:00:08. > :00:15.Today even as President Obama ordered new limits to US
:00:16. > :00:18.surveillance practice, he was still defending the National Security
:00:19. > :00:25.Agency. It may seem sometimes that America is being held to a different
:00:26. > :00:29.standard. And I will admit the readiness of some to assume the
:00:30. > :00:33.worst motives by our Government can be frustrating. Is it now time to
:00:34. > :00:36.give an amnesty to the man who triggered all of this, Edward
:00:37. > :00:44.Snowden. We will hear from Noam Chomsky, a former head of the Civil
:00:45. > :00:50.Service, and a key person who monitors our terror laws. The riots,
:00:51. > :00:54.why did the Police Complaints Authority falsely claim a victim had
:00:55. > :00:59.shot a policeman, and why did it take so long to detract it. The fact
:01:00. > :01:03.they knew and let the story run for days, should have led to serious
:01:04. > :01:07.resignations. Just how far will people go to get fit in January. Our
:01:08. > :01:20.man, Nimrod Khamer, goes the distance. Good evening. President
:01:21. > :01:23.Obama today made it official, Edward Snowden's revelations about the
:01:24. > :01:28.actions about the National Security Agency have changed US Government
:01:29. > :01:32.policy on surveillance. The President announced changes to the
:01:33. > :01:38.way phone records are collected and also promised that if he wanted to
:01:39. > :01:42.know what world leaders and close friends and allies were thinking he
:01:43. > :01:48.would lift the phone rather than monitor their calls. Has this
:01:49. > :01:53.exposed a deficiency in oversight and surveillance in Britain?
:01:54. > :01:57.President Obama's spying programme has caused shock at home and outrage
:01:58. > :02:03.abroad. He has been under pressure to act ever since Edward Snowden
:02:04. > :02:07.started revealing just how sweeping US surveillance powers have become.
:02:08. > :02:12.Americans are alarmed that the Government's been hoarding
:02:13. > :02:17.information about their phone calls. Allies like Germany's Angela Merkel
:02:18. > :02:19.are infuriated that America has been tapping their calls. But the
:02:20. > :02:23.President is also under pressure from Anne tell begins community
:02:24. > :02:29.warning him not to limit their power. So, which President Obama was
:02:30. > :02:33.at work today? The former constitutional scholar or the
:02:34. > :02:38.Commander-in-Chief? He criticised Edward Snowden for aiding America's
:02:39. > :02:42.adversaries, but said he didn't want to dwell on Snowden's actions.
:02:43. > :02:47.Regardless of how we got here though, the task before us now is
:02:48. > :02:51.greater than simply repairing the damage done to our operations or
:02:52. > :02:56.preventing more disclosures from taking place in the future. Instead
:02:57. > :03:00.we have to make some important decisions about how to protect
:03:01. > :03:03.ourselves and sustain our leadership in the world while upholding the
:03:04. > :03:09.civil liberties and privacy protections that our ideals and
:03:10. > :03:12.constitution require. The President stopped short to demanding an end to
:03:13. > :03:16.the bulk collection of American phone data. What he did promise was
:03:17. > :03:20.to stop the National Security Agency from holding phone records. But
:03:21. > :03:24.where they will be stored is up for consultation. It means the agencies
:03:25. > :03:29.will have to get permission from a secret intelligence court to access
:03:30. > :03:34.the data. And there's to be a public advocate to represent privacy
:03:35. > :03:38.concerns in those courts. He's also restricting America's ability to spy
:03:39. > :03:43.on foreign leaders. I thought it was a remarkably good speech and well
:03:44. > :03:48.balanced. Of course it won't please people, the most vehement critics on
:03:49. > :03:53.either side, but you never can. I think he has displayed an enormous
:03:54. > :03:56.growth of understanding of what intelligence agencies do and why
:03:57. > :04:00.they are important in the time he has been in office. You know when
:04:01. > :04:05.you actually are responsible for protecting people you behave
:04:06. > :04:09.differently than when all you have to do is talk about T he's
:04:10. > :04:13.responsible now. Today there were yet more leaks from Edward Snowden.
:04:14. > :04:18.This time concerning an NSA programme called Dishfire, documents
:04:19. > :04:23.seen by the Guardian and Channel four News reveal that the NHS has
:04:24. > :04:26.collected 200 million text messages a day from around the world.
:04:27. > :04:30.Apparently enabling the agency to track people's where abouts,
:04:31. > :04:36.contacts and bank details. According to the reports, GCHQ is also able to
:04:37. > :04:43.access the database and to access information they wouldn't normally
:04:44. > :04:47.be legally entitled to see. So do these revelations mean it is time
:04:48. > :04:49.that the Government here followed President Obama's lead and
:04:50. > :04:54.introduced new checks on the country's spies. Ministers refuse to
:04:55. > :05:00.comment on the details. The Foreign Secretary said he had seen no
:05:01. > :05:07.evidence of breaches of individuals' privacy, but there are calls for a
:05:08. > :05:10.review of the law. GCHQ contends and indeed the Foreign Secretary has
:05:11. > :05:15.confirmed it already today that it has always acting within a proper,
:05:16. > :05:20.legal framework. That being so, the question for us now is whether that
:05:21. > :05:24.legal framework is adequate to take account of the enormous
:05:25. > :05:29.technological change which has taken place since the present legislation
:05:30. > :05:34.of put in place. My God bless the United States of America. Thank you.
:05:35. > :05:38.President Obama was determined not to give Edward Snowden any credit
:05:39. > :05:43.today. But would the President even have made this speech if it hadn't
:05:44. > :05:51.been for Snowden's revelations. Many say not. They think it is time this
:05:52. > :05:54.exiled spy was given amnesty. I spoke to MIT professor, Noam
:05:55. > :06:00.Chomsky, earlier this evening, who is a supporter of Edward Snowden. I
:06:01. > :06:06.asked him whether he thought the whistleblower's actions have had an
:06:07. > :06:10.influence on foreign policy? Not foreign policy except indirectly,
:06:11. > :06:15.they have had a major impact on public awareness and opinion. They
:06:16. > :06:19.have led to the exposure of many, actually literally falsehoods about
:06:20. > :06:25.the nature of the policy and what it is alleged to have achieved. You
:06:26. > :06:27.have called for an amnesty for Edward Snowden, but President Obama
:06:28. > :06:35.made it pretty clear in his speech today that he thinks that the
:06:36. > :06:40.actions of Edward Snowden will have some far reaching consequences in
:06:41. > :06:45.relation to your adversaries, that may not be known for many years. I
:06:46. > :06:50.have gone along with the amnesty proposals but I don't think I agree
:06:51. > :06:54.with them. I think he should be honoured for what he did. We might
:06:55. > :06:59.ask for amnesty for the various people engaged in major war crimes,
:07:00. > :07:05.could easily name some, but you don't give amnesty to someone who
:07:06. > :07:10.has done the right thing. You praise him for it. Will we know in several
:07:11. > :07:13.years that there are negative consequences? President Obama
:07:14. > :07:17.doesn't know any more about that than I do. Realistically there is
:07:18. > :07:21.absolutely, I would have thought, no chance of Edward Snowden being
:07:22. > :07:24.honoured. But on the other side, do you think there is a chance that he
:07:25. > :07:36.will have to live out his days in Russia? Well, his coming To the end
:07:37. > :07:39.of his Russian visa soon, we don't know what will happen then. There
:07:40. > :07:42.might be other countries that might be willing to accept him, maybe
:07:43. > :07:48.Brazil. It is pretty clear that most of the world is pretty frightened of
:07:49. > :07:55.the United States. That became very obvious in the scandalous case of
:07:56. > :08:00.the Ava Morales presidential plane travelling back to from Russia,
:08:01. > :08:04.where European countries wouldn't allow the plane to enter their
:08:05. > :08:08.airspace, no doubt out of fear of the United States. Which is a
:08:09. > :08:12.vindictive power. It has made it clear at the highest level that they
:08:13. > :08:18.are going to do anything they can to get hold of him. Noam Chomsky. Well
:08:19. > :08:22.Lord Butler butt, the former Cabinet Secretary, chaired an inquiry into
:08:23. > :08:26.the use of intelligence in the lead up to the Iraq War, and now sits on
:08:27. > :08:31.the Intelligence and Security Committee. David Anderson QC is the
:08:32. > :08:34.independent reviewer of terrorism legislation and they are with me
:08:35. > :08:38.now. Edward Snowden has done the world a service, President Obama, as
:08:39. > :08:44.good as admitted it in the fact that they are changing the law? If all he
:08:45. > :08:47.had done was to draw attention to the capabilities of the intelligence
:08:48. > :08:51.agencies and started a debate, yes, I think that is a service. It could
:08:52. > :08:54.have happened before because actually these things had been
:08:55. > :09:01.debated in parliament. What he has done is drawn attention to it. What
:09:02. > :09:04.he did was to download many thousands of actual intelligence
:09:05. > :09:08.reports and go off to Russia and China with them. We don't know that
:09:09. > :09:12.anything adverse has happened as a result of that to US citizen,
:09:13. > :09:16.British citizens or anybody, we don't know anything? We don't know,
:09:17. > :09:19.but I don't think you will find the Russians and the Chinese haven't
:09:20. > :09:23.studied these carefully or terrorists haven't studied these
:09:24. > :09:27.carefully. Noam Chomsky said that you he would like to see him
:09:28. > :09:31.honoured, that won't happen I don't think. What about an amnesty? I
:09:32. > :09:34.think it is very important that in any organisation for people who come
:09:35. > :09:37.across genuine criminality they should have the opportunity to blow
:09:38. > :09:40.the whistle. I believe actually there are procedures in our
:09:41. > :09:44.intelligence agencies that allow that to happen. What we can't end up
:09:45. > :09:50.with, it seems to me, is a situation in which the likes of Mr Snowden or
:09:51. > :09:53.indeed the editor of the Guardian, are the people who are ultimately
:09:54. > :09:58.determining what it is the public can see and what is too secret for
:09:59. > :10:01.them to see because of the damage caused to national security. You
:10:02. > :10:06.think he should be charged? That is for the Americans, I don't want to
:10:07. > :10:10.get in to what should happen to Mr Snowden. President Obama is making
:10:11. > :10:13.clear that in a time of rapidly changing technology then privacy and
:10:14. > :10:18.civil liberties have to be protected. Let's look at your
:10:19. > :10:23.Intelligence Security Committee, when MI5, MI6 and GCHQ came in front
:10:24. > :10:26.of your committee for the first time, they knew what the questions
:10:27. > :10:29.were, why should the public have faith in that? It was the first time
:10:30. > :10:32.they had come in front of us in public. They knew the general
:10:33. > :10:36.subjects, but actually I thought some interesting things came out of
:10:37. > :10:40.that. They knew the territory, they knew the questions? It hadn't been
:10:41. > :10:45.rehearsed. No. One of the interesting things that came out was
:10:46. > :10:48.that they said they got actual evidence of the way in which
:10:49. > :10:52.terrorists on the basis of what Edward Snowden had revealed were
:10:53. > :10:56.changing their habits. They say that, but why should the public have
:10:57. > :11:03.any faith, if you are going to say you are putting the MI5 and MI6 and
:11:04. > :11:06.GCHQ in front of a committee on accountability and you tell them
:11:07. > :11:11.what they will be asked, where is the faith in that? It was good they
:11:12. > :11:13.came before the committee. Part of this is the intelligence agencies
:11:14. > :11:18.themselves showing a bit more transparency. Should they? I think
:11:19. > :11:20.they should. So far as the Intelligence and Security Committee
:11:21. > :11:23.is concerned, it is facing a real test. It has produced two reports in
:11:24. > :11:27.recent years that I think people have perceived as underwhelming. One
:11:28. > :11:33.on rendition, where I don't think they got to the bottom of t and one
:11:34. > :11:37.on 7/7, where the inquest showed there were some things they missed.
:11:38. > :11:40.They have an extraordinary triple now, they have got the investigation
:11:41. > :11:42.of Woolich, that is a detailed one. They have got the whole
:11:43. > :11:45.investigation of surveillance and the balance between liberty and
:11:46. > :11:50.security, to top that off they have also now got the againson Inquiry
:11:51. > :11:56.into possible complicity in torture. Those are all huge jobs. The members
:11:57. > :11:58.of the Intelligence and Security Committee have other things do,
:11:59. > :12:03.constituencies and parliamentary activities. I hope they are
:12:04. > :12:08.resourced to do that. Interesting, you have been underwhelming? I can't
:12:09. > :12:12.speak for previous committees. Have you got too much on your plate? We
:12:13. > :12:16.have a great deal on our plate. Is it too much? Time will tell. We are
:12:17. > :12:22.just finishing the Woolich inquiry, we have asked for evidence on the
:12:23. > :12:27.Snowden relations and the balance between liberty and security. We're
:12:28. > :12:35.taking on the staff that were serving the againson committee, we
:12:36. > :12:40.will have extra staff -- Gibson committee.
:12:41. > :12:48.The allegations about Dishfire, we know that it is incredibly complex,
:12:49. > :12:52.the allegation is that GCHQ have circumvented UK laws by taking these
:12:53. > :12:56.200 million texts daily, stored in the US. Our spies have accessed this
:12:57. > :13:01.stuff which is essentially against British law. Do they have access to
:13:02. > :13:05.Dishfire? I can't comment on that. Are you concerned about that? We
:13:06. > :13:11.will look at it, we look at all these things. But what I can remind
:13:12. > :13:18.you of is that during the summer it was said that GCHQ had evaded the
:13:19. > :13:25.law by using Prism. We did look into that, and every case in which the
:13:26. > :13:28.GCHQ had asked for information from NSA through Prism, there was a
:13:29. > :13:33.proper warrant for it. We confirmed that. So they had always acted
:13:34. > :13:39.within the law. Now these allegations today, I don't know, but
:13:40. > :13:44.we will look into it. As a matter of urgency? Well yeah, of course. But
:13:45. > :13:49.the problem with that is we actually don't know. If GCHQ is acting, as it
:13:50. > :13:51.were, outside the law, we don't know. Are you concerned about that?
:13:52. > :13:55.I think everybody should be concerned. I think equally they will
:13:56. > :14:00.be wrong to think that we're dealing here with organisations that are out
:14:01. > :14:03.of control. We don't just rely on the Intelligence and Security
:14:04. > :14:07.Committee. We also have two intelligence commissioners who are
:14:08. > :14:11.formidable former Court of Appeal judges who have quite respective
:14:12. > :14:16.low-sized staffs and who spend quite a lot of their time looking into the
:14:17. > :14:21.activities of GCHQ and other agencies, and coming to their own
:14:22. > :14:22.conclusion that is they publish, and very few people read. Thank you very
:14:23. > :14:27.much. Today the family of Mark Duggan,
:14:28. > :14:31.shot dead by police in north London in 2011 received an apology from the
:14:32. > :14:35.Independent Police Complaints Commisssion. The police watchdog
:14:36. > :14:38.said it had wrongly told the media that he had fired at the police
:14:39. > :14:43.before he was shot. In a damning admission, the IPCC said it knew
:14:44. > :14:47.that the Duggan family's confidence in the commission and investigation
:14:48. > :14:52.was damaged by mistakes made at an early stage. Where did the IPCC put
:14:53. > :14:57.out than I correct information and why didn't it correct the record as
:14:58. > :15:04.soon as it realised it was wrong. Here is Jim Reid.
:15:05. > :15:12.His death sparked the worst riots in a generation. Last week a court
:15:13. > :15:17.found police acted within the law when they shot and killed Mark
:15:18. > :15:24.Duggan. But serious questions remain about the way the authorities
:15:25. > :15:29.handled this case. Today the police watchdog, the IPCC, apologised to
:15:30. > :15:33.the Duggan family for putting out misleading information in the
:15:34. > :15:40.aftermath of the shooting. That information continuity out not just
:15:41. > :15:43.-- turned Knott -- turned out not just to be false but inflammatory.
:15:44. > :15:49.To look at the significance you have to look at the way events unfolded.
:15:50. > :15:53.Mark Duggan was shot dead at six. 15pm on August fourth. A police
:15:54. > :15:58.officer was taken to hospital after a bullet was found stuck in his
:15:59. > :16:00.radio. Almost immediately the police watchdog was called to investigate.
:16:01. > :16:05.The press started to call about the story. A late night spokesman at the
:16:06. > :16:08.IPCC told the reporter that they didn't know the order in which the
:16:09. > :16:13.shots were fired. We understand the officer was shot first before the
:16:14. > :16:17.male was shot. A clear impression was given that gunfire had been
:16:18. > :16:22.exchanged that evening. That a shoot out of some kind had taken place on
:16:23. > :16:26.the streets of Tottenham. One of the reporters given that information was
:16:27. > :16:29.from the Press Association, the news agency whose material is then sent
:16:30. > :16:35.on to every broadcaster and newspaper in the country. The same
:16:36. > :16:40.news was flashed up on 24-hour TV channel, that worried IPCC
:16:41. > :16:43.investigator Colin Sparrow, at the firearms unit HQ in Whitechapel East
:16:44. > :17:16.London. He told The next day the ballistics came
:17:17. > :17:20.out. The bullet in the radio was a police bullet, not from the gun of
:17:21. > :17:23.Mark Duggan, there was no dramatic firefight. But nothing was done to
:17:24. > :17:26.correct the false impression there was a shoot out that night. Some
:17:27. > :17:31.newspapers continued to say there had been. That afternoon Mark
:17:32. > :17:34.Duggan's family and supporters walked to Tottenham Police Station
:17:35. > :17:39.to protest peacefully. To put out all this misinformation, to put out
:17:40. > :17:45.this idea that there was a shoot out when there absolutely wasn't a shoot
:17:46. > :17:51.out and they knew. To refusing to to the family home to inform them.
:17:52. > :17:55.These are the only reasons and sole reasons we went to Tottenham Police
:17:56. > :17:58.Station, had they done the things they were supposed to have done we
:17:59. > :18:02.wouldn't have gone there. Tottenham, there wouldn't have been a riot
:18:03. > :18:05.there, and I would imagine there wouldn't have been riots in all
:18:06. > :18:11.those other areas of London where there were riots. As riots took hold
:18:12. > :18:15.across England the IPCC decided not to correct the full story of a shoot
:18:16. > :18:19.out. It took another three days until the watchdog released the
:18:20. > :18:25.results of those ballistic tests. The fact that they knew and let the
:18:26. > :18:31.story persist should have led to resignations, seems to me. There are
:18:32. > :18:34.two roles for IPCC in statute, one is police scrutiny and the other is
:18:35. > :18:38.public guardianship, on both counts they failed. So, if the police
:18:39. > :18:42.watchdog knew something was wrong, knew that false and inflammatory
:18:43. > :18:47.information was still being reported, why didn't it do something
:18:48. > :18:50.about it? Well, on Sunday August seventh after the first night of
:18:51. > :18:54.rioting, it did issue a statement, warning people to ignore rumours
:18:55. > :18:58.that Mark Duggan had been executed by police. But it didn't even
:18:59. > :19:03.mention those false reports of a firefight. The IPCC has told
:19:04. > :19:08.Newsnight it didn't want the results of those ballistics tests to be made
:19:09. > :19:12.public until its own investigators could take evidence from the
:19:13. > :19:18.firearms officers involved. That same afternoon 11 members of the
:19:19. > :19:21.Met's elite CO-19 team sat together in a room for eight hours before
:19:22. > :19:24.giving written statements, something allowed under the current
:19:25. > :19:28.guidelines. The officers involved have always denied they broke any
:19:29. > :19:34.rules or colluded inappropriately. It is a concern that has been raised
:19:35. > :19:41.before. Most notably after the shooting of Jean Charles DeMenezes.
:19:42. > :19:44.I think we need a team of investigative lawyers leading
:19:45. > :19:48.investigations. We need an Independent Police Complaints
:19:49. > :19:52.Commisssion that is more like the Crown Prosecution Service, only that
:19:53. > :19:55.can get confidence back. Today the IPCC said armed police should be
:19:56. > :19:59.separated after a shooting and banned from conferring. Officers
:20:00. > :20:03.involved in the Duggan case, will also be told to answer the
:20:04. > :20:09.watchdog's questions at an interview, something they have so
:20:10. > :20:12.far refused to do. We asked the IPCC to come on to Newsnight tonight, but
:20:13. > :20:20.they said they cannot be interviewed by the shooting of Mark Duggan,
:20:21. > :20:27.until their own investigation is complete. Jeremy Clarkson is a
:20:28. > :20:33.notorious and prodigious tweeter, more than two million people follow
:20:34. > :20:38.him on-line. Many will see the photo of him seemingly asleep on the
:20:39. > :20:44.plane, surrounded by Top Gear colleagues, next to a piece of paper
:20:45. > :20:50.with a message scrawled on it, which some would find offensive. "Sadly I
:20:51. > :20:55.fell asleep on the plane" when the image was shared on-line. He later
:20:56. > :21:05.deleted the tweet and wanted to apologise to anyone who was upset by
:21:06. > :21:08.the tweet. Joining me is the rugby player turned Strictly star and
:21:09. > :21:14.anti-bullying campaigner. You have seen the picture, what do you think
:21:15. > :21:19.of it? Initially I was shocked at the word "gay" used in an offensive
:21:20. > :21:23.manner. The horrible swear word offensive to women any way. It was
:21:24. > :21:33.disappointing to see that. Again you know, we know that Clarkson is very
:21:34. > :21:39.close to the bone in the stuff he Does. And the power of social media
:21:40. > :21:43.and why we are here talking about it. He has to be a role model and
:21:44. > :21:47.can't be seen to be doing the wrong thing. Personally I think we need to
:21:48. > :21:54.educate the next beginlation to understand what gay means, and not
:21:55. > :21:58.in a casual homophobic way with him sleeping on a plane alongside
:21:59. > :22:03.offensive wear words. Again, he's in the public eye, on one of the
:22:04. > :22:07.biggest TV shows in England with Top Gear. You know, it is a shame that
:22:08. > :22:13.you know it has come to this point of him being smeared across the
:22:14. > :22:23.papers. But I think that personally he has afollow -- apologised, and
:22:24. > :22:26.how can we draw the positives out in some respects and use what he has
:22:27. > :22:31.done to educate people about it and say he has done wrong and apologised
:22:32. > :22:35.and taken it off Twitter. Now we need to use that and say that's not
:22:36. > :22:41.acceptable in a social media environment. It wasn't exactly a
:22:42. > :22:47.fulsome apology. What I wonder is you are very acutely aware of
:22:48. > :22:52.bullying, I wondered if you were the son of a father who was a big Top
:22:53. > :22:56.Gear fan and you saw that, and you were a son that was gay and perhaps
:22:57. > :23:00.hadn't come out. What impact a tweet like that would have. Clarkson's
:23:01. > :23:06.followers are also kids? Yeah, absolutely. You know not only in
:23:07. > :23:13.this country, you know Top Gear is global. Ultimately you know the word
:23:14. > :23:21."gay" at the moment, especially in playgrounds is used in casual way,
:23:22. > :23:30.casual homophobia in playgrounds is rife, it can be "faggot", "homo" or
:23:31. > :23:35."gay". If you are the father of a child in the closet or mother, one
:23:36. > :23:38.you probably might not know, for that reason, when that child might
:23:39. > :23:44.not want to come out and think actually if I come out what will I
:23:45. > :23:48.be subjected to. If it all right to see star on TV doing that, he's
:23:49. > :23:51.portraying that is OK and perreceiving that is OK. It is the
:23:52. > :23:55.knock-on effects it has. Bearing in mind we have come a long way. 20
:23:56. > :23:59.years ago it was racism and it has taken that next generation to drive
:24:00. > :24:05.a cultural change. Homophobia is where racism was 20 years ago. There
:24:06. > :24:08.is a lot of work to be done. And it does start by educating the next
:24:09. > :24:12.generation of youngsters. That is how I perceive it. Do you think he
:24:13. > :24:17.should do a bit of penance? I can't hear you. Do you think he should do
:24:18. > :24:22.penance? I can't hear you, sorry, good night.
:24:23. > :24:25.We wanted to talk to Jeremy Clarkson tonight but we were unable to
:24:26. > :24:28.contact him. January is traditionally the month
:24:29. > :24:34.when people sometimes make rash decisions to go dry, go low-carb,
:24:35. > :24:38.get fit fast. The Sunday supplements are full of fitness programmes
:24:39. > :24:43.promising to change your life and the clothes and gears to go with it.
:24:44. > :24:52.The new fad is Extreme Fittness, we sent Nimrod Khamer out to look at
:24:53. > :24:56.four of the latest crazes. Hydrospining, which combines cycling
:24:57. > :25:09.and swimming is huge in France, and only just now arrived in the UK. I
:25:10. > :25:14.went to check it out. The resistance is 12-times higher than with air,
:25:15. > :25:18.because you are inside the water. So you burn much more calories, now you
:25:19. > :25:24.are inside the water, I want you to go much quicker. Go on. She gave me
:25:25. > :25:29.a challenge to hit the record speed of 60 kms per hour. I'm not sure you
:25:30. > :25:39.have the perfect position. It was a little bit tougher than I thought.
:25:40. > :25:50.40. 50 if you want to challenge. You want to maybe film the numbers!
:25:51. > :25:56.After all that exercise, I needed something less strenuous and more
:25:57. > :26:04.relaxing, like yoga with your dog. Doga! So the dog was chosen because
:26:05. > :26:07.he is the most comfortable? He's man's best friend and they like to
:26:08. > :26:14.be touched and they are very complimentry to the owner. This is
:26:15. > :26:26.the breed that I -- breathing that I use. You have to lift your eyes and
:26:27. > :26:33.go "hah", "hah". Lift him up. : I'm not going to lie it was weird and it
:26:34. > :26:37.got even weirder. Row, row, row the boat
:26:38. > :26:42.# Gently down the stream... . What are you doing with your feet
:26:43. > :26:47.Breathe into your waistline. Use that breath. Just stay still, let's
:26:48. > :26:51.do it again, I'm going to give you a little squash and we're going to
:26:52. > :26:59.breathe together. Breathe, push your hips up. Inhale! Lift up, lift up,
:27:00. > :27:07.lift up. There, push into your arms, straighten t arms. I had a good
:27:08. > :27:20.time, but my sternest test was still to come.
:27:21. > :27:26.I went to a session called Vikings and Valkaries, designed to separate
:27:27. > :27:41.the men from the boys. Take it up with momentum push. Down, down,
:27:42. > :27:45.down. Try the technique. Just pretend I'm wrecking it. You have to
:27:46. > :27:49.grab both hands. We have some big kit and see great results for people
:27:50. > :27:53.who come not being able to lift the tyre within an inch, and within a
:27:54. > :28:08.few weeks they are flipping it five or six times up and down the track.
:28:09. > :28:13.Heave, heave. Heave. I had held my own against some seriously big guy,
:28:14. > :28:24.but wanted to try something more cardiovascular. The new tip after
:28:25. > :28:34.work activity all Overgrown town, is exercise and raving, Raveosise. She
:28:35. > :28:44.showed us the move and we had to copy her. There is no alcohol, it is
:28:45. > :28:49.healthy and it is a fun thing to do after work and it gets you fit
:28:50. > :28:57.really. I had loads of fun, but after a long day of extreme exercise
:28:58. > :29:05.I felt raved out. But I guess that's the point. Nimrod Khamer, clearly
:29:06. > :29:40.loved Doga the best. Tomorrow morning's front
:29:41. > :29:45.25 leading charities urge David Cameron to open Britain's doors to
:29:46. > :30:15.its share of the most vulnerable refugees. And finally on the
:30:16. > :30:24.That's it for tonight. Jeremy back on Monday. We leave you the work of
:30:25. > :30:30.the University of Queensland's Global University Institute, they
:30:31. > :31:32.spent years filming coral and then speeding the images
:31:33. > :31:33.Good evening, today's heavy showers have cleared away,