:00:00. > :00:00.No arrest, no charges, not even a shred of proof, as far as we know.
:00:07. > :00:09.But this man is still all over the front pages.
:00:10. > :00:13.Should there be anonymity for those accused of sexual offences?
:00:14. > :00:26.Also tonight, with hindsight, how many different ways did we break
:00:27. > :00:31.They jump up on the statue. Trouncing it.
:00:32. > :00:34.Also tonight, with hindsight, how many different ways did we break
:00:35. > :00:49.brutalised, tortured. We want to give you the chance to rebuild your
:00:50. > :00:51.country, your lives, to give your families a chance of that better
:00:52. > :00:53.future. We'll ask, how does what was
:00:54. > :00:56.said then colour what we do now? And our latest Proms preview,
:00:57. > :01:09.Laura Mvula. Sir Cliff Richard said in a
:01:10. > :01:23.statement last night from Portugal, where he has a home, though not
:01:24. > :01:26.the one searched by police, in Berkshire, that he was happy to
:01:27. > :01:30.cooperate with the police, should they wish to speak to him to over
:01:31. > :01:33.an allegation of sexual assault He described the allegation
:01:34. > :01:38.as completely false. Sir Cliff also noted that somehow
:01:39. > :01:42.the press, the BBC in this case, had been alerted to
:01:43. > :01:45.the fact that his flat was going to be searched, thereby making
:01:46. > :01:49.the allegation very public indeed. No charges
:01:50. > :01:51.against Sir Cliff have yet been brought, and it's not the first time
:01:52. > :01:54.that someone being investigated for a crime has found themselves
:01:55. > :01:57.in the public eye before any We'll discuss whether there should
:01:58. > :02:02.be more protections for those alleged to have committed
:02:03. > :02:18.sex offences in a moment. His face splashed all over the
:02:19. > :02:22.newspapers, inside, pages of speculation on his private life,
:02:23. > :02:28.about a man who has not been found guilty or charged or been arrested
:02:29. > :02:33.or questioned. A news helicopter hovered overhead yesterday, as
:02:34. > :02:37.police arrived to search his flat in Berkshire. The singer is still in
:02:38. > :02:42.Portugal and was not told about the operation in advance, but BBC news
:02:43. > :02:45.reporters were clearly waiting for the detectives to turn up in
:02:46. > :02:51.unmarked police cars. The one thing that we know about Sir Cliff Richard
:02:52. > :02:55.is that he has denied any wrongdoing, and he says that it
:02:56. > :03:01.appears that the press knew what was happening before he did. He is right
:03:02. > :03:07.to be angry about that, that is part of the problem, that people already
:03:08. > :03:12.have got 0% of the facts, but 100% of the opinions as to what is going
:03:13. > :03:16.on. How did the media know about the search? Guidelines from the
:03:17. > :03:41.Association of Chief Police Officers say...
:03:42. > :03:51.There were two forces involved in this search, this morning Thames
:03:52. > :03:55.Valley Police released a statement. By late afternoon, the BBC's had of
:03:56. > :04:09.news-gathering tweeted. But then, a separate statement from
:04:10. > :04:20.South Yorkshire Police, when a media outlet...
:04:21. > :04:27.There should always be good relationships between the police and
:04:28. > :04:31.the media, they should not be cosy, but both sides have something to
:04:32. > :04:37.gain. In the end, the public have something to gain. One of the
:04:38. > :04:40.problems in recent years, there has been a knee jerk reaction by the
:04:41. > :04:48.police, saying, we must not talk to them, which is ridiculous. Let's
:04:49. > :04:52.welcome Cliff Richard. The investigation is focused on an
:04:53. > :04:55.alleged assault on a boy under 16 at an event featuring the American
:04:56. > :04:59.evangelist Billy Graham in the mid-80s. Sir Cliff Richard has
:05:00. > :05:04.called the allegation completely false, but the publicity has
:05:05. > :05:08.triggered calls for anonymity to be extended to the accused in cases
:05:09. > :05:14.like this. There will be people who say it is trial by media again, that
:05:15. > :05:22.the interesting factor of this situation, he has been named before
:05:23. > :05:26.he has even been arrested, which is really unusual, it is the first time
:05:27. > :05:34.in 25 years I have heard of this, I was quite shocked. Other
:05:35. > :05:39.high-profile celebrities all were cleared of sex offences or had
:05:40. > :05:43.charges dropped. All were named and had their private lives splashed
:05:44. > :05:47.over the press. In other cases, like the prosecution of Rolf Harris, the
:05:48. > :05:54.publicity led to other victims coming forward and a successful
:05:55. > :05:59.prosecution. The main reason for not introducing anonymity for defendants
:06:00. > :06:03.is that these cases, once there has been a charge, to encourage
:06:04. > :06:08.complainants to come forward, because they feel, it was not just
:06:09. > :06:14.me. That is relevant in cases where the defendant is in a position of
:06:15. > :06:19.authority or high profile, and we know there are recent cases of this
:06:20. > :06:25.nature. So, they come forward and give their accounts before trial,
:06:26. > :06:30.sometimes during trial, and that evidence is often used. Police said
:06:31. > :06:34.they had received information of the result of the media coverage of the
:06:35. > :06:38.last few days. But this is the start of what could be a long process will
:06:39. > :06:43.stop Sir Cliff Richard is innocent until proven guilty.
:06:44. > :06:47.To discuss anonymity in sexual-offence cases is the former
:06:48. > :06:54.MP Ann Widdecombe, and Jill Saward, campaigner and rape victim herself.
:06:55. > :06:58.It was the case up until a change in the Sexual Offences Act in 1988
:06:59. > :07:08.Jill, the men who raped you and were convicted of that crime, they
:07:09. > :07:22.The main rapist's name, I found it out the morning I went to court, it
:07:23. > :07:27.was the first time I was allowed to be told. I asked at low record
:07:28. > :07:33.levels, I was told I was not allowed to know. It was a horrendous
:07:34. > :07:37.experience, you have to come to terms with the fact that this is a
:07:38. > :07:41.real person, suddenly this person who you have known about, but know
:07:42. > :07:45.nothing about, has a name and becomes a person. When you are
:07:46. > :07:49.supposed to be concentrating on the evidence you are about to give,
:07:50. > :07:55.having to think about everything to do with them and about them and
:07:56. > :08:01.learning their name, it is not the right time, it is not appropriate at
:08:02. > :08:05.all. It is totally wrong to put that on victims in that situation. You
:08:06. > :08:14.would not want to see a return to that, but from what the report
:08:15. > :08:18.mentioned, the problems that a false allegation can cause some people are
:08:19. > :08:22.not to be ignored. Is there any change in the law that would be
:08:23. > :08:29.beneficial? I do not think that it is right to have publicised it
:08:30. > :08:36.before somebody has been questioned. I do not believe that is the right
:08:37. > :08:39.way ahead. But it is important, from the moment somebody is questioned,
:08:40. > :08:42.that we are made aware of the name of that person, so that it can
:08:43. > :08:46.encourage other people to come forward. So many people have been
:08:47. > :08:55.convicted because other people have come forward. Victims are very
:08:56. > :08:58.vulnerable, and feel very much quite often that it was their fault that
:08:59. > :09:04.it happened. It is the wrong feeling. But you are led to believe
:09:05. > :09:09.by ceremony different people and agencies and perceptions that it was
:09:10. > :09:15.your fault in somewhere or other. Therefore, you feel guilty about
:09:16. > :09:20.making that move and going forward and taking the step. To know that
:09:21. > :09:24.other people out there have been through something similar makes it
:09:25. > :09:29.so much easier for you to feel that you will be believed. And
:09:30. > :09:36.Widdecombe, this is the point, and it has been one that has been made
:09:37. > :09:39.by the police, victims find strength in numbers, so the naming and
:09:40. > :09:42.publicising of somebody who has an accusation against them has led to
:09:43. > :09:47.other people feeling strong enough to come forward. Yes, but the law
:09:48. > :09:54.has to protect the innocent as well as deal with the guilty. From what
:09:55. > :09:59.we have seen in recent months, this case takes it a whole stage further,
:10:00. > :10:06.perfectly innocent people being named, other people coming forward,
:10:07. > :10:11.the case being disproved, 19 charges in one celebrity case, just being
:10:12. > :10:15.completely disproved, but the people have not been able to work while
:10:16. > :10:21.their names have been across the press, they have been subject to
:10:22. > :10:26.social disapproval, they are terribly and chess and worried, and
:10:27. > :10:29.it is not a level playing field, because if and when the charges
:10:30. > :10:35.dismissed or the jury throws something out, we still do not know
:10:36. > :10:39.who brought the allegation. I would say this for the level playing
:10:40. > :10:45.field, it is perfectly true that if somebody really is guilty, others
:10:46. > :10:49.may come forward, but it is also the case that where a woman has
:10:50. > :10:54.previously made such allegations, but people should have the
:10:55. > :11:00.opportunity to know that. You have made the suggestion that in those
:11:01. > :11:06.cases, a judge could make those false allegations known. In the
:11:07. > :11:11.other cases you are referring to, to take the point is a victim of rape,
:11:12. > :11:17.why would you want to not enable women to feel stronger about the
:11:18. > :11:21.ability to come forward, those are the facts about some of these
:11:22. > :11:27.cases? You would not want to take that away from people? First of all,
:11:28. > :11:32.that is no reason to start naming people before charge. You might want
:11:33. > :11:38.to do it on charge, but not before that, and that has been very widely
:11:39. > :11:47.disregarded. Secondly, yes, where a judge believes that an allegation
:11:48. > :11:51.has been malicious or frivolous or with pound signs in the eyes, he
:11:52. > :11:55.should be able to name the accuser, but for those for whom the evidence
:11:56. > :11:59.is not even strong enough to proceed to court, they have had months of
:12:00. > :12:07.worry, there has to be a level playing field. Either anonymity for
:12:08. > :12:13.both or no anonymity for either. Do you think there is a place in the
:12:14. > :12:21.middle where these differing opinions could meet? It is unlikely.
:12:22. > :12:24.One of the things that she said is that people should be able to be
:12:25. > :12:29.named if it is proved they have made a false allegation. The law allows
:12:30. > :12:34.that to happen. For a lot of people, and allegation may not be
:12:35. > :12:41.seen as false. Somebody may be seen -- found not guilty, but it does not
:12:42. > :12:44.necessarily mean a victim has endured a sexual assault. This can
:12:45. > :12:49.affect somebody for the rest of their lives. We talk about how it
:12:50. > :12:53.affects the offenders for the rest of their lives, many of the people
:12:54. > :12:56.we have seen, it has not affected them that badly, because they have
:12:57. > :13:04.gone back to their jobs. That is true of the Thames as well, and
:13:05. > :13:09.often they spend -- suspend their lives. We do not take the impact on
:13:10. > :13:16.victims seriously at all in this country.
:13:17. > :13:19.It's almost impossible to grasp the enormity of the violent events
:13:20. > :13:24.History needs time in the blind spot of the rear-view mirror before
:13:25. > :13:29.In a moment we'll discuss where the lessons of history take us with
:13:30. > :13:32.regards to Iraq and what seems to be the reluctance of the US and Britain
:13:33. > :13:38.First, a reminder of how that past looked, in the present.
:13:39. > :13:45.We're going to run two broadcasts made by US President George W Bush
:13:46. > :13:49.and then British Prime Minister Tony Blair, both were delivered to the
:13:50. > :13:52.Iraqi people in April 2003, after troops had been sent in to Iraq.
:13:53. > :14:05.And it is the whole speech and nothing but the speech.
:14:06. > :14:14.At the moment, the regime of Saddam Hussein is being removed from power.
:14:15. > :14:18.American and coalition forces are operating inside Baghdad. We will
:14:19. > :14:24.not stop until Saddam Hussein's corrupt gang is gone. The government
:14:25. > :14:30.of Iraq, and the future of your country will soon belong to you. The
:14:31. > :14:34.goals of the coalition are clear and limited. We will end a brutal
:14:35. > :14:40.regime, whose aggression and weapons of mass destruction make it a unique
:14:41. > :14:44.threat to the world. Coalition forces will help maintain law and
:14:45. > :14:51.order so Iraqis can live in security. We will expect -- respect
:14:52. > :14:55.your traditions, whose principles of equality and compassion are
:14:56. > :14:59.essential to a rock's future. We will help you build a peaceful and
:15:00. > :15:04.representative government that protects the rights of all citizens.
:15:05. > :15:15.And then our military forces will leave. Iraq will go forward as a
:15:16. > :15:20.unified, sovereign nation. The United States and coalition partners
:15:21. > :15:25.respect the people of Iraq. We are taking measures to spare the lives
:15:26. > :15:30.of innocent citizens. We are beginning to deliver food, water and
:15:31. > :15:36.medicine to those in need. Our only enemy is Saddam Hussein and his
:15:37. > :15:41.brutal regime, and that regime is your enemy as well. In a new era,
:15:42. > :15:45.your country will no longer be held captive to the will of a cruel
:15:46. > :15:54.dictator. You will be free to build a better life, instead of building
:15:55. > :15:57.palaces Saddam Hussein and sons. Free for making prosperity without
:15:58. > :16:03.economic sanctions, free to speak your mind and join in the political
:16:04. > :16:08.affairs of Iraq. And all the people who make up your country will be
:16:09. > :16:14.free of the terrible persecution that so many having your order. The
:16:15. > :16:18.nightmare that Saddam Hussein has brought to your nation will soon be
:16:19. > :16:25.over. You are a good and gifted people. A great civilisation that
:16:26. > :16:32.contributes to humanity. You deserve better than tyranny and torture. You
:16:33. > :16:40.deserve to live as free people and I assure every citizen, your nation
:16:41. > :16:44.will soon be free. This is Tony Blair, Prime Minister of the United
:16:45. > :16:48.Kingdom. I am glad to be able to speak to you today to tell you
:16:49. > :16:53.Saddam Hussein's regime is collapsing and years of brutality,
:16:54. > :16:58.oppression and fear are coming to an end. That a new and better future
:16:59. > :17:04.beckons for the people of Iraq. We did not want this war, but in
:17:05. > :17:09.refusing to give up his weapons of mass destruction, Saddam gave us no
:17:10. > :17:15.choice but to act. Now the war has begun, it will be seen through to
:17:16. > :17:20.the end. We will continue to do what we can to avoid civilian casualties.
:17:21. > :17:27.Our enemy is Saddam and his regime, not the Iraqi people. Our forces are
:17:28. > :17:32.friends and liberators of the Iraqi people, not your conquerors. And
:17:33. > :17:39.they will not stay in Iraq a day longer than is necessary. I know,
:17:40. > :17:45.however, some of you feared a repeat of 1991, when you thought Saddam's
:17:46. > :17:49.war was being ended, but he stayed and you suffered. That will not
:17:50. > :17:57.happen this time. This regime will be gone and ended. And then we will
:17:58. > :18:01.work with you to build a peaceful, prosperous Iraq that you want and
:18:02. > :18:07.deserve. This Iraq will not be run by Britain, or by the United States,
:18:08. > :18:13.or by the United Nations. It will be run by you, the people of Iraq. Our
:18:14. > :18:19.aim is to help alleviate humanitarian suffering and to move
:18:20. > :18:25.as soon as possible to an interim authority that is run by Iraqis.
:18:26. > :18:29.That will pave the way for a truly representative Iraqi government,
:18:30. > :18:34.which respects human rights and the rule of law and spends Iraq's
:18:35. > :18:40.wealth, not on palaces and weapons of mass destruction, not on you and
:18:41. > :18:46.the services you need. Saddam Hussein and his regime plundered
:18:47. > :18:49.your nation's wealth. While many of you live in poverty, they lived
:18:50. > :18:54.lives of luxury. Saddam became one of the richest men in the world, his
:18:55. > :19:00.money stolen from you. The money from Iraqi oil will be yours, to be
:19:01. > :19:07.used to build prosperity for you and your families. I know from my
:19:08. > :19:11.meetings with Iraqi exiles who live in Britain, that you are an
:19:12. > :19:16.inventive, creative people. You should be free to travel, to have
:19:17. > :19:22.access to independent media, free to express your views and develop your
:19:23. > :19:28.culture. My experience of people the world over is that we all want to be
:19:29. > :19:33.able to live our lives in peace and in security. We want to give our
:19:34. > :19:40.families the chance of a decent life and future. Three years, that chance
:19:41. > :19:45.has been denied to you. Millions of your countrymen and women have been
:19:46. > :19:51.forced to leave -- fee years. Many have been tortured, brutalised by
:19:52. > :19:54.the regime. Now, we want to give you the chance to rebuild your country
:19:55. > :20:00.and your lives, to give your families a chance that better
:20:01. > :20:10.future. So it is in the spirit of friendship and goodwill that we now
:20:11. > :20:23.offer our help. Thank you. Tony Blair and George Bush -- George W
:20:24. > :20:27.Bush. Joining me is John Rentoul, a confirmed Blairite and Peter
:20:28. > :20:34.Hitchens, not a confirmed Blairite. What do those speeches make you
:20:35. > :20:40.think? They make me feel very sad because the hopes that people had at
:20:41. > :20:48.the time proved to be so awfully badly founded. You cannot say
:20:49. > :20:56.anything other than the present state of Iraq is a disaster. Would
:20:57. > :21:00.you still say Tony Blair and George Bush's policy was right, or that it
:21:01. > :21:06.was wrong and they caused what is happening now? It was not completely
:21:07. > :21:13.wrong. The aims of the policy were good and noble. It turned out
:21:14. > :21:18.extremely badly. I think the worst lesson to take from Iraq would be
:21:19. > :21:25.Peter's lesson, that intervention never works. Sometimes it works and
:21:26. > :21:28.in Iraq, it did not. But I ink we have a responsibility, partly
:21:29. > :21:35.because we helped to create the mess, to finish the job. Peter
:21:36. > :21:39.Hitchens, you have been pre-empted, but I would like to know your
:21:40. > :21:48.reaction to seeing those words again. One thing they make me feel
:21:49. > :21:53.is the self regard these ignorant people who launched themselves into
:21:54. > :21:57.a problem they did not understand and created a mess far worse than
:21:58. > :22:02.the one they claim to be clearing up. It seems to be to be a good
:22:03. > :22:07.warning to politicians that things are more complicated than they seem.
:22:08. > :22:10.Since they cannot run their own countries with competence, it
:22:11. > :22:18.strikes me as wise to steer clear of running other people's. John Rentoul
:22:19. > :22:26.says that I say you should never intervene. I would not go that far.
:22:27. > :22:31.There may be circumstances. But it would help if you knew what you were
:22:32. > :22:35.doing before you intervened. They rejected the advice of people who
:22:36. > :22:40.knew what they were doing. How can you know what you are doing? You
:22:41. > :22:48.cannot imagine in 2003 that somebody sat down, no matter how clever, that
:22:49. > :22:55.a force like IS would be marauding across the country, killing people.
:22:56. > :23:02.The history of Iraq since we created it has been one of violence and
:23:03. > :23:05.terrible mayhem, much of which was directed against the British when we
:23:06. > :23:10.first went there. If anybody knew that, they would have realised it
:23:11. > :23:21.was more of a problem. I am not sure they understood the divisions
:23:22. > :23:27.between Sunni and Shia. One thing that has to be rammed home is they
:23:28. > :23:31.said they would bring democracy to Iraq. A collaboration between the
:23:32. > :23:37.United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran has overthrown the
:23:38. > :23:40.democratically elected government of Iraq and replaced it with one more
:23:41. > :23:48.to its taste. That is not democratic. That is a gross
:23:49. > :23:56.simplification. It is a straightforward statement. Everyone
:23:57. > :24:01.would agree that Mr Maliki was part of the problem in dealing with Isis.
:24:02. > :24:10.Part of the pressure from within Iraq... If you set yourself up as
:24:11. > :24:13.bringing democracy to the country and then collaborate in overthrowing
:24:14. > :24:21.the democratically chosen leader, you cannot claim to be the apostle
:24:22. > :24:25.of democracy. Can I ask you both this question about the shadows of
:24:26. > :24:30.history. So many believe the reluctance on the part of the US and
:24:31. > :24:37.Britain to go in is based on the fact the last campaigns have been
:24:38. > :24:43.unsuccessful. The Gulf Wars. Are we deluding ourselves and allowing
:24:44. > :24:48.history to skew the present. The situation now is different. The
:24:49. > :24:57.humanitarian disaster, the potential genocide, it is a different
:24:58. > :25:01.situation. It would be foolish to ignore any possibility of saving
:25:02. > :25:10.people from genocide, starvation, all the other terrible things. You
:25:11. > :25:17.have to be careful not to extend that, which it could easily happen,
:25:18. > :25:22.into something bigger. The Libyan catastrophe began with claims we
:25:23. > :25:32.would prevent a massacre. Libya is now one big massacre. Nobody reports
:25:33. > :25:39.it because nobody goes there. We did prevent a massacre in Libya. There
:25:40. > :25:48.is no question. It has not turned out very well. The causes of that
:25:49. > :25:52.are deep and various. They are not necessarily to do with the
:25:53. > :25:57.intervention, just as the causes of ices are not necessarily to do with
:25:58. > :26:05.the intervention of 2003, but more with our failure to intervene with
:26:06. > :26:11.Syria. I would say it is largely a consequence of our destabilisation.
:26:12. > :26:14.It crosses one of the last frontiers of our
:26:15. > :26:16.imaginations - lost tribes, whole communities we know nothing about.
:26:17. > :26:20.When 20 more members of an ancient tribe came out
:26:21. > :26:22.of the jungle this week they gave us a unique insight into
:26:23. > :26:41.The first pictures of an Amazonian tribe believed to have fled their
:26:42. > :26:47.lands in Peru across the border to Brazil. They have told that they
:26:48. > :26:53.were attacked, possibly by loggers or drug traffickers. But they are
:26:54. > :26:56.not safe yet. Things easily cured in the outside world have wiped out
:26:57. > :27:17.communities in the past that have not been exposed to them. They were
:27:18. > :27:20.forced to make contact because of their land being destroyed. I think
:27:21. > :27:26.the authorities must provide money to protect their lives. We do not
:27:27. > :27:32.know the name of the latest tribe but it is believed there are over 70
:27:33. > :27:37.tribes not contacted in the Amazon and over 100 worldwide. The
:27:38. > :27:40.challenge now is to prepare tech from a world that is long they have
:27:41. > :27:45.wanted nothing to do with. One man who has had the privilege
:27:46. > :27:48.of meeting some of the world's most secretive tribes
:27:49. > :27:50.is Dr John Hemming, an explorer and historian, who was once head
:27:51. > :28:03.of the Royal Geographical Society. They have very powerful
:28:04. > :28:06.personalities these people. Can you describe what it is like to meet
:28:07. > :28:13.someone who may not have seen a person like yourself. It is
:28:14. > :28:19.traumatic. Can you imagine, you live all your life in the forest and,
:28:20. > :28:24.suddenly, you have this extraordinary experience. The four
:28:25. > :28:29.peoples I have seen at the time of contact have reacted differently.
:28:30. > :28:37.They are highly intelligent people. Two groups, just in a state of
:28:38. > :28:41.shock, another was quite aggressive, they had bows and arrows all the
:28:42. > :28:51.time and would not let us see their village. The fourth group treated us
:28:52. > :28:55.like gods. They did not know who we were all what we wanted. This
:28:56. > :29:07.contact was made by Brazilian professionals. They went quite well.
:29:08. > :29:13.The great problem is disease. And are spreading diseases they have no
:29:14. > :29:21.antibodies to. They are wonderfully fit. In perfect health. We come
:29:22. > :29:27.along and ruin it, which is very unfair. What sensation does it leave
:29:28. > :29:31.you with? Is it like the men and women who go to space who come back
:29:32. > :29:42.down and save the world is never quite the same again? It had eight
:29:43. > :29:51.the effect. -- a bit big effect. -- big effect. It turned into three
:29:52. > :30:02.large books. And the research goes on. You cannot generalise, every
:30:03. > :30:06.tribe is different, but I cannot think of a single people who did not
:30:07. > :30:14.want to preserve, or even revive their culture. Like our own
:30:15. > :30:19.minorities, such as the Welsh, the Scottish, they want to keep and
:30:20. > :30:26.preserve and treasure their heritage. I read that in your first
:30:27. > :30:31.trip to the Amazon you were given permission by the Brazilian
:30:32. > :30:36.government to name areas you discovered and gave them names of
:30:37. > :30:43.your Brazilian girlfriend will stop that was nothing to do with the
:30:44. > :30:50.Indians. It was a long time ago. We have to leave it there. Thanks for
:30:51. > :30:56.coming in this and evening. That is it from me, the last of the bending
:30:57. > :31:01.machine of standing presenters. We'd leave you with a treat as part of
:31:02. > :31:06.the Proms preview season. We end tonight with the incredible voice of
:31:07. > :31:23.Laura M Foula. This is a song from her new album. -- Laura Mvula.
:31:24. > :31:35.# Saw you wandering in my dream last night.
:31:36. > :31:42.# Singing wonder, wonder what you might do.
:31:43. > :31:51.# You can't simply hide a dream in the blue.
:31:52. > :31:54.# Don't try to fight, don't let me go.
:31:55. > :31:58.# You've gone too far from what I know.
:31:59. > :32:05.# I lost my heart in the dark with you.
:32:06. > :32:22.# Don't try to fight, don't let me go.
:32:23. > :32:27.# You've gone too far from what I know.
:32:28. > :32:35.# I lost my heart in the dark with you.