19/10/2012

Download Subtitles

Transcript

:00:08. > :00:13.$:/STARTFEED. Now it is time for Newswatch with present 24/7. --

:00:13. > :00:19.Samira Ahmed. Welcome to Newswatch with me,

:00:19. > :00:26.Samira Ahmed. Have both sides of the Scottish independence debate

:00:26. > :00:32.been getting a fair hearing? And we ask Lyse Doucet what the

:00:32. > :00:38.rise of social media means for traditional TV reporting? How she

:00:38. > :00:42.journalists Highness this new resource? -- how it should

:00:42. > :00:46.journalists Highness of this new resource?

:00:46. > :00:50.Some of the details about the referendum on Scottish independence

:00:50. > :00:53.were announced this week, and the issue was discussed on many

:00:54. > :00:58.programmes. Those included Thursday night's

:00:58. > :01:02.Question Time. Scores of viewers contacted the BBC complaining that

:01:02. > :01:12.one side of the debate got more of an ailing then the other. Among

:01:12. > :01:28.

:01:28. > :01:33.them was Alastair Wright from Scotland also featured in one of

:01:33. > :01:37.this week's football World Cup qualifying matches. Not that you

:01:37. > :01:47.would know -- have known much about it according to a pure Michael

:01:47. > :01:47.

:01:47. > :02:52.Apology for the loss of subtitles for 65 seconds

:02:52. > :02:57.We asked BBC news for a response to Let us know your thoughts on the

:02:57. > :02:59.issues we are covering it in this week's programme. Details of how to

:02:59. > :03:03.contact us at the end of the programme.

:03:04. > :03:11.Last weekend at there was an unusual new competitor in the

:03:12. > :03:16.Sunday night's ratings. Millions of people watched coverage of Felix

:03:16. > :03:21.Baumgartner's fall to earth on YouTube. Meanwhile, pollsters and

:03:21. > :03:26.analysts watched Facebook to follow the BBC -- the American at

:03:26. > :03:32.presidential debate. And Nick Griffin has been criticised by

:03:32. > :03:38.police after leaking the address of the gay couple refused a broom by a

:03:38. > :03:48.bed-and-breakfast. Some Newswatch viewers believe an

:03:48. > :04:11.

:04:11. > :04:15.obsession with the social media is That is the perspective of a couple

:04:15. > :04:22.of viewers, but what has the development of social media meant

:04:22. > :04:27.for the traditional reporter? Last week the BBC's chief international

:04:27. > :04:32.correspondent Lyse Doucet posed that question.

:04:32. > :04:37.Do we take to our trenches and say we are bigger and better, or do we

:04:37. > :04:43.joined forces with the social media revolution, and say that we are all

:04:43. > :04:48.on the same side? Do we admit defeat in this age old battle to be

:04:48. > :04:55.first with the news? To the answer, ladies and gentlemen, is about

:04:55. > :04:59.nothing less than our own survival. Lyse Doucet addressing the great

:04:59. > :05:03.and the good of the television industry. She joins us now from

:05:03. > :05:08.Brussels. If you have talked about journalists needing to embrace

:05:08. > :05:14.social media to avoid being obsolete. How far has it made news

:05:14. > :05:20.coverage better for viewers? would describe our job as trying to

:05:20. > :05:25.get as close to the truth as quickly as possible. I would say it

:05:25. > :05:30.is obvious that we should embrace social media. You have a source of

:05:30. > :05:35.information which like any source of infra -- information has to be

:05:35. > :05:39.verified, but it provides you with a tip offs, and access to the

:05:39. > :05:43.officials that are part of the stories, so why would we not try to

:05:43. > :05:49.be part of this endless stream of information it it is out there and

:05:49. > :05:53.available to us? Are real concern that listeners and viewers have is

:05:53. > :05:57.how they feel things like Twitter and Facebook are intruding into

:05:57. > :06:07.coverage. They talk about journalism on the cheap, where

:06:07. > :06:08.

:06:08. > :06:13.journalists are reading out tweets instead of authenticating stories.

:06:13. > :06:19.One blogger and recently did not turn out to be a Serbian woman but

:06:19. > :06:24.a Scottish man blogging from Scotland. -- but Syrian woman.

:06:24. > :06:28.There is a need for scepticism, but our job is to be there on the

:06:28. > :06:38.ground at speaking to absolutely everyone who go and help us tell

:06:38. > :06:43.the story. There are times we cannot be everywhere. You get very

:06:43. > :06:47.few visas to go in through Damascus, I am one of the few people who has

:06:47. > :06:51.been able to go in, and going in with activists on rebels without a

:06:51. > :06:59.visa is dangerous, so therefore we have to see what other information

:06:59. > :07:06.is coming through, whether it is on a YouTube or Facebook or Twitter.

:07:06. > :07:10.How do you authenticate it? If you are not there. We now have a whole

:07:10. > :07:16.hull but which is called the user generated content hob. They have

:07:16. > :07:21.come up with the a rigorous check list, checking the weather,

:07:21. > :07:26.checking what is known about the location, checking voices and audio,

:07:26. > :07:34.before it goes out on death. Nothing goes on air before it is

:07:35. > :07:40.verified, -- before it goes out on death. Do you think there is a

:07:40. > :07:43.pressure on the BBC to run stuff about what -- perhaps always

:07:43. > :07:47.carrying out all the cheques he would have in the days before

:07:47. > :07:51.social media, because everybody else is doing it? The only pressure

:07:51. > :07:58.should be to get the story by it. There is the pressure to be first

:07:58. > :08:08.with the story, but it is better to be second and wrong -- second and

:08:08. > :08:09.

:08:09. > :08:12.right, but second and wrong. -- than this first and wrong. I invite

:08:12. > :08:18.everyone to come and see a our dedicated team of journalists which

:08:18. > :08:21.is going through all those videos, and there is also our viewers and

:08:22. > :08:26.listeners telling us what they think of our coverage and sometimes

:08:26. > :08:31.adding to it. We have to exercise the same journalistic standards

:08:31. > :08:35.that we do what every other aspect of the job. We have to move with

:08:35. > :08:40.the times. Technology is offering as new opportunities, but we have

:08:40. > :08:44.to maximise the opportunities and minimise the risks.

:08:44. > :08:50.Looking to the future, do you think social media will take over from

:08:50. > :08:55.the role of the traditional news bulletin? I do not think so,

:08:55. > :09:01.because we have been told time and time again that what matters the

:09:01. > :09:06.most is a story and the storyteller. And also trust and credibility.

:09:06. > :09:11.Therefore people keep turning to us to say, and I have seen this

:09:12. > :09:15.information and heard these rumours - let me see what the BBC, our

:09:15. > :09:21.correspondent I trust, is saying, let me make sense of the story and

:09:21. > :09:26.why it matters. I think we still have a purpose, people are still

:09:26. > :09:29.turning to us, but if we are not dare telling the story as well as

:09:29. > :09:34.possible, people will turn elsewhere.

:09:34. > :09:38.As the US presidential election approaches, we are hearing more and

:09:38. > :09:48.more reporting from America, but has that country infected did

:09:48. > :09:55.

:09:55. > :10:03.Thank you for your comments this week. If you want to share your