24/01/2013

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:11. > :00:15.living. Is that a good enough new normal?

:00:15. > :00:19.Tonight on Newsnight Scotland, by 2014 families will be feeling the

:00:19. > :00:22.impact of the coalition government's welfare reforms. How

:00:22. > :00:29.much will it influence the way they vote in the independence

:00:29. > :00:33.referendum? Whatever happens, should welfare be devolved. From

:00:33. > :00:37.April the UK Government will begin the main elements of their welfare

:00:37. > :00:41.reforms. All of the changes are expected to take four years to

:00:41. > :00:44.complete but halfway to the process is the Scottish independence

:00:44. > :00:49.referendum and by that time it is expected that the bulk of changes

:00:49. > :00:59.will be well under way. Could the welfare reforms have a significant

:00:59. > :01:06.influence on how people will vote in 2014?

:01:06. > :01:09.We would just get your pump now, give you your milk. 18 months ago I

:01:09. > :01:16.interviewed Claire for this programme. She and her partner

:01:16. > :01:21.Derek have twin girls, now aged six. One of them, Katie, has complex

:01:21. > :01:26.disabilities and requires 24 hour care. Derek works and Clare is a --

:01:26. > :01:32.a home carer. They describe themselves as the working poor and

:01:32. > :01:40.they say the changes will hit them hard. The benefits cap introduced

:01:40. > :01:49.last week will have an impact on us for the next three years. With tax

:01:49. > :01:55.credits etc, with inflation and the cost of living, they will be rising.

:01:55. > :02:00.With regard to our source of income, that will not obviously be

:02:00. > :02:09.increasing with the cost of living over the next three years. Claire

:02:09. > :02:13.helps to campaign for the carers in Scotland. When it comes to the 2014

:02:13. > :02:19.referendum, she says what people like her are looking for is detail.

:02:19. > :02:25.In an independent Scotland, with regard to reform, would he U-turn

:02:25. > :02:34.on what the Tories have brought in just now? Would he stop a bedroom

:02:34. > :02:37.tax, which will be coming into place in April? There are a lot of

:02:37. > :02:43.carers who are dependent on housing benefit who are going to be

:02:43. > :02:47.suffering with this tax. The entire UK well-cut -- welfare system is in

:02:47. > :02:51.a spin and it is unclear how many people will be affected north of

:02:51. > :02:56.the border but critics say it could be as many as one in three

:02:56. > :03:01.households, taking �2.5 billion out of the Scottish economy. All across

:03:01. > :03:06.Scotland it is not just people who are on health and unemployment

:03:06. > :03:11.related benefits, it will affect the working poor. People on low

:03:11. > :03:16.wages to store get help with the Brent. One parent earning more than

:03:16. > :03:20.�50,000 a year could lose all or part of their child benefit. To

:03:20. > :03:30.what extent should either part of the Independent's campaign target

:03:30. > :03:30.

:03:31. > :03:34.disaffected voters on welfare? income communities and households

:03:34. > :03:39.tend to vote less, even though they may have more of a stake in the

:03:39. > :03:43.outcome of an election. One exception is pensioners. Older

:03:43. > :03:50.people tend to have higher turnouts and vote on issues of pensions and

:03:50. > :03:54.benefits much more directly. It may be true that the poorer you are the

:03:54. > :04:03.less likely you are to vote, but this could -- could this be a

:04:03. > :04:07.motivating factor to drive people to vote? It will partly depend on

:04:07. > :04:11.people's evaluation of what the long-term consequences will be in

:04:11. > :04:15.terms of their position. Undoubtedly one aspect of that, for

:04:15. > :04:20.those people primarily on benefits, will be a judgment about whether or

:04:20. > :04:23.not in the long run they are likely to be better off under the policies

:04:23. > :04:29.of the UK Government or better off on the policies pursued by the

:04:29. > :04:39.Scottish government. I suspect at the moment most people will say, in

:04:39. > :04:42.truth I am not sure. Setting out a clear case would help. The SNP says

:04:42. > :04:47.that an independent Scotland would have a fairer welfare system. But

:04:47. > :04:57.how would they pay for it? In Europe governments are cutting

:04:57. > :05:01.

:05:02. > :05:09.their welfare bills. And that was before the euro crisis. Scotland is

:05:09. > :05:14.one of the richer countries in Europe and we would do well to do a

:05:14. > :05:19.system based on universality and equity, and we are not seen that

:05:19. > :05:24.with the cuts come from Westminster and those threatened by other

:05:24. > :05:34.parties here in Scotland, like the Labour Party. Four those who can

:05:34. > :05:35.

:05:35. > :05:44.should, those who can't we will always help. Four -- of those who

:05:44. > :05:51.can. People Macey independence as a chance to punish a perceived

:05:51. > :05:58.unsympathetic Welt -- Westminster government. -- people may see.

:05:58. > :06:00.think it would be a mistake to make these simplistic arguments a

:06:00. > :06:05.central part of the Independent's campaign because I think be better

:06:05. > :06:09.to go the campaign will benefit from it in the long term. The full

:06:09. > :06:14.impact of the cumulative cuts introduced since 2010 have not been

:06:14. > :06:23.experienced yet. When that does it will be an issue that comes more to

:06:23. > :06:33.the fore of political debate in the UK and in the referendum campaign.

:06:33. > :06:37.The yes/no campaign will need to take that into account, but at that

:06:37. > :06:42.I made it is an incomplete picture. I am joined by the chairman of

:06:42. > :06:48.report it -- of reform Scotland, the policy director for the centre

:06:48. > :06:52.Rolph public policy and one of the co-founders of Women for

:06:52. > :06:56.Independence. -- director for the Centre for Scottish Public Policy.

:06:56. > :07:00.Leaving aside the details of the welfare reforms from Iain Duncan

:07:00. > :07:05.Smith, do you think it is reasonable to do what he is trying

:07:05. > :07:09.to do? I think certain aspects of it make a lot of sense. But I don't

:07:09. > :07:14.think that was the issue that we were discussing here. The issue is

:07:14. > :07:18.whether or not to welfare is important enough to be done at a

:07:18. > :07:28.Scottish level and whether it will influence the vote in 2014. At

:07:28. > :07:29.

:07:29. > :07:33.$:/STARTFEED. If it is necessary to tackle the welfare system, it

:07:33. > :07:38.doesn't matter if you have more devolution or if you keep the same

:07:38. > :07:41.system or whether you have an independent Scotland, the issues

:07:41. > :07:44.Iain Duncan Smith is trying to tackle would have to be tackled.

:07:44. > :07:50.They would and some of the universal credit proposals make a

:07:50. > :07:54.lot of sense. I still get back to saying, the key thing and, and what

:07:54. > :07:58.the Social Attitudes Survey shows that almost two thirds of Scots

:07:58. > :08:03.want Holyrood to be involved in making the key decisions about

:08:04. > :08:08.welfare created in the way that's right for Scotland. Is that

:08:08. > :08:13.possible for that to happen? Without getting rid of the other

:08:13. > :08:18.aspect of welfare, which is that it's, what the economists call part

:08:18. > :08:21.of the automatic stabilisers. It just happens, if one part of the UK

:08:21. > :08:24.is doing badly, automatically money through the welfare system goes to

:08:24. > :08:28.that area, so we all help out. It could be Scotland, could be

:08:28. > :08:34.Cornwall or any other area. Could you devolve benefits to Scotland or

:08:34. > :08:38.indeed other areas of the UK and keep that? It's entirely possible

:08:38. > :08:43.to put that mechanism in place, as in many other parts of the world. I

:08:43. > :08:46.would go further in Scotland. We were sitting here in this city of

:08:46. > :08:50.Glasgow and the city authorities have no say over welfare payment.

:08:50. > :08:54.In order to tackle some of the social problems in Glasgow, surely

:08:54. > :09:00.you have to put them together with housing, with education and with

:09:00. > :09:03.the rest of the powers in the City Council. Right. What about, you're

:09:03. > :09:07.pro-independence, but what's your answer to this basic point about

:09:07. > :09:12.the automatic stabilisers, if people in Cornwall are doing badly,

:09:12. > :09:17.then automatically, not because of any decisions, effectively wealth

:09:17. > :09:21.is thrown from Scotland to Cornwall. If Scotland is doing badly it flows

:09:21. > :09:24.from Cornwall to Scotland. I'd have to agree with Ross actually.

:09:24. > :09:29.Regardless of the outcome of independence referendum, I think

:09:29. > :09:33.that you need to be in control of the levers of economics. In terms

:09:33. > :09:38.of welfare, in Glasgow and other areas of Scotland - I think what

:09:38. > :09:43.Ross is trying to say is that you could keep a British welfare system

:09:43. > :09:46.but devolve decision making, I'm trying not to get you wrong,

:09:46. > :09:48.devolve decisions on individual benefits to tailor to local

:09:48. > :09:53.conditions. If you have independence you wouldn't have a

:09:53. > :09:58.British welfare system. That's my preferred option. We have to arc a

:09:58. > :10:01.stark choice at the moment, clearly, we're going down on austerity

:10:01. > :10:05.measures. Year seeing a divergence between the Scottish and UK

:10:05. > :10:11.Government. In Scotland they're trying to offset some of the

:10:11. > :10:14.effects sts austerity. There have been discusses this week to offset

:10:14. > :10:18.them. In Glasgow you're seeing the effects of inequality already. I'm

:10:18. > :10:24.here to talk about inequality in women. Already, we're seeing

:10:24. > :10:30.effects of austerity bills. If you look at the Joseph Rowntree

:10:30. > :10:37.Foundation have done a study with the fiscal, Institute of Fiscal

:10:37. > :10:41.Studies have done studies and women are the most affected. What are we

:10:41. > :10:45.saying here? Are we just saying there should pbtd be any cuts to

:10:45. > :10:48.welfare at all? We're saying it's about priorities. Government have

:10:48. > :10:53.priorities. The priorities in the UK Government are not about looking

:10:53. > :10:57.after the poorest in society. From my perspective, the women in

:10:57. > :11:04.society, who are the carers, as your VT showed. I'm curious,

:11:04. > :11:09.briefly on this points, so, if someone said to you, look, it's

:11:09. > :11:12.perfectly right and moral for us to help people in Sheffield, as

:11:12. > :11:14.Newsnight have just been talking about, if they're doing badly

:11:14. > :11:18.through the welfare system. Scotland should contribute to that.

:11:18. > :11:23.You'd say what, we shouldn't care about people in Sheffield? That's

:11:23. > :11:27.not what I'm saying. At the moment we have an imperfect system. I

:11:27. > :11:31.don't agree with the UK welfare reform. The unfortunate part is

:11:31. > :11:37.that other parts of the UK have got a welfare system that they didn't

:11:37. > :11:42.vote for. I have every sympathy, I was watching in Sheffield, and I

:11:42. > :11:46.would, you know, at the moment, the system is such that I would

:11:46. > :11:54.advocate that the wealth, there is universality of benefits at the

:11:54. > :12:00.moment. I'd advocate change. A gree with Ross that there -- I agree

:12:00. > :12:05.with Ross for centralise -- because a central system doesn't work.

:12:05. > :12:15.would you favour keeping that,if you like, British automatic system

:12:15. > :12:15.

:12:15. > :12:25.and devolving or just getting rid of that system? At the moment

:12:25. > :12:25.

:12:25. > :12:28.there's a complete gudd le of welfare and taxes. So the point of

:12:28. > :12:32.welfare, local government is responsible for Housing Benefit,

:12:32. > :12:37.but other things to do with housing, like winter fuel, winter allowance

:12:37. > :12:41.is done at a different level. So at the moment, there are so many

:12:41. > :12:45.inconsistencies. It would be better if you're responsible for

:12:45. > :12:48.alleviating poverty in a certain area that all of the tools are

:12:48. > :12:51.given to you, including those of welfare. So those should be passed

:12:51. > :12:55.down to the right level of Government. There are certain

:12:55. > :13:00.things that would be done best at a Westminster level and certain

:13:00. > :13:06.things done best at a local level. The context of this, as everyone

:13:06. > :13:10.says, these welfare reforms are terrible, it's not entirely obvious

:13:10. > :13:17.that's what people in Scotland think. I think there's two points -

:13:17. > :13:21.one which arises from Ben's last point. There's an interesting

:13:21. > :13:25.constitutional conundrum that there's nothing in the Scotland Act

:13:25. > :13:29.which would forbid the UK Government directly devolving power

:13:29. > :13:33.for welfare straight to Glasgow and bypassing Holyrood all together.

:13:33. > :13:38.That's an issue which I don't think any of the parties in Scotland have

:13:38. > :13:42.yet tackled. I don't know if it came to anything. I think there

:13:42. > :13:47.were proposals to do something like that under the Blair Government.

:13:47. > :13:50.never came to anything at that point. There were pilot projects.

:13:50. > :13:54.They are in England. But there could be projects in Scotland. That

:13:54. > :14:00.would change the terms this afternoon debate. The second point

:14:00. > :14:05.which arises is the impact on the referendum. And the reverse of that

:14:05. > :14:09.first point. Elections are won and lost or whether people vote

:14:10. > :14:15.aspirationally or whether they vote in a negative way. So the coalition

:14:15. > :14:18.across the UK was effectively put together in a negative vote against

:14:19. > :14:22.the then Labour Government. It wasn't a positive vote for the

:14:22. > :14:26.Tories nor the Lib Dems. It was a negative vote which forced those

:14:26. > :14:30.two parties together. The difficulty for the Unionist parties

:14:30. > :14:35.in the better together campaign is that welfare cuts will be seen in a

:14:35. > :14:40.really negative light in Scotland. The easy message for the 'Yes'

:14:40. > :14:45.campaign, for Natalie and the like, will be that you can vote against

:14:45. > :14:51.us -- those negative cuts by voting for independence. I don't think the

:14:51. > :14:55.better together campaign have addressed that. Do you think, your

:14:55. > :14:59.side of the argument should come up with proposals as well? After all,

:15:00. > :15:03.if you won the referendum vote, that's amazing opportunity because

:15:03. > :15:09.effectively you could have a new welfare system and start from

:15:09. > :15:13.scratch. One of the things you have, is universal credit as proposed by

:15:13. > :15:18.Iain Duncan Smith. You wouldn't want to create a system with all

:15:18. > :15:23.the complexities that have grown up in the British system over tens and

:15:23. > :15:27.indeed hundreds of years. You'd say right, we'll do it simply. That's

:15:27. > :15:31.the beautiful opportunity of independence that you have a huge

:15:31. > :15:36.array of systems across the world and the UK that you can learn from.

:15:36. > :15:39.Independence is an opportunity to draw a welfare system which is

:15:39. > :15:45.reflective of the values of Scottish society, which is fairer

:15:45. > :15:51.and more inclusive. Obviously, Ben and credit to Ben, has been in

:15:51. > :15:56.favour of deefyo plus consistently, but talking about devolving welfare,

:15:56. > :16:01.that option is not on the table. You have a stark contrast between

:16:01. > :16:07.whether or not to continue down the path or choose fairness and made a

:16:07. > :16:11.model. The other side of this Ben Thomson, the Scottish Government's

:16:11. > :16:14.analysis of research done on this shows that families in Scotland

:16:14. > :16:18.will suffer less from Iain Duncan Smith reforms than anywhere else in

:16:18. > :16:22.the UK. Again, I come back to the fact that some of the things that

:16:22. > :16:26.Iain Duncan Smith has are very good. He is trying to simplify the system.

:16:26. > :16:30.There are something like 39 classes of benefits and he's trying to lump

:16:30. > :16:34.six of them together. He is trying to make it simple. We can learn

:16:34. > :16:38.from that. It comes back to the central theme that... Hang on, we

:16:38. > :16:43.need to leave that for another time. Thank you all very much indeed. And

:16:43. > :16:47.we will be discussing the referendum again on Monday, in a

:16:47. > :16:49.Newsnight Scotland special debate programme. An audience will be

:16:49. > :16:52.representing Scotland's ethnic minorities communities will

:16:52. > :16:56.question leading politicians on some of the issues raised bit