:00:00. > :00:07.Clinton lands in Iowa - to news that could be a game changer.
:00:08. > :00:10.The FBI will investigate additional classified material
:00:11. > :00:22.In New Hampshire, Trump praises the move.
:00:23. > :00:29.The news this morning is this is bigger than Watergate. This is
:00:30. > :00:31.bigger than Watergate. In my opinion. This is bigger than
:00:32. > :00:33.Watergate. Can it shift the polls with 11
:00:34. > :00:38.days to go? Uber is forced to pay
:00:39. > :00:40.drivers the minimum wage. You know, they need to make sure
:00:41. > :00:45.that they can pay their wages. If everything was so free
:00:46. > :00:48.and flexible as they said it was, then everything would be totally
:00:49. > :00:51.anarchic, you know, and people would sometimes carry out work or go
:00:52. > :01:03.off and do whatever they wanted. We'll hear from a Uber driver who is
:01:04. > :01:06.not happy about today's court ruling.
:01:07. > :01:11.A word of encouragement for those who can't even
:01:12. > :01:25.It's not as if this US election campaign has been boring.
:01:26. > :01:28.But tonight, it was newly electrified.
:01:29. > :01:30.The FBI announced it would revisit its investigation
:01:31. > :01:32.into whether Hillary Clinton had classified information stored
:01:33. > :01:34.amongst her private emails, as new ones came to light.
:01:35. > :01:38.No one knows what the new evidence will throw up.
:01:39. > :01:40.But the timing could not have have been more critical,
:01:41. > :01:42.throwing an electoral lifeline to Donald Trump.
:01:43. > :01:44.He's already declared it bigger than Watergate.
:01:45. > :01:48.It plays into his narrative of her being corrupt.
:01:49. > :01:51.Democrats have dismissed it as empty noise, and are furious
:01:52. > :01:53.at what they call a politically irresponsible move.
:01:54. > :01:56.But many ballots have already been cast, and many minds
:01:57. > :02:06.have long been made up, so will it shift anyone's vote?
:02:07. > :02:16.# Ain't no Mountain high enough. Change is coming but the choice is
:02:17. > :02:24.yours. When there are no ceilings, the sky's the limit. Make jobs page.
:02:25. > :02:27.Thank you all! With 11 days to go until the election, it was beginning
:02:28. > :02:32.to look like the presidency was Clinton's Toulouse. Hillary Clinton
:02:33. > :02:37.was on a plane to Iowa with no Wi-Fi when news came through that the FBI
:02:38. > :02:41.was looking again at her e-mail server. She and her team, as shocked
:02:42. > :02:45.as the journalists with her, who learned of the News as they touch
:02:46. > :02:52.down. The accusations have followed her throughout the campaign. Hillary
:02:53. > :02:56.was ignoring the accusations. Tonight, a fresh investigation into
:02:57. > :03:01.new e-mails after the FBI seized electronic devices becoming to her
:03:02. > :03:07.aid, Huma Abedin, and her husband, Anthony Weiner. This is bigger than
:03:08. > :03:11.Watergate. This is bigger. At the Trump rally in New Hampshire, they
:03:12. > :03:16.were celebrating a moment that could come in this extraordinary election
:03:17. > :03:19.saga, turn things around yet again. The latest investigation plays into
:03:20. > :03:23.a narrative he has worked hard to create, that she is corrupt,
:03:24. > :03:28.crooked, dishonest. The markets tonight were acting like this was a
:03:29. > :03:32.game changer, the prospect of it from victory appearing to spook
:03:33. > :03:40.them. Early voting has opened in many states. 7.3 million Americans
:03:41. > :03:43.have already voted. For Hillary, the next 11 days might have been a march
:03:44. > :03:46.to victory on the 9th of November but it remains to be seen out how
:03:47. > :03:47.the spectre of impeachment while in office could affect our chances.
:03:48. > :03:50.Well, our diplomatic editor Mark Urban has been out
:03:51. > :03:52.and about meeting voters in the Southern states, and is now
:03:53. > :04:02.Talk us through the details of the e-mail investigation itself. From
:04:03. > :04:06.what we understand, the e-mails were between Anthony Weiner and Huma
:04:07. > :04:10.Abedin. She, as you know, the vice-chair of the Hillary Clinton
:04:11. > :04:17.campaign, a key aid during her time in the State Department also. As far
:04:18. > :04:21.as we understand from leaks coming from the FBI, they don't include
:04:22. > :04:27.actual e-mails from Hillary Clinton herself. But we can intuit on the
:04:28. > :04:31.fact that this investigation has been reopened after the FBI said in
:04:32. > :04:36.July that Hillary Clinton did not have a criminal case to answer,
:04:37. > :04:41.because there is something that may give them further insight into one
:04:42. > :04:45.of two things. The fact of having this Private server, which is an
:04:46. > :04:48.offence under federal law, the type of thing which a junior civil
:04:49. > :04:50.servant or member of the military subject to high security clearance
:04:51. > :04:55.might easily have lost their job or even gone to jail for. And then the
:04:56. > :05:01.actual content. Was classified content bleeding into immune
:05:02. > :05:05.occasions between Hillary Clinton and her aides? That is the area they
:05:06. > :05:11.are looking at now and obviously, it is potentially hugely awkward in its
:05:12. > :05:15.timing for Hillary Clinton and her campaign. I know you have been out
:05:16. > :05:19.in North Carolina and Virginia, swing state. What kind of impact, if
:05:20. > :05:26.any, do you think this will have on the boat? The pollsters here -- the
:05:27. > :05:32.vote. The posters here are quite sure, they say, that phenomena such
:05:33. > :05:36.as shy Donald Trump supporters have been taken into account in their
:05:37. > :05:40.complex calculations. A couple of nights ago in a remote part of North
:05:41. > :05:44.Carolina, we were at a trump event where several thousand people were
:05:45. > :05:48.queueing for hours to get in. It was quite striking how many people had
:05:49. > :05:53.come to see him and you wondered, can they really be so confident in
:05:54. > :05:57.their calculations? But let's assume they are broadly right. We had seen
:05:58. > :06:05.the race narrowing a little bit, a percentage point or two in the last
:06:06. > :06:08.day or two in the poll of polls exercises and that is before this
:06:09. > :06:11.latest news, of course. So I think it is reasonable to expect it might
:06:12. > :06:15.tighten a little further still but of course, the question, are so many
:06:16. > :06:19.minds already made up that this isn't going to have a big effect?
:06:20. > :06:24.Will Hillary Clinton still, going into polling day, have a commanding
:06:25. > :06:25.lead? Thank you for joining us. Some pretty confident pollsters here.
:06:26. > :06:27.I'm joined by the Republican Party pollster Frank Luntz,
:06:28. > :06:29.and from Washington, Mike Czin, a former spokesman
:06:30. > :06:41.Thank you for joining us. It sounds as if the FBI director had no choice
:06:42. > :06:47.but to release this information once new e-mails came out. Do you agree?
:06:48. > :06:52.I'm very confused as to why this came out now and how it came out. I
:06:53. > :06:56.think if the FBI is going to look into it, they have a responsibility
:06:57. > :07:00.to share with the American people, 11 days before the election, more
:07:01. > :07:03.than they have shared today. We know Hillary Clinton has been interviewed
:07:04. > :07:08.and has made herself available to the FBI for hours, congressional
:07:09. > :07:12.Republicans have spent god knows how much taxpayer money looking into
:07:13. > :07:16.this. Just a couple of months ago, they did not have a reason to move
:07:17. > :07:20.forward beyond that, the FBI. Why this is happening now and why there
:07:21. > :07:24.isn't more information is troubling. But I do think what your
:07:25. > :07:35.correspondent was saying earlier, people are voting. This information
:07:36. > :07:39.has been out there. Will it move votes at the end of the day? Maybe
:07:40. > :07:43.around the margins but I think as more and the faster the information
:07:44. > :07:47.gets out there, the best it is for Hillary Clinton to move past this.
:07:48. > :07:50.Let me try to understand, do you think there was political motivation
:07:51. > :07:55.behind this? Do you think the FBI gave way to trump's demands? Is
:07:56. > :07:59.their anger amongst Democrats tonight? I think there is more
:08:00. > :08:06.frustration and confusion as to what the FBI is doing is moving forward.
:08:07. > :08:09.I think they have a responsibility, 11 days before the election. It is
:08:10. > :08:13.totally unprecedented to tease this information. They have a
:08:14. > :08:16.responsibility to review this and share the information. So voters can
:08:17. > :08:19.make up their minds. But I think many of these questions have been
:08:20. > :08:25.asked and answered by Hillary Clinton. What is going on? I can't
:08:26. > :08:28.believe it, I thought it was a joke. I was at the Thames and several
:08:29. > :08:31.people came up to me and asked if I had heard it had happened and I
:08:32. > :08:35.thought it was a ruse. There's no way the FBI would do this with 11
:08:36. > :08:39.days to go, no way unless they thought there was a serious problem.
:08:40. > :08:46.They already had issues with what Clinton did but they said there was
:08:47. > :08:49.no reason to go further, no reason to prosecute her. For them to open
:08:50. > :08:52.it up now, my God, there is something there. With Wikileaks
:08:53. > :08:55.releasing information every day about the foundation and the e-mails
:08:56. > :09:00.and the communication between Clinton and her allies and her
:09:01. > :09:04.campaign people, it is painting a picture that she can't be happy
:09:05. > :09:09.with. From what Mark was saying, they don't even concern e-mails she
:09:10. > :09:13.wrote. How can it be that big if it is not from her? Because the
:09:14. > :09:17.question becomes, did she tell the truth in her testimony? Were things
:09:18. > :09:21.that were part of her server exposed? The issue here is not just
:09:22. > :09:28.about e-mails. It is whether or not her testimony will stand up. Mike?
:09:29. > :09:32.Frank makes it sound like e-mails that have been hacked by Russia to
:09:33. > :09:36.benefit Donald Trump is somehow an indication of guilt on Hillary
:09:37. > :09:40.Clinton's part, which I think is an absurd premise. Hillary Clinton said
:09:41. > :09:44.e-mails and so did her aides. We all do. The fact Russia has fact that
:09:45. > :09:48.and is trying to sway the election, that is the Watergate. Donald Trump
:09:49. > :09:52.said this is Watergate half a dozen times today but I think this is
:09:53. > :09:57.unprecedented, the way that the director had a press conference to
:09:58. > :10:02.address this issue this summer was equally unprecedented. You just said
:10:03. > :10:06.twice, Russia hacked, because it tried to undermine what happened.
:10:07. > :10:10.For the voter, they don't care how it was obtained. They want to know,
:10:11. > :10:14.are the candidates telling the truth? I agree with the people
:10:15. > :10:17.before me. This is not likely to have a major impact because it is so
:10:18. > :10:23.close to election day. However, the fact the FBI director, who the
:10:24. > :10:26.Democrats had said handled this investigation the way it should be
:10:27. > :10:31.done, the fact is, he's opening it up and that is remarkable. Mike,
:10:32. > :10:35.would you agree that whatever is in the e-mails, it leaves the door
:10:36. > :10:38.ajar, something people thought was done and dusted isn't? That is
:10:39. > :10:44.worrying when you are choosing a candidate for president. Listen, I
:10:45. > :10:48.think that e-mail is being reviewed by the FBI 11 days out with this
:10:49. > :10:53.announcement is very odd. I think it's important that the information
:10:54. > :10:57.gets out as quickly as possible, while they review it. But again,
:10:58. > :11:01.these are not e-mails from Hillary Clinton. We don't know what is in
:11:02. > :11:05.them. The FBI did not say they are opening up their investigation. They
:11:06. > :11:07.are going to be reviewing these documents to see if they are
:11:08. > :11:11.consistent with what the countless man-hours they have put into this
:11:12. > :11:14.investigation already. The other thing is, and I think Frank is
:11:15. > :11:19.right, this probably won't sway things because people are voting.
:11:20. > :11:24.There's very few relative numbers of people who are undecided. The
:11:25. > :11:27.greatest weakness is integrity. You could say, lots of people say the
:11:28. > :11:33.FBI is responding to pressure from Donald Trump. Donald Trump doesn't
:11:34. > :11:36.intimidate anyone. The fact is, the fact he says this could be bigger,
:11:37. > :11:41.this is bigger than Watergate actually hurts his case because then
:11:42. > :11:44.it politicises something that the FBI has explicitly not politicised.
:11:45. > :11:50.I want to emphasise to people watching tonight that the FBI is
:11:51. > :11:55.beyond politics. Everyone has said so on both sides. But why have they
:11:56. > :11:59.done this now? Why would you get involved right now? You never would,
:12:00. > :12:03.the FBI director hates partisan politics and he did not want to do
:12:04. > :12:07.this. Clearly, there is something there that is so significant that he
:12:08. > :12:12.has decided that he has no choice. That is why this is there. We don't
:12:13. > :12:15.know that. That's not what he said. That is putting words in his mouth.
:12:16. > :12:19.We don't know what it is, we only know there are e-mails and what that
:12:20. > :12:24.is, who they are with, what the content is, is unknown. Mike, you
:12:25. > :12:28.were a spokesman for president Obama. What would you be advising
:12:29. > :12:35.the Clinton campaign now and Hillary Clinton to do? There are two things,
:12:36. > :12:38.it is in the best interest of the FBI, the American people and the
:12:39. > :12:40.campaign for them to have a full airing of what this is. But I think
:12:41. > :12:44.the second part is, Donald Trump thinks this is his Hail Mary pass,
:12:45. > :12:47.that will help sway the election. You really need a proactive vision
:12:48. > :12:51.and something to campaign on, not just hope that there will be some
:12:52. > :12:55.kind of e-mail that will help sway the election which I don't think is
:12:56. > :12:58.going to happen. This has nothing to do with Donald Trump and everything
:12:59. > :13:04.to do with the Secretary of State. I will tell you, the Clinton campaign,
:13:05. > :13:06.you can hear it in his voice, the Clinton campaign is really scared
:13:07. > :13:09.the night. I think we will revisit this. Thank you for joining us.
:13:10. > :13:12.The Uber website calls on its drivers to Drive When You Want -
:13:13. > :13:15.Which all sounds fine, until they don't.
:13:16. > :13:18.Today, a landmark ruling at the Employment Tribunal told
:13:19. > :13:21.The taxi company will now have to pay drivers a minium
:13:22. > :13:24.wage and holiday leave - to treat them, in other words,
:13:25. > :13:26.as employees, not freelancers who work for a brand.
:13:27. > :13:29.For the two drivers who brought the case, it's a clear victory.
:13:30. > :13:33.But the impact of the ruling is huge, sending a warning
:13:34. > :13:35.to all disruptive technology firms that business cannot come
:13:36. > :13:40.But will this also have unintended consequences,
:13:41. > :13:42.marking the moment the radical business model stopped being quite
:13:43. > :14:00.You pick what to play, even whether to play,
:14:01. > :14:04.For many workers, though, self employment is nowhere near as clear
:14:05. > :14:10.Uber insists that its drivers are self-employed but in a
:14:11. > :14:11.potentially far-reaching judgment, an employment tribunal
:14:12. > :14:18.Solicitors for two Uber drivers who brought the test case
:14:19. > :14:25.I think it's a massive deal actually because you know this is the way
:14:26. > :14:32.We're seeing that companies in the so-called gig economy are often
:14:33. > :14:34.mislabelling, we say, their workers as self-employed.
:14:35. > :14:37.And actually, we're saying they are not
:14:38. > :14:40.self-employed, they are workers, so other companies that
:14:41. > :14:42.are structuring their business in this way will now
:14:43. > :14:45.need to look at those arrangements because they are at risk of a
:14:46. > :14:48.Working individuals fit into three broad categories.
:14:49. > :14:51.The self-employed, which Uber insisted
:14:52. > :14:56.included its drivers, do not enjoy any significant employment rights.
:14:57. > :14:58.However, the tribunal said they were in fact workers.
:14:59. > :15:01.That means they have some rights, like being paid
:15:02. > :15:04.the national minimum wage, holiday pay, and pension contributions,
:15:05. > :15:12.These have extra rights on top, like maternity and paternity pay,
:15:13. > :15:15.statutory notice for dismissal, redundancy payments and protection
:15:16. > :15:22.The employment tribunal came up with 13
:15:23. > :15:25.characteristics of the way Uber drivers work that means, it said,
:15:26. > :15:35.For a start, Uber drivers do not know
:15:36. > :15:37.who it is that they will be picking up or indeed
:15:38. > :15:40.where they want to go when
:15:41. > :15:43.they accept a job on the app platform.
:15:44. > :15:46.And, if, finding out those things, they decide they no longer
:15:47. > :15:49.want the work and they cancel, well Uber can log them off and prevent
:15:50. > :15:52.There are plenty of other companies who
:15:53. > :15:54.will be looking at this judgment carefully.
:15:55. > :15:56.Next month, Maggie Dewhurst is taking the courier
:15:57. > :15:57.company CitySprint to a similar tribunal.
:15:58. > :16:01.I don't think anyone really believe that they themselves
:16:02. > :16:04.are running a business in the true sense of the word, where you can
:16:05. > :16:06.expand, you can get other people to
:16:07. > :16:12.I work for CitySprint, I do the work that CitySprint tell
:16:13. > :16:15.Uber drivers work for Uber, they carry out the
:16:16. > :16:20.If everything was so free and flexible
:16:21. > :16:21.as they said it was, then everything
:16:22. > :16:28.People would sometimes carry out work or go
:16:29. > :16:33.off and do whatever they wanted but
:16:34. > :16:36.According to the Resolution Foundation there are
:16:37. > :16:38.now 4.8 million self-employed people in the UK.
:16:39. > :16:42.That's one in every seven working people.
:16:43. > :16:50.However their earnings have fallen an average of ?60 a week over
:16:51. > :16:54.I think it's partly a story brought to the fore by these
:16:55. > :16:56.tech platforms that have changed the way
:16:57. > :16:59.in which lots of businesses are
:17:00. > :17:00.organising their workforces, but I think in terms
:17:01. > :17:07.ramifications go far beyond workers in the so-called gig economy.
:17:08. > :17:12.Many self-employed workers are construction workers, in education,
:17:13. > :17:18.in consultancy, driving a white van, and for all these types of workers,
:17:19. > :17:19.how their living standards and their rights are
:17:20. > :17:22.secured, is brought into
:17:23. > :17:27.And that's why it's really welcome that
:17:28. > :17:30.the government has already said it is looking at atypical forms of
:17:31. > :17:32.employment and how the world of work is changing.
:17:33. > :17:35.Much of these new ways of working have been driven by
:17:36. > :17:37.technology, and ultimately technology may provide
:17:38. > :17:40.the solution, though not necessarily in a way we like.
:17:41. > :17:42.Robots replacing couriers, and Uber itself
:17:43. > :17:47.There will be no issue about whether a robot or a computer is
:17:48. > :18:06.Joining me now, Labour MP and shadow minister Chi Onwurah,
:18:07. > :18:08.from Newcastle, and Steven Rowe, who was driving for Uber
:18:09. > :18:20.Thank you for joining us. , Chi. Steven, are you pleased with this
:18:21. > :18:24.development? Absolutely not. I don't understand what it is about. Because
:18:25. > :18:29.I am self-employed I get benefits, I can work one I want, start one I
:18:30. > :18:34.want, stop and I want, I have total flexibility. It never occurred to me
:18:35. > :18:39.over the last four years, it is four years that I've been using the Uber
:18:40. > :18:49.app, that I would get holiday pay sickbay. Is the job where your money
:18:50. > :18:51.comes from? Yes, although I working on other projects which are
:18:52. > :18:56.developing, the great thing about Uber is that you can work on your
:18:57. > :18:59.own projects which might not bring in income straightaway... You
:19:00. > :19:03.exceptional, what would you say to the people who say, this is
:19:04. > :19:08.terrible, I should be getting a proper wage, I'm not making as much
:19:09. > :19:13.money as I could? We are not employed by Uber. We are not paid a
:19:14. > :19:18.wage. It's always been that way. Taxi drivers are self-employed, they
:19:19. > :19:29.have been since time a memorial. They all using the Halo app. Will
:19:30. > :19:38.that mean that they are all employed by Halo? Chi Onwurah, how do you
:19:39. > :19:43.respond? It is good for Uber and it is good for Steven. Steven, I am
:19:44. > :19:46.pleased that you feel you are in control of your work and I am sure
:19:47. > :19:53.that is good feel but there are 40,000 Uber Uber drivers and what
:19:54. > :19:58.this ruling says is that they don't have the kind of control of how they
:19:59. > :20:04.get their jobs, what they are paid, and whether they can refuse a job.
:20:05. > :20:08.That constitutes self-employment. We have to take our hats off to the GM
:20:09. > :20:14.Beaver showing what a modern union does which is stand up for the
:20:15. > :20:18.rights of working people -- the GMB, for showing, and how they are
:20:19. > :20:23.transformed in the new digital environment. Steven, would it make
:20:24. > :20:27.things harder for you? Absolutely, it's regressive. The world is
:20:28. > :20:34.changing. People have more than one job and employment law should
:20:35. > :20:37.reflect that. Chi Onwurah, if you are stifling entrepreneurship and
:20:38. > :20:41.making these disruptive technologies feel they should behave like John
:20:42. > :20:46.Lewis, a Conservative shop, you are stopping people from coming forward
:20:47. > :20:51.with new projects? Liverpool I am not sure John Lewis is conservative,
:20:52. > :20:56.it is more a corroborative. This is good Uber. I am a tech evangelist, I
:20:57. > :21:01.worked in telecoms three years before coming into Parliament and it
:21:02. > :21:08.can make hugely progressive difference to all our lives. But the
:21:09. > :21:14.kind of power and control, this judgment is important in the detail,
:21:15. > :21:19.it showed that Uber drivers got around to drivers and they had jobs,
:21:20. > :21:23.how quickly they responded, effective performance management. If
:21:24. > :21:28.you have that kind of control others and body then you have
:21:29. > :21:31.responsibilities to them. And I think too often people who implement
:21:32. > :21:35.this great new technology which can change lives for the better, they
:21:36. > :21:38.forget there are still responsibilities in the real world
:21:39. > :21:45.to the people who are delivering bad. You are working for a big
:21:46. > :21:50.corporate giant. No, I'm working for myself. I can choose whether to
:21:51. > :21:55.accept a job, choose one I want to work. I'm not working for a
:21:56. > :21:58.corporate giant. In my view, that big corporate giant is working for
:21:59. > :22:03.me. They are getting the work, collecting the money, they take a
:22:04. > :22:08.percentage of it. What will happen because of this ruling? I'm really
:22:09. > :22:14.worried because I can't see how Uber can carry on working in the way
:22:15. > :22:19.setup. Can they take on everyone as a salary? That will mean
:22:20. > :22:24.redundancies, lay-offs. If you can call it bad. Uber will have to adapt
:22:25. > :22:30.its business model to reflect the fact that the Labour they are using,
:22:31. > :22:35.the people, and Steven, if he rejects a job that's part of his
:22:36. > :22:41.performance management by Uber and they have the ability to deactivate
:22:42. > :22:47.him in 20 seconds. You could be deactivated. I don't know why people
:22:48. > :22:54.would turn down jobs because you are there to earn money. I think my
:22:55. > :22:58.acceptance rate was about 96%. Fantastic for Steven but other
:22:59. > :23:03.people might have commitments, they might have care responsibilities,
:23:04. > :23:08.and bonuses. The important thing here is that Uber needs to recognise
:23:09. > :23:12.that the Labour which helps deliver its $62 billion worth of market
:23:13. > :23:19.value, that Labour has rights and it will be better, Uber will be at off
:23:20. > :23:24.as a company if it respects and values the people that work for it
:23:25. > :23:26.and this judgment should help it do that. Chi Onwurah, Steven Rowe,
:23:27. > :23:29.thank you both very much. "A tidy desk", the comedy
:23:30. > :23:30.Christmas mug states, The joke only works, I suppose,
:23:31. > :23:35.if the mug itself is also covered in mildew and belongs
:23:36. > :23:37.to the perennially untidy. But what if mess were
:23:38. > :23:40.actuallly good for the mind? What if all our attempts
:23:41. > :23:42.at orderliness actually made us less Sighs of relief the world over
:23:43. > :23:46.from the chronically messy. Here's Tim Harford,
:23:47. > :23:47.who's been writing about Is the road to success
:23:48. > :23:59.in life a neat, tidy one? Or is a rich, happy
:24:00. > :24:03.life inherently messy? If you believe the glossy
:24:04. > :24:07.magazines, this... We feel proud when we have a tidy
:24:08. > :24:14.desk, and anxious when the But we all know that
:24:15. > :24:22.when things get busy, Messiness isn't just part of life,
:24:23. > :24:28.it can actually enhance our lives. We'll come back to my
:24:29. > :24:30.messy desk later. First, let me show you what mess can
:24:31. > :24:41.do for the true greats. In 1975, the jazz musician
:24:42. > :24:46.Keith Jarrett was preparing one of his improvised
:24:47. > :24:49.piano concerts in the city of An old rehearsal piano had been
:24:50. > :24:58.delivered to the stage, out of tune, sticky keys, harsh, tinny upper
:24:59. > :25:00.notes and too small for the concert But Jarrett felt he
:25:01. > :25:07.had to try, and so, in front of a packed
:25:08. > :25:10.auditorium, he sat down All the adjustments that Jarrett had
:25:11. > :25:33.to make to cope with the unplayable piano made the music better, not
:25:34. > :25:37.worse. Against his gloomy expectations,
:25:38. > :25:40.Jarrett produced one of the greatest jazz
:25:41. > :25:45.performances in history. Jarrett was forced into that
:25:46. > :25:47.situation, but other artists have decided to actively
:25:48. > :25:52.embrace disruption. Brian Eno has worked with everyone
:25:53. > :25:55.from Coldplay to David Bowie. In musical circles, he is famous
:25:56. > :25:58.for a deck of cards he calls If you're stuck, pull
:25:59. > :26:02.out a card and let the I don't generally pick
:26:03. > :26:12.more than one at a time, so the point is to, sort
:26:13. > :26:14.of, be faced with the dilemma of trying to deal with the card,
:26:15. > :26:17.whatever it happens to say. All these do is sort
:26:18. > :26:19.of structure your And they say, "Put some
:26:20. > :26:25.attention here and People are at their most
:26:26. > :26:28.alert when they are So alertness is where
:26:29. > :26:34.everything good comes from, It's when you suddenly
:26:35. > :26:37.think, "Wow, now that's And you used these cards
:26:38. > :26:40.on David Bowie's album, We used to play a game sometimes
:26:41. > :26:48.where we would start something new, either
:26:49. > :26:50.I would start something or he would, and then
:26:51. > :26:52.we would both pull a card His was, "Destroy nothing
:26:53. > :26:56.and continue with immaculate And mine was, "Take away
:26:57. > :27:05.the most important thing". So whatever started to become
:27:06. > :27:09.centre of the piece, I would try to take it out!
:27:10. > :27:14.the piece was, he would try to keep endowing it with more of that
:27:15. > :27:26.that was a piece called Moss Garden.
:27:27. > :27:28.Another way to tap into your creative side is to improvise.
:27:29. > :27:33.Neuroscientists can peer inside the brains
:27:34. > :27:36.of improvising musicians and rappers using an FMRI scanner.
:27:37. > :27:38.They see areas of the prefrontal cortex
:27:39. > :27:43.Other areas that allow self-expression become active.
:27:44. > :27:47.The improvising brain allows the mess
:27:48. > :27:55.of unfiltered, risky ideas to flow out.
:27:56. > :27:59.Mess can also be wielded as a weapon.
:28:00. > :28:02.Some of the most skilled competitors deliberately create
:28:03. > :28:08.They figure that they can improvise a response
:28:09. > :28:10.to the chaos faster than their opponents.
:28:11. > :28:16.Like to punch him in the face, I'll tell you.
:28:17. > :28:18.They are bringing drugs, they are bringing crime.
:28:19. > :28:23.Total and complete shutdown of Muslims
:28:24. > :28:29.Donald Trump was a master of mess during
:28:30. > :28:33.He dominated the news agenda with his
:28:34. > :28:34.outlandish statements, leaving his opponents
:28:35. > :28:49.We're talking about a constant flow of new
:28:50. > :28:56.To deal with it, some of us are pilers and
:28:57. > :29:00.The filers try to tidy away e-mails and documents
:29:01. > :29:03.before they've really had a chance to understand them.
:29:04. > :29:06.We happy-go-lucky pilers, in contrast,
:29:07. > :29:10.allow our messy desks to organise themselves.
:29:11. > :29:18.And every once in a while, you can just take that useless lower
:29:19. > :29:20.layer and put it in the only filing cabinet
:29:21. > :29:39.So what better way to ease into your weekend than with a stunning view
:29:40. > :29:41.of dawn on the Dorset coast, captured by photographer
:29:42. > :29:44.The Jurassic Coast is known for many things, but not
:29:45. > :30:42.Hello, look at the weekend weather for the UK and Europe if you are
:30:43. > :30:44.travelling. Saturday for the UK. A foggy