05/04/2016

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:00. > :00:09.Iceland's Prime Minister quits

:00:10. > :00:12.after revelations in the Panama Papers.

:00:13. > :00:16.Our Prime minister insists he's tough on corruption,

:00:17. > :00:18.so is it time to impose direct rule

:00:19. > :00:22.on the tax havens who answer to Britain?

:00:23. > :00:24.As trouble brews in paradise, we'll put that

:00:25. > :00:33.Companies in Bermuda pay taxes, I am the taxman, I am the finance

:00:34. > :00:36.minister, I can tell you, that we pay taxes.

:00:37. > :00:38.And the former foreign office minister who took

:00:39. > :00:52.back control of the Turks and Caicos tells us how he would do it now.

:00:53. > :00:56.One week on from news that Port Talbot is up for sale, ministers are

:00:57. > :00:58.to consider loaning money for a new power plant to bring down its huge

:00:59. > :01:01.energy bills. How much our energy costs and the government energy

:01:02. > :01:04.policy really to blame for the problems. And will anyone pay up for

:01:05. > :01:06.its multi-billion pound pension burden? We will ask the former

:01:07. > :01:13.pensions Minister for his view. the new prince of pop is under

:01:14. > :01:18.attack for his hair style. Are Justin Bieber's white

:01:19. > :01:19.dreadlocks an insult The Panama Papers have

:01:20. > :01:40.claimed their first scalp. A big one, the Prime Minister

:01:41. > :01:42.of Iceland, Sigmundur Gunnauggson, who, the papers revealed,

:01:43. > :01:44.set up a company in the British Virgin Islands

:01:45. > :01:47.with his wife and then, when he entered parliament,

:01:48. > :01:49.failed to declare it. Our own Prime minister who had been

:01:50. > :01:52.under pressure over the revelation of his late father's involvement

:01:53. > :01:55.in a Panama based fund for investors, today insisted he had

:01:56. > :01:57.no shares, no offshore trusts

:01:58. > :01:58.and no offshore funds. It is the central role which British

:01:59. > :02:01.dependencies have played in what Jeremy Corbyn today called

:02:02. > :02:03.the encouragement of tax avoidance on an industrial scale that led him

:02:04. > :02:07.to echo the call made by the former Business Secretary Vince Cable

:02:08. > :02:09.on Newsnight last night for the imposition of direct rule

:02:10. > :02:28.on British overseas territories VOICEOVER: The Panama papers have

:02:29. > :02:34.claimed their first big scalp. CHEERING

:02:35. > :02:36.A crowd here in Reykjavik have been demanding the resignation of

:02:37. > :02:40.Sigmundur Gunnlaugsson, the prime on a stir of Iceland, if you days ago

:02:41. > :02:47.he was dismissing claims that he had hidden wealth offshore in Panama and

:02:48. > :02:51.today he quit over the scandal, his finance minister also implicated is

:02:52. > :02:56.still hanging on. David Cameron has come in for some heat as well, his

:02:57. > :03:02.late father, who worked in finance, used Panama as well. I own no

:03:03. > :03:06.shares, I have a salary as Prime Minister, and I have some savings,

:03:07. > :03:11.which I get some interest from, and I have a house which we used to live

:03:12. > :03:16.in, which we now let out while we are living in Downing Street, that

:03:17. > :03:20.is all I have. No shares, no offshore trust, no offshore funds,

:03:21. > :03:25.nothing like that. The Labour leader focused today not an Panama but on

:03:26. > :03:28.some of the British Overseas Territories, 14 of them, former

:03:29. > :03:34.crown Colonies, still dependent on the UK. Many, like Montserrat and

:03:35. > :03:38.the Falklands, have not become financial centres, others, have made

:03:39. > :03:42.their way onto lists of tax havens. There is particular attention on bee

:03:43. > :03:46.media, in the Atlantic, the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman

:03:47. > :03:50.Islands in the Caribbean, and Gibraltar, in Europe. These

:03:51. > :03:52.territories are accused of enabling excessive secrecy, of the sort that

:03:53. > :03:58.allow the Icelandic Prime Minister to keep his investments hidden in

:03:59. > :04:01.Panama. You can go through the British Virgin Islands, classic

:04:02. > :04:07.case, you can incorporate a company very cheaply there, and then you

:04:08. > :04:10.can, that company can own assets, and even though you, the rich

:04:11. > :04:15.person, are the beneficial owner of the company, you can put nominees in

:04:16. > :04:18.the way. If you go to the British Virgin Islands and try to find out

:04:19. > :04:22.more about the company, and I have done that myself, you bang your head

:04:23. > :04:25.against a brick wall. To give you a sense of what this secrecy means on

:04:26. > :04:32.the ground, this is a company filing from the British Virgin Islands, LW

:04:33. > :04:36.group Limited, 350578. It tells you the number of the lawyers who set up

:04:37. > :04:40.the company and their address, the company current lawyers, and their

:04:41. > :04:45.address. What it does not tell you is that this company is the owner of

:04:46. > :04:50.a number of large British companies, namely, yodel, the delivery company,

:04:51. > :04:53.and Littlewoods, the shop, it is not tell you who the shareholders are,

:04:54. > :04:57.it is the Barclay brothers in this case. We can work out from filings

:04:58. > :05:00.elsewhere what the Barclay brothers company is but other owners have

:05:01. > :05:06.stayed off the radar. What can the Foreign Office do? Jeremy Corbyn

:05:07. > :05:11.alluded to the fact that in 2009, London imposed a wrecked role on the

:05:12. > :05:14.Turks and Caicos Islands because of local corruption, he suggested the

:05:15. > :05:18.Foreign Office to do the same for overseas Territories who do not play

:05:19. > :05:22.ball on secrecy. Actually it is more likely they would use another power.

:05:23. > :05:29.The Foreign Office's final big lever is legal, it can pass laws or order

:05:30. > :05:32.council through the Privy Council Office the territories into line,

:05:33. > :05:37.that relies upon the overseas territories doing as they are told,

:05:38. > :05:40.and not declaring independence. Some of the bigger overseas territories,

:05:41. > :05:45.like Bermuda, may be tempted by that path. The Foreign Office considers

:05:46. > :05:51.this a nuclear option, they would prefer to chivvy and encourage but

:05:52. > :05:58.use little bargaining chips. The dramatic pressure is there preferred

:05:59. > :06:02.weapon. It is seen as a bunch of banana republics, people can dismiss

:06:03. > :06:05.that, what we are intimately involved in this issue, in this

:06:06. > :06:10.problem, we in Britain, and in Europe. European tax savings, the

:06:11. > :06:14.United States as well, the rich world is part of the problem, that

:06:15. > :06:18.is where the tax havens are, you are not going to stash money into

:06:19. > :06:22.Nigeria, you will stash it somewhere rich and developed. One thing has

:06:23. > :06:24.become clear, Ireland's tax havens are only one corner of the

:06:25. > :06:36.controversy around tax. -- island. STUDIO: Earlier I spoke

:06:37. > :06:39.to the Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister

:06:40. > :06:40.of Bermuda Bob Richards and asked him what he says

:06:41. > :06:43.to Jeremy Corbyn's suggestion that places like Bermuda should be

:06:44. > :06:48.brought under direct rule. I would say that the need is a

:06:49. > :06:52.country that has its own constitution.

:06:53. > :06:57.We have a democratically elected government that operates under the

:06:58. > :07:00.rule of law under the Constitution, and the Constitution is an agreed

:07:01. > :07:08.document with the United Kingdom government. We would not expect the

:07:09. > :07:16.United Kingdom, a government that has great respect for the rule of

:07:17. > :07:21.law, to breach their own covenants. How do you justify to British

:07:22. > :07:25.taxpayers that you provide a place for people to hide the they are due

:07:26. > :07:33.to pay in the countries where they are based? That is a question based

:07:34. > :07:38.on a full is assumption. We have our own laws, our own taxes. Every

:07:39. > :07:45.company that incorporates in Bermuda has two provide the government

:07:46. > :07:49.agency, the bemused and monetary authority, the names of the

:07:50. > :07:57.beneficial owners of those companies. -- the Bermudan monetary

:07:58. > :08:00.authority. That includes trusts. It is a beneficial ownership register.

:08:01. > :08:04.You provide the information but you do not deny that they are not paying

:08:05. > :08:10.the taxes they are due to pay in their own country, for example,

:08:11. > :08:13.Britain. If the British authorities think that some Britain has a

:08:14. > :08:19.company in Bermuda, and they are not paying their taxes, we will assist

:08:20. > :08:25.the UK Government, your government's laws around taxes, are for them.

:08:26. > :08:29.Anything that we can do, the only thing we can do, is cooperate and

:08:30. > :08:34.assist with you when asked through the proper channels. Why do you

:08:35. > :08:41.think that in 2013, David Cameron said to Bermuda that you had to get

:08:42. > :08:47.your house in order? I think that he misspoke, quite frankly, because

:08:48. > :08:53.insofar as a business concern, the United Kingdom is planning to

:08:54. > :08:58.construct a beneficial ownership registry. So that you know that. --

:08:59. > :09:04.I'm sure that you know that. The media has had such a registry for 70

:09:05. > :09:12.years, 70... It does not mean that you are not a tax haven. Yes it

:09:13. > :09:15.does? Yes, it does, the people of Bermuda pay taxes, companies pay

:09:16. > :09:20.taxes, I am the taxman, I am the finance minister, I can tell you,

:09:21. > :09:27.the taxes come to about 18% of GDP. We pay taxes. Every time I put up

:09:28. > :09:32.taxes I get howls of from residents, as I did in this budget session. The

:09:33. > :09:36.notion that we can run a country, run a government, without taxes, is

:09:37. > :09:41.not really realistic. Do you put yourself in a different bracket from

:09:42. > :09:45.the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands? I'm not going to

:09:46. > :09:52.comment on overseas territories, the only thing I can say to you is this:

:09:53. > :09:56.there seems to be a tendency on the part of not just the UK but the UK

:09:57. > :10:02.included and other countries to treat all overseas territories the

:10:03. > :10:07.same. One size fits all. I continue categorically, one size does not fit

:10:08. > :10:12.all. The constitutions of those islands that you mention are

:10:13. > :10:16.different from Bermuda, we have a higher level of self-government,

:10:17. > :10:22.than they do. From the beginning, from 1947, our forebears had the

:10:23. > :10:26.notion that we did not want just anybody doing business in Bermuda,

:10:27. > :10:31.we would screen them and we would approve them, and discard the ones

:10:32. > :10:35.that did not meet our standards. That is the reason that you do not

:10:36. > :10:41.see the new dimensions in those Panama papers. By the way, I must

:10:42. > :10:43.remind you, the UK is mentioned in the Panama papers! But, not Bermuda.

:10:44. > :10:50.Thank you for joining us. STUDIO: Joining me now from Cardiff

:10:51. > :10:53.is Chris Bryant Labour MP who was the minister responsible

:10:54. > :10:56.for the last time we took powers imposed direct rule on the Turks

:10:57. > :11:01.and Caicos Islands in March 2009, though in that instance it was to do

:11:02. > :11:09.with a corruption scandal. Wait a minute, what a load of

:11:10. > :11:14.baloney you have heard, Bermuda certainly has no income tax, no

:11:15. > :11:20.property tax, no sales tax, no inheritance tax! It is a tax haven!

:11:21. > :11:22.The whole point of the way some overseas territories have

:11:23. > :11:28.constructed their tax regime is not just to be competitive, but is to

:11:29. > :11:34.attract people to try to hide their international assets there. Do you

:11:35. > :11:37.agree with Jeremy Corbyn that direct rule should be imposed on the

:11:38. > :11:41.territories and dependencies? The one thing that was said that was

:11:42. > :11:45.right, we should not treat them all exactly the same way. You have

:11:46. > :11:50.criticised Bermuda, could there be direct rule? Not tomorrow, no there

:11:51. > :11:55.should not, there are plenty of other powers that the UK Government

:11:56. > :11:59.already has, which it has, for some reason for the last six years it has

:12:00. > :12:03.been choosing not to exercise. Sorry to enter, let me clarify the

:12:04. > :12:08.position, is Jeremy Corbyn wrong to lump them together? He has not lump

:12:09. > :12:12.them together, we are not saying that we should suddenly install

:12:13. > :12:16.direct rule over the Falkland Islands, Pitcairn, the British

:12:17. > :12:21.Indian Ocean Territory! The point is really important, in Turks and

:12:22. > :12:26.Caicos, the cavernous is still chaired by the British governor. --

:12:27. > :12:29.the cabinet. All legislation must receive Royal assent, because they

:12:30. > :12:33.are part of the British Crown. There are plenty of powers that the

:12:34. > :12:39.government has. Let me give you one instance, when I was Foreign Office

:12:40. > :12:41.minister, in 2009/10, several of the financial services overseas

:12:42. > :12:45.territories, which Jeremy Peace writes 2.2, they were insignificant

:12:46. > :12:56.financial problems and they needed to borrow a lot of money. -- which

:12:57. > :13:01.is right to point to. I refuse to allow them to borrow more money,

:13:02. > :13:06.until such time as they brought in some broader tax basis, because it

:13:07. > :13:10.is one thing to try to have a competitive tax regime, I understand

:13:11. > :13:15.that, but it is another to have a set of rules which means that you

:13:16. > :13:18.can hide the beneficial ownership of significant assets from the rest of

:13:19. > :13:23.the world. It is worth bearing in mind that 8% of the worlds wealth is

:13:24. > :13:29.hidden. Let's be clear, a lot of what is being revealed and will

:13:30. > :13:36.still be revealed and is yet to be revealed was during Labour's watch.

:13:37. > :13:40.This is a long-standing problem. I agree.

:13:41. > :13:50.It is not one-sided fits all but is there an argument for taking Turks

:13:51. > :13:57.and Caicos under direct control and how would you do it? You would have

:13:58. > :14:02.two order in Council, a pretty straightforward process. But it is

:14:03. > :14:07.the implications of it. Of doing that, what would they be? They would

:14:08. > :14:13.be dramatic. That would be the nuclear option. I would say you need

:14:14. > :14:16.to use all the other powers and I'm mystified why why the Conservative

:14:17. > :14:22.government in 2010 or Coalition Government, decided to allow all bad

:14:23. > :14:25.are linked to go forward for all those other countries without

:14:26. > :14:30.requiring them to move forward on transparency. The one point in

:14:31. > :14:34.relation to Bermuda, which is key, it is all very well to gather

:14:35. > :14:38.information within Bermuda, on beneficial ownership, but you need

:14:39. > :14:44.to share that between all the different dependencies, overseas

:14:45. > :14:49.territories and the UK Government, to make sure you're doing it

:14:50. > :14:53.properly. And in the end, my constituents spit with fury when

:14:54. > :14:57.they hear that there is one set of rules for the ultra rich and another

:14:58. > :15:01.set of rules for everyone else. Everyone else has got to pay their

:15:02. > :15:07.fair share of tax and why should these big corporations not. Why

:15:08. > :15:13.should wash and go or kitten able to hide ownership of properties through

:15:14. > :15:17.companies in BBI or why should we in the UK not be able to know that the

:15:18. > :15:22.president of the United Arab Emirates owns vast chunks of the

:15:23. > :15:24.London property market. Thank you very much for that, Chris Bryant.

:15:25. > :15:27.There are two big imepdiments to a potential sale of Tata Steel,

:15:28. > :15:29.we'll deal with the massive pension burden in a moment,

:15:30. > :15:34.but the other is the cost of energy, twice what Germany pays.

:15:35. > :15:36.Industry, and not just the steel industry,

:15:37. > :15:40.But is there an inventive way to tempt a buyer in,

:15:41. > :15:45.through an energy deal, or is energy a red herring?

:15:46. > :15:47.Here's the FT's energy correspondent Kiran Stacey,

:15:48. > :15:56.who we asked to shed some light on the issue.

:15:57. > :15:59.Among the attempts to save steel-making at Port Talbot,

:16:00. > :16:02.one intriguing idea sits on the table.

:16:03. > :16:09.Supposing the government could lend the money

:16:10. > :16:11.for a buyer to build their own gas power station

:16:12. > :16:14.The cripplingly high energy costs, about which Tata has

:16:15. > :16:16.repeatedly complained, would no longer be an impediment.

:16:17. > :16:24.But how much are energy costs and the government energy

:16:25. > :16:26.policy really to blame for the company's problems?

:16:27. > :16:31.When steel companies are put under pressure and profit

:16:32. > :16:35.margins are squeezed, or even wiped out completely,

:16:36. > :16:38.those fixed costs and costs with reasonable variations,

:16:39. > :16:40.like electricity, become a much bigger issue.

:16:41. > :16:44.And that is what we have seen over the last two or three years.

:16:45. > :16:46.There is no question that electricity prices for heavy

:16:47. > :16:50.Higher in fact than any other country in the EU.

:16:51. > :16:57.One explanation is the subsidies given to renewables such as wind

:16:58. > :17:05.Like us, their subsidies are paid for by putting levies

:17:06. > :17:09.But unlike us, the German government has given large industrial users

:17:10. > :17:14.9 billion euros back on their bills since 2013.

:17:15. > :17:22.In that time the UK has paid out just ?160 million.

:17:23. > :17:24.Melting steel at temperatures of almost 1300 Celsius

:17:25. > :17:30.But how much of an impact do energy prices and green subsidies actually

:17:31. > :17:37.Of that 9.5p per kilowatt hour of electricity that UK heavy

:17:38. > :17:41.industry paid in 2014, this is how it broke down.

:17:42. > :17:46.The raw electricity accounts for 55% of the cost.

:17:47. > :17:49.Delivering it accounts for another 27%.

:17:50. > :17:58.And energy and climate change policies account for 15%.

:17:59. > :18:00.Of the overall costs of running a blast furnace such

:18:01. > :18:05.as those at Port Talbot, electricity accounts for about 6%.

:18:06. > :18:08.Altogether therefore, green policy accounts for around 1%

:18:09. > :18:12.of what it costs to melt steel at the South Wales site.

:18:13. > :18:17.The figures you have seen are about electricity.

:18:18. > :18:20.We are talking in Port Talbot largely about gas.

:18:21. > :18:25.And gas is not affected by this at all.

:18:26. > :18:34.And British Gas prices are about medium for the whole of Europe.

:18:35. > :18:37.So it cannot be this, i.e., green taxes, which has affected

:18:38. > :18:39.the closure or the threat of closure of Port Talbot.

:18:40. > :18:43.There are lots of other things that could have done it, but above all,

:18:44. > :18:45.it is the international price of steel which has

:18:46. > :18:52.The government could of course remove green levies altogether.

:18:53. > :18:54.It could, in the words attributed to David Cameron,

:18:55. > :18:59.That would give you your one, maybe 2% saving on the cost

:19:00. > :19:05.But compared to the 30% drop in the price of some steel products

:19:06. > :19:08.worldwide in the last year, I'm not sure that that is going

:19:09. > :19:18.to make the difference needed to save the British steel industry.

:19:19. > :19:21.It is possible that generous government subsidies could pull

:19:22. > :19:23.companies on the cusp of going under back from the brink.

:19:24. > :19:26.But it seems that in the case of Tata, their problems

:19:27. > :19:37.The other huge issue surrounding Tata or any other potential buyer is

:19:38. > :19:38.pensions. With me now in the studio

:19:39. > :19:41.is Steve Webb, who was Pensions Minister for the five years

:19:42. > :19:49.of the coalition government. In your view is any potential buyer

:19:50. > :19:54.going to take on the pension burden? It looks pretty toxic to me. You

:19:55. > :19:57.have enough trouble making money selling steel but if you're worried

:19:58. > :20:01.also about the cost of pension promises already made but the fact

:20:02. > :20:08.that the pension deficit could blow up again in the future, you just

:20:09. > :20:11.never knew a pension fund deficit and any purchaser would not want

:20:12. > :20:14.that level of uncertainty. What would the most likely outcome be

:20:15. > :20:20.question mark in a normal situation, if a business is running and become

:20:21. > :20:28.insolvent, the pension fund if it is short of money as this is, and it

:20:29. > :20:35.changes by the day. Potentially it runs into billions by some measures.

:20:36. > :20:38.140,000 people involved, not just the workers working for Tata at the

:20:39. > :20:43.moment. Yes, the people actively working, and another 30,000 who have

:20:44. > :20:48.not yet retired, a round 80,000 to have retired. If the money goes into

:20:49. > :20:57.the Pension Protection Fund, would you think is most likely, they will

:20:58. > :21:01.not get 100% of their action. -- pension. It will not replace every

:21:02. > :21:06.penny of the pension you're going to get. So men and women would lose

:21:07. > :21:14.their pension. And the hardest-hit would be the longest serving. Just

:21:15. > :21:17.explain why that is. No one is getting a full pay-out. If you have

:21:18. > :21:22.not yet reached pension age you get 90% of something, that something is

:21:23. > :21:26.capped. If you've worked in the industry man and boy all your life,

:21:27. > :21:31.you could build up a pension or perhaps 60,000 a year but the cap

:21:32. > :21:35.would take you down to around 30. You could lose potentially up to

:21:36. > :21:42.half your pension. There is also an issue over whether it was index

:21:43. > :21:46.linked. Again that would be the long serving workers who lose out. You

:21:47. > :21:54.have brought in something to try to amend this, but it was not passed. I

:21:55. > :21:57.thought it was wrong to cap long-term workers. If you have a

:21:58. > :22:02.decent pension because you worked in a scheme of your life, it is not

:22:03. > :22:08.their that it is capped so hard. So last year, I legislated for a bigger

:22:09. > :22:13.cap for longer workers but that has not been implemented. It is that cap

:22:14. > :22:18.plus 3%. And why has it not been implemented? I guess it has not been

:22:19. > :22:22.a priority, to be fair to the new government, they have been doing

:22:23. > :22:27.other things, but it ought to be a priority. Long serving workers need

:22:28. > :22:31.this. And there is no impediment to David Cameron for example doing this

:22:32. > :22:37.tomorrow. Detailed regulations could be done in a matter of months. So

:22:38. > :22:42.before all this happens, it could be done. One of the other ideas being

:22:43. > :22:45.floated is the idea that the government as it did with Royal

:22:46. > :22:51.Mail, would take on the pension burden. And you rules would preclude

:22:52. > :22:58.that, do you think, or not? It would be challenging to say the industry

:22:59. > :23:03.is a special case. And the government would be worried that the

:23:04. > :23:06.car industry, defence, aerospace, they would be worried about the

:23:07. > :23:11.president. Not that they could not afford to, today they would not be a

:23:12. > :23:14.problem but promises would need to be kept for decades to come. I think

:23:15. > :23:18.the worried would be the president. Anti-EU? You're not allowed to

:23:19. > :23:24.subsidise your own industries where the complete with other people. So

:23:25. > :23:27.the EU takes the view there is too much steel capacity so that is hard

:23:28. > :23:28.to see that working for the government.

:23:29. > :23:30.The Canadian singer songwriter Justin Bieber has been accused

:23:31. > :23:32.of cultural appropriation for wearing his blond

:23:33. > :23:37.As someone who in the past defended US reality TV star Kylie Jenner's

:23:38. > :23:40.right to style her hair in corn rows,

:23:41. > :23:43.he is not unaware of the implications of his new hairstyle.

:23:44. > :23:46.But are the Rolling Stones guilty because they appropriated soul blues

:23:47. > :23:51.What is cultural appropriation and what is cultural appreciation?

:23:52. > :24:10.This programme, the proud boast would be meaningless first with

:24:11. > :24:16.Justin Bieber news if we were not all over his latest hairstyle.

:24:17. > :24:20.The Canadian pop star has been dividing opinion with his new

:24:21. > :24:25.hairdo. Are these dreadlocks and if so is it cultural appropriation as

:24:26. > :24:31.some have claimed? Another man got into trouble on a San Francisco

:24:32. > :24:43.campus for his haircut. You say I cannot have the hairstyle because of

:24:44. > :24:49.your culture? Are you Egyptian? I have certainly been told, made aware

:24:50. > :24:53.in no uncertain terms that the hairstyle I have had have been

:24:54. > :24:58.deemed too black or not appropriate for that situation. So again of

:24:59. > :25:02.white person is able to just kind of experiment with these hairstyles as

:25:03. > :25:08.though there some of costume and is not subject to any of the same

:25:09. > :25:17.stigma that a black person might be. It is frustrating.

:25:18. > :25:23.At this busy mixed barbershop in London this evening the reaction to

:25:24. > :25:29.the Justin Bieber Barnet Fair Rory seemed to be, keep your hair on. I

:25:30. > :25:35.wish I had that amount of hair! Why not. If you've got the hair, you can

:25:36. > :25:44.do whatever you want with it. I think they look nice. I do. The

:25:45. > :25:51.crossover between cultures, it is predominately known as an

:25:52. > :26:02.Afro-Caribbean type of thing. It looks a bit like punk. Not raster or

:26:03. > :26:08.anything. That does not look very good! He is copying the black spiral

:26:09. > :26:14.of dreadlocks I suppose. But he has changed it up a bit. It is like Mick

:26:15. > :26:19.Hucknall and boy George, they tried to do something like that. If he had

:26:20. > :26:23.come to you what would you have said this remark he would be in the chair

:26:24. > :26:26.right there! I would ask one customer to get up and get him

:26:27. > :26:28.straight in the chair, Justin Bieber!

:26:29. > :26:31.Joining me in the studio to discuss this further is Ian Dunt the Editor

:26:32. > :26:33.of "politics.co.uk", Emma Dabri an academic and writer.

:26:34. > :26:37.And from our BBC studios in New York writer Chimene Suleyman.

:26:38. > :26:44.Good evening. It is a particular debate in the United States. Do you

:26:45. > :26:51.think that Justin Bieber has done something wrong? I think we should

:26:52. > :27:01.not necessarily hold celebrities to a higher status than the rest of us.

:27:02. > :27:04.The issue really, he is allowed to do what he wants to do with his own

:27:05. > :27:08.hairstyle. But we have a responsibility to each other and

:27:09. > :27:13.responsibility to marginalised communities to listen to why this

:27:14. > :27:19.had them or if there is something we are doing is harmful. What might be

:27:20. > :27:22.harmful about that. And then make an informed decision. In your opinion

:27:23. > :27:26.what is harmful? I think there is a fine line between cultural

:27:27. > :27:33.appropriation and cultural appreciation. It is a fine line. But

:27:34. > :27:36.a line nonetheless. Appropriation I think, there has been a lot of

:27:37. > :27:42.miscommunication about what the word means. It is not about necessarily

:27:43. > :27:48.enjoying someone else's cultural aesthetic. It is about taking an

:27:49. > :27:52.aspect of something that belongs to someone else, without their

:27:53. > :27:58.permission, and profiting from it. Let me put that to Ian Durrant. It

:27:59. > :28:05.is someone taking something from another culture, taking advantage

:28:06. > :28:11.for example of a marginalised culture. Like chicken tikka masala

:28:12. > :28:16.or Elvis Presley and the blues, which basically created rock 'n'

:28:17. > :28:20.roll. Exactly that. We are people, we mix cultures and we mix

:28:21. > :28:24.artistically. And bank god we do because if we do not we are

:28:25. > :28:27.functioning in an almost identical way to the way the far right has

:28:28. > :28:32.always asked us to in our little identity ghettos. That seems more

:28:33. > :28:38.severe than the haircut of Justin Bieber. Does it matter? I think

:28:39. > :28:43.saying that Elvis began rock 'n' roll is typical of what happens when

:28:44. > :28:48.we see cultural appropriation at its finest. One generally of white

:28:49. > :28:52.artist discredited and history will credit this person as being

:28:53. > :28:58.responsible for something that has been born often out of black

:28:59. > :29:02.struggle. You say that about the Rolling Stones as well? If you are

:29:03. > :29:08.going to save the invented rock 'n' roll, that is a problem. Two said

:29:09. > :29:14.they invented it, it is spurious. It is inaccurate. And it is crucial as

:29:15. > :29:21.well the idea that the question was, is it an insult to African culture.

:29:22. > :29:27.I think when we live in a time when African culture is diverse, is it

:29:28. > :29:34.still routinely stigmatised and presented as letter, as primitive

:29:35. > :29:36.and underdeveloped. But at the same time there is a systematic

:29:37. > :29:42.extraction of African resources, physical, material and cultural.

:29:43. > :29:46.That is when it gets into appropriation. It is not

:29:47. > :29:48.appreciation, we do not actually appreciate African culture when

:29:49. > :29:51.black people are participating in that. But only when a white person

:29:52. > :30:06.starts to take ownership. Was Elvis taking the blues and doing

:30:07. > :30:09.something with it, was that an act of cultural appropriation? The fact

:30:10. > :30:14.that he is now known as the king of rock and roll... It speaks to the

:30:15. > :30:20.fact that a white person will always end up with being predicted with an

:30:21. > :30:24.innovation that has come from black struggle and creativity. So that was

:30:25. > :30:33.a bad thing, most people would say that started a rich cultural

:30:34. > :30:41.heritage we have all enjoyed. Often when something is taken, in the

:30:42. > :30:46.past, they get the credit for it? And we live in a racist society,

:30:47. > :31:00.unfair, but this is not a sensible way of dealing with that.

:31:01. > :31:06.What would you regard as being an act of cultural appreciation? It

:31:07. > :31:11.tends to happen more organically, I grew up in London, there is a

:31:12. > :31:15.diverse community there, often what happens is that subcultures are

:31:16. > :31:21.formed through that process. It has the be an organic thing. To go back

:31:22. > :31:23.to what has been said about erasure, in the last week, with the debate

:31:24. > :31:28.that was happening around Rory Goldstein, who was wearing

:31:29. > :31:33.dreadlocks at a San Francisco University, there was a lot of real

:31:34. > :31:36.commitment to the history behind the dreadlocks, how may people wanted to

:31:37. > :31:42.mention that the Celts also wore dreadlocks. And Vikings. What

:31:43. > :31:46.happened in that conversation, even in that debate was that the

:31:47. > :31:49.African-American community, the black community, the Rastafarian

:31:50. > :31:53.community, were deleted from the discussion. -- Corey Goldstein. To

:31:54. > :31:58.favour a group of people that has not existed for the last thousand

:31:59. > :32:02.years. It is... It is this level of erasure that we are talking about. A

:32:03. > :32:09.different type of erasure, as you might call it, if you look at John

:32:10. > :32:12.Cena walls, who got a lot of flak for taking a Bollywood theme in

:32:13. > :32:18.India as part of a cold play music video. Was she guilty of cultural

:32:19. > :32:22.appropriation? -- Beyonce Knowles. Cultural appropriation is not just

:32:23. > :32:28.about taking the signifiers of a different cultural group and wearing

:32:29. > :32:32.them and using them, it is about power dynamics, as far as I'm aware,

:32:33. > :32:35.there is not such a discrepancy of power dynamics between

:32:36. > :32:42.African-Americans and Indians, there is not a systematic use of Indian

:32:43. > :32:47.culture by African-Americans for their own material and cultural

:32:48. > :32:51.gain, in the same way that global popular culture takes and takes and

:32:52. > :32:58.takes from black culture, lack people are rarely credited. Do you

:32:59. > :33:04.accept the difference, Ian, that if Beyonce Knowles, for instance,

:33:05. > :33:09.because there is similarity in terms of power, between African-American

:33:10. > :33:15.culture and England's culture, is it OK for her to wear dreadlocks? --

:33:16. > :33:21.and Indian culture. You are saying there is a difference, yes. Power

:33:22. > :33:28.dynamic start important that does not mean that one thing is immoral

:33:29. > :33:32.one and moral another, we should not do some assessment of relative

:33:33. > :33:36.levels of the scrum and nation. Is there a danger that this will lead

:33:37. > :33:42.to more division, the more this has been emphasised. I think that there

:33:43. > :33:46.is an organic exchange of cultures that happen, that kind of

:33:47. > :33:51.contributes to London culture and too many manifestations of

:33:52. > :33:54.contemporary culture. There is actually a far more... There is a

:33:55. > :33:59.far more raw and cynical use of, within popular culture, really of

:34:00. > :34:05.things that come from blackness, bearing in mind, blackness and

:34:06. > :34:12.African this is still routinely subjected to this concept of being

:34:13. > :34:14.inferior and lesser. And yet at the same time every blue seems to be

:34:15. > :34:20.obsessed with the cultural output. -- Africaness. The calculation on

:34:21. > :34:24.this, when I look at someone, I need to look at the race when I make an

:34:25. > :34:27.evaluation of whether they are culturally appropriating or not...

:34:28. > :34:30.Anti-racist teaching has been to look at what some things rather than

:34:31. > :34:34.how they look, this runs against that. Thank you all very much

:34:35. > :34:42.indeed. Riad Sattouf is a Franco-Syrian

:34:43. > :34:44.graphic novelist who worked on Charlie Hebdo for a decade,

:34:45. > :34:47.before the attack, won a Cesar for his first film and has now

:34:48. > :34:50.put his own nomadic childhood between France, Libya and Syria

:34:51. > :34:53.into a graphic novel memoir. It's a best seller in France,

:34:54. > :34:55.has been translated into 15 languages,

:34:56. > :34:57.and is about to be published here. The title of the memoir,

:34:58. > :35:00.The Arab of the Future, refers to his father's belief that

:35:01. > :35:02.Arab nationalism, as evinced by Colonel Muammar Gaddafi,

:35:03. > :35:06.would transform the Arab world. And so in 1980 he takes his French

:35:07. > :35:11.wife, whom he met at the Sorbonne in Paris, and toddler Riad off,

:35:12. > :35:14.first to Libya and then to his family village near Homs

:35:15. > :35:17.in Syria where comically nothing ever appears to go right for this

:35:18. > :35:21.idealist bombastic man. We witness all this

:35:22. > :35:24.through the the sensory the urine smell from

:35:25. > :35:31.Libyan men and the sharp

:35:32. > :35:33.and spicy air in France. But the book doesn't shy away

:35:34. > :35:45.from his Syrian family's First of all, why have you begun

:35:46. > :35:51.this odyssey, this is only the first part of what will eventually be your

:35:52. > :35:59.life in the graphic novel. In 2011I had to help a part of my family that

:36:00. > :36:01.were still living in Homs to come to France and I had difficulty

:36:02. > :36:08.obtaining authorisation in France for them. So I wanted to tell, buy

:36:09. > :36:13.comics, what was happening in the French administration. To tell the

:36:14. > :36:20.story, I had to tell it from the beginning. So I started this

:36:21. > :36:24.project. Early on the cartoon, you allude to your own ability as a

:36:25. > :36:28.draw. -- in the cartoon. When other kids are drawing pictures, you are

:36:29. > :36:34.drawing pictures of the French president! I tell the story of my

:36:35. > :36:45.future, with my father, who was Syrian, my mother, French, I tell

:36:46. > :36:51.the story, the birth of the ambition to become a cartoonist. Sometimes

:36:52. > :36:55.people say that you are gifted to music, to drawing, I was very

:36:56. > :37:00.interested to show that I think it does not exist! For me, for example,

:37:01. > :37:07.one day, I had drawn a character like that, my grandmother, she

:37:08. > :37:13.thought that it was the president, Pompidou, so in her eyes, I was a

:37:14. > :37:19.genius. But then, you scribble, and you are rude and so forth, it is

:37:20. > :37:26.more that you are controversial, as you are as a cartoonist. I was very

:37:27. > :37:34.good at drawing when I was a child. To be like other people, I faked it!

:37:35. > :37:38.One of your earliest memories is seeing Colonel Gaddafi, when you go

:37:39. > :37:42.to Libya, your father idealises what he stands for, you see him

:37:43. > :37:47.everywhere, you see him in the school, on the billboards. This idea

:37:48. > :37:52.that dictators, early on in your life, become a very big thing for

:37:53. > :37:58.you. My father was an educated man but from a very poor family, he was

:37:59. > :38:04.for education, modernity, he was against religion. He had very strong

:38:05. > :38:07.paradox, for example, he was admiring Colonel Gaddafi, he was

:38:08. > :38:13.admiring Bashar al-Assad, he was dreaming of making one day a coup.

:38:14. > :38:21.He wanted to execute everybody! He was obsessed... He wanted to become

:38:22. > :38:25.somebody powerful. As a boy, it is what I am telling in the book, I

:38:26. > :38:32.admired my father, and I thought that everything he was telling me

:38:33. > :38:35.was the truth. Actually, difficult and dark elements in the book, what

:38:36. > :38:41.happens when you go to the village, near Homs, where your father was

:38:42. > :38:44.raised, you meet, first of all, children that you play with and your

:38:45. > :38:48.cousins. Children are playing with plastic soldiers, and saying that

:38:49. > :38:54.these are is really soldiers, cut off their heads, they are Jewish. My

:38:55. > :39:02.father was from a Syrian family, he became a doctor. He had been offered

:39:03. > :39:09.to become a teacher at Oxford. He preferred to go back to the Arabic

:39:10. > :39:14.world and Syria, we went to live in his village, to this small peasant

:39:15. > :39:20.village. Near Homs. In the village, a very rude life. Syria was obsessed

:39:21. > :39:24.with Israel, all of the children... You were inculcated at an early age,

:39:25. > :39:28.your cousins thought you looked Jewish, they beat you up. They did

:39:29. > :39:34.not think I looked Jewish, but it was because I was French origin, so

:39:35. > :39:38.when you are from foreign origin, it was analysed that France was an ally

:39:39. > :39:42.of the United States, the United States is an ally of Israel! When

:39:43. > :39:47.you were French, you were Israelis! LAUGHTER

:39:48. > :39:53.They were telling me that I was a Jewish! The first Arabic word I

:39:54. > :39:58.heard was the word who Jewish. You produced this book am which has been

:39:59. > :40:04.fated by both the left and the right in France, very good response to it.

:40:05. > :40:08.-- feted. I wonder if some in the Arabic world think you have been

:40:09. > :40:12.disrespectful, you are very funny about what you see as a medieval

:40:13. > :40:18.view, actually... LAUGHTER ... Of the village near Homs, you

:40:19. > :40:22.would presumably say on the other side, your grandmother was French. I

:40:23. > :40:27.am telling the story of my family and my life. My family in Syria,

:40:28. > :40:35.some of them read that there was a book, they said, it was like that.

:40:36. > :40:42.It is very known. I'm just telling the point of view of the children in

:40:43. > :40:46.a small village, near Homs, and I let the reader make their own

:40:47. > :40:50.judgment on it. Thank you very much for joining us.

:40:51. > :40:53.Before we go, let's take a look out of the windows.

:40:54. > :40:55.Well, this studio doesn't have any, but the artist Gillian Wearing,

:40:56. > :40:58.in a collaborative project with people all round the world,

:40:59. > :41:00.has created a new artwork that celebrates the very different

:41:01. > :41:02.views that people enjoy from their windows.

:41:03. > :41:04.Your Views will premiere at the University of Brighton Gallery

:41:05. > :41:07.from 30 April to 29 May as part of the 50th anniversary edition

:41:08. > :41:12.of Brighton Festival and HOUSE festival.

:41:13. > :42:08.Here are a few windows. Goodnight.

:42:09. > :42:15.Good evening to you, looks like the weather is going to be very

:42:16. > :42:16.changeable across the UK during Wednesday, and so from our two hour