18/09/2012

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:03. > :00:07.process with any vigour. But some commentators see -- think A-bomb

:00:07. > :00:12.the administration seems much less likely. -- eight admit Romney

:00:13. > :00:15.administration seems much less likely.

:00:15. > :00:20.On Newsnight Scotland, what is going on over the Lockerbie

:00:20. > :00:25.investigation? A court in Malta is examining element in the case on

:00:25. > :00:30.behalf of Scottish authorities. I'll be closer to a new appeal or a

:00:31. > :00:37.public inquiry? Also, what future for the arts, as Creative Scotland

:00:37. > :00:43.changes the funding rules. Ms Ps a hear complaints, or is it just

:00:43. > :00:47.people wanting top quality culture? Will they ever meet -- ever be

:00:47. > :00:51.universally accepted answers to questions about Lockerbie? There

:00:51. > :00:56.are reports a court in Malta has been re examining witnesses, and it

:00:56. > :01:01.is being asked, what are the Scottish legal authorities doing?

:01:01. > :01:11.Will they be a new appeal on behalf of Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi, or even a

:01:11. > :01:12.

:01:12. > :01:15.public inquiry. This is the Maltese newspaper

:01:15. > :01:20.article which has thrown the spotlight once again on the role

:01:20. > :01:23.the Ireland played in the 1988 Lockerbie bombing. And on the

:01:23. > :01:28.secrecy surrounding the continuing investigation. Amid conditions of

:01:28. > :01:31.secrecy so tight that even the peepholes in the Court Room were so

:01:31. > :01:37.tight could -- were blocked, a magistrate questioned a number of

:01:37. > :01:42.witnesses following a diplomatic request from the UK. Neither the

:01:42. > :01:46.Maltese not Scottish authorities will comment.

:01:46. > :01:50.A Malta was well known as a place for prominence Libyans to relax and

:01:50. > :01:55.do business, probably in contravention of UN sanctions. The

:01:55. > :01:58.only man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi, was

:01:58. > :02:05.a frequent visitor, he had a mistress on the island. His last

:02:05. > :02:08.visit was the day before the bombing in 1988. He was said to

:02:08. > :02:15.have bought clothing, fragments of which were found wrapped around

:02:15. > :02:18.pieces of the bomb timer. The shop keep that -- this shopkeeper

:02:18. > :02:25.controversially identified in, and this was accepted by the trial

:02:25. > :02:31.judges. Megrahi had used his Libyan Arab Airlines connections to send

:02:31. > :02:37.an armoured deck -- other company to suitcase onto a service which

:02:37. > :02:43.fed into a Pan Am Flight 103. Megrahi, who died earlier this year,

:02:43. > :02:47.was convicted of mass murder and later released on compassionate

:02:47. > :02:53.grounds. Police say they investigation into the bombing

:02:53. > :02:58.remains life. Dumfries and Galloway police are working with Louis -- US

:02:58. > :03:01.enforcement agencies in order to preserve the integrity of the

:03:01. > :03:07.investigation, it would not be appropriate to offer further

:03:07. > :03:12.comment. Reevel Alderson is with me now.

:03:12. > :03:17.What is going on in Malta? We do not know what went on last

:03:17. > :03:22.week, because neither the Maltese authorities nor the Crown Office or

:03:22. > :03:26.the police, as we had just there, will comment. I have to say, from

:03:26. > :03:30.the Scottish Crown Office perspective, it is fairly strange

:03:30. > :03:33.that they say they will not comment on a life investigation of, the

:03:33. > :03:37.police say that, they say they could not possibly comment on a

:03:37. > :03:40.live investigation. Of course, the police do that all the time, they

:03:40. > :03:46.appealed for witnesses and talk about how tragic an event has been

:03:46. > :03:51.and so forth. We do not know what is happening, but it is quite clear

:03:51. > :03:56.that the investigation that has been undertaken by Dumfries and

:03:56. > :03:59.Galloway Constabulary since 1988 is continuing, are we know that, and

:03:59. > :04:05.we know there are a number of officers involved, but we do not

:04:05. > :04:11.know of any links to Malta or whether any of them went to Malta.

:04:11. > :04:14.Up there is also a summit coming up at home about this. Yes, there is a

:04:14. > :04:20.petition before the justice committee of the Scottish

:04:20. > :04:25.parliament from the justice for Megrahi Group, at they are asking

:04:25. > :04:30.for a public inquiry to be held into the circumstances and indeed

:04:30. > :04:33.the conduct of the investigation and subsequent trial. It will

:04:33. > :04:37.reappear before the justice committee later this month, what

:04:37. > :04:41.will happen then, I think it will be continued, but there does appear

:04:41. > :04:45.to be a body of new evidence which they have got which they are likely

:04:45. > :04:52.to put to the Scottish government about what they would see as the

:04:52. > :04:56.mishandling of the prosecution. It was intended to be a modern,

:04:56. > :05:00.forward looking funding body to replace the Scottish Arts Council,

:05:00. > :05:04.but two years on, Creative Scotland faces ramblings from the ranks of

:05:04. > :05:08.artists and performers it invests in. Their main complaint is a

:05:08. > :05:13.funding shake-up that would involve more of -- more companies using

:05:13. > :05:16.lottery funding, and a lack of communication. Today, Creative

:05:16. > :05:25.Scotland's chief executive was quizzed by the Scottish Parliament

:05:25. > :05:31.at launched a robust defence. You deny people the right of appeal.

:05:31. > :05:34.It would not be tolerated anywhere else. Secretive and unaccountable,

:05:34. > :05:40.the charges levelled at the Scottish Arts Council when it came

:05:40. > :05:44.under the spotlight at Westminster 14 years ago.

:05:44. > :05:49.It is approximately one year on from the last meeting, had two

:05:49. > :05:53.years on from its creation. Today, a new body at the new parliament.

:05:53. > :05:59.But the questions are the same. His Creative Scotland run by a group of

:05:59. > :06:04.bureaucrats? A I would defend my team. We are

:06:04. > :06:08.not bureaucrats, we are skilled people who are trying to make the

:06:08. > :06:13.best of the limited resources we have to benefit the whole of

:06:13. > :06:18.Scotland. That was certainly the end when

:06:18. > :06:23.Creative Scotland was set up two years ago to handle a budget of �83

:06:23. > :06:26.million with a diverse range of cultural activity. There were

:06:26. > :06:34.already concerned about the merging of commercially viable art forms

:06:34. > :06:37.with those which require a subsidy. A new film version of off a novel

:06:37. > :06:42.got to Creative Scotland backing, but so did a successful television

:06:42. > :06:52.cookery show, leaving many considering -- questioning of the

:06:52. > :06:55.

:06:55. > :07:01.But it is the decision to move or 49 organisations like this one from

:07:01. > :07:06.fixed funding on to lottery money which has caused the biggest outcry.

:07:06. > :07:15.Are we need to do two things, one being building a large project with

:07:15. > :07:22.multiple partners over a long time, like the show. Also, doing very

:07:22. > :07:26.fast turnaround shows, a three- month run in April somewhere, now,

:07:26. > :07:32.under the old system, we were given a plot of money for two years,

:07:32. > :07:35.added was very flexible and we could do these things. And now,

:07:35. > :07:39.with the new investment agreements, it is very different, because what

:07:39. > :07:43.you have to bring to the table when you go to Creative Scotland is you

:07:44. > :07:47.have to bring a level of detail that is almost impossible for some

:07:47. > :07:52.projects where we do not know what will be having, so what it means is

:07:52. > :07:58.that we will have to make many, many more funding applications to

:07:58. > :08:01.Creative Scotland, which is our administration will have to grow.

:08:01. > :08:05.But Andrew Dixon insists the lottery is the way forward, and not

:08:06. > :08:09.just for individual projects. A lottery funding can be used for

:08:09. > :08:15.this, and a number of the distributors, they have been

:08:15. > :08:22.funding individual elite athletes. They do more revenue funding that

:08:22. > :08:25.we have in the past. We want to explore that further. Why some --

:08:25. > :08:30.while some may question whether Creative Scotland can use lottery

:08:30. > :08:33.money to replace continuing funding, most are happy to consider any new

:08:33. > :08:37.form of revenue, as long as Creative Scotland handles the

:08:37. > :08:40.paperwork and enables them to focus on the work.

:08:40. > :08:43.It has to start with Creative Scotland not party on

:08:43. > :08:46.responsibility of navigating the rules of lottery funding to

:08:46. > :08:49.companies like ours, but dealing with it themselves at working out

:08:49. > :08:55.away where they can give us the money, to trust us if they like Al

:08:55. > :09:00.work. And if our work has a track record. To say, there you go, do

:09:00. > :09:04.not worry about these things, and there are specific things that fit

:09:04. > :09:09.into that. I am sure we can get around things if Creative Scotland

:09:09. > :09:12.do listen. Today, Andrew Dixon admitted he had

:09:12. > :09:16.got it wrong, but intended to do better.

:09:16. > :09:20.We needed to listen more to artists, not just work through the

:09:20. > :09:23.intermediary agencies that where -- that we are funding to support

:09:23. > :09:27.artists, so we are putting in place measures to do that. We have had a

:09:27. > :09:32.very good dialogue over the theatre review that we have done a, a lot

:09:32. > :09:36.of people are engaging with that consultation process, and now there

:09:36. > :09:41.is a dialogue over how to spend the money, we will do the same with

:09:41. > :09:46.dance and crafts. We are very committed to talking to artist. It

:09:46. > :09:51.is quite good when the artists come to us and we can listen to them

:09:51. > :09:55.directly. A lot of the commentary has been happening on Twitter and

:09:55. > :09:58.in the press rather than directly engaging with Creative Scotland.

:09:58. > :10:02.The end is no doubting that Scotland is an amazingly creative

:10:02. > :10:08.place, and not just in the world of theatre. This city, just a month

:10:08. > :10:14.ago, was a host to the world's largest art festival. Companies

:10:14. > :10:17.take their world -- take their work abroad often. But with such a busy

:10:17. > :10:24.and complicated cultural scene, is it feasible for Creative Scotland

:10:24. > :10:27.to fund it all? Are so, tough decisions ahead for Creative

:10:28. > :10:36.Scotland -- Creative Scotland, if they want to nurture all art forms

:10:36. > :10:41.across the whole nation. I am joined by Joyce McMillan and

:10:41. > :10:47.France is the key, director of Contemporary Art in Glasgow. --

:10:47. > :10:52.Frances McKie. There are concerns over

:10:52. > :10:56.communications and transparency. Where have we got to with that?

:10:56. > :11:00.The situation is still quite serious in the sense that there are

:11:00. > :11:03.many leading artists who are very unhappy with the way things have

:11:03. > :11:07.gone with Creative Scotland over the last year or so, and the issues

:11:07. > :11:11.are to do party would be shift towards lottery funding, which you

:11:11. > :11:15.have heard about just now, the insecurity and so on, but also to

:11:15. > :11:18.do with the language and the tone in which that has been implemented,

:11:18. > :11:23.and I have almost lost out of the number of people who have

:11:23. > :11:26.complained to me about being talked down to a, about being patronised,

:11:26. > :11:30.about being taught to as if they did not know how to run their own

:11:30. > :11:34.companies, about being treated as if they need for public subsidy,

:11:34. > :11:37.which is absolutely standard feature of the art scene in any

:11:37. > :11:41.civilised European country, was somehow a problem which required

:11:41. > :11:45.them to be harassed or questioned as to why they cannot enhance their

:11:45. > :11:50.income from other sources and in other ways. I do not know why that

:11:50. > :11:53.tone was taken, I do not know where that problem came from, but I am

:11:53. > :11:56.very glad to see Andrew Dixon acknowledging that there has been a

:11:56. > :12:00.problem at that level. That is a first step towards doing something

:12:00. > :12:04.about it, but it has to be said that the row that he complains

:12:04. > :12:06.about on the internet and everywhere else was absolutely

:12:06. > :12:10.necessary to kick down the door and get that conversation going,

:12:10. > :12:20.because it just was that happening, and a lot of people took to social

:12:20. > :12:27.

:12:27. > :12:33.networks like the Twitter because How difficult is it for people to

:12:33. > :12:40.actually apply for funding and then be critical, because they fear or

:12:40. > :12:46.consequences for the funding? across the art community it is

:12:46. > :12:51.difficult, but I think what has been done has opened the door and

:12:51. > :12:55.broken the silence on discussion about funding. Now it is more

:12:55. > :13:01.possible to talk about the detail of funding. Things have been

:13:01. > :13:07.changing. The discussions we have been having have been much more

:13:08. > :13:13.positive since your criticisms. We're talking much longer term with

:13:13. > :13:21.no cherry-picking of projects so it is much more supportive. We

:13:21. > :13:23.appreciate that but there is further to go. Then used to be more

:13:23. > :13:31.communication from Creative Scotland about the changes that

:13:31. > :13:35.have created the openness and their responses to the dialogue. What

:13:35. > :13:39.about the actual structures? There are of his problems with

:13:39. > :13:45.communication but that is not a whole story. There was could

:13:45. > :13:51.discussion today about the way that Creative Scotland is trying to

:13:51. > :13:58.focus -- function with a much up smaller staff from the Arts Council

:13:58. > :14:02.had. What is happening is that decisions are being made by small

:14:02. > :14:08.teams of Creative Scotland employees. I think the effect of

:14:08. > :14:16.that, given that all those people are effectively managed by the same

:14:16. > :14:23.line managers, is to narrow the Spear of decision-making. Are I

:14:23. > :14:32.think that is an issue. It is not very clear to people how those

:14:32. > :14:36.teams are working because they have all got new titles. Be on that, I

:14:36. > :14:40.think there is the need for independent voices from people who

:14:40. > :14:44.were not employees of the organisation to be advising on

:14:44. > :14:49.those decisions, perhaps in an advisory rather than a decisive

:14:49. > :14:54.role. That was how the Arts Council functioned and it was seen as

:14:54. > :15:00.cumbersome but it did widen the voice is contributing. Do you have

:15:00. > :15:04.concerns that they could be some geographical box-ticking going on?

:15:04. > :15:14.Probably. It is very difficult for culture to happen across the

:15:14. > :15:20.

:15:20. > :15:24.country. It does happen in the strangest places. It does not have

:15:24. > :15:31.to beat Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee, but it is very hard to say that has

:15:31. > :15:35.to be replicated across every region of the country. Once again,

:15:35. > :15:41.the questioning today to go to the issue. There was interesting

:15:41. > :15:47.discussion about her project in Dumfries and Galloway which people

:15:47. > :15:50.saw as having been parachuted in. I think it is great if Creative

:15:50. > :15:53.Scotland starts to support infrastructure across the whole of

:15:53. > :15:59.Scotland but I think there is a suspicion that at the moment they

:15:59. > :16:03.go towards ticking their own boxes by parachuting things in. I do not

:16:03. > :16:08.see at the moment one the processes are for preventing that. The whole

:16:08. > :16:14.idea of their dialogue with local authorities and artists is not very

:16:14. > :16:19.systematic and there is not much Monetary. Today in committee there

:16:19. > :16:26.was evidence about social enterprise models in artist that

:16:26. > :16:33.crude. What does that actually mean? I'm not so sure! I agree

:16:33. > :16:39.there you need to have public subsidy as well. Some things, such

:16:39. > :16:45.as working with the NHS or other social art forms, to do social good

:16:45. > :16:51.with the hard. But not all art is socially could, not all art is

:16:51. > :16:55.healthy and friendly. Some art is nasty and evil! So social

:16:55. > :16:59.enterprise worked for some things but not others. People will be

:16:59. > :17:06.listening to this and saying of the arts taking their share of the

:17:06. > :17:11.cards? One of the interesting things about this row is that this

:17:11. > :17:16.is really not about money. People are not complaining about the

:17:16. > :17:19.amount of money. People understand that the core funding has to reduce

:17:19. > :17:25.and they understand a lottery funding may have to play a bigger

:17:25. > :17:28.role. It is about the way that the transition is being handled, the

:17:28. > :17:33.values and language that up being deployed, and this kind of

:17:33. > :17:38.insistence that some had there is something wrong with people for

:17:38. > :17:42.needing public subsidy. Scotland should be proud of the way to have

:17:43. > :17:49.publicly supported the arts. When Andrew Dixon took up his job, he

:17:49. > :17:53.said that giving money was the boring part of his job. I think it

:17:53. > :17:56.is her privileged to give money to some of the people who crate Art in

:17:57. > :18:01.Scotland and they should be seen as a central part of the job of

:18:01. > :18:06.Creative Scotland. I think because they have that attitude to it they

:18:06. > :18:11.have let people down in terms of the detail, the transparency, and

:18:11. > :18:16.they are still making it completely clear what they on about. They have

:18:16. > :18:21.such a wide remit that people do sometimes ask what are they doing?

:18:21. > :18:27.Other encouraging enterprise, of encouraging people to tackle social

:18:27. > :18:34.problems, or rather, in fact, standing up for art? I think their

:18:34. > :18:41.job is just enough for art. Thank you both very much for coming in. A

:18:41. > :18:46.quick look at tomorrow's papers. The front page lead in all the

:18:46. > :18:56.papers is the killing of two and aren't police officers in

:18:56. > :19:14.

:19:14. > :19:21.That is it from me for tonight. A Good evening. It looks like another

:19:21. > :19:26.day of a sunny spells and showers. The showers will push their way

:19:26. > :19:31.down to the Midlands and it is from their northwards where most of the

:19:31. > :19:38.showers will be. But even with the showers, some good spells of

:19:38. > :19:42.sunshine in between. Temperatures up to 17 or 18 down towards the

:19:42. > :19:49.south. For many counties of England it will be a fine day with plenty

:19:49. > :19:54.of sunshine. Most of Wales enjoying a decent day. One of two showers

:19:54. > :20:00.for the afternoon, most of them around the shores of Cardigan Bay.

:20:00. > :20:05.For more than Ireland, a reasonable day. Not particularly windy and 13

:20:05. > :20:10.or 14 degrees. Could spells of sunshine is gone and but equally a

:20:10. > :20:16.scattering of my showers. Rain on the way for Thursday will affect

:20:16. > :20:21.many northern parts of the United Kingdom. The further south the two

:20:21. > :20:30.on Thursday, the prospects are that bit drier but it does look fairly