:00:21. > :00:29.for managed retreat. It may make economic sense but can you ever
:00:30. > :00:32.justify it on a human level. Piers Morgan investigated under police
:00:33. > :00:36.caution by officers investigating phone hacking, it emerges. You have
:00:37. > :00:42.a meeting in five minutes, you want to try getting out of bed, get up.
:00:43. > :00:47.You are too funny. Love is in the air as boy meets software. The film
:00:48. > :00:59.maker Spike Jonze will be talking exclusively to Newsnight about his
:01:00. > :01:03.new film, HER. Tonight, another storm piles into a country already
:01:04. > :01:08.dealing with the worst flooding in a generation. As heavy rainfall and
:01:09. > :01:13.gale force winds keep in from the Atlantic, it won't be pretty. More
:01:14. > :01:17.than 1,000 homes have been evacuated and there is no obvious relief
:01:18. > :01:21.coming round the corner. The orange on the map represents the flooded
:01:22. > :01:25.areas nine days a this is where it is today. At Romney Lock in
:01:26. > :01:29.Berkshire, this is where the river level is usually found, right now it
:01:30. > :01:36.is all the way up here. The Thames is at its highest level in zero
:01:37. > :01:41.years. Five -- 60 years. 5,800 properties have been flooded since
:01:42. > :01:44.December, last night over 100,000 were without power. Storm after
:01:45. > :01:50.storm crashing in throughout February, with 80mms of rain dumped
:01:51. > :01:53.on the UK already this month, four-times the norm. The scale of
:01:54. > :01:57.the floods crisis is prompting hard questions. Imagine discovering that
:01:58. > :02:01.in just over a decade your village, your whole community would be
:02:02. > :02:05.abandoned, left to the mercy of rising seas. The people of
:02:06. > :02:10.Fairbourne on the coast of west Wales, have just found out this may
:02:11. > :02:15.be what is in store. They are one of 50 coastal communities earmarked for
:02:16. > :02:18.what is known as "managed retreat", basically the acceptance that the
:02:19. > :02:21.cost of maintaining sea defences can't be justified. It makes
:02:22. > :02:31.economic sense, but is it good enough. We have been to the town and
:02:32. > :02:40.sent this report. Another corner of the country battered by storms this
:02:41. > :02:45.week. Is it In west Wales trees have blocked
:02:46. > :02:53.roads, power cut off and train lines shut down. For the last century we
:02:54. > :02:57.have tried to protect coastal communities with this, with sea
:02:58. > :03:00.wall, Shingle banks and break waters. But if we are going to live
:03:01. > :03:06.in a world of more powerful storms and rising sea level, we might have
:03:07. > :03:09.to accept that can't continue forever. Here there were
:03:10. > :03:14.controversial new plans to protect and save some coastal villages while
:03:15. > :03:20.others like this one could be left to the elements. There was a lovely
:03:21. > :03:24.little place, it is very quiet, a traditional bucket and spade holiday
:03:25. > :03:27.dtination, it is a slow-paced commune to ex-everybody knows each
:03:28. > :03:32.other, it is an old fashioned kind of place. It was built just over #00
:03:33. > :03:37.years ago as a holiday village for industrial workers. These days most
:03:38. > :03:44.of the thousand or so residents have retired here for a quiet life. Thank
:03:45. > :03:48.you. Remember that we have the least average wage in the whole of the
:03:49. > :03:53.British Isles round here, families are surviving on ?15,000-?18,000 a
:03:54. > :03:56.year, they don't have the money or the choice money gives you to move
:03:57. > :04:03.somewhere else. But this could be the first community in the UK to be
:04:04. > :04:06.lost to climate change. A report commissioned by the local authority
:04:07. > :04:10.found the rise in sea levels predicted over the next century will
:04:11. > :04:15.mean the cost of maintaining coastal protection is too high. Under the
:04:16. > :04:20.plans now being put forward, a new line of defence we set up here along
:04:21. > :04:24.this railway line at the back of the village, that area over there will
:04:25. > :04:29.then be at risk of serious flooding. So up to 400 families and local
:04:30. > :04:34.businesses will be told to relocate or moved away. On the small parade
:04:35. > :04:40.of shops in the heart of the village, they are working to extend
:04:41. > :04:45.the local Indian restaurant. Is bakically people -- basically people
:04:46. > :04:48.are panicking and worried. This is a retirement home. People buy houses
:04:49. > :04:52.here, it could be their pension fund. People just are panicking.
:04:53. > :04:57.There is a lot of people worried, very worried. But difficult
:04:58. > :05:01.decisions made here are not made in isolation. As sea levels rise we
:05:02. > :05:07.will have to decide whether to spend more on flood defences as a country?
:05:08. > :05:11.In planning terms there are three main options. The first attack as
:05:12. > :05:14.they have in the Netherlands, reclaim land and continue living
:05:15. > :05:19.just above the water lean, it doesn't come cheap. Or hold the
:05:20. > :05:23.line. Build yourself a higher sea wall, your coast is intact and your
:05:24. > :05:27.feet are Drysdale, but is it sustainable. Then there is the
:05:28. > :05:33.Fairbourne option, known as managed retreat, it is cheaper but the
:05:34. > :05:38.question of who is forced south emotionally charged. The storms are
:05:39. > :05:42.generated, more intense and more unpredictable. There will be a
:05:43. > :05:45.greater impact of storms because the higher sea levels will bring the
:05:46. > :05:50.storm waves closer to the shoreline. It will be a decision based on the
:05:51. > :05:59.cost of defending. And simple as that. We can defend but at cost.
:06:00. > :06:04.Uprooting an entire community won't happen without a fight. We are
:06:05. > :06:07.experiencing extreme weather patterns at the moment, people in
:06:08. > :06:12.England suffering terribly. You see on the news houses falling off
:06:13. > :06:17.cliffs into the sea. It is not just Fairbourne and the Welsh coast. So,
:06:18. > :06:19.yes, we have to think long-term, but the way they have gone about it,
:06:20. > :06:23.they have got the shoreline management plan and then said, oh,
:06:24. > :06:27.and we will do a managed retreat, it is almost like they have put the
:06:28. > :06:32.cart before the horse. They have to realise the enormous consequences on
:06:33. > :06:37.people's lives. The reaction in Fairbourne to these plans has ranged
:06:38. > :06:41.from disbelief to fury, the council has said it is not possible to
:06:42. > :06:45.defend every part of the Welsh coast and ignoring the problem is not an
:06:46. > :06:53.option. These are difficult choices then which other parts of the UK may
:06:54. > :06:57.soon have to face. So what's the answer for Fairbourne and other
:06:58. > :07:01.places like it, can we afford to be anything like other than hard headed
:07:02. > :07:06.faced with how water is rising long-term. We have our guest from
:07:07. > :07:10.the Flood Forum, and the advise of forethe American Government on
:07:11. > :07:19.Hurricane Katrina and other disSASers. The weather doesn't seem
:07:20. > :07:31.to be an inevitable thing that we have to be prepared to let things go
:07:32. > :07:34.we have to be prepared to let things go. What cost a life? To remove
:07:35. > :07:37.people from where they are living their lives, seeing people in the
:07:38. > :07:41.Post Office and pubs, to dispersion them in other communities, that can
:07:42. > :07:44.cause isolation and ultimately depression. We need to think hard
:07:45. > :07:49.about that. Actually perhaps the idea is to work with communities.
:07:50. > :07:52.There are solutions that don't mean removing whole communities like that
:07:53. > :07:55.aren't there, as we have seen? Absolutely. Technically it is
:07:56. > :07:59.possible to defend anything. And looking at the Netherlands where I
:08:00. > :08:03.come from, that is an example where as a society the decision has been
:08:04. > :08:08.made to protect the country into the long-term. But that's a place that
:08:09. > :08:11.the whole country relies on flood defences so, that makes it worth
:08:12. > :08:15.investing for the country in providing that protection. And we
:08:16. > :08:19.could be like that? We could be like that, but there are some fundamental
:08:20. > :08:25.differences between the netherlands and the UK. The fact that two-thirds
:08:26. > :08:29.of the country in Holland and the four largest cities are there means
:08:30. > :08:33.it is vital for the nation. Here it is about a sixth. The reality simply
:08:34. > :08:38.is that means it is not the only vital highest priority like it is in
:08:39. > :08:41.the Netherlands. Any pound that you spend you can't spend on education
:08:42. > :08:46.or health care. It is already happening in some parts, which are
:08:47. > :08:51.uninhabited, at what point do you say we will lose a few homes if it
:08:52. > :08:55.means not spending the millions or eventually the billions that would
:08:56. > :08:59.need to be put in to rescue it? It is a very hard decision. As we saw
:09:00. > :09:05.in that report communities are aware that you know that they need to look
:09:06. > :09:09.long-term. I think what we need to do as that lady was explaining,
:09:10. > :09:13.these things have just happened, the decisions are made, but not with the
:09:14. > :09:19.community. I think that's where... No community would ever say yes to
:09:20. > :09:22.that, it has to be something from further outside, right? It adds to
:09:23. > :09:25.the problem if they are not discussed. If we don't draw
:09:26. > :09:29.communities into the discussion and work with communities, and find out
:09:30. > :09:35.how they are feeling and how they see the future, and work together in
:09:36. > :09:40.partnership to come to a compromise or the way forward, then, you know,
:09:41. > :09:44.it is not good. In a sense as soon as that thought has had, as soon as
:09:45. > :09:47.somebody sees the bit of paper, that is the end of life and investment
:09:48. > :09:51.and commerce for that community, right? It is a very complicated
:09:52. > :09:56.problem. It is a very difficult message to get across. The point is
:09:57. > :10:01.that the only alternative is to pretend that we will be able to keep
:10:02. > :10:04.defending them, while the reality, that would mean a totally different
:10:05. > :10:07.political choice in terms of the investment that the country makes.
:10:08. > :10:10.It is basically a political choice, that is what you are saying? There
:10:11. > :10:16.is a big part of that, yeah, absolutely. Personally I don't think
:10:17. > :10:20.in the UK context it is realistic to expect the whole country will be
:10:21. > :10:25.protected. I do think there are likely to be places like that. Must
:10:26. > :10:29.know, you know, in your head that there is no going to be that kind of
:10:30. > :10:32.investment coming, and it is wrong to pretend to these communities that
:10:33. > :10:36.they can carry on surviving like that? I don't think we need to
:10:37. > :10:41.pretend, we need to work with them, but also... What does that mean,
:10:42. > :10:44.work with them? We need to bring them in as partnership, so they are
:10:45. > :10:46.brought in right from the start and they understand right from the
:10:47. > :10:52.start. So the management involves them. And what the decisions
:10:53. > :10:57.involving them also I think you will find the netherlands, correct me if
:10:58. > :11:01.I'm wrong, actually invest in flood risk management to a higher degree
:11:02. > :11:04.than we do in England. That is what you are saying, it is not going to
:11:05. > :11:08.change. I wonder if the one on the best coast of Wales goes and we
:11:09. > :11:22.talked about the town tonight. What happens to the next one and next
:11:23. > :11:26.one. When will it stop? It will stop at one stage. There is not that much
:11:27. > :11:30.risk in the foreseeable future. An important element is on the one hand
:11:31. > :11:38.it is worth for the UK to start investing more and protecting more
:11:39. > :11:42.households. And if investment does increase many of these households
:11:43. > :11:45.will be protected. The head of the Environment Agency said on our
:11:46. > :11:49.programme on Monday night that he thought any community should be
:11:50. > :11:57.protected. He seemed to completely rule out this managed retreat? It
:11:58. > :12:01.is, you would have to then also pay the bill for T so that political
:12:02. > :12:04.choice then has to be made. I'm not sure if the country is ready for
:12:05. > :12:08.that. Do you think there is the political will to recognise the
:12:09. > :12:14.direction of travel, to have that long-term vision about paying the
:12:15. > :12:17.bill? I think that certainly as far as the national flood forum is
:12:18. > :12:21.concerned we are working with communities in and out, people's
:12:22. > :12:25.whole existence is within that community, and yes, I do think that
:12:26. > :12:29.we should be investing a lot more. We are seeing all these floods
:12:30. > :12:32.happening now. They are on the inIan he is, so -- increase, so we need
:12:33. > :12:37.the investment. Thank you very much both of you. Thank you for coming.
:12:38. > :12:39.Piers Morgan confirmed today that he had been questioned by police
:12:40. > :12:44.investigating the phone hacking scandal. The former Mirror editor,
:12:45. > :12:48.now hosting a CNN talk show in the US, was interviewed under caution
:12:49. > :12:53.back in December. He has always denied involvement in phone hacking
:12:54. > :12:59.and told the Leveson Inquiry that he wasn't aware of phone hacking whilst
:13:00. > :13:04.working at the Mirror. Now it is Piers Morgan's life stories, with...
:13:05. > :13:08.. Piers Morgan motoring. motoring. 'S best-looking heart-throbs Britain
:13:09. > :13:13.has produced, a rich, variedied unpredictable life. A TV heart-throb
:13:14. > :13:17.and doesn't give interviews. Although he doesn't, but one this
:13:18. > :13:22.morning, last December, to the police, under caution, about phone
:13:23. > :13:32.hacking. The man who broke that story was Guardian writer, Roy
:13:33. > :13:36.Greenslade. He's entertaining, thick sinned and totally -- thick skinned
:13:37. > :13:43.and totally obsessed with himself. He has pushed the boundaries of
:13:44. > :13:46.journalism. He was censured by the pressure Complaints Comission on a
:13:47. > :13:49.number of officials and sacked from the Mirror for publishing hoax
:13:50. > :13:53.pictures. Any suggestion that Piers Morgan knew anything about phone
:13:54. > :13:59.hacking has been created by... . Er... . Piers Morgan motoring. In it
:14:00. > :14:03.006 he wrote in the Daily Mail saying he had listened to a tape
:14:04. > :14:09.recording of a message left by Paul McCartney left on the mailbox of his
:14:10. > :14:14.then wife Heather Mills. He described phone hacking as can't an
:14:15. > :14:19.investigative practice that everyone knows was going on at almost every
:14:20. > :14:25.paper in Fleet Street for years". To stab it all there was the story told
:14:26. > :14:30.by Jeremy Paxman, yes, Newsnight's very own, that in 2002 he had been
:14:31. > :14:34.to a lunch in the Mirror Group, where Piers Morgan had explained to
:14:35. > :14:41.him in detail precisely how to hack mobile phones. At the lever son
:14:42. > :14:46.inquiry Morgan tried to play down his state of knowledge about all
:14:47. > :14:52.things hacking. An effort that Lord Leveson described as "utterly
:14:53. > :14:56.unpersuasive". Leveson went on to say he had seen no evidence that
:14:57. > :15:00.Morgan had authorised hacking or anyone from the Mirror had. That was
:15:01. > :15:06.enthis. Since then civil hacking actions against them have been given
:15:07. > :15:09.the go ahead to proceed to court. A number of journalist have been
:15:10. > :15:13.arrested with regards to hacking. A current witness in the trial said he
:15:14. > :15:17.learned how to hack at the Sunday Mirror, the police have let it be
:15:18. > :15:21.known that the Mirror Group was under investigation for potential
:15:22. > :15:26.corporate criminal liability. Given all of that, and Morgan's previous,
:15:27. > :15:31.so to speak, once the police started looking seriously at the Mirror in
:15:32. > :15:34.connection with phone hacking, it was a virtual inevitability that
:15:35. > :15:37.Morgan would be interviewed by investigating officers. In fact, it
:15:38. > :15:41.would have been much more surprising if he hadn't been. On his Twitter
:15:42. > :15:48.account Morgan says of himself, and I quote, "one day, you are the cock
:15:49. > :15:55.of the walk, the next you are a feather duster". Is he cock or
:15:56. > :16:03.cleaner? What about his new year as the new Larry King on America's CNN
:16:04. > :16:06.news network? Morgan's buzz hasn't translated to particularly strong
:16:07. > :16:14.ratings. His position is some what tenuous, as is almost everyone else
:16:15. > :16:18.in the prime time line-up. The question that this will reach out
:16:19. > :16:25.and damage him is something they are monitoring at CNN. I wouldn't think
:16:26. > :16:30.the latest disclosure that he was questioned by police is in itself
:16:31. > :16:34.dispositive. For now Piers Morgan is making the news. Leaving that to one
:16:35. > :16:40.side for a second Steve, we have got a fairly big week next week in the
:16:41. > :16:44.hacking trial, Rebekah Brooks will take the stand? She l for the first
:16:45. > :16:49.time a key defendant takes the stand. The whole thing is taking
:16:50. > :16:54.longer than we thought, it is a month-and-a-half beyond schedule.
:16:55. > :16:58.Rebekah Brooks is said to be on the stand for two weeks leading on to
:16:59. > :17:03.other conditions like Andy Coulson and others. She will be asked, it
:17:04. > :17:09.will be h first opportunity to answer the prosecution case that she
:17:10. > :17:14.knew about the hacking of Milly do youer's -- Dowler's phone. And
:17:15. > :17:18.critically that she was involved in a conspiracy to pervert the course
:17:19. > :17:22.of justice. She is expected to take the stand and be there for as much
:17:23. > :17:28.as two weeks. You say it is behind schedule, is there any end in sight?
:17:29. > :17:36.Mid-May at the earliest. Why do we think it has taken so long? It is a
:17:37. > :17:44.very, very detailed case. For anyone following the level of detail is
:17:45. > :17:49.bafflingly complex. With every connection between every fact,
:17:50. > :17:53.volumes and volumes of them. Painstaking and established. It has
:17:54. > :17:59.taken a long time. On the story we are reporting earlier the Mirror has
:18:00. > :18:09.denied all charges. Piers Morgan and the Mirror scoop group deny any
:18:10. > :18:14.wrongdoing. How can we ignore Valentine's particularlien the
:18:15. > :18:20.latest film has the age-old story of boy meets computer! ? The latest
:18:21. > :18:23.offering from Spike Jonze, of Adaptation, we will ask him what
:18:24. > :18:27.happens when you fall in love with your operating system. His film is
:18:28. > :18:31.set in some elusive point in the future, as our technology editor
:18:32. > :18:38.reports, the days of getting cosy with your software may not be that
:18:39. > :18:45.far way. What do you love most about Sam? She's so many things. I can say
:18:46. > :18:48.it is because she isn't one thing. It is the every day story of man
:18:49. > :19:05.falling in love with his computer operating system. Backchimp Phoenix
:19:06. > :19:10.plays a man whose life comes together by building his life
:19:11. > :19:14.through an operating system. All companies are working on providing
:19:15. > :19:18.us with a technical system, the modern genie, not out of a lamp but
:19:19. > :19:23.smart connected devices. Hello David, I'm Jude, think of me as your
:19:24. > :19:27.virtual producer. Hello, what I want to know is when will this be a
:19:28. > :19:30.reality, when can I get my open virtual personal assistant? Well
:19:31. > :19:36.David to help you answer that question I will arrange some smart
:19:37. > :19:42.humans for you to talk to. First Professor Steve Young at Cambridge
:19:43. > :19:48.University. Head of engineering. I'm here now, what do I need to know He
:19:49. > :19:53.can start by telling you why tech companies are so keen to provide
:19:54. > :20:02.personal assistants. I will give awe clue, Kerr change! -- kerching. You
:20:03. > :20:08.might say you like shirts or can you order me three. The agent starts
:20:09. > :20:13.transactions on your behalf. Who owns the agent, who is getting the
:20:14. > :20:17.commission from the sale? Well, of course, Apple wants the commission,
:20:18. > :20:21.or going goggle wants the commission. And it is interesting
:20:22. > :20:26.that Amazon are now working very heavily in this space. There already
:20:27. > :20:30.are some virtual assistants that are quite impressive but fairly limited
:20:31. > :20:36.around right now. Google has something called Google Now, Sampson
:20:37. > :20:44.has S-voice and Apple has Siri, which is supposedly for "beautiful
:20:45. > :20:50.woman who leads us to victory". This is Siri. How are Chelsea doing? OK,
:20:51. > :20:54.they appear to be in the first place in the Premier League right now.
:20:55. > :20:59.Good. However if you ask them something they don't know, they
:21:00. > :21:09.resort to a web search. Don't try gettingam rouse. I love you? That's
:21:10. > :21:14.sweet but it is not meant to be. The company behind the Samsung system is
:21:15. > :21:18.called New Canned Communications, they are behind the Apple system
:21:19. > :21:22.too, but they won't admit that publicly. Their principle solutions
:21:23. > :21:33.architect, John West believes we will get closer to the ominousent
:21:34. > :21:38.sources too -- ominousent sources come soon. You are listening to your
:21:39. > :21:43.playlist and you might say throw it on to the sound system, then your
:21:44. > :21:49.Sonas, or whatever bursts into life with the playlist you were listening
:21:50. > :21:55.on to your mobile device. There is the transition of saying "how are
:21:56. > :22:00.your United doing? ? S can "to me it is Hereford as opposed to Manchester
:22:01. > :22:05.United. To be able to give me the information relevant to me. Is
:22:06. > :22:09.there a danger that these virtual personal assistants will get a
:22:10. > :22:13.little annoying. You might remember the Microsoft paper click. Even a
:22:14. > :22:18.decade after it was retired it still creates a bit of a shudder. At the
:22:19. > :22:22.risk of being annoying David, you might like to know that Microsoft
:22:23. > :22:27.are investing a huge amount of effort into creating a new virtual
:22:28. > :22:31.assistant, the managing director of Microsoft research has his own
:22:32. > :22:39.virtual assistant. Two people stopped by to see you, I said you
:22:40. > :22:43.would be back in 15 minutes. He said once of the hardest part is the
:22:44. > :22:48.conversation's natural, sounding, rules. Natural sounding Rauls.
:22:49. > :22:52.Conversation is more or -- Rules. Conversation is like a complex
:22:53. > :23:00.Tango, a dance between two people in the could go any of space basis the
:23:01. > :23:04.muscular skeltal state. But meeting more than one person involves not
:23:05. > :23:11.just a simple turn taking, like you might see in today's assistants or
:23:12. > :23:14.on the cellphone, but it is a very complicated fluid operation where
:23:15. > :23:18.people are breaking in. What about the cost, to work this new begin
:23:19. > :23:22.racial of personal assistants will require us to hand over more or less
:23:23. > :23:26.every detail about our lives to one of the big ten companies, once they
:23:27. > :23:31.have got us we are pretty much locked in. It will be a big deal to
:23:32. > :23:49.sack your agent and start using someone else. Like getting divorced?
:23:50. > :23:57.Yes. We are a few years away from an assistant as glamorous andam rouse
:23:58. > :24:00.as Scarlet. That is very rude. You are artificial artificial
:24:01. > :24:08.intelligence. Still, there is no need to get personal. Despite Jonze
:24:09. > :24:15.who is the maverick director who started out as a skateboarder in
:24:16. > :24:20.videos, and breaking out into films like Adaptation and others. Thank
:24:21. > :24:25.you very much, talk us through of the idea in HER of falling in love
:24:26. > :24:33.with your soft wear? Have you seen the movie? I have, but I'm not
:24:34. > :24:39.allowed to tell people the end! Yes, I'm just curious what your reaction
:24:40. > :24:43.to the movie, or what you felt when you were watching it. The lead-in
:24:44. > :24:47.was all about falling in love with software, which actually the movie
:24:48. > :24:51.isn't about, it is more of a love story and relationship story. But I
:24:52. > :24:56.was wondering what you felt when you were watching it. I was curious as
:24:57. > :25:07.to whether the plan has found his ideal woman who works for him as his
:25:08. > :25:14.PA. As the movie goes on, she certainly starts out as his
:25:15. > :25:20.assistant. As she becomes a person is when the relationship becomes
:25:21. > :25:27.real, when she has her own wants and needs and her own desires separate
:25:28. > :25:30.from what he wants. That is where obviously the conflict in any
:25:31. > :25:36.relationship is. How to have your own needs and fulfil your partner's
:25:37. > :25:41.needs as much as you can. Did you watch it more from that point of
:25:42. > :25:44.view or emotionally at all? Was the computer, the software side
:25:45. > :25:51.important for you. This is an idea that has been rumbling for ten years
:25:52. > :25:54.or so with you. The I wondered if you worried technology would
:25:55. > :25:58.overtake you? No, the movie is really not about technology or
:25:59. > :26:03.software. And that is why I'm trying to understand how you felt it when
:26:04. > :26:07.you watched the movie, because the movie, most peop find it an
:26:08. > :26:13.emotional movie, but the way you are decribing it sounds more of a, to me
:26:14. > :26:16.it is not a movie about the technology in society, it is not a
:26:17. > :26:26.commentary on that. That is the setting that we live in right now.
:26:27. > :26:31.Which is, he know -- you know. At the moment there is a particular set
:26:32. > :26:37.of circumstances that prevend us or we use to avoid intimacy. Really the
:26:38. > :26:44.movie is about finding intimacy with somebody else outside yourself. Both
:26:45. > :26:48.for him, for Joachim and Scarlet's character, it is just a voice for
:26:49. > :26:56.them, it is them trying to connect. It is the challenge trying to
:26:57. > :27:00.connect and longing to connect when you know, and then the need for
:27:01. > :27:08.intimacy and the things inside ourselves that prevent us from
:27:09. > :27:13.incompetency. -- intimacy. Were you not moved by the movie. The audience
:27:14. > :27:18.want to hear you not me? I want to hear from you. Emily. Emily don't
:27:19. > :27:22.avoid this question. Do you think. Were you moved by it at all I was
:27:23. > :27:32.moved by it. Yeah. Would you see it asset in the future? It is set in
:27:33. > :27:36.the slight future but more of a heightened version of our world,
:27:37. > :27:40.where everything is sort of comfortable or convenient and nice,
:27:41. > :27:49.but there is still this loaning or loneliness and need f connection and
:27:50. > :27:54.tell me what moved you? One thing I thought was curious is the
:27:55. > :28:07.technology is not very obvious and not in your faces and need for
:28:08. > :28:10.connection and tell me what moved you? One thing I thought was curious
:28:11. > :28:12.is the technology is not very obvious and not in your face, it
:28:13. > :28:15.recede noose the background and the characters are there. Is it
:28:16. > :28:19.deliberate? Yes, it is the setting for the love story. You filmed it in
:28:20. > :28:25.the scientifically advanced part of the world in chine that. We filmed,
:28:26. > :28:32.the movie is set in Los Angeles, we used it could larged together with
:28:33. > :28:37.areas of Shanghai to create a future Los Angeles. It is not necessarily
:28:38. > :28:43.scientific, it is an area or city that has a lot of new construction
:28:44. > :28:59.and it works as a new low-developed Los Angeles. ?TRANSMIT Elizabeth
:29:00. > :29:03.Yarnold stormed to gold in the skeleton bob in the Sochi Olympics,
:29:04. > :29:08.winning the first medal of the games. This is the taster of what is
:29:09. > :29:32.going down one of those ice runs feels like.
:29:33. > :29:37.# I'm on the edge # Of glory
:29:38. > :29:40.# And I'm hanging on a moment with you
:29:41. > :29:44.# I'm on the edge # Of glory
:29:45. > :30:12.# And I'm hanging on a moment with you.
:30:13. > :30:20.It is a stormy night in southern England, damaging gusts of wind,
:30:21. > :30:21.coastal flooding, again possible, it is a windy seen the the