Britain. This is Air Salvage International,
:21:17. > :21:26.launched 15 years ago at Cotswold Airport near Cirencester, when Mark
:21:26. > :21:35.Gregory took a gamble by risking �1,000 on an old turbo prop plane.
:21:35. > :21:40.Mark was an engineer working for Dan Air an airline that went bust.
:21:40. > :21:46.With my redundancy money I bought an aircraft, a very small turbo-
:21:46. > :21:49.prop aircraft. I stripped it down on my own with no help from any one,
:21:50. > :21:55.which was quite a challenge. In no time, Mark had sold the aircraft
:21:55. > :22:00.doors alone for �4,000 and realized he was on to something. A lot of
:22:00. > :22:05.people thought he was completely mad. But he ended up employee in
:22:05. > :22:10.quite a few people who thought it would never work. It has paid off
:22:10. > :22:15.in the end. Now Mark employs over 40 people who break up and recycle
:22:15. > :22:25.44 aircraft a year. Almost every part of a modern plane can be used
:22:25. > :22:27.
:22:27. > :22:31.again. I would say anywhere between 80 and 95% of the plane gets re-
:22:31. > :22:38.used. Nuts, bolts food trollies, doors, life jackets even the
:22:38. > :22:43.emergency chutes. Everything has a part number and a serial number.
:22:43. > :22:52.Everything is traceable. If it does not have a part number or serial
:22:52. > :23:00.number, it is worthless. But the most prized part is the engine.
:23:00. > :23:05.This is amazing. You come to work here every day? Every day. What is
:23:06. > :23:11.it you do? We will do a quick engine run, preserve the engine and
:23:11. > :23:20.then take it off. Ultimately the engine is coming off? Yes. Before
:23:20. > :23:28.it comes off? An engine runs. fire it up. How much does it sell
:23:28. > :23:35.for? About $1 million. So it has already been sold? Can I fire it
:23:35. > :23:45.up? If you want. Which button do I press? It is this one here. I am
:23:45. > :23:48.
:23:48. > :23:52.going to do this. What a noise what a thrill. But on
:23:52. > :23:56.the other side of the runway, it's as quiet as a graveyard. There is
:23:56. > :23:59.an eerie, unsettling feel about these pensioned off planes. And
:23:59. > :24:09.film companies are queuing up to get hold of them before the
:24:09. > :24:10.
:24:10. > :24:15.demolition jaws bite. Service will go onto a lorry and go work? This
:24:16. > :24:21.is going up north, to a film company up north, Warner Brothers.
:24:21. > :24:26.Quite a major film, then? This adds to the other things you have been
:24:26. > :24:32.involved in? Casualty? Dr Who, James Bond. If I wanted one of
:24:32. > :24:41.those, how much would it cost? About 25,000, as it is at the
:24:41. > :24:51.moment. Can't afford it. I certainly can't afford this!
:24:51. > :25:01.Yes. What can Mark Tierney, shaken and not stirred. Just occasionally,
:25:01. > :25:01.
:25:01. > :25:05.his company comes across something special. Like this VIP gold plated
:25:05. > :25:08.jet once owned by an Arab sheikh. This is far too good to scrap, so
:25:08. > :25:11.Air Salvage is turning it into a high end hospitality suite. They
:25:11. > :25:15.will park it outside their reception and you will even be able
:25:15. > :25:25.to have a sleepover. Possibly even people who want a weekend away.
:25:25. > :25:26.
:25:26. > :25:29.Rather than the Mile High Club, it will be the 10 ft high club.
:25:29. > :25:31.Discoveries like that are rare, but there's often real drama in this
:25:31. > :25:35.business. Air Salvage becomes truly international when they're called
:25:35. > :25:38.on to recover parts like this after a crash, or in this case, a cockpit
:25:38. > :25:41.fire. July 29th, 2011. Flight MS- 667 was preparing to take off from
:25:41. > :25:48.Cairo to Jeddah when the fire took hold. 300 passengers were evacuated
:25:48. > :25:52.and the plane was written off. sent a team of guys to Cairo,
:25:52. > :25:57.stripped the plane down and brought them back. They are on the market
:25:57. > :26:02.to be sold. It must be quite exciting? It is. We never know what
:26:02. > :26:08.will happen because we are always on standby to go out and recover an
:26:08. > :26:11.aircraft. One thing is for sure they really enjoy their work here.
:26:11. > :26:17.Eventually all that is left is the aluminium body of the jet and that
:26:17. > :26:20.will soon be on its way to the beer and soft drinks industry. So that
:26:20. > :26:30.can you're drinking from might have flown round the world 24 times
:26:30. > :26:34.
:26:34. > :26:44.But it's the artistic and unusual design uses of redundant jets that
:26:44. > :26:48.
:26:48. > :26:58.Designer, Will Walmsley, from Gloucester, turns jumbo jets into
:26:58. > :27:05.
:27:05. > :27:12.objects of art. What have you done with this? Taking a cabin crew seat
:27:12. > :27:18.from a Boeing 737. Built legs for it, strip it out and giving it a
:27:18. > :27:23.new coat of paint. People will buy these for their houses? Enthusiasts,
:27:23. > :27:30.and anyone who likes the minimalist style. How much would this be?
:27:30. > :27:38.About �650. And this looks like a lamp or a light fitting? It is a
:27:38. > :27:43.hydraulic events and it is now just a lamp for a living room. --
:27:43. > :27:48.hydraulic event. Why would people want this? People who want
:27:49. > :27:55.something that no one else has. much with the Celts for? About
:27:55. > :28:02.�1,200. -- sell for. It looks like this may be one industry that is
:28:03. > :28:06.recession-proof. Air travel is still expanding and with it the
:28:06. > :28:09.demand for new planes. So more and more jets will end their life here
:28:09. > :28:19.in the Cotswolds. But not this piece. I rather fancy this in my
:28:19. > :28:22.
:28:22. > :28:26.Well that's just about it for this week but if you'd like to keep in
:28:26. > :28:36.touch with what we're up to then you can find us on Twitter. Or you
:28:36. > :28:38.
:28:38. > :28:41.Next week, we investigate what's been going on behind the scenes at