03/11/2017

Download Subtitles

Transcript

0:00:04 > 0:00:07Harassment becomes a full-blown crisis in politics: Three

0:00:07 > 0:00:13new accusations today, affecting MPs in both main parties.

0:00:14 > 0:00:17Tory Dover MP Charlie Elphicke has the whip suspended,

0:00:17 > 0:00:20and the Conservative Party says he has been referred to the police.

0:00:20 > 0:00:22He denies wrongdoing and says he doesn't even know

0:00:22 > 0:00:26what the accusation is.

0:00:26 > 0:00:29And in Labour, Ivan Lewis and Clive Lewis are both accused

0:00:29 > 0:00:30of inappropriate behaviour.

0:00:30 > 0:00:31Both deny it.

0:00:31 > 0:00:34I don't, as a rule, at packed Labour Party Conferences,

0:00:34 > 0:00:40grope people's bottoms.

0:00:40 > 0:00:42What will the effect on our politics and the main parties be,

0:00:42 > 0:00:46as allegations accumulate?

0:00:46 > 0:00:49Can you judge a regime by the way it treats its infants?

0:00:49 > 0:00:51We hear the shocking testimony of children liberated

0:00:51 > 0:00:53from so-called Islamic State.

0:01:10 > 0:01:20And also tonight: Given what we've heard about Kevin Spacey,

0:01:20 > 0:01:29Rouen should we still be watching House Of Cards? -- should we still

0:01:29 > 0:01:34be watching House Of Cards?

0:01:34 > 0:01:35Hello.

0:01:35 > 0:01:37It has been yet another extraordinary political day.

0:01:37 > 0:01:39It's so strange to see ideological debate between the parties

0:01:39 > 0:01:41replaced by talk of inappropriate, intimate touching.

0:01:41 > 0:01:44Like the expenses scandal, which saw new exposes day after day,

0:01:44 > 0:01:46this one is spinning out of the control of

0:01:46 > 0:01:48the party managers.

0:01:48 > 0:01:50Politics is struggling to find the words to cope with it.

0:01:50 > 0:01:52Take yesterday's story of Kelvin Hopkins -

0:01:52 > 0:01:55Jeremy Corbyn was asked about it this morning, but was unable

0:01:55 > 0:01:56to offer any comment.

0:01:56 > 0:01:58Were you aware of the allegations against Mr Hopkins, sir?

0:01:58 > 0:02:01Goodbye.

0:02:01 > 0:02:03But this evening, we've had new accusations against three MPs,

0:02:03 > 0:02:05coming out hour after hour.

0:02:05 > 0:02:07Two of them are former members of the Shadow Cabinet,

0:02:07 > 0:02:09and one well-known Conservative MP.

0:02:09 > 0:02:14Let's go through them with Chris Cook, who is with me.

0:02:14 > 0:02:22Let's start with Charlie Elphicke. This came out at around 9pm.The

0:02:22 > 0:02:30Tory Chief Whip Julian Smith issued statements saying they had suspended

0:02:30 > 0:02:43him from the party and issued passed it the police. Charlie Elphicke said

0:02:43 > 0:02:45he was not aware of what the accusations are and denied any

0:02:45 > 0:02:48wrongdoing.That was all quite late this evening and we don't know much

0:02:48 > 0:02:54about it. Clive Lewis, he was pretty well-known and indeed got into some

0:02:54 > 0:03:00trouble for using the phrase get on your knees, bitch at a party

0:03:00 > 0:03:06Conference.A brief Labour Party statement saying the Labour Party is

0:03:06 > 0:03:12investigating a formal complaint made today against Clive Lewis,

0:03:12 > 0:03:16specifically that an activist said she felt he had touched her

0:03:16 > 0:03:22inappropriately while having a hug at the party Conference.Clive Lewis

0:03:22 > 0:03:28came out very quickly after that. He went on to the news channel and he

0:03:28 > 0:03:30didn't deny it. This is what he said.

0:03:30 > 0:03:32I don't, as a rule, at packed Labour Party Conferences,

0:03:32 > 0:03:36grope people's bottoms when I greet them.

0:03:36 > 0:03:40This, you know, it is just not how I roll, it's not what I do.

0:03:40 > 0:03:43Is the person mistaken?

0:03:43 > 0:03:48Have I kind of given them a hug and this has, you know,

0:03:48 > 0:03:49been misinterpreted?

0:03:49 > 0:03:51I don't know.

0:03:51 > 0:03:58But all I know is that I would not deliberately do that.

0:03:58 > 0:04:05And the third one today, Ivan Lewis, another Lewis but completely

0:04:05 > 0:04:10separate and a former Labour Shadow Cabinet member.There are two

0:04:10 > 0:04:16allegations. One is that he touched an activist's legs, and the other is

0:04:16 > 0:04:20about his conduct as a minister in the Department of Health. He has put

0:04:20 > 0:04:25out a statement denying specifically and firmly the first of those, and

0:04:25 > 0:04:30he put out a statement that sort of says that if there are problems at

0:04:30 > 0:04:33the Department of Health, no one else seemed to know about them. I

0:04:33 > 0:04:39have on occasion asked women I work for out for dinner and develop

0:04:39 > 0:04:44strong feelings for them and I am sorry if this was inappropriate in

0:04:44 > 0:04:50the circumstances.Yesterday, Kelvin Hopkins, another former Cabinet

0:04:50 > 0:04:56member, that case emerged. Today, late this afternoon, actually, he

0:04:56 > 0:05:02issued quite a firm and strong denial and quite a long piece about

0:05:02 > 0:05:10it.There was a statement yesterday about Mr Hopkins is saying

0:05:10 > 0:05:13inappropriate things and having inappropriately at an event in 2014.

0:05:13 > 0:05:16His statement is striking because it features a trope we have seen

0:05:16 > 0:05:23already in some of them coverage after Hartpury Weinstein. He said

0:05:23 > 0:05:27how cordial things were after the incident is supposed to have taken

0:05:27 > 0:05:40place. It -- after the Harvey Weinstein story.

0:05:45 > 0:05:48It is awkward and difficult because even after an incident you may still

0:05:48 > 0:05:53want to ingratiate yourself.

0:05:53 > 0:05:56Joining me now is Jasmin Beckett, Young Labour's representative

0:05:56 > 0:06:04on the Labour Party's National Executive Committee.

0:06:04 > 0:06:12Is the party geared up for dealing with the volume of allegations?

0:06:12 > 0:06:17Yeah, I mean, I think that we have a lot we need to improve. We recently

0:06:17 > 0:06:22passed a new sexual harassment policy which is a huge step forward

0:06:22 > 0:06:26for us, but it just doesn't go far enough. It doesn't introduce an

0:06:26 > 0:06:33independent body away from politics to deal with these complaints, so

0:06:33 > 0:06:37that's a huge reason why people haven't been coming forward, and

0:06:37 > 0:06:45that's something we need to look at again.You wrote in an e-mail to the

0:06:45 > 0:06:50NEC and Jeremy Corbyn saying there are still people who don't want to

0:06:50 > 0:06:54complain because they don't feel able to do so. He said these

0:06:54 > 0:07:01experiences are not rare.Yeah, I think we've all... There's a lot of

0:07:01 > 0:07:07rumours, and I've been in positions myself where I've been in NEC

0:07:07 > 0:07:10meetings and had inappropriate remarks made towards myself, and you

0:07:10 > 0:07:18know, I know that, as fantastic as they are, staff members dealing with

0:07:18 > 0:07:23these complaints, and then the NEC's disputes body, who will dispute over

0:07:23 > 0:07:26them, and it puts you off from making a complaint because, you

0:07:26 > 0:07:30know, these are people you know than they might know the person about

0:07:30 > 0:07:35whom you're making a complaint.Age is a factor. You represent Young

0:07:35 > 0:07:41labour. Pages is a factor in some of these cases was not in your view, if

0:07:41 > 0:07:52a 55-year-old MP -- age is a factor. If a 55-year-old MP makes advances

0:07:52 > 0:07:58to a young activist, is that unacceptable in your view?Any MPs

0:07:58 > 0:08:02and elected officials in our party or others are in positions of power,

0:08:02 > 0:08:06and if they abuse that power, it is wrong and should not be happening.

0:08:06 > 0:08:13Chris Cook was saying, in some of these cases, the women seem to have

0:08:13 > 0:08:18had good relations with the MP or the person beforehand, and good

0:08:18 > 0:08:23relations afterwards. Do you think... Because I think a lot of

0:08:23 > 0:08:27people will say, it can't be so bad if they were friends afterwards. Do

0:08:27 > 0:08:33you think that can form any part of the defence of somebody accused of

0:08:33 > 0:08:37inappropriately propositioning or forcing themselves on someone?No,

0:08:37 > 0:08:41because, as I say, I mean, these people are in positions of power,

0:08:41 > 0:08:45and ultimately, these are the people deciding on the laws in our country,

0:08:45 > 0:08:49and they should know better. As I said today in my e-mail, with the

0:08:49 > 0:08:55Labour Party, we want to look like the society which we wish to create,

0:08:55 > 0:08:59and if our MPs don't look like that and our own procedures don't look

0:08:59 > 0:09:06like that, then I worry that we, you know, the public will see that.

0:09:06 > 0:09:09There will be enquiries and a lot of these cases and it will often be one

0:09:09 > 0:09:13word against another - how do you tell if Clive Lewis squeezed

0:09:13 > 0:09:18someone's bottom? Do you think we should always default to believing

0:09:18 > 0:09:23the woman, the victim, in these cases? It will be difficult... In

0:09:23 > 0:09:28the past, people have always said we have not given sufficient weight to

0:09:28 > 0:09:34victims' testimony.My go- to is to believe those coming forward because

0:09:34 > 0:09:39obviously if you get a lot of... Well maybe it's not true, and it

0:09:39 > 0:09:44stops people coming forward. That has to be for the investigation's

0:09:44 > 0:09:50panel to look at all these details, and ideally, that's why we would

0:09:50 > 0:09:53have an independent body looking at those so we can ensure the procedure

0:09:53 > 0:09:57is rigorous.Thank you very much indeed.

0:09:57 > 0:09:59Ian Birrell is a former speech writer for David Cameron,

0:09:59 > 0:10:02and is now a contributing editor for the Mail on Sunday and writes

0:10:02 > 0:10:06for the "i" newspaper.

0:10:06 > 0:10:11Ian, how big a crisis is this for our politics?I think it is a big

0:10:11 > 0:10:15crisis. People are compared it to the expenses scandal but I think it

0:10:15 > 0:10:18goes beyond that. It is a political issue rather than a party issue. It

0:10:18 > 0:10:23goes to the heart of culture and society. We see a glimpse of a

0:10:23 > 0:10:26problem where too many men in powerful positions think they can

0:10:26 > 0:10:31abuse their positions, and too many women are having their careers

0:10:31 > 0:10:34dented, their confidence ruined and their aspirations to engage in the

0:10:34 > 0:10:37political system devastated and destroyed. This is a culture that

0:10:37 > 0:10:43has the change.This might prompt a bigger change then the expenses

0:10:43 > 0:10:47scandal bid. Obviously, that led to reform of the expenses system. This

0:10:47 > 0:10:52might change our whole way of life in the Commons really.The hope is

0:10:52 > 0:10:57gone out of this mess emerges a more sensible system in the running of

0:10:57 > 0:11:00the Commons and the career structure. It is about attitudes in

0:11:00 > 0:11:04the heart of society, which hasn't to be forgotten. It is about women

0:11:04 > 0:11:08who are having their lives devastated and men abusing, which is

0:11:08 > 0:11:18to be tackled.Does this crisis bring an election closer? Does it

0:11:18 > 0:11:22remove the Government's working majority with the Ulster Unionist?

0:11:22 > 0:11:26We don't know yet. We are in the foothills and every day there was an

0:11:26 > 0:11:31astonishing development, like today. If the Labour leader has knowingly

0:11:31 > 0:11:35promoted someone whom they knew had been accused, justifiably, which we

0:11:35 > 0:11:40don't know yet, but if that is the case, it raises serious questions as

0:11:40 > 0:11:44to whether Jeremy Corbyn is fit to be Labour leader. If Theresa May has

0:11:44 > 0:11:48been engaged in cover-ups, there are questions there. If you are not fit

0:11:48 > 0:11:51to be in the cabinet, I don't understand how you are still fit to

0:11:51 > 0:11:54be an MP. These are profound questions which need to be dealt

0:11:54 > 0:12:04with.Them eBay -- there may be by-elections.It is about equal

0:12:04 > 0:12:11rights for 50% of society.We are in crucial times, than this, with

0:12:11 > 0:12:13Brexit, and Parliament and the Government have to make some

0:12:13 > 0:12:19difficult decisions in the next two years.It is a body blow from

0:12:19 > 0:12:23politics. The lack of faith, the lack of trust, the economic woes,

0:12:23 > 0:12:29and this is one more body blow in a divided country with a pathetically

0:12:29 > 0:12:32weak Prime Minister and a political system not trusted by a lot of

0:12:32 > 0:12:35people, with these divisions in society, it could be worse timing.

0:12:35 > 0:12:38But that mustn't get in the way of resolving these really critical

0:12:38 > 0:12:45issues.Ian Beryl, thank you very much.

0:12:45 > 0:12:50Just one paper of note tomorrow - the Sun carries a headlines saying

0:12:50 > 0:12:52Chris Evans the BBC Radio 2 DJ exposed himself

0:12:52 > 0:13:02to a girl for two years.

0:13:02 > 0:13:07The BBC has said tonight:

0:13:11 > 0:13:18They said they would not comment on a story that dates back more than 20

0:13:18 > 0:13:18years.

0:13:18 > 0:13:20It also says police investigated at the time and there

0:13:20 > 0:13:22was insufficient evidence.

0:13:22 > 0:13:24Bit by bit, so-called Islamic State is being driven

0:13:24 > 0:13:25out of Iraq and Syria.

0:13:25 > 0:13:29Syrian troops have taken the last city in which Isis had a presence,

0:13:29 > 0:13:32and the group is now reduced to two small enclaves in Western Syria,

0:13:32 > 0:13:34and a section of the Euphrates River Valley spanning the border

0:13:34 > 0:13:38of Syria and Iraq.

0:13:38 > 0:13:41That's not to say Isis is over, but it is not the force it was,

0:13:41 > 0:13:45a fact for which many are thankful.

0:13:45 > 0:13:49And it means we can now find out more about what life was like

0:13:49 > 0:13:50when Isis was in control.

0:13:50 > 0:13:52As it has retreated, it has left thousands of women

0:13:52 > 0:13:53and children behind.

0:13:53 > 0:13:55Some are the abandoned families of IS fighters,

0:13:55 > 0:13:57others are being held as prisoners or slaves.

0:13:57 > 0:14:00There are also boys who were forced to fight for IS.

0:14:00 > 0:14:03The goal now is to reunite families and to rehabilitate those whose

0:14:03 > 0:14:04minds have been stolen by the group.

0:14:04 > 0:14:07Tim Whewell reports now from Iraq on the children left behind

0:14:07 > 0:14:08by the fighters of Islamic state.

0:14:08 > 0:14:19You might find some of the testimony upsetting.

0:14:19 > 0:14:21# If you're happy, happy, happy

0:14:21 > 0:14:27# Clap your hands...#

0:14:27 > 0:14:29In a classroom in northern

0:14:29 > 0:14:31Iraq, they're singing

0:14:31 > 0:14:41to overcome their memories.

0:14:44 > 0:14:46These nine and ten-year-olds were all captives of

0:14:46 > 0:14:47so-called Islamic State,

0:14:47 > 0:14:51where music was Haram - forbidden.

0:14:51 > 0:14:53From their smiles, you might not guess the violence they've seen,

0:14:53 > 0:14:58but they're all scarred by it.

0:14:58 > 0:15:05ISIS enslaved this boy and his sister three years ago.

0:15:17 > 0:15:24So what did they tell you about the guns?

0:15:29 > 0:15:34The children at this rehabilitation centre are Yazidi,

0:15:34 > 0:15:36part of the non-Muslim minority singled out for particular

0:15:36 > 0:15:41cruelty by ISIS.

0:15:41 > 0:15:43In 2014, their villages were seized and thousands of men

0:15:43 > 0:15:50murdered on the spot.

0:15:50 > 0:15:53The women were sold into slavery, and children taken for re-education

0:15:53 > 0:15:56to serve the so-called Caliphate.

0:15:56 > 0:16:00What did they say about your family?

0:16:12 > 0:16:15When first they talk aboutt their experience,

0:16:15 > 0:16:19it was not actually easy and good, but now they can express

0:16:19 > 0:16:25it in a different way.

0:16:25 > 0:16:28At first they were just too scared to talk about it.

0:16:28 > 0:16:31Now they can talk about it, but freely, but in a better way,

0:16:31 > 0:16:34like they don't express so much, I wouldn't say anger, but they feel

0:16:34 > 0:16:35comfortable and relaxed now.

0:16:35 > 0:16:39But they say they've seen things which are truly shocking.

0:17:14 > 0:17:19Now, every day brings more Yazidi children to camps like this one,

0:17:19 > 0:17:23as they return from captivity.

0:17:23 > 0:17:29And many not only witnessed atrocities, they became instruments

0:17:29 > 0:17:36in the Isis project themselves.

0:17:36 > 0:17:41The terror group trained thousands of boys like these.

0:17:41 > 0:17:44They called them lion cubs of the Caliphate.

0:17:44 > 0:17:46They were fighters, informers, suicide bombers.

0:17:46 > 0:17:50More than 50 boys blew themselves up defending the biggest Isis-held

0:17:50 > 0:17:55city, Mosul, before it fell in July.

0:17:55 > 0:17:57Some were children of foreign fighters, others recruited

0:17:57 > 0:18:05or kidnapped from local families.

0:18:05 > 0:18:07Zahed is a 14-year-old Yazidi boy, reunited with his father

0:18:07 > 0:18:11just three weeks ago.

0:18:11 > 0:18:14But his three years away have left a gulf between them.

0:18:14 > 0:18:16Zahed lost his native language, Kurdish, and was forcibly converted

0:18:16 > 0:18:26to the Isis version of Islam.

0:18:26 > 0:18:29All that time, they were teaching you guns, and they were teaching

0:18:29 > 0:18:31you about the Koran, what were they telling

0:18:31 > 0:18:41you about the Koran?

0:18:45 > 0:18:48And he nearly was killed, as he was launched into an attack

0:18:48 > 0:18:50just five months ago, over the Syrian border.

0:18:50 > 0:18:59How is your leg now?

0:19:08 > 0:19:15Who did they say the enemy was?

0:19:16 > 0:19:18The infidels.

0:19:18 > 0:19:23The non-Muslims.

0:19:23 > 0:19:26According to Isis, his own father is an infidel,

0:19:26 > 0:19:35and after three years, not surprisingly, part of the boy's

0:19:35 > 0:19:40mind may still belong to the group he was forced to fight for.

0:19:47 > 0:19:53What do they show, the videos?

0:20:18 > 0:20:22Back at the camp, the two children, returning from their music class,

0:20:22 > 0:20:28are taking me to meet their mother and their aunt.

0:20:28 > 0:20:33He was separated from his mother, when Isis captured them.

0:20:33 > 0:20:40The family later paid a $28,000 ransom for his release.

0:21:02 > 0:21:05His military training was shortlived.

0:21:05 > 0:21:08Isis gave up on him after a few days, as the eight-year-old cried

0:21:08 > 0:21:13and failed to learn.

0:21:13 > 0:21:16But though he has come home, many other Isis captives haven't.

0:21:16 > 0:21:18The children's aunt says that even though Isis has

0:21:18 > 0:21:20been largely defeated, some Isis families are still holding

0:21:20 > 0:21:28Yazidi children, passing them off as their own.

0:22:06 > 0:22:08Yazidi children like these have suffered unimaginable horrors

0:22:08 > 0:22:09during their short lives.

0:22:09 > 0:22:19But no-one knows how many more still need to be rescued.

0:22:23 > 0:22:26You can see a longer version of Tim Whewell's film on "Our World"

0:22:26 > 0:22:28on the BBC News Channel at 9.30 on Saturday night,

0:22:28 > 0:22:37and 9.30 on Sunday night, and, of course, on the iPlayer.

0:22:37 > 0:22:40It is getting hard to keep up with the allegations and revelations

0:22:40 > 0:22:42about sexual harassment that are now forthcoming.

0:22:42 > 0:22:44Names are coming thick and fast - not just in politics.

0:22:44 > 0:22:48Kevin Spacey and Dustin Hoffman are two that have emerged

0:22:48 > 0:22:51this week for example.

0:22:51 > 0:22:54But when you find out about the bad behaviour of big stars

0:22:54 > 0:22:57who you have admired or loved, does it affect your

0:22:57 > 0:22:58appreciation of their art?

0:22:58 > 0:23:01I consider the Woody Allen film Annie Hall to be one

0:23:01 > 0:23:05of the best movies ever - but knowing that his adopted

0:23:05 > 0:23:09daughter has accused him of sexual abuse, should I reassess my opinion?

0:23:09 > 0:23:11What's the difference?

0:23:11 > 0:23:12It's all mental masturbation.

0:23:12 > 0:23:14Oh, now we're finally getting to a subject you

0:23:14 > 0:23:15know something about.

0:23:15 > 0:23:17Just because allegations arise about the director,

0:23:17 > 0:23:20doesn't mean the script changes, or the quality of the acting -

0:23:20 > 0:23:22it's the same film it always was.

0:23:22 > 0:23:25But we have a relationship with a film that goes

0:23:25 > 0:23:28deeper than the lines, some kind of aesthetic

0:23:28 > 0:23:32connection that speaks to

0:23:32 > 0:23:35us, and what it says surely does alter with the perception of those

0:23:35 > 0:23:36behind the work.

0:23:36 > 0:23:37David?

0:23:37 > 0:23:40It's his name.

0:23:40 > 0:23:42The point is most clearly made by Bill Cosby.

0:23:42 > 0:23:45His character was a lovable dad, a role model.

0:23:45 > 0:23:52You felt he was Bill Cosby.

0:23:52 > 0:23:55Given the admission that the real Cosby drugged women for sex,

0:23:55 > 0:24:00it's hard to watch the show in the same way again.

0:24:00 > 0:24:01Or take Roman Polanski.

0:24:01 > 0:24:04Is it OK to watch movies of someone who's

0:24:04 > 0:24:06exiled himself to avoid court action for rape?

0:24:06 > 0:24:08His case raises the additional question of whether you

0:24:08 > 0:24:10want to give commercial reward to someone whose

0:24:10 > 0:24:13behaviour is appalling by buying their product.

0:24:13 > 0:24:16This is an omnipresent dilemma and arises in

0:24:16 > 0:24:21cases of the dead as well as the living.

0:24:21 > 0:24:24A statue by sculptor and typographer Eric Gill sits outside

0:24:24 > 0:24:28the BBC's Broadcasting House.

0:24:28 > 0:24:34After his death, it emerged he'd abused his daughters.

0:24:34 > 0:24:36Does it now makes sense to stop using the ubiquitous

0:24:36 > 0:24:40Gill Sans typeface?

0:24:40 > 0:24:43For some, Kevin Spacey's House Of Cards is the most pressing

0:24:43 > 0:24:44application of this issue.

0:24:44 > 0:24:46Production has stopped on the latest series,

0:24:46 > 0:24:49but if they finished making it, would as many people want to watch

0:24:49 > 0:24:53it as in previous ones?

0:24:53 > 0:24:55Joining me in the studio to discuss is the writer and Guardian

0:24:55 > 0:24:57columnist Lucy Mangan, and writer and sociology

0:24:57 > 0:25:05professor at Birmingham City University, Kehinde Andrews.

0:25:07 > 0:25:14Kehinde, can I ask you, let us take the House of Cards, it is one I have

0:25:14 > 0:25:17heard people talking about, what would be be your stance on that?In

0:25:17 > 0:25:21terms of this debate you have to understand you can't separate out

0:25:21 > 0:25:26the art from the artist, in the same way you can't separate out racist

0:25:26 > 0:25:31theorists from racist theory, you can't separate out the idea you have

0:25:31 > 0:25:35people who are sexual predators from producing work that has created what

0:25:35 > 0:25:39we call rape culture, these two things go hand in hand and they

0:25:39 > 0:25:42can't be separated out, especially in this case.I take it you think,

0:25:42 > 0:25:49and it is 178 will like boycotting the products of people who are

0:25:49 > 0:25:53sexual predators or evil sexual predators.The idea you can separate

0:25:53 > 0:26:00these two things out, it is not correct. There is a reason why Kos

0:26:00 > 0:26:04bee, Polanski, spacey, it is a reason this is men and sexual

0:26:04 > 0:26:07violence, unfortunately that seems to be the permissible and that is

0:26:07 > 0:26:11something which is legitimate within the industry.I want to pushdown

0:26:11 > 0:26:14more time, you wouldn't watch House of Cards that the point?I do watch

0:26:14 > 0:26:18it and I won't like it has changed the way I think about it, it changes

0:26:18 > 0:26:24the way I see the character, knowing what I now know.What about you, do

0:26:24 > 0:26:29you have any sort of guilt about sop some of these, the ones we have seen

0:26:29 > 0:26:34in that little film?It depends whether the art is existing or if by

0:26:34 > 0:26:39watching it, I am putting more money into someone who is a proven

0:26:39 > 0:26:45predator. I think there is a different between that and watching

0:26:45 > 0:26:50old Woodley Alan films for pleasure, in you get rid of everything that

0:26:50 > 0:26:54has been tainted over history, and especially the clip we are going at

0:26:54 > 0:26:58now, you end up with very little, and also I worry that if you do

0:26:58 > 0:27:02boycott everything and if you take it off the television and off

0:27:02 > 0:27:08Netflix and the rest of it, you erase quite a part of the story, we

0:27:08 > 0:27:14have to learn to sit with the fact that these great things, and less

0:27:14 > 0:27:18great things were often created by terrible people. We have to sit with

0:27:18 > 0:27:22that and learn that, that they correlate and great talent doesn't

0:27:22 > 0:27:29mean a great person.It almost gets you to the debate about the statue

0:27:29 > 0:27:36of Cecil Rhodes and almost the same. Where do you draw the line Kehinde?

0:27:36 > 0:27:41It is sex and sexual aggression does seem to be taken as a more, more

0:27:41 > 0:27:45seriously than other violent crime, you could imagine somebody involved

0:27:45 > 0:27:50in a violent crime or coming out of jail for some offence that is not

0:27:50 > 0:27:54sexual by nature, and I don't think you would take the same view of not

0:27:54 > 0:27:58wanting to watch their product, as you would about a known sexual

0:27:58 > 0:28:01predator.I think there is a distinction here, because I think

0:28:01 > 0:28:05one of the things is if you have done a crime and you have given, you

0:28:05 > 0:28:08have served time for that crime, will is a question about do you,

0:28:08 > 0:28:12have you recuperated? In the issues we are talking about, these are

0:28:12 > 0:28:20things that have gone unpunished, if what is being is true and they

0:28:20 > 0:28:23haven't been punished, and I think that is why it is important that

0:28:23 > 0:28:29this, it is not a coincidence these are of a sexual nature, it is not a

0:28:29 > 0:28:32coincidence it is men and it ties into the culture of the product we

0:28:32 > 0:28:36are talking about.Lucy, it is quite clear, isn't it, that there are

0:28:36 > 0:28:41things we will take out. No-one is going to see archive of top of the

0:28:41 > 0:28:45pops with Jimmy Savile, that is removed from the public space, isn't

0:28:45 > 0:28:50it. So clearly, there is a sort of line, and I imagine you agree with

0:28:50 > 0:28:57not showing archive...I think we all make moral choices on a

0:28:57 > 0:29:03continuum and as a watcher or viewer we make that decision. Obviously I

0:29:03 > 0:29:09would choose, easily choose not to watch Jim'll Fix It repeats because

0:29:09 > 0:29:13of the weight of that art compared to what he did, is there is no

0:29:13 > 0:29:18contest, but there is a whole other grey area, where we make on an

0:29:18 > 0:29:22individual basis a trade off, but it becomes very difficult if people are

0:29:22 > 0:29:26making those trade offs or deciding those on our behalf. That is where I

0:29:26 > 0:29:33worry we get into pushing a whole lot of stuff aside.The case of Eric

0:29:33 > 0:29:40Gill, he has been dead for decades now, pretty hideous stuff he did in

0:29:40 > 0:29:44his life without anyone realising it until afterwards. For you we just

0:29:44 > 0:29:49have to accept he was a flawed person and but nevertheless enjoy

0:29:49 > 0:29:54his type face and his work.That is a difficult one. I was writing a

0:29:54 > 0:30:01book about children's literature and there is an author there who was an

0:30:01 > 0:30:04active paedophile throughout his life while he was writing and was

0:30:04 > 0:30:07convicted for it, and I had to decide whether to put him in the

0:30:07 > 0:30:16book or keep him out. In the end I made an irrational emotional act.

0:30:16 > 0:30:21But it is not logical and it is not, and I feel bad about not having put

0:30:21 > 0:30:26him in the history of it when he was a very thought of writer. I don't

0:30:26 > 0:30:32think that is purely right but I did think made the morality of the

0:30:32 > 0:30:35decision outweighed the, the sort of academic.I understand what you are

0:30:35 > 0:30:43saying. There is an aesthetic connection. But, sorry Kehinde, do

0:30:43 > 0:30:48you want to come in on that point? We need to start decentring the

0:30:48 > 0:30:53people who do this. By saying this is great art and we have to keep it,

0:30:53 > 0:30:57by doing that we are ignoring the other art that goes on, the women

0:30:57 > 0:31:00minorities who produce art which we haven't said is this wonderful

0:31:00 > 0:31:04piece, right. I think that is really important. Sometimes it is about

0:31:04 > 0:31:07shifting away from the dominant narratives and away from some of the

0:31:07 > 0:31:12things we think is good. Opening up the debate.You don't worry,

0:31:12 > 0:31:16briefly, you don't worry you will end up throwing away too much stuff.

0:31:16 > 0:31:24We will lose half the historic art out there.If if we end up using a

0:31:24 > 0:31:27lot so more people come in, that is the risk we have to take.We need to

0:31:27 > 0:31:31leave it there. Thank you both very much indeed.

0:31:31 > 0:31:36Thank you both very much indeed.

0:31:36 > 0:31:40That's all from us this evening.

0:31:40 > 0:31:40I