:00:06. > :00:11.Tonight: Newsnight reveals what really happened with the summer's
:00:11. > :00:14.great GCSE results scandal. We have got the documents that show
:00:14. > :00:24.how the watchdog leaned on exam boards to change grades.
:00:24. > :00:27.
:00:27. > :00:33.Also tonight: Can social unrest derail austerity across Europe?
:00:33. > :00:39.are the bond market so spooked by protests on the streets?
:00:39. > :00:42.We have the man who predicted it all on Newsnight 14 years ago.
:00:42. > :00:46.blimey, look at her. And as close to 40,000 sign the
:00:46. > :00:56.petition to end the Sun's Page 3, we ask if it's time to bin the pin-
:00:56. > :01:04.
:01:04. > :01:10.We're joined by Hattie from Good evening. What really happened
:01:10. > :01:15.with the summer's GCC scandal? This programme has come a step closer to
:01:15. > :01:19.understanding the sequence of events. Documents obtained by
:01:19. > :01:25.Newsnight show how Ofqual and leaned on exam boards to change
:01:25. > :01:27.grades. The aim, as we now know, was to end more than two decades of
:01:27. > :01:32.grade creep. Sanchia Berg has been going through
:01:32. > :01:37.the correspondence and is with me now. A strong sign there was
:01:37. > :01:43.intervention. Yes, we knew there was intervention but what it looked
:01:43. > :01:50.like we did not know, but now we do. This year's GCSE English grading
:01:50. > :01:55.was the worst fiasco in history of the exam but thousands of students
:01:55. > :01:59.expecting that crucial a C grade did not get it. Ofqual said they
:01:59. > :02:03.did not fix the results and had not told exam boards that the results
:02:03. > :02:08.should fall but ever since, everybody has been trying to find
:02:08. > :02:10.out what happened, which is why we put in a Freedom of Information
:02:10. > :02:15.Bill quest for all the correspondence between the exam
:02:15. > :02:19.boards and Ofqual, and we have discovered that at least two exam
:02:19. > :02:25.boards had problems with their grades as though they were coming
:02:25. > :02:30.in. So the regulator intervened. During a telecoms runs on Friday
:02:30. > :02:37.the 13th July it with all the exam boards, the Ofqual representative
:02:37. > :02:41.said that Ofqual could not accept any apparent grade inflation. Four
:02:41. > :02:51.days later, another teleconferencing with the exam
:02:51. > :02:54.
:02:54. > :03:00.boards and they were raising Pretty unconditional. They were
:03:00. > :03:05.saying, grades cannot rise. Ofqual said those remarks should be seen
:03:05. > :03:09.in the context, that they were seeing the results could only rise
:03:09. > :03:13.is justified, and this is the first year comparable outcomes came in in
:03:13. > :03:19.English, which means the result should be on a par with recent
:03:19. > :03:25.years. Do they justify them? Edexcel and a Welsh board did try
:03:25. > :03:29.to justify them. Edexcel said there was a serious mismatch between the
:03:29. > :03:33.examiner's judgments and the required outcomes. But these
:03:33. > :03:36.objections, even though they were sustained for a long time,
:03:36. > :03:42.eventually they had to drop them because Ofqual said they would
:03:42. > :03:47.force them to change their grades if they did not do it voluntarily.
:03:47. > :03:52.Ofqual was pretty worried about how this would look, bluntly. Yes.
:03:52. > :03:58.There is a briefing paper from July where a Ofqual official says, how
:03:58. > :04:06.will we defend the grade boundary changes? And he says the rationale
:04:06. > :04:10.must be that it... The examiners judgment, rather than the
:04:10. > :04:17.statistical fix... But a statistical fix is what it really
:04:17. > :04:19.does look like, especially to Brian Lightman, who is head of the
:04:19. > :04:26.Association of school and college leaders. He is part of a group
:04:26. > :04:32.taking legal action against Ofqual at the moment. I think it shows
:04:32. > :04:36.that what has gone on here has been attempting to manipulate results in
:04:36. > :04:40.order to meet a statistical outcome and the problem with that is it
:04:40. > :04:44.does not take into account the actual quality of the pupils' work
:04:44. > :04:49.and you cannot simply hold down results in order to meet some sort
:04:49. > :04:53.of expectation without looking at the students'' work and making sure
:04:53. > :04:58.that pupils actually get their just deserts in terms of the effort that
:04:58. > :05:03.they have made. And as we heard, the grades did not rise, they fell.
:05:03. > :05:09.And that is something Ofqual did not anticipate. It was seeking ways
:05:09. > :05:11.to explain that. We found in this correspondence the message is that
:05:11. > :05:16.Ofqual has circulated to all of the exam boards the day before the
:05:16. > :05:26.results were published. Ofqual were telling the exam boards how it
:05:26. > :05:30.would explain the drop in results. Students from selective schools
:05:30. > :05:37.were not doing a GCSE English any more, their exams would not show up
:05:37. > :05:47.in the figures, but eight minutes after Ofqual sent its messages out,
:05:47. > :05:47.
:05:48. > :05:52.one bounced back from a main exam That was the explanation that
:05:52. > :05:57.Ofqual gave the following day. Later on it said that there were
:05:57. > :06:02.other reasons why the fall may have taken place, there were other
:06:02. > :06:06.changes in the cohort, but it is interesting to see that is what AQA
:06:06. > :06:12.said and yet Ofqual went ahead with that explanation anyway, so there
:06:12. > :06:19.are still questions to be answered. It is a very interesting situation.
:06:19. > :06:24.Thank you. Ofqual refused to appear live on the programme this evening.
:06:24. > :06:29.Protests in Spain, are riots in Greece, the spectre of another
:06:29. > :06:34.direly needed a bail-out, just another long week in the eurozone.
:06:34. > :06:38.Tonight, suggestions that Spanish banks will need another 60 billion
:06:38. > :06:41.euros in extra capital to ride out the downturn. The Spanish
:06:41. > :06:46.government has gone tough with posterity and paved the way for
:06:46. > :06:54.serious spending cuts, but will social unrest destabilise this
:06:54. > :07:03.For Spanish politicians, this is the world they can control.
:07:03. > :07:08.Everything goes to a script and timetable. These are the most
:07:08. > :07:13.rigorous stress tests ever, says the minister, and now, tonight, we
:07:14. > :07:18.no space need 60 billion euros to save its banks. -- we know that
:07:18. > :07:23.Spain needs. But this is the world they cannot control. Violent
:07:23. > :07:27.clashes in Madrid this week, just the latest in a growing wave of
:07:27. > :07:35.opposition to the cuts Spain has to make to stay afloat. And the
:07:35. > :07:40.problem is, it is not just Spain. If Portugal's workers took to the
:07:40. > :07:43.streets in massive numbers last Saturday, faced with a rise in
:07:43. > :07:49.national insurance that would have taken a month's salary out of their
:07:49. > :07:55.national pay. We have become used to scenes like this of course, but
:07:55. > :07:59.not to what happened next. Portuguese government backed down.
:07:59. > :08:04.For two years, we have seen protests against austerity that
:08:04. > :08:08.have achieved nothing, more or less, but the Portuguese U-turn has
:08:08. > :08:14.changed that. Bond investors now have to consider the prospect that
:08:14. > :08:19.social unrest Candy real things and they are starting to price in the
:08:19. > :08:23.risk of constitutional crisis normally associated with developing
:08:23. > :08:28.countries. This man advises the Investment funds that buy and sell
:08:28. > :08:33.government bonds. They are acutely sensitive to the qualitative
:08:33. > :08:37.aspects, and one of those his political risk, and this is evident
:08:37. > :08:44.across the board throughout southern Europe, so what we have
:08:44. > :08:48.now is a situation where emerging market type risk factors are now
:08:48. > :08:52.being priced in too many developed markets, and the markets are much
:08:52. > :08:58.more in tune to these risks but are struggling to come to terms with
:08:58. > :09:02.the social and political risk. Greek workers, who went on general
:09:02. > :09:10.strike this week, are facing another 11 billion euros worth of
:09:10. > :09:14.cuts to come, and some economists believe the austerity plans are
:09:14. > :09:24.unachievable. This graph shows how much higher labour costs are in
:09:24. > :09:25.
:09:25. > :09:31.The blue plaque shows where we were three years ago, the red bars the
:09:31. > :09:40.effects of austerity. But from Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy,
:09:40. > :09:44.which costs may still have between What happened in Portugal last week
:09:44. > :09:48.is very significant because it shows that is popular resistance is
:09:48. > :09:53.strong enough, sooner or later the government will have to change
:09:53. > :09:56.their stance. That is what the markets are worried about, and
:09:56. > :10:01.politicians and officials in Brussels and Frankfurt and Berlin
:10:01. > :10:06.are fearing that more than anything else. The problem is, produced in
:10:06. > :10:10.Europe has begun to move in ways politicians are finding hard to
:10:10. > :10:15.cope with. Andalusia has seen rates and supermarkets co-ordinated by an
:10:15. > :10:20.elected mayor. -- have seen it raids on supermarkets. And in
:10:20. > :10:28.Catalonia, much of the population wants independence or fiscal
:10:28. > :10:33.autonomy. I don't think the masses can stop Mariano Rajoy's austerity
:10:33. > :10:38.measures but I think they can bring down his government. I think there
:10:38. > :10:42.is every chance that will happen. We will see a must intensify over
:10:42. > :10:46.the next year, and the ferocity of some of the individual localised
:10:46. > :10:50.protests this year, when they gather strength and when the
:10:50. > :10:55.austerity measures at a country, which already has 25% unemployment,
:10:55. > :10:59.we will see chaos. The if the Spanish government of Mariano Rajoy
:10:59. > :11:05.looked strong and decisive, the markets might worry less, but it
:11:05. > :11:12.doesn't, and they do. Spain is not just facing a budget deficit, Spain
:11:12. > :11:17.is facing a banking, sovereign debt, real-estate, political and
:11:17. > :11:23.constitutional crisis. They are all feeding off each other. This is
:11:23. > :11:29.making deficit reduction measures in Spain extremely difficult. I
:11:29. > :11:35.think that really is the nub of the Spanish problem. This week, scenes
:11:35. > :11:39.of violence were not new, but their economic meaning might be.
:11:39. > :11:43.In a moment we will speak to a Spanish MP who speaks to the
:11:44. > :11:47.government on foreign affairs about this, and the world-famous
:11:47. > :11:51.economist Martin Feldstein, but first we wanted to show you a clip
:11:51. > :12:00.from Martin Feldstein's appearance on Newsnight 14 years ago, in which
:12:00. > :12:05.he made some a marks that are starting to look eerily prescient.
:12:05. > :12:09.One of the doom-mongers in-Chief is the imminent American economist
:12:09. > :12:13.Martin Feldstein at Harvard. We are about to pop in on him and get him
:12:13. > :12:18.to outline way things might turn nasty. If you have more
:12:18. > :12:24.disagreement, if you have countries that feel they are under the thumb
:12:24. > :12:27.of others, under the thumb of a process that they cannot control,
:12:27. > :12:32.and yet they are in their own mind sovereign countries, the temptation
:12:32. > :12:40.to pull out will be very small, and who knows just what the response
:12:40. > :12:47.will be from the centre? Well, 14 years on, we can speak to Martin
:12:48. > :12:54.Feldstein again. He is in Berlin. You predicted this almost to the
:12:54. > :12:59.word. Has it taken longer than you expected? I don't think I had any
:12:59. > :13:05.timetable in mind but I think it was clear that trying to force a
:13:05. > :13:11.common monetary policy and a single exchange rate on such disparate
:13:11. > :13:17.countries was not going to work. Where do you think this is going?
:13:17. > :13:24.Well, frankly I am quite worried about Spain in particular. Not just
:13:24. > :13:30.because of the rioting, but because of the power of the individual
:13:30. > :13:34.regions. The new plan that the European Central Bank announced, in
:13:34. > :13:39.which they will buy Spanish bonds as long as Bain sticks to a plan
:13:39. > :13:45.that has been approved by the European stability mechanism, I
:13:45. > :13:51.think that is not going to last -- as long as Spain the sticks. I
:13:51. > :13:57.think at some point, Spain will depart from what they have promised,
:13:57. > :14:01.because of riots or local regions, and at that point the ECB will have
:14:01. > :14:07.to decide, do they stop buying the government bonds and allow interest
:14:07. > :14:10.rates to sort? Or do they keep buying them and weaken the
:14:10. > :14:15.credibility of the programme? Either way I think it will be bad
:14:15. > :14:20.news for making progress in Spain. Do you think we will see political
:14:20. > :14:26.break-up within Spain? More autonomy for some of the regions
:14:26. > :14:29.like Catalonia? They have a fair amount of fiscal autonomy already.
:14:29. > :14:34.While they are talking about pulling out, I think the odds of
:14:34. > :14:38.that are still pretty low. Quite interesting listening to the bond
:14:38. > :14:43.analyst a moment ago saying that calculated risk now in southern
:14:43. > :14:46.Europe is like it used to be for the emerging markets, that they are
:14:46. > :14:53.taking into account all sorts of things they never had to worry
:14:53. > :14:57.about? Well, in the emerging markets, in east Asia and Latin
:14:57. > :15:03.America, they could always take the option of devaluing the currency
:15:03. > :15:08.and allowing their economies to recover. Spain cannot do that. As
:15:08. > :15:12.long as the euro remains as strong as it is today, we are going to
:15:12. > :15:15.continued to see large international deficits, large
:15:15. > :15:20.current account deficits in Spain, and that is going too frightened
:15:21. > :15:26.the bond markets. You are famous of course for this formula that showed
:15:26. > :15:36.us originally that the measure of globalisation of capitalism... Do
:15:36. > :15:40.you think we are starting to Globalised capitalism? I don't
:15:40. > :15:46.think it is collapsing. What we are seeing is financial markets within
:15:46. > :15:53.Europe, which were supposed to be strengthened as a result of forming
:15:53. > :16:00.the euro, they are rapidly breaking down and going back to national
:16:00. > :16:03.markets, because people are afraid to lend, banks are afraid it to
:16:03. > :16:07.lend to borrowers in other countries. So we are seeing a
:16:07. > :16:12.breakdown of credit within the euro-zone. What do you think
:16:12. > :16:20.happens to the euro-zone and the euro? If we are inviting you back
:16:20. > :16:25.in another 15 years, what good your prediction be? Let's is a one-year!
:16:25. > :16:31.It is very hard to say. I think it was a mistake to enter into the
:16:31. > :16:39.euro in the first place, but it would be very costly in many ways,
:16:39. > :16:43.economically, politically, to turn the process away. We still could
:16:43. > :16:50.see some of the countries, like Greece, which are in much worse
:16:50. > :16:55.shape than Spain and Italy, we could see them leave the euro-zone.
:16:55. > :16:59.Not immediately, but perhaps after the German election. Do you think
:16:59. > :17:05.we will see a pressure to more extreme kinds of government as a
:17:05. > :17:10.result of this social unrest we are seeing, if they can get rid of the
:17:10. > :17:16.government of Mariano Rajoy, for example? The one government that
:17:17. > :17:20.seems to be working very well in the peripheral areas is the Italian
:17:20. > :17:27.government, where experienced bureaucrat, not elected officials,
:17:27. > :17:37.have been putting together a programme that has been reducing
:17:37. > :17:43.
:17:43. > :17:47.fiscal deficit in a meaningful way. We are going to move on. Today's
:17:47. > :17:53.Page Three quads the American philosopher William James on the
:17:53. > :17:56.perils of pessimism while wearing a tasselled monokini. The debate
:17:57. > :18:02.about Page Three has never really gone away, but has gained traction
:18:02. > :18:12.over the past week with a sequence of high-profile comedians and
:18:12. > :18:12.
:18:13. > :18:17.politicians signing a petition to ended. -- to end it. Look at her!
:18:17. > :18:27.Where would we be without Page Three? In a much better place, say
:18:27. > :18:37.many. Beauty queen shocks a council. Sharon Spencer, 22... She is more
:18:37. > :18:38.
:18:38. > :18:43.It is more than 40 years since the first scantily-clad model made her
:18:43. > :18:48.bow in the pages of the tabloids. Page 3 is a British institution,
:18:48. > :18:53.but labelled anachronistic this week by Labour's Harriet Harman,
:18:53. > :18:59.known by some as Hattie from Camberwell, a moniker she
:18:59. > :19:03.apparently shared with today's Page Three girl in there Sun. The
:19:03. > :19:08.pictures were clamours and sophisticated in the early years,
:19:08. > :19:13.says one of the original Page Three girls. Today, not so much. They are
:19:13. > :19:19.tacky, and too obvious, and probably inappropriate to be in a
:19:19. > :19:25.family household. Today's families are different, you mustn't forget
:19:26. > :19:32.that when Page Three started, it was at a time in the Seventies,
:19:32. > :19:34.when we were exploding into free love, it was an exciting time, or
:19:34. > :19:40.freedom, free-spirited people floating about the place with
:19:40. > :19:46.flowers in the -- in their hair. current, model says Page Three
:19:46. > :19:48.objectifies women, but in a good way. It is a form of
:19:48. > :19:52.objectification but any anthropologist will tell you that
:19:52. > :19:58.it has been imperative for the survival of the human species.
:19:58. > :20:02.Celebrating sexuality is imperative, and Page Three is celebrating that.
:20:02. > :20:07.Campaigners against pornography have linked Page Three pictures to
:20:07. > :20:13.violence against women. But others have seen them to -- as the working
:20:13. > :20:20.man's old masters. The chap I am talking about is as likely to enjoy
:20:20. > :20:25.looking at the Dell on page three of these -- of the Sun as his
:20:25. > :20:30.intellectual betters, as they see themselves are, to go to the Art
:20:30. > :20:36.Gallery, seeing it painted. Today there is a lot more sex about them
:20:36. > :20:41.when Page Three began. It is still with us, and there are no shortage
:20:41. > :20:50.of young women keen to appear in it. However, almost 40,000 people have
:20:50. > :20:56.signed a petition urging the sun to drop it. -- urging the Sun.
:20:56. > :21:02.years after winning the right to vote through protest, papers might
:21:02. > :21:07.actually start to fill pages of with the almost outrageous words of
:21:07. > :21:13.powerful women, every day when the, whose place -- faces don't need to
:21:13. > :21:18.be pleasing. It is meant to represent youth and freshness and
:21:18. > :21:22.it represents natural beauty, we don't have models to have had
:21:22. > :21:28.plastic surgery on the page. It is legal, we are allowed to publish
:21:28. > :21:35.those images. It has become an innocuous British institution.
:21:35. > :21:42.proud of my body, and whatever I do with it in my spare time is none of
:21:42. > :21:45.the council's business. So, Page Three has its knockers!
:21:45. > :21:50.One person campaigning for decades against it is Harriet Harman. She
:21:50. > :21:55.is joined by the former deputy editor of the News Of The World,
:21:55. > :21:59.Neil Wallis. How do you feel when you have been on this sort of
:21:59. > :22:05.campaign for more than two decades, and it doesn't seem to have shifted
:22:05. > :22:10.at all? It is an institution today as much as ever. I think so much
:22:10. > :22:13.has changed since the Seventies. I think the whole expectation for
:22:13. > :22:19.women of what they can do with their lives and what they can be in
:22:19. > :22:23.their lives, I think it is really very old fashioned now, very out of
:22:23. > :22:30.date. It was always objectionable, the idea that women are most
:22:30. > :22:33.important as sex objects, but I do just wonder whether or not
:22:33. > :22:39.sometimes they sit down there in the News Of The World and think,
:22:39. > :22:48.should we really pack this in? Is this sensible? We have women having
:22:48. > :22:53.all sorts of campaigns, why have we got this? They may be are saying,
:22:53. > :22:59.we're not going to be told what to do by a bunch of Wood Lane. What is
:22:59. > :23:05.it for? I think it is the wrong way round, the question. This is really
:23:05. > :23:11.about - it does this matter enough that women are campaigning about
:23:11. > :23:17.edition like this, when it there are frankly most important issues?
:23:17. > :23:22.You are here now, let's have the debate. What is it for? I don't
:23:22. > :23:28.believe there is an issue about it really being in debate. Because
:23:28. > :23:35.nobody really cares. 37,000 women have signed this petition. Not just
:23:35. > :23:42.women, people. 3 million women reads the -- read the Sun every day.
:23:42. > :23:46.It is an out rated -- outdated argument. Page 3 is a harmless
:23:46. > :23:52.picture that has been their back 440 odd years. Real women do not
:23:52. > :23:58.care about it. What purpose does it serve for you? If it went, with the
:23:58. > :24:02.paper be worse off? What is the purpose of any picture of an
:24:02. > :24:07.attractive person? It is a nice picture, it is harmless, adds a
:24:07. > :24:11.touch of fun to the paper, and why not? If you open any newspaper, and
:24:11. > :24:15.one of the great things I love about broadsheet is whenever they
:24:15. > :24:22.illustrate the story, it is always a pretty young woman who
:24:22. > :24:25.illustrates the story. You look at pages about the City in particular.
:24:25. > :24:33.I think you would be fair to recognise they usually have their
:24:33. > :24:37.clothes on. Sometimes! The idea that they have got to have bare
:24:37. > :24:44.breasts and it is for objectification, and the idea that
:24:44. > :24:50.women are there to be Lear at. you see the advert for the
:24:51. > :24:56.Wonderbra? With that woman... It said, hello boys. What was it
:24:56. > :25:02.selling, on what basis? The truth is, there are many issues. But the
:25:02. > :25:07.Sun is a newspaper. The paper is full of the stories about how
:25:07. > :25:15.police and social workers have ignored, for years, the issue about
:25:15. > :25:21.exploitation of children. That is an issue to campaign on, an issue
:25:21. > :25:25.to have a petition about. Harriet Harman has done, to be fair.
:25:25. > :25:28.There are other British newspapers that have a much more vindictive
:25:28. > :25:35.approach to do some of the women that they portray in their papers,
:25:35. > :25:39.he doesn't have to be the Sun alone, does it? Yes, but with their Page
:25:39. > :25:45.Three Women, dressed only in their knickers... The whole point of them
:25:45. > :25:49.is none other than for them to be Lear at as sexual objects, that is
:25:49. > :25:54.the point of it. Of course there are a lot of other issues which are
:25:54. > :25:59.important. But we are entitled to have our say about it without being
:25:59. > :26:03.accused of not being real women, or being vilified for being frumpy old
:26:03. > :26:06.harridans. That is the other thing. You want your free speech to
:26:06. > :26:10.publish these photos, we want our free speech to say, we don't think
:26:10. > :26:16.that is how you should be looking at women in this day and age,
:26:16. > :26:21.without being vilified as a result. The issue is, there are far more
:26:21. > :26:25.serious issues. The people who have launched this petition, putting it
:26:25. > :26:32.in the Guardian, gaining lot of headlines... You could say that
:26:32. > :26:38.about anything of you wanted. What happens on Saturday and Sunday in
:26:38. > :26:43.your paper? They don't run bomb. Because the paper as much more in
:26:43. > :26:49.the house, so there is much more chance... You don't want families
:26:49. > :26:56.to see them? The primary leadership of the Sun, the 7 million adults to
:26:56. > :27:01.read it, are adults. So why did they are good, clean, innocuous fun,
:27:01. > :27:04.in which case presumably you are not ashamed to have them on any day,
:27:04. > :27:10.or else you do feel they are slightly seedy and don't want them
:27:10. > :27:14.in the house at the weekend? That is fairly fatuous, really. 7
:27:14. > :27:18.million adults choose to look at the paper every day. If they take
:27:18. > :27:27.it home or not, that is a decision for them. It is a paper aimed at
:27:27. > :27:32.adults. What we are aware of, not that I work there now is the paper
:27:32. > :27:36.is very much more family-orientated at the weekend, more television and
:27:36. > :27:42.sport orientated, so it is much more round the home, and
:27:42. > :27:50.accordingly, they don't have topless women in it. So why are you
:27:50. > :27:54.saying that there are no doubts, or thinking again about this? They are
:27:54. > :27:59.going to be sticking to it, not even having second thoughts, even
:28:00. > :28:04.though we are in the 21st century? When you look at what is around in
:28:04. > :28:08.the 21st Century, the idea that a 40 year-old institution should fall
:28:08. > :28:14.out because if a particular demographic of women deciding they
:28:14. > :28:17.don't like it - and many of those women who don't even read the paper,
:28:17. > :28:22.they are asserting their view over the 3 million... You keep saying it
:28:22. > :28:27.is women, a lot of men have signed it as well. Quite high-profile
:28:27. > :28:32.people as well. What does high- profile have to do with it? The
:28:32. > :28:42.fact that some comedians and actresses and might sign up...
:28:42. > :28:44.
:28:44. > :28:50.what happens... But what are they there for? In their bed -- in their
:28:50. > :28:54.knickers, with bare breasts, that is the betrayal of Women on page 3.
:28:54. > :29:04.With respect, who want you to say that people cannot choose to look
:29:04. > :29:06.
:29:06. > :29:10.at it? Did you read today's? didn't, I don't think had the comes
:29:10. > :29:13.from Camberwell anyway! I think women should be respected for what
:29:13. > :29:18.they can do in their lives, and girls should have high aspirations
:29:18. > :29:24.than just looking good with no clothes on. Surely, in the 21st
:29:24. > :29:30.century there is more than that two women. I Usain a girl should not
:29:30. > :29:39.have the right to aspire to be a Page Three girl -- or Usain? We are
:29:39. > :29:45.going to leave it there. Thank you very much. The front of the papers