:00:09. > :00:14.Evidence of a possible cover-up within the Met police. A document
:00:15. > :00:18.obtained by the BBC suggests records of a link between an allegedly
:00:19. > :00:22.corrupt officer and another murder investigation. Tonight, we ask if
:00:23. > :00:28.this is a new low for the force. Was this the inventor of Bitcoin?
:00:29. > :00:33.REPORTER: Why did you quit Bitcoin, Sir? No questions right now. He
:00:34. > :00:39.claims he had nothing to do with the cryptocurrency. So why are some
:00:40. > :00:44.still convinced he was behind it? And, a porn business aimed at women.
:00:45. > :01:01.The burgeoning new industry that comes from Japan.
:01:02. > :01:07.Good evening. The BBC has seen evidence of a possible cover-up
:01:08. > :01:10.within The Met Police concerning an allegedly corrupt officer linked to
:01:11. > :01:14.the murder case of Stephen Lawrence. Well, today the Met Commissioner
:01:15. > :01:18.insisted he could restore trust in the force, but this evening,
:01:19. > :01:23.documents have emerged suggesting claims the Met police force made
:01:24. > :01:27.just last month could be wrong. Jim Reed has been following the
:01:28. > :01:31.developments. There have been other dramatic days
:01:32. > :01:36.in the 21 years since Stephen Lawrence was murdered. For The Met
:01:37. > :01:40.Police though, the last 48-hours have been some of the most difficult
:01:41. > :01:46.in its recent history. This is an awful outcome, a terrible
:01:47. > :01:50.day yesterday where obviously the results of Mark Ellison QC's
:01:51. > :01:55.inquiry's told us some pretty awful things about the past. So what I've
:01:56. > :02:01.got to do obviously is to make sure people are trusting the Met met, the
:02:02. > :02:09.Met of today and the Met of the future. I feel for the family, I saw
:02:10. > :02:14.yesterday they tried to talk about it. Long ago, historic in the past.
:02:15. > :02:19.The Met Police commissioner might like to see this as a problem not of
:02:20. > :02:32.his making. The confirmation of his force, the SC squad tried to -- SCS
:02:33. > :02:37.squad tried to spy on the Lawrence family. He's simply deflected or
:02:38. > :02:42.sought to deflect the criticism that's been laid fairly and squarely
:02:43. > :02:44.at his feet elsewhere. It smacks of somebody not trying to go forward
:02:45. > :02:50.but looking back and simply looking at it from an emotional point of
:02:51. > :02:53.view. And tonight, there are new allegations of a possible police
:02:54. > :02:57.cover-up concerning an allegedly corrupt officer limped to the
:02:58. > :03:02.Lawrence investigation. -- linked. There are three major questions as
:03:03. > :03:07.things stand, that still loom large for the Met. First up, who knew
:03:08. > :03:11.what? Former SDS officers used to gather here at a safe house on this
:03:12. > :03:17.quiet residential street in North London in. 1993, the year that
:03:18. > :03:20.Stephen Lawrence was killed, it's claimed Britain's top police officer
:03:21. > :03:26.calm to play them a visit. The then Commissioner of The Met row poll tan
:03:27. > :03:31.police, Commissioner Condon, is said to have handed over a bottle of
:03:32. > :03:36.whisky as a thank you for all their hard work. One former SDS member
:03:37. > :03:39.said senior officers at the Met were well aware of the unit's general
:03:40. > :03:47.role. I personally had Lord Condon came
:03:48. > :03:52.out to visit us. He's denied meeting me, but his diary probably documents
:03:53. > :03:58.it. I asked, is this a special event, the Commissioner coming out
:03:59. > :04:05.and I was informed, no, every single Met Commissioner has met the SDS
:04:06. > :04:07.since its formation, so surely every single commissioner bares some
:04:08. > :04:11.responsibility for this unit that was there. So it's impossible that
:04:12. > :04:15.senior management didn't know what was going on? If they are going to
:04:16. > :04:20.call me a liar, that's the only definite scenario, but no.
:04:21. > :04:24.In a statement today, Lord Condon denied he ever knew about any action
:04:25. > :04:28.by undercover officers in connection to the Lawrence case. Had he done,
:04:29. > :04:32.he claims he would have stopped the action immediately. The next
:04:33. > :04:35.question - did the actions of undercover officers undermine the
:04:36. > :04:39.first public inquiry into the Lawrence case led by Sir William
:04:40. > :04:42.Macpherson? Today, this man, the Head of Scotland Yard's Counter
:04:43. > :04:47.Terrorism Command, was temporarily moved from his post. The Ellison
:04:48. > :04:51.Review, publish yesterday, said Richard Walton was part of the
:04:52. > :04:54.police team involved in drafting the final written submissions to the
:04:55. > :05:00.Macpherson Inquiry. Ahead of that, he met up with a police spy in the
:05:01. > :05:04.Lawrence camp, known as N81, calling it a fascinating and valuable ex
:05:05. > :05:08.change. His account was found to be less than straightforward to
:05:09. > :05:11.establish and somewhat troubling. Finally, what of separate
:05:12. > :05:15.allegations of police corruption? The claim this man, Detective
:05:16. > :05:20.Sergeant John Davidson, was being paid off by the father of one
:05:21. > :05:24.Stephen Lawrence's murderers. The BBC's seen evidence tonight that
:05:25. > :05:28.Davidson was named in another case involving possible police
:05:29. > :05:31.corruption, the murder of private investigator Daniel Morgan. Last
:05:32. > :05:35.month, Scotland Yard were saying it had no record of his involvement in
:05:36. > :05:41.that investigation. What we need to be reassured about
:05:42. > :05:45.is that the culture of policing is fundamentally honest. This sort of
:05:46. > :05:48.misconduct and scandal, it cannot take place today and if it does, it
:05:49. > :05:52.will be revealed, it will be exposed. I think that's what the
:05:53. > :05:58.public need to be reassured about, that things really have changed.
:05:59. > :06:03.The Lawrence case might be historic. It might be 21 years old. But it
:06:04. > :06:06.will take more than words from The Met Police to convince its critics
:06:07. > :06:11.all its problems really are in the past.
:06:12. > :06:14.That was Jim Reed and Lord Paddick, the former deputy asssistant
:06:15. > :06:18.Commissioner of The Met joins me now from York. Lord Paddick, good
:06:19. > :06:22.evening. Let's start with what we have learned then. Evidence that Mr
:06:23. > :06:26.Davidson was named nine times in those documents about another murder
:06:27. > :06:32.investigation when the Met said it had no record of that last month.
:06:33. > :06:40.How do you respond to that? Well, I don't know. Your report says
:06:41. > :06:44.that Davidson may have possibly been involved. That's slightly weaker
:06:45. > :06:49.than he was definitely involved. I don't know what documents you've
:06:50. > :06:54.seen, I don't know what documents the Met base their response on, but
:06:55. > :06:59.clearly it doesn't look very good. What we've seen is the documents
:07:00. > :07:02.that names him and those are documents that the Met said just
:07:03. > :07:12.last month they had no record of him being linked to at all.
:07:13. > :07:15.Well, as you say, I don't know on what basis the Met made that
:07:16. > :07:21.statement. I don't know what evidence they had that made them say
:07:22. > :07:24.that, compared with the evidence that you now have in your
:07:25. > :07:29.possession. It's a very unfair question for me to say, what the
:07:30. > :07:32.Met's motivation was, because I don't know what evidence they had at
:07:33. > :07:36.that time. Sure. Let's look at Mr Hogan Howe who, as we heard in that
:07:37. > :07:40.report, has been talking about the past and talking about these
:07:41. > :07:45.thingses happening a long time ago. Would you feel confident that this
:07:46. > :07:52.is all history or would you worry that this was still ongoing?
:07:53. > :07:59.What I would be confident of is, if you are a member of the public and
:08:00. > :08:05.you are a victim of crime or you dial 999, you can trust 99.9% of the
:08:06. > :08:10.police officers who might turn up when you call for help, not just in
:08:11. > :08:13.London, but across the country. The overwhelming majority of police
:08:14. > :08:19.officers are decent, hard-working people who are trying to do the best
:08:20. > :08:23.for them. They will be in despair at the revelations that we have seen
:08:24. > :08:27.over the last couple of days. So when you say despair, do you think
:08:28. > :08:36.we are making too much of the stories that are emerging in these
:08:37. > :08:40.days of alleged police corruption? Clearly any police corruption is
:08:41. > :08:45.going to affect how the public view the whole of the Police Service.
:08:46. > :08:48.What I'm saying is, we need to get these things into perspective.
:08:49. > :08:52.There's a world of difference between the special demonstrations
:08:53. > :08:57.squad who never believe that they would have to reveal their real
:08:58. > :09:02.identity to anybody, therefore they felt they could do whatever they
:09:03. > :09:06.wanted to and they would never be held publicly to account. There is a
:09:07. > :09:10.world of difference between that and undercover officers who're working
:09:11. > :09:13.against terrorists and other people involved in organised crime who're
:09:14. > :09:17.saving people's lives because of the work they are dog and putting their
:09:18. > :09:22.own lives on the line -- the work they are doing. Ordinary officers
:09:23. > :09:27.who perform duty every day to try and keep us safe. We have got to get
:09:28. > :09:32.things into perspective. Clearly, if you have got a senior officer at
:09:33. > :09:36.Scotland Yard in charge of Counter-Terrorism who Ellison says
:09:37. > :09:40.he has his doubts about, then clearly the commissioner's done the
:09:41. > :09:44.right thing in temporarily moving that officer away from such a very
:09:45. > :09:49.sensitive position. And do you think that the public can
:09:50. > :09:52.still have confidence that Bernard Hogan Howe is the right person to
:09:53. > :09:58.lead the Met given that the day after he called it the worst
:09:59. > :10:07.revelation, the worst day of his life, worse revelations have come
:10:08. > :10:11.out? Well, your report talks about possible links may have been between
:10:12. > :10:16.the officer of DS Davidson involved in the Lawrence case and him being
:10:17. > :10:21.in some way involved possibly in the Morgan case. Now, that to me at the
:10:22. > :10:29.moment doesn't sound very strong. If it turns out that the Met has misled
:10:30. > :10:33.the public over something in recent days under Bernard Hogan Howe's
:10:34. > :10:41.watch, then clearly that is a far more serious issue. In that case we
:10:42. > :10:46.need to find out what did he know? Did he allow the Met to mislead the
:10:47. > :10:50.public if that's what's happened. If that was the case, that would be
:10:51. > :10:57.fatal for him. Thank you very much indeed.
:10:58. > :11:01.There've probably been better starts to a spring can everyones than this
:11:02. > :11:06.one. In the early hours the Liberal Democrats were beaten into last
:11:07. > :11:09.place at a council by election by their Bus Pass Elvis party whose key
:11:10. > :11:15.pledge is to legalise brothels with a discount for OAPs. Caught in a
:11:16. > :11:18.trap? We are not going to dwell on one result in Clifton North
:11:19. > :11:25.Nottingham. The party has suffered consistency
:11:26. > :11:31.in the polls. The Lib Dems will set out an in or out choice on Europe
:11:32. > :11:36.for as they take on UKIP. We'll talk to Tim Farron in a moment after a
:11:37. > :11:39.reminder of how they are faring. We thought we'd give the Liberal
:11:40. > :11:45.Democrats a health check. Since June 2010, the percentage of people
:11:46. > :11:52.intending to vote Lib Dem has fallen from 21 to 9%. The Tory vote 29 to
:11:53. > :11:56.34% while Labour's risen from 32 to 38%. UKIP has had a big leap from
:11:57. > :12:01.22010%. Voters don't seem that happy with
:12:02. > :12:06.Nick Clegg. He scores the lowest on satisfaction ratings as party leader
:12:07. > :12:13.with just 25% compared with 31% for both Ed Miliband and Nigel Farage
:12:14. > :12:16.and 37% for David Cameron. Nick Clegg's diminished stature has
:12:17. > :12:21.been reflected in the numbers willing to pay to join. Party
:12:22. > :12:26.membership's fallen from 65,000 in 2010 to 43,000, although they had a
:12:27. > :12:32.slight increase last year. That's not just a Lib Dem problem though.
:12:33. > :12:38.Labour membership fell from 193,000 to 188,000, Tory from 177,000 to
:12:39. > :12:45.134,000, only UKIP were the big winners with a rise from 15,000 to
:12:46. > :12:48.32,000. Partly as a result of this, the
:12:49. > :12:54.party's finances are somewhat underweight. The Lib Dems spent ?6.4
:12:55. > :12:58.million but the income was just ?6.2 million, leaving them badly
:12:59. > :13:02.out-of-pocket. What ideas of the party's brains come up with for the
:13:03. > :13:07.2015 manifesto? Among the front runners with a mansion tax on homes
:13:08. > :13:11.worth over ?2 million, a raid on pensions limiting tax free savings
:13:12. > :13:17.to ?1 million and an increase in the personal tax allowance to an
:13:18. > :13:18.expected ?10,500 or more. Will this be enough to ensure Nick Clegg is
:13:19. > :13:29.fit for the fight? We'll see. We are going to be talking to Tim
:13:30. > :13:34.Farron, the Lib Dem President in a moment, but first, let's bring you
:13:35. > :13:37.our next report. Pornography, let's be frank, belongs more often to a
:13:38. > :13:42.man's world. In Japan, the industry's moving in the opposite
:13:43. > :13:46.direction. They are increasingly directly make porn films aimed at a
:13:47. > :13:49.female audience with male porn stars treated like rock stars. Here is
:13:50. > :14:09.Rupert Wingfield-Hayes. In Tokyo, empty apartments double as
:14:10. > :14:16.film sets. Young people aspire to be film stars. This vast city is now
:14:17. > :14:20.the porn capital of the world. This woman is one of thousands of young
:14:21. > :14:46.Japanese women who every year flock to join its ranks.
:14:47. > :14:54.As many as 20,000 adult movies are made in Tokyo every year.
:14:55. > :15:01.Traditionally, Japanese porn has had its fair share of the extreme and
:15:02. > :15:07.the bizarre. But this new generation, film makers is aiming at
:15:08. > :15:12.a new market. Women. Ellie is 30 and went to film school. She says
:15:13. > :15:34.women's appetite for porn is being driven by frustration with men.
:15:35. > :15:39.Shoko and her co star film all morning.
:15:40. > :15:46.Women viewers are increasingly seen as a vast untapped market. One
:15:47. > :15:55.recent survey suggests one in five Japanese women regularly watch porn.
:15:56. > :16:00.They want to see sex, but also I want thatcy.
:16:01. > :16:15.-- intimacy. Another big change is the promotion of male stars. The
:16:16. > :16:21.real star of this shoot is Itetsu. It's him the female viewers want to
:16:22. > :16:24.see and it's him the photographer lingers on. This 35-year-old is the
:16:25. > :16:48.first male porn actor in Europe Japan to become a really big star.
:16:49. > :16:55.Ultimately, this isn't just about changing tastes. All over the world,
:16:56. > :17:00.people are watching porn for free on the Internet, the old business model
:17:01. > :17:04.is broken. Anni has been a porn actress for
:17:05. > :17:10.three years. She says it's getting harder and harder for anyone to make
:17:11. > :17:15.money. Many people watch porn for free, so actresses have to work
:17:16. > :17:22.harder. They have to shoot longer so it's very, very hard. The fee is
:17:23. > :17:28.getting less. It's a completely different thing to 20 years ago.
:17:29. > :17:32.Right now, Anni is a big star. Her videos sell thousands of copies.
:17:33. > :17:36.She's constantly on the road promoting her films. She's opening
:17:37. > :17:40.up new markets in China where she has a million followers on its
:17:41. > :17:48.version of Twitter. Even in China, 40% of her fans are women.
:17:49. > :17:52.Many, many promoting events all the time and they need to keep the
:17:53. > :17:56.relationship with the fans. We have to have this blog, Twitter and
:17:57. > :18:03.everything. I think they are looking for another way to sell the videos
:18:04. > :18:12.these days. For Ittetsu, that means doing a lot of this.
:18:13. > :18:21.Building the brand. For Japan's biggest male porn star, taking your
:18:22. > :18:25.clothes off in front of the fans' cameras is a big part of the job
:18:26. > :18:29.too. It's called "added value" but the
:18:30. > :19:02.goal is just the same, to get the fans to part with their money.
:19:03. > :19:09.The industry's betting with up with are much more willing to pay for
:19:10. > :19:16.porn than men. These fans are lining up to meet four of their favourite
:19:17. > :19:19.male stars. They are paying for a 30-second chat, hand shake and
:19:20. > :19:25.signed DVD and it really is 30-seconds.
:19:26. > :19:31.Ten years ago, this scene would have been unthinkable. But Japanese women
:19:32. > :19:42.appear more open than ever about exploring their sexual fantasies.
:19:43. > :19:47.I think the future is in females because more and more women are more
:19:48. > :19:49.confident to talk about intimate life and they are more curious. I
:19:50. > :20:04.think the future is women. If the porn industry has a future,
:20:05. > :20:12.then it has to find customers who're willing to pay for its products.
:20:13. > :20:18.That used to be men alone in their bedrooms. But in Tokyo, it looks
:20:19. > :20:26.like the future of porn will be increasingly female.
:20:27. > :20:34.Now, Tim Farron has just popped up from the Lib Dems Spring Conference.
:20:35. > :20:38.I'm not going to ask you about Japanese porn, you will be relieved
:20:39. > :20:44.to hear. I know tomorrow you kick off with a shuningt of an in-out
:20:45. > :20:51.referendum on Europe in the May elections? Yes, the European
:20:52. > :20:56.elections are on May 22nd and offer people a genuine choice. Politics is
:20:57. > :21:00.stage and managerial and who you vote for can often be very blurred
:21:01. > :21:03.on messages. Two parties have a clear message - if you want to leave
:21:04. > :21:07.the European Union, risk those three million jobs and peace and security
:21:08. > :21:11.and our ability to catch criminals across borders, you should vote
:21:12. > :21:14.UKIP, they are the clear party. If you think Britain's future is best
:21:15. > :21:18.within the European Union, fighting for those jobs and for the recovery
:21:19. > :21:22.of our economy with it, alongside our neighbours in Europe, then you
:21:23. > :21:27.vote Liberal Democrat. Labour or Tory, that would be a wasted vote.
:21:28. > :21:30.I'm thinking that ten years ago, your ambition was to Jeffers take
:21:31. > :21:47.the Tories, now it seems you are battling with UKIP, that's a bit of
:21:48. > :21:52.a comedown -- was to -- overtake the Tories. It's very right that Nick
:21:53. > :21:57.Clegg's decided to put the challenge down to Nigel Farage which he has
:21:58. > :22:01.accepted and I will say that so far as I am concerned, UKIP's position
:22:02. > :22:05.is utterly wrong and against Britain's interests but it's at
:22:06. > :22:09.least clear and you know what you are getting if you vote for them and
:22:10. > :22:14.also Liberal Democrat, are you in or are you out. That's the choice
:22:15. > :22:21.people need to make in May. You said it doesn't matter where you come in
:22:22. > :22:25.the elections. One pollster could see you losing all 12 seats. Would
:22:26. > :22:29.you say that didn't matter? Of course it does. It matters that we
:22:30. > :22:33.do as well as we possibly can and for the future of Britain's
:22:34. > :22:36.relationship with our friends and neighbours in Europe with the
:22:37. > :22:40.protection of the three million jobs and our ability to catch criminals
:22:41. > :22:42.and for sustaining peace and security within our continent, it's
:22:43. > :22:47.really important to stay in the European Union. What is the message
:22:48. > :22:51.that would come out of the European elections on 22nd May. If UKIP have
:22:52. > :22:55.done well, the message will be to businesses in this country and
:22:56. > :22:59.outside, you'd better leave Britain. There is no future because you are
:23:00. > :23:01.no longer going to be part of that important market. If the Liberal
:23:02. > :23:05.Democrats do well in May, the message will be the opposite. I want
:23:06. > :23:09.to look further afield because the Liberal Democrats have had a rocky
:23:10. > :23:16.few months. The Lord Rennard scandal, was that badly handled? If
:23:17. > :23:21.he turned up in York, would he be welcome? I don't think it's been
:23:22. > :23:25.badly handled in the last few months. It was badly handled over
:23:26. > :23:32.the last decade. The reality is that I think the party in not dealing
:23:33. > :23:41.with the issue years ago when it appeared to a few people did not do
:23:42. > :23:47.a service either to Lord Rennard or to the people who complained. Since
:23:48. > :23:53.it's come to our attention broadly a year ago, it's clear that we have
:23:54. > :23:56.dealt with it during. Would he be welcome if he turned up there today?
:23:57. > :23:59.He's not a party member at the moment, his membership is currently
:24:00. > :24:04.suspended as the investigation continues.
:24:05. > :24:08.How did the Tories handle the Patrick Rock allegations? Do you
:24:09. > :24:12.think their fared better? I mean, I think these are all grubby things
:24:13. > :24:19.for us to comment on as media stories. The fact is, the issue has
:24:20. > :24:25.been a far more serious one and more appalling one and it's important
:24:26. > :24:28.that those things that are potentially involved there and all
:24:29. > :24:33.these things are important to be underlined by saying people are
:24:34. > :24:36.innocent unless proven proven guilty that, it's wrong for us to be trying
:24:37. > :24:40.to score any political points one way or another, just as I thought it
:24:41. > :24:45.was grubby ov the Harriet Harman situation a few weeks ago. You use
:24:46. > :24:48.the word "grubby" and one of the problems I guess the Liberal
:24:49. > :24:51.Democrats have with the voters is the whole manifesto question that
:24:52. > :24:55.whatever you say after the tuition fees looks like an empty pledge.
:24:56. > :24:58.Does that mean there'll be nothing really in your manifesto going
:24:59. > :25:04.forward or that you have to make sure you stuck to your promises? I
:25:05. > :25:08.do accept that the fees issue's always about trust because a new
:25:09. > :25:12.policy is far better than the Labour one it replaced in terms of being
:25:13. > :25:17.fairer to students from better off backgrounds. This whole issue of
:25:18. > :25:21.trust is important. But let's not overdo it. We got 9% of the seats in
:25:22. > :25:26.Parliament, 23% of the votes in the election and got 65% of our
:25:27. > :25:30.manifesto promises such as the tax cut for 24 million lowest paid
:25:31. > :25:35.people in this country. If a party with 9% of the MPs and 23% of the
:25:36. > :25:38.the vote had got 1010% of the manifesto through which is what you
:25:39. > :25:41.are suggesting we should have done, that would be a matter for the
:25:42. > :25:45.United Nations, a travel else the I of democracy. We got two thirds of
:25:46. > :25:50.what we promised the electorate done, despite less than a quarter
:25:51. > :25:54.voting for us. Tim Farron, thank you very much indeed. Despite our best
:25:55. > :25:58.efforts, for a second night we are unable to speak to the journalist
:25:59. > :26:02.who broke the Bitcoin story. The Sochi Paralympics opening ceremony
:26:03. > :26:06.was full of the usual pomp but it may be remembered for who didn't
:26:07. > :26:10.turn up. Prince Edward pulled out. The British Government refused the
:26:11. > :26:14.invitation and, when the countries paraded their flags around the
:26:15. > :26:19.arena, the Ukrainian Paralympic team chose to sit it out, leaving the
:26:20. > :26:23.flag bearer on his own. The team said they want to compete to remind
:26:24. > :26:29.the world what is happening in their country under the presence of
:26:30. > :26:32.Russian troops. Earlier, I spoke to Bogdana Matsotska, an Al pyre
:26:33. > :26:43.Skinner who boycotted the games on Friday 21th February after 30
:26:44. > :26:50.protesters were shot dead in Kiev. -- Alpine skier. Tell us why you
:26:51. > :26:54.chose to pull out of the Olympics, Bogdana Matsotska? I'm training a
:26:55. > :26:57.lot, four years for this Paralympics and it was a really hard decision
:26:58. > :27:02.for me and my dad because he's my coach. But after we saw just on TV
:27:03. > :27:12.and received the messages what's going on in Ukraine and then we have
:27:13. > :27:15.all out war, it was so... The feelings were that we could not do
:27:16. > :27:20.it another way. It was the right decision at that moment I think. I
:27:21. > :27:23.feel the thing that I did, we did, was the right decision. What was the
:27:24. > :27:28.reaction from your team-mates, the rest of the Ukraine team when you
:27:29. > :27:34.told them? They were surprised actually, like "oh, what, come on,
:27:35. > :27:40.we are competing and training a lot and you just want to recognise all
:27:41. > :27:45.your job what you have done before", but, you know, everybody have their
:27:46. > :27:48.own minds and I cannot tell them to do something and they cannot tell me
:27:49. > :27:58.what I need to do. Did it have the ever fact you were
:27:59. > :28:02.hoping it would have? I was surprised when the newspapers or the
:28:03. > :28:12.channels started to call on me and to offer me. I was just thinking
:28:13. > :28:18.that, you know, I'm... I cannot do things another way. When it started
:28:19. > :28:22.all around the world, it was the chance to tell the all of the world
:28:23. > :28:27.what is going on in Ukraine. Do you think the Ukrainian team should be
:28:28. > :28:35.at the Paralympics now? Come on, guys. Now the Crimea, they
:28:36. > :28:42.want to take Crimea to part of Ukraine and they just put the
:28:43. > :28:48.soldiers in my country and after this you want to compete in this
:28:49. > :28:52.country, it's insane, but they have their own minds. I cannot tell them.
:28:53. > :29:01.Have you said that to them? Have you made those views felt? No. No. They
:29:02. > :29:04.have on the shoulder there, so they can do what they want and what they
:29:05. > :29:10.think is right. What did you make of the ceremony
:29:11. > :29:18.today when the Ukrainian flag carrier was the only one
:29:19. > :29:23.representing Ukraine? From one side I'm really happy that
:29:24. > :29:29.the people understand and it's also the message to all the world because
:29:30. > :29:38.we need help, you know, Russia is big country and now it's difficult
:29:39. > :29:43.situation. I don't know, I have lots of feeling, I cannot explain it all,
:29:44. > :29:51.you know, it's really hard to tell it, but I hope that all this things
:29:52. > :29:57.what's going on now just end and finally we'll get a new government
:29:58. > :30:01.with the Ukrainian Ukraine, you know. Bogdana Matsotska speaking to
:30:02. > :30:05.me earlier from Ukraine and sadly, that's all we have time for, but
:30:06. > :30:32.from all of us here, good night, have a good weekend.
:30:33. > :30:33.Hello. It's going to be a grey start to