09/05/2013

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:03. > :00:08.might have to wait until possible criminal trials, hacking and

:00:08. > :00:12.corruption, are over. A little earlier I spoke to Daniel

:00:12. > :00:15.Morgan's brother, Alastair. What do you hope will come from

:00:15. > :00:18.What do you hope will come from this new inquiry? Well I obscure ups

:00:18. > :00:28.this new inquiry? Well I suppose more than anything else a

:00:28. > :00:28.

:00:28. > :00:32.recognition of the extent of the diplomatic. How many children have

:00:32. > :00:36.been looked after by alcoholic and drug addicted parents? We look at

:00:36. > :00:40.how best to deal with it. A report from a trick of Scotland committee

:00:40. > :00:44.is not the type of things that you'd expect to make headlines and cause

:00:44. > :00:48.offence in the middle east but that is what happened after the Church

:00:48. > :00:52.and Society Council issued a paper arguing the script does not support

:00:52. > :00:58.Jewish claims to the land of Israel. The Israel ambassador himself has

:00:58. > :01:01.condemned the problem -- has condemned the report.

:01:01. > :01:05.The Church of Scotland has called for the withdrawal of the Israeli

:01:05. > :01:11.military from the West Bank. What has made this report so in century

:01:11. > :01:18.is the use of Scripture and theology to argue that the Jewish people have

:01:18. > :01:22.no particular right to the territory of Israel. The author questions the

:01:22. > :01:26.look for interpretation of the Bible which says the land was promised to

:01:26. > :01:31.the Israelites by God. They say Christians should not be supporting

:01:31. > :01:34.any claims by Jewish or any other people to an exclusive or even

:01:34. > :01:40.privileged to divine right to possess particular territory. It is

:01:40. > :01:45.a misuse of the Bible to use it as a topographic guide to settle

:01:45. > :01:47.contemporary conflicts over land. The report is intended for

:01:47. > :01:52.discussion by the general SMP are one of the so-called deliverance is

:01:52. > :01:57.that delegates will be asked to agree suggest the church should

:01:57. > :02:01.refute claims that Scripture offers any people is a privileged claim for

:02:01. > :02:11.possession of a particular territory. The Israeli ambassador to

:02:11. > :02:31.

:02:31. > :02:34.the UK reacted to the report article in the Jerusalem Post.

:02:34. > :02:38.Representatives of the Church and the Jewish community in Scotland met

:02:38. > :02:43.today in an attempt to calm matters. They agreed a new

:02:43. > :02:47.introduction should be written to clarify language and to reaffirm

:02:47. > :02:51.that there is no change in the Church of Scotland 's long-held

:02:51. > :02:54.position of the rights of Israel to exist. Both sides agreed not to

:02:54. > :02:59.speak to the media until debate at the General assembly later this

:02:59. > :03:05.month. Within a matter of hours the Church of Scotland has gone from

:03:05. > :03:11.taking an outspoken version of the issued to saying nothing at all.

:03:11. > :03:15.I'm joined now by Marcus Dysch of the Jewish crook -- of the Jewish

:03:15. > :03:21.Chronicle who broke this story and in Glasgow by attempt to Mac,

:03:21. > :03:27.commentator on religious matters. Just tell us the story about what

:03:27. > :03:30.has been happening. It started life as a fairly obscure report. It seems

:03:30. > :03:35.to have snowballed. Probably the church has been quite surprised by

:03:35. > :03:38.the level of upset within the Jewish community, not just in Scotland but

:03:38. > :03:44.across Britain and when we broke the story in the Jewish Chronicle last

:03:44. > :03:47.week, it didn't spiral out of control but the reaction surprised a

:03:47. > :03:52.lot of people in the Church of Scotland. You shouldn't

:03:52. > :03:55.underestimate the depth of upset and hurt within the Jewish community,

:03:55. > :04:00.especially in Scotland and nationally across Britain. And what

:04:00. > :04:06.they discovered and what Jewish people discovered in the report when

:04:06. > :04:12.they found it was going to be going to the assembly next month. It is

:04:12. > :04:14.not just in Britain, is it? We've had columns in the Jerusalem Post.

:04:15. > :04:20.The Jewish anti-defamation league has been speaking out against it,

:04:20. > :04:25.too. It has caused a diplomatic incident, almost. Internationally,

:04:25. > :04:29.there is a lot of concern. The British ambassador to Britain's

:04:29. > :04:35.comments to the report were mentioned as well. The effect this

:04:35. > :04:38.could have on communities in Britain is great. The position the Scottish

:04:38. > :04:42.Jews are coming from and the difficult circumstances for them in

:04:42. > :04:46.Scotland at the moment for quite some time Scotland has been

:04:46. > :04:52.considered as a hotbed of anti-Israel activity. And this,

:04:52. > :04:56.coming from the church, piles the pressure on the Jewish community.

:04:56. > :05:00.Can you explain in your view what it is that is giving so much offence?

:05:00. > :05:05.Resume a break, if the Church of Scotland came out and said we think

:05:05. > :05:09.Israel should stick by UN resolutions and stick to their

:05:09. > :05:14.land, than a lot of people would say in the Jewish community we don't

:05:14. > :05:20.agree with you but fair is fair, you're entitled to your opinion.

:05:20. > :05:23.Those things you've explained about boycotts on the politics behind it

:05:23. > :05:26.is perhaps unfortunately quite common at the moment and the Israeli

:05:26. > :05:31.international arena is facing a lot of questions about this. What we

:05:31. > :05:34.don't expect is some of the language that is used, the terminology. When

:05:34. > :05:40.you move into a position as the church has done when you are

:05:40. > :05:42.questioning Jewish people's rights to the land of Israel based on

:05:42. > :05:48.Israeli government policy, you're starting to stray into dangerous

:05:48. > :05:55.territory, maybe this is why the Church has stripped itself up here

:05:55. > :05:59.by talking about Jewish rights to the land of Israel. Johnston McKay,

:05:59. > :06:04.what seems to have given particular offence is this strand in the

:06:04. > :06:07.document which basically says Jewish people don't understand their own

:06:07. > :06:13.Scripture and we are going to tell them what the correct interpretation

:06:13. > :06:18.of their Scripture is. We want to promote the rights of Palestinians,

:06:18. > :06:23.that is one thing, but to say you guys... At one point it talks about

:06:23. > :06:26.how Jesus had a new interpretation of what the land of Israel meant and

:06:26. > :06:31.how the Jews didn't understand it. You can see why a lot of Jewish

:06:31. > :06:35.people would find that very uncomfortable and reminiscent of the

:06:35. > :06:39.old arguments of anti-Semitism. would first of all say that if a

:06:39. > :06:44.Christian church starts talking about what Jesus said, you cannot

:06:44. > :06:48.necessarily accuse it of being anti-Semitic. I'm not suggesting it

:06:48. > :06:53.is but I am suggesting the argument that somehow the Jews don't

:06:53. > :06:59.understand themselves and don't understand Israel and the Christians

:06:59. > :07:03.do is uncomfortably reminiscent of the idea of an original Judaic sin.

:07:03. > :07:08.The Church of Scotland since 1947 has supported the existence of the

:07:08. > :07:13.state of Israel. Of that there is no question and there is nothing that I

:07:13. > :07:19.have seen over the last few days that in anyway undermines the Church

:07:19. > :07:21.of Scotland's commitment to the existence of the Church of -- State

:07:22. > :07:25.of Israel. What the Church of Scotland has said is that it

:07:26. > :07:31.believes there needs to be a two state solution and therefore there

:07:31. > :07:35.ought to be some sort of Palestinian state. That is the exceptional...

:07:35. > :07:41.Look come if the board of deputies of the British Jews came on tonight

:07:41. > :07:45.and said, look, I've been looking at the new Testament and I think that

:07:45. > :07:49.any reasonable perpetration, any Christian church should have

:07:49. > :07:54.bishops, the Church of Scotland would say that is outrageous! You

:07:54. > :07:59.cannot tell us what our own religion is! Lets be realistic about this.

:07:59. > :08:04.These are not too similar situations at all. The new Testament doesn't

:08:04. > :08:09.take anything whatsoever as far as I can see about the state of Israel.

:08:09. > :08:15.The new Testament is talking about when it talks about Israel or the

:08:15. > :08:20.new Israel, it talks about metaphor. In terms of the old Testament, as we

:08:20. > :08:23.called it, there is no question the Church of Scotland has consistently

:08:23. > :08:28.supported the state of Israel and suddenly this should now be brought

:08:28. > :08:37.up as if we were no longer doing so. Marcus Dysch, do you see the point

:08:37. > :08:42.of any of that or is there and absence of meeting of minds? There

:08:42. > :08:44.was no consultation with the Jewish people over this. It has asked

:08:44. > :08:54.anybody in the Jewish community what it thinks about it. It starts

:08:54. > :08:55.

:08:55. > :08:58.telling the church we should be questioning the Jewish rights to

:08:58. > :09:05.Israel. It is cared understand why the Jewish community is so concerned

:09:05. > :09:09.about that. Perhaps it is a naive of the Church to not have thought of

:09:09. > :09:14.this when they didn't bother speaking to the Jewish people in the

:09:14. > :09:18.first place for any consultation. Very briefly. I don't think the

:09:18. > :09:24.church is saying that at all. It has consistently supported the state of

:09:24. > :09:32.Israel, it is not suggesting that because there should be support for

:09:32. > :09:37.Palestinians. Thank you both very much indeed. As you sit watching

:09:37. > :09:40.this, perhaps in the comfort of your home, perhaps enjoying an out cup --

:09:40. > :09:44.nightcap, would it surprise you to know that at least 80,000 children

:09:44. > :09:49.in Scotland tonight being cared for by alcoholic or drug addicted

:09:49. > :09:53.parents? Can Bailey of Scotland's children's Commissioner and he says

:09:53. > :09:58.that such parents aren't always bad parents. I will be speaking to him

:09:58. > :10:01.in a moment, but first, we report on whether we spend too much time

:10:01. > :10:11.supporting the problems of adults that a children's needs are often

:10:11. > :10:21.

:10:21. > :10:24.overlooked. Scotland's long documented relationship with alcohol

:10:24. > :10:31.and drugs brings repercussions for our health service, society at large

:10:31. > :10:35.and tens of thousands of families. Children whose site -- childhoods

:10:35. > :10:40.are stolen, caught up in a cycle of addiction. This father of three from

:10:40. > :10:48.Fife says their family was unremarkable but his ex-partner's

:10:48. > :10:53.mood swings led to chaos caused by drinking. For the most part people

:10:53. > :11:00.thought we would all key and we got on well. If you are outside the

:11:00. > :11:07.house, it was a different story. If you were inside the house, you could

:11:07. > :11:11.hear the animosity and attention on a daily basis. I ended up with

:11:11. > :11:19.custody but by then my oldest child was off the rails and coming in

:11:19. > :11:26.drunk. The implications of living with their mother was massive.

:11:26. > :11:35.According to the Scottish government, the license up to 40,000

:11:35. > :11:39.children are affected by appearance using drugs. The number rose to

:11:39. > :11:45.50,000 for a parent with alcohol problems. Tens of thousands more

:11:45. > :11:51.never enter the system. When they do, there are widespread variations

:11:51. > :11:55.in the support families are given. Too often the needs of offspring are

:11:56. > :12:00.overlooked in attempts to help the parents. Parents are given too many

:12:00. > :12:05.chances before decisions are made. It is right to try and keep our

:12:05. > :12:11.family together, but the focus is too much in some cases on helping

:12:11. > :12:16.those parents get better. Ultimately decisions need to be made and you

:12:16. > :12:22.have to stop taking too many chances and saying, we cannot have this any

:12:22. > :12:27.more it is in the children's best interest to police them elsewhere.

:12:27. > :12:30.In Scotland there are tens of thousands of children affected. He

:12:30. > :12:39.did not have the capacity to take all of them away from the families.

:12:39. > :12:49.Even if we get, at care placement can be what vulnerable children

:12:49. > :12:53.need, but if they are supported to stay in the family home, they can

:12:53. > :12:58.experience far better life than children who are taken into care.

:12:59. > :13:04.There is no lack of good well, there are hundreds of charities and faulty

:13:04. > :13:07.organisations dedicated to helping families with addiction problems.

:13:07. > :13:12.This one run by the ABBA liar childcare trust works to help

:13:12. > :13:20.mothers with their children. It is funded by Glasgow City Council but

:13:20. > :13:27.it can only help 12 families at a time. It is nearly always cool.

:13:27. > :13:31.is where the children's whose moms use the charity come. The scheme has

:13:31. > :13:36.been operating for a year. If it works it is the perfect solution,

:13:36. > :13:43.helping addicts recover without taking away their children. Can

:13:43. > :13:46.Scotland a foredeck? Scotland as a country of compassion and

:13:46. > :13:52.opportunity. It recognises that everyone has strengths. Everybody

:13:52. > :13:57.loves their children deep down, we all have that capacity. We're here

:13:57. > :14:04.to try bring that to the fore and help them tackle some of the other

:14:04. > :14:08.key difficult issues that those families face on a daily basis.

:14:08. > :14:14.resources to look at alternative forms of support to care. More

:14:14. > :14:18.support in relation to families, especially for complex families who

:14:18. > :14:27.may be quite difficult to work with, but the long-term benefits are worth

:14:27. > :14:34.it. The Scottish government said it is committed to ensuring children at

:14:34. > :14:39.risk I helped sinner of the more consistent approach. -- sooner.

:14:39. > :14:43.Focusing on the needs of the child and not the needs of the system.

:14:43. > :14:49.Tam Baillie is the Children's Commissioner and he joins me now.

:14:49. > :14:53.I'm getting confused, you were quoted the other day saying that

:14:53. > :15:00.just because parents are drug addicts or alcoholics that does not

:15:00. > :15:07.mean their children should be taken away. I am not quite sure what this

:15:07. > :15:13.debate is about. Is the sum to be about changing the emphasis? The key

:15:13. > :15:18.thing is individual assessments. Some suggestions have been looking

:15:18. > :15:25.at trying to have easy solutions, some kind of tech box, a parent is

:15:25. > :15:32.our drug user, that means the automatic removal of the child.

:15:32. > :15:37.Clearly, there are children in neglectful or dangerous

:15:37. > :15:44.circumstances and we have to get to this children. It was mentioned in

:15:44. > :15:50.the film about lack of resources. One of the key things about younger

:15:50. > :15:53.children is universal services, health visits. They are the main

:15:53. > :15:58.universal service in our youngest families, where we have most

:15:58. > :16:02.concerns. If you do not identify the families who need additional

:16:02. > :16:10.support, we will miss those families. Even if we do identify

:16:10. > :16:12.them, we have very inconsistent assessment processes. That leads to

:16:12. > :16:19.lack of confidence in the decision-making about where their

:16:19. > :16:25.children should be. You heard there is too much emphasis put on keeping

:16:25. > :16:28.families together. The social services are being run for the

:16:28. > :16:37.benefit of the adults and not the children. Is there any truth in

:16:37. > :16:42.that? Yes, I sent the evidence to the committee. It has been said

:16:42. > :16:49.repeatedly about having an overly optimistic approach in terms of the

:16:49. > :16:53.capacity of the adults to change behaviour. We have two challenge the

:16:53. > :17:02.decision-making that is just based on an adult's capacity to change

:17:02. > :17:06.behaviour. You are not making blanket proposals that in more cases

:17:06. > :17:12.children should be left with the families. You're saying it may be

:17:12. > :17:17.the opposite. There are two things. If we get better at identify the

:17:17. > :17:21.children and assessing what children need, that might reduce the

:17:21. > :17:26.likelihood of children coming into care at a litre date. The second

:17:26. > :17:29.thing is if we get better at identifying children, were likely to

:17:29. > :17:34.come across children who need support these and know and who might

:17:34. > :17:39.have to be moved into care. There are two pressures in the system just

:17:40. > :17:43.now, one is to go for early intervention and the second is we

:17:43. > :17:48.know there are a lot of children who missed by social services right now.

:17:48. > :17:54.If we have better Unicef -- universal services they can pick up

:17:54. > :17:58.on this children. There is a lack of resources and the health service for

:17:58. > :18:08.instance. To get round the problem of children being missed, what more

:18:08. > :18:11.

:18:11. > :18:15.do you need? That is a pressing keys for additional health visitors.

:18:15. > :18:21.that the problem of just having people to visit which is the problem

:18:21. > :18:25.or is there a problem about not identifying, even in high profile

:18:25. > :18:30.cases families have not been identified as problem families.

:18:30. > :18:38.quality of assessments as variable. I have said that to the committee

:18:38. > :18:42.and we have to get better at looking at assessments, looking at the

:18:42. > :18:46.relationship between the parent and child. We have to look at the

:18:46. > :18:53.evidence of what will make a successful placement for a child at

:18:53. > :19:00.home as opposed to in care. Thank you very much. A quick look at the

:19:00. > :19:10.front pages. Cameron facing rebellion over EU decider. The

:19:10. > :19:10.