:00:00. > :00:00.Once under cover, now under lock and key.
:00:00. > :00:08.Fake Sheikh Mazher Mahmood is jailed for 15 months for tampering
:00:09. > :00:14.with evidence in the collapsed drugs trial of pop star Tulisa.
:00:15. > :00:17.As questions are raised about more trials where he provided evidence,
:00:18. > :00:21.Newsnight speaks to victims of some of his other stings.
:00:22. > :00:26.I can't describe what it was like the moment that the judge said
:00:27. > :00:40.We'll ask one of the tabloids' best known victims if the press
:00:41. > :00:45.She was Pakistan's first social media superstar,
:00:46. > :00:49.murdered by her brother in a so-called honour killing.
:00:50. > :00:52.The parents of Qandeel Baloch speak out, as they take their own son
:00:53. > :01:08.And she once said that she "can't stand the bad lighting,
:01:09. > :01:12.tinny voices, snarky scripts and fake cool of today's TV shows."
:01:13. > :01:25.Camille Paglia joins us to talk feminism and politics.
:01:26. > :01:30.The Sun's leader column today was as moralistic
:01:31. > :01:33."Reporters are paid to find stories and check facts.
:01:34. > :01:37.They don't always get it right, but they take pride in trying."
:01:38. > :01:39.Somewhat strange, then, that when it came off the presses
:01:40. > :01:43.this morning their Sunday edition's star reporter,
:01:44. > :01:46.a man already proven to manufacture stories and invent his own facts,
:01:47. > :01:53.Mazher Mahmood, the so-called Fake Sheikh of tabloid lore,
:01:54. > :01:56.is in jail tonight after receiving a 15 month sentence for conspiring
:01:57. > :01:59.to pervert the course of justice in a case involving the singer
:02:00. > :02:05.That worthy editorial homily, by the way, referred to tweets
:02:06. > :02:08.about refugees posted yesterday by Gary Lineker and
:02:09. > :02:14.The newspaper found no room at all for Mahmood's misdemeanours.
:02:15. > :02:17.John Sweeney spent the day with four victims of his stings
:02:18. > :02:22.who were at the Old Bailey to see that sentence handed down.
:02:23. > :02:27.Here is the Fake Sheikh in his pomp, working for the News of the World.
:02:28. > :02:32.And here he is bringing down London's Burning star John Alford.
:02:33. > :02:36.The actor served nine months for supplying drugs.
:02:37. > :02:39.Today, the boot was on the other foot.
:02:40. > :02:40.Mazher Mahmood got 15 months for perverting
:02:41. > :02:44.the course of justice, when yet another showbiz sting,
:02:45. > :02:49.this time against pop star Tulisa, went wrong.
:02:50. > :02:53.Mazher Mahmood was once one of Britain's most
:02:54. > :02:59.And it's time to his victims to have their say.
:03:00. > :03:03.These people have one thing in common.
:03:04. > :03:11.Their lives were wrecked by the Fake Sheikh.
:03:12. > :03:13.Stage hypnotist Jonathan Royle says he was stitched up by Mahmood
:03:14. > :03:19.when he got six months in prison for giving the reporter fake coins.
:03:20. > :03:24.From the moment that the judge said, "Send him down".
:03:25. > :03:41.I wouldn't wish it upon my worst enemy.
:03:42. > :03:48.I was put on suicide watch in Strangeways.
:03:49. > :03:51.I slept for weeks in prison, fully clothed, scared that
:03:52. > :03:59.People have now started to see that what I've been saying
:04:00. > :04:02.for the past 18 and a half years actually is true.
:04:03. > :04:08.Another scalp, former world champion boxer Herbie Hyde,
:04:09. > :04:12.who got 22 months for supplying drugs.
:04:13. > :04:15.Mahmood had so much evidence, so much....
:04:16. > :04:26.Like he said I sent him a text saying that I...
:04:27. > :04:29.I wrote him a text saying I've got the cocaine, and the match fixing.
:04:30. > :04:42.I thought, I might as well kill myself.
:04:43. > :04:45.If I'm going to put this thing to my family.
:04:46. > :05:02.What effect did Mazher Mahmood's journalism have on you?
:05:03. > :05:04.Basically because of the story that went out about me,
:05:05. > :05:12.It wasn't just a job, it was a career.
:05:13. > :05:15.And a career that I think I would have done very
:05:16. > :05:18.well at and I would have lasted quite a long time.
:05:19. > :05:24.A fourth scalp, John Alford, whose career ended in 1999
:05:25. > :05:31.It was very convenient for the police.
:05:32. > :05:35.The police and criminal evidence act was put in place to protect us
:05:36. > :05:38.They had a very cosy relationship with the press because
:05:39. > :05:41.they could use lies, trickery and deceit to get a story,
:05:42. > :05:50.Very convenient for them, very damning for us.
:05:51. > :05:52.Their solicitor is calling for an inquiry and she is damning
:05:53. > :05:54.about the conduct of the Metropolitan Police.
:05:55. > :06:05.And what was going on was very heavy.
:06:06. > :06:09.I hope finally people will listen to what these people have been
:06:10. > :06:15.I will stress that not one of the convictions
:06:16. > :06:29.Today the company said they would fight those cases
:06:30. > :06:32.and that Mazher Mahmood had led scores of successful investigations
:06:33. > :06:34.during his 25 year career with the company, which had
:06:35. > :06:41.led to the exposure of criminality and wrongdoing.
:06:42. > :06:44.For the likes of us and the other people that he stung,
:06:45. > :06:46.I certainly don't feel justice has been done.
:06:47. > :06:55.As far as not wishing it on my worst enemy,
:06:56. > :06:58.I am more than happy that Mazher Mahmood is now sat
:06:59. > :07:00.there quaking in his boots wondering what is going to happen
:07:01. > :07:05.I would like to be a fly on the wall.
:07:06. > :07:08.The question now is, why did the authorities let these
:07:09. > :07:17.Well, joining us now via Skype from France is Max Mosley,
:07:18. > :07:21.who was himself the subject of a sting by the News of the World.
:07:22. > :07:24.Since then he has campaigned for stronger regulation
:07:25. > :07:37.The somewhat laughable defence is now at the beginning of the phone
:07:38. > :07:40.hacking scandal was that it was one rogue reporter. Do you think that
:07:41. > :07:46.description might apply in this case? Very much so. The problem is
:07:47. > :07:56.that News group newspapers which is the son, the News of the World, they
:07:57. > :08:00.are a criminal enterprise and the number one criminal in that group is
:08:01. > :08:06.Mazher Mahmood and has been shown to be exactly what he is. What is
:08:07. > :08:11.essential from all of this is that we have the second part of the lab
:08:12. > :08:20.is an enquiry, to look at the relationship between the police and
:08:21. > :08:27.the press. And particularly News Group newspapers. The third or
:08:28. > :08:32.fourth investigation into the Daniel Morgan murder enquiry was underway,
:08:33. > :08:39.a Chief Superintendent at Scotland Yard was put under surveillance by
:08:40. > :08:44.the News of the World. It is extraordinary that in a civilised
:08:45. > :08:47.society there was no comeback, no investigation into that. Scotland
:08:48. > :08:55.Yard just did nothing. Now the time has come when this has got to shop
:08:56. > :08:59.and we've got to expose those elements in the police who are
:09:00. > :09:08.responsible for the corrupt system. You will be aware that Leveson Two
:09:09. > :09:13.has been cancelled, are you suggesting it might be revived by
:09:14. > :09:16.this case? It has to be. We either accept we have a corrupt police
:09:17. > :09:21.force with a corrupt relationship with a major newspaper group, we
:09:22. > :09:30.either except that and say that's OK and is fine, or we have Leveson Two
:09:31. > :09:32.and root out the elements responsible for this. Personally I
:09:33. > :09:39.don't want to live in a country where that sort of thing can go on,
:09:40. > :09:43.and I most people do. You've spent just shy of ?4 million of your own
:09:44. > :09:46.money on bankrolling an organisation new hope would police this
:09:47. > :09:52.relationship. What gives you the right to do that? First of all that
:09:53. > :09:59.is not to police the relationship between the police and the press...
:10:00. > :10:07.To police the behaviour of the press. Exactly. What we are talking
:10:08. > :10:10.about at the moment is the corrupt relationship between the press and
:10:11. > :10:14.the police and that's a serious matter. A separate question is
:10:15. > :10:19.whether the press should have a regulator that actually looks at
:10:20. > :10:24.what they do, an independent regulator. I feel that we need such
:10:25. > :10:28.a regulator, we particularly need one because if somebody has a case
:10:29. > :10:33.against the press at the moment, unless they are a millionaire they
:10:34. > :10:42.can't bring it. Unless you can risk ?1 million you can't bring a case.
:10:43. > :10:48.The first Leveson idea was that if you have a complaint against the
:10:49. > :10:53.press you go to a cheap, inexpensive arbitration and get settled. If the
:10:54. > :10:59.press want to go to expensive High Court proceedings they pay. What the
:11:00. > :11:03.press are doing is saying, we've got to pay both sides of the case. But
:11:04. > :11:10.what they are leaving and if that that is only if they don't agree to
:11:11. > :11:15.cheap arbitration. Access to justice is absolutely vital. 99% of the
:11:16. > :11:21.population can't afford to go to the High Court. When I said to Leveson
:11:22. > :11:26.in the enquiry... We are very short of time. I want to ask you one more
:11:27. > :11:33.question. It's fair to say that publishers haven't beaten a path to
:11:34. > :11:39.your door. Publishers like News Group newspapers... Or anyone else
:11:40. > :11:42.really. The last thing they want or The Daily Mail, is a proper
:11:43. > :11:47.regulator. They will do everything in their power to make sure there
:11:48. > :11:57.isn't one. And a half of the rest of the population I will do my best to
:11:58. > :12:01.see there is one. You don't think it -- Ipso is fit for purpose? It is
:12:02. > :12:07.under the thumb of the large newspapers which comes down to four
:12:08. > :12:11.billionaires. All of them tax exiles living outside the UK and control
:12:12. > :12:18.70% of the British press. Somebody calls that a free press, it's
:12:19. > :12:21.laughable. You think it should be regulated by an organisation
:12:22. > :12:27.bankrolled by another wealthy individual? People have paid for
:12:28. > :12:31.things the public need for generations. That's a perfectly
:12:32. > :12:38.legitimate thing. The difference is I have no control whatsoever over
:12:39. > :12:44.the proposed new regulator. All I do is provide the money. That is
:12:45. > :12:47.something the public need. It's a public service, that's why its
:12:48. > :12:50.charitable and that's why it needs doing. Thank you.
:12:51. > :12:52.Theresa May has pronounced herself optimistic that she will get
:12:53. > :12:56.Her French and German counterparts have warned that a hard Brexit
:12:57. > :12:59.will involve commensurately hard negotiations and the former European
:13:00. > :13:02.commissioner Jonathan Hill has revealed that many senior EU figures
:13:03. > :13:08.still don't believe that Britain will go through with it at all.
:13:09. > :13:11.There have even been reports today that EU officials may lobby to have
:13:12. > :13:17.So it's fair to say that there's no more consensus abroad
:13:18. > :13:21.about what Brexit might end up looking like than there is at home.
:13:22. > :13:23.Newsnight's Diplomatic Editor, Mark Urban, has been surveying
:13:24. > :13:27.the scene on the side of the negotiating table
:13:28. > :13:29.where the 27 countries staying in will be sitting opposite the one
:13:30. > :13:36.The Prime Minister's been very clear.
:13:37. > :13:39.From the moment she arrived at the summit ...
:13:40. > :13:48.Yes, that seems straightforward enough.
:13:49. > :13:51.The British government's policy is to leave the EU by activating
:13:52. > :13:59.So why do many people in Brussels not believe it?
:14:00. > :14:02.There is a surprisingly widely held view that Britain might
:14:03. > :14:09.still decide to stay in, and I think that partly explains why
:14:10. > :14:13.previously Donald Tusk has talked about "it's hard Brexit or no exit".
:14:14. > :14:15.And it's not just the commission or Brussels civil service.
:14:16. > :14:17.It's Germany, critically, that has apparently adopted a policy
:14:18. > :14:20.that Britain needs to be given as much time to change
:14:21. > :14:28.The worst thing that can happen is Brexit.
:14:29. > :14:36.Now after the referendum, which is not legally binding,
:14:37. > :14:40.I think there is no sense, really no sense, in urging
:14:41. > :14:45.the Britons to accomplish what is considered by all of us
:14:46. > :14:49.to be the worst outcome we can think of.
:14:50. > :14:51.In Whitehall, and the country more widely, people care
:14:52. > :14:57.But that's not the case in many of the other
:14:58. > :15:02.And that's why the issue has been so far down this week's summit
:15:03. > :15:07.agenda, and why many of those nations are ready to fall in behind
:15:08. > :15:13.a German lead, that says play it long, wait for the British
:15:14. > :15:15.to develop buyers remorse, particularly if their
:15:16. > :15:21.And earlier this week, with the experience of sterling's
:15:22. > :15:27.fall still fresh in people's minds, the EU ratcheted up the pressure
:15:28. > :15:29.another notch, offering the UK a chance it seemed
:15:30. > :15:42.We will conduct the negotiations in good faith.
:15:43. > :15:52.Minimise the cost and seek the best possible deal for all.
:15:53. > :15:56.But as I have said before, I am afraid that no such outcome exists
:15:57. > :16:06.Of course, it is and can only be for the UK to assess the outcome
:16:07. > :16:10.of the negotiations, and determine if Brexit
:16:11. > :16:19.That last phrase suggests the UK can abandon Brexit once Theresa May has
:16:20. > :16:23.seen what her fellow leaders are prepared to offer.
:16:24. > :16:27.It undermines British government legal arguments that
:16:28. > :16:29.Article 50 is irrevocable, and may offer another two
:16:30. > :16:36.years for Downing Street to change its mind.
:16:37. > :16:39.And all the time, EU leaders will be using their leverage.
:16:40. > :16:41.For example, by closing the UK out of many discussions,
:16:42. > :16:48.something the Prime Minister complained about today.
:16:49. > :16:52.We will be, as I've said, in the first quarter of next year
:16:53. > :16:56.There will be a process for the 27 to consider how they are going
:16:57. > :17:01.But, we will continue to play our role, as I have done,
:17:02. > :17:04.I can assure you that I haven't been backward
:17:05. > :17:10.So ended a summit and a week, where the 27 continued
:17:11. > :17:19.in their refusal to have any pre-negotiation of Brexit,
:17:20. > :17:21.and for good measure threatened to keep growing uncertainty
:17:22. > :17:27.about the UK and its economy well beyond the activation of Article 50.
:17:28. > :17:35.Some breaking news tonight concerning another EU deal. Mark
:17:36. > :17:39.urban is here now. What happened? Essentially this appears to be a
:17:40. > :17:44.breakdown of trade talks with Canada. It's a long saga. The talks
:17:45. > :17:50.themselves went on for six, nearly seven years. For the past year or
:17:51. > :17:56.so, the EU has been trying to ratify an agreement with Canada, this trade
:17:57. > :18:00.agreement. Talks have broken down and the Canadian Trade Minister
:18:01. > :18:07.tonight said the EU is incapable of doing this deal, even with a country
:18:08. > :18:12.like ours of very similar values. It's a torturous saga and frankly it
:18:13. > :18:18.is straight out of the Leave campaign playbook. In the sense that
:18:19. > :18:24.it is a dramatic illustration of how convoluted, hidebound and ultimately
:18:25. > :18:27.frustrating it is to try and do free trade through an EU framework.
:18:28. > :18:32.Whether they are able to revive this, we can't yet say, but the
:18:33. > :18:38.Canadians for the moment are saying they've given up, thwarted at the
:18:39. > :18:47.last minute by a regional Belgian that wouldn't agree to it.
:18:48. > :18:52.Conversely, any implications of a UK deal with the EU? It's like the most
:18:53. > :18:57.extraordinary diplomatic conundrum because on the one hand you can say,
:18:58. > :19:01.oh Lord, deliver us from this sort of process that Canada has been put
:19:02. > :19:04.through, but for the UK to get through to that point where it can
:19:05. > :19:10.cut its own free-trade deals with countries like the UK and Canada
:19:11. > :19:15.wherever, it's going to have to go through a very similar process. In
:19:16. > :19:18.that sense, it's a bit of a nightmarish harbinger about how
:19:19. > :19:24.complex things might be if all 27 of the other states choose to use their
:19:25. > :19:30.own points of pressure. It might be Spain on Gibraltar, it might be
:19:31. > :19:32.Remainiac on workers' rights in Britain, all these points they might
:19:33. > :19:37.have two hold-up agreement of any deal when it is finally reached.
:19:38. > :19:39.Happy days diplomatic editors, though! Thank you very much, Mark
:19:40. > :19:43.Urban. In life, she was Pakistan's first
:19:44. > :19:45.social media superstar. Provocative selfies and film clips
:19:46. > :19:47.garnered comparisons with Kim Kardashian and propelled
:19:48. > :19:49.Qandeel Baloch to a comparable level In death, she seems set to prove
:19:50. > :19:55.an even more influential figure. Murdered by her own brother
:19:56. > :19:58.in a so-called honour crime after her flirting on camera
:19:59. > :20:00.with a prominent cleric caused a media furore,
:20:01. > :20:04.the case has prompted unprecedented scrutiny of the stone age patriarchy
:20:05. > :20:07.that sees a thousand Pakistani women die in similar
:20:08. > :20:12.circumstances every year. And earlier this month,
:20:13. > :20:15.the country's Parliament passed a law to close a loophole that had
:20:16. > :20:17.allowed the perpetrators And she became Pakistan's
:20:18. > :20:37.social media superstar. Her highly provocative videos
:20:38. > :20:52.shocked many in Pakistan, On the 15th July 2016,
:20:53. > :21:02.Qandeel was killed by her brother, because in his eyes,
:21:03. > :21:12.she had brought shame on the family. It was on one chat show that she met
:21:13. > :21:16.Mufti Qavi, a celebrity cleric. Mufti Qavi suggested that they meet
:21:17. > :21:29.next time he was in Karachi. A few weeks later, during the holy
:21:30. > :21:32.month of Ramadan, Qandeel Baloch met It was during this meeting
:21:33. > :21:43.that she took a number of selfies. In one, she was wearing
:21:44. > :21:45.the Mufti's hat. This picture in particular caused
:21:46. > :21:50.a media storm. Soon she and the Mufti
:21:51. > :21:59.were everywhere. In the fallout, Mufti Qavi
:22:00. > :22:01.was suspended from his job For her brother Waseem, the media
:22:02. > :22:23.intrusion was the final straw. But why were those selfies
:22:24. > :22:45.with Mufti Qavi so controversial? A month after the selfies appeared,
:22:46. > :22:50.Qandeel was killed. How much did the photos with
:22:51. > :22:55.Mufti Qavi contribute to her murder? I went to meet him at his
:22:56. > :22:58.madrasah in Multan. Mufti Qavi comes from a family
:22:59. > :23:06.of clerics who have lived To the locals, he is a revered
:23:07. > :23:52.and respected religious scholar. 1,000 women die each year
:23:53. > :23:58.from honour crimes in Pakistan. A bill being debated in Parliament
:23:59. > :24:01.is looking to put an end to honour It will take away the right
:24:02. > :24:32.of a family to forgive the killer. I wanted to talk to Qandeel's father
:24:33. > :24:39.about Atia's concerns. He hasn't visited his son Waseem
:24:40. > :25:30.in jail, but some relatives have. In a nondescript patch of land
:25:31. > :25:35.lies Qandeel's body, The Anti-Honour Crime Bill was
:25:36. > :26:27.passed on the 6th of October 2016. The hope is that this law will stop
:26:28. > :26:30.those who kill for honour And you can watch the full Our World
:26:31. > :26:39.documentary "The Killing of Qandeel", by Hani Taha,
:26:40. > :26:44.on the News Channel this Saturday and Sunday at 9.30pm,
:26:45. > :26:59.as well as on the iPlayer. I'm joined now by the author and
:27:00. > :27:02.renowned feminist, Camille Paglia. She's in town for a Battle of Ideas
:27:03. > :27:05.event in London tomorrow that will examine the myriad facets
:27:06. > :27:09.of modern feminism. Including the question of what women
:27:10. > :27:12.should be fighting for in 2016. When you watch a film like that from
:27:13. > :27:16.Pakistan and then see that we have another female Prime Minister and we
:27:17. > :27:21.may be about to get a female president, is the answer to that
:27:22. > :27:26.question not dependent on where those women live? Well, I've
:27:27. > :27:29.constantly said that that we real focus of contemporary feminism
:27:30. > :27:33.should be on the lack of civil rights and atrocities committed
:27:34. > :27:41.against women in the third World and not an excessive sensationalising of
:27:42. > :27:44.problems that bourgeoise girls are having in dating on college
:27:45. > :27:48.campuses. There has been a severe disproportion and 425 years I've
:27:49. > :27:52.been calling for young women to stand up for themselves and show
:27:53. > :27:56.responsibility for the choices they make in their social lives and for
:27:57. > :28:01.colleges and universities to stop intruding into social lives of
:28:02. > :28:05.students. I mean, the question then of what women should be fighting for
:28:06. > :28:11.is, they should just be fighting more? I believe that the proper
:28:12. > :28:15.definition of feminism should be a quality of opportunity in the public
:28:16. > :28:20.realm. This is what I have constantly said, that women should
:28:21. > :28:26.demand that barriers to their advance in careers like politics and
:28:27. > :28:30.must be removed. However, the private realm is far more complex.
:28:31. > :28:36.This is where I oppose intrusions by the state or by bureaucratic
:28:37. > :28:40.administrators on college campuses who have now, in effect, usurped the
:28:41. > :28:46.educational mission and destroyed it in the US, and I'm very unhappy that
:28:47. > :28:51.those mad trends seem to be leaking over into Britain. I see. I hope
:28:52. > :28:56.that doesn't constitute a spoiler for tomorrow's event! Let me ask
:28:57. > :29:02.you, is Hilary Clinton a good feminist? Alas, Hilary Clinton's
:29:03. > :29:08.prominence is due to her atavistic attachment to a man. Hillary has
:29:09. > :29:13.accomplished very little in her career although she has had the
:29:14. > :29:17.opportunity to do so. I would have hoped that the first woman president
:29:18. > :29:22.would have achieved it on her own talents and merits and not because
:29:23. > :29:26.she has lived under the shadow of a very charismatic politician, for
:29:27. > :29:29.whom I voted twice. I wasn't really a fan of Hilary Clinton but I have
:29:30. > :29:35.becomes India Lee disillusioned. She should -- she should not surely
:29:36. > :29:40.exempt herself from seeking office purely because she has been married
:29:41. > :29:45.to a man who has achieved that? I'm afraid she has written on Bill
:29:46. > :29:49.Clinton's coat-tails in her career and has accomplished exactly
:29:50. > :29:55.nothing. The destabilisation of North Africa is one of them... I
:29:56. > :30:00.feel she is one of the most incompetent and corrupt politicians
:30:01. > :30:03.in my lifetime in America. I hesitate to ask the next question
:30:04. > :30:08.commercially she is a better feminist than Donald Trump? Alas...
:30:09. > :30:12.Is she a better logician than Donald Trump?
:30:13. > :30:20.-- is she a better politician than Donald Trump? Yes! So she is the
:30:21. > :30:23.second worst ever? She has enormous staff who feed her lines come
:30:24. > :30:29.everything she does is poll tested and so on. I feel that the senator
:30:30. > :30:33.from California should have been the first woman president. That is a
:30:34. > :30:39.woman of real habitats. She still might be. The trouble is that people
:30:40. > :30:45.running for president in the United States must subject themselves to
:30:46. > :30:50.one or two years... Their whole lives are consumed with money and
:30:51. > :30:56.trying to appeal to an enormous country. Even one of our states is
:30:57. > :31:00.as big as Europe... If we had the system you had where a person could
:31:01. > :31:04.rise to the top of the party and then that person takes over as
:31:05. > :31:07.president, we would have had a woman president long before this.
:31:08. > :31:13.You wrote about Donald Trump and described him as a master of the
:31:14. > :31:18.unexpected. You seem to centre the two some of its charms. Has he got
:31:19. > :31:23.any left? Well, if Donald Trump wins, it is because of a populist
:31:24. > :31:28.fatigue with a tyranny by a political structure in Washington
:31:29. > :31:34.which essentially is a unique party, there is very different between --
:31:35. > :31:39.very little difference between Democrats and Republicans. -- a
:31:40. > :31:43.uni-party. Pair is a relationship with the mainstream media where it
:31:44. > :31:48.is possible for people to make fortunes... I don't think it's
:31:49. > :31:52.understood in Europe how corrupt our mainstream media is. If Trump wins,
:31:53. > :31:57.it will shatter the power structure of two parties and the mainstream
:31:58. > :32:01.media. And we barely scratched the surface. That is indeed always got
:32:02. > :32:12.time for. Good night. -- that's all we've got time for.
:32:13. > :32:13.Good evening. The weekend is fast approaching. Let's