03/06/2016

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:00. > :00:00.Tonight, Michael Gove tells us people have had

:00:00. > :00:08.enough of the experts, as he makes his case

:00:09. > :00:24.I am sorry, you have had your day, unelected, unaccountable elite. I am

:00:25. > :00:28.afraid it is time to SAQ fired, we are going to back control. -- time

:00:29. > :00:33.Has his hour in the sun made the case for Brexit

:00:34. > :00:37.A highly sexualised, toxic environment, where bullying was rife

:00:38. > :00:41.As the inquest into the death of a soldier at Deepcut Barracks

:00:42. > :00:44.concludes, we ask if the Army simply couldn't handle women.

:00:45. > :00:46.Lord Dannatt, former head of the Army, joins us live.

:00:47. > :00:56.Tom Keneally, the Booker Prize-winning author who brought

:00:57. > :01:03.This time, a revisionist take on Napoleon Bonaparte.

:01:04. > :01:15.Josephine once commented on it, that she went to the wardrobe and found

:01:16. > :01:17.items of clothing missing. So he is a Frenchman, he tried it all, I

:01:18. > :01:27.Was this the week when something in the EU waters shifted?

:01:28. > :01:29.When all those who'd quietly thought the Remain camp would emerge

:01:30. > :01:31.unambiguously triumphant suddenly got a sense of something stirring

:01:32. > :01:38.Something feels different at the end of this week.

:01:39. > :01:43.But it's a sense that the Out camp have found their footing -

:01:44. > :01:45.on immigration, on sovereignty perhaps.

:01:46. > :01:47.Tonight, Michael Gove - for the Out campaign -

:01:48. > :01:50.faced Sky News, and an audience of voters hungry for answers

:01:51. > :01:56.Our political man David Grossman was watching close up.

:01:57. > :01:58.It's supposedly a presage of the end of days -

:01:59. > :02:05.David Cameron and Michael Gove were once the closest of friends.

:02:06. > :02:11.For the next three weeks, they're on opposite sides

:02:12. > :02:13.of the referendum contest that could presage the end of days

:02:14. > :02:29.Today, it was Michael Gove's turn to sit where his 1's best friend for

:02:30. > :02:35.ever sat yesterday. He was first as the bout the economy if he supported

:02:36. > :02:38.the case for Brexit and then about friendly foreign leaders who

:02:39. > :02:43.supported it. We have gone into battle with these

:02:44. > :02:47.people, give me one. You cannot name one, can you? I will give you a half

:02:48. > :02:51.for Donald Trump. One of the things about Donald Trump

:02:52. > :02:55.and all of these people is that they do not have a vote in this

:02:56. > :03:00.referendum. The people in this audience and watching at home have a

:03:01. > :03:03.vote and my view is when you hear foreign leaders and politicians, do

:03:04. > :03:06.not pay attention to what they say but what they do and the truth is

:03:07. > :03:12.that Barack Obama would never accept a court in Mexico decreeing the law

:03:13. > :03:18.in the United States. Michael Gove was asked about possible job losses

:03:19. > :03:23.which the Remain sites they will follow Brexit. I know myself on my

:03:24. > :03:29.own background that the European Union, it depresses employment and

:03:30. > :03:32.it destroys jobs. My father had if fishing business in Aberdeen

:03:33. > :03:36.destroyed by the European Union and the Common fisheries policy. The

:03:37. > :03:40.European Union has hollowed out communities across this country. It

:03:41. > :03:43.has also contributed to lower salaries for working people and it

:03:44. > :03:47.has also ensured that young people in this country do not have the

:03:48. > :03:51.opportunities to get the entry-level jobs we heard about last night. You

:03:52. > :03:58.can say that their concerns do not matter. I did not say that. You said

:03:59. > :04:04.a majority... You claimed that your father was an example... You are on

:04:05. > :04:09.the side of the elites, I am on the side of the people. Meanwhile, the

:04:10. > :04:14.Chancellor was on duty for the Remain campaign visiting JP Morgan,

:04:15. > :04:20.a bank that helped crush the world's financial system. The CEO makes $27

:04:21. > :04:25.million a year, yes, that is right, he was there to warn against Brexit.

:04:26. > :04:31.Although at first, he sounded like he was arguing for it. I love the UK

:04:32. > :04:40.and Britain even though I am an American -- I am an American patriot

:04:41. > :04:44.and I... They were the only people standing against the terror of Nazi

:04:45. > :04:49.is, the British people, and the world owes them a great debt of

:04:50. > :04:53.gratitude. As the Chancellor perhaps wondered where this was going, Mr

:04:54. > :04:57.Diamond got to the point, telling his employees in the event of

:04:58. > :05:00.leaving the EU, they may have to leave some operations out of the UK

:05:01. > :05:05.and he did not know how many he would be forced to fire. At a

:05:06. > :05:09.Brexit, we cannot do it all here. We have to start planning for that. I

:05:10. > :05:15.do not know if it means 1,000, 2,000, as many as 4,000 jobs, it

:05:16. > :05:21.would be all around the UK. Mr Gove dismissed these concerns. The final

:05:22. > :05:25.question from the studio audience was about himself. You considering a

:05:26. > :05:30.leadership bid? That is the leadership question! I am absolutely

:05:31. > :05:33.not. The one thing I can tell you if there are a lot of talented people

:05:34. > :05:41.who could be Prime Minister after David Cameron would count me out.

:05:42. > :05:47.APPLAUSE. These days, Michael Gove sometimes dresses like this, but 11

:05:48. > :05:51.years ago as one of the first MPs to support David Cameron's leadership,

:05:52. > :05:55.he was dressed in a bit like a beatnik. I think David Cameron is

:05:56. > :06:00.the person who most adeptly has his finger on contemporary Britain's

:06:01. > :06:02.policy. We shall see which of the two has his finger on Britain's

:06:03. > :06:05.polls in three weeks' time. Joining us tonight:

:06:06. > :06:07.Alastair Campbell, once Tony Blair's Dia Chakravarty, an Outter,

:06:08. > :06:11.and political director Although she is here

:06:12. > :06:32.speaking in her own right. Did Michael Gove speak for you when

:06:33. > :06:37.he spoke about getting away from experts and the elites? That was

:06:38. > :06:41.interesting and I do agree. Most of the Remain so far, it has been very

:06:42. > :06:47.establishment. The establishment is saying we need to remain within the

:06:48. > :06:50.EU. The other thing that resonated is the control issue. Economic

:06:51. > :06:55.suspect you are the on both sides and I like the idea of taking back

:06:56. > :06:59.control and that will motivate me. You work with economics, do you like

:07:00. > :07:05.having a man who says, I do not need to name a single economist? It has

:07:06. > :07:09.been speculative on both sides. Does anybody understand who is saying

:07:10. > :07:14.what as far as economic is concerned on either side? It will be uncertain

:07:15. > :07:18.whatever we do because that is the nature of the world we live in.

:07:19. > :07:24.These people now coming out and saying, economic is going to be

:07:25. > :07:30.destroyed if we leave the EU, better record is not great, is it? Do you

:07:31. > :07:35.agree with what I said at the beginning of the evening, the sense

:07:36. > :07:40.that something has shifted? Remain is not as confident as they were two

:07:41. > :07:44.weirs -- two weeks ago? In any case pained you should stay focused until

:07:45. > :07:48.the end on your arguments and I do not believe Michael Gove has pushed

:07:49. > :07:52.forward in the way you suggest -- in any campaign. This is the biggest

:07:53. > :07:57.decision any of us will take in our lifetime, it is like several general

:07:58. > :08:02.elections of decision-making. It is right people take an interest and

:08:03. > :08:05.may be that some people are confused and undecided. But for the

:08:06. > :08:10.politicians, they have to keep going with the main demons. I have always

:08:11. > :08:15.thought from the beginning, do not take anything for granted. -- the

:08:16. > :08:17.main arguments. When you have unleashed the forces involved in

:08:18. > :08:23.this referendum, we are seeing a deliberate attempt by one Tory

:08:24. > :08:29.politician to get rid of another. That is confusing things for the

:08:30. > :08:33.Labour Party. You are not talking about Michael Gove? I think it is

:08:34. > :08:37.sad that has happened but it happens when you have a referendum. You

:08:38. > :08:41.cannot always control... David Cameron announced the referendum in

:08:42. > :08:46.very soon -- very different circumstances to what we have got

:08:47. > :08:49.now. The big arguments Cameron is putting forward and Jeremy Corbyn

:08:50. > :08:55.and the Trade Union Bill is... But they have done it and done it. They

:08:56. > :09:00.have to keep doing it. We all watch programmes like this and we see

:09:01. > :09:04.newspapers, how can there be millions of people still undecided?

:09:05. > :09:12.Still thinking! We can talk to one of them. You honestly undecided? He

:09:13. > :09:16.has a good device for his column! Thank you. I have always been a

:09:17. > :09:20.passionate Eurosceptic and I do not believe that means you have to

:09:21. > :09:24.leave. They are not the same thing. What has happened this last week has

:09:25. > :09:29.been interesting because a couple of polls have showed a switch, even the

:09:30. > :09:34.pollsters do not trust them. It is very unreliable. I believe we will

:09:35. > :09:39.vote to stay but that is a different matter. It is curious a couple of

:09:40. > :09:43.polls changes the temperature of the debate. It is fairly clear two

:09:44. > :09:51.things have happened. Reject the has not worked. I believe that. Before

:09:52. > :09:55.that interview, it showed on two crucial issues, people were not

:09:56. > :10:00.worried about the money if they got the control on the immigration

:10:01. > :10:07.right. So the economy is now my work than immigration? Immigration is

:10:08. > :10:11.playing higher. That is economic. It has been really confusing, nobody

:10:12. > :10:14.can tell us the implications. Your own campaigning is focusing now

:10:15. > :10:20.solidly on immigration, they have made that decision and it seems to

:10:21. > :10:24.be working. I am not a part of the official campaign. I am not

:10:25. > :10:27.pretending to speak for them but in your name, you happy and comfortable

:10:28. > :10:33.with that? It does not matter to what Nigel Farage Mr Gove says, this

:10:34. > :10:38.is a really big decision. I cannot decide the future of my country

:10:39. > :10:42.based on who is supporting which campaign because it is a very

:10:43. > :10:49.confused pool of people, made really, really conflicting

:10:50. > :10:55.bedfellows. Suddenly you have JP Morgan and the unions on the same

:10:56. > :11:02.side. The America bank accent was an own goal! He has got an own view and

:11:03. > :11:07.he can go on television, he has gone beyond that. If you are a Royal

:11:08. > :11:13.David Cameron supporting Tory, a loyal Jeremy Corbyn supporting

:11:14. > :11:18.Labour person, Tim Farron, the Greens, if you follow your leaders,

:11:19. > :11:23.it is a landslide for In, but it is not happening. Because most of the

:11:24. > :11:27.thinking that matters at the moment is not going on inside the bubble.

:11:28. > :11:31.The reason I am, I do not think anything has moved, but the reason I

:11:32. > :11:37.may be more worried than I was is because I think that all this

:11:38. > :11:41.economic heavy artillery is being pounded out and I do not agree with

:11:42. > :11:47.Simon, you have to keep going with big messages because they have that

:11:48. > :11:51.element of truth. It has not stopped these more emotional arguments. For

:11:52. > :11:53.me, the In campaign has got to get a bit more emotional and show the

:11:54. > :11:58.fight, show that this really matters. In the end, this is about

:11:59. > :12:03.people going out and persuading other people. I have to persuade him

:12:04. > :12:08.if I can and find other people and persuade them and it is not going to

:12:09. > :12:11.happen inside the studios. Philosophically, what is this about?

:12:12. > :12:17.David Cameron faced an audience yesterday not just asking about the

:12:18. > :12:22.EU referendum but Sadiq Khan and nurses, putting their leader on the

:12:23. > :12:30.spot. Is this about a metropolitan bubble burst and haves and

:12:31. > :12:34.have-nots? If you go out to the public, they will say what they

:12:35. > :12:38.think about you. What they think about you, that is always the danger

:12:39. > :12:46.of a referendum. What is interesting here is that this is what this poll

:12:47. > :12:51.shows, people do not always vote by their pocketbook. They vote for

:12:52. > :12:55.vague concepts like national identity, control and sovereignty

:12:56. > :12:59.and Mr Gove shrewdly went on and on about taking back control. If you

:13:00. > :13:03.say take back control, almost anybody wants to do that, it is a

:13:04. > :13:13.good line. If you got behind that, there is a cloud of immigration, it

:13:14. > :13:17.is quite potent message. I still think a lot of Remain people are not

:13:18. > :13:21.telling the pollsters what they want to do. David Cameron is constantly

:13:22. > :13:28.telling people it is about their pocketbook and it is not. I do not

:13:29. > :13:31.feel comfortable defending David Cameron, strange bedfellows! But he

:13:32. > :13:35.is also saying it is about what sort of country we are and they worry

:13:36. > :13:40.when I see Michael Gove who is one of the more intelligence Tory

:13:41. > :13:43.ministers saying it does not matter what experts think and what people

:13:44. > :13:48.said who know what is going on in the world. The only reason he says

:13:49. > :13:52.that, if he had big employers coming out for Leave, he would say that

:13:53. > :13:58.their opinion mattered. I think there is massive responsibility on

:13:59. > :14:03.individuals to inform ourselves. Is that what they want in the Leave

:14:04. > :14:09.camp? That there are no experts? Who do we believe? Who do you believe?

:14:10. > :14:12.It is not about the Leave campaign or the Remain campaign, what they

:14:13. > :14:18.want any more, it is about the ordinary person. It is a more subtle

:14:19. > :14:22.question. Is it better for the country to say we have not got

:14:23. > :14:27.experts and economists? Is that the message people want? The experts

:14:28. > :14:31.typically come from the establishment, that is the point.

:14:32. > :14:37.This is the idea that Boris Johnson and Michael Gove are not part of the

:14:38. > :14:41.establishment! If you follow Jeremy Corbyn's position. All his life, he

:14:42. > :14:46.has been antiestablishment. He has been Eurosceptic. He was in favour

:14:47. > :14:49.of Brexit and suddenly you find themselves very much part of the

:14:50. > :14:59.establishment as Leader of the Opposition. This is the denigration

:15:00. > :15:03.of anybody who does not have that opinion, really. Both sides do it.

:15:04. > :15:13.Yes, I agree. There wasn't a single economist for

:15:14. > :15:19.Margaret Thatcher. Totting up how many experts you have one each side

:15:20. > :15:24.is pure politics, pretty vacuous. When you have so many people saying

:15:25. > :15:28.we'll be worse off if we take this decision, you can't just say to them

:15:29. > :15:34.all, you are all part of project fear, some of them, in the end...

:15:35. > :15:37.Quickly respond. They may well be experts but these very people have

:15:38. > :15:42.got it wrong over and over in the past, how can we trust them?

:15:43. > :15:44.The question of why and exactly how four young recruits died

:15:45. > :15:47.at the Deepcut army base is one that, by any stretch

:15:48. > :15:48.of the imagination, should have been answered

:15:49. > :15:52.Today, an inquest into the death of 18-year-old Cheryl James,

:15:53. > :15:54.found with a single gunshot wound two decades ago, ascertained

:15:55. > :15:56.she killed herself - a verdict her long-suffering

:15:57. > :16:00.But crucially, the coroner today unearthed a culture

:16:01. > :16:06.Highly sexualised, chaotic, alcohol-fuelled and toxic.

:16:07. > :16:09.A place where bullying was rife and young recruits had nowhere

:16:10. > :16:15.The coroner declared that staff at the camp had failed in their duty

:16:16. > :16:20.The British Army has had many great days,

:16:21. > :16:31.She joined the Army in 1995, did well in training and was then

:16:32. > :16:42.21 years ago, private Cheryl James was on guard duty here at Deepcut

:16:43. > :16:49.There was a shot and her body was found dead.

:16:50. > :16:51.Her family have maintained to this day that Surrey Police

:16:52. > :16:53.and the Royal Military Police concluded far too quickly

:16:54. > :17:00.And so, as a result of that critical time, there was no proper

:17:01. > :17:09.In 2014, they won their battle for a fresh inquest

:17:10. > :17:13.That inquest reported today, but the result was not

:17:14. > :17:17.Coroner Brian Barker found that Cheryl James died

:17:18. > :17:23.Speaking after the verdict, her father, Des James,

:17:24. > :17:25.politely and respectfully disagreed with the coroner's

:17:26. > :17:35.While we welcome the coroner's verdict, the coroner's findings

:17:36. > :17:37.today on the environment at Deepcut, we are deeply saddened

:17:38. > :17:46.Having sat through all of the evidence ourselves,

:17:47. > :17:48.listened carefully to every word, read every statement

:17:49. > :18:00.In short, it is our opinion that it did not lead to this verdict.

:18:01. > :18:03.Now, 20 years ago, in the first inquest, the verdict was open.

:18:04. > :18:06.Now, clearly, the family are very unhappy and what we are hearing

:18:07. > :18:09.from them is a concern that there was no strong

:18:10. > :18:15.So why did the coroner find it that way?

:18:16. > :18:18.But the inquest also raised wider issues about the culture at Deepcut

:18:19. > :18:26.In terms of the way in which the Army deals

:18:27. > :18:29.with recruits and trainees, things are very different now.

:18:30. > :18:33.They are right to say that, they are entitled to say that.

:18:34. > :18:35.Where they really still have a problem is

:18:36. > :18:39.This coroner referred to it, other coroners have referred

:18:40. > :18:41.to it in other cases, and in other criminal cases,

:18:42. > :18:43.and it remains the case that the Army really

:18:44. > :18:50.In 2014, 24,000 serving men and women were polled and 90%

:18:51. > :18:53.of them thought the Army had an overly sexualised culture,

:18:54. > :18:56.and 39% of those people had had an upsetting incident.

:18:57. > :19:02.It is way beyond the realm of other workplaces and this is a real issue.

:19:03. > :19:04.Tonight, a BBC Two documentary broadcast testimony from other

:19:05. > :19:14.A Corporal who was one of my instructors asked me to go

:19:15. > :19:17.back to the female accommodation, so I went back and I walked

:19:18. > :19:27.And he called me from the shower room.

:19:28. > :19:42.And he pushed me up against the wall, And he started kissing me.

:19:43. > :19:46.And then he put his hand up my skirt.

:19:47. > :19:58.And with his other hands, started fondling my

:19:59. > :20:09.One thing I'd learned from training is that you don't talk back

:20:10. > :20:17.to your NCOs, and you don't fight back.

:20:18. > :20:20.The tragedy of private Cheryl James is not just a story

:20:21. > :20:25.It also shines a light on what its critics say

:20:26. > :20:33.is the British Army's failure to face up to its darker side.

:20:34. > :20:38.Lord Dannatt, former head of the Army joins us now.

:20:39. > :20:44.After 20 years, two inquests, the family still don't feel

:20:45. > :20:47.That's the real problem here, isnt it?

:20:48. > :20:54.Of course it is, the first thing to say is, one has huge sympathy and

:20:55. > :21:00.sorrow for the tragedy of Cheryl James losing her life. One expresses

:21:01. > :21:05.huge sympathy towards her family and the families of the other three

:21:06. > :21:08.soldiers who lost their lives at Deepcut 15, 20 years ago. It's a

:21:09. > :21:13.tragedy and nothing will ever replace Cheryl James's life and the

:21:14. > :21:18.life of her family all one can say is it an ongoing tragedy for them.

:21:19. > :21:23.One can say more than that, one can say they don't feel they've had the

:21:24. > :21:29.answers to this now. What has to happen for them to get that? It's

:21:30. > :21:34.difficult for them not to feel they've had the answers, I

:21:35. > :21:40.understand entirely. Of course this corona conducted his inquest of the

:21:41. > :21:44.best of usability and came up with the conclusion he did. There's no

:21:45. > :21:51.getting away from the fact all was not well by a long degree at Deepcut

:21:52. > :21:54.20 years ago and Nicholas Blake QC conducted an investigation into

:21:55. > :21:57.thousands six into Deepcut and the army accepted a lot of

:21:58. > :22:01.responsibility things were not right. The decision was taken to

:22:02. > :22:05.close Deepcut in the intervening years. Standards have improved, the

:22:06. > :22:09.budgetary regime has been such it hasn't been possible to close

:22:10. > :22:13.Deepcut, and things have changed. There's no getting away that things

:22:14. > :22:18.are not right and I would say this to anybody listening to this and

:22:19. > :22:22.what the shocking programme broadcast at 9pm on BBC Two, if I

:22:23. > :22:26.can finish this point, that watched that programme, if there are things

:22:27. > :22:30.that happen to them, allegations they want to put forward, they must

:22:31. > :22:33.come forward to the police, these must be investigated, because where

:22:34. > :22:38.things have not been done like they need to be investigated, people

:22:39. > :22:42.investigated if necessary. The families as you know are calling for

:22:43. > :22:47.a public inquiry and you'll be aware you were the former head of the

:22:48. > :22:51.army. You must look back at some of this, it must have crossed your

:22:52. > :22:56.desk, didn't you think, don't you wish, you had got to the bottom of

:22:57. > :23:02.that? Two or three things: this has been investigated more than once,

:23:03. > :23:04.Surrey Police investigated what the Royal Military Police investigated,

:23:05. > :23:11.a case under investigation for some time. I accept entirely the Army has

:23:12. > :23:16.found it difficult to deal with allegations of sexual harassment and

:23:17. > :23:20.bullying, bullying is endemic. Should there be a public inquiry? I

:23:21. > :23:23.think there should be, it the only practical and reasonable response to

:23:24. > :23:27.this because people have a right to know. I stress again if there are

:23:28. > :23:32.individuals who went through training at Deepcut and elsewhere

:23:33. > :23:35.and believe they suffered bullying or sexual harassment that hasn't

:23:36. > :23:40.been investigated, they should complain, if they are serving to the

:23:41. > :23:44.service police, or to the civilian police, these things will be... It's

:23:45. > :23:47.really important. You've just made that point before. It sounds as

:23:48. > :23:52.though the army still has a problem with women. It started to recruit

:23:53. > :24:00.women, yet it didn't give them any duty of care, wouldn't allow them to

:24:01. > :24:04.get to padres when they needed them, it failed the women who needed help

:24:05. > :24:09.and it hasn't changed much today, you heard from the lawyer. I have to

:24:10. > :24:13.reject that it hasn't changed very much, the position described in the

:24:14. > :24:19.programme at 9pm was quite appalling, that was 20 years ago.

:24:20. > :24:26.Since Nicholas Blake QC investigated Deepcut in 2006, Ofsted inspect all

:24:27. > :24:31.training establishments. The survey is from 2014. You have to allow me

:24:32. > :24:35.to finish. Ofsted inspector or training establishments and in the

:24:36. > :24:39.last round of inspections all were found to be either good or

:24:40. > :24:42.excellent, things have changed. There's always room for improvement,

:24:43. > :24:46.there can be no covering up if people have felt they've been abused

:24:47. > :24:50.or wrongly treated, they must complain, it must be investigated.

:24:51. > :24:54.Wrongdoers must be brought to book even 20 years later, it's really

:24:55. > :24:58.important. If parents send young people to the Army, they must have

:24:59. > :25:01.confidence the Army will look after them and not abuse them. It's really

:25:02. > :25:04.critical and what makes our soldiers really good. We can't accept poorer

:25:05. > :25:16.standards from anyone. Lord Danek. We've been talking a lot

:25:17. > :25:19.about Europe, in case you hadn't noticed, but tonight,

:25:20. > :25:21.we take you back to the man who had designs on the continent some 200

:25:22. > :25:24.years before the EU - Boris Johnson, you might recall,

:25:25. > :25:27.got rather a mixed press for comparing those who ran Brussels

:25:28. > :25:30.to Napoleon and Hitler. Now the Booker-Prize winning

:25:31. > :25:32.Australian novelist Thomas Keneally casts Bonaparte, at least,

:25:33. > :25:34.in a different light. In his new novel, 'Napoleon's Last

:25:35. > :25:36.Island', the Emperor's final exile on St Helena,

:25:37. > :25:38.in the South Atlantic, becomes a metaphor for the way

:25:39. > :25:40.unwanted foreigners are treated by Keneally's fellow countrymen,

:25:41. > :25:42.and by others. He's been talking to our

:25:43. > :25:44.Culture Editor, Stephen Smith. It's Boris's bogeyman,

:25:45. > :25:52.Napoleon Bonaparte, Boney ended his days

:25:53. > :25:56.on the inhospitable bluff They chose this island

:25:57. > :26:02.in the South Atlantic to put him, a magnificent

:26:03. > :26:03.place for detention. Only two real beaches

:26:04. > :26:17.from which anyone could escape. The Emperor lived in a kind of grand

:26:18. > :26:20.flat belonging to the East India He befriended the company's agent,

:26:21. > :26:24.a Brit, and his family. A friendship which

:26:25. > :26:25.eventually cost them dear. kind of exile, in

:26:26. > :26:34.Australia, under a cloud. It was characteristic of the way

:26:35. > :26:37.19th-century Britain hived off its undesirables

:26:38. > :26:41.to Australia. Not only the convicts,

:26:42. > :26:44.not only the working class, but also the unsatisfactory members

:26:45. > :26:50.of the bourgeoisie and gentry. At the London library,

:26:51. > :26:54.at ungodly o'clock this morning, Tom Keneally recalls

:26:55. > :26:56.stumbling upon Napoleon's Aussie Is there any hard evidence Napoleon

:26:57. > :27:05.ever wore women's clothing? Because he does in

:27:06. > :27:07.the book, doesn't he? Yes, there is a rumour

:27:08. > :27:11.he liked dressing She went to the wardrobe and found

:27:12. > :27:24.items of clothing missing. He's a Frenchman, he

:27:25. > :27:31.tried it all, I think. Some reviewers have seen

:27:32. > :27:34.in the figure of Napoleon perhaps a metaphor for what

:27:35. > :27:37.Australia and many others do with Yes, a number of us

:27:38. > :27:48.have been campaigning for an end to the detention system

:27:49. > :27:52.in Australia, which is a de facto Punishing people for seeking asylum,

:27:53. > :27:56.which is not a crime And I think the same

:27:57. > :27:59.tendency is occurring here But after all they are a problem

:28:00. > :28:14.we partly made by our reckless And we're not, perhaps, the main

:28:15. > :28:26.engines, the tyrants of the main engines of expulsion, but, you know,

:28:27. > :28:29.in solving this problem, they've got Some here have advocated

:28:30. > :28:32.adopting an Australian The writer says that's fine

:28:33. > :28:38.when the normal channels work. But the normal channels

:28:39. > :28:40.of immigration, for all of us, have been swamped

:28:41. > :28:42.by the refugees of the world. We are not as kind in awarding

:28:43. > :28:44.points to people He urges Britain to beware

:28:45. > :29:00.the type of detention centre for unauthorised arrivals

:29:01. > :29:05.that they have down under. The idea of locking

:29:06. > :29:08.up will satisfy about ready percent of the population,

:29:09. > :29:14.but the other 80, you can only get them to bear it,

:29:15. > :29:16.to bear the national shame of it, if you lie

:29:17. > :29:19.about who's in there. I profited from writing books

:29:20. > :29:27.about scapegoating, so I can't sit Look at the snow, look

:29:28. > :29:35.at the snow, look at the I lost a worker, I expect

:29:36. > :29:45.to be compensated. By sheer chance, Tom Keneally heard

:29:46. > :29:47.the story of Oskar Schindler, which became his novel

:29:48. > :29:51.and Steven Spielberg's film. From a Holocaust

:29:52. > :29:53.survivor called Poldek, who was selling him

:29:54. > :29:58.a briefcase at the time. To look at a man like Poldek,

:29:59. > :30:04.a vivid man, he used to say things to Spielberg, Stephen,

:30:05. > :30:07.you can't win an Academy Awards with little furry animals, enough

:30:08. > :30:09.with the little furry animals. And you can't look at a man

:30:10. > :30:17.like that and work out why an entire regime considered that he had

:30:18. > :30:20.to have his oxygen taken away from But all racial hysteria is the great

:30:21. > :30:39.nonsense of history. Before we go, Nick Clegg solicited

:30:40. > :30:45.the ire of our loquacious former London Mayor by suggesting

:30:46. > :30:47.he was "Donald Trump It's not the first time

:30:48. > :30:53.the blonde Brexiteer has been compared to Trump and,

:30:54. > :30:55.if these images are anything to go by, it

:30:56. > :30:59.may not be the last.