28/07/2016

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:10. > :00:13.A big, shiny deal for a new nuclear power station, Hinkley C,

:00:14. > :00:18.has just been signed after years of delay.

:00:19. > :00:28.-- not quite yet. EDF has signed but now the Government says it needs to

:00:29. > :00:35.think it over. This delay seems to have come as a surprise to one EDF.

:00:36. > :00:39.I will be asking a local MP whether it will ever be switched on.

:00:40. > :00:41.TRANSLATION: They want to damage our way of life,

:00:42. > :00:43.our openness and, yes, our readiness to take

:00:44. > :00:46.Angela Merkel stands firm on Germany's refugee policy

:00:47. > :00:49.after the spate of terrorist attacks but promises more security measures.

:00:50. > :00:52.There has never been a man or a woman, not me, not Bill,

:00:53. > :00:57.nobody more qualified than Hillary Clinton

:00:58. > :01:05.to serve as President of the United States of America.

:01:06. > :01:07.After the monumental build-up, Hillary Clinton will wow the room.

:01:08. > :01:11.But what does she have to do to wow a very divided country?

:01:12. > :01:15.We'll be joined by two women, who have watched her every step

:01:16. > :01:25.and misstep, Tina Brown and Jill Abrahamson.

:01:26. > :01:39.Finally, after years of delay, this evening, EDF agreed the deal on

:01:40. > :01:44.Hinkley Point C. Now there is a glitch. Theresa May's new government

:01:45. > :01:48.wants some thinking time. The parties have been postponed and

:01:49. > :01:53.media interviews cancelled. What is the alternative? There is no other

:01:54. > :01:58.scheme on the table. This one has been complex and fraught enough.

:01:59. > :02:03.Now, the consortium of EDF and a Chinese company are ready to go.

:02:04. > :02:09.There have been worries over the EDF debt and the deal involves a 35 year

:02:10. > :02:13.contract to pay EDF ?92 50 for each megawatt hour of energy it

:02:14. > :02:28.generates, more than double the present cost. Helen Thomas is with

:02:29. > :02:33.us. There was commitment to nuclear but the Government wants to consider

:02:34. > :02:36.carefully all the component parts of this project. The decision is now

:02:37. > :02:42.pushed back to the early autumn. The official line is this is not a

:02:43. > :02:45.delay, a rethink. This is a new Prime Minister, the new Secretary of

:02:46. > :02:50.State wanting to make sure they are on top of all the details. This was

:02:51. > :02:54.not expected. What we are being told is this is Theresa May, the new

:02:55. > :03:03.Prime Minister, stamping her authority on these really big,

:03:04. > :03:05.confiscated decisions. It is worth saying there is some suggestion she

:03:06. > :03:08.discussed this with President Francois Hollande in Paris but it

:03:09. > :03:12.did seem to come as a surprise to EDF this evening. They had a full

:03:13. > :03:21.day of media interviews and so on plant. That is all off. -- planned.

:03:22. > :03:29.The board of French utility EDF has approved building and ?18 billion

:03:30. > :03:32.new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point in Somerset.

:03:33. > :03:35.French unease over the project continues with one board

:03:36. > :03:37.member resigned today ahead of the vote.

:03:38. > :03:41.The Government late tonight seemed to put the brakes on the project.

:03:42. > :03:43.It will make a decision in the autumn.

:03:44. > :03:46.Hinkley could be the first nuclear power station built in the UK

:03:47. > :03:54.Would it supercharge the UK's energy outlook,

:03:55. > :03:56.or are the lights of the country's energy policy flickering?

:03:57. > :04:03.The UK needs new generating capacity to replace ageing coal and nuclear

:04:04. > :04:07.Then there is increased electricity demand.

:04:08. > :04:12.The plan is this comes from a mix of energy sources,

:04:13. > :04:15.including renewables and new nuclear power plants.

:04:16. > :04:20.And the requirement is about 95 gigawatts of new capacity.

:04:21. > :04:25.Remember, the UK Government wants three things from its energy policy.

:04:26. > :04:27.It wants security of supply from a range

:04:28. > :04:34.It wants low or zero carbon options to help meet climate change goals.

:04:35. > :04:40.After all, it is consumers that ultimately end up bearing the cost

:04:41. > :04:47.In theory, Hinkley does help meet some of those goals.

:04:48. > :04:51.It is big, capable of supplying about 7% of the UK's electricity,

:04:52. > :04:58.It is also low carbon and nuclear power is always on the 24 hours

:04:59. > :05:04.It should even create thousands of jobs over the ten years

:05:05. > :05:11.But the first Hinkley headache is the cost.

:05:12. > :05:14.Sure, EDF pays for its construction and takes the risk that it runs late

:05:15. > :05:38.But, their incentive is a guaranteed price of ?92.50 per megawatt hour

:05:39. > :05:41.for the electricity produced over the 35 year life of the plant.

:05:42. > :05:43.That is way above current wholesale electricity prices,

:05:44. > :05:46.dragged down by low fossil fuel prices, making up the difference

:05:47. > :05:48.was estimated to cost about 6.1 billion when the contract

:05:49. > :05:50.was signed back in October 2013, according to the

:05:51. > :05:54.Earlier this year, it put the cost of those top

:05:55. > :05:58.Well, it will be the most expensive power station that has ever been

:05:59. > :06:06.The power that future consumers will pay for will be a very high price.

:06:07. > :06:08.What we do know, if Hinkley was operating today,

:06:09. > :06:11.it would be producing power, round about two and a half times

:06:12. > :06:13.the wholesale price, which means the consumers will be

:06:14. > :06:15.paying in a subsidy of about ?1.5 billion a year.

:06:16. > :06:18.That does seem a very high price, even taking into account

:06:19. > :06:20.the benefits you get full security of supply

:06:21. > :06:33.The second worry is more fundamental. Will it work? The type

:06:34. > :06:37.of reactor EDF plans for Hinkley is proving the industry conjugated to

:06:38. > :06:43.build. The ones in France and Finland are running leers -- years

:06:44. > :06:48.late and billions over budget. Maybe EDF has learned valuable lessons.

:06:49. > :06:52.The Government boss Max out it for building several more nuclear plants

:06:53. > :07:04.after Hinkley means the UK would reap all the benefits. -- the

:07:05. > :07:07.Government's wanting to build several more nuclear plants. There

:07:08. > :07:11.is a bizarre strategy of allowing several different reactor types to

:07:12. > :07:15.be built at the same time we could find ourselves in a few years' time

:07:16. > :07:19.with four different reactor types being built by five different

:07:20. > :07:24.manufacturers. Even if Hinkley is finishing ten years' time, will it

:07:25. > :07:27.be the type of power, the type of technology we actually need? The

:07:28. > :07:33.supposed advantage of Hinkley as it provides a of power all the time.

:07:34. > :07:38.Actually that is not what the UK wants anymore. It needs flexible

:07:39. > :07:42.generating capacity that goes up and down to complement varying amounts

:07:43. > :07:47.of wind, solar and hydro coming onto the electricity. Hinkley is

:07:48. > :07:52.incredibly unresponsive. You cannot adjust its output. Renewable energy

:07:53. > :07:57.currently cannot easily combined renewable energy and Hinkley Point.

:07:58. > :08:02.Better energy storage could help smooth out the unpredictable peaks

:08:03. > :08:07.and troughs of power supply. In an interconnected world, there is more

:08:08. > :08:16.ability to adjust this down when it is tight. Hinkley was meant to like

:08:17. > :08:19.the way to a new, modern energy system. The risk is the UK ends up

:08:20. > :08:22.with an expensive and outdated piece of kit.

:08:23. > :08:29.I'm joined now from Hinkley by its constituency MP,

:08:30. > :08:30.Ian Liddell-Grainger, who has been involved in these

:08:31. > :08:32.negotiations for the last nine-and-a-half years.

:08:33. > :08:35.And also from our Bristol studio by the Green Party's south west

:08:36. > :08:37.MEP, Molly Scott-Cato, a patron of the Stop

:08:38. > :08:42.good evening to both of you. When did you find out there was going to

:08:43. > :08:46.be a delay? I was actually here on site at Hinkley C and we were

:08:47. > :08:51.discussing about the various parts to the deal with the team here. We

:08:52. > :08:56.got a note saying the Prime Minister wanted to have a look at this and go

:08:57. > :09:02.through it in her own way. That must have been a bit of a shock for you.

:09:03. > :09:06.I probably should have guessed. Theresa May has her own mindful that

:09:07. > :09:12.she has been a very successful Home Secretary. She checks everything. --

:09:13. > :09:17.her own mind that she wants to make sure this is right. It is three

:09:18. > :09:23.countries. An enormous deal for the United Kingdom, France and China.

:09:24. > :09:26.She is checking it, like the Prime Minister should. Very much sticking

:09:27. > :09:32.to the party line that she has been a Home Secretary for a long time in

:09:33. > :09:41.the Government, so she knew it was coming. -- the party line. This is a

:09:42. > :09:47.90,000 page deal. I had done four prime ministers and secretaries of

:09:48. > :09:50.state. Amber Road is now the Home Secretary. Obviously, Andrea Leadsom

:09:51. > :09:54.is also one of her secretaries of State. She has seen it going across.

:09:55. > :10:00.Until you get into the complexities of the deal at this, you do not see

:10:01. > :10:05.the whole picture. That is what this lady is doing. This presumably was a

:10:06. > :10:09.surprise to you as well. For me, it was a pleasant surprise. It shows we

:10:10. > :10:19.have had weak governments over the past six years and this deal has not

:10:20. > :10:21.been scrutinised properly. It seems the Prime Minister is getting cold

:10:22. > :10:24.feet and I hope she scrutinises the deal carefully. I hope if she does

:10:25. > :10:27.that she will see the price is ridiculously high and not the type

:10:28. > :10:32.of deal we need for the 21st-century. For all those reasons,

:10:33. > :10:36.I think she will be changing her mind about this in the autumn. If

:10:37. > :10:41.she does change her mind about it, chances are she will not necessarily

:10:42. > :10:45.go for renewables or she may go for another kind of nuclear deal.

:10:46. > :10:53.Renewables by far the most advanced technology we can bring on that

:10:54. > :10:56.onstream quickly. They were not bring the amount of consistent

:10:57. > :11:00.energy needed to make up the 7% desperate they needed in the next

:11:01. > :11:06.ten years. Neither will Hinkley. We will not get any electricity from

:11:07. > :11:10.Hinkley. Even if the reactor works by 2027. The only technologies we

:11:11. > :11:13.have that work are renewables. We need to seriously invest in those

:11:14. > :11:18.bring them on stream. That will create far more jobs, about 120,000

:11:19. > :11:25.jobs according to a report I commissioned, compared with 500 at

:11:26. > :11:28.Hinkley thought that it is better for the economy and better for jobs.

:11:29. > :11:33.It is safer and cleaner as a way of producing electricity. Is the

:11:34. > :11:37.Government in on this or is there any room for manoeuvre question what

:11:38. > :11:42.you have said that Theresa May wants to look over it. What if she wants

:11:43. > :11:46.to renegotiate the price at once and other nuclear deal, wants to bring

:11:47. > :11:53.another country in? I do not think that is what she's doing. I have

:11:54. > :11:58.just spoken to Greg Clark. She is the person she is. Greg Clark has

:11:59. > :12:02.briefed her. I am getting in touch with her PPS tomorrow to ask for a

:12:03. > :12:06.meeting so I can go through everything. That is not what she is

:12:07. > :12:11.doing and it is blatantly obvious. She is wanting to make sure it is

:12:12. > :12:15.right. If she is going to do this thoroughly, and make sure it is

:12:16. > :12:20.right, you cannot be 100% sure it will go ahead as is because you are

:12:21. > :12:25.not suggesting for one minute she might make changes. I wonder what

:12:26. > :12:32.Greg Clark actually said to you. He said the Prime Minister will look at

:12:33. > :12:35.it and is aware of the situation. She discussed it with President

:12:36. > :12:38.Francois Hollande a few days ago but she is one of the people who look at

:12:39. > :12:43.everything that is across her desk. That is the way it should be. You

:12:44. > :12:47.can say it is the party line but I would say it is a common-sense

:12:48. > :12:52.approach. I applaud the Prime Minister. That is strong government

:12:53. > :12:56.and not weak government. Just coming back to you on that, there are some

:12:57. > :13:05.issues about UDF. In there are issues about this particular type of

:13:06. > :13:10.nuclear technology. -- about EDF. Other plants are way behind and over

:13:11. > :13:15.budget. Let's just say that renewables are not the possibility

:13:16. > :13:19.you wish them to be. Is there another way forward, if it is going

:13:20. > :13:23.to be low carbon energy? I cannot really say that. I know that

:13:24. > :13:28.renewables can do the job. You are right to draw attention to the fact

:13:29. > :13:33.there are problems with EDF. Now the politics is starting to unravel,

:13:34. > :13:38.they are using the scheme as a way to recapitalise business. That may

:13:39. > :13:41.break European competition rules. The whole deal may itself turn out

:13:42. > :13:46.to be illegal. Also what we are seeing as we have not had a proper

:13:47. > :13:51.energy policy, a strategic energy policy in this country for several

:13:52. > :13:55.decades. Our planners are being left behind when they are reducing

:13:56. > :14:00.demand. That is if we just try to match supply of energy with demand

:14:01. > :14:04.for energy and also use energy storage a lot better. You heard in

:14:05. > :14:12.the film but the problem with the Hinkley Point C project is that it

:14:13. > :14:16.cannot actually turn on and off electricity. You heard the

:14:17. > :14:20.representative from Switch saying it does not do the job that is needed

:14:21. > :14:23.in ten years' time where there will be different flows of electricity.

:14:24. > :14:24.There needs to be a more sophisticated form of nuclear

:14:25. > :14:32.energy. I'm sorry, I didn't see the film

:14:33. > :14:36.because I'm here live at Hinckley. I think you're suggesting we need to

:14:37. > :14:40.change to a modular system. I don't think it's the case at all. What

:14:41. > :14:45.we're talking about is raw energy, it'll produce enough energy for 7%

:14:46. > :14:50.of homes in Britain. It's a big, powerful beast, that's what building

:14:51. > :14:52.here and I think we should. I've got confidence, I've spent nine and I

:14:53. > :14:56.think we should. I've got confidence, I've spent nine and a

:14:57. > :14:59.half over half my time as an MP. I've got faith in it and I think we

:15:00. > :15:01.should get on with it. Thank you both very much indeed for joining

:15:02. > :15:03.us. The German Chancellor,

:15:04. > :15:04.Angela Merkel, today insisted that there would be

:15:05. > :15:07.no change in the country's willingness to take in refugees

:15:08. > :15:09.after the recent terror attacks. She interrupted her summer holiday

:15:10. > :15:12.to return to Berlin and announced new measures to improve security,

:15:13. > :15:14.including deciphering web chatter But, despite the fact that the two

:15:15. > :15:19.attacks in Bavaria were carried out by asylum seekers, who both

:15:20. > :15:21.had claimed allegiance to IS, she was adamant that Germany

:15:22. > :15:24.would stick to its principles Munich train station

:15:25. > :15:38.was the birthplace of Europe threw up fences,

:15:39. > :15:45.Germans welcomed refugees Now, this country is taking a hard

:15:46. > :15:55.look at its open border policy after four attacks in the space

:15:56. > :15:58.of a week, three of them carried out In the little Bavarian town

:15:59. > :16:02.of Ansbach on Sunday, It wasn't the deadliest

:16:03. > :16:15.of the attacks, but it was the one with the most chilling implications

:16:16. > :16:18.for a country struggling not to give in to fear.

:16:19. > :16:20.The bomber was trying to get through this archway here,

:16:21. > :16:22.because on the other side There were two and a half

:16:23. > :16:26.thousand people here. Witnesses say they saw him pacing up

:16:27. > :16:30.and down here, In the end, he came over to this

:16:31. > :16:34.terrace here, that's The attacker was the man on the left

:16:35. > :16:40.in the red shirt. A Syrian who arrived in Germany two

:16:41. > :16:44.years ago via Bulgaria. In 2013, he was interviewed

:16:45. > :16:46.on Bulgarian TV talking He was due to be deported

:16:47. > :16:56.from Germany back to Bulgaria. Before he blew himself up he pledged

:16:57. > :16:59.allegiance to Islamic State. Neighbours said he was friendly

:17:00. > :17:03.but quite isolated. Annette and Gabriela live

:17:04. > :17:08.on the same street. They got to know Dalil quite well

:17:09. > :17:11.through their voluntary In October he had an injured arm,

:17:12. > :17:16.and he had an operation. And then I haven't seen him for many

:17:17. > :17:28.weeks, and I asked, where is he? And he said, he's in his room,

:17:29. > :17:31.he has a laptop now, and he doesn't come out

:17:32. > :17:36.of his room that much any more. Did you get the impression

:17:37. > :17:38.he was particularly religious? You say that very firmly,

:17:39. > :17:43.why are you so sure? Because I know he didn't do Ramadan,

:17:44. > :17:46.we talked about that... He was not a soldier

:17:47. > :17:50.for IS, not at all. Nee, das ist eine

:17:51. > :17:51.Ausrede. A year ago, an army of Annettes

:17:52. > :17:58.and Gabrielas came together in an extraordinary

:17:59. > :18:01.display of hospitality. But for these two, that

:18:02. > :18:07.solidarity has been shattered. Personally, I just told my friend,

:18:08. > :18:11.everybody needs to go back home. I'm not willing to go

:18:12. > :18:17.out of my way and help, because I'm afraid that your

:18:18. > :18:20.friendly, and then actually you turn Did that change for you on Sunday

:18:21. > :18:29.was demand on Sunday. Just around the corner we met a man

:18:30. > :18:35.who summed up how many people feel. Because there was this

:18:36. > :18:38.Willkommenskultur, this welcoming. All of last week's attacks took

:18:39. > :18:43.place in southern Germany. A mass shooting

:18:44. > :18:50.in a shopping centre. A machete attack near a restaurant,

:18:51. > :18:53.as well as Sunday's suicide bombing. More than a million refugees have

:18:54. > :18:56.come to Germany since the beginning The majority of them

:18:57. > :19:02.through Bavaria. Now, there is talk of

:19:03. > :19:04.closing the Borders, Has it changed since

:19:05. > :19:13.the attacks of the last week? We don't yet know the extent

:19:14. > :19:19.of the impact of all of this on German public opinion,

:19:20. > :19:21.but certainly the kind of language we're hearing today is very

:19:22. > :19:23.different from what people were saying a year ago, last summer,

:19:24. > :19:31.at the height of Willkommenskultur. Even before these attacks,

:19:32. > :19:33.support for Angela Merkel's refugee policy was dwindling,

:19:34. > :19:35.and now she is under intense political pressure

:19:36. > :19:42.from her own coalition partners. The CSU, the centre-right party that

:19:43. > :19:44.dominates politics in Bavaria, today said refugees who couldn't

:19:45. > :19:46.prove their identity should be Angela Merkel said she would order

:19:47. > :19:52.extra security measures, but on her refugee policy

:19:53. > :19:56.she is holding firm. TRANSLATION: For me it's clear

:19:57. > :19:59.we will stick to our principles. Our principle, which is article one

:20:00. > :20:01.of the German constitution, that the dignity of human

:20:02. > :20:16.beings is inviolable. And the principles mean we give

:20:17. > :20:19.those who are politically persecuted asylum, and we give protection

:20:20. > :20:21.to those fleeing war In accordance with the Geneva

:20:22. > :20:25.Convention. In Ansbach, investigators are trying

:20:26. > :20:28.to work out whether Mohammed Dalil was a member of Islamic State

:20:29. > :20:30.from the beginning, or whether his pledge of allegiance

:20:31. > :20:32.was a more recent development. The German authorities say Dalil

:20:33. > :20:36.was suffering from mental illness. That he had tried and tried

:20:37. > :20:39.to commit suicide, and that his psychological treatment

:20:40. > :20:44.had been terminated. Juergen Sauer, a psychotherapist

:20:45. > :20:47.who works with asylum seekers, says many are traumatised,

:20:48. > :20:49.and that bureaucratic hurdles often mean they can't

:20:50. > :20:51.get the help they need. We know all these people

:20:52. > :20:54.who went to the hospital because they wanted to commit

:20:55. > :20:56.suicide, they get for 1-2 weeks the support, and then they are sent

:20:57. > :20:59.again into life without support. It might be really a relationship

:21:00. > :21:02.between this lack of treatment In other words, there may

:21:03. > :21:15.be others out there. Many are now asking

:21:16. > :21:18.an uncomfortable question. Has the open border policy

:21:19. > :21:20.made Germans vulnerable? In Ansbach, the local priest

:21:21. > :21:23.was having dinner with his family when he heard the bomb go off just

:21:24. > :21:27.outside his church. TRANSLATION: What happened

:21:28. > :21:29.here in the past week, of course, it's doing

:21:30. > :21:35.something to us. But if we split, if we turn

:21:36. > :21:38.against each other, if we reject people who are in need,

:21:39. > :21:40.then something really And yet the week's deadliest attack

:21:41. > :21:58.had nothing to do with refugees. Munich's Muslim community held

:21:59. > :22:00.prayers at the site of Friday's attack, when a German-

:22:01. > :22:02.Iranian teenager with a history of depression opened fire

:22:03. > :22:04.in a shopping centre. He killed ten people,

:22:05. > :22:07.including himself. He shouted antiforeigner slogans,

:22:08. > :22:09.and followed the Norwegian Had he been white, this

:22:10. > :22:14.would have been interpreted as a far right attack,

:22:15. > :22:17.but his heritage means the public gaze is directed back

:22:18. > :22:22.to the issue of immigration. As the spectre of terrorism

:22:23. > :22:27.casts its shadow deeper into Europe, these are fearful and confusing

:22:28. > :22:35.times for Germany. Joining me now from Cologne

:22:36. > :22:38.is German MP Norbert Spinrath, European Affairs spokesman

:22:39. > :22:40.for the SPD Party, who are in coalition

:22:41. > :22:58.with Angela Merkel's CDU/CSU. Good evening, Mr Spinrath. Good

:22:59. > :23:01.evening from Cologne. A survey said the majority of the SPD believe

:23:02. > :23:08.Angela Merkel's refugee policy had failed. I do not think that it

:23:09. > :23:16.failed. The social Democratic party as a coalition partner of Chancellor

:23:17. > :23:28.Merkel stays to her policy for refugees. I think there is no link

:23:29. > :23:36.from the refugees to the attacks of the last days. We saw a mass murder,

:23:37. > :23:44.mass shooting, without any link to terrorist attacks. We saw a refugee

:23:45. > :23:51.who arrived two years ago in Germany. He was ill, he had

:23:52. > :24:00.depressions, he was a mystic, I think that was not a normal

:24:01. > :24:09.terrorist attack. -- he was brain sick. If two refugees are involved

:24:10. > :24:16.in such attacks, when you have 2 million refugees in the last 18

:24:17. > :24:21.months, it is not to be called a link between those. But we heard

:24:22. > :24:27.from people in the film who were very welcoming originally feeling

:24:28. > :24:31.they were going to pull back. One MP in Angela Merkel's own party has

:24:32. > :24:35.said it's all very well to have the welcome culture, but we need the

:24:36. > :24:39.farewell culture where failed asylum seekers are moved out of the country

:24:40. > :24:53.more quickly, do you agree with that? I think we have two I -- have

:24:54. > :25:01.to observe. We have to see that 99% of very normal people... They need

:25:02. > :25:07.protection. They came to us to look for protection. They are happy they

:25:08. > :25:16.can be here, far away from their homeland, where there is war, or

:25:17. > :25:23.other things. I think we have to look very strong on those they are

:25:24. > :25:31.failing in their role. And we have to take measures. We have a large

:25:32. > :25:37.catalogue what we want to do in future. I wonder if you think what

:25:38. > :25:42.has happened in Germany is quite different to what is happening in

:25:43. > :25:46.France. Manuel Valls, the French Prime Minister, has said people will

:25:47. > :25:48.have to learn to live with the terrorist threat, is it the same for

:25:49. > :25:58.Germany? Yellow no, we don't want to live with the

:25:59. > :26:06.terrorist threat, we want to make sure our people, our inhabitants,

:26:07. > :26:12.that they are secure in Germany, and that the police Administration, the

:26:13. > :26:18.police forces, and other administrations, we'll do anything

:26:19. > :26:25.to give them security. I'm sorry to interrupt. I just wonder if you

:26:26. > :26:31.think there is any validity in the calls some people are making in

:26:32. > :26:36.Germany for a pause. Just to calm things down, rethink, sort out

:26:37. > :26:42.security better, then restart allowing refugees. What do you think

:26:43. > :26:53.about that possibility? I think most of the people... And I spoke to a

:26:54. > :26:57.lot of them. Most of the people say there is a link. We have to deal

:26:58. > :27:04.with it, operate a lot of measures. Do anything for my security, that

:27:05. > :27:11.says the people. The people are not in that fear that a few politicians

:27:12. > :27:14.want to mention. Mr Spinrath, thank you very much indeed.

:27:15. > :27:16.In just over four hours, Chelsea Clinton will introduce her

:27:17. > :27:18.mother at the Democrat National Convention in Philadelphia.

:27:19. > :27:21.And all the speeches from Meryl Streep's opening scream,

:27:22. > :27:26.to Michelle Obama's brilliantly crafted words, from Bill Clinton's

:27:27. > :27:28.folksy homage, to Barack Obama's ringing endorsement have been

:27:29. > :27:31.leading to this moment when Hillary Clinton takes the stage.

:27:32. > :27:33.The problem is, is the whipsmart, dedicated, loyal, honest woman

:27:34. > :27:37.they portray the one that the voters see.

:27:38. > :27:39.The faithful are in the hall, but the sceptical threaten

:27:40. > :27:50.I'm asking you to join me and reject cynicism and reject fear.

:27:51. > :27:56.The situation is worse than it has ever been before!

:27:57. > :27:58.Don't let anyone ever tell you this country

:27:59. > :28:10.The other campaign looks based on fear. Of immigrants, terrorism and

:28:11. > :28:12.economic decline. The 2016 presidential election feels

:28:13. > :28:16.like a choice. For what was traditionally a nation

:28:17. > :28:19.of optimists. Between two diametrically

:28:20. > :28:20.opposed narratives Hope and fear are not

:28:21. > :28:24.new things in American Back in 1968, Richard Nixon's

:28:25. > :28:31.campaigns were set against a The Vietnam War, and

:28:32. > :28:34.the assassinations of Martin Luther King

:28:35. > :28:36.and Robert Kennedy, and widespread rioting

:28:37. > :28:37.in Nixon was the fear

:28:38. > :28:51.candidate and his strategy As we look at America, we see cities

:28:52. > :28:55.enveloped in smoke and flames. We hear Simon is the night. We see

:28:56. > :28:57.Americans dying on distant battlefields abroad.

:28:58. > :29:02.Our convention occurs at the moment of crisis for

:29:03. > :29:08.The attacks on our police and the terrorism of our

:29:09. > :29:13.cities threaten our very way of life.

:29:14. > :29:15.Donald Trump and his team have

:29:16. > :29:17.been clear they see 1968 and present-day

:29:18. > :29:27.They look to Nixon's campaign for inspiration.

:29:28. > :29:29.If you look at 1968, the Democratic president was

:29:30. > :29:33.I think Lyndon Johnson was in the 30s, maybe the 20s.

:29:34. > :29:41.It is maybe slightly ticking up after having

:29:42. > :29:44.American troop casualties were very high in 1968.

:29:45. > :29:46.There is really nothing comparable to that now.

:29:47. > :29:51.Don't get cynical because, look at yourselves...

:29:52. > :29:54.The Nixon and Trump campaigns are a far cry from Ronald

:29:55. > :29:58.Reagan's vision of America in the 1980s.

:29:59. > :30:02.Wanted to be a shining city on a hill.

:30:03. > :30:04.One obvious way of measuring hope or fear is consumer

:30:05. > :30:07.One rule has held fast since the 1980s.

:30:08. > :30:08.When consumer confidence is above 100

:30:09. > :30:10.points, the incumbent party wins the popular vote.

:30:11. > :30:27.2012, that rule was broken. President Obama won despite economic

:30:28. > :30:30.gloom. Today, consumer confidence is at 97. The Democrats and Republicans

:30:31. > :30:36.disagreeing on everything, it is possible that can -- consumer

:30:37. > :30:39.confidence may be affected by Republicans thinking the cupboard is

:30:40. > :30:45.bare simply because there is a democratic president. Republicans

:30:46. > :30:49.thinking it is good because there is a Democratic president. It may not

:30:50. > :30:53.mean what it used to put it is difficult to surf this stuff out. I

:30:54. > :30:58.still believe in a place called Hope. It is worth remembering that

:30:59. > :31:02.while Bill Clinton and Barrett Obama whether recent optimism candidates,

:31:03. > :31:07.despite the rhetoric for many Americans right now, it is this man

:31:08. > :31:09.who is offering hope, a chance to change their fortunes. That may be

:31:10. > :31:12.difficult to resist. Joining me now are Jill Abramson

:31:13. > :31:29.from the Guardian US and Tina Brown Good evening to both of you. First

:31:30. > :31:33.of all, Tina Brown, hearing what Katie was saying. The problem is

:31:34. > :31:37.Barack Obama talks about America being great. A lot of Americans do

:31:38. > :31:46.not think America is a great for them and they do not feel to this --

:31:47. > :31:51.optimistic. She has -- they have to counter the idea that Donald Trump

:31:52. > :31:57.is the candidate of hope. There is as much psychic gloom, emotional

:31:58. > :32:01.gloom, as there is economic gloom in large swathes of America who feel

:32:02. > :32:06.left behind and left out of the big dream and left on the shelf, not

:32:07. > :32:10.considered, talked down to by the elite. Those are the people who

:32:11. > :32:14.Donald Trump is speaking to. What we have seen is the majority of

:32:15. > :32:23.Americans have said America is not on the right track. More than half

:32:24. > :32:26.of the Americans have said they want the candidate of change. Most of

:32:27. > :32:28.them feel Hillary Clinton is not the candidate for change. They also feel

:32:29. > :32:33.that Donald Trump is my changes may be for the worse. That leaves us in

:32:34. > :32:41.a fascinating situation. Everyone wants change and Trump is the change

:32:42. > :32:44.candidate. Everyone was trying to stress that Hillary Clinton was a

:32:45. > :32:51.candidate for change. That was the theme of Bill Clinton's song. Like

:32:52. > :32:55.Tina Brown, you know Hillary Clinton, at least partly from

:32:56. > :32:59.close-up and partly from a distance. The problem is she does lead into

:33:00. > :33:06.the idea that she is part of the elite and actually she has some very

:33:07. > :33:11.tricky stuff which may well then resurfaced in the next four months.

:33:12. > :33:17.How does she counter that? Well, you have heard some of the rhetoric

:33:18. > :33:22.already during this week in the convention, where many speakers have

:33:23. > :33:29.labelled her the change maker. She is trying to portray herself as an

:33:30. > :33:33.agent of change, which you are right, is quite tricky, considering

:33:34. > :33:41.she has been a Washington figure for generations. -- a generation. Going

:33:42. > :33:50.back to when she was first lady in 1993. Just to come in on that, the

:33:51. > :33:55.recent CNN poll, when it talks about trustworthiness and honesty, 68% say

:33:56. > :34:00.Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy versus 43% on Trump.

:34:01. > :34:07.That is devastating at this stage of the game. It is devastating but I

:34:08. > :34:11.have written that, based on supervising investigative stories

:34:12. > :34:17.about her at the New York Times, as an investigative reporter myself,

:34:18. > :34:22.looking into many of the Clinton controversies, I think she is

:34:23. > :34:30.basically honest and trustworthy. Many of the charges against her at

:34:31. > :34:34.the Republican convention, people chancing lock her up. It is

:34:35. > :34:39.extremely exaggerated. Even though most recent e-mails, when you

:34:40. > :34:48.actually examined the case against her, it came down to three e-mails

:34:49. > :34:53.that did not have clarified headers. She is hurt by that. She is hurt by

:34:54. > :34:59.that but she blames the media. She is very distrustful of the media and

:35:00. > :35:03.hostile to them. Very defensive about the media. With good reason.

:35:04. > :35:12.Hillary Clinton has been demonised for decades and decades and decades

:35:13. > :35:15.by the GOP, the Republican attack machine, and these nonevent pseudo-

:35:16. > :35:22.scandals in a sense which have bedevilled her. A leading Republican

:35:23. > :35:27.person is said to me last night, Hillary Clinton has baggage but

:35:28. > :35:33.Trump is crazy and you cannot fix crazy. Interesting that Michael

:35:34. > :35:36.Bloomberg last night, himself a billionaire, the businessman

:35:37. > :35:42.candidate, he really made the point that Trump is a reckless candidate.

:35:43. > :35:46.As we go towards an election, it is about whether the petty and

:35:47. > :35:51.trustworthiness of Hillary Clinton will be as dangerous in her mind as

:35:52. > :35:55.a reckless, radical, off the wall candidate. You have to accept you

:35:56. > :36:01.think that and a lot of people in the big cities think that. In great

:36:02. > :36:07.swathes of America, they think that Trump is the best candidate. On

:36:08. > :36:12.radio, you are talking about what she had to do in the campaign a new

:36:13. > :36:17.city had to show her true self, to be stern and release her inner

:36:18. > :36:23.pitch, as you called it. Is this really the night for that? I think

:36:24. > :36:28.you have already seen a little bit of that in men talking about her.

:36:29. > :36:33.They stressed the fighter in Hillary Clinton. It was almost as if Hillary

:36:34. > :36:37.Clinton is supposed to be be solid, national-security candidate last

:36:38. > :36:40.time, this time she is being positioned as the cuddly

:36:41. > :36:44.grandmother. The truth of Hillary Clinton is she is a feisty, BS

:36:45. > :36:48.women, who fights the change. I think it will be a lot more

:36:49. > :36:54.appealing, particularly to the young, the Lenny women, who want to

:36:55. > :37:01.see their women are fierce. -- millennial. It is more authentic

:37:02. > :37:05.than anything we have heard before. What we have heard in a well crafted

:37:06. > :37:13.speech written for Michelle Obama and Obama and Clinton were both

:37:14. > :37:18.orators. She is not an oratory, so I wonder how she is going to deal with

:37:19. > :37:29.this. She has said she is not a natural politician like her husband.

:37:30. > :37:34.In terms of her feistiness and, to use her phrase, we saw that in the

:37:35. > :37:38.primaries with the great speech in San Diego. You could see how she

:37:39. > :37:47.relished attacking Donald Trump on important points. She is nearly

:37:48. > :37:52.ready to go out there and really get in his face. She herself is kind of

:37:53. > :37:58.delights in the fact she's so she clearly gets under his skin. Tina

:37:59. > :38:02.Brown, in a way, what we are talking about is the night this convention

:38:03. > :38:06.finishes, the big fight starts between the pair of them. Things are

:38:07. > :38:10.going to get very dirty. In the swing states you are very have to

:38:11. > :38:19.that is she will have to play a very careful game. Hillary loves a fight.

:38:20. > :38:24.At her best is when her back is against the wall. During the last

:38:25. > :38:28.primary campaign, and now, she is in the thick of it. She will be buoyed

:38:29. > :38:33.up by all of these testimonies after being so battered. It must be very

:38:34. > :38:37.exciting for her to hear these wonderful testimonies from so many,

:38:38. > :38:44.incredibly strong figures in the Democratic party. She will put on

:38:45. > :38:45.her fighting boots. Thank you very much for joining us tonight. Thank

:38:46. > :38:55.you. The front pages tomorrow, chaos over

:38:56. > :39:01.nuclear plant. Ministers done energy industry with new Hinkley review. On

:39:02. > :39:05.the left-hand side, rail fares to -- rail firms to cut fares on

:39:06. > :39:11.investigation. Last orders for airport drinking. An intention to

:39:12. > :39:19.make passengers pay for unruly behaviour. In the Guardian, Hinkley

:39:20. > :39:25.Point nuclear plant gets the go-ahead. On the right-hand side, it

:39:26. > :39:28.has a hug from last night at the convention as Hillary Clinton made a

:39:29. > :39:32.surprise appearance before tonight's B.

:39:33. > :39:34.Today Sky announced that they were launching a big push

:39:35. > :39:37.We feel like we've seen this new fangled nonsense before.

:39:38. > :39:41.I think this was the happiest day of my life.

:39:42. > :40:31.Thursday was another warm day in the south. Fresh condition is now

:40:32. > :40:33.pushing in from the north. This weather